Jump to content

Visual prosthesis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
VinnyCee (talk | contribs)
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Neuroprosthetics | #UCB_Category 20/31
 
(378 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Device intended to restore vision to blind people}}
''For the non-functional prosthesis or '''glass eye''' see [[Ocular prosthesis]] and [[Craniofacial prosthesis]].''
{{For|non-functional prostheses or glass eyes|Ocular prosthesis|Craniofacial prosthesis}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}}


A '''visual prosthesis''', often referred to as a '''bionic eye''', is an experimental visual device intended to restore functional vision in those suffering from partial or total [[blindness]]. Many devices have been developed, usually modeled on the '''[[cochlear implant]]''' or '''bionic ear''' devices, a type of [[Neuroprosthetics|neural prosthesis]] in use since the mid 1980s.
A '''visual prosthesis''', often referred to as a '''bionic eye''', is an experimental visual device intended to restore functional vision in those with partial or total [[blindness]]. Many devices have been developed, usually modeled on the [[cochlear implant]] or bionic ear devices, a type of [[Neuroprosthetics|neural prosthesis]] in use since the mid-1980s. The idea of using electrical current (e.g., electrically stimulating the [[retina]] or the [[visual cortex]]) to provide sight dates back to the 18th century, discussed by [[Benjamin Franklin]],<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dobelle |first1=Wm. H. |title=Artificial Vision for the Blind by Connecting a Television Camera to the Visual Cortex |journal=ASAIO Journal |date=January 2000 |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=3–9 |doi=10.1097/00002480-200001000-00002 |pmid=10667705 }}</ref> [[Tiberius Cavallo]],<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fodstad|first1=H.|last2=Hariz|first2=M.|editor1-first=Damianos E. |editor1-last=Sakas |editor2-first=Elliot S. |editor2-last=Krames|editor3-first=Brian A. |editor3-last=Simpson|title=Operative Neuromodulation|publisher=Springer |date=2007 |page=11|chapter=Electricity in the treatment of nervous system disease |isbn=9783211330791|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2uJ5jYdNXKQC&q=electricity+blindness+Cavallo&pg=PA11|access-date=21 July 2013}}</ref> and Charles LeRoy.<ref>{{cite journal |display-authors=4|author=Sekirnjak C|author2=Hottowy P|author3=Sher A|author4=Dabrowski W|author5=Litke AM|author6=Chichilnisky EJ|date=2008 |title=High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design |journal=J Neurosci |volume=28 |issue=17 |pages=4446–56|doi=10.1523/jneurosci.5138-07.2008 |pmid=18434523 |pmc=2681084}}</ref>


==Biological considerations ==
== Biological considerations ==
The ability to give sight to a blind person via a bionic eye depends on the circumstances surrounding the loss of sight. For retinal prostheses, which are the most prevalent visual prosthetic under development (due to ease of access to the retina among other considerations), patients with vision loss due to degeneration of [[Photoreceptor cell|photoreceptors]] ([[retinitis pigmentosa]], [[choroideremia]], [[geographic atrophy|geographic atrophy macular degeneration]]) are the best candidate for treatment. Candidates for visual prosthetic implants find the procedure most successful if the optic nerve was developed prior to the onset of blindness. Persons born with blindness may lack a fully developed [[optical nerve]], which typically develops prior to birth,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Provis |first1=Jan M. |last2=Van Driel |first2=Diana |last3=Billson |first3=Frank A. |last4=Russell |first4=Peter |title=Human fetal optic nerve: Overproduction and elimination of retinal axons during development |journal=The Journal of Comparative Neurology |date=1 August 1985 |volume=238 |issue=1 |pages=92–100 |doi=10.1002/cne.902380108 |pmid=4044906 |s2cid=42902826 }}</ref> though [[neuroplasticity]] makes it possible for the nerve, and sight, to develop after implantation{{Citation needed|date=October 2013}}.


== Technological considerations ==
The ability to give sight to a blind person via a bionic eye depends on the circumstances surrounding the loss of sight. For retinal prostheses, which are the most prevalent visual prosthetic under development (due to ease of access to the retina among other considerations), vision loss due to degeneration of photoreceptors (retinitis pigmentosa, choroideremia, geographic atrophy macular degeneration) is the best candidate for treatment. Candidates for visual prosthetic implants find the procedure most successful if the optic nerve was developed prior to the onset of blindness. Persons born with blindness may lack a fully developed optical nerve, which typically develops prior to birth.{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}}
Visual prosthetics are being developed as a potentially valuable aid for individuals with visual [[Biodegradation|degradation]]. Only three visual prosthetic devices have received marketing approval in the EU.<ref name=fightingblindness>{{cite web|url=https://www.fightingblindness.ie/how-we-can-help/research/research-blogs/irisii-becomes-third-bionic-retina-approved-in-europe/|title=IRIS®II becomes third bionic retina approved in Europe|work=[[fightingblindness]]|date=August 2016|access-date=5 August 2021}}</ref> Argus II, co-developed at the University of Southern California (USC) Eye Institute<ref name=Reuters>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/27/usc-eye-institute-fda-idUSnPn6JGDrT+9d+PRN20140827|title=USC Eye Institute ophthalmologists implant first FDA-approved Argus II retinal prosthesis in western United States|work=[[Reuters]]|date=27 August 2014|access-date=5 January 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150105222606/http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/27/usc-eye-institute-fda-idUSnPn6JGDrT+9d+PRN20140827|archive-date=5 January 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> and manufactured by [[Second Sight Medical Products]] Inc., was the first device to have received marketing approval (CE Mark in Europe in 2011). Most other efforts remain investigational; the Retina Implant AG's Alpha IMS won a CE Mark July 2013 and is a significant improvement in resolution. It is not, however, FDA-approved in the US.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chuang |first1=Alice T |last2=Margo |first2=Curtis E |last3=Greenberg |first3=Paul B |title=Retinal implants: a systematic review: Table 1 |journal=British Journal of Ophthalmology |date=July 2014 |volume=98 |issue=7 |pages=852–856 |doi=10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303708 |pmid=24403565|s2cid=25193594 }}</ref>

==Technological considerations ==

Visual prosthetics are being developed as a potentially valuable aid for individuals with visual degradation. The visual prosthetic in humans remains investigational.


