Jump to content

Talk:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(260 intermediate revisions by 82 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{notaforum}}
{{Not a forum}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject International relations | law=yes|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject International relations|class=C|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject International law}}
{{WikiProject Law Enforcement}}
{{WikiProject Pirate Politics|importance=High}}
{{Law enforcement|class=C|nested=Mid}}
{{WikiProject United States Public Policy
{{WikiProject Trade|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|USGov=Yes|USGov-importance=Low}}
|class = <!-- a class specified here overrides the automatic rating based on the numerical scores -->
|importance = <!-- this works just like the usual WikiProject importance ratings -->
|comprehensiveness = <!-- 1-10 -->
|sourcing = <!-- 0-6 -->
|neutrality = <!-- 0-3 -->
|readability = <!-- 0-3 -->
|formatting = <!-- 0-2 -->
|illustrations = <!-- 0-2 --> }}
}}
}}
{{dyktalk|1 June|2008|entry=... that the proposed '''[[Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement]]''' would allow security officials at some [[international border]]s to randomly search travelers' [[MP3 players]], [[laptop]]s, and [[cell phone]]s for [[copyright infringement|copyright-infringing]] music files?|views=1800}}
{{DYK talk|1 June|2008|entry=... that the proposed '''[[Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement]]''' would allow security officials at some [[international border]]s to randomly search travelers' [[MP3 players]], [[laptop]]s, and [[cell phone]]s for [[copyright infringement|copyright-infringing]] music files?|views=1800}}
{{ITN talk|29 January|2012}}
{{ITN talk|29 January|2012}}
{{auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot|age=120|dounreplied=yes}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement/Archive index
|target=Talk:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement/Archive index
Line 29: Line 21:
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 1
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadsleft = 6
|algo = old(120d)
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}


== ACTA referred to the European Court of Justice ==
== Trans-Pacific Agreement ?! ==


Since 22 February, ACTA has been referred to the European Court of Justice. No ruling has been given as of yet. Avaaz claims that the European Commission is trying to manipulate the process
Seems like something similar is going on between the US. and Pacific countries ... http://tppwatch.org/what-is-tppa/ [[User:Stanjourdan|Stanjourdan]] ([[User talk:Stanjourdan|talk]]) 10:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== lifting the indefinite Semi-protection ==


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
The media attention has dropped, so it should be time to look if the protection should be lifted so unregistered and newly registered users can make contributions to the article.[[User:Belorn|Belorn]] ([[User talk:Belorn|talk]]) 05:34, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=717102912 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
:{{Done}} [[User:Thehelpfulone|<font color="red">'''The'''</font>]][[User_talk:Thehelpfulone|<font color="black"> '''Helpful'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Thehelpfulone|<font color="red"> '''One'''</font>]] 18:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://publicacta.org.nz/wellington-declaration//


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
*Maybe it should be reinstated since it's been brought up again? The first sentence right now, before I go edit it out, contains "...(aka d-bags who ant to ruin everybodies internet)" [[Special:Contributions/24.125.232.144|24.125.232.144]] ([[User talk:24.125.232.144|talk]]) 00:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}
::It is quite clear that when acta is up on the news, the vandalism starts again. [[User:Belorn|Belorn]] ([[User talk:Belorn|talk]]) 17:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Irrelevant. Locking Wikipedia pages is typically a reactionary measure, not a preventative one. The editing on the article for the past week has been relatively tame and within normal limits, so there's no reason to needlessly restrict who can edit the page (a bit of an interesting choice given the goals of SOPA, PIPA and ACTA, methinks). '''[[User:Elektrik Shoos|<font color="#FFCC66">elektrik</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Elektrik Shoos|<font color="#666666">SHOOS</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Elektrik Shoos|talk]]) 08:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 19:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
== So what exactly would it do? ==


