User talk:MuZemike: Difference between revisions
→Another quick thought...: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Or: The War Room</span> |
|||
'''''Gentlemen, you can't [[Wikipedia:Civility|fight]] in here, this is the War Room!''''' |
|||
{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}| |
|||
{{pp-meta |
|||
| type =semi |
|||
| reason =  due to excessive [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] or [[WP:SOCK|sock puppetry]] |
|||
| explanation-text = That means a few bad eggs have ruined it for everyone, and non-autoconfirmed users will not be able to communicate with me except through '''[[User talk:MuZemike/Unprotected talk page|here]]'''. |
|||
}} |
|||
|}} |
|||
{| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="10" style="background:#52A629; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px;" |
|||
|colspan="2" style="background-color: #A9FF7F; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;"| |
|||
{{User:MuZemike/Menu}} |
|||
|- |
|||
<!-- |
|||
| style="background-color: #A9FF7F; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"| |
|||
<center>{{User talk rules|bar=n}} Oh, and remember to post new comments and topics at the '''bottom''' of the page or the section in which you are discussing and '''sign''' every post you make here by simply adding four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of your message.</center> |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="background-color: #A9FF7F; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"| |
|||
*<big>'''Deleted pages'''</big> – if I deleted a page you were involved with in which you have an issue with, talk to me about it first here. I will be happy to [[WP:USERFY|userfy]] for you, restore the page if I believed to have made an error in judgment, or fulfill any other request within reason. If you would like a copy of any other deleted page to work on, also let me know. Keep in mind that I '''will not''', for any reason, restore [[WP:COPYVIO|copyright violations]] or [[WP:ATTACK|attack pages]]. |
|||
**''See [[Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted?]]'' |
|||
|- |
|||
--> |
|||
| style="background-color: #A9FF7F; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"| |
|||
{{TOCleft}} |
|||
{{archive box|auto=long|style=background-color: #A9FF7F; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; font-size=large;|bot=MiszaBot III|age=3}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
||
|maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
||
|counter = |
|counter = 11 |
||
|minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
||
|algo = old(72h) |
|algo = old(72h) |
||
|archive = User talk:MuZemike/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = User talk:MuZemike/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="background-color: #A9FF7F; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"| |
|||
== Unblock request == |
|||
== [[User:Meatspin28]] == |
|||
Thank you for your block on this user. I wanted to let you know that the user has elected to "vanish" your block template on their page. I am uncertain if they are allowed to do this during their block period. [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 13:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:FWIW, there's actually a discussion about this [[Wikipedia talk:User pages#Block notices and BLANKING|here]], but I personally am against to what they're proposing; it doesn't really matter to me if the user does or not, as long as unblock requests aren't blanked. He may need to be informed that everything is still present in the pages' histories, so blanking block templates, AFD tags, etc. accomplish virtually nothing. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 14:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Also, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Meatspin28&diff=387823541&oldid=387823065 this] explains a lot. Stuff like this is a good reason why little kids need to stay away from Wikipedia in general, [[Wikipedia:Child protection|pedophilia]] notwithstanding; then again, there would be virtually no way to enforce age limits (YouTube is a prime example of such failure to do so; look at all the accounts there who claim to be 106 years old). –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 14:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== WikiCup 2010 September newsletter == |
|||
[[File:Trophy.png|right]] |
|||
We are half-way through our final round, entering the home straight. {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant|TonyTheTiger}} leads at the time of writing with 1180 points, immediately followed by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant|Sasata}} with 1175 points. {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant|Sturmvogel_66}} closely follows in third place with 1100 points. For those who are interested, data about the finalists has been compiled at [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/finalists]], while a list of content submitted by all WikiCup contestants prior to this round has been compiled at [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Submissions]]. As ever, anything contestants worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]], and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the [[WT:CUP|WikiCup talk page]]. |
|||
Despite controversy, the WikiCup remains open. [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups|Signups for next year's competition are more than welcome]], and suggestions for how next year's competition will work are appreciated at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring]]. More general comments and discussions should be directed at the WikiCup talk page. One month remains in the 2010 WikiCup, after which we will know our champion. Good luck everyone! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]], [[User:Fox|Fox]] and [[User:The ed17|The ed17]] 23:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)</div> |
|||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0075 --> |
|||
== Hello :) == |
|||
