Talk:Kemper Project

this should be DYK eligible

This article should be eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" entry, if it is nominated it soon; it is supposed to be nominated within 5 days of being created or significantly (5x) expanded.

The instructions for nominating it are at Template talk:Did you know. Basically, all you need to do is take this code if you created a new article:

{{subst:NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=new | author=  }}

or this code if you expanded it

{{subst:NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=expanded | author= }}

and write the hook, a concise and interesting bit of info from the article beginning with "... that" and ending with a question mark. The info from the hook has to be present in the article and supported (in the article) with a citation. Someone will double-check to make sure the source says what it's claimed to say.

Once you've come up with a hook, fill in your username as the author and fill the title of the article, then add the above code, including your hook following the "hook=" part, to the top of the appropriate section for the day the article was started on the DYK template talk page. The code will produce an entry formatted like the others. After that, just keep an eye on the entry; if anyone brings up an issue with it, try to address it. I'll keep an eye out as well. If everything goes well, it will appear on the Main Page for several hours a few days from now. --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 15:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

refs added to pages that don't exist

I noticed you added some refs to Kemper Project to pages that have nothing to do with the Kemper Project. Please don't do that. Thanks. Brian Everlasting (talk) 04:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, exactly which refs are you referring to? Johnfos (talk) 06:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your ref talks about nuclear power but not the Kemper Project?: Mark Diesendorf, Shunning nuclear power but not its waste, Energy Research and Social Science, September 2016. Brian Everlasting (talk) 12:41, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I see now the reference should have been Piles of dirty secrets behind model "clean coal" project, New York Times, July 5, 2016. Johnfos (talk) 14:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kemper Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306225517/http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20131108-911885.html?dsk=y to https://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20131108-911885.html?dsk=y
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017234647/http://www.mcrcc.osmre.gov/MCR/States/Mississippi.shtm to http://www.mcrcc.osmre.gov/MCR/States/Mississippi.shtm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kemper Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921061649/http://energyfairness.org/2013/09/kemper-plant-drawing-global-interest/ to http://energyfairness.org/2013/09/kemper-plant-drawing-global-interest/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Reference URLs at Miss. Power all dead

Mississippi Power appears to have undergone a website re-organisation. I tried several reference urls and all took me to the company's home page. Unfortunately, some of the titles recorded in the cite template are extremely unhelpful (eg "Save Money and Energy" for a ref about waste water discharge) in finding if the page has just moved, or if there's an archive.

I feel this article remains topical, as the Kemper Project was a high profile failure of an intended IGCC plant, with IGCC and its commercialisation being central to international energy policies and peripheral to the climate debate. Therefore I believe it is worth marking this article for cleanup, especially its references. I am still a new editor, and would prefer someone with more experience to make that decision.

Any feedback would be welcome. Prime Lemur (talk) 10:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Michigan State University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)