Jump to content

Talk:Qantas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pronunciation
m Awards: layout
 
(655 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AirlineProject}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
Both G-BNLS and G-BIKF are Ba planes?!
{{WikiProject Aviation
|B-Class-1=no
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->
|B-Class-2=yes
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
|B-Class-3=yes
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|B-Class-4=yes
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B-Class-5=yes
|Airlines-project=yes}}
{{WikiProject Australia|importance=High|QLD=yes|QLD-importance=mid|Sydney=yes|Sydney-importance=low|transport=yes}}
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Brands|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Industrial design|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{Refideas|[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz73jydj4z1o Former Qantas boss exit pay slashed by millions (BBC)]}}
{{notice|{{Graph:PageViews|365}}|heading=Daily page views |center=y |image=Open data small color.png}}
{{Australian English}}
{{Article history
|action1=FAC
|action1date=04:25, 4 November 2007
|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Qantas/archive1
|action1result=not promoted
|action1oldid=169056513
|currentstatus=FFAC
|otd1date=2013-11-16|otd1oldid=581847147
|otd2date=2020-11-16|otd2oldid=989035217
}}{{reqphoto|in=Bayside Council|of=headquarters at 203 Coward, Mascot, NSW - Qantas Centre - Please photograph all four buildings: Qantas Building A - [http://maps.google.com/maps?q=203+Coward,+Mascot,+NSW&hl=en&ll=-33.924168,151.186187&spn=0.007772,0.016512&sll=-33.923853,151.183883&sspn=0.007808,0.016512&hnear=203+Coward+St,+Mascot+New+South+Wales+2020,+Australia&t=m&z=17&layer=c&cbll=-33.924183,151.186264&panoid=K1qnKggr0GQgc_Jz3fM2cQ&cbp=12,155.65,,0,-17.43 Map], Qantas Building B - [http://maps.google.com/maps?q=203+Coward,+Mascot,+NSW&hl=en&ll=-33.924168,151.186187&spn=0.007772,0.016512&sll=-33.923853,151.183883&sspn=0.007808,0.016512&hnear=203+Coward+St,+Mascot+New+South+Wales+2020,+Australia&t=m&z=17&layer=c&cbll=-33.924183,151.186264&panoid=K1qnKggr0GQgc_Jz3fM2cQ&cbp=12,227.52,,0,-7.6 Map], Qantas Building C - [http://maps.google.com/maps?q=203+Coward,+Mascot,+NSW&hl=en&ll=-33.925895,151.187367&spn=0.003516,0.016512&sll=-33.923853,151.183883&sspn=0.007808,0.016512&hnear=203+Coward+St,+Mascot+New+South+Wales+2020,+Australia&t=h&z=17&layer=c&cbll=-33.925894,151.187364&panoid=8XIAjIlr_darhC7UVNY-Qw&cbp=11,301.76,,0,-9.59 Map], Qantas Building D - [http://maps.google.com/maps?q=203+Coward,+Mascot,+NSW&hl=en&ll=-33.926082,151.187271&spn=0.003516,0.016512&sll=-33.923853,151.183883&sspn=0.007808,0.016512&hnear=203+Coward+St,+Mascot+New+South+Wales+2020,+Australia&t=h&z=17&layer=c&cbll=-33.926086,151.187273&panoid=BcKOZcfCjSJtVu5j4OAQdw&cbp=11,271.67,,1,4.74 Corporate service building] - [http://maps.google.com/maps?q=203+Coward,+Mascot,+NSW&hl=en&ll=-33.925619,151.187239&spn=0.003516,0.016512&sll=-33.923853,151.183883&sspn=0.007808,0.016512&hnear=203+Coward+St,+Mascot+New+South+Wales+2020,+Australia&t=h&z=17&layer=c&cbll=-33.925619,151.187242&panoid=wHzNFB90J_lssnG6q2Vaww&cbp=11,208.16,,1,-4.91 Map]}}


{{Archives}}
Why is this page not called "QANTAS"? The name is an acronym.<br>
(later..) Oh, I see. QANTAS exist as a redirect which no one uses.


