Talk:Anonymous (hacker group): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:11, 20 August 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anonymous (hacker group) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 2 months

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Anonymous (hacker group). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Anonymous (hacker group) at the Reference desk.

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

Many of these questions arise frequently on the talk page concerning Anonymous.

To view an explanation to the answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question.

Q1: I have an issue with Anonymous being referred to as a "group".

A1: The purpose for the disambiguation in the title is so that readers know we are not talking about Anonymous (the concept of being unknown). If you have a better suggestion, please include it in your comments.

Q2: Why isn't the most recent activity associated with Anonymous presented here?

A2: Wikipedia is not a news service or a promotional space for events. Important topics related to Anonymous may be included once they have become notable and are reported upon by verifiable media sources known for accuracy. These sources can then be cited within the article.

Find and message me I need a hand getting to a theif. You are the only hope of finding my dead friends motorcycle. Marino...

Q3: Why isn't an important topic related to Anonymous included in this article?

A3: This article is a work in progress. A topic related to Anonymous may simply go unnoticed by Wikipedia editors, lack notability, lack verifiable citations, or all of the above. If a topic related to Anonymous is notable, please help by editing and include it in the article if you can, but remember to try to confirm the accuracy of the topic with verifiable citations. If you wish to remain anonymous then just type what you would like to see in the article on the talkpage, so others can cut and paste for you. Try to tell us the web address, book, newspaper, or wherever you found the information, this will help your edit to last longer.

Q4: A particular wing of Anonymous is not liked, respected, or appreciated by another wing of Anonymous. Some consider specific sub-groups to be a splinter organizations, and no longer part of Anonymous. As such, their actions shouldn't be attributed to Anonymous. Why isn't this contention mentioned in the article? Why aren't the actions by these groups excluded from this page?

A4: See answer to previous question. There is currently no way to discern in clear terms who comprises various sub-groups of Anonymous, and individuals may only be judged by their actions in a given situation. A "member" of Anonymous may act as a cause oriented figure in a particular project, and then switch to other projects or non-participation in minutes, without a paper trail to document this. This often presents media sources with confusion, leaving attribution of actions unclear. Lacking citation, this article cannot discern which individuals and sub-groups are and are not members of Anonymous at a given time, and which actions are and are not attributed to Anonymous. Strict sourcing is necessary to reference activities as ventures carried out by Anonymous. This article may reference schisms and group infighting, but cannot exclude any wing of Anonymous from representation if verifiable sourcing is provided.

Q5: Can I leave a message for Anonymous here?

A5: Sorry, but no. This talk page is only for discussing improvements to the Anonymous article. The members of the group do not monitor this page and therefore will not see any messages directed to them. Messages left for Anonymous will be removed as violations of WP:NOTAFORUM.

Anonymous (hacker group) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 12, 2008	Articles for deletion	Kept
March 19, 2008	Articles for deletion	Speedily kept
March 11, 2009	Articles for deletion	Kept
April 26, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 28, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
Current status: Good article

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Internet culture Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Sociology: Social Movements Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the social movements task force.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Scientology Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

On 27 July 2009, Anonymous (hacker group) was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

Dubious line lacking sources

On the 2022 section the line that goes: "Anonymous also hacked into Russian propaganda channels and played Ukrainian music through them. After that they started showing what is really happening in Ukraine." Lacks source and it is clearly not inpartial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brujua (talk • contribs) 23:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

True, it should be "the events in Ukraine" or something. Dawsongfg (talk) 04:15, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

..sorry for the necroposting.. Dawsongfg (talk) 04:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"But they are not your personal army – that's Rule 44 –" LOL Since when? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:40:C480:CA00:94E9:F420:77A4:B6C0 (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

#OpIran Operation Iran

The Iranian protest is mentioned as a small paragraph in the Operation Russia subsection of the History section which is unfair to it. #OpIran is a legitimate operation on its own crucial for the Iranian protesters now.

Anonymous Operations Twitter is the first place I was informed of Operation Iran. I followed that channel for Operation Russia until they suddenly initiated Operation Iran aside Operation Russia. I don't know where they get their information from, but I think they're really close to the Anonymous hackers busy with the cyberwar against the Iranian (Islamic Republican) government. They play a role in the coordination of the protests where to sabotage strategic locations with Molotov cocktails, where to protests and where to lookout for snipers and other kinds of Iranian police ambushes. They also give information what to do against Iranian IR spyware on Android devices from Google itself.

It's the first place I personally encountered a sort of Twitter leaflet campaign (not a bot/bumping/spamming campaign, describing it that way is not really appreciated) of Mahsah Amini and other victims, martyrs and heroes that later spread across Twitter and the rest of social media. I don't how to define the Iranians hanging out there in the comments. Politically pretty activists asking for help, giving fellow Iranians hints to combat the cops and all kinds of motivational peptalks that remind me of the 1789 French Revolution. Alexandros des Børgus (talk) 10:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find reliable reporting on it, not OR, you're welcome to try updating the article with it. Legowerewolf (talk) 13:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza Strip News - Gaza Times or Bitcoin Magazine etc. Foxnews puplications?

There obciously quite are many sourses around us.

But what one may consider as RELIABLE, the others have the right to disagree with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kartasto (talk • contribs) 13:11, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has pretty strict standards for what is and isn't a reliable source. Legowerewolf (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

== Anonymous and Brazilian Hacker Bring Down Largest Internet Children's Content Network ==

In February 2023 the hacker group Anonymous teamed up with Brazilian hacker Daniel Ghost and together they took down the largest illegal child content network on the surface of the web. The site operated from an interface similar to a social network, but of course, with no relation to the company. According to the hackers, the action involved removing the illegal site and also exploiting security vulnerabilities that made it possible to delete backups related to the platform. The site was taken down after the hackers involved gained access to the domain used by the criminals. After the takedown the hacker group announced the extinction of the illegal site, as well as the domain used.

Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

History > 2020 section: Replace the word "gibibytes" with "gigabytes" for continuity; both the stated source and the WIRED article used to source that article use "giga" over "gibi". Not worth making an account for a simple typo, but it was bugging the hell out of me. 209.133.34.12 (talk) 17:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fixed Softlemonades (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous and Brazilian Hacker Bring Down Largest Internet Children's Content Network (2023)

Em fevereiro de 2023, o grupo de hackers Anonymous se uniu ao hacker brasileiro Daniel Ghost e, juntos, derrubaram a maior rede de conteúdo infantil ilegal na superfície da web. O site operava a partir de uma interface semelhante a uma rede social, mas, claro, sem relação com a empresa. De acordo com os hackers, a ação envolveu a remoção do site ilegal e também a exploração de vulnerabilidades de segurança que possibilitaram a exclusão de backups relacionados à plataforma. O site foi retirado do ar depois que os hackers envolvidos obtiveram acesso ao domínio usado pelos criminosos. Após a derrubada, o grupo de hackers anunciou a extinção do site ilegal, bem como do domínio utilizado. Um artigo de jornal brasileiro. Williamcantwell (talk) 23:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pesquise esta notícia no google. Pesquisar em inglês. Todos os jornais brasileiros fizeram uma matéria sobre isso. procurar:

Hacker brasileiro Ghost and Anonymous derruba grande site de pedofilia Williamcantwell (talk) 23:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Search in Portuguese for this news: Braz"ilian hacker Ghost and Anonymous take down major pedophilia site.

Todos os j"ornais brasileiros fizeram uma matéria sobre isso. Williamcantwell (talk) 23:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The takedown was done by Anonymous and a Brazilian hacker named ghost Williamcantwell (talk) 23:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]