Jump to content

Universe: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ChuispastonBot (talk | contribs)
m r2.7.1) (robot Adding: hif:Sansaar
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Everything in space and time}}
{{Other uses}}
{{Other uses}}
{{pp-move-indef}}{{Cosmology}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{Good article}}
{{Use American English|date=March 2024}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2024}}
{{CS1 config|mode=cs1}}
{{Infobox
| title = Universe
| image = [[File:Hubble ultra deep field.jpg|300px]]
| caption = The [[Hubble Ultra-Deep Field]] image shows some of the most remote [[Galaxy|galaxies]] visible to present technology (diagonal is ~1/10 apparent [[Moon]] diameter)<ref name="spacetelescope.org">{{cite web |url=http://spacetelescope.org/images/heic0406a/ |title=Hubble sees galaxies galore |work=spacetelescope.org |access-date=April 30, 2017 |archive-date=May 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170504043058/http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/heic0406a/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
| label1 = [[Age of the universe|Age]] (within [[Lambda-CDM model|ΛCDM model]])
| data1 = 13.787 ± 0.020 billion years<ref name="Planck 2015" />
| label2 = Diameter
| data2 = Unknown.<ref name="Brian Greene 2011" /><br>[[Observable universe]]: {{val|8.8|e=26|u=m}} {{nowrap|(28.5 G[[parsec|pc]] or 93 G[[light-year|ly]])}}<ref>{{cite book |first1=Itzhak |last1=Bars |first2=John |last2=Terning |title=Extra Dimensions in Space and Time |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fFSMatekilIC&pg=PA27 |access-date=May 1, 2011 |date=2009 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-387-77637-8 |pages=27–}}</ref>
| label3 = Mass (ordinary matter)
| data3 = At least {{val|e=53|u=kg}}<ref name="Paul Davies 2006 43">{{cite book |first=Paul |last=Davies |date=2006 |title=The Goldilocks Enigma |pages=43ff |publisher=First Mariner Books |isbn=978-0-618-59226-5 |url=https://archive.org/details/cosmicjackpotwhy0000davi |url-access=registration}}</ref>
| label4 = Average density (with [[energy]])
| data4 = {{val|9.9|e=-27|u=kg/m3}}<ref name="wmap_universe_made_of">{{cite web |author=NASA/WMAP Science Team |date=January 24, 2014 |title=Universe 101: What is the Universe Made Of? |url=http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_matter.html |publisher=NASA |access-date=February 17, 2015 |archive-date=March 10, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080310235855/http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_matter.html |url-status=live}}</ref>
| label5 = Average temperature
| data5 = {{val|2.72548|ul=K}}<br>({{val|-270.4|ul=°C}}, {{val|-454.8|ul=°F}})<ref name=Fixsen>{{Cite journal |last1=Fixsen |first1=D.J. |date=2009 |title=The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background |journal=[[The Astrophysical Journal]] |volume=707 |issue=2 |pages=916–920 |arxiv=0911.1955 |bibcode=2009ApJ...707..916F |doi=10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916 |s2cid=119217397 |issn=0004-637X}}</ref>
| label6 = Main contents
| data6 = [[Baryon#Baryonic matter|Ordinary (baryonic)]] [[matter]] (4.9%)<br />[[Dark matter]] (26.8%)<br />[[Dark energy]] (68.3%)<ref name="planck2013parameters" />
| label7 = Shape
| data7 = [[Shape of the universe|Flat]] with 0.4% error margin<ref>{{cite web |author=NASA/WMAP Science Team |date=January 24, 2014 |url=http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html |title=Universe 101: Will the Universe expand forever? |publisher=NASA |access-date=April 16, 2015 |archive-date=March 9, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080309164248/http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html |url-status=live}}</ref>
}}


The '''universe''' is all of [[space]] and [[time]]{{efn|name=spacetime|According to [[modern physics]], particularly the [[theory of relativity]], space and time are intrinsically linked as [[spacetime]].}} and their contents.<ref name="Zeilik1998">{{cite book |title=Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics |last1=Zeilik |first1=Michael |last2=Gregory |first2=Stephen A. |year=1998 |edition=4th |publisher=Saunders College |quote=The totality of all space and time; all that is, has been, and will be. |isbn=978-0-03-006228-5}}</ref> It comprises all of [[existence]], any [[fundamental interaction]], [[physical process]] and [[physical constant]], and therefore all forms of [[matter]] and [[energy]], and the structures they form, from [[sub-atomic particles]] to entire [[Galaxy filament|galactic filaments]]. Since the early 20th century, the field of [[cosmology]] establishes that [[space and time]] emerged together at the [[Big Bang]] {{val|13.787|0.020|u=billion years}} ago<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Planck Collaboration |last2=Aghanim |first2=N. |author2-link=Nabila Aghanim |last3=Akrami |first3=Y. |last4=Ashdown |first4=M. |last5=Aumont |first5=J. |last6=Baccigalupi |first6=C. |last7=Ballardini |first7=M. |last8=Banday |first8=A. J. |last9=Barreiro |first9=R. B.|last10=Bartolo|first10=N. |last11=Basak |first11=S. |date=September 2020 |title=Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters |journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics |volume=641 |pages=A6 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 |arxiv=1807.06209 |bibcode=2020A&A...641A...6P |s2cid=119335614 |issn=0004-6361}}</ref> and that the [[Expansion of the universe|universe has been expanding]] since then. The [[observable universe|portion of the universe that we can see]] is approximately 93 billion [[light-year]]s in diameter at present, but the total size of the universe is not known.<ref name="Brian Greene 2011">{{cite book |first=Brian |last=Greene |author-link=Brian Greene |title=The Hidden Reality |publisher=[[Alfred A. Knopf]] |year=2011 |title-link=The Hidden Reality}}</ref>
The '''universe''' is commonly defined as the totality of everything that [[existence|exist]]s,<ref>
{{cite book|url=http://www.yourdictionary.com/universe|title=Webster's New World College Dictionary
|year=2010|publisher=Wiley Publishing, Inc.}}</ref> including all physical matter and energy, the planets, stars, galaxies, and the contents of intergalactic space,<ref>{{cite book|url=http://www.yourdictionary.com/universe|title=The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language|edition=4th|year=2010
|publisher=Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/universe|title=Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary}}</ref> although this usage may differ with the context (see definitions, below).
The term ''universe'' may be used in slightly different contextual senses, denoting such concepts as the ''[[cosmos]]'', the ''[[world (philosophy)|world]]'', or ''[[nature]]''.
Observations of earlier stages in the development of the universe, which can be seen at great distances, suggest that the universe has been governed by the same physical laws and constants throughout most of its extent and history.


Some of the earliest [[Timeline of cosmological theories|cosmological models]] of the universe were developed by [[ancient Greek philosophy|ancient Greek]] and [[Indian philosophy|Indian philosophers]] and were [[geocentric model|geocentric]], placing Earth at the center.<ref>{{cite book |title=From China to Paris: 2000 Years Transmission of Mathematical Ideas |first=Yvonne |last=Dold-Samplonius |author-link=Yvonne Dold-Samplonius |year=2002 |publisher=Franz Steiner Verlag}}</ref><ref name="Routledge">{{cite book |title=Medieval Science Technology and Medicine: An Encyclopedia |first1=Thomas F. |last1=Glick |first2=Steven |last2=Livesey |first3=Faith |last3=Wallis |publisher=Routledge |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-415-96930-7}}</ref> Over the centuries, more precise astronomical observations led [[Nicolaus Copernicus]] to develop the [[heliocentrism|heliocentric model]] with the [[Sun]] at the center of the [[Solar System]]. In developing the [[Newton's law of universal gravitation|law of universal gravitation]], [[Isaac Newton]] built upon Copernicus's work as well as [[Johannes Kepler]]'s [[Kepler's laws of planetary motion|laws of planetary motion]] and observations by [[Tycho Brahe]].
==History==
Throughout recorded history, several [[cosmology|cosmologies]] and [[cosmogony|cosmogonies]] have been proposed to account for observations of the universe. The earliest quantitative [[geocentric]] models were developed by the [[ancient Greece|ancient Greeks]], who proposed that the universe possesses infinite space and has existed eternally, but contains a single set of concentric [[sphere]]s of finite size&nbsp;– corresponding to the fixed stars, the [[Sun]] and various [[planet]]s&nbsp;– rotating about a spherical but unmoving [[Earth]]. Over the centuries, more precise observations and improved theories of gravity led to [[Nicolaus Copernicus|Copernicus's]] [[heliocentrism|heliocentric model]] and the [[Isaac Newton|Newtonian]] model of the [[Solar System]], respectively. Further improvements in astronomy led to the realization that the Solar System is embedded in a [[galaxy]] composed of billions of stars, the [[Milky Way]], and that other galaxies exist outside it, as far as astronomical instruments can reach. Careful studies of the distribution of these galaxies and their [[spectral line]]s have led to much of [[physical cosmology|modern cosmology]]. Discovery of the [[red shift]] and cosmic [[microwave background radiation]] revealed that the universe is expanding and apparently had a beginning.


Further observational improvements led to the realization that the Sun is one of a few hundred billion stars in the [[Milky Way]], which is one of a few hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe. Many of the stars in a galaxy [[exoplanet|have planets]]. [[End of Greatness|At the largest scale]], galaxies are distributed uniformly and the same in all directions, meaning that the universe has neither an edge nor a center. At smaller scales, galaxies are distributed in [[galaxy cluster|clusters]] and [[supercluster]]s which form immense [[galaxy filament|filaments]] and [[void (astronomy)|voids]] in space, creating a vast foam-like structure.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RLwangEACAAJ |title=An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics |last1=Carroll |first1=Bradley W. |last2=Ostlie |first2=Dale A. |year=2013 |publisher=Pearson |isbn=978-1-292-02293-2 |edition=International |pages=1173–1174 |access-date=May 16, 2018}}</ref> Discoveries in the early 20th century have suggested that the universe had a beginning and has been expanding since then.<ref name="Hawking">{{cite book |last=Hawking |first=Stephen |url=https://archive.org/details/briefhistoryofti00step_1 |title=A Brief History of Time |year=1988 |publisher=Bantam |isbn=978-0-553-05340-1 |page=[https://archive.org/details/briefhistoryofti00step_1/page/43 43] |author-link=Stephen Hawking |url-access=registration}}</ref>
[[Image:HubbleUltraDeepFieldwithScaleComparison.jpg|thumb|right|290px|This high-resolution image of the [[Hubble ultra deep field]] shows a diverse range of [[Galaxy|galaxies]], each consisting of billions of [[star]]s. The equivalent area of sky that the picture occupies is shown in the lower left corner. The smallest, reddest galaxies, about 100, are some of the most distant galaxies to have been imaged by an optical telescope, existing at the time shortly after the Big Bang.]]


According to the Big Bang theory, the energy and matter initially present have become less dense as the universe expanded. After an initial accelerated expansion called the [[inflationary epoch]] at around 10<sup>−32</sup> seconds, and the separation of the four known [[fundamental interaction|fundamental forces]], the universe gradually cooled and continued to expand, allowing the first [[subatomic particle]]s and simple [[atom]]s to form. Giant clouds of [[hydrogen]] and [[helium]] were gradually drawn to the places where matter was most [[density|dense]], forming the first galaxies, stars, and everything else seen today.
According to the prevailing scientific model of the universe, known as the [[Big bang|Big Bang]], the universe expanded from an extremely hot, dense phase called the [[Planck epoch]], in which all the matter and energy of the [[observable universe]] was concentrated. Since the Planck epoch, the universe has been [[Cosmic expansion|expanding]] to its present form, possibly with a brief period (less than [[Scientific Notation|10<sup>−32</sup>]] seconds) of [[cosmic inflation]]. Several independent experimental measurements support this theoretical [[Metric expansion of space|expansion]] and, more generally, the Big Bang theory. Recent observations indicate that this expansion is accelerating because of [[dark energy]], and that most of the matter in the universe may be in a form which cannot be detected by present instruments, and so is not accounted for in the present models of the universe; this has been named [[dark matter]]. The imprecision of current observations has hindered predictions of the [[ultimate fate of the universe]].


From studying the effects of [[gravity]] on both matter and light, it has been discovered that the universe contains much more [[matter]] than is accounted for by visible objects; stars, galaxies, nebulas and interstellar gas. This unseen matter is known as [[dark matter]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Redd |first1=Nola |title=What is Dark Matter? |url=https://www.space.com/20930-dark-matter.html |website=Space.com |access-date=February 1, 2018 |archive-date=February 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180201075430/https://www.space.com/20930-dark-matter.html |url-status=live}}</ref> In the widely accepted [[Lambda-CDM model|ΛCDM]] cosmological model, dark matter accounts for about {{val|25.8|1.1|u=%}} of the mass and energy in the universe while about {{val|69.2|1.2|u=%}} is [[dark energy]], a mysterious form of energy responsible for the [[accelerated expansion|acceleration]] of the [[expansion of the universe]].<ref name="planck_2015">{{Cite web |url=https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2016/10/aa27101-15/T9.html |title=Planck 2015 results, table 9 |access-date=May 16, 2018 |archive-date=July 27, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180727024529/https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2016/10/aa27101-15/T9.html |url-status=live}}</ref> Ordinary ('[[Baryon#Baryonic matter|baryonic]]') matter therefore composes only {{val|4.84|0.1|u=%}} of the universe.<ref name="planck_2015" /> Stars, planets, and visible gas clouds only form about 6% of this ordinary matter.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Persic |first1=Massimo |last2=Salucci |first2=Paolo |date=September 1, 1992 |title=The baryon content of the Universe |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=258 |issue=1 |pages=14P–18P |doi=10.1093/mnras/258.1.14P |doi-access=free |issn=0035-8711 |arxiv=astro-ph/0502178 |bibcode=1992MNRAS.258P..14P |s2cid=17945298}}</ref>
Current interpretations of [[observable universe|astronomical observations]] indicate that the [[age of the universe]] is 13.75 ±0.17 [[1000000000 (number)|billion]] years,<ref name="marshallaugerhilbertblandford">S. H. Suyu, P. J. Marshall, M. W. Auger, S. Hilbert, R. D. Blandford, L. V. E. Koopmans, C. D. Fassnacht and T. Treu. [http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0004-637X/711/1/201/ Dissecting the Gravitational Lens B1608+656. II. Precision Measurements of the Hubble Constant, Spatial Curvature, and the Dark Energy Equation of State.] The Astrophysical Journal, 2010; 711 (1): 201 DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/201</ref> and that the diameter of the [[observable universe]] is at least 93 billion [[light year]]s or {{val|8.80|e=26}} metres.<ref name=ly93>{{cite web | last = Lineweaver | first = Charles | coauthors = Tamara M. Davis | year = 2005 | url = http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=misconceptions-about-the-2005-03&page=5 | title = Misconceptions about the Big Bang | publisher = [[Scientific American]] | accessdate = 2008-11-06}}</ref> According to [[general relativity]], space can expand faster than the speed of light, although we can view only a small portion of the universe due to the limitation imposed by light speed. Since we cannot observe space beyond the limitations of light (or any electromagnetic radiation), it is uncertain whether the size of the universe is finite or infinite.


There are many competing hypotheses about the [[ultimate fate of the universe]] and about what, if anything, preceded the Big Bang, while other physicists and philosophers refuse to speculate, doubting that information about prior states will ever be accessible. Some physicists have suggested various [[multiverse]] hypotheses, in which the universe might be one among many.<ref name="Brian Greene 2011" /><ref name="EllisKS032" /><ref>{{Cite news |date=August 3, 2011 |title='Multiverse' theory suggested by microwave background |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-14372387 |access-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214233557/https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-14372387 |url-status=live}}</ref>
==Etymology, synonyms and definitions==
{{See also|Cosmos|Nature|World (philosophy)|Celestial spheres}}
The word ''universe'' derives from the [[Old French]] word ''Univers'', which in turn derives from the [[Latin]] word ''universum''.<ref>''The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary'', volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971, p.3518.</ref> The Latin word was used by [[Cicero]] and later Latin authors in many of the same senses as the modern [[English language|English]] word is used.<ref name="lewis_short" /> The Latin word derives from the poetic contraction ''Unvorsum''&nbsp;— first used by [[Lucretius]] in Book IV (line 262) of his ''[[On the Nature of Things|De rerum natura]]'' (''On the Nature of Things'')&nbsp;— which connects ''un, uni'' (the combining form of ''unus', or "one") with ''vorsum, versum'' (a noun made from the perfect passive participle of ''vertere'', meaning "something rotated, rolled, changed").<ref name="lewis_short">Lewis and Short, ''A Latin Dictionary'', Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-864201-6, pp. 1933, 1977–1978.</ref> Lucretius used the word in the sense "everything rolled into one, everything combined into one".


{{cosmology}}
[[Image:Foucault pendulum animated.gif|thumb|right|Artistic rendition (highly exaggerated) of a [[Foucault pendulum]] showing that the Earth is not stationary, but rotates.]]


== Definition ==
An alternative interpretation of ''unvorsum'' is "everything rotated as one" or "everything rotated by one". In this sense, it may be considered a translation of an earlier Greek word for the universe, {{polytonic|περιφορά}}, "something transported in a circle", originally used to describe a course of a meal, the food being carried around the circle of dinner guests.<ref>Liddell and Scott, ''A Greek-English Lexicon'', Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-864214-8, p.1392.</ref> This Greek word refers to [[celestial spheres|an early Greek model of the universe]], in which all matter was contained within rotating spheres centered on the Earth; according to [[Aristotle]], the rotation of [[Primum Mobile|the outermost sphere]] was responsible for the motion and change of everything within. It was natural for the Greeks to assume that the Earth was stationary and that the heavens rotated about the [[Earth]], because careful [[astronomy|astronomical]] and physical measurements (such as the [[Foucault pendulum]]) are required to prove otherwise.
[[File:NASA-HubbleLegacyFieldZoomOut-20190502.webm|thumb|upright=2.7|center|<div align="center">[[Hubble Space Telescope]] – [[Hubble Ultra-Deep Field|Ultra-Deep Field galaxies]] to Legacy field zoom out<br />(video 00:50; May 2, 2019)</div>]]


The physical universe is defined as all of [[space]] and [[time]]{{efn|name=spacetime|}} (collectively referred to as [[spacetime]]) and their contents.<ref name="Zeilik1998" /> Such contents comprise all of energy in its various forms, including [[electromagnetic radiation]] and [[matter]], and therefore planets, [[natural satellite|moons]], stars, galaxies, and the contents of [[intergalactic space]].<ref name="Britannica">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Universe |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia Britannica online |date=2012 |url=https://www.britannica.com/science/universe |access-date=February 17, 2018 |archive-date=June 9, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210609004717/https://www.britannica.com/science/universe |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Universe |title=Universe |work=Merriam-Webster Dictionary |access-date=September 21, 2012 |archive-date=October 22, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022182145/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/universe |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Universe?s=t |title=Universe |work=Dictionary.com |access-date=September 21, 2012 |archive-date=October 23, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121023004855/http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/universe?s=t |url-status=live }}</ref> The universe also includes the [[physical law]]s that influence energy and matter, such as [[conservation law]]s, [[classical mechanics]], and [[Theory of relativity|relativity]].<ref name="Schreuder2014">{{cite book|first=Duco A.|last=Schreuder|title=Vision and Visual Perception|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I7a7BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA135|date=2014|publisher=Archway Publishing|isbn=978-1-4808-1294-9|page=135|access-date=January 27, 2016|archive-date=April 22, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210422045606/https://books.google.com/books?id=I7a7BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA135|url-status=live}}</ref>
The most common term for "universe" among the ancient [[Greek philosophy|Greek philosophers]] from [[Pythagoras]] onwards was {{polytonic|τὸ πᾶν}} (The All), defined as all matter ({{polytonic|τὸ ὅλον}}) and all space ({{polytonic|τὸ κενόν}}).<ref>Liddell and Scott, pp.1345–1346.</ref><ref>{{cite book | author = Yonge, Charles Duke | year = 1870 | title = An English-Greek lexicon | publisher = American Bok Company | location = New York | pages = 567}}</ref> Other synonyms for the universe among the ancient Greek philosophers included {{polytonic|κόσμος}} (meaning the [[world (philosophy)|world]], the [[cosmos]]) and {{polytonic|φύσις}} (meaning [[Nature]], from which we derive the word [[physics]]).<ref>Liddell and Scott, pp.985, 1964.</ref> The same synonyms are found in Latin authors (''totum'', ''mundus'', ''natura'')<ref>Lewis and Short, pp. 1881–1882, 1175, 1189–1190.</ref> and survive in modern languages, e.g., the German words ''Das All'', ''Weltall'', and ''Natur'' for universe. The same synonyms are found in English, such as everything (as in the [[theory of everything]]), the cosmos (as in [[cosmology]]), the [[world (philosophy)|world]] (as in the [[many-worlds hypothesis]]), and [[Nature]] (as in [[natural law]]s or [[natural philosophy]]).<ref>OED, pp. 909, 569, 3821–3822, 1900.</ref>


The universe is often defined as "the totality of existence", or [[everything]] that exists, everything that has existed, and everything that will exist.<ref name="Schreuder2014" /> In fact, some philosophers and scientists support the inclusion of ideas and abstract concepts—such as mathematics and logic—in the definition of the universe.{{refn|1={{cite journal |last=Tegmark |first=Max |title=The Mathematical Universe |journal=Foundations of Physics |volume=38 |issue=2 |pages=101–150 |doi=10.1007/s10701-007-9186-9 |bibcode=2008FoPh...38..101T |arxiv=0704.0646 |year=2008|s2cid=9890455 }} A short version of which is available at {{cite arXiv |eprint=0709.4024 |title=Shut up and calculate|last1=Fixsen|first1=D. J.|class=physics.pop-ph|year=2007}} in reference to David Mermin's famous quote "shut up and calculate!"<ref>{{cite journal |title=Could Feynman Have Said This? |first=N. David |last=Mermin |journal=Physics Today |volume=57 |issue=5 |page=10 |date=2004 |doi=10.1063/1.1768652 |bibcode=2004PhT....57e..10M |doi-access= }}</ref>}}<ref>{{cite book|first=Jim|last=Holt|title=Why Does the World Exist?|publisher=Liveright Publishing |year=2012|page=308}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first=Timothy|last=Ferris|title=The Whole Shebang: A State-of-the-Universe(s) Report|publisher=Simon & Schuster|year=1997|page=400}}</ref> The word ''universe'' may also refer to concepts such as ''the [[cosmos]]'', ''the [[world]]'', and ''[[nature]]''.<ref>{{cite book |title=Creation Out of Nothing: A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration |page=[https://archive.org/details/creationoutofnot0000copa/page/220 220] |first1=Paul |last1=Copan |author2=William Lane Craig |publisher=Baker Academic |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-8010-2733-8 |url=https://archive.org/details/creationoutofnot0000copa/page/220 }}</ref><ref name="Bolonkin2011">{{cite book|first=Alexander|last=Bolonkin|title=Universe, Human Immortality and Future Human Evaluation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TuWQx58ZnPsC&pg=PA3|date=2011|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=978-0-12-415801-6|pages=3–|access-date=January 27, 2016|archive-date=February 8, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210208114300/https://books.google.com/books?id=TuWQx58ZnPsC&pg=PA3|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Broadest definition: reality and probability===
{{See also|Introduction to quantum mechanics|Interpretation of quantum mechanics|Many-worlds hypothesis}}


== Etymology ==
The broadest definition of the universe can be found in ''[[De divisione naturae]]'' by the [[Middle Ages|medieval]] [[philosopher]] and [[theology|theologian]] [[Johannes Scotus Eriugena]], who defined it as simply everything: everything that is created and everything that is not created. Time is not considered in Eriugena's definition; thus, his definition includes everything that exists, has existed and will exist, as well as everything that does not exist, has never existed and will never exist. This all-embracing definition was not adopted by most later philosophers, but something not entirely dissimilar reappears in [[quantum physics]], perhaps most obviously in the [[path integral formulation|path-integral formulation]] of [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]].<ref name="path_integral">{{cite book | author = Feynman RP, Hibbs AR | year = 1965 | title = Quantum Physics and Path Integrals | publisher = McGraw–Hill | location = New York | isbn = 0-07-020650-3}}<br />{{cite book | author = Zinn Justin J | year = 2004 | title = Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics | publisher = Oxford University Press | isbn = 0-19-856674-3 | oclc = 212409192}}</ref> According to that formulation, the [[probability amplitude]]s for the various outcomes of an experiment given a perfectly defined initial state of the system are determined by summing over all possible paths by which the system could progress from the initial to final state. Naturally, an experiment can have only one outcome; in other words, only one possible outcome is made real in this universe, via the mysterious process of [[measurement in quantum mechanics|quantum measurement]], also known as the [[wavefunction collapse|collapse of the wavefunction]] (but see the [[many-worlds hypothesis]] below in the [[Multiverse]] section). In this well-defined mathematical sense, even that which does not exist (all possible paths) can influence that which does finally exist (the experimental measurement). As a specific example, every [[electron]] is intrinsically identical to every other; therefore, probability amplitudes must be computed allowing for the possibility that they exchange positions, something known as [[exchange symmetry]]. This conception of the universe embracing both the existent and the non-existent loosely parallels the [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] doctrines of [[shunyata]] and [[pratitya-samutpada|interdependent development of reality]], and [[Gottfried Leibniz]]'s more modern concepts of [[contingency]] and the [[identity of indiscernibles]].
The word ''universe'' derives from the [[Old French]] word {{lang|fro|univers}}, which in turn derives from the [[Latin]] word {{lang|la|universus}}, meaning 'combined into one'.<ref>''The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary'', volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971, p. 3518. {{isbn|978-0198611172}}.</ref> The Latin word 'universum' was used by [[Cicero]] and later Latin authors in many of the same senses as the modern [[English language|English]] word is used.<ref name="lewis_short">Lewis, C.T. and Short, S (1879) ''A Latin Dictionary'', Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|0-19-864201-6}}, pp. 1933, 1977–1978.</ref>


===Definition as reality===
=== Synonyms ===
A term for ''universe'' among the ancient Greek philosophers from [[Pythagoras]] onwards was {{lang|grc|τὸ πᾶν}} ({{transliteration|grc|tò pân}}) 'the all', defined as all matter and all space, and {{lang|grc|τὸ ὅλον}} ({{transliteration|grc|tò hólon}}) 'all things', which did not necessarily include the void.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Liddell |author2=Scott |title=A Greek-English Lexicon |url=http://lsj.gr/wiki/πᾶς |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181106193619/https://lsj.translatum.gr/wiki/%CF%80%E1%BE%B6%CF%82 |archive-date=November 6, 2018 |access-date=July 30, 2022 |website=lsj.gr |quote=πᾶς}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author1=Liddell |author2=Scott |title=A Greek-English Lexicon |url=http://lsj.gr/wiki/ὅλος |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181106185336/https://lsj.translatum.gr/wiki/%E1%BD%85%CE%BB%CE%BF%CF%82 |archive-date=November 6, 2018 |access-date=July 30, 2022 |website=lsj.gr |quote=ὅλος}}</ref> Another synonym was {{lang|grc|ὁ κόσμος}} ({{transliteration|grc|ho kósmos}}) meaning 'the [[world (philosophy)|world]], the [[cosmos]]'.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Liddell |author2=Scott |title=A Greek–English Lexicon |url=https://lsj.gr/wiki/κόσμος |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181106193457/https://lsj.translatum.gr/wiki/%CE%BA%CF%8C%CF%83%CE%BC%CE%BF%CF%82 |archive-date=November 6, 2018 |access-date=July 30, 2022 |website=lsj.gr |quote=κόσμος}}</ref> Synonyms are also found in Latin authors ({{lang|la|totum}}, {{lang|la|mundus}}, {{lang|la|natura}})<ref>{{cite book |author=Lewis, C.T. |author2=Short, S |date=1879 |title=A Latin Dictionary |url=https://archive.org/details/latindictionaryf00lewi |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-864201-5 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/latindictionaryf00lewi/page/n1188 1175], 1189–1190, 1881–1882}}</ref> and survive in modern languages, e.g., the [[German language|German]] words {{lang|de|Das All}}, {{lang|de|Weltall}}, and {{lang|de|Natur}} for ''universe''. The same synonyms are found in English, such as everything (as in the [[theory of everything]]), the cosmos (as in [[cosmology]]), the world (as in the [[many-worlds interpretation]]), and [[nature]] (as in [[natural law]]s or [[natural philosophy]]).<ref>{{cite book |title=The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary |volume=II |isbn=978-0-19-861117-2 |publisher=Oxford: Oxford University Press |date=1971 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/compacteditionof03robe/page/569 569, 909, 1900, 3821–3822] |url=https://archive.org/details/compacteditionof03robe/page/569 }}</ref>
{{See also|Reality|Physics}}


== Chronology and the Big Bang ==
More customarily, the universe is defined as everything that exists, has existed, and will exist {{Citation needed|date=May 2010}}. According to this definition and our present understanding, the universe consists of three elements: [[space]] and [[time]], collectively known as [[space-time]] or the [[vacuum]]; [[matter]] and various forms of [[energy]] and [[momentum]] occupying [[space-time]]; and the [[physical law]]s that govern the first two. These elements will be discussed in greater detail below. A related definition of the term ''universe'' is everything that exists at a single moment of [[cosmological time]], such as the present, as in the sentence "The universe is now bathed uniformly in [[cosmic microwave background radiation|microwave radiation]]".
{{Main|Big Bang|Chronology of the universe}}
{{Nature timeline}}


The prevailing model for the evolution of the universe is the [[Big Bang]] theory.<ref>{{cite book|first=Joseph|last=Silk|title=Horizons of Cosmology|publisher=Templeton Pressr|date=2009|page=208}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first=Simon|last=Singh|title=Big Bang: The Origin of the Universe|publisher=Harper Perennial|date=2005|page=560|bibcode=2004biba.book.....S}}</ref> The Big Bang model states that the earliest state of the universe was an extremely hot and dense one, and that the universe subsequently expanded and cooled. The model is based on [[general relativity]] and on simplifying assumptions such as the [[homogeneity (physics)#Translation invariance|homogeneity]] and [[isotropy]] of space. A version of the model with a [[cosmological constant]] (Lambda) and [[cold dark matter]], known as the [[Lambda-CDM model]], is the simplest model that provides a reasonably good account of various observations about the universe.
The three elements of the universe (spacetime, matter-energy, and physical law) correspond roughly to the ideas of [[Aristotle]]. In his book ''[[Physics (Aristotle)|The Physics]]'' ({{polytonic|Φυσικῆς}}, from which we derive the word "physics"), Aristotle divided {{polytonic|τὸ πᾶν}} (everything) into three roughly analogous elements: ''matter'' (the stuff of which the universe is made), ''form'' (the arrangement of that matter in space) and ''change'' (how matter is created, destroyed or altered in its properties, and similarly, how form is altered). [[Physical law]]s were conceived as the rules governing the properties of matter, form and their changes. Later philosophers such as [[Lucretius]], [[Averroes]], [[Avicenna]] and [[Baruch Spinoza]] altered or refined these divisions{{Citation needed|date=May 2010}}; for example, Averroes and Spinoza discern ''[[natura naturans]]'' (the active principles governing the universe) from ''[[natura naturata]]'', the passive elements upon which the former act.
[[File:CMB Timeline300 no WMAP.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|In this schematic diagram, time passes from left to right, with the universe represented by a disk-shaped "slice" at any given time. Time and size are not to scale. To make the early stages visible, the time to the afterglow stage (really the first 0.003%) is stretched and the subsequent expansion (really by 1,100 times to the present) is largely suppressed.]]


The initial hot, dense state is called the [[Planck epoch]], a brief period extending from time zero to one [[Planck time]] unit of approximately 10<sup>−43</sup> seconds. During the Planck epoch, all types of matter and all types of energy were concentrated into a dense state, and [[gravity]]—currently the weakest by far of the [[fundamental interactions|four known forces]]—is believed to have been as strong as the other fundamental forces, and all the forces may have been [[grand unification|unified]]. The physics controlling this very early period (including [[quantum gravity]] in the Planck epoch) is not understood, so we cannot say what, if anything, happened [[Big Bang#Pre–Big Bang cosmology|before time zero]]. Since the Planck epoch, [[expansion of the universe|the universe has been expanding]] to its present scale, with a very short but intense period of [[cosmic inflation]] speculated to have occurred within the first [[Scientific Notation|10<sup>−32</sup>]] seconds.<ref name="Sivaram">{{cite journal |author=Sivaram |first=C. |date=1986 |title=Evolution of the Universe through the Planck epoch |journal=Astrophysics and Space Science |volume=125 |issue=1 |pages=189–199 |bibcode=1986Ap&SS.125..189S |doi=10.1007/BF00643984 |s2cid=123344693}}</ref> This initial period of inflation would explain why space appears to be [[Flatness problem|very flat]].
===Definition as connected space-time===
{{See also|Chaotic Inflation theory}}


Within the first fraction of a second of the universe's existence, the four fundamental forces had separated. As the universe continued to cool from its inconceivably hot state, various types of [[subatomic particles]] were able to form in short periods of time known as the [[quark epoch]], the [[hadron epoch]], and the [[lepton epoch]]. Together, these epochs encompassed less than 10 seconds of time following the Big Bang. These [[elementary particle]]s associated stably into ever larger combinations, including stable [[proton]]s and [[neutron]]s, which then formed more complex [[atomic nuclei]] through [[nuclear fusion]].<ref name="Johnson 474–478">{{Cite journal |last=Johnson |first=Jennifer A. |date=February 2019 |title=Populating the periodic table: Nucleosynthesis of the elements |journal=Science |language=en |volume=363 |issue=6426 |pages=474–478 |doi=10.1126/science.aau9540 |pmid=30705182 |bibcode=2019Sci...363..474J |s2cid=59565697 |issn=0036-8075|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="durrer"/>
It is possible to conceive of disconnected [[space-time]]s, each existing but unable to interact with one another. An easily visualized metaphor is a group of separate [[soap bubble]]s, in which observers living on one soap bubble cannot interact with those on other soap bubbles, even in principle. According to one common terminology, each "soap bubble" of space-time is denoted as a universe, whereas our particular [[space-time]] is denoted as ''the universe'', just as we call our moon ''the [[Moon]]''. The entire collection of these separate space-times is denoted as the [[multiverse]].<ref name="EllisKS03">{{cite journal
| last = Ellis
| first = George F.R.
| authorlink = George Ellis
| coauthors = U. Kirchner, W.R. Stoeger
| title = Multiverses and physical cosmology
| journal = Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
| volume = 347
| issue =
3| pages = 921–936
| publisher =
| year = 2004
| url = http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0305292
| doi =10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07261.x
| id =
| accessdate = 2007-01-09
| format = subscription required}}</ref> In principle, the other unconnected universes may have different [[dimension]]alities and [[topology|topologies]] of [[space-time]], different forms of [[matter]] and [[energy]], and different [[physical law]]s and [[physical constant]]s, although such possibilities are currently speculative.


This process, known as [[Big Bang nucleosynthesis]], lasted for about 17 minutes and ended about 20 minutes after the Big Bang, so only the fastest and simplest reactions occurred. About 25% of the [[proton]]s and all the [[neutron]]s in the universe, by mass, were converted to [[helium]], with small amounts of [[deuterium]] (a [[isotope|form]] of [[hydrogen]]) and traces of [[lithium]]. Any other [[chemical element|element]] was only formed in very tiny quantities. The other 75% of the protons remained unaffected, as [[hydrogen]] nuclei.<ref name="Johnson 474–478"/><ref name="durrer">{{cite book|last=Durrer |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Durrer |title=The Cosmic Microwave Background |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-521-84704-9}}</ref>{{rp|27–42}}
===Definition as observable reality===
{{See also|Observable universe|Observational cosmology}}


After nucleosynthesis ended, the universe entered a period known as the [[photon epoch]]. During this period, the universe was still far too hot for matter to form neutral [[atom]]s, so it contained a hot, dense, foggy [[Plasma (physics)|plasma]] of negatively charged [[electron]]s, neutral [[neutrino]]s and positive nuclei. After about 377,000 years, the universe had cooled enough that electrons and nuclei could form the first stable [[atom]]s. This is known as [[recombination (cosmology)|recombination]] for historical reasons; electrons and nuclei were combining for the first time. Unlike plasma, neutral atoms are [[Opacity (optics)|transparent]] to many [[wavelength]]s of light, so for the first time the universe also became transparent. The photons released ("[[photon decoupling|decoupled]]") when these atoms formed can still be seen today; they form the [[cosmic microwave background]] (CMB).<ref name="durrer"/>{{rp|15–27}}
According to a still-more-restrictive definition, the universe is everything within our connected [[space-time]] that could have a chance to interact with us and vice versa.{{Citation needed|date=May 2010}} According to the [[general relativity|general theory of relativity]], some regions of [[space]] may never interact with ours even in the lifetime of the universe, due to the finite [[speed of light]] and the ongoing [[expansion of space]]. For example, radio messages sent from Earth may never reach some regions of space, even if the universe would live forever; space may expand faster than light can traverse it. It is worth emphasizing that those distant regions of space are taken to exist and be part of reality as much as we are; yet we can never interact with them. The spatial region within which we can affect and be affected is denoted as the [[observable universe]]. Strictly speaking, the observable universe depends on the location of the observer. By traveling, an observer can come into contact with a greater region of space-time than an observer who remains still, so that the observable universe for the former is larger than for the latter. Nevertheless, even the most rapid traveler may not be able to interact with all of space. Typically, the observable universe is taken to mean the universe observable from our vantage point in the Milky Way Galaxy.


