Jump to content

Prime Minister of the United Kingdom: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Head of government of the United Kingdom}}
{{Infobox Political post
|Flag = Flag of the United Kingdom.png
{{For|the list|List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom}}
{{pp-semi-indef|small=yes}}
|insignia = Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (HM Government).svg
{{Use British English|date=April 2013}}
|insigniacaption = Arms of [[Her Majesty's Government (term)|Her Majesty's Government]]
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2024}}
|post = Prime Minister
{{Infobox official post
|body = the </br>United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| post = Prime Minister
|image = Official-photo-cameron.png
| body = the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|incumbent = [[David Cameron]]
| insignia = Coat of arms of the United Kingdom (2022, lesser arms).svg
|incumbentsince = 11 May 2010
| insigniasize = 150px
|style = [[The Right Honourable]]
|residence = [[10 Downing Street]]<br/>London, United Kingdom<br/><br/>[[Chequers]]<br/>Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
| insigniacaption = [[Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom|Royal Arms]] of [[Government of the United Kingdom|His Majesty's Government]]
| insigniaalt =
|appointer = [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|Monarch of the United Kingdom]]
| flag = Flag of the United Kingdom.svg
|termlength = [[At Her Majesty's pleasure]]
| flagsize =
|formation = {{Start date and years ago|df=yes|1721|04|04}}
| flagalt =
|inaugural = [[Robert Walpole|Sir Robert Walpole]] (As First Lord of the Treasury, Regarded as the First Prime Minister)
| flagborder = yes
|salary = £142,000
| flagcaption = [[Flag of the United Kingdom]]
|website = http://www.number10.gov.uk/
| image = Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer Official Portrait (cropped 2).jpg
| [[List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom]]
| imagesize =
| alt =
| imagecaption =
| incumbent = [[Keir Starmer]]
| acting =
| incumbentsince = 5 July 2024
| department = {{indented plainlist|
* [[Government of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Prime Minister's Office (United Kingdom)|Prime Minister's Office]]
* [[Cabinet Office]]
}}
}}
| style = {{indented plainlist|
* '''Prime Minister'''<br />(informal)
* [[The Right Honourable]]<br />(formal)
* [[Excellency|His Excellency]]<br />(diplomatic)
}}
| type = [[Head of government]]
| status = [[Minister of the Crown|Chief Minister of the Crown]]
<br> [[Great Office of State]]
| abbreviation =
| member_of = {{indented plainlist|
* [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|Cabinet]]
* [[Privy Council of the United Kingdom|Privy Council]]
* [[British–Irish Council]]
* [[National Security Council (United Kingdom)|National Security Council]]
*[[Council of the Nations and Regions]]
* [[Prime Minister and Heads of Devolved Governments Council|PM and Heads of Devolved Governments Council]]
}}
| reports_to = {{hlist|[[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|Monarch]]|[[Parliament of the United Kingdom|Parliament]]}}
| residence = {{ubl|[[10 Downing Street]] (official)|[[Chequers]] (country house)}}
| seat =
| nominator =
| appointer = [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom#Appointment of the prime minister|The Monarch]]
| appointer_qualified = (with their choice limited to the person who can command the [[Confidence and supply|confidence]] of the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]])<ref>{{Cite news |last=Andersson |first=Jasmine |date=2022-08-31 |title=Queen to appoint new prime minister at Balmoral |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-62728328 |access-date= |work=[[BBC News]] |language=en-GB}}</ref>
| termlength = [[At His Majesty's pleasure]]
| termlength_qualified =
| constituting_instrument =
| precursor =
| formation =
| first = [[Sir Robert Walpole]]
| last =
| abolished =
| superseded_by =
| succession =
| unofficial_names =
| deputy = ''No fixed position; often held by'':{{blist|[[Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Deputy Prime Minister]]|[[First Secretary of State]]}}
| salary = £166,786 per annum {{small|(2024)}}<!--£75,440 Claimed Salary of PM + £91,346 MP Salary (2024)--><ref>{{Cite web |title=Salaries of Members of His Majesty's Government – Financial Year 2022–23 |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1124173/2022-12-07-Ministerial-Salaries-22-23-table.pdf |date=15 December 2022}}</ref><br />(including £91,346 [[Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)|MP]] salary)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pay and expenses for MPs |url=https://www.theipsa.org.uk/mps-pay-and-pensions}}</ref>
| website = {{URL|https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street|10 Downing Street}}
| footnotes =
}}
{{uk-gov-positions}}


The '''Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland''' is the [[head of government|Head of]] [[Government of the United Kingdom|Her Majesty's Government]] in the [[United Kingdom]]. The Prime Minister and [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|Cabinet]] (consisting of all the most senior [[minister (government)|ministers]], who are government department heads) are collectively [[Accountability#Political accountability|accountable]] for their policies and actions to the [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|Sovereign]], to [[Parliament of the United Kingdom|Parliament]], to their [[List of political parties in the United Kingdom|political party]] and ultimately to the [[electorate]]. The {{asof|2010|10|alt=[[List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom|current]] Prime Minister}}, [[David Cameron]], leader of the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]], was appointed on 11 May 2010.
The '''prime minister of the United Kingdom''' <!--"prime minister" is uncapitalized per MOS:JOBTITLES because it is preceded by the modifier "the" and denotes a description, not a title-->is the [[head of government]] of the [[United Kingdom]]. The prime minister [[Advice (constitutional law)|advises]] the [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|sovereign]] on the exercise of much of the [[Royal prerogative in the United Kingdom|royal prerogative]], chairs the [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|Cabinet]], and selects its [[Minister of the Crown|ministers]]. As modern prime ministers hold office by virtue of their ability to [[Motions of no confidence in the United Kingdom|command the confidence]] of the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]], they sit as [[Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)|members of Parliament]].


The office of prime minister is not established by any statute or constitutional document, but exists only by long-established [[Convention (norm)#Government|convention]], whereby the monarch appoints as prime minister the person most likely to [[Vote of Confidence|command the confidence]] of the House of Commons.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cabinet-manual |title=The Cabinet Manual |date=October 2011 |publisher=[[Cabinet Office]] |edition=1st |page=14 |chapter=The principles of government formation (Section 2.8) |quote=Prime Ministers hold office unless and until they resign. If the prime minister resigns on behalf of the Government, the sovereign will invite the person who appears most likely to be able to command the confidence of the House to serve as prime minister and to form a government. |access-date=24 July 2016}}</ref> In practice, this is the leader of the political party that holds the largest number of seats in the Commons. The prime minister is ''[[ex officio]]'' also [[First Lord of the Treasury]] (prior to 1905 also the official title of the position), [[Minister for the Civil Service]], the minister responsible for [[national security]],<ref name="manual" />{{rp|p.22}} and [[Minister for the Union]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/minister-for-the-union |title=Minister for the Union |publisher= GOV.UK |accessdate=6 September 2022}}</ref> The prime minister's official residence and office, by virtue of being the First Lord of the Treasury, is [[10 Downing Street]] in London.<ref>{{Cite web|title=About us - Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street - GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street/about|access-date=25 March 2023|website=www.gov.uk|language=en}}</ref>
The position of Prime Minister was not created; it evolved slowly and erratically over three hundred years due to numerous acts of Parliament, political developments, and accidents of history. The office is therefore best understood from a historical perspective. The origins of the position are found in constitutional changes that occurred during the Revolutionary Settlement (1688–1720) and the resulting shift of political power from the Sovereign to Parliament. Although the Sovereign was not stripped of his or her ancient prerogatives and legally remained the head of government, politically it gradually became necessary for him or her to govern through a Prime Minister who could command a majority in Parliament.


Early conceptions of the office of prime minister evolved as the "[[Primus inter pares]]" or "first among equals", however that does not differentiate on status and responsibility upon whoever is holding office. Historically, the prime minister has never been the first among equals at any time prior to 1868. Until now, that characterisation of the prime minister is reflective of the democratic nature of their position. The power of the prime minister depends on the support of their respective party and on the popular mandate.<ref>{{Cite web |last=PoliticalScience |date=2021-05-26 |title=UK Prime Minister's Position - Political Systems |url=https://www.politicalscienceview.com/uk-prime-ministers-position/ |access-date=2024-11-12 |website=Political Science |language=en-US}}</ref> The appointment of [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|cabinet ministers]] and granting of [[Honours system in the United Kingdom|honours]] are done through the prime minister's [[power of appointment]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=How government works - GOV.UK |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/how-government-works#who-runs-government |access-date=2024-11-18 |website=www.gov.uk |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Governance |url=https://honours.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/about/governance/ |access-date=2024-11-18 |website=UK Honours System |language=en}}</ref> The prime minister alongside the cabinet proposes new legislation and decide on key policies that fit their agenda which is then passed by an [[act of parliament]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The executive |url=https://consoc.org.uk/the-constitution-explained/the-executive/ |access-date=2024-11-12 |website=The Constitution Society |language=en-GB}}</ref>
By the 1830s the Westminster System of government (or Cabinet Government) had emerged; the Prime Minister had become "first among equals" in the Cabinet and head of Her Majesty's Government. The political position of Prime Minister was enhanced by the development of modern political parties, the introduction of mass communication (inexpensive newspapers, radio, television and the internet), and photography. By the turn of the 20th century the modern premiership had emerged; the office had become the pre-eminent position in the constitutional hierarchy vis-a-vis the Sovereign, Parliament and Cabinet.


The power of the office of prime minister has grown significantly since the first prime minister, [[Robert Walpole]] in 1721. Prime ministerial power itself evolved gradually alongside the office itself which have played an increasingly prominent role in British politics since the early [[20th century]].<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Blick |first1=Andrew |last2=Jones |first2=George |date=2010-06-07 |title=The power of the Prime Minister |url=https://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-power-of-the-prime-minister |url-status=dead |website=History & Policy}}</ref> During the premierships of [[Tony Blair]] and [[Margaret Thatcher]], prime ministerial power expanded substantially and their leadership in the office were described as "presidential" due to their personal yielding of power and tight control over the cabinet.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Hayton |first1=Richard |url=https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/92565/3/HAYTON%20%26%20HEPPELL%20The%20Presidentialization%20of%20Party%20Politics%20in%20the%20UK.pdf |title=The Presidentialisation of Party Politics in the UK |last2=Heppell |first2=Timothy |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=9781137482457 |pages=5 |chapter=Constitutional structures and the party system in the UK |date=24 August 2015 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2010-09-08 |title=Why Tony Blair's Leadership Journey Failed |url=https://hbr.org/2010/09/why-tony-blairs-leadership-jou |access-date=2024-11-18 |work=Harvard Business Review |language=en |issn=0017-8012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Beckett |first=Charlie |date=2013-04-13 |title=Margaret Thatcher: how she reshaped politics and political communications |url=https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2013/04/08/margaret-thatcher-how-she-reshaped-politics-and-political-communications/ |url-status=dead |website=LSE Blogs}}</ref> The prime minister is regarded as one of the world's most powerful political leaders in modern times.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Koop |first=Avery |date=January 20, 2021 |title=History Visualized: The World Leaders In Positions of Power (1970-Today) |url=https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualized-world-leaders-in-positions-of-power/ |url-status=dead |website=Visual Capitalist}}</ref> As the leader of the [[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|world's sixth largest economy]], the prime minister hold significant domestic and international leadership alongside being the leader of a prominent member state of [[NATO]], the [[G7]] and [[G20]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Seldon |first=Anthony |title=The Impossible Office?: The History of the British Prime Minister |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2021 |isbn=978-1316515327 |publication-date=May 6, 2021 |pages=87}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Prime Minister to drive forward UK growth as he meets world's leading economic powers at G20 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/prime-minister-to-drive-forward-uk-growth-as-he-meets-worlds-leading-economic-powers-at-g20#:~:text=Prime%20Minister%20Keir%20Starmer%20said,values%20differ%20from%20o |access-date=2024-11-18 |website=GOV.UK |language=en}}</ref>
As leader of the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]], the Prime Minister's authority was further enhanced by the Parliament Act of 1911 which marginalised the influence of the [[House of Lords]] in the law-making process. The accretion of so much political power in one position gave rise to concerns that the office had become too "presidential", and that the Prime Minister was an "elected Monarch". Late in the 20th century several acts of Parliament and political changes placed some limits on the Premier's authority.


[[List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom|58 people]] (55 men and 3 women) have served as prime minister, the first of whom was [[Robert Walpole]] taking office on 3 April 1721. The [[List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom by length of tenure|longest-serving]] prime minister was also Walpole, who served over 20 years, and the shortest-serving was [[Liz Truss]], who served seven weeks. The current prime minister is [[Keir Starmer]], who succeeded [[Rishi Sunak]] on 5 July 2024, following the [[2024 United Kingdom general election|2024 general election]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Culbertson |first=Alix |date=2024-07-05 |title='Our work is urgent and we begin it today': Sir Keir Starmer says in first address as prime minister |url=https://news.sky.com/story/sir-keir-starmer-officially-becomes-uks-prime-minister-13173454 |access-date=2024-07-05 |website=[[Sky News]] |language=en}}</ref>
==Authority==
As the "Head of Her Majesty's Government" the modern Prime Minister leads the Cabinet (the [[Executive (government)|Executive]]). In addition the Prime Minister leads a major political party and generally commands a majority in the House of Commons (the lower house of the [[Legislature]]). As such the incumbent wields both legislative and executive powers. Under the British system there is a unity of powers rather than [[separation of powers|separation]].<ref>[[#Le May|Le May]], 98–99. Walter Bagehot, an authority on 19th century British government, said this unity is "the efficient secret" of its constitution. Bagehot's description of the "efficient part" of the British constitution is quoted by Le May and many other standard texts: "The efficient secret of the English Constitution may be described as the close union, the nearly complete fusion, of the executive and legislative powers. No doubt, by the traditional theory, as it exists in all the books, the goodness of our constitution consists in the entire separation of the legislative and executive authorities, but in truth its merit consists in their singular approximation. The connecting link is the Cabinet ... A Cabinet is a combing committee&nbsp;— a hyphen which joins a buckle which fastens the legislative part of the State to the executive part of the State. In its origin it belongs to the one, in its functions it belongs to the other."</ref> In the House of Commons, the Prime Minister guides the law-making process with the goal of enacting the legislative agenda of their political party. In an executive capacity the Prime Minister appoints (and may dismiss) all other cabinet members and [[minister (government)|ministers]], and co-ordinates the policies and activities of all government departments, and the staff of the Civil Service. The Prime Minister also acts as the public "face" and "voice" of Her Majesty's Government, both at home and abroad. Solely upon the advice of the Prime Minister, the Sovereign exercises many statutory and prerogative powers: they include the dissolution of Parliament; high judicial, political, official and [[Church of England]] ecclesiastical appointments; and the conferral of peerages, knighthoods, decorations and other honours.


==History==
==Constitutional background==
{{Main|History of the prime minister of the United Kingdom}}{{Expand section|date=November 2024}}[[File:Robert-Walpole-1st-Earl-of-Orford.jpg|thumb|upright=0.75|Sir [[Robert Walpole]] is generally considered to have been the first person to hold the position of Prime Minister.]]
{{Politics of the United Kingdom}}
The position of prime minister was not created; it evolved slowly and organically over three hundred years due to numerous [[Act of Parliament (UK)|Acts of Parliament]], political developments, and accidents of history. The office is therefore best understood from a historical perspective. The origins of the position are found in constitutional changes that occurred during the Revolutionary Settlement (1688–1720) and the resulting shift of political power from the sovereign to Parliament.<ref name="Evolution of Prime Minister">{{Cite news |title=George I |url=http://www.royal.gov.uk/HistoryoftheMonarchy/KingsandQueensoftheUnitedKingdom/TheHanoverians/GeorgeI.aspx |access-date=4 April 2014}}</ref>


==Powers and authority==
The British system of government is based on an [[Constitution of the United Kingdom|"unwritten" constitution]], meaning that it is much easier for the MPs to wipe their asses on.<ref>[[#King|King]], pages 3–8. King makes the point that much of the British constitution is in fact covered in brown stains making it unreadable. The distinctive feature of the British constitution, he says, is that it is not codified.</ref> Scattered across 800 years, the British constitution consists of many documents—such as [[Qu'ran]] (610), the [[Nazis]] (1933), and the [[Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949|Parliament Act]] (1911)—and, most important for the evolution of the office of Prime Minister, customs known as [[constitutional convention (political custom)|convention]]s that became accepted practice. In 1841, Prime Minister Lord Melbourne explained this feature of the British constitution in a letter to young Queen Victoria:
{{Main|Powers of the prime minister of the United Kingdom}}


=== Executive powers ===
:All the political part of the English Constitution is fully understood, and distinctly stated in Blackstone and many other books, but the Ministerial part, the work of conducting the executive government, has rested so much on practice, on usage, on understanding, that there is no particular publication to which reference can be made for the explanation and description of it. It is to be sought in debates, in protests, in letters, in memoirs, and wherever it can be picked up. <ref>[[#Le May|Le May]], p. 63</ref>
The prime minister is the head of the [[United Kingdom government]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Prime Minister |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/prime-minister |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171014185426/https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/prime-minister |archive-date=14 October 2017 |access-date=19 May 2018 |website=Gov.UK}}</ref> As such, the modern prime minister leads the Cabinet (the Executive). In addition, the prime minister leads a major political party and generally commands a majority in the House of Commons (the lower chamber of Parliament). The incumbent wields both significant legislative and executive powers. Under the British system, there is a [[Fusion of powers|unity of powers]] rather than [[separation of powers|separation]].<ref>[[#Le May|Le May]], 98–99. Walter Bagehot, an authority on 19th-century British government, said this unity is "the efficient secret" of its constitution. Bagehot's description of the "efficient part" of the British constitution is quoted by Le May and many other standard texts: "The efficient secret of the English Constitution may be described as the close union, the nearly complete fusion, of the executive and legislative powers. No doubt, by the traditional theory, as it exists in all the books, the goodness of our constitution consists in the entire separation of the legislative and executive authorities, but in truth, its merit consists in their singular approximation. The connecting link is the Cabinet ... A Cabinet is a combing committee—a hyphen which joins a buckle which fastens the legislative part of the State to the executive part of the State. In its origin, it belongs to the one, in its functions it belongs to the other."</ref> Walter Bagehot described the office of prime minister as the "keystone of the Cabinet arch" that maintained while the prime minister can hold significant power over the executive, it is often exercised collectively through the Cabinet (Government).{{Sfn|Bagehot|1867|p=67–68}}


Ministerial responsibility is also an aspect of a prime minister's executive authority. The prime minister leads the cabinet which makes the holder of that office bear responsibility for the collective conduct of the government. Professor Rodney Brazier points out that the since the prime minister wields significant sway over policy, that power must be subjected to the conclusion and input of Cabinet ministers. This prevents the office of prime minister from becoming more dominant and also ensures that executive power is authorised with broader support from and within the government.{{Sfn|Brazier|1988|p=52–53}} The prime minister must constantly maintain the confidence of the House of Commons because, as Bagehot notes, the power of the prime minister derives from their ability to command a majority in the House in order to pass legislation and continue the functions of government. If a prime minister loses the confidence of the House, which occurs in a vote of no confidence, they are often expected to resign from office or request the monarch dissolve parliament to call a general election.{{Sfn|Bagehot|1867|p=72–73}}
Almost one hundred years later, Prime Minister Herbert Asquith made the same point in his memoirs:
[[File:British-war-cabinet-1939-40-churchill-chamberlain.jpg|alt=fmr UK PM Chamberlain and cabinet|thumb|Prime Minister [[Neville Chamberlain]] alongside his [[Chamberlain war ministry|cabinet]] on the eve of [[World War II]] in September, 1939]]
[[File:PM visits school as government announces more free schools (16740506276).jpg|thumb|Prime Minister [[David Cameron]] announcing the approval of more [[Free school (England)|free schools]] across the country as a part of his education policy on 9 March 2015]]
The prime minister acts as the principal advisor to the monarch, who is the head of state, a capacity that has evolved gradually during the history of the office. Bagehot says that despite the monarch holding certain theoretical executive powers, in practice, these powers are often executed upon the advice and recommendation of the prime minister and the cabinet.{{Sfn|Bagehot|1867|p=73}} This is considered a major principle of the "unity of powers" that exists within a constitutional monarchy in which the monarch "reigns but does not rule". According to Brazier, the prime minister advises the monarch on matters such as the dissolution of parliament and appointments to the House of Lords, but these decisions are often made with the consent of parliament.{{Sfn|Brazier|1988|p=45–46}}


The prime minister leads the executive in directing government policy and maintaining coordination between government departments which is dependent upon the cooperation and consent of ministers.{{Sfn|Bagehot|1867|p=67–68}} Foreign policy and national security are areas in which the prime minister has traditionally enjoyed more authority under what are known as prerogative powers. Vernon Bogdanor argues that the abilities to declare war, negotiate treaties and deploy the armed forces have historically been part of the monarch's royal authority but have slowly evolved into a function of the office of prime minister. Despite this, the exercise of the prime minister's prerogative powers in these matters is under the oversight of parliament. It is often by convention that a prime minister must seek the approval of parliament before committing the nation to military action.{{Sfn|Bogdanor|1997|p=101–103}} In addition to this, the prime minister also exerts informal influence over public policy. Brazier notes this is due to the prime minister often being the leader of the largest party in government, therefore having a direct impact in initiating policy both in government and during election campaigns.{{Sfn|Brazier|1988|p=89}}
:In this country we live . . . under an unwritten Constitution. It is true that we have on the Statute-book great instruments like Magna Carta, the Petition of Right, and the Bill of Rights which define and secure many of our rights and privileges; but the great bulk of our constitutional liberties and . . . our constitutional practices do not derive their validity and sanction from any Bill which has received the formal assent of the King, Lords and Commons. They rest on usage, custom, convention, often of slow growth in their early stages, not always uniform, but which in the course of time received universal observance and respect. <ref>quoted in [[#Hanchant|Hanchant]], p. 209</ref>


=== Legislative powers ===
Until the 20th century the relationship between the Prime Minister vis-a-vis the Sovereign, Parliament and Cabinet was defined entirely by these unwritten conventions of the constitution. Despite its growing dominance in the constitutional hierarchy, the Premiership was given little formal recognition; the legal fiction was maintained that the Sovereign still governed directly. For example, many of the Prime Minister's executive and legislative powers are actually “[[royal prerogative]]s” and still formally vested in the Head of State, the [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|Sovereign]].<ref>[[#Low|Low]], p.155. In 1902, for example, Arthur Balfour said, "The Prime Minister has no salary as Prime Minister. He has no statutory duties as Prime Minister, his name occurs in no Acts of Parliament, and though holding the most important place in the constitutional hierarchy, he has no place which is recognized by the laws of his country. This is a strange paradox"</ref>
In the House of Commons, the prime minister guides the law-making process with the goal of enacting the legislative agenda of their political party. In an executive capacity, the prime minister appoints (and may dismiss) all other Cabinet members and [[minister (government)|ministers]], and co-ordinates the policies and activities of all government departments, and the staff of the Civil Service. The prime minister also acts as the public "face" and "voice" of His Majesty's Government, both at home and abroad. Solely upon the [[Advice (constitutional)|advice]] of the prime minister, the sovereign exercises many statutory and prerogative powers, including high judicial, political, official and [[Church of England]] ecclesiastical appointments; the conferral of peerages and some knighthoods, decorations and other important honours.<ref>[[#Barnett|Barnett]], pp. 245–246</ref>
[[File:Lord-Palmerston-Addressing-The-House-Of-Commons-During-The-Debates-On-The-Treaty-Of-France-In-February-1860,-1863.jpg|alt=fmr UK PM Palmerston|thumb|Prime Minister [[Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston|Lord Palmerston]] during a debate in [[Parliament of the United Kingdom|Parliament]] over the [[Cobden–Chevalier Treaty]] in February, 1860]]
Bagehot identifies the prime minister as the leader of the "efficient" part of government that functions within the government to steer legislation through both Houses of Parliament. Although the prime minister does not possess the power to introduce legislation directly, their control of the cabinet and their role as leader of the largest political party in the House of Commons enables them substantial influence over any legislative agenda. Bagehot points out that this power is based on the prime minister's ability to operate the "machinery of government" that allows them to guide legislation that align with their party's political and ideological priorities.{{Sfn|Bagehot|1867|p=72}} Brazier argues that the legislative power of the prime minister has greatly expanded following the post-war period and that as a result, the prime minister now directly authorises supervision over government bills and has a consequential role in the introduction of legislation.{{Sfn|Brazier|1988|p=102}}


The prime minister is able to wield considerable power in the passing of legislation through their ability to manage party discipline and cohesion in voting patterns. Bogdanor states that this largely depends upon the prime minister being the leader of the largest party in the Commons, which can pass legislation without any or little resistance if they can command the confidence of the House. This aspect of prime ministerial power is informal and often carried out by the office of Whips, who makes sure that MPs remain loyal and vote on the government line.{{Sfn|Bogdanor|1997|p=211}} The political scientist [[Anthony King (political scientist)|Anthony King]] said that the prime minister's influence over legislation is further solidified through their ability to shape policy before it reaches parliament. King further argued that the shaping of legislation, on many occasions, involves the collaborative efforts of cabinet ministers and civil servants, but the prime minister's approval is needed in order to initiate the legislative agenda. King's analysis of contemporary politcs showed that some prime ministers often bypass or overrule the cabinet on traditional discussion and to push through their preferred agendas with notable cases such as Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.{{Sfn|King|2010|p=145}}
Under this arrangement Britain might appear to have two executives: the Prime Minister and Sovereign. The concept of "[[the Crown]]" resolves this paradox.<ref>[[#Low|Low]], p. 255 "There is no distinction", said Gladstone, "more vital to the practice of the British constitution or to the right judgment upon it than the distinction between the Sovereign and the Crown."</ref> The Crown symbolises the state’s authority to govern: to make laws and execute them, impose taxes and collect them, declare war and make peace. Before the "[[Glorious Revolution]]" of 1688 the Sovereign wore the Crown and exercised the powers it symbolises. Afterwards Parliament gradually forced Sovereigns to assume a neutral political position. Parliament placed the Crown in "commission", entrusting its authority to responsible Ministers (the Prime Minister and Cabinet), accountable for their policies and actions to Parliament and the people. Although the Sovereign still wears the Crown and her prerogative powers are still legally intact,<ref group=note>The Sovereign's prerogative powers are sometimes called [[reserve powers]]. They include the sole authority to dismiss a Prime Minister and government of the day in extremely rare and exceptional circumstances, and other essential powers (such as the veto, and summoning, proroguing and dissolving Parliament) to preserve the stability of the nation. Reserve powers are available to her to use without the consent of Parliament. She also, through her various Governor Generals in the Commonwealth nations, has various and differed reserve powers in each realm. Reserve powers, in practice, are the court of absolute last resort in resolving situations that fundamentally threaten the security and stability of the nation as a whole and are almost never used. [[Elizabeth II]] has never used her reserve powers.</ref> Parliament has removed her from everyday governance, leaving her in practice with three constitutional rights: to be kept informed, to advise, and to warn.<ref>[[#Bagehot|Bagehot]], p. 67</ref><ref>[[#Low|Low]], pages 255–258.</ref>


=== Parliamentary powers ===
==Foundations of the office of Prime Minister==
[[File:G7 leaders signing statement against Terrorism at the 2017 Taormina Summit.jpg|thumb|Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] (in the middle) alongside [[G7]] leaders signing statement against Terrorism at the [[2017 Taormina summit]]]]
===Revolutionary settlement===
The prime minister's influence in the [[Palace of Westminster|Houses of Parliament]] is derived from longstanding conventions and statutes that have gradually evolved through the centuries. The office of prime minister itself is not explicitly mentioned in parliamentary law but is developed by constitutional conventions and therefore it is defined by precedent and tradition. Bogdanor notes that the prime minister's power in parliament is exhibited by their control of the executive (the Cabinet) and their ability to influence the legislative agenda.{{Sfn|Bogdanor|2009|p=85}} The ability of the prime minister to influence legislation, according to academic [[Philip Norton, Baron Norton of Louth|Philip Norton]], is often through party discipline and having a reliable majority of MPs who vote in support of the government's priorities.{{Sfn|Norton|2011|p=126}}
Because the Premiership was not intentionally created, there is no exact date when its evolution began. A meaningful starting point, however, is 1688-9 when [[James II of England|James II]] fled [[Kingdom of England|England]] and the [[Parliament of England]] confirmed William and Mary as joint constitutional monarchs, enacting legislation that limited their authority and that of their successors: the [[Bill of Rights 1689|Bill of Rights (1689)]], the [[Mutiny Acts|Mutiny Bill]] (1689), the [[Triennial Acts|Triennial Bill]] (1694), the [[Treason Act 1695|Treason Act (1696)]] and the [[Act of Settlement 1701|Act of Settlement (1701)]].<ref>[[#Knappen|Knappen]], pages 448–451.</ref> Known collectively as the Revolutionary Settlement, these acts transformed the constitution, shifting the balance of power from the Sovereign to Parliament. They also provided the basis for the evolution of the office of Prime Minister, which did not exist at that time.