==Ongoing projects==
==Ongoing projects==
===Argus Retinal Prosthesis===
===Argus retinal prosthesis===
{{main|Argus retinal prosthesis}}
Drs. Mark Humayun and Eugene DeJuan at the Doheny Eye Institute ([[University of Southern California|USC]]) along with Bio-electronics Engineer Dr Wentai Liu at University of California, Santa Cruz were the original inventors of the active epi-retinal prosthesis <ref name="ERP">{{cite web | url=http://artificialretina.energy.gov/howartificialretinaworks.shtml | title=How the Artificial Retina Works | author=U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science }}</ref> and demonstrated [[proof of principle]] in acute patient investigations at [[Johns Hopkins University]] in the early 1990s along with Dr. Robert Greenberg. In the late 1990s the company [[Second Sight (company)|Second Sight]] was formed by Dr. Greenberg along with medical device entrepreneur, [[Alfred E. Mann]], to develop a chronically implantable retinal prosthesis. Their first generation implant had 16 electrodes and was implanted in 6 subjects between 2002 and 2004. Five of these subjects still use the device in their homes today. These subjects, who were all completely blind prior to implantation, can now perform a surprising array of tasks using the device. More recently, the company announced that it has received [[Food and Drug Administration|FDA]] approval to begin a trial of its second generation, 60 electrode implant, in the US.<ref name="SSannounce">{{cite web | author=Second Sight | title=Ending the Journey through Darkness: Innovative Technology Offers New Hope for Treating Blindness due to Retinitis Pigmentosa | date=January 9, 2007 | url=http://www.2-sight.com/Argus_II_IDE_pr.htm}}</ref><ref name="BBC">{{cite news | author=Jonathan Fildes | title=Trials for bionic eye implants | publisher=BBC | date=16 February 2007 | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6368089.stm}}</ref> Additionally they have planned clinical trials worldwide, which all got underway in 2007. Second generation Argus II trials are currently ongoing in the U.S. and are still waiting on FDA approval for public sale. Only around ten people in the U.S. currently have this model. It was recently approved in Europe, yet it costs roughly $100,000. The Argus III model is currently in process of improved sight with 240 electrodes.<ref>{{cite web|title=Bionic eye gives partial sight to blind|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7358218n&tag=content;col1|publisher=CBS Interactive Inc.|accessdate=20 March 2011}}</ref> Three major US government funding agencies (National Eye Institute, Department of Energy, and National Science Foundation) have supported the work at Second Sight, USC, UCSC, CalTech, and other research labs .
Mark Humayun, who joined the faculty of the [[Keck School of Medicine of USC]] Department of Ophthalmology in 2001;<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.keckmedicine.org/doctor/mark-s-humayun/|title=Humayun faculty page at USC Keck|access-date=15 February 2015}}</ref> Eugene Dejuan, now at the [[University of California San Francisco]]; engineer Howard D. Phillips; bio-electronics engineer Wentai Liu, now at [[University of California Los Angeles]]; and Robert Greenberg, now of Second Sight, were the original inventors of the active epi-retinal prosthesis<ref name="ERP">{{cite web | url=http://artificialretina.energy.gov/about.shtml| title= Overview of the Artificial Retina Project | author=U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science }}</ref> and demonstrated [[proof of principle]] in acute patient investigations at [[Johns Hopkins University]] in the early 1990s. In the late 1990s the company Second Sight<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.2-sight.com |title=Second Sight official website |publisher=2-sight.com |date=2015-05-21 |access-date=2018-06-12}}</ref> was formed by Greenberg along with medical device entrepreneur, [[Alfred E. Mann]],<ref name=S1>Second Sight. 14 November 2014 [https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1266806/000161577414000310/s100457_s1a.htm Second Sight Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1: Registration Statement]</ref>{{rp|35}} Their first-generation implant had 16 electrodes and was implanted in six subjects by Humayun at [[University of Southern California]] between 2002 and 2004.<ref name=S1/>{{rp|35}}<ref>{{cite web|author=Miriam Karmel|work=Eyenet Magazine|date=March 2012|url=http://www.aao.org/publications/eyenet/201203/retina.cfm?RenderForPrint=1&|title=Clinical Update: Retina. Retinal Prostheses: Progress and Problems|access-date=15 February 2015|archive-date=15 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150215150701/http://www.aao.org/publications/eyenet/201203/retina.cfm?RenderForPrint=1&|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2007, the company began a trial of its second-generation, 60-electrode implant, dubbed the Argus II, in the US and in Europe.<ref name="SSannounce">{{cite web | author=Second Sight | title=Press Release: Ending the Journey through Darkness: Innovative Technology Offers New Hope for Treating Blindness due to Retinitis Pigmentosa | date=9 January 2007 | url=http://www.2-sight.com/assets/pdfs/20070109%20second%20sight%20release.pdf | access-date=15 February 2015 | archive-date=5 March 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230305114502/https://www.2-sight.com/assets/pdfs/20070109%20second%20sight%20release.pdf | url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="BBC">{{cite news | author=Jonathan Fildes | title=Trials for bionic eye implants |publisher=BBC | date=16 February 2007 | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6368089.stm}}</ref> In total 30 subjects participated in the studies spanning 10 sites in four countries. In the spring of 2011, based on the results of the clinical study which were published in 2012,<ref name="Ophthalmology">{{cite journal |last1=Humayun |first1=Mark S. |last2=Dorn |first2=Jessy D. |last3=da Cruz |first3=Lyndon |last4=Dagnelie |first4=Gislin |last5=Sahel |first5=José-Alain |last6=Stanga |first6=Paulo E. |last7=Cideciyan |first7=Artur V. |last8=Duncan |first8=Jacque L. |last9=Eliott |first9=Dean |last10=Filley |first10=Eugene |last11=Ho |first11=Allen C. |last12=Santos |first12=Arturo |last13=Safran |first13=Avinoam B. |last14=Arditi |first14=Aries |last15=Del Priore |first15=Lucian V. |last16=Greenberg |first16=Robert J. |title=Interim Results from the International Trial of Second Sight's Visual Prosthesis |journal=Ophthalmology |date=April 2012 |volume=119 |issue=4 |pages=779–788 |doi=10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.028 |pmid=22244176 |pmc=3319859 }}</ref> Argus II was approved for commercial use in Europe, and Second Sight launched the product later that same year. The Argus II was approved by the United States FDA on 14 February 2013. Three US government funding agencies (National Eye Institute, Department of Energy, and National Science Foundation) have supported the work at Second Sight, USC, UCSC, Caltech, and other research labs.<ref>{{cite news|last=Sifferlin|first=Alexandra|title=FDA approves first bionic eye|url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/19/health/fda-bionic-eye/index.html?hpt=us_bn1|work=CNN|publisher=TIME|access-date=22 February 2013|date=19 February 2013}}</ref>


===Microsystem-based Visual Prosthesis (MIVIP)===
===Microsystem-based visual prosthesis (MIVP)===
Designed by Claude Veraart at the [[Université catholique de Louvain|University of Louvain]], this is a spiral cuff electrode around the optic nerve at the back of the eye. It is connected to a stimulator implanted in a small depression in the skull. The stimulator receives signals from an externally-worn camera, which are translated into electrical signals that stimulate the optic nerve directly.<ref name="Geary">{{cite book
Designed by Claude Veraart at the [[Université catholique de Louvain|University of Louvain]] in 2002, this is a spiral cuff electrode around the optic nerve at the back of the eye. It is connected to a stimulator implanted in a small depression in the skull. The stimulator receives signals from an externally worn camera, which are translated into electrical signals that stimulate the optic nerve directly.<ref name="Geary">{{cite book
| author=[[James Geary]]
| author=James Geary| author-link=James Geary
| title=The Body Electric
| title=The Body Electric
| publisher=Phoenix
| publisher=Phoenix
| year=2002}}</ref>
| date=2002}}{{page needed|date=November 2019}}</ref>


===Implantable Miniature Telescope===
===Implantable miniature telescope===
Although not truly an active prosthesis, an Implantable Miniature Telescope is one type of visual implant that has met with some success in the treatment of end-stage [[age-related macular degeneration]].<ref name="Chun">{{cite journal
Although not truly an active prosthesis, an implantable miniature telescope is one type of visual implant that has met with some success in the treatment of end-stage [[age-related macular degeneration]].<ref name="Chun">{{cite journal
| author=Chun DW, Heier JS, Raizman MB.
| author=Chun DW| author2= Heier JS| author3=Raizman MB
| title=Visual prosthetic device for bilateral end-stage macular degeneration.
| title=Visual prosthetic device for bilateral end-stage macular degeneration
| journal=Expert Rev Med Devices.
| journal=Expert Rev Med Devices
| year=2005
| date=2005
| volume=2
| volume=2
| issue=6
| issue=6
| pages=657–65
| pages=657–65
| pmid=16293092
| pmid=16293092
| doi=10.1586/17434440.2.6.657}}</ref><ref name="Lane 1">{{cite journal
| doi=10.1586/17434440.2.6.657| s2cid= 40168891}}</ref><ref name="Lane 1">{{cite journal
| author=Lane SS, Kuppermann BD, Fine IH, Hamill MB, Gordon JF, Chuck RS, Hoffman RS, Packer M, Koch DD.
| display-authors=4| author=Lane SS| author2=Kuppermann BD| author3=Fine IH| author4=Hamill MB| author5=Gordon JF| author6= Chuck RS| author7=Hoffman RS| author8= Packer M| author9=Koch DD
| title=A prospective multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the implantable miniature telescope.
| title=A prospective multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the implantable miniature telescope
| journal=Am J Ophthalmol.
| journal=Am J Ophthalmol
| year=2004
| date=2004
| volume=137
| volume=137
| issue=6
| issue=6
Line 42: Line 43:
| pmid=15183782
| pmid=15183782
| doi=10.1016/j.ajo.2004.01.030}}</ref><ref name="Lane 2">{{cite journal
| doi=10.1016/j.ajo.2004.01.030}}</ref><ref name="Lane 2">{{cite journal
| author=Lane SS, Kuppermann BD.
| author=Lane SS| author2=Kuppermann BD
| title=The Implantable Miniature Telescope for macular degeneration.
| title=The Implantable Miniature Telescope for macular degeneration
| journal=Curr Opin Ophthalmol.
| journal=Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
| year=2006
| date=2006
| volume=17
| volume=17
| issue=1
| issue=1
| pages=94–8
| pages=94–98
| pmid=16436930
| pmid=16436930
| doi=10.1097/01.icu.0000193067.86627.a1}}</ref> This type of device is implanted in the [[human eye|eye]]'s [[posterior chamber]] and works by increasing (by about three times) the size of the image projected onto the retina in order to overcome a centrally-located [[scotoma]] or blind spot.<ref name="Lane 1"/><ref name="Lane 2"/>
| doi=10.1097/01.icu.0000193067.86627.a1| s2cid=28740344
}}</ref> This type of device is implanted in the [[human eye|eye]]'s [[posterior chamber]] and works by increasing (by about three times) the size of the image projected onto the retina in order to overcome a centrally located [[scotoma]] or blind spot.<ref name="Lane 1"/><ref name="Lane 2"/>