{{User:MiszaBot/config
JetConnect has been operating many of the trans-Tasman Qantas flights as well as the domestic NZ service for some time, using 737-300s on the NZ register - many ex-Ansett. Now that JetStar is starting to enter the trans-Tasman market, is JetConnect to be wound down? And should it not be listed as a Qantas subsidiary?
| algo = old(30d)
rerj in Hobart
| archive = Talk:Qantas/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 3
| maxarchivesize = 100K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 5
| minthreadsleft = 10
}}


==Safety==
== 747 flypast ==
What does the CEO's daughter have to do with the safety of the airline? I think this needs to be rewritten or or removed. [[User:WikiDon|WikiDon]] 04:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC)


[[File:747-400ER (VH-OEE) Final Commercial Flight for Qantas 01 (cropped).jpg|thumb|747-400ER (VH-OEE) performing a flypast over Sydney at the end of what is likely to be the final commercial flight by a Qantas 747, on 29 March 2020<ref>{{cite web |title=KLM, Qantas Reportedly Flying Final 747 Flights This Weekend |url=https://airlinegeeks.com/2020/03/27/klm-qantas-flying-final-747-flights-this-weekend/ |website=AirlineGeeks.com |accessdate=30 March 2020 |language=en |date=27 March 2020 |quote=VH-OEE is expected to make the fleet’s final passenger flight when it departs Santiago, Chile and arrives in Sydney on March 28. Flight QF28 is expected to arrive at 5:50 p.m. local time}}</ref>]]
:It's got precisely nothing to do with the safety of the airline; in fact, it's got nothing to do with Qantas. Removed with prejudice. --[[User:Robert Merkel|Robert Merkel]] 05:37, 29 July 2005 (UTC)


The above image has been removed, twice. The first time the edit summary was "QANTAS has not retired the 747. Stop Posting."; I restored with a citation (as seen above), and the edit summary "Restored with source - and you don't need to remove the image if you disagree with the caption"; it was removed again with the edit summary "No need for the image".
''Repairs to the nine-year-old aircraft were undertaken in China by TAECO at a cost in excess of A$100 million and it was suggested at the time that this expense was solely to avoid a hull-loss being recorded, a claim Qantas denied.'' At roughly 1.3 Australian dollars to the US dollar, these repairs are substantially less than the cost of a new 747 (>$200M US), [http://www.boeing.com/commercial/prices/index.html] so surely this suggestion was a silly one. If we don't put who made the suggestions, then to me, it seems like a bit of a non-event. Thoughts, anyone? [[User:RupertMillard|RupertMillard]] 00:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)


That's not how Wikipedia works.
You don't value a nine year old plane with half its useful life gone against the price of a new one, would you spend $30000 to fix a nine year old car ? We're also talking 1999 dollars here ($200m now was around $160m then). And then you have to factor in the value of the aircraft if it was parted (aircraft as young as 14-15 years are parted out without ever being in an accident). All things considered, its amazing OJH wasn't written off. I don't recall an aircraft with that much damage (two deatached landing gear, substantial damage to the wing and engine pylons, mud ingested into the engines etc, etc) ever being repaired anywhere (it is the most expensive aircraft repair in history) and these claims were widely made in the media and elsewhere [http://www.crikey.com.au/articles/2004/01/06-0002.html], [http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-78607.html]. [[User:Andypasto|Andypasto]] 03:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
:Ah. Thank you for explaining it so well. It might help future simpletons like me to put that it was the most expensive aircraft repair in history in the article. [[User:RupertMillard|RupertMillard]] 12:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