As the universe expands, the [[energy density]] of [[electromagnetic radiation]] decreases more quickly than does that of [[matter]] because the energy of each photon decreases as it is [[cosmological redshift|cosmologically redshifted]]. At around 47,000 years, the [[energy density]] of matter became larger than that of photons and [[neutrino]]s, and began to dominate the large scale behavior of the universe. This marked the end of the [[radiation-dominated era]] and the start of the [[matter-dominated era]].<ref name="steane">{{cite book|first=Andrew M. |last=Steane |title=Relativity Made Relatively Easy, Volume 2: General Relativity and Cosmology |isbn=978-0-192-89564-6 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2021}}</ref>{{rp|390}}
== Size, age, contents, structure, and laws ==<!-- [[Hubble's law]] links to this section -->
{{Main|Observable universe|Age of the universe|Large-scale structure of the universe|Abundance of the chemical elements}}


In the earliest stages of the universe, tiny fluctuations within the universe's density led to [[filament (cosmology)|concentrations]] of [[dark matter]] gradually forming. Ordinary matter, attracted to these by [[gravity]], formed large gas clouds and eventually, stars and galaxies, where the dark matter was most dense, and [[Void (astronomy)|voids]] where it was least dense. After around 100–300 million years,<ref name="steane"/>{{rp|333}} the first [[star]]s formed, known as [[Population III]] stars. These were probably very massive, luminous, [[metallicity|non metallic]] and short-lived. They were responsible for the gradual [[reionization]] of the universe between about 200–500 million years and 1 billion years, and also for seeding the universe with elements heavier than helium, through [[stellar nucleosynthesis]].<ref>{{cite news |work=Scientific American |title=The First Stars in the Universe |first1=Richard B. |last1=Larson |first2=Volker |last2=Bromm |name-list-style=amp |date=March 2002 |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-first-stars-in-the-un/ |access-date=June 9, 2015 |archive-date=June 11, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150611032732/http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-first-stars-in-the-un/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
The universe is immensely large and possibly infinite in volume. The region visible from Earth (the [[observable universe]]) is a sphere with a radius of about 46 billion [[light years]],<ref>{{cite web | last = Lineweaver | first = Charles | coauthors = Tamara M. Davis | year = 2005 | url = http://space.mit.edu/~kcooksey/teaching/AY5/MisconceptionsabouttheBigBang_ScientificAmerican.pdf | title = Misconceptions about the Big Bang | publisher = [[Scientific American]] | accessdate = 2007-03-05}}</ref> based on where the [[metric expansion of space|expansion of space]] has [[comoving distance|taken]] the most distant objects observed. For comparison, the diameter of a typical [[galaxy]] is only 30,000 light-years, and the typical distance between two neighboring galaxies is only 3 million [[light-years]].<ref>Rindler (1977), p.196.</ref> As an example, our [[Milky Way]] Galaxy is roughly 100,000 light years in diameter,<ref>{{cite web
| last = Christian
| first = Eric
| last2 = Samar
| first2 = Safi-Harb
| title = How large is the Milky Way?
| url=http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980317b.html
| accessdate = 2007-11-28 }}</ref> and our nearest sister galaxy, the [[Andromeda Galaxy]], is located roughly 2.5 million light years away.<ref>{{cite journal
| author=I. Ribas, C. Jordi, F. Vilardell, E.L. Fitzpatrick, R.W. Hilditch, F. Edward
| title=First Determination of the Distance and Fundamental Properties of an Eclipsing Binary in the Andromeda Galaxy
| journal=Astrophysical Journal
| year=2005
|volume=635
| issue=1
| pages=L37–L40
| bibcode=2005ApJ...635L..37R
| doi = 10.1086/499161
}}<br />{{cite journal
| author=McConnachie, A. W.; Irwin, M. J.; Ferguson, A. M. N.; Ibata, R. A.; Lewis, G. F.; Tanvir, N.
| title=Distances and metallicities for 17 Local Group galaxies
| journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
| year=2005
|volume=356
|issue=4
| pages=979–997
| bibcode=2005MNRAS.356..979M
| doi = 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08514.x
}}</ref> There are probably more than 100 billion (10<sup>11</sup>) [[Galaxy|galaxies]] in the observable universe.<ref>{{cite web | last = Mackie | first = Glen |date= February 1, 2002 | url = http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~gmackie/billions.html | title = To see the Universe in a Grain of Taranaki Sand | publisher = Swinburne University | accessdate = 2006-12-20 }}</ref> Typical galaxies range from [[dwarf galaxy|dwarfs]] with as few as ten million<ref>{{cite web | date=2000-05-03 | url = http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2000/pr-12-00.html
| title = Unveiling the Secret of a Virgo Dwarf Galaxy
| publisher = ESO | accessdate = 2007-01-03 }}</ref> (10<sup>7</sup>) [[star]]s up to giants with one [[Orders of magnitude (numbers)#1012|trillion]]<ref name="M101">{{cite web | date=2006-02-28 | url = http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hst_spiral_m10.html | title = Hubble's Largest Galaxy Portrait Offers a New High-Definition View
| publisher = NASA | accessdate = 2007-01-03 }}</ref> (10<sup>12</sup>) stars, all orbiting the galaxy's center of mass. Thus, a very rough estimate from these numbers would suggest there are around one [[sextillion]] (10<sup>21</sup>) stars in the observable universe; though a 2010 study by astronomers resulted in a figure of 300 sextillion (3{{e|23}}).<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2010-12-01-dwarf-stars_N.htm |title=Universe holds billions more stars than previously thought |author=Vergano, Dan |date=1 December 2010 |work= [[USA Today]] |accessdate=14 December 2010}}</ref>


The universe also contains a mysterious energy—possibly a [[scalar field]]—called [[dark energy]], the density of which does not change over time. After about 9.8 billion years, the universe had expanded sufficiently so that the density of matter was less than the density of dark energy, marking the beginning of the present [[dark-energy-dominated era]].<ref>[[Barbara Ryden|Ryden, Barbara]], "Introduction to Cosmology", 2006, eqn. 6.33</ref> In this era, the expansion of the universe is [[accelerating expansion of the universe|accelerating]] due to dark energy.
[[File:Cosmological Composition - Pie Chart.png|thumb|450px|The universe is believed to be mostly composed of [[dark energy]] and [[dark matter]], both of which are poorly understood at present. Less than 5% of the universe is ordinary matter, a relatively small contribution.]]


== Physical properties ==
The observable matter is spread uniformly (''homogeneously'') throughout the universe, when averaged over distances longer than 300 million light-years.<ref>{{cite journal | author=N. Mandolesi, P. Calzolari, S. Cortiglioni, F. Delpino, G. Sironi | title=Large-scale homogeneity of the Universe measured by the microwave background | journal=Letters to Nature | year=1986 |volume=319 | issue=6056 | pages=751–753 | doi= 10.1038/319751a0 }}</ref> However, on smaller length-scales, matter is observed to form "clumps", i.e., to cluster hierarchically; many [[atoms]] are condensed into [[star]]s, most stars into galaxies, most galaxies into [[galaxy groups and clusters|clusters, superclusters]] and, finally, the [[large-scale structure of the universe|largest-scale structures]] such as the [[Great Wall (astronomy)|Great Wall of galaxies]]. The observable matter of the universe is also spread ''isotropically'', meaning that no direction of observation seems different from any other; each region of the sky has roughly the same content.<ref>{{cite web | last = Hinshaw | first = Gary |date= November 29, 2006 | url = http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm.html | title = New Three Year Results on the Oldest Light in the Universe | publisher = NASA WMAP | accessdate = 2006-08-10 }}</ref> The universe is also bathed in a highly isotropic [[microwave]] [[electromagnetic radiation|radiation]] that corresponds to a [[thermal equilibrium]] [[blackbody spectrum]] of roughly 2.725 [[kelvin]].<ref>{{cite web | last = Hinshaw | first = Gary |date= December 15, 2005 | url = http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest3.html | title = Tests of the Big Bang: The CMB | publisher = NASA WMAP | accessdate = 2007-01-09 }}</ref> The hypothesis that the large-scale universe is homogeneous and isotropic is known as the [[cosmological principle]],<ref>Rindler (1977), p. 202.</ref> which is [[End of Greatness|supported by astronomical observations]].
{{Main|Observable universe|Age of the universe|Expansion of the universe}}
Of the four [[fundamental interaction]]s, [[gravitation]] is the dominant at astronomical length scales. Gravity's effects are cumulative; by contrast, the effects of positive and negative charges tend to cancel one another, making electromagnetism relatively insignificant on astronomical length scales. The remaining two interactions, the [[weak nuclear force|weak]] and [[strong nuclear force]]s, decline very rapidly with distance; their effects are confined mainly to sub-atomic length scales.<ref name="OpenStax-college-physics"/>{{rp|1470}}


The universe appears to have much more [[matter]] than [[antimatter]], an asymmetry possibly related to the [[CP violation]].<ref>{{cite web|date=October 28, 2003 |url=http://www.pparc.ac.uk/Ps/bbs/bbs_antimatter.asp |title=Antimatter |publisher=Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council |access-date=August 10, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040307075727/http://www.pparc.ac.uk/Ps/bbs/bbs_antimatter.asp |archive-date=March 7, 2004 }}</ref> This imbalance between matter and antimatter is partially responsible for the existence of all matter existing today, since matter and antimatter, if equally produced at the [[Big Bang]], would have completely annihilated each other and left only [[photon]]s as a result of their interaction.<ref name="NAT-20171020">{{cite journal |author=Smorra C. |display-authors=et al |title=A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment |date=October 20, 2017 |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=550 |issue=7676 |pages=371–374 |doi=10.1038/nature24048 |pmid=29052625 |bibcode=2017Natur.550..371S |s2cid=205260736 |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/2291601/files/nature24048.pdf |doi-access=free |access-date=August 25, 2019 |archive-date=October 30, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181030045315/https://cds.cern.ch/record/2291601/files/nature24048.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> These laws are [[Gauss's law]] and the non-divergence of the [[stress–energy–momentum pseudotensor]].<ref>{{harvtxt|Landau|Lifshitz|1975|p=361}}: "It is interesting to note that in a closed space the total electric charge must be zero. Namely, every closed surface in a finite space encloses on each side of itself a finite region of space. Therefore, the flux of the electric field through this surface is equal, on the one hand, to the total charge located in the interior of the surface, and on the other hand to the total charge outside of it, with opposite sign. Consequently, the sum of the charges on the two sides of the surface is zero."</ref>
The present overall [[density]] of the universe is very low, roughly 9.9 × 10<sup>−30</sup> grams per cubic centimetre. This mass-energy appears to consist of 73% [[dark energy]], 23% [[cold dark matter]] and 4% [[baryonic matter|ordinary matter]]. Thus the density of atoms is on the order of a single hydrogen atom for every four cubic meters of volume.<ref>{{cite web | last = Hinshaw | first = Gary |date= February 10, 2006 | url = http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101matter.html | title = What is the Universe Made Of? | publisher = NASA WMAP | accessdate = 2007-01-04}}</ref> The properties of dark energy and dark matter are largely unknown. Dark matter [[gravity|gravitates]] as ordinary matter, and thus works to slow the [[metric expansion of space|expansion of the universe]]; by contrast, dark energy [[accelerating universe|accelerates its expansion]].


=== Size and regions ===
The [[Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe|most precise estimate]] of the [[age of the universe|universe's age]] is 13.73±0.12 billion years old, based on observations of the [[cosmic microwave background radiation]].<ref name="NASA_age">{{cite web | title = Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results | url=http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/dr3/pub_papers/fiveyear/basic_results/wmap5basic.pdf|format=PDF|publisher=nasa.gov|accessdate=2008-03-06}}</ref> Independent estimates (based on measurements such as [[radioactive dating]]) agree, although they are less precise, ranging from 11–20 billion years<ref>{{cite web
{{See also|Observational cosmology}}
| author =Britt RR
[[File:Extended universe logarithmic illustration (English annotated).png|thumb|upright=2.4|Illustration of the observable universe, centered on the Sun. The distance scale is [[logarithmic scale|logarithmic]]. Due to the finite speed of light, we see more distant parts of the universe at earlier times.]]
| title =Age of Universe Revised, Again
| publisher =[[space.com]]
| date = 2003-01-03
| url = http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/age_universe_030103.html
| accessdate = 2007-01-08}}</ref>
to 13–15 billion years.<ref>{{cite web
| author = Wright EL
| title =Age of the Universe
| publisher =[[UCLA]]
| year = 2005
| url = http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/age.html
| accessdate = 2007-01-08
}}<br />{{cite journal
| author = Krauss LM, Chaboyer B
| title =Age Estimates of Globular Clusters in the Milky Way: Constraints on Cosmology
| journal =[[Science (journal)|Science]]
| volume = 299
| issue = 5603
| pages = 65–69
| publisher =[[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]
| date = 3 January 2003
| url = http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/299/5603/65?ijkey=3D7y0Qonz=GO7ig.&keytype=3Dref&siteid=3Dsci
| accessdate = 2007-01-08
| doi =10.1126/science.1075631
| pmid =12511641}}</ref> The universe has not been the same at all times in its history; for example, the relative populations of [[quasar]]s and galaxies have changed and [[space]] itself appears to have [[metric expansion of space|expanded]]. This expansion accounts for how Earth-bound scientists can observe the light from a galaxy 30 billion light years away, even if that light has traveled for only 13 billion years; the very space between them has expanded. This expansion is consistent with the observation that the light from distant galaxies has been [[redshift]]ed; the [[photon]]s emitted have been stretched to longer [[wavelength]]s and lower [[frequency]] during their journey. The rate of this spatial expansion is [[accelerating universe|accelerating]], based on studies of [[Type Ia supernova]]e and corroborated by other data.


Due to the finite [[speed of light]], there is a limit (known as the [[particle horizon]]) to how far light can travel over the [[age of the universe]].
The [[abundance of the chemical elements|relative fractions]] of different [[chemical element]]s&nbsp;— particularly the lightest atoms such as [[hydrogen]], [[deuterium]] and [[helium]]&nbsp;— seem to be identical throughout the universe and throughout its observable history.<ref>{{cite web | last = Wright | first = Edward L. |date= September 12, 2004 | url = http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/BBNS.html | title = Big Bang Nucleosynthesis | publisher = UCLA | accessdate = 2007-01-05 }}<br />{{cite journal | author=M. Harwit, M. Spaans | title=Chemical Composition of the Early Universe | journal=The Astrophysical Journal | year=2003 |volume=589 |issue=1 | pages=53–57 | bibcode=2003ApJ...589...53H | doi = 10.1086/374415}}<br />{{cite journal | author=C. Kobulnicky, E. D. Skillman | title=Chemical Composition of the Early Universe | journal=Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society | year=1997 |volume=29 | pages=1329 | bibcode=1997AAS...191.7603K }}</ref> The universe seems to have much more [[matter]] than [[antimatter]], an asymmetry possibly related to the observations of [[CP violation]].<ref>{{cite web |date= October 28, 2003 | url = http://www.pparc.ac.uk/ps/bbs/bbs_antimatter.asp | title = Antimatter | publisher = Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council | accessdate = 2006-08-10 }}</ref> The universe appears to have no net [[electric charge]], and therefore [[gravity]] appears to be the dominant interaction on cosmological length scales. The universe also appears to have neither net [[momentum]] nor [[angular momentum]]. The absence of net charge and momentum would follow from accepted physical laws ([[Gauss's law]] and the non-divergence of the [[stress-energy-momentum pseudotensor]], respectively), if the universe were finite.<ref>Landau and Lifshitz (1975), p.361.</ref>
The spatial region from which we can receive light is called the [[observable universe]]. The [[Comoving distance|proper distance]] (measured at a fixed time) between Earth and the edge of the observable universe is 46 billion light-years<ref name="Extra Dimensions in Space and Time">{{cite book|first1=Itzhak|last1=Bars|first2=John|last2=Terning|title=Extra Dimensions in Space and Time|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fFSMatekilIC&pg=PA27|access-date=October 19, 2018|date=2018|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-0-387-77637-8|pages=27–}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Crane |first=Leah |date=29 June 2024 |editor-last=de Lange |editor-first=Catherine |title=How big is the universe, really? |work=New Scientist |page=31}}</ref> (14 billion [[parsecs]]), making the [[Observable universe#Size|diameter of the observable universe]] about 93 billion light-years (28 billion parsecs).<ref name="Extra Dimensions in Space and Time" /> Although the distance traveled by light from the edge of the observable universe is close to the [[age of the universe]] times the speed of light, {{convert|13.8|e9ly|e9pc}}, the proper distance is larger because the edge of the observable universe and the Earth have since moved further apart.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://earthsky.org/space/what-is-a-light-year |title=What is a light-year? |work=EarthSky |date=February 20, 2013 |first=Christopher |last=Crockett |access-date=February 20, 2015 |archive-date=February 20, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150220203559/http://earthsky.org/space/what-is-a-light-year |url-status=live }}</ref>


For comparison, the diameter of a typical [[galaxy]] is 30,000 light-years (9,198 [[parsecs]]), and the typical distance between two neighboring galaxies is 3 million [[light-years]] (919.8 kiloparsecs).<ref name="r196">[[#Rindler|Rindler]], p. 196.</ref> As an example, the [[Milky Way]] is roughly 100,000–180,000 light-years in diameter,<ref>{{cite web
[[Image:Elementary particle interactions.svg|thumb|left|300px|The [[elementary particle]]s from which the universe is constructed. Six [[lepton]]s and six [[quark]]s comprise most of the [[matter]]; for example, the [[proton]]s and [[neutron]]s of [[atomic nucleus|atomic nuclei]] are composed of quarks, and the ubiquitous [[electron]] is a lepton. These particles interact via the [[gauge boson]]s shown in the middle row, each corresponding to a particular type of [[gauge symmetry]]. The [[Higgs boson]] (as yet unobserved) is believed to confer [[mass]] on the particles with which it is connected. The [[graviton]], a supposed gauge boson for [[gravity]], is not shown.]]
|last1=Christian|first1=Eric
|last2=Samar|first2=Safi-Harb |author-link2=Samar Safi-Harb
|title=How large is the Milky Way?
|url=http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980317b.html
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19990202064645/http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980317b.html
|url-status=dead
|archive-date=February 2, 1999
|access-date=November 28, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.space.com/29270-milky-way-size-larger-than-thought.html|title=Size of the Milky Way Upgraded, Solving Galaxy Puzzle|publisher=Space.com|last=Hall|first=Shannon|date=May 4, 2015|access-date=June 9, 2015|archive-date=June 7, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150607104254/http://www.space.com/29270-milky-way-size-larger-than-thought.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and the nearest sister galaxy to the Milky Way, the [[Andromeda Galaxy]], is located roughly 2.5 million light-years away.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Ribas |first1=I. |last2=Jordi |first2=C. |last3=Vilardell |first3=F. |last4=Fitzpatrick |first4=E. L. |last5=Hilditch |first5=R. W. |last6=Guinan |first6=F. Edward |date=2005 |title=First Determination of the Distance and Fundamental Properties of an Eclipsing Binary in the Andromeda Galaxy |journal=Astrophysical Journal |volume=635 |issue=1 |pages=L37–L40 |arxiv=astro-ph/0511045 |bibcode=2005ApJ...635L..37R |doi=10.1086/499161 |s2cid=119522151}}<br />{{cite journal |author=McConnachie, A.W. |author2=Irwin, M.J. |author3=Ferguson, A.M.N. |author3-link=Annette Ferguson |author4=Ibata, R.A. |author5=Lewis, G.F. |author6=Tanvir, N. |author6-link=Nial Tanvir |date=2005 |title=Distances and metallicities for 17 Local Group galaxies |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=356 |issue=4 |pages=979–997 |arxiv=astro-ph/0410489 |bibcode=2005MNRAS.356..979M |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08514.x|doi-access=free }}</ref>


Because humans cannot observe space beyond the edge of the observable universe, it is unknown whether the size of the universe in its totality is finite or infinite.<ref name="Brian Greene 2011" /><ref>{{cite web|title=How can space travel faster than the speed of light?|first=Vanessa |last=Janek |website=Universe Today|date=February 20, 2015|url=http://www.universetoday.com/119068/how-can-space-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/|access-date=June 6, 2015|archive-date=December 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211216061309/https://www.universetoday.com/119068/how-can-space-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Is faster-than-light travel or communication possible? Section: Expansion of the Universe |url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html#13 |work=Philip Gibbs |date=1997 |access-date=June 6, 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100310205556/http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html#13 |archive-date=March 10, 2010 }}</ref> Estimates suggest that the whole universe, if finite, must be more than 250 times larger than a [[Hubble volume|Hubble sphere]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vardanyan |first1=M. |last2=Trotta |first2=R. |last3=Silk |first3=J. |date=January 28, 2011 |title=Applications of Bayesian model averaging to the curvature and size of the Universe |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters |volume=413 |issue=1 |pages=L91–L95 |arxiv=1101.5476 |bibcode=2011MNRAS.413L..91V |doi=10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01040.x |doi-access=free |s2cid=2616287}}</ref> Some disputed<ref>{{cite web |url=https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/06/urban_myths_in_contemporary_co.html |title=Urban Myths in Contemporary Cosmology |last=Schreiber |first=Urs |date=June 6, 2008 |website=The n-Category Café |publisher=[[University of Texas at Austin]] |access-date=June 1, 2020 |archive-date=July 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200701041542/https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/06/urban_myths_in_contemporary_co.html |url-status=live }}</ref> estimates for the total size of the universe, if finite, reach as high as <math>10^{10^{10^{122}}}</math> megaparsecs, as implied by a suggested resolution of the [[Hartle–Hawking state|No-Boundary Proposal]].<ref>{{cite journal|arxiv=hep-th/0610199| author=[[Don Page (physicist)|Don N. Page]]|year=2007|title=Susskind's Challenge to the Hartle-Hawking No-Boundary Proposal and Possible Resolutions| journal=Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics| volume=2007| issue=1| page=004| doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/004| bibcode=2007JCAP...01..004P| s2cid=17403084}}</ref>{{efn|name=bignumber|Although listed in [[parsec|megaparsecs]] by the cited source, this number is so vast that its digits would remain virtually unchanged for all intents and purposes regardless of which conventional units it is listed in, whether it to be [[nanometers]] or [[parsec|gigaparsecs]], as the differences would disappear into the error.}}
The universe appears to have a smooth [[space-time continuum]] consisting of three [[space|spatial]] [[dimension]]s and one temporal ([[time]]) dimension. On the average, [[3-space|space]] is observed to be very nearly flat (close to zero [[curvature]]), meaning that [[Euclidean geometry]] is experimentally true with high accuracy throughout most of the Universe.<ref name="Shape">[http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm/mr_content.html WMAP Mission: Results&nbsp;– Age of the Universe]</ref> Spacetime also appears to have a [[simply connected space|simply connected]] [[topology]], at least on the length-scale of the observable universe. However, present observations cannot exclude the possibilities that the universe has more dimensions and that its spacetime may have a multiply connected global topology, in analogy with the cylindrical or [[toroid]]al topologies of two-dimensional [[space]]s.<ref name="_spacetime_topology">{{cite conference
| first = Jean-Pierre
| last = Luminet
| authorlink =
| coauthors = Boudewijn F. Roukema
| title = Topology of the Universe: Theory and Observations
| booktitle = Proceedings of Cosmology School held at Cargese, Corsica, August 1998
| pages =
| publisher =
| year = 1999
| location =
| url = http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9901364
| doi =
| id =
| accessdate = 2007-01-05
}}<br />{{cite journal
| last = Luminet
| first = Jean-Pierre
| authorlink =
| coauthors = J. Weeks, A. Riazuelo, R. Lehoucq, J.-P. Uzan
| title = Dodecahedral space topology as an explanation for weak wide-angle temperature correlations in the cosmic microwave background
| journal = [[Nature (journal)|Nature]]
| volume = 425
| issue =
6958| pages = 593–5
| publisher =
| year=2003
| pmid = 14534579
| url = http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310253
| doi =10.1038/nature01944
| id =
| accessdate = 2007-01-09
| format = subscription required}}</ref>


=== Age and expansion ===
The universe appears to behave in a manner that regularly follows a set of [[physical law]]s and [[physical constant]]s.<ref>{{cite web | last = Strobel | first = Nick |date= May 23, 2001 | url = http://www.astronomynotes.com/starprop/s7.htm | title = The Composition of Stars | publisher = Astronomy Notes | accessdate = 2007-01-04 }}<br />{{cite web | url=http://www.faqs.org/faqs/astronomy/faq/part4/section-4.html | title = Have physical constants changed with time? | publisher = Astrophysics (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) | accessdate = 2007-01-04 }}</ref> According to the prevailing [[Standard Model]] of physics, all matter is composed of three generations of [[lepton]]s and [[quark]]s, both of which are [[fermion]]s. These [[elementary particle]]s interact via at most three [[fundamental interaction]]s: the [[electroweak]] interaction which includes [[electromagnetism]] and the [[weak nuclear force]]; the [[strong nuclear force]] described by [[quantum chromodynamics]]; and [[gravity]], which is best described at present by [[general relativity]]. The first two interactions can be described by [[renormalization|renormalized]] [[quantum field theory]], and are mediated by [[gauge boson]]s that correspond to a particular type of [[gauge symmetry]]. A renormalized quantum field theory of general relativity has not yet been achieved, although various forms of [[string theory]] seem promising. The theory of [[special relativity]] is believed to hold throughout the universe, provided that the spatial and temporal length scales are sufficiently short; otherwise, the more general theory of general relativity must be applied. There is no explanation for the particular values that [[physical constant]]s appear to have throughout our universe, such as [[Planck's constant]] ''h'' or the [[gravitational constant]] ''G''. Several [[conservation law]]s have been identified, such as the [[conservation of charge]], [[conservation of momentum|momentum]], [[conservation of angular momentum|angular momentum]] and [[conservation of energy|energy]]; in many cases, these conservation laws can be related to [[symmetry|symmetries]] or [[Bianchi identity|mathematical identities]].
{{Main|Age of the universe|Expansion of the universe}}
Assuming that the [[Lambda-CDM model]] is correct, the measurements of the parameters using a variety of techniques by numerous experiments yield a best value of the age of the universe at 13.799 [[Measurement uncertainty|±]] 0.021 billion years, as of 2015.<ref name="Planck 2015">{{cite journal|author=Planck Collaboration|year=2016|title=Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters|journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics|volume=594|page=A13, Table 4|arxiv=1502.01589|bibcode=2016A&A...594A..13P|doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201525830|s2cid=119262962}}</ref>


Over time, the universe and its contents have evolved. For example, the relative population of [[quasar]]s and galaxies has changed<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/galaxy-collisions-give-birth-quasars |work=Science News |title=Galaxy Collisions Give Birth to Quasars |date=March 25, 2010 |first=Phil |last=Berardelli |access-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-date=March 25, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220325005200/https://www.science.org/content/article/galaxy-collisions-give-birth-quasars |url-status=live }}</ref> and the [[expansion of the universe|universe has expanded]]. This expansion is inferred from the observation that the light from distant galaxies has been [[redshift]]ed, which implies that the galaxies are receding from us. Analyses of [[Type Ia supernova]]e indicate that the [[accelerating expansion of the Universe|expansion is accelerating]].<ref name="riess">{{cite journal|author=Riess, Adam G.|year=1998|title=Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant|journal=Astronomical Journal|volume=116|issue=3|pages=1009–1038|arxiv=astro-ph/9805201 |doi=10.1086/300499|bibcode=1998AJ....116.1009R|last2=Filippenko|last3=Challis|last4=Clocchiatti|last5=Diercks|last6=Garnavich|last7=Gilliland|last8=Hogan|last9=Jha|last10=Kirshner|last11=Leibundgut|last12=Phillips|last13=Reiss|last14=Schmidt|last15=Schommer|last16=Smith|last17=Spyromilio|last18=Stubbs|last19=Suntzeff|last20=Tonry|s2cid=15640044|author-link=Adam Riess}}</ref><ref name="perlmutter">{{cite journal|author=Perlmutter, S. |journal=Astrophysical Journal|volume=517|issue=2|pages=565–586|year=1999|title=Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae|arxiv=astro-ph/9812133 |doi=10.1086/307221|bibcode=1999ApJ...517..565P|last2=Aldering|last3=Goldhaber|last4=Knop|last5=Nugent|last6=Castro|last7=Deustua|last8=Fabbro|last9=Goobar|last10=Groom|last11=Hook|last12=Kim|last13=Kim|last14=Lee|last15=Nunes|last16=Pain|last17=Pennypacker|last18=Quimby|last19=Lidman|last20=Ellis|last21=Irwin|last22=McMahon|last23=Ruiz-Lapuente|last24=Walton|last25=Schaefer|last26=Boyle|last27=Filippenko|last28=Matheson|last29=Fruchter|last30=Panagia|s2cid=118910636|display-authors=29|author-link=Saul Perlmutter}}</ref>
===Fine tuning===
{{main|Fine-tuned Universe}}
It appears that many of the properties of the universe have special values in the sense that a universe where these properties only differ slightly would not be able to support intelligent life.<ref>{{cite book|author=[[Stephen Hawking]]|year=1988|title=A Brief History of Time|publisher=Bantam Books|isbn=0-553-05340-X|page=125}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|year=1999|title=Just Six Numbers|publisher=HarperCollins Publishers|isbn=0-465-03672-4|author=[[Martin Rees]]}}</ref> Not all scientists agree that this [[fine-tuned universe|fine-tuning]] exists.<ref name="adams">{{cite journal | last=Adams | first=F.C. | year=2008 | title=Stars in other universes: stellar structure with different fundamental constants | journal= Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | issue=08 | doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/010 | url=http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3697 | volume=2008 | pages=010}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last=Harnik | first=R. | coauthors=Kribs, G.D. and Perez, G. | year=2006 | title=A universe without weak interactions | journal=Physical Review D | volume=74 | doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.74.035006 | issue=3 | url=http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0604027 | pages=035006 }}</ref> In particular, it is not known under what conditions intelligent life could form and what form or shape that would take. A relevant observation in this discussion is that existence of an observer to observe fine-tuning, requires that the universe supports intelligent life. As such the [[conditional probability]] of observing a universe that is fine-tuned to support intelligent life is 1. This observation is known as the [[anthropic principle]] and is particularly relevant if the creation of the universe was probabilistic or if multiple universes with a variety of properties exist (see [[#Multiverse theory|below]]).


The more matter there is in the universe, the stronger the mutual [[gravitational]] pull of the matter. If the universe were ''too'' dense then it would re-collapse into a [[gravitational singularity]]. However, if the universe contained too ''little'' matter then the self-gravity would be too weak for astronomical structures, like galaxies or planets, to form. Since the Big Bang, the universe has expanded [[monotonic]]ally. [[Anthropic principle#Anthropic 'coincidences'|Perhaps unsurprisingly]], our universe has [[Critical Mass Density of the Universe|just the right mass–energy density]], equivalent to about 5 protons per cubic meter, which has allowed it to expand for the last 13.8 billion years, giving time to form the universe as observed today.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Raymond A. |last1=Serway |first2=Clement J. |last2=Moses |first3=Curt A. |last3=Moyer |title=Modern Physics |publisher=Cengage Learning |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-111-79437-8 |page=21}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://openstax.org/books/astronomy-2e/pages/29-7-the-anthropic-principle |title=Astronomy 2e |publisher=OpenStax |isbn=978-1-951-69350-3 |first1=Andrew |last1=Fraknoi |display-authors=etal |year=2022 |page=1017 |access-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214122906/https://openstax.org/books/astronomy-2e/pages/29-7-the-anthropic-principle |url-status=live }}</ref>
==Historical models==
{{See also|Cosmology|Timeline of cosmology}}


There are dynamical forces acting on the particles in the universe which affect the expansion rate. Before 1998, it was expected that the expansion rate would be decreasing as time went on due to the influence of gravitational interactions in the universe; and thus there is an additional observable quantity in the universe called the [[deceleration parameter]], which most cosmologists expected to be positive and related to the matter density of the universe. In 1998, the deceleration parameter was measured by two different groups to be negative, approximately −0.55, which technically implies that the second derivative of the cosmic [[scale factor cosmology|scale factor]] <math> \ddot{a}</math> has been positive in the last 5–6 billion years.<ref name="nobel_2011">{{cite web |url=https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2011/ |title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 |access-date=April 16, 2015 |archive-date=April 17, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150417023358/http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2011/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Overbye|first=Dennis|title=A 'Cosmic Jerk' That Reversed the Universe|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/11/us/a-cosmic-jerk-that-reversed-the-universe.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm|newspaper=New York Times|date=October 11, 2003|access-date=February 20, 2017|archive-date=July 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701114952/http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/11/us/a-cosmic-jerk-that-reversed-the-universe.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm|url-status=live}}</ref>
Many models of the cosmos (cosmologies) and its origin (cosmogonies) have been proposed, based on the then-available data and conceptions of the universe. Historically, cosmologies and cosmogonies were based on narratives of gods acting in various ways. Theories of an impersonal universe governed by physical laws were first proposed by the Greeks and Indians. Over the centuries, improvements in astronomical observations and theories of motion and gravitation led to ever more accurate descriptions of the universe. The modern era of cosmology began with [[Albert Einstein|Albert Einstein's]] 1915 [[general relativity|general theory of relativity]], which made it possible to quantitatively predict the origin, evolution, and conclusion of the universe as a whole. Most modern, accepted theories of cosmology are based on general relativity and, more specifically, the predicted [[Big Bang]]; however, still more careful measurements are required to determine which theory is correct.


===Creation===
=== Spacetime ===
{{Main|Creation myth|Creator deity}}
{{Main|Spacetime|World line}}
{{See also|Lorentz transformation}}
Many cultures have [[creation myth|stories describing the origin of the world]], which may be roughly grouped into common types. In one type of story, the world is born from a [[world egg]]; such stories include the [[Finnish people|Finnish]] [[epic poetry|epic poem]] ''[[Kalevala]]'', the [[China|Chinese]] story of [[Pangu]] or the [[History of India|Indian]] [[Brahmanda Purana]]. In related stories, the creation idea is caused by a single entity emanating or producing something by him- or herself, as in the [[Tibetan Buddhism]] concept of [[Adi-Buddha]], the [[ancient Greece|ancient Greek]] story of [[Gaia (mythology)|Gaia]] (Mother Earth), the [[Aztec mythology|Aztec]] goddess [[Coatlicue]] myth, the [[ancient Egyptian religion|ancient Egyptian]] [[Ennead|god]] [[Atum]] story, or the [[Genesis creation narrative]]. In another type of story, the world is created from the union of male and female deities, as in the [[Maori mythology|Maori story]] of [[Rangi and Papa]]. In other stories, the universe is created by crafting it from pre-existing materials, such as the corpse of a dead god&nbsp;— as from [[Tiamat]] in the [[Babylon]]ian epic [[Enuma Elish]] or from the giant [[Ymir]] in [[Norse mythology]]&nbsp;– or from chaotic materials, as in [[Izanagi]] and [[Izanami]] in [[Japanese mythology]]. In other stories, the universe emanates from fundamental principles, such as [[Brahman]] and [[Prakrti]], or the [[yin and yang]] of the [[Tao]].
Modern physics regards [[event (relativity)|events]] as being organized into [[spacetime]].<ref>{{Cite book
|author=Schutz, Bernard
|title=A First Course in General Relativity
|publisher=Cambridge University Press
|edition=2nd
|date= 2009
|isbn=978-0-521-88705-2
|pages=[https://archive.org/details/firstcourseingen00bern_0/page/142 142, 171]
|author-link=Bernard Schutz
|url=https://archive.org/details/firstcourseingen00bern_0/page/142
}}</ref> This idea originated with the [[special theory of relativity]], which predicts that if one observer sees two events happening in different places at the same time, a second observer who is moving relative to the first will see those events happening at different times.<ref name="Mermin2005">{{cite book|first=N. David |last=Mermin |author-link=N. David Mermin |title=It's About Time: Understanding Einstein's Relativity |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=2021 |orig-year=2005 |edition=Princeton Science Library paperback |isbn=978-0-691-12201-4 |oclc=1193067111}}</ref>{{rp|45–52}} The two observers will disagree on the time <math>T</math> between the events, and they will disagree about the distance <math>D</math> separating the events, but they will agree on the [[speed of light]] <math>c</math>, and they will measure the same value for the combination <math>c^2T^2 - D^2</math>.<ref name="Mermin2005"/>{{rp|80}} The square root of the [[absolute value]] of this quantity is called the ''interval'' between the two events. The interval expresses how widely separated events are, not just in space or in time, but in the combined setting of spacetime.<ref name="Mermin2005"/>{{rp|84,136}}<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1007/s10714-006-0254-9 |bibcode=2006GReGr..38..643B |arxiv=gr-qc/0407022 |title=Spacetime and Euclidean geometry |journal=General Relativity and Gravitation |volume=38 |issue=4 |year=2006 |pages=643–651 |last1=Brill |first1=Dieter |last2=Jacobsen |first2=Ted |citeseerx=10.1.1.338.7953 |s2cid=119067072 }}</ref>


The special theory of relativity cannot account for [[gravity]]. Its successor, the [[general theory of relativity]], explains gravity by recognizing that spacetime is not fixed but instead dynamical. In general relativity, gravitational force is reimagined as curvature of [[spacetime]]. A curved path like an orbit is not the result of a force deflecting a body from an ideal straight-line path, but rather the body's attempt to fall freely through a background that is itself curved by the presence of other masses. A remark by [[John Archibald Wheeler]] that has become proverbial among physicists summarizes the theory: "Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve",<ref name="Wheeler">{{Cite book|last=Wheeler|first=John Archibald|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zGFkK2tTXPsC&pg=PA235|title=Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics|date=2010|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|isbn=978-0-393-07948-7|language=en|author-link=John Archibald Wheeler|access-date=February 17, 2023|archive-date=February 17, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230217135729/https://books.google.com/books?id=zGFkK2tTXPsC&pg=PA235|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kersting|first=Magdalena|date=May 2019|title=Free fall in curved spacetime – how to visualise gravity in general relativity|journal=[[Physics Education]] |volume=54|issue=3|pages=035008|doi=10.1088/1361-6552/ab08f5|bibcode=2019PhyEd..54c5008K |s2cid=127471222 |issn=0031-9120|doi-access=free|hdl=10852/74677|hdl-access=free}}</ref> and therefore there is no point in considering one without the other.<ref name="Hawking" /> The [[Newton's law of universal gravitation|Newtonian theory of gravity]] is a good approximation to the predictions of general relativity when gravitational effects are weak and objects are moving slowly compared to the speed of light.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Goldstein |first1=Herbert |title=Classical Mechanics |title-link=Classical Mechanics (Goldstein) |last2=Poole |first2=Charles P. |last3=Safko |first3=John L. |date=2002 |publisher=Addison Wesley |isbn=0-201-31611-0 |edition=3rd |location=San Francisco |oclc=47056311 |author-link=Herbert Goldstein |author2-link=Charles P. Poole}}</ref>{{Rp|page=327}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Goodstein |first=Judith R. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1020305599 |title=Einstein's Italian Mathematicians: Ricci, Levi-Civita, and the Birth of General Relativity |date=2018 |publisher=American Mathematical Society |isbn=978-1-4704-2846-4 |location=Providence, Rhode Island |pages=143 |oclc=1020305599 |author-link=Judith R. Goodstein}}</ref>
===Philosophical models===
{{See|Cosmology}}
{{See also|Pre-Socratic philosophy|Physics (Aristotle)|Hindu cosmology|Islamic cosmology|Time}}


The relation between matter distribution and spacetime curvature is given by the [[Einstein field equations]], which require [[tensor calculus]] to express.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Choquet-Bruhat |first=Yvonne |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/317496332 |title=General Relativity and the Einstein Equations |date=2009 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-155226-7 |location=Oxford |oclc=317496332 |author-link=Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat}}</ref>{{Rp|page=43}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Prescod-Weinstein |first=Chanda |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1164503847 |title=The Disordered Cosmos: A Journey into Dark Matter, Spacetime, and Dreams Deferred |date=2021 |publisher=Bold Type Books |isbn=978-1-5417-2470-9 |location=New York, New York |language=en-us |oclc=1164503847 |author-link=Chanda Prescod-Weinstein |access-date=February 17, 2023 |archive-date=February 21, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220221214240/http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1164503847 |url-status=live }}</ref> The universe appears to be a smooth spacetime continuum consisting of three [[space|spatial]] [[dimension]]s and one temporal ([[time]]) dimension. Therefore, an event in the spacetime of the physical universe can be identified by a set of four coordinates: {{nowrap begin}}(''x'', ''y'', ''z'', ''t''){{nowrap end}}. On average, [[3-space|space]] is observed to be very nearly [[Shape of the universe|flat]] (with a [[curvature]] close to zero), meaning that [[Euclidean geometry]] is empirically true with high accuracy throughout most of the universe.<ref name="Shape">{{Cite web |title=WMAP Mission – Age of the Universe |url=https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm/mr_content.html |access-date=February 14, 2023 |website=map.gsfc.nasa.gov |archive-date=December 4, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221204182149/https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm/mr_content.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Spacetime also appears to have a [[simply connected space|simply connected]] [[topology]], in analogy with a sphere, at least on the length scale of the observable universe. However, present observations cannot exclude the possibilities that the universe has more dimensions (which is postulated by theories such as string theory) and that its spacetime may have a multiply connected global topology, in analogy with the cylindrical or [[toroid]]al topologies of two-dimensional [[space]]s.<ref name="Nat03">{{cite journal
From the 6th century BCE, the [[pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratic Greek philosophers]] developed the earliest known philosophical models of the universe. The earliest Greek philosophers noted that appearances can be deceiving, and sought to understand the underlying reality behind the appearances. In particular, they noted the ability of matter to change forms (e.g., ice to water to steam) and several philosophers proposed that all the apparently different materials of the world (wood, metal, etc.) are all different forms of a single material, the [[arche]]. The first to do so was [[Thales]], who called this material [[Water (classical element)|Water]]. Following him, [[Anaximenes]] called it [[Air (classical element)|Air]], and posited that there must be attractive and repulsive [[force]]s that cause the arche to condense or dissociate into different forms. [[Empedocles]] proposed that multiple fundamental materials were necessary to explain the diversity of the universe, and proposed that all four classical elements (Earth, Air, Fire and Water) existed, albeit in different combinations and forms. This four-element theory was adopted by many of the subsequent philosophers. Some philosophers before Empedocles advocated less material things for the arche; [[Heraclitus]] argued for a [[Logos]], [[Pythagoras]] believed that all things were composed of [[number]]s, whereas Thales' student, [[Anaximander]], proposed that everything was composed of a chaotic substance known as [[Apeiron (cosmology)|apeiron]], roughly corresponding to the modern concept of a [[quantum foam]]. Various modifications of the apeiron theory were proposed, most notably that of [[Anaxagoras]], which proposed that the various matter in the world was spun off from a rapidly rotating apeiron, set in motion by the principle of [[Nous]] (Mind). Still other philosophers&nbsp;— most notably [[Leucippus]] and Democritus&nbsp;— proposed that the universe was composed of indivisible [[atom]]s moving through empty space, a [[vacuum]]; [[Aristotle]] opposed this view ("Nature abhors a vacuum") on the grounds that [[Drag (physics)|resistance to motion]] increases with [[density]]; hence, empty space should offer no resistance to motion, leading to the possibility of infinite [[speed]].
|last1 = Luminet
|first1 = Jean-Pierre
|author-link = Jean-Pierre Luminet
|last2 = Weeks
|first2 = Jeffrey R.
|last3 = Riazuelo
|first3 = Alain
|last4 = Lehoucq
|first4 = Roland
|last5 = Uzan
|first5 = Jean-Philippe
|title = Dodecahedral space topology as an explanation for weak wide-angle temperature correlations in the cosmic microwave background
|journal = [[Nature (journal)|Nature]]
|volume = 425
|issue = 6958
|pages = 593–595
|date = October 9, 2003
|pmid = 14534579
|arxiv = astro-ph/0310253
|doi = 10.1038/nature01944
|bibcode = 2003Natur.425..593L
|s2cid = 4380713
|url = https://cds.cern.ch/record/647738
|type = Submitted manuscript
|access-date = August 21, 2018
|archive-date = May 17, 2021
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210517180259/https://cds.cern.ch/record/647738
|url-status = live
}}</ref><ref name="_spacetime_topology">{{cite conference
|first1=Jean-Pierre
|last1=Luminet
|first2=Boudewijn F.
|last2=Roukema
|title=Topology of the Universe: Theory and Observations
|book-title=Proceedings of Cosmology School held at Cargese, Corsica, August 1998
|date=1999
|arxiv=astro-ph/9901364
|bibcode=1999ASIC..541..117L }}</ref>


