User talk:Tony Sidaway: Difference between revisions
Notification: proposed deletion of Gradient Analytics. |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=8 October 2021}} |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia clerks|Sidaway, Tony]] |
|||
== Nomination of [[:OpenBSD security features]] for deletion == |
|||
{{User:Tony Sidaway/TopNav|username=Tony_Sidaway}} |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:OpenBSD security features]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
{| |
|||
|<big><center>'''Transclusions in userspace cause widespread liveware compatibility problems; massive noise issue. Recommend disabling entirely.'''</center></big> |
|||
|- |
|||
|<big><center>''-A bug report I considered filing on Mediawiki's Bugzilla''</center></big> |
|||
|} |
|||
---- |
|||
{| |
|||
|<big>'''Help me to reduce the disfiguring effect of jargon on Wikipedia discourse. Whenever you are tempted to use POV as a word, consider using one of these alternatives: ''biased, slanted, subjective, tendentious, opinionated, one-sided, non-neutral, partisan, unfair, poorly framed, unbalanced, partial, ill-conceived, promotional, polemical, distorted, advocating, prejudicial, skewed, unrepresentative, imbalanced, apologetic, inequitable, weighted'' (please add to this list)'''</big> |
|||
|} |
|||
<big><center>''This is both my user page and my talk page. To find out more about me and what I do, click on the icons in the amazingly cool navigation bar above.</center><center> [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Tony_Sidaway&action=edit§ion=new Click here to leave a new message.]'''</center></big> |
|||
<center><big>Please contact me by email if you are blocked from editing:</big></center> |
|||
<center><big>'''minorityreport@bluebottle.com'''</big></center> |
|||
{{User:Tony Sidaway/Templates/TalkArchiveBar}} |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenBSD security features]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
== Statements and evidence in Aucaman RFAR == |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Tonystewart14|Tonystewart14]] ([[User talk:Tonystewart14|talk]]) 03:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC) |
|||
When you opened the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Aucaman|Aucaman RfAr]] on 29 March, you left out several statements previously made on the [[WP:RFAR]] page, including my own ( [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=44798848&oldid=44796799]) and Zora's ([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=45124654&oldid=45123039]) defending statements, and several of those made against Aucaman. Is there any special meaning attached to this? Will it be okay for the authors to re-instate these on the new page? I myself plan to re-submit a new version on the evidence page anyway, but I'd very much like to have Zora's statement preserved for the Arbcom's consideration too. Also, in my earlier statement, I had argued for widening the case to a larger group of participants, on the grounds that Zmmz' role is that of a spokesperson of a whole group acting in concert against Aucaman. Can this still be done, will it be okay if I include evidence to that effect too? Thanks for your advice. [[User:LukasPietsch|Lukas]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:LukasPietsch|(T.]]|[[Special:Emailuser/LukasPietsch|@)]]</sup></small> 07:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == |
|||
: From memory, I think I was following the new practice of moving to the case page only statements that appeared to have been made by people listed as parties to the case. However there is no hard-and-fast rule about this, it's just a rule of thumb that we use to try to keep the case page relatively uncluttered. Zora's statement is on the talk page and will almost cetainly have been read by arbitrators, especially as he's a well known, experienced editor whose judgement is generally trustworthy. But I'll move your statement and Zora's to the main case page just in case. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 08:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tony Sidaway. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
:: Thanks. Sorry, I hadn't actually seen our statements had been on the talk page all along. [[User:LukasPietsch|Lukas]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:LukasPietsch|(T.]]|[[Special:Emailuser/LukasPietsch|@)]]</sup></small> 17:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
And to answer your other question, if you include sufficient evidence on the evidence page the arbitrators may decide to widen the case. You can also put proposed findings of fact based on that evidence on the workshop page. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 20:38, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Email == |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=813413898 --> |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Joycelyn O'Brien]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Joycelyn O'Brien]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joycelyn O'Brien]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
I sent you one...--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 09:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Soetermans|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">soetermans</span>]]. [[User talk: Soetermans|<sup>↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">'''TALK'''</span></sup>]] 22:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
: Thanks. I read it and replied. Meanwhile I see that someone has [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-April/043428.html posted about this] on wikien-l. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 10:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == |
|||
== Basij again == |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Tony Sidaway. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
