User:KMalaysia/RFA: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m tweak |
tweak |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Fæ is a highly active and experienced contributor in a variety of areas in which having the |
Fæ is a highly active and experienced contributor (for those who like stats: 47,500 edits over 12 months) in a variety of areas in which having the tools would benefit the project. I highlight the following reasons why Fæ should be given the tools: |
||
*Fæ is an OTRS volunteer. |
*Fæ is an OTRS volunteer and has been since August 2010. The fact of being an OTRS volunteer already demonstrates a high degree of trustworthiness. But also, having the administrative tools will help Fæ to carry out important OTRS-related functions, like dealing with copyright and BLP violations that get reported via email. |
||
*Fæ has a demonstrated commitment to, and proficiency in, content work, with three good articles and one featured article. |
*Fæ has a demonstrated commitment to, and proficiency in, content work, with three good articles and one featured article. |
||
*Fæ's one featured article, [[Hoxne Hoard]], demonstrates exactly the qualities the project needs in an administrator. The article [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hoxne Hoard/archive1|passed FA]] as the result of an [[Wikipedia:GLAM/BM/Hoxne challenge|organised collaboration]] between multiple editors on- and off-wiki. It's one thing to write an FA yourself; it's another thing entirely to demonstrate the people skills, teamwork and leadership needed to get a large collaboration across the line. |
*Fæ's one featured article, [[Hoxne Hoard]], demonstrates exactly the qualities the project needs in an administrator. The article [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hoxne Hoard/archive1|passed FA]] as the result of an [[Wikipedia:GLAM/BM/Hoxne challenge|organised collaboration]] between multiple editors on- and off-wiki. It's one thing to write an FA yourself; it's another thing entirely to demonstrate the people skills, teamwork and leadership needed to get a large collaboration across the line. I'd also suggest having a look at [[WP:GLAM/BM]] and [[WP:GLAM/BL]] for Fæ's ongoing collaborative work in [[WP:GLAM|GLAM]] projects. |
||
*Fæ is very competent in deletion policy and practice |
*Fæ is very competent in deletion policy and practice. Fæ makes well-reasoned nominations (eg [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Francis Xavier Montmorency]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irena Lipienė]]) and arguments. |
||
*Fæ is a proficient vandal fighter. |
*Fæ is a proficient vandal fighter. |
||
*Fæ deals with complaints well - one of the most important parts of being an admin. A review of Fæ's talk page articles reveals that editors do disagree with Fæ from time to time: but the disagreements and complaints are dealt with courteously and constructively. |
*Fæ deals with complaints well - one of the most important parts of being an admin. A review of Fæ's talk page articles reveals that editors do disagree with Fæ from time to time: but the disagreements and complaints are dealt with courteously and constructively. |
Latest revision as of 19:20, 10 March 2011
Fæ is a highly active and experienced contributor (for those who like stats: 47,500 edits over 12 months) in a variety of areas in which having the tools would benefit the project. I highlight the following reasons why Fæ should be given the tools:
- Fæ is an OTRS volunteer and has been since August 2010. The fact of being an OTRS volunteer already demonstrates a high degree of trustworthiness. But also, having the administrative tools will help Fæ to carry out important OTRS-related functions, like dealing with copyright and BLP violations that get reported via email.
- Fæ has a demonstrated commitment to, and proficiency in, content work, with three good articles and one featured article.
- Fæ's one featured article, Hoxne Hoard, demonstrates exactly the qualities the project needs in an administrator. The article passed FA as the result of an organised collaboration between multiple editors on- and off-wiki. It's one thing to write an FA yourself; it's another thing entirely to demonstrate the people skills, teamwork and leadership needed to get a large collaboration across the line. I'd also suggest having a look at WP:GLAM/BM and WP:GLAM/BL for Fæ's ongoing collaborative work in GLAM projects.
- Fæ is very competent in deletion policy and practice. Fæ makes well-reasoned nominations (eg Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Francis Xavier Montmorency and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irena Lipienė) and arguments.
- Fæ is a proficient vandal fighter.
- Fæ deals with complaints well - one of the most important parts of being an admin. A review of Fæ's talk page articles reveals that editors do disagree with Fæ from time to time: but the disagreements and complaints are dealt with courteously and constructively.