=== Shape ===
Although Heraclitus argued for eternal change, his quasi-contemporary [[Parmenides]] made the radical suggestion that all change is an illusion, that the true underlying reality is eternally unchanging and of a single nature. Parmenides denoted this reality as {{polytonic|τὸ ἐν}} (The One). Parmenides' theory seemed implausible to many Greeks, but his student [[Zeno of Elea]] challenged them with several famous [[Zeno's paradoxes|paradoxes]]. Aristotle resolved these paradoxes by developing the notion of an infinitely divisible continuum, and applying it to [[space]] and [[time]].
{{Main|Shape of the universe}}
[[File:End of universe.jpg|thumb|The three possible options for the shape of the universe]]


General relativity describes how spacetime is curved and bent by mass and energy (gravity). The [[topology]] or [[geometry]] of the universe includes both [[Shape of the universe#Local geometry (spatial curvature)|local geometry]] in the [[observable universe]] and [[Shape of the universe#Global geometry|global geometry]]. Cosmologists often work with a given [[space-like]] slice of spacetime called the [[Comoving distance|comoving coordinates]]. The section of spacetime which can be observed is the backward [[light cone]], which delimits the [[cosmological horizon]]. The cosmological horizon, also called the particle horizon or the light horizon, is the maximum distance from which [[Elementary particle|particles]] can have traveled to the [[observation|observer]] in the [[age of the universe]]. This horizon represents the boundary between the observable and the unobservable regions of the universe.<ref name="books.google.com">{{cite book |author=Harrison |first=Edward Robert |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kNxeHD2cbLYC&pg=PA447 |title=Cosmology: the science of the universe |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-521-66148-5 |pages=447– |access-date=May 1, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160826075123/https://books.google.com/books?id=kNxeHD2cbLYC&pg=PA447 |archive-date=August 26, 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Liddle |first1=Andrew R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XmWauPZSovMC&pg=PA24 |title=Cosmological inflation and large-scale structure |last2=Lyth |first2=David Hilary |date=2000 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-57598-0 |pages=24– |access-date=May 1, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131231164745/http://books.google.com/books?id=XmWauPZSovMC&pg=PA24 |archive-date=December 31, 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>
The [[Indian philosophy|Indian philosopher]] [[Kanada]], founder of the [[Vaisheshika]] school, developed a theory of [[atomism]] and proposed that [[light]] and [[heat]] were varieties of the same substance.<ref>[[Will Durant]], ''Our Oriental Heritage'':
{{quote|"Two systems of Hindu thought propound physical theories suggestively similar to those of [[Ancient Greece|Greece]]. Kanada, founder of the Vaisheshika philosophy, held that the world was composed of atoms as many in kind as the various elements. The [[Jainism|Jains]] more nearly approximated to [[Democritus]] by teaching that all atoms were of the same kind, producing different effects by diverse modes of combinations. Kanada believed light and heat to be varieties of the same substance; [[Udayana]] taught that all heat comes from the sun; and [[Vācaspati Miśra|Vachaspati]], like Newton, interpreted light as composed of minute particles emitted by substances and striking the eye."}}</ref> In the 5th century AD, the [[Buddhist atomism|Buddhist atomist]] philosopher [[Dignāga]] proposed [[atom]]s to be point-sized, durationless, and made of energy. They denied the existence of substantial matter and proposed that movement consisted of momentary flashes of a stream of energy.<ref>F. Th. Stcherbatsky (1930, 1962), ''Buddhist Logic'', Volume 1, p.19, Dover, New York:
{{quote|"The Buddhists denied the existence of substantial matter altogether. Movement consists for them of moments, it is a staccato movement, momentary flashes of a stream of energy... "Everything is evanescent“,... says the Buddhist, because there is no stuff... Both systems <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Samkhya|Sānkhya]], and later Indian Buddhism] share in common a tendency to push the analysis of Existence up to its minutest, last elements which are imagined as absolute qualities, or things possessing only one unique quality. They are called “qualities” (guna-dharma) in both systems in the sense of absolute qualities, a kind of atomic, or intra-atomic, energies of which the empirical things are composed. Both systems, therefore, agree in denying the objective reality of the categories of Substance and Quality,... and of the relation of Inference uniting them. There is in Sānkhya philosophy no separate existence of qualities. What we call quality is but a particular manifestation of a subtle entity. To every new unit of quality corresponds a subtle quantum of matter which is called guna “quality”, but represents a subtle substantive entity. The same applies to early Buddhism where all qualities are substantive... or, more precisely, dynamic entities, although they are also called dharmas ('qualities')."}}</ref>


An important parameter determining the future evolution of the universe theory is the [[density parameter]], Omega (Ω), defined as the average matter density of the universe divided by a critical value of that density. This selects one of three possible [[Shape of the universe|geometries]] depending on whether Ω is equal to, less than, or greater than 1. These are called, respectively, the flat, open and closed universes.<ref name=FateOfTheUniverse>{{cite web|title=What is the Ultimate Fate of the Universe?|url=http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_fate.html|publisher=National Aeronautics and Space Administration |access-date=August 23, 2015|archive-date=December 22, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211222195155/https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_fate.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
The theory of [[temporal finitism]] was inspired by the doctrine of creation shared by the three [[Abrahamic religions]]: [[Judaism]], [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]]. The [[Christian philosophy|Christian philosopher]], [[John Philoponus]], presented the philosophical arguments against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past. Philoponus' arguments against an infinite past were used by the [[Early Islamic philosophy|early Muslim philosopher]], [[Al-Kindi]] (Alkindus); the [[Jewish philosophy|Jewish philosopher]], [[Saadia Gaon]] (Saadia ben Joseph); and the [[Kalam|Muslim theologian]], [[Al-Ghazali]] (Algazel). They employed two logical arguments against an infinite past, the first being the "argument from the impossibility of the existence of an actual infinite", which states:<ref name=Craig>{{Cite journal|title=Whitrow and Popper on the Impossibility of an Infinite Past|first=William Lane|last=Craig|journal=The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science|volume=30|issue=2|date=June 1979|pages=165–170 [165–6]|doi=10.1093/bjps/30.2.165}}</ref>


Observations, including the [[Cosmic Background Explorer]] (COBE), [[Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe]] (WMAP), and [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck]] maps of the CMB, suggest that the universe is infinite in extent with a finite age, as described by the [[Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric|Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker]] (FLRW) models.<ref name="nasa_popular_uni_curv">{{Cite web |title=WMAP – Shape of the Universe |url=https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html |access-date=February 14, 2023 |website=map.gsfc.nasa.gov |archive-date=March 31, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190331105235/https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Nat03" /><ref name="RBSG08">{{cite journal|last1=Roukema|first1=Boudewijn|first2=Zbigniew |last2=Buliński |first3=Agnieszka |last3=Szaniewska |first4=Nicolas E. |last4=Gaudin |title=A test of the Poincare dodecahedral space topology hypothesis with the WMAP CMB data|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics|volume=482|issue=3 |pages=747–753|date=2008|arxiv=0801.0006|doi=10.1051/0004-6361:20078777|bibcode=2008A&A...482..747L|s2cid=1616362}}</ref><ref name="Aurich0403597">{{cite journal|last=Aurich|first=Ralf|author2=Lustig, S. |author3=Steiner, F. |author4=Then, H. |title=Hyperbolic Universes with a Horned Topology and the CMB Anisotropy|journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity|volume=21 |issue=21 |pages=4901–4926|date=2004 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/21/21/010 |arxiv=astro-ph/0403597|bibcode=2004CQGra..21.4901A|s2cid=17619026}}</ref> These FLRW models thus support inflationary models and the standard model of cosmology, describing a [[Minkowski space|flat]], homogeneous universe presently dominated by [[dark matter]] and [[dark energy]].<ref name="planck_cosmological_parameters">{{cite journal |arxiv=1303.5076 |title=Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters |author=Planck Collaboration |journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics |date=2014 |bibcode=2014A&A...571A..16P |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 |volume=571 |page=A16|s2cid=118349591 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web
:"An actual infinite cannot exist."
|title=Planck reveals 'almost perfect' universe
:"An infinite temporal regress of events is an actual infinite."
|url=http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/mar/21/planck-reveals-almost-perfect-universe
:"<math>\therefore</math> An infinite temporal regress of events cannot exist."
|work=Michael Banks
|publisher=Physics World
|date=March 21, 2013
|access-date=March 21, 2013
|archive-date=March 24, 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130324022238/http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/mar/21/planck-reveals-almost-perfect-universe
|url-status=live
}}</ref>


=== Support of life ===
The second argument, the "argument from the impossibility of completing an actual infinite by successive addition", states:<ref name=Craig/>
{{Main|Fine-tuned universe}}
The fine-tuned universe hypothesis is the proposition that the conditions that allow the existence of observable [[life]] in the universe can only occur when certain universal [[physical constant|fundamental physical constants]] lie within a very narrow range of values. According to this hypothesis, if any of several fundamental constants were only slightly different, the universe would have been unlikely to be conducive to the establishment and development of [[matter]], astronomical structures, elemental diversity, or life as it is understood. Whether this is true, and whether that question is even logically meaningful to ask, are subjects of much debate.<ref name=stanford_encylopedia>{{cite web
|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fine-tuning/
|title=Fine-Tuning
|website=[[The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]
|publisher=Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University
|access-date=February 15, 2022
|date=November 12, 2021
|first=Simon
|last=Friederich
|archive-date=October 10, 2023
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231010234820/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fine-tuning/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> The proposition is discussed among [[philosophy|philosophers]], [[scientist]]s, [[theology|theologians]], and proponents of [[creationism]].<ref name=toa>{{cite web |url=http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CI/CI301.html |title=CI301: The Anthropic Principle |access-date=October 31, 2007 |editor-first=Mark |editor-last=Isaak |date=2005 |work=Index to Creationist Claims |publisher=[[TalkOrigins Archive]] |archive-date=July 1, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701145811/http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CI/CI301.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


== Composition ==
:"An actual infinite cannot be completed by successive addition."
{{See also|Galaxy formation and evolution|Galaxy cluster|Nebula}}
:"The temporal series of past events has been completed by successive addition."
The universe is composed almost completely of dark energy, dark matter, and [[matter|ordinary matter]]. Other contents are [[electromagnetic radiation]] (estimated to constitute from 0.005% to close to 0.01% of the total [[mass–energy equivalence|mass–energy]] of the universe) and [[antimatter]].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=electromagnetic radiation {{!}} physics|url=http://www.britannica.com/science/electromagnetic-radiation|access-date=July 26, 2015|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica|last=Fritzsche|first=Hellmut|page=1|archive-date=August 31, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150831050929/http://www.britannica.com/science/electromagnetic-radiation|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/Pdf_downloads/8.pdf|title=Physics 7:Relativity, SpaceTime and Cosmology|access-date=July 26, 2015|website=Physics 7:Relativity, SpaceTime and Cosmology|publisher=University of California Riverside|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150905155421/http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/Pdf_downloads/8.pdf|archive-date=September 5, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Physics – for the 21st Century|url=http://www.learner.org/courses/physics/unit/text.html?unit=11&secNum=6|website=learner.org|access-date=July 27, 2015|publisher=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Annenberg Learner|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150907212145/http://www.learner.org/courses/physics/unit/text.html?unit=11&secNum=6|archive-date=September 7, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref>
:"<math>\therefore</math> The temporal series of past events cannot be an actual infinite."


The proportions of all types of matter and energy have changed over the history of the universe.<ref>{{cite web|title=Dark matter – A history shapes by dark force|publisher=National Geographic|url=http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2015/01/hidden-cosmos/timeline-graphic|work=Timothy Ferris|year=2015|access-date=December 29, 2015|archive-date=March 4, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304095337/http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2015/01/hidden-cosmos/timeline-graphic|url-status=dead}}</ref> The total amount of electromagnetic radiation generated within the universe has decreased by 1/2 in the past 2 billion years.<ref>{{Cite web|title=It's Official: The Universe Is Dying Slowly|url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/it-s-official-the-universe-is-dying-slowly/|access-date=August 11, 2015|first=Nola Taylor|last=Redd, SPACE.com|website=[[Scientific American]]|archive-date=August 12, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150812010821/http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/it-s-official-the-universe-is-dying-slowly/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=RIP Universe – Your Time Is Coming… Slowly {{!}} Video |url=http://www.space.com/30194-rip-universe-your-time-is-coming-slowly-video.html |publisher=Space.com |first=Will |last=Parr |display-authors=et al |access-date=August 20, 2015 |archive-date=August 13, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150813221122/http://www.space.com/30194-rip-universe-your-time-is-coming-slowly-video.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Today, ordinary matter, which includes atoms, stars, galaxies, and [[life]], accounts for only 4.9% of the contents of the universe.<ref name="planck2013parameters" /> The present overall [[density]] of this type of matter is very low, roughly 4.5 × 10<sup>−31</sup> grams per cubic centimeter, corresponding to a density of the order of only one proton for every four cubic meters of volume.<ref name="wmap_universe_made_of" /> The nature of both dark energy and dark matter is unknown. Dark matter, a mysterious form of matter that has not yet been identified, accounts for 26.8% of the cosmic contents. Dark energy, which is the energy of empty space and is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate, accounts for the remaining 68.3% of the contents.<ref name="planck2013parameters">{{cite web|title=First Planck results: the universe is still weird and interesting|url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2013/03/first-planck-results-the-universe-is-still-weird-and-interesting/|work=Matthew Francis|publisher=Ars technica|date=March 21, 2013|access-date=August 21, 2015|archive-date=May 2, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502143413/https://arstechnica.com/science/2013/03/first-planck-results-the-universe-is-still-weird-and-interesting/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="DarkMatter" /><ref name="peebles">{{cite journal |author=Peebles |first1=P. J. E. |last2=Ratra |first2=Bharat |name-list-style=amp |date=2003 |title=The cosmological constant and dark energy |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=75 |issue=2 |pages=559–606 |arxiv=astro-ph/0207347 |bibcode=2003RvMP...75..559P |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559 |s2cid=118961123}}</ref>
Both arguments were adopted by later Christian philosophers and theologians, and the second argument in particular became more famous after it was adopted by [[Immanuel Kant]] in his thesis of the first [[antinomy]] concerning [[time]].<ref name=Craig/>


[[File:Formation of galactic clusters and filaments.jpg|thumb|upright=2.4|The formation of clusters and large-scale [[Galaxy filament|filaments]] in the [[cold dark matter]] model with [[dark energy]]. The frames show the evolution of structures in a 43 million parsecs (or 140 million light-years) box from redshift of 30 to the present epoch (upper left z=30 to lower right z=0).]]
===Astronomical models===
[[File:Nearsc.gif|thumb|upright=2.4|A map of the superclusters and [[void (astronomy)|voids]] nearest to Earth]]
{{Main|History of astronomy}}
Matter, dark matter, and dark energy are distributed homogeneously throughout the universe over length scales longer than 300 million light-years (ly) or so.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Mandolesi |first1=N. |last2=Calzolari |first2=P. |last3=Cortiglioni |first3=S. |last4=Delpino |first4=F. |last5=Sironi |first5=G. |last6=Inzani |first6=P. |last7=Deamici |first7=G. |last8=Solheim |first8=J.-E. |last9=Berger |first9=L. |doi=10.1038/319751a0 |last10=Partridge |first10=R.B. |last11=Martenis |first11=P.L. |last12=Sangree |first12=C.H. |last13=Harvey |first13=R.C. |title=Large-scale homogeneity of the universe measured by the microwave background |journal=Nature |volume=319 |issue=6056 |pages=751–753 |year=1986 |bibcode=1986Natur.319..751M |s2cid=4349689 }}</ref> However, over shorter length-scales, matter tends to clump hierarchically; many [[atom]]s are condensed into [[star]]s, most stars into galaxies, most galaxies into [[galaxy groups and clusters|clusters, superclusters]] and, finally, large-scale [[Galaxy filament|galactic filaments]]. The observable universe contains as many as an estimated 2 trillion galaxies<ref name="BBC-20231129">{{cite news |last=Gunn |first=Alistair |title=How many galaxies are there in the universe? – Do astronomers know how many galaxies exist? How many can we see in the observable Universe? |url=https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/how-many-galaxies-in-universe |date=November 29, 2023 |work=[[BBC Sky at Night]] |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20231203021645/https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/how-many-galaxies-in-universe |archivedate=December 3, 2023 |accessdate=December 2, 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=New Horizons spacecraft answers the question: How dark is space? |website=phys.org |url=https://phys.org/news/2021-01-horizons-spacecraft-dark-space.html |access-date=January 15, 2021 |language=en |archive-date=January 15, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115110710/https://phys.org/news/2021-01-horizons-spacecraft-dark-space.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Howell |first1=Elizabeth |title=How Many Galaxies Are There? |url=https://www.space.com/25303-how-many-galaxies-are-in-the-universe.html |website=Space.com |access-date=March 5, 2021 |date=March 20, 2018 |archive-date=February 28, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210228013433/https://www.space.com/25303-how-many-galaxies-are-in-the-universe.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and, overall, as many as an estimated 10<sup>24</sup> stars<ref name="ESA-2019">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=How Many Stars Are There In The Universe? |url=https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Herschel/How_many_stars_are_there_in_the_Universe |date=2019 |work=[[European Space Agency]] |access-date=September 21, 2019 |archive-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923134902/http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Herschel/How_many_stars_are_there_in_the_Universe |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|chapter=The Structure of the Universe|doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-8730-2_10|title=The Fundamentals of Modern Astrophysics|pages=279–294|year=2015|last1=Marov|first1=Mikhail Ya.|isbn=978-1-4614-8729-6}}</ref> &ndash; more stars (and earth-like planets) than all the [[Sand|grains of beach sand]] on planet [[Earth]];<ref name="SU-20020201">{{cite web |last=Mackie |first=Glen |title=To see the Universe in a Grain of Taranaki Sand |url=http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~gmackie/billions.html |date=February 1, 2002 |work=[[Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing]] |access-date=January 28, 2017 |archive-date=June 30, 2012 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120630205715/http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~gmackie/billions.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="CNET-20150319">{{cite news |last=Mack |first=Eric |title=There may be more Earth-like planets than grains of sand on all our beaches – New research contends that the Milky Way alone is flush with billions of potentially habitable planets – and that's just one sliver of the universe. |url=https://www.cnet.com/science/the-milky-way-is-flush-with-habitable-planets-study-says/ |date=March 19, 2015 |work=[[CNET]] |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20231201144523/https://www.cnet.com/science/the-milky-way-is-flush-with-habitable-planets-study-says/ |archivedate=December 1, 2023 |accessdate=December 1, 2023 }}</ref><ref name="MNRAS-20150313">{{cite journal |last1=T. Bovaird |first1=T. |last2=Lineweaver |first2=C.H. |last3=Jacobsen |first3=S.K. |title=Using the inclinations of Kepler systems to prioritize new Titius–Bode-based exoplanet predictions |url=https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/448/4/3608/970734 |date=March 13, 2015 |journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]] |volume=448 |issue=4 |pages=3608–3627 |doi=10.1093/mnras/stv221 |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20231201151205/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/448/4/3608/970734 |archivedate=December 1, 2023 |accessdate=December 1, 2023 |doi-access=free |arxiv=1412.6230 }}</ref> but less than the total number of atoms estimated in the universe as 10<sup>82</sup>;<ref name="LS-20210711">{{cite news |last=Baker |first=Harry |title=How many atoms are in the observable universe? |url=https://www.livescience.com/how-many-atoms-in-universe.html |date=July 11, 2021 |work=[[Live Science]] |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20231201143640/https://www.livescience.com/how-many-atoms-in-universe.html |archivedate=December 1, 2023 |accessdate=December 1, 2023 }}</ref> and the estimated total number of stars in an [[Inflation (cosmology)|inflationary universe]] (observed and unobserved), as 10<sup>100</sup>.<ref name="SR-20200203">{{cite journal |last=Totani |first=Tomonori |title=Emergence of life in an inflationary universe |date=February 3, 2020 |journal=[[Scientific Reports]] |volume=10 |number=1671 |page=1671 |doi=10.1038/s41598-020-58060-0 |doi-access=free |pmid=32015390 |pmc=6997386 |arxiv=1911.08092 |bibcode=2020NatSR..10.1671T }}</ref> Typical galaxies range from [[dwarf galaxy|dwarfs]] with as few as ten million<ref>{{cite journal|date=May 3, 2000|url=http://www.eso.org/public/usa/news/eso0018/|title=Unveiling the Secret of a Virgo Dwarf Galaxy|journal=European Southern Observatory Press Release|pages=12|publisher=ESO|access-date=January 3, 2007|bibcode=2000eso..pres...12.|archive-date=July 13, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713223811/http://www.eso.org/public/usa/news/eso0018/|url-status=live}}</ref> (10<sup>7</sup>) stars up to giants with one [[10^12|trillion]]<ref name="M101">{{cite web|date=February 28, 2006|url=http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hst_spiral_m10.html|title=Hubble's Largest Galaxy Portrait Offers a New High-Definition View|publisher=NASA|access-date=January 3, 2007|archive-date=May 27, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200527063744/https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hst_spiral_m10.html|url-status=live}}</ref> (10<sup>12</sup>) stars. Between the larger structures are [[void (astronomy)|voids]], which are typically 10–150 Mpc (33 million–490 million ly) in diameter. The [[Milky Way]] is in the [[Local Group]] of galaxies, which in turn is in the [[Laniakea Supercluster]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|url=http://www.nature.com/news/earth-s-new-address-solar-system-milky-way-laniakea-1.15819|title=Earth's new address: 'Solar System, Milky Way, Laniakea'|journal=Nature|date=September 3, 2014|access-date=August 21, 2015|doi=10.1038/nature.2014.15819|last1=Gibney|first1=Elizabeth|author-link=Elizabeth Gibney|s2cid=124323774|archive-date=January 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190107010904/http://www.nature.com/news/earth-s-new-address-solar-system-milky-way-laniakea-1.15819?error=cookies_not_supported&code=81eb43f5-e92f-436d-9725-3b681615454d|url-status=live}}</ref> This supercluster spans over 500 million light-years, while the Local Group spans over 10 million light-years.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.universetoday.com/30286/local-group/|title=Local Group|publisher=Universe Today|work=Fraser Cain|date=May 4, 2009|access-date=August 21, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180621093042/https://www.universetoday.com/30286/local-group/|archive-date=June 21, 2018|url-status=dead}}</ref> The universe also has vast regions of relative emptiness; the largest known void measures 1.8 billion ly (550 Mpc) across.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/apr/20/astronomers-discover-largest-known-structure-in-the-universe-is-a-big-hole|title=Astronomers discover largest known structure in the universe is ... a big hole|date=April 20, 2015|newspaper=The Guardian|last1=Devlin|first1=Hannah|author-link=Hannah Devlin|last2=Correspondent|first2=Science|access-date=December 18, 2016|archive-date=February 7, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170207131614/https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/apr/20/astronomers-discover-largest-known-structure-in-the-universe-is-a-big-hole|url-status=live}}</ref>
Astronomical models of the universe were proposed soon after [[astronomy]] began with the [[Babylonian astronomy|Babylonian astronomers]], who viewed the universe as a [[Flat Earth|flat disk]] floating in the ocean, and this forms the premise for early Greek maps like those of [[Anaximander]] and [[Hecataeus of Miletus]].


[[File:Universe content bar chart.svg|thumb|upright=1.5|Comparison of the contents of the universe today to 380,000 years after the Big Bang, as measured with 5 year WMAP data (from 2008).<ref>{{Cite web|title=Content of the Universe – WMAP 9yr Pie Chart|url=http://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/080998/|website=wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov|access-date=July 26, 2015|archive-date=September 5, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150905184934/http://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/080998/|url-status=live}}</ref> Due to rounding, the sum of these numbers is not 100%.]]
Later [[Ancient Greece|Greek]] philosophers, observing the motions of the heavenly bodies, were concerned with developing models of the universe based more profoundly on empirical evidence. The first coherent model was proposed by [[Eudoxus of Cnidos]]. According to this model, space and time are infinite and eternal, the Earth is spherical and stationary, and all other matter is confined to rotating concentric spheres. This model was refined by [[Callippus]] and [[Aristotle]], and brought into nearly perfect agreement with astronomical observations by [[Ptolemy]]. The success of this model is largely due to the mathematical fact that any function (such as the position of a planet) can be decomposed into a set of circular functions (the [[Fourier modes]]). However, not all Greek scientists accepted the geocentric model of the universe. The [[Pythagoreans|Pythagorean]] philosopher [[Philolaus]] postulated that at the center of the universe was a "central fire" around which the [[Earth]], [[Sun]], [[Moon]] and [[Planets]] revolved in uniform circular motion.<ref>Boyer, C. ''A History of Mathematics.'' Wiley, p. 54.</ref>
The [[Greek astronomy|Greek astronomer]] [[Aristarchus of Samos]] was the first known individual to propose a [[Heliocentrism|heliocentric]] model of the universe. Though the original text has been lost, a reference in Archimedes' book The Sand Reckoner describes Aristarchus' heliocentric theory. [[Archimedes]] wrote: (translated into English)


The observable universe is [[isotropic]] on scales significantly larger than superclusters, meaning that the statistical properties of the universe are the same in all directions as observed from Earth. The universe is bathed in highly isotropic [[microwave]] [[electromagnetic radiation|radiation]] that corresponds to a [[thermal equilibrium]] [[blackbody spectrum]] of roughly 2.72548 [[kelvin]]s.<ref name="Fixsen" /> The hypothesis that the large-scale universe is homogeneous and isotropic is known as the [[cosmological principle]].<ref>[[#Rindler|Rindler]], p. 202.</ref> A universe that is both homogeneous and isotropic looks the same from all vantage points and has no center.<ref name=Liddle>{{cite book |title=An Introduction to Modern Cosmology |edition=2nd |first=Andrew |last=Liddle |isbn=978-0-470-84835-7 |year=2003 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}. p. 2.</ref><ref name="livio">{{cite book|title=The Accelerating Universe: Infinite Expansion, the Cosmological Constant, and the Beauty of the Cosmos|last=Livio|first=Mario|author-link=Mario Livio|date=2001|publisher=John Wiley and Sons|page=53|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4EidS6_VVNYC&q=cosmological+principle+%22center+of+the+universe%22&pg=PA53|access-date=March 31, 2012|isbn=978-0-471-43714-7|archive-date=May 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210513224845/https://books.google.com/books?id=4EidS6_VVNYC&q=cosmological+principle+%22center+of+the+universe%22&pg=PA53|url-status=live}}</ref>
<blockquote>
You King Gelon are aware the 'universe' is the name given by most astronomers to the sphere the center of which is the center of the Earth, while its radius is equal to the straight line between the center of the Sun and the center of the Earth. This is the common account as you have heard from astronomers. But Aristarchus has brought out a book consisting of certain hypotheses, wherein it appears, as a consequence of the assumptions made, that the universe is many times greater than the 'universe' just mentioned. His hypotheses are that the fixed stars and the Sun remain unmoved, that the Earth revolves about the Sun on the circumference of a circle, the Sun lying in the middle of the orbit, and that the sphere of fixed stars, situated about the same center as the Sun, is so great that the circle in which he supposes the Earth to revolve bears such a proportion to the distance of the fixed stars as the center of the sphere bears to its surface.
</blockquote>


=== Dark energy ===
Aristarchus thus believed the stars to be very far away, and saw this as the reason why there was no visible parallax, that is, an observed movement of the stars relative to each other as the Earth moved around the Sun. The stars are in fact much farther away than the distance that was generally assumed in ancient times, which is why stellar parallax is only detectable with telescopes. The geocentric model, consistent with planetary parallax, was assumed to be an explanation for the unobservability of the parallel phenomenon, stellar parallax. The rejection of the heliocentric view was apparently quite strong, as the following passage from Plutarch suggests (On the Apparent Face in the Orb of the Moon):
{{Main|Dark energy}}
An explanation for why the expansion of the universe is accelerating remains elusive. It is often attributed to the gravitational influence of "dark energy", an unknown form of energy that is hypothesized to permeate space.<ref name="peebles(a)">{{cite journal|author1=Peebles, P.J.E. |author2=Ratra, Bharat |name-list-style=amp |title=The cosmological constant and dark energy|year=2003|journal=Reviews of Modern Physics|arxiv=astro-ph/0207347|volume=75|issue=2|pages=559–606|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559|bibcode=2003RvMP...75..559P|s2cid=118961123 }}</ref> On a [[mass–energy equivalence]] basis, the density of dark energy (~ 7 × 10<sup>−30</sup> g/cm<sup>3</sup>) is much less than the density of ordinary matter or dark matter within galaxies. However, in the present dark-energy era, it dominates the mass–energy of the universe because it is uniform across space.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Why the cosmological constant is small and positive |first1=Paul J. |last1=Steinhardt |first2=Neil|last2=Turok|journal=Science|volume=312|issue=5777|pages=1180–1183 |doi=10.1126/science.1126231 |arxiv=astro-ph/0605173 |year=2006 |bibcode=2006Sci...312.1180S |pmid=16675662|s2cid=14178620 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/dareng.html |title=Dark Energy |work=Hyperphysics |access-date=January 4, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130527105518/http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/astro/dareng.html |archive-date=May 27, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


Two proposed forms for dark energy are the [[cosmological constant]], a ''constant'' energy density filling space homogeneously,<ref name="carroll">{{cite journal|author=Carroll, Sean |year=2001 |title=The cosmological constant |journal=Living Reviews in Relativity |volume=4 |issue=1 |page=1 |doi=10.12942/lrr-2001-1 |doi-access=free |pmid=28179856 |pmc=5256042 |arxiv=astro-ph/0004075 |bibcode=2001LRR.....4....1C |author-link=Sean M. Carroll }}</ref> and [[scalar field]]s such as [[quintessence (physics)|quintessence]] or [[moduli (physics)|moduli]], ''dynamic'' quantities whose energy density can vary in time and space while still permeating them enough to cause the observed rate of expansion. Contributions from scalar fields that are constant in space are usually also included in the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant can be formulated to be equivalent to [[vacuum energy]].
<blockquote>
[[Cleanthes]] [a contemporary of Aristarchus and head of the Stoics] thought it was the duty of the Greeks to indict Aristarchus of Samos on the charge of impiety for putting in motion the Hearth of the universe [i.e. the earth], . . . supposing the heaven to remain at rest and the earth to revolve in an oblique circle, while it rotates, at the same time, about its own axis. [1]
</blockquote>


=== Dark matter ===
The only other astronomer from antiquity known by name who supported Aristarchus' heliocentric model was [[Seleucus of Seleucia]], a [[Hellenization|Hellenized]] [[Babylonia]]n astronomer who lived a century after Aristarchus.<ref>[[Otto E. Neugebauer]] (1945). "The History of Ancient Astronomy Problems and Methods", ''Journal of Near Eastern Studies'' '''4''' (1), p. 1–38.
{{Main|Dark matter}}
{{quote|"the [[Chaldaea]]n Seleucus from Seleucia"}}</ref><ref>[[George Sarton]] (1955). "Chaldaean Astronomy of the Last Three Centuries B. C.", ''Journal of the American Oriental Society'' '''75''' (3), pp. 166–173 [169]:
Dark matter is a hypothetical kind of [[matter]] that is invisible to the entire [[electromagnetic spectrum]], but which accounts for most of the matter in the universe. The existence and properties of dark matter are inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, radiation, and the [[Observable universe#Large-scale structure|large-scale structure]] of the universe. Other than [[neutrinos]], a form of [[hot dark matter]], dark matter has not been detected directly, making it one of the greatest mysteries in modern [[astrophysics]]. Dark matter neither [[blackbody spectrum|emits]] nor absorbs light or any other [[electromagnetic radiation]] at any significant level. Dark matter is estimated to constitute 26.8% of the total mass–energy and 84.5% <!--26.8/(4.9 + 26.8)--> of the total matter in the universe.<ref name="DarkMatter">Sean Carroll, Ph.D., Caltech, 2007, The Teaching Company, ''Dark Matter, Dark Energy: The Dark Side of the Universe'', Guidebook Part 2. p. 46, Accessed October 7, 2013, "...dark matter: An invisible, essentially collisionless component of matter that makes up about 25 percent of the energy density of the universe... it's a different kind of particle... something not yet observed in the laboratory..."</ref><ref name=planckcam>{{cite web |url=http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/planck-captures-portrait-of-the-young-universe-revealing-earliest-light |title=Planck captures portrait of the young universe, revealing earliest light |date=March 21, 2013 |publisher=University of Cambridge |access-date=March 21, 2013 |archive-date=April 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190417165900/https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/planck-captures-portrait-of-the-young-universe-revealing-earliest-light |url-status=live }}</ref>
{{quote|"the heliocentrical astronomy invented by Aristarchos of Samos and still defended a century later by Seleucos the [[Babylonia]]n"}}</ref><ref>William P. D. Wightman (1951, 1953), ''The Growth of Scientific Ideas'', Yale University Press p.38, where Wightman calls him [[Seleukos]] the [[Chaldea]]n.</ref> According to [[Plutarch]], Seleucus was the first to prove the heliocentric system through [[reasoning]], but it is not known what arguments he used. Seleucus' arguments for a heliocentric theory were probably related to the phenomenon of [[tide]]s.<ref>[[Lucio Russo]], ''Flussi e riflussi'', Feltrinelli, Milano, 2003, ISBN 88-07-10349-4.</ref> According to [[Strabo]] (1.1.9), Seleucus was the first to state that the [[tide]]s are due to the attraction of the Moon, and that the height of the tides depends on the Moon's position relative to the Sun.<ref>{{cite journal | author = Bartel | authorlink = Bartel Leendert van der Waerden | year = 1987 | title = The Heliocentric System in Greek, Persian and Hindu Astronomy | doi = 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb37224.x | bibcode = 1987NYASA.500..525V | url = | journal = Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | volume = 500 | issue = 1| pages = 525–545 [527] }}</ref> Alternatively, he may have proved the heliocentric theory by determining the constants of a [[Geometry|geometric]] model for the heliocentric theory and by developing methods to compute planetary positions using this model, like what Nicolaus Copernicus later did in the 16th century.<ref>{{cite journal | author = Bartel | authorlink = Bartel Leendert van der Waerden | year = 1987 | title = The Heliocentric System in Greek, Persian and Hindu Astronomy | doi = 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb37224.x | bibcode = 1987NYASA.500..525V | url = | journal = Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | volume = 500 | issue = 1| pages = 525–545 [527–9] }}</ref> During the [[Middle Ages]], heliocentric models may have also been proposed by the [[Indian astronomy|Indian astronomer]], [[Aryabhata]],<ref>{{cite journal | author = Bartel | authorlink = Bartel Leendert van der Waerden | year = 1987 | title = The Heliocentric System in Greek, Persian and Hindu Astronomy | doi = 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb37224.x | bibcode = 1987NYASA.500..525V | url = | journal = Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | volume = 500 | issue = 1| pages = 525–545 [529–34] }}</ref> and by the [[Islamic astronomy|Persian astronomers]], [[Ja'far ibn Muhammad Abu Ma'shar al-Balkhi|Albumasar]]<ref>{{cite journal | author = Bartel | authorlink = Bartel Leendert van der Waerden | year = 1987 | title = The Heliocentric System in Greek, Persian and Hindu Astronomy | doi = 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb37224.x | bibcode = 1987NYASA.500..525V | url = | journal = Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | volume = 500 | issue = 1| pages = 525–545 [534–7] }}</ref> and [[Al-Sijzi]].<ref name=Nasr>{{Cite book |last=Nasr |first=Seyyed H. |authorlink=Hossein Nasr |date=1st edition in 1964, 2nd edition in 1993 |title=An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines |edition=2nd |publisher=1st edition by [[Harvard University Press]], 2nd edition by [[State University of New York Press]] |isbn=0791415155 |pages=135–6}}</ref>


=== Ordinary matter ===
[[Image:ThomasDiggesmap.JPG|thumb|left|[[Copernican heliocentrism|Model of the Copernican universe]] by [[Thomas Digges]] in 1576, with the amendment that the stars are no longer confined to a sphere, but spread uniformly throughout the space surrounding the [[planet]]s.]]
{{Main|Matter}}
The remaining 4.9% of the mass–energy of the universe is ordinary matter, that is, [[atom]]s, [[ion]]s, [[electron]]s and the objects they form. This matter includes [[star]]s, which produce nearly all of the light we see from galaxies, as well as interstellar gas in the [[interstellar medium|interstellar]] and [[intergalactic medium|intergalactic]] media, [[planet]]s, and all the objects from everyday life that we can bump into, touch or squeeze.<ref name="Davies2">{{cite book |author=Davies |first=P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=akb2FpZSGnMC&pg=PA1 |title=The New Physics: A Synthesis |date=1992 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-0-521-43831-5 |page=1 |language=en |access-date=May 17, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210203103749/https://books.google.com/books?id=akb2FpZSGnMC&pg=PA1 |archive-date=February 3, 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> The great majority of ordinary matter in the universe is unseen, since visible stars and gas inside galaxies and clusters account for less than 10 percent of the ordinary matter contribution to the mass–energy density of the universe.<ref>{{Cite journal
| last1=Persic
| first1=Massimo
| last2=Salucci
| first2=Paolo
| date=September 1, 1992
| title=The baryon content of the universe
| journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
| language=en
| volume=258
| issue=1
| pages=14P–18P
| doi=10.1093/mnras/258.1.14P
| doi-access=free
| issn=0035-8711
|arxiv=astro-ph/0502178 |bibcode=1992MNRAS.258P..14P |s2cid=17945298
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Shull |first1=J. Michael |last2=Smith |first2=Britton D. |last3=Danforth |first3=Charles W. |date=November 1, 2012 |title=The Baryon Census in a Multiphase Intergalactic Medium: 30% of the Baryons May Still Be Missing |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/23 |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |volume=759 |issue=1 |pages=23 |doi=10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/23 |arxiv=1112.2706 |bibcode=2012ApJ...759...23S |s2cid=119295243 |issn=0004-637X |quote=Galaxy surveys have found ~10% of these baryons in collapsed objects such as galaxies, groups, and clusters [...] Of the remaining 80%–90% of cosmological baryons, approximately half can be accounted for in the low-z [intergalactic medium] |access-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-date=September 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230921160249/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/23 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Macquart |first1=J.-P. |last2=Prochaska |first2=J. X. |last3=McQuinn |first3=M. |last4=Bannister |first4=K. W. |last5=Bhandari |first5=S. |last6=Day |first6=C. K. |last7=Deller |first7=A. T. |last8=Ekers |first8=R. D. |last9=James |first9=C. W. |last10=Marnoch |first10=L. |last11=Osłowski |first11=S. |last12=Phillips |first12=C. |last13=Ryder |first13=S. D. |last14=Scott |first14=D. R. |last15=Shannon |first15=R. M. |date=May 28, 2020 |title=A census of baryons in the Universe from localized fast radio bursts |url=http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2300-2 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=581 |issue=7809 |pages=391–395 |doi=10.1038/s41586-020-2300-2 |pmid=32461651 |arxiv=2005.13161 |bibcode=2020Natur.581..391M |s2cid=256821489 |issn=0028-0836 |access-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-date=November 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231105012727/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2300-2 |url-status=live }}</ref>


Ordinary matter commonly exists in four [[state of matter|states]] (or [[phase (matter)|phases]]): [[solid]], [[liquid]], [[gas]], and [[plasma (physics)|plasma]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://openstax.org/books/chemistry-2e/pages/1-2-phases-and-classification-of-matter |title=Chemistry 2e |publisher=OpenStax |first1=Paul |last1=Flowers |display-authors=etal |year=2019 |isbn=978-1-947-17262-3 |page=14 |access-date=February 17, 2023 |archive-date=February 17, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230217173041/https://openstax.org/books/chemistry-2e/pages/1-2-phases-and-classification-of-matter |url-status=live }}</ref> However, advances in experimental techniques have revealed other previously theoretical phases, such as [[Bose–Einstein condensate]]s and [[fermionic condensate]]s.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 2001 |url=https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2001/popular-information/ |access-date=February 17, 2023 |website=NobelPrize.org |language=en-US |archive-date=February 17, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230217172801/https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2001/popular-information/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Cohen-Tannoudji |first1=Claude |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HT_ICgAAQBAJ |title=Advances In Atomic Physics: An Overview |last2=Guery-Odelin |first2=David |date=2011 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-981-4390-58-3 |pages=684 |language=en |author-link=Claude Cohen-Tannoudji |access-date=February 17, 2023 |archive-date=June 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230604212103/https://books.google.com/books?id=HT_ICgAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> Ordinary matter is composed of two types of [[elementary particle]]s: [[quark]]s and [[lepton]]s.<ref name="Hooft">{{cite book |author='t Hooft |first=G. |url=https://archive.org/details/insearchofultima0000hoof |title=In search of the ultimate building blocks |date=1997 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-0-521-57883-7 |page=[https://archive.org/details/insearchofultima0000hoof/page/6 6] |language=en |url-access=registration}}</ref> For example, the proton is formed of two [[up quarks]] and one [[down quark]]; the neutron is formed of two down quarks and one up quark; and the electron is a kind of lepton. An atom consists of an [[atomic nucleus]], made up of protons and neutrons (both of which are [[baryons]]), and electrons that orbit the nucleus.<ref name="OpenStax-college-physics">{{cite book |url=https://openstax.org/books/college-physics-2e/pages/33-4-particles-patterns-and-conservation-laws |title=College Physics 2e |publisher=OpenStax |first1=Paul Peter |last1=Urone |display-authors=etal |isbn=978-1-951-69360-2 |year=2022 |access-date=February 13, 2023 |archive-date=February 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230213180410/https://openstax.org/books/college-physics-2e/pages/33-4-particles-patterns-and-conservation-laws |url-status=live }}</ref>{{rp|1476}}
The Aristotelian model was accepted in the [[Western world]] for roughly two millennia, until Copernicus revived Aristarchus' theory that the astronomical data could be explained more plausibly if the [[earth]] rotated on its axis and if the [[sun]] were placed at the center of the universe.