{{reflist-talk}}
== Hubs/Focus Cities ==


-- <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 16:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
How are these determined? LHR is listed as a hub, yet LAX doesn't rate a mention in either. This seems odd as QF flies from LAX to four destinations (AKL, SYD, MEL, BNE), but from LHR to only three (SIN, BKK, HKG). A hub implies spokes, and for QF LHR is only an endpoint - no-one would reasonably connect between QF flights at LHR except for code shares. --[[User:Kjd|kjd]] 13:11, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
:"Likely to be" is pure speculation. I suggest removing the image per [[WP:CRYSTAL]].--'''[[User:Jetstreamer|Jetstreamer]]'''&nbsp;''{{sup|[[User talk:Jetstreamer#top|Talk]]}}'' 16:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
:I have moved LHR to be a focus city, because few would connect to different QF flights in London. (Singapore to Hong Kong in 25 hours, anyone?) --[[User:Kjd|kjd]] 13:22, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
::{{u|Jetstreamer}} Please cite the part of WP:CRYSTAL that mandates the removal of images; or indeed text such as that as in this example. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 17:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
:::"Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place, as even notable events can be cancelled or postponed at the last minute by a major incident." That said, "Likely to be" marks it has not been definite. The caption is at least misleading. If showing a Qantas 747 aircraft is the main intention I suggest changing the caption.--'''[[User:Jetstreamer|Jetstreamer]]'''&nbsp;''{{sup|[[User talk:Jetstreamer#top|Talk]]}}'' 18:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
::::So nothing in WP:CRYSTAL mandates the removal of images; and yet the image has again been removed, citing exactly that page; and we agree that no claim that a "date" is "definite" is made. I also note that WP:CRYSTAL also includes {{tq|"It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about ... whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced."}} and {{tq|"Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included"}} <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 19:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::{{reply to|Pigsonthewing}} Please take everything in what Wikipedia is NOT into consideration here. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and encyclopaedias deal with long standing and well established details - not things that may turn out to be true (this is the main tenor of WP Crystal). The 747 gone idea is possible but far from established. Qantas announced that they were grounding their A380s a month or so ago and they have been flying almost daily to the US over the last week or so. When you read advice in the Wikipedia help pages it is important to realise that the help given is rarely prescriptive, it gives examples of the sort of things that are necessary to buld a sensible reliable encyclopaedia. Please do not expect the answer to be written in black and white and if it does not specifically answer the question you have say "well that is OK then and do it anyway" that is not how it works. [[User:Andrewgprout|Andrewgprout]] ([[User talk:Andrewgprout|talk]]) 23:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
::::::OK, I've taken "everything in what Wikipedia is NOT into consideration". None of it mandates the removal of an image such as this and none of it mandates the removal of text such as that used in its caption. Would you now like to take into consideration the quotes from WP:CRYSTAL, which I gave above? <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 10:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
::::::: The source you referenced is not reliable and has been contradicted by many other, more reputable sites. The image isn't really relavent what purpose does it serve, none. It doesn't inform anyone. It would be more fitting for the image, if they had have been retired , which they have not to be placed in the Qantas History Article IMO.--[[User:Life200BC|Life200BC]] ([[User talk:Life200BC|talk]]) 10:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::::: There are plenty of other reliable, sites saying th same thing. No contradictory reliable site has been cited. The image is highly relevant. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 10:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
::::::::: https://simpleflying.com/qantas-747-parking/ https://www.executivetraveller.com/news/qantas-boeing-747-retired All indicating that they have not being retired despite rumors suggesting otherwise. Until QANTAS announces that they have retired the planes i suggest that this speculative image and caption not be posted. If QANTAS does retire the Queen I believe that this would be a fitting addition.--[[User:Life200BC|Life200BC]] ([[User talk:Life200BC|talk]]) 10:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::::::: It's unclear why you believe your sources (one of which says {{tq|"What could be the last flight of a Qantas Boeing 747 took place on Sunday afternoon..."}}, the other itself speculative) more reliable than the one I gave above; but as I said other reliable sources also support the claim in my caption text. And in any case, if your sources are correct, it neither mandates the removal of the image nor precludes a ''change'' to its caption. The ''image'' is not speculative - do you dispute that the aircraft conducted a flyby over Sydney? Why do you think that was? Why do you not think that event worthy of mention? <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 11:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::::::: The sources which I refer to have talked to QANTAS. The one you have has not and is purely speculative. No sources have QANTAS saying they have retired the 747. QANTAS has done many flybys. The reason behind this could be insignificant, such as being the last international flight to Sydney before the grounding of QFI. A flyby isn't really relavent to a section of this article and doesn't add anything to it. If QANTAS does retire the 747 and this turns out to be the last commercial flight this image should be posted. Until then I believe it is irrelavent and speculative without a reliable source, which isn't contradicted by the owner.-Until QANTAS themselves announces that they have been retired this image should not be included.-[[User:Life200BC|Life200BC]] ([[User talk:Life200BC|talk]]) 11:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)


Are we still pretending this didn't happen? <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 22:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
:A hub isn't just a city from which services to other cities depart, but also a) where flights connect with other flights and b) where airlines base crews, fleets, maintenance bases etc. QF announced in late 2004 (early 2005?) that they would base crews at LHR. QF Flights also connect with BA and other oneworld partners at LHR. This might be something to think about is deciding whether LHR and LAX are hubs. (Incidentally, I think that the LHR-HKG flights are code shared and operated by BA, - but I don't think that this would make it any less a hub - if it were to be considered one). I think the best way to answer this question is to find out what QF considers to be its hubs. -I'll see if I can do some research on this point. [[User:Adz|Adz]] 04:29, 17 September 2005 (UTC)