Created by VisionCare Ophthalmic Technologies in conjunction with the CentraSight Treatment Program, the telescope is about the size of a pea and is implanted behind the iris of one eye. Images are projected onto healthy areas of the central retina, outside the degenerated macula, and is enlarged to reduce the effect the blind spot has on central vision. 2.2x or 2.7x magnification strengths make it possible to see or discern the central vision object of interest while the other eye is used for peripheral vision because the eye that has the implant will have limited peripheral vision as a side effect. The implant doesn’t affect your natural eye movement; you’ll need to wear glasses and may need to sometimes use a hand-held magnifying glass to read or see fine details.<ref>{{cite web|last=Lipshitz|first=Dr. Isaac|title=Implantable Telescope Technology|url=http://www.centrasight.com/centrasight_technology|publisher=VisionCare Ophthalmic Technologies, Inc.|accessdate=20 March 2011}}</ref>
Created by VisionCare Ophthalmic Technologies in conjunction with the CentraSight Treatment Program in 2011, the telescope is about the size of a pea and is implanted behind the [[iris (anatomy)|iris]] of one eye. Images are projected onto healthy areas of the central retina, outside the degenerated [[macula]], and is enlarged to reduce the effect the blind spot has on central vision. 2.2x or 2.7x magnification strengths make it possible to see or discern the central vision object of interest while the other eye is used for peripheral vision because the eye that has the implant will have limited peripheral vision as a side effect. Unlike a telescope which would be hand-held, the implant moves with the eye which is the main advantage. Patients using the device may however still need glasses for optimal vision and for close work. Before surgery, patients should first try out a hand-held telescope to see if they would benefit from image enlargement. One of the main drawbacks is that it cannot be used for patients who have had [[cataract surgery]] as the [[intraocular lens]] would obstruct insertion of the telescope. It also requires a large incision in the [[cornea]] to insert.<ref>{{cite web|last=Lipshitz|first=Isaac|title=Implantable Telescope Technology|url=http://www.centrasight.com/centrasight_technology|publisher=VisionCare Ophthalmic Technologies, Inc.|access-date=20 March 2011}}</ref>


A [[Cochrane (organisation)|Cochrane systematic review]] seeking to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the implantable miniature telescope for patients with late or advanced age-related macular degeneration found only one ongoing study evaluating the OriLens intraocular telescope, with results expected in 2020.<ref name="Gupta">{{cite journal | author=Gupta A, Lam J, Custis P, Munz S, Fong D, Koster M | title=Implantable miniature telescope (IMT) for vision loss due to end-stage age-related macular degeneration | journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev | volume= 2018| issue=5 | pages=CD011140 | date=2018 | pmid=29847689 | pmc=6022289 | doi=10.1002/14651858.CD011140.pub2}}</ref>
===T&uuml;bingen MPDA Project Alpha IMS===

===Tübingen MPDA Project Alpha IMS===
A Southern German team led by the University Eye Hospital in Tübingen, was formed in 1995 by Eberhart Zrenner to develop a subretinal prosthesis.
A Southern German team led by the University Eye Hospital in Tübingen, was formed in 1995 by Eberhart Zrenner to develop a subretinal prosthesis.
The chip is located behind the [[retina]] and utilizes microphotodiode arrays (MPDA) which collect incident light and transform it into electrical current stimulating the [[retinal ganglion cell]]s. As natural [[Photoreceptor cell|photoreceptors]] are far more efficient than [[photodiode]]s, visible light is not powerful enough to stimulate the MPDA. Therefore, an external power supply is used to enhance the stimulation current. The German team commenced in vivo experiments in 2000, when evoked cortical potentials were measured from Yucatán micropigs and rabbits. At 14 months post implantation, the implant and retina surrounding it were examined and there were no noticeable changes to anatomical integrity. The implants were successful in producing evoked cortical potentials in half of the animals tested. The thresholds identified in this study were similar to those required in epiretinal stimulation. Later reports from this group concern the results of a clinical pilot study on 11 participants with [[retinitis pigmentosa]]. Some blind patients were able to read letters, recognize unknown objects, localize a plate, a cup and cutlery.<ref>{{cite journal | title=Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words | author=Eberhart Zrenner| display-authors=etal | journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B | year=2010 | doi=10.1098/rspb.2010.1747 | volume=278 | issue=1711| pages=1489–97 | pmid=21047851 | pmc=3081743}}</ref> Two of the patients were found to make [[microsaccades]] similar to those of healthy control participants, and the properties of the eye movements depended on the stimuli that the patients were viewing—suggesting that eye movements might be useful measures for evaluating vision restored by implants.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Alexander |first1=Robert |last2=Macknik |first2=Stephen |last3=Martinez-Conde |first3=Susana |title=Microsaccade Characteristics in Neurological and Ophthalmic Disease. |journal=Frontiers in Neurology |date=2018 |volume=9 |issue=144 |pages=144 |doi=10.3389/fneur.2018.00144|pmid=29593642 |pmc=5859063 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hafed |first1=Z |last2=Stingl |first2=K |last3=Bartz-Schmidt |first3=K |last4=Gekeler |first4=F |last5=Zrenner |first5=E |title=Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant. |journal=Vision Research |volume=118 |pages=119–131 |doi=10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.006|pmid=25906684 |year=2016 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
The chip is located behind the [[retina]] and utilizes microphotodiode arrays (MPDA) which collect incident light and transform it into electrical current stimulating the [[retinal ganglion cell]]s.
Multicenter study started in 2010, using a fully implantable device with 1500 Electrodes Alpha IMS (produced by Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany), with 10 patients included; preliminary results were presented at ARVO 2011.{{citation needed|date=August 2018}} The first UK implantations took place in March 2012 and were led by [[Robert MacLaren]] at the [[University of Oxford]] and [[Tim Jackson (physician)|Tim Jackson]] at [[King's College Hospital]] in London.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-17936699 | title=Blind man 'excited' at retina implant | work=BBC News | date=3 May 2012 | access-date=23 May 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-17936302 | title=Two blind British men have electronic retinas fitted | work=BBC News | date=3 May 2012 | access-date=23 May 2016 | author=Fergus Walsh}}</ref> [[David Wong (physician)|David Wong]] also implanted the Tübingen device in a patient in [[Hong Kong]].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.hku.hk/press/news_detail_6815.html | title=HKU performed the first subretinal microchip implantation in Asia Patient regained eyesight after the surgery | publisher=The University of Hong Kong | work=HKU.hk | date=3 May 2012 | access-date=23 May 2016 | type=Press release}}</ref>
As natural [[Photoreceptor cell|photoreceptors]] are far more efficient than [[photodiodes]], visible light is not powerful enough to stimulate the MPDA. Therefore, an external power supply is used to enhance the stimulation current. The German team commenced in vivo experiments in 2000, when evoked cortical potentials were measured from Yucatán micropigs and rabbits. At 14 months post implantation, the implant and retina surrounding it were examined and there were no noticeable changes to anatomical integrity. The implants were successful in producing evoked cortical potentials in half of the animals tested. The thresholds identified in this study were similar to those required in epiretinal stimulation.

The latest reports from this group concern the results of a clinical pilot study on 11 participants suffering from [[Retinitis Pigmentosa|RP]]. Some blind patients were able to read letters, recognize unknown objects, localize a plate, a cup and cutlery. The results were to be presented in detail in 2011 in the Proceeedings of the Royal Society B (doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1747).
On 19 March 2019 Retina Implant AG discontinued business activities quoting innovation-hostile climate of Europe's rigid regulatory systems and unsatisfactory results in patients.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Retina Implant - Your Expert for retinitis pigmentosa - Retina Implant |url=https://www.retina-implant.de/en/ |url-status=dead |access-date=2020-02-10 |website=www.retina-implant.de |archive-date=5 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805082212/https://www.retina-implant.de/en/ }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Retina Implant AG discontinues business activities |url=https://www.bioregio-stern.de/en/news/retina-implant-ag-discontinues-business-activities |access-date=2024-06-30 |website=BioRegio STERN {{!}} Wirtschaft weiterdenken |language=en}}</ref>
In 2010 a new multicenter Study has been started using a fully implantable device with 1500 Electrodes Alpha IMS (produced by Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany), 10 patients included so far; first results have been presented at ARVO 2011.


