Talk:Weng Chun: Difference between revisions
Thamesbank (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=}} |
|||
== Contested deletion == |
== Contested deletion == |
||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
With regard to the Duplication Detector report message, I have removed the text which was orginally from the website referenced and replaced it with an original text. --[[User:Thamesbank|Thamesbank]] ([[User talk:Thamesbank|talk]]) 16:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
With regard to the Duplication Detector report message, I have removed the text which was orginally from the website referenced and replaced it with an original text. --[[User:Thamesbank|Thamesbank]] ([[User talk:Thamesbank|talk]]) 16:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Why was my edit deleted? == |
|||
Weng Chun is not an art in and of itself, it's merely a different romanization of the Chinese characters for Wing Chun. What this page is about is the Lo Family style of Weng Chun, which is a very SMALL part of the world of Weng Chun, and is thus extremely misleading. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.77.248.115|64.77.248.115]] ([[User talk:64.77.248.115|talk]]) 12:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Your viewpoint would be incorrect given the current subject matter and it's references. Likewise, there's two separate sets of characters being discussed here, not simply a different romanization. In order to make the kind of changes you're claiming, you'd need some pretty verifiable and reliable references (by Wikipedia's standards) instead of your opinion (which constitutes [[wp:or]]). That's the way Wikipedia works. --[[User:Wgungfu|Marty Goldberg]] ([[User talk:Wgungfu|talk]]) 20:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:38, 19 August 2023
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the source material is not copyrighted and the author is referenced. The history of Weng Chun cannot be written in my own words without the danger of misrepresenting the facts. --Thamesbank (talk) 10:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Quick update: I have made extensive edits to the texts and hope this has resolved the issue. Regards and sorry for the trouble! --Thamesbank (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
With regard to the Duplication Detector report message, I have removed the text which was orginally from the website referenced and replaced it with an original text. --Thamesbank (talk) 16:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Why was my edit deleted?
[edit]Weng Chun is not an art in and of itself, it's merely a different romanization of the Chinese characters for Wing Chun. What this page is about is the Lo Family style of Weng Chun, which is a very SMALL part of the world of Weng Chun, and is thus extremely misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.77.248.115 (talk) 12:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Your viewpoint would be incorrect given the current subject matter and it's references. Likewise, there's two separate sets of characters being discussed here, not simply a different romanization. In order to make the kind of changes you're claiming, you'd need some pretty verifiable and reliable references (by Wikipedia's standards) instead of your opinion (which constitutes wp:or). That's the way Wikipedia works. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 20:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)