ArmanJan deleted well sourced info on human rights issues at [[Basij]] twice [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Basij&diff=44270271&oldid=43362210], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Basij&diff=44335749&oldid=44308500] and vandalized the talk [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Basij&diff=44335804&oldid=43129429 page]. You told him to stop on [[Talk:Basij#Vandalism|Talk:Basij]] and on his [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ArmanJan&diff=44470987&oldid=42725668 talk page], which he [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ArmanJan&diff=45402042&oldid=45375074 deleted], as he did with other complaints. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Now he removed a photo claiming it to be a "well known" [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Basij&diff=47643711&oldid=46544419 forgery], giving no evidence or source - the photo's authenticity has been falsely denied before [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Basij&diff=45374723&oldid=44473153], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Image:Basijis.jpg&action=history]. As the article is on attack by others too (e.g [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Databot&diff=47346925&oldid=47345244 Databot]) I checked ArmanJan contrib's: He put wrong PD related tags to several imgs [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Image:Iran-guard-pasdaran_21.gif&action=history], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Image:Fajr-3.jpg&action=history], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Image:BasijMembers.jpg&action=history]. He vandalized [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Military_of_Iran&diff=45401471&oldid=44782407 Talk:Military_of_Iran] (a reasonable post by an anon) and [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Islamic_Revolutionary_Guards_Corps&diff=39094308&oldid=18088627 Talk:Islamic_Revolutionary_Guards_Corps]. As far as I can tell, his [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=ArmanJan&offset=0&limit=500&namespace=6 img uploads] mostly have misleading licensing infos. Some others noted this on his talk page too. All in all he should get a stern warning. It's tedious to watch after that article. --[[User:Tickle me|tickle]] [[User_talk:Tickle me|me]] 06:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
====What Do you Advise on this?==== |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals&oldid=48164937#HEY_FOLKS-How_about_an_Obvious_Need What would you think] about the wisdom of posting a discrete link to this notice at the very page top [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals]], and how do you like the concept? Something in a box saying '''See this New Notice''' (Flashing lights and sirens wouldn't be enough as far as I can see!) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=866998401 --> |
|||
*what other actions might be in order- RFC, VP, Adds at head ends of CAT:CAT. The utility and desirablily seems self-evident. |
|||
Sigh! Back to content edits! |
|||
Best regards, <B>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</B><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 20:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Task force climate change == |
|||
: In the skin that I use, Cologneblue, the categories of a page are listed at the top right hand side of the page--this applies both to articles and to subcategories. If you check a category page in the skin that you use, you will probably find that the parent category is listed somewhere. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 01:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Hello Tony Sidaway, |
|||
:*Thanks. Yeah, I've been using the default (name unknown), which buries them way down the bottom. I'd never even noticed them in wikiP outside an edit screen until I got back last month, so browsing with them couldn't happen. Makes me wonder how many users ('customers'? i.e. not editors) are missing the same thing. Perhaps the default ought to be 'Cologneblue'. |
|||
:*Sorry for getting excited and reinventing a wheel I'd not seen. Probably part of hitting the 50's--my eyes have been a real pain for all close work until Friday when I got a computer prescription bifocal, so I can even read hardcopy and work on the screen w/o switching between glasses. It's been a trial this past two years. I've lost track of how many complaints I've made to webpages for using such small fonts when they didn't scale up font sizes using IE6. At least our software works for all browsers that way. |
|||
:*I think I'll try out the skin! Sorry to have bothered you, though someone did note that listing the Main article or articles would be useful thing, and in fact seeing some Cats like that was what inspired the idea when looking for a way up the tree. I've annoted that below the original post with 'Egg on Face' subsection reflecting the point, especially for long Cat pages, the explicit note up high also makes some sense. I'll have to explore the presentation of all the skins. |
|||
Best regards, <B>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</B><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 04:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
===On the Above again, More Egg=== |
|||
Oops: I apparently didn't save the edit to the Category page... Here's the current note just posted: |
|||
You are currently noted as a participant of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Climate change task force]]. With much of the activity in this task force about ten years ago, I think it's time for a revival. Global warming is getting a lot of attention in the media now and it's therefore important our articles are up-to-date, accurate and neutral. |
|||
I apparently never saved out on the edit I was recommending. It should have looked like [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Category:History_of_Canada&oldid=48326442 This example] or when polished for presentation and organization, the current: [[:Category:History of Canada ]]. Apparently too many open browser windows, or the like. Apologies (again) <B>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</B><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 21:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I've updated the task force page and the to do list and invite you to have a look at the page again, add something to the TO DO list or start collaborating by improving one of our many articles. If climate change has lost your interest, feel free to remove your name from the participants list. |
|||
== For Fuddyduddies == |
|||
[[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 16:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Hi Tony. Recall when I originally joined wikipedia and I created the [[Seven Samurai 20XX]] article as my first contribution...? I've gotten around to creating its subpages and expansion, and I'd be feel quite gay if you could take a look at it and provide some feedback on how far its come. -[[User:Megaman Zero|Zero]]<sup>[[User talk:Megaman Zero|Talk]]</sup> 01:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: Time I stopped being a curmudgeon about signs of appreciation's barnstar == |
|||
: Seems good. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 01:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
You did THAT to the '''[[Gamergate]]''' article—in ''2015''?!?!!! That is one ''well deserved'' barnstar, lemme tell you! The nostalgia! My best friend and I were following ''[[The Jimquisition]], [[Unskippable]], [[Zero Punctuation]]'' and other then-''[[The Escapist (magazine)|The Escapist]]'' fare of the time, several days a week, so we saw that blow up real-time! Dude, I mean...'''''dude'''''. Dang. |