Another essential part of the parliamentary powers possessed by the prime minister is determining the composition of the Cabinet. According to Professor Robert Hazell, the prime minister not only chooses cabinet members but also dictates the collective decision-making process of members as well. The prime minister most often would chair cabinet meetings and may determine their frequency, thereby controlling the agenda for policy and steering decisions in their preferred direction.{{Sfn|Hazell|2012|p=35}} Additionally, the prime minister can exercise considerable control over parliamentary time. Authors Alexander Horne and Gavin Drewry state that the prime minister uses this power through the [[Leader of the House of Commons]], by which they are able to allocate time for government bills and often ensuring access to this time over private members' bills.{{Sfn|Drewry|Horne|2018|p=94}}
===Treasury Bench===
The Revolutionary Settlement gave the Commons control over finances and legislation and changed the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature. For want of money, Sovereigns had to summon Parliament annually and could no longer dissolve or prorogue it without its advice and consent. Parliament became a permanent feature of political life.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], pages 371–373</ref> The veto fell into disuse because Sovereigns feared that if they denied legislation Parliament would deny them money. No Sovereign has denied [[royal assent]] since Queen Anne vetoed the [[Scottish Militia Bill 1708|Scottish Militia Bill]] in 1708.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], p. 382</ref>


The prime minister's parliamentary powers also extend to foreign relations. Contemporary historian [[Anthony Seldon]] says that the prime minister acts as the main representative of the government in the international sphere, including in parliament, where treaties are ratified and international commitments are debated.{{Sfn|Seldon|2017|p=163}}{{full citation needed|date=November 2024}}
[[File:British House of Commons 1834.jpg|left|thumb|Late in the 17th century Treasury Ministers began to attend the Commons regularly. They were given a reserved place, called the Treasury Bench, to the Speaker's right where the Prime Minister and senior Cabinet members sit today]]


=== Prerogative powers ===
Treasury officials and other department heads were drawn into Parliament serving as liaisons between it and the Sovereign. Ministers had to present the government's policies, and negotiate with Members to gain the support of the majority; they had to explain the government's financial needs, suggest ways of meeting them and give an account of how money had been spent. The Sovereign’s representatives attended Commons sessions so regularly that they were given reserved seats at the front, known as the Treasury Bench. This is the beginning of "unity of powers": the Sovereign's Ministers (the Executive) became leading members of Parliament (the Legislature). Today the Prime Minister ([[First Lord of the Treasury]]), the [[Chancellor of the Exchequer]] (responsible for [[United Kingdom budget|The Budget]]) and other senior members of the Cabinet sit on the Treasury bench and present policies in much the same way Ministers did late in the 17th century.
[[File:The House of Commons 1793-94 by Karl Anton Hickel.jpg|thumb|Prime Minister [[William Pitt the Younger]] addressing the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] on the outbreak of [[War of the First Coalition|war with France]] in 1793]]
The most significant powers given to the prime minister are "prerogative powers". These are a set of constitutional privileges deriving from monarchial authority that have gradually evolved into tools of executive power managed by the prime minister and the government. Bagehot famously called the British system as one where "the executive power is now yielded by the prime minister" rather than the monarch, a shift from personal to political power. Prerogative powers allow the prime minister to act without the immediate or direct consent of parliament especially in circumstances such as declaring war, deployment of troops and the granting of honours.{{Sfn|Bagehot|1867|p=63}}


Brazier argues that prerogative powers allow the prime minister to act within the "authority of the crown" in situations where neither convention nor statutory law applies. As noted by both Bagehot and Brazier, areas in which the prime minister authorises their given prerogative powers are matters of foreign affairs. In recent occasions, the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]] saw Prime Minister Tony Blair deploying British troops to [[Saudi Arabia]] without the immediate consent or approval of parliament.<ref>{{Cite web |title=20 years since Parliament approved military action in Iraq – Parliamentary Affairs special collection |url=https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/journal/parliamentary-affairs-special-iraq-vote-20-years |access-date=2024-11-12 |website=www.hansardsociety.org.uk}}</ref> Brazier says the rise of parliamentary and public scrutiny has led to calls for reform and checks on the use of prerogative powers.{{Sfn|Brazier|1988|p=132}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-01-01 |title=Parliamentary approval for military action |url=https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/parliamentary-approval-military-action |access-date=2024-11-12 |website=Institute for Government |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Mills |first=Claire |date=14 October 2024 |title=Military action: Parliament's role |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10001/CBP-10001.pdf |url-status=dead |website=House of Commons Library}}</ref> The only prime minister who did not seek parliamentary or legal consent for military action was [[Anthony Eden]] during the [[Suez Crisis]] in 1956.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Letter: Didn't Eden lie repeatedly in parliament over Suez? |url=https://www.ft.com/content/d0e72934-eb37-44b2-a712-5a2340e01f5d |access-date=2024-11-12 |website=www.ft.com |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Norton-Taylor |first=Richard |date=2006-12-01 |title=Lawyers warned Eden that Suez invasion was illegal |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/dec/01/egypt.past |access-date=2024-11-12 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref>
===Standing Order 66===
After the Revolution there was a constant threat that non-government members of Parliament would ruin the country's finances by proposing ill-considered money bills. Vying for control to avoid chaos the Crown's Ministers gained an advantage in 1706 when the Commons informally declared, "That this House will receive no petition for any sum of money relating to public Service, but what is recommended from the Crown." On 11 June 1713 this non-binding rule became Standing Order 66: that "the Commons would not vote money for any purpose, except on a motion of a Minister of the Crown." Standing Order 66 remains in effect today (though renumbered as no. 48),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmstords/2/2.pdf |date=16 December 2009 |page=65 |title=Standing Orders of the House of Commons |format=PDF |location=London, United Kingdom |publisher=Parliament of the United Kingdom}}</ref> essentially unchanged for three hundred years.<ref>[[#Roseveare|Roseveare]], p.80.</ref>


Professors Mark Elliot and Robert Thomas argue that prerogative powers present a constitutional anomaly in the 21st century. Both contend that such powers lack direct democratic legitimacy due to not being regulated by parliamentary statutes and raise concerns over accountability. Elliot and Thomas have pointed out that judicial intervention in cases such as [[R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union|Miller I]] and [[R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland|Miller II]], where the [[Supreme Court of the United Kingdom|Supreme Court]] exercised scrutiny over the use of prerogative powers by the government to prorogue parliament during the [[Britain's withdrawal from the EU|United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union]], was successful in keeping check over the authority of both the prime minister and the government.{{sfn|Thomas|Elliot|2020|p=249}} The evolving usage of prerogative powers also has signalled tension between tradition and accountability. Authors Paul Craig and Adam Tomkins state that the absence of a written constitution gives a prime minister greater leeway in employing their given prerogative powers without limits that in turn would create uncertainty although the use of such powers by the prime minister is often constrained by political convention than by law.{{Sfn|Craig|Tomkins|2005|p=306}}
Empowering Ministers with sole financial initiative had an immediate and lasting impact. Apart from achieving its intended purpose&nbsp;– to stabilise the budgetary process&nbsp;– it gave the Crown a leadership role in the Commons; and, the [[Lord Treasurer]] assumed a leading position among Ministers.


==Constitutional background==
The power of financial initiative was not, however, absolute. Only Ministers might initiate money bills, but Parliament now reviewed and consented to them. Standing Order 66 therefore represents the beginnings of Ministerial responsibility and accountability.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], pages 372–373</ref>
{{Main|Constitution of the United Kingdom}}
{{Politics of the United Kingdom}}
The British system of government is based on an [[Constitution of the United Kingdom|uncodified constitution]], meaning that it is not set out in any single document.<ref>[[#King|King]], pp. 3–8. King makes the point that much of the British constitution is in fact written and that no constitution is written down in its entirety. The distinctive feature of the British constitution, he says, is that it is not codified.</ref> The British constitution consists of many documents, and most importantly for the evolution of the office of the prime minister, it is based on customs known as [[constitutional convention (political custom)|constitutional conventions]] that became accepted practice. In 1928, Prime Minister [[H. H. Asquith]] described this characteristic of the British constitution in his memoirs:<blockquote>In this country we live ... under an unwritten Constitution. It is true that we have on the Statute-book great instruments like Magna Carta, the Petition of Right, and the Bill of Rights which define and secure many of our rights and privileges; but the great bulk of our constitutional liberties and ... our constitutional practices do not derive their validity and sanction from any Bill which has received the formal assent of the King, Lords and Commons. They rest on usage, custom, convention, often of slow growth in their early stages, not always uniform, but which in the course of time received universal observance and respect.<ref>Quoted in [[#Hanchant|Hanchant]], p. 209</ref>
</blockquote>


The relationships between the prime minister and the sovereign, Parliament and Cabinet are defined largely by these unwritten conventions of the constitution. Many of the prime minister's executive and legislative powers are actually [[royal prerogative]]s which are still formally vested in the [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|sovereign]], who remains the [[head of state]].<ref>[[#Low|Low]], p.155. In 1902, for example, Arthur Balfour said, "The prime minister has no salary as prime minister. He has no statutory duties as prime minister, his name occurs in no Acts of Parliament, and though holding the most important place in the constitutional hierarchy, he has no place which is recognized by the laws of his country. This is a strange paradox"</ref> Despite its growing dominance in the constitutional hierarchy, the premiership was given little formal recognition until the 20th century; the [[legal fiction]] was maintained that the sovereign still governed directly. The position was first mentioned in statute only in 1917, in the schedule of the [[Chequers Estate Act 1917|Chequers Estate Act]]. Increasingly during the 20th century, the office and role of prime minister featured in [[statute law]] and official documents; however, the prime minister's powers and relationships with other institutions still largely continue to derive from ancient royal prerogatives and historic and modern constitutional conventions. Prime ministers continue to hold the position of [[First Lord of the Treasury]] and, since November 1968, that of [[Minister for the Civil Service]], the latter giving them authority over the [[Civil Service (United Kingdom)|civil service]].
The term "Prime Minister" appears at this time as an unofficial title for the leader of the government, usually the head of the Treasury.<ref>[[#Dodd|Dodd]], p 50 There are a few instances of the use of "Prime" or "First" Minister in the 17th century. After the Restoration in 1660, for example, Lord Clarendon was encouraged to assume the title of "First Minister" in the new government rather than accept a specific office. According to the Duke of Ormonde, however, "He (Clarendon) could not consent to enjoy a pension out of the Exchequer under no other title or pretense but being First Minister . . . [an office] so newly translated out of French into English that it was not enough understood to be liked and everyone would detest it for the burden it was attended with."</ref> Jonathan Swift, for example, wrote in 1713 about "those who are now commonly called Prime Minister among us", referring to [[Sidney Godolphin, 1st Earl of Godolphin]] and [[Robert Harley, 1st Earl of Oxford and Mortimer|Robert Harley]], [[Anne of Great Britain|Queen Anne's]] Lord Treasurers and chief ministers.<ref>[[#Marriott|Mariott]], p. 87.</ref> Since 1721, every head of the Sovereign's government&nbsp;– with one exception in the 18th century ([[William Pitt the Elder]]) and one in the 19th ([[Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury|Lord Salisbury]])&nbsp;– has been First Lord of the Treasury.


Under this arrangement, Britain might appear to have two executives: the prime minister and the sovereign. The concept of "[[the Crown]]" resolves this paradox.<ref>[[#Low|Low]], p. 255 "There is no distinction," said Gladstone, "more vital to the practice of the British constitution or to the right judgement upon it than the distinction between the Sovereign and the Crown."</ref> The Crown symbolises the state's authority to govern: to make laws and execute them, impose taxes and collect them, declare war and make peace. Before the "[[Glorious Revolution]]" of 1688, the sovereign exclusively wielded the powers of the Crown; afterwards, Parliament gradually forced monarchs to assume a neutral political position. Parliament has effectively dispersed the powers of the Crown, entrusting its authority to responsible ministers (the prime minister and Cabinet), accountable for their policies and actions to Parliament, in particular the elected [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]].
===Beginnings of the Prime Minister's party leadership===
The modern Prime Minister is the leader of a major political party with millions of followers. In the general election of 1997, for example, 13.5&nbsp;million people voted for the [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]] led by [[Tony Blair]]; 9.6&nbsp;million for the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]], led by [[John Major]], the previous Prime Minister; and, 5.2&nbsp;million for the [[Liberal Democrats|Liberal Democrat Party]] led by [[Paddy Ashdown]]. Generally agreeing on policies, party leaders and their supporters suppress their differences of opinion at the polls for the sake of gaining a majority of seats in the Commons and being able to form a government.


Although many of the sovereign's prerogative powers are still legally intact,{{refn|The Sovereign's prerogative powers are sometimes called [[reserve power]]s. They include the sole authority to dismiss a prime minister and government of the day in extremely rare and exceptional circumstances, and other powers such as withholding [[Royal Assent]], and summoning and proroguing Parliament. These reserve powers can be exercised without the consent of Parliament. While formally discretionary, the exercise of these powers is heavily limited by convention.|group=n}} constitutional conventions have removed the monarch from day-to-day governance, with ministers exercising the royal prerogatives, leaving the monarch in practice with three constitutional rights: to be kept informed, to advise and to warn.<ref>[[#Bagehot|Bagehot]], p. 67</ref><ref>[[#Low|Low]], pp 255–258</ref>
Political parties first appeared during the [[Exclusion Crisis]] of 1678–1681. The [[Whig (British political party)|Whigs]], who believed in [[limited monarchy]], wanted to exclude [[James II of England|James Stuart]] from succeeding to the throne because he was a Catholic. The [[Tories (political faction)|Tories]], who believed in the "[[Divine Right of Kings]]", defended James' hereditary claim. These parties dominated British politics for over 150 years, with the Whigs evolving into the [[Liberal Party (UK)|Liberal Party]] and the Tories into the Conservative. Even today, Conservatives are often called "Tories".


==Modern premiership==
Political parties were not well organised or disciplined in the 17th century. They were more like factions with "members" drifting in and out, collaborating temporarily on issues when it was to their advantage, then disbanding when it was not. A major deterrent to the development of opposing parties was the idea that there could only be one "King's Party" and to oppose it would be disloyal or even treasonous. This idea lingered throughout the 18th century. Nevertheless it became possible at the end of the 17th century to identify Parliaments and Ministries as being either "Whig" or "Tory" in composition.
===Appointment===
In modern times, much of the process involving prime ministerial appointments is informally governed by [[Constitutional conventions of the United Kingdom|constitutional conventions]] and with the rules and processes described by authoritative sources such as [[Cabinet Manual (United Kingdom)|The Cabinet Manual]].{{Refn|Paragraphs 2.7 to 2.20 and 3.1 to 3.2.}}
[[File:The Queen and Tony Blair 6 May 2005 (7139078283).jpg|thumb|[[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]] receiving Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]] after winning a third term in office on 6 May 2005]]
The prime minister is appointed by the monarch, through the exercise of the [[Royal prerogative in the United Kingdom|royal prerogative]].<ref>{{cite web|author=[[Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Select Committee|Public Administration Select Committee]]|title=Taming the Prerogative: Strengthening Ministerial Accountability to Parliament. Fourth Report of Session 2003–04|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmpubadm/422/422.pdf|publisher=Parliament of the United Kingdom|page=4}}</ref> In the past, the monarch has used personal choice to dismiss or appoint a prime minister (the last time being in 1834), but it is now the convention that the monarch should not be drawn into party politics.<ref name="manual">{{cite web |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/60641/cabinet-manual.pdf |title=The Cabinet Manual |date=October 2011 |publisher=Cabinet Office |edition=1st}}</ref>{{rp|3}} Bogdanor states that throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, the monarch often appointed the prime minister based on their personal preference, regardless of whether they have great or little public support.{{Sfn|Bogdanor|2009|p=45–49}}


If a prime minister (incumbent or otherwise) leads their party to victory in a [[general election]] and gains an overall majority in the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] they will be invited by the monarch to form a new government.<ref>{{Cite web |date=4 July 2024 |title=How is a Prime Minister appointed? |url=https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/how-is-a-prime-minister-appointed-2/ |website=House of Commons Library}}</ref> Following the invitation, the prime minister will be driven to [[Buckingham Palace]] to meet the monarch.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Keir Starmer's first meeting with King Charles after election |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cxx29w75x01o |access-date=2024-10-08 |website=www.bbc.com |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Reporter |first=James Crawford-Smith Royal |date=2024-07-05 |title=King Charles appoints Sir Keir Starmer as his third prime minister |url=https://www.newsweek.com/king-charles-appoints-sir-keir-starmer-third-prime-minister-photos-1921356 |access-date=2024-10-08 |website=Newsweek |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-05 |title=The UK election winner only becomes prime minister when King Charles III says so |url=https://apnews.com/article/uk-general-election-starmer-labour-king-charles-53dc545af3b52e9d5332d0047835f5f6 |access-date=2024-10-08 |website=AP News |language=en}}</ref> The meeting between the monarch and the incoming prime minister is a moment for the latter to pledge their loyalty to the monarch and seek permission to form a new government. The prime minister is expected to bow before the monarch in a ceremony known as "[[kissing hands]]". Following this, the prime minister is officially appointed the head of His Majesty's government.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2024-07-05 |title=What is 'Kissing the Hand' ceremony in UK politics? |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/uk/what-is-kissing-the-hand-ceremony-in-uk-politics/articleshow/111521482.cms?from=mdr |access-date=2024-10-07 |work=The Economic Times |issn=0013-0389}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Ilse |first=Jess |date=2024-07-05 |title=Kissing hands: how King Charles will oversee an ancient tradition that turns Sir Keir Starmer into Prime Minister |url=https://royalcentral.co.uk/royal-news/kissing-hands-how-king-charles-will-oversee-an-ancient-tradition-that-turns-sir-keir-starmer-into-prime-minister-200766/ |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=Royal Central |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Maitland |first=Hayley |date=2024-07-05 |title=What, Exactly, Is The "Kissing The Hands" Ceremony That King Charles & Keir Starmer Are About To Take Part In? |url=https://www.vogue.co.uk/article/kissing-the-hands-ceremony-king-prime-minister |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=British Vogue |language=en-GB}}</ref>
===Cabinet===
The modern Prime Minister is also the leader of the Cabinet. A convention of the constitution, the modern Cabinet is a group of ministers who formulate policies. As the political heads of government departments Cabinet Ministers ensure that policies are carried out by permanent civil servants. Although the modern Prime Minister selects Ministers, appointment still rests with the Sovereign. With the Prime Minister as its leader, the Cabinet forms the [[executive branch]] of government.<ref group=note>Once in office, the Prime Minister fills not only Cabinet level positions but many other government offices (up to 90 appointments), selected mostly from the House of Commons, distributing them to party members, partly as a reward for their loyalty. The power to make so many appointments to government offices is one of the most effective means the Prime Minister has of maintaining party discipline in the Commons.</ref>


The prime minister "...holds that position by virtue of his or her ability to command the confidence of the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]], which in turn commands the confidence of the electorate, as expressed through a [[List of United Kingdom general elections|general election]]."<ref name="manual" />{{rp|3.1}} By convention, [[List of United Kingdom Parliament constituencies represented by sitting prime ministers|the prime minister is also an MP]] and is normally the leader of the [[List of political parties in the United Kingdom|political party]] that commands a [[Majority government|majority]] in the House of Commons.<ref name="manual" />{{rp|3.1}}{{refn|During the history of the modern office, five men have served as Prime Minister in both the House of Commons and House of Lords; four moved from serving in the Commons to accept a peerage, while the fifth disclaimed his peerage after his appointment and contested [[1963 Kinross and Western Perthshire by-election|a by-election]] to become an MP.|group=n}}
The term "Cabinet" first appears after the Revolutionary Settlement to describe those ministers who conferred privately with the Sovereign. The growth of the Cabinet met with widespread complaint and opposition because its meetings were often held in secret and it excluded the ancient [[Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council|Privy Council]] from the Sovereign's circle of advisers, reducing it to an honorary body.<ref>[[#Dodd|Dodd]], p. 79. In 1691, for example, a Lord protested, that "'Cabinet-Council' is not a word to be found in our Law-books. We know it not before: we took it for a nick-name. Nothing can fall out more unhappily, than to have a distinction made of the 'Cabinet' and 'Privy-Council' ... If some of the Privy-Council men be trusted, and some not, to whom is a gentleman to apply? Must he ask, "Who is a Cabinet-Counsellor? ... I am sure, these distinctions of some being more trusted than others have given great dissatisfaction.”</ref> The early Cabinet, like that of today, included the Treasurer and other department heads who sat on the Treasury bench. However, it might also include individuals who were not members of Parliament such as household officers (i.e. the Master of the Horse) and members of the royal family. The exclusion of non-members of Parliament from the Cabinet was essential to the development of ministerial accountability and responsibility.


===Prime Minister's Office===
Both William and Anne appointed and dismissed Cabinet members, attended meetings, made decisions, and followed up on actions. Relieving the Sovereign of these responsibilities and gaining control over the Cabinet's composition was an essential part of evolution of the Premiership. This process began after the Hanoverian Succession. Although [[George I of Great Britain|George I]] (1714–1727) attended Cabinet meetings at first, after 1717 he withdrew because he did not speak English and was bored with the discussions. [[George II of Great Britain|George II]] (1727–1760) occasionally presided at Cabinet meetings but his grandson, [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]] (1760–1820), is known to have attended only two during his 60 year reign. Thus, the convention that Sovereigns do not attend Cabinet meetings was established primarily through royal indifference to the everyday tasks of governance. The Prime Minister became responsible for calling meetings, presiding, taking notes, and reporting to the Sovereign. These simple executive tasks naturally gave the Prime Minister ascendancy over his Cabinet colleagues.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], p. 383.</ref>
{{main|10 Downing Street}}


The Prime Minister's Office helps the prime minister to 'establish and deliver the government's overall strategy and policy priorities, and to communicate the government's policies to Parliament, the public and international audiences'.<ref>{{Cite web |title=What the Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street does |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street |access-date=20 February 2021 |website=gov.uk |quote=The office helps the Prime Minister to establish and deliver the government's overall strategy and policy priorities, and to communicate the government's policies to Parliament, the public and international audiences.}}</ref> The Prime Minister's Office is formally part of the Cabinet Office, but the boundary between its work and that of the wider Cabinet Office can be unclear;<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Role and Status of the Prime Minister's Office inquiry launched |url=https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/327/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/news/119922/the-role-and-status-of-the-prime-ministers-office-inquiry-launched |access-date=20 February 2021 |website=parliament.uk |quote=Nominally, it is a part of the Cabinet Office, yet it is largely operationally distinct. Its functional relationship with the Cabinet Office is unclear.}}; {{Cite web |last=[[Constitution Committee]] |date=29 January 2010 |title=The Cabinet Office and the Centre of Government |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldselect/ldconst/30/30.pdf |access-date=20 February 2021 |page=9 |quote=Evidence conflicted about the relationship between the Cabinet Office and the Prime Minister's Office. In the view of some witnesses, the boundary between the two was blurred... Dr Richard Heffernan, Reader in Government, Open University, claimed that "we do not know where the Prime Minister's Department begins and where the Cabinet Office ends".}}</ref> the wider Cabinet Office might carry out very similar work. [[Peter Hennessy]] has claimed that this overall arrangement means there is in fact effectively a Prime Minister's Department, though it is not called this.<ref>{{Cite web |last=[[House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee]] |date=19 June 2014 |title=Role and powers of the Prime Minister |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmpolcon/351/351.pdf |access-date=20 February 2021 |page=34 |quote=One way forward would be to create a Prime Minister's Department—either as a separate entity or as a formal department combined with the Cabinet Office. Lord Hennessy believed that, in practice, there was already a Prime Minister's Department, but it was simply not referred to in those terms: "I am reluctant for a Prime Minister's Department to exist, being a traditionalist, but it does. It is there. It is the department that dare not speak its name."}}</ref>
Although the first three Hanoverians rarely attended Cabinet meetings they insisted on their prerogatives to appoint and dismiss ministers and to direct policy even if from outside the Cabinet. It was not until late in the 18th century that Prime Ministers gained control over Cabinet composition (see section [[#Emergence of Cabinet government|Emergence of Cabinet Government]] below).


The Prime Minister's Office was officially created in 1916 by [[David Lloyd George]] during the [[World War I]], which marked the first formal recognition of the office of prime minister and established it as an independent institution from other entities within government, with staff to support the coordination of government policy. This development came as a response to the demands of wartime governance, as Lloyd George's leadership needed a more centred and efficient executive function.{{Sfn|Brazier|2008|p=214}}
==="One Party Government"===
British governments (or Ministries) are generally formed by one party. The Prime Minister and Cabinet are usually all members of the same political party, almost always the one that has a majority of seats in the House of Commons. Coalition governments (a ministry that consists of representatives from two or more parties) and minority governments (a one-party ministry formed by a party that does not command a majority in the Commons) are relatively rare. "One party government", as this system is sometimes called, has been the general rule for almost three hundred years.