Soon after the [[Big Bang]], primordial protons and neutrons formed from the [[quark–gluon plasma]] of the early universe as it cooled below two trillion degrees. A few minutes later, in a process known as [[Big Bang nucleosynthesis]], nuclei formed from the primordial protons and neutrons. This nucleosynthesis formed lighter elements, those with small atomic numbers up to [[lithium]] and [[beryllium]], but the abundance of heavier elements dropped off sharply with increasing atomic number. Some [[boron]] may have been formed at this time, but the next heavier element, [[carbon]], was not formed in significant amounts. Big Bang nucleosynthesis shut down after about 20 minutes due to the rapid drop in temperature and density of the expanding universe. Subsequent formation of [[metallicity|heavier elements]] resulted from [[stellar nucleosynthesis]] and [[supernova nucleosynthesis]].<ref name=Clayton1983>{{cite book|last1=Clayton|first1=Donald D.|title=Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis|url=https://archive.org/details/principlesofstel0000clay|url-access=registration|date=1983|publisher=The University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-10953-4|pages=[https://archive.org/details/principlesofstel0000clay/page/362 362–435]}}</ref>
{{cquote|In the center rests the sun. For who would place this lamp of a very beautiful temple in another or better place than this wherefrom it can illuminate everything at the same time?|20px|20px|Nicolaus Copernicus| in Chapter 10, Book 1 of ''De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestrum'' (1543)}}


=== Particles ===
As noted by Copernicus himself, the suggestion that the [[Earth's rotation|Earth rotates]] was very old, dating at least to [[Philolaus]] (c. 450 BC), [[Heraclides Ponticus]] (c. 350 BC) and [[Ecphantus the Pythagorean]]. Roughly a century before Copernicus, Christian scholar [[Nicholas of Cusa]] also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis in his book, ''On Learned Ignorance'' (1440).<ref>Misner, Thorne and Wheeler (1973), p. 754.</ref> Aryabhata (476–550), [[Brahmagupta]] (598–668), [[Albumasar]] and [[Al-Sijzi]], also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}} The first [[Empirical research|empirical evidence]] for the Earth's rotation on its axis, using the phenomenon of [[comet]]s, was given by [[Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī|Tusi]] (1201–1274) and [[Ali Qushji]] (1403–1474).{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}} Tusi, however, continued to support the Aristotelian universe, thus Qushji was the first to refute the Aristotelian notion of a stationary Earth on an [[empirical]] basis, similar to how Copernicus later justified the Earth's rotation. [[Al-Birjandi]] (d. 1528) further developed a theory of "circular [[inertia]]" to explain the Earth's rotation, similar to how [[Galileo Galilei]] explained it.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ragep |first=F. Jamil |year=2001a |title=Tusi and Copernicus: The Earth's Motion in Context |journal=Science in Context |volume=14 |issue=1–2 |pages=145–63 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ragep |first=F. Jamil |year=2001b |title=Freeing Astronomy from Philosophy: An Aspect of Islamic Influence on Science |journal=Osiris, 2nd Series |volume=16 |issue=Science in Theistic Contexts: Cognitive Dimensions |pages=49–64 & 66–71 | jstor=301979 | bibcode=2001Osir...16...49R}}</ref>
[[File:Standard Model of Elementary Particles.svg|thumb|upright=2.2|Standard model of elementary particles: the 12 fundamental fermions and 4 fundamental bosons. Brown loops indicate which bosons (red) couple to which fermions (purple and green). Columns are three generations of matter (fermions) and one of forces (bosons). In the first three columns, two rows contain quarks and two leptons. The top two rows' columns contain up (u) and down (d) quarks, charm (c) and strange (s) quarks, top (t) and bottom (b) quarks, and photon (γ) and gluon (g), respectively. The bottom two rows' columns contain electron neutrino (ν<sub>e</sub>) and electron (e), muon neutrino (ν<sub>μ</sub>) and muon (μ), tau neutrino (ν<sub>τ</sub>) and tau (τ), and the Z<sup>0</sup> and W<sup>±</sup> carriers of the weak force. Mass, charge, and spin are listed for each particle.|alt=A four-by-four table of particles. Columns are three generations of matter (fermions) and one of forces (bosons). In the first three columns, two rows contain quarks and two leptons. The top two rows' columns contain up (u) and down (d) quarks, charm (c) and strange (s) quarks, top (t) and bottom (b) quarks, and photon (γ) and gluon (g), respectively. The bottom two rows' columns contain electron neutrino (ν sub e) and electron (e), muon neutrino (ν sub μ) and muon (μ), and tau neutrino (ν sub τ) and tau (τ), and Z sup 0 and W sup ± weak force. Mass, charge, and spin are listed for each particle.]]


{{Main|Particle physics}}
[[Image:Libr0309.jpg|thumb|[[Johannes Kepler]] published the ''[[Rudolphine Tables]]'' containing a star catalog and planetary tables using [[Tycho Brahe]]'s measurements.]]


Ordinary matter and the forces that act on matter can be described in terms of [[elementary particle]]s.<ref>{{cite book |author=Veltman, Martinus |title=Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics |url=https://archive.org/details/factsmysteriesin0000velt |url-access=registration |publisher=World Scientific |year=2003 |isbn=978-981-238-149-1}}</ref> These particles are sometimes described as being fundamental, since they have an unknown substructure, and it is unknown whether or not they are composed of smaller and even more fundamental particles.<ref name=PFIp1-3>{{cite book
Copernicus' [[Heliocentrism|heliocentric model]] allowed the stars to be placed uniformly through the (infinite) space surrounding the planets, as first proposed by [[Thomas Digges]] in his ''Perfit Description of the Caelestiall Orbes according to the most aunciente doctrine of the Pythagoreans, latelye revived by Copernicus and by Geometricall Demonstrations approved'' (1576).<ref name = "Misner-p755">Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (1973), p.755.</ref> [[Giordano Bruno]] accepted the idea that space was infinite and filled with solar systems similar to our own; for the publication of this view, he was [[execution by burning|burned at the stake]] in the [[Campo de' Fiori|Campo dei Fiori]] in Rome on 17 February 1600.<ref name = "Misner-p755"/>
|first1=Sylvie
|last1=Braibant
|first2=Giorgio
|last2=Giacomelli
|first3=Maurizio
|last3=Spurio
|year=2012
|title=Particles and Fundamental Interactions: An Introduction to Particle Physics
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e8YUUG2pGeIC&pg=PA1
|edition=2nd
|pages=1–3
|publisher=[[Springer (publisher)|Springer]]
|isbn=978-94-007-2463-1
|access-date=January 27, 2016
|archive-date=August 26, 2016
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160826133823/https://books.google.com/books?id=e8YUUG2pGeIC&pg=PA1
|url-status=live
}}</ref><ref name=Close>{{cite book
|author-last=Close
|author-first=Frank
|year=2012
|title=Particle Physics: A Very Short Introduction
|publisher=Oxford University Press
|isbn=978-0-19-280434-1
}}</ref> In most contemporary models they are thought of as points in space.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mann |first=Adam |date=August 20, 2022 |title=What Are Elementary Particles? |url=https://www.livescience.com/65427-fundamental-elementary-particles.html |access-date=August 17, 2023 |website=Live Science |archive-date=August 17, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230817161504/https://www.livescience.com/65427-fundamental-elementary-particles.html |url-status=live }}</ref> All elementary particles are currently best explained by [[quantum mechanics]] and exhibit [[wave–particle duality]]: their behavior has both particle-like and [[wave]]-like aspects, with different features dominating under different circumstances.<ref>{{cite book |last=Zwiebach |first=Barton |title=Mastering Quantum Mechanics: Essentials, Theory, and Applications |publisher=MIT Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-262-04613-8 |page=31 |author-link=Barton Zwiebach}}</ref>


Of central importance is the [[Standard Model]], a theory that is concerned with [[Electromagnetism|electromagnetic]] interactions and the [[Weak interaction|weak]] and [[Strong interaction|strong]] nuclear interactions.<ref name="Oerter2006">{{cite book |author=Oerter |first=R. |url=https://archive.org/details/theoryofalmostev0000oert |title=The Theory of Almost Everything: The Standard Model, the Unsung Triumph of Modern Physics |publisher=[[Penguin Group]] |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-13-236678-6 |page=[https://archive.org/details/theoryofalmostev0000oert/page/2 2] |format=Kindle |url-access=registration}}</ref> The Standard Model is supported by the experimental confirmation of the existence of particles that compose matter: [[quark]]s and [[lepton]]s, and their corresponding "[[antimatter]]" duals, as well as the force particles that mediate [[fundamental interactions|interactions]]: the [[photon]], the [[W and Z bosons]], and the [[gluon]].<ref name=PFIp1-3 /> The Standard Model predicted the existence of the recently discovered [[Higgs boson]], a particle that is a manifestation of a field within the universe that can endow particles with mass.<ref name="OnyisiFAQ">{{cite web
This cosmology was accepted provisionally by [[Isaac Newton]], [[Christiaan Huygens]] and later scientists,<ref name = "Misner-p755">Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (1973), p. 755–756.</ref> although it had several paradoxes that were resolved only with the development of [[general relativity]]. The first of these was that it assumed that space and time were infinite, and that the stars in the universe had been burning forever; however, since stars are constantly radiating [[energy]], a finite star seems inconsistent with the radiation of infinite energy. Secondly, Edmund Halley (1720)<ref>Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (1973), p. 756.</ref> and [[Jean-Philippe de Cheseaux]] (1744)<ref>{{cite book | author = [[Jean-Philippe de Cheseaux|de Cheseaux JPL]] | year = 1744 | title = Traité de la Comète | publisher = Lausanne | pages = 223ff}}. Reprinted as Appendix II in {{cite book | author = Dickson FP | year = 1969 | title = The Bowl of Night: The Physical Universe and Scientific Thought | publisher = M.I.T. Press | location = Cambridge, MA | isbn = 978-0262540032}}</ref> noted independently that the assumption of an infinite space filled uniformly with stars would lead to the prediction that the nighttime sky would be as bright as the sun itself; this became known as [[Olbers' paradox]] in the 19th century.<ref>{{cite journal | author = [[Heinrich Wilhelm Matthäus Olbers|Olbers HWM]] | year = 1826 | title = Unknown title | journal = Bode's Jahrbuch | volume = 111}}. Reprinted as Appendix I in {{cite book | author = Dickson FP | year = 1969 | title = The Bowl of Night: The Physical Universe and Scientific Thought | publisher = M.I.T. Press | location = Cambridge, MA | isbn = 978-0262540032}}</ref> Third, Newton himself showed that an infinite space uniformly filled with matter would cause infinite forces and instabilities causing the matter to be crushed inwards under its own gravity.<ref name = "Misner-p755"/> This instability was clarified in 1902 by the [[Jeans instability]] criterion.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Jeans |first1= J. H. |year=1902| title = The Stability of a Spherical Nebula | journal= Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of London, Series A| volume=199| pages= 1–53 |issue=312-320 | doi = 10.1098/rsta.1902.0012 | bibcode = 1902RSPTA.199....1J | jstor=90845 | url=http://maeresearch.ucsd.edu/~cgibson/Documents2007/PapersAList%20copy/MiscellaneousPapers/Jeans1902.pdf | format=PDF | accessdate=17 March 2011}}</ref> One solution to these latter two paradoxes is the [[Carl Charlier|Charlier universe]], in which the matter is arranged hierarchically (systems of orbiting bodies that are themselves orbiting in a larger system, ''ad infinitum'') in a [[fractal]] way such that the universe has a negligibly small overall density; such a cosmological model had also been proposed earlier in 1761 by [[Johann Heinrich Lambert]].<ref>Rindler, p. 196; Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (1973), p. 757.</ref> A significant astronomical advance of the 18th century was the realization by [[Thomas Wright (astronomer)|Thomas Wright]], [[Immanuel Kant]] and others that stars are not distributed uniformly throughout space; rather, they are grouped into [[galaxy|galaxies]].<ref>Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, p.756.</ref>
|last=Onyisi
|first=P.
|date=October 23, 2012
|title=Higgs boson FAQ
|url=https://wikis.utexas.edu/display/utatlas/Higgs+boson+FAQ
|publisher=[[University of Texas]] ATLAS group
|access-date=January 8, 2013
|archive-date=October 12, 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012130340/https://wikis.utexas.edu/display/utatlas/Higgs+boson+FAQ
|url-status=live
}}</ref><ref name="strasslerFAQ2">{{cite web
|last=Strassler
|first=M.
|author-link=Matt Strassler
|date=October 12, 2012
|title=The Higgs FAQ 2.0
|url=http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/the-higgs-particle/the-higgs-faq-2-0/
|work=ProfMattStrassler.com
|access-date=January 8, 2013
|quote=[Q] Why do particle physicists care so much about the Higgs particle?<br />[A] Well, actually, they don't. What they really care about is the Higgs ''field'', because it is ''so'' important. [emphasis in original]
|archive-date=October 12, 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012042637/http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/the-higgs-particle/the-higgs-faq-2-0/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> Because of its success in explaining a wide variety of experimental results, the Standard Model is sometimes regarded as a "theory of almost everything".<ref name=Oerter2006 /> The Standard Model does not, however, accommodate gravity. A true force–particle "theory of everything" has not been attained.<ref name="Weinberg2011">{{cite book|first=Steven|last=Weinberg|title=Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientist's Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature|publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-307-78786-6|date=2011}}</ref>


==== Hadrons ====
The modern era of [[physical cosmology]] began in 1917, when [[Albert Einstein]] first applied his general theory of relativity to model the structure and dynamics of the universe.<ref name="einstein_1917">{{cite journal | last = Einstein | first = A | authorlink = Albert Einstein | year = 1917 | title = Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie | series = 1917 | journal = Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte | volume = (part 1) | pages = 142–152}}</ref> This theory and its implications will be discussed in more detail in the following section.
{{Main|Hadron}}
A hadron is a [[composite particle]] made of [[quark]]s [[bound state|held together]] by the [[strong force]]. Hadrons are categorized into two families: [[baryon]]s (such as [[proton]]s and [[neutron]]s) made of three quarks, and [[meson]]s (such as [[pion]]s) made of one quark and one [[antiparticle|antiquark]]. Of the hadrons, protons are stable, and neutrons bound within atomic nuclei are stable. Other hadrons are unstable under ordinary conditions and are thus insignificant constituents of the modern universe.<ref name=Allday2002/>{{rp|118–123}}


From approximately 10<sup>−6</sup> seconds after the [[Big Bang]], during a period known as the [[hadron epoch]], the temperature of the universe had fallen sufficiently to allow quarks to bind together into hadrons, and the mass of the universe was dominated by [[hadron]]s. Initially, the temperature was high enough to allow the formation of hadron–anti-hadron pairs, which kept matter and antimatter in [[thermal equilibrium]]. However, as the temperature of the universe continued to fall, hadron–anti-hadron pairs were no longer produced. Most of the hadrons and anti-hadrons were then eliminated in particle–antiparticle [[annihilation]] reactions, leaving a small residual of hadrons by the time the universe was about one second old.<ref name=Allday2002>{{cite book|last1=Allday|first1=Jonathan|title=Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang|date=2002|publisher=IOP Publishing|isbn=978-0-7503-0806-9|edition=2nd}}</ref>{{rp|244–266}}
==Theoretical models==
[[Image:Cassini-science-br.jpg|thumb|High-precision test of general relativity by the [[Cassini-Huygens|Cassini]] space probe (artist's impression): [[radio]] signals sent between the Earth and the probe (green wave) are [[Shapiro effect|delayed]] by the warping of [[space and time]] (blue lines) due to the [[Sun]]'s mass.]]


==== Leptons ====
Of the four [[fundamental interaction]]s, [[gravitation]] is dominant at cosmological length scales; that is, the other three forces are believed to play a negligible role in determining structures at the level of planets, stars, galaxies and larger-scale structures. Since all matter and energy gravitate, gravity's effects are cumulative; by contrast, the effects of positive and negative charges tend to cancel one another, making electromagnetism relatively insignificant on cosmological length scales. The remaining two interactions, the [[weak nuclear force|weak]] and [[strong nuclear force]]s, decline very rapidly with distance; their effects are confined mainly to sub-atomic length scales.
{{Main|Lepton}}
A lepton is an [[elementary particle|elementary]], [[half-integer spin]] particle that does not undergo strong interactions but is subject to the [[Pauli exclusion principle]]; no two leptons of the same species can be in exactly the same state at the same time.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia
|title=Lepton (physics)
|url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/336940/lepton
|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]
|access-date=September 29, 2010
|archive-date=May 11, 2015
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150511203531/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/336940/lepton
|url-status=live
}}</ref> Two main classes of leptons exist: [[electric charge|charged]] leptons (also known as the ''electron-like'' leptons), and neutral leptons (better known as [[neutrino]]s). Electrons are stable and the most common charged lepton in the universe, whereas [[muon]]s and [[tau (particle)|taus]] are unstable particles that quickly decay after being produced in [[high energy physics|high energy]] collisions, such as those involving [[cosmic ray]]s or carried out in [[particle accelerator]]s.<ref>{{cite book
| last=Harari | first=H.
| year=1977
| chapter=Beyond charm
| title=Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions at High Energy, Les Houches, France, Jul 5 – Aug 14, 1976
| editor1-last=Balian | editor1-first=R.
| editor2-last=Llewellyn-Smith | editor2-first=C.H.
| series=Les Houches Summer School Proceedings
| volume=29 | page=613
| publisher=[[North-Holland Publishing Company|North-Holland]]
}}</ref><ref>{{cite conference
|author=Harari H.
|title=Three generations of quarks and leptons
|url=https://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/getdoc/slac-pub-1974.pdf
|book-title=Proceedings of the XII Rencontre de Moriond
|editor1=E. van Goeler
|editor2=Weinstein R.
|page=170
|year=1977
|id=SLAC-PUB-1974
|conference=
|access-date=May 29, 2020
|archive-date=May 13, 2020
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200513180308/https://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/getdoc/slac-pub-1974.pdf
|url-status=live
}}</ref> Charged leptons can combine with other particles to form various [[composite particle]]s such as [[atom]]s and [[positronium]]. The [[electron]] governs nearly all of [[chemistry]], as it is found in [[atom]]s and is directly tied to all [[chemical property|chemical properties]]. Neutrinos rarely interact with anything, and are consequently rarely observed. Neutrinos stream throughout the universe but rarely interact with normal matter.<ref>{{cite press release
|publisher=[[Massachusetts Institute of Technology|MIT News Office]]
|date=April 18, 2007
|title=Experiment confirms famous physics model
|url=http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/neutrino.html
|access-date=June 2, 2015
|archive-date=July 5, 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130705100832/http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/neutrino.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref>


The [[lepton epoch]] was the period in the evolution of the early universe in which the [[lepton]]s dominated the mass of the universe. It started roughly 1 second after the [[Big Bang]], after the majority of hadrons and anti-hadrons annihilated each other at the end of the [[hadron epoch]]. During the lepton epoch the temperature of the universe was still high enough to create lepton–anti-lepton pairs, so leptons and anti-leptons were in thermal equilibrium. Approximately 10 seconds after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe had fallen to the point where lepton–anti-lepton pairs were no longer created.<ref>{{cite web|title=Thermal history of the universe and early growth of density fluctuations|url=http://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~gamk/TUM_Lectures/Lecture4.pdf|work=Guinevere Kauffmann|publisher=[[Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics]]|access-date=January 6, 2016|archive-date=August 21, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160821041542/http://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~gamk/TUM_Lectures/Lecture4.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Most leptons and anti-leptons were then eliminated in [[annihilation]] reactions, leaving a small residue of leptons. The mass of the universe was then dominated by [[photon]]s as it entered the following [[photon epoch]].<ref>{{cite web|title=First few minutes|work=Eric Chaisson|publisher=Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics|url=https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~ejchaisson/cosmic_evolution/docs/fr_1/fr_1_part3.html|access-date=January 6, 2016|archive-date=December 4, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204050252/https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~ejchaisson/cosmic_evolution/docs/fr_1/fr_1_part3.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Timeline of the Big Bang|work=The physics of the Universe|url=https://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/topics_bigbang_timeline.html|access-date=January 6, 2016|archive-date=March 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200330140345/https://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/topics_bigbang_timeline.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
===General theory of relativity===
{{Main|Introduction to general relativity|General relativity|Einstein's field equations}}


==== Photons ====
Given gravitation's predominance in shaping cosmological structures, accurate predictions of the universe's past and future require an accurate theory of gravitation. The best theory available is [[Albert Einstein]]'s general theory of relativity, which has passed all experimental tests hitherto. However, since rigorous experiments have not been carried out on cosmological length scales, general relativity could conceivably be inaccurate. Nevertheless, its cosmological predictions appear to be consistent with observations, so there is no compelling reason to adopt another theory.
{{Main|Photon epoch}}
{{See also|Photino}}
A photon is the [[quantum]] of [[light]] and all other forms of [[electromagnetic radiation]]. It is the [[force carrier|carrier]] for the [[electromagnetic force]]. The effects of this [[force]] are easily observable at the [[microscopic scale|microscopic]] and at the [[macroscopic scale|macroscopic]] level because the photon has zero [[rest mass]]; this allows long distance [[fundamental interaction|interactions]].<ref name="OpenStax-college-physics"/>{{rp|1470}}


The photon epoch started after most leptons and anti-leptons were [[annihilation|annihilated]] at the end of the lepton epoch, about 10 seconds after the Big Bang. Atomic nuclei were created in the process of nucleosynthesis which occurred during the first few minutes of the photon epoch. For the remainder of the photon epoch the universe contained a hot dense [[plasma (physics)|plasma]] of nuclei, electrons and photons. About 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe fell to the point where nuclei could combine with electrons to create neutral atoms. As a result, photons no longer interacted frequently with matter and the universe became transparent. The highly redshifted photons from this period form the cosmic microwave background. Tiny variations in the temperature of the CMB correspond to variations in the density of the universe that were the early "seeds" from which all subsequent [[structure formation]] took place.<ref name=Allday2002 />{{rp|244–266}}
General relativity provides of a set of ten nonlinear partial differential equations for the [[metric tensor (general relativity)|spacetime metric]] ([[Einstein field equations|Einstein's field equations]]) that must be solved from the distribution of [[mass-energy]] and [[momentum]] throughout the universe. Since these are unknown in exact detail, cosmological models have been based on the [[cosmological principle]], which states that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. In effect, this principle asserts that the gravitational effects of the various galaxies making up the universe are equivalent to those of a fine dust distributed uniformly throughout the universe with the same average density. The assumption of a uniform dust makes it easy to solve Einstein's field equations and predict the past and future of the universe on cosmological time scales.
{{Big Bang timeline|state=collapsed}}


==Habitability==
Einstein's field equations include a [[cosmological constant]] (''Λ''),<ref name="einstein_1917" /><ref>Rindler (1977), pp. 226–229.</ref> that corresponds to an energy density of empty space.<ref>Landau and Lifshitz (1975), pp. 358–359.</ref> Depending on its sign, the cosmological constant can either slow (negative ''Λ'') or accelerate (positive ''Λ'') the [[metric expansion of space|expansion of the universe]]. Although many scientists, including Einstein, had speculated that ''Λ'' was zero,<ref>{{cite journal | last = Einstein | first = A | authorlink = Albert Einstein | year = 1931 | title = Zum kosmologischen Problem der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie | journal = Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse | volume = 1931 | pages = 235–237}}<br />{{cite journal | author = [[Albert Einstein|Einstein A.]], [[Willem de Sitter|de Sitter W.]] | year = 1932 | title = On the relation between the expansion and the mean density of the universe | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | volume = 18 | pages = 213–214 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.18.3.213 | pmid = 16587663 | issue = 3 | pmc = 1076193}}</ref> recent astronomical observations of [[type Ia supernova]]e have detected a large amount of "[[dark energy]]" that is accelerating the universe's expansion.<ref>[http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/12/text/ Hubble Telescope news release]</ref> Preliminary studies suggest that this dark energy corresponds to a positive ''Λ'', although alternative theories cannot be ruled out as yet.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6156110.stm | work=BBC News | title=Mysterious force's long presence | date=2006-11-16}}</ref> Russian [[physics|physicist]] [[Yakov Borisovich Zel'dovich|Zel'dovich]] suggested that ''Λ'' is a measure of the [[zero-point energy]] associated with [[virtual particle]]s of [[quantum field theory]], a pervasive [[vacuum energy]] that exists everywhere, even in empty space.<ref>{{cite journal | author = [[Yakov Borisovich Zel'dovich|Zel'dovich YB]] | year = 1967 | title = Cosmological constant and elementary particles | journal = Zh. Eksp. & Teor. Fiz. Pis'ma | volume = 6 | pages = 883–884}} English translation in ''Sov. Phys.&nbsp;— JTEP Lett.'', '''6''', pp. 316–317 (1967).</ref> Evidence for such zero-point energy is observed in the [[Casimir effect]].
The frequency of [[life in the universe]] has been a frequent point of investigation in [[astronomy]] and [[astrobiology]], being the issue of the [[Drake equation]] and the different views on it, from identifying the [[Fermi paradox]], the situation of not having found any signs of [[extraterrestrial life]], to arguments for a [[biophysical cosmology]], a view of life being inherent to the [[physical cosmology]] of the universe.<ref name="v237">{{cite book | last=Dick | first=Steven J. | title=Space, Time, and Aliens | chapter=The Biophysical Cosmology: The Place of Bioastronomy in the History of Science | publisher=Springer International Publishing | publication-place=Cham | date=2020 | isbn=978-3-030-41613-3 | doi=10.1007/978-3-030-41614-0_4 | pages=53–58}}</ref>


== Cosmological models ==
===Special relativity and space-time===
=== Model of the universe based on general relativity ===
{{Main|Introduction to special relativity|Special relativity}}
{{Main|Solutions of the Einstein field equations}}
[[Image:Only distance is real.svg|thumb|300px|Only its length ''L'' is intrinsic to the rod (shown in black); coordinate differences between its endpoints (such as Δx, Δy or Δξ, Δη) depend on their frame of reference (depicted in blue and red, respectively).]]
{{See also|Big Bang|Ultimate fate of the universe}}

[[General relativity]] is the [[Differential geometry|geometric]] [[Theoretical physics|theory]] of [[gravitation]] published by [[Albert Einstein]] in 1915 and the current description of gravitation in [[modern physics]]. It is the basis of current [[Physical cosmology|cosmological]] models of the universe. General relativity generalizes [[special relativity]] and [[Newton's law of universal gravitation]], providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of [[space]] and [[Time in physics|time]], or spacetime. In particular, the [[curvature]] of spacetime is directly related to the [[energy]] and [[momentum]] of whatever [[matter]] and [[radiation]] are present.<ref name="zeilik_cosmology" />
The universe has at least three [[space|spatial]] and one temporal ([[time]]) dimension. It was long thought that the spatial and temporal dimensions were different in nature and independent of one another. However, according to the [[special relativity|special theory of relativity]], spatial and temporal separations are interconvertible (within limits) by changing one's motion.


The relation is specified by the [[Einstein field equations]], a system of [[partial differential equation]]s. In general relativity, the distribution of matter and energy determines the geometry of spacetime, which in turn describes the [[acceleration]] of matter. Therefore, solutions of the Einstein field equations describe the evolution of the universe. Combined with measurements of the amount, type, and distribution of matter in the universe, the equations of general relativity describe the evolution of the universe over time.<ref name="zeilik_cosmology" />
To understand this interconversion, it is helpful to consider the analogous interconversion of spatial separations along the three spatial dimensions. Consider the two endpoints of a rod of length ''L''. The length can be determined from the differences in the three coordinates Δx, Δy and Δz of the two endpoints in a given reference frame


With the assumption of the [[cosmological principle]] that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic everywhere, a specific solution of the field equations that describes the universe is the [[metric (general relativity)|metric tensor]] called the [[Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric]],
:<math>
:<math>
L^{2} = \Delta x^{2} + \Delta y^{2} + \Delta z^{2}
ds^2 = -c^{2} dt^2 +
R(t)^2 \left( \frac{dr^2}{1-k r^2} + r^2 d\theta^2 + r^2 \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2 \right)
</math>
</math>
where (''r'', θ, φ) correspond to a [[spherical coordinate system]]. This metric has only two undetermined parameters. An overall [[dimensionless]] length [[scale factor (cosmology)|scale factor]] ''R'' describes the size scale of the universe as a function of time (an increase in ''R'' is the [[expansion of the universe]]),<ref>{{harvtxt|Raine|Thomas|2001|p=12}}</ref> and a curvature index ''k'' describes the geometry. The index ''k'' is defined so that it can take only one of three values: 0, corresponding to flat [[Euclidean geometry]]; 1, corresponding to a space of positive [[curvature]]; or −1, corresponding to a space of positive or negative curvature.<ref name="RaineThomas66" /> The value of ''R'' as a function of time ''t'' depends upon ''k'' and the [[cosmological constant]] ''Λ''.<ref name="zeilik_cosmology">{{cite book |title=Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics |last1=Zeilik |first1=Michael |last2=Gregory |first2=Stephen A. |date=1998 |edition=4th |publisher=Saunders College Publishing |isbn=978-0-03-006228-5 |section=25-2}}</ref> The cosmological constant represents the energy density of the vacuum of space and could be related to dark energy.<ref name="peebles" /> The equation describing how ''R'' varies with time is known as the [[Friedmann equation]] after its inventor, [[Alexander Friedmann]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Friedmann |first=A. |author-link=Alexander Friedmann |date=1922 |title=Über die Krümmung des Raumes |url=http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/files/16735/E001554876.pdf |url-status=live |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=377–386 |bibcode=1922ZPhy...10..377F |doi=10.1007/BF01332580 |s2cid=125190902 |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160515100312/http%3A//publikationen.ub.uni%2Dfrankfurt.de/files/16735/E001554876.pdf |archive-date=May 15, 2016 |access-date=August 13, 2015}}</ref>


The solutions for ''R(t)'' depend on ''k'' and ''Λ'', but some qualitative features of such solutions are general. First and most importantly, the length scale ''R'' of the universe can remain constant ''only'' if the universe is perfectly isotropic with positive curvature (''k'' = 1) and has one precise value of density everywhere, as first noted by [[Albert Einstein]].<ref name="zeilik_cosmology" />
using the [[Pythagorean theorem]]. In a rotated reference frame, the coordinate differences differ, but they give the same length


Second, all solutions suggest that there was a [[gravitational singularity]] in the past, when ''R'' went to zero and matter and energy were infinitely dense. It may seem that this conclusion is uncertain because it is based on the questionable assumptions of perfect homogeneity and isotropy (the cosmological principle) and that only the gravitational interaction is significant. However, the [[Penrose–Hawking singularity theorems]] show that a singularity should exist for very general conditions. Hence, according to Einstein's field equations, ''R'' grew rapidly from an unimaginably hot, dense state that existed immediately following this singularity (when ''R'' had a small, finite value); this is the essence of the [[Big Bang]] model of the universe. Understanding the singularity of the Big Bang likely requires a [[quantum theory of gravity]], which has not yet been formulated.<ref>{{harvtxt|Raine|Thomas|2001|pp=122–123}}</ref>
:<math>
L^{2} = \Delta \xi^{2} + \Delta \eta^{2} + \Delta \zeta^{2}.
</math>


Third, the curvature index ''k'' determines the sign of the curvature of constant-time spatial surfaces<ref name="RaineThomas66">{{harvtxt|Raine|Thomas|2001|p=66}}</ref> averaged over sufficiently large length scales (greater than about a billion [[light-year]]s). If ''k'' = 1, the curvature is positive and the universe has a finite volume.<ref name="RaineThomas70" /> A universe with positive curvature is often visualized as a [[3-sphere|three-dimensional sphere]] embedded in a four-dimensional space. Conversely, if ''k'' is zero or negative, the universe has an infinite volume.<ref name="RaineThomas70">{{harvtxt|Raine|Thomas|2001|p=70}}</ref> It may seem counter-intuitive that an infinite and yet infinitely dense universe could be created in a single instant when ''R'' = 0, but exactly that is predicted mathematically when ''k'' is nonpositive and the [[cosmological principle]] is satisfied. By analogy, an infinite plane has zero curvature but infinite area, whereas an infinite cylinder is finite in one direction and a [[torus]] is finite in both.
Thus, the coordinates differences (Δx, Δy, Δz) and (Δξ, Δη, Δζ) are not intrinsic to the rod, but merely reflect the reference frame used to describe it; by contrast, the length ''L'' is an intrinsic property of the rod. The coordinate differences can be changed without affecting the rod, by rotating one's reference frame.


The [[ultimate fate of the universe]] is still unknown because it depends critically on the curvature index ''k'' and the cosmological constant ''Λ''. If the universe were sufficiently dense, ''k'' would equal +1, meaning that its average curvature throughout is positive and the universe will eventually recollapse in a [[Big Crunch]],<ref>{{harvtxt|Raine|Thomas|2001|p=84}}</ref> possibly starting a new universe in a [[Big Bounce]]. Conversely, if the universe were insufficiently dense, ''k'' would equal 0 or −1 and the universe would expand forever, cooling off and eventually reaching the [[Future of an expanding universe|Big Freeze]] and the [[heat death of the universe]].<ref name="zeilik_cosmology" /> Modern data suggests that the [[accelerated expansion|expansion of the universe is accelerating]]; if this acceleration is sufficiently rapid, the universe may eventually reach a [[Big Rip]]. Observationally, the universe appears to be flat (''k'' = 0), with an overall density that is very close to the critical value between recollapse and eternal expansion.<ref>{{harvtxt|Raine|Thomas|2001|pp=88, 110–113}}</ref>
The analogy in [[spacetime]] is called the interval between two events; an event is defined as a point in spacetime, a specific position in space and a specific moment in time. The spacetime interval between two events is given by


=== Multiverse hypotheses ===
:<math>
{{Main|Multiverse|Many-worlds interpretation|Bubble universe theory}}
s^{2} = L_{1}^{2} - c^{2} \Delta t_{1}^{2} = L_{2}^{2} - c^{2} \Delta t_{2}^{2}
{{See also|Eternal inflation}}
</math>
Some speculative theories have proposed that our universe is but one of a [[set (mathematics)|set]] of disconnected universes, collectively denoted as the [[multiverse]], challenging or enhancing more limited definitions of the universe.<ref name="EllisKS032" /><ref>{{cite journal |author=Munitz |first=M. K. |date=1959 |title=One Universe or Many? |journal=Journal of the History of Ideas |volume=12 |issue=2 |pages=231–255 |doi=10.2307/2707516 |jstor=2707516}}</ref> [[Max Tegmark]] developed a four-part [[Multiverse#Max Tegmark's four levels|classification scheme]] for the different types of multiverses that scientists have suggested in response to various problems in [[physics]]. An example of such multiverses is the one resulting from the [[bubble universe theory|chaotic inflation]] model of the early universe.<ref name="chaotic_inflation">{{cite journal |author=Linde |first=A. |author-link=Andrei Linde |date=1986 |title=Eternal chaotic inflation |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/167897 |url-status=live |journal=Mod. Phys. Lett. A |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=81–85 |bibcode=1986MPLA....1...81L |doi=10.1142/S0217732386000129 |s2cid=123472763 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190417211031/https://cds.cern.ch/record/167897/ |archive-date=April 17, 2019 |access-date=August 6, 2017}}<br />{{cite journal |author=Linde |first=A. |author-link=Andrei Linde |date=1986 |title=Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflationary Universe |url=http://www.stanford.edu/~alinde/Eternal86.pdf |url-status=live |journal=Phys. Lett. B |volume=175 |issue=4 |pages=395–400 |bibcode=1986PhLB..175..395L |doi=10.1016/0370-2693(86)90611-8 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131127164909/http://www.stanford.edu/~alinde/Eternal86.pdf |archive-date=November 27, 2013 |access-date=March 17, 2011}}</ref>


Another is the multiverse resulting from the [[many-worlds interpretation]] of quantum mechanics. In this interpretation, parallel worlds are generated in a manner similar to [[quantum superposition]] and [[decoherence]], with all states of the [[wave function]]s being realized in separate worlds. Effectively, in the many-worlds interpretation the multiverse evolves as a [[universal wavefunction]]. If the Big Bang that created our multiverse created an ensemble of multiverses, the wave function of the ensemble would be entangled in this sense.<ref name=everett1957>{{cite journal |last1=Everett |first1=Hugh |author-link=Hugh Everett |year=1957 |title=Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=454–462 |bibcode=1957RvMP...29..454E |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454 |s2cid=17178479 }}</ref> Whether scientifically meaningful probabilities can be extracted from this picture has been and continues to be a topic of much debate, and multiple versions of the many-worlds interpretation exist.<ref name="ball">{{Cite web |last=Ball |first=Philip |author-link=Philip Ball |date=February 17, 2015 |title=Too many worlds |url=https://aeon.co/essays/is-the-many-worlds-hypothesis-just-a-fantasy |url-status=live |access-date=September 23, 2021 |website=[[Aeon.co]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210927130915/https://aeon.co/essays/is-the-many-worlds-hypothesis-just-a-fantasy|archive-date=September 27, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Peres |first=Asher |title=[[Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods]] |publisher=Kluwer Academic Publishers |year=1995 |isbn=0-7923-2549-4 |pages=374 |author-link=Asher Peres}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kent |first=Adrian |author-link=Adrian Kent |date=February 2015 |title=Does it Make Sense to Speak of Self-Locating Uncertainty in the Universal Wave Function? Remarks on Sebens and Carroll |journal=Foundations of Physics |language=en |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=211–217 |arxiv=1408.1944 |bibcode=2015FoPh...45..211K |doi=10.1007/s10701-014-9862-5 |issn=0015-9018 |s2cid=118471198}}</ref> The subject of the [[Interpretations of quantum mechanics|interpretation of quantum mechanics]] is in general marked by disagreement.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Schlosshauer |first1=Maximilian |last2=Kofler |first2=Johannes |last3=Zeilinger |first3=Anton |author-link3=Anton Zeilinger |date=August 1, 2013 |title=A snapshot of foundational attitudes toward quantum mechanics |journal=Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics |volume=44 |issue=3 |pages=222–230 |arxiv=1301.1069 |bibcode=2013SHPMP..44..222S |doi=10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.04.004 |issn=1355-2198 |s2cid=55537196}}</ref><ref name=":22">{{Cite journal |last=Mermin |first=N. David |author-link=N. David Mermin |date=July 1, 2012 |title=Commentary: Quantum mechanics: Fixing the shifty split |journal=[[Physics Today]] |volume=65 |issue=7 |pages=8–10 |bibcode=2012PhT....65g...8M |doi=10.1063/PT.3.1618 |issn=0031-9228 |quote=New interpretations appear every year. None ever disappear. |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite book |last=Cabello |first=Adán |title=What is Quantum Information? |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2017 |isbn=9781107142114 |editor-last=Lombardi |editor-first=Olimpia |editor-link=Olimpia Lombardi |pages=138–143 |chapter=Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness |bibcode=2015arXiv150904711C |doi=10.1017/9781316494233.009 |editor2-last=Fortin |editor2-first=Sebastian |editor3-last=Holik |editor3-first=Federico |editor4-last=López |editor4-first=Cristian |arxiv=1509.04711 |s2cid=118419619}}</ref>
where ''c'' is the speed of light. According to [[special relativity]], one can change a spatial and time separation (''L''<sub>1</sub>, Δ''t''<sub>1</sub>) into another (''L''<sub>2</sub>, Δ''t''<sub>2</sub>) by changing one's reference frame, as long as the change maintains the spacetime interval ''s''. Such a change in reference frame corresponds to changing one's motion; in a moving frame, lengths and times are different from their counterparts in a stationary reference frame. The precise manner in which the coordinate and time differences change with motion is described by the [[Lorentz transformation]].