|||
:: Well I spied your comment on the talkpage, and I decided to go back and finish what I started. I think its lovely I did, too. Could you leave an update of any other qualms you would prefer ammended on the talkpage...? I feel the combined editting skills of you and I could really make something. And why is that surprising...? Its a wiki. Please feel welcome to assist. -[[User:Megaman Zero|Zero]]<sup>[[User talk:Megaman Zero|Talk]]</sup> 01:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
... |
|||
== east sea == |
|||
Thank you for all your hard work, there and elsewhere! Thank you very much! —[[User:Geekdiva|Geekdiva]] ([[User talk:Geekdiva|talk]]) 10:33, 19 June 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks. I worked hard on several controversial articles for a long time, and I think my work was appreciated. [[Global warming]] is one, [[Gamergate controversy]] is another, and there were many others. [[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 22:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Chavez boxes == |
|||
== How to control global warming listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
Why did you delete the userbox on Chavez? Politics in Venezuela are polarized along pro- and anti-Chavez lines, so they were no different from any other userbox expressing an opinion. [[User:Tjss|Tjss]] 15:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] |
|||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[How to control global warming]]. Since you had some involvement with the ''How to control global warming'' redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 8#How to control global warming|the redirect discussion]] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> — <span style="font-family:gill sans">[[User:the Man in Question|the Man in Question]]</span> [[User talk:the Man in Question|<small>(in question)</small>]] 23:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Moving to inactive == |
|||
: In general I think the expression of such opinions constitutes an unsuitable use of the transclusion mechanism and particularly of the Template namespace. I deleted a pro- and anti-Chavez userbox because they happened to catch my attention and they clearly fall under the "divisive" criterion of the T1 CSD. You should feel free to describe your opinion of Chavez on your userpage if you think this will help other editors to understand your edits, but it would probably be better if you simply strove to avoid importing your personal opinions into Wikipedia in any form. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 16:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Hi, FYI the climate change task force is now a stand-alone project ([[WP:WikiProject Climate change]]). You were once listed as active at the task force but from your contribs it appears you are in (semi?) wiki retirement. I've therefore taken liberty to move your name to the inactive list, but feel free to rejoin us any time! [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 20:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::That's ridiculous when you're talking about a user page. Most of the userboxes available express opinions, including everything from the Basque seperatist movement to being a Vegan to being an Athiest. If you don't believe me look at the userboxes under "Regional politics" or some other category. I am recreating the boxes. If you disagree, start a VfD or bring it to the arbitration committee. You don't get to unilaterally delete things; THAT is Wikipedian policy. [[User:Tjss|Tjss]] 02:25, 15 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Hope you're doing well, whatever you're up to == |
|||
== An opinion please. == |
|||
[[File:Wikipe-tan head.png|60px]] |
|||
If you have a moment, could you [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Good_Omens&curid=78797&diff=48367649&oldid=46756942 take a peek here?] My instinct is to revert it as unfounded opinion (NOR?), but I want to seek a more experienced opinion before acting. Thanks. --[[User:InkSplotch|InkSplotch]]<sup>([[User_talk:InkSplotch|talk]])</sup> 03:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks for the good wishes. I'm largely disengaging from all social forums, as indicated [https://mobile.twitter.com/TonySidaway/status/1159137537983750155 here] [brief Twitter thread]. There's still time for me to reconnect with my solipsistic side, I hope. Only by shutting out [[All You Zombies|all you zombies]] can I have any peace, which for some reason seems to involve lots of microcontroller stuff and obscure programming languages. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 13:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:If I could find it, I'd send you lyrics to a song where the singer, in first person, places a cell call to someone else, asking if the other party received his email. The conversation goes live into the mens room when the singer walks in on an occupied stall. He wants to talk about techno weenie who piled it all up on a sheet of plywood, doused it with crisco, set it afire, and disappeared into the Rockies leaving only an address at the corner store. But the ironic refrain claims the speaker isn't a victim of the techno world "oops, didn't know the stall was occ-uuuuu-piiiiied....." Good for you, and if you can stand a bit of zombi speak, I have [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf5TgVRGND4 just what the doctor ordered] [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 14:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:: I've returned to the coastline between the rivers Tyne and Wear, which I choose to call Mesopotamia for obvious reasons. Nature is very much evident here, where I grew up. I get out onto the coastal walks whenever I can. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 19:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::: Awesome! I just returned from a forest school outting (classic version) with multiple families. The kiddos turned up many species of mushrooms, saprophytic vascular plants, a tree frog, multiple salamanders, various aquatic creepie crawlies which in our area indicate a stream has high water quality. This made me quite happy since not that long ago that stream had problems. Enjoy your anti digital reawakening! I haven't managed to pull the plug yet, obviously. [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 20:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Category:Triassic turtles]]== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:Category:Triassic turtles]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#C1|section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a [[:Category:Disambiguation categories|disambiguation category]], a [[:Category:Wikipedia soft redirected categories|category redirect]], a [[:Category:Wikipedia featured topics categories|featured topics category]], under discussion at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. |