== Qantas fleet ==
::My only extra comment would be that if a hub is defined as being where you can connect to codeshares/alliance flights, then pretty much every major destination (including LAX) would then be a hub. AFAIK QF has no in-house maintainance base at LHR, I've only ever see their jets parked at BA hangars. --[[User:Kjd|kjd]] 07:02, 23 September 2005 (UTC)


I was wondering about to export Qantas current fleet and Qantas livery in to Qantas fleet page as per Wikipedia splitting there must be atleast 77k bytes but the article size is 150k splitting needed[[User:Ktdk|Ktdk]] ([[User talk:Ktdk|talk]]) 13:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
:::Is Singapore considered a hub for Qantas, then?--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 13:50, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
::::Singapore is regarded by the airline as a hub and has often been reported in the media as such. Regarding kjd's comments however, connecting with codeshared flights in itself does not make a port a hub, but basing crews and other facilities there does, and as far as I am aware, QF does base crews at LHR, so it is different to LAX. I will try to find out more about LHR and get back to you. -- [[User:Adz|Adz]]|[[User talk:Adz|talk]] 10:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
:::::Having a crew base does not make an airport a hub. The idea of a hub comes from the hub-and-spoke system. An airport must have connecting flights for an airline for it to be considered a hub. For example, United has a crew base in Boston, but no one would call it a hub. [[User:Dbinder|Dbinder]] 16:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


== Moving sections from Qantas to Qantas fleet ==
== Tell them they're dreaming. ==


I think that details about Qantas' fleet would fit better in that article like liveries and products on the aircraft. I therefore propose that they get moved to that page --[[User:Life200BC|Life200BC]] ([[User talk:Life200BC|talk]]) 03:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
I admit, I'm mad about planes.


== London Heathrow to be added to focus cities ==
But could someone please add a photo of any or all of Wunala Dreaming , Nalanji Dreaming and Yananyi Dreaming?


Qantas has a flight from perth to london is planning to expand its flights to London from Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane and this is one of their primary goals [[User:NotOrrio|NotOrrio]] ([[User talk:NotOrrio|talk]]) 04:45, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
:-)


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
Regards, [[User:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 05:48, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* [[commons:File:Flag of Queensland.svg|Flag of Queensland.svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2022-12-06T12:44:00.931242 | Flag of Queensland.svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Queensland.svg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 12:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion ==
[[Image:A380QantasFlyBy.JPG|right|thumb|250px|A380 in Qantas livery]]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
:Yeah. Beautiful planes! I'll have to take a picture of them next time I see them. I actually saw one of them on the weekend, but there was a lot of traffic at the end of the runway and I didn't stop. I took a photograph of the A380 as it overflew Sydney, but I was in the wrong spot, down sun, hidden by trees on Mrs Macquaries Chair and the few shots I could get really suck. And they'd moved it into a hangar by the time I got to the airport. In the meantime, what about using a picture from a press release? --[[User:SuperJumbo|Jumbo]] 03:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
* [[commons:File:Qantas Dreamliner Premium Economy Seat 4.jpg|Qantas Dreamliner Premium Economy Seat 4.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy | 2023-01-03T14:52:31.390610 | Qantas Dreamliner Premium Economy Seat 4.jpg -->
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 14:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)


== Qantas Mayday and redirect 2023? ==


I don’t know how to upload pictures but someone with more wiki knowledge can use these links to get pictures of all three dreaming planes;
Hi, not sure how to edit airline articles but can someone add these to the article?


mayday call:
Wunala Dreaming:
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=VH-OEJ&distinct_entry=true


https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/19/qantas-flight-from-sydney-to-fiji-forced-to-turn-back-after-potential-mechanical-issue
Nalanji Dreaming:
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=VH-EBU&distinct_entry=true


https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-19/qantas-mayday-sydney-airport-auckland-aviation/101869928
Yananyi Dreaming:
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=VH-VXB&distinct_entry=true


https://www.9news.com.au/national/qantas-flight-mayday-call-passengers-no-idea-until-landing/d0cf8bb1-bc9e-46a2-891d-d7981dce927f
Regards, [[User:Patm|Patm]] 06:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


:Thanks Patm. It's worth noting however that the images on Airliners.net are protected by copyright. Most photographers who contribute to the site though have their email addresses on the site and it is possible to email them and ask them to release the photos under a GNU Free Documentation License for use on wikipedia. I did it to obtain the pics for the Flight West article. -- [[User:Adz|Adz]]|[[User talk:Adz|talk]] 10:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


mechanical issue:
== advertising-speak ==


https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/19/qantas-flight-from-sydney-to-fiji-forced-to-turn-back-after-potential-mechanical-issue [[User:Helpingpeopleyay|Helpingpeopleyay]] ([[User talk:Helpingpeopleyay|talk]]) 06:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
"The interior design for the A380 aircraft will provide new levels of comfort for passengers"