===Harvard/MIT Retinal Implant===
===Harvard/MIT Retinal Implant===
Joseph Rizzo and John Wyatt at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and MIT began researching the feasibility of a retinal prosthesis in 1989, and performed a number of proof-of-concept epiretinal stimulation trials on blind volunteers between 1998 and 2000. They have since developed a subretinal stimulator, an array of electrodes, that is placed beneath the retina in the subretinal space and receives image signals beamed from a camera mounted on a pair of glasses. The stimulator chip decodes the picture information beamed from the camera and stimulates retinal ganglion cells accordingly. Their second generation prosthesis collects data and sends it to the implant through RF fields from transmitter coils that are mounted on the glasses. A secondary receiver coil is sutured around the iris.<ref name="RLE Progress Report 151">{{cite web|last=Wyatt, Jr.|first=J.L.|title=The Retinal Implant Project|url=http://www.rle.mit.edu/media/pr151/19.pdf|publisher=Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)|accessdate=20 March 2011}}</ref>
Joseph Rizzo and John Wyatt at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and MIT began researching the feasibility of a retinal prosthesis in 1989, and performed a number of proof-of-concept epiretinal stimulation trials on blind volunteers between 1998 and 2000. They have since developed a subretinal stimulator, an array of electrodes, that is placed beneath the retina in the subretinal space and receives image signals beamed from a camera mounted on a pair of glasses. The stimulator chip decodes the picture information beamed from the camera and stimulates retinal ganglion cells accordingly. Their second generation prosthesis collects data and sends it to the implant through radio frequency fields from transmitter coils that are mounted on the glasses. A secondary receiver coil is sutured around the iris.<ref name="RLE Progress Report 151">{{cite web|last=Wyatt |first=J.L. Jr.|title=The Retinal Implant Project|url=http://www.rle.mit.edu/media/pr151/19.pdf|publisher=Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)|access-date=20 March 2011}}</ref>


===Artificial Silicon Retina (ASR)===
===Artificial silicon retina (ASR)===
{{For|vision sensor|Silicon retina}}
The brothers Alan Chow and Vincent Chow have developed a microchip containing 3500 photo diodes, which detect light and convert it into electrical impulses, which stimulate healthy [[retinal ganglion cell]]s. The ASR requires no externally-worn devices.<ref name="Geary"/>
The brothers Alan and Vincent Chow developed a microchip in 2002 containing 3500 photodiodes, which detect light and convert it into electrical impulses, which stimulate healthy [[retinal ganglion cell]]s. The ASR requires no externally worn devices.<ref name="Geary"/>


The original Optobionics Corp. stopped operations, but Dr. Chow acquired the Optobionics name, the ASR implants and will be reorganizing a new company under the same name. The ASR microchip is a 2mm in diameter silicon chip (same concept as computer chips) containing ~5,000 microscopic solar cells called “microphotodiodes” that each have their own stimulating electrode.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASR® Device|url=http://optobionics.com/asrdevice.shtml|publisher=Optobionics|accessdate=20 March 2011}}</ref>
The original Optobionics Corp. stopped operations, but Chow acquired the Optobionics name, the ASR implants and plans to reorganize a new company under the same name.<ref name="ASR® Device">{{cite web|title=ASR® Device|url=http://optobionics.com/asrdevice.shtml|publisher=Optobionics|access-date=20 March 2011}}</ref> The ASR microchip is a 2mm in diameter silicon chip (same concept as computer chips) containing ~5,000 microscopic solar cells called "microphotodiodes" that each have their own stimulating electrode.<ref name="ASR® Device"/>


===Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis (PRIMA)===
===Optoelectronic Retinal Prosthesis===
Daniel Palanker and his group at Stanford University have developed an optoelectronic system for visual prosthesis <ref name="Palanker">{{cite web | url=http://www.stanford.edu/~palanker/lab/retinalpros.html | title=Artificial Sight: Optoelectronic Retinal Prosthesis | author=Palanker Group}}</ref> that includes a subretinal photodiode array and an infrared image projection system mounted on video goggles. Information from the video camera is processed in a pocket PC and displayed on pulsed near-infrared (IR, 850-900&nbsp;nm) video goggles. IR image is projected onto the retina via natural eye optics, and activates photodiodes in the subretinal implant that convert light into pulsed bi-phasic electric current in each pixel. Charge injection can be further increased using a common bias voltage provided by a radiofrequency-driven implantable power supply <ref name="Loudin">{{cite journal | author=J.D. Loudin, D.M. Simanovskii, K. Vijayraghavan, C.K. Sramek, A.F. Butterwick, P. Huie, G.Y. McLean, and D.V. Palanker | url=http://www.stanford.edu/~palanker/publications/OptoelectronicRetinalProsthesis.pdf |format=PDF| title=Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance | journal=J Neural Engineering | volume=4 | pages=S72–S84 | year=2007 | doi=10.1088/1741-2560/4/1/S09 | pmid=17325419 | issue=1}}</ref> Proximity between electrodes and neural cells necessary for high resolution stimulation can be achieved utilizing the effect of retinal migration.
[https://web.stanford.edu/~palanker/lab/retinalpros.html Daniel Palanker and his group] at Stanford University developed a [[Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis|photovoltaic]] retinal prosthesis in 2012,<ref name="Palanker">{{cite web | url=http://www.stanford.edu/~palanker/lab/retinalpros.html | title=Photovoltaic Retinal Prosthesis | author=Palanker Group}}</ref> that includes a subretinal photodiode array and an infrared image projection system mounted on video goggles. Images captured by video camera are processed in a pocket PC and displayed on video goggles using pulsed near-infrared (IR, 880–915&nbsp;nm) light. These images are projected onto the retina via natural eye optics, and photodiodes in the subretinal implant convert light into pulsed bi-phasic electric current in each pixel.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis with high pixel density|author1=K. Mathieson|author2=J. Loudin|author3=G. Goetz|author4=P. Huie|author5=L. Wang|author6=T. Kamins|author7= L. Galambos|author8= R. Smith|author9=J.S. Harris|author10=A. Sher |author11=D. Palanker|journal=Nature Photonics|volume=6|issue=6|pages=391–97|year=2012|doi=10.1038/nphoton.2012.104|pmid=23049619|pmc=3462820|bibcode=2012NaPho...6..391M}}</ref> Electric current flowing through the tissue between the active and return electrode in each pixel stimulates the nearby inner retinal neurons, primarily the bipolar cells, which transmit excitatory responses to the retinal ganglion cells.
This technology is being commercialized by Pixium Vision ([http://www.pixium-vision.com/en/technology-1/prima-vision-restoration-system PRIMA] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181023174947/http://www.pixium-vision.com/en/technology-1/prima-vision-restoration-system |date=23 October 2018 }}), and is being evaluated in a clinical trial (2018).
Following this proof of concept, [https://web.stanford.edu/~palanker/lab/index.html Palanker group] is focusing now on developing pixels smaller than 50μm using 3-D electrodes and utilizing the effect of retinal migration into voids in the subretinal implant.


=== Bionic Vision Technologies (BVT) ===
===Dobelle Eye===
{{Update section|date=January 2019|reason=Preclinical testing and patient tests should now have completed or have been cancelled (existing text says they were scheduled for 2014)}}
{{Main|William H. Dobelle}}
Bionic Vision Technologies (BVT) is a company, that has taken over the research and commercialisation rights of Bionic Vision Australia (BVA). BVA was a consortium of some of Australia's leading universities and research institutes, and funded by the Australian Research Council from 2010, it ceased operations on 31 December 2016. The members of the consortium consisted of [[Bionics Institute]], [[University of New South Wales|UNSW Sydney]], Data 61 [[CSIRO|CSRIO]], Center for Eye Research Australia (CERA), and [[University of Melbourne|The University of Melbourne]]. There were many more partners as well. The Australian Federal Government awarded a $42 million ARC grant to Bionic Vision Australia to develop bionic vision technology.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://bionicvision.org.au/|title=About BVA|website=Bionicvision|language=en-US|access-date=2019-08-09}}</ref>


While the BVA consortium was still together, the team was led by Professor Anthony Burkitt, and they were developing two retinal prostheses. One known as The Wide-View device, that combined novel technologies with materials that had been successfully used in other clinical implants. This approach incorporated a microchip with 98 stimulating electrodes and aimed to provide increased mobility for patients to help them move safely in their environment. This implant would be placed in the suprachoroidal space. Researchers expected the first patient tests to begin with this device in 2013, it is currently unknown whether full trials were conducted, but at least one woman named Dianne Ashworth was implanted with the device, and was able to read letters and numbers using it.,<ref>{{Citation|title=Dianne Ashworth 12 months on, 2013| date=31 July 2014 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQEZiAuJ_AE|language=en|access-date=2019-08-09}}</ref> she later went on to write a book titled "I Spy with My Bionic Eye", about her life, vision loss, and being the first person to be implanted with the BVA, Bionic Eye device.
Similar in function to the Harvard/MIT device, except the stimulator chip sits in the [[primary visual cortex]], rather than on the retina. Many subjects have been implanted with a high success rate and limited negative effects. Still in the developmental phase, upon the death of Dr. Dobelle, selling the eye for profit was ruled against in favor of donating it to a publicly funded research team.<ref name="Geary"/><ref name=Ings>{{cite book|title=The Eye: a natural history|author=Simon Ings|year=2007|chapter=Chapter 10(3): Making eyes to see|publisher=Bloomsbury|location=London|pages=276–283}}</ref>


