Jump to content

United States Patent and Trademark Office: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 38°48′05″N 77°03′50″W / 38.801499°N 77.063835°W / 38.801499; -77.063835
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dghorab (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Structure: removed irrelevant content
 
(389 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|United States national patent bureau}}
{{Redirect|USPO|the agency governing United States Post Offices|United States Postal Service}}
{{Redirect|USPO|the agency governing United States Post Offices|United States Postal Service}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=August 2010}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2024}} {{Use American English|date=December 2023}}
{{Infobox Government agency
{{Infobox government agency
|nativename=
|agency_name = United States Patent and Trademark Office
|nativename_a=
|nativename = PTO / USPTO
|nativename_r=
|nativename_a =
|image=Usptojamesmadisonbuildingsouthside.jpg
|nativename_r =
|image_size=
|logo =
|image_caption=The James Madison building on the campus of the United States Patent and Trademark Office headquarters in [[Alexandria, Virginia|Alexandria]]. This is the largest building on the campus.
|logo_width =
|logo=
|logo_caption =
|logo_width=
|seal = US-PatentTrademarkOffice-Seal.svg
|logo_caption=
|seal_width = 140x
|seal_caption = Seal of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
|seal=Seal of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.svg
|seal_width=140
|formed =
|seal_caption=Seal of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
|preceding1 =
|formed={{start date and age|1836|7|4}}<ref>{{cite web
|preceding2 =
|url=https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/241.html |title=Records of the Patent and Trademark office |work=[[National Archives and Records Administration]] |date=August 15, 2016 }}</ref><ref>An act to promote the progress of the useful arts, and to repeal all acts and parts of acts heretofore made for that purpose, ch. 356, {{USStat|5|117}} (1836)</ref><br />[[Washington, D.C.]], [[United States|U.S.]]
|dissolved =
|preceding1=
|superseding =
|preceding2=
|jurisdiction =
|dissolved=
|headquarters = [[Alexandria, Virginia]]<br />United States
|superseding=
|coordinates = {{coord|38.801499|-77.063835|display=inline,title|type:landmark_region:US}}
|jurisdiction=
|region_code =
|headquarters=[[Alexandria, Virginia|Alexandria]], [[Virginia]], U.S.
|employees = 9,716 (2009)
|coordinates={{coord|38.801499|-77.063835|display=inline,title|type:landmark_region:US}}
|budget =
|region_code=
|minister1_name =
|employees=13,103 (as of September 30, 2022){{r|FY 2022|p=20}}
|minister1_pfo =
|budget=
|minister2_name =
|minister1_name=
|minister2_pfo =
|minister1_pfo=
|chief1_name = [[David Kappos|David J. Kappos]]
|minister2_name=
|chief1_position = [[Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property]]
|minister2_pfo=
|chief2_name = Bernard Knight
|chief1_name=Derrick Brent
|chief2_position = General Counsel
|chief1_position=Director (acting)
|parent_agency =
|chief2_name=Shirin Bidel-Niyat
|child1_agency =
|chief2_position=Deputy Director (acting)<ref name="Law360-20241218"/>
|child2_agency =
|parent_agency=[[United States Department of Commerce]]
|website = {{URL|http://www.uspto.gov/|USPTO.gov}}
|child1_agency=
|footnotes =
|child2_agency=
}}
|website={{URL|www.uspto.gov}}
[[File:Patent Office relief on the Herbert C. Hoover Building.JPG|200px|thumb|right|[[Relief]] representing the Patent Office at the [[Herbert C. Hoover Building]].]]
|footnotes=
The '''United States Patent and Trademark Office''' ('''PTO''' or '''USPTO''') is an agency in the [[United States Department of Commerce]] that issues [[patent]]s to [[inventor]]s and businesses for their inventions, and [[trademark]] registration for product and [[intellectual property]] identification.
|chief3_name=Vaishali Udupa
|chief3_position=Commissioner for Patents<ref>{{cite web |title=Vaishali Udupa |url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/vaishali-udupa |publisher=U.S. Patent & Trademark Office |access-date=December 18, 2023}}</ref>
|chief4_name=David S. Gooder
|chief4_position=Commissioner for Trademarks<ref>{{cite web |title=David S. Gooder |url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/executive-biographies/david-s-gooder |publisher=U.S. Patent & Trademark Office |access-date=December 18, 2023}}</ref>
|chief5_name=
|chief5_position=
|chief6_name=
|chief6_position=
|chief7_name=
|chief7_position=
|chief8_name=
|chief8_position=
|chief9_name=
|chief9_position=
|parent_department=}}
{{United States patent law}}


The '''United States Patent and Trademark Office''' ('''USPTO''') is an [[List of federal agencies in the United States|agency]] in the [[United States Department of Commerce|U.S. Department of Commerce]] that serves as the national [[patent office]] and [[trademark]] registration authority for the United States. The USPTO's headquarters are in [[Alexandria, Virginia]], after a 2005 move from the [[Crystal City, Virginia|Crystal City]] area of neighboring [[Arlington County, Virginia|Arlington]], [[Virginia]].
The USPTO is based in [[Alexandria, Virginia]], after a 2006 move from the [[Crystal City, Virginia|Crystal City]] area of [[Arlington County, Virginia|Arlington, Virginia]]. The offices under Patents and the Chief Information Officer that remained just outside the southern end of Crystal City completed moving to Randolph Square, a brand-new building in [[Shirlington Village]], on April 27, 2009.


The USPTO is "unique among federal agencies because it operates solely on fees collected by its users, and not on taxpayer dollars".<ref name="Bohle">{{cite news | last = Bohle | first = Shannon | title = A Four Part Series on Open Notebook Science (Part 4) |url=http://www.scilogs.com/scientific_and_medical_libraries/a-four-part-series-on-open-notebook-science-part-4/ | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140219191548/http://www.scilogs.com/scientific_and_medical_libraries/a-four-part-series-on-open-notebook-science-part-4/ | archive-date=February 19, 2014| publisher = Nature.com | date = February 2014 | access-date = February 19, 2014 }}</ref> Its "operating structure is like a business in that it receives requests for services—applications for patents and trademark registrations—and charges fees projected to cover the cost of performing the services [it] provide[s]".<ref name="Bohle"/><ref>{{cite web | title = USPTO 2014–2018 Strategic Plan |url=http://www.uspto.gov/about/stratplan/DRAFT_USPTO_2014-2018_Strategic_Plan.pdf | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140122065152/http://www.uspto.gov/about/stratplan/DRAFT_USPTO_2014-2018_Strategic_Plan.pdf | archive-date=January 22, 2014| publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office | date = February 2014 | access-date = February 19, 2014 }}</ref>
The head of the USPTO is [[David Kappos|David J. Kappos]], who was sworn in on August 13, 2009<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/08/kappos-sworn-in-as-director.html |title=Kappos Sworn in as Director |first=Dennis |last=Crouch |authorlink=Dennis Crouch |publisher=Patently-O |date=2009-08-13 |accessdate=2009-08-17}}</ref> following the [[United States Senate]]'s confirmation of his appointment by [[President of the United States|President]] [[Barack Obama]].<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.uspto.gov/main/homepagenews/2009aug07.htm |title=David Kappos Confirmed as Patent and Trademark Office Director |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |date=2009-08-07 |accessdate=2009-08-11}}</ref> He succeeded [[John J. Doll|John Doll]], who served as acting head following the resignation of [[Jon W. Dudas]] at the end of the [[Presidency of George W. Bush|George W. Bush administration]].<ref>

{{cite web
The office is headed by the [[Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property|under secretary of commerce for intellectual property]] and director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. {{As of|December 2024}}, Derrick Brent is [[Acting (law)|acting]] undersecretary and director,<ref name="Brent-bio">{{cite web |title=Derrick Brent: Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office |url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/derrick-brent |website=U.S. Patent & Trademark Office |access-date=December 18, 2024}}</ref> having taken on that role upon the resignation of [[Kathi Vidal]] on December 13, 2024.<ref name="Law360-20241218">{{cite news |last1=Schliep |first1=Theresa |title=USPTO Chief Of Staff Steps Up To Acting Deputy Director - Law360 |url=https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/2274558/uspto-chief-of-staff-steps-up-to-acting-deputy-director |access-date=December 18, 2024 |work=Law 360 |date=December 16, 2024 |language=en}}</ref>
| url = http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/01/patently-o-bi-3.html
| title = Bits and Bytes NO. 88
| first = Dennis
| last = Crouch
| authorlink = Dennis Crouch
| publisher = Patently-O
| date = January 16, 2009
| accessdate = January 29, 2009
}}</ref>


The USPTO cooperates with the [[European Patent Office]] (EPO) and the [[Japan Patent Office]] (JPO) as one of the [[Trilateral Patent Offices]]. The USPTO is also a Receiving Office, an International Searching Authority and an International Preliminary Examination Authority for international patent applications filed in accordance with the [[Patent Cooperation Treaty]].
The USPTO cooperates with the [[European Patent Office]] (EPO) and the [[Japan Patent Office]] (JPO) as one of the [[Trilateral Patent Offices]]. The USPTO is also a Receiving Office, an International Searching Authority and an International Preliminary Examination Authority for international patent applications filed in accordance with the [[Patent Cooperation Treaty]].


==Mission==
==Mission==
The legal basis for the United States patent system is the [[Copyright Clause]] in Section 8 of [[Article One of the United States Constitution|Article I of the U.S. Constitution]], which gives Congress the power to grant patents and copyrights on a national basis. Trademark law, on the other hand, is considered to be authorized by the [[Commerce Clause]].<ref>{{cite news | title = The United States Constitution |url=https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140125111307/http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html | archive-date=January 25, 2014| publisher = The U.S. National Archives | date = January 2014 | access-date = February 19, 2014 }}</ref>
{{Unreferenced section|date=May 2010}}
<blockquote>The Congress shall have Power ... To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.</blockquote>
The legal basis for the United States patent system is Article 1, Section 8 of the [[United States Constitution]], wherein the powers of Congress are defined. It states, in part:
The USPTO maintains a permanent, interdisciplinary historical record of all U.S. patent applications in order to fulfill objectives outlined in the [[United States Constitution]].<ref name="Bohle"/> The PTO's mission is to promote "industrial and technological progress in the United States and strengthen the national economy" by:
* Administering the laws relating to patents and trademarks;
* Advising the [[United States Secretary of Commerce|secretary of commerce]], the president of the United States, and the administration on patent, trademark, and [[copyright]] protection; and
* Providing advice on the trade-related aspects of intellectual property.


<gallery>
:"The Congress shall have Power&nbsp;... To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;"
Patent Office relief on the Herbert C. Hoover Building.JPG | [[Relief]] representing the Patent Office at the [[Herbert C. Hoover Building]].

14 12 31 US Patent Office Sign Alexandria VA 01.jpg | Signboard of US Patent Office Alexandria.
The mission of the PTO is
</gallery>
* promoting "industrial and technological progress in the United States and strengthen the national economy" by:
* administering the laws relating to patents and trademarks;
* advising the [[United States Secretary of Commerce|Secretary of Commerce]], the [[President of the United States]], and the administration on patent, trademark, and [[copyright]] protection; and
* providing advice on the trade-related aspects of [[intellectual property]].


==Structure==
==Structure==
The USPTO is headquartered at the Alexandria Campus, consisting of 11 buildings in a city-like development surrounded by ground floor retail and high rise residential buildings between the [[Washington Metro|Metro]] stations of [[King Street – Old Town (WMATA station)|King Street station]] (the main search building is two blocks due south of the King Street station) and [[Eisenhower Avenue (WMATA station)|Eisenhower Avenue station]] where the actual Alexandria Campus is located between Duke Street (on the North) to Eisenhower Avenue (on the South), and between John Carlyle Street (on the East) to Elizabeth Lane (on the West) in Alexandria, Virginia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://usptocareers.gov/Pages/NewEmployee/Campus.aspx|title=USPTO Campus|website=usptocareers.gov|access-date=May 6, 2018|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121014021642/http://www.usptocareers.gov/Pages/NewEmployee/Campus.aspx|archive-date=October 14, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/about/contacts/locations/map_alex.jsp|title=Visiting the USPTO – Map – Alexandria Headquarters |last=Public Information Services Group |date=September 27, 2009 |website=USPTO|access-date=May 6, 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150108121523/http://www.uspto.gov/about/contacts/locations/map_alex.jsp|archive-date=January 8, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/image/campus_map.jpg|title=USPTO Alexandria Campus |website=USPTO|access-date=May 6, 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170429162122/https://www.uspto.gov/image/campus_map.jpg|archive-date=April 29, 2017}}</ref> An additional building in [[Arlington, Virginia]], was opened in 2009.
[[File:Usptojamesmadisonbuildingsouthside.jpg|thumb|right|275px|PTO headquarters in [[Alexandria, Virginia]]]]