|||
: I'd suggest that you copy those words to the talk page and query them. There may be a source for this--Pratchett or Gaiman may at some point have acknowledged drawing directly on The Omen. I don't see it myself but it's about fifteen years since I read the book--which is not one of my favorites. If nothing is forthcoming by the end of the Easter weekend, remove the words from the article until someone can source the statement. The copy on the talk page will still be available for editors to work on. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 16:08, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::On the above, I'm familiar with Practchett, and it seems likely owning about half his works— pretty good at comedy though. I'd advise searching some of the web forums specific to sci-fi community, or perhaps start in B&N and Amazon reviews of books (this will likely turn up immediately if reviewed there). I think he's in [[Baen's Bar]], or would hope other discussions in [[online communities]] would lead you to right place. OTHO, <s>why not just use <nowiki>{{fact}} and {{disputed}}</nowiki> and post a note on both the (users) talks that the statement needs supported.</s> Ahhhh Two edits total, I see now! |
|||
::(This co-posted to [[user talk:InkSplotch]] before closing this edit) <B>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</B><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> |
|||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Category:Triassic turtles|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 17:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks for the advice, from both parties. It appears someone beat me to it anyhow, but I think I'd have gone for Tony's suggestion. Using <nowiki>{{fact}} and {{disputed}}</nowiki> seems a bit cold before I've made any attempts at direct communication. I'd rather drop a note on the article talk page, or that user's talk page, first. |
|||
== Username Eligible == |
|||
::For my own research, I find lspace.org a good resource, and of course the author interviews linked from there or neilgaiman.com. Terry Pratchett doesn't contribute to Baen's Bar, only because (so far as I know) he's never been published through Baen. I'm not as certain about Gaiman. I think the confusion lies in a few homages to The Omen found in their book, but then it's full of homages to many sources, books, movies, and more. |
|||
My username is suitable for Wikipedia editing? |
|||
::Anyhoo, enough babbling here. I wanted to post to say thank you (and because this is where I started the conversation, I tend to keep editing in the same spot - tho I appreciate the cross-posting). |
|||
[[User:WeTalkWiki]] 14:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
: Thanks for asking. I see no problem with your username, though I'm hardly up to date with current practice on Wikipedia. If you find the username being challenged, and this makes it difficult to improve Wikipedia, I believe you can ask for it to be changed. I'm sure you realise that the purpose of the wiki is to produce a great encyclopedia, it isn't for experiments in what constitutes a valid identifier. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 22:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:List of locations in Pirates of the Caribbean]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:List of locations in Pirates of the Caribbean]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
::--[[User:InkSplotch|InkSplotch]]<sup>([[User_talk:InkSplotch|talk]])</sup> 22:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
<blockquote>Fails [[WP:LISTN]]. It's all [[WP:PLOT]] information aside from trivial filming location details. It is in no way a justified spin-out.</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
==If I can trouble you for a little feedback== |
|||
You are cordially invited to pick on Frank:<br>(Beats handling problems!<G>)<br> |
|||
re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arsenal_of_Democracy#If_I_can_trouble_you_for_a_little_feedback Request some 'peer review' (Talkpage sections detailing concerns)]] on new article: [[Arsenal of Democracy]] |
|||
This post is being made Friday 14 April 2006 to a double handful (spam?) of admins & editors for some reactions, and advice (Peer Review) on this article, and it's remaining development, as I'd like to put it to bed ASAP. (Drop in's welcome too!) Your advice would be valuable and appreciated. Replies on talk link (above) indicated. Thanks! <B>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</B><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 18:53, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:List of locations in Pirates of the Caribbean|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
== Chap rape == |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 12:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC) |
|||
According to our [[rape]] article, Eurpoean rape of a male subject from a female is apparently acceptable: |
|||
==Orphaned non-free image File:SuperOffice Logo.png== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:SuperOffice Logo.png]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 04:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
''Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which came into force on May 1, 2004, rape in England and Wales was redefined from non-consensual vaginal or anal intercourse, and is now defined as non-consensual penis penetration of the vagina, anus or mouth of another person. The changes also made rape punishable with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.'' |
|||
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == |
|||
''Although a woman who forces a man to have sex cannot be prosecuted for rape under English law, if she helps a man commit a rape she can be prosecuted for the crime. A woman can also be prosecuted for causing a man to engage in sexual activity without his consent, a crime which also carries a maximum life sentence if it involves penetration of the mouth, anus or vagina. The statute also includes a new sexual crime, called "assault by penetration", which also has the same punishment as rape, and is committed when someone sexually penetrates the anus or vagina with a part of his or her body, or with an object, without that person's consent.'' |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