BVA was also concurrently developing the High-Acuity device, which incorporated a number of new technologies to bring together a microchip and an implant with 1024 electrodes. The device aimed to provide functional central vision to assist with tasks such as face recognition and reading large print. This high-acuity implant would be inserted epiretinally. Patient tests were planned for this device in 2014 once preclinical testing had been completed, it is unknown whether these trials ever took place.
===Intracortical Visual Prosthesis===
{{Main|Intracortical Visual Prosthesis}}


Patients with [[retinitis pigmentosa]] were to be the first to participate in the studies, followed by age-related macular degeneration. Each prototype consisted of a camera, attached to a pair of glasses which sent the signal to the implanted microchip, where it was converted into electrical impulses to stimulate the remaining healthy neurons in the retina. This information was then passed on to the optic nerve and the vision processing centres of the brain.
The Laboratory of Neural Prosthesis at Illinois Institute Of Technology (IIT), Chicago, is developing a visual prosthetic using Intracortical Iridium Oxide (AIROF) electrodes arrays. These arrays will be implanted on the occipital lobe. External hardware will capture images, process them and generate instructions which will then be transmitted to implanted circuitry via a telemetry link. The circuitry will decode the instructions and stimulate the electrodes, in turn stimulating the visual cortex. The group is developing a wearable external image capture and processing system. Studies on animals and psyphophysical studies on humans are being conducted to test the feasibility of a human volunteer implant. {{Citation needed|date=May 2007}}


On 2 January 2019, BVT released positive results from a set of trials on four Australians using a new version of the device. Older versions of the device were only designed to be used temporarily, but the new design allowed the technology to be used constantly, and for the first time outside the lab, even to be taken home. More implants are to be administered throughout 2019.<ref>{{Citation|title=Channel 9 BVT|url=https://www.facebook.com/BionicVisionTechnologies/videos/1541714469305476/|language=en|access-date=2019-08-09}}</ref>
===Virtual Retinal Display (VRD)===
{{Main|Virtual retinal display}}
Laser-based system for projecting an image directly onto the retina. This could be useful for enhancing normal vision or bypassing an occlusion such as a [[cataract]], or a damaged [[cornea]].<ref name="Geary"/>


According to fact sheets dated March, 2019, on BVT's website, they expect the device to obtain market approval in 3 to 5 years.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://bionicvis.com/fact-sheets/|title=Fact Sheets {{!}} Bionic Vision Technologies|website=bionicvis.com|access-date=2019-08-09}}</ref>
===Visual Cortical Implant===
[[Image:ImplantSawan.JPG‎|thumb|alt=Visual cortical implant designed by Mohamad Sawan|The Visual Cortical Implant]][http://www.polymtl.ca/recherche/rc/en/professeurs/details.php?NoProf=108/ Dr. Mohamad Sawan], Professor and Researcher at [http://www.polystim.ca/ Polystim neurotechnologies Laboratory] at the Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, has been working on a visual prosthesis to be implanted into the visual cortex. The basic principle of Dr. Sawan’s technology consists of stimulating the visual cortex by implanting a silicon microchip on a network of electrodes, made of biocompatible materials, wherein each electrode injects a stimulating electrical current in order to provoke a series of luminous points to appear (an array of pixels) in the field of vision of the sightless person. This system is composed of two distinct parts: the implant and an external controller. The implant is lodged in the visual cortex and wirelessly receives data and energy from the external controller. It contains all the circuits necessary to generate the electrical stimuli and to monitor the changing microelectrode/biological tissue interface. The battery-operated outer controller consists of a micro-camera, which captures images, as well as a processor and a command generator, which process the imaging data to translate the captured images and generate and manage the electrical stimulation process. The external controller and the implant exchange data in both directions by a transcutaneous radio frequency (RF) link, which also powers the implant.<ref>{{cite web|last=Sawan|title=INTRA-CORTICAL VISUAL PROSTHESIS|url=http://www.polymtl.ca/polystim/en/navigation/Prothesevisuelleintra-corticale.php|work=INTRA-CORTICAL VISUAL PROSTHESIS|publisher=Montréal Polytechnical|accessdate=April 10, 2011}}</ref>


===Other projects===
===Dobelle Eye===
{{Main|William H. Dobelle}}
Other note-worthy researchers include Richard Normann ([http://www.bioen.utah.edu/faculty/RAN/ University of Utah]) and David Bradley at [[University of Chicago]], Eduardo Fernandez and the European Consortium CORTIVIS (http://cortivis.umh.es), Ed Tehovnik at [[MIT]], Tohru Yagi in [http://www.io.mei.titech.ac.jp/research/retina/ Japan Visual Prosthesis Project], and the [[Bionic Vision Australia]] multi-institute partnership.

Similar in function to the Harvard/MIT device, except the stimulator chip sits in the [[primary visual cortex]], rather than on the retina. Many subjects have been implanted with a high success rate and limited negative effects. The project first began in 2002 and was still in the developmental phase, upon the death of Dobelle, selling the eye for profit was ruled against{{by whom|date=September 2018}} in favor of donating it to a publicly funded research team.<ref name="Geary"/><ref name=Ings>{{cite book|title=The Eye: a natural history|author=Simon Ings|date=2007|chapter=Chapter 10(3): Making eyes to see|publisher=Bloomsbury|location=London|pages=276–83}}</ref>

===Intracortical visual prosthesis===
{{Update section|date=January 2019|reason=Is this still in development? This work was in 2012.}}
The Laboratory of Neural Prosthetics at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, started developing a visual prosthetic using intracortical electrode arrays in 2009. While similar in principle to the Dobelle system, the use of intracortical electrodes allow for greatly increased spatial resolution in the stimulation signals (more electrodes per unit area). In addition, a wireless telemetry system is being developed<ref>{{cite journal|last=Rush|first=Alexander|author2=PR Troyk |title=A Power and Data Link for a Wireless-Implanted Neural Recording System|journal= IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering|date=November 2012|volume=59|issue=11|pages=3255–62|pmid=22922687|doi=10.1109/tbme.2012.2214385|s2cid=5412047}}</ref> to eliminate the need for transcranial wires. Arrays of activated iridium oxide film (AIROF)-coated electrodes will be implanted in the visual cortex, located on the occipital lobe of the brain. External hardware will capture images, process them, and generate instructions which will then be transmitted to implanted circuitry via a telemetry link. The circuitry will decode the instructions and stimulate the electrodes, in turn stimulating the visual cortex. The group is developing a wearable external image capture and processing system to accompany the implanted circuitry. Studies on animals and psychophysical studies on humans are being conducted<ref>{{cite journal|last=Srivastava|first=Nishant|author2=PR Troyk |author3=G Dagnelie |title=Detection, eye-hand coordination and virtual mobility performance in simulated vision for a cortical visual prosthesis device|journal=Journal of Neural Engineering|date=June 2009|volume=6|issue=3|pmid=19458397|doi=10.1088/1741-2560/6/3/035008|page=035008|pmc=3902177|bibcode=2009JNEng...6c5008S}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lewis |first1=Philip M. |last2=Rosenfeld |first2=Jeffrey V. |title=Electrical stimulation of the brain and the development of cortical visual prostheses: An historical perspective |journal=Brain Research |date=January 2016 |volume=1630 |pages=208–224 |doi=10.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.038 |pmid=26348986 |doi-access=free }}</ref> to test the feasibility of a human volunteer implant.{{citation needed|reason=Almost a decade has past. Are these studies ongoing or have they completed?|date=September 2018}}

