Jump to content

Talk:Fiduciary: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Business}}, {{WikiProject Finance}}, {{WikiProject Law}}.
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArticleHistory
is the relationship between husband and wife fiduciaral ?
|action1=FAC
|action1date=10:13, 23 February 2006
|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fiduciary/archive1
|action1result=not promoted
|action1oldid=40813121


|action2=PR
== Overhaul ==
|action2date=20:35, 23 February 2006
|action2link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Fiduciary/archive1
|action2result=reviewed
|action2oldid=40866838


|currentstatus=FFAC
I have done away with the old text and introduced a new version of the article which is more comprehensive and accurate. I have stuck to the basic principles of fiduciary duties, this is because the law w/regard to equity - and fiduciary principles, especially - can differ greatly between Canada, UK, US, and Australia.
}}
--[[User:Charlemagne the Hammer|Charlemagne the Hammer]] 03:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=

{{WikiProject Business|importance=Top}}
Please note that I have not yet inserted footnotes or general links --[[User:Charlemagne the Hammer|Charlemagne the Hammer]] 03:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject Law|importance=Top}}
== Vanity? ==
}}
Who are Melanie Jizzle and Philip Fizzler? That MUST be a prank. I'm going to remove them.
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Fiduciary/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}

[[User:qweryqwery|qweryqwery]]

*I think the page may have been written by law students. It is common for lawyers to use fictious names to describe how a law operates. It appears as though the names are not vanity but force of habit. I would perhaps reword to use fiducary and person, etc.

*I think that "force of habit" is being excessively charitable. Fictitious names are usually sensical. "Paul" is the Plaintiff, "Daniel" is the Defendant; "Tim" is the Testator, "Gene" is the Grantee; Vic usually winds up being the victim of something in Bar Exam problems, and Axel likely faces criminal liability as an accessory. See the article on computer programming names, where such names are identified as "essentially metasyntactical variables." But a full first and last name? There's no explanation. I vote for removal, replacing with, as suggested, "fiduciary" and "beneficiary."--[[User:64.80.112.170|64.80.112.170]] 14:15, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

*I didn't make it beyond the opening sentence: "Fiduciary in common law jurisdictions, is a legal term used to describe a relationship of between [sic] a person who occupies a particular position of trust, power or responsibility with respect to the rights, property or interests..." Is readability such a terrible thing?[[User:195.47.86.1|195.47.86.1]] 05:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

I cleaned up the intro somewhat. I think you should give the article another chance! [[User:204.177.90.3|204.177.90.3]] 15:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:38, 14 February 2024

Former featured article candidateFiduciary is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 23, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 23, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article candidate