Hi there, I'm [[User:Addihockey10]], you may have heard of me, if you haven't - well here I am :). I was wondering, I was looking for someone to coach me and help me understand policies to an administrator caliber. I have put a request at [[WP:Admin coaching]] but it looks pretty inactive at the moment. I was wondering if you (or someone you know) would be willing to be my admin coach. Thank you for your consideration. Happy editing! --<b><font color=red>[[User:Addihockey10|Addi]]</font><font color=blue>[[User talk:Addihockey10|hockey]]</font><font color=gold>[[Special:Contributions/Addihockey10|10]]</font></b> 17:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== File:AbraKadabraAlakazam.png == |
|||
Just wondering, what exactly did you do [[:File:AbraKadabraAlakazam.png|here]]? <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Bws2cool|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>([[User talk:Bws2cool#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Bws2cool|Edits]])</sup> 22:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I just compressed the size of the PNG a little bit; there shouldn't be any cosmetic changes to the image itself. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 22:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Ok then. It just did not change much in size, so I was wondering if it was worth it. <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Bws2cool|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>([[User talk:Bws2cool#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Bws2cool|Edits]])</sup> 22:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Oh hey, just letting you know that I commented on [[Talk:Abra, Kadabra, and Alakazam#WP:VG assessment|your assessment]]. Just in case you didn't watch the page. <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Bws2cool|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>([[User talk:Bws2cool#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Bws2cool|Edits]])</sup> 02:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Scaredy_Bat == |
|||
How do you know [[User:Scaredy_Bat]] is a sock puppet of [[User:Kagome_85]]? |
|||
And did [[User:Scaredy_Bat]] make any posts at all? |
|||
>.> sorry [[User:Kagome_85]] forced me to quit here because of consent harassment and cyber stalking I use to be. [[User:Moukity]] |
|||
[[User:Kagome_85]] actually has other accounts other then whats listed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Kagome_85 here] |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/142.163.135.140|142.163.135.140]] ([[User talk:142.163.135.140|talk]]) 22:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I have [[WP:CHECKUSER|checkuser]], that's why. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 22:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Oh OK Thank You Tho I must warn you [[User:Kagome_85]] Will just make another account after another, It will never stop. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/142.163.135.140|142.163.135.140]] ([[User talk:142.163.135.140|talk]]) 23:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== "Scruffy" vandal == |
|||
He's apparently planning a mass addition of "scruffy" to tons of talk pages tomorrow. He's also using multiple IP addresses. Could you please rangeblock him? ~<span style="border:2px solid blue;background:beige;font-family:Mistral">'''[[User:NSD|<font color="green">Nerdy</font>]][[User:NSD/t|<font color="#0F0">Science</font>]][[Special:Contributions/NerdyScienceDude|<font color="#8d7">Dude</font>]]'''</span> 22:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Where did he say this? –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 22:22, 2 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::{{vandal|71.178.152.143}} |
|||
::{{vandal|71.178.154.43}} |
|||
::I don't know where the threat was, but {{diff2|388358125|Scruffy is talking about "2:30"}} for some naughtiness. (I'm assuming the range would be too wide - might be easier just to semi various users' talkpages). [[User talk:TFOWR|<b style="color:#000">TFOW</b><b style="color:#F00">R</b>]] 22:25, 2 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::The threat is [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Courcelles&diff=prev&oldid=388357427 here]. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 22:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:FYI: See also some archived older discussions: |
|||
:*[[User talk:JamesBWatson/Archive 18#FYI re: returning vandal]] |
|||
:*[[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive639#Threat to conduct to massive attack by IP???]] |
|||
:--- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 22:31, 2 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Can I haz sox? == |
|||
Hi, just curious if you'd be willing to run a CU on {{user|Zarapastroso}}, {{user|Isvie Mandalov}}, and all IPs used to check for unblocked socks (if you haven't already). Thanks in advance, [[User:Access Denied|<font color="red">Access Denied</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Access Denied|<font color="black">[FATAL ERROR]</font>]]</sup> 02:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:{{NAO}}: Yes, you can haz sox, but onlee in [[Boston Red Sox|red]]. kthxbai. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;">Neutralhomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] • 02:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)</small> |
|||
::No, I haven't, and I probably won't bother, most of these ranges are too busy for me to hardblock or even softblock. Oh and Neutralhomer, I'd watch what type of Sox mentioned around here. We don't see red around here, because it's all [[Chicago White Sox|black and white]] ;) –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 04:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::I knew I would run into a White Sox fan with that comment. :) At least it wasn't one of [[Sox#See also|these sox]]. :) - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;">Neutralhomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] • 04:29, 3 October 2010 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:I'm going to open a ban discussion on AN regarding this idiot. [[User:Access Denied|<font color="red">Access Denied</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Access Denied|<font color="black">[FATAL ERROR]</font>]]</sup> 04:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Who's going to preside over the ban discussion? [[Bill Buckner]]? –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 04:33, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== AN notice about the scuffy vandal == |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice--> [[User:Access Denied|<font color="red">Access Denied</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Access Denied|<font color="black">[FATAL ERROR]</font>]]</sup> 04:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Personally, I don't think that's going to do much to discourage him from his abuse. