Jump to content

Talk:Timeline of events associated with Anonymous: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
This is ''timeline'' content ... Undid revision 468056728 by Beagel (talk)
 
(130 intermediate revisions by 65 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture}}
{{Talk header}}
{{split-to|page=Anonymous (group)|date=07 November 2011|diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Anonymous_%28group%29&curid=15716827&diff=459424082&oldid=459379512}}
{{afd-merged-from|Operation Leakspin|Operation Leakspin (2nd nomination)|15 October 2022}}
{{Ticket confirmation|source=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/|id=2022050810003262 |license=d}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Comedy |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Computer Security |importance=Low |computing-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject History |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Internet |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Media |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Scientology |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Sociology |importance=Low|Social movements=y}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Timeline of events associated with Anonymous/Archive %(counter)d
}}


== Proposed merge of [[Operation Tunisia]] into [[Timeline of events associated with Anonymous#Arab Spring activities]] ==
== Operation Mayhem ==


tone and notability issues for more than 10 years [[User:Softlemonades|Softlemonades]] ([[User talk:Softlemonades|talk]]) 20:40, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Operation Mayhem is a current going Operation that involves the [[Guy Fawkes Virus]]. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TheDamox|TheDamox]] ([[User talk:TheDamox|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDamox|contribs]]) 00:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:'''support''' merge [[User:Joyous!|Joyous!]] [[User_talk:Joyous%21|Noise!]] 03:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)


== could someone politely help copyedit ==
== resource ==
{{moved from|User talk:149.86.69.66}}
[[Timeline of events associated with Anonymous]] has something listed under 2012 labelled "Interpol Attack", if someone could pop over and copyedit it please it'd be greatly appreciated. i read the source and it seemed aight, i'd do it myself but this IP account is blocked and i don't feel like creating an account just to copyedit one thing (and also don't trust the other braincells of this IP) [[Special:Contributions/149.86.69.66|149.86.69.66]] ([[User talk:149.86.69.66#top|talk]]) 14:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


== Citation overkill ==
[[Stratfor#2011 Hacking]] [[Special:Contributions/99.181.143.108|99.181.143.108]] ([[User talk:99.181.143.108|talk]]) 04:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.190.86.5|99.190.86.5]] ([[User talk:99.190.86.5|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


This article is heavily overcited. Someone tried to take care of my "Excessive citations" tag by simply redistributing the citations throughout the paragraph without actually removing any. I had only tagged a few series of refs with an inline tag, but those weren't the only overcited/refbombed sections. There are still single short sentences with multiple citations. We just don't need that many. See [[WP:Citation overkill]]. <span style="text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 1em">[[User:Grorp|<span style="color:#6a0dad"> &nbsp;&nbsp;▶ I am Grorp ◀ </span>]]</span> 04:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
== from [[Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012]], potential resource ==


:<s>If your main concern(s) about citation overkill is readability, then an alternative method in the form of [[WP:CITEMERGE]] has been applied with the "Multiref2" on areas with citation overkill problems. Hopefully things are fine by now.[[Special:Contributions/74.3.163.33|74.3.163.33]] ([[User talk:74.3.163.33|talk]]) 09:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)</s> <small>Ban-evasion by [[WP:LTA/BMN123]], using an open-proxy [[Special:Contributions/184.152.68.190|184.152.68.190]] ([[User talk:184.152.68.190|talk]]) 21:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)</small>
[http://www.usatoday.com/video/news/1336252714001 Iowa GOP worried by hacker threat to caucus vote] "With two weeks left before Iowa's first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses, the Iowa [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] is taking steps to secure its electronic vote collection system after receiving a mysterious threat to its computers. (Dec. 19), from [[USA Today]]
:: Hardly. The point wasn't the visual of a series of citations, it was that there are too many unnecessary and duplicate sources being used. We only need enough so that the content in the article can be verified. There is no purpose in adding 3 or 5 or more citations which say basically the same thing. Maybe read [[WP:TIMELINE]]. This is a timeline article. Items should be ''very brief''. [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?search=timeline+of+intitle%3A%22timeline+of%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&advancedSearch-current=%7B%22fields%22%3A%7B%22intitle%22%3A%22timeline+of%22%7D%7D&ns0=1 Check here for a list of timeline articles] and check some of them. See how they are usually bulleted lists, and each item is very brief. Quite unlike this article which has bloated into a chronological list of Anonymous activism. <span style="text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 1em">[[User:Grorp|<span style="color:#6a0dad"> &nbsp;&nbsp;▶ I am Grorp ◀ </span>]]</span> 09:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


