Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rail-rocking: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:28, 19 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rail-rocking

Non-notable and non-verifiable TMac 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete TMac 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nice try at an article; though it was interesting. BJAODN. Royal Blue ^T/_C 00:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
From the article: "Although generally shunned and considered idiotic and dangerous, it has begun to accumulate" ... delete votes. Not much

for BJAODN. Barno 01:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yet another Test article. In fact, I think the term Test article should be acknowledged just the same as test edit. Its pretty much the same principle. --Jay(Reply) 01:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sorry, WP:NFT. Bad ideas 02:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Jay Ruby 02:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, the Jay man. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn. Blnguyen 04:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:NFT. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 06:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:NFT. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 06:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't sound like a sport or a joke. Almost a troll, it seems. (aeropagitica) 07:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sounds like a troll. S iva1979^{Talk to me} 11:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable + unreferenced + poorly written + contradictary + original research + made up one day at school = Strong Delete Bobby1011 14:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete {{nonsense}}, dangerous, unencyclopædic, WP:NFT, vancarlimospacecraft, absolute idiocy, moronic, immature, infantile, and just plain stupid Avi 17:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 01:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Dogbreathcanada 20:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not verifiable, likely test article FloNight 15:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[Rail-Rocking]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result of the debate was '''delete'''. [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 00:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
+===[[Rail-rocking]]===
 Non-notable and non-verifiable [[User:Tim macready|TMac]] 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
-*Delete [[User:Tim macready|TMac]] 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' [[User:Tim macready|TMac]] 00:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*Nice try at an article; though it ''was'' interesting. '''BJAODN'''. [[User:Royboycrashfan|<span style="color: #4169E1;">'''Roy'''al Blue</span>]] <span style="color: #166D88;">[[User talk:Royboycrashfan|<span style="color: #166D88;"><sup>T</sup></span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Royboycrashfan|<span style="color: #166D88;"><sub>C</sub></span>]]</span> 00:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*From the article: "Although generally shunned and considered idiotic and dangerous, it has begun to accumulate" ... '''delete''' votes.  Not much
+for BJAODN.  [[User:Barno|Barno]] 01:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Yet another Test article. In fact, I think the term Test article should be acknowledged just the same as test edit. Its pretty much the same principle. --[[User:Master Jay|'''<span style="background:black; color:white;">Jay</span>''']]'''<span style="background:gold;">([[User talk:Master Jay|Reply]])</span>''' 01:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''', sorry, [[WP:NFT]]. [[User:Bad ideas|Bad ideas]] 02:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' per Jay [[User:Endomion|Ruby]] 02:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom, the Jay man. [[User:Dustimagic| <span style="color: black;">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<span style="color: orange;">'''T'''</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<span style="color: red;">'''C'''</span>]])</sup> 04:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as nn. [[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]] 04:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as [[WP:NFT]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|<span style="font-family:Arial; color:#D47C14;">OhNo</span>]][[User:Ohnoitsjamie|<span style="color:#7D4C0C;">itsJamie</span>]][[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 06:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' per nom and [[WP:NFT]].  [[User:Dbtfz|Dbtfz]] <small>([[User_talk:Dbtfz|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Dbtfz|contribs]])</small> 06:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Doesn't sound like a sport or a joke. Almost a troll, it seems. [[User:(aeropagitica)|<span style="color: #FFFFFF; font-family: Ariel; background: #800080">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</span>]] 07:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Sounds like a [[troll]]. <span style="background:gold;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">S</span>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</span>[[User talk:Siva1979|<sup style="background:yellow;">Talk to me</sup>]] 11:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*Not notable + unreferenced + poorly written + contradictary + original research + made up one day at school = '''Strong Delete''' [[User:Bobby1011|Bobby1011]] 14:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+* '''Speedy delete''' {{tl|nonsense}}, dangerous, unencyclopædic, [[WP:NFT]], vancarlimospacecraft, absolute idiocy, moronic, immature, infantile, and just plain stupid [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 17:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 01:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom. --[[User:Dogbreathcanada|Dogbreathcanada]] 20:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' not verifiable, likely test article [[User:FloNight|FloNight]] 15:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>