:Nobody was hurt in either of those incidents. Neither plane suffered damage. Despite some parts of the media making a meal out of them, I don't think they belong in the article. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 06:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
"The first flight of the revolutionary new A380 aircraft"
::Ok. Thanks for telling! [[User:Helpingpeopleyay|Helpingpeopleyay]] ([[User talk:Helpingpeopleyay|talk]]) 21:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


== Disturbing Page Preview ==
These parts read like an advertising brochure in my mind. Should they be changed?


When hovering over the link to this page I noticed that the image appears to be of an animal dissection or something similar. I'm not an editor here but it seemed like someone should probably change it. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:CAAE:5A00:6867:8706:4A2C:72BA|2A02:C7C:CAAE:5A00:6867:8706:4A2C:72BA]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7C:CAAE:5A00:6867:8706:4A2C:72BA|talk]]) 15:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
[[User:Jeremyh|Jeremyh]] 06:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


:You're right. I've toned it down somewhat. Enough? --[[User:ScottDavis|Scott Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:ScottDavis|Talk]]</sup> 11:09, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
:Please be more specific. Which link? Cheers, [[User:Cl3phact0|Cl3phact0]] ([[User talk:Cl3phact0|talk]]) 21:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)


== Quick Firing ? ==
== Proposed re-order of sections ==


I propose that the sections "Company heads" and "Corporate affairs" be moved down (and possibly reversed) and located between "Services" and "Accidents and incidents". The rational for this is two-fold: first, that the flow of the article would be more natural (i.e., History, Destinations, Fleet, Design, Liveries, Services, '''Corporate affairs''', '''Company heads''', Accidents and incidents, etc.); second, the general reader, in my view, is probably more interested in the company's history, destinations, and what it does (rather than, say, the information that an investor, financial analyst, or business journalist would be interested in finding – and, with all the respect in the world, if those folks are '''only''' looking here for that kind of information, they might want to consider another line of work). Before making a relatively significant change like this, it seemed like getting input from others might be wise. Cheers, [[User:Cl3phact0|Cl3phact0]] ([[User talk:Cl3phact0|talk]]) 12:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)<br>{{Done}} Cheers, [[User:Cl3phact0|Cl3phact0]] ([[User talk:Cl3phact0|talk]]) 07:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Why is this here ? Its ridiculously obscure. Do we have a reference to Bachelor of Arts at the top of the British Airways page or Alcoholics Anonymous at the top of the American Airlines page ? [[User:Andypasto|Andypasto]] 11:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
:That is the normal way of referring users to other articles that they '''might''' have been looking for. [[QF]] is a redirect to the Qantas article. Bachelor of Arts is listed before British Airways on the [[BA]] disambig page, and Alcoholics Anonymous is before American Airlines in [[AA]]. Feel free to convert QF from a redirect to a disambig and list all meanings there. --[[User:ScottDavis|Scott Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:ScottDavis|Talk]]</sup> 12:31, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