The PTO is headquartered at the USPTO Campus, consisting of 11 buildings in a city-like development surrounded by ground floor retail and highrise residential buildings between the [[King Street – Old Town (WMATA station)|King Street]] and [[Eisenhower Avenue (WMATA station)|Eisenhower Avenue]] [[Washington Metro|Metro]] stations in Alexandria, Virginia.<ref>[http://usptocareers.gov/Pages/NewEmployee/Campus.aspx USPTO Campus]</ref> An additional building in [[Arlington, Virginia]] was opened in 2009. By 2014, the PTO will open offices in [[Detroit]], [[Dallas]], [[Denver]], and [[Silicon Valley]] to reduce backlog and reflect regional industrial strengths.<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/editorials/article/Silicon-Valley-wins-in-securing-U-S-patent-office-3682845.php Silicon Valley wins in securing U.S. patent office]</ref>
The USPTO was expected by 2014 to open its first ever satellite offices in [[Detroit]], [[Dallas]], [[Denver]], and [[Silicon Valley]] to reduce backlog and reflect regional industrial strengths.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/editorials/article/Silicon-Valley-wins-in-securing-U-S-patent-office-3682845.php|title=Silicon Valley wins in securing U.S. patent office|date=July 4, 2012|website=SFGate|access-date=May 6, 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171113211718/http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/editorials/article/Silicon-Valley-wins-in-securing-U-S-patent-office-3682845.php|archive-date=November 13, 2017}}</ref> The first satellite office opened in Detroit on July 13, 2012.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2011-03-01/pdf/CREC-2011-03-01-pt1-PgS1071.pdf#page=3 |title=Patent Reform Act of 2011 Amendment |work=Congressional Record 112th Congress (2011–2012) |format=pdf |access-date=March 5, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121106140855/http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2011-03-01/pdf/CREC-2011-03-01-pt1-PgS1071.pdf#page=3 |archive-date=November 6, 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.uspto.gov/news/pr/2010/10_65.jsp|title=USPTO to Open First Ever Satellite Office in Detroit|publisher=U.S. Patent and Trademark Office|format=pdf|date=December 16, 2010|access-date=July 14, 2012|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120630044451/http://www.uspto.gov/news/pr/2010/10_65.jsp|archive-date=June 30, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/07/detroit_beats_silicon_valley_i.html |title=Detroit beats Silicon Valley in opening first-ever patent office outside Washington, D.C. |first1=Melissa |last1=Anders |date=July 13, 2012 |publisher=MLive.com |access-date=July 13, 2012 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120719102121/http://www.mlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/07/detroit_beats_silicon_valley_i.html |archive-date=July 19, 2012 }}</ref><ref name="Markowitz">{{cite news |url=http://www.inc.com/hot-spots-detroit/eric-markowitz/what-does-a-patent-office-mean-for-detroit.html |first1=Eric |last1=Markowitz |publisher=Inc.com |date=March 1, 2012 |title=What Does a Patent Office Mean For Detroit? |access-date=July 10, 2012 |archive-date=May 22, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120522185649/http://www.inc.com/hot-spots-detroit/eric-markowitz/what-does-a-patent-office-mean-for-detroit.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120711/BIZ/207110377/1361/Patent-office-prepares-to-open-Detroit-location |date=July 11, 2012 |title=Patent office prepares to open Detroit location |agency=Associated Press |work=[[The Detroit News]] |location=Detroit, Michigan |access-date=July 11, 2012 }}{{Dead link|date=May 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> In 2013, due to the [[Budget sequestration in 2013|budget sequestration]], the satellite office for Silicon Valley, which is home to one of the nation's top patent-producing cities, was put on hold.<ref name=seq1>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=217869885|title=Silicon Valley Patent Office Shelved|website=[[NPR]]|agency=Associated Press|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130922153713/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=217869885|archive-date=September 22, 2013|access-date=April 3, 2018}}</ref> However, renovation and infrastructure updates continued after the sequestration, and the Silicon Valley location opened in the [[San Jose City Hall]] in 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/uspto-locations/silicon-valley-california|title=Silicon Valley U.S. Patent and Trademark Office|first=Silicon Valley Regional|last=Office|publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office|access-date=May 6, 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150108070659/http://www.uspto.gov/about/locations/Silicon_Valley.jsp|archive-date=January 8, 2015}}</ref>

{{As of|2009|9|30|df=US}}, the end of the U.S. government's fiscal year, the PTO had 9,716 employees, nearly all of whom are based at its five-building headquarters complex in Alexandria. Of those, 6,242 were [[patent examiner]]s (almost all of whom were assigned to examine [[utility patent]]s; only 99 were assigned to examine [[design patent]]s) and 388 were [[trademark examining attorney]]s; the rest are support staff.<ref name="USPTO 2005–2009 count">{{cite web |url=http://www.uspto.gov/about/stratplan/ar/2009/2009annualreport.pdf |title=USPTO Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2009 |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |page=140 |access-date=January 16, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110103204805/http://www.uspto.gov/about/stratplan/ar/2009/2009annualreport.pdf |archive-date=January 3, 2011 }}</ref> While the agency has noticeably grown in recent years, the rate of growth was far slower in fiscal 2009 than in the recent past; this is borne out by data from fiscal 2005 to the present:<ref name="USPTO 2005–2009 count"/> As of the end of FY 2018, the USPTO was composed of 12,579 federal employees, including 8,185 patent examiners, 579 trademark examiners, and 3,815 other staff.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY17PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 17|website=USPTO|access-date=January 14, 2019|archive-date=January 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190115075842/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY17PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>


<gallery>
{{As of|2009|9|30|df=US}}, the end of the U.S. government's fiscal year, the PTO had 9,716 employees, nearly all of whom are based at its five-building headquarters complex in Alexandria. Of those, 6,242 were [[patent examiner]]s (almost all of whom were assigned to examine utility patents; only 99 were assigned to examine [[design patent]]s) and 388 were [[trademark examining attorney]]s; the rest are support staff.<ref name="USPTO 2005–2009 count">{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/about/stratplan/ar/2009/2009annualreport.pdf |title=USPTO Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2009 |format=PDF |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |page=140 |accessdate=2010-01-16}}</ref> While the agency has noticeably grown in recent years, the rate of growth was far slower in fiscal 2009 than in the recent past; this is borne out by data from fiscal 2005 to the present:<ref name="USPTO 2005–2009 count"/>
US Patent Office main building.jpg | USPTO Madison Building Exterior.
Interior of the US Patent and Trademark Madison Building.jpg | Interior atrium of the USPTO Madison Building.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, San Jose City Hall, San Jose, California.jpg | USPTO satellite office in San Jose, California.
</gallery>


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 79: Line 96:
! Employees
! Employees
! Patent examiners
! Patent examiners
! Trademark examining attorneys
! Trademark examining attorneys
! Patent Filings (Utility)
! Trademark Filings
! Patent Application Backlog
|-
|-
| 2023<ref name="FY 2023">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY23AFR.pdf|title=Agency Financial Report|website=USPTO|access-date=September 26, 2024|archive-date=August 28, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240828131413/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY23AFR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 2009
| 13,452{{r|FY 2023|p=2,22}}
| 8,568{{r|FY 2023|p=22}}
| 756{{r|FY 2023|p=22}}
| 594,143{{r|FY 2023|p=6}}
| 737,018{{r|FY 2023|p=7}}
|
|-
| 2022
| 13,103{{r|FY 2022|p=20}}
| 8,509{{r|FY 2022|p=20}}
| 718{{r|FY 2022|p=20}}
| 457,510{{r|FY 2022|p=22}}
| 787,798{{r|FY 2022|p=24}}
|
|-
| 2021
| 12,963{{r|FY 2021|p=2,19,243}}
| 8,073{{r|FY 2021|p=19,243}}
| 662{{r|FY 2021|p=19,243}}
| 650,703{{r|FY 2021|p=38}}
| 943,928{{r|FY 2021|p=38,223}}
|
|-
| 2020<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY20PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2020|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=March 22, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230322153238/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY20PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 12,928
| 8,434
| 622
| 653,311{{r|FY 2021|p=38,201}}
| 738,112{{r|FY 2021|p=38,223}}
|
|-
| 2019<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY19PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2019|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131310/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY19PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 12,652
| 9,614
| 701
| 666,843{{r|FY 2021|p=38,201}}
| 673,233{{r|FY 2021|p=38,223}}
|
|-
| 2018<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY18PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2018|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131303/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY18PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 12,579
| 8,185
| 579
| 647,572{{r|FY 2021|p=38,201}}
| 594,107{{r|FY 2021|p=38}}
|
|-
| 2017<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY17PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2017|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516133839/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY17PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 12,588
| 8,147
| 549
| 650,350{{r|FY 2021|p=38,201}}
| 530,270{{r|FY 2021|p=38}}
| 526,579
|-
| 2016<ref name="FY 2016">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY16PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2016|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131256/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY16PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 12,725
| 8,351
| 570
| 650,411
| 530,270
| 537,655
|-
| 2015<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY15PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2015|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=April 5, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405041523/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY15PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 12,667
| 9,161
| 456
| 618,062<ref name="FY 2016"/>
| 503,889<ref name="FY 2016"/>
| 553,221<ref name="FY 2016"/>
|-
| 2014<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY2014PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2014|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131300/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY2014PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 12,450
| 9,302
| 429
| 618,457<ref name="FY 2016"/>
| 455,017<ref name="FY 2016"/>
|
|-
| 2013<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY2013PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2013|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131308/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY2013PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 11,773
| 8,051
| 409
| 601,464<ref name="FY 2016"/>
| 433,654<ref name="FY 2016"/>
|
|-
| 2012<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2012PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2012|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131314/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2012PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 11,531
| 7,935
| 386
| 565,406
| 415,026
| 608,283
|-
| 2011<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2011PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2011|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=April 1, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220401004851/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2011PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 10,210
| 6,780
| 378
| 536,604
| 398,667
|
|-
| 2010<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2010PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2010|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=February 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230216193546/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2010PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 9,507
| 6,225
| 378
| 509,367
| 368,939
| 726,331
|-
| 2009<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2009PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2009|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131240/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2009PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 9,716
| 9,716
| 6,242
| 6,243
| 388
| 388
| 485,500
| 352,051
| 750,596
|-
|-
| 2008<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2008PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2008|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131240/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2008PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 2008
| 9,518
| 9,518
| 6,055
| 6,055
| 398
| 398
| 495,095
| 401,392
| 750,596
|-
|-
| 2007<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2007PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2007|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131309/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2007PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 2007
| 8,913
| 8,913
| 5,477
| 5,477
| 404
| 404
| 467,243
| 394,368
|
|-
|-
| 2006<ref name="FY 2006">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2006PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2006|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131300/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2006PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 2006
| 8,189
|
| 4,883
| 4,779
| 413
| 413
|
|
|
|-
|-
| 2005
| 2005
| 7,363
|
| 4,177<ref name="FY 2006"/>
| 4,258
| 357<ref name="FY 2006"/>
| 357
|
|
|
|-
| 2004
|
| 3,681<ref name="FY 2006"/>
| 286<ref name="FY 2006"/>
|
|
|
|-
| 2003
|
| 3,579<ref name="FY 2006"/>
| 256<ref name="FY 2006"/>
|
|
|
|-
| 1998<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/performance-and-planning/annual-reports/pto-glance-acknowledgements|title=PTO at a glance / Acknowledgements |website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=July 4, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220704051921/https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/performance-and-planning/annual-reports/pto-glance-acknowledgements|url-status=live}}</ref>
| 5,300
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| 1996<ref name="FY 1996">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/performance-and-planning/annual-reports/1996-annual-review-additional-information#tab|title=1996 Annual Review - Additional Information |website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=March 31, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331152819/https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/performance-and-planning/annual-reports/1996-annual-review-additional-information|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Filed 96">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/web/offices/com/annual/1996/pg101.gif|title=Table 2. Patent Applications Filed|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=March 23, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323045358/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/web/offices/com/annual/1996/pg101.gif|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Trademark 96">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/web/offices/com/annual/1996/pg113.gif|title=Table 17. Trademark Applications Filed|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=March 23, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323151441/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/web/offices/com/annual/1996/pg113.gif|url-status=live}}</ref>
|
|
|
| 189,979<ref name="Filed 96"/>
| 200,640<ref name="Trademark 96"/>
|
|-
| 1995<ref name="FY 1995">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/1995annualreport.pdf|title=Setting The Course For Our Future - A Patent and Trademark Office Review - Fiscal Year 1995 |website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131252/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/1995annualreport.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
|
|
|
| 221,304
| 175,307
|
|-
| 1994<ref name="FY 1994">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/1994annualreport.pdf|title=Working for Our Customers - A Patent and Trademark Office Review - Fiscal Year 1994 |website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516131249/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/1994annualreport.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
|
|
|
| 186,126
| 155,376
|
|-
| 1993<ref name="FY 1994"/>
|
|
|
| 174,553
| 139,735
|
|-
| 1992<ref name="FY 1994"/>
|
|
|
| 172,539
| 125,237
|
|-
| 1986
|
|
|
| 120,988<ref name="Filed 96"/>
| 69,253<ref name="Trademark 96"/>
|
|-
| 1976
|
|
|
| 101,807<ref name="Filed 96"/>
| 37,074<ref name="Trademark 96"/>
|
|}
|}


Patent examiners make up the bulk of the employees at USPTO. They are generally newly graduated scientists and engineers, recruited from various universities around the nation. They hold degrees in various scientific disciplines, but who do not necessarily hold law degrees. Unlike Patent Examiners, Trademark Examiners must be licensed attorneys. All examiners work under a strict, "count"-based production system.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/1700_1705.htm |title=1705 Examiner Docket, Time, and Activity Recordation [R-5&#93; - 1700 Miscellaneous |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |date= |accessdate=2010-01-29}}</ref> For every application, "counts" are earned by composing, filing, and mailing a first Office action on the merits, and upon disposal of an application.
Patent examiners make up the bulk of the employees at USPTO. They hold degrees in various scientific disciplines, but do not necessarily hold law degrees. Unlike patent examiners, [[trademark examiner]]s must be licensed attorneys.{{citation needed|date=January 2019|reason=Trademark examiners are required to be licensed attorneys, as shown by consistent referral to examiners as "trademark examining attorneys" throughout the USPTO website.|https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-maintaining-trademark-registration/responding-office-actions=}}


All examiners work under a strict, "count"-based production system.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/1700_1705.htm |title=1705 Examiner Docket, Time, and Activity Recordation [R-5&#93; – 1700 Miscellaneous |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |access-date=January 29, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100528111309/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/1700_1705.htm |archive-date=May 28, 2010 }}</ref> For every application, "counts" are earned by composing, filing, and mailing a first office action on the merits, and upon disposal of an application.
The Commissioner for Patents oversees three main bodies, headed by former Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations, currently<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.uspto.gov/about/bios/focarino_commissioner.jsp |title=Executive Biography for Margaret A. Focarino |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |date= |accessdate=2012-01-12}}</ref> Peggy Focarino, the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, currently{{When|date=January 2010}} Andrew Hirshfeld as Acting Deputy, and finally the Commissioner for Patent Resources and Planning, which is currently{{When|date=January 2010}} vacant.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/ |title=Patent Organization |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |date= |accessdate=2010-01-29}}</ref> The Patent Operations of the office is divided into nine different technology centers that deal with various arts.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dacp/index.html |title=Office of the Commissioner for Patents |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |date=2009-12-30 |accessdate=2010-01-29}}</ref>


Decisions of patent examiners may be appealed to the [[Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences]], an [[Article I and Article III tribunals|administrative law body]] of the USPTO. Decisions of the BPAI may further be appealed to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit]], or a civil suit may be brought against the Commissioner of Patents in the [[United States District Court for the District of Columbia]]. The [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] may ultimately decide on a patent case. Similarly, decisions of trademark examiners may be appealed to the [[Trademark Trial and Appeal Board]], with subsequent appeals directed to the Federal Circuit, or a civil action may also be brought.
Prior to 2012, decisions of patent examiners could be appealed to the [[Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences]], an [[Article I and Article III tribunals|administrative law body]] of the USPTO. Decisions of the BPAI could further be appealed to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit]], or a civil suit could be brought against the Commissioner of Patents in the [[United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia]].<ref>35 U.S.C. § 145.</ref> The [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] may ultimately decide on a patent case. Under the [[America Invents Act]], the BPAI was converted to the [[Patent Trial and Appeal Board]] or "PTAB".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/blog/director/entry/ptab_submissions_have_commenced |date=September 18, 2012 |first1=David |last1=Kappos |title=PTAB Submissions Have Commenced|website=USPTO|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170513194150/https://www.uspto.gov/blog/director/entry/ptab_submissions_have_commenced|archive-date=May 13, 2017|url-status=live|access-date=May 6, 2018}}</ref> Similarly, decisions of trademark examiners could be appealed to the [[Trademark Trial and Appeal Board]], with subsequent appeals directed to the Federal Circuit, or a civil action may also be brought.


