Jump to content

Talk:The War of the Roses (novel): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{NovelsWikiProject}}.
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
This article was created on behalf of Warren Adler and Stonehouse, the owners of the copyright.
{{WikiProject Novels|importance=Mid}}
}}
A new article, entirely original has been posted in the TEMP section. It is ready to go up.

:Someone has added a rediect so I think this tempis now the new article. [[User:PeregrineV|PeregrineV]] 20:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

==Fair use rationale for Image:Waroftheroses2.jpg==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]]
'''[[:Image:Waroftheroses2.jpg]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]].

Please go to [[:Image:Waroftheroses2.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline |fair use rationale]]. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->

[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 03:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:42, 10 February 2024

A new article, entirely original has been posted in the TEMP section. It is ready to go up.

Someone has added a rediect so I think this tempis now the new article. PeregrineV 20:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Waroftheroses2.jpg

[edit]

Image:Waroftheroses2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]