== External links modified ==
I didn't find any particular mention about *what* it plans to change (several countries have signed it already, so it must have been fully formulated by now). It's a threat to human rights and has sparked lots of criticism, so there should be more information on it, rather than some general info about signing and leaks. And way too much jargon. The article seems biased towards the agreement, making it look like good and noble and something every country should sign. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.28.234.39|86.28.234.39]] ([[User talk:86.28.234.39|talk]]) 10:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
Just because the article is not ultra negative does not mean its bias. The article actually seems very unbias in the good sense. It seems to me that you dont actually want an unbias article but just want an anti ACTA tone throughout the article. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/31.205.28.203|31.205.28.203]] ([[User talk:31.205.28.203|talk]]) 04:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:tbh, I think he's right. This is quite biased...It only tells us who is against it and why... if we wanted to know that, we'd read the news. There's no information about what changes the treaty actually means. The PDF's are too politically correct for the common man to understand. It puts the protesters in a bad light and makes them look like they're all whining corporations that want free stuff whilst in my internet research i've found that the treaty is more than just piracy... I came to wikipedia to see what the deal is. My bad [[Special:Contributions/91.182.71.133|91.182.71.133]] ([[User talk:91.182.71.133|talk]]) 02:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


I have just modified {{plural:16|one external link|16 external links}} on [[Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=744478002 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
::The few things that can be described as neutral and objective facts about the changes the treaty introduce are under the '''Legal framework''' and '''Treaty content''' sections. The rest are as any other political subjet about the changes the treaty introduce as precived by different parties. That said, the ''Criticism'' section should be weaved into the ''Positions'' section, and the article need a bit of updating about the final version. [[User:Belorn|Belorn]] ([[User talk:Belorn|talk]]) 06:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edri.org/files/EDRI_acta_series_2_20120117.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edri.org/files/EDRI_acta_series_1_20120116.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edri.org/files/EDRI_acta_series_4_20120119.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/we-have-every-right-be-furious-about-acta
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/286925/20120124/acta-sopa-reasons-scarier-threat-internet-freedom.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/01/28/final-draft-of-acta-watered-down-tpp-still-dangerous-on-ip-rules/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/84576,Warsaw-demonstrators-protest-ACTA
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://channel6newsonline.com/2012/01/poland-thousands-protest-signing-of-anti-piracy-agreement/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://fakty.interia.pl/raport/internauci-przeciwko-acta/news/milion-glosow-w-sprawie-acta,1752654,7906
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://sg.news.yahoo.com/poland-signs-copyright-treaty-drew-protests-102302237.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2012/01/27/amid-acta-outcy-politicians-don-anonymous-guy-fawkes-masks/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://metinalista.si/why-i-signed-acta/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/6407227/Protests-erupt-across-Europe-against-ACTA
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://biznes.onet.pl/bedzie-referendum-ws-acta-juz-200-tys-podpisow,18515,5010615,1,news-detal
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/289767/20120130/acta-protest-sign-poland-uk-censorship-petition.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120507132516/http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/acta-crc_apr15-2011_eng.pdf to http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/acta-crc_apr15-2011_eng.pdf


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
== New version of ACTA released ==


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Since ACTA is supposed to be signed by Poland on the 26th of January 2012, the nowadays official version has been released. It's available at the site of the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, more precisely : http://www.mkidn.gov.pl/media/docs/20120118-wniosek_ACTA.pdf . The PDF is quite big, since the text is stored as images. The English version starts on page 57. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:XAVeRY|XAVeRY]] ([[User talk:XAVeRY|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/XAVeRY|contribs]]) 15:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: This is the final text since 15 November 2010 available as a normal text PDF [http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/trade-topics/intellectual-property/anti-counterfeiting/ on EC's site]. [[User:Tokenzero|Tokenzero]] ([[User talk:Tokenzero|talk]]) 10:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
::I looked for the PDF of the treaty text at that web site, and do not immediately see it. The page I see is largely pro-ACTA advertising, with many links. The few, most obvious, candidate links I have checked do not seme to have it. Can you give a complete link to the pdf? Thanks. [[User:Wwheaton|Wwheaton]] ([[User talk:Wwheaton|talk]]) 04:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Completely below is the "external links" section, which gives a link to the final version. Furhtermore the full txt is available here on wikisource: [[s:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement]]. [[User:L.tak|L.tak]] ([[User talk:L.tak|talk]]) 05:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 13:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
== Blatant POV pushing ==