===Management===
In recent years, the USPTO has seen increasing delays between when a patent application is filed and when it issues. To address its workload challenges, the USPTO has undertaken an aggressive program of hiring and recruitment. The USPTO hired 1,193 new patent examiners In Fiscal Year 2006 (year ending September 30, 2006),<ref name="USPTO 2006 Performance">{{cite web |url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/annual/2006/3020100_patentperfrm.html |title=Patent Performance for the year 2006 |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office }}</ref> 1,215 new examiners in fiscal 2007,<ref name="USPTO 2007">{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/annual/2007/2007annualreport.pdf |title=USPTO Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2007 |format=PDF |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |accessdate=2009-04-23}}</ref> and 1,211 in fiscal year 2008.<ref name="USPTO 2008">{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/annual/2008/2008annualreport.pdf |title=USPTO Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2008 |format=PDF |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |accessdate=2009-04-23}}</ref> The USPTO expected to continue hiring patent examiners at a rate of approximately 1,200 per year through 2012; however, due to a slowdown in new application filings since the onset of the [[late-2000s recession|late-2000s economic crisis]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/04/economic-downturn-downturn-in-patent-filings.html |title=Economic Downturn => Downturn in Patent Filings |first=Dennis |last=Crouch |authorlink=Dennis Crouch |publisher=Patently-O |date=2009-04-12 |accessdate=2009-04-13}}</ref> and projections of substantial declines in [[maintenance fee (patent)|maintenance fees]] in coming years,<ref name="Quinn Academy">{{cite web|url=http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/03/23/patent-academy-closing-uspto-budget-crisis-deepening/ |title=Patent Academy Closing, USPTO Budget Crisis Deepening? |first=Gene |last=Quinn |publisher= IPWatchdog |date=2009-03-23 |accessdate=2009-04-13}}</ref> the agency imposed a hiring freeze in early March 2009.<ref name="Quinn freeze">{{cite web|url=http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/03/02/pto-hiring-freeze-and-budget-problems/ |title=PTO Hiring Freeze and Budget Problems |first=Gene |last=Quinn |publisher= IPWatchdog |date=2009-03-02 |accessdate=2009-04-13}}</ref>
In October 2021, [[President of the United States|President]] [[Joe Biden]] nominated attorney [[Kathi Vidal]] to serve as the USPTO director.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/biden-nominates-winston-strawn-partner-kathi-vidal-lead-uspto-2021-10-26/|title=Biden nominates Winston & Strawn partner Kathi Vidal to lead USPTO|newspaper=Reuters|date=October 26, 2021|last1=Brittain|first1=Blake}}</ref> She was sworn in on April 13, 2022.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/uspto-welcomes-new-director-kathi-vidal|title=USPTO Welcomes New Director Kathi Vidal|date=April 13, 2022|publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office|access-date=April 13, 2022}}</ref> On December 16, 2022, Kathi Vidal announced that Vaishali Udupa,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/organizational-offices/office-commissioner-patents|title=Office of the Commissioner for Patents|date=January 30, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130150625/https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/organizational-offices/office-commissioner-patents |archive-date=January 30, 2023 }}</ref> an intellectual property attorney, engineer, and currently a top executive from Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), will join the 13,000-person Department of Commerce agency as the new commissioner for patents effective January 17, 2023.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/vaishali-udupa-join-uspto-new-commissioner-patents|title=Vaishali Udupa to join USPTO as new Commissioner for Patents|date=December 16, 2022|publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221216193550/https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/vaishali-udupa-join-uspto-new-commissioner-patents |access-date=June 29, 2024|archive-date=December 16, 2022 }}</ref>

In 2006, USPTO instituted a new training program for patent examiners called the "Patent Training Academy." It is an eight-month program designed to teach new patent examiners the fundamentals of patent law, practice and examination procedure in a college-style environment.<ref>[http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/annual/2006/50200_natureoftrain.html USPTO Annual Report 2006, The Nature of the Training Provided to USPTO Examiners]</ref> Because of the impending USPTO budget crisis previously alluded to, it had been rumored that the Academy would be closed by the end of 2009.<ref name="Quinn Academy"/> Focarino, then Acting Commissioner for Patents, denied in a May 2009 interview that the Academy was being shut down, but stated that it would be cut back because the hiring goal for new examiners in fiscal 2009 was reduced to 600.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/05/12/an-interview-with-the-acting-commissioner-for-patents/id=3381/ |title=An Interview with the Acting Commissioner for Patents |first=Gene |last=Quinn |publisher= IPWatchdog |date=2009-05-12 |accessdate=2009-05-24}}</ref> Ultimately, 588 new patent examiners were hired in fiscal year 2009.<ref name="USPTO 2009 examiner hiring">{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/about/stratplan/ar/2009/2009annualreport.pdf |title=USPTO Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2009 |format=PDF |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |page=14 |accessdate=2010-01-16}}</ref>


==Fee diversion==
==Fee diversion==
For many years, [[United States Congress|Congress]] has "diverted" about 10% of the fees that the USPTO collected into the general treasury of the United States. In effect, this took money collected from the patent system to use for the general budget. This fee diversion has been generally opposed by patent practitioners (e.g., [[patent attorney]]s and [[patent attorney|patent agent]]s), inventors, the USPTO,<ref>{{cite press release |publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office |date = February 2, 2004 |url = http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/04-03.htm |title = President's proposed budget ends USPTO fee diversion in FY 2005 |access-date = November 24, 2006 |url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070106082244/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/04-03.htm |archive-date = January 6, 2007 }}</ref> as well as former federal judge [[Paul R. Michel]].<ref>[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/07/14/interview-with-chief-judge-paul-r-michel-on-us-patent-reform/ Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110820180554/http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/07/14/interview-with-chief-judge-paul-r-michel-on-us-patent-reform/ |date=August 20, 2011 }}, Intellectual Property Watch, July 19, 2011. Consulted on August 8, 2011.</ref> These stakeholders would rather use the funds to improve the patent office and patent system, such as by implementing the USPTO's 21st Century Strategic Plan.<ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21/ |title = Strategic Plan for the 21st Century |access-date = November 24, 2006 |date = February 24, 2006 |publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20061225041141/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21/ |archive-date = December 25, 2006 }}</ref> The last six annual budgets of the [[George W. Bush]] administration did not propose to divert any USPTO fees, and the first budget of the [[Barack Obama]] administration continued this practice,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/05/docs-at-bio-panel-offers-suggestions-for-fixing-the-uspto.html |title=Docs at BIO: Panel Offers Suggestions for Fixing the USPTO – Updated |first=Donald |last=Zuhn |publisher=PatentDocs.org |date=May 20, 2009 |access-date=May 24, 2009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090523210937/http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/05/docs-at-bio-panel-offers-suggestions-for-fixing-the-uspto.html |archive-date=May 23, 2009 }}</ref> as well as the second budget of the Trump administration;<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 23, 2017 |title=USPTO gets $3.6 billion in President's FY 2018 budget, avoids fee diversion |url=https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/05/23/uspto-3-6-billion-presidents-fy-2018-budget-avoids-fee-diversion/id=83633/ |access-date=May 27, 2022 |website=IPWatchdog.com {{!}} Patents & Patent Law |language=en}}</ref> however, stakeholders continue to press for a permanent end to fee diversion.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 17, 2016 |title=Diversion of USPTO user fees is a tax on innovation |url=https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/05/17/diversion-uspto-user-fees-tax-innovation/id=69070/ |access-date=May 27, 2022 |website=IPWatchdog.com {{!}} Patents & Patent Law |language=en}}</ref>
For many years, [[United States Congress|Congress]] has "diverted" about 10% of the fees that the USPTO collected into the general treasury of the United States. In effect, this took money collected from the patent system to use for the general budget. This fee diversion has been generally opposed by patent practitioners (''e.g.'', [[patent attorney]]s and [[patent attorney|patent agent]]s), [[inventor]]s, the USPTO,<ref>{{cite press release

|publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office
The discussion of which party can appropriate the fees is more than a financial question. Patent fees represent a policy lever that influences both the number of applications submitted to the office as well as their quality.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00638.x |title=On the price elasticity of demand for patents |first1=Gaétan |last1=de Rassenfosse |first2=Bruno |last2=van Pottelsberghe |journal=Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics |volume=74 |issue=1 |pages=58–77 |date=2012 |s2cid=43660064 |url=https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/53960/1/wp08031.pdf |access-date=February 16, 2021 |archive-date=August 9, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809032223/https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/53960/1/wp08031.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=de Rassenfosse |first1=Gaétan |author-link=Gaétan de Rassenfosse |last2=Jaffe |first2=Adam |date=2018 |title=Are patent fees effective at weeding out low-quality patents? |url=http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290598/files/15_01.pdf |journal=Journal of Economics & Management Strategy |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=134–148 |doi=10.1111/jems.12219 |s2cid=158435358}}</ref>
|date=February 2, 2004 |url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/04-03.htm
|title= President's proposed budget ends USPTO fee diversion in FY 2005 |accessdate=2006-11-24
}}</ref> as well as former federal judge [[Paul R. Michel]].<ref>[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/07/14/interview-with-chief-judge-paul-r-michel-on-us-patent-reform/ Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform], Intellectual Property Watch, July 19, 2011. Consulted on August 8, 2011.</ref> These stakeholders would rather use the funds to improve the patent office and patent system, such as by implementing the USPTO's 21st Century Strategic Plan.<ref>{{cite web
| url = http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21/| title = Strategic Plan for the 21st Century
| accessdate = 2006-11-24| date = February 24, 2006
| publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office
}}</ref> The last six annual budgets of the [[George W. Bush]] administration did not propose to divert any USPTO fees, and the first budget of the [[Barack Obama]] administration continues this practice; however, stakeholders continue to press for a permanent end to fee diversion.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/05/docs-at-bio-panel-offers-suggestions-for-fixing-the-uspto.html |title=Docs at BIO: Panel Offers Suggestions for Fixing the USPTO -- Updated |first=Donald |last=Zuhn |publisher=PatentDocs.org |date=2009-05-20 |accessdate=2009-05-24}}</ref>


==Patents==
==Patents==
[[File:FirstUSpatent.jpg|right|thumb|First United States patent]]
[[File:FirstUSpatent.jpg|right|thumb|First United States patent]]
[[File:Inventors Hall of Fame in Madison Bldg at USPTO.jpg|thumb|The National Inventors Hall of Fame is housed in the Madison Building of the USPTO.]]
* On July 31, 1790, the first U.S. patent was issued to [[Samuel Hopkins (inventor)|Samuel Hopkins]] for an improvement "in the making of [[Potash|Pot ash]] and [[potassium carbonate|Pearl ash]] by a new Apparatus and Process." This patent was signed by then President [[George Washington]].
* On July 31, 1790, the first U.S. patent was issued to [[Samuel Hopkins (inventor)|Samuel Hopkins]] for an improvement "in the making of [[Potash|Pot ash]] and [[potassium carbonate|Pearl ash]] by a new Apparatus and Process". This patent was signed by then-President [[George Washington]].
* The [[X-Patent]]s (the first 10,280 issued between 1790 and 1836) were destroyed by a fire; fewer than 3,000 of those have been recovered and re-issued with numbers that include an "X". The X generally appears at the end of the numbers hand-written on full-page patent images; however, in patent collections and for search purposes, the X is considered to be the patent type&nbsp;&ndash; analogous to the "D" of design patents&nbsp;&ndash; and appears at the beginning of the number. The X distinguishes the patents from those issued after the fire, which began again with patent number 1.
* The [[X-Patent]]s (the first 9,957 (approximately),<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.govinfo.gov/features/anniversary-first-patent | title=Anniversary of the First Patent Issued in the United States }}</ref> issued between 1790 and 1836) were destroyed by a fire; fewer than 3,000 of those have been recovered and re-issued with numbers that include an "X". The X generally appears at the end of the numbers hand-written on full-page patent images; however, in patent collections and for search purposes, the X is considered to be the patent type&nbsp;– analogous to the "D" of design patents&nbsp;– and appears at the beginning of the number. The X distinguishes the patents from those issued after the fire, which began again with patent number 1.
* Each year, the PTO issues [[list of top United States patent recipients|over 150,000 patents]] to companies and individuals worldwide. {{As of| 2008|2|df=US}}, the PTO has granted over 8,000,000 patents.
* Each year, the PTO issues over 150,000 patents to companies and individuals worldwide. {{As of|2011|12|df=US}}, the PTO had granted 8,743,423 patents and received 16,020,302 applications.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/h_counts.htm | title = U.S. Patent Activity Calendar Years 1790 to the Present | access-date = December 12, 2012 | date = December 12, 2012 | publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office | url-status = live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121202121415/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/h_counts.htm | archive-date = December 2, 2012 }} <!-- Note: Add total patent applications (utility, design, plant) and patents granted (utility, design, plants). For patents granted, don't include data from the Patent Grants to Foreign Residents column or you will overcount. --></ref>
* On June 19, 2018, the 10 millionth U.S. patent was issued to Joseph Marron for invention of a "Coherent LADAR [System] Using Intra-Pixel Quadrature Detection" to improve laser detection and ranging (LADAR).<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/united-states-issues-patent-number-10000000 |title=United States Issues Patent Number 10,000,000 |date=June 19, 2018 |access-date=June 21, 2018 |archive-date=June 19, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180619141725/https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/united-states-issues-patent-number-10000000 |url-status=live }}</ref> The patent was the first to receive the newly redesigned patent cover. It was signed by then-President [[Donald Trump]] during a special ceremony at the [[Oval Office]].<ref>{{cite tweet|number=1009188142249906176|user=uspto|title=Today, @POTUS signed patent ten...|date=June 19, 2018}}</ref>
* In February 2024, the USPTO issued a new guideline relating to obtaining a patent as per earlier recommendation by [[Joe Biden|Biden]]'s administration. The guideline states that; to obtain a patent, a real person, not [[Artificial intelligence|AI]], must have made a “significant contribution” to the invention and that only a human being can be named as an inventor on a patent.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fung |first=Brian |date=February 14, 2024 |title=Only real people, not AI, can patent inventions, US government says {{!}} CNN Business |url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/14/tech/billions-in-ai-patents-get-new-regulations/index.html |access-date=February 15, 2024 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref>