[[Stephen Macknik]] and [[Susana Martinez-Conde]] at [[SUNY Downstate Medical Center]] are also developing an intracortical visual prosthetic, called OBServe.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Collins |first1=Francis |title=The Amazing Brain: Making Up for Lost Vision |url=https://directorsblog.nih.gov/tag/observe/ |website=NIH Director's Blog |date=27 August 2019 |publisher=National Institutes of Health |access-date=10 November 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Hale |first1=Conor |title=Sidestepping failing retinas by linking cameras straight to the visual cortex |url=https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/sidestepping-failing-retinas-by-linking-cameras-straight-to-visual-cortex |access-date=11 November 2019 |publisher=FierceBiotech}}</ref> The planned system will use an LED array, a video camera, optogenetics, [[adeno-associated virus]] transfection, and eye tracking.<ref name=Macknik2019>{{cite journal |last1=Macknik |last2=Alexander |last3=Caballero |last4=Chanovas |last5=Nielsen |last6=Nishimura |last7=Schaffer |last8=Slovin |last9=Babayoff |last10=Barak |last11=Tang |last12=Ju |last13=Yazdan-Shahmorad |last14=Alonso |last15=Malinskiy |last16=Martinez Conde |title=Advanced Circuit and Cellular Imaging Methods in Nonhuman Primates |journal=Journal of Neuroscience |volume=16 |issue=42 |pages=8267–8274 |doi=10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1168-19.2019 |pmid=31619496 |pmc=6794937 |year=2019 }}</ref> Components are currently being developed and tested in animals.<ref name=Macknik2019/>


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Brainport]]
*[[Bionic contact lens]]
* [[Bionic contact lens]]
* [[Human echolocation]]


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{reflist}}


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://www.ffb.ca/patient_resources/factsheets/retinal_protheses.html Research Fact Sheet ~ Retinal Prostheses] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130219205234/http://www.ffb.ca/patient_resources/factsheets/retinal_protheses.html |date=19 February 2013 }}
* [http://www.upgradeyourbody.com/biotech-directory/senses/bionic-eyes/ List of visual prosthesis companies]
* [http://www.mivision.com.au/quantum-leap-for-bionic-eye/ Quantum Leap for Bionic Eye]
* [http://www.emedicine.com/oph/topic763.htm ARMD, Retinal Electronic Prosthesis and RPE Transplantation - eMedicine.com]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6368089.stm 'Bionic' eye implants look ahead - BBC]
* [http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7216 NewScientist.com: 'Bionic eye' may help reverse blindness]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4411591.stm BBC: 'Artificial eye']
* [http://www.health.howstuffworks.com/bionic-eye.htm How does a "bionic eye" allow blind people to see? - HowStuffWorks.com]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6585367.stm Research opens way for bionic eye]; BBC, 24 April 2007.
* [http://www.io.mei.titech.ac.jp/research/retina/#link Visual Prosthesis Links]; Japan Visual Prosthesis Group
* [http://www.stanford.edu/~palanker/List_of_publications.html Palanker Group Publication List]
* [http://artificialretina.energy.gov/papers.shtml Published Papers Related to the DOE Artificial Retina Project CRADA]
* [http://www.bostonretinalimplant.org/index.php?fontsize=bigger&hicontrast= The Boston Retinal Implant Project]
* [http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7358218n&tag=content;col1 'Bionic eye gives partial sight to the blind' - CBS News Video]
* [http://www.centrasight.com/centrasight_technology Implantable Telescope Technology - CentraSight]
* [http://www.rle.mit.edu/media/pr151/19.pdf - The Retinal Implant Project - rle.mit.edu]
* [http://optobionics.com/asrdevice.shtml - ASR® Device - optobionics.com]
* [http://issues.control.com.au/issues2009/86nano.pdf - 'Tiny Technologies Raise Big Ethical Issues' - issues.control.com.au]


{{Emerging technologies}}
{{emerging technologies|topics=yes|neuro=yes|infocom=yes}}
<!---Place all category tags here-->


[[Category:Blindness]]
[[Category:Artificial organs]]
[[Category:Blindness equipment]]
[[Category:Eye]]
[[Category:Eye]]
[[Category:Implants (medicine)]]
[[Category:Neuroprosthetics]]
[[Category:Prosthetics]]
[[Category:Prosthetics]]
[[Category:Neuroprosthetics]]
[[Category:Medical devices]]
[[Category:Artificial organs]]
[[Category:Emerging technologies]]

[[de:Retina-Implantat]]
[[it:Occhio bionico]]
[[pl:Proteza wzroku]]
[[pt:Olho biônico]]
[[sk:Umelé oko]]
[[fi:Argus-silmä]]
[[ta:செயற்கைக் கண்]]
[[tr:Yapay retina]]
[[zh:视觉假体]]

Latest revision as of 04:15, 30 November 2024

A visual prosthesis, often referred to as a bionic eye, is an experimental visual device intended to restore functional vision in those with partial or total blindness. Many devices have been developed, usually modeled on the cochlear implant or bionic ear devices, a type of neural prosthesis in use since the mid-1980s. The idea of using electrical current (e.g., electrically stimulating the retina or the visual cortex) to provide sight dates back to the 18th century, discussed by Benjamin Franklin,[1] Tiberius Cavallo,[2] and Charles LeRoy.[3]

Biological considerations

[edit]

The ability to give sight to a blind person via a bionic eye depends on the circumstances surrounding the loss of sight. For retinal prostheses, which are the most prevalent visual prosthetic under development (due to ease of access to the retina among other considerations), patients with vision loss due to degeneration of photoreceptors (retinitis pigmentosa, choroideremia, geographic atrophy macular degeneration) are the best candidate for treatment. Candidates for visual prosthetic implants find the procedure most successful if the optic nerve was developed prior to the onset of blindness. Persons born with blindness may lack a fully developed optical nerve, which typically develops prior to birth,[4] though neuroplasticity makes it possible for the nerve, and sight, to develop after implantation[citation needed].

Technological considerations

[edit]

Visual prosthetics are being developed as a potentially valuable aid for individuals with visual degradation. Only three visual prosthetic devices have received marketing approval in the EU.[5] Argus II, co-developed at the University of Southern California (USC) Eye Institute[6] and manufactured by Second Sight Medical Products Inc., was the first device to have received marketing approval (CE Mark in Europe in 2011). Most other efforts remain investigational; the Retina Implant AG's Alpha IMS won a CE Mark July 2013 and is a significant improvement in resolution. It is not, however, FDA-approved in the US.[7]

Ongoing projects

[edit]

Argus retinal prosthesis

[edit]

Mark Humayun, who joined the faculty of the Keck School of Medicine of USC Department of Ophthalmology in 2001;[8] Eugene Dejuan, now at the University of California San Francisco; engineer Howard D. Phillips; bio-electronics engineer Wentai Liu, now at University of California Los Angeles; and Robert Greenberg, now of Second Sight, were the original inventors of the active epi-retinal prosthesis[9] and demonstrated proof of principle in acute patient investigations at Johns Hopkins University in the early 1990s. In the late 1990s the company Second Sight[10] was formed by Greenberg along with medical device entrepreneur, Alfred E. Mann,[11]: 35  Their first-generation implant had 16 electrodes and was implanted in six subjects by Humayun at University of Southern California between 2002 and 2004.[11]: 35 [12] In 2007, the company began a trial of its second-generation, 60-electrode implant, dubbed the Argus II, in the US and in Europe.[13][14] In total 30 subjects participated in the studies spanning 10 sites in four countries. In the spring of 2011, based on the results of the clinical study which were published in 2012,[15] Argus II was approved for commercial use in Europe, and Second Sight launched the product later that same year. The Argus II was approved by the United States FDA on 14 February 2013. Three US government funding agencies (National Eye Institute, Department of Energy, and National Science Foundation) have supported the work at Second Sight, USC, UCSC, Caltech, and other research labs.[16]

Microsystem-based visual prosthesis (MIVP)

[edit]

Designed by Claude Veraart at the University of Louvain in 2002, this is a spiral cuff electrode around the optic nerve at the back of the eye. It is connected to a stimulator implanted in a small depression in the skull. The stimulator receives signals from an externally worn camera, which are translated into electrical signals that stimulate the optic nerve directly.[17]

Implantable miniature telescope

[edit]

Although not truly an active prosthesis, an implantable miniature telescope is one type of visual implant that has met with some success in the treatment of end-stage age-related macular degeneration.[18][19][20] This type of device is implanted in the eye's posterior chamber and works by increasing (by about three times) the size of the image projected onto the retina in order to overcome a centrally located scotoma or blind spot.[19][20]

Created by VisionCare Ophthalmic Technologies in conjunction with the CentraSight Treatment Program in 2011, the telescope is about the size of a pea and is implanted behind the iris of one eye. Images are projected onto healthy areas of the central retina, outside the degenerated macula, and is enlarged to reduce the effect the blind spot has on central vision. 2.2x or 2.7x magnification strengths make it possible to see or discern the central vision object of interest while the other eye is used for peripheral vision because the eye that has the implant will have limited peripheral vision as a side effect. Unlike a telescope which would be hand-held, the implant moves with the eye which is the main advantage. Patients using the device may however still need glasses for optimal vision and for close work. Before surgery, patients should first try out a hand-held telescope to see if they would benefit from image enlargement. One of the main drawbacks is that it cannot be used for patients who have had cataract surgery as the intraocular lens would obstruct insertion of the telescope. It also requires a large incision in the cornea to insert.[21]