== Archived refs not used in the article ==
== New York ==


*{{cite journal|date=3–9 April 2001|title= World Airline Directory{{spaced ndash}}Qantas Airways|journal= [[Flight International]]|page= 63|format= PDF|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2001/2001%20-%201175.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140201112104/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2001/2001%20-%201175.html|archivedate= 1 February 2014|accessdate= 26 April 2012|url-status= dead}}
''In Mid 2005 Qantas annouced it would increase services to Shanghai and Johannesburg and on the 30th of December 2005 Qantas annouced that services to New York would go from 3 per week to 5 per week from early 2006.'' Looks like somebody has a crystal ball. Wikipedia reports before December on an announcement to be made on December 30!? Anyone know what meaning it's supposed to convey? --[[User:ScottDavis|Scott Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:ScottDavis|Talk]]</sup> 07:09, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
*{{cite journal|date= 1–7 April 1998|title= World Airline Directory{{spaced ndash}}Qantas Airways|journal= [[Flight International]]|pages= 80|format= PDF|accessdate= 3 October 2011|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1998/1998%20-%200872.html|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180206214925/https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1998/1998%20-%200872.html|archive-date= 6 February 2018}}
:Found the press release from 30 November. Fixed. --[[User:ScottDavis|Scott Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:ScottDavis|Talk]]</sup> 07:19, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
*{{Cite journal|title= World Airline Directory – Qantas Airways Ltd.|journal= [[Flight International]]|issn= 0015-3710|volume= 149|number= 4517|date= 3 April 1996|page= 75|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1996/1996%20-%200811.html|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20140201112246/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1996/1996%20-%200811.html|archivedate= 1 February 2014|url-status= dead}}
*{{cite journal|title= World Airlines – Qantas Airways Ltd|journal= [[Flight International]]|date= 18 May 1972|page= 38|format= PDF|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1972/1972%20-%201298.html|accessdate= 22 August 2011}}
*{{cite journal|title= World airline directory – Qantas Airways|journal= [[Flight International]]|date= 28 April 1979|page= 1394|format= PDF|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1979/1979%20-%201456.html|accessdate= 11 December 2011}}
*{{cite journal|title= Qantas safety and monopoly&nbsp;(page&nbsp;21)|first= David|last= Learmount|journal= [[Flight International]]|issn= 0015-3710|number= 4091|volume= 132|date= 5 December 1987|pages= 21{{spaced ndash}}24|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1987/1987%20-%202599.html|archiveurl= https://www.webcitation.org/6DDrruBkw?url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1987/1987%20-%202599.html|archivedate= 27 December 2012|url-status= dead}}
*{{cite journal|title= Qantas safety and monopoly&nbsp;(page&nbsp;22)|journal= Flight International|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1987/1987%20-%202600.html|archiveurl= https://www.webcitation.org/6DDs5WbcK?url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1987/1987%20-%202600.html|archivedate= 27 December 2012|url-status= dead}}
*{{cite journal|title= Qantas safety and monopoly&nbsp;(page&nbsp;23)|journal= Flight International|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1987/1987%20-%202601.html|archiveurl= https://www.webcitation.org/6DDs9yR7y?url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1987/1987%20-%202601.html|archivedate= 27 December 2012|url-status= dead}}
*{{cite journal|title= Qantas safety and monopoly&nbsp;(page&nbsp;24)|journal= Flight International|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1987/1987%20-%202602.html|archiveurl= https://www.webcitation.org/6DDsGpo5w?url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1987/1987%20-%202602.html|archivedate= 27 December 2012|url-status= dead}}
*{{cite journal|title= World Airline Directory – Qantas Airways|journal= [[Flight International]]|issn= 0015-3710|number= 4670|volume= 155|date= 31 March – 6 April 1999|page= 94|url= http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1999/1999%20-%200814.html|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20131020012444/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1999/1999%20-%200814.html|archivedate= 20 October 2013|url-status= dead}}
[[User:Sunnya343|Sunnya343]] ([[User talk:Sunnya343|talk]]) 04:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


== Aircraft Orders ==
== Awards ==


A series of back and forth edits (starting [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Qantas&oldid=1250609444 here]) resulted in the ''partial'' removal of the <s>entire</s> list of awards. <s>This seems a bit extreme.</s> Qantas have obviously invested a lot of time and effort in research and design, and the outcomes of this (including resulting awards) seem like an aspect of the company's activity and history that ought to be chronicled here somewhere. Cheers, [[User:Cl3phact0|Cl3phact0]] ([[User talk:Cl3phact0|talk]]) 07:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)<br>PS: My mistake, this has been partially reversed (although I'm not sure what criteria we're applying for which awards are listed). -- [[User:Cl3phact0|Cl3phact0]] ([[User talk:Cl3phact0|talk]]) 07:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Just after the Qantas 787 order was announced, I wrote a paragraph in the 2005 News section about the order. Later, another paragraph about the order was added to the Fleet section. They're mostly redundant, but I'd like some opinion on which one should stay and which should be removed. I personally think a mention obviously belongs in the news section, since this is the biggest QF news in a long time. Should some description of the 787 (similar to the paragraph on the A380 that's already there) be put in the Fleet section instead of info on the order itself?