== External links modified ==
The whole lede of the article is a textbook example of POV pushing. First, per WP:MOS it's way too long. And the reason why it's too long cuz someone saw fit to cram in as much as "so-and-so opposes it", "opponents have argued..." "opponents have also criticized..." and so and so forth. Seriously, this is as an unbalanced instance of POV pushing as I've seen.[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font color="Orange">Volunteer</font><font color="Blue">Marek</font>]] 00:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
:Could you specify a bit more in depth what you mean. If you consider it too long, what sections should be removed/shortened, or is it the lead that you have issue with? [[User:Belorn|Belorn]] ([[User talk:Belorn|talk]]) 00:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


I have just modified 27 external links on [[Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=783244228 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
::As I already said above, yes, it's the lede. For now.[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font color="Orange">Volunteer</font><font color="Blue">Marek</font>]] 01:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091125195920/http://www.eurunion.org/eu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2418&Itemid=58 to http://www.eurunion.org/eu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2418&Itemid=58
:::I wouldn't call it POV pushing because the opposition makes up the bulk of the issue's notable coverage. The lede however is too long. [[User:PeRshGo|PeRshGo]] ([[User talk:PeRshGo|talk]]) 01:05, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091128125034/http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/7/31/acta_5th_round_of_negotiation_rabat_16-17_july_2009 to http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/7/31/acta_5th_round_of_negotiation_rabat_16-17_july_2009
::::You don't think it overdoing it? Usually in these kinds of articles the concerned parties have the decency to put in a sentence or two in the lede and save all that stuff for a bulky "Criticisms" section. Just saying, that's how POV pushing is USUALLY done. Here it's just over the top.[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font color="Orange">Volunteer</font><font color="Blue">Marek</font>]] 05:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091110111637/http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/11/6/the_6th_round_of_negotiations_on_anti-counterfeiting_trade_agreement to http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/11/6/the_6th_round_of_negotiations_on_anti-counterfeiting_trade_agreement
:::::Sorry, must been too tired and missed it :). Anyway, The ideal approach is to integrate the negative criticism into the article: negative information is woven throughout the article in the appropriate topical sections ([[wp:Criticism]]). So the criticism do belong there, but the historical information like when the preliminary talks and Official negotiations took place might better be outside the lead section. The text about the draft text leaks might also be unnecesary in a lead as it does not look to be most important aspects of the article. Last, the Polish signing of the treaty might also be moved down. [[User:Belorn|Belorn]] ([[User talk:Belorn|talk]]) 10:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions
:::::::Wanted to give a heads up that the page desperately needs some coverage/analysis of the ''recent'' treaty content - there's literally zilch on the page right now, pretty much all the analysis or summarization of content is of the outdated drafts. And until the body of the page is complete and neutral, getting the lead that way will be pretty impossible. I've had trouble finding good english dissections in the media '''[[User:Sloggerbum|<font color="green">Sloggerbum</font>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Sloggerbum|<font color="maroon">talk</font>]])</small> 22:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edri.org/files/EDRI_acta_series_2_20120117.pdf
:::::::: I'm trying to summarize criticism from major organizations on the Polish Wikipedia [http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedysta:Tokenzero/ACTA here], you may find it a good coverage of the final content, in particular the references, as they're almost all in English and include key quotations from significant sources. [[User:Tokenzero|Tokenzero]] ([[User talk:Tokenzero|talk]]) 15:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edri.org/files/EDRI_acta_series_1_20120116.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edri.org/files/EDRI_acta_series_4_20120119.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/we-have-every-right-be-furious-about-acta
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120130023554/http://freeknowledge.eu/acta-a-global-threat-to-freedoms-open-letter to http://freeknowledge.eu/acta-a-global-threat-to-freedoms-open-letter
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/286925/20120124/acta-sopa-reasons-scarier-threat-internet-freedom.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/01/28/final-draft-of-acta-watered-down-tpp-still-dangerous-on-ip-rules/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/84576%2CWarsaw-demonstrators-protest-ACTA
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://channel6newsonline.com/2012/01/poland-thousands-protest-signing-of-anti-piracy-agreement/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://fakty.interia.pl/raport/internauci-przeciwko-acta/news/milion-glosow-w-sprawie-acta%2C1752654%2C7906
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://sg.news.yahoo.com/poland-signs-copyright-treaty-drew-protests-102302237.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2012/01/27/amid-acta-outcy-politicians-don-anonymous-guy-fawkes-masks/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://metinalista.si/why-i-signed-acta/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/6407227/Protests-erupt-across-Europe-against-ACTA
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://biznes.onet.pl/bedzie-referendum-ws-acta-juz-200-tys-podpisow%2C18515%2C5010615%2C1%2Cnews-detal
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/289767/20120130/acta-protest-sign-poland-uk-censorship-petition.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
===Something a bit fresh===
Hi, I'm here cause I was bribed :) (bento next time ok? ) Can I suggest clearer approachable language, lets start off shoving all the lede into a section called overview, links and all, same as we did on sopa, then like this
*Dump "The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is a proposed plurilateral agreement for the purpose of establishing international standards on intellectual property rights enforcement."
*Dump It would establish an international legal framework for countries to join voluntarily,
*Dump The scope of ACTA includes counterfeit goods, generic medicines and copyright infringement on the Internet.