=== List of millionth US patents ===
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Patents issued under revised numbering scheme of the [[Patent Act of 1836]]
|-
! Patent Number !! Patent Title !! Issue Date !! Days Since Last <br> Millionth Issue
|-
| 1<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/0000001 | title= First U.S. Patent: Traction Wheels | access-date= 14 July 2024 | format= pdf}}</ref> || Traction Wheels || July 13, 1836
|-
| 1,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/1000000 | title= Millionth U.S. Patent: Vehicle Tire | access-date= 17 July 2024 | format= pdf}}</ref> || Vehicle Tire || August 8, 1911 || {{age in days|12 Jul 1836|8 Aug 1911}}
|-
| 2,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/2000000 | title= 2 Millionths U.S. Patent: Vehicle Wheel Construction | access-date= 17 July 2024 | format= pdf}}</ref> || Vehicle Wheel Construction || May 12, 1932 || {{age in days|8 Aug 1911|12 May 1932}}
|-
| 3,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/3000000 | title= 3 Millionth U.S. Patent: Automatic Reading System | access-date= 17 July 2024 | format= pdf}}</ref> || Automatic Reading System || May 6, 1955 || {{age in days|12 May 1932|6 May 1955}}
|-
| 4,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/4000000 | title= 4 Millionth U.S. Patent: Process for Recycling Asphalt-Aggregate Compositions | access-date= 17 July 2024 | format= pdf}}</ref> || Process for Recycling Asphalt-Aggregate Compositions || December 28, 1976 || {{age in days|6 May 1955|28 Dec 1976}}
|-
| 5,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/5000000 | title= 5 Millionth U.S. Patent: Ethanol Production by Escherichia Coli Strains }}</ref> || Ethanol Production by Escherichia Coli Strains || March 19, 1991 || {{age in days|28 Dec 1976|19 Mar 1991}}
|-
| 6,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/6000000 | title= 6 Millionth U.S. Patent: Extendible Method and Apparatus for Synchronizing Multiple Files on Two Different Computer Systems }}</ref> || Extendible Method and Apparatus for Synchronizing Multiple Files on Two Different Computer Systems || December 7, 1999 || {{age in days|19 Mar 1991|7 Dec 1999}}
|-
| 7,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/7000000 | title= 7 Millionth U.S. Patent: Polysaccharide Fibers }}</ref> || Polysaccharide Fibers || February 14, 2006 || {{age in days|7 Dec 1999|14 Feb 2006}}
|-
| 8,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/8000000 | title= 8 Millionth U.S. Patent: Visual Prosthesis }}</ref> || Visual Prosthesis || August 16, 2011 || {{age in days|14 Feb 2006|16 Aug 2011}}
|-
| 9,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/9000000 | title= 9 Millionth U.S. Patent: Windshield Washer Conditioner }}</ref> || Windshield Washer Conditioner || April 7, 2015 || {{age in days|16 Aug 2011|7 Apr 2015}}
|-
| 10,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/10000000 | title= 10 Millionth U.S. Patent: Coherent Ladar Using Intra-Pixel Quadrature Detection }}</ref> || Coherent Ladar Using Intra-Pixel Quadrature Detection || June 19, 2018 || {{age in days|7 Apr 2015|19 Jun 2018}}
|-
| 11,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11000000 | title= 11 Millionth U.S. Patent: Repositioning Wires and Methods for Repositioning Prosthetic Heart Valve Devices within a Heart Chamber }}</ref> || Repositioning Wires and Methods for Repositioning Prosthetic Heart Valve Devices within a Heart Chamber || May 11, 2021 || {{age in days|19 Jun 2018|11 May 2021}}
|-
| 12,000,000<ref>{{cite web | website= ppubs.uspto.gov/ | url= https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/12000000 | title= 12 Millionth U.S. Patent: Labeled Nucleotide Analogs, Reaction Mixtures, and Methods and System for Sequencing }}</ref> || Labeled Nucleotide Analogs, Reaction Mixtures, and Methods and System for Sequencing || June 4, 2024 || {{age in days|11 May 2021|4 Jun 2024}}
|}

=== Bar chart ===
{{Vertical bar chart
| full_name = Days since last millionth patent filed at the USPTO
| color_12=blue
| type=number of patents
|1911|27419|1932|7583|1955|8394|1976|7907|1991|5194|1999|3185|2006|2261|2011|2009|2015|1330|2018|1169|2021|1057|2024|1120}}


==Trademarks==
==Trademarks==
The USPTO examines applications for [[trademark]] registration. If approved, the trademarks are registered on either the [[Principal Register]] or the [[Supplemental Register]], depending upon whether the mark meets the appropriate distinctiveness criteria. However, this function is declining in popularity as trademark applicants move to cheaper, more straightforward state-by-state registrations.{{citation needed|date=February 2011}}<ref>{{cite web
The USPTO examines applications for trademark registration, which can be filed under five different filing bases: use in commerce, intent to use, foreign application, foreign registration, or international registration.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-getting-started/trademark-basics/basis-filing|title=Basis for Filing|last=Trademarks|website=USPTO|language=en-US|access-date=January 14, 2019|archive-date=January 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190115075806/https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-getting-started/trademark-basics/basis-filing|url-status=live}}</ref> If approved, the trademarks are registered on either the [[Principal Register]] or the [[Supplemental Register]], depending upon whether the mark meets the appropriate distinctiveness criteria. This federal system governs goods and services distributed via interstate commerce, and operates alongside state level trademark registration systems.<ref>{{cite web
| url = http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/trademark/trademark-registration/state-trademark-info-links.html
|url = http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/trademark/trademark-registration/state-trademark-info-links.html
| title = State Trademark Information
|title = State Trademark Information
| accessdate = 2008-02-11| date = February 11, 2008| publisher = FindLaw For Small Business
|access-date = February 11, 2008
|date = February 11, 2008
|publisher = FindLaw For Small Business
|url-status = live
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080302103739/http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/trademark/trademark-registration/state-trademark-info-links.html
|archive-date = March 2, 2008
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
| url = http://www.uspto.gov | title = Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
|url = http://www.uspto.gov
|title = Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
| accessdate = 2008-02-11| date = February 11, 2008| publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office
|access-date = February 11, 2008
|date = February 11, 2008
|publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office
|url-status = live
}} ''Note: click on "Trademarks" then click on "TESS" tab.''</ref>
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100903003911/http://www.uspto.gov/
|archive-date = September 3, 2010
}} ''Note: click on "Trademarks" then click on "TESS" tab.''</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url = http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/trademark-faqs
|title = Trademark FAQs
|access-date = September 14, 2015
|publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office
|url-status = live
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150912050501/http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/trademark-faqs
|archive-date = September 12, 2015
}}</ref>

Trademark applications have grown substantially in recent years, jumping from 296,490 new applications in 2000,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2000PAR.pdf|title=USPTO Annual Report FY2000|website=USPTO.gov|access-date=January 14, 2019|archive-date=April 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180424032615/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/about/stratplan/ar/USPTOFY2000PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> to 345,000 new applications in 2014, to 458,103 new applications in 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.erikpelton.com/uspto-received-more-than-458000-trademark-applications-in-2018-a-new-record-but-slower-growth/|title=USPTO received more than 458,000 trademark applications in 2018 – a new record, but slower growth|last=Erik|date=January 6, 2019|website=Erik M Pelton & Associates, PLLC|language=en-US|access-date=January 14, 2019}}</ref> Recent growth has been driven partially by growing numbers of trademark applications originating in China; trademark applications from China have grown more than 12-fold since 2013, and in 2017, one in every nine trademark applications reviewed by the U.S. Trademark Office originated in China.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/flood-of-trademark-applications-fromchinaalarms-u-s-officials-1525521600|title=Flood of Trademark Applications From China Alarms U.S. Officials|last=Gershman|first=Jacob|date=May 5, 2018|work=Wall Street Journal|access-date=January 14, 2019|language=en-US|issn=0099-9660}}</ref>

Since 2008, the Trademark Office has hosted a National Trademark Expo every two years, billing it as "a free, family-friendly event designed to educate the public about trademarks and their importance in the global marketplace."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/trademark/trademark-updates-and-announcements/about-usptos-national-trademark-expo|title=About the USPTO's National Trademark Exposition|last=Trademarks|website=USPTO|language=en-US|access-date=January 14, 2019|archive-date=January 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190115075840/https://www.uspto.gov/trademark/trademark-updates-and-announcements/about-usptos-national-trademark-expo|url-status=live}}</ref> The Expo features celebrity speakers such as [[Anson Williams]] (of the television show ''[[Happy Days]]'')<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/trademark/trademark-updates-and-announcements/2014-national-trademark-expo|title=2014 National Trademark Expo|last=Trademarks|website=USPTO|language=en-US|access-date=January 14, 2019|archive-date=January 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190115075757/https://www.uspto.gov/trademark/trademark-updates-and-announcements/2014-national-trademark-expo|url-status=live}}</ref> and basketball player [[Kareem Abdul-Jabbar]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/events/2018-national-trademark-expo|title=2018 National Trademark Exposition|website=USPTO|language=en-US|access-date=January 14, 2019|archive-date=January 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190115075847/https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/events/2018-national-trademark-expo|url-status=live}}</ref> and has numerous trademark-holding companies as exhibitors. Before the 2009 National Trademark Expo, the Trademark Office designed and launched a kid-friendly trademark mascot known as T. Markey, who appears as an anthropomorphized registered trademark symbol.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20141203/15321529320/uspto-acts-like-three-letter-agency-redacts-bunch-stuff-about-its-kid-friendly-t-markey-character.shtml|title=USPTO Acts Like A Three-Letter Agency, Redacts A Bunch Of Stuff About Its Kid-Friendly 'T. Markey' Character|last=Cushing |first=Tim |website=Techdirt |date=December 4, 2014 |access-date=January 14, 2019|archive-date=January 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190115132504/https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20141203/15321529320/uspto-acts-like-three-letter-agency-redacts-bunch-stuff-about-its-kid-friendly-t-markey-character.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref> T. Markey is featured prominently on the Kids section of the USPTO website, alongside fellow IP mascots Ms. Pat Pending (with her robot cat GeaRS) and Mark Trademan.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/kids/kids.html|title=USPTO Kids|website=USPTO|access-date=January 14, 2019|archive-date=December 3, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181203190038/https://www.uspto.gov/kids/kids.html|url-status=live}}</ref>

In 2020, trademark applications marked the sharpest declines and inclines in American history. During the spring, [[COVID-19 lockdowns]] led to reduced filings, which then increased in July 2020 to exceed the previous year. August 2020 was subsequently the highest month of trademark filings in the history of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.<ref>{{Cite web|title=USPTO Director Andrei Iancu speaks on pandemic's effect on intellectual property|url=https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2020/09/uspto-director-andrei-iancu-speaks-on-pandemics-effect-on-intell/|website=americanbar.org|publisher=[[American Bar Association]]|date=October 30, 2020|access-date=October 2, 2020|archive-date=October 11, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201011043428/https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2020/09/uspto-director-andrei-iancu-speaks-on-pandemics-effect-on-intell/|url-status=live}}</ref>


==Representation==
==Representation==
The PTO only allows certain qualified persons to practice before the PTO. ''Practice'' includes filing of patent applications on behalf of inventors, prosecuting patent applications on behalf of inventors, and participating in administrative appeals and other proceedings before the PTO examiners and boards. The PTO sets its own standards for who may practice and requires that any person who practices become registered. A patent agent is a person who has passed the [[USPTO registration examination]] (the "patent bar") but has not passed any state bar exam to become a licensed attorney; a patent attorney is a person who has passed both a state bar and the patent bar and is in good standing as an attorney.<ref name="uspto1">{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/attorney.htm |title=General Information Concerning Patents: Attorneys and Agents |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |date= |accessdate=2010-01-29}}</ref> A patent agent can only act in a representative capacity in patent matters presented to the USPTO, and may not represent a patent holder or applicant in a court of law. To be eligible for taking the patent bar exam, a candidate must possess a degree in "engineering or physical science or the equivalent of such a degree".<ref name="uspto1"/>
The USPTO only allows certain qualified persons to practice before the USPTO. ''Practice'' includes filing of patent and trademark applications on behalf of individuals and companies, prosecuting the patent and trademark applications, and participating in administrative appeals and other proceedings before the PTO examiners, examining attorneys and boards. The USPTO sets its own standards for who may practice. Any person who practices patent law before the USPTO must become a registered patent attorney or agent. A patent agent is a person who has passed the [[USPTO registration examination]] (the "patent bar") but has not passed any state bar exam to become a licensed attorney; a patent attorney is a person who has passed both a state bar and the patent bar and is in good standing as an attorney.<ref name="uspto1">{{cite web |url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/attorney.htm |title=General Information Concerning Patents: Attorneys and Agents |publisher=United States Patent and Trademark Office |access-date=January 29, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100123220237/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/attorney.htm |archive-date=January 23, 2010 }}</ref> A patent agent can only act in a representative capacity in patent matters presented to the USPTO, and may not represent a patent holder or applicant in a court of law. To be eligible for taking the patent bar exam, a candidate must possess a degree in "engineering or physical science or the equivalent of such a degree".<ref name="uspto1"/> Any person who practices trademark law before the USPTO must be an active member in good standing of the highest court of any state.<ref>{{cite web |title=Becoming a trademark practitioner |url=https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/patent-and-trademark-practitioners/becoming-trademark-practitioner |website=United States Patent and Trademark Office |publisher=USPTO |access-date=December 5, 2018 |archive-date=December 6, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181206001609/https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/patent-and-trademark-practitioners/becoming-trademark-practitioner |url-status=live }}</ref>