The least controversial, but still highly disputed, category of multiverse in Tegmark's scheme is [[Multiverse#Level I: An extension of our universe|Level I]]. The multiverses of this level are composed by distant spacetime events "in our own universe". Tegmark and others<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Jaume |last1=Garriga |first2=Alexander |last2=Vilenkin |date=2007 |title=Many Worlds in One |journal=Physical Review D |volume=64 |issue=4 |page=043511 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043511 |arxiv=gr-qc/0102010v2|s2cid=119000743 }}</ref> have argued that, if space is infinite, or sufficiently large and uniform, identical instances of the history of Earth's entire [[Hubble volume]] occur every so often, simply by chance. Tegmark calculated that our nearest so-called [[doppelgänger]] is 10<sup>10<sup>115</sup></sup> metres away from us (a [[double exponential function]] larger than a [[googolplex]]).<ref name="TegmarkPUstaple">{{cite journal |author=Tegmark |first=Max |date=2003 |title=Parallel universes. Not just a staple of science fiction, other universes are a direct implication of cosmological observations |journal=Scientific American |volume=288 |issue=5 |pages=40–51 |arxiv=astro-ph/0302131 |bibcode=2003SciAm.288e..40T |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40 |pmid=12701329}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Tegmark, Max |journal=Scientific American |title=Parallel Universes |date=2003 |arxiv=astro-ph/0302131|bibcode=2003SciAm.288e..40T |pages=40–51|doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40 |pmid=12701329 |volume=288|issue=5 }}</ref> However, the arguments used are of speculative nature.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gil |first1=Francisco José Soler |last2=Alfonseca |first2=Manuel |date=2013 |title=About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space |journal=Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science |volume=29 |issue=3 |page=361 |arxiv=1301.5295 |doi=10.1387/theoria.9951 |s2cid=52996408 |hdl-access=free |hdl=10486/664735}}</ref>
===Solving Einstein's field equations===
{{See also|Big Bang|Ultimate fate of the universe}}


It is possible to conceive of disconnected spacetimes, each existing but unable to interact with one another.<ref name="TegmarkPUstaple" /><ref name="EllisScA">{{cite journal |author=Ellis |first=G. F. |date=2011 |title=Does the Multiverse Really Exist? |journal=Scientific American |volume=305 |issue=2 |pages=38–43 |bibcode=2011SciAm.305a..38E |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0811-38 |pmid=21827123}}</ref> An easily visualized metaphor of this concept is a group of separate [[soap bubble]]s, in which observers living on one soap bubble cannot interact with those on other soap bubbles, even in principle.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.livescience.com/15530-multiverse-universe-eternal-inflation-test.html |title=Weird! Our Universe May Be a 'Multiverse,' Scientists Say |first=Clara |last=Moskowitz|author-link= Clara Moskowitz |date=August 12, 2011 |work=livescience |access-date=May 4, 2015 |archive-date=May 5, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150505003038/http://www.livescience.com/15530-multiverse-universe-eternal-inflation-test.html |url-status=live }}</ref> According to one common terminology, each "soap bubble" of spacetime is denoted as a ''universe'', whereas humans' particular spacetime is denoted as ''the universe'',<ref name="EllisKS032" /> just as humans call Earth's moon ''the [[Moon]]''. The entire collection of these separate spacetimes is denoted as the multiverse.<ref name="EllisKS032">{{cite journal |last1=Ellis |first1=George F. R. |author-link=George Francis Rayner Ellis |last2=Kirchner |first2=U. |last3=Stoeger |first3=W. R. |date=2004 |title=Multiverses and physical cosmology |journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]] |volume=347 |issue=3 |pages=921–936 |arxiv=astro-ph/0305292 |bibcode=2004MNRAS.347..921E |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07261.x |doi-access=free |s2cid=119028830}}</ref>
The distances between the spinning galaxies increase with time, but the distances between the stars within each galaxy stay roughly the same, due to their gravitational interactions. This animation illustrates a closed Friedmann universe with zero [[cosmological constant]] Λ; such a universe oscillates between a [[Big Bang]] and a [[Big Crunch]].
[[File:Closed Friedmann universe zero Lambda.ogg|thumb|right|Animation illustrating the [[metric expansion of the universe]]]]


With this terminology, different ''universes'' are not [[causality|causally connected]] to each other.<ref name="EllisKS032" /> In principle, the other unconnected ''universes'' may have different [[dimension]]alities and [[Topology|topologies]] of spacetime, different forms of [[matter]] and [[energy]], and different [[physical law]]s and [[physical constant]]s, although such possibilities are purely speculative.<ref name="EllisKS032" /> Others consider each of several bubbles created as part of [[chaotic inflation]] to be separate ''universes'', though in this model these universes all share a causal origin.<ref name="EllisKS032" />
In non-Cartesian (non-square) or curved coordinate systems, the Pythagorean theorem holds only on infinitesimal length scales and must be augmented with a more general [[metric tensor]] ''g''<sub>μν</sub>, which can vary from place to place and which describes the local geometry in the particular coordinate system. However, assuming the [[cosmological principle]] that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic everywhere, every point in space is like every other point; hence, the metric tensor must be the same everywhere. That leads to a single form for the metric tensor, called the [[Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric]]


== Historical conceptions ==
:<math>
{{See also|Cosmology|Timeline of cosmological theories|Nicolaus Copernicus#Copernican system|Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica#Beginnings of the Scientific Revolution}}
ds^2 = -c^{2} dt^2 +
Historically, there have been many ideas of the cosmos (cosmologies) and its origin (cosmogonies). Theories of an impersonal universe governed by physical laws were first proposed by the Greeks and Indians.<ref name=Routledge /> Ancient Chinese philosophy encompassed the notion of the universe including both all of space and all of time.<ref>{{cite news|last=Gernet|first=J.|date=1993–1994|title=Space and time: Science and religion in the encounter between China and Europe|journal=Chinese Science|volume=11|pages=93–102}}</ref> Over the centuries, improvements in astronomical observations and theories of motion and gravitation led to ever more accurate descriptions of the universe. The modern era of cosmology began with [[Albert Einstein]]'s 1915 [[general relativity|general theory of relativity]], which made it possible to quantitatively predict the origin, evolution, and conclusion of the universe as a whole. Most modern, accepted theories of cosmology are based on general relativity and, more specifically, the predicted [[Big Bang]].<ref name="Blandford">{{cite journal|title=A century of general relativity: Astrophysics and cosmology|author=Blandford R. D.|journal=Science|volume=347|issue=6226|pages=1103–1108|doi=10.1126/science.aaa4033|bibcode=2015Sci...347.1103B|pmid=25745165|year=2015|s2cid=30364122}}</ref>
R(t)^2 \left( \frac{dr^2}{1-k r^2} + r^2 d\theta^2 + r^2 \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2 \right)
</math>


=== Mythologies ===
where (''r'', θ, φ) correspond to a [[spherical coordinate system]]. This [[metric (mathematics)|metric]] has only two undetermined parameters: an overall length scale ''R'' that can vary with time, and a curvature index ''k'' that can be only 0, 1 or −1, corresponding to flat [[Euclidean geometry]], or spaces of positive or negative [[curvature]]. In cosmology, solving for the history of the universe is done by calculating ''R'' as a function of time, given ''k'' and the value of the [[cosmological constant]] ''Λ'', which is a (small) parameter in Einstein's field equations. The equation describing how ''R'' varies with time is known as the [[Friedmann equation]], after its inventor, [[Alexander Friedmann]].<ref>{{cite journal | author = [[Alexander Friedmann|Friedmann A.]] | year = 1922 | title = Über die Krümmung des Raumes | journal = Zeitschrift für Physik | volume = 10 | issue = 1 | pages = 377–386 | doi = 10.1007/BF01332580}}</ref>
{{Main|Creation myth|Cosmogony|Religious cosmology}}
Many cultures have [[List of creation myths|stories describing the origin of the world and universe]]. Cultures generally regard these stories as having some [[truth]]. There are however many differing beliefs in how these stories apply amongst those believing in a supernatural origin, ranging from a god directly creating the universe as it is now to a god just setting the "wheels in motion" (for example via mechanisms such as the big bang and evolution).<ref>{{cite book |quote="In common usage the word 'myth' refers to narratives or beliefs that are untrue or merely fanciful; the stories that make up national or ethnic mythologies describe characters and events that common sense and experience tell us are impossible. Nevertheless, all cultures celebrate such myths and attribute to them various degrees of literal or symbolic ''truth''." |last=Leeming |first=David A. |isbn=978-1-59884-174-9 |date=2010|page=xvii |title=Creation Myths of the World |publisher=ABC-CLIO}}</ref>


Ethnologists and anthropologists who study myths have developed various classification schemes for the various themes that appear in creation stories.<ref name=Eliade1964>{{cite book|last1=Eliade|first1=Mircea|title=Myth and Reality (Religious Traditions of the World)|date=1964|publisher=Allen & Unwin|isbn=978-0-04-291001-7}}</ref><ref name=Leonard2004>{{cite book|last1=Leonard|first1=Scott A.|last2=McClure|first2=Michael|title=Myth and Knowing: An Introduction to World Mythology|date=2004|publisher=McGraw-Hill|isbn=978-0-7674-1957-4|edition=}}</ref> For example, in one type of story, the world is born from a [[world egg]]; such stories include the [[Finnish people|Finnish]] [[epic poetry|epic poem]] ''[[Kalevala]]'', the [[China|Chinese]] story of [[Pangu]] or the [[History of India|Indian]] [[Brahmanda Purana]]. In related stories, the universe is created by a single entity emanating or producing something by him- or herself, as in the [[Tibetan Buddhism]] concept of [[Adi-Buddha]], the [[ancient Greece|ancient Greek]] story of [[Gaia (mythology)|Gaia]] (Mother Earth), the [[Aztec mythology|Aztec]] goddess [[Coatlicue]] myth, the [[ancient Egyptian religion|ancient Egyptian]] [[Ennead|god]] [[Atum]] story, and the [[Judeo-Christian]] [[Genesis creation narrative]] in which the [[God in Abrahamic religions|Abrahamic God]] created the universe. In another type of story, the universe is created from the union of male and female deities, as in the [[Maori mythology|Maori story]] of [[Rangi and Papa]]. In other stories, the universe is created by crafting it from pre-existing materials, such as the corpse of a dead god—as from [[Tiamat]] in the [[Babylon]]ian epic ''[[Enuma Elish]]'' or from the giant [[Ymir]] in [[Norse mythology]]—or from chaotic materials, as in [[Izanagi]] and [[Izanami]] in [[Japanese mythology]]. In other stories, the universe emanates from fundamental principles, such as [[Brahman]] and [[Prakrti]], and the [[Serer creation myth|creation myth]] of the [[Serer people|Serers]].<ref>([[Henry Gravrand]], "La civilisation Sereer -Pangool") [in] [[Universität Frankfurt am Main]], Frobenius-Institut, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kulturmorphologie, Frobenius Gesellschaft, "Paideuma: Mitteilungen zur Kulturkunde, Volumes 43–44", F. Steiner (1997), pp. 144–145, {{ISBN|3-515-02842-0}}</ref>
The solutions for ''R(t)'' depend on ''k'' and ''Λ'', but some qualitative features of such solutions are general. First and most importantly, the length scale ''R'' of the universe can remain constant ''only'' if the universe is perfectly isotropic with positive curvature (''k''=1) and has one precise value of density everywhere, as first noted by [[Albert Einstein]]. However, this equilibrium is unstable and since the universe is known to be inhomogeneous on smaller scales, ''R'' must change, according to [[general relativity]]. When ''R'' changes, all the spatial distances in the universe change in tandem; there is an overall expansion or contraction of space itself. This accounts for the observation that galaxies appear to be flying apart; the space between them is stretching. The stretching of space also accounts for the apparent paradox that two galaxies can be 40 billion light years apart, although they started from the same point 13.7 billion years ago and never moved faster than the [[speed of light]].


=== Philosophical models ===
Second, all solutions suggest that there was a [[gravitational singularity]] in the past, when ''R'' goes to zero and matter and energy became infinitely dense. It may seem that this conclusion is uncertain since it is based on the questionable assumptions of perfect homogeneity and isotropy (the cosmological principle) and that only the gravitational interaction is significant. However, the [[Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems]] show that a singularity should exist for very general conditions. Hence, according to Einstein's field equations, ''R'' grew rapidly from an unimaginably hot, dense state that existed immediately following this singularity (when ''R'' had a small, finite value); this is the essence of the [[Big Bang]] model of the universe. A common misconception is that the Big Bang model predicts that matter and energy exploded from a single point in space and time; that is false. Rather, space itself was created in the Big Bang and imbued with a fixed amount of energy and matter distributed uniformly throughout; as space expands (i.e., as ''R(t)'' increases), the density of that matter and energy decreases.
{{Further|Cosmology}}
{{See also|Pre-Socratic philosophy|Physics (Aristotle)|Hindu cosmology|Islamic cosmology|Philosophy of space and time}}
The [[pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratic Greek philosophers]] and Indian philosophers developed some of the earliest philosophical concepts of the universe.<ref name=Routledge /><ref>{{cite book|title=The Unfinished Universe|page=21|publisher=Oxford University Press|first=Louise B.|last=Young |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-195-08039-1 |oclc=26399171}}</ref> The earliest Greek philosophers noted that appearances can be deceiving, and sought to understand the underlying reality behind the appearances. In particular, they noted the ability of matter to change forms (e.g., ice to water to steam) and several philosophers proposed that all the physical materials in the world are different forms of a single primordial material, or ''[[arche]]''. The first to do so was [[Thales]], who proposed this material to be [[Water (classical element)|water]]. Thales' student, [[Anaximander]], proposed that everything came from the limitless ''[[Apeiron (cosmology)|apeiron]]''. [[Anaximenes of Miletus|Anaximenes]] proposed the primordial material to be [[Air (classical element)|air]] on account of its perceived attractive and repulsive qualities that cause the ''arche'' to condense or dissociate into different forms. [[Anaxagoras]] proposed the principle of ''[[Nous]]'' (Mind), while [[Heraclitus]] proposed [[fire (classical element)|fire]] (and spoke of ''[[logos]]''). [[Empedocles]] proposed the elements to be earth, water, air and fire. His four-element model became very popular. Like [[Pythagoras]], [[Plato]] believed that all things were composed of [[number]], with Empedocles' elements taking the form of the [[Platonic solids]]. [[Democritus]], and later philosophers—most notably [[Leucippus]]—proposed that the universe is composed of indivisible [[atom]]s moving through a [[void (astronomy)|void]] ([[vacuum]]), although [[Aristotle]] did not believe that to be feasible because air, like water, offers [[Drag (physics)|resistance to motion]]. Air will immediately rush in to fill a void, and moreover, without resistance, it would do so indefinitely fast.<ref name=Routledge />


Although Heraclitus argued for eternal change,<ref>{{cite SEP|url-id=heraclitus |title=Heraclitus |date=September 3, 2019 |last=Graham |first=Daniel W.}}</ref> his contemporary [[Parmenides]] emphasized changelessness. Parmenides' poem ''On Nature'' has been read as saying that all change is an illusion, that the true underlying reality is eternally unchanging and of a single nature, or at least that the essential feature of each thing that exists must exist eternally, without origin, change, or end.<ref>{{cite SEP|url-id=parmenides |title=Parmenides |date=October 19, 2020 |first=John |last=Palmer}}</ref> His student [[Zeno of Elea]] challenged everyday ideas about motion with several famous [[Zeno's paradoxes|paradoxes]]. Aristotle responded to these paradoxes by developing the notion of a potential countable infinity, as well as the infinitely divisible continuum.<ref>{{cite SEP|url-id=zeno-elea |title=Zeno of Elea |date=April 8, 2021 |first=John |last=Palmer}}</ref><ref>{{cite IEP|url-id=zenos-paradoxes |title=Zeno's Paradoxes |first=Bradley |last=Dowden}}</ref>
{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#FFFDD0; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 35%;" cellspacing="5"
| style="text-align: left;"|
Space has no boundary&nbsp;– that is empirically more certain than any external observation. However, that does not imply that space is infinite...(translated, original German)
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[Bernhard Riemann]] (Habilitationsvortrag, 1854)
|}


The [[Indian philosophy|Indian philosopher]] [[Kanada (philosopher)|Kanada]], founder of the [[Vaisheshika]] school, developed a notion of [[atomism]] and proposed that [[light]] and [[heat]] were varieties of the same substance.<ref>[[Will Durant]], ''Our Oriental Heritage'': {{blockquote|"Two systems of Hindu thought propound physical theories suggestively similar to those of [[Ancient Greece|Greece]]. Kanada, founder of the Vaisheshika philosophy, held that the world is composed of atoms as many in kind as the various elements. The [[Jainism|Jains]] more nearly approximated to [[Democritus]] by teaching that all atoms were of the same kind, producing different effects by diverse modes of combinations. Kanada believed light and heat to be varieties of the same substance; [[Udayana]] taught that all heat comes from the Sun; and [[Vācaspati Miśra|Vachaspati]], like [[Isaac Newton|Newton]], interpreted light as composed of minute particles emitted by substances and striking the eye."}}</ref> In the 5th century AD, the [[Buddhist atomism|Buddhist atomist]] philosopher [[Dignāga]] proposed [[atom]]s to be point-sized, durationless, and made of energy. They denied the existence of substantial matter and proposed that movement consisted of momentary flashes of a stream of energy.<ref>Stcherbatsky, F. Th. (1930, 1962), ''Buddhist Logic'', Volume 1, p. 19, Dover, New York: {{blockquote|"The Buddhists denied the existence of substantial matter altogether. Movement consists for them of moments, it is a staccato movement, momentary flashes of a stream of energy... "Everything is evanescent",... says the Buddhist, because there is no stuff... Both systems <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Samkhya|Sānkhya]], and later Indian Buddhism<nowiki>]</nowiki> share in common a tendency to push the analysis of existence up to its minutest, last elements which are imagined as absolute qualities, or things possessing only one unique quality. They are called "qualities" (''guna-dharma'') in both systems in the sense of absolute qualities, a kind of atomic, or intra-atomic, energies of which the empirical things are composed. Both systems, therefore, agree in denying the objective reality of the categories of Substance and Quality,... and of the relation of Inference uniting them. There is in Sānkhya philosophy no separate existence of qualities. What we call quality is but a particular manifestation of a subtle entity. To every new unit of quality corresponds a subtle quantum of matter which is called ''guna'', "quality", but represents a subtle substantive entity. The same applies to early Buddhism where all qualities are substantive... or, more precisely, dynamic entities, although they are also called ''dharmas'' ('qualities')."}}</ref>
Third, the curvature index ''k'' determines the sign of the mean spatial curvature of [[spacetime]] averaged over length scales greater than a billion [[light year]]s. If ''k''=1, the curvature is positive and the universe has a finite volume. Such universes are often visualized as a [[3-sphere|three-dimensional sphere ''S''<sup>3</sup> embedded in a four-dimensional space]]. Conversely, if ''k'' is zero or negative, the universe ''may'' have infinite volume, depending on its overall [[topology]]. It may seem counter-intuitive that an infinite and yet infinitely dense universe could be created in a single instant at the Big Bang when ''R''=0, but exactly that is predicted mathematically when ''k'' does not equal 1. For comparison, an infinite plane has zero curvature but infinite area, whereas an infinite cylinder is finite in one direction and a [[torus]] is finite in both. A toroidal universe could behave like a normal universe with [[periodic boundary conditions]], as seen in [[wraparound (video games)|"wrap-around" video games]] such as ''[[Asteroids (arcade game)|Asteroids]]''; a traveler crossing an outer "boundary" of space going ''outwards'' would reappear instantly at another point on the boundary moving ''inwards''.


The notion of [[temporal finitism]] was inspired by the doctrine of creation shared by the three [[Abrahamic religions]]: [[Judaism]], [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]]. The [[Christian philosophy|Christian philosopher]], [[John Philoponus]], presented the philosophical arguments against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past and future. Philoponus' arguments against an infinite past were used by the [[Early Islamic philosophy|early Muslim philosopher]], [[Al-Kindi]] (Alkindus); the [[Jewish philosophy|Jewish philosopher]], [[Saadia Gaon]] (Saadia ben Joseph); and the [[Kalam|Muslim theologian]], [[Al-Ghazali]] (Algazel).<ref name="Viney1985">{{cite book |author=Viney |first=Donald Wayne |title=Charles Hartshorne and the Existence of God |publisher=SUNY Press |year=1985 |isbn=978-0-87395-907-0 |pages=65–68 |chapter=The Cosmological Argument}}</ref>
[[File:CMB Timeline300 no WMAP.jpg|thumb|600px|center|Prevailing model of the origin and expansion of [[spacetime]] and all that it contains.]]
{{Clear}}
The [[ultimate fate of the universe]] is still unknown, because it depends critically on the curvature index ''k'' and the cosmological constant ''Λ''. If the universe is sufficiently dense, ''k'' equals +1, meaning that its average curvature throughout is positive and the universe will eventually recollapse in a [[Big Crunch]], possibly starting a new universe in a [[Big Bounce]]. Conversely, if the universe is insufficiently dense, ''k'' equals 0 or −1 and the universe will expand forever, cooling off and eventually becoming inhospitable for all life, as the stars die and all matter coalesces into black holes (the [[Future of an expanding universe|Big Freeze]] and the [[heat death of the universe]]). As noted above, recent data suggests that the expansion speed of the universe is not decreasing as originally expected, but increasing; if this continues indefinitely, the universe will eventually rip itself to shreds (the [[Big Rip]]). Experimentally, the universe has an overall density that is very close to the critical value between recollapse and eternal expansion; more careful astronomical observations are needed to resolve the question.


[[Pantheism]] is the [[Philosophy|philosophical]] [[Religion|religious]] belief that the universe itself is identical to [[divinity]] and a [[Deity|supreme being]] or entity.<ref name="Pearsall">{{cite book |last1=Pearsall |first1=Judy |title=The New Oxford Dictionary Of English |date=1998 |publisher=Clarendon Press |isbn=978-0-19-861263-6 |edition=1st |location=Oxford |page=1341}}</ref> The physical universe is thus understood as an all-encompassing, [[Immanence|immanent]] deity.<ref name="Edwards">{{cite book |last1=Edwards |first1=Paul |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofph08edwa |title=Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=1967 |publisher=Macmillan |location=New York |page=[https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofph08edwa/page/34 34] |url-access=registration}}</ref> The term 'pantheist' designates one who holds both that everything constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine, consisting of an all-encompassing, manifested [[God (male deity)|god]] or [[goddess]].<ref name="Edwards2">{{Cite book |title=Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Paul Edwards |publisher=Macmillan and Free Press |year=1967 |location=New York |page=34}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Reid-Bowen |first=Paul |title=Goddess as Nature: Towards a Philosophical Thealogy |date=April 15, 2016 |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |isbn=9781317126348 |page=70}}</ref>
===Big Bang model===
{{Main|Big Bang|Timeline of the Big Bang|Nucleosynthesis|Lambda-CDM model}}


=== Astronomical concepts ===
The prevailing Big Bang model accounts for many of the experimental observations described above, such as the correlation of distance and [[redshift]] of galaxies, the universal ratio of hydrogen:helium atoms, and the ubiquitous, isotropic microwave radiation background. As noted above, the redshift arises from the [[metric expansion of space]]; as the space itself expands, the wavelength of a [[photon]] traveling through space likewise increases, decreasing its energy. The longer a photon has been traveling, the more expansion it has undergone; hence, older photons from more distant galaxies are the most red-shifted. Determining the correlation between distance and redshift is an important problem in experimental [[physical cosmology]].
{{Main|History of astronomy|Timeline of astronomy}}
[[File:Aristarchus working.jpg|thumb|right|3rd century BCE calculations by [[Aristarchus of Samos|Aristarchus]] on the relative sizes of, from left to right, the Sun, Earth, and Moon, from a 10th-century AD Greek copy]]


The earliest written records of identifiable [[history of astronomy|predecessors to modern astronomy]] come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and [[Mesopotamia]] from around 3000 to 1200 [[Common Era|BCE]].<ref name=Lindberg2007a>{{Cite book |last=Lindberg |first=David C. |title=The beginnings of Western science: the European Scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2007 |isbn=9780226482057 |edition=2nd |page=12}}</ref><ref name="Grant2007a">{{cite book |last=Grant |first=Edward |title=A History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-521-68957-1 |edition=|location=New York |pages=1–26 |chapter=Ancient Egypt to Plato |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/historynaturalph00gran/page/n16 |chapter-url-access=limited}}</ref> [[Babylonian astronomy|Babylonian astronomers]] of the 7th century BCE viewed the world as a [[Flat Earth|flat disk]] surrounded by the ocean.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Wayne |last=Horowitz |journal=Iraq |year=1988 |title=The Babylonian Map of the World |volume=50 |pages=147–165 |doi=10.2307/4200289 |jstor=4200289|s2cid=190703581 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Keel |first1=Othmar |title=The Symbolism of the Biblical World |year=1997 |publisher=Eisenbrauns |isbn=978-1-575-06014-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Fy4B1iMg33YC |pages=20–22 |access-date=February 26, 2023 |archive-date=March 13, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240313184352/https://books.google.com/books?id=Fy4B1iMg33YC |url-status=live }}</ref>
[[Image:Primordial nucleosynthesis.svg|thumb|400px|Chief nuclear reactions responsible for the [[abundance of the chemical elements|relative abundances]] of light [[atomic nucleus|atomic nuclei]] observed throughout the universe.]]


Later [[Ancient Greece|Greek]] philosophers, observing the motions of the heavenly bodies, were concerned with developing models of the universe based more profoundly on [[empirical evidence]]. The first coherent model was proposed by [[Eudoxus of Cnidos]], a student of Plato who followed Plato's idea that heavenly motions had to be circular. In order to account for the known complications of the planets' motions, particularly [[Retrograde and prograde motion|retrograde movement]], Eudoxus' model included 27 different [[celestial spheres]]: four for each of the planets visible to the naked eye, three each for the Sun and the Moon, and one for the stars. All of these spheres were centered on the Earth, which remained motionless while they rotated eternally. Aristotle elaborated upon this model, increasing the number of spheres to 55 in order to account for further details of planetary motion. For Aristotle, normal [[classical elements|matter]] was entirely contained within the terrestrial sphere, and it obeyed fundamentally different rules from [[Aether (classical element)|heavenly material]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wright |first=Larry |date=August 1973 |title=The astronomy of Eudoxus: Geometry or physics? |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0039368173900022 |journal=Studies in History and Philosophy of Science |language=en |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=165–172 |doi=10.1016/0039-3681(73)90002-2 |bibcode=1973SHPSA...4..165W |access-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-date=March 15, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230315164807/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0039368173900022 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Dicati |first=Renato |title=The Ancients' Astronomy |date=2013 |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-88-470-2829-6_2 |work=Stamping Through Astronomy |pages=19–55 |place=Milano |publisher=Springer Milan |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-88-470-2829-6_2 |isbn=978-88-470-2828-9 |access-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-date=March 13, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240313184405/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-88-470-2829-6_2 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Other experimental observations can be explained by combining the overall expansion of space with [[nuclear physics|nuclear]] and [[atomic physics]]. As the universe expands, the energy density of the [[electromagnetic radiation]] decreases more quickly than does that of [[matter]], since the energy of a photon decreases with its wavelength. Thus, although the energy density of the universe is now dominated by matter, it was once dominated by radiation; poetically speaking, all was [[light]]. As the universe expanded, its energy density decreased and it became cooler; as it did so, the [[elementary particle]]s of matter could associate stably into ever larger combinations. Thus, in the early part of the matter-dominated era, stable [[proton]]s and [[neutron]]s formed, which then associated into [[atomic nuclei]]. At this stage, the matter in the universe was mainly a hot, dense [[Plasma (physics)|plasma]] of negative [[electron]]s, neutral [[neutrino]]s and positive nuclei. [[Nuclear reaction]]s among the nuclei led to the present abundances of the lighter nuclei, particularly [[hydrogen]], [[deuterium]], and [[helium]]. Eventually, the electrons and nuclei combined to form stable atoms, which are transparent to most wavelengths of radiation; at this point, the radiation decoupled from the matter, forming the ubiquitous, isotropic background of microwave radiation observed today.


The post-Aristotle treatise ''[[De Mundo]]'' (of uncertain authorship and date) stated, "Five elements, situated in spheres in five regions, the less being in each case surrounded by the greater—namely, earth surrounded by water, water by air, air by fire, and fire by ether—make up the whole universe".<ref name=1908DeMundo>{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/demundoarisrich |title=De Mundo |year=1914 |author=Aristotle |author2=Forster, E. S. |author3=Dobson, J. F. |page=[https://archive.org/details/demundoarisrich/page/2 2] |location=Oxford |publisher=The Clarendon Press}}</ref> This model was also refined by [[Callippus]] and after concentric spheres were abandoned, it was brought into nearly perfect agreement with astronomical observations by [[Ptolemy]].<ref name="almagest">{{cite journal |last=Goldstein |first=Bernard R. |date=1997 |title=Saving the phenomena: the background to Ptolemy's planetary theory |journal=Journal for the History of Astronomy |volume=28 |issue=1 |pages=1–12 |bibcode=1997JHA....28....1G |doi=10.1177/002182869702800101 |s2cid=118875902}}</ref> The success of such a model is largely due to the mathematical fact that any function (such as the position of a planet) can be decomposed into a set of circular functions (the [[Fourier series|Fourier modes]]). Other Greek scientists, such as the [[Pythagoreans|Pythagorean]] philosopher [[Philolaus]], postulated (according to [[Stobaeus]]' account) that at the center of the universe was a "central fire" around which the [[Earth]], [[Sun]], [[Moon]] and [[planet]]s revolved in uniform circular motion.<ref>Boyer, C. (1968) [https://archive.org/details/AHistoryOfMathematics ''A History of Mathematics'']. Wiley, p. 54.</ref>
Other observations are not answered definitively by known physics. According to the prevailing theory, a slight imbalance of [[matter]] over [[antimatter]] was present in the universe's creation, or developed very shortly thereafter, possibly due to the [[CP violation]] that has been observed by [[particle physics|particle physicists]]. Although the matter and antimatter mostly annihilated one another, producing [[photon]]s, a small residue of matter survived, giving the present matter-dominated universe. Several lines of evidence also suggest that a rapid [[cosmic inflation]] of the universe occurred very early in its history (roughly 10<sup>−35</sup> seconds after its creation). Recent observations also suggest that the [[cosmological constant]] (''Λ'') is not zero and that the net [[mass-energy]] content of the universe is dominated by a [[dark energy]] and [[dark matter]] that have not been characterized scientifically. They differ in their gravitational effects. Dark matter gravitates as ordinary matter does, and thus slows the expansion of the universe; by contrast, dark energy serves to accelerate the universe's expansion.


The [[Greek astronomy|Greek astronomer]] [[Aristarchus of Samos]] was the first known individual to propose a [[Heliocentrism|heliocentric]] model of the universe. Though the original text has been lost, a reference in [[Archimedes]]' book ''[[The Sand Reckoner]]'' describes Aristarchus's heliocentric model. Archimedes wrote:
===Multiverse theory===
{{Main|Multiverse|Many-worlds hypothesis|Bubble universe theory|Parallel universe (fiction)}}
[[File:Multiverse - level II.svg|thumb|Depiction of a [[multiverse]] of seven [[bubble universe theory|"bubble" universes]], which are separate [[spacetime]] continua, each having different [[physical law]]s, [[physical constant]]s, and perhaps even different numbers of [[dimension]]s or [[topology|topologies]].]]


<blockquote>You, King Gelon, are aware the universe is the name given by most astronomers to the sphere the center of which is the center of the Earth, while its radius is equal to the straight line between the center of the Sun and the center of the Earth. This is the common account as you have heard from astronomers. But Aristarchus has brought out a book consisting of certain hypotheses, wherein it appears, as a consequence of the assumptions made, that the universe is many times greater than the universe just mentioned. His hypotheses are that the fixed stars and the Sun remain unmoved, that the Earth revolves about the Sun on the circumference of a circle, the Sun lying in the middle of the orbit, and that the sphere of fixed stars, situated about the same center as the Sun, is so great that the circle in which he supposes the Earth to revolve bears such a proportion to the distance of the fixed stars as the center of the sphere bears to its surface.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Heath |first=Thomas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rZmHAAAAQBAJ |title=Aristarchus of Samos, the Ancient Copernicus: A History of Greek Astronomy to Aristarchus, Together with Aristarchus's Treatise on the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and Moon |date=2013 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-06233-6 |pages=302 |language=en |author-link=Thomas Heath (classicist) |access-date=February 26, 2023 |archive-date=March 13, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240313184546/https://books.google.com/books?id=rZmHAAAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref></blockquote>
Some speculative theories have proposed that this universe is but one of a [[set (mathematics)|set]] of disconnected universes, collectively denoted as the [[multiverse]], altering the concept that the universe encompasses everything.<ref name="EllisKS03" /><ref>{{cite journal | author = Munitz MK | year = 1959 | title = One Universe or Many? | journal = Journal of the History of Ideas | volume = 12 | pages = 231–255 | doi = 10.2307/2707516 | issue = 2 | jstor = 2707516}}</ref> By definition, there is no possible way for anything in one universe to affect another; if two "universes" could affect one another, they would be part of a single universe. Thus, although some fictional characters travel between [[parallel universe (fiction)|parallel fictional "universes"]], this is, strictly speaking, an incorrect usage of the term ''universe''. The disconnected universes are conceived as being physical, in the sense that each should have its own space and time, its own matter and energy, and its own physical laws&nbsp;— that also challenges the definition of parallelity as these universes don't exist synchronously (since they have their own time) or in a geometrically parallel way (since there's no interpretable relation between spatial positions of the different universes). Such physically disconnected universes should be distinguished from the [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] conception of [[plane (esotericism)|alternate planes of consciousness]], which are not thought to be physical places and are connected through the flow of information. The concept of a multiverse of disconnected universes is very old; for example, Bishop [[Étienne Tempier]] of Paris ruled in 1277 that God could create as many universes as he saw fit, a question that was being hotly debated by the French theologians.<ref>Misner, Thorne and Wheeler (1973), p.753.</ref>


Aristarchus thus believed the stars to be very far away, and saw this as the reason why [[stellar parallax]] had not been observed, that is, the stars had not been observed to move relative each other as the Earth moved around the Sun. The stars are in fact much farther away than the distance that was generally assumed in ancient times, which is why stellar parallax is only detectable with precision instruments. The geocentric model, consistent with planetary parallax, was assumed to be the explanation for the unobservability of stellar parallax.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kolkata |first=James J. |url=http://iopscience.iop.org/book/978-1-6817-4100-0 |title=Elementary Cosmology: From Aristotle's Universe to the Big Bang and Beyond |date=2015 |publisher=IOP Publishing |isbn=978-1-68174-100-0 |doi=10.1088/978-1-6817-4100-0ch4 |access-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-date=June 5, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180605142714/http://iopscience.iop.org/book/978-1-6817-4100-0 |url-status=live }}</ref>
There are two scientific senses in which multiple universes are discussed. First, disconnected spacetime continua may exist; presumably, all forms of matter and energy are confined to one universe and cannot "tunnel" between them. An example of such a theory is the [[bubble universe theory|chaotic inflation]] model of the early universe.<ref name="chaotic_inflation">{{cite journal | author = [[Andrei Linde|Linde A.]] | year = 1986 | title = Eternal chaotic inflation | journal = Mod. Phys. Lett. | volume = A1 | pages = 81–85 | bibcode = 1986MPLA....1...81L |doi=10.1142/S0217732386000129}}<br />{{cite journal | author = [[Andrei Linde|Linde A.]] | year = 1986 | title = Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflationary universe | journal = Phys. Lett. | volume = B175 | issue=4 | pages = 395–400 | url=http://www.stanford.edu/~alinde/Eternal86.pdf |format=PDF | accessdate=17 March 2011 | doi = 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90611-8 }}</ref> Second, according to the [[many-worlds hypothesis]], a parallel universe is born with every [[quantum measurement]]; the universe "forks" into parallel copies, each one corresponding to a different outcome of the quantum measurement. However, both senses of the term "multiverse" are speculative and may be considered [[Falsifiability|unscientific]]; no known experimental test in one universe could reveal the existence or properties of another non-interacting universe.


