Talk:A posteriori (languages): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:47, 19 January 2024

Requested merge

A posteriori (languages) → A Priori – 2 years since first proposed. It's time. johncheverly 23:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - this article and its partner (A priori (languages)) are still little more than stubs despite being in existence for several years each. They could quite easily be incorporated as a new section in the larger article (constructed languages), for example between the Overview and History sections. Both the current "stubs" could remain as redirects. Green Giant (talk) 02:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a merge request, not a move request and has been listed as such since on the respective pages since 2011. These pages are a posteriori (languages) and a priori (languages) [sic]. A Priori is a redirect to A priori and a posteriori and should continue to direct there or to A priori (a dab page). If you want to merge the two pages into a single a priori and a posteriori languages, fine with me. They are probably better dealt with together either in a single article of their own or, as User:Green Giant suggests, another related article. The issue has also been discussed a couple of time before at Talk:A priori (languages) — AjaxSmack 05:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - whatever happens "a priori" has no caps. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Constructed language with A priori (languages) This is just a classification of one aspect of constructed languages, and therefore it makes sense to have it in the main article on constructed languages, since there doesn't seem to be a lot to say about it. It also makes sense to discuss it along with a priori languages, as the antithesis. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|
-{{WP Languages|class=}}
+{{WikiProject Languages}}
+}}
+== Requested merge ==
+[[:A posteriori (languages)]] → {{no redirect|A Priori}} – 2 years since first proposed.  It's time. [[User:Johncheverly|johncheverly]] 23:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
+*'''Oppose''' - this article and its partner ([[A priori (languages)]]) are still little more than stubs despite being in existence for several years each. They could quite easily be incorporated as a new section in the larger article ([[constructed languages]]), for example between the Overview and History sections. Both the current "stubs" could remain as redirects. [[User:Green Giant|Green Giant]] ([[User talk:Green Giant|talk]]) 02:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
+*This is a [[WP:MERGE|merge request]], not a [[WP:RM|move request]] and has been listed as such since on the respective pages since 2011.  These pages are {{no redirect|a posteriori (languages)}} and {{no redirect|a priori (languages)}} ''[sic]''.  {{no redirect|A Priori}} is a redirect to [[A priori and a posteriori]] and should continue to direct there or to [[A priori]] (a dab page).  If you want to merge the two pages into a single [[a priori and a posteriori languages]], fine with me.  They are probably better dealt with together either in a single article of their own or, as [[User:Green Giant]] suggests, another related article.  The issue has also been discussed a couple of time before at [[Talk:A priori (languages)]] — [[User talk:AjaxSmack|<span style="border:1px solid #000073;background:#4D4DA6;padding:2px;color:#F9FFFF;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em"><span style="font-family:Georgia;">&nbsp;'''AjaxSmack'''&nbsp;</span></span>]] 05:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
+*Comment - whatever happens "a priori" has no caps. [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 03:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
+*'''Merge to [[Constructed language]] with [[A priori (languages)]]''' This is just a classification of one aspect of constructed languages, and therefore it makes sense to have it in the main article on constructed languages, since there doesn't seem to be a lot to say about it. It also makes sense to discuss it along with ''a priori'' languages, as the antithesis. --[[User:Colapeninsula|Colapeninsula]] ([[User talk:Colapeninsula|talk]]) 14:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)