===Prime Minister's Questions===
Early in his reign, [[William III of England|William]] (1689–1702) preferred "Mixed Ministries" (or coalitions) consisting of both Tories and Whigs. William thought this composition would dilute the power of any one party and also give him the benefit of differing points of view. However, this approach did not work well because the members could not agree on a leader or on policies, and often worked at odds with each other.
{{main|Prime Minister's Questions}}


Prime Minister's Questions is a [[constitutional convention (political custom)|constitutional convention]], currently held as a single session every Wednesday at noon when the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] is sitting, in which the prime minister answers questions from [[Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)|members of Parliament]] (MPs). The leader of the opposition usually asks the prime minister six questions, and the leader of the third-largest parliamentary party can ask two questions. It is an occasion when the prime minister appears regularly on live television and radio.
In 1697, William formed a homogeneous Whig ministry. Known as the ''Junto'', this government is often cited as the first true Cabinet because its members were all Whigs, reflecting the majority composition of the Commons.<ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], pages 75–76.</ref>
[[File:Prime Minister's Questions, 4 September 2024 13.jpg|thumb|The current Prime Minister, [[Keir Starmer]], speaking in the House of Commons on 4 September 2024]]
Before the 1880s, oral questions were mainly directed towards cabinet ministers and therefore such questions were regarded as the same even when addressed to the Prime Minister. The session in its modern form was first introduced on Tuesday 24 October in 1961 when the then Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan]] answered questions for between 15 minutes from 3.15pm to 3.30pm as an experiment. Since 1997 PMQs were held every Wednesdays at 3pm until 3.30pm.<ref>{{Cite web |date=21 October 2011 |title=50 years of Prime Minister's Questions |url=https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/news-by-year/2011/october1/50-years-of-pmqs/ |website=UK Parliament |access-date=7 October 2024 |archive-date=7 October 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241007143219/https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/news-by-year/2011/october1/50-years-of-pmqs/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> In 1989, the first PMQs were broadcast and in 1990 were broadcast live to the public as a step towards transparency and accountability.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Baldwin |first=Sian |date=2024-07-24 |title=When do the next Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs) take place? |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/prime-ministers-questions-pmqs-next-date-b1117391.html |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=Evening Standard |language=en}}</ref>


The timing of PMQs has often changed depending on the varied schedules of prime ministers.<ref>{{Cite web |title=BBC Politics 97 |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/politics97/news/05/0509/questions.shtml |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=www.bbc.co.uk}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-05-22 |title=Prime minister's questions (PMQs) |url=https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/prime-ministers-questions-pmqs |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=Institute for Government |language=en}}</ref> In 1881, questions addressed to the prime minister were placed at the end of question time so that the then 72-year old Prime Minister William Gladstone could arrive late. In 1904, questions were answered only when they reached No 51 and in 1940 they were expanded to No 45. The procedure was in practice until 1953 when PMQs were restricted to Tuesdays and Thursdays only to assist Winston Churchill who was 78-years old.<ref>{{Cite news |last=White |first=Michael |date=2011-10-27 |title=The history of PMQs |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/oct/27/history-pmqs-prime-ministers-commons |access-date=2024-10-07 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref>
Anne (1702–1714) followed this pattern but preferred Tory Cabinets. This approach worked well as long as Parliament was also predominantly Tory. However, in 1708, when the Whigs obtained a majority, Anne did not call on them to form a government, refusing to accept the idea that politicians could force themselves on her merely because their party had a majority.<ref>[[#Dodd|Dodd]], p.66 "Is it not hard" Anne said, "that men of sense and honour will not promote the good of their country, because everything in the world is not done as they desire?"</ref> She never parted with an entire Ministry or accepted an entirely new one regardless of the results of an election. Anne preferred to retain a minority government rather than be dictated to by Parliament. Consequently, her chief ministers [[Sidney Godolphin, 1st Earl of Godolphin]] and [[Robert Harley, 1st Earl of Oxford and Mortimer|Robert Harley]], who were called "Prime Minister" by some, had difficulty executing policy in the face of a hostile Parliament.<ref name="Smith, pages 379–382"/><ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], p. 76–83.</ref>


The prime minister also appears before the [[Liaison Committee (House of Commons of the United Kingdom)|Liaison Committee]] to answer questions about public policy.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmstords/0002/body.htm#145 |title=Standing Orders of the House of Commons |work=Parliament.UK |access-date=7 July 2021 |quote=Standing Order 145(2)The committee may also hear evidence from the Prime Minister on matters of public policy.}}</ref>
William's and Anne's experiments with the political composition of the Cabinet illustrated the strengths of one party government and the weaknesses of coalition and minority governments. Nevertheless, it was not until the 1830s that the constitutional convention was established that the Sovereign must select the Prime Minister (and Cabinet) from the party whose views reflect those of the majority in Parliament. Since then, most ministries have reflected this one party rule.


===Security and transport===
Despite the "one party" convention, Prime Ministers may still be called upon to lead either minority or coalition governments. A [[minority government]] may be formed as a result of a "[[hung parliament]]" in which no single party commands a majority in the House of Commons after a general election or the death, resignation or defection of existing members. By convention the serving Prime Minister is given first opportunity to reach agreements that will allow them to survive a vote of confidence in the House and continue to govern. The last minority government was led by Labour Prime Minister [[Harold Wilson]] for eight months after the [[United Kingdom general election, February 1974|February 1974 general election]] produced a hung parliament. In the [[United Kingdom general election, October 1974|October 1974 general election]], the Labour Party gained 18 seats, giving Wilson a majority of three.
[[File:Downing Street, Home of PM Gordon Brown - geograph.org.uk - 1380047.jpg|thumb|Two armed police officers stand guard in 2009 at the entrance to 10 Downing Street, the official residence of the Prime Minister.]]
The personal protection of the prime minister<ref>{{Cite news |last=Stacey |first=Kiran |date=27 October 2014 |title=Police to review security after man runs into David Cameron |work=Financial Times |url=https://www.ft.com/content/a0fd7b08-5def-11e4-b7a2-00144feabdc0 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/a0fd7b08-5def-11e4-b7a2-00144feabdc0 |archive-date=10 December 2022 |url-access=subscription |access-date=26 February 2021 |quote=The force said: "The MPS Specialist Protection Command is responsible for the personal protection of the prime minister"}}</ref> and former prime ministers<ref>{{Cite web |date=4 September 2008 |title=Tony Blair's bodyguard left gun in Starbuck's toilet |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2679015/Tony-Blairs-bodyguard-left-gun-in-Starbucks-toilet.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2679015/Tony-Blairs-bodyguard-left-gun-in-Starbucks-toilet.html |archive-date=10 January 2022 |access-date=26 February 2021 |website=Daily Telegraph |quote=The SO1 unit – full name Specialist Protection Command – is responsible for the personal safety of Prime Minister Gordon Brown and former Prime Ministers Mr Blair and Margaret Thatcher.}}{{cbignore}}; {{Cite web |date=12 March 2020 |title=Cottage next to David Cameron's Dean home destroyed in suspected arson |url=https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/18301351.cottage-next-david-camerons-dean-home-destroyed-suspected-arson |access-date=26 February 2021 |website=Oxford Mail |quote=The fire will raise questions about security for Mr Cameron, 53, who as a former Prime Minister has lifelong personal protection from the Specialist Protection Branch of the Metropolitan Police Service Protection Command.}}</ref> is the responsibility of [[Protection Command]] within the [[Metropolitan Police Service]]. When the prime minister resides in 10 Downing Street, they are constantly surrounded by armed police units with "airport-style" security checkpoints, large metal gates, street patrols and heavy vetting for staff and non-ministerial individuals. Such installations were introduced due to fears of [[Irish Republican Army (1922–1969)|IRA]] bomb threats and attacks which were persistent during [[The Troubles]]. When travelling, the prime minister will be accompanied by a select group of police officers joined by a wider team of security personnel. On the road, the prime ministerial entourage will be followed by police outriders on motorbikes to clear a path in the traffic and to stop them from being a sitting target.<sup><ref>{{Cite web |title=What security does the prime minister have? |url=https://news.sky.com/story/what-security-does-the-prime-minister-have-12932957 |access-date=2024-10-09 |website=Sky News |language=en}}</ref></sup> The fleet of [[Prime Ministerial Car]]s provides the prime minister with a number of security features as well as transport. The vehicles are driven by officers from this unit.<ref>{{Cite web |title=SO1 Specialist Protection |url=http://www.eliteukforces.info/police/SO1-specialist-protection |access-date=18 May 2019 |website=www.eliteukforces.info}}</ref> These vehicles are often custom made and always British manufactured with in-built gun ports, an independent oxygen supply and the ability to release tear gas to subdue angry crowds.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Smith |first=Mikey |date=2014-10-27 |title=David Cameron's security: The people who protect the Prime Minister |url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-camerons-security-people-who-4518310 |access-date=2024-10-09 |website=The Mirror |language=en}}</ref> [[Air transport of the British royal family and government|Air transport for the prime minister]] is provided by a variety of military and civilian operators.


===International role===
A hung parliament may also lead to the formation of a [[coalition government]] in which two or more parties negotiate a joint programme to command a majority in the Commons. Coalitions have also been formed during times of national crisis such as war. Under this circumstance, the parties agree to temporarily set aside their political differences and unite to face the national crisis. Coalitions are rare; since 1721, there have been fewer than a dozen. When the [[United Kingdom general election, 2010|general election of 2010]] produced a hung parliament, the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties agreed to form Her Majesty's current coalition government, the first in seventy years. The last Coalition in the UK before 2010 was led by Conservative Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] during most of the Second World War from May 1940 to May 1945. [[Clement Attlee]], the leader of the Labour Party, served as Deputy Prime Minister.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], p. 376–379.</ref>
{{Main|List of international trips made by prime ministers of the United Kingdom}}
One of the roles of the prime minister is to represent the UK at home and abroad,<ref>{{cite web |title=Power and decision-making in the UK |work=BBC Bitesize |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zwypxfr/revision/4 |access-date=13 March 2021 |quote=The PM has several roles including:... representing the UK at home and abroad}}</ref> for example at the annual [[G7 Summit]]. The prime minister makes many international trips. According to [[Gus O'Donnell]], the number of overseas visits for the prime minister has gone up.<ref>{{cite web |first1=Andrew |last1=Blick |first2=George |last2=Jones |title=The power of the Prime Minister |url=http://health-equity.pitt.edu/4042/1/policy-paper-102.html |website=health-equity.pitt.edu/ |access-date=21 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402125443/http://health-equity.pitt.edu/4042/1/policy-paper-102.html|archive-date=2 April 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref>


===Treasury Commission===
=== Deputy ===
{{Main|Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom}}
The Premiership is still largely a convention of the constitution; its legal authority is derived primarily from the fact that the Prime Minister is also First Lord of the Treasury. The connection of these two offices&nbsp;– one a convention, the other a legal office&nbsp;– began with the Hanoverian Succession in 1714.
Prime ministers have had various deputies, sometimes as an official [[Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|deputy prime minister]], [[first secretary of state]] or ''de facto'' deputy. Some prime ministers have not chosen a deputy at all, preferring ''ad hoc'' arrangements.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Norton|first=Philip|title=Governing Britain: Parliament, Ministers and Our Ambiguous Constitution|publisher=[[Manchester University Press]]|year=2020|isbn=9-781526-145451|pages=142}}</ref>


Historically, the position of deputy prime minister has been created out of political necessity rather than being established by statutory law or convention with the title not being defined in the constitution.{{Sfn|Bagehot|1867|p=65–69}} The position was first created (unofficially) for [[Clement Attlee]] in Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]]'s [[Churchill war ministry|ministry]] during [[World War II]], in order to manage administrative duties, domestic affairs and welfare, while Churchill focused on military strategy.{{Sfn|Brazier|1988|p=134–137}} In recent times, after the [[2010 United Kingdom general election|2010 general election]] resulted in a [[hung parliament]], the leaders of the [[Leader of the Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] and the [[Leader of the Liberal Democrats|Liberal Democrats]], [[David Cameron]] and [[Nick Clegg]], formed a [[coalition government]] in which Clegg served as deputy prime minister. In that capacity, Clegg chaired cabinet meetings, key committees and led negotiations on major reforms. As such, the office saw an unusual level of formalisation and recognition during Clegg's tenure.{{Sfn|Bogdanor|2009|p=212–214}}
When George I succeeded to the English throne in 1714, his German ministers advised him to leave the office of [[Lord High Treasurer]] vacant because those who had held it in recent years had grown overly powerful, in effect, replacing the Sovereign as head of the government. They also feared that a Lord High Treasurer would undermine their own influence with the new King. They therefore suggested that he place the office in "commission", meaning that a committee of five ministers would perform its functions together. Theoretically, this dilution of authority would prevent any one of them from presuming to be the head of the government. The King agreed and created the Treasury Commission consisting of the First Lord of the Treasury, the Second Lord, and three Junior Lords.


==== Succession ====
No one has been appointed Lord High Treasurer since 1714; it has remained in commission for three hundred years. The Treasury Commission ceased to meet late in the 18th century but has survived, albeit with very different functions: the First Lord of the Treasury is now the Prime Minister, the Second Lord is the Chancellor of the Exchequer (and actually in charge of the Treasury), and the Junior Lords are government Whips maintaining party discipline in the House of Commons; they no longer have any duties related to the Treasury, though when [[Delegated legislation in the United Kingdom|subordinate legislation]] requires the consent of the Treasury it is still two of the Junior Lords who sign on its behalf.<ref group=note>See e.g. the various orders prescribing fees to be taken in public offices</ref><ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], p. 107.</ref>
Nobody has the right of automatic succession to the prime ministership.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Brazier |first=Rodney |title=Choosing a Prime Minister: The Transfer of Power in Britain |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2020 |isbn=978-0-19-885929-1 |pages=174}}</ref> It is generally considered that in the event of the death of the prime minister, it would be appropriate to appoint an interim prime minister, though there is some debate as to how to decide who this should be.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Norton |first=Philip |date=2016 |title=A temporary occupant of No.10? Prime Ministerial succession in the event of the death of the incumbent |journal=[[Public Law]] |pages=34}}</ref>


According to [[Rodney Brazier]], there are no procedures within government to cope with the sudden death of the prime minister.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brazier|2020|page=84}}</ref> There is also no such title as acting prime minister of the United Kingdom.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brazier|2020|page=68}}</ref> Despite refusing "...to discuss a hypothetical situation" with [[BBC News]] in 2011,<ref>{{Cite news |date=21 December 2011 |title=MP urges 'line of succession' rules for prime minister |work=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-16283292 |access-date=6 June 2021}}</ref> the [[Cabinet Office]] said the following in 2006:<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Vennard |first=Andrew |date=2008 |title=Prime Ministerial succession |journal=[[Public Law (journal)|Public Law]] |pages=304}}</ref>{{Blockquote|There is no single protocol setting out all of the possible implications. However, the general constitutional position is as set out below. There can be no automatic assumption about who The Queen would ask to act as caretaker Prime Minister in the event of the death of the Prime Minister. The decision is for her under the Royal Prerogative. However, there are some key guiding principles. The Queen would probably be looking for a very senior member of the Government (not necessarily a Commons Minister since this would be a short-term appointment). If there was a recognised deputy to the Prime Minister, used to acting on his behalf in his absences, this could be an important factor. Also important would be the question of who was likely to be in contention to take over long-term as Prime Minister. If the most senior member of the Government was him or herself a contender for the role of Prime Minister, it might be that The Queen would invite a slightly less senior non-contender. In these circumstances, her private secretary would probably take soundings, via the Cabinet Secretary, of members of the Cabinet, to ensure that The Queen invited someone who would be acceptable to the Cabinet to act as their chair during the caretaker period. Once the Party had elected a new leader, that person would, of course, be invited to take over as Prime Minister.
==Early Prime Ministers==
}}Additionally, when the prime minister is travelling, it is standard practice for a senior duty minister to be appointed who can attend to urgent business and meetings if required, though the prime minister remains in charge and updated throughout.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mason |first=Chris |date=15 August 2016 |title=Is Boris Johnson running the country? |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/37086680 |access-date=19 March 2021 |website=[[BBC News]]}}</ref>
==="First" Prime Minister===
Since the office was not created, there is no "first" Prime Minister. However, the honorary appellation is traditionally given to Sir [[Robert Walpole]] who became First Lord of the Treasury in 1721. [[File:robertwalpole.jpg|thumb|175px|left|Portrait of Sir [[Robert Walpole]], studio of [[Jean-Baptiste van Loo]], 1740. Walpole is considered to have been the "First" Prime Minister.]]
In 1720, the [[South Sea Company]], created to trade in cotton, agricultural goods and slaves, collapsed, causing the financial ruin of thousands of investors and heavy losses for many others including members of the royal family. King George I called on Robert Walpole, well known for his political and financial acumen, to handle the emergency. With considerable skill{{Citation needed|date=May 2010}} and some luck{{Citation needed|date=May 2010}}, Walpole acted quickly to restore public credit and confidence, and led the country out of the crisis. A year later, the King appointed him First Lord of the Treasury, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Leader of the House of Commons making him the most powerful minister in the government. Ruthless, crude, and hard-working, he had a "sagacious business sense" and was a superb manager of men.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], p. 384.</ref> At the head of affairs for the next two decades, Walpole stabilised the nation's finances, kept it at peace, made it prosperous, and secured the [[Hanoverian Succession]].<ref>[[#Pike|Pike]], pages 22–23.</ref>


On 6 April 2020, when [[Boris Johnson]] was admitted into the Intensive Care Unit of St Thomas' Hospital, when suffering from COVID-19, he asked [[Dominic Raab]] "to deputise for him where necessary".<ref>{{Cite web |date=6 April 2020 |title=Statement from Downing Street: 6 April 2020 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/statement-from-downing-street-6-april-2020 |access-date=19 March 2021 |website=[[gov.uk]]}}</ref>
Walpole demonstrated for the first time how a chief minister&nbsp;– a Prime Minister&nbsp;– could be the actual Head of the Government under the new constitutional framework. First, recognising that the Sovereign could no longer govern directly but was still the nominal head of the government, he insisted that he was nothing more than the "King's Servant".<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], p. 385. He worked tirelessly to maintain the King's confidence, and sometimes resorted to bribery. On the accession of George II in 1727, for example, Walpole gave the new King an additional £100,000 for his personal use to maintain his offices.</ref> Second, recognising that power had shifted to the Commons, he conducted the nation's business there and made it dominant over the Lords in all matters. Third, recognising that the Cabinet had become the executive and must be united, he dominated the other members and demanded their complete support for his policies. Fourth, recognising that political parties were the source of ministerial strength, he led the Whig party and maintained discipline. In the Commons, he insisted on the support of all Whig members, especially those who held office. Finally, he set an example for future Prime Ministers by resigning his offices in 1742 after a vote of confidence, which he won by just 3 votes. This slim majority undermined his power even though he still retained the confidence of the Sovereign.<ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], pages 77–81. The preceding paragraph is a paraphrase of Hearn's famous list of Walpole's contributions to the evolution of the office of Prime Minister in his book ''Government of England'', page 220, quoted by Marriott.</ref><ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], pages 385–387</ref>


===Ambivalence and denial===
===Resignation===
[[File:Prime Minister Rishi Sunak leaves 10 Downing Street (53836890030).jpg|thumb|Prime Minister [[Rishi Sunak]] announces his resignation outside 10 Downing Street, 5 July 2024.]]
For all his contributions, Walpole was not a Prime Minister in the modern sense. The King—not Parliament—chose him; and the King—not Walpole—chose the Cabinet. Walpole set an example, not a precedent, and few followed his example. For over 40 years after Walpole's fall in 1742, there was widespread ambivalence about the position. In some cases, the Prime Minister was a figurehead with power being wielded by other individuals; in others there was a reversion to the "chief minister" model of earlier times in which the Sovereign actually governed.<ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], p. 86. During most periods of British history, there have been Chief Ministers who have had many of the attributes of a modern Prime Minister such as [[Dunstan of Glastonbury]] under [[Edgar of England|Edgar]], [[Ralph Flambard]] under [[William II of England|William II]], [[Cardinal Wolsey]] and [[Thomas Cromwell]] under [[Henry VIII]], and many others.</ref> At other times, there appeared to be two prime ministers. During [[Great Britain in the Seven Years War|Britain's participation in the Seven Years War]], for example, the powers of government were divided equally between the [[Thomas Pelham-Holles, 1st Duke of Newcastle|Duke of Newcastle]] and [[William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham]], leading to them both alternatively being described as Prime Minister. Furthermore, many thought that the title "Prime Minister" usurped the Sovereign's constitutional position as "head of the government" and that it was an affront to other ministers because they were all appointed by and equally responsible to the Sovereign.
A prime minister ends their tenure by offering their resignation to the British monarch.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The appointment of prime ministers and the role of the Queen |url=https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/appointment-prime-ministers |access-date=23 February 2021 |website=[[Institute for Government]] |date=13 September 2019 |quote=The incumbent prime minister informs Buckingham Palace that they will be resigning. There is then a well-rehearsed sequence of events in which the outgoing prime minister travels to see the Queen and formally tenders his or her resignation.}}</ref> This can happen after their party has suffered a [[general election]] defeat, so that they no longer command the confidence of the House of Commons. It can also happen mid-term, if they are forced to resign for political reasons,<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mikhailova |first1=Anna |last2=Yorke |first2=Harry |date=16 May 2019 |title=Tearful Theresa May forced to agree to stand down: PM out by June 30 at the latest |work=Daily Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/05/16/brexit-latest-news-theresa-may-set-showdown-meeting-senior-tories |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |access-date=26 February 2021 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/05/16/brexit-latest-news-theresa-may-set-showdown-meeting-senior-tories |archive-date=10 January 2022 |quote=During an emotionally-charged meeting with senior members of the 1922 Committee of Tory MPs, Mrs May was forced to agree to stand down within weeks so the Conservatives can elect a new leader before Parliament's summer recess.}}{{cbignore}}</ref> or for other reasons such as ill-health.<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 January 1957 |title=1957: Sir Anthony Eden resigns |work=BBC ON THIS DAY |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/9/newsid_2800000/2800833.stm |access-date=22 February 2021 |quote=Sir Anthony Eden has resigned as prime minister of Britain due to ill health.}}; {{Cite web |date=10 January 1957 |title=Sir Anthony Eden resigns |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/1957/jan/10/conservatives.past |access-date=22 February 2021 |website=The Guardian |quote=Sir Anthony Eden resigned the office of Prime Minister yesterday because, in the opinion of four doctors, "his health will no longer enable him to sustain the heavy burdens inseparable from the office of Prime Minister."}}</ref> If the prime minister resigns mid-term, and their party has a majority in the Commons, the party selects a new leader according to its rules, and this new leader is invited by the monarch to become the new prime minister. The outgoing prime minister is likely to remain in post until the new leader has been chosen by the party. After resigning, the outgoing prime minister remains a [[Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)|Member of Parliament]]. An outgoing prime minister can ask the monarch to bestow honours on any number of people of their choosing, known as the [[Prime Minister's Resignation Honours]]. No incumbent prime minister has ever lost their own seat at a general election.<ref>{{Cite web |title=What happens if a prime minister loses their seat in a general election? |url=https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/prime-minister-lost-seat-general-election |access-date=22 February 2021 |website=[[Institute for Government]] |date=27 November 2019 |quote=Has a prime minister ever lost their seat? No incumbent prime minister has ever lost his or her seat at a general election.}}</ref> Only one prime minister has been assassinated: [[Assassination of Spencer Perceval|Spencer Perceval, in 1812]].