[[File:Flammarion.jpg|thumb|right|[[Flammarion engraving]], Paris 1888]]
==Shape of the universe==

{{Main|Shape of the universe}}
The only other astronomer from antiquity known by name who supported Aristarchus's heliocentric model was [[Seleucus of Seleucia]], a [[Hellenistic astronomer]] who lived a century after Aristarchus.<ref>{{cite journal|author-link=Otto E. Neugebauer|author=Neugebauer, Otto E. |date=1945|title=The History of Ancient Astronomy Problems and Methods|journal=Journal of Near Eastern Studies|volume=4|issue=1|pages= 166–173|quote=the [[Chaldaea]]n Seleucus from Seleucia|jstor=595168|doi=10.1086/370729|s2cid=162347339 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Sarton |first=George |author-link=George Sarton |date=1955 |title=Chaldaean Astronomy of the Last Three Centuries B. C. |journal=Journal of the American Oriental Society |volume=75 |issue=3 |pages=166–173 [169] |doi=10.2307/595168 |jstor=595168 |quote=the heliocentrical astronomy invented by Aristarchos of Samos and still defended a century later by Seleucos the [[Babylonia]]n}}</ref><ref>William P. D. Wightman (1951, 1953), ''The Growth of Scientific Ideas'', Yale University Press. p. 38, where Wightman calls him [[Seleucus of Seleucia|Seleukos]] the [[Chaldea]]n.</ref> According to Plutarch, Seleucus was the first to prove the heliocentric system through [[reasoning]], but it is not known what arguments he used. Seleucus' arguments for a heliocentric cosmology were probably related to the phenomenon of [[tide]]s.<ref>[[Lucio Russo]], ''Flussi e riflussi'', Feltrinelli, Milano, Italy, 2003, {{ISBN|88-07-10349-4}}.</ref> According to [[Strabo]] (1.1.9), Seleucus was the first to state that the tides are due to the attraction of the Moon, and that the height of the tides depends on the Moon's position relative to the Sun.<ref>{{harvtxt|Bartel|1987|loc=p. 527}}</ref> Alternatively, he may have proved heliocentricity by determining the constants of a [[Geometry|geometric]] model for it, and by developing methods to compute planetary positions using this model, similar to [[Nicolaus Copernicus]] in the 16th century.<ref>{{harvtxt|Bartel|1987|loc=pp. 527–529}}</ref> During the [[Middle Ages]], [[Heliocentrism|heliocentric]] models were also proposed by the [[Islamic astronomy|Persian astronomers]] [[Ja'far ibn Muhammad Abu Ma'shar al-Balkhi|Albumasar]]<ref>{{harvtxt|Bartel|1987 |loc=pp. 534–537}}</ref> and [[Al-Sijzi]].<ref name=Nasr>{{Cite book |last=Nasr |first=Seyyed H. |author-link=Hossein Nasr |orig-year=1964 |date=1993 |title=An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines |edition=2nd |publisher=1st edition by [[Harvard University Press]], 2nd edition by [[State University of New York Press]] |isbn=978-0-7914-1515-3 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/introductiontois00nasr/page/135 135–136] |url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontois00nasr/page/135 }}</ref>


[[File:ThomasDiggesmap.JPG|thumb|left|upright=1.4|[[Copernican heliocentrism|Model of the Copernican Universe]] by [[Thomas Digges]] in 1576, with the amendment that the stars are no longer confined to a sphere, but spread uniformly throughout the space surrounding the [[planet]]s]]
The shape or [[geometry]] of the universe includes both [[Shape of the universe#Local geometry (spatial curvature)|local geometry]] in the [[observable universe]] and [[Shape of the universe#Global geometry|global geometry]], which we may or may not be able to measure. Shape can refer to curvature and [[topology]]. More formally, the subject in practice investigates which [[3-manifold]] corresponds to the spatial section in [[comoving coordinates]] of the four-dimensional [[spacetime|space-time]] of the universe. Cosmologists normally work with a given [[space-like]] slice of spacetime called the [[Comoving distance|comoving coordinates]]. In terms of observation, the section of spacetime that can be observed is the backward [[light cone]] (points within the [[cosmic light horizon]], given time to reach a given observer). If the observable universe is smaller than the entire universe (in some models it is many orders of magnitude smaller), one cannot determine the global structure by observation: one is limited to a small patch.


The Aristotelian model was accepted in the [[Western world]] for roughly two millennia, until Copernicus revived Aristarchus's perspective that the astronomical data could be explained more plausibly if the [[Earth]] rotated on its axis and if the [[Sun]] were placed at the center of the universe.<ref name="TMU">{{Cite book |last1=Frautschi |first1=Steven C. |title=The Mechanical Universe: Mechanics and Heat |title-link=The Mechanical Universe |last2=Olenick |first2=Richard P. |last3=Apostol |first3=Tom M. |last4=Goodstein |first4=David L. |date=2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-71590-4 |edition=Advanced |location=Cambridge [Cambridgeshire] |page=58 |oclc=227002144 |author-link=Steven Frautschi |author-link3=Tom M. Apostol |author-link4=David L. Goodstein}}</ref>
Among the [[Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric|Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker]] (FLRW) models, the presently most popular shape of the Universe found to fit observational data according to cosmologists is the infinite flat model,<ref name="nasa_popular_uni_curv">[http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html Shape of the Universe], WMAP website at NASA.</ref> while other FLRW models include the [[Homology_sphere#Cosmology|Poincaré dodecahedral space]]<ref name="Nat03">{{cite journal | last = Luminet | first = Jean-Pierre | authorlink = Jean-Pierre Luminet | coauthors = Jeff Weeks, Alain Riazuelo, Roland Lehoucq, Jean-Phillipe Uzan | title = Dodecahedral space topology as an explanation for weak wide-angle temperature correlations in the cosmic microwave background | journal = Nature | volume = 425 | issue =6958 | pages = 593–5 | publisher = [[Nature]] | location = | date = 2003-10-09 | url = http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310253 | issn = | doi = 10.1038/nature01944 | id = | accessdate = 2009-03-18 | pmid = 14534579 }}</ref><ref name="RBSG08">{{cite journal | last =Roukema | first =Boudewijn | authorlink = | coauthors = Zbigniew Buliński, Agnieszka Szaniewska, Nicolas E. Gaudin | title =A test of the Poincare dodecahedral space topology hypothesis with the WMAP CMB data | journal = Astronomy and Astrophysics | volume =482 | issue = 3| pages =747 | publisher = | year = 2008 | url =http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0006 | doi =10.1051/0004-6361:20078777 | id = | accessdate = 2009-03-18 }}</ref> and the [[Picard horn]].<ref name="Aurich0403597">{{cite journal | last =Aurich | first =Ralf | authorlink = | coauthors =Lustig, S., Steiner, F., Then, H. | title =Hyperbolic Universes with a Horned Topology and the CMB Anisotropy | journal =Class.Quant.Grav. | volume =21 | issue = 21| pages =4901–4926| publisher =[[Institute of Physics]] | location = | year =2004 | url =http://iopscience.iop.org/0264-9381/21/21/010/ | issn = | doi = 10.1088/0264-9381/21/21/010| id = | accessdate =2010-09-18 | archiveurl=http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403597 | archivedate=2004-10-14 }}</ref> The data fit by these FLRW models of space especially include the [[Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe]] (WMAP) maps of cosmic background radiation. NASA released the first WMAP cosmic background radiation data in February 2003. In 2009 the [[Planck (spacecraft)|Planck observatory]] was launched to observe the microwave background at higher resolution than WMAP, possibly providing more information on the shape of the Universe. The data will in principle be released in late 2012.


{{blockquote|In the center rests the Sun. For who would place this lamp of a very beautiful temple in another or better place than this wherefrom it can illuminate everything at the same time?|Nicolaus Copernicus|in Chapter 10, Book 1 of ''De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestrum'' (1543)}}
==See also==

{{Portal box|Astronomy|Space}}
As noted by Copernicus, the notion that the [[Earth's rotation|Earth rotates]] is very old, dating at least to [[Philolaus]] ({{Circa|450 BC}}), [[Heraclides Ponticus]] ({{Circa|350 BC}}) and [[Ecphantus the Pythagorean]]. Roughly a century before Copernicus, the Christian scholar [[Nicholas of Cusa]] also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis in his book, ''On Learned Ignorance'' (1440).<ref>[[#Misner|Misner, Thorne and Wheeler]], p. 754.</ref> Al-Sijzi<ref>{{cite book|title=Science in the Quran|volume=1|publisher=Malik Library|first=Ema Ākabara|last=Ālī|page=218}}</ref> also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis. [[Empirical research|Empirical evidence]] for the Earth's rotation on its axis, using the phenomenon of [[comet]]s, was given by [[Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī|Tusi]] (1201–1274) and [[Ali Qushji]] (1403–1474).<ref>{{Citation |last=Ragep |first=F. Jamil |year=2001 |title=Tusi and Copernicus: The Earth's Motion in Context |journal=Science in Context |volume=14 |issue=1–2 |pages=145–163 |doi=10.1017/s0269889701000060 |s2cid=145372613 }}</ref>
<div style="-moz-column-count:4; column-count:4;">

This cosmology was accepted by [[Isaac Newton]], [[Christiaan Huygens]] and later scientists.<ref name="Misner-p755">[[#Misner|Misner, Thorne and Wheeler]], pp. 755–756.</ref> Newton demonstrated that the same [[Newton's laws of motion|laws of motion]] and gravity apply to earthly and to celestial matter, making Aristotle's division between the two obsolete. [[Edmund Halley]] (1720)<ref name=m756>[[#Misner|Misner, Thorne and Wheeler]], p. 756.</ref> and [[Jean-Philippe de Chéseaux]] (1744)<ref>{{cite book |author=de Cheseaux JPL |title=Traité de la Comète |date=1744 |publisher=Lausanne |pages=223ff |author-link=Jean-Philippe de Cheseaux}}. Reprinted as Appendix II in {{cite book |author=Dickson |first=F. P. |title=The Bowl of Night: The Physical Universe and Scientific Thought |date=1969 |publisher=M.I.T. Press |isbn=978-0-262-54003-2 |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |language=en-us}}</ref> noted independently that the assumption of an infinite space filled uniformly with stars would lead to the prediction that the nighttime sky would be as bright as the Sun itself; this became known as [[Olbers' paradox]] in the 19th century.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Olbers HWM |author-link=Heinrich Wilhelm Matthäus Olbers |date=1826 |title=Unknown title |journal=Bode's Jahrbuch |volume=111}}. Reprinted as Appendix I in {{cite book |author=Dickson |first=F. P. |title=The Bowl of Night: The Physical Universe and Scientific Thought |date=1969 |publisher=M.I.T. Press |isbn=978-0-262-54003-2 |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |language=en-us}}</ref> Newton believed that an infinite space uniformly filled with matter would cause infinite forces and instabilities causing the matter to be crushed inwards under its own gravity.<ref name="Misner-p755" /> This instability was clarified in 1902 by the [[Jeans instability]] criterion.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jeans |first1=J. H. |date=1902 |title=The Stability of a Spherical Nebula |journal=[[Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A]] |volume=199 |pages=1–53 |issue=312–320 |doi=10.1098/rsta.1902.0012 |bibcode=1902RSPTA.199....1J |jstor=90845 |doi-access= }}</ref> One solution to these paradoxes is the [[Carl Charlier|Charlier]] universe, in which the matter is arranged hierarchically (systems of orbiting bodies that are themselves orbiting in a larger system, ''ad infinitum'') in a [[fractal]] way such that the universe has a negligibly small overall density; such a cosmological model had also been proposed earlier in 1761 by [[Johann Heinrich Lambert]].<ref name=r196 /><ref>[[#Misner|Misner, Thorne and Wheeler]], p. 757.</ref>

===Deep space astronomy===
During the 18th century, [[Immanuel Kant]] speculated that [[nebula]]e could be entire galaxies separate from the Milky Way,<ref name="m756" /> and in 1850, [[Alexander von Humboldt]] called these separate galaxies ''Weltinseln'', or "world islands", a term that later developed into "island universes".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jones |first=Kenneth Glyn |date=February 1971 |title=The Observational Basis for Kant's Cosmogony: A Critical Analysis |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002182867100200104 |journal=Journal for the History of Astronomy |language=en |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=29–34 |doi=10.1177/002182867100200104 |bibcode=1971JHA.....2...29J |s2cid=126269712 |issn=0021-8286 |access-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230227183635/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002182867100200104 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Robert W. |date=February 2008 |title=Beyond the Galaxy: The Development of Extragalactic Astronomy 1885–1965, Part 1 |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002182860803900106 |journal=Journal for the History of Astronomy |language=en |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=91–119 |doi=10.1177/002182860803900106 |bibcode=2008JHA....39...91S |s2cid=117430789 |issn=0021-8286 |access-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-date=February 27, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230227183635/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002182860803900106 |url-status=live }}</ref> In 1919, when the [[Hooker Telescope]] was completed, the prevailing view was that the universe consisted entirely of the Milky Way Galaxy. Using the Hooker Telescope, [[Edwin Hubble]] identified [[Cepheid variable]]s in several spiral nebulae and in 1922–1923 proved conclusively that [[Andromeda Galaxy|Andromeda Nebula]] and [[Triangulum Nebula|Triangulum]] among others, were entire galaxies outside our own, thus proving that the universe consists of a multitude of galaxies.<ref name="SharovNovikov1993">{{cite book|last1=Sharov|first1=Aleksandr Sergeevich|last2=Novikov|first2=Igor Dmitrievich|title=Edwin Hubble, the discoverer of the big bang universe|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ttEwkEdPc70C&pg=PA34|access-date=December 31, 2011|date=1993|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-41617-7|page=34|archive-date=June 23, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130623075250/http://books.google.com/books?id=ttEwkEdPc70C&pg=PA34|url-status=live}}</ref> With this Hubble formulated the [[Hubble constant]], which allowed for the first time a calculation of the age of the Universe and size of the Observable Universe, which became increasingly precise with better meassurements, starting at 2 billion years and 280 million light-years, until 2006 when data of the [[Hubble Space Telescope]] allowed a very accurate calculation of the age of the Universe and size of the Observable Universe.<ref name="p537">{{cite web | title=Cosmic Times | website=Imagine the Universe! | date=December 8, 2017 | url=https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/educators/programs/cosmictimes/educators/guide/age_size.html | access-date=October 31, 2024}}</ref>

The modern era of [[physical cosmology]] began in 1917, when [[Albert Einstein]] first applied his [[general theory of relativity]] to model the structure and dynamics of the universe.<ref name="einstein_1917">{{cite journal |last=Einstein |first=Albert |author-link=Albert Einstein |date=1917 |title=Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie |journal=Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte |series=1917 |volume=(part 1) |pages=142–152}}</ref> The discoveries of this era, and the questions that remain unanswered, are outlined in the sections above.

{{wide image|Observable Universe Logarithmic Map (horizontal layout english annotations).png|2250px|Map of the observable universe with some of the notable astronomical objects known as of 2018. The scale of length increases exponentially toward the right. Celestial bodies are shown enlarged in size to be able to understand their shapes.}}
{{multiple image
| align = center
| direction = horizontal
| background color =
| width =81
| caption_align = center
| header_background =
| header_align = center
| header = Location of the Earth in the universe
| image1 = The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg
| width1 = 82
| caption1 = [[Earth]]
| image2 = Solar System true color.jpg
| width2 = 146
| caption2 = [[Solar&nbsp;System]]
| image3 = RadcliffeWave1.png
| width3 = 146
| caption3 = [[Radcliffe Wave]]
| image4 = Milky Way Arms ssc2008-10.svg
| width4 = 93
| caption4 = [[Orion Arm]]
| image5 = Artist's impression of the Milky Way (updated - annotated).jpg
| width5 = 83
| caption5 = [[Milky&nbsp;Way]]
| image6 = Local Group and nearest galaxies.jpg
| width6 = 111
| caption6 = [[Local Group|Local&nbsp;Group]]
| image7 = Local supercluster-ly.jpg
| width7 = 86
| caption7 = [[Virgo Supercluster|Virgo SCl]]
| image8 = Observable universe r2.jpg
| width8 = 83
| caption8 = [[Laniakea Supercluster|Laniakea SCl]]
| image9 = Observable Universe with Measurements 01.png
| width9 = 83
| caption9 = [[Observable universe]]
| footer_background =
| footer_align = center
| footer =
}}

== See also ==
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}
* [[Cosmic Calendar]] (scaled down timeline)
* [[Cosmic latte]]
* [[Cosmic latte]]
* [[Detailed logarithmic timeline]]
* [[Cosmology]]
* [[Dyson's eternal intelligence]]
* [[Earth's location in the universe]]
* [[Esoteric cosmology]]
* [[False vacuum]]
* [[False vacuum]]
* [[Future of an expanding universe]]
* [[Final anthropic principle]]
* [[Hindu cycle of the universe]]
* [[Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey]]
* [[Heat death of the universe]]
* [[Kardashev scale]]
* ''[[The Mysterious Universe]]'' (book)
* [[History of the center of the Universe]]
* [[Nucleocosmochronology]]
* [[Illustris project]]
* [[Non-standard cosmology]]
* [[Non-standard cosmology]]
* [[Omega Point]]
* [[Nucleocosmochronology]]
* [[Parallel universe (fiction)]]
* [[Omniverse]]
* [[Rare Earth hypothesis]]
* [[Rare Earth hypothesis]]
* [[Vacuum genesis]]
* [[Space and survival]]
* [[World view]]
* [[Terasecond and longer]]
* [[Timeline of the early universe]]
* [[Timeline of the far future]]
* [[Timeline of the near future]]
* [[Zero-energy universe]]
* [[Zero-energy universe]]
{{div col end}}
</div>


== References ==
==Notes and references==
'''Footnotes'''
{{Reflist|2}}
{{notelist}}


'''Citations'''
==Further reading==
{{reflist}}
* {{cite book|author = [[Lev Landau|Landau, Lev]], [[Evgeny Lifshitz|Lifshitz, E.M.]] | year = 1975 | title= The Classical Theory of Fields ([[Course of Theoretical Physics]], Vol. 2) | edition = revised 4th English|publisher=Pergamon Press|location=New York|isbn=9780080181769|pages=358–397}}
* [[Edward Robert Harrison]] (2000) ''Cosmology'' 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. Gentle.
* {{cite book | author = [[Charles W. Misner|Misner, C.W.]], [[Kip Thorne|Thorne, Kip]], [[John Archibald Wheeler|Wheeler, J.A.]] | title = [[Gravitation (book)|Gravitation]] | location = San Francisco | publisher = W. H. Freeman | year = 1973 | isbn = 978-0-7167-0344-0 | pages = 703–816 }} The classic text for a generation.
* {{cite book | author = [[Wolfgang Rindler|Rindler, W.]] | year = 1977 | title = Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological | publisher = Springer Verlag | location = New York | isbn = 0-387-10090-3 | pages = 193–244}}
* {{cite book | author = [[Steven Weinberg|Weinberg, S.]] | year = 1993 | title = The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe | edition = 2nd updated | publisher = Basic Books | location = New York | isbn = 978-0465024377 | oclc = 28746057}} For lay readers.
* -------- (2008) ''Cosmology''. Oxford University Press. Challenging.
* Oscar Monchito (1987) ''Universe. What a concept''. Colton, 23rd edition. For advanced readers.
* {{cite book | first1=Harry | last1=Nussbaumer | first2=Lydia | last2=Bieri | first3=Allan | last3=Sandage | year = 2009 | title= Discovering the Expanding Universe | publisher=Cambridge University Press | isbn=978-0-521-51484-2 | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=RaNOJkQ4l14C}}


=== Bibliography ===
==External links==
* {{Cite journal |last=Van Der Waerden |first=B. L. |author-link=Bartel Leendert van der Waerden |date=June 1987 |title=The Heliocentric System in Greek, Persian and Hindu Astronomy |journal=Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |language=en |volume=500 |issue=1 |pages=525–545 |bibcode=1987NYASA.500..525V |doi=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb37224.x |issn=0077-8923 |s2cid=222087224}}
{{Spoken Wikipedia|En-Universe.ogg|2007-07-07}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Landau |first1=L. D. |author-link1=Lev Landau |title=The classical theory of fields |title-link=Course of Theoretical Physics |last2=Lifshitz |first2=E. M. |author-link2=Evgeny Lifshitz |date=1975 |publisher=Pergamon Press |isbn=978-0-08-018176-9 |edition=4th rev. English |series=Course of theoretical physics |volume=2 |location=Oxford ; New York |pages=358–397 |language=engrus |name-list-style=vanc}}
{{Commons category|Universe}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Liddell |first1=Henry George |title=A Greek-English lexicon |last2=Scott |first2=Robert |date=1994 |publisher=Clarendon Pr |isbn=978-0-19-864214-5 |location=Oxford |name-list-style=amp}}
{{wikiquote}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Misner |first1=Charles W. |author-link1=Charles W. Misner |title=Gravitation |title-link=Gravitation (book) |last2=Thorne |first2=Kip S. |last3=Wheeler |first3=John Archibald |author-link3=Kip Thorne |last4=Kip |last5=Wheeler |author-link5=John Archibald Wheeler |last6=J.A. |date=2008 |publisher=Freeman |isbn=978-0-7167-0344-0 |edition=27. printing |location=New York, NY |pages=703–816}}
* {{HSW|hole-in-universe|Is there a hole in the universe?}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Raine |first1=Derek |title=An introduction to the science of cosmology |last2=Thomas |first2=Edwin G. |last3=Thomas |first3=E. G. |publisher=Institute of Physics Publ |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-7503-0405-4 |series=Series in astronomy and astrophysics |location=Bristol}}
* [http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/age_universe_030103.html Age of the Universe] at Space.Com
* {{Cite book |last=Rindler |first=Wolfgang |author-link=Wolfgang Rindler |title=Essential relativity: special, general, and cosmological |date=1986 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-387-10090-6 |series=Texts and monographs in physics |location=New York Heidelberg |pages=193–244}}
* [http://www.pbs.org/wnet/hawking/html/home.html ''Stephen Hawking's Universe'']&nbsp;– Why is the universe the way it is?
* {{Cite book |title=Universe |date=2012 |publisher=DK Pub |isbn=978-0-7566-9841-6 |editor-last=Rees |editor-first=Martin J. |edition=Rev. |location=New York |oclc=809932784 |editor-last2=DK Publishing, Inc |editor-last3=Smithsonian Institution}}
* [http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html Cosmology FAQ]
* [http://www.shekpvar.net/~dna/Publications/Cosmos/cosmos.html Cosmos&nbsp;– An "illustrated dimensional journey from microcosmos to macrocosmos"]
* [http://www.co-intelligence.org/newsletter/comparisons.html Illustration comparing the sizes of the planets, the sun, and other stars]
* [http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjuric/universe/ Logarithmic Maps of the Universe]
* [http://www.slate.com/id/2087206/nav/navoa/ My So-Called Universe]&nbsp;– Arguments for and against an infinite and parallel universes
* [http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/multiverse1.html Parallel Universes] by Max Tegmark
* [http://cosmology.lbl.gov/talks/Ho_07.pdf The Dark Side and the Bright Side of the Universe] Princeton University, Shirley Ho
* [http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/ Richard Powell: ''An Atlas of the Universe'']&nbsp;– Images at various scales, with explanations
* [http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1142346 Multiple Big Bangs]
* [http://www.exploreuniverse.com/ic/ Universe&nbsp;– Space Information Centre]
* [http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/index.html Exploring the Universe] at Nasa.gov


== External links ==
===Videos===
{{Spoken Wikipedia|date=June 13, 2012|WIKIPEDIA SPOKEN ARTICLE - Universe (Part 1).oga|WIKIPEDIA SPOKEN ARTICLE - Universe (Part 2).oga|WIKIPEDIA SPOKEN ARTICLE - Universe (Part 3).oga|WIKIPEDIA SPOKEN ARTICLE - Universe (Part 4).oga}}
* [http://www.youtube.com/embed/17jymDn0W6U The Known Universe] created by the [[American Museum of Natural History]]
* [http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/ NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)] / ([http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/Library/Distances/ NED-Distances]).
* [http://www.youtube.com/embed/0fKBhvDjuy0 Understand The Size Of The Universe] - by [[Powers of Ten]]
* [https://www.livescience.com/how-many-atoms-in-universe.html There are about 10<sup>82</sup> atoms in the observable universe] – ''[[LiveScience]]'', July 2021.
* [https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/05/21/this-is-why-we-will-never-know-everything-about-our-universe/ ''This is why we will never know everything about our universe''] – ''[[Forbes]]'', May 2019.


{{Sister bar|wikt=Universe |commonscat=yes |q=Universe |b=no |v=no |n=no |s=no}}
{{Cosmology topics}}
{{Earth's location}}
{{Earth's location}}
{{Fundamental interactions}}
{{Nature nav}}
{{Nature nav}}
{{Portal bar|Stars|Spaceflight|Solar System|Science}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Universe| ]]
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]
[[Category:Astronomical dynamical systems]]
[[Category:Concepts in astronomy]]
[[Category:Environments]]
[[Category:Environments]]
[[Category:Universe]]
[[Category:Main topic articles]]
[[Category:Physical cosmology]]

[[af:Heelal]]
[[ar:فضاء كوني]]
[[an:Universo]]
[[arc:ܬܒܝܠ]]
[[ast:Universu]]
[[az:Kainat]]
[[bn:মহাবিশ্ব]]
[[zh-min-nan:Ú-tiū]]
[[be:Сусвет]]
[[be-x-old:Сусьвет]]
[[bs:Svemir]]
[[bg:Вселена]]
[[ca:Univers]]
[[cv:Çут Тĕнче]]
[[cs:Vesmír]]
[[cy:Bydysawd (seryddiaeth)]]
[[da:Universet]]
[[de:Universum]]
[[nv:Yágháhookáán]]
[[dsb:Uniwersum]]
[[et:Universum]]
[[el:Σύμπαν]]
[[es:Universo]]
[[eo:Universo]]
[[eu:Unibertso]]
[[fa:گیتی]]
[[hif:Sansaar]]
[[fr:Univers]]
[[fy:Hielal]]
[[gl:Universo]]
[[gu:બ્રહ્માંડ]]
[[hak:Yî-chhiu]]
[[ko:우주]]
[[hi:ब्रह्माण्ड]]
[[hr:Svemir]]
[[io:Universo]]
[[id:Alam semesta]]
[[ia:Universo]]
[[is:Alheimurinn]]
[[it:Universo]]
[[he:היקום]]
[[jv:Alam semesta]]
[[kn:ಬ್ರಹ್ಮಾಂಡ]]
[[pam:Sikluban]]
[[ka:სამყარო]]
[[csb:Swiatnica]]
[[sw:Ulimwengu]]
[[ht:Linivè]]
[[ku:Gerdûn]]
[[la:Universum]]
[[lv:Visums]]
[[lt:Visata]]
[[li:Universum]]
[[lmo:Ünivers]]
[[hu:Világegyetem]]
[[mk:Вселена]]
[[ml:പ്രപഞ്ചം]]
[[mr:विश्व]]
[[arz:كون]]
[[ms:Alam semesta]]
[[mwl:Ouniberso]]
[[mn:Ертөнц]]
[[my:စကြဝဠာ]]
[[nah:Cemānāhuac]]
[[nl:Heelal]]
[[nds-nl:Hielal]]
[[ne:ब्रह्माण्ड]]
[[ja:宇宙]]
[[nap:Annevierzo]]
[[frr:Åål]]
[[no:Universet]]
[[nn:Universet]]
[[nrm:Eunivers]]
[[nov:Universe]]
[[oc:Univèrs]]
[[uz:Olam]]
[[pfl:Weldall]]
[[pnb:کائنات]]
[[pap:Universo]]
[[nds:Weltruum]]
[[pl:Wszechświat]]
[[pt:Universo]]
[[ro:Univers]]
[[qu:Ch'askancha]]
[[ru:Вселенная]]
[[rue:Весмір]]
[[stq:Al]]
[[sq:Gjithësia]]
[[scn:Universu]]
[[simple:Universe]]
[[sk:Vesmír]]
[[sl:Vesolje]]
[[ckb:گەردوون]]
[[sr:Свемир]]
[[sh:Svemir]]
[[su:Jagat]]
[[fi:Maailmankaikkeus]]
[[sv:Universum]]
[[tl:Sanlibutan]]
[[ta:அண்டம்]]
[[tt:Космос]]
[[te:విశ్వం]]
[[th:เอกภพ]]
[[tg:Коинот]]
[[tr:Evren]]
[[uk:Всесвіт]]
[[ur:کائنات]]
[[vi:Vũ trụ]]
[[zh-classical:宇宙]]
[[war:Sangkalibutan]]
[[yi:אוניווערס]]
[[zh-yue:宇宙]]
[[bat-smg:Vėsata]]
[[zh:宇宙]]

Latest revision as of 14:11, 26 November 2024

Universe
The Hubble Ultra-Deep Field image shows some of the most remote galaxies visible to present technology (diagonal is ~1/10 apparent Moon diameter)[1]
Age (within ΛCDM model)13.787 ± 0.020 billion years[2]
DiameterUnknown.[3]
Observable universe: 8.8×1026 m (28.5 Gpc or 93 Gly)[4]
Mass (ordinary matter)At least 1053 kg[5]
Average density (with energy)9.9×10−27 kg/m3[6]
Average temperature2.72548 K
(−270.4 °C, −454.8 °F)[7]
Main contentsOrdinary (baryonic) matter (4.9%)
Dark matter (26.8%)
Dark energy (68.3%)[8]
ShapeFlat with 0.4% error margin[9]

The universe is all of space and time[a] and their contents.[10] It comprises all of existence, any fundamental interaction, physical process and physical constant, and therefore all forms of matter and energy, and the structures they form, from sub-atomic particles to entire galactic filaments. Since the early 20th century, the field of cosmology establishes that space and time emerged together at the Big Bang 13.787±0.020 billion years ago[11] and that the universe has been expanding since then. The portion of the universe that we can see is approximately 93 billion light-years in diameter at present, but the total size of the universe is not known.[3]

Some of the earliest cosmological models of the universe were developed by ancient Greek and Indian philosophers and were geocentric, placing Earth at the center.[12][13] Over the centuries, more precise astronomical observations led Nicolaus Copernicus to develop the heliocentric model with the Sun at the center of the Solar System. In developing the law of universal gravitation, Isaac Newton built upon Copernicus's work as well as Johannes Kepler's laws of planetary motion and observations by Tycho Brahe.

Further observational improvements led to the realization that the Sun is one of a few hundred billion stars in the Milky Way, which is one of a few hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe. Many of the stars in a galaxy have planets. At the largest scale, galaxies are distributed uniformly and the same in all directions, meaning that the universe has neither an edge nor a center. At smaller scales, galaxies are distributed in clusters and superclusters which form immense filaments and voids in space, creating a vast foam-like structure.[14] Discoveries in the early 20th century have suggested that the universe had a beginning and has been expanding since then.[15]

According to the Big Bang theory, the energy and matter initially present have become less dense as the universe expanded. After an initial accelerated expansion called the inflationary epoch at around 10−32 seconds, and the separation of the four known fundamental forces, the universe gradually cooled and continued to expand, allowing the first subatomic particles and simple atoms to form. Giant clouds of hydrogen and helium were gradually drawn to the places where matter was most dense, forming the first galaxies, stars, and everything else seen today.

From studying the effects of gravity on both matter and light, it has been discovered that the universe contains much more matter than is accounted for by visible objects; stars, galaxies, nebulas and interstellar gas. This unseen matter is known as dark matter.[16] In the widely accepted ΛCDM cosmological model, dark matter accounts for about 25.8%±1.1% of the mass and energy in the universe while about 69.2%±1.2% is dark energy, a mysterious form of energy responsible for the acceleration of the expansion of the universe.[17] Ordinary ('baryonic') matter therefore composes only 4.84%±0.1% of the universe.[17] Stars, planets, and visible gas clouds only form about 6% of this ordinary matter.[18]

There are many competing hypotheses about the ultimate fate of the universe and about what, if anything, preceded the Big Bang, while other physicists and philosophers refuse to speculate, doubting that information about prior states will ever be accessible. Some physicists have suggested various multiverse hypotheses, in which the universe might be one among many.[3][19][20]

Definition

Hubble Space TelescopeUltra-Deep Field galaxies to Legacy field zoom out
(video 00:50; May 2, 2019)

The physical universe is defined as all of space and time[a] (collectively referred to as spacetime) and their contents.[10] Such contents comprise all of energy in its various forms, including electromagnetic radiation and matter, and therefore planets, moons, stars, galaxies, and the contents of intergalactic space.[21][22][23] The universe also includes the physical laws that influence energy and matter, such as conservation laws, classical mechanics, and relativity.[24]

The universe is often defined as "the totality of existence", or everything that exists, everything that has existed, and everything that will exist.[24] In fact, some philosophers and scientists support the inclusion of ideas and abstract concepts—such as mathematics and logic—in the definition of the universe.[26][27][28] The word universe may also refer to concepts such as the cosmos, the world, and nature.[29][30]

Etymology

The word universe derives from the Old French word univers, which in turn derives from the Latin word universus, meaning 'combined into one'.[31] The Latin word 'universum' was used by Cicero and later Latin authors in many of the same senses as the modern English word is used.[32]

Synonyms

A term for universe among the ancient Greek philosophers from Pythagoras onwards was τὸ πᾶν (tò pân) 'the all', defined as all matter and all space, and τὸ ὅλον (tò hólon) 'all things', which did not necessarily include the void.[33][34] Another synonym was ὁ κόσμος (ho kósmos) meaning 'the world, the cosmos'.[35] Synonyms are also found in Latin authors (totum, mundus, natura)[36] and survive in modern languages, e.g., the German words Das All, Weltall, and Natur for universe. The same synonyms are found in English, such as everything (as in the theory of everything), the cosmos (as in cosmology), the world (as in the many-worlds interpretation), and nature (as in natural laws or natural philosophy).[37]

Chronology and the Big Bang

The prevailing model for the evolution of the universe is the Big Bang theory.[38][39] The Big Bang model states that the earliest state of the universe was an extremely hot and dense one, and that the universe subsequently expanded and cooled. The model is based on general relativity and on simplifying assumptions such as the homogeneity and isotropy of space. A version of the model with a cosmological constant (Lambda) and cold dark matter, known as the Lambda-CDM model, is the simplest model that provides a reasonably good account of various observations about the universe.

In this schematic diagram, time passes from left to right, with the universe represented by a disk-shaped "slice" at any given time. Time and size are not to scale. To make the early stages visible, the time to the afterglow stage (really the first 0.003%) is stretched and the subsequent expansion (really by 1,100 times to the present) is largely suppressed.

The initial hot, dense state is called the Planck epoch, a brief period extending from time zero to one Planck time unit of approximately 10−43 seconds. During the Planck epoch, all types of matter and all types of energy were concentrated into a dense state, and gravity—currently the weakest by far of the four known forces—is believed to have been as strong as the other fundamental forces, and all the forces may have been unified. The physics controlling this very early period (including quantum gravity in the Planck epoch) is not understood, so we cannot say what, if anything, happened before time zero. Since the Planck epoch, the universe has been expanding to its present scale, with a very short but intense period of cosmic inflation speculated to have occurred within the first 10−32 seconds.[40] This initial period of inflation would explain why space appears to be very flat.

Within the first fraction of a second of the universe's existence, the four fundamental forces had separated. As the universe continued to cool from its inconceivably hot state, various types of subatomic particles were able to form in short periods of time known as the quark epoch, the hadron epoch, and the lepton epoch. Together, these epochs encompassed less than 10 seconds of time following the Big Bang. These elementary particles associated stably into ever larger combinations, including stable protons and neutrons, which then formed more complex atomic nuclei through nuclear fusion.[41][42]

This process, known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis, lasted for about 17 minutes and ended about 20 minutes after the Big Bang, so only the fastest and simplest reactions occurred. About 25% of the protons and all the neutrons in the universe, by mass, were converted to helium, with small amounts of deuterium (a form of hydrogen) and traces of lithium. Any other element was only formed in very tiny quantities. The other 75% of the protons remained unaffected, as hydrogen nuclei.[41][42]: 27–42 

After nucleosynthesis ended, the universe entered a period known as the photon epoch. During this period, the universe was still far too hot for matter to form neutral atoms, so it contained a hot, dense, foggy plasma of negatively charged electrons, neutral neutrinos and positive nuclei. After about 377,000 years, the universe had cooled enough that electrons and nuclei could form the first stable atoms. This is known as recombination for historical reasons; electrons and nuclei were combining for the first time. Unlike plasma, neutral atoms are transparent to many wavelengths of light, so for the first time the universe also became transparent. The photons released ("decoupled") when these atoms formed can still be seen today; they form the cosmic microwave background (CMB).[42]: 15–27 

As the universe expands, the energy density of electromagnetic radiation decreases more quickly than does that of matter because the energy of each photon decreases as it is cosmologically redshifted. At around 47,000 years, the energy density of matter became larger than that of photons and neutrinos, and began to dominate the large scale behavior of the universe. This marked the end of the radiation-dominated era and the start of the matter-dominated era.[43]: 390 

In the earliest stages of the universe, tiny fluctuations within the universe's density led to concentrations of dark matter gradually forming. Ordinary matter, attracted to these by gravity, formed large gas clouds and eventually, stars and galaxies, where the dark matter was most dense, and voids where it was least dense. After around 100–300 million years,[43]: 333  the first stars formed, known as Population III stars. These were probably very massive, luminous, non metallic and short-lived. They were responsible for the gradual reionization of the universe between about 200–500 million years and 1 billion years, and also for seeding the universe with elements heavier than helium, through stellar nucleosynthesis.[44]

The universe also contains a mysterious energy—possibly a scalar field—called dark energy, the density of which does not change over time. After about 9.8 billion years, the universe had expanded sufficiently so that the density of matter was less than the density of dark energy, marking the beginning of the present dark-energy-dominated era.[45] In this era, the expansion of the universe is accelerating due to dark energy.

Physical properties

Of the four fundamental interactions, gravitation is the dominant at astronomical length scales. Gravity's effects are cumulative; by contrast, the effects of positive and negative charges tend to cancel one another, making electromagnetism relatively insignificant on astronomical length scales. The remaining two interactions, the weak and strong nuclear forces, decline very rapidly with distance; their effects are confined mainly to sub-atomic length scales.[46]: 1470 

The universe appears to have much more matter than antimatter, an asymmetry possibly related to the CP violation.[47] This imbalance between matter and antimatter is partially responsible for the existence of all matter existing today, since matter and antimatter, if equally produced at the Big Bang, would have completely annihilated each other and left only photons as a result of their interaction.[48] These laws are Gauss's law and the non-divergence of the stress–energy–momentum pseudotensor.[49]

Size and regions

Illustration of the observable universe, centered on the Sun. The distance scale is logarithmic. Due to the finite speed of light, we see more distant parts of the universe at earlier times.

