Talk:List of mycologists: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 10:22, 10 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of mycologists article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about a mycologist or someone who contributed to the field of mycology

Anybody mind ...

... if I rearrange the names so that they appear last, first? If there are no complaints, I'll do so in about a week. Sasata (talk) 04:02, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no opposition to the above. Before I do so, any ideas on how to make the formatting of the article more useful? I'm thinking of a table with sortable columns for name, birth year, and author abbreviation. Other suggestions? Sasata (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the deed. There's currently a heavy bias towards North Americans, but hopefully that will improve as others work on the page. Sasata (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This looks quite good. Do you want to add a note at the top about lichenologists? Many mycologists studied both (C. W. Dodge and Nylader are excellent examples.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HerbTricoter (talk • contribs) 19:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, have mentioned this in the intro. Sasata (talk) 20:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi. In my browser the string of images at the top of the article stack singly and vertically which now means a long scroll down to the list itself, making the article initially appear to be a list of images of Mycologists. I boldly converted these to a gallery, thus, at least, compacting the layout.

This change was reverted. The related comment cites WP:IG, presumably, and not unreasonably, on the basis that the gallery failed the rule of thumb; such a gallery would only lend itself to a title along the lines of "Gallery" or "Images of [insert article title]". However WP:IG itself cites wikipedia is not an image repository and says that "Images are typically interspersed individually throughout an article near the relevant text", which they are not in this case.

One alternative might be to include images in the table where these are available. I think this only works well where the majority of list entries actually have an accompanying image (e.g. Grade I listed buildings in the City of London). Another alternative, as suggested by WP:IG itself, is to use the Commons to group the images and simply include a {{Commons}} pointer to that. What do others think? --KenBailey (talk) 07:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{skiptotoctalk}}
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
+{{Talk header}}
-{{WPBiography
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|blp=no|listas=mycologists, List of|
-|living=no
+{{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=low}}
-|class=List
+{{WikiProject Biography
 |s&a-work-group=yes
+|s&a-priority=Low
-|listas=Vittadini, Carlo
-|priority=Low
 }}
-{{WikiProject Fungi|class=List|importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Fungi |importance=Mid |mycologist=yes}}
 }}
+{{Annual readership}}
+== Anybody mind ... ==
+... if I rearrange the names so that they appear last, first? If there are no complaints, I'll do so in about a week. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]) 04:02, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
+:Ok, no opposition to the above. Before I do so, any ideas on how to make the formatting of the article more useful? I'm thinking of a table with sortable columns for name, birth year, and author abbreviation. Other suggestions? [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]) 21:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
+::I've done the deed.  There's currently a heavy bias towards North Americans, but hopefully that will improve as others work on the page. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]) 15:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
+This looks quite good. Do you want to add a note at the top about lichenologists? Many mycologists studied both (C. W. Dodge and Nylader are excellent examples.)  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:HerbTricoter|HerbTricoter]] ([[User talk:HerbTricoter|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/HerbTricoter|contribs]]) 19:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:Good idea, have mentioned this in the intro. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]) 20:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
+== Images ==
+Hi. In my browser the string of images at the top of the article stack singly and vertically which now means a long scroll down to the list itself, making the article initially appear to be a list of images of Mycologists. I [[WP:Be bold|boldly]] converted these to a [[template:gallery|gallery]], thus, at least, compacting the layout.
+This change was [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_mycologists&diff=654043682&oldid=654042564 reverted]. The related comment cites [[WP:IG]], presumably, and not unreasonably, on the basis that the gallery failed the rule of thumb;  ''such a gallery would only lend itself to a title along the lines of "Gallery" or "Images of [insert article title]"''. However [[WP:IG]] itself cites [[WP:NOTREPOSITORY|wikipedia is not an image repository]] and says that "Images are typically interspersed individually throughout an article near the relevant text", which they are not in this case.
+One alternative might be to include images in the table where these are available. I think this only works well where the majority of list entries actually have an accompanying image (e.g. [[Grade I listed buildings in the City of London]]). Another alternative, as suggested by [[WP:IG]] itself, is to use the Commons to group the images and simply include a {{[[template:Commons|Commons]]}} pointer to that. What do others think? --[[User:KenBailey|KenBailey]] ([[User talk:KenBailey|talk]]) 07:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)