The United States allows any citizen from any country to sit for the patent bar (if he/she has the requisite technical background).<ref>[http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/37/11/7 Code of Federal Regulations], Title 37, Chapter I, Part 11, [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/appxr_11_7.htm Section 11.7]</ref> Only Canada has a reciprocity agreement with the United States that confers upon a patent agent similar rights.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/foia/oed/legal/legal11.pdf |title=Decision on Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 10.2(c) |format=PDF |date=May 9, 2003 |accessdate=2010-01-29}}</ref>
The United States allows any citizen from any country to sit for the patent bar (if he/she has the requisite technical background).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/37/11/7|title=37 CFR 11.7 Requirements for registration.|website=LII / Legal Information Institute|access-date=May 6, 2018}}</ref> Only Canada has a reciprocity agreement with the United States that confers upon a patent agent similar rights.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/foia/oed/legal/legal11.pdf |title=Decision on Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 10.2(c) |date=May 9, 2003 |access-date=January 29, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100923061312/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/foia/oed/legal/legal11.pdf |archive-date=September 23, 2010 }}</ref>


An unrepresented inventor may file a patent application and prosecute it on his or her own behalf (''[[pro se]]''). If it appears to a patent examiner that an inventor filing a ''pro se'' application is not familiar with the proper procedures of the Patent Office, the examiner may suggest that the filing party obtain representation by a registered patent attorney or patent agent.<ref>''[[Manual of Patent Examining Procedure]]'', [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep_e8r3_0400.pdf Chapter 400]</ref> The patent examiner cannot recommend a specific attorney or agent, but the Patent Office does post a list of those who are registered.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://oedci.uspto.gov/OEDCI/ |title=Patent Attorney/Agent Search |publisher=Office of Enrollment and Discipline, United States Patent and Trademark Office |accessdate=2011-10-17}}</ref>
An unrepresented inventor may file a patent application and prosecute it on his or her own behalf (''[[pro se]]''). If it appears to a patent examiner that an inventor filing a ''pro se'' application is not familiar with the proper procedures of the Patent Office, the examiner may suggest that the filing party obtain representation by a registered patent attorney or patent agent.<ref>''[[Manual of Patent Examining Procedure]]'', [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep_e8r3_0400.pdf Chapter 400] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051127114214/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep_e8r3_0400.pdf |date=November 27, 2005 }}</ref> The patent examiner cannot recommend a specific attorney or agent, but the Patent Office does post a list of those who are registered.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://oedci.uspto.gov/OEDCI/ |title=Patent Attorney/Agent Search |publisher=Office of Enrollment and Discipline, United States Patent and Trademark Office |access-date=October 17, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111015111546/https://oedci.uspto.gov/OEDCI/ |archive-date=October 15, 2011 }}</ref>


While the inventor of a relatively simple-to-describe invention may well be able to produce an adequate specification and detailed drawings, there remains language complexity in what is [[claim (patent)|claim]]ed, either in the particular claim language of a utility application, or in the manner in which drawings are presented in a design application. There is also skill required when searching for prior art that is used to support the application and to prevent applying for a patent for something that may be unpatentable. A patent examiner will make special efforts to help ''pro se'' inventors understand the process but the failure to adequately understand or respond to an Office action from the USPTO can endanger the inventor's rights, and may lead to abandonment of the application.
While the inventor of a relatively simple-to-describe invention may well be able to produce an adequate specification and detailed drawings, there remains language complexity in what is [[claim (patent)|claim]]ed, either in the particular claim language of a utility application, or in the manner in which drawings are presented in a design application. There is also skill required when searching for prior art that is used to support the application and to prevent applying for a patent for something that may be unpatentable. A patent examiner will make special efforts to help ''pro se'' inventors understand the process but the failure to adequately understand or respond to an office action from the USPTO can endanger the inventor's rights, and may lead to abandonment of the application.


==Electronic filing system==
==Electronic filing system==
The USPTO will accept patent applications filed in electronic form. Inventors or their patent agents/attorneys can file applications as [[Portable Document Format|Adobe PDF]] documents. The web page for submitting applications is [https://sportal.uspto.gov/secure/portal/efs-unregistered https://sportal.uspto.gov/secure/portal/efs-unregistered]. Filing fees can be paid by credit card or by a USPTO "deposit account".
The USPTO accepts patent applications filed in electronic form. Inventors or their patent agents/attorneys can file applications as [[Portable Document Format|Adobe PDF]] documents. Filing fees can be paid by credit card or by a USPTO "deposit account".


==Patent search tools==
==Patent search tools==
[[File:PSF at USPTO Madison Bldg.jpg|thumb|The lobby of the Public Search Facility, looking out toward the atrium, inside the Madison Building of the USPTO. The bronze bust of Thomas Jefferson is at the far right. Researchers can access patent search databases within the facility.]]
The USPTO web site provides free electronic copies of issued patents and patent applications as multiple-page [[TIFF]] (graphic) documents. The site also provides Boolean search and analysis tools.<ref>[http://www.marketsandpatents.com/bulletin/IPB-02152012.html Nowotarski, Mark, “Searching the USPTO patent database”, Insurance IP Bulletin, February 2012]</ref>
The USPTO web site provides free electronic copies of issued patents and patent applications as multiple-page [[TIFF]] (graphic) documents. The site also provides Boolean search and analysis tools.<ref>[http://www.marketsandpatents.com/bulletin/IPB-02152012.html Nowotarski, Mark, "Searching the USPTO patent database", Insurance IP Bulletin, February 2012] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120309022543/http://marketsandpatents.com/bulletin/IPB-02152012.html |date=March 9, 2012 }}</ref>


The USPTO's free distribution service only distributes the patent documents as a set of TIFF files.<ref>[http://www.uspto.gov/patft/help/images.htm Patent Full-Page Images]</ref> Numerous free and commercial services provide patent documents in other formats, such as [[Adobe PDF]] and [[Cartesian Perceptual Compression|CPC]].
The USPTO's free distribution service only distributes the patent documents as a set of TIFF files.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/patft/help/images.htm|title=PatFT Full-Text Images|website=USPTO|access-date=May 6, 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130901235123/http://www.uspto.gov/patft/help/images.htm|archive-date=September 1, 2013}}</ref> Numerous free and commercial services provide patent documents in other formats, such as [[Adobe PDF]] and [[Cartesian Perceptual Compression|CPC]].


==Criticisms==
== Criticisms ==

The USPTO has been criticized for granting patents for impossible or absurd, already known, or arguably obvious inventions.<ref name="ross">Philip E. Ross, [http://www.forbes.com/global/2000/0529/0311090a.html ''Patently Absurd''], Forbes.com, May 29, 2000.</ref>
The USPTO has been criticized for granting patents for impossible or absurd, already known, or arguably obvious inventions.<ref name="ross">Philip E. Ross, [https://www.forbes.com/global/2000/0529/0311090a.html ''Patently Absurd''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170729210452/https://www.forbes.com/global/2000/0529/0311090a.html |date=July 29, 2017 }}, Forbes.com, May 29, 2000.</ref> Economists have documented that, although the USPTO makes mistakes when granting patents, these mistakes might be less prominent than some might believe.<ref>{{Cite journal|title= Low-Quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners|last1=de Rassenfosse|first1=Gaetan|url= https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewaa026|last2=Griffiths|first2=William|last3=Jaffe|first3=Adam|last4=Webster|first4=Elizabeth|date=2020|journal=Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization|volume=37|issue=3|pages=607–636|doi=10.1093/jleo/ewaa026}}</ref>


===Controversial patents===
===Controversial patents===
<!--This section needs to demonstrate controversy over the patents described herein, rather than just listing some patents that sound silly. So far, the only one here that actually discusses any controversy is the one about the space vehicle.-->
<!--This section needs to demonstrate controversy over the patents described herein, rather than just listing some patents that sound silly. So far, the only one here that actually discusses any controversy is the one about the space vehicle. -->
*{{US patent|5,443,036}}, "[[Method of exercising a cat]]", covers having a cat chase the beam from a laser pointer. The patent has been criticized as being obvious.<ref name="NYTimes2004_10_21">{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/21/business/21scene.html|author=Hal H. Varian|title=Patent Protection Gone Awry|date=2004-10-21|work=The New York Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2002/10/55831|title=Stop the Patent Process Madness|date=2002-10-21|author= Lauren Weinstein |authorlink=Lauren Weinstein (activist) |work=[[Wired News]]}}</ref>
*{{US patent|5,443,036}}, "Method of exercising a cat", covers having a cat chase the beam from a [[laser pointer]]. The patent has been criticized as being obvious.<ref name="NYTimes2004_10_21">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/21/business/21scene.html|author=Hal H. Varian|title=Patent Protection Gone Awry|date=October 21, 2004|work=The New York Times|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150528062022/http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/21/business/21scene.html|archive-date=May 28, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2002/10/55831|title=Stop the Patent Process Madness|date=October 21, 2002|author=Lauren Weinstein|author-link=Lauren Weinstein (activist)|work=[[Wired News]]|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140119134737/http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2002/10/55831|archive-date=January 19, 2014}}</ref>
*{{US patent|6,004,596}}, "[[Sealed crustless sandwich]]", issued in 1999, covers the design of a sandwich with crimped edges.<ref name="NYTimes2004_10_21"/><ref>{{cite news|author=Sara Schaefer Muñoz|date=2005-04-05|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB111266108673297874.html|title=Patent No. 6,004,596: Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich}}</ref> However, all claims of the patent were subsequently canceled by the PTO upon reexamination.<ref>Reexamination certificate no. US 6,004,596 C1, September 25, 2007, retrieved from USPTO [http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair Public Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR)], December 1, 2008 (request PAIR entry for Reexamination Control Number 90/005949 as "Application Number").</ref>
*{{US patent|6,004,596}}, "[[Sealed crustless sandwich]]", issued in 1999, covers the design of a sandwich with crimped edges.<ref name="NYTimes2004_10_21"/><ref>{{cite news|author=Sara Schaefer Muñoz|date=April 5, 2005|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB111266108673297874|title=Patent No. 6,004,596: Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170710051120/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB111266108673297874|archive-date=July 10, 2017}}</ref> All claims of the patent were canceled by the PTO upon reexamination.<ref>Reexamination certificate no. US 6,004,596 C1, September 25, 2007, retrieved from USPTO [http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair Public Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090114020637/http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair |date=January 14, 2009 }}, December 1, 2008 (request PAIR entry for Reexamination Control Number 90/005949 as "Application Number").</ref>
*{{US patent|6,025,810}}, "Hyper-light-speed antenna", an antenna that sends signals faster than the speed of light.<ref name="ross"/> According to the description in the patent, "The present invention takes a transmission of energy, and instead of sending it through normal time and space, it pokes a small hole into another dimension, thus, sending the energy through a place which allows transmission of energy to exceed the speed of light."<ref>{{US patent|6,025,810}}, col. 1, lines 30-34.</ref>
*{{US patent|6,025,810}}, "Hyper-light-speed antenna", an antenna that sends signals faster than the [[speed of light]].<ref name="ross"/> According to the description in the patent, "The present invention takes a transmission of energy, and instead of sending it through normal time and space, it pokes a small hole into another dimension, thus, sending the energy through a place which allows transmission of energy to exceed the speed of light."<ref>{{US patent|6,025,810}}, col. 1, lines 30–34.</ref>
*{{US patent|6,368,227}}, "Method of swinging on a swing", issued April 9, 2002<ref name="NewScientist2002_04_17">{{cite web|url=http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2178-boy-takes-swing-at-us-patents.html|publisher=[[New Scientist]]|date=2002-04-17|author=Jeff Hecht|title=Boy takes swing at US patents}}</ref> by patent examiner Kien T. Nguyen,<ref name="NYTimes2002_05_13">{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/13/business/patents-patent-office-faces-huge-backlogs-extremely-technical-inventions-absurd.html|work=The New York Times|title=Patents; The Patent Office faces huge backlogs, extremely technical inventions, and absurd ones.|author=Teresa Riordan|date=2002-05-13}}</ref> was granted to a seven-year-old boy, whose father, a patent attorney, wanted to demonstrate how the patent system worked to his son (aged 5 at the time of the application). The PTO initially rejected it due to prior art, but eventually issued the patent.<ref name="NewScientist2002_04_17"/> However, all claims of the patent were subsequently canceled by the PTO upon reexamination.<ref>Reexamination certificate no. US 6,368,227 C1, July 1, 2003, retrieved from USPTO [http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair Public Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR)], August 22, 2008</ref>
*{{US patent|6,368,227}}, "Method of swinging on a swing", issued April 9, 2002,<ref name="NewScientist2002_04_17">{{cite web|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2178-boy-takes-swing-at-us-patents.html|publisher=[[New Scientist]]|date=April 17, 2002|author=Jeff Hecht|title=Boy takes swing at US patents|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514000604/http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2178-boy-takes-swing-at-us-patents.html|archive-date=May 14, 2011}}</ref><ref name="NYTimes2002_05_13">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/13/business/patents-patent-office-faces-huge-backlogs-extremely-technical-inventions-absurd.html|work=The New York Times|title=Patents; The Patent Office faces huge backlogs, extremely technical inventions, and absurd ones.|author=Teresa Riordan|date=May 13, 2002|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170316153058/http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/13/business/patents-patent-office-faces-huge-backlogs-extremely-technical-inventions-absurd.html|archive-date=March 16, 2017}}</ref> was granted to a seven-year-old boy, whose father, a patent attorney, wanted to demonstrate how the patent system worked to his son who was five years old at the time of the application. The PTO initially rejected it due to prior art, but eventually issued the patent.<ref name="NewScientist2002_04_17"/> Upon reexamination all claims of the patent were canceled by the PTO.<ref>Reexamination certificate no. US 6,368,227 C1, July 1, 2003, retrieved from USPTO [http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair Public Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090114020637/http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair |date=January 14, 2009 }}, August 22, 2008</ref>
*{{US patent|6,960,975}}, "Space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state", describes an [[anti-gravity]] device. In November 2005, the USPTO was criticized by physicists for granting it. The journal ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' first highlighted this patent issued for a device that presumably amounts to a [[perpetual motion]] machine, defying the laws of physics.<ref>{{cite journal
*{{US patent|6,960,975}}, "Space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state", describes an [[anti-gravity]] device. In November 2005, the USPTO was criticized by physicists for granting it. The journal ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' first highlighted this patent issued for a device that presumably amounts to a [[perpetual motion]] machine, defying the laws of physics.<ref>{{cite journal
| last = Ball | first = Philip | date = November 10, 2005
| last = Ball | first = Philip | date = November 10, 2005
| title = Antigravity craft slips past patent officers | journal = Nature | volume = 438 | issue = 7065 | page = 139
| title = Antigravity craft slips past patent officers | journal = Nature | volume = 438 | issue = 7065 | page = 139
| pmid = 16280998 | doi = 10.1038/438139a
| pmid = 16280998 | doi = 10.1038/438139a
| bibcode = 2005Natur.438Q.139B | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | author = United Press International | title = Patent issued for anti-gravity device | url = http://www.physorg.com/news8042.html | publisher = Phyorg.com | year = 2005 | access-date = November 24, 2006 | url-status = live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20061210231450/http://www.physorg.com/news8042.html | archive-date = December 10, 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | author = Brian Handwerk | title = Antigravity Machine Patent Draws Physicists' Ire | url = http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1111_051111_junk_patent.html | publisher = National Geographic News | date = November 11, 2005 | access-date = November 24, 2006 | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20061114085057/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1111_051111_junk_patent.html | archive-date = November 14, 2006 }}</ref><ref>An [https://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20051109-13140400-bc-us-antigravity.xml untraceable link] was also included here as an additional reference.{{Full citation needed|date=January 2010}} {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051204041457/https://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20051109-13140400-bc-us-antigravity.xml |date=December 4, 2005 }}</ref> The device comprises a particular electrically [[superconductivity|superconducting]] shield and electromagnetic generating device. The examiner allowed the claims because the design of the shield and device was novel and not obvious.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|url = http://sherinianlaw.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/11079670.pdf
| author = United Press International
|title = Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)
| title = Patent issued for anti-gravity device | url = http://www.physorg.com/news8042.html
|access-date = September 5, 2014
| publisher = Phyorg.com | year = 2005 | accessdate = 2006-11-24
|author = Ramon M Barrera (examiner)
}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|date = June 7, 2005
| author = Brian Handwerk | title = Antigravity Machine Patent Draws Physicists' Ire
|work = 11/079,670 Space Vehicle Propelled by the Pressure of Inflationary Vacuum State
| url = http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1111_051111_junk_patent.html
| publisher = National Geographic News | date = November 11, 2005 | accessdate = 2006-11-24
|publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office
|page = 2
}}</ref><ref>An [http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20051109-13140400-bc-us-antigravity.xml untraceable link]{{dead link|date=October 2011}} was also included here as an additional reference.{{Citation broken|date=January 2010}}</ref> The device comprises a particular electrically [[superconductivity|superconducting]] shield and electromagnetic generating device. The examiner allowed the claims because the design of the shield and device was novel and not obvious.<ref>{{cite web
|url-status = live
| url = http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_CH/.cmd/ad/.ar/sa.getBib/.ps/N/.c/6_0_69/.ce/7_0_3AB/.p/5_0_341/.d/2?selectedTab=ifwtab&isSubmitted=isSubmitted&dosnum=11079670#7_0_3AB
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160201163821/http://sherinianlaw.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/11079670.pdf
| title = Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)
|archive-date = February 1, 2016
| accessdate = 2006-11-24| author = Ramon M Barrera (examiner)
}} ''Note: Navigate to the 'Image File Wrapper' to find the file; download and open with a PDF reader.'' The specific passage from the document follows: "The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: None of the prior art of record taught or disclosed the claimed superconducting shield and electromagnetic field generating means structure."</ref> In situations such as this where a substantial question of [[patentability]] is raised after a patent is issued, the Commissioner of the Patent Office can order a [[reexamination]] of the patent.
| date = June 7, 2005| format = PDF
| work = 11/079,670 Space Vehicle Propelled by the Pressure of Inflationary Vacuum State
| publisher = United States Patent and Trademark Office| page = 2
}} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}} ''Note: Navigate to the 'Image File Wrapper' to find the file; download and open with a PDF reader.'' The specific passage from the document follows: "The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: None of the prior art of record taught or disclosed the claimed superconducting shield and electromagnetic field generating means structure."</ref> In situations such as this where a substantial question of [[patentability]] is raised after a patent issues, the Commissioner of the Patent Office can order a [[reexamination]] of the patent.