==Privileges ==
For these reasons there was a reluctance to use the title. Although Walpole is now called the "first" Prime Minister, the title was not commonly used during his tenure. Walpole himself denied it. In 1741, during the attack that led to Walpole's downfall, [[Samuel Sandys]] declared that "According to our Constitution we can have no sole and prime minister." In his defence, Walpole said "I unequivocally deny that I am sole or Prime Minister and that to my influence and direction all the affairs of government must be attributed."<ref name="Marriott, p. 88">[[#Marriott|Marriott]], p. 88</ref> [[George Grenville]], Prime Minister in the 1760s, said it was "an odious title" and never used it.<ref>[[#Low|Low]], p. 156</ref> [[Lord North]], the reluctant head of the King's Government during the [[American War of Independence]], "would never suffer himself to be called Prime Minister, because it was an office unknown to the Constitution."<ref>[[#Low|Low]], pages 156–157</ref><ref group=note>The 18th-century ambivalence causes problems for researchers trying to identify who was a Prime Minister and who was not. Every list of Prime Ministers may omit certain politicians. For instance, unsuccessful attempts to form ministries—such as the two-day government formed by the [[William Pulteney, 1st Earl of Bath|Earl of Bath]] in 1746, often dismissed as the "[[Short-lived Ministry|Silly Little Ministry]]"—may be included in a list or omitted, depending on the criteria selected.</ref>
{{Main|List of peerages held by prime ministers of the United Kingdom|Orders of precedence in the United Kingdom}}


On taking office a new prime minister usually makes a public statement to announce to the country that they have been appointed by the reigning monarch (called "[[kissing hands]]"). This is usually done by saying words to the effect of:
Denials of the Premiership's legal existence continued throughout the 19th century. In 1806, for example, one member of the Commons said, "the Constitution abhors the idea of a prime minister". In 1829, [[Marquess of Lansdowne|Lord Lansdowne]] said, "nothing could be more mischievous or unconstitutional than to recognise by act of parliament the existence of such an office."<ref>[[#Walpole|Walpole]], pp. 213–214</ref>


{{Blockquote
By the turn of the 20th century the Premiership had become, by convention, the most important position in the constitutional hierarchy. Yet there were no legal documents describing its powers or acknowledging its existence. Incumbents had no statutory authority in their own right. As late as 1904, Arthur Balfour explained the status of his office in a speech at Haddington: "The Prime Minister has no salary as Prime Minister. He has no statutory duties as Prime Minister, his name occurs in no Acts of Parliament, and though holding the most important place in the constitutional hierarchy, he has no place which is recognised by the laws of his country. This is a strange paradox."<ref>[[#Low|Low]], pp. 160-161 In his memoirs, ''Gleanings'', Gladstone lamented the Prime Ministry's unseemly status in the government hierarchy: "Nowhere in the wide world," he said, "does so great a substance cast so small a shadow. Nowhere is there a man who has so much power with so little to show for it in the way of formal title or prerogative."</ref>
| His Majesty the King ''[Her Majesty the Queen]'' has asked me to form a government and I have accepted.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Cameron |first=David |date=11 May 2010 |title=David Cameron becomes PM: Full Downing Street statement |agency=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8676405.stm |access-date=11 May 2010}}; {{YouTube|id=TezCBzlB3d8|title=Prime Minister Gordon Brown arrives at Downing Street}}; {{YouTube|id=Ebj1vT7CMyk|title=Transfer of Power from James Callaghan to Margaret Thatcher}}; {{Cite news |last=May |first=Theresa |date=13 July 2016 |title=Prime Minister Theresa May promises 'a better Britain' – the full speech |agency=[[Total Politics]] |url=https://www.totalpolitics.com/articles/news/prime-minster-theresa-may-promises-better-britain-full-speech |access-date=13 July 2016}}</ref>}}


=== Precedence and form of address ===
In 1905 the position was given some official recognition when the "Prime Minister" was named in the [[United Kingdom order of precedence|order of precedence]], outranked, among non-royals, only by the Archbishops of [[Archbishop of Canterbury|Canterbury]] and [[Archbishop of York|York]], the [[Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland]] and the [[Lord Chancellor]].<ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], p 85</ref>
Ministerial listings are printed in the official records of parliament known as "Hansard", and 1885 was the first known instance of official use of the title of Prime Minister. The minutes of the first meeting of the Committee of Imperial Defence in 1902 saw the first internal reference to the title as well. The 1904 edition of the Imperial Calendar referred to the then Prime Minister, Arthur Balfour, as 'Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury'; in the previous edition he was merely 'First Lord of the Treasury and Lord Privy Seal'.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=The Institution of Prime Minister – History of government |url=https://history.blog.gov.uk/2012/01/01/the-institution-of-prime-minister/ |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=history.blog.gov.uk}} [[File:UKOpenGovernmentLicence.svg|30px]] Text was copied from this source, which is available under an [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Open Government Licence v3.0]. © Crown copyright.</ref>


Throughout the United Kingdom, the prime minister outranks all other dignitaries except members of the royal family, the [[lord chancellor]], and senior ecclesiastical figures.{{refn|
The first Act of Parliament—albeit in a schedule—to mention the Premiership was the [[Chequers Estate Act 1917|Chequers Estate Act]] on 20 December 1917.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/talking_politics/88166.stm|title=UK Politics: Talking Politics&nbsp;— Conventions of the constitution|last=Rozenberg|first=Joshua|date=3 June 1998|publisher=BBC News|publisher=British Broadcasting Corporation|accessdate=2 November 2008}}</ref> This law conferred the [[Chequers]] Estate owned by [[Arthur Lee, 1st Viscount Lee of Fareham|Sir Arthur]] and Lady Lee, as a gift to the Crown for use as a country home for future Prime Ministers.
These include: in [[England and Wales]], the [[Church of England|Anglican]] archbishops of Canterbury and York; in Scotland, the lord high commissioner and the [[moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland]]; in [[Northern Ireland]], the [[Church of Ireland|Anglican]] and Roman Catholic archbishops of Armagh and Dublin and the [[Moderator of the Presbyterian Church in Ireland|moderator of the General Assembly]] of the [[Presbyterian Church in Ireland|Presbyterian Church]].|group= n}} The prime minister was officially granted a place in the order of precedence in December 1905, and the first statutory reference to the Prime Minister was present in the Chequers Estate Act 1917, which specified Chequers as a prime-ministerial residence. Public recognition of the existence of a 'Prime Minister's Office' in the Civil Service Yearbook came as recently as the 1977 edition.<ref name=":0" />


The prime minister is customarily a member of the [[Privy Council of the United Kingdom|Privy Council]] and thus entitled to the appellation "[[The Right Honourable]]". Membership of the council is retained for life. It is a constitutional convention that only a privy counsellor can be appointed prime minister. Most potential candidates have already attained this status. The only case when a non-privy counsellor was the natural appointment was [[Ramsay MacDonald]] in 1924. The issue was resolved by appointing him to the Council immediately prior to his appointment as prime minister.
Unequivocal legal recognition was given in the [[Ministers of the Crown Act 1937]], which made provision for paying a salary to the person who is both "the First Lord of the Treasury and Prime Minister". Explicitly recognising two hundred years' of ambivalence, the act states that it intended "To give statutory recognition to the existence of the position of Prime Minister, and to the historic link between the Premiership and the office of First Lord of the Treasury, by providing in respect to that position and office a salary of ..." The Act made a distinction between the "position" (Prime Minister) and the "office" (First Lord of the Treasury), emphasising the unique political character of the former. Nevertheless, the brass plate on the door of the Prime Minister's home, [[10 Downing Street]], still bears the title of "First Lord of the Treasury", as it has since the 18th century.


According to the now-defunct [[Department for Constitutional Affairs]], the prime minister is made a privy counsellor as a result of taking office and should be addressed by the official title prefixed by "The Right Honourable" and not by a personal name.{{Citation needed|reason=Reliable source needed for the whole sentence|date=July 2016}} Although this form of address is employed on formal occasions, it is rarely used by the media. As "prime minister" is a position, not a title, the incumbent should be referred to as "the prime minister", although the title "Prime Minister" (e.g. "Prime Minister Keir Starmer") has become commonplace within current political reporting.<ref>{{cite web |title=Life after the premiership of Tony Blair |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tony-Blair/Life-after-the-premiership |website=Britannica.com|date=18 July 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Gordon Brown: Labour plan would make UK work for Scotland |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-63853652 |access-date=6 November 2023 |work=BBC News |date=5 December 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Castel |first1=Steven |title=The Race for a New British Prime Minister Begins, Again |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/21/world/europe/british-prime-minister-race.html |access-date=6 November 2023 |work=The New York Times |date=21 October 2022}}</ref> Within the UK, the expression "Prime Minister Starmer" is never used, although it, too, is sometimes used by foreign dignitaries and news sources.{{citation needed|date=July 2022}}
=="First among equals"==
===Emergence of Cabinet government=== <!-- This section is linked to from the section "Foundations of the office of Prime Minister > Cabinet", above. -->
Despite the reluctance to legally recognise the Premiership, ambivalence toward it waned in the 1780s. As noted previously, George III (1760–1820) is known to have attended only two Cabinet meetings. However, during the first twenty years of his reign, he tried to be his own "prime minister" by controlling policy from outside the Cabinet, appointing and dismissing ministers, meeting privately with individual ministers, and giving them instructions. These practices caused confusion and dissension in Cabinet meetings, especially during the dysfunctional ministries of [[William Pitt the Elder|the Earl of Chatham]] from 1766–1768 and of the [[Augustus Henry FitzRoy|Duke of Grafton]] from 1768-1770 when no one, not even the King, seemed to be in charge.<ref>see [[#Tuchman2|Tuchman]], ''The March of Folly'', pp 127-232 for detailed descriptions of these and other ministries between the years 1760 and 1782</ref>


=== Compensation ===
After the failure of [[Lord North]]'s ministry (1770–1782) in March 1782 due to Britain's defeat in the [[American Revolutionary War]] and the ensuing [[vote of no confidence]] by Parliament, the [[Charles Watson-Wentworth, 2nd Marquess of Rockingham|Marquess of Rockingham]] reasserted the Prime Minister's control over the Cabinet. Rockingham assumed the Premiership "on the distinct understanding that measures were to be changed as well as men; and that the measures for which the new ministry required the royal consent were the measures which they, while in opposition, had advocated." He and his Cabinet were united in their policies and would stand or fall together; they also refused to accept anyone in the Cabinet who did not agree.<ref group=note>This event also marks the beginnings of collective Cabinet responsibility. This principle states that the decisions made by any one Cabinet member become the responsibility of the entire Cabinet.</ref> King George threatened to [[abdicate]] but in the end reluctantly agreed out of necessity: he had to have a government.
In 2010, the prime minister received £14,500 in addition to a salary of £65,737 as a member of parliament.<ref name=":1">{{Citation |title=A new politics: cutting Ministerial pay |date=13 May 2010 |url=http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/latest-news/2010/05/a-new-politics-cutting-ministerial-pay-50065 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100618230623/http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/latest-news/2010/05/a-new-politics-cutting-ministerial-pay-50065 |publisher=Number10.gov.uk |access-date=19 June 2010 |archive-date=18 June 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Until 2006, the [[lord chancellor]] was the highest-paid member of the government, ahead of the prime minister. This reflected the lord chancellor's position at the head of the [[Judiciary of England and Wales#Judicial salaries|judicial pay scale]]. The [[Constitutional Reform Act 2005]] eliminated the lord chancellor's judicial functions and also reduced the office's salary to below that of the prime minister. During the [[premiership of Gordon Brown]], the prime minister received an salary of £193,885 on 1 April 2009 which was higher than the salary of £166,786 as of 2024. The reasons for such reductions are Brown's cuts to voluntary pay at around £150,000 during pre-election in the May 2010 election, and when David Cameron became prime minister the cuts were extended to 5%, amounting at around £142,500. Subsequent prime ministers have kept the restraint on ministerial pay and have not taken any further pay outside of what they are entitled.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Chart of the week: Prime Minister's salary |url=https://www.icaew.com/insights/viewpoints-on-the-news/2024/sep-2024/chart-of-the-week-prime-ministers-salary |access-date=2024-10-31 |website=www.icaew.com |language=en}}</ref> According to journalist Simon Kelner, the salary of the prime minister must be increased and that further expansion of a salary or hospitality received by a prime minister is disavowed under the [[Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883]] which only criminalised voter bribery and introduced standards for election expenses, and "created a more level playing field for parliamentary candidates". Kelner said that it is a inadequate way of holding a prime minister into account. This was in respone to the [[2024 Labour Party freebies controversy]], in which the current prime minister, [[Keir Starmer]], having reportedly failed to disclose the amount of gifts and "freebies" received by him, members of his family and cabinet.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Features |first=Simon Wilson published in |date=2024-10-07 |title=How much does the prime minister get paid? |url=https://moneyweek.com/economy/uk-economy/how-much-does-the-prime-minister-get-paid |access-date=2024-10-31 |website=moneyweekuk |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kelner |first=Simon |date=2024-09-20 |title=The real problem is that Keir Starmer is not paid enough |url=https://inews.co.uk/opinion/the-real-problem-is-that-keir-starmer-is-not-paid-enough-3285448 |access-date=2024-10-31 |website=inews.co.uk |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=September 19, 2024 |title=UK PM Starmer accepted more gifts than any other member of parliament, Sky News reports |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-pm-starmer-accepted-more-gifts-than-any-other-member-parliament-sky-news-2024-09-18/ |work=Reuters}}</ref>


=== Official residences ===
From this time, there was a growing acceptance of the position of Prime Minister and the title was more commonly used, if only unofficially.<ref name="Smith, pages 379–382">[[#Smith|Smith]], pages 379–382.</ref><ref>[[#Low|Low]], pp. 141-142.</ref> Associated initially with the Whigs, even the Tories started to accept it. Lord North, for example, who had said the office was "unknown to the constitution", reversed himself in 1783 when he said, "In this country some one man or some body of men like a Cabinet should govern the whole and direct every measure."<ref>[[#Dodd|Dodd]], p. 127</ref><ref>Pares, p. 175 In a letter to the King written at the same time, North repeated the idea, "That in critical times, it is necessary that there should be one directing Minister, who should plan the whole of the operations of government, so far as to make them co-operate zealously & actively with his designs even tho' contrary to their own."</ref> In 1803, [[William Pitt the Younger]], also a Tory, suggested to a friend that "this person generally called the first minister" was an absolute necessity for a government to function, and expressed his belief that this person should be the minister in charge of the finances.<ref name="Marriott, p. 88"/>
10 Downing Street, in [[London]], has been the [[official residence|official place of residence]] of the prime minister since 1732; they are entitled to use its staff and facilities, including extensive offices. The building was originally given by [[George I of Great Britain|King George I]] to Robert Walpole, widely regarded as the nation's first prime minister, as a personal gift. However, Walpole insisted that he would accept it in his capacity as first lord of the Treasury and requested that his subsequent successors be entitled to reside in and use the property as they wish.<ref>{{Cite web |title=History of 10 Downing Street - GOV.UK |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/history/10-downing-street |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=www.gov.uk |language=en}}</ref> The complex incorporates the flats of No.11 and No.12 Downing Street, which have been reconstructed through to connect them to No.10. Altogether, the three buildings contain over 100 rooms.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-06-08 |title=No.10 Downing Street |url=https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/no10-downing-street |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=Institute for Government |language=en}}</ref>
[[File:William Pitt the Younger at Westminster.gif|thumb|200px|right|''William Pitt the Younger in front of the Treasury Bench addressing the House of Commons.'' Pitt's 19 year ministry followed by Lord Liverpool's 15, led the Tory Party to accept the office of Prime Minister as a convention of the constitution.]]


{{Multiple image
The Tories' wholesale conversion started when Pitt was confirmed as Prime Minister in the election of 1784. For the next 17 years until 1801 (and again from 1804 to 1806), Pitt, the Tory, was Prime Minister in the same sense that Walpole, the Whig, had been earlier.
| perrow = 1
| header = Prime ministerial residences
| image1 = Larry the cat outside 10 Downing St.jpg
| image2 = Chequers (cropped).jpg
| caption1 = [[10 Downing Street]], the official place of residence of the prime minister
| caption2 = [[Chequers]], used by the prime minister as a country retreat
}}


[[Chequers]], a [[English country house|country house]] in Buckinghamshire, gifted to the government in 1917, may be used as a country retreat for the prime minister. The estate was previously owned by the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] minister and [[First Lord of the Admiralty]], [[Arthur Lee, 1st Viscount Lee of Fareham|Sir Arthur Lee]], before being donated to the British government under the [[Chequers Estate Act 1917]]. It was to give the incumbent prime minister the time to "spend two days a week in the high and pure air of the Chiltern hills and woods" and on the condition that incumbent should not own any residential country estate of their own.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sommerlad |first=Joe |date=13 July 2018 |title=Chequers: A brief history of the British prime minister's country residence |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chequers-uk-prime-minister-where-residence-trump-visit-theresa-may-buckinghamshire-a8445321.html |website=The Independent |access-date=9 October 2024 |archive-date=3 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231203232849/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chequers-uk-prime-minister-where-residence-trump-visit-theresa-may-buckinghamshire-a8445321.html |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Baldwin |first=Sian |date=2024-08-13 |title=Chequers: Where is the Prime Minister's country house and who owns it? |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/chequers-prime-minister-country-house-location-b1032991.html |access-date=2024-10-09 |website=Evening Standard |language=en}}</ref>
Their conversion was reinforced after 1810. In that year, George III, who had suffered periodically from mental instability (due to a blood disorder now known as [[porphyria]]), became permanently insane and spent the remaining 10 years of his life unable to discharge his duties. The [[Prince Regent]] was prevented from using the full powers of Kingship. The Regent became [[George IV of the United Kingdom|George IV]] in 1820, but during his 10 year reign was indolent and frivolous. Consequently, for 20 years the throne was virtually vacant and Tory Cabinets led by Tory Prime Ministers filled the void, governing virtually on their own.


During the 18th and 19th centuries, many prime ministers were members of the [[British nobility]] and therefore held the office whilst serving in the [[House of Lords]]. Through lineage and inheritance, these prime ministers acquired large estates, though they still owned properties in London for political affairs and many used [[English country house|country houses]] as a retreat. Until the mid-20th Century, parliamentary sessions did not begin until the [[New Year]] after ending in August, which would give the prime minister long periods in respite.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Prime Ministerial Residences in History |url=https://www.museumofpm.org/prime-ministerial-residencies-london-elsewhere/prime-ministerial-residences-in-history/ |access-date=2024-10-09 |website=Museum of the Prime Minister |language=en-US}}</ref>
The Tories were in power for almost 50 years, except for a short Whig ministry from 1806 to 1807. [[Lord Liverpool]] was Prime Minister for 15 years; he and Pitt held the position for 34 years. Under their long, consistent leadership, Cabinet government became a convention of the constitution. Although subtle issues remained to be settled, the [[Cabinet Government|Cabinet system of government]] is essentially the same today as it was in 1830.


== Post-premiership ==
Under this form of government, called the [[Westminster System]], the Sovereign is [[Head of State]] and titular head of [[Her Majesty's Government]]. She selects as her Prime Minister the person who is able to command a working majority in the House of Commons, and invites him to form a government. As the actual [[Head of Government]], the Prime Minister selects his Cabinet, choosing its members from among those in Parliament who agree or generally agree with his intended policies. He then recommends them to the Sovereign who confirms his selections by formally appointing them to their respective offices. Led by the Prime Minister, the Cabinet is collectively responsible for everything the government does. The Sovereign does not confer with its members privately about policy or attend its meetings. With respect to ''actual'' governance, the monarch has only three constitutional rights: to be kept informed, to advise, and to warn.<ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], pp 92-93 Bagehot enumerated the three rights of a constitutional Monarch as "the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, the right to warn"</ref> In practice this means that the Sovereign reviews state papers and meets regularly with the Prime Minister, usually weekly, when she may advise and warn him regarding the proposed decisions and actions of Her Government.<ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], pp 78-83. Marriott enumerates five characteristics of modern Cabinet Government: 1. exclusion of the Sovereign, 2. close correspondence of party affiliation between the Cabinet and the majority in Parliament, 3. homogeneity of the Cabinet, 4. collective responsibility, and 5. ascendency of the Prime Minister.</ref>


===Loyal Opposition===
=== Retirement honours ===
[[File:0O2A1330-2_(54139304641).jpg|thumb|Eight former prime ministers seen together in 2024 – first row Blair and Major, second row Cameron and Brown, third Johnson and May, fourth Sunak and Truss]]
The modern British system includes not only a government formed by the majority party (or coalition of parties) in the House of Commons but also an organised and open opposition formed by those who are not members of the governing party. Called the [[Loyal Opposition]] (or "Her Majesty's Opposition"), they occupy the benches to the Speaker's left. Seated in the front, directly across from the ministers on the Treasury Bench, the leaders of the opposition form a "Shadow Government", complete with a salaried "Shadow Prime Minister", the [[Leader of the Opposition]], ready to assume office if the government falls or loses the next election.
Upon retirement, it is customary for the sovereign to grant a prime minister some honour or dignity. The honour bestowed is commonly, but not invariably, membership of the UK's most senior order of chivalry, the [[Order of the Garter]]. The practice of creating a retired prime minister a Knight Companion of the Garter (KG) has been fairly prevalent since the mid-nineteenth century. Upon the retirement of a prime minister who is Scottish, it is likely that the primarily Scottish honour of [[Order of the Thistle|Knight of the Thistle]] (KT) will be used instead of the Order of the Garter, which is generally regarded as an English honour.{{refn|This circumstance is somewhat confused, however, as since the Great Reform Act 1832, only seven Scots have served as prime minister. Of these, two – [[Bonar Law]] and [[Ramsay MacDonald]] – died while still sitting in the Commons, not yet having retired; MacDonald was offered the KT in 1935, but declined it as acceptance would have conflicted with his principles as a Labour Party member.<ref>{{cite book |last=Vickers |first=Hugo |date=1994 |title=Royal Orders |location=Great Britain |publisher=Boxtree Limited |page=55 |isbn=1852835109}}</ref> The [[George Hamilton-Gordon, 4th Earl of Aberdeen|Earl of Aberdeen]] was appointed to ''both'' the Order of the Garter and the Order of the Thistle, while [[Alec Douglas-Home]] became a KT while Foreign Secretary. Yet another, [[Arthur Balfour]], was appointed to the Order of the Garter, but represented an English constituency and may not have considered himself entirely Scottish; of the remaining two, the [[Archibald Primrose, 5th Earl of Rosebery|Earl of Rosebery]] became a KG, and [[Gordon Brown]] remained in the House of Commons as a [[backbencher]] until 2015.|group= n}}


Historically it has also been common to grant prime ministers a [[peerage]] upon retirement from the Commons, elevating the individual to the Lords. Formerly, the peerage bestowed was usually an [[earl]]dom.{{refn|Churchill was offered a [[Duke of London|dukedom]] but declined.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Rasor |first=Eugene L. |url=https://archive.org/details/winstonschurchil00raso |title=Winston S. Churchill, 1874–1965: a comprehensive historiography and annotated bibliography |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-313-30546-7 |page=[https://archive.org/details/winstonschurchil00raso/page/205 205] |url-access=registration}}</ref>|group= n}} The last such creation was for [[Harold Macmillan]], who resigned in 1963. Unusually, he became [[Earl of Stockton]] only in 1984, over twenty years after leaving office.
[[File:House of Commons Microcosm.jpg|thumb|left|200px|''The House of Commons early 19th century.'' The Loyal Opposition occupy the benches to the Speaker's left. Seated in the front, the leaders of the opposition form a "Shadow Government", complete with a salaried "Shadow Prime Minister" ready to assume office if the government falls or loses the next election.]]


Macmillan's successors [[Alec Douglas-Home]], [[Harold Wilson]], [[James Callaghan]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[David Cameron]], and [[Theresa May]] all accepted [[life peer]]ages (although Douglas-Home had previously disclaimed his hereditary title as [[Earl of Home]] and Cameron received a peerage after reentering Government as Foreign Secretary, not for services as a former Prime Minister). [[Edward Heath]] did not accept a peerage of any kind; neither have any of the prime ministers who have retired since 1990 other than Cameron (having done so to re-join the Cabinet, rather than as an honour per se) and May. Edward Heath (in 1992), [[John Major]] (in 2005) and [[Tony Blair]] (in 2022) were appointed as Knights Companion of the Garter. Major (in 1998) and [[Gordon Brown]] (in 2024) were appointed members of the [[Order of the Companions of Honour]], although Blair had previously disclosed that he did not want honours bestowed on himself or future prime ministers.
Opposing the King's government was considered disloyal, even treasonous, at the end of the 17th century. During the 18th century this idea waned and finally disappeared as the two party system developed. The expression "His Majesty's Opposition" was coined by [[John Cam Hobhouse]], Lord Broughton. In 1826, Broughton, a Whig, announced in the Commons that he opposed the report of a Bill. As a joke, he said, "It was said to be very hard on His Majesty's ministers to raise objections to this proposition. For my part, I think it is much more hard on His Majesty's Opposition to compel them to take this course."<ref>[[#Foord|Foord]], p.1 Laughter followed Hobhouse's remark but George Tierney, a leading Whig, repeated the phrase and added a definition. "My honourable friend," he said, "could not have invented a better phrase to designate us than that which he has adopted, for we are certainly to all intents and purposes a branch of His Majesty's Government."</ref> The phrase caught on and has been used ever since. Sometimes translated as the "[[Loyal Opposition]]", it acknowledges the legitimate existence of the two party system, and describes an important constitutional concept: opposing the government is not treason; reasonable men can honestly oppose its policies and still be loyal to the Sovereign and the nation.


The most recent former prime minister to die was Margaret Thatcher (1979–1990) on 8 April 2013. Her death meant that for the first time since 1955 (the year in which the [[Earldom of Attlee]] was created, subsequent to the death of [[Earl Baldwin of Bewdley|Earl Baldwin]] in 1947) the membership of the House of Lords included no former prime minister, a situation which remained the case until David Cameron was appointed to the House in November 2023.
Informally recognised for over a century as a convention of the constitution, the position of Leader of the Opposition was given statutory recognition in 1937 by the [[Ministers of the Crown Act 1937|Ministers of the Crown Act]].


=== Activities ===
===Great Reform Bill and the Premiership===
There are currently no established roles or job positions for former prime ministers following their resignations or after leaving office unexpectedly. It depends on their personal choice and reasons surrounding the need to take on such positions. During the 18th and 19th centuries, many former prime ministers, who were wealthy members of the [[British nobility|nobility]], would often simply retire to their country estates. The first prime minister, [[Robert Walpole]], accumulated large personal wealth while serving in office and from previous investments made in the 1710s. Prime Ministers [[John Stuart, 3rd Earl of Bute|Lord Bute]] and [[Archibald Primrose, 5th Earl of Rosebery|Lord Rosebery]] were among the wealthiest men in the country during their retirements and are often touted as some of the wealthiest to serve as in office. However some prime ministers, such as [[William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham|William Pitt the Elder]] and his son [[William Pitt the Younger]], amassed large public debts that were later paid off by parliament. In 1937, a official pension for former prime ministers was given at the sum of £2000 per annum.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |title=Former Prime Ministers – History of government |url=https://history.blog.gov.uk/2012/11/01/former-prime-ministers/ |access-date=2024-10-08 |website=history.blog.gov.uk}}</ref>
British Prime Ministers have never been elected directly by the public. They have all become Prime Minister indirectly because firstly, they were members of either the Commons or Lords; secondly, they were the leader of a great political party; and, thirdly, they either inherited a majority in the Commons, or won more seats than the opposition in a general election.


