Jump to content

Talk:Roman expansion in Italy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citations?: nice work, no citations
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 5 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Italy}}, {{WikiProject History}}, {{WikiProject European history}}, {{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome}}.
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Italy|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject History}}
{{WikiProject History}}
{{WikiProject European history|importance=high}}
{{eurohist}}
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|importance=high}}
{{Classical_greece_and_rome}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|B1=n|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Classical=yes|Roman=yes}}
}}


==Citations?==
==Citations?==
From skimming this article I notice a lack of cited material, can we fix this? [[User:Jeff503|Jeff503]] ([[User talk:Jeff503|talk]]) 01:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
From skimming this article I notice a lack of cited material, can we fix this? [[User:Jeff503|Jeff503]] ([[User talk:Jeff503|talk]]) 01:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
: Very nice work, but indeed, it needs inline citations. Take a look at [[Roman Dacia]] for an example.--[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 22:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
: Very nice work, but indeed, it needs inline citations. Take a look at [[Roman Dacia]] for an example.--[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 22:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

== Early romanisation vs late ==

It may be worthwhile to temper the claims of romanisation during the 2nd century with the (I think very astute) views of Mouritsen ''Italian unification'' (BICS, 1998). Romanisation's actual completion during the empire biased sources towards retrojection; the [[Social War (91–87 BC)|Social War]] should not be seen so blithely as a war merely to enfranchise the allies; there was a real revolt against Roman rule underneath the imperial age sources. [[User:Ifly6|Ifly6]] ([[User talk:Ifly6|talk]]) 19:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:25, 12 January 2024

Citations?

[edit]

From skimming this article I notice a lack of cited material, can we fix this? Jeff503 (talk) 01:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice work, but indeed, it needs inline citations. Take a look at Roman Dacia for an example.--Codrin.B (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Early romanisation vs late

[edit]

It may be worthwhile to temper the claims of romanisation during the 2nd century with the (I think very astute) views of Mouritsen Italian unification (BICS, 1998). Romanisation's actual completion during the empire biased sources towards retrojection; the Social War should not be seen so blithely as a war merely to enfranchise the allies; there was a real revolt against Roman rule underneath the imperial age sources. Ifly6 (talk) 19:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]