Due to the finite speed of light, there is a limit (known as the particle horizon) to how far light can travel over the age of the universe. The spatial region from which we can receive light is called the observable universe. The proper distance (measured at a fixed time) between Earth and the edge of the observable universe is 46 billion light-years[50][51] (14 billion parsecs), making the diameter of the observable universe about 93 billion light-years (28 billion parsecs).[50] Although the distance traveled by light from the edge of the observable universe is close to the age of the universe times the speed of light, 13.8 billion light-years (4.2×10^9 pc), the proper distance is larger because the edge of the observable universe and the Earth have since moved further apart.[52]

For comparison, the diameter of a typical galaxy is 30,000 light-years (9,198 parsecs), and the typical distance between two neighboring galaxies is 3 million light-years (919.8 kiloparsecs).[53] As an example, the Milky Way is roughly 100,000–180,000 light-years in diameter,[54][55] and the nearest sister galaxy to the Milky Way, the Andromeda Galaxy, is located roughly 2.5 million light-years away.[56]

Because humans cannot observe space beyond the edge of the observable universe, it is unknown whether the size of the universe in its totality is finite or infinite.[3][57][58] Estimates suggest that the whole universe, if finite, must be more than 250 times larger than a Hubble sphere.[59] Some disputed[60] estimates for the total size of the universe, if finite, reach as high as megaparsecs, as implied by a suggested resolution of the No-Boundary Proposal.[61][b]

Age and expansion

Assuming that the Lambda-CDM model is correct, the measurements of the parameters using a variety of techniques by numerous experiments yield a best value of the age of the universe at 13.799 ± 0.021 billion years, as of 2015.[2]

Over time, the universe and its contents have evolved. For example, the relative population of quasars and galaxies has changed[62] and the universe has expanded. This expansion is inferred from the observation that the light from distant galaxies has been redshifted, which implies that the galaxies are receding from us. Analyses of Type Ia supernovae indicate that the expansion is accelerating.[63][64]

The more matter there is in the universe, the stronger the mutual gravitational pull of the matter. If the universe were too dense then it would re-collapse into a gravitational singularity. However, if the universe contained too little matter then the self-gravity would be too weak for astronomical structures, like galaxies or planets, to form. Since the Big Bang, the universe has expanded monotonically. Perhaps unsurprisingly, our universe has just the right mass–energy density, equivalent to about 5 protons per cubic meter, which has allowed it to expand for the last 13.8 billion years, giving time to form the universe as observed today.[65][66]

There are dynamical forces acting on the particles in the universe which affect the expansion rate. Before 1998, it was expected that the expansion rate would be decreasing as time went on due to the influence of gravitational interactions in the universe; and thus there is an additional observable quantity in the universe called the deceleration parameter, which most cosmologists expected to be positive and related to the matter density of the universe. In 1998, the deceleration parameter was measured by two different groups to be negative, approximately −0.55, which technically implies that the second derivative of the cosmic scale factor has been positive in the last 5–6 billion years.[67][68]

Spacetime

Modern physics regards events as being organized into spacetime.[69] This idea originated with the special theory of relativity, which predicts that if one observer sees two events happening in different places at the same time, a second observer who is moving relative to the first will see those events happening at different times.[70]: 45–52  The two observers will disagree on the time between the events, and they will disagree about the distance separating the events, but they will agree on the speed of light , and they will measure the same value for the combination .[70]: 80  The square root of the absolute value of this quantity is called the interval between the two events. The interval expresses how widely separated events are, not just in space or in time, but in the combined setting of spacetime.[70]: 84, 136 [71]

The special theory of relativity cannot account for gravity. Its successor, the general theory of relativity, explains gravity by recognizing that spacetime is not fixed but instead dynamical. In general relativity, gravitational force is reimagined as curvature of spacetime. A curved path like an orbit is not the result of a force deflecting a body from an ideal straight-line path, but rather the body's attempt to fall freely through a background that is itself curved by the presence of other masses. A remark by John Archibald Wheeler that has become proverbial among physicists summarizes the theory: "Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve",[72][73] and therefore there is no point in considering one without the other.[15] The Newtonian theory of gravity is a good approximation to the predictions of general relativity when gravitational effects are weak and objects are moving slowly compared to the speed of light.[74]: 327 [75]

The relation between matter distribution and spacetime curvature is given by the Einstein field equations, which require tensor calculus to express.[76]: 43 [77] The universe appears to be a smooth spacetime continuum consisting of three spatial dimensions and one temporal (time) dimension. Therefore, an event in the spacetime of the physical universe can be identified by a set of four coordinates: (x, y, z, t). On average, space is observed to be very nearly flat (with a curvature close to zero), meaning that Euclidean geometry is empirically true with high accuracy throughout most of the universe.[78] Spacetime also appears to have a simply connected topology, in analogy with a sphere, at least on the length scale of the observable universe. However, present observations cannot exclude the possibilities that the universe has more dimensions (which is postulated by theories such as string theory) and that its spacetime may have a multiply connected global topology, in analogy with the cylindrical or toroidal topologies of two-dimensional spaces.[79][80]

Shape

The three possible options for the shape of the universe

General relativity describes how spacetime is curved and bent by mass and energy (gravity). The topology or geometry of the universe includes both local geometry in the observable universe and global geometry. Cosmologists often work with a given space-like slice of spacetime called the comoving coordinates. The section of spacetime which can be observed is the backward light cone, which delimits the cosmological horizon. The cosmological horizon, also called the particle horizon or the light horizon, is the maximum distance from which particles can have traveled to the observer in the age of the universe. This horizon represents the boundary between the observable and the unobservable regions of the universe.[81][82]

An important parameter determining the future evolution of the universe theory is the density parameter, Omega (Ω), defined as the average matter density of the universe divided by a critical value of that density. This selects one of three possible geometries depending on whether Ω is equal to, less than, or greater than 1. These are called, respectively, the flat, open and closed universes.[83]

Observations, including the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE), Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and Planck maps of the CMB, suggest that the universe is infinite in extent with a finite age, as described by the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) models.[84][79][85][86] These FLRW models thus support inflationary models and the standard model of cosmology, describing a flat, homogeneous universe presently dominated by dark matter and dark energy.[87][88]

Support of life

The fine-tuned universe hypothesis is the proposition that the conditions that allow the existence of observable life in the universe can only occur when certain universal fundamental physical constants lie within a very narrow range of values. According to this hypothesis, if any of several fundamental constants were only slightly different, the universe would have been unlikely to be conducive to the establishment and development of matter, astronomical structures, elemental diversity, or life as it is understood. Whether this is true, and whether that question is even logically meaningful to ask, are subjects of much debate.[89] The proposition is discussed among philosophers, scientists, theologians, and proponents of creationism.[90]

Composition

The universe is composed almost completely of dark energy, dark matter, and ordinary matter. Other contents are electromagnetic radiation (estimated to constitute from 0.005% to close to 0.01% of the total mass–energy of the universe) and antimatter.[91][92][93]

The proportions of all types of matter and energy have changed over the history of the universe.[94] The total amount of electromagnetic radiation generated within the universe has decreased by 1/2 in the past 2 billion years.[95][96] Today, ordinary matter, which includes atoms, stars, galaxies, and life, accounts for only 4.9% of the contents of the universe.[8] The present overall density of this type of matter is very low, roughly 4.5 × 10−31 grams per cubic centimeter, corresponding to a density of the order of only one proton for every four cubic meters of volume.[6] The nature of both dark energy and dark matter is unknown. Dark matter, a mysterious form of matter that has not yet been identified, accounts for 26.8% of the cosmic contents. Dark energy, which is the energy of empty space and is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate, accounts for the remaining 68.3% of the contents.[8][97][98]

The formation of clusters and large-scale filaments in the cold dark matter model with dark energy. The frames show the evolution of structures in a 43 million parsecs (or 140 million light-years) box from redshift of 30 to the present epoch (upper left z=30 to lower right z=0).
A map of the superclusters and voids nearest to Earth

Matter, dark matter, and dark energy are distributed homogeneously throughout the universe over length scales longer than 300 million light-years (ly) or so.[99] However, over shorter length-scales, matter tends to clump hierarchically; many atoms are condensed into stars, most stars into galaxies, most galaxies into clusters, superclusters and, finally, large-scale galactic filaments. The observable universe contains as many as an estimated 2 trillion galaxies[100][101][102] and, overall, as many as an estimated 1024 stars[103][104] – more stars (and earth-like planets) than all the grains of beach sand on planet Earth;[105][106][107] but less than the total number of atoms estimated in the universe as 1082;[108] and the estimated total number of stars in an inflationary universe (observed and unobserved), as 10100.[109] Typical galaxies range from dwarfs with as few as ten million[110] (107) stars up to giants with one trillion[111] (1012) stars. Between the larger structures are voids, which are typically 10–150 Mpc (33 million–490 million ly) in diameter. The Milky Way is in the Local Group of galaxies, which in turn is in the Laniakea Supercluster.[112] This supercluster spans over 500 million light-years, while the Local Group spans over 10 million light-years.[113] The universe also has vast regions of relative emptiness; the largest known void measures 1.8 billion ly (550 Mpc) across.[114]

Comparison of the contents of the universe today to 380,000 years after the Big Bang, as measured with 5 year WMAP data (from 2008).[115] Due to rounding, the sum of these numbers is not 100%.

The observable universe is isotropic on scales significantly larger than superclusters, meaning that the statistical properties of the universe are the same in all directions as observed from Earth. The universe is bathed in highly isotropic microwave radiation that corresponds to a thermal equilibrium blackbody spectrum of roughly 2.72548 kelvins.[7] The hypothesis that the large-scale universe is homogeneous and isotropic is known as the cosmological principle.[116] A universe that is both homogeneous and isotropic looks the same from all vantage points and has no center.[117][118]

Dark energy

An explanation for why the expansion of the universe is accelerating remains elusive. It is often attributed to the gravitational influence of "dark energy", an unknown form of energy that is hypothesized to permeate space.[119] On a mass–energy equivalence basis, the density of dark energy (~ 7 × 10−30 g/cm3) is much less than the density of ordinary matter or dark matter within galaxies. However, in the present dark-energy era, it dominates the mass–energy of the universe because it is uniform across space.[120][121]

Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological constant, a constant energy density filling space homogeneously,[122] and scalar fields such as quintessence or moduli, dynamic quantities whose energy density can vary in time and space while still permeating them enough to cause the observed rate of expansion. Contributions from scalar fields that are constant in space are usually also included in the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant can be formulated to be equivalent to vacuum energy.

Dark matter

Dark matter is a hypothetical kind of matter that is invisible to the entire electromagnetic spectrum, but which accounts for most of the matter in the universe. The existence and properties of dark matter are inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, radiation, and the large-scale structure of the universe. Other than neutrinos, a form of hot dark matter, dark matter has not been detected directly, making it one of the greatest mysteries in modern astrophysics. Dark matter neither emits nor absorbs light or any other electromagnetic radiation at any significant level. Dark matter is estimated to constitute 26.8% of the total mass–energy and 84.5% of the total matter in the universe.[97][123]

Ordinary matter

The remaining 4.9% of the mass–energy of the universe is ordinary matter, that is, atoms, ions, electrons and the objects they form. This matter includes stars, which produce nearly all of the light we see from galaxies, as well as interstellar gas in the interstellar and intergalactic media, planets, and all the objects from everyday life that we can bump into, touch or squeeze.[124] The great majority of ordinary matter in the universe is unseen, since visible stars and gas inside galaxies and clusters account for less than 10 percent of the ordinary matter contribution to the mass–energy density of the universe.[125][126][127]

Ordinary matter commonly exists in four states (or phases): solid, liquid, gas, and plasma.[128] However, advances in experimental techniques have revealed other previously theoretical phases, such as Bose–Einstein condensates and fermionic condensates.[129][130] Ordinary matter is composed of two types of elementary particles: quarks and leptons.[131] For example, the proton is formed of two up quarks and one down quark; the neutron is formed of two down quarks and one up quark; and the electron is a kind of lepton. An atom consists of an atomic nucleus, made up of protons and neutrons (both of which are baryons), and electrons that orbit the nucleus.[46]: 1476 

Soon after the Big Bang, primordial protons and neutrons formed from the quark–gluon plasma of the early universe as it cooled below two trillion degrees. A few minutes later, in a process known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis, nuclei formed from the primordial protons and neutrons. This nucleosynthesis formed lighter elements, those with small atomic numbers up to lithium and beryllium, but the abundance of heavier elements dropped off sharply with increasing atomic number. Some boron may have been formed at this time, but the next heavier element, carbon, was not formed in significant amounts. Big Bang nucleosynthesis shut down after about 20 minutes due to the rapid drop in temperature and density of the expanding universe. Subsequent formation of heavier elements resulted from stellar nucleosynthesis and supernova nucleosynthesis.[132]

Particles

A four-by-four table of particles. Columns are three generations of matter (fermions) and one of forces (bosons). In the first three columns, two rows contain quarks and two leptons. The top two rows' columns contain up (u) and down (d) quarks, charm (c) and strange (s) quarks, top (t) and bottom (b) quarks, and photon (γ) and gluon (g), respectively. The bottom two rows' columns contain electron neutrino (ν sub e) and electron (e), muon neutrino (ν sub μ) and muon (μ), and tau neutrino (ν sub τ) and tau (τ), and Z sup 0 and W sup ± weak force. Mass, charge, and spin are listed for each particle.
Standard model of elementary particles: the 12 fundamental fermions and 4 fundamental bosons. Brown loops indicate which bosons (red) couple to which fermions (purple and green). Columns are three generations of matter (fermions) and one of forces (bosons). In the first three columns, two rows contain quarks and two leptons. The top two rows' columns contain up (u) and down (d) quarks, charm (c) and strange (s) quarks, top (t) and bottom (b) quarks, and photon (γ) and gluon (g), respectively. The bottom two rows' columns contain electron neutrino (νe) and electron (e), muon neutrino (νμ) and muon (μ), tau neutrino (ντ) and tau (τ), and the Z0 and W± carriers of the weak force. Mass, charge, and spin are listed for each particle.

Ordinary matter and the forces that act on matter can be described in terms of elementary particles.[133] These particles are sometimes described as being fundamental, since they have an unknown substructure, and it is unknown whether or not they are composed of smaller and even more fundamental particles.[134][135] In most contemporary models they are thought of as points in space.[136] All elementary particles are currently best explained by quantum mechanics and exhibit wave–particle duality: their behavior has both particle-like and wave-like aspects, with different features dominating under different circumstances.[137]

Of central importance is the Standard Model, a theory that is concerned with electromagnetic interactions and the weak and strong nuclear interactions.[138] The Standard Model is supported by the experimental confirmation of the existence of particles that compose matter: quarks and leptons, and their corresponding "antimatter" duals, as well as the force particles that mediate interactions: the photon, the W and Z bosons, and the gluon.[134] The Standard Model predicted the existence of the recently discovered Higgs boson, a particle that is a manifestation of a field within the universe that can endow particles with mass.[139][140] Because of its success in explaining a wide variety of experimental results, the Standard Model is sometimes regarded as a "theory of almost everything".[138] The Standard Model does not, however, accommodate gravity. A true force–particle "theory of everything" has not been attained.[141]

Hadrons

A hadron is a composite particle made of quarks held together by the strong force. Hadrons are categorized into two families: baryons (such as protons and neutrons) made of three quarks, and mesons (such as pions) made of one quark and one antiquark. Of the hadrons, protons are stable, and neutrons bound within atomic nuclei are stable. Other hadrons are unstable under ordinary conditions and are thus insignificant constituents of the modern universe.[142]: 118–123 

From approximately 10−6 seconds after the Big Bang, during a period known as the hadron epoch, the temperature of the universe had fallen sufficiently to allow quarks to bind together into hadrons, and the mass of the universe was dominated by hadrons. Initially, the temperature was high enough to allow the formation of hadron–anti-hadron pairs, which kept matter and antimatter in thermal equilibrium. However, as the temperature of the universe continued to fall, hadron–anti-hadron pairs were no longer produced. Most of the hadrons and anti-hadrons were then eliminated in particle–antiparticle annihilation reactions, leaving a small residual of hadrons by the time the universe was about one second old.[142]: 244–266 

Leptons

A lepton is an elementary, half-integer spin particle that does not undergo strong interactions but is subject to the Pauli exclusion principle; no two leptons of the same species can be in exactly the same state at the same time.[143] Two main classes of leptons exist: charged leptons (also known as the electron-like leptons), and neutral leptons (better known as neutrinos). Electrons are stable and the most common charged lepton in the universe, whereas muons and taus are unstable particles that quickly decay after being produced in high energy collisions, such as those involving cosmic rays or carried out in particle accelerators.[144][145] Charged leptons can combine with other particles to form various composite particles such as atoms and positronium. The electron governs nearly all of chemistry, as it is found in atoms and is directly tied to all chemical properties. Neutrinos rarely interact with anything, and are consequently rarely observed. Neutrinos stream throughout the universe but rarely interact with normal matter.[146]

The lepton epoch was the period in the evolution of the early universe in which the leptons dominated the mass of the universe. It started roughly 1 second after the Big Bang, after the majority of hadrons and anti-hadrons annihilated each other at the end of the hadron epoch. During the lepton epoch the temperature of the universe was still high enough to create lepton–anti-lepton pairs, so leptons and anti-leptons were in thermal equilibrium. Approximately 10 seconds after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe had fallen to the point where lepton–anti-lepton pairs were no longer created.[147] Most leptons and anti-leptons were then eliminated in annihilation reactions, leaving a small residue of leptons. The mass of the universe was then dominated by photons as it entered the following photon epoch.[148][149]

Photons

A photon is the quantum of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation. It is the carrier for the electromagnetic force. The effects of this force are easily observable at the microscopic and at the macroscopic level because the photon has zero rest mass; this allows long distance interactions.[46]: 1470 

The photon epoch started after most leptons and anti-leptons were annihilated at the end of the lepton epoch, about 10 seconds after the Big Bang. Atomic nuclei were created in the process of nucleosynthesis which occurred during the first few minutes of the photon epoch. For the remainder of the photon epoch the universe contained a hot dense plasma of nuclei, electrons and photons. About 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe fell to the point where nuclei could combine with electrons to create neutral atoms. As a result, photons no longer interacted frequently with matter and the universe became transparent. The highly redshifted photons from this period form the cosmic microwave background. Tiny variations in the temperature of the CMB correspond to variations in the density of the universe that were the early "seeds" from which all subsequent structure formation took place.[142]: 244–266 

Habitability

The frequency of life in the universe has been a frequent point of investigation in astronomy and astrobiology, being the issue of the Drake equation and the different views on it, from identifying the Fermi paradox, the situation of not having found any signs of extraterrestrial life, to arguments for a biophysical cosmology, a view of life being inherent to the physical cosmology of the universe.[150]

Cosmological models

Model of the universe based on general relativity

General relativity is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915 and the current description of gravitation in modern physics. It is the basis of current cosmological models of the universe. General relativity generalizes special relativity and Newton's law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time, or spacetime. In particular, the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present.[151]

The relation is specified by the Einstein field equations, a system of partial differential equations. In general relativity, the distribution of matter and energy determines the geometry of spacetime, which in turn describes the acceleration of matter. Therefore, solutions of the Einstein field equations describe the evolution of the universe. Combined with measurements of the amount, type, and distribution of matter in the universe, the equations of general relativity describe the evolution of the universe over time.[151]

With the assumption of the cosmological principle that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic everywhere, a specific solution of the field equations that describes the universe is the metric tensor called the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric,

where (r, θ, φ) correspond to a spherical coordinate system. This metric has only two undetermined parameters. An overall dimensionless length scale factor R describes the size scale of the universe as a function of time (an increase in R is the expansion of the universe),[152] and a curvature index k describes the geometry. The index k is defined so that it can take only one of three values: 0, corresponding to flat Euclidean geometry; 1, corresponding to a space of positive curvature; or −1, corresponding to a space of positive or negative curvature.[153] The value of R as a function of time t depends upon k and the cosmological constant Λ.[151] The cosmological constant represents the energy density of the vacuum of space and could be related to dark energy.[98] The equation describing how R varies with time is known as the Friedmann equation after its inventor, Alexander Friedmann.[154]

The solutions for R(t) depend on k and Λ, but some qualitative features of such solutions are general. First and most importantly, the length scale R of the universe can remain constant only if the universe is perfectly isotropic with positive curvature (k = 1) and has one precise value of density everywhere, as first noted by Albert Einstein.[151]

Second, all solutions suggest that there was a gravitational singularity in the past, when R went to zero and matter and energy were infinitely dense. It may seem that this conclusion is uncertain because it is based on the questionable assumptions of perfect homogeneity and isotropy (the cosmological principle) and that only the gravitational interaction is significant. However, the Penrose–Hawking singularity theorems show that a singularity should exist for very general conditions. Hence, according to Einstein's field equations, R grew rapidly from an unimaginably hot, dense state that existed immediately following this singularity (when R had a small, finite value); this is the essence of the Big Bang model of the universe. Understanding the singularity of the Big Bang likely requires a quantum theory of gravity, which has not yet been formulated.[155]

Third, the curvature index k determines the sign of the curvature of constant-time spatial surfaces[153] averaged over sufficiently large length scales (greater than about a billion light-years). If k = 1, the curvature is positive and the universe has a finite volume.[156] A universe with positive curvature is often visualized as a three-dimensional sphere embedded in a four-dimensional space. Conversely, if k is zero or negative, the universe has an infinite volume.[156] It may seem counter-intuitive that an infinite and yet infinitely dense universe could be created in a single instant when R = 0, but exactly that is predicted mathematically when k is nonpositive and the cosmological principle is satisfied. By analogy, an infinite plane has zero curvature but infinite area, whereas an infinite cylinder is finite in one direction and a torus is finite in both.

The ultimate fate of the universe is still unknown because it depends critically on the curvature index k and the cosmological constant Λ. If the universe were sufficiently dense, k would equal +1, meaning that its average curvature throughout is positive and the universe will eventually recollapse in a Big Crunch,[157] possibly starting a new universe in a Big Bounce. Conversely, if the universe were insufficiently dense, k would equal 0 or −1 and the universe would expand forever, cooling off and eventually reaching the Big Freeze and the heat death of the universe.[151] Modern data suggests that the expansion of the universe is accelerating; if this acceleration is sufficiently rapid, the universe may eventually reach a Big Rip. Observationally, the universe appears to be flat (k = 0), with an overall density that is very close to the critical value between recollapse and eternal expansion.[158]

Multiverse hypotheses

Some speculative theories have proposed that our universe is but one of a set of disconnected universes, collectively denoted as the multiverse, challenging or enhancing more limited definitions of the universe.[19][159] Max Tegmark developed a four-part classification scheme for the different types of multiverses that scientists have suggested in response to various problems in physics. An example of such multiverses is the one resulting from the chaotic inflation model of the early universe.[160]

Another is the multiverse resulting from the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. In this interpretation, parallel worlds are generated in a manner similar to quantum superposition and decoherence, with all states of the wave functions being realized in separate worlds. Effectively, in the many-worlds interpretation the multiverse evolves as a universal wavefunction. If the Big Bang that created our multiverse created an ensemble of multiverses, the wave function of the ensemble would be entangled in this sense.[161] Whether scientifically meaningful probabilities can be extracted from this picture has been and continues to be a topic of much debate, and multiple versions of the many-worlds interpretation exist.[162][163][164] The subject of the interpretation of quantum mechanics is in general marked by disagreement.[165][166][167]

The least controversial, but still highly disputed, category of multiverse in Tegmark's scheme is Level I. The multiverses of this level are composed by distant spacetime events "in our own universe". Tegmark and others[168] have argued that, if space is infinite, or sufficiently large and uniform, identical instances of the history of Earth's entire Hubble volume occur every so often, simply by chance. Tegmark calculated that our nearest so-called doppelgänger is 1010115 metres away from us (a double exponential function larger than a googolplex).[169][170] However, the arguments used are of speculative nature.[171]

It is possible to conceive of disconnected spacetimes, each existing but unable to interact with one another.[169][172] An easily visualized metaphor of this concept is a group of separate soap bubbles, in which observers living on one soap bubble cannot interact with those on other soap bubbles, even in principle.[173] According to one common terminology, each "soap bubble" of spacetime is denoted as a universe, whereas humans' particular spacetime is denoted as the universe,[19] just as humans call Earth's moon the Moon. The entire collection of these separate spacetimes is denoted as the multiverse.[19]

With this terminology, different universes are not causally connected to each other.[19] In principle, the other unconnected universes may have different dimensionalities and topologies of spacetime, different forms of matter and energy, and different physical laws and physical constants, although such possibilities are purely speculative.[19] Others consider each of several bubbles created as part of chaotic inflation to be separate universes, though in this model these universes all share a causal origin.[19]

Historical conceptions

Historically, there have been many ideas of the cosmos (cosmologies) and its origin (cosmogonies). Theories of an impersonal universe governed by physical laws were first proposed by the Greeks and Indians.[13] Ancient Chinese philosophy encompassed the notion of the universe including both all of space and all of time.[174] Over the centuries, improvements in astronomical observations and theories of motion and gravitation led to ever more accurate descriptions of the universe. The modern era of cosmology began with Albert Einstein's 1915 general theory of relativity, which made it possible to quantitatively predict the origin, evolution, and conclusion of the universe as a whole. Most modern, accepted theories of cosmology are based on general relativity and, more specifically, the predicted Big Bang.[175]

Mythologies

Many cultures have stories describing the origin of the world and universe. Cultures generally regard these stories as having some truth. There are however many differing beliefs in how these stories apply amongst those believing in a supernatural origin, ranging from a god directly creating the universe as it is now to a god just setting the "wheels in motion" (for example via mechanisms such as the big bang and evolution).[176]

Ethnologists and anthropologists who study myths have developed various classification schemes for the various themes that appear in creation stories.[177][178] For example, in one type of story, the world is born from a world egg; such stories include the Finnish epic poem Kalevala, the Chinese story of Pangu or the Indian Brahmanda Purana. In related stories, the universe is created by a single entity emanating or producing something by him- or herself, as in the Tibetan Buddhism concept of Adi-Buddha, the ancient Greek story of Gaia (Mother Earth), the Aztec goddess Coatlicue myth, the ancient Egyptian god Atum story, and the Judeo-Christian Genesis creation narrative in which the Abrahamic God created the universe. In another type of story, the universe is created from the union of male and female deities, as in the Maori story of Rangi and Papa. In other stories, the universe is created by crafting it from pre-existing materials, such as the corpse of a dead god—as from Tiamat in the Babylonian epic Enuma Elish or from the giant Ymir in Norse mythology—or from chaotic materials, as in Izanagi and Izanami in Japanese mythology. In other stories, the universe emanates from fundamental principles, such as Brahman and Prakrti, and the creation myth of the Serers.[179]

Philosophical models

The pre-Socratic Greek philosophers and Indian philosophers developed some of the earliest philosophical concepts of the universe.[13][180] The earliest Greek philosophers noted that appearances can be deceiving, and sought to understand the underlying reality behind the appearances. In particular, they noted the ability of matter to change forms (e.g., ice to water to steam) and several philosophers proposed that all the physical materials in the world are different forms of a single primordial material, or arche. The first to do so was Thales, who proposed this material to be water. Thales' student, Anaximander, proposed that everything came from the limitless apeiron. Anaximenes proposed the primordial material to be air on account of its perceived attractive and repulsive qualities that cause the arche to condense or dissociate into different forms. Anaxagoras proposed the principle of Nous (Mind), while Heraclitus proposed fire (and spoke of logos). Empedocles proposed the elements to be earth, water, air and fire. His four-element model became very popular. Like Pythagoras, Plato believed that all things were composed of number, with Empedocles' elements taking the form of the Platonic solids. Democritus, and later philosophers—most notably Leucippus—proposed that the universe is composed of indivisible atoms moving through a void (vacuum), although Aristotle did not believe that to be feasible because air, like water, offers resistance to motion. Air will immediately rush in to fill a void, and moreover, without resistance, it would do so indefinitely fast.[13]

Although Heraclitus argued for eternal change,[181] his contemporary Parmenides emphasized changelessness. Parmenides' poem On Nature has been read as saying that all change is an illusion, that the true underlying reality is eternally unchanging and of a single nature, or at least that the essential feature of each thing that exists must exist eternally, without origin, change, or end.[182] His student Zeno of Elea challenged everyday ideas about motion with several famous paradoxes. Aristotle responded to these paradoxes by developing the notion of a potential countable infinity, as well as the infinitely divisible continuum.[183][184]

The Indian philosopher Kanada, founder of the Vaisheshika school, developed a notion of atomism and proposed that light and heat were varieties of the same substance.[185] In the 5th century AD, the Buddhist atomist philosopher Dignāga proposed atoms to be point-sized, durationless, and made of energy. They denied the existence of substantial matter and proposed that movement consisted of momentary flashes of a stream of energy.[186]

The notion of temporal finitism was inspired by the doctrine of creation shared by the three Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The Christian philosopher, John Philoponus, presented the philosophical arguments against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past and future. Philoponus' arguments against an infinite past were used by the early Muslim philosopher, Al-Kindi (Alkindus); the Jewish philosopher, Saadia Gaon (Saadia ben Joseph); and the Muslim theologian, Al-Ghazali (Algazel).[187]

Pantheism is the philosophical religious belief that the universe itself is identical to divinity and a supreme being or entity.[188] The physical universe is thus understood as an all-encompassing, immanent deity.[189] The term 'pantheist' designates one who holds both that everything constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine, consisting of an all-encompassing, manifested god or goddess.[190][191]

Astronomical concepts

3rd century BCE calculations by Aristarchus on the relative sizes of, from left to right, the Sun, Earth, and Moon, from a 10th-century AD Greek copy

The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern astronomy come from Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia from around 3000 to 1200 BCE.[192][193] Babylonian astronomers of the 7th century BCE viewed the world as a flat disk surrounded by the ocean.[194][195]

Later Greek philosophers, observing the motions of the heavenly bodies, were concerned with developing models of the universe based more profoundly on empirical evidence. The first coherent model was proposed by Eudoxus of Cnidos, a student of Plato who followed Plato's idea that heavenly motions had to be circular. In order to account for the known complications of the planets' motions, particularly retrograde movement, Eudoxus' model included 27 different celestial spheres: four for each of the planets visible to the naked eye, three each for the Sun and the Moon, and one for the stars. All of these spheres were centered on the Earth, which remained motionless while they rotated eternally. Aristotle elaborated upon this model, increasing the number of spheres to 55 in order to account for further details of planetary motion. For Aristotle, normal matter was entirely contained within the terrestrial sphere, and it obeyed fundamentally different rules from heavenly material.[196][197]

The post-Aristotle treatise De Mundo (of uncertain authorship and date) stated, "Five elements, situated in spheres in five regions, the less being in each case surrounded by the greater—namely, earth surrounded by water, water by air, air by fire, and fire by ether—make up the whole universe".[198] This model was also refined by Callippus and after concentric spheres were abandoned, it was brought into nearly perfect agreement with astronomical observations by Ptolemy.[199] The success of such a model is largely due to the mathematical fact that any function (such as the position of a planet) can be decomposed into a set of circular functions (the Fourier modes). Other Greek scientists, such as the Pythagorean philosopher Philolaus, postulated (according to Stobaeus' account) that at the center of the universe was a "central fire" around which the Earth, Sun, Moon and planets revolved in uniform circular motion.[200]

The Greek astronomer Aristarchus of Samos was the first known individual to propose a heliocentric model of the universe. Though the original text has been lost, a reference in Archimedes' book The Sand Reckoner describes Aristarchus's heliocentric model. Archimedes wrote:

You, King Gelon, are aware the universe is the name given by most astronomers to the sphere the center of which is the center of the Earth, while its radius is equal to the straight line between the center of the Sun and the center of the Earth. This is the common account as you have heard from astronomers. But Aristarchus has brought out a book consisting of certain hypotheses, wherein it appears, as a consequence of the assumptions made, that the universe is many times greater than the universe just mentioned. His hypotheses are that the fixed stars and the Sun remain unmoved, that the Earth revolves about the Sun on the circumference of a circle, the Sun lying in the middle of the orbit, and that the sphere of fixed stars, situated about the same center as the Sun, is so great that the circle in which he supposes the Earth to revolve bears such a proportion to the distance of the fixed stars as the center of the sphere bears to its surface.[201]

Aristarchus thus believed the stars to be very far away, and saw this as the reason why stellar parallax had not been observed, that is, the stars had not been observed to move relative each other as the Earth moved around the Sun. The stars are in fact much farther away than the distance that was generally assumed in ancient times, which is why stellar parallax is only detectable with precision instruments. The geocentric model, consistent with planetary parallax, was assumed to be the explanation for the unobservability of stellar parallax.[202]

Flammarion engraving, Paris 1888

The only other astronomer from antiquity known by name who supported Aristarchus's heliocentric model was Seleucus of Seleucia, a Hellenistic astronomer who lived a century after Aristarchus.[203][204][205] According to Plutarch, Seleucus was the first to prove the heliocentric system through reasoning, but it is not known what arguments he used. Seleucus' arguments for a heliocentric cosmology were probably related to the phenomenon of tides.[206] According to Strabo (1.1.9), Seleucus was the first to state that the tides are due to the attraction of the Moon, and that the height of the tides depends on the Moon's position relative to the Sun.[207] Alternatively, he may have proved heliocentricity by determining the constants of a geometric model for it, and by developing methods to compute planetary positions using this model, similar to Nicolaus Copernicus in the 16th century.[208] During the Middle Ages, heliocentric models were also proposed by the Persian astronomers Albumasar[209] and Al-Sijzi.[210]

Model of the Copernican Universe by Thomas Digges in 1576, with the amendment that the stars are no longer confined to a sphere, but spread uniformly throughout the space surrounding the planets

The Aristotelian model was accepted in the Western world for roughly two millennia, until Copernicus revived Aristarchus's perspective that the astronomical data could be explained more plausibly if the Earth rotated on its axis and if the Sun were placed at the center of the universe.[211]

In the center rests the Sun. For who would place this lamp of a very beautiful temple in another or better place than this wherefrom it can illuminate everything at the same time?

— Nicolaus Copernicus, in Chapter 10, Book 1 of De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestrum (1543)

As noted by Copernicus, the notion that the Earth rotates is very old, dating at least to Philolaus (c. 450 BC), Heraclides Ponticus (c. 350 BC) and Ecphantus the Pythagorean. Roughly a century before Copernicus, the Christian scholar Nicholas of Cusa also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis in his book, On Learned Ignorance (1440).[212] Al-Sijzi[213] also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis. Empirical evidence for the Earth's rotation on its axis, using the phenomenon of comets, was given by Tusi (1201–1274) and Ali Qushji (1403–1474).[214]

This cosmology was accepted by Isaac Newton, Christiaan Huygens and later scientists.[215] Newton demonstrated that the same laws of motion and gravity apply to earthly and to celestial matter, making Aristotle's division between the two obsolete. Edmund Halley (1720)[216] and Jean-Philippe de Chéseaux (1744)[217] noted independently that the assumption of an infinite space filled uniformly with stars would lead to the prediction that the nighttime sky would be as bright as the Sun itself; this became known as Olbers' paradox in the 19th century.[218] Newton believed that an infinite space uniformly filled with matter would cause infinite forces and instabilities causing the matter to be crushed inwards under its own gravity.[215] This instability was clarified in 1902 by the Jeans instability criterion.[219] One solution to these paradoxes is the Charlier universe, in which the matter is arranged hierarchically (systems of orbiting bodies that are themselves orbiting in a larger system, ad infinitum) in a fractal way such that the universe has a negligibly small overall density; such a cosmological model had also been proposed earlier in 1761 by Johann Heinrich Lambert.[53][220]

Deep space astronomy

During the 18th century, Immanuel Kant speculated that nebulae could be entire galaxies separate from the Milky Way,[216] and in 1850, Alexander von Humboldt called these separate galaxies Weltinseln, or "world islands", a term that later developed into "island universes".[221][222] In 1919, when the Hooker Telescope was completed, the prevailing view was that the universe consisted entirely of the Milky Way Galaxy. Using the Hooker Telescope, Edwin Hubble identified Cepheid variables in several spiral nebulae and in 1922–1923 proved conclusively that Andromeda Nebula and Triangulum among others, were entire galaxies outside our own, thus proving that the universe consists of a multitude of galaxies.[223] With this Hubble formulated the Hubble constant, which allowed for the first time a calculation of the age of the Universe and size of the Observable Universe, which became increasingly precise with better meassurements, starting at 2 billion years and 280 million light-years, until 2006 when data of the Hubble Space Telescope allowed a very accurate calculation of the age of the Universe and size of the Observable Universe.[224]

The modern era of physical cosmology began in 1917, when Albert Einstein first applied his general theory of relativity to model the structure and dynamics of the universe.[225] The discoveries of this era, and the questions that remain unanswered, are outlined in the sections above.

Map of the observable universe with some of the notable astronomical objects known as of 2018. The scale of length increases exponentially toward the right. Celestial bodies are shown enlarged in size to be able to understand their shapes.

See also

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b According to modern physics, particularly the theory of relativity, space and time are intrinsically linked as spacetime.
  2. ^ Although listed in megaparsecs by the cited source, this number is so vast that its digits would remain virtually unchanged for all intents and purposes regardless of which conventional units it is listed in, whether it to be nanometers or gigaparsecs, as the differences would disappear into the error.