== Timeline format ==
[[Special:Contributions/99.181.143.108|99.181.143.108]] ([[User talk:99.181.143.108|talk]]) 04:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


See [[WP:TIMELINE]] and [[Timeline]]. This article reads like an advertisement or propaganda for Anonymous, and justification for their [oft times criminal] actions, rather than a chronological list of events related to Anonymous—too much promotion/advert content, too much prose and description rather than being a general timeline of events. I have modified year 2007 into one of the typical Wikipedia timeline formats. Feel free to jump in and summarize some of the other lengthy paragraphs and sections. <span style="text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 1em">[[User:Grorp|<span style="color:#6a0dad"> &nbsp;&nbsp;▶ I am Grorp ◀ </span>]]</span> 05:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
== resources ==
: A month ago, I completed the summarizing of 2007-2010, but there is still much more that needs to be done (2011-2024). The work reduced the overall page size from 274K to 228K (a 17% reduction); reduced the word count from 17.1K to 13.4K (a 22% reduction). The remaining word count is still over 13,000 words which is much larger than it should be, and the [[WP:OVERCITE]] on the remaining years has not been addressed either, but would be addressed by trimming those huge paragraphs to simple event notes. <span style="text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 1em">[[User:Grorp|<span style="color:#6a0dad"> &nbsp;&nbsp;▶ I am Grorp ◀ </span>]]</span> 20:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

[[Stratfor#2011 Hacking]] [[Special:Contributions/99.181.143.108|99.181.143.108]] ([[User talk:99.181.143.108|talk]]) 04:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

:More [http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/27/questions-about-motives-behind-stratfor-hack/ Questions About Motives Behind Stratfor Hack] by NICOLE PERLROTH [[New York Times]] December 27, 2011, 6:31 PM
:[[Special:Contributions/99.190.86.5|99.190.86.5]] ([[User talk:99.190.86.5|talk]]) 06:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
::From [[WSJ]], [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203479104577122811997424378.html 'Anonymous' Hackers Target U.S. Security Think Tank] December 27, 2011 [[Associated Press]]. 09:48, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:52, 27 October 2024

tone and notability issues for more than 10 years Softlemonades (talk) 20:40, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

support merge Joyous! Noise! 03:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

could someone politely help copyedit

[edit]

Timeline of events associated with Anonymous has something listed under 2012 labelled "Interpol Attack", if someone could pop over and copyedit it please it'd be greatly appreciated. i read the source and it seemed aight, i'd do it myself but this IP account is blocked and i don't feel like creating an account just to copyedit one thing (and also don't trust the other braincells of this IP) 149.86.69.66 (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation overkill

[edit]

This article is heavily overcited. Someone tried to take care of my "Excessive citations" tag by simply redistributing the citations throughout the paragraph without actually removing any. I had only tagged a few series of refs with an inline tag, but those weren't the only overcited/refbombed sections. There are still single short sentences with multiple citations. We just don't need that many. See WP:Citation overkill.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 04:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If your main concern(s) about citation overkill is readability, then an alternative method in the form of WP:CITEMERGE has been applied with the "Multiref2" on areas with citation overkill problems. Hopefully things are fine by now.74.3.163.33 (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Ban-evasion by WP:LTA/BMN123, using an open-proxy 184.152.68.190 (talk) 21:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hardly. The point wasn't the visual of a series of citations, it was that there are too many unnecessary and duplicate sources being used. We only need enough so that the content in the article can be verified. There is no purpose in adding 3 or 5 or more citations which say basically the same thing. Maybe read WP:TIMELINE. This is a timeline article. Items should be very brief. Check here for a list of timeline articles and check some of them. See how they are usually bulleted lists, and each item is very brief. Quite unlike this article which has bloated into a chronological list of Anonymous activism.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 09:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline format

[edit]

See WP:TIMELINE and Timeline. This article reads like an advertisement or propaganda for Anonymous, and justification for their [oft times criminal] actions, rather than a chronological list of events related to Anonymous—too much promotion/advert content, too much prose and description rather than being a general timeline of events. I have modified year 2007 into one of the typical Wikipedia timeline formats. Feel free to jump in and summarize some of the other lengthy paragraphs and sections.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A month ago, I completed the summarizing of 2007-2010, but there is still much more that needs to be done (2011-2024). The work reduced the overall page size from 274K to 228K (a 17% reduction); reduced the word count from 17.1K to 13.4K (a 22% reduction). The remaining word count is still over 13,000 words which is much larger than it should be, and the WP:OVERCITE on the remaining years has not been addressed either, but would be addressed by trimming those huge paragraphs to simple event notes.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 20:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]