-[[User:QFlyer|QFlyer]] 06:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

The photo of the 787, is that a real plane or a computer generated image? Regards, [[User:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 02:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
:As the 787 does not yet fly it must be computer generated --[[User:Denniss|Denniss]] 03:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Since the production line for the 717 is about to be closed, with the last plane for Airtran currently being assembled, would it be a good idea to remove the mention of 4 717 being on order?--[[User:203.198.148.54|203.198.148.54]] 08:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

:No, because they will be the aircraft presently used by Jetstar, when they get replaced there by A320s. However, they seem to be double-counted with QantasLink, so something needs to be cleaned up to clarify the overlap. --[[User:ScottDavis|Scott Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:ScottDavis|Talk]]</sup> 14:02, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

== Margaret Jackson ==
I think the link to Margaret Jackson (charman) links to the wrong Margaret Jackson. [[User:HiFiGuy|HiFiGuy]] 00:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
:This seems to be the case. I've asked [[user:Petaholmes|Petaholmes]] to look into it, as her knowledge of notable Australian women is immense. A quick search reveals no article, so this may be a case where a new stub could be created, but if there is already an article, perhaps under a married or maiden name as for the British politician [[Margaret Jackson]], then we don't want to duplicate existing work. --[[User:SuperJumbo|Jumbo]] 01:23, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

== Pilots' strike ==

Although a lot of people have forgotten about it, the pilots' strike was a watershed moment in industrial relations, particularly for those pilots who were blacklisted. Could someone write about it? - [[User:Richardcavell|Richardcavell]] 02:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
:There's and article at [[1989 Australian pilots' strike]]. --[[User:ScottDavis|Scott Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:ScottDavis|Talk]]</sup> 04:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

== Pronunciation ==

I found no mention of the pronunciation of the name "Qantas". My understanding is that it's pronounced as ''kwantas''. Can someone please include some information about that in the article? --[[User:Cotoco|Cotoco]] 21:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:52, 14 October 2024

Former featured article candidateQantas is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 4, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 16, 2013, and November 16, 2020.

747 flypast

[edit]
747-400ER (VH-OEE) performing a flypast over Sydney at the end of what is likely to be the final commercial flight by a Qantas 747, on 29 March 2020[1]

The above image has been removed, twice. The first time the edit summary was "QANTAS has not retired the 747. Stop Posting."; I restored with a citation (as seen above), and the edit summary "Restored with source - and you don't need to remove the image if you disagree with the caption"; it was removed again with the edit summary "No need for the image".

That's not how Wikipedia works.

References

  1. ^ "KLM, Qantas Reportedly Flying Final 747 Flights This Weekend". AirlineGeeks.com. 27 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020. VH-OEE is expected to make the fleet's final passenger flight when it departs Santiago, Chile and arrives in Sydney on March 28. Flight QF28 is expected to arrive at 5:50 p.m. local time

-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Likely to be" is pure speculation. I suggest removing the image per WP:CRYSTAL.--Jetstreamer Talk 16:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jetstreamer Please cite the part of WP:CRYSTAL that mandates the removal of images; or indeed text such as that as in this example. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place, as even notable events can be cancelled or postponed at the last minute by a major incident." That said, "Likely to be" marks it has not been definite. The caption is at least misleading. If showing a Qantas 747 aircraft is the main intention I suggest changing the caption.--Jetstreamer Talk 18:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So nothing in WP:CRYSTAL mandates the removal of images; and yet the image has again been removed, citing exactly that page; and we agree that no claim that a "date" is "definite" is made. I also note that WP:CRYSTAL also includes "It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about ... whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced." and "Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included" Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Pigsonthewing: Please take everything in what Wikipedia is NOT into consideration here. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and encyclopaedias deal with long standing and well established details - not things that may turn out to be true (this is the main tenor of WP Crystal). The 747 gone idea is possible but far from established. Qantas announced that they were grounding their A380s a month or so ago and they have been flying almost daily to the US over the last week or so. When you read advice in the Wikipedia help pages it is important to realise that the help given is rarely prescriptive, it gives examples of the sort of things that are necessary to buld a sensible reliable encyclopaedia. Please do not expect the answer to be written in black and white and if it does not specifically answer the question you have say "well that is OK then and do it anyway" that is not how it works. Andrewgprout (talk) 23:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've taken "everything in what Wikipedia is NOT into consideration". None of it mandates the removal of an image such as this and none of it mandates the removal of text such as that used in its caption. Would you now like to take into consideration the quotes from WP:CRYSTAL, which I gave above? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The source you referenced is not reliable and has been contradicted by many other, more reputable sites. The image isn't really relavent what purpose does it serve, none. It doesn't inform anyone. It would be more fitting for the image, if they had have been retired , which they have not to be placed in the Qantas History Article IMO.--Life200BC (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are plenty of other reliable, sites saying th same thing. No contradictory reliable site has been cited. The image is highly relevant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
https://simpleflying.com/qantas-747-parking/ https://www.executivetraveller.com/news/qantas-boeing-747-retired All indicating that they have not being retired despite rumors suggesting otherwise. Until QANTAS announces that they have retired the planes i suggest that this speculative image and caption not be posted. If QANTAS does retire the Queen I believe that this would be a fitting addition.--Life200BC (talk) 10:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's unclear why you believe your sources (one of which says "What could be the last flight of a Qantas Boeing 747 took place on Sunday afternoon...", the other itself speculative) more reliable than the one I gave above; but as I said other reliable sources also support the claim in my caption text. And in any case, if your sources are correct, it neither mandates the removal of the image nor precludes a change to its caption. The image is not speculative - do you dispute that the aircraft conducted a flyby over Sydney? Why do you think that was? Why do you not think that event worthy of mention? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The sources which I refer to have talked to QANTAS. The one you have has not and is purely speculative. No sources have QANTAS saying they have retired the 747. QANTAS has done many flybys. The reason behind this could be insignificant, such as being the last international flight to Sydney before the grounding of QFI. A flyby isn't really relavent to a section of this article and doesn't add anything to it. If QANTAS does retire the 747 and this turns out to be the last commercial flight this image should be posted. Until then I believe it is irrelavent and speculative without a reliable source, which isn't contradicted by the owner.-Until QANTAS themselves announces that they have been retired this image should not be included.-Life200BC (talk) 11:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are we still pretending this didn't happen? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qantas fleet