In their retirements, a majority of former prime ministers have written memoirs and autobiographies. Some prime ministers have also written non-political books as well, including Winston Churchill's histories of [[World War II]] and of the [[English language]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=pixelstorm |date=2008-10-17 |title=The Books of Sir Winston Churchill |url=https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/reference/the-books-of-sir-winston-churchill/ |access-date=2024-10-08 |website=International Churchill Society |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=pixelstorm |date=2009-01-07 |title=Churchill the Writer: His Life as a Man of Letters |url=https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/reference/churchill-the-writer-his-life-as-a-man-of-letters/ |access-date=2024-10-31 |website=International Churchill Society |language=en-US}}</ref> [[Edward Heath]]'s books on his wider interests in sailing, music and travel, Major's history of cricket<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mosey |first=Roger |date=2007-05-19 |title=Playing a straight bat |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2007/may/19/featuresreviews.guardianreview10 |access-date=2024-10-31 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2007-05-19 |title=A Politician addicted to spin |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-daily-telegraph-a-politician-addicte/130674581/ |access-date=2024-10-31 |website=Newspapers.com |language=en-US}}</ref> and Arthur Balfour's philosophical writings.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Root |first=John David |date=1980 |title=The Philosophical and Religious Thought of Arthur James Balfour (1848-1930) |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-british-studies/article/abs/philosophical-and-religious-thought-of-arthur-james-balfour-18481930/A1BF68053D5643185DC06E36B91B15DF |journal=Journal of British Studies |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=120–141 |doi=10.1086/385758 |via=Cambridge University Press}}</ref> Some prime ministers such as [[William Ewart Gladstone|William Gladstone]] mainly wrote tracts and tomes on theology and religion<ref>{{Cite web |title=Gladstone's Writing |url=https://www.gladstoneslibrary.org/reading-rooms/digital-gladstone/gladstones-writing |access-date=2024-10-31 |website=Gladstone's Library |language=en-GB}}</ref> and [[Benjamin Disraeli]] wrote many best-selling novels in addition to memoirs and history.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Benjamin Disraeli: Literary Contribution as Novelist |url=https://www.englishliterature.info/2021/08/benjamin-disraeli-literary-writings.html |access-date=2024-10-31 |website=Literature Analysis}}</ref><ref name=":2" /><ref>{{Cite news |title=The best and worst memoirs by British prime ministers |url=https://www.economist.com/the-economist-reads/2024/07/03/the-best-and-worst-memoirs-by-british-prime-ministers |access-date=2024-10-08 |newspaper=The Economist |issn=0013-0613}}</ref>
[[File:Charles Grey - 2nd Earl Grey - atop the Grey Momument - Newcastle upon Tyne - England - 140804.jpg|thumbnail|200px|Lord Grey, often called the first modern Prime Minister]]
[[File:The Duke of Wellington and Sir Robert Peel 1844.jpg|thumb|The [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington|Duke of Wellington]] (on the left) served in the government of his successor, [[Robert Peel]] (on the right), twice.]]
[[File:Inscription Grey Monument.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Inscription on Grey Monument, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England (click image to enlarge)]]
In the 21st century, many former prime ministers have set up their own foundations and charities to be used as a platform to continue involvement in political and public issues after they leave office.<ref name=":2" /> In 1991, [[Margaret Thatcher]] became the first prime minister to set up her own foundation to try to secure her legacy and propagate her ideology known as [[Thatcherism]], but it closed down in 2005.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Barkham |first=Patrick |date=2005-05-10 |title=End of an era for Thatcher foundation |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/may/11/conservatives.politics |access-date=2024-10-08 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> Tony Blair has set up a sports foundation, an inter-faith foundation and the [[Tony Blair Institute for Global Change]] in 2016.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2016-12-01 |title=Tony Blair Institute 'to focus on making globalisation work' |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-38167749 |access-date=2024-10-08 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}|</ref> In his post-premiership, Blair is also the first prime minister to take on a major international role, as an official envoy of the [[Quartet on the Middle East]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2015-05-27 |title=Tony Blair quits Middle East envoy role |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-32905468 |access-date=2024-10-08 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref> [[Gordon Brown]] was actively involved in politics long after he left office, most notably during the [[2014 Scottish independence referendum]], in which he campaigned for the no vote that advocated Scotland to remain in the union.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Freedland |first=Jonathan |date=2014-06-27 |title=Gordon Brown is back, and may be the man to save the union |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/27/gordon-brown-union-scottish-independence |access-date=2024-10-09 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Boffey |first=Daniel |date=2014-09-20 |title=Gordon Brown tells Scots: I'll make sure Westminster keeps promises |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/20/gordon-brown-scotland-labour-party-strategy |access-date=2024-10-09 |work=The Observer |language=en-GB |issn=0029-7712}}</ref>


However, some former prime ministers have returned to serve in the governments of their successors, and a few have had 'retreads' that saw them serve short tenures due to their successors unexpectedly resigning or passing away. Notable cases include the [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington|Duke of Wellington]] who, after serving two brief terms in office, was able to command significant influence as a senior member of the [[Tories (British political party)|Tory party]] and returned to serve in two governments of his successor, [[Robert Peel|Sir Robert Peel]], as [[Foreign Secretary]] and [[Minister without portfolio (United Kingdom)|Minister without portfolio]]. He later retired to serve as Commander-in-Chief of the Army from 1842 until his death in 1852.<ref name=":2" /> Arthur Balfour served as prime minister for three years of his term after he was defeated in the [[1906 United Kingdom general election|1906 general election]] and later went on to serve as the [[Foreign Secretary]] for eleven years in the [[Imperial War Cabinet|imperial war cabinet]] during and after [[World War I]] under three prime ministers. After [[Neville Chamberlain]] resigned as prime minister in May 1940, he returned to serve under Winston Churchill in his subsequent [[Churchill war ministry|war cabinet]]. [[Alec Douglas-Home]], who resigned after losing the [[1964 United Kingdom general election|1964 general election]], later came to serve in the cabinet of Edward Heath in 1970.<ref>{{Cite web |title=British Prime Ministers who returned to government |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/british-prime-ministers-who-returned-to-government |access-date=2024-10-08 |website=GOV.UK |language=en}}</ref>
Since 1722, most Prime Ministers have been members of the Commons; since 1902, all have had a seat there.<ref group=note>Except [[Alec Douglas-Home|Lord Home]], who resigned his peerage to stand in a by-election soon after becoming Prime Minister</ref> Like other members, they are elected initially to represent only a constituency. Former Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]], for example, represented [[Sedgefield (UK Parliament constituency)|Sedgefield]] in County Durham from 1983 to 2007. He became Prime Minister because in 1994 he was elected Labour Party leader and then led the party to victory in the [[United Kingdom general election, 1997|1997 general election]], winning 418 seats compared to 165 for the Conservatives and gaining a majority in the House of Commons.


=== {{anchor|Public Duty Costs Allowance|PDCA}} Public Duty Costs Allowance (PDCA) ===
Neither the Sovereign nor the [[House of Lords]] had any meaningful influence over who was elected to the Commons in 1997 or in deciding whether or not Blair would become Prime Minister. Their detachment from the electoral process and the selection of the Prime Minister has been a convention of the constitution for almost 200 years.


All former prime ministers are entitled to claim for salary or office expenses incurred in fulfilling public duties in that role. The allowance may not be used to pay for private or parliamentary duties. It is administered by the Cabinet Office Finance Team.
Prior to the 19th century, however, they had significant influence, using to their advantage the fact that most citizens were disenfranchised and seats in the Commons were allocated disproportionately. The system was based on legislation passed in 1429 and virtually unchanged for 400 years.<ref>Maitland, p. 354.</ref><ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], pages 234–235.</ref> In 1832, only 440,000 met the voter qualifications in a population of 17&nbsp;million. Although populations shifted, representation in the Commons remained the same. Consequently, some constituencies were over-represented; others under-represented. Through patronage, corruption and bribery, the Crown and Lords "owned" about 30% of the seats (called "pocket" or "rotten boroughs") giving them a significant influence in the Commons and in the selection of the Prime Minister.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], pages 37–38,</ref><ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], pages 219–222.</ref>


The maximum amount which may be claimed per year is £115,000, plus 10% towards any staff pension costs. This limit is reviewed annually, and at the start of each Parliament, by the current prime minister. The maximum level may be adjusted downwards if the former prime minister receives any public funds for fulfilling other public appointments.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Public Duty Costs Allowance guidance |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-duty-cost-allowance/public-duty-costs-allowance-guidance |access-date=2 November 2022 |website=GOV.UK |language=en}}</ref> Downing Street confirmed in November 2023 that former prime minister David Cameron would not claim from the PDCA [[David Cameron's tenure as Foreign Secretary|while he acted as Foreign Secretary]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Allegretti |first=Steven Swinford, Chris Smyth, Laurence Sleator, Oliver Wright, Geraldine Scott, Matt Dathan, Aubrey |date=25 November 2023 |title=MP files letter of no confidence in Rishi Sunak as reshuffle backlash begins — as it happened |newspaper=[[The Times]] |language=en |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/rishi-sunak-cabinet-reshuffle-2023-latest-news-suella-braverman-whvp0c88l |access-date=25 November 2023 |issn=0140-0460}}</ref>
In 1830, [[Charles Grey, 2nd Earl Grey|Charles Grey]], a life-long Whig, became Prime Minister determined to reform the electoral system. For two years, he and his Cabinet (including four future Prime Ministers&nbsp;– [[William Lamb, 2nd Viscount Melbourne|Melbourne]], [[John Russell, 1st Earl Russell|Russell]], [[Henry Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston|Palmerston]] and [[Edward Smith-Stanley, 14th Earl of Derby|Derby]]&nbsp;– and one former one, [[Frederick John Robinson, 1st Viscount Goderich|Goderich]]) fought to pass what has come to be known as the [[Reform Act 1832|Great Reform Bill of 1832]].<ref>[[#Pike|Pike]], pages 188–194.</ref><ref>Minney, p. 216. These are two of the most exciting years in all of Parliamentary history, filled with drama and a sense that history was being made. Lord Creevey, for example, recorded in his diary, "I dined in Downing Street with Lady Grey.... After dinner the private secretary to the Prime Minister and myself being alone, I ascertained that although Lord Grey was gone to Brighton ostensibly to prick for Sheriffs for the year, his great object was to put his plan of reform before the King, previous... to its being proposed to the House of Commons. A ticklish operation, this! to propose to a Sovereign a plan for reducing his own power and patronage. However, there is the plan all cut and dry, and the Cabinet unanimous upon it.... Grey is determined to fight it out to a dissolution of Parliament, if his plan is beat in the Commons. My eye, what a crisis!"</ref>


== See also ==
The greatness of the Great Reform Bill lay less in substance than symbolism. As John Bright, the liberal statesman of the next generation, said, "It was not a good Bill, but it was a great Bill when it passed."<ref>Trevelyan, p.272.</ref>


===Lists of prime ministers by different criteria===
Substantively, it increased the franchise 65% to 717,000 with the middle class receiving most of the new votes. The representation of 56 rotten boroughs was eliminated completely and half the representation of 30 others; the freed up seats were distributed to boroughs created for previously disenfranchised areas. However, many rotten boroughs remained and it still excluded millions of working class men and all women.<ref>[[#Marriott|Marriott]], pages 222–223.</ref><ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], pages 437–444.</ref>
{{Div col|colwidth=27em}}
* [[Timeline of prime ministers of Great Britain and the United Kingdom]]
* [[List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom by length of tenure]]
* [[List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom by age]]
* [[List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom by education]]
* [[List of current heads of government in the United Kingdom and dependencies]]
* [[List of fictional prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[List of peerages held by prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[List of United Kingdom Parliament constituencies represented by sitting prime ministers]]
* [[Historical rankings of prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
{{Div col end}}
All lists: [[:Category:Lists of prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]


===Other related pages===
Symbolically, the Bill exceeded expectations and is now ranked with [[Magna Carta]] and the [[Bill of Rights 1689|Bill of Rights]] as one of the most important pieces of legislation ever passed by Parliament.
{{Div col|colwidth=27em}}

* [[Air transport of the Royal Family and Government of the United Kingdom]]
First, the Great Reform Bill removed the Sovereign from the election process and the choice of Prime Minister. Slowly evolving for 100 years, this convention was confirmed two years after the passage of the bill. In 1834 [[King William IV]] dismissed Melbourne as Premier, but was forced to recall him when [[Robert Peel]], the King's choice, could not form a working majority. Since then, no Sovereign has tried to impose a Prime Minister on Parliament.
* [[Spouse of the prime minister of the United Kingdom]]

* [[Records of prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
Second, the Bill reduced the Lords' power by eliminating many of their pocket boroughs and creating new ones where they had no influence. Weakened, they were unable to prevent the passage of more comprehensive electoral reforms in 1867, 1884, 1918 and 1928 when universal equal suffrage was achieved.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], pages 454, 468, 486, and 489.</ref> [[File:PunchDizzyReformBill.png|thumb|180px|left|''Disraeli and Gladstone Race to Pass the Reform Bill, Punch, 1867'' The rivalry between Disraeli and Gladstone helped to identify the position of Prime Minister with specific personalities. (Disraeli is in the lead looking back over his shoulder at Gladstone.)]] Ultimately, this erosion of power led to the Parliament Act of 1911 that marginalised the Lords' role in the legislative process and to the convention that a Prime Minister cannot sit in the House of Lords. The last to do so was [[Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury]], from 1895 to 1902.<ref group=note>The last Prime Minister to be a member of the Lords during any part of his tenure was [[Alec Douglas-Home, 14th Earl of Home]] in 1963. Lord Home was the last Prime Minister who was a hereditary peer, but, within days of attaining office, he disclaimed his peerage, abiding by the convention that the Prime Minister should sit in the House of Commons. A junior member of his Conservative Party who had already been selected as candidate in a [[Kinross and West Perthshire by-election, 1963|by-election]] in a staunch Conservative seat stood aside, allowing Home to contest the by-election, win and thus procure a seat in the lower House.</ref>

Grey's bearing changed the Premiership. Often called the first "modern Prime Minister", he set both an example and a precedent for his successors. He was ''primus inter pares'', "first among equals", as Bagehot said in 1867 of the Prime Minister's status. Using his Whig victory as a mandate for reform, Grey was unrelenting in the pursuit of this goal, using every Parliamentary device to achieve it. Although respectful toward the King, he made it clear that his constitutional duty was to acquiesce to the will of the people and Parliament.

The Loyal Opposition acquiesced too. Some disgruntled Tories claimed they would repeal the Bill once they regained a majority. But in 1834, Robert Peel, the new Conservative leader, put an end to this threat when he stated in his [[Tamworth Manifesto]] that the Bill was "a final and irrevocable settlement of a great constitutional question which no friend to the peace and welfare of this country would attempt to disturb".<ref>[[#Pike|Pike]], p. 219.</ref> Thus, Peel affirmed a convention of the constitution that promotes stability in the British system: the Parliament of the day must respect the settlement of constitutional issues made by previous Parliaments.

===Populist Prime Ministers===
[[File:Elliott & Fry10a.jpg|thumb|200|right|Prime Minister [[William Ewart Gladstone]] cultivated the public image as a ''man of the people'' by circulating pictures like this of himself cutting down oak trees with an axe.]]

The Premiership was a reclusive office prior to 1832. The incumbent worked with his Cabinet and other government officials; he occasionally met with the Sovereign, and attended Parliament when it was in session during the spring and summer. He never went out on the stump to campaign, even during elections; he rarely spoke directly to ordinary voters about policies and issues.

After the passage of the [[Great Reform Bill]], the nature of the position changed; Prime Ministers had to go out among the people. The Bill increased the electorate to 717,000. Subsequent legislation (and population growth) raised it to 2&nbsp;million in 1867, 5.5&nbsp;million in 1884 and 21.4&nbsp;million in 1918. As the franchise increased, power shifted to the people and Prime Ministers assumed more responsibilities with respect to party leadership. It naturally fell on them to motivate and organise their followers, explain party policies, and deliver its "message". Successful leaders had to have a new set of skills: to give a good speech, present a favourable image, and interact with a crowd. They became the "voice", the “face” and the "image" of the party and ministry.

[[File:Victoria Disraeli cartoon.jpg|thumb|left|180px|Prime Minister [[Benjamin Disraeli]] cultivated a public image as an Imperialist with grand gestures such as conferring on [[Queen Victoria|Victoria]] the title “Empress of India”.]]

Robert Peel, often called the "model Prime Minister",<ref>Rosebery, p. 27. Lord Rosebery, later a Prime Minister himself, said of Peel: "the model of all Prime Ministers. It is more than doubtful, indeed, if it be possible in this generation, when the burdens of Empire and of office have so incalculably grown, for any Prime Minister to discharge the duties of his high office with the same thoroughness or in the same spirit as Peel . . . Peel kept a strict supervision over every department: he seems to have been master of the business of each and all of them . . . it is probable that no Prime Minister ever fulfilled so completely and thoroughly the functions of the office, parliamentary, administrative, and general as Sir Robert Peel."</ref> was the first to recognise this new role. After the successful Conservative campaign of 1841, J. W. Croker said in a letter to Peel, "The elections are wonderful, and the curiosity is that all turns on the name of Sir Robert Peel. 'It's the first time that I remember in our history that the people have chosen the first Minister for the Sovereign. Mr. Pitt's case in '84 is the nearest analogy; but then the people only confirmed the Sovereign's choice; here every Conservative candidate professed himself in plain words to be Sir Robert Peel's man, and on that ground was elected."<ref>Hanham, pages 63–64.</ref>

[[Benjamin Disraeli]] and [[William Ewart Gladstone]] developed this new role further by projecting "images" of themselves to the public. Known by their nicknames "Dizzy" and the "Grand Old Man", their colourful, sometimes bitter, personal and political rivalry over the issues of their time&nbsp;– Imperialism vs. Anti-Imperialism, expansion of the franchise, labour reform, and Irish Home Rule&nbsp;– spanned almost twenty years until Disraeli's death in 1881.<ref group=note>Even after death their rivalry continued. When Disraeli died in 1881, Gladstone proposed a state funeral, but Disraeli's will specified that he have a private funeral and be buried next to his wife. Gladstone replied, "As [Disraeli] lived, so he died&nbsp;— all display, without reality or genuineness." Disraeli, for his part, once said that GOM (the acronym for "Grand Old Man"), really stood for "God's Only Mistake".</ref> Documented by the penny press, photographs and political cartoons, their rivalry linked specific personalities with the Premiership in the public mind and further enhanced its status.

[[File:GladstoneandRosebery.gif|thumb|200px|right|''Gladstone During the Midlothian Campaign 1879'' Speaking directly to the people for the first time, Gladstone's Midlothian campaign symbolises a major change in the role of the Prime Minister. (Gladstone is seated in the centre; Rosebery, a future Prime Minister, is sitting on the carpet in front.)]]

Each created a different public image of himself and his party. Disraeli, who expanded the Empire to protect British interests abroad, cultivated the image of himself (and the Conservative Party) as "Imperialist", making grand gestures such as conferring the title "Empress of India" on Queen Victoria in 1876. Gladstone, who saw little value in the Empire, proposed an anti-Imperialist policy (later called "Little England"), and cultivated the image of himself (and the Liberal Party) as "man of the people" by circulating pictures of himself cutting down great oak trees with an axe as a hobby.

Gladstone went beyond image by appealing directly to the people. In his [[Midlothian Campaign]]&nbsp;– so called because he stood as a candidate for that county&nbsp;– Gladstone spoke in fields, halls and railway stations to hundreds, sometimes thousands, of students, farmers, labourers and middle class workers. Although not the first leader to speak directly to voters&nbsp;– both he and Disraeli had spoken directly to party loyalists before on special occasions&nbsp;– he was the first to canvass an entire constituency delivering his message to anyone who would listen, encouraging his supporters and trying to convert his opponents. Publicised nationwide, Gladstone's message became that of the party. Noting its significance, [[Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 7th Earl of Shaftesbury|Lord Shaftesbury]] said, "It is a new thing and a very serious thing to see the Prime Minister on the stump."<ref>Bigham, p. 318. Disraeli and Victoria thought the tactic was unconstitutional. "Such conduct", the Queen said, "is unheard of and the only excuse is&nbsp;– that he is not quite sane."</ref>

Campaigning directly to the people became commonplace. Several 20th century Prime Ministers, such as [[David Lloyd George]] and [[Winston Churchill]], were famous for their oratorical skills. After the introduction of radio, motion pictures, television, and the internet, many used these technologies to project their public image and address the nation. [[Stanley Baldwin]], a master of the radio broadcast in the 1920s and 1930s, reached a national audience in his talks filled with homely advice and simple expressions of national pride.<ref>[[#Pike|Pike]], p. 389.</ref> [[Winston Churchill|Churchill]] also used the radio to great effect, inspiring, reassuring and informing the people with his speeches during the Second World War. Two recent Prime Ministers, [[Margaret Thatcher]] and [[Tony Blair]], achieved celebrity status, like rock stars but have been criticised for their more 'presidential' style of leadership.. According to [[Anthony King (professor)|Anthony King]], ""The props in Blair's theatre of celebrity included ... his guitar, his casual clothes ... footballs bounced skilfully off the top of his head ... and carefully choreographed speeches-cum-performances at Labour Party conferences."<ref>[[#King|King]], pages 319–320.</ref>

==Modern Premiership==
===Parliament Act and the Premiership===
In addition to being the leader of a great political party and the head of Her Majesty's Government, the modern Prime Minister is the leader of the House of Commons. From this commanding position, the Prime Minister directs the law-making process, enacting into law his party’s programme. For example, Tony Blair, whose Labour party was elected in 1997 partly on a promise to enact a British Bill of Rights and to create devolved governments for Scotland and Wales, subsequently stewarded through Parliament the Human Rights Act (1998), the Scotland Act (1998) and the Government of Wales Act (1998).

From its appearance in the 14th century Parliament has been a bicameral legislature consisting of the Commons and the Lords. Members of the Commons are elected; those in the Lords are not. Most Lords are called "Temporal" with titles such as Duke, Marquess, Earl and Viscount. The balance are Lords Spiritual (prelates of the Anglican Church).

For most of the history of the Upper House, Lords Temporal were land owners who held their estates, titles and seats as an hereditary right passed down from one generation to the next in some cases for centuries. In 1910, for example, there were nineteen whose title was created before 1500.<ref>[[#Tuchman1|Tuchman]], p 391</ref><ref group=note>Following a series of reforms in the 20th century the Lords now consists almost entirely of appointed members who hold their title only for their own lifetime. As of July 2008 the Lords had 746 members, compared to 646 in the Commons.</ref><ref name="lords_composition">{{cite web |url=http://www.parliament.uk/directories/house_of_lords_information_office/analysis_by_composition.cfm |title=House of Lords: Breakdown of Lords by party strength and type of peerage |accessdate=25 May 2008 |date=1 May 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hcio/stateparties.cfm |title=House of Commons: State of the parties |accessdate=25 May 2008|date=23 May 2008 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080511151016/http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hcio/stateparties.cfm |archivedate = 11 May 2008}}</ref>

Until 1911, Prime Ministers had to guide legislation through the Commons and the Lords and obtain a majority approval in both to translate it into law. This was not always easy because political differences usually separated the chambers. Representing the landed aristocracy, Lords Temporal were generally Tory (later Conservative) who wanted to maintain the status quo and resisted progressive measures such as extending the franchise. The party affiliation of members of the Commons was less predictable. During the 18th century its makeup varied because the Lords had considerable control over elections: sometimes Whigs dominated it, sometimes Tories. After the passage of the Great Reform Bill in 1832, the Commons gradually became more progressive, a tendency that increased with the passage of each subsequent expansion of the franchise.

[[File:Meeting of Asquith cabinet19090001.jpg|250px|thumb|right| ''Asquith's Cabinet Reacts to the Lords' Rejection of the "People's Budget"—a satirical cartoon, 1909'' Prime Minister Asquith's government welcomed the Lords' veto of the "People's Budget"; it moved the country toward a constitutional crisis over the Lords' legislative powers. (Asquith makes the announcement while David Lloyd George holds down a jubilant Winston Churchill.)]]

In 1906, the Liberal party, led by Sir [[Henry Campbell-Bannerman]], won an overwhelming victory on a platform that promised social reforms for the working class. With 379 seats compared to the Conservatives' 132, the Liberals could confidently expect to pass their legislative programme through the Commons.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], p. 477,</ref><ref>[[#Tuchman1|Tuchman]], p 365. The Liberal majority was actually much larger in practice because on most issues they could rely on the votes of 51 Labour and Lib-Lab representatives and 83 Irish Nationalists. Their majority was so large and unprecedented&nbsp;— they had more seats than all other parties combined&nbsp;— that one Conservative called it a "hideous abnormality".</ref> At the same time, however, the Conservative Party had a huge majority in the Lords; it could easily veto any legislation passed by the Commons that was against their interests.<ref>Furthermore, [[Arthur Balfour]], the defeated Conservative Prime Minister and now Leader of the Opposition, declared that the House of Lords was the "watchdog of the constitution"; it had an obligation to promote stability by rejecting "radical" legislation proposed by "zealots" who may have a temporary numerical advantage in the Commons. [[David Lloyd George]], the new Liberal [[President of the Board of Trade]] and a future Prime Minister, said the Lords ". . . is not the watchdog of the British Constitution. It is Mr Balfour's poodle!" [[#Smith|Smith]], p. 478</ref>

For five years, the Commons and the Lords fought over one bill after another. The Liberals pushed through parts of their programme, but the Conservatives vetoed or modified others. When the Lords vetoed the "People's Budget" in 1909, the controversy moved almost inevitably toward a constitutional crisis.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], pp 478-480. Although the Liberals did pass the [[Trade Disputes Act 1906|Trade Disputes Act]], the [[Workmen's Compensation Act 1906|Workmen's Compensation Act]], the [[Labour Exchanges Act 1909|Labour Exchanges Act]], the [[Trade Boards Act 1909|Trade Boards Act]], and the [[Housing and Town Planning Act 1909|Housing and Town Planning Act]], the Lords vetoed an [[Education Bill]], a land reform bill, a [[Licensing Bill]], and a Plural Voting Bill; they mutilated and mauled an [[Agricultural Holdings Bill]] and an Irish Town Tenants Bill, and they almost rejected the [[Old Age Pensions Act 1908|Old Age Pensions Act]].</ref>

[[File:Passing of the Parliament Bill, 1911 - Project Gutenberg eText 19609.jpg|250px|thumb|left| ''An important vote: the [[House of Lords]] voting for the [[Parliament Act 1911]]. From the Drawing by S. Begg'' The Parliament Act 1911 eliminated the Lords’ veto power over legislation approved by the House of Commons. Indirectly, it also further enhanced the dominance of the Prime Minister in the constitutional hierarchy.]]

In 1910, Prime Minister [[Herbert Asquith]]<ref group=note>Campbell-Bannerman retired and died in 1908</ref> introduced a bill "for regulating the relations between the Houses of Parliament" which would eliminate the Lords' veto power over legislation. Passed by the Commons, the Lords rejected it. In a general election fought on this issue, the Liberals were weakened but still had a comfortable majority. At Asquith's request, King [[George V of the United Kingdom|George V]] then threatened to create a sufficient number of new Liberal Peers to ensure the bill's passage. Rather than accept a permanent Liberal majority, the Conservative Lords yielded, and the bill became law.<ref>[[#Knappen|Knappen]], pp 554-555</ref>

The [[Parliament Act 1911]] established the supremacy of the Commons. It provided that the Lords could not delay for more than one month any bill certified by the Speaker of the Commons as a money bill. Furthermore, the act provided that any bill rejected by the Lords would nevertheless become law if passed by the Commons in three successive sessions provided that two years had elapsed since its original passage. The Lords could still delay or suspend the enactment of legislation but could no longer veto it.<ref>[[#Smith|Smith]], p. 482,</ref><ref>[[#Knappen|Knappen]], p. 555</ref> Subsequently the Lords “suspending” power was reduced to one year by the [[Parliament Act 1949]].

Indirectly, the Act enhanced the already dominant position of Prime Minister in the constitutional hierarchy. Although the Lords are still involved in the legislative process and the Prime Minister must still guide legislation through both Houses, the Lords no longer have the power to veto or even delay enactment of legislation passed by the Commons. Provided that he controls the Cabinet, maintains party discipline, and commands a majority in the Commons, the Prime Minister is assured of putting through his legislative agenda.

