User talk:Atomic Duck!

Danny Elfman Picture

I see that you uploaded a different picture of Danny Elfman on his article. I would have appreciated it if you could have discussed this (continued the discussion we were having) before you changed it. But I'm sure you just forgot.

Nevertheless, it seems like a fine picture that you added, but do you have an image tag for it? Is it fair use, and could you reason why it is fair use?

Because I would rather use my image, that is fair use, than a picture that isn't- even if you think he looks geeky in it? Do you know what I'm saying?

Thanks.

--Rachel Cakes 07:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I am sorry I forgot to discuss it. I checked if it was fair use, and it indeed is. However, you can revert back if you wish.

Hey, no worries. It's okay- we can leave that picture there. It does look better than mine, and it's great that it is fair use so we'll just leave it as is. At least it's better than the photo of him from Oingo Boingo- taken in the 70s! :)

And remember to leave your signature by typing four tildes, like this:~~~~. Regards, --Rachel Cakes 10:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay thanks. See you later. Atomic Duck! 23:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Danny Elfman2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Danny Elfman2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Stan 13:00, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Atomic Ducks!.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Atomic Ducks!.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 04:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD tags

Please do not remove Articles for Deletion tags. Thanks! Joe 06:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I am aware of this rule, but you see Milkshake227 is a friend of mine who is just trying vandalize. He is deliberately trying to delete it to spite me. Thanks in advance. Atomic Duck!

If this is the case, the insufficiency of his reasons for deletion will be borne out at AfD and the article will be kept accordingly. Your best bet is to explain at AfD why you think the article should be kept. :) Joe 06:53, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I will do that. Atomic Duck!

I am a friend of his yes, but this has nothing to do with spite, it is a made up band, and it does not meet any WP:MUSIC requirements. Milkshake227

I should say that I was neither agreeing nor disagreeing with Atomic's assessment of Milk's nomination; my suggestion assumed only arguendo that the assessment was accurate. Joe 19:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Danny Elfman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Danny Elfman.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 05:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Ryan Avery

Because of your edits on the Aquabats]] article, I was hoping you would look at this article on Aquabat Cadet, forum moderator, and fellow performer Ryan Avery (whose band is opening for Aquabats in Arizona), and lend your comments on the corresponding AfD. Thanks! PT ^(s-s-s-s) 23:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Please Use Edit Summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Tiptoety 06:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)