I cannot possibly comprehend the European concensus for the inclusion of that law. Anyone should be charged with rape for not following the obvious morality issue of violating another's body. Apparently European law confroms itself differently than the rest of the world's common sense. That is so far over the mark that I had difficulty believing it when I first read about it. I regard the actions of the prosecutors in this case as quite inhuman. It certainly should not happen in UK law, which treats other cases of direct infanticide altogether more sensibly in my opinion. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
In the common American courts, (such as the case of 1998), almost all courts and of the world's majority thought this unlawful. |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 --> |
|||
== Userboxes == |
|||
Glad I live my safe Japanese home. -[[User:Megaman Zero|Zero]]<sup>[[User talk:Megaman Zero|Talk]]</sup> 12:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Hey Tony. I made a user box using one of your quotes. [[User:Slightsmile/Userboxes/wikilawyering]]. [[User:Slightsmile|<span style="color: navy;">Slight</span>]][[User talk:Slightsmile|<i style="color: teal;">Smile</i>]] 17:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: Our articles on this subject aren't very good. The Sexual Offences Act, 2003 provides for up to ten years imprisonment on conviction following indictment for sexual assault (touching an unwilling person in a sexual manner when one doesn't reasonably believe that he or she consents). The Act also makes the defendant liable to life imprisonment if the assault is penetrative (in the case of a man, this would involve penetration of the anus with any object or part of the body). |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Kronstadt mutinies]] == |
|||
: The act also extends the meaning of rape to include penetration of the mouth with the penis without consent. In the Sexual Offences Act 1976, the law of rape only applied to vaginal or anal penetration. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 13:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:Kronstadt mutinies]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
:: That's good to hear. If you look at the recent acts of rape, Male rape has risen, and while its still in the lower percentage in respective comparison to male on female, its some cause for concern. I suppose in 1976, the English merely made an assumption of only the female sex being rape victims. However, a bit of time passage, and lots of goodwill, and the law has become more respectible in this regard. Thanks for putting my qualm to rest. I was fully knackered after my late-night essay construction last night. Seeing this piece of information sent me into full rant mood today. |
|||
<blockquote>'''Might be some potential for a legitimate article here, but in this case such a poor starting point that we might as well start from scratch.'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
:: When I recover some free time, I'll do more research on this subsection, and we can put our heads together again. -[[User:Megaman Zero|Zero]]<sup>[[User talk:Megaman Zero|Talk]]</sup> 19:39, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Kronstadt mutinies|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
== Happy Spring celebration / Easter (as your preferences and beliefs dictate) == |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher|talk]]) 13:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Coordinators and help needed == |
|||
[[Image:JellyBellyPile.JPG|thumb|left|Here's hoping that if the bunny leaves you any beans they're this kind! <font color="green">[[User:Lar/Esperanza|+]]</font>+[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 15:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC) ]] |
|||
[[File:School.svg|40px]] Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools|'''Schools Project''']], please let us know [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Schools#Project_coordinators|here]]. We look forward to hearing from you.<br><hr><small>Sent to project members 13:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Participants list|here]].</small> |
|||
== Top of the page/jargon == |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Participants_list&oldid=1041253844 --> |
|||
== A kitten for you! == |
|||
Given that your second statement refers to a reduction of jargon, I was wondering if you realised how jargony the first statement on your page is? I have no idea what it says. The juxtaposition is actually quite funny; it certainly does strengthen the second statement. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] 19:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Cute grey kitten.jpg|left|150px]] |
|||
: Yes, the first statement is an in-joke, so it's a bit exclusive. Fortunately it's of no great consequence to the running of Wikipedia. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 23:28, 16 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
i love kittens!!111 |
|||
[[User:Namehumor|Namehumor]] ([[User talk:Namehumor|talk]]) 17:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== RFC against Messhermit == |
|||
<br style="clear: both;"/> |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Gradient Analytics]]== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:Gradient Analytics]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not [[Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance|credibly indicate]] how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about [[Wikipedia:Notability|what is generally accepted as notable]]. |
|||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Gradient Analytics|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Gradient+Analytics|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> – [[User:Srich32977|S. Rich]] ([[User talk:Srich32977|talk]]) 06:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Hello there! Due to College, I'm being a little bit busy with some other topics besides Wikipedia. My question is: I have a RFC against my person, and I want to know if there is some sort of time limit to present my other side of the story. Thanks! and I'm really waiting for the answer. [[User:Messhermit|Messhermit]] 14:54, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:Svedeesh Cheff.png]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The file [[:File:Svedeesh Cheff.png]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
: You mean the arbitration case [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Messhermit]]? No, it's okay. I suggest that you leave a message on the talk page of one of the more active arbitrators, say [[User talk:Dmcdevit]], explaining that you'll be too busy to contribute properly. They can, and would probably be willing to, shelve the case until your return. If you're not going to be editing Wikipedia for a while, then there is no urgency, and there are other cases they can get on with in the meantime. If you don't get a positive response, come back here and I'll see if I can help. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 18:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