==="Presidential" Premiership===
The role and power of the Prime Minister have been subject to much change in the last fifty years. There has gradually been a change from Cabinet decision making and deliberation to the dominance of the Prime Minister. As early as 1965, in a new introduction to [[Walter Bagehot]]'s classic work ''[[The English Constitution]]'', [[Richard Crossman]] identified a new era of "Prime Ministerial" government. Some commentators, such as the political scientist Michael Foley, have argued there is a ''de facto'' "British Presidency". In Tony Blair's government, many sources such as former ministers have suggested that decision-making was centred around him and Gordon Brown, and the Cabinet was no longer used for decision making.<ref>Chapter 12 Blair's Cabinet: Monarchy Returns, British Government in Crisis, Christopher Foster, Hart Publishing, 2005</ref> Former ministers such as [[Clare Short]] and [[Chris Smith, Baron Smith of Finsbury|Chris Smith]] have criticised the lack of decision-making power in Cabinet. When she resigned, Short denounced "the centralisation of power into the hands of the Prime Minister and an increasingly small number of advisers"<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3019871.stm |title=Short launches broadside on Blair |publisher=BBC News |date=12 May 2003 |accessdate=23 April 2006}}</ref> The [[Butler Review]] of 2004 condemned Blair's style of "sofa government". [[File:Churchill waves to crowds.jpg|thumb|200px|right|''Churchill waves to the Crowds After Announcing the Surrender of Germany 1945'']]

Prime Ministers may dominate the Cabinet so much that they become "Semi-Presidents". Examples include [[William Ewart Gladstone]], [[David Lloyd George]], [[Neville Chamberlain]], [[Winston Churchill]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], and [[Tony Blair]]. The powers of some Prime Ministers waxed or waned, depending upon their own level of energy, political skills or outside events: [[Ramsay MacDonald]], for example, was dominant in his Labour governments, but during his [[UK National Government|National Government]] his powers diminished so that he was merely the figurehead of the government. In modern times, Prime Ministers have never been merely titular; dominant or somewhat dominant personalities are the norm.

Generally, however, the Prime Minister is held responsible by the nation for the consequences of legislation or of general government policy – indeed, this heavy burden has pictured as ageing Prime Ministers at two or three times the normal rate. Margaret Thatcher's party forced her from power after the introduction of the [[community charge|poll tax]]; [[Anthony Eden|Sir Anthony Eden]] fell from power following the [[Suez Crisis]]; and Neville Chamberlain resigned in 1940 after the Allies were forced to retreat from Norway, as he believed a government supported by all parties was essential, and the Labour and Liberal parties would not join a government headed by him.

The Prime Minister's powers are also limited by the House of Commons, whose support the Government is obliged to maintain. The Commons checks the powers of the Prime Minister through committee hearings and through [[Question Time]], a weekly occurrence in which the Prime Minister is obliged to respond to the questions of the Leader of the Opposition and other members of the House. In practice, however, a Government with a strong majority need rarely fear "backbench rebellions".

===Powers and constraints===
When commissioned by the Sovereign, a potential Prime Minister's first requisite is to "form a Government"&nbsp;– create a cabinet of ministry that has the support of the House of Commons, of which they are expected to be a member. The Prime Minister then formally kisses the hands of his Sovereign, whose royal prerogative is thereafter exercised solely on the advice of the Prime Minister and Her Majesty's Government ("HMG"). The Prime Minister has weekly audiences with the Sovereign, whose functions are constitutionally limited "to advise, to be consulted, and to warn"; the extent of the Sovereign's ability to influence the nature of the Prime Ministerial advice is unknown, but presumably varies depending upon the personal relationship between the Sovereign and the Prime Minister of the day.

The Prime Minister will appoint all other cabinet members (who then become active Privy Counsellors) and ministers, although consulting senior ministers on their junior ministers, without any Parliamentary or other control or process over these powers. At any time, he may obtain the appointment, dismissal or nominal resignation of any other minister; he may resign, either purely personally or with his whole government. The Prime Minister generally co-ordinates the policies and activities of the Cabinet and Government departments, acting as the main public "face" of Her Majesty's Government.

Although the [[Commander-in-Chief]] of the [[British Armed Forces]] is legally the Sovereign, under constitutional practice the Prime Minister, with the Secretary of State for Defence whom he may appoint or dismiss, holds power over the deployment and disposition of British forces, and the declaration of war. The Prime Minister can authorise, but not directly order, the use of Britain's [[Nuclear weapons and the United Kingdom|nuclear weapons]] and the Prime Minister is hence a Commander-in-Chief in all but name.

The Prime Minister makes all the most senior Crown appointments, and most others are made by Ministers over whom he has the power of appointment and dismissal. [[Privy Council of the United Kingdom|Privy Counsellors]], [[Ambassador]]s and [[High Commissioner]]s, senior civil servants, senior military officers, members of important committees and commissions, and other officials are selected, and in most cases may be removed, by the Prime Minister. He also formally advises the Sovereign on the appointment of Archbishops and Bishops of the [[Church of England]], but his discretion is limited by the existence of the [[Crown Nominations Commission]]. The appointment of senior judges, while constitutionally still on the advice of the Prime Minister, is now made on the basis of recommendations from independent bodies.

Peerages, knighthoods, and other honours are bestowed by the Sovereign only on the advice of the Prime Minister. The only important British honours over which the Prime Minister does not have control are the Orders of the [[Order of the Garter|Garter]], [[Order of the Thistle|Thistle]], and [[Order of Merit|Merit]]; the [[Royal Victorian Order]]; and the [[Venerable Order of Saint John]], which are all within the "personal gift" of the Sovereign.

The Prime Minister appoints Ministers known as the "Whips", who use his patronage to negotiate for the support of MPs and to discipline dissenters of the government parliamentary party. Party discipline is strong since electors generally vote for parties rather than individuals. Members of Parliament may be expelled from their party for failing to support the Government on important issues, and although this will not mean they must resign as MPs, it will usually make re-election difficult. Members of Parliament who hold ministerial office or political privileges can expect removal for failing to support the Prime Minister. Restraints imposed by the Commons grow weaker when the Government's party enjoys a large majority in that House, or in the electorate. In general, however, the Prime Minister and their colleagues may secure the Commons' support for almost any bill by internal party negotiations with little regard to opposition MPs.

However, even a government with a healthy majority can on occasion find itself unable to pass legislation. For example, on 31 January 2006, Tony Blair's Government was defeated over certain aspects of proposals to outlaw religious hatred, and, on 9 November 2005, was defeated over plans which would have allowed police to detain terror suspects for up to 90 days without charge. On other occasions, the Government alters its proposals in order to avoid defeat in the Commons, as Tony Blair's Government did in February 2006 over education reforms.<ref name="education reforms">{{
cite news
|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,17129-2028503,00.html
|work=The Times |location=London
|title=Blair defends school reform climbdown.
|date=7 February 2006
}}</ref>

Formerly, a Prime Minister whose government lost a Commons vote would be regarded as fatally weakened, and his whole government would resign, usually precipitating a general election. In modern practice, when the Government party has an absolute majority in the House, only the express vote "that this House has no confidence in Her Majesty's Government" is treated as having this effect; dissentients on a minor issue within the majority party are unlikely to force an election with the probable loss of their seats and salaries, and any future in the party.

Likewise, a Prime Minister is no longer just "first amongst equals" in HM Government; although theoretically his Cabinet might still outvote him, in practice he progressively entrenches his position by retaining only personal supporters in the Cabinet. In periodical reshuffles, the Prime Minister can sideline and simply drop from Cabinet the Members who have fallen out of favour: they remain Privy Counsellors, but the Prime Minister decides which of them are summoned to meetings. The Prime Minister is responsible for producing and enforcing the [[Ministerial Code]].

==Precedence, privileges and form of address==
[[File:Blair Cheney at Number 10.jpg|thumb|140px|right|Tony Blair and [[Dick Cheney]] at the main door to 10 Downing Street, the Prime Minister's residence in London, on 11 March 2002]]
By tradition, before a new Prime Minister can enter [[10 Downing Street]] for the first time as its occupant, they are required to announce to the country and the world that they have [[Kissing hands|kissed hands]] with the reigning monarch, and thus have become Prime Minister. This is usually done by saying words to the effect of:

{{quote|Her Majesty the Queen ''[His Majesty the King]'' has asked me to form a government and I have accepted.|<ref>{{cite news |title=David Cameron becomes PM: Full Downing Street statement |first= David |last=Cameron |agency=BBC News |date=11 May 2010 | accessdate = 11 May 2010 |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8676405.stm}}</ref><ref>{{YouTube|id = TezCBzlB3d8|title = Prime Minister Gordon Brown arrives at Downing Street}}</ref><ref>{{YouTube|id = Ebj1vT7CMyk|title = Transfer of Power from James Callaghan to Margaret Thatcher}}</ref>}}

Throughout the United Kingdom, the Prime Minister outranks all other dignitaries except members of the Royal Family, the [[Lord Chancellor]], and senior ecclesiastical figures.<ref group=note>These include: in [[England and Wales]], the [[Church of England|Anglican]] Archbishops of Canterbury and York; in Scotland, the Lord High Commissioner and the [[Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland|Moderator of the General Assembly]] of the [[Church of Scotland]]; in [[Northern Ireland]], the [[Church of Ireland|Anglican]] and Roman Catholic Archbishops of Armagh and Dublin and the [[Moderator of the Presbyterian Church in Ireland|Moderator of the General Assembly]] of the [[Presbyterian Church in Ireland|Presbyterian Church]].</ref>

At present the Prime Minister receives £142,500 including a salary of £65,737 as a Member of Parliament.<ref>{{cite |url=http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/latest-news/2010/05/a-new-politics-cutting-ministerial-pay-50065 |title=A new politics: cutting Ministerial pay |publisher=Number10.gov.uk |date=13 May 2010 |accessdate=19 June 2010}}</ref> Until 2006, the [[Lord Chancellor]] was the highest paid member of the government ahead of the Prime Minister. This reflected the Lord Chancellor's position as head of the [[Judiciary of England and Wales#Judicial salaries|judicial pay scale]]. The [[Constitutional Reform Act 2005]] eliminated the Lord Chancellor's judicial functions and also reduced the office's salary below that of the Prime Minister.

The Prime Minister is customarily a member of the Privy Council and thus entitled to the appellation "[[The Right Honourable]]". Membership of the Council is retained for life. It is a constitutional convention that only a Privy Counsellor can be appointed Prime Minister. Most potential candidates have already attained this status. The only occasion when a non-Privy Counsellor was the natural appointment was Ramsay MacDonald in 1924. The issue was resolved by appointing him to the Council immediately prior to his appointment as Prime Minister.

According to the now defunct [[Department for Constitutional Affairs]], the Prime Minister is made a Privy Counsellor as a result of taking office and should be addressed by the official title prefixed by "The Right Honourable" and not by a personal name. Although this form of address is employed at formal occasions it is rarely used by the media. Since "Prime Minister" is a position, not a title, the incumbent should be referred to as "the Prime Minister". The title "Prime Minister" (e.g. "Prime Minister David Cameron") is technically incorrect but is sometimes used erroneously outside the United Kingdom, and has more recently become acceptable within it.<ref>An example of "Prime Minister" being used as a title, even by Number 10 Downing Street. {{cite web |url=http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/latest-news/2010/09/pm-attending-european-council-55107|title=PM attends European Council |date=16 September 2010 |accessdate=17 September 2010}}</ref> Within the UK, the expression "Prime Minister Cameron" (or "Prime Minister Brown", etc.) is never used, although it, too, is sometimes used by foreign dignitaries and news sources.

[[File:chequers2.jpg|thumb|200px|left|''Chequers.'' The Prime Minister's official country home.]]
While in office, the Prime Minister officially resides at [[10 Downing Street]] in London and is also entitled to use the country house of [[Chequers]] in [[Buckinghamshire]].

Upon retirement, it is customary for the Sovereign to grant a Prime Minister some honour or dignity. The honour commonly, but not invariably, bestowed is membership of the United Kingdom's most senior order of chivalry, the [[Order of the Garter]]. The practice of creating retired Prime Ministers Knights (or, in the case of Margaret Thatcher, Ladies) of the Garter has been fairly prevalent since the middle-19th century. On the retirement of a Prime Minister who is Scottish, it is likely that the primarily Scottish honour of the [[Order of the Thistle]] will be used instead of the Order of the Garter, which is generally regarded as an English honour.

It has also been common for Prime Ministers to be granted a [[peerage]] upon retirement from the Commons, which elevates the individual to the [[House of Lords]]. Formerly, the peerage bestowed was usually an [[earldom]] (which was always hereditary), with Churchill offered a [[Duke of London|dukedom]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Winston S. Churchill, 1874-1965: a comprehensive historiography and annotated bibliography |last=Rasor |first=Eugene L. |year=2000 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-313-30546-7 |page=205 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=6PpNUK5u1lkC&pg=PA205&lpg=PA205}}</ref> However, since the 1960s, hereditary peerages have generally been eschewed, and [[life peerage]]s have been preferred, although in 1984 [[Harold Macmillan]] was created [[Earl of Stockton]]. Sir Alec Douglas-Home, Harold Wilson, James Callaghan and Margaret Thatcher accepted life peerages. However, Edward Heath, John Major and Tony Blair did not accept peerages of any kind, although Mr. Major was later appointed a Knight of the Garter. {{Asof|2010}}, Gordon Brown remains a Member of Parliament, retaining his Commons seat in the [[United Kingdom general election 2010|2010 general election]] and choosing to remain a backbencher.

==Living former Prime Ministers==

There are four living former British Prime Ministers:

<center><gallery caption="Living former Prime Ministers">
File:Margaret Thatcher cropped2.png|[[Margaret Thatcher|The Baroness Thatcher]] <br/>served 1979–1990, born 1925
File:John Major 1996.jpg|[[John Major|Sir John Major]] <br/>served 1990–1997, born 1943
File:TonyBlairBasra.JPG|[[Tony Blair]] <br/>served 1997–2007, born 1953
File:GordonBrown1234 cropped .jpg|[[Gordon Brown]] [[Member of Parliament|MP]]<br/>served 2007–2010, born 1951
</gallery></center>

==See also==
* [[List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Historical rankings of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Cultural depictions of prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Parliament of the United Kingdom]]
* [[List of things named after prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[List of nicknames of prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Prime Minister's Questions]]
* [[Records of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[:Category:Books written by prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Spouses of the Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[Armorial of prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[List of burial places of prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[UK Prime Ministers timeline|Detailed timeline of UK Prime Ministers from Lord Palmerston to David Cameron]]
{{Div col end}}
* [[Westminster System]]
More related pages: [[:Category:Prime ministers of the United Kingdom]]
* [[10 Downing Street]]
* [[List of United Kingdom Parliament constituencies represented by sitting Prime Ministers]]
* [[Prime Ministerial Car (United Kingdom)]]
* [[List of fictional Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom]]


==Notes==
==Notes==
{{Reflist|group=note|2}}
{{reflist|group=n}}
{{notelist}}


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{reflist}}

===Works cited ===
* {{Cite book |last=Bagehot |first=Walter |title=The English Constitution |date=1867 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-953901-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bagehot |first=Walter |title=The English Constitution |publisher=Wm. Collins & Sons |year=1963 |isbn=978-0-521-46535-9 |ref=Bagehot |author-link=Walter Bagehot |orig-year=1867}}
* {{Cite book |last=Barnett |first=Hilaire |title=Constitutional & Administrative Law |publisher=Routledge-Cavendish |year=2009 |edition=7th |location=Abingdon, Oxfordshire |ref=Barnett}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bogdanor |first=Vernon |title=The Monarchy and the Constitution |date=1997 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-829334-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bogdanor |first=Vernon |title=The New British Constitution |date=2009 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-1841136714}}
* {{Cite book |last=Brazier |first=Rodney |title=Constitutional Practice |date=1988 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-825596-3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Brazier |first=Rodney |title=Constitutional Reform |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0198765233}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chrimes |first=S. B. |title=English Constitutional History |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1947 |isbn=978-0-404-14653-5 |location=Oxford |ref=Chrimes}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Craig |first1=Paul |title=The Executive and Public Law: Power and Accountability in Comparative Perspective |last2=Tomkins |first2=Adam |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-826869-7}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Drewry |first1=Gavin |title=Parliament and the Law |last2=Horne |first2=Alexander |date=2018 |publisher=Hart Publishing |isbn=978-1849462952}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hanchant |first=W.L. |title=England Is Here—Speeches and Writings of the Prime Ministers of England |publisher=Bodley Head |year=1943 |ref=Hanchant}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hazell |first=Robert |title= The Politics of Coalition: How the Conservative - Liberal Democrat Government Works |date=2012 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1849463102}}
* {{Cite book |last=King |first=Anthony |title=The British Constitution |date=2010 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-957698-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Le May |first=G. H. L. |title=The Victorian Constitution, Conventions, Usages and Contingencies |publisher=Duckworth |year=1979 |ref=Le May}}
* {{cite book |title=The Governance of England |url=https://archive.org/details/governanceofen00lows |last=Low |first=S. |year=1904 |ref=Low |publisher=T. Fisher Unwin, London |isbn=978-0-521-38155-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Leonard |first=Dick |title=A History of British Prime Ministers, Walpole to Cameron |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-137-33804-4 |ref=Leonard}}
* {{Cite book |last=Norton |first=Philip |title=The British Polity |date=2011 |publisher=Pearson Publishing |isbn=978-0801318436}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Thomas |first1=Robert |title=Public Law |last2=Elliot |first2=Mark |date=2020 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-885227-8}}


==Works cited==
==Further reading==
* {{Cite book |last=Brazier |first=Rodney |title=Ministers of the Crown |date=2016 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780198724063}}
{{Refbegin|2}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Denver |first1=David |last2=Garnett |first2=Mark |date=2012 |title=The popularity of British prime ministers. |journal=British Journal of Politics and International Relations |volume=14 |issue=1 |pages=57–73 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00466.x |s2cid=143249516 | issn = 1369-1481 }}
*{{Cite book |title=The English Constitution |last=Bagehot |first=Walter |year=1963 |ref=Bagehot |publisher=Wm. Collins Sons & Ltd., first published in 1867 |authorlink=Walter Bagehot |isbn=0521465354}}
*{{Cite book |title=English Constitutional History |last=Chrimes |first=S. B. |year=1947 |ref=Chrimes |publisher=Oxford University Press, Oxford |isbn=0404146538}}
* {{Cite book |last=Garnett |first=Mark |title=The British Prime Minister in an Age of Upheaval |date=2021 |publisher=Polity Press |isbn=978-1509539352}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Kaarbo |first1=Juliet |last2=Hermann |first2=Margaret G. |date=1998 |title=Leadership styles of prime ministers: How individual differences affect the foreign policymaking process. |url=http://panel.inkuba.com/sites/2/archivos/Leadership%203.pdf |journal=Leadership Quarterly |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=243–263 |doi=10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90029-7}}
*{{Cite book |title=The Growth of Responsible Government from James the First to Victoria |last=Dodd |first=A. H. |year=1956 |ref=Dodd|publisher=Routledge and Kegan Paul, London}}
* {{Cite book | last1 = Kavanagh | first1 = Dennis |last2=Seldon |first2=Anthony |title=The Powers Behind the Prime Minister:The Hidden Influence of Number Ten |date=2018 |publisher=Hart Publishing |isbn=978-0007292066}}
*Farnborough, Thomas Erskine, 1st Baron. (1896). ''Constitutional History of England since the Accession of George the Third,'' 11th ed. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
*{{Cite book |title=His Majesty's Opposition |last=Foord |first=Archibald S. |year=1964 |ref=Foord |publisher=Clarendon Press, Oxford |isbn=0313219745}}
* {{Cite book |title=The British Prime Minister' |date=1985 |publisher=Duke University Press |editor-last=King |editor-first=Anthony Stephen}}
*{{Cite book |title=England Is Here—Speeches and Writings of the Prime Ministers of England |last=Hanchant |first=W.L. |year=1943 |publisher=Bodley Head |ref=Hanchant}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Langer |first=Ana Inés |date=2007 |title=A historical exploration of the personalisation of politics in the print media: The British Prime Ministers (1945–1999). |journal=Parliamentary Affairs |volume=60 |issue=3 |pages=371–387 |doi=10.1093/pa/gsm028}}
*{{Cite book |title=The British Constitution |last=King |first=Anthony |year=2007 |publisher=Oxford University Press, Oxford |isbn=096914363X}}
* {{Cite book |last=Leyland |first=Peter |title=Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom |date=2007 |publisher=Hart Publishing |isbn=978-1849461603}}
*{{Cite book |title=Constitutional and Legal History of England |last=Knappen |first=M. M. |year=1942 |ref=Knappen |publisher=Harcourt, Brace & Company |isbn=0837723353}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Seldon |first1=Anthony |title=The Impossible Office? The History of the British Prime Minister |last2=Meakin |first2=Jonathan |last3=Thoms |first3=Illias |date=2021 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=9781316515327 |ol=34770382M}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Strangio |first1=Paul |title=Understanding Prime-Ministerial Performance: Comparative Perspectives |last2=Hart |first2=Paul 't |last3=Walter |first3=James |date=2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780199666423}}
*{{Cite book |title=The Victorian Constitution, Conventions, Usages and Continguencies |last=Le May |first=G. H. L. |year=1979 |ref=Le May |publisher=Duckworth}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Theakston |first1=Kevin |last2=Gill |first2=Mark |date=2006 |title=Rating 20th-century British prime ministers. |journal=British Journal of Politics and International Relations |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=193–213 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00220.x |s2cid=145216328}}
*{{Cite book |title=The Governance of England |last=Low |first=S. |year=1904 |ref=Low |publisher=T. Fisher Unwin, London |isbn=052138155X}}
*{{Cite book |title=English Political Institutions |last=Marriott |first=J. A. R. |year=1925 |ref=Marriott |publisher=Oxford University Press, Oxford}}
* {{Cite book |last=Thomson |first=George Malcolm |title=The Prime Ministers: From Robert Walpole to Margaret Thatcher |date=1980 |publisher=Secker & Warburg}}{{ISBN?}}
*{{Cite book |title=Britain's Prime Ministers: From Walpole to Wilson |last=Pike |first=E. Royston |year=1968 |ref=Pike |publisher=Odhams Books |isbn=0600720322}}
*{{Cite book |title=Treasury, 1660–1870: The Foundations of Control |last=Roseveare |first=Henry |year=1973 |ref=Roseveare |publisher=Allen and Unwin |isbn=0049421158}}
*{{Cite book |title=A Constitutional and Legal History of England |last=Smith |first=Goldwin |year=1990 |ref=Smith |publisher=Dorset Press |isbn=0880294744}}
*{{Cite book |title=The Proud Tower, A Portrait of the World before the War, 1890-1914 |last=Tuchman |first=Barbara W. |ref=Tuchman1 |year=1966 |publisher=The Macmillan Company |isbn=0345405013}}
*{{Cite book |title=The March of Folly, From Troy to Vietnam|last=Tuchman |first=Barbara W. |ref=Tuchman2 |year=1984 |publisher=Random House |isbn=0345308239}}
*{{Cite book |title=Essays Political and Biographical|last=Walpole |first=S. |year=2009 |ref=Walpole |publisher=BiblioBazaar, llc |isbn=1113709820}}
{{Refend}}


==External links==
==External links==
{{Commons category|Prime ministers of the United Kingdom}}
*[http://www.number10.gov.uk/ Number 10 official website]
* [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street#content Number 10 official website]
*[http://www.flickr.com/number10gov Photos from the Prime Minister's Office]
* [http://www.parliament.uk Parliament of the United Kingdom website]
*[http://britishconstitution.blogspot.com/search/label/The%20Prime%20Minister The British Constitution] A general introduction to the constitutional function of the UK Prime Minister
*[http://www.parliament.uk/ Parliament of the United Kingdom. (2004). Official Website.]
* [http://www.archontology.org/nations/uk/bpm/ Principal Ministers of the Crown: 1730–2006]

*[http://www.archontology.org/nations/uk/bpm/ Principal Ministers of the Crown: 1730–2006]
{{Prime Minister of the United Kingdom}}
{{Prime Minister of the United Kingdom}}
{{List of UK Prime Ministers}}
{{List of UK Prime Ministers}}
{{Navboxes
|list =
{{Great Offices of State}}
{{Great Offices of State}}
{{Cabinet positions in the United Kingdom}}
{{European Council}}
{{UK heads of governments}}
{{UK heads of governments}}
{{Europe heads of state and government}}
{{Europe heads of state and government}}
{{United Kingdom topics}}
{{United Kingdom topics}}
{{Downing Street}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2010}}
{{Prime Minister}}
{{Use British English|date=September 2010}}
}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Prime Minister Of The United Kingdom}}
[[Category:Prime ministers of the United Kingdom| ]]
[[Category:British Prime Minister's Office| ]]
[[Category:Ministerial offices in the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Political history of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Political history of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom| ]]
[[Category:United Kingdom nuclear command and control]]
[[Category:Current ministerial offices in the United Kingdom]]

[[af:Eerste Minister van die Verenigde Koninkryk]]
[[ang:Forma Þegn þæs Geānedan Cynerīces]]
[[ar:رئيس وزراء المملكة المتحدة]]
[[de:Premierminister des Vereinigten Königreichs]]
[[es:Primer ministro del Reino Unido]]
[[eo:Britaj ĉefministroj]]
[[fa:نخست‌وزیر بریتانیا]]
[[fr:Premier ministre du Royaume-Uni]]
[[gd:Prìomh Mhinistear na Rìoghachd Aonaichte]]
[[gl:Primeiro Ministro do Reino Unido]]
[[ko:영국의 총리]]
[[is:Forsætisráðherra Bretlands]]
[[it:Primo ministro del Regno Unito]]
[[he:ראש ממשלת בריטניה]]
[[ka:გაერთიანებული სამეფოს პრემიერ-მინისტრი]]
[[kw:Pennmenyster an Rywvaneth Unys]]
[[lt:Jungtinės Karalystės ministras pirmininkas]]
[[arz:رئيس وزرا المملكه المتحده]]
[[ms:Perdana Menteri United Kingdom]]
[[ja:イギリスの首相]]
[[nrm:Preunmié Minnistre du Rouoyaume Unni]]
[[nds:Premierminister vun Grootbritannien]]
[[pt:Primeiro-ministro do Reino Unido]]
[[ro:Prim-ministrul Regatului Unit]]
[[ru:Премьер-министр Великобритании]]
[[simple:Prime Minister of the United Kingdom]]
[[fi:Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan pääministeri]]
[[sv:Storbritanniens premiärminister]]
[[uk:Прем'єр-міністри Великобританії]]
[[zh:英国首相]]

Latest revision as of 11:22, 5 January 2025

Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Incumbent
Keir Starmer
since 5 July 2024
Style
TypeHead of government
StatusChief Minister of the Crown
Great Office of State
Member of
Reports to
Residence
AppointerThe Monarch
(with their choice limited to the person who can command the confidence of the House of Commons)[1]
Term lengthAt His Majesty's pleasure
First holderSir Robert Walpole
DeputyNo fixed position; often held by:
Salary£166,786 per annum (2024)[2]
(including £91,346 MP salary)[3]
Website10 Downing Street

The prime minister of the United Kingdom is the head of government of the United Kingdom. The prime minister advises the sovereign on the exercise of much of the royal prerogative, chairs the Cabinet, and selects its ministers. As modern prime ministers hold office by virtue of their ability to command the confidence of the House of Commons, they sit as members of Parliament.

