Jump to content

Talk:Preussen-class ironclad/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Qwerfjkl (bot) moved page Talk:Preussen class ironclad/GA1 to Talk:Preussen-class ironclad/GA1: Move GA subpage to match talk page
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Preussen class ironclad/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Preussen class ironclad/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Preussen class ironclad/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Preussen class ironclad/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>


'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 10:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 10:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->


Line 33: Line 33:
#::
#::
#'''Overall''':
#'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->

;End note
I've very happy with this article – expertly-written, follows MoS, illustrated by good images, and the like. I hope this article can get the Star. If Parsecboy would like advice, please ask me. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 01:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:59, 26 February 2023

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 10:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
End note

I've very happy with this article – expertly-written, follows MoS, illustrated by good images, and the like. I hope this article can get the Star. If Parsecboy would like advice, please ask me. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 01:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]