A Cochrane systematic review seeking to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the implantable miniature telescope for patients with late or advanced age-related macular degeneration found only one ongoing study evaluating the OriLens intraocular telescope, with results expected in 2020.[22]

Tübingen MPDA Project Alpha IMS

[edit]

A Southern German team led by the University Eye Hospital in Tübingen, was formed in 1995 by Eberhart Zrenner to develop a subretinal prosthesis. The chip is located behind the retina and utilizes microphotodiode arrays (MPDA) which collect incident light and transform it into electrical current stimulating the retinal ganglion cells. As natural photoreceptors are far more efficient than photodiodes, visible light is not powerful enough to stimulate the MPDA. Therefore, an external power supply is used to enhance the stimulation current. The German team commenced in vivo experiments in 2000, when evoked cortical potentials were measured from Yucatán micropigs and rabbits. At 14 months post implantation, the implant and retina surrounding it were examined and there were no noticeable changes to anatomical integrity. The implants were successful in producing evoked cortical potentials in half of the animals tested. The thresholds identified in this study were similar to those required in epiretinal stimulation. Later reports from this group concern the results of a clinical pilot study on 11 participants with retinitis pigmentosa. Some blind patients were able to read letters, recognize unknown objects, localize a plate, a cup and cutlery.[23] Two of the patients were found to make microsaccades similar to those of healthy control participants, and the properties of the eye movements depended on the stimuli that the patients were viewing—suggesting that eye movements might be useful measures for evaluating vision restored by implants.[24][25] Multicenter study started in 2010, using a fully implantable device with 1500 Electrodes Alpha IMS (produced by Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany), with 10 patients included; preliminary results were presented at ARVO 2011.[citation needed] The first UK implantations took place in March 2012 and were led by Robert MacLaren at the University of Oxford and Tim Jackson at King's College Hospital in London.[26][27] David Wong also implanted the Tübingen device in a patient in Hong Kong.[28]

On 19 March 2019 Retina Implant AG discontinued business activities quoting innovation-hostile climate of Europe's rigid regulatory systems and unsatisfactory results in patients.[29][30]

Harvard/MIT Retinal Implant

[edit]

Joseph Rizzo and John Wyatt at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and MIT began researching the feasibility of a retinal prosthesis in 1989, and performed a number of proof-of-concept epiretinal stimulation trials on blind volunteers between 1998 and 2000. They have since developed a subretinal stimulator, an array of electrodes, that is placed beneath the retina in the subretinal space and receives image signals beamed from a camera mounted on a pair of glasses. The stimulator chip decodes the picture information beamed from the camera and stimulates retinal ganglion cells accordingly. Their second generation prosthesis collects data and sends it to the implant through radio frequency fields from transmitter coils that are mounted on the glasses. A secondary receiver coil is sutured around the iris.[31]

Artificial silicon retina (ASR)

[edit]

The brothers Alan and Vincent Chow developed a microchip in 2002 containing 3500 photodiodes, which detect light and convert it into electrical impulses, which stimulate healthy retinal ganglion cells. The ASR requires no externally worn devices.[17]

The original Optobionics Corp. stopped operations, but Chow acquired the Optobionics name, the ASR implants and plans to reorganize a new company under the same name.[32] The ASR microchip is a 2mm in diameter silicon chip (same concept as computer chips) containing ~5,000 microscopic solar cells called "microphotodiodes" that each have their own stimulating electrode.[32]

Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis (PRIMA)

[edit]

Daniel Palanker and his group at Stanford University developed a photovoltaic retinal prosthesis in 2012,[33] that includes a subretinal photodiode array and an infrared image projection system mounted on video goggles. Images captured by video camera are processed in a pocket PC and displayed on video goggles using pulsed near-infrared (IR, 880–915 nm) light. These images are projected onto the retina via natural eye optics, and photodiodes in the subretinal implant convert light into pulsed bi-phasic electric current in each pixel.[34] Electric current flowing through the tissue between the active and return electrode in each pixel stimulates the nearby inner retinal neurons, primarily the bipolar cells, which transmit excitatory responses to the retinal ganglion cells. This technology is being commercialized by Pixium Vision (PRIMA Archived 23 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine), and is being evaluated in a clinical trial (2018). Following this proof of concept, Palanker group is focusing now on developing pixels smaller than 50μm using 3-D electrodes and utilizing the effect of retinal migration into voids in the subretinal implant.

Bionic Vision Technologies (BVT)

[edit]

Bionic Vision Technologies (BVT) is a company, that has taken over the research and commercialisation rights of Bionic Vision Australia (BVA). BVA was a consortium of some of Australia's leading universities and research institutes, and funded by the Australian Research Council from 2010, it ceased operations on 31 December 2016. The members of the consortium consisted of Bionics Institute, UNSW Sydney, Data 61 CSRIO, Center for Eye Research Australia (CERA), and The University of Melbourne. There were many more partners as well. The Australian Federal Government awarded a $42 million ARC grant to Bionic Vision Australia to develop bionic vision technology.[35]

While the BVA consortium was still together, the team was led by Professor Anthony Burkitt, and they were developing two retinal prostheses. One known as The Wide-View device, that combined novel technologies with materials that had been successfully used in other clinical implants. This approach incorporated a microchip with 98 stimulating electrodes and aimed to provide increased mobility for patients to help them move safely in their environment. This implant would be placed in the suprachoroidal space. Researchers expected the first patient tests to begin with this device in 2013, it is currently unknown whether full trials were conducted, but at least one woman named Dianne Ashworth was implanted with the device, and was able to read letters and numbers using it.,[36] she later went on to write a book titled "I Spy with My Bionic Eye", about her life, vision loss, and being the first person to be implanted with the BVA, Bionic Eye device.

BVA was also concurrently developing the High-Acuity device, which incorporated a number of new technologies to bring together a microchip and an implant with 1024 electrodes. The device aimed to provide functional central vision to assist with tasks such as face recognition and reading large print. This high-acuity implant would be inserted epiretinally. Patient tests were planned for this device in 2014 once preclinical testing had been completed, it is unknown whether these trials ever took place.

Patients with retinitis pigmentosa were to be the first to participate in the studies, followed by age-related macular degeneration. Each prototype consisted of a camera, attached to a pair of glasses which sent the signal to the implanted microchip, where it was converted into electrical impulses to stimulate the remaining healthy neurons in the retina. This information was then passed on to the optic nerve and the vision processing centres of the brain.

On 2 January 2019, BVT released positive results from a set of trials on four Australians using a new version of the device. Older versions of the device were only designed to be used temporarily, but the new design allowed the technology to be used constantly, and for the first time outside the lab, even to be taken home. More implants are to be administered throughout 2019.[37]

According to fact sheets dated March, 2019, on BVT's website, they expect the device to obtain market approval in 3 to 5 years.[38]

Dobelle Eye

[edit]

Similar in function to the Harvard/MIT device, except the stimulator chip sits in the primary visual cortex, rather than on the retina. Many subjects have been implanted with a high success rate and limited negative effects. The project first began in 2002 and was still in the developmental phase, upon the death of Dobelle, selling the eye for profit was ruled against[by whom?] in favor of donating it to a publicly funded research team.[17][39]

Intracortical visual prosthesis

[edit]

The Laboratory of Neural Prosthetics at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, started developing a visual prosthetic using intracortical electrode arrays in 2009. While similar in principle to the Dobelle system, the use of intracortical electrodes allow for greatly increased spatial resolution in the stimulation signals (more electrodes per unit area). In addition, a wireless telemetry system is being developed[40] to eliminate the need for transcranial wires. Arrays of activated iridium oxide film (AIROF)-coated electrodes will be implanted in the visual cortex, located on the occipital lobe of the brain. External hardware will capture images, process them, and generate instructions which will then be transmitted to implanted circuitry via a telemetry link. The circuitry will decode the instructions and stimulate the electrodes, in turn stimulating the visual cortex. The group is developing a wearable external image capture and processing system to accompany the implanted circuitry. Studies on animals and psychophysical studies on humans are being conducted[41][42] to test the feasibility of a human volunteer implant.[citation needed]