The office of prime minister is not established by any statute or constitutional document, but exists only by long-established convention, whereby the monarch appoints as prime minister the person most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons.[4] In practice, this is the leader of the political party that holds the largest number of seats in the Commons. The prime minister is ex officio also First Lord of the Treasury (prior to 1905 also the official title of the position), Minister for the Civil Service, the minister responsible for national security,[5]: p.22  and Minister for the Union.[6] The prime minister's official residence and office, by virtue of being the First Lord of the Treasury, is 10 Downing Street in London.[7]

Early conceptions of the office of prime minister evolved as the "Primus inter pares" or "first among equals", however that does not differentiate on status and responsibility upon whoever is holding office. Historically, the prime minister has never been the first among equals at any time prior to 1868. Until now, that characterisation of the prime minister is reflective of the democratic nature of their position. The power of the prime minister depends on the support of their respective party and on the popular mandate.[8] The appointment of cabinet ministers and granting of honours are done through the prime minister's power of appointment.[9][10] The prime minister alongside the cabinet proposes new legislation and decide on key policies that fit their agenda which is then passed by an act of parliament.[11]

The power of the office of prime minister has grown significantly since the first prime minister, Robert Walpole in 1721. Prime ministerial power itself evolved gradually alongside the office itself which have played an increasingly prominent role in British politics since the early 20th century.[12] During the premierships of Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher, prime ministerial power expanded substantially and their leadership in the office were described as "presidential" due to their personal yielding of power and tight control over the cabinet.[13][14][15] The prime minister is regarded as one of the world's most powerful political leaders in modern times.[16] As the leader of the world's sixth largest economy, the prime minister hold significant domestic and international leadership alongside being the leader of a prominent member state of NATO, the G7 and G20.[17][18]

58 people (55 men and 3 women) have served as prime minister, the first of whom was Robert Walpole taking office on 3 April 1721. The longest-serving prime minister was also Walpole, who served over 20 years, and the shortest-serving was Liz Truss, who served seven weeks. The current prime minister is Keir Starmer, who succeeded Rishi Sunak on 5 July 2024, following the 2024 general election.[19]

History

Sir Robert Walpole is generally considered to have been the first person to hold the position of Prime Minister.

The position of prime minister was not created; it evolved slowly and organically over three hundred years due to numerous Acts of Parliament, political developments, and accidents of history. The office is therefore best understood from a historical perspective. The origins of the position are found in constitutional changes that occurred during the Revolutionary Settlement (1688–1720) and the resulting shift of political power from the sovereign to Parliament.[20]

Powers and authority

Executive powers

The prime minister is the head of the United Kingdom government.[21] As such, the modern prime minister leads the Cabinet (the Executive). In addition, the prime minister leads a major political party and generally commands a majority in the House of Commons (the lower chamber of Parliament). The incumbent wields both significant legislative and executive powers. Under the British system, there is a unity of powers rather than separation.[22] Walter Bagehot described the office of prime minister as the "keystone of the Cabinet arch" that maintained while the prime minister can hold significant power over the executive, it is often exercised collectively through the Cabinet (Government).[23]

Ministerial responsibility is also an aspect of a prime minister's executive authority. The prime minister leads the cabinet which makes the holder of that office bear responsibility for the collective conduct of the government. Professor Rodney Brazier points out that the since the prime minister wields significant sway over policy, that power must be subjected to the conclusion and input of Cabinet ministers. This prevents the office of prime minister from becoming more dominant and also ensures that executive power is authorised with broader support from and within the government.[24] The prime minister must constantly maintain the confidence of the House of Commons because, as Bagehot notes, the power of the prime minister derives from their ability to command a majority in the House in order to pass legislation and continue the functions of government. If a prime minister loses the confidence of the House, which occurs in a vote of no confidence, they are often expected to resign from office or request the monarch dissolve parliament to call a general election.[25]

fmr UK PM Chamberlain and cabinet
Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain alongside his cabinet on the eve of World War II in September, 1939
Prime Minister David Cameron announcing the approval of more free schools across the country as a part of his education policy on 9 March 2015

The prime minister acts as the principal advisor to the monarch, who is the head of state, a capacity that has evolved gradually during the history of the office. Bagehot says that despite the monarch holding certain theoretical executive powers, in practice, these powers are often executed upon the advice and recommendation of the prime minister and the cabinet.[26] This is considered a major principle of the "unity of powers" that exists within a constitutional monarchy in which the monarch "reigns but does not rule". According to Brazier, the prime minister advises the monarch on matters such as the dissolution of parliament and appointments to the House of Lords, but these decisions are often made with the consent of parliament.[27]

The prime minister leads the executive in directing government policy and maintaining coordination between government departments which is dependent upon the cooperation and consent of ministers.[23] Foreign policy and national security are areas in which the prime minister has traditionally enjoyed more authority under what are known as prerogative powers. Vernon Bogdanor argues that the abilities to declare war, negotiate treaties and deploy the armed forces have historically been part of the monarch's royal authority but have slowly evolved into a function of the office of prime minister. Despite this, the exercise of the prime minister's prerogative powers in these matters is under the oversight of parliament. It is often by convention that a prime minister must seek the approval of parliament before committing the nation to military action.[28] In addition to this, the prime minister also exerts informal influence over public policy. Brazier notes this is due to the prime minister often being the leader of the largest party in government, therefore having a direct impact in initiating policy both in government and during election campaigns.[29]

Legislative powers

In the House of Commons, the prime minister guides the law-making process with the goal of enacting the legislative agenda of their political party. In an executive capacity, the prime minister appoints (and may dismiss) all other Cabinet members and ministers, and co-ordinates the policies and activities of all government departments, and the staff of the Civil Service. The prime minister also acts as the public "face" and "voice" of His Majesty's Government, both at home and abroad. Solely upon the advice of the prime minister, the sovereign exercises many statutory and prerogative powers, including high judicial, political, official and Church of England ecclesiastical appointments; the conferral of peerages and some knighthoods, decorations and other important honours.[30]

fmr UK PM Palmerston
Prime Minister Lord Palmerston during a debate in Parliament over the Cobden–Chevalier Treaty in February, 1860

Bagehot identifies the prime minister as the leader of the "efficient" part of government that functions within the government to steer legislation through both Houses of Parliament. Although the prime minister does not possess the power to introduce legislation directly, their control of the cabinet and their role as leader of the largest political party in the House of Commons enables them substantial influence over any legislative agenda. Bagehot points out that this power is based on the prime minister's ability to operate the "machinery of government" that allows them to guide legislation that align with their party's political and ideological priorities.[31] Brazier argues that the legislative power of the prime minister has greatly expanded following the post-war period and that as a result, the prime minister now directly authorises supervision over government bills and has a consequential role in the introduction of legislation.[32]

The prime minister is able to wield considerable power in the passing of legislation through their ability to manage party discipline and cohesion in voting patterns. Bogdanor states that this largely depends upon the prime minister being the leader of the largest party in the Commons, which can pass legislation without any or little resistance if they can command the confidence of the House. This aspect of prime ministerial power is informal and often carried out by the office of Whips, who makes sure that MPs remain loyal and vote on the government line.[33] The political scientist Anthony King said that the prime minister's influence over legislation is further solidified through their ability to shape policy before it reaches parliament. King further argued that the shaping of legislation, on many occasions, involves the collaborative efforts of cabinet ministers and civil servants, but the prime minister's approval is needed in order to initiate the legislative agenda. King's analysis of contemporary politcs showed that some prime ministers often bypass or overrule the cabinet on traditional discussion and to push through their preferred agendas with notable cases such as Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.[34]

Parliamentary powers

Prime Minister Theresa May (in the middle) alongside G7 leaders signing statement against Terrorism at the 2017 Taormina summit

The prime minister's influence in the Houses of Parliament is derived from longstanding conventions and statutes that have gradually evolved through the centuries. The office of prime minister itself is not explicitly mentioned in parliamentary law but is developed by constitutional conventions and therefore it is defined by precedent and tradition. Bogdanor notes that the prime minister's power in parliament is exhibited by their control of the executive (the Cabinet) and their ability to influence the legislative agenda.[35] The ability of the prime minister to influence legislation, according to academic Philip Norton, is often through party discipline and having a reliable majority of MPs who vote in support of the government's priorities.[36]

Another essential part of the parliamentary powers possessed by the prime minister is determining the composition of the Cabinet. According to Professor Robert Hazell, the prime minister not only chooses cabinet members but also dictates the collective decision-making process of members as well. The prime minister most often would chair cabinet meetings and may determine their frequency, thereby controlling the agenda for policy and steering decisions in their preferred direction.[37] Additionally, the prime minister can exercise considerable control over parliamentary time. Authors Alexander Horne and Gavin Drewry state that the prime minister uses this power through the Leader of the House of Commons, by which they are able to allocate time for government bills and often ensuring access to this time over private members' bills.[38]

The prime minister's parliamentary powers also extend to foreign relations. Contemporary historian Anthony Seldon says that the prime minister acts as the main representative of the government in the international sphere, including in parliament, where treaties are ratified and international commitments are debated.[39][full citation needed]

Prerogative powers

Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger addressing the House of Commons on the outbreak of war with France in 1793

The most significant powers given to the prime minister are "prerogative powers". These are a set of constitutional privileges deriving from monarchial authority that have gradually evolved into tools of executive power managed by the prime minister and the government. Bagehot famously called the British system as one where "the executive power is now yielded by the prime minister" rather than the monarch, a shift from personal to political power. Prerogative powers allow the prime minister to act without the immediate or direct consent of parliament especially in circumstances such as declaring war, deployment of troops and the granting of honours.[40]

Brazier argues that prerogative powers allow the prime minister to act within the "authority of the crown" in situations where neither convention nor statutory law applies. As noted by both Bagehot and Brazier, areas in which the prime minister authorises their given prerogative powers are matters of foreign affairs. In recent occasions, the 2003 invasion of Iraq saw Prime Minister Tony Blair deploying British troops to Saudi Arabia without the immediate consent or approval of parliament.[41] Brazier says the rise of parliamentary and public scrutiny has led to calls for reform and checks on the use of prerogative powers.[42][43][44] The only prime minister who did not seek parliamentary or legal consent for military action was Anthony Eden during the Suez Crisis in 1956.[45][46]

Professors Mark Elliot and Robert Thomas argue that prerogative powers present a constitutional anomaly in the 21st century. Both contend that such powers lack direct democratic legitimacy due to not being regulated by parliamentary statutes and raise concerns over accountability. Elliot and Thomas have pointed out that judicial intervention in cases such as Miller I and Miller II, where the Supreme Court exercised scrutiny over the use of prerogative powers by the government to prorogue parliament during the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union, was successful in keeping check over the authority of both the prime minister and the government.[47] The evolving usage of prerogative powers also has signalled tension between tradition and accountability. Authors Paul Craig and Adam Tomkins state that the absence of a written constitution gives a prime minister greater leeway in employing their given prerogative powers without limits that in turn would create uncertainty although the use of such powers by the prime minister is often constrained by political convention than by law.[48]

Constitutional background

The British system of government is based on an uncodified constitution, meaning that it is not set out in any single document.[49] The British constitution consists of many documents, and most importantly for the evolution of the office of the prime minister, it is based on customs known as constitutional conventions that became accepted practice. In 1928, Prime Minister H. H. Asquith described this characteristic of the British constitution in his memoirs:

In this country we live ... under an unwritten Constitution. It is true that we have on the Statute-book great instruments like Magna Carta, the Petition of Right, and the Bill of Rights which define and secure many of our rights and privileges; but the great bulk of our constitutional liberties and ... our constitutional practices do not derive their validity and sanction from any Bill which has received the formal assent of the King, Lords and Commons. They rest on usage, custom, convention, often of slow growth in their early stages, not always uniform, but which in the course of time received universal observance and respect.[50]

The relationships between the prime minister and the sovereign, Parliament and Cabinet are defined largely by these unwritten conventions of the constitution. Many of the prime minister's executive and legislative powers are actually royal prerogatives which are still formally vested in the sovereign, who remains the head of state.[51] Despite its growing dominance in the constitutional hierarchy, the premiership was given little formal recognition until the 20th century; the legal fiction was maintained that the sovereign still governed directly. The position was first mentioned in statute only in 1917, in the schedule of the Chequers Estate Act. Increasingly during the 20th century, the office and role of prime minister featured in statute law and official documents; however, the prime minister's powers and relationships with other institutions still largely continue to derive from ancient royal prerogatives and historic and modern constitutional conventions. Prime ministers continue to hold the position of First Lord of the Treasury and, since November 1968, that of Minister for the Civil Service, the latter giving them authority over the civil service.

Under this arrangement, Britain might appear to have two executives: the prime minister and the sovereign. The concept of "the Crown" resolves this paradox.[52] The Crown symbolises the state's authority to govern: to make laws and execute them, impose taxes and collect them, declare war and make peace. Before the "Glorious Revolution" of 1688, the sovereign exclusively wielded the powers of the Crown; afterwards, Parliament gradually forced monarchs to assume a neutral political position. Parliament has effectively dispersed the powers of the Crown, entrusting its authority to responsible ministers (the prime minister and Cabinet), accountable for their policies and actions to Parliament, in particular the elected House of Commons.

Although many of the sovereign's prerogative powers are still legally intact,[n 1] constitutional conventions have removed the monarch from day-to-day governance, with ministers exercising the royal prerogatives, leaving the monarch in practice with three constitutional rights: to be kept informed, to advise and to warn.[53][54]

Modern premiership

Appointment

In modern times, much of the process involving prime ministerial appointments is informally governed by constitutional conventions and with the rules and processes described by authoritative sources such as The Cabinet Manual.[55]

Queen Elizabeth II receiving Prime Minister Tony Blair after winning a third term in office on 6 May 2005

The prime minister is appointed by the monarch, through the exercise of the royal prerogative.[56] In the past, the monarch has used personal choice to dismiss or appoint a prime minister (the last time being in 1834), but it is now the convention that the monarch should not be drawn into party politics.[5]: 3  Bogdanor states that throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, the monarch often appointed the prime minister based on their personal preference, regardless of whether they have great or little public support.[57]

If a prime minister (incumbent or otherwise) leads their party to victory in a general election and gains an overall majority in the House of Commons they will be invited by the monarch to form a new government.[58] Following the invitation, the prime minister will be driven to Buckingham Palace to meet the monarch.[59][60][61] The meeting between the monarch and the incoming prime minister is a moment for the latter to pledge their loyalty to the monarch and seek permission to form a new government. The prime minister is expected to bow before the monarch in a ceremony known as "kissing hands". Following this, the prime minister is officially appointed the head of His Majesty's government.[62][63][64]

The prime minister "...holds that position by virtue of his or her ability to command the confidence of the House of Commons, which in turn commands the confidence of the electorate, as expressed through a general election."[5]: 3.1  By convention, the prime minister is also an MP and is normally the leader of the political party that commands a majority in the House of Commons.[5]: 3.1 [n 2]

Prime Minister's Office

The Prime Minister's Office helps the prime minister to 'establish and deliver the government's overall strategy and policy priorities, and to communicate the government's policies to Parliament, the public and international audiences'.[65] The Prime Minister's Office is formally part of the Cabinet Office, but the boundary between its work and that of the wider Cabinet Office can be unclear;[66] the wider Cabinet Office might carry out very similar work. Peter Hennessy has claimed that this overall arrangement means there is in fact effectively a Prime Minister's Department, though it is not called this.[67]

The Prime Minister's Office was officially created in 1916 by David Lloyd George during the World War I, which marked the first formal recognition of the office of prime minister and established it as an independent institution from other entities within government, with staff to support the coordination of government policy. This development came as a response to the demands of wartime governance, as Lloyd George's leadership needed a more centred and efficient executive function.[68]

Prime Minister's Questions

Prime Minister's Questions is a constitutional convention, currently held as a single session every Wednesday at noon when the House of Commons is sitting, in which the prime minister answers questions from members of Parliament (MPs). The leader of the opposition usually asks the prime minister six questions, and the leader of the third-largest parliamentary party can ask two questions. It is an occasion when the prime minister appears regularly on live television and radio.

The current Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, speaking in the House of Commons on 4 September 2024

Before the 1880s, oral questions were mainly directed towards cabinet ministers and therefore such questions were regarded as the same even when addressed to the Prime Minister. The session in its modern form was first introduced on Tuesday 24 October in 1961 when the then Prime Minister Harold Macmillan answered questions for between 15 minutes from 3.15pm to 3.30pm as an experiment. Since 1997 PMQs were held every Wednesdays at 3pm until 3.30pm.[69] In 1989, the first PMQs were broadcast and in 1990 were broadcast live to the public as a step towards transparency and accountability.[70]

The timing of PMQs has often changed depending on the varied schedules of prime ministers.[71][72] In 1881, questions addressed to the prime minister were placed at the end of question time so that the then 72-year old Prime Minister William Gladstone could arrive late. In 1904, questions were answered only when they reached No 51 and in 1940 they were expanded to No 45. The procedure was in practice until 1953 when PMQs were restricted to Tuesdays and Thursdays only to assist Winston Churchill who was 78-years old.[73]

The prime minister also appears before the Liaison Committee to answer questions about public policy.[74]

Security and transport

Two armed police officers stand guard in 2009 at the entrance to 10 Downing Street, the official residence of the Prime Minister.

The personal protection of the prime minister[75] and former prime ministers[76] is the responsibility of Protection Command within the Metropolitan Police Service. When the prime minister resides in 10 Downing Street, they are constantly surrounded by armed police units with "airport-style" security checkpoints, large metal gates, street patrols and heavy vetting for staff and non-ministerial individuals. Such installations were introduced due to fears of IRA bomb threats and attacks which were persistent during The Troubles. When travelling, the prime minister will be accompanied by a select group of police officers joined by a wider team of security personnel. On the road, the prime ministerial entourage will be followed by police outriders on motorbikes to clear a path in the traffic and to stop them from being a sitting target.[77] The fleet of Prime Ministerial Cars provides the prime minister with a number of security features as well as transport. The vehicles are driven by officers from this unit.[78] These vehicles are often custom made and always British manufactured with in-built gun ports, an independent oxygen supply and the ability to release tear gas to subdue angry crowds.[79] Air transport for the prime minister is provided by a variety of military and civilian operators.

International role

One of the roles of the prime minister is to represent the UK at home and abroad,[80] for example at the annual G7 Summit. The prime minister makes many international trips. According to Gus O'Donnell, the number of overseas visits for the prime minister has gone up.[81]

Deputy

Prime ministers have had various deputies, sometimes as an official deputy prime minister, first secretary of state or de facto deputy. Some prime ministers have not chosen a deputy at all, preferring ad hoc arrangements.[82]

Historically, the position of deputy prime minister has been created out of political necessity rather than being established by statutory law or convention with the title not being defined in the constitution.[83] The position was first created (unofficially) for Clement Attlee in Prime Minister Winston Churchill's ministry during World War II, in order to manage administrative duties, domestic affairs and welfare, while Churchill focused on military strategy.[84] In recent times, after the 2010 general election resulted in a hung parliament, the leaders of the Conservative and the Liberal Democrats, David Cameron and Nick Clegg, formed a coalition government in which Clegg served as deputy prime minister. In that capacity, Clegg chaired cabinet meetings, key committees and led negotiations on major reforms. As such, the office saw an unusual level of formalisation and recognition during Clegg's tenure.[85]

Succession

Nobody has the right of automatic succession to the prime ministership.[86] It is generally considered that in the event of the death of the prime minister, it would be appropriate to appoint an interim prime minister, though there is some debate as to how to decide who this should be.[87]

According to Rodney Brazier, there are no procedures within government to cope with the sudden death of the prime minister.[88] There is also no such title as acting prime minister of the United Kingdom.[89] Despite refusing "...to discuss a hypothetical situation" with BBC News in 2011,[90] the Cabinet Office said the following in 2006:[91]

There is no single protocol setting out all of the possible implications. However, the general constitutional position is as set out below. There can be no automatic assumption about who The Queen would ask to act as caretaker Prime Minister in the event of the death of the Prime Minister. The decision is for her under the Royal Prerogative. However, there are some key guiding principles. The Queen would probably be looking for a very senior member of the Government (not necessarily a Commons Minister since this would be a short-term appointment). If there was a recognised deputy to the Prime Minister, used to acting on his behalf in his absences, this could be an important factor. Also important would be the question of who was likely to be in contention to take over long-term as Prime Minister. If the most senior member of the Government was him or herself a contender for the role of Prime Minister, it might be that The Queen would invite a slightly less senior non-contender. In these circumstances, her private secretary would probably take soundings, via the Cabinet Secretary, of members of the Cabinet, to ensure that The Queen invited someone who would be acceptable to the Cabinet to act as their chair during the caretaker period. Once the Party had elected a new leader, that person would, of course, be invited to take over as Prime Minister.

Additionally, when the prime minister is travelling, it is standard practice for a senior duty minister to be appointed who can attend to urgent business and meetings if required, though the prime minister remains in charge and updated throughout.[92]

On 6 April 2020, when Boris Johnson was admitted into the Intensive Care Unit of St Thomas' Hospital, when suffering from COVID-19, he asked Dominic Raab "to deputise for him where necessary".[93]

Resignation

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announces his resignation outside 10 Downing Street, 5 July 2024.

A prime minister ends their tenure by offering their resignation to the British monarch.[94] This can happen after their party has suffered a general election defeat, so that they no longer command the confidence of the House of Commons. It can also happen mid-term, if they are forced to resign for political reasons,[95] or for other reasons such as ill-health.[96] If the prime minister resigns mid-term, and their party has a majority in the Commons, the party selects a new leader according to its rules, and this new leader is invited by the monarch to become the new prime minister. The outgoing prime minister is likely to remain in post until the new leader has been chosen by the party. After resigning, the outgoing prime minister remains a Member of Parliament. An outgoing prime minister can ask the monarch to bestow honours on any number of people of their choosing, known as the Prime Minister's Resignation Honours. No incumbent prime minister has ever lost their own seat at a general election.[97] Only one prime minister has been assassinated: Spencer Perceval, in 1812.

Privileges

On taking office a new prime minister usually makes a public statement to announce to the country that they have been appointed by the reigning monarch (called "kissing hands"). This is usually done by saying words to the effect of:

His Majesty the King [Her Majesty the Queen] has asked me to form a government and I have accepted.[98]

Precedence and form of address

Ministerial listings are printed in the official records of parliament known as "Hansard", and 1885 was the first known instance of official use of the title of Prime Minister. The minutes of the first meeting of the Committee of Imperial Defence in 1902 saw the first internal reference to the title as well. The 1904 edition of the Imperial Calendar referred to the then Prime Minister, Arthur Balfour, as 'Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury'; in the previous edition he was merely 'First Lord of the Treasury and Lord Privy Seal'.[99]

Throughout the United Kingdom, the prime minister outranks all other dignitaries except members of the royal family, the lord chancellor, and senior ecclesiastical figures.[n 3] The prime minister was officially granted a place in the order of precedence in December 1905, and the first statutory reference to the Prime Minister was present in the Chequers Estate Act 1917, which specified Chequers as a prime-ministerial residence. Public recognition of the existence of a 'Prime Minister's Office' in the Civil Service Yearbook came as recently as the 1977 edition.[99]

The prime minister is customarily a member of the Privy Council and thus entitled to the appellation "The Right Honourable". Membership of the council is retained for life. It is a constitutional convention that only a privy counsellor can be appointed prime minister. Most potential candidates have already attained this status. The only case when a non-privy counsellor was the natural appointment was Ramsay MacDonald in 1924. The issue was resolved by appointing him to the Council immediately prior to his appointment as prime minister.

According to the now-defunct Department for Constitutional Affairs, the prime minister is made a privy counsellor as a result of taking office and should be addressed by the official title prefixed by "The Right Honourable" and not by a personal name.[citation needed] Although this form of address is employed on formal occasions, it is rarely used by the media. As "prime minister" is a position, not a title, the incumbent should be referred to as "the prime minister", although the title "Prime Minister" (e.g. "Prime Minister Keir Starmer") has become commonplace within current political reporting.[100][101][102] Within the UK, the expression "Prime Minister Starmer" is never used, although it, too, is sometimes used by foreign dignitaries and news sources.[citation needed]

Compensation

In 2010, the prime minister received £14,500 in addition to a salary of £65,737 as a member of parliament.[103] Until 2006, the lord chancellor was the highest-paid member of the government, ahead of the prime minister. This reflected the lord chancellor's position at the head of the judicial pay scale. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 eliminated the lord chancellor's judicial functions and also reduced the office's salary to below that of the prime minister. During the premiership of Gordon Brown, the prime minister received an salary of £193,885 on 1 April 2009 which was higher than the salary of £166,786 as of 2024. The reasons for such reductions are Brown's cuts to voluntary pay at around £150,000 during pre-election in the May 2010 election, and when David Cameron became prime minister the cuts were extended to 5%, amounting at around £142,500. Subsequent prime ministers have kept the restraint on ministerial pay and have not taken any further pay outside of what they are entitled.[104] According to journalist Simon Kelner, the salary of the prime minister must be increased and that further expansion of a salary or hospitality received by a prime minister is disavowed under the Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883 which only criminalised voter bribery and introduced standards for election expenses, and "created a more level playing field for parliamentary candidates". Kelner said that it is a inadequate way of holding a prime minister into account. This was in respone to the 2024 Labour Party freebies controversy, in which the current prime minister, Keir Starmer, having reportedly failed to disclose the amount of gifts and "freebies" received by him, members of his family and cabinet.[105][106][107]

Official residences

10 Downing Street, in London, has been the official place of residence of the prime minister since 1732; they are entitled to use its staff and facilities, including extensive offices. The building was originally given by King George I to Robert Walpole, widely regarded as the nation's first prime minister, as a personal gift. However, Walpole insisted that he would accept it in his capacity as first lord of the Treasury and requested that his subsequent successors be entitled to reside in and use the property as they wish.[108] The complex incorporates the flats of No.11 and No.12 Downing Street, which have been reconstructed through to connect them to No.10. Altogether, the three buildings contain over 100 rooms.[109]

Prime ministerial residences
10 Downing Street, the official place of residence of the prime minister
Chequers, used by the prime minister as a country retreat

Chequers, a country house in Buckinghamshire, gifted to the government in 1917, may be used as a country retreat for the prime minister. The estate was previously owned by the Conservative minister and First Lord of the Admiralty, Sir Arthur Lee, before being donated to the British government under the Chequers Estate Act 1917. It was to give the incumbent prime minister the time to "spend two days a week in the high and pure air of the Chiltern hills and woods" and on the condition that incumbent should not own any residential country estate of their own.[110][111]

During the 18th and 19th centuries, many prime ministers were members of the British nobility and therefore held the office whilst serving in the House of Lords. Through lineage and inheritance, these prime ministers acquired large estates, though they still owned properties in London for political affairs and many used country houses as a retreat. Until the mid-20th Century, parliamentary sessions did not begin until the New Year after ending in August, which would give the prime minister long periods in respite.[112]

Post-premiership

Retirement honours

Eight former prime ministers seen together in 2024 – first row Blair and Major, second row Cameron and Brown, third Johnson and May, fourth Sunak and Truss

Upon retirement, it is customary for the sovereign to grant a prime minister some honour or dignity. The honour bestowed is commonly, but not invariably, membership of the UK's most senior order of chivalry, the Order of the Garter. The practice of creating a retired prime minister a Knight Companion of the Garter (KG) has been fairly prevalent since the mid-nineteenth century. Upon the retirement of a prime minister who is Scottish, it is likely that the primarily Scottish honour of Knight of the Thistle (KT) will be used instead of the Order of the Garter, which is generally regarded as an English honour.[n 4]

Historically it has also been common to grant prime ministers a peerage upon retirement from the Commons, elevating the individual to the Lords. Formerly, the peerage bestowed was usually an earldom.[n 5] The last such creation was for Harold Macmillan, who resigned in 1963. Unusually, he became Earl of Stockton only in 1984, over twenty years after leaving office.