Citations

  1. ^ "Hubble sees galaxies galore". spacetelescope.org. Archived from the original on May 4, 2017. Retrieved April 30, 2017.
  2. ^ a b Planck Collaboration (2016). "Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 594: A13, Table 4. arXiv:1502.01589. Bibcode:2016A&A...594A..13P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830. S2CID 119262962.
  3. ^ a b c d Greene, Brian (2011). The Hidden Reality. Alfred A. Knopf.
  4. ^ Bars, Itzhak; Terning, John (2009). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-0-387-77637-8. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
  5. ^ Davies, Paul (2006). The Goldilocks Enigma. First Mariner Books. pp. 43ff. ISBN 978-0-618-59226-5.
  6. ^ a b NASA/WMAP Science Team (January 24, 2014). "Universe 101: What is the Universe Made Of?". NASA. Archived from the original on March 10, 2008. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
  7. ^ a b Fixsen, D.J. (2009). "The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background". The Astrophysical Journal. 707 (2): 916–920. arXiv:0911.1955. Bibcode:2009ApJ...707..916F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916. ISSN 0004-637X. S2CID 119217397.
  8. ^ a b c "First Planck results: the universe is still weird and interesting". Matthew Francis. Ars technica. March 21, 2013. Archived from the original on May 2, 2019. Retrieved August 21, 2015.
  9. ^ NASA/WMAP Science Team (January 24, 2014). "Universe 101: Will the Universe expand forever?". NASA. Archived from the original on March 9, 2008. Retrieved April 16, 2015.
  10. ^ a b Zeilik, Michael; Gregory, Stephen A. (1998). Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics (4th ed.). Saunders College. ISBN 978-0-03-006228-5. The totality of all space and time; all that is, has been, and will be.
  11. ^ Planck Collaboration; Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday, A. J.; Barreiro, R. B.; Bartolo, N.; Basak, S. (September 2020). "Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 641: A6. arXiv:1807.06209. Bibcode:2020A&A...641A...6P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. ISSN 0004-6361. S2CID 119335614.
  12. ^ Dold-Samplonius, Yvonne (2002). From China to Paris: 2000 Years Transmission of Mathematical Ideas. Franz Steiner Verlag.
  13. ^ a b c d Glick, Thomas F.; Livesey, Steven; Wallis, Faith (2005). Medieval Science Technology and Medicine: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-96930-7.
  14. ^ Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (2013). An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (International ed.). Pearson. pp. 1173–1174. ISBN 978-1-292-02293-2. Retrieved May 16, 2018.
  15. ^ a b Hawking, Stephen (1988). A Brief History of Time. Bantam. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-553-05340-1.
  16. ^ Redd, Nola. "What is Dark Matter?". Space.com. Archived from the original on February 1, 2018. Retrieved February 1, 2018.
  17. ^ a b "Planck 2015 results, table 9". Archived from the original on July 27, 2018. Retrieved May 16, 2018.
  18. ^ Persic, Massimo; Salucci, Paolo (September 1, 1992). "The baryon content of the Universe". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 258 (1): 14P – 18P. arXiv:astro-ph/0502178. Bibcode:1992MNRAS.258P..14P. doi:10.1093/mnras/258.1.14P. ISSN 0035-8711. S2CID 17945298.
  19. ^ a b c d e f g Ellis, George F. R.; Kirchner, U.; Stoeger, W. R. (2004). "Multiverses and physical cosmology". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 347 (3): 921–936. arXiv:astro-ph/0305292. Bibcode:2004MNRAS.347..921E. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07261.x. S2CID 119028830.
  20. ^ "'Multiverse' theory suggested by microwave background". BBC News. August 3, 2011. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  21. ^ "Universe". Encyclopaedia Britannica online. 2012. Archived from the original on June 9, 2021. Retrieved February 17, 2018.
  22. ^ "Universe". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Archived from the original on October 22, 2012. Retrieved September 21, 2012.
  23. ^ "Universe". Dictionary.com. Archived from the original on October 23, 2012. Retrieved September 21, 2012.
  24. ^ a b Schreuder, Duco A. (2014). Vision and Visual Perception. Archway Publishing. p. 135. ISBN 978-1-4808-1294-9. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  25. ^ Mermin, N. David (2004). "Could Feynman Have Said This?". Physics Today. 57 (5): 10. Bibcode:2004PhT....57e..10M. doi:10.1063/1.1768652.
  26. ^ Tegmark, Max (2008). "The Mathematical Universe". Foundations of Physics. 38 (2): 101–150. arXiv:0704.0646. Bibcode:2008FoPh...38..101T. doi:10.1007/s10701-007-9186-9. S2CID 9890455. A short version of which is available at Fixsen, D. J. (2007). "Shut up and calculate". arXiv:0709.4024 [physics.pop-ph]. in reference to David Mermin's famous quote "shut up and calculate!"[25]
  27. ^ Holt, Jim (2012). Why Does the World Exist?. Liveright Publishing. p. 308.
  28. ^ Ferris, Timothy (1997). The Whole Shebang: A State-of-the-Universe(s) Report. Simon & Schuster. p. 400.
  29. ^ Copan, Paul; William Lane Craig (2004). Creation Out of Nothing: A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration. Baker Academic. p. 220. ISBN 978-0-8010-2733-8.
  30. ^ Bolonkin, Alexander (2011). Universe, Human Immortality and Future Human Evaluation. Elsevier. pp. 3–. ISBN 978-0-12-415801-6. Archived from the original on February 8, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  31. ^ The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971, p. 3518. ISBN 978-0198611172.
  32. ^ Lewis, C.T. and Short, S (1879) A Latin Dictionary, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-864201-6, pp. 1933, 1977–1978.
  33. ^ Liddell; Scott. "A Greek-English Lexicon". lsj.gr. Archived from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2022. πᾶς
  34. ^ Liddell; Scott. "A Greek-English Lexicon". lsj.gr. Archived from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2022. ὅλος
  35. ^ Liddell; Scott. "A Greek–English Lexicon". lsj.gr. Archived from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2022. κόσμος
  36. ^ Lewis, C.T.; Short, S (1879). A Latin Dictionary. Oxford University Press. pp. 1175, 1189–1190, 1881–1882. ISBN 978-0-19-864201-5.
  37. ^ The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1971. pp. 569, 909, 1900, 3821–3822. ISBN 978-0-19-861117-2.
  38. ^ Silk, Joseph (2009). Horizons of Cosmology. Templeton Pressr. p. 208.
  39. ^ Singh, Simon (2005). Big Bang: The Origin of the Universe. Harper Perennial. p. 560. Bibcode:2004biba.book.....S.
  40. ^ Sivaram, C. (1986). "Evolution of the Universe through the Planck epoch". Astrophysics and Space Science. 125 (1): 189–199. Bibcode:1986Ap&SS.125..189S. doi:10.1007/BF00643984. S2CID 123344693.
  41. ^ a b Johnson, Jennifer A. (February 2019). "Populating the periodic table: Nucleosynthesis of the elements". Science. 363 (6426): 474–478. Bibcode:2019Sci...363..474J. doi:10.1126/science.aau9540. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 30705182. S2CID 59565697.
  42. ^ a b c Durrer, Ruth (2008). The Cosmic Microwave Background. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84704-9.
  43. ^ a b Steane, Andrew M. (2021). Relativity Made Relatively Easy, Volume 2: General Relativity and Cosmology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-192-89564-6.
  44. ^ Larson, Richard B. & Bromm, Volker (March 2002). "The First Stars in the Universe". Scientific American. Archived from the original on June 11, 2015. Retrieved June 9, 2015.
  45. ^ Ryden, Barbara, "Introduction to Cosmology", 2006, eqn. 6.33
  46. ^ a b c Urone, Paul Peter; et al. (2022). College Physics 2e. OpenStax. ISBN 978-1-951-69360-2. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
  47. ^ "Antimatter". Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council. October 28, 2003. Archived from the original on March 7, 2004. Retrieved August 10, 2006.
  48. ^ Smorra C.; et al. (October 20, 2017). "A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment" (PDF). Nature. 550 (7676): 371–374. Bibcode:2017Natur.550..371S. doi:10.1038/nature24048. PMID 29052625. S2CID 205260736. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 30, 2018. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  49. ^ Landau & Lifshitz (1975, p. 361): "It is interesting to note that in a closed space the total electric charge must be zero. Namely, every closed surface in a finite space encloses on each side of itself a finite region of space. Therefore, the flux of the electric field through this surface is equal, on the one hand, to the total charge located in the interior of the surface, and on the other hand to the total charge outside of it, with opposite sign. Consequently, the sum of the charges on the two sides of the surface is zero."
  50. ^ a b Bars, Itzhak; Terning, John (2018). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-0-387-77637-8. Retrieved October 19, 2018.
  51. ^ Crane, Leah (June 29, 2024). de Lange, Catherine (ed.). "How big is the universe, really?". New Scientist. p. 31.
  52. ^ Crockett, Christopher (February 20, 2013). "What is a light-year?". EarthSky. Archived from the original on February 20, 2015. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
  53. ^ a b Rindler, p. 196.
  54. ^ Christian, Eric; Samar, Safi-Harb. "How large is the Milky Way?". Archived from the original on February 2, 1999. Retrieved November 28, 2007.
  55. ^ Hall, Shannon (May 4, 2015). "Size of the Milky Way Upgraded, Solving Galaxy Puzzle". Space.com. Archived from the original on June 7, 2015. Retrieved June 9, 2015.
  56. ^ Ribas, I.; Jordi, C.; Vilardell, F.; Fitzpatrick, E. L.; Hilditch, R. W.; Guinan, F. Edward (2005). "First Determination of the Distance and Fundamental Properties of an Eclipsing Binary in the Andromeda Galaxy". Astrophysical Journal. 635 (1): L37 – L40. arXiv:astro-ph/0511045. Bibcode:2005ApJ...635L..37R. doi:10.1086/499161. S2CID 119522151.
    McConnachie, A.W.; Irwin, M.J.; Ferguson, A.M.N.; Ibata, R.A.; Lewis, G.F.; Tanvir, N. (2005). "Distances and metallicities for 17 Local Group galaxies". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 356 (4): 979–997. arXiv:astro-ph/0410489. Bibcode:2005MNRAS.356..979M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08514.x.
  57. ^ Janek, Vanessa (February 20, 2015). "How can space travel faster than the speed of light?". Universe Today. Archived from the original on December 16, 2021. Retrieved June 6, 2015.
  58. ^ "Is faster-than-light travel or communication possible? Section: Expansion of the Universe". Philip Gibbs. 1997. Archived from the original on March 10, 2010. Retrieved June 6, 2015.
  59. ^ Vardanyan, M.; Trotta, R.; Silk, J. (January 28, 2011). "Applications of Bayesian model averaging to the curvature and size of the Universe". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 413 (1): L91 – L95. arXiv:1101.5476. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.413L..91V. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01040.x. S2CID 2616287.
  60. ^ Schreiber, Urs (June 6, 2008). "Urban Myths in Contemporary Cosmology". The n-Category Café. University of Texas at Austin. Archived from the original on July 1, 2020. Retrieved June 1, 2020.
  61. ^ Don N. Page (2007). "Susskind's Challenge to the Hartle-Hawking No-Boundary Proposal and Possible Resolutions". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2007 (1): 004. arXiv:hep-th/0610199. Bibcode:2007JCAP...01..004P. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/004. S2CID 17403084.
  62. ^ Berardelli, Phil (March 25, 2010). "Galaxy Collisions Give Birth to Quasars". Science News. Archived from the original on March 25, 2022. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
  63. ^ Riess, Adam G.; Filippenko; Challis; Clocchiatti; Diercks; Garnavich; Gilliland; Hogan; Jha; Kirshner; Leibundgut; Phillips; Reiss; Schmidt; Schommer; Smith; Spyromilio; Stubbs; Suntzeff; Tonry (1998). "Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant". Astronomical Journal. 116 (3): 1009–1038. arXiv:astro-ph/9805201. Bibcode:1998AJ....116.1009R. doi:10.1086/300499. S2CID 15640044.
  64. ^ Perlmutter, S.; Aldering; Goldhaber; Knop; Nugent; Castro; Deustua; Fabbro; Goobar; Groom; Hook; Kim; Kim; Lee; Nunes; Pain; Pennypacker; Quimby; Lidman; Ellis; Irwin; McMahon; Ruiz-Lapuente; Walton; Schaefer; Boyle; Filippenko; Matheson; Fruchter; et al. (1999). "Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae". Astrophysical Journal. 517 (2): 565–586. arXiv:astro-ph/9812133. Bibcode:1999ApJ...517..565P. doi:10.1086/307221. S2CID 118910636.
  65. ^ Serway, Raymond A.; Moses, Clement J.; Moyer, Curt A. (2004). Modern Physics. Cengage Learning. p. 21. ISBN 978-1-111-79437-8.
  66. ^ Fraknoi, Andrew; et al. (2022). Astronomy 2e. OpenStax. p. 1017. ISBN 978-1-951-69350-3. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  67. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011". Archived from the original on April 17, 2015. Retrieved April 16, 2015.
  68. ^ Overbye, Dennis (October 11, 2003). "A 'Cosmic Jerk' That Reversed the Universe". New York Times. Archived from the original on July 1, 2017. Retrieved February 20, 2017.
  69. ^ Schutz, Bernard (2009). A First Course in General Relativity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 142, 171. ISBN 978-0-521-88705-2.
  70. ^ a b c Mermin, N. David (2021) [2005]. It's About Time: Understanding Einstein's Relativity (Princeton Science Library paperback ed.). Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12201-4. OCLC 1193067111.
  71. ^ Brill, Dieter; Jacobsen, Ted (2006). "Spacetime and Euclidean geometry". General Relativity and Gravitation. 38 (4): 643–651. arXiv:gr-qc/0407022. Bibcode:2006GReGr..38..643B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.338.7953. doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0254-9. S2CID 119067072.
  72. ^ Wheeler, John Archibald (2010). Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-07948-7. Archived from the original on February 17, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  73. ^ Kersting, Magdalena (May 2019). "Free fall in curved spacetime – how to visualise gravity in general relativity". Physics Education. 54 (3): 035008. Bibcode:2019PhyEd..54c5008K. doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ab08f5. hdl:10852/74677. ISSN 0031-9120. S2CID 127471222.
  74. ^ Goldstein, Herbert; Poole, Charles P.; Safko, John L. (2002). Classical Mechanics (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Addison Wesley. ISBN 0-201-31611-0. OCLC 47056311.
  75. ^ Goodstein, Judith R. (2018). Einstein's Italian Mathematicians: Ricci, Levi-Civita, and the Birth of General Relativity. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-4704-2846-4. OCLC 1020305599.
  76. ^ Choquet-Bruhat, Yvonne (2009). General Relativity and the Einstein Equations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-155226-7. OCLC 317496332.
  77. ^ Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda (2021). The Disordered Cosmos: A Journey into Dark Matter, Spacetime, and Dreams Deferred. New York, New York: Bold Type Books. ISBN 978-1-5417-2470-9. OCLC 1164503847. Archived from the original on February 21, 2022. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  78. ^ "WMAP Mission – Age of the Universe". map.gsfc.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  79. ^ a b Luminet, Jean-Pierre; Weeks, Jeffrey R.; Riazuelo, Alain; Lehoucq, Roland; Uzan, Jean-Philippe (October 9, 2003). "Dodecahedral space topology as an explanation for weak wide-angle temperature correlations in the cosmic microwave background". Nature (Submitted manuscript). 425 (6958): 593–595. arXiv:astro-ph/0310253. Bibcode:2003Natur.425..593L. doi:10.1038/nature01944. PMID 14534579. S2CID 4380713. Archived from the original on May 17, 2021. Retrieved August 21, 2018.
  80. ^ Luminet, Jean-Pierre; Roukema, Boudewijn F. (1999). "Topology of the Universe: Theory and Observations". Proceedings of Cosmology School held at Cargese, Corsica, August 1998. arXiv:astro-ph/9901364. Bibcode:1999ASIC..541..117L.
  81. ^ Harrison, Edward Robert (2000). Cosmology: the science of the universe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 447–. ISBN 978-0-521-66148-5. Archived from the original on August 26, 2016. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
  82. ^ Liddle, Andrew R.; Lyth, David Hilary (2000). Cosmological inflation and large-scale structure. Cambridge University Press. pp. 24–. ISBN 978-0-521-57598-0. Archived from the original on December 31, 2013. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
  83. ^ "What is the Ultimate Fate of the Universe?". National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Archived from the original on December 22, 2021. Retrieved August 23, 2015.
  84. ^ Roukema, Boudewijn; Buliński, Zbigniew; Szaniewska, Agnieszka; Gaudin, Nicolas E. (2008). "A test of the Poincare dodecahedral space topology hypothesis with the WMAP CMB data". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 482 (3): 747–753. arXiv:0801.0006. Bibcode:2008A&A...482..747L. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078777. S2CID 1616362.
  85. ^ Aurich, Ralf; Lustig, S.; Steiner, F.; Then, H. (2004). "Hyperbolic Universes with a Horned Topology and the CMB Anisotropy". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 21 (21): 4901–4926. arXiv:astro-ph/0403597. Bibcode:2004CQGra..21.4901A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/21/010. S2CID 17619026.
  86. ^ Planck Collaboration (2014). "Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 571: A16. arXiv:1303.5076. Bibcode:2014A&A...571A..16P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591. S2CID 118349591.
  87. ^ "Planck reveals 'almost perfect' universe". Michael Banks. Physics World. March 21, 2013. Archived from the original on March 24, 2013. Retrieved March 21, 2013.
  88. ^ Friederich, Simon (November 12, 2021). "Fine-Tuning". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
  89. ^ Isaak, Mark, ed. (2005). "CI301: The Anthropic Principle". Index to Creationist Claims. TalkOrigins Archive. Archived from the original on July 1, 2014. Retrieved October 31, 2007.
  90. ^ Fritzsche, Hellmut. "electromagnetic radiation | physics". Encyclopædia Britannica. p. 1. Archived from the original on August 31, 2015. Retrieved July 26, 2015.
  91. ^ "Physics 7:Relativity, SpaceTime and Cosmology" (PDF). Physics 7:Relativity, SpaceTime and Cosmology. University of California Riverside. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 5, 2015. Retrieved July 26, 2015.
  92. ^ "Physics – for the 21st Century". learner.org. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Annenberg Learner. Archived from the original on September 7, 2015. Retrieved July 27, 2015.
  93. ^ "Dark matter – A history shapes by dark force". Timothy Ferris. National Geographic. 2015. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved December 29, 2015.
  94. ^ Redd, SPACE.com, Nola Taylor. "It's Official: The Universe Is Dying Slowly". Scientific American. Archived from the original on August 12, 2015. Retrieved August 11, 2015.
  95. ^ Parr, Will; et al. "RIP Universe – Your Time Is Coming… Slowly | Video". Space.com. Archived from the original on August 13, 2015. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
  96. ^ a b Sean Carroll, Ph.D., Caltech, 2007, The Teaching Company, Dark Matter, Dark Energy: The Dark Side of the Universe, Guidebook Part 2. p. 46, Accessed October 7, 2013, "...dark matter: An invisible, essentially collisionless component of matter that makes up about 25 percent of the energy density of the universe... it's a different kind of particle... something not yet observed in the laboratory..."
  97. ^ a b Peebles, P. J. E. & Ratra, Bharat (2003). "The cosmological constant and dark energy". Reviews of Modern Physics. 75 (2): 559–606. arXiv:astro-ph/0207347. Bibcode:2003RvMP...75..559P. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559. S2CID 118961123.
  98. ^ Mandolesi, N.; Calzolari, P.; Cortiglioni, S.; Delpino, F.; Sironi, G.; Inzani, P.; Deamici, G.; Solheim, J.-E.; Berger, L.; Partridge, R.B.; Martenis, P.L.; Sangree, C.H.; Harvey, R.C. (1986). "Large-scale homogeneity of the universe measured by the microwave background". Nature. 319 (6056): 751–753. Bibcode:1986Natur.319..751M. doi:10.1038/319751a0. S2CID 4349689.
  99. ^ Gunn, Alistair (November 29, 2023). "How many galaxies are there in the universe? – Do astronomers know how many galaxies exist? How many can we see in the observable Universe?". BBC Sky at Night. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved December 2, 2023.
  100. ^ "New Horizons spacecraft answers the question: How dark is space?". phys.org. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved January 15, 2021.
  101. ^ Howell, Elizabeth (March 20, 2018). "How Many Galaxies Are There?". Space.com. Archived from the original on February 28, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  102. ^ Staff (2019). "How Many Stars Are There In The Universe?". European Space Agency. Archived from the original on September 23, 2019. Retrieved September 21, 2019.
  103. ^ Marov, Mikhail Ya. (2015). "The Structure of the Universe". The Fundamentals of Modern Astrophysics. pp. 279–294. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8730-2_10. ISBN 978-1-4614-8729-6.
  104. ^ Mackie, Glen (February 1, 2002). "To see the Universe in a Grain of Taranaki Sand". Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing. Archived from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved January 28, 2017.
  105. ^ Mack, Eric (March 19, 2015). "There may be more Earth-like planets than grains of sand on all our beaches – New research contends that the Milky Way alone is flush with billions of potentially habitable planets – and that's just one sliver of the universe". CNET. Archived from the original on December 1, 2023. Retrieved December 1, 2023.
  106. ^ T. Bovaird, T.; Lineweaver, C.H.; Jacobsen, S.K. (March 13, 2015). "Using the inclinations of Kepler systems to prioritize new Titius–Bode-based exoplanet predictions". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 448 (4): 3608–3627. arXiv:1412.6230. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv221. Archived from the original on December 1, 2023. Retrieved December 1, 2023.
  107. ^ Baker, Harry (July 11, 2021). "How many atoms are in the observable universe?". Live Science. Archived from the original on December 1, 2023. Retrieved December 1, 2023.
  108. ^ Totani, Tomonori (February 3, 2020). "Emergence of life in an inflationary universe". Scientific Reports. 10 (1671): 1671. arXiv:1911.08092. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.1671T. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58060-0. PMC 6997386. PMID 32015390.
  109. ^ "Unveiling the Secret of a Virgo Dwarf Galaxy". European Southern Observatory Press Release. ESO: 12. May 3, 2000. Bibcode:2000eso..pres...12. Archived from the original on July 13, 2015. Retrieved January 3, 2007.
  110. ^ "Hubble's Largest Galaxy Portrait Offers a New High-Definition View". NASA. February 28, 2006. Archived from the original on May 27, 2020. Retrieved January 3, 2007.
  111. ^ Gibney, Elizabeth (September 3, 2014). "Earth's new address: 'Solar System, Milky Way, Laniakea'". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15819. S2CID 124323774. Archived from the original on January 7, 2019. Retrieved August 21, 2015.
  112. ^ "Local Group". Fraser Cain. Universe Today. May 4, 2009. Archived from the original on June 21, 2018. Retrieved August 21, 2015.
  113. ^ Devlin, Hannah; Correspondent, Science (April 20, 2015). "Astronomers discover largest known structure in the universe is ... a big hole". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 7, 2017. Retrieved December 18, 2016. {{cite news}}: |last2= has generic name (help)
  114. ^ "Content of the Universe – WMAP 9yr Pie Chart". wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved July 26, 2015.
  115. ^ Rindler, p. 202.
  116. ^ Liddle, Andrew (2003). An Introduction to Modern Cosmology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-84835-7.. p. 2.
  117. ^ Livio, Mario (2001). The Accelerating Universe: Infinite Expansion, the Cosmological Constant, and the Beauty of the Cosmos. John Wiley and Sons. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-471-43714-7. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved March 31, 2012.
  118. ^ Peebles, P.J.E. & Ratra, Bharat (2003). "The cosmological constant and dark energy". Reviews of Modern Physics. 75 (2): 559–606. arXiv:astro-ph/0207347. Bibcode:2003RvMP...75..559P. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559. S2CID 118961123.
  119. ^ Steinhardt, Paul J.; Turok, Neil (2006). "Why the cosmological constant is small and positive". Science. 312 (5777): 1180–1183. arXiv:astro-ph/0605173. Bibcode:2006Sci...312.1180S. doi:10.1126/science.1126231. PMID 16675662. S2CID 14178620.
  120. ^ "Dark Energy". Hyperphysics. Archived from the original on May 27, 2013. Retrieved January 4, 2014.
  121. ^ Carroll, Sean (2001). "The cosmological constant". Living Reviews in Relativity. 4 (1): 1. arXiv:astro-ph/0004075. Bibcode:2001LRR.....4....1C. doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-1. PMC 5256042. PMID 28179856.
  122. ^ "Planck captures portrait of the young universe, revealing earliest light". University of Cambridge. March 21, 2013. Archived from the original on April 17, 2019. Retrieved March 21, 2013.
  123. ^ Davies, P. (1992). The New Physics: A Synthesis. Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-521-43831-5. Archived from the original on February 3, 2021. Retrieved May 17, 2020.
  124. ^ Persic, Massimo; Salucci, Paolo (September 1, 1992). "The baryon content of the universe". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 258 (1): 14P – 18P. arXiv:astro-ph/0502178. Bibcode:1992MNRAS.258P..14P. doi:10.1093/mnras/258.1.14P. ISSN 0035-8711. S2CID 17945298.
  125. ^ Shull, J. Michael; Smith, Britton D.; Danforth, Charles W. (November 1, 2012). "The Baryon Census in a Multiphase Intergalactic Medium: 30% of the Baryons May Still Be Missing". The Astrophysical Journal. 759 (1): 23. arXiv:1112.2706. Bibcode:2012ApJ...759...23S. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/23. ISSN 0004-637X. S2CID 119295243. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved February 27, 2023. Galaxy surveys have found ~10% of these baryons in collapsed objects such as galaxies, groups, and clusters [...] Of the remaining 80%–90% of cosmological baryons, approximately half can be accounted for in the low-z [intergalactic medium]
  126. ^ Macquart, J.-P.; Prochaska, J. X.; McQuinn, M.; Bannister, K. W.; Bhandari, S.; Day, C. K.; Deller, A. T.; Ekers, R. D.; James, C. W.; Marnoch, L.; Osłowski, S.; Phillips, C.; Ryder, S. D.; Scott, D. R.; Shannon, R. M. (May 28, 2020). "A census of baryons in the Universe from localized fast radio bursts". Nature. 581 (7809): 391–395. arXiv:2005.13161. Bibcode:2020Natur.581..391M. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2300-2. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 32461651. S2CID 256821489. Archived from the original on November 5, 2023. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
  127. ^ Flowers, Paul; et al. (2019). Chemistry 2e. OpenStax. p. 14. ISBN 978-1-947-17262-3. Archived from the original on February 17, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  128. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2001". NobelPrize.org. Archived from the original on February 17, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  129. ^ Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude; Guery-Odelin, David (2011). Advances In Atomic Physics: An Overview. World Scientific. p. 684. ISBN 978-981-4390-58-3. Archived from the original on June 4, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  130. ^ 't Hooft, G. (1997). In search of the ultimate building blocks. Cambridge University Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-521-57883-7.
  131. ^ Clayton, Donald D. (1983). Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis. The University of Chicago Press. pp. 362–435. ISBN 978-0-226-10953-4.
  132. ^ Veltman, Martinus (2003). Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-238-149-1.
  133. ^ a b Braibant, Sylvie; Giacomelli, Giorgio; Spurio, Maurizio (2012). Particles and Fundamental Interactions: An Introduction to Particle Physics (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-94-007-2463-1. Archived from the original on August 26, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  134. ^ Close, Frank (2012). Particle Physics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280434-1.
  135. ^ Mann, Adam (August 20, 2022). "What Are Elementary Particles?". Live Science. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
  136. ^ Zwiebach, Barton (2022). Mastering Quantum Mechanics: Essentials, Theory, and Applications. MIT Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-262-04613-8.
  137. ^ a b Oerter, R. (2006). The Theory of Almost Everything: The Standard Model, the Unsung Triumph of Modern Physics (Kindle). Penguin Group. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-13-236678-6.
  138. ^ Onyisi, P. (October 23, 2012). "Higgs boson FAQ". University of Texas ATLAS group. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved January 8, 2013.
  139. ^ Strassler, M. (October 12, 2012). "The Higgs FAQ 2.0". ProfMattStrassler.com. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved January 8, 2013. [Q] Why do particle physicists care so much about the Higgs particle?
    [A] Well, actually, they don't. What they really care about is the Higgs field, because it is so important. [emphasis in original]
  140. ^ Weinberg, Steven (2011). Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientist's Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-78786-6.
  141. ^ a b c Allday, Jonathan (2002). Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang (2nd ed.). IOP Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7503-0806-9.
  142. ^ "Lepton (physics)". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on May 11, 2015. Retrieved September 29, 2010.
  143. ^ Harari, H. (1977). "Beyond charm". In Balian, R.; Llewellyn-Smith, C.H. (eds.). Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions at High Energy, Les Houches, France, Jul 5 – Aug 14, 1976. Les Houches Summer School Proceedings. Vol. 29. North-Holland. p. 613.
  144. ^ Harari H. (1977). "Three generations of quarks and leptons" (PDF). In E. van Goeler; Weinstein R. (eds.). Proceedings of the XII Rencontre de Moriond. p. 170. SLAC-PUB-1974. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 13, 2020. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
  145. ^ "Experiment confirms famous physics model" (Press release). MIT News Office. April 18, 2007. Archived from the original on July 5, 2013. Retrieved June 2, 2015.
  146. ^ "Thermal history of the universe and early growth of density fluctuations" (PDF). Guinevere Kauffmann. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 21, 2016. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
  147. ^ "First few minutes". Eric Chaisson. Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Archived from the original on December 4, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
  148. ^ "Timeline of the Big Bang". The physics of the Universe. Archived from the original on March 30, 2020. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
  149. ^ Dick, Steven J. (2020). "The Biophysical Cosmology: The Place of Bioastronomy in the History of Science". Space, Time, and Aliens. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 53–58. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41614-0_4. ISBN 978-3-030-41613-3.
  150. ^ a b c d e Zeilik, Michael; Gregory, Stephen A. (1998). "25-2". Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics (4th ed.). Saunders College Publishing. ISBN 978-0-03-006228-5.
  151. ^ Raine & Thomas (2001, p. 12)
  152. ^ a b Raine & Thomas (2001, p. 66)
  153. ^ Friedmann, A. (1922). "Über die Krümmung des Raumes" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Physik. 10 (1): 377–386. Bibcode:1922ZPhy...10..377F. doi:10.1007/BF01332580. S2CID 125190902. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 15, 2016. Retrieved August 13, 2015.
  154. ^ Raine & Thomas (2001, pp. 122–123)
  155. ^ a b Raine & Thomas (2001, p. 70)
  156. ^ Raine & Thomas (2001, p. 84)
  157. ^ Raine & Thomas (2001, pp. 88, 110–113)
  158. ^ Munitz, M. K. (1959). "One Universe or Many?". Journal of the History of Ideas. 12 (2): 231–255. doi:10.2307/2707516. JSTOR 2707516.
  159. ^ Linde, A. (1986). "Eternal chaotic inflation". Mod. Phys. Lett. A. 1 (2): 81–85. Bibcode:1986MPLA....1...81L. doi:10.1142/S0217732386000129. S2CID 123472763. Archived from the original on April 17, 2019. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
    Linde, A. (1986). "Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflationary Universe" (PDF). Phys. Lett. B. 175 (4): 395–400. Bibcode:1986PhLB..175..395L. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90611-8. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 27, 2013. Retrieved March 17, 2011.
  160. ^ Everett, Hugh (1957). "Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics". Reviews of Modern Physics. 29 (3): 454–462. Bibcode:1957RvMP...29..454E. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454. S2CID 17178479.
  161. ^ Ball, Philip (February 17, 2015). "Too many worlds". Aeon.co. Archived from the original on September 27, 2021. Retrieved September 23, 2021.
  162. ^ Peres, Asher (1995). Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 374. ISBN 0-7923-2549-4.
  163. ^ Kent, Adrian (February 2015). "Does it Make Sense to Speak of Self-Locating Uncertainty in the Universal Wave Function? Remarks on Sebens and Carroll". Foundations of Physics. 45 (2): 211–217. arXiv:1408.1944. Bibcode:2015FoPh...45..211K. doi:10.1007/s10701-014-9862-5. ISSN 0015-9018. S2CID 118471198.
  164. ^ Schlosshauer, Maximilian; Kofler, Johannes; Zeilinger, Anton (August 1, 2013). "A snapshot of foundational attitudes toward quantum mechanics". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 44 (3): 222–230. arXiv:1301.1069. Bibcode:2013SHPMP..44..222S. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.04.004. ISSN 1355-2198. S2CID 55537196.
  165. ^ Mermin, N. David (July 1, 2012). "Commentary: Quantum mechanics: Fixing the shifty split". Physics Today. 65 (7): 8–10. Bibcode:2012PhT....65g...8M. doi:10.1063/PT.3.1618. ISSN 0031-9228. New interpretations appear every year. None ever disappear.
  166. ^ Cabello, Adán (2017). "Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness". In Lombardi, Olimpia; Fortin, Sebastian; Holik, Federico; López, Cristian (eds.). What is Quantum Information?. Cambridge University Press. pp. 138–143. arXiv:1509.04711. Bibcode:2015arXiv150904711C. doi:10.1017/9781316494233.009. ISBN 9781107142114. S2CID 118419619.
  167. ^ Garriga, Jaume; Vilenkin, Alexander (2007). "Many Worlds in One". Physical Review D. 64 (4): 043511. arXiv:gr-qc/0102010v2. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043511. S2CID 119000743.
  168. ^ a b Tegmark, Max (2003). "Parallel universes. Not just a staple of science fiction, other universes are a direct implication of cosmological observations". Scientific American. 288 (5): 40–51. arXiv:astro-ph/0302131. Bibcode:2003SciAm.288e..40T. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40. PMID 12701329.
  169. ^ Tegmark, Max (2003). "Parallel Universes". Scientific American. 288 (5): 40–51. arXiv:astro-ph/0302131. Bibcode:2003SciAm.288e..40T. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40. PMID 12701329.
  170. ^ Gil, Francisco José Soler; Alfonseca, Manuel (2013). "About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space". Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science. 29 (3): 361. arXiv:1301.5295. doi:10.1387/theoria.9951. hdl:10486/664735. S2CID 52996408.
  171. ^ Ellis, G. F. (2011). "Does the Multiverse Really Exist?". Scientific American. 305 (2): 38–43. Bibcode:2011SciAm.305a..38E. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0811-38. PMID 21827123.
  172. ^ Moskowitz, Clara (August 12, 2011). "Weird! Our Universe May Be a 'Multiverse,' Scientists Say". livescience. Archived from the original on May 5, 2015. Retrieved May 4, 2015.
  173. ^ Gernet, J. (1993–1994). "Space and time: Science and religion in the encounter between China and Europe". Chinese Science. Vol. 11. pp. 93–102.
  174. ^ Blandford R. D. (2015). "A century of general relativity: Astrophysics and cosmology". Science. 347 (6226): 1103–1108. Bibcode:2015Sci...347.1103B. doi:10.1126/science.aaa4033. PMID 25745165. S2CID 30364122.
  175. ^ Leeming, David A. (2010). Creation Myths of the World. ABC-CLIO. p. xvii. ISBN 978-1-59884-174-9. In common usage the word 'myth' refers to narratives or beliefs that are untrue or merely fanciful; the stories that make up national or ethnic mythologies describe characters and events that common sense and experience tell us are impossible. Nevertheless, all cultures celebrate such myths and attribute to them various degrees of literal or symbolic truth.
  176. ^ Eliade, Mircea (1964). Myth and Reality (Religious Traditions of the World). Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0-04-291001-7.
  177. ^ Leonard, Scott A.; McClure, Michael (2004). Myth and Knowing: An Introduction to World Mythology. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-7674-1957-4.
  178. ^ (Henry Gravrand, "La civilisation Sereer -Pangool") [in] Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frobenius-Institut, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kulturmorphologie, Frobenius Gesellschaft, "Paideuma: Mitteilungen zur Kulturkunde, Volumes 43–44", F. Steiner (1997), pp. 144–145, ISBN 3-515-02842-0
  179. ^ Young, Louise B. (1993). The Unfinished Universe. Oxford University Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-195-08039-1. OCLC 26399171.
  180. ^ Graham, Daniel W. (September 3, 2019). "Heraclitus". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  181. ^ Palmer, John (October 19, 2020). "Parmenides". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  182. ^ Palmer, John (April 8, 2021). "Zeno of Elea". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  183. ^ Dowden, Bradley. "Zeno's Paradoxes". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  184. ^ Will Durant, Our Oriental Heritage:

    "Two systems of Hindu thought propound physical theories suggestively similar to those of Greece. Kanada, founder of the Vaisheshika philosophy, held that the world is composed of atoms as many in kind as the various elements. The Jains more nearly approximated to Democritus by teaching that all atoms were of the same kind, producing different effects by diverse modes of combinations. Kanada believed light and heat to be varieties of the same substance; Udayana taught that all heat comes from the Sun; and Vachaspati, like Newton, interpreted light as composed of minute particles emitted by substances and striking the eye."

  185. ^ Stcherbatsky, F. Th. (1930, 1962), Buddhist Logic, Volume 1, p. 19, Dover, New York:

    "The Buddhists denied the existence of substantial matter altogether. Movement consists for them of moments, it is a staccato movement, momentary flashes of a stream of energy... "Everything is evanescent",... says the Buddhist, because there is no stuff... Both systems [Sānkhya, and later Indian Buddhism] share in common a tendency to push the analysis of existence up to its minutest, last elements which are imagined as absolute qualities, or things possessing only one unique quality. They are called "qualities" (guna-dharma) in both systems in the sense of absolute qualities, a kind of atomic, or intra-atomic, energies of which the empirical things are composed. Both systems, therefore, agree in denying the objective reality of the categories of Substance and Quality,... and of the relation of Inference uniting them. There is in Sānkhya philosophy no separate existence of qualities. What we call quality is but a particular manifestation of a subtle entity. To every new unit of quality corresponds a subtle quantum of matter which is called guna, "quality", but represents a subtle substantive entity. The same applies to early Buddhism where all qualities are substantive... or, more precisely, dynamic entities, although they are also called dharmas ('qualities')."

  186. ^ Viney, Donald Wayne (1985). "The Cosmological Argument". Charles Hartshorne and the Existence of God. SUNY Press. pp. 65–68. ISBN 978-0-87395-907-0.
  187. ^ Pearsall, Judy (1998). The New Oxford Dictionary Of English (1st ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 1341. ISBN 978-0-19-861263-6.
  188. ^ Edwards, Paul (1967). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan. p. 34.
  189. ^ Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Paul Edwards. New York: Macmillan and Free Press. 1967. p. 34.
  190. ^ Reid-Bowen, Paul (April 15, 2016). Goddess as Nature: Towards a Philosophical Thealogy. Taylor & Francis. p. 70. ISBN 9781317126348.
  191. ^ Lindberg, David C. (2007). The beginnings of Western science: the European Scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. p. 12. ISBN 9780226482057.
  192. ^ Grant, Edward (2007). "Ancient Egypt to Plato". A History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–26. ISBN 978-0-521-68957-1.
  193. ^ Horowitz, Wayne (1988). "The Babylonian Map of the World". Iraq. 50: 147–165. doi:10.2307/4200289. JSTOR 4200289. S2CID 190703581.
  194. ^ Keel, Othmar (1997). The Symbolism of the Biblical World. Eisenbrauns. pp. 20–22. ISBN 978-1-575-06014-9. Archived from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved February 26, 2023.
  195. ^ Wright, Larry (August 1973). "The astronomy of Eudoxus: Geometry or physics?". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 4 (2): 165–172. Bibcode:1973SHPSA...4..165W. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(73)90002-2. Archived from the original on March 15, 2023. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
  196. ^ Dicati, Renato (2013). "The Ancients' Astronomy". Stamping Through Astronomy. Milano: Springer Milan. pp. 19–55. doi:10.1007/978-88-470-2829-6_2. ISBN 978-88-470-2828-9. Archived from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
  197. ^ Aristotle; Forster, E. S.; Dobson, J. F. (1914). De Mundo. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. p. 2.
  198. ^ Goldstein, Bernard R. (1997). "Saving the phenomena: the background to Ptolemy's planetary theory". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 28 (1): 1–12. Bibcode:1997JHA....28....1G. doi:10.1177/002182869702800101. S2CID 118875902.
  199. ^ Boyer, C. (1968) A History of Mathematics. Wiley, p. 54.
  200. ^ Heath, Thomas (2013). Aristarchus of Samos, the Ancient Copernicus: A History of Greek Astronomy to Aristarchus, Together with Aristarchus's Treatise on the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and Moon. Cambridge University Press. p. 302. ISBN 978-1-108-06233-6. Archived from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved February 26, 2023.
  201. ^ Kolkata, James J. (2015). Elementary Cosmology: From Aristotle's Universe to the Big Bang and Beyond. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/978-1-6817-4100-0ch4. ISBN 978-1-68174-100-0. Archived from the original on June 5, 2018. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
  202. ^ Neugebauer, Otto E. (1945). "The History of Ancient Astronomy Problems and Methods". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 4 (1): 166–173. doi:10.1086/370729. JSTOR 595168. S2CID 162347339. the Chaldaean Seleucus from Seleucia
  203. ^ Sarton, George (1955). "Chaldaean Astronomy of the Last Three Centuries B. C.". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 75 (3): 166–173 [169]. doi:10.2307/595168. JSTOR 595168. the heliocentrical astronomy invented by Aristarchos of Samos and still defended a century later by Seleucos the Babylonian
  204. ^ William P. D. Wightman (1951, 1953), The Growth of Scientific Ideas, Yale University Press. p. 38, where Wightman calls him Seleukos the Chaldean.
  205. ^ Lucio Russo, Flussi e riflussi, Feltrinelli, Milano, Italy, 2003, ISBN 88-07-10349-4.
  206. ^ Bartel (1987, p. 527)
  207. ^ Bartel (1987, pp. 527–529)
  208. ^ Bartel (1987, pp. 534–537)
  209. ^ Nasr, Seyyed H. (1993) [1964]. An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines (2nd ed.). 1st edition by Harvard University Press, 2nd edition by State University of New York Press. pp. 135–136. ISBN 978-0-7914-1515-3.
  210. ^ Frautschi, Steven C.; Olenick, Richard P.; Apostol, Tom M.; Goodstein, David L. (2007). The Mechanical Universe: Mechanics and Heat (Advanced ed.). Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-521-71590-4. OCLC 227002144.
  211. ^ Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, p. 754.
  212. ^ Ālī, Ema Ākabara. Science in the Quran. Vol. 1. Malik Library. p. 218.
  213. ^ Ragep, F. Jamil (2001). "Tusi and Copernicus: The Earth's Motion in Context". Science in Context. 14 (1–2): 145–163. doi:10.1017/s0269889701000060. S2CID 145372613.
  214. ^ a b Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, pp. 755–756.
  215. ^ a b Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, p. 756.
  216. ^ de Cheseaux JPL (1744). Traité de la Comète. Lausanne. pp. 223ff.. Reprinted as Appendix II in Dickson, F. P. (1969). The Bowl of Night: The Physical Universe and Scientific Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54003-2.
  217. ^ Olbers HWM (1826). "Unknown title". Bode's Jahrbuch. 111.. Reprinted as Appendix I in Dickson, F. P. (1969). The Bowl of Night: The Physical Universe and Scientific Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54003-2.
  218. ^ Jeans, J. H. (1902). "The Stability of a Spherical Nebula". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 199 (312–320): 1–53. Bibcode:1902RSPTA.199....1J. doi:10.1098/rsta.1902.0012. JSTOR 90845.
  219. ^ Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, p. 757.
  220. ^ Jones, Kenneth Glyn (February 1971). "The Observational Basis for Kant's Cosmogony: A Critical Analysis". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 2 (1): 29–34. Bibcode:1971JHA.....2...29J. doi:10.1177/002182867100200104. ISSN 0021-8286. S2CID 126269712. Archived from the original on February 27, 2023. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
  221. ^ Smith, Robert W. (February 2008). "Beyond the Galaxy: The Development of Extragalactic Astronomy 1885–1965, Part 1". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 39 (1): 91–119. Bibcode:2008JHA....39...91S. doi:10.1177/002182860803900106. ISSN 0021-8286. S2CID 117430789. Archived from the original on February 27, 2023. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
  222. ^ Sharov, Aleksandr Sergeevich; Novikov, Igor Dmitrievich (1993). Edwin Hubble, the discoverer of the big bang universe. Cambridge University Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-521-41617-7. Archived from the original on June 23, 2013. Retrieved December 31, 2011.
  223. ^ "Cosmic Times". Imagine the Universe!. December 8, 2017. Retrieved October 31, 2024.
  224. ^ Einstein, Albert (1917). "Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie". Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte. 1917. (part 1): 142–152.

Bibliography

Listen to this article
(4 parts, 1 hour and 13 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated 13 June 2012 (2012-06-13), and do not reflect subsequent edits.