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
*Go with something like "The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement ACTA is a voluntary international agreement to make uniform intellectual property rights laws including copyright. It effects name brand and counterfeit goods and medicines, as well as copyright infringement on the internet and in smartphones and mp3 players."


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 01:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
For Volunteer Marek's concerns, instead of just summarizing the article section by section like for sopa, how about we summarize for and against into roughly equal sized parts of the lede ? Because yes, all the notable stuff is the opposition because they do funny protests people love to watch and everyone falls asleep listening to the hot air, so understandably it's not in the article. But lets cover both sides shall we ? that way I can get my Bento ! (nod) (hint) (Should I call the section blatant bento pushing ? too far ?) <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|<span style="color:#002100;">'''Penyulap'''</span>]]</span><sub>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:07AA07;">''' talk'''</span>]]</sub> 15:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
: +1, but it might be hard to cover both sides equally without just writing section by section what it's supposed to protect - I tried to read EC and Polish responses and it's basically repeating over and over that it doesn't require any change, that there's no way legitimate medicine could be targeted and that there are sooo many guarantees like the non-binding preamble's reference to Doho and the undefined fundamental right to fair process. There's some interesting content in the "older" [http://infojustice.org/archives/7106 legal opinion] of the EP Legal Service, 5 October 2011 (released to the public on December 19 after pressure from FFII), though, that might be considered the official EP stance. [[User:Tokenzero|Tokenzero]] ([[User talk:Tokenzero|talk]]) 15:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
:In general, I think its a good idea to put the current lead into a section, and make a new short lead that breifly present what ACTA is, its purpose, and a very summery of the opposition to it, and lastly a short summery of the controversy around the negotiations. But please do not call acta an agreement to make uniform copyright laws. Acta is about intellectual property rights enforcement which extends over much more than just copyright. [[User:Belorn|Belorn]] ([[User talk:Belorn|talk]]) 22:29, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
::Any better, any suggestions? <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Penyulap|<span style="color:#002100;">'''Penyulap'''</span>]]</span><sub>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:07AA07;">''' talk'''</span>]]</sub> 19:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


I have just modified 10 external links on [[Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=788844833 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
===Rewrite as per ITN comments===
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080601022602/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=ae997868-220b-4dae-bf4f-47f6fc96ce5e&p=1 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=ae997868-220b-4dae-bf4f-47f6fc96ce5e&p=1
I've rewritten the lead essentially from scratch, as the other was more or less at an unworkable point. The original content has been moved to a new section titled ''background'', which is a more appropriate designation for that text. <span style="background:black;color:white">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''''—&nbsp;'''''[[User:CMBJ|<span style="background:black;color:white">'''''C&nbsp;M&nbsp;B&nbsp;J'''''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 23:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120128091944/http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/287236/20120125/act-against-acta-demonstrators-protest-poland-signing.htm to http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/287236/20120125/act-against-acta-demonstrators-protest-poland-signing.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120215065354/http://www.kestudies.org/node/20 to http://kestudies.org/node/20/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100123221752/http://www.unitedfuture.org.nz/default%2C1286%2Cdunne_what_are_we_signing_up_to_mr_power.sm to http://www.unitedfuture.org.nz/default%2C1286%2Cdunne_what_are_we_signing_up_to_mr_power.sm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120718223527/http://acta.net.nz/the-wellington-declaration to http://acta.net.nz/the-wellington-declaration
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120718223527/http://acta.net.nz/the-wellington-declaration to http://acta.net.nz/the-wellington-declaration
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100221153827/http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/Trade-Agreements/Anti-Counterfeiting/0-ACTA.php to http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/Trade-Agreements/Anti-Counterfeiting/0-ACTA.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120313030005/http://gamepolitics.com/category/topics/acta to http://gamepolitics.com/category/topics/acta
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100204021257/http://acta.net.nz/ to http://www.acta.net.nz/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100709024919/http://slaconnections.typepad.com/public_policy_blog/2010/06/proposed-acta-changes-sent-to-the-ustr-.html to http://slaconnections.typepad.com/public_policy_blog/2010/06/proposed-acta-changes-sent-to-the-ustr-.html


