Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 12: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:44, 27 February 2023

< September 11	September 13 >

September 12

File:KilcundaBass Football Jumper.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. It may be self-made, but the image of the black panther itself is clearly copyrighted. — ξ ^xplicit 03:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KilcundaBass Football Jumper.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Team design not likely to be CC license. Eeekster (talk) 02:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This file is one that I created myself and have released onto the internet for free use. Yamtrig (talk) 02:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MilnerHallCrest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MilnerHallCrest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

university seal, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 03:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IEML2.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IEML2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be google maps with overlay picture - no source for either of them Skier Dude (talk 03:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NSEC New.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NSEC New.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

PD-self does not jive with the (c) www.nsecollege.scodz.com watermark Skier Dude (talk 03:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NSEC at night.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NSEC at night.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

PD-self does not jive with the (c) www.nsecollege.scodz.com watermark Skier Dude (talk 03:42, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image-Lionel Kiddie City Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-Lionel Kiddie City Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 03:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ekti Tarar Khonje.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ekti Tarar Khonje.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

film poster; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 03:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Third Addiction.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Third Addiction.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Live 09.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Live 09.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Live 2010.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Live 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:House of Cards.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:House of Cards.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Freefall album cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freefall album cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:High Tide.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:High Tide.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Redshift.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redshift.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Childish Thing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Childish Thing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Resound.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Resound.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skier Dude. I am the Business Manager of 'Out of the Blue' and uploaded the album covers for 'Resound' and various other Out of the Blue albums. Please let me know what further information I need to provide (and how to do this) to show that I have permission to upload these files on behalf of the group.Ootboxford (talk) 21:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Imperial Standard of Napoleon III.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imperial Standard of Napoleon III.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be low quality copy of http://www.tmealf.com/f-Napoleon%20III-SPEC.jpg
Stretched aspect ratio from original
No attribution Begoontalk 15:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but retag — this image is PD-old, since the imperial standard of Napoleon III couldn't have been created after 1870. Nyttend (talk) 03:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And that applies even though it's probably copied from a website without attribution? It's one artist's interpretation of blazon for that image, not a fixed image that's been around since 1870. Irrelevant to its non-free status is the change in aspect ratio, but that needs discussing elsewhere. Personally, I believe the fact that it is just one artist's possible interpretation should mean that we can't just lift it from a web site and use it without permission, but if policy disagrees with that, so be it. Begoontalk 03:59, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kassartribe-balkassar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassartribe-balkassar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No licence, CLEARLY Google Image... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Coram_deo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coram deo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Album cover Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Coke400.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coke400.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Promotional logo... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Supercar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Supercar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be from an ad. Eeekster (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Marussia car.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marussia car.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

From File:Supercar.jpg with the watermark removed. Eeekster (talk) 17:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WBA PTM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WBA PTM.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WEST_DERBY,_LASER_final_version.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WEST DERBY, LASER final version.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

School Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WEST_DERBY_Laser_Thumb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WEST DERBY Laser Thumb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

School Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Piravom1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piravom1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Rationale supplied by Binukalarickan (talk · contribs) in a speedy tag:

Appearing on several websites, Low resolution is provided to wikipedia, Notified the user for its origin. User need to upload the high quality version of the file to prove that the picture has taken by him.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SunChips-HC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SunChips-HC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a low-resolution photograph of a bag of Sun Chips. Presumably the copyright to the packaging design belongs to Frito-Lay. I even have doubts that the photo was taken by the uploader; this looks like a Web-resolution image, and the "self" part of the {{PD-self}} tag was added by a user other than the uploader (it was originally tagged {{PD}}). —Bkell (talk) 20:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ensko-Stephen death 1969.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ensko-Stephen death 1969.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a New York Times obit declared PD under the criterion that "This work is irrevocably in the public domain in the United States because it was first published in the United States without copyright notice prior to 1978." Can we verify that the NYT published content without copyright notices? This seems somewhat unlikely for a newspaper of that stature. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RobertBuck 1930.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RobertBuck 1930.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

How do we know copyright was not renewed? The Decatur Daily Review was published through 1980, so it seems possible that they renewed copyright on their back catalog. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.