[edit]

I was wondering about to export Qantas current fleet and Qantas livery in to Qantas fleet page as per Wikipedia splitting there must be atleast 77k bytes but the article size is 150k splitting neededKtdk (talk) 13:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moving sections from Qantas to Qantas fleet

[edit]

I think that details about Qantas' fleet would fit better in that article like liveries and products on the aircraft. I therefore propose that they get moved to that page --Life200BC (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

London Heathrow to be added to focus cities

[edit]

Qantas has a flight from perth to london is planning to expand its flights to London from Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane and this is one of their primary goals NotOrrio (talk) 04:45, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Qantas Mayday and redirect 2023?

[edit]

Hi, not sure how to edit airline articles but can someone add these to the article?

mayday call:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/19/qantas-flight-from-sydney-to-fiji-forced-to-turn-back-after-potential-mechanical-issue

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-19/qantas-mayday-sydney-airport-auckland-aviation/101869928

https://www.9news.com.au/national/qantas-flight-mayday-call-passengers-no-idea-until-landing/d0cf8bb1-bc9e-46a2-891d-d7981dce927f


mechanical issue:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/19/qantas-flight-from-sydney-to-fiji-forced-to-turn-back-after-potential-mechanical-issue Helpingpeopleyay (talk) 06:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody was hurt in either of those incidents. Neither plane suffered damage. Despite some parts of the media making a meal out of them, I don't think they belong in the article. HiLo48 (talk) 06:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thanks for telling! Helpingpeopleyay (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disturbing Page Preview

[edit]

When hovering over the link to this page I noticed that the image appears to be of an animal dissection or something similar. I'm not an editor here but it seemed like someone should probably change it. 2A02:C7C:CAAE:5A00:6867:8706:4A2C:72BA (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more specific. Which link? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed re-order of sections

[edit]

I propose that the sections "Company heads" and "Corporate affairs" be moved down (and possibly reversed) and located between "Services" and "Accidents and incidents". The rational for this is two-fold: first, that the flow of the article would be more natural (i.e., History, Destinations, Fleet, Design, Liveries, Services, Corporate affairs, Company heads, Accidents and incidents, etc.); second, the general reader, in my view, is probably more interested in the company's history, destinations, and what it does (rather than, say, the information that an investor, financial analyst, or business journalist would be interested in finding – and, with all the respect in the world, if those folks are only looking here for that kind of information, they might want to consider another line of work). Before making a relatively significant change like this, it seemed like getting input from others might be wise. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 12:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archived refs not used in the article

[edit]

Sunnya343 (talk) 04:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

[edit]

A series of back and forth edits (starting here) resulted in the partial removal of the entire list of awards. This seems a bit extreme. Qantas have obviously invested a lot of time and effort in research and design, and the outcomes of this (including resulting awards) seem like an aspect of the company's activity and history that ought to be chronicled here somewhere. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS: My mistake, this has been partially reversed (although I'm not sure what criteria we're applying for which awards are listed). -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]