Macmillan's successors Alec Douglas-Home, Harold Wilson, James Callaghan, Margaret Thatcher, David Cameron, and Theresa May all accepted life peerages (although Douglas-Home had previously disclaimed his hereditary title as Earl of Home and Cameron received a peerage after reentering Government as Foreign Secretary, not for services as a former Prime Minister). Edward Heath did not accept a peerage of any kind; neither have any of the prime ministers who have retired since 1990 other than Cameron (having done so to re-join the Cabinet, rather than as an honour per se) and May. Edward Heath (in 1992), John Major (in 2005) and Tony Blair (in 2022) were appointed as Knights Companion of the Garter. Major (in 1998) and Gordon Brown (in 2024) were appointed members of the Order of the Companions of Honour, although Blair had previously disclosed that he did not want honours bestowed on himself or future prime ministers.

The most recent former prime minister to die was Margaret Thatcher (1979–1990) on 8 April 2013. Her death meant that for the first time since 1955 (the year in which the Earldom of Attlee was created, subsequent to the death of Earl Baldwin in 1947) the membership of the House of Lords included no former prime minister, a situation which remained the case until David Cameron was appointed to the House in November 2023.

Activities

There are currently no established roles or job positions for former prime ministers following their resignations or after leaving office unexpectedly. It depends on their personal choice and reasons surrounding the need to take on such positions. During the 18th and 19th centuries, many former prime ministers, who were wealthy members of the nobility, would often simply retire to their country estates. The first prime minister, Robert Walpole, accumulated large personal wealth while serving in office and from previous investments made in the 1710s. Prime Ministers Lord Bute and Lord Rosebery were among the wealthiest men in the country during their retirements and are often touted as some of the wealthiest to serve as in office. However some prime ministers, such as William Pitt the Elder and his son William Pitt the Younger, amassed large public debts that were later paid off by parliament. In 1937, a official pension for former prime ministers was given at the sum of £2000 per annum.[115]

In their retirements, a majority of former prime ministers have written memoirs and autobiographies. Some prime ministers have also written non-political books as well, including Winston Churchill's histories of World War II and of the English language,[116][117] Edward Heath's books on his wider interests in sailing, music and travel, Major's history of cricket[118][119] and Arthur Balfour's philosophical writings.[120] Some prime ministers such as William Gladstone mainly wrote tracts and tomes on theology and religion[121] and Benjamin Disraeli wrote many best-selling novels in addition to memoirs and history.[122][115][123]

The Duke of Wellington (on the left) served in the government of his successor, Robert Peel (on the right), twice.

In the 21st century, many former prime ministers have set up their own foundations and charities to be used as a platform to continue involvement in political and public issues after they leave office.[115] In 1991, Margaret Thatcher became the first prime minister to set up her own foundation to try to secure her legacy and propagate her ideology known as Thatcherism, but it closed down in 2005.[124] Tony Blair has set up a sports foundation, an inter-faith foundation and the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change in 2016.[125] In his post-premiership, Blair is also the first prime minister to take on a major international role, as an official envoy of the Quartet on the Middle East.[126] Gordon Brown was actively involved in politics long after he left office, most notably during the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, in which he campaigned for the no vote that advocated Scotland to remain in the union.[127][128]

However, some former prime ministers have returned to serve in the governments of their successors, and a few have had 'retreads' that saw them serve short tenures due to their successors unexpectedly resigning or passing away. Notable cases include the Duke of Wellington who, after serving two brief terms in office, was able to command significant influence as a senior member of the Tory party and returned to serve in two governments of his successor, Sir Robert Peel, as Foreign Secretary and Minister without portfolio. He later retired to serve as Commander-in-Chief of the Army from 1842 until his death in 1852.[115] Arthur Balfour served as prime minister for three years of his term after he was defeated in the 1906 general election and later went on to serve as the Foreign Secretary for eleven years in the imperial war cabinet during and after World War I under three prime ministers. After Neville Chamberlain resigned as prime minister in May 1940, he returned to serve under Winston Churchill in his subsequent war cabinet. Alec Douglas-Home, who resigned after losing the 1964 general election, later came to serve in the cabinet of Edward Heath in 1970.[129]

Public Duty Costs Allowance (PDCA)

All former prime ministers are entitled to claim for salary or office expenses incurred in fulfilling public duties in that role. The allowance may not be used to pay for private or parliamentary duties. It is administered by the Cabinet Office Finance Team.

The maximum amount which may be claimed per year is £115,000, plus 10% towards any staff pension costs. This limit is reviewed annually, and at the start of each Parliament, by the current prime minister. The maximum level may be adjusted downwards if the former prime minister receives any public funds for fulfilling other public appointments.[130] Downing Street confirmed in November 2023 that former prime minister David Cameron would not claim from the PDCA while he acted as Foreign Secretary.[131]

See also

Lists of prime ministers by different criteria

All lists: Category:Lists of prime ministers of the United Kingdom

More related pages: Category:Prime ministers of the United Kingdom

Notes

  1. ^ The Sovereign's prerogative powers are sometimes called reserve powers. They include the sole authority to dismiss a prime minister and government of the day in extremely rare and exceptional circumstances, and other powers such as withholding Royal Assent, and summoning and proroguing Parliament. These reserve powers can be exercised without the consent of Parliament. While formally discretionary, the exercise of these powers is heavily limited by convention.
  2. ^ During the history of the modern office, five men have served as Prime Minister in both the House of Commons and House of Lords; four moved from serving in the Commons to accept a peerage, while the fifth disclaimed his peerage after his appointment and contested a by-election to become an MP.
  3. ^ These include: in England and Wales, the Anglican archbishops of Canterbury and York; in Scotland, the lord high commissioner and the moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland; in Northern Ireland, the Anglican and Roman Catholic archbishops of Armagh and Dublin and the moderator of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church.
  4. ^ This circumstance is somewhat confused, however, as since the Great Reform Act 1832, only seven Scots have served as prime minister. Of these, two – Bonar Law and Ramsay MacDonald – died while still sitting in the Commons, not yet having retired; MacDonald was offered the KT in 1935, but declined it as acceptance would have conflicted with his principles as a Labour Party member.[113] The Earl of Aberdeen was appointed to both the Order of the Garter and the Order of the Thistle, while Alec Douglas-Home became a KT while Foreign Secretary. Yet another, Arthur Balfour, was appointed to the Order of the Garter, but represented an English constituency and may not have considered himself entirely Scottish; of the remaining two, the Earl of Rosebery became a KG, and Gordon Brown remained in the House of Commons as a backbencher until 2015.
  5. ^ Churchill was offered a dukedom but declined.[114]

References

  1. ^ Andersson, Jasmine (31 August 2022). "Queen to appoint new prime minister at Balmoral". BBC News.
  2. ^ "Salaries of Members of His Majesty's Government – Financial Year 2022–23" (PDF). 15 December 2022.
  3. ^ "Pay and expenses for MPs".
  4. ^ "The principles of government formation (Section 2.8)". The Cabinet Manual (1st ed.). Cabinet Office. October 2011. p. 14. Retrieved 24 July 2016. Prime Ministers hold office unless and until they resign. If the prime minister resigns on behalf of the Government, the sovereign will invite the person who appears most likely to be able to command the confidence of the House to serve as prime minister and to form a government.
  5. ^ a b c d "The Cabinet Manual" (PDF) (1st ed.). Cabinet Office. October 2011.
  6. ^ "Minister for the Union". GOV.UK. Retrieved 6 September 2022.
  7. ^ "About us - Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 25 March 2023.
  8. ^ PoliticalScience (26 May 2021). "UK Prime Minister's Position - Political Systems". Political Science. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  9. ^ "How government works - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 18 November 2024.
  10. ^ "Governance". UK Honours System. Retrieved 18 November 2024.
  11. ^ "The executive". The Constitution Society. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  12. ^ Blick, Andrew; Jones, George (7 June 2010). "The power of the Prime Minister". History & Policy.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  13. ^ Hayton, Richard; Heppell, Timothy (24 August 2015). "Constitutional structures and the party system in the UK". The Presidentialisation of Party Politics in the UK (PDF). Palgrave Macmillan. p. 5. ISBN 9781137482457.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  14. ^ "Why Tony Blair's Leadership Journey Failed". Harvard Business Review. 8 September 2010. ISSN 0017-8012. Retrieved 18 November 2024.
  15. ^ Beckett, Charlie (13 April 2013). "Margaret Thatcher: how she reshaped politics and political communications". LSE Blogs.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  16. ^ Koop, Avery (20 January 2021). "History Visualized: The World Leaders In Positions of Power (1970-Today)". Visual Capitalist.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  17. ^ Seldon, Anthony (2021). The Impossible Office?: The History of the British Prime Minister. Cambridge University Press (published 6 May 2021). p. 87. ISBN 978-1316515327.
  18. ^ "Prime Minister to drive forward UK growth as he meets world's leading economic powers at G20". GOV.UK. Retrieved 18 November 2024.
  19. ^ Culbertson, Alix (5 July 2024). "'Our work is urgent and we begin it today': Sir Keir Starmer says in first address as prime minister". Sky News. Retrieved 5 July 2024.
  20. ^ "George I". Retrieved 4 April 2014.
  21. ^ "Prime Minister". Gov.UK. Archived from the original on 14 October 2017. Retrieved 19 May 2018.
  22. ^ Le May, 98–99. Walter Bagehot, an authority on 19th-century British government, said this unity is "the efficient secret" of its constitution. Bagehot's description of the "efficient part" of the British constitution is quoted by Le May and many other standard texts: "The efficient secret of the English Constitution may be described as the close union, the nearly complete fusion, of the executive and legislative powers. No doubt, by the traditional theory, as it exists in all the books, the goodness of our constitution consists in the entire separation of the legislative and executive authorities, but in truth, its merit consists in their singular approximation. The connecting link is the Cabinet ... A Cabinet is a combing committee—a hyphen which joins a buckle which fastens the legislative part of the State to the executive part of the State. In its origin, it belongs to the one, in its functions it belongs to the other."
  23. ^ a b Bagehot 1867, p. 67–68.
  24. ^ Brazier 1988, p. 52–53.
  25. ^ Bagehot 1867, p. 72–73.
  26. ^ Bagehot 1867, p. 73.
  27. ^ Brazier 1988, p. 45–46.
  28. ^ Bogdanor 1997, p. 101–103.
  29. ^ Brazier 1988, p. 89.
  30. ^ Barnett, pp. 245–246
  31. ^ Bagehot 1867, p. 72.
  32. ^ Brazier 1988, p. 102.
  33. ^ Bogdanor 1997, p. 211.
  34. ^ King 2010, p. 145.
  35. ^ Bogdanor 2009, p. 85.
  36. ^ Norton 2011, p. 126.
  37. ^ Hazell 2012, p. 35.
  38. ^ Drewry & Horne 2018, p. 94.
  39. ^ Seldon 2017, p. 163.
  40. ^ Bagehot 1867, p. 63.
  41. ^ "20 years since Parliament approved military action in Iraq – Parliamentary Affairs special collection". www.hansardsociety.org.uk. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  42. ^ Brazier 1988, p. 132.
  43. ^ "Parliamentary approval for military action". Institute for Government. 1 January 2024. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  44. ^ Mills, Claire (14 October 2024). "Military action: Parliament's role" (PDF). House of Commons Library.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  45. ^ "Letter: Didn't Eden lie repeatedly in parliament over Suez?". www.ft.com. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  46. ^ Norton-Taylor, Richard (1 December 2006). "Lawyers warned Eden that Suez invasion was illegal". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  47. ^ Thomas & Elliot 2020, p. 249.
  48. ^ Craig & Tomkins 2005, p. 306.
  49. ^ King, pp. 3–8. King makes the point that much of the British constitution is in fact written and that no constitution is written down in its entirety. The distinctive feature of the British constitution, he says, is that it is not codified.
  50. ^ Quoted in Hanchant, p. 209
  51. ^ Low, p.155. In 1902, for example, Arthur Balfour said, "The prime minister has no salary as prime minister. He has no statutory duties as prime minister, his name occurs in no Acts of Parliament, and though holding the most important place in the constitutional hierarchy, he has no place which is recognized by the laws of his country. This is a strange paradox"
  52. ^ Low, p. 255 "There is no distinction," said Gladstone, "more vital to the practice of the British constitution or to the right judgement upon it than the distinction between the Sovereign and the Crown."
  53. ^ Bagehot, p. 67
  54. ^ Low, pp 255–258
  55. ^ Paragraphs 2.7 to 2.20 and 3.1 to 3.2.
  56. ^ Public Administration Select Committee. "Taming the Prerogative: Strengthening Ministerial Accountability to Parliament. Fourth Report of Session 2003–04" (PDF). Parliament of the United Kingdom. p. 4.
  57. ^ Bogdanor 2009, p. 45–49.
  58. ^ "How is a Prime Minister appointed?". House of Commons Library. 4 July 2024.
  59. ^ "Keir Starmer's first meeting with King Charles after election". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  60. ^ Reporter, James Crawford-Smith Royal (5 July 2024). "King Charles appoints Sir Keir Starmer as his third prime minister". Newsweek. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  61. ^ "The UK election winner only becomes prime minister when King Charles III says so". AP News. 5 July 2024. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  62. ^ "What is 'Kissing the Hand' ceremony in UK politics?". The Economic Times. 5 July 2024. ISSN 0013-0389. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  63. ^ Ilse, Jess (5 July 2024). "Kissing hands: how King Charles will oversee an ancient tradition that turns Sir Keir Starmer into Prime Minister". Royal Central. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  64. ^ Maitland, Hayley (5 July 2024). "What, Exactly, Is The "Kissing The Hands" Ceremony That King Charles & Keir Starmer Are About To Take Part In?". British Vogue. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  65. ^ "What the Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street does". gov.uk. Retrieved 20 February 2021. The office helps the Prime Minister to establish and deliver the government's overall strategy and policy priorities, and to communicate the government's policies to Parliament, the public and international audiences.
  66. ^ "The Role and Status of the Prime Minister's Office inquiry launched". parliament.uk. Retrieved 20 February 2021. Nominally, it is a part of the Cabinet Office, yet it is largely operationally distinct. Its functional relationship with the Cabinet Office is unclear.; Constitution Committee (29 January 2010). "The Cabinet Office and the Centre of Government" (PDF). p. 9. Retrieved 20 February 2021. Evidence conflicted about the relationship between the Cabinet Office and the Prime Minister's Office. In the view of some witnesses, the boundary between the two was blurred... Dr Richard Heffernan, Reader in Government, Open University, claimed that "we do not know where the Prime Minister's Department begins and where the Cabinet Office ends".
  67. ^ House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee (19 June 2014). "Role and powers of the Prime Minister" (PDF). p. 34. Retrieved 20 February 2021. One way forward would be to create a Prime Minister's Department—either as a separate entity or as a formal department combined with the Cabinet Office. Lord Hennessy believed that, in practice, there was already a Prime Minister's Department, but it was simply not referred to in those terms: "I am reluctant for a Prime Minister's Department to exist, being a traditionalist, but it does. It is there. It is the department that dare not speak its name."
  68. ^ Brazier 2008, p. 214.
  69. ^ "50 years of Prime Minister's Questions". UK Parliament. 21 October 2011. Archived from the original on 7 October 2024. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  70. ^ Baldwin, Sian (24 July 2024). "When do the next Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs) take place?". Evening Standard. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  71. ^ "BBC Politics 97". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  72. ^ "Prime minister's questions (PMQs)". Institute for Government. 22 May 2024. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  73. ^ White, Michael (27 October 2011). "The history of PMQs". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  74. ^ "Standing Orders of the House of Commons". Parliament.UK. Retrieved 7 July 2021. Standing Order 145(2)The committee may also hear evidence from the Prime Minister on matters of public policy.
  75. ^ Stacey, Kiran (27 October 2014). "Police to review security after man runs into David Cameron". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2021. The force said: "The MPS Specialist Protection Command is responsible for the personal protection of the prime minister"
  76. ^ "Tony Blair's bodyguard left gun in Starbuck's toilet". Daily Telegraph. 4 September 2008. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2021. The SO1 unit – full name Specialist Protection Command – is responsible for the personal safety of Prime Minister Gordon Brown and former Prime Ministers Mr Blair and Margaret Thatcher.; "Cottage next to David Cameron's Dean home destroyed in suspected arson". Oxford Mail. 12 March 2020. Retrieved 26 February 2021. The fire will raise questions about security for Mr Cameron, 53, who as a former Prime Minister has lifelong personal protection from the Specialist Protection Branch of the Metropolitan Police Service Protection Command.
  77. ^ "What security does the prime minister have?". Sky News. Retrieved 9 October 2024.
  78. ^ "SO1 Specialist Protection". www.eliteukforces.info. Retrieved 18 May 2019.
  79. ^ Smith, Mikey (27 October 2014). "David Cameron's security: The people who protect the Prime Minister". The Mirror. Retrieved 9 October 2024.
  80. ^ "Power and decision-making in the UK". BBC Bitesize. Retrieved 13 March 2021. The PM has several roles including:... representing the UK at home and abroad
  81. ^ Blick, Andrew; Jones, George. "The power of the Prime Minister". health-equity.pitt.edu/. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2015.
  82. ^ Norton, Philip (2020). Governing Britain: Parliament, Ministers and Our Ambiguous Constitution. Manchester University Press. p. 142. ISBN 9-781526-145451.
  83. ^ Bagehot 1867, p. 65–69.
  84. ^ Brazier 1988, p. 134–137.
  85. ^ Bogdanor 2009, p. 212–214.
  86. ^ Brazier, Rodney (2020). Choosing a Prime Minister: The Transfer of Power in Britain. Oxford University Press. p. 174. ISBN 978-0-19-885929-1.
  87. ^ Norton, Philip (2016). "A temporary occupant of No.10? Prime Ministerial succession in the event of the death of the incumbent". Public Law: 34.
  88. ^ Brazier 2020, p. 84
  89. ^ Brazier 2020, p. 68
  90. ^ "MP urges 'line of succession' rules for prime minister". BBC News. 21 December 2011. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  91. ^ Vennard, Andrew (2008). "Prime Ministerial succession". Public Law: 304.
  92. ^ Mason, Chris (15 August 2016). "Is Boris Johnson running the country?". BBC News. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
  93. ^ "Statement from Downing Street: 6 April 2020". gov.uk. 6 April 2020. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
  94. ^ "The appointment of prime ministers and the role of the Queen". Institute for Government. 13 September 2019. Retrieved 23 February 2021. The incumbent prime minister informs Buckingham Palace that they will be resigning. There is then a well-rehearsed sequence of events in which the outgoing prime minister travels to see the Queen and formally tenders his or her resignation.
  95. ^ Mikhailova, Anna; Yorke, Harry (16 May 2019). "Tearful Theresa May forced to agree to stand down: PM out by June 30 at the latest". Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2021. During an emotionally-charged meeting with senior members of the 1922 Committee of Tory MPs, Mrs May was forced to agree to stand down within weeks so the Conservatives can elect a new leader before Parliament's summer recess.
  96. ^ "1957: Sir Anthony Eden resigns". BBC ON THIS DAY. 9 January 1957. Retrieved 22 February 2021. Sir Anthony Eden has resigned as prime minister of Britain due to ill health.; "Sir Anthony Eden resigns". The Guardian. 10 January 1957. Retrieved 22 February 2021. Sir Anthony Eden resigned the office of Prime Minister yesterday because, in the opinion of four doctors, "his health will no longer enable him to sustain the heavy burdens inseparable from the office of Prime Minister."
  97. ^ "What happens if a prime minister loses their seat in a general election?". Institute for Government. 27 November 2019. Retrieved 22 February 2021. Has a prime minister ever lost their seat? No incumbent prime minister has ever lost his or her seat at a general election.
  98. ^ Cameron, David (11 May 2010). "David Cameron becomes PM: Full Downing Street statement". BBC News. Retrieved 11 May 2010.; Prime Minister Gordon Brown arrives at Downing Street on YouTube; Transfer of Power from James Callaghan to Margaret Thatcher on YouTube; May, Theresa (13 July 2016). "Prime Minister Theresa May promises 'a better Britain' – the full speech". Total Politics. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
  99. ^ a b "The Institution of Prime Minister – History of government". history.blog.gov.uk. Retrieved 7 October 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under an Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright.
  100. ^ "Life after the premiership of Tony Blair". Britannica.com. 18 July 2024.
  101. ^ "Gordon Brown: Labour plan would make UK work for Scotland". BBC News. 5 December 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
  102. ^ Castel, Steven (21 October 2022). "The Race for a New British Prime Minister Begins, Again". The New York Times. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
  103. ^ A new politics: cutting Ministerial pay, Number10.gov.uk, 13 May 2010, archived from the original on 18 June 2010, retrieved 19 June 2010
  104. ^ "Chart of the week: Prime Minister's salary". www.icaew.com. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  105. ^ Features, Simon Wilson published in (7 October 2024). "How much does the prime minister get paid?". moneyweekuk. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  106. ^ Kelner, Simon (20 September 2024). "The real problem is that Keir Starmer is not paid enough". inews.co.uk. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  107. ^ "UK PM Starmer accepted more gifts than any other member of parliament, Sky News reports". Reuters. 19 September 2024.
  108. ^ "History of 10 Downing Street - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  109. ^ "No.10 Downing Street". Institute for Government. 8 June 2023. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  110. ^ Sommerlad, Joe (13 July 2018). "Chequers: A brief history of the British prime minister's country residence". The Independent. Archived from the original on 3 December 2023. Retrieved 9 October 2024.
  111. ^ Baldwin, Sian (13 August 2024). "Chequers: Where is the Prime Minister's country house and who owns it?". Evening Standard. Retrieved 9 October 2024.
  112. ^ "Prime Ministerial Residences in History". Museum of the Prime Minister. Retrieved 9 October 2024.
  113. ^ Vickers, Hugo (1994). Royal Orders. Great Britain: Boxtree Limited. p. 55. ISBN 1852835109.
  114. ^ Rasor, Eugene L. (2000). Winston S. Churchill, 1874–1965: a comprehensive historiography and annotated bibliography. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 205. ISBN 978-0-313-30546-7.
  115. ^ a b c d "Former Prime Ministers – History of government". history.blog.gov.uk. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  116. ^ pixelstorm (17 October 2008). "The Books of Sir Winston Churchill". International Churchill Society. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  117. ^ pixelstorm (7 January 2009). "Churchill the Writer: His Life as a Man of Letters". International Churchill Society. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  118. ^ Mosey, Roger (19 May 2007). "Playing a straight bat". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  119. ^ "A Politician addicted to spin". Newspapers.com. 19 May 2007. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  120. ^ Root, John David (1980). "The Philosophical and Religious Thought of Arthur James Balfour (1848-1930)". Journal of British Studies. 19 (2): 120–141. doi:10.1086/385758 – via Cambridge University Press.
  121. ^ "Gladstone's Writing". Gladstone's Library. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  122. ^ "Benjamin Disraeli: Literary Contribution as Novelist". Literature Analysis. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  123. ^ "The best and worst memoirs by British prime ministers". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  124. ^ Barkham, Patrick (10 May 2005). "End of an era for Thatcher foundation". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  125. ^ "Tony Blair Institute 'to focus on making globalisation work'". BBC News. 1 December 2016. Retrieved 8 October 2024.|
  126. ^ "Tony Blair quits Middle East envoy role". BBC News. 27 May 2015. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  127. ^ Freedland, Jonathan (27 June 2014). "Gordon Brown is back, and may be the man to save the union". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 9 October 2024.
  128. ^ Boffey, Daniel (20 September 2014). "Gordon Brown tells Scots: I'll make sure Westminster keeps promises". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Retrieved 9 October 2024.
  129. ^ "British Prime Ministers who returned to government". GOV.UK. Retrieved 8 October 2024.
  130. ^ "Public Duty Costs Allowance guidance". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
  131. ^ Allegretti, Steven Swinford, Chris Smyth, Laurence Sleator, Oliver Wright, Geraldine Scott, Matt Dathan, Aubrey (25 November 2023). "MP files letter of no confidence in Rishi Sunak as reshuffle backlash begins — as it happened". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 25 November 2023.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Works cited

  • Bagehot, Walter (1867). The English Constitution. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-953901-7.
  • Bagehot, Walter (1963) [1867]. The English Constitution. Wm. Collins & Sons. ISBN 978-0-521-46535-9.
  • Barnett, Hilaire (2009). Constitutional & Administrative Law (7th ed.). Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge-Cavendish.
  • Bogdanor, Vernon (1997). The Monarchy and the Constitution. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-829334-7.
  • Bogdanor, Vernon (2009). The New British Constitution. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-1841136714.
  • Brazier, Rodney (1988). Constitutional Practice. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-825596-3.
  • Brazier, Rodney (2008). Constitutional Reform. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198765233.
  • Chrimes, S. B. (1947). English Constitutional History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-404-14653-5.
  • Craig, Paul; Tomkins, Adam (2005). The Executive and Public Law: Power and Accountability in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-826869-7.
  • Drewry, Gavin; Horne, Alexander (2018). Parliament and the Law. Hart Publishing. ISBN 978-1849462952.
  • Hanchant, W.L. (1943). England Is Here—Speeches and Writings of the Prime Ministers of England. Bodley Head.
  • Hazell, Robert (2012). The Politics of Coalition: How the Conservative - Liberal Democrat Government Works. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1849463102.
  • King, Anthony (2010). The British Constitution. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-957698-2.
  • Le May, G. H. L. (1979). The Victorian Constitution, Conventions, Usages and Contingencies. Duckworth.
  • Low, S. (1904). The Governance of England. T. Fisher Unwin, London. ISBN 978-0-521-38155-0.
  • Leonard, Dick (2014). A History of British Prime Ministers, Walpole to Cameron. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-33804-4.
  • Norton, Philip (2011). The British Polity. Pearson Publishing. ISBN 978-0801318436.
  • Thomas, Robert; Elliot, Mark (2020). Public Law. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-885227-8.

Further reading