<blockquote>'''Unused Wikipedia screenshot, no obvious use.'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
::Hello Tony. I find Messhermit's request very strange. Please consider the following points: |
|||
::*This Arbitration concerns Messhermit's behavior toward me, as you can read on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Messhermit Request for Arbitration page] and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Messhermit/Evidence Evidence page]. |
|||
::*The Arbitration Committee considered the evidence and opened the case on April 7. |
|||
::*''From April 7 to April 17'', Messhermit has been ''very active'' on Wikipedia, as you can see on his public [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Messhermit User contributions] page. |
|||
::*During all these days, Messhermit has been particularly active in the article about the [[Cenepa War]]. Please see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&action=history History Page], where he proceeded to add a <nowiki>{{NPOV}}</nowiki> tag (and be rude to others who wanted to remove it) [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&diff=46972891&oldid=46046758], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&diff=next&oldid=48361431], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&diff=next&oldid=48420833], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&diff=next&oldid=48442760], to remove entire sections of it (including links to references) [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&diff=next&oldid=46972891], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&diff=next&oldid=48462921], sometimes replacing it with new data [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&diff=next&oldid=48500504], sometimes not. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cenepa_War&diff=next&oldid=48722212]. Some of Messhermit's comments toward me and other in the [[Talk:Cenepa War|Talk Page]] have been very rude and uncalled for [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cenepa_War&diff=prev&oldid=48463499], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cenepa_War&diff=prev&oldid=48505587]. Interestingly, this article (which was mostly written by me) was quite stable until I requested the Arbitration. |
|||
::*All of a sudden, Messhermit says he is busy. |
|||
::*Messhermit has had enough time to put into question the validity of this Arbitration (''a "political trial" based on conveniently presented evidence'', as he calls it), and to ask for support from third parties [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Albrecht&diff=prev&oldid=48517316], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Albrecht&diff=next&oldid=48657419]. |
|||
::*I have my daytime job, so ''I am busy too''. Still, I found the time to present my evidence in detail. That is because I sincerely believe that Wikipedia has rules and procedures to deal with these problems. |
|||
::*It looks like I have had to undergo all this without responding in kind, and then see how Messhermit asks for a postponement of the Arbitration (whatever the results are). |
|||
::Like I said, I find all this very strange. In view of the evidence presented here, I would like to ask you to please let this Arbitration to continue as normal. I think this issue between Messhemit and myself cannot go on indefinitely. Best Regards -- [[User:Andres C.|Andrés]] 03:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[File talk:Svedeesh Cheff.png|the file's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion|files for discussion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> --[[User:Minorax|<span style="font-family: monospace, monospace; color:#69C;">Minorax</span>]]<sup>«¦[[User talk:Minorax|'''talk''']]¦»</sup> 14:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::I think I have valid reasons to doubt that Messhermit is being sincere on this request. As you can see, he is ''quite active'' on Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AHistory_of_the_Ecuadorian-Peruvian_territorial_dispute&diff=48945802&oldid=48933287]. I don't know what's going on here. [[User:Andres C.|Andrés]] 04:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== A goat for you! == |
|||
==Bgully== |
|||
well, {{user|Adam88}} is the only sock I can think of right now; of course he'll create others. I didn't want to block him myself, since 'legally' he more or less sat out his year's ban, and ''would'' be an editor in good standing if he actually did edit articles; as it is, he's reduced to bitching about me and my "clique" in irregular intervals, so yes, I think you can block him on grounds of that; he is not as great a nuisance as other trolls I could mention, but there seems to be no reason why he should stick around just to add to the noise ratio around here. regards, [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|('''ᛏ''')]]</small> 08:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Boer Goat (8742860752).jpg|left|150px]] |
|||
Hope you're doing well Tony. |
|||
[[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 16:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==lying to protect wikipedia== |
|||
<br style="clear: both;"/> |
|||
== "[[:Prince Charles]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] |
|||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Prince_Charles&redirect=no Prince Charles]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 14#Prince Charles}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Векочел|Векочел]] ([[User talk:Векочел|talk]]) 14:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==MfD nomination of [[:Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references]]== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|30px]] [[:Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references]], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[:Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:Mfd notice --> [[User:HouseBlaster|House]][[Special:Contributions/HouseBlaster|Blaster]]<sup>[[User talk:HouseBlaster|talk]]</sup> 22:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Joseph Long (actor)]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:Joseph Long (actor)]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