===Controversial trademarks===
===Controversial trademarks===
* {{US trademark|77139082}}, "[[Cloud Computing]]" for [[Dell]], covering "''custom manufacture of computer hardware for use in data centers and mega-scale computing environments for others''", was allowed by a trademark attorney on July 8, 2008. Cloud computing is a generic term that could define technology infrastructure for years to come, which had been in general use at the time of the application.<ref>[http://www.cio.com/article/440863/Dell_Tries_to_Trademark_cloud_Computing_ Dell Tries to Trademark 'cloud Computing']</ref> The application was rejected on August 12, 2008 as descriptive and generic.<ref>[http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/Dell-Cloud-Computing-Trademark-Rejected/ Dell Cloud Computing Trademark Rejected]</ref>
* {{US trademark|77139082}}, "Cloud Computing" for [[Dell]], covering "custom manufacture of computer hardware for use in [[data center]]s and mega-scale computing environments for others", was allowed by a trademark attorney on July 8, 2008. [[Cloud computing]] is a generic term that could define technology infrastructure for years to come, which had been in general use at the time of the application.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cio.com/article/440863/Dell_Tries_to_Trademark_cloud_Computing_|title=Dell Tries to Trademark 'cloud Computing'|first=Agam|last=Shah|website=cio.com|access-date=May 6, 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140416183718/http://www.cio.com/article/440863/Dell_Tries_to_Trademark_cloud_Computing_|archive-date=April 16, 2014}}</ref> The application was rejected on August 12, 2008, as descriptive and generic.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/Dell-Cloud-Computing-Trademark-Rejected/|title=Dell Cloud Computing Trademark Rejected|website=eweek.com|date=August 19, 2008|access-date=May 6, 2018}}</ref>
* {{US trademark|75215401}}, "[[Netbook]]" for [[Psion]], covering "''laptop computers''" was registered on November 21, 2000. Although the company discontinued the ''netBook'' line in November 2003 and allowed the trademark to become [[genericized]] through use by journalists and vendors (products marketed as 'netbooks' include the [[Dell Inspiron Mini Series]], [[Asus]] [[eeePC]], [[HP Mini 1000]], [[MSI Wind Netbook]] and others), [[USPTO]] subsequently rejected a number of trademarks citing a "likelihood of confusion" under section 2(d), including 'G NETBOOK' ({{US trademark|77527311}} rejected October 31, 2008), [[Micro-Star International|MSI]]'s 'WIND NETBOOK' ({{US trademark|}}) and [[Coby Electronics Corporation|Coby Electronics]]' 'COBY NETBOOK' ({{US trademark|77590174}} rejected January 13, 2009. [[Psion]] also delivered a batch of cease and desist letters on December 23, 2008 relating to the [[genericized trademark]].<ref>[http://www.mtpt.co.uk/2008/12/a-netbook-by-any-other-name-or-how-psion-is-going-discover-you-have-to-use-it-or-lose-it.html A netbook by any other name, or how Psion is going discover you have to use it or lose it]{{Dead link|date=January 2010}}</ref>
* {{US trademark|75215401}}, "[[Netbook]]" for [[Psion (computers)|Psion]], covering "laptop computers" was registered on November 21, 2000. Although the company discontinued the ''netBook'' line in November 2003 and allowed the trademark to become [[genericized]] through use by journalists and vendors (products marketed as 'netbooks' include the [[Dell Inspiron Mini Series]], [[Asus]] [[eeePC]], [[HP Mini 1000]], [[MSI Wind Netbook]] and others), [[USPTO]] subsequently rejected a number of trademarks citing a "likelihood of confusion" under section 2(d), including 'G NETBOOK' ({{US trademark|77527311}} rejected October 31, 2008), [[Micro-Star International|MSI]]'s 'WIND NETBOOK' ({{US trademark|}}) and [[Coby Electronics Corporation|Coby Electronics]]' 'COBY NETBOOK' ({{US trademark|77590174}}) rejected January 13, 2009. Psion also delivered a batch of [[cease-and-desist letters]] on December 23, 2008, relating to the [[genericized trademark]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.mtpt.co.uk/2008/12/a-netbook-by-any-other-name-or-how-psion-is-going-discover-you-have-to-use-it-or-lose-it.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090205122433/http://www.mtpt.co.uk/2008/12/a-netbook-by-any-other-name-or-how-psion-is-going-discover-you-have-to-use-it-or-lose-it.html|url-status=dead|title=A netbook by any other name, or how Psion is going discover you have to use it or lose it|archivedate=February 5, 2009}}</ref>


===Slow patent examination and backlog===
===Slow patent examination and backlog===
{{Main|Backlog of unexamined patent applications}}
{{Main|Backlog of unexamined patent applications}}
{{multiple image | total_width=450
The USPTO has been criticized for taking an inordinate amount of time in examining patent applications. This is particularly true in the fast growing area{{Update after|2010|11|16}}<!--Is this still true after Bilski?--> of [[business method patent]]s. As of 2005, patent examiners in the business method area were still examining patent applications filed in 2001.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}}
| image1=US patents 1790-2008.png |caption1=U.S. patents granted, 1790–2010.<ref name="USPTO Activity">{{Citation | url = http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/h_counts.htm | title = U.S. Patent Activity 1790 to the Present | publisher = USPTO | url-status = live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121202121415/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/h_counts.htm | archive-date = December 2, 2012 }}.</ref>
| image2=1976- United States utility patents issued, by year - bar chart.svg |caption2=More U.S. utility patents have been issued in the most recent thirty years than in the first 200 years in which they were issued (1790–1990).
}}

The USPTO has been criticized for taking an inordinate amount of time in examining patent applications. This is particularly true in the fast-growing area{{Update after|2010|11|16}}<!--Is this still true after Bilski?--> of [[business method patent]]s. As of 2005, patent examiners in the business method area were still examining patent applications filed in 2001.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}}

The delay was attributed by spokesmen for the Patent Office to a combination of a sudden increase in business method patent filings after the 1998 [[State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group|''State Street Bank'' decision]], the unfamiliarity of patent examiners with the business and financial arts (e.g., banking, [[insurance]], stock trading etc.), and the issuance of a number of controversial patents (''e.g.'', {{US patent|5,960,411}} "[[1-Click|Amazon one click patent]]") in the business method area.

Effective August 2006, the USPTO introduced an [[Petition to make special|accelerated patent examination procedure]] in an effort to allow inventors a speedy evaluation of an application with a final disposition within twelve months. The procedure requires additional information to be submitted with the application and also includes an interview with the examiner.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/accelerated/|title=Accelerated Examination |website=USPTO|access-date=May 6, 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090916021707/http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/accelerated/|archive-date=September 16, 2009}}</ref> The first accelerated patent was granted on March 15, 2007, with a six-month issuance time.<ref>[http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/07-13.htm USPTO grants first patent under accelerated review option] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070428003136/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/07-13.htm |date=April 28, 2007 }} Press Release</ref>


As of the end of 2008, there were 1,208,076 patent applications pending at the Patent Office. At the end of 1997, the number of applications pending was 275,295. Therefore, over those eleven years there was a 439% increase in the number of pending applications.<ref>Gene Quinn, [http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/11/21/how-to-fix-the-uspto/ ''How to Fix the USPTO''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327065446/http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/11/21/how-to-fix-the-uspto/ |date=March 27, 2009 }}, IPWatchdog, November 21, 2008. Consulted on December 6, 2008.</ref>
The delay was attributed by spokesmen for the Patent Office to a combination of a sudden increase in business method patent filings after the 1998 [[State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group|''State Street Bank'' decision]], the unfamiliarity of patent examiners with the business and financial arts (''e.g.'', banking, [[insurance]], stock trading etc.), and the issuance of a number of controversial patents (''e.g.'', {{US patent|5,960,411}} "[[1-Click|Amazon one click patent]]") in the business method area.


December 2012 data showed that there was 597,579 unexamined patent applications in the backlog.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uspto.gov/dashboards/patents/main.dashxml |title=United States Patent and Trademark Office |access-date=February 23, 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130220100513/http://www.uspto.gov/dashboards/patents/main.dashxml |archive-date=February 20, 2013 }} December 2012 Patents Data</ref> During the four years since 2009, more than a 50% reduction was achieved. First action pendency was reported as 19.2 months.
Effective in August 2006, the USPTO introduced an [[Petition to make special|accelerated patent examination procedure]] in an effort to allow inventors a speedy evaluation of an application with a final disposition within twelve months. The procedure requires additional information to be submitted with the application and also includes an interview with the examiner.<ref>[http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/accelerated/ USPTO Accelerated Patent Examination]</ref> The first accelerated patent was granted on March 15, 2007 with a 6 month issuance time.<ref>[http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/07-13.htm USPTO grants first patent under accelerated review option] Press Release</ref>


