User talk:Southpole1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Southpole1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Undid revision 460135957 by Southpole1 (talk) still blocked: there is consensus that this should stay |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
== October 2011 == |
|||
| ⚫ | I am not threatening you but warning you. And leaving you time to think about it. BTW why do you blank your page? Something to hide? <span style="padding-left: 5pt; font-size: 0.9em; letter-spacing: 0.1em">— '''[[User:Racconish|Racconish]]'''[[User talk:Racconish|<sup> Tk </sup>]]</span> 19:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]  after a review of the reverts you have made on [[:Moxon Huddersfield]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate and discuss]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that: |
|||
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.''' |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Sparthorse|Sparthorse]] ([[User talk:Sparthorse|talk]]) 16:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, Southpole1. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance]] regarding your comments on me at [[Talk:Moxon Huddersfield]]. {{#if:|The thread is [[{{{Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance}}}#|{{{thread}}}]]. }}{{#if:Southpole1|The discussion is about the topic [[:Southpole1]].}}<!--Template:WQA-notice--> Thank you. --<span style="padding-left: 5pt; font-size: 0.9em; letter-spacing: 0.1em">'''[[User:Racconish|Racconish]]'''[[User talk:Racconish|<sup> Tk </sup>]]</span> 18:02, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Please avoid commenting on contributors == |
|||
e.g. "Blinded by arrogance" at [[Talk:Moxon Huddersfield]]. Thanks. [[User:Gerardw|Gerardw]] ([[User talk:Gerardw|talk]]) 18:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==RSN== |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== November 2011 == |
== November 2011 == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 19:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Southpole1|your contributions]]. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to [[:Moxon Huddersfield]], as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with [[Help:Minor edit]], a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the [[Help:Reverting|reversion]] of clear-cut [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> ''It is particularly deceptive to mark such edit warring as minor.'' <span style="padding-left: 5pt; font-size: 0.9em; letter-spacing: 0.1em">— '''[[User:Racconish|Racconish]]'''[[User talk:Racconish|<sup> Tk </sup>]]</span> 17:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*I do not see why anyone should wait to stop your ongoing disruptions. ANI was proposed above by Racconish, but it is entirely within an administrator's discretion in this case to act now: you obviously are not abiding by consensus. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 19:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
You have been already [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Southpole1&diff=457679967&oldid=457679119 warned] about edit warring. [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Racconish&diff=prev&oldid=459982965 Your last message] on my talk page shows you have read [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Moxon_Huddersfield&oldid=459767288#Fourth_opinion this other warning] on [[WP:DE]]. Nevertheless, you [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Moxon_Huddersfield&diff=459982603&oldid=459770588 deleted] again a close paraphrase of a reliable source on which consensus had been built. I give you 24 hours to revert your last "minor" change, after which I will raise the matter at [[WP:ANI]]. Thank you, <span style="padding-left: 5pt; font-size: 0.9em; letter-spacing: 0.1em">— '''[[User:Racconish|Racconish]]'''[[User talk:Racconish|<sup> Tk </sup>]]</span> 18:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:29, 11 November 2011
Final warning (continued)
[edit]I am not threatening you but warning you. And leaving you time to think about it. BTW why do you blank your page? Something to hide? — Racconish Tk 19:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies (talk) 19:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- I do not see why anyone should wait to stop your ongoing disruptions. ANI was proposed above by Racconish, but it is entirely within an administrator's discretion in this case to act now: you obviously are not abiding by consensus. Drmies (talk) 19:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)