You realise that I don't see anything wrong with doing this? In some ways I would be rather dissapointed if people didn't at least lie by omission (much better to say we have a load of effective anti vandalism measures in place rather than outlineing the ways around these). In fact that is pretty much the intention behind [[WP:BEANS]]. The probablem is aside from any issues of people steping outside their powers or whatever we have an inconsistancy. [[WP:OFFICE]] powers are not needed to block vandles. Admins have delibertately blocked the whole of AOL before now so it isn't needed for range blocks etheir. That is why I was considering the posibilty that the vandalism was to a degree at least a cover story.[[User:Geni|Geni]] 19:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
<blockquote>'''Has worked as an actor but not had the roles to meet [[WP:ENT]] / [[WP:GNG]]. Long-time unref BLP.'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
== Jeff Merkey at it again == |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Joseph Long (actor)|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
Removing sockpuppet banners from proven sockpuppet accounts. |
|||
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Sint+Holo]] |
|||
::And he's removing comments informing him he shouldn't be removing sockpuppet tags from his own page, claiming harrasing dialogue. And yes, I left the comment, but other than that, haven't touched his pages --[[User:Jerryg|Jerry]] ([[User talk:Jerryg|Talk]]) 22:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Boleyn|Boleyn]] ([[User talk:Boleyn|talk]]) 07:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Danny and Eloquence == |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Gradient Analytics]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:Gradient Analytics]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
You say that I adopted a dictatorial tone towards Danny, which is quite true. To my mind that reflects the seriousness of what is going on here. Erik followed Wikipedia policy. For doing that he got banned and desysoped. There are few more serious things that can be done within a community like this. The creation of the Dannyisme account is a positive step towards making sure this does not happen again, but it is not enough so far as I am concerned. I see no reason why Danny's ordinary account should have access to any powers of those above a normal user after this incident. If anyone else had done something like this they would have been permanently banned but we do need Danny in his Foundation capacity. |
|||
<blockquote>'''Notability-- cannot find secondary sources discussing the company'''</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
I see from previous parts of Danny's talk page that similar concerns have been raised in the past so this is not exactly unprecedented in subject area. What is unprecedented is the incredible abuse of power that has taken place. [[User:David Newton|David Newton]] 20:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Gradient Analytics|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
== Danny == |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Queenofconfusion|Queenofconfusion]] ([[User talk:Queenofconfusion|talk]]) 11:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Nor is this the treatment we, and particularly Eloquence, deserve. Danny is more than welcome to quit if he can't handle the stress of people wondering why he is randomly protecting pages on gimped versions without citing the Office Action policy. Or maybe he could simply say it's an Office Action, and remove all doubt and concern. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 22:13, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== A Thoughful Request == |
|||
Dear Tony, |
|||
Thank you for removing the stalkers from WP. It's been relaxing to work on Cherokee and Native American articles without the harassment. However, four of the users are still here and their conduct is not going to stop. If they come near my talk page or engage in any more harrassment, I would appreciate them being warned and if this fails, handled appropriately. One of the users still has a banner on their user page they are here for stalking and harassment and this is {{User3|MediaMangler}}. |
|||
The users are: |
|||
{{User3|MediaMangler}} |
|||
{{User3|Vigilant}} |
|||
{{User3|Jerryg}} |
|||
{{User3|Friendly Neighbour}} |
|||
I would like these users to be banned from my talk page since all they do is post flame bait and harassment. |
|||
All of these accounts are SCOX members who came to the site originally for the sole purpose of stalking and libeling me. They are simply not going to stop until someone stops them. I have discussed the postings of these users with Danny and he has requested I send me a complete listing in writing of the materials I feel are inappropriate. My response was to have Fred Bauder review the article in question and make edits perhaps with assistance from other ARBCOM folks. I am going to stay away from my bio and after doing a lot of soul searching about myself, I can clearly see why [[WP:AUTO]] exists. It's just not possible to be neutral about your own autobiography. I did communicate to Danny if there were items in the article I objected to, I would use the same approach Jimbo uses which is to post clarification to the talk page. However, I consider myself under a self imposed ban on any edits to the article in question. I noted Nicholas Turnbull is walking away. I have mixed feelings about it, and I also am not neutral on this topic, so I have no comment to make that would be helpful there. Thank you for your help in making WP a better place for everyone to contribute. Sincerely, [[User:Sint Holo|Sint Holo]] 22:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:54, 30 May 2024
This user may have left Wikipedia. Tony Sidaway has not edited Wikipedia since 8 October 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Nomination of OpenBSD security features for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OpenBSD security features is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenBSD security features until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tonystewart14 (talk) 03:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tony Sidaway. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Joycelyn O'Brien for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joycelyn O'Brien is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joycelyn O'Brien until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 22:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tony Sidaway. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Task force climate change
[edit]Hello Tony Sidaway,
You are currently noted as a participant of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Climate change task force. With much of the activity in this task force about ten years ago, I think it's time for a revival. Global warming is getting a lot of attention in the media now and it's therefore important our articles are up-to-date, accurate and neutral.