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
:Very nicely done. I would like to see the notable/infamous secrecy of the negotiations being mentioned in the lead but beyond that its a extreme improvement over the last lead. [[User:Belorn|Belorn]] ([[User talk:Belorn|talk]]) 11:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
==UN's opinion?==
What's UN's opinion on this? Who knows about it? What are the chances ACTA gets archived or banned overall? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/187.126.135.232|187.126.135.232]] ([[User talk:187.126.135.232|talk]]) 21:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
:Probability is virtually zero-chance. The UN may look over this treaty and some member states object to it, but that will have no impact whatsoever on what the signatories of the treaty do. [[User:HammerFilmFan|HammerFilmFan]] ([[User talk:HammerFilmFan|talk]]) 03:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
==Protests in Poland==
Don't have an account but protests in Poland were much larger than what is said on the website. Protests took place 25th, 26th and there is another protest in Warsaw today. In Krakow alone there was 15000 people. This is according to the PAP (Polish Press Agency). In total given protests took place in around 30 cities and at a minimum 1000 people were at each protest with ones in Wroclaw and Bydgoszcz counting 5000+ so we are talking of tens of thousands of people on the streets between 25th-26th. The big Warsaw protest takes place today (27th), so expect protests totalling at above 100000.
NEWS IN POLISH
http://www.rmf24.pl/raport-koniec-wolnego-internetu/acta-fakty/news-tysiace-osob-na-protestach-przeciwko-acta-zamieszki-w,nId,431100
"W sumie wzięło w nich udział co najmniej kilkadziesiąt tysięcy ludzi."
TRANSLATION: In total at least tens of thousands of people participated.
Kraków: 15000
Wrocław, Bydgoszcz: 5000+
Katowice: 1000
Lodz: 2500+
Kielce: 2000
Gdynia: 2000
http://www.rmf24.pl/fakty/polska/news-stworzylismy-z-wami-mape-protestow,nId,430940
Poznań: 2000
MAP OF PROTESTS:
http://www.rmf24.pl/fakty/polska/news-stworzylismy-z-wami-mape-protestow,nId,430940 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.202.52.134|92.202.52.134]] ([[User talk:92.202.52.134|talk]]) 23:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
== EU Countries that signed this treaty ==