Stephen Macknik and Susana Martinez-Conde at SUNY Downstate Medical Center are also developing an intracortical visual prosthetic, called OBServe.[43][44] The planned system will use an LED array, a video camera, optogenetics, adeno-associated virus transfection, and eye tracking.[45] Components are currently being developed and tested in animals.[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Dobelle, Wm. H. (January 2000). "Artificial Vision for the Blind by Connecting a Television Camera to the Visual Cortex". ASAIO Journal. 46 (1): 3–9. doi:10.1097/00002480-200001000-00002. PMID 10667705.
  2. ^ Fodstad, H.; Hariz, M. (2007). "Electricity in the treatment of nervous system disease". In Sakas, Damianos E.; Krames, Elliot S.; Simpson, Brian A. (eds.). Operative Neuromodulation. Springer. p. 11. ISBN 9783211330791. Retrieved 21 July 2013.
  3. ^ Sekirnjak C; Hottowy P; Sher A; Dabrowski W; et al. (2008). "High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design". J Neurosci. 28 (17): 4446–56. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5138-07.2008. PMC 2681084. PMID 18434523.
  4. ^ Provis, Jan M.; Van Driel, Diana; Billson, Frank A.; Russell, Peter (1 August 1985). "Human fetal optic nerve: Overproduction and elimination of retinal axons during development". The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 238 (1): 92–100. doi:10.1002/cne.902380108. PMID 4044906. S2CID 42902826.
  5. ^ "IRIS®II becomes third bionic retina approved in Europe". fightingblindness. August 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
  6. ^ "USC Eye Institute ophthalmologists implant first FDA-approved Argus II retinal prosthesis in western United States". Reuters. 27 August 2014. Archived from the original on 5 January 2015. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
  7. ^ Chuang, Alice T; Margo, Curtis E; Greenberg, Paul B (July 2014). "Retinal implants: a systematic review: Table 1". British Journal of Ophthalmology. 98 (7): 852–856. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303708. PMID 24403565. S2CID 25193594.
  8. ^ "Humayun faculty page at USC Keck". Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  9. ^ U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. "Overview of the Artificial Retina Project".
  10. ^ "Second Sight official website". 2-sight.com. 21 May 2015. Retrieved 12 June 2018.
  11. ^ a b Second Sight. 14 November 2014 Second Sight Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1: Registration Statement
  12. ^ Miriam Karmel (March 2012). "Clinical Update: Retina. Retinal Prostheses: Progress and Problems". Eyenet Magazine. Archived from the original on 15 February 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  13. ^ Second Sight (9 January 2007). "Press Release: Ending the Journey through Darkness: Innovative Technology Offers New Hope for Treating Blindness due to Retinitis Pigmentosa" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2023. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  14. ^ Jonathan Fildes (16 February 2007). "Trials for bionic eye implants". BBC.
  15. ^ Humayun, Mark S.; Dorn, Jessy D.; da Cruz, Lyndon; Dagnelie, Gislin; Sahel, José-Alain; Stanga, Paulo E.; Cideciyan, Artur V.; Duncan, Jacque L.; Eliott, Dean; Filley, Eugene; Ho, Allen C.; Santos, Arturo; Safran, Avinoam B.; Arditi, Aries; Del Priore, Lucian V.; Greenberg, Robert J. (April 2012). "Interim Results from the International Trial of Second Sight's Visual Prosthesis". Ophthalmology. 119 (4): 779–788. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.028. PMC 3319859. PMID 22244176.
  16. ^ Sifferlin, Alexandra (19 February 2013). "FDA approves first bionic eye". CNN. TIME. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
  17. ^ a b c James Geary (2002). The Body Electric. Phoenix.[page needed]
  18. ^ Chun DW; Heier JS; Raizman MB (2005). "Visual prosthetic device for bilateral end-stage macular degeneration". Expert Rev Med Devices. 2 (6): 657–65. doi:10.1586/17434440.2.6.657. PMID 16293092. S2CID 40168891.
  19. ^ a b Lane SS; Kuppermann BD; Fine IH; Hamill MB; et al. (2004). "A prospective multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the implantable miniature telescope". Am J Ophthalmol. 137 (6): 993–1001. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.01.030. PMID 15183782.
  20. ^ a b Lane SS; Kuppermann BD (2006). "The Implantable Miniature Telescope for macular degeneration". Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 17 (1): 94–98. doi:10.1097/01.icu.0000193067.86627.a1. PMID 16436930. S2CID 28740344.
  21. ^ Lipshitz, Isaac. "Implantable Telescope Technology". VisionCare Ophthalmic Technologies, Inc. Retrieved 20 March 2011.
  22. ^ Gupta A, Lam J, Custis P, Munz S, Fong D, Koster M (2018). "Implantable miniature telescope (IMT) for vision loss due to end-stage age-related macular degeneration". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 (5): CD011140. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011140.pub2. PMC 6022289. PMID 29847689.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. ^ Eberhart Zrenner; et al. (2010). "Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 278 (1711): 1489–97. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1747. PMC 3081743. PMID 21047851.
  24. ^ Alexander, Robert; Macknik, Stephen; Martinez-Conde, Susana (2018). "Microsaccade Characteristics in Neurological and Ophthalmic Disease". Frontiers in Neurology. 9 (144): 144. doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00144. PMC 5859063. PMID 29593642.
  25. ^ Hafed, Z; Stingl, K; Bartz-Schmidt, K; Gekeler, F; Zrenner, E (2016). "Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant". Vision Research. 118: 119–131. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.006. PMID 25906684.
  26. ^ "Blind man 'excited' at retina implant". BBC News. 3 May 2012. Retrieved 23 May 2016.
  27. ^ Fergus Walsh (3 May 2012). "Two blind British men have electronic retinas fitted". BBC News. Retrieved 23 May 2016.
  28. ^ "HKU performed the first subretinal microchip implantation in Asia Patient regained eyesight after the surgery". HKU.hk (Press release). The University of Hong Kong. 3 May 2012. Retrieved 23 May 2016.
  29. ^ "Retina Implant - Your Expert for retinitis pigmentosa - Retina Implant". www.retina-implant.de. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
  30. ^ "Retina Implant AG discontinues business activities". BioRegio STERN | Wirtschaft weiterdenken. Retrieved 30 June 2024.
  31. ^ Wyatt, J.L. Jr. "The Retinal Implant Project" (PDF). Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Retrieved 20 March 2011.
  32. ^ a b "ASR® Device". Optobionics. Retrieved 20 March 2011.
  33. ^ Palanker Group. "Photovoltaic Retinal Prosthesis".
  34. ^ K. Mathieson; J. Loudin; G. Goetz; P. Huie; L. Wang; T. Kamins; L. Galambos; R. Smith; J.S. Harris; A. Sher; D. Palanker (2012). "Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis with high pixel density". Nature Photonics. 6 (6): 391–97. Bibcode:2012NaPho...6..391M. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.104. PMC 3462820. PMID 23049619.
  35. ^ "About BVA". Bionicvision. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
  36. ^ Dianne Ashworth 12 months on, 2013, 31 July 2014, retrieved 9 August 2019
  37. ^ Channel 9 BVT, retrieved 9 August 2019
  38. ^ "Fact Sheets | Bionic Vision Technologies". bionicvis.com. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
  39. ^ Simon Ings (2007). "Chapter 10(3): Making eyes to see". The Eye: a natural history. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 276–83.
  40. ^ Rush, Alexander; PR Troyk (November 2012). "A Power and Data Link for a Wireless-Implanted Neural Recording System". IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 59 (11): 3255–62. doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2214385. PMID 22922687. S2CID 5412047.
  41. ^ Srivastava, Nishant; PR Troyk; G Dagnelie (June 2009). "Detection, eye-hand coordination and virtual mobility performance in simulated vision for a cortical visual prosthesis device". Journal of Neural Engineering. 6 (3): 035008. Bibcode:2009JNEng...6c5008S. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/6/3/035008. PMC 3902177. PMID 19458397.
  42. ^ Lewis, Philip M.; Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V. (January 2016). "Electrical stimulation of the brain and the development of cortical visual prostheses: An historical perspective". Brain Research. 1630: 208–224. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.038. PMID 26348986.
  43. ^ Collins, Francis (27 August 2019). "The Amazing Brain: Making Up for Lost Vision". NIH Director's Blog. National Institutes of Health. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
  44. ^ Hale, Conor. "Sidestepping failing retinas by linking cameras straight to the visual cortex". FierceBiotech. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  45. ^ a b Macknik; Alexander; Caballero; Chanovas; Nielsen; Nishimura; Schaffer; Slovin; Babayoff; Barak; Tang; Ju; Yazdan-Shahmorad; Alonso; Malinskiy; Martinez Conde (2019). "Advanced Circuit and Cellular Imaging Methods in Nonhuman Primates". Journal of Neuroscience. 16 (42): 8267–8274. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1168-19.2019. PMC 6794937. PMID 31619496.
[edit]