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 04:47, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::It's mainly because a ''de jure'' ban will make dealing with him easier, especially because he's taking advantage of dynamic IPs. [[User:Access Denied|<font color="red">Access Denied</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Access Denied|<font color="black">[FATAL ERROR]</font>]]</sup> 04:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::As it stands, I already just use RBI with his edits on-sight, as do others. I read far enough to confirm per WP:DUCK, then pull up his contribution page and start hitting the revert button after blocking. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 04:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::::[[User:John254/mass rollback.js]] [[User:Access Denied|<font color="red">Access Denied</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Access Denied|<font color="black">[FATAL ERROR]</font>]]</sup> 05:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Another Yongle sock, this one also vandalising == |
|||
{{user|Peter I of Russia}} is an obvious [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yongle the Great/Archive|Yongle sock]], but also taking an AfD template from an AfD I started and adding it to other articles. I thought that the IP range block would stop this. Any suggestions? Thanks. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 06:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I've blocked another range on top of 3 more socks. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 06:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks. Another editor has deleted a template (in Chinese, not English) he created. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 07:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Is this user scruffy? == |
|||
== Precious anniversary == |
|||
Earlier today (in my timezone at least), {{User|What is to be said?}} was blocked as a sock of {{User|Zarapastroso}}, a.k.a. Scruffy. Now I've noticed {{User|Desalinado}} whose activities so far exactly mirror those of the sock's initial career, issuing welcome messages to new users, possibly in order to gain auto-confirmed status. The evidence isn't incriminating enough for a block, but I wonder if an SPI is called for. The first sock let two weeks pass between the initial stage and the actual vandalism, which makes me wonder how many other sleepers are around. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 17:47, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Three}} |
|||
:Don't worry about filing an SPI; it's {{confirmed}}. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 18:07, 3 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Good article reassessment for [[Kingdom of Sicily]] == |
|||
== Another quick thought... == |
|||
[[Kingdom of Sicily]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Kingdom of Sicily/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Good article reassessment for [[Wild Arms (video game)]] == |
|||
Dear MuZemike, |
|||
[[Wild Arms (video game)]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Wild Arms (video game)/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you == |
|||
Thanks for defending me on WP:AN. I wanted to ask a quick question: Do you think the person will stop now? I think the threat of sanctions with his school/IP will suffice. I think this person was having fun, but I seriously doubt they want real trouble. This contradicts what I said moments ago on Access Denied's talk page, but after noticing your report I decided to interject. |
|||
I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @[[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] |
|||
Secondly, I.recommend trying to reconcile with the person. He or she seems to be upset with the project and knowledgeable og certain functions (ex.basic HTML). This person was probably a long time vandal at one point before and simply changed his/her tactics, or (what I personally think) an editor who was disaffected by certain members of the community. Adversaries should be spoken to and reasoned with. They are also a good thing because they make you stronger. So why not ask "Why? What are your motives?". Revert, block, ignore may help for most but maybe not for this person. |
|||
this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself. |
|||
are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? [[Special:Contributions/109.64.104.168|109.64.104.168]] ([[User talk:109.64.104.168|talk]]) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Thirdly, I recommend waiting after speaking with the person to see if they'll vandalize again. If they don't, squash it. If they do, send him or her to hell. |
|||
I’m still held against my will won’t someone help before they kill me, Francisco quinones Jimenez [[Special:Contributions/50.24.236.43|50.24.236.43]] ([[User talk:50.24.236.43|talk]]) 12:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:38, 25 December 2024
Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
- 2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
Precious anniversary
[edit]Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Kingdom of Sicily
[edit]Kingdom of Sicily has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wild Arms (video game)
[edit]Wild Arms (video game) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you
[edit]I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @M.Bitton this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself.
are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? 109.64.104.168 (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
I’m still held against my will won’t someone help before they kill me, Francisco quinones Jimenez 50.24.236.43 (talk) 12:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)