I've updated the task force page and the to do list and invite you to have a look at the page again, add something to the TO DO list or start collaborating by improving one of our many articles. If climate change has lost your interest, feel free to remove your name from the participants list.
Femke Nijsse (talk) 16:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Re: Time I stopped being a curmudgeon about signs of appreciation's barnstar
[edit]You did THAT to the Gamergate article—in 2015?!?!!! That is one well deserved barnstar, lemme tell you! The nostalgia! My best friend and I were following The Jimquisition, Unskippable, Zero Punctuation and other then-The Escapist fare of the time, several days a week, so we saw that blow up real-time! Dude, I mean...dude. Dang.
...
Thank you for all your hard work, there and elsewhere! Thank you very much! —Geekdiva (talk) 10:33, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I worked hard on several controversial articles for a long time, and I think my work was appreciated. Global warming is one, Gamergate controversy is another, and there were many others. TS 22:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
How to control global warming listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect How to control global warming. Since you had some involvement with the How to control global warming redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 23:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Moving to inactive
[edit]Hi, FYI the climate change task force is now a stand-alone project (WP:WikiProject Climate change). You were once listed as active at the task force but from your contribs it appears you are in (semi?) wiki retirement. I've therefore taken liberty to move your name to the inactive list, but feel free to rejoin us any time! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Hope you're doing well, whatever you're up to
[edit]Thanks for the good wishes. I'm largely disengaging from all social forums, as indicated here [brief Twitter thread]. There's still time for me to reconnect with my solipsistic side, I hope. Only by shutting out all you zombies can I have any peace, which for some reason seems to involve lots of microcontroller stuff and obscure programming languages. --TS 13:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- If I could find it, I'd send you lyrics to a song where the singer, in first person, places a cell call to someone else, asking if the other party received his email. The conversation goes live into the mens room when the singer walks in on an occupied stall. He wants to talk about techno weenie who piled it all up on a sheet of plywood, doused it with crisco, set it afire, and disappeared into the Rockies leaving only an address at the corner store. But the ironic refrain claims the speaker isn't a victim of the techno world "oops, didn't know the stall was occ-uuuuu-piiiiied....." Good for you, and if you can stand a bit of zombi speak, I have just what the doctor ordered NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- I've returned to the coastline between the rivers Tyne and Wear, which I choose to call Mesopotamia for obvious reasons. Nature is very much evident here, where I grew up. I get out onto the coastal walks whenever I can. --TS 19:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Awesome! I just returned from a forest school outting (classic version) with multiple families. The kiddos turned up many species of mushrooms, saprophytic vascular plants, a tree frog, multiple salamanders, various aquatic creepie crawlies which in our area indicate a stream has high water quality. This made me quite happy since not that long ago that stream had problems. Enjoy your anti digital reawakening! I haven't managed to pull the plug yet, obviously. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- I've returned to the coastline between the rivers Tyne and Wear, which I choose to call Mesopotamia for obvious reasons. Nature is very much evident here, where I grew up. I get out onto the coastal walks whenever I can. --TS 19:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Triassic turtles
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Triassic turtles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Username Eligible
[edit]My username is suitable for Wikipedia editing? User:WeTalkWiki 14:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking. I see no problem with your username, though I'm hardly up to date with current practice on Wikipedia. If you find the username being challenged, and this makes it difficult to improve Wikipedia, I believe you can ask for it to be changed. I'm sure you realise that the purpose of the wiki is to produce a great encyclopedia, it isn't for experiments in what constitutes a valid identifier. --TS 22:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
The article List of locations in Pirates of the Caribbean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:LISTN. It's all WP:PLOT information aside from trivial filming location details. It is in no way a justified spin-out.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SuperOffice Logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SuperOffice Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Userboxes
[edit]Hey Tony. I made a user box using one of your quotes. User:Slightsmile/Userboxes/wikilawyering. SlightSmile 17:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
The article Kronstadt mutinies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Might be some potential for a legitimate article here, but in this case such a poor starting point that we might as well start from scratch.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Coordinators and help needed
[edit] Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.
Sent to project members 13:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.
A kitten for you!
[edit]i love kittens!!111
Namehumor (talk) 17:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gradient Analytics
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gradient Analytics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – S. Rich (talk) 06:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Svedeesh Cheff.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused Wikipedia screenshot, no obvious use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
A goat for you!
[edit]Hope you're doing well Tony.
Herostratus (talk) 16:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
"Prince Charles" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Prince Charles has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 14 § Prince Charles until a consensus is reached. Векочел (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references
[edit]Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1/Old cast list with references during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. HouseBlastertalk 22:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Joseph Long (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Has worked as an actor but not had the roles to meet WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Long-time unref BLP.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Gradient Analytics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability-- cannot find secondary sources discussing the company
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Queenofconfusion (talk) 11:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)