===Fraud by remote working employees===
As of the end of 2008, there were 1,208,076 patent applications pending at the Patent Office. At the end of 1997, the number of pending applications pending was 275,295. Therefore, over those eleven years there was a 439% increase in the number of pending applications.<ref>Gene Quinn, [http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/11/21/how-to-fix-the-uspto/ ''How to Fix the USPTO''], IPWatchdog, November 21, 2008. Consulted on December 6, 2008.</ref>
In 2012, the USPTO initiated an internal investigation into allegations of fraud by employees taking advantage of its [[remote work]] policies. Investigators discovered that some patent examiners had lied about the hours they had worked, but high level officials prevented access to computer records, thus limiting the number of employees who could be punished.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Rein |first1=Lisa |title=Patent office filters out worst telework abuses in report to its watchdog |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/patent-office-filters-out-worst-telework-abuses-in-report-to-watchdog/2014/08/10/cd5f442e-1e4d-11e4-82f9-2cd6fa8da5c4_story.html |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] | date=August 10, 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140812014557/http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/patent-office-filters-out-worst-telework-abuses-in-report-to-watchdog/2014/08/10/cd5f442e-1e4d-11e4-82f9-2cd6fa8da5c4_story.html |archive-date=August 12, 2014}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
{| style="float:right; margin:1em; width:25em; border:1px solid #a0a0a0; padding:10px; background:#f5f5f5; text-align:left;"
{| style="float:right; margin:1em; width:30em; border:1px solid #a0a0a0; padding:10px; background:#f5f5f5; text-align:left;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
|'''Directors of the USPTO'''
|'''Directors of the USPTO'''
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|1. [[List of persons who have headed the United States Patent Office]]
|1. [[List of people who have headed the United States Patent Office]]
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
| ...
| ...
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|u. '''[[Bruce Lehman]]''' (1993–1998)
|r. '''[[Bruce Lehman]]''' (1993–1998)
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|v. '''[[Q. Todd Dickinson]]''' (1998–2001)
|s. '''[[Q. Todd Dickinson]]''' (1998–2001)
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|w. '''[[James E. Rogan]]''' (December 2001 - 2004)
|t. '''[[James E. Rogan]]''' (December 2001 2004)
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|x. '''[[Jon Dudas]]''' (2004 - January 2009)
|u. '''[[Jon Dudas]]''' (2004 January 2009)
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|y. '''[[John J. Doll]]''' (January 2009 - August 2009) (''acting'')
|v. '''[[John J. Doll]]''' (January 2009 August 2009) (''acting'')
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|z. '''[[David Kappos|David J. Kappos]]''' (August 2009–present)
|w. '''[[David J. Kappos]]''' (August 2009 – February 2013)
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|x. '''[[Teresa Stanek Rea]]''' (February 2013 – November 21, 2013) (''acting'')
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|y. '''[[Margaret A. (Peggy) Focarino]]''' (November 21, 2013 – January 12, 2014) (''by delegation'')
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|z. '''[[Michelle K. Lee]]''' (January 13, 2014 – June 6, 2017)
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|aa. '''[[Joseph Matal]]''' (June 7, 2017 – February 8, 2018) (''acting'')<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/executive-biographies/joseph-matal |title=Joseph Matal |access-date=June 15, 2017 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170626070849/https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/executive-biographies/joseph-matal |archive-date=June 26, 2017 }}</ref>
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
|bb. '''[[Andrei Iancu]]''' (February 8, 2018 – January 20, 2021)<ref name=PTO20180208>{{cite news |last1=Fucito |first1=Paul |title=Andrei Iancu Begins Role as New Director of United States Patent and Trademark Office |url=https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/andrei-iancu-begins-role-new-director-united-states-patent-and-trademark |access-date=February 16, 2018 |publisher=U.S. Patent and Trademark Office |date=February 8, 2018 |archive-date=February 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180210180325/https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/andrei-iancu-begins-role-new-director-united-states-patent-and-trademark |url-status=live }}</ref>
|- style="text-align:left; font-size:x-small;"
| cc. [[Kathi Vidal]] (2022–present)
|}
|}


*[[Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences]] (BPAI)
*[[Confederate Patent Office]]
*[[Confederate Patent Office]]
*[[Criticism of the United States government#Criticism of agencies|Criticism of the United States government § Criticism of agencies]]
*[[1877 U.S. Patent Office fire]]
*[[1836 U.S. Patent Office fire]]
*[[Electronic Filing System (USPTO)]]
*[[Electronic Filing System (USPTO)]]
*''[[Ex Parte Quayle]]''
*''[[Ex Parte Quayle]]''
*[[Google Patents]]
*[[Google Patents]]
*[[John Ruggles]]
*[[History of United States patent law]]
*[[Invention Secrecy Act]]
*[[Invention Secrecy Act]]
*[[NASA spinoff]]
*[[NASA spinoff]]
*[[National Inventors Hall of Fame]]
*[[National Inventors Hall of Fame]]
*[[Office of Independent Inventor Programs]] (1999)
*[[Old Patent Office Building]]
*[[Old Patent Office Building]]
*[[Patent office]]
*[[Patent Application Information Retrieval]] (PAIR)
*[[Patent model]]
*[[Patent Office Professional Association]] (POPA)
*[[Patent Office Professional Association]] (POPA)
*[[John Ruggles]]
*[[Science and technology in the United States]]
*[[Science and technology in the United States]]
*[[Technological history of the United States]]
*[[Technological history of the United States]]
*[[Term of patent in the United States]]
*[[Timeline of United States discoveries]]
*[[Timeline of United States discoveries]]
*[[Timeline of United States inventions]]
*[[Timeline of United States inventions]]
*[[Trademark Trial and Appeal Board]] (TTAB)
*[[Trilateral Patent Offices]]
*[[United States patent law]]
*[[Yankee ingenuity]]
*[[Yankee ingenuity]]
*[[1836 U.S. Patent Office fire]]
*[[1877 U.S. Patent Office fire]]


==References and notes==
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|refs=
<ref name="FY 2022">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY22AFR.pdf|title=FY 2022 Agency Financial Report|website=USPTO|access-date=October 25, 2023|archive-date=May 16, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516135105/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY22AFR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
<ref name="FY 2021">{{Cite web|url=https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY21PAR.pdf|title=Performance & Accountability Report FY 2021|website=USPTO|access-date=June 22, 2023|archive-date=June 22, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220622005737/https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTOFY21PAR.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
*{{cite book |title=The Patent Office Pony: A History of the Early Patent Office |first1=Kenneth W. |last1=Dobyns |date=November, 1994 |page=249 |publisher=Sergeant Kirkland's Museum and Historical Society |place=Fredericksburg, Virginia |edition=1st |isbn=0-9632137-4-1}} ISBN 978-0-9632137-4-7
* {{cite book |title=The Patent Office Pony: A History of the Early Patent Office |first1=Kenneth W. |last1=Dobyns |date=November 1994 |page=249 |publisher=Sergeant Kirkland's Museum and Historical Society |place=Fredericksburg, Virginia |edition=1st |isbn=0-9632137-4-1}} {{ISBN|978-0-9632137-4-7}}.
* {{cite web |last=Schacht |first=Wendy H. |title=U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Appropriations Process: A Brief Explanation |url=http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/crs/RS20906_110106.pdf |publisher=Congressional Research Service |access-date=April 22, 2011 |date=January 6, 2011}}


==External links==
==External links==
{{Commons category|United States Patent and Trademark Office}}
* '''USPTO'''
** [http://www.uspto.gov/ Main page]
* {{Official website|https://www.uspto.gov/}}
* [https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/patent-and-trademark-office USPTO] in the [[Federal Register]]
** [http://www.uspto.gov/main/search.html Searches]
* [https://search.uspto.gov/search?query=&op=Search&affiliate=web-sdmg-uspto.gov Searches] (USPTO)
** [http://tarr.uspto.gov/ Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR)] search by trademark serial number or registration number
* [https://tsdr.uspto.gov/ Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR)] search by trademark serial number or registration number (USPTO)
** [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/gcounsel/oed.htm Office of Enrollment & Discipline (OED)]
** [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/ptdl/ Patent and Trademark Depository Library Program]
* [https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/organizational-offices/office-general-counsel/office-enrollment-and-discipline-oed Office of Enrollment & Discipline (OED)]
* [https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/support-centers/patent-and-trademark-resource-centers-ptrcs Patent and Trademark Depository Library Program]
** [http://www.uspto.gov/smallbusiness/ Stopfakes.gov Small Business Resources]
* [https://www.stopfakes.gov/article?id=Small-Business-Administration Stopfakes.gov Small Business Resources]
** [http://patft.uspto.gov/ Patent Full-Text and Full-Page Image Databases]
* [https://search.library.wisc.edu/database/UWI03650 Patent Full-Text and Full-Page Image Databases] (USPTO)
* {{Gutenberg author | id=25489|name=United States Patent Office}}
* {{Internet Archive author |search=("Patent Office" OR "Patent and Trademark Office" OR "USPTO")}}


{{United States Department of Commerce}}
=== Papers ===
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:United States Patent and Trademark Office| ]]
* {{cite web |last=Schacht |first=Wendy H. |title=U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Appropriations Process: A Brief Explanation |url=http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/crs/RS20906_110106.pdf |publisher=Congressional Research Service |accessdate=April 22, 2011 |date=January 6, 2011}}
[[Category:Patent offices]]

{{USDC agencies}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:United States Patent And Trademark Office}}
[[Category:Agencies of the United States government]]
[[Category:Intellectual property organizations]]
[[Category:Intellectual property organizations]]
[[Category:Patent offices]]
[[Category:United States trademark law]]
[[Category:United States trademark law]]
[[Category:Agencies of the United States government]]
[[Category:United States patent law|Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[Category:United States patent law|Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[Category:United States Department of Commerce agencies|Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[Category:United States Department of Commerce agencies|Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[Category:United States Patent and Trademark Office|*]]
[[Category:International Searching and Preliminary Examining Authorities]]

[[de:United States Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[es:Oficina de Patentes y Marcas de Estados Unidos]]
[[fr:United States Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[id:Kantor Paten dan Merek Dagang Amerika Serikat]]
[[it:United States Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[ja:米国特許商標庁]]
[[no:United States Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[pl:Biuro Patentów i Znaków Towarowych USA]]
[[ru:Бюро по регистрации патентов и торговых марок США]]
[[sv:United States Patent and Trademark Office]]
[[ur:USPTO]]
[[zh:美国专利及商标局]]

Latest revision as of 21:38, 19 December 2024

United States Patent and Trademark Office
Seal of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

The James Madison building on the campus of the United States Patent and Trademark Office headquarters in Alexandria. This is the largest building on the campus.
Agency overview
FormedJuly 4, 1836; 188 years ago (1836-07-04)[1][2]
Washington, D.C., U.S.
HeadquartersAlexandria, Virginia, U.S.
38°48′05″N 77°03′50″W / 38.801499°N 77.063835°W / 38.801499; -77.063835
Employees13,103 (as of September 30, 2022)[3]: 20 
Agency executives
  • Derrick Brent, Director (acting)
  • Shirin Bidel-Niyat, Deputy Director (acting)[4]
  • Vaishali Udupa, Commissioner for Patents[5]
  • David S. Gooder, Commissioner for Trademarks[6]
Parent agencyUnited States Department of Commerce
Websitewww.uspto.gov

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is an agency in the U.S. Department of Commerce that serves as the national patent office and trademark registration authority for the United States. The USPTO's headquarters are in Alexandria, Virginia, after a 2005 move from the Crystal City area of neighboring Arlington, Virginia.

The USPTO is "unique among federal agencies because it operates solely on fees collected by its users, and not on taxpayer dollars".[7] Its "operating structure is like a business in that it receives requests for services—applications for patents and trademark registrations—and charges fees projected to cover the cost of performing the services [it] provide[s]".[7][8]

The office is headed by the under secretary of commerce for intellectual property and director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. As of December 2024, Derrick Brent is acting undersecretary and director,[9] having taken on that role upon the resignation of Kathi Vidal on December 13, 2024.[4]

The USPTO cooperates with the European Patent Office (EPO) and the Japan Patent Office (JPO) as one of the Trilateral Patent Offices. The USPTO is also a Receiving Office, an International Searching Authority and an International Preliminary Examination Authority for international patent applications filed in accordance with the Patent Cooperation Treaty.

Mission

[edit]

The legal basis for the United States patent system is the Copyright Clause in Section 8 of Article I of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power to grant patents and copyrights on a national basis. Trademark law, on the other hand, is considered to be authorized by the Commerce Clause.[10]

The Congress shall have Power ... To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

The USPTO maintains a permanent, interdisciplinary historical record of all U.S. patent applications in order to fulfill objectives outlined in the United States Constitution.[7] The PTO's mission is to promote "industrial and technological progress in the United States and strengthen the national economy" by:

  • Administering the laws relating to patents and trademarks;
  • Advising the secretary of commerce, the president of the United States, and the administration on patent, trademark, and copyright protection; and
  • Providing advice on the trade-related aspects of intellectual property.

Structure

[edit]

The USPTO is headquartered at the Alexandria Campus, consisting of 11 buildings in a city-like development surrounded by ground floor retail and high rise residential buildings between the Metro stations of King Street station (the main search building is two blocks due south of the King Street station) and Eisenhower Avenue station where the actual Alexandria Campus is located between Duke Street (on the North) to Eisenhower Avenue (on the South), and between John Carlyle Street (on the East) to Elizabeth Lane (on the West) in Alexandria, Virginia.[11][12][13] An additional building in Arlington, Virginia, was opened in 2009.

The USPTO was expected by 2014 to open its first ever satellite offices in Detroit, Dallas, Denver, and Silicon Valley to reduce backlog and reflect regional industrial strengths.[14] The first satellite office opened in Detroit on July 13, 2012.[15][16][17][18][19] In 2013, due to the budget sequestration, the satellite office for Silicon Valley, which is home to one of the nation's top patent-producing cities, was put on hold.[20] However, renovation and infrastructure updates continued after the sequestration, and the Silicon Valley location opened in the San Jose City Hall in 2015.[21]

As of September 30, 2009, the end of the U.S. government's fiscal year, the PTO had 9,716 employees, nearly all of whom are based at its five-building headquarters complex in Alexandria. Of those, 6,242 were patent examiners (almost all of whom were assigned to examine utility patents; only 99 were assigned to examine design patents) and 388 were trademark examining attorneys; the rest are support staff.[22] While the agency has noticeably grown in recent years, the rate of growth was far slower in fiscal 2009 than in the recent past; this is borne out by data from fiscal 2005 to the present:[22] As of the end of FY 2018, the USPTO was composed of 12,579 federal employees, including 8,185 patent examiners, 579 trademark examiners, and 3,815 other staff.[23]

At end of FY Employees Patent examiners Trademark examining attorneys Patent Filings (Utility) Trademark Filings Patent Application Backlog
2023[24] 13,452[24]: 2,22  8,568[24]: 22  756[24]: 22  594,143[24]: 6  737,018[24]: 7 
2022 13,103[3]: 20  8,509[3]: 20  718[3]: 20  457,510[3]: 22  787,798[3]: 24 
2021 12,963[25]: 2,19,243  8,073[25]: 19,243  662[25]: 19,243  650,703[25]: 38  943,928[25]: 38,223 
2020[26] 12,928 8,434 622 653,311[25]: 38,201  738,112[25]: 38,223 
2019[27] 12,652 9,614 701 666,843[25]: 38,201  673,233[25]: 38,223 
2018[28] 12,579 8,185 579 647,572[25]: 38,201  594,107[25]: 38 
2017[29] 12,588 8,147 549 650,350[25]: 38,201  530,270[25]: 38  526,579
2016[30] 12,725 8,351 570 650,411 530,270 537,655
2015[31] 12,667 9,161 456 618,062[30] 503,889[30] 553,221[30]
2014[32] 12,450 9,302 429 618,457[30] 455,017[30]
2013[33] 11,773 8,051 409 601,464[30] 433,654[30]
2012[34] 11,531 7,935 386 565,406 415,026 608,283
2011[35] 10,210 6,780 378 536,604 398,667
2010[36] 9,507 6,225 378 509,367 368,939 726,331
2009[37] 9,716 6,243 388 485,500 352,051 750,596
2008[38] 9,518 6,055 398 495,095 401,392 750,596
2007[39] 8,913 5,477 404 467,243 394,368
2006[40] 4,779 413
2005 4,177[40] 357[40]
2004 3,681[40] 286[40]
2003 3,579[40] 256[40]
1998[41] 5,300
1996[42][43][44] 189,979[43] 200,640[44]
1995[45] 221,304 175,307
1994[46] 186,126 155,376
1993[46] 174,553 139,735
1992[46] 172,539 125,237
1986 120,988[43] 69,253[44]
1976 101,807[43] 37,074[44]

Patent examiners make up the bulk of the employees at USPTO. They hold degrees in various scientific disciplines, but do not necessarily hold law degrees. Unlike patent examiners, trademark examiners must be licensed attorneys.[citation needed]

All examiners work under a strict, "count"-based production system.[47] For every application, "counts" are earned by composing, filing, and mailing a first office action on the merits, and upon disposal of an application.

Prior to 2012, decisions of patent examiners could be appealed to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, an administrative law body of the USPTO. Decisions of the BPAI could further be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or a civil suit could be brought against the Commissioner of Patents in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.[48] The United States Supreme Court may ultimately decide on a patent case. Under the America Invents Act, the BPAI was converted to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or "PTAB".[49] Similarly, decisions of trademark examiners could be appealed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with subsequent appeals directed to the Federal Circuit, or a civil action may also be brought.

Management

[edit]

In October 2021, President Joe Biden nominated attorney Kathi Vidal to serve as the USPTO director.[50] She was sworn in on April 13, 2022.[51] On December 16, 2022, Kathi Vidal announced that Vaishali Udupa,[52] an intellectual property attorney, engineer, and currently a top executive from Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), will join the 13,000-person Department of Commerce agency as the new commissioner for patents effective January 17, 2023.[53]

Fee diversion

[edit]

For many years, Congress has "diverted" about 10% of the fees that the USPTO collected into the general treasury of the United States. In effect, this took money collected from the patent system to use for the general budget. This fee diversion has been generally opposed by patent practitioners (e.g., patent attorneys and patent agents), inventors, the USPTO,[54] as well as former federal judge Paul R. Michel.[55] These stakeholders would rather use the funds to improve the patent office and patent system, such as by implementing the USPTO's 21st Century Strategic Plan.[56] The last six annual budgets of the George W. Bush administration did not propose to divert any USPTO fees, and the first budget of the Barack Obama administration continued this practice,[57] as well as the second budget of the Trump administration;[58] however, stakeholders continue to press for a permanent end to fee diversion.[59]

The discussion of which party can appropriate the fees is more than a financial question. Patent fees represent a policy lever that influences both the number of applications submitted to the office as well as their quality.[60][61]

Patents

[edit]
First United States patent
The National Inventors Hall of Fame is housed in the Madison Building of the USPTO.
  • On July 31, 1790, the first U.S. patent was issued to Samuel Hopkins for an improvement "in the making of Pot ash and Pearl ash by a new Apparatus and Process". This patent was signed by then-President George Washington.
  • The X-Patents (the first 9,957 (approximately),[62] issued between 1790 and 1836) were destroyed by a fire; fewer than 3,000 of those have been recovered and re-issued with numbers that include an "X". The X generally appears at the end of the numbers hand-written on full-page patent images; however, in patent collections and for search purposes, the X is considered to be the patent type – analogous to the "D" of design patents – and appears at the beginning of the number. The X distinguishes the patents from those issued after the fire, which began again with patent number 1.
  • Each year, the PTO issues over 150,000 patents to companies and individuals worldwide. As of December 2011, the PTO had granted 8,743,423 patents and received 16,020,302 applications.[63]
  • On June 19, 2018, the 10 millionth U.S. patent was issued to Joseph Marron for invention of a "Coherent LADAR [System] Using Intra-Pixel Quadrature Detection" to improve laser detection and ranging (LADAR).[64] The patent was the first to receive the newly redesigned patent cover. It was signed by then-President Donald Trump during a special ceremony at the Oval Office.[65]
  • In February 2024, the USPTO issued a new guideline relating to obtaining a patent as per earlier recommendation by Biden's administration. The guideline states that; to obtain a patent, a real person, not AI, must have made a “significant contribution” to the invention and that only a human being can be named as an inventor on a patent.[66]

List of millionth US patents

[edit]
Patents issued under revised numbering scheme of the Patent Act of 1836
Patent Number Patent Title Issue Date Days Since Last
Millionth Issue
1[67] Traction Wheels July 13, 1836
1,000,000[68] Vehicle Tire August 8, 1911 27,419
2,000,000[69] Vehicle Wheel Construction May 12, 1932 7,583
3,000,000[70] Automatic Reading System May 6, 1955 8,394
4,000,000[71] Process for Recycling Asphalt-Aggregate Compositions December 28, 1976 7,907
5,000,000[72] Ethanol Production by Escherichia Coli Strains March 19, 1991 5,194
6,000,000[73] Extendible Method and Apparatus for Synchronizing Multiple Files on Two Different Computer Systems December 7, 1999 3,185
7,000,000[74] Polysaccharide Fibers February 14, 2006 2,261
8,000,000[75] Visual Prosthesis August 16, 2011 2,009
9,000,000[76] Windshield Washer Conditioner April 7, 2015 1,330
10,000,000[77] Coherent Ladar Using Intra-Pixel Quadrature Detection June 19, 2018 1,169
11,000,000[78] Repositioning Wires and Methods for Repositioning Prosthetic Heart Valve Devices within a Heart Chamber May 11, 2021 1,057
12,000,000[79] Labeled Nucleotide Analogs, Reaction Mixtures, and Methods and System for Sequencing June 4, 2024 1,120

Bar chart

[edit]
Days since last millionth patent filed at the USPTO

Trademarks

[edit]

The USPTO examines applications for trademark registration, which can be filed under five different filing bases: use in commerce, intent to use, foreign application, foreign registration, or international registration.[80] If approved, the trademarks are registered on either the Principal Register or the Supplemental Register, depending upon whether the mark meets the appropriate distinctiveness criteria. This federal system governs goods and services distributed via interstate commerce, and operates alongside state level trademark registration systems.[81][82][83]

Trademark applications have grown substantially in recent years, jumping from 296,490 new applications in 2000,[84] to 345,000 new applications in 2014, to 458,103 new applications in 2018.[85] Recent growth has been driven partially by growing numbers of trademark applications originating in China; trademark applications from China have grown more than 12-fold since 2013, and in 2017, one in every nine trademark applications reviewed by the U.S. Trademark Office originated in China.[86]

Since 2008, the Trademark Office has hosted a National Trademark Expo every two years, billing it as "a free, family-friendly event designed to educate the public about trademarks and their importance in the global marketplace."[87] The Expo features celebrity speakers such as Anson Williams (of the television show Happy Days)[88] and basketball player Kareem Abdul-Jabbar[89] and has numerous trademark-holding companies as exhibitors. Before the 2009 National Trademark Expo, the Trademark Office designed and launched a kid-friendly trademark mascot known as T. Markey, who appears as an anthropomorphized registered trademark symbol.[90] T. Markey is featured prominently on the Kids section of the USPTO website, alongside fellow IP mascots Ms. Pat Pending (with her robot cat GeaRS) and Mark Trademan.[91]

In 2020, trademark applications marked the sharpest declines and inclines in American history. During the spring, COVID-19 lockdowns led to reduced filings, which then increased in July 2020 to exceed the previous year. August 2020 was subsequently the highest month of trademark filings in the history of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.[92]

Representation

[edit]

The USPTO only allows certain qualified persons to practice before the USPTO. Practice includes filing of patent and trademark applications on behalf of individuals and companies, prosecuting the patent and trademark applications, and participating in administrative appeals and other proceedings before the PTO examiners, examining attorneys and boards. The USPTO sets its own standards for who may practice. Any person who practices patent law before the USPTO must become a registered patent attorney or agent. A patent agent is a person who has passed the USPTO registration examination (the "patent bar") but has not passed any state bar exam to become a licensed attorney; a patent attorney is a person who has passed both a state bar and the patent bar and is in good standing as an attorney.[93] A patent agent can only act in a representative capacity in patent matters presented to the USPTO, and may not represent a patent holder or applicant in a court of law. To be eligible for taking the patent bar exam, a candidate must possess a degree in "engineering or physical science or the equivalent of such a degree".[93] Any person who practices trademark law before the USPTO must be an active member in good standing of the highest court of any state.[94]

The United States allows any citizen from any country to sit for the patent bar (if he/she has the requisite technical background).[95] Only Canada has a reciprocity agreement with the United States that confers upon a patent agent similar rights.[96]

An unrepresented inventor may file a patent application and prosecute it on his or her own behalf (pro se). If it appears to a patent examiner that an inventor filing a pro se application is not familiar with the proper procedures of the Patent Office, the examiner may suggest that the filing party obtain representation by a registered patent attorney or patent agent.[97] The patent examiner cannot recommend a specific attorney or agent, but the Patent Office does post a list of those who are registered.[98]

While the inventor of a relatively simple-to-describe invention may well be able to produce an adequate specification and detailed drawings, there remains language complexity in what is claimed, either in the particular claim language of a utility application, or in the manner in which drawings are presented in a design application. There is also skill required when searching for prior art that is used to support the application and to prevent applying for a patent for something that may be unpatentable. A patent examiner will make special efforts to help pro se inventors understand the process but the failure to adequately understand or respond to an office action from the USPTO can endanger the inventor's rights, and may lead to abandonment of the application.

Electronic filing system

[edit]

The USPTO accepts patent applications filed in electronic form. Inventors or their patent agents/attorneys can file applications as Adobe PDF documents. Filing fees can be paid by credit card or by a USPTO "deposit account".

Patent search tools

[edit]
The lobby of the Public Search Facility, looking out toward the atrium, inside the Madison Building of the USPTO. The bronze bust of Thomas Jefferson is at the far right. Researchers can access patent search databases within the facility.

The USPTO web site provides free electronic copies of issued patents and patent applications as multiple-page TIFF (graphic) documents. The site also provides Boolean search and analysis tools.[99]

The USPTO's free distribution service only distributes the patent documents as a set of TIFF files.[100] Numerous free and commercial services provide patent documents in other formats, such as Adobe PDF and CPC.

Criticisms

[edit]

The USPTO has been criticized for granting patents for impossible or absurd, already known, or arguably obvious inventions.[101] Economists have documented that, although the USPTO makes mistakes when granting patents, these mistakes might be less prominent than some might believe.[102]

Controversial patents

[edit]
  • U.S. patent 5,443,036, "Method of exercising a cat", covers having a cat chase the beam from a laser pointer. The patent has been criticized as being obvious.[103][104]
  • U.S. patent 6,004,596, "Sealed crustless sandwich", issued in 1999, covers the design of a sandwich with crimped edges.[103][105] All claims of the patent were canceled by the PTO upon reexamination.[106]
  • U.S. patent 6,025,810, "Hyper-light-speed antenna", an antenna that sends signals faster than the speed of light.[101] According to the description in the patent, "The present invention takes a transmission of energy, and instead of sending it through normal time and space, it pokes a small hole into another dimension, thus, sending the energy through a place which allows transmission of energy to exceed the speed of light."[107]
  • U.S. patent 6,368,227, "Method of swinging on a swing", issued April 9, 2002,[108][109] was granted to a seven-year-old boy, whose father, a patent attorney, wanted to demonstrate how the patent system worked to his son who was five years old at the time of the application. The PTO initially rejected it due to prior art, but eventually issued the patent.[108] Upon reexamination all claims of the patent were canceled by the PTO.[110]
  • U.S. patent 6,960,975, "Space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state", describes an anti-gravity device. In November 2005, the USPTO was criticized by physicists for granting it. The journal Nature first highlighted this patent issued for a device that presumably amounts to a perpetual motion machine, defying the laws of physics.[111][112][113][114] The device comprises a particular electrically superconducting shield and electromagnetic generating device. The examiner allowed the claims because the design of the shield and device was novel and not obvious.[115] In situations such as this where a substantial question of patentability is raised after a patent is issued, the Commissioner of the Patent Office can order a reexamination of the patent.

Controversial trademarks

[edit]

Slow patent examination and backlog

[edit]
U.S. patents granted, 1790–2010.[119]
More U.S. utility patents have been issued in the most recent thirty years than in the first 200 years in which they were issued (1790–1990).

The USPTO has been criticized for taking an inordinate amount of time in examining patent applications. This is particularly true in the fast-growing area[needs update] of business method patents. As of 2005, patent examiners in the business method area were still examining patent applications filed in 2001.[citation needed]

The delay was attributed by spokesmen for the Patent Office to a combination of a sudden increase in business method patent filings after the 1998 State Street Bank decision, the unfamiliarity of patent examiners with the business and financial arts (e.g., banking, insurance, stock trading etc.), and the issuance of a number of controversial patents (e.g., U.S. patent 5,960,411 "Amazon one click patent") in the business method area.

Effective August 2006, the USPTO introduced an accelerated patent examination procedure in an effort to allow inventors a speedy evaluation of an application with a final disposition within twelve months. The procedure requires additional information to be submitted with the application and also includes an interview with the examiner.[120] The first accelerated patent was granted on March 15, 2007, with a six-month issuance time.[121]

As of the end of 2008, there were 1,208,076 patent applications pending at the Patent Office. At the end of 1997, the number of applications pending was 275,295. Therefore, over those eleven years there was a 439% increase in the number of pending applications.[122]

December 2012 data showed that there was 597,579 unexamined patent applications in the backlog.[123] During the four years since 2009, more than a 50% reduction was achieved. First action pendency was reported as 19.2 months.

Fraud by remote working employees

[edit]

In 2012, the USPTO initiated an internal investigation into allegations of fraud by employees taking advantage of its remote work policies. Investigators discovered that some patent examiners had lied about the hours they had worked, but high level officials prevented access to computer records, thus limiting the number of employees who could be punished.[124]

See also

[edit]
Directors of the USPTO
1. List of people who have headed the United States Patent Office
...
r. Bruce Lehman (1993–1998)
s. Q. Todd Dickinson (1998–2001)
t. James E. Rogan (December 2001 – 2004)
u. Jon Dudas (2004 – January 2009)
v. John J. Doll (January 2009 – August 2009) (acting)
w. David J. Kappos (August 2009 – February 2013)
x. Teresa Stanek Rea (February 2013 – November 21, 2013) (acting)
y. Margaret A. (Peggy) Focarino (November 21, 2013 – January 12, 2014) (by delegation)
z. Michelle K. Lee (January 13, 2014 – June 6, 2017)
aa. Joseph Matal (June 7, 2017 – February 8, 2018) (