I have just modified 11 external links on [[Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=789422903 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
Hello. I came to the page in order to find out which countries signed this treaty and which ones did not. (I want to find out where the traitors are strongest.) Could someone add this to the article somewhere please? [[Special:Contributions/194.166.100.6|194.166.100.6]] ([[User talk:194.166.100.6|talk]]) 09:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101121062406/http://nerdng.arpa.com/2010/11/acta-final-agreement-leaked.html to http://nerdng.arpa.com/2010/11/acta-final-agreement-leaked.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130429194750/http://commentneelie.eu/sentence.php?s=2743 to http://commentneelie.eu/sentence.php?s=2743
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.yjil.org/docs/pub/o-35-katz-hinze-ACTA-on-knowledge-economy.pdf
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/jsct/21november2011/treaties/anti_counterfeiting_nia.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090501081045/http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/EU_Council_refuses_to_release_secret_ACTA_documents to http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/EU_Council_refuses_to_release_secret_ACTA_documents
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100308015940/http://acta.net.nz/ to http://acta.net.nz/
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2009/12/04/whats-the-need-for-secrecy/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324102503/http://www.rp.pl/artykul/796028%2C796607-Polskie-serwisy-niedostepne-przez-24h.html to http://www.rp.pl/artykul/796028%2C796607-Polskie-serwisy-niedostepne-przez-24h.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/651tq3vg7?url=http://channel6newsonline.com/2012/01/poland-thousands-protest-signing-of-anti-piracy-agreement/ to http://channel6newsonline.com/2012/01/poland-thousands-protest-signing-of-anti-piracy-agreement/
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/655ZzVr4T?url=http://fakty.interia.pl/raport/internauci-przeciwko-acta/news/milion-glosow-w-sprawie-acta%2C1752654%2C7906 to http://fakty.interia.pl/raport/internauci-przeciwko-acta/news/milion-glosow-w-sprawie-acta%2C1752654%2C7906
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224174550/http://www.wbj.pl/article-58076-polish-government-asks-european-parliament-not-to-sign-acta.html to http://www.wbj.pl/article-58076-polish-government-asks-european-parliament-not-to-sign-acta.html
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://svt.se/2.34007/1.2721450/demonstration_mot_acta_i_goteborg
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.vansterpartiet.eu/showPage.php?ID=2548
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210095456/https://www.accessnow.org/policy-activism/press-blog/acta-protest-feb-11 to https://www.accessnow.org/policy-activism/press-blog/acta-protest-feb-11
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/655Z8y58J?url=http://biznes.onet.pl/bedzie-referendum-ws-acta-juz-200-tys-podpisow%2C18515%2C5010615%2C1%2Cnews-detal to http://biznes.onet.pl/bedzie-referendum-ws-acta-juz-200-tys-podpisow%2C18515%2C5010615%2C1%2Cnews-detal
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100204021257/http://acta.net.nz/ to http://www.acta.net.nz/


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
"EU and its Member States that signed the Agreement at this ceremony are: the EU, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom"
Sauce: http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/i_property/acta1201.html <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.55.55.257|78.55.55.257]] ([[User talk:78.55.55.257|talk]]) 16:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
==Depositary==
I actually knew that a rapporteur is not a reporter but I had to look up [[Depositary]]. Shouldn't we at least have a redirect for that? --[[Special:Contributions/92.202.63.148|92.202.63.148]] ([[User talk:92.202.63.148|talk]]) 15:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 07:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
== Map & EU. ==


== Outdated ==
The map may be clearer with a color for the EU. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.81.62.174|98.81.62.174]] ([[User talk:98.81.62.174|talk]]) 16:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


The article is extremely out of date, still being written as though the treaty is still up for consideration. (It is unlikely enter into force.) It has been tagged accordingly to correct outdated language, mostly tenses. –[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄</span>]]) 21:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
== Edit request on 30 January 2012 ==

{{edit semi-protected|answered=no}}
<!-- Begin request -->
Please remove ''Mike Masnick of Techdirt noted that the handmade masks were themselves symbolically "counterfeit," as Time Warner owns intellectual property rights to the masks and typically expects royalties for their depiction.'' from Polish parliament section. The cited source is a popular [http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120126/12313917555/polish-politicians-don-guy-fawkesanonymous-masks-to-protest-acta-signing.shtml blog] and definitely not reliable. It is not clear whether the producers of that mask pay any royalties or not. It is just a speculation and definitely not neutral to present it as facts. The [http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/08/29/how-time-warner-profits-from-the-anonymous-hackers/ second source] from Times doesn't say that Polish parliament wearing of that mask is an act of "counterfeiting".

<!-- End request -->
[[Special:Contributions/83.170.106.45|83.170.106.45]] ([[User talk:83.170.106.45|talk]]) 04:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

== map does not match article ==

article says south korea signed, but map does not show south korea in magenta; is that intentional? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.201.80.240|91.201.80.240]] ([[User talk:91.201.80.240|talk]]) 07:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Introduction section edit request ==

Could you please fix a statement "The agreement was signed on 1 October 2010 ..." - the date should be 1 October 2011. ()
Thanks.

Latest revision as of 16:26, 15 July 2024

ACTA referred to the European Court of Justice

[edit]

Since 22 February, ACTA has been referred to the European Court of Justice. No ruling has been given as of yet. Avaaz claims that the European Commission is trying to manipulate the process

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 27 external links on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated

[edit]

The article is extremely out of date, still being written as though the treaty is still up for consideration. (It is unlikely enter into force.) It has been tagged accordingly to correct outdated language, mostly tenses. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement&oldid=1234682499"