Talk:CR Vasco da Gama: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) m Archiving 5 thread(s) (older than 10d) to Talk:CR Vasco da Gama/Archive 1. |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{Football}}, {{WPBrazil}}. Tag: |
||
| (40 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} |
{{Talkheader}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
|||
{{WikiProject Football|importance=high|Brazil=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Brazil|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|maxarchivesize = 60K |
|maxarchivesize = 60K |
||
| Line 8: | Line 12: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
||
{{Broken anchors|links= |
|||
{{Football|class=start}} |
|||
* <nowiki>[[Portuguese Brazilians#Portuguese immigration to Brazil|Portuguese immigrants]]</nowiki> |
|||
{{WPBrazil|class=start}} |
|||
}} |
|||
<BR> |
<BR> |
||
<div style="border: solid #228b22 3px; padding: 10px; background-color: #FFFFBD;"> |
<div style="border: solid #228b22 3px; padding: 10px; background-color: #FFFFBD;"> |
||
| Line 42: | Line 46: | ||
Acctually the influence of Vasco was not only avoinding the influence of racism in the acceptance of players in field, but about prejudice in general, as poor white people were also not allowed to play in the official league. I explained a little about it in the topic racism just above, with the "historic answer". Unfortunatelly I couldn't find any source in english language, but the fact is well documented in portuguese, and it would be quite easy to be checked even by a non-portuguese speaker, using some automatic translator. |
Acctually the influence of Vasco was not only avoinding the influence of racism in the acceptance of players in field, but about prejudice in general, as poor white people were also not allowed to play in the official league. I explained a little about it in the topic racism just above, with the "historic answer". Unfortunatelly I couldn't find any source in english language, but the fact is well documented in portuguese, and it would be quite easy to be checked even by a non-portuguese speaker, using some automatic translator. |
||
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion == |
|||
== Fair use rationale for Image:Vasco-da-gama.png == |
|||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: |
|||
* [[commons:File:B Series Brazilian Championship Trophy.png|B Series Brazilian Championship Trophy.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-05-01T19:06:28.080879 | B Series Brazilian Championship Trophy.png --> |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]] |
|||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File: Football Trophy|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 19:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
'''[[:Image:Vasco-da-gama.png]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]]. |
|||
Please go to [[:Image:Vasco-da-gama.png|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline |fair use rationale]]. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. |
|||
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 --> |
|||
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 07:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Page move == |
|||
As per [[User:Carioca]]'s request, reasoning as to why the page was moved from it's original location, in line with [[WP:NC#Sports teams]] policy. |
|||
== Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion == |
|||
The English section of the club's official website predominantly uses the CR abbreviation (as seen [http://www.crvascodagama.com/?display=HISTORIA-1-EN here]) |
|||
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion: |
|||
* [[commons:File:Libertadores.png|Libertadores.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-05-12T11:11:50.505431 | Libertadores.png --> |
|||
* [[commons:File:Mercosul.png|Mercosul.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-05-12T11:11:50.505431 | Mercosul.png --> |
|||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File: Football Trophy|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 11:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion == |
|||
Google News search returns no results for either of the names. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:BanRay|<font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''Ban'''</font>]][[User:BanRay|<font style="color:#000000;background:white;">'''Ray'''</font>]]</span></small> 21:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion: |
|||
* [[commons:File:COPA 1 AMR.png|COPA 1 AMR.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-10-13T15:23:09.499497 | COPA 1 AMR.png --> |
|||
* [[commons:File:COPA 2 BR.png|COPA 2 BR.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-10-13T15:23:09.499497 | COPA 2 BR.png --> |
|||
* [[commons:File:COPA 7 AMR.png|COPA 7 AMR.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-10-13T15:23:09.499497 | COPA 7 AMR.png --> |
|||
* [[commons:File:COPA 7 BR.png|COPA 7 BR.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-10-13T15:23:09.499497 | COPA 7 BR.png --> |
|||
* [[commons:File:COPA 9 INT.png|COPA 9 INT.png]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-10-13T15:23:09.499497 | COPA 9 INT.png --> |
|||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by RicardoSilvaRDM|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 15:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== Class Reassessment == |
||
is this article good enough for C-class?? It has improved a great amount in the past year. [[Special:Contributions/2601:6C5:8100:6D80:FD94:B264:C572:7F09|2601:6C5:8100:6D80:FD94:B264:C572:7F09]] ([[User talk:2601:6C5:8100:6D80:FD94:B264:C572:7F09|talk]]) 02:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
the season article named xxx Campeonato Brasileiro Série A like [[2011 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A]] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Langholz8|Langholz8]] ([[User talk:Langholz8|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Langholz8|contribs]]) 22:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:38, 31 January 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CR Vasco da Gama article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Help to improve articles related to Brazil in Simple English Wikipedia. If you are not fluent in English, that is the right place.
Copyright staus of images
[edit]I'm removing the images without a clear copyright status. I've contacted the uploader about that, but he didn't reply.
Is this fair use?
-
Time do Vasco da Gama em 1949
-
Time do Vasco da Gama em 1948
-
Time do Vasco da Gama em 1945
-
Time do Vasco da Gama em 1929
-
Time do Vasco da Gama em 1923
I believe that all images available at http://www.crvascodagama.com/fotos/thumbnails.php?album=3 are free domain, as there is no mention about copyright. However, I sent a message to Vasco to clarify this aspect, but I have no answer. It seems that they do no answer most of the e-mails received.
Special Mention?
[edit]Does it seem to anyone else tht this statement is a bit random and perhaps point of view? There doesn't seem to be anything on it in the text about vasco's role in apparently "eradicating" the racism. Also it's worded a bit opinionated, and un-encyclopaedically. I recon this statement should be removed.
Acctually the influence of Vasco was not only avoinding the influence of racism in the acceptance of players in field, but about prejudice in general, as poor white people were also not allowed to play in the official league. I explained a little about it in the topic racism just above, with the "historic answer". Unfortunatelly I couldn't find any source in english language, but the fact is well documented in portuguese, and it would be quite easy to be checked even by a non-portuguese speaker, using some automatic translator.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Class Reassessment
[edit]is this article good enough for C-class?? It has improved a great amount in the past year. 2601:6C5:8100:6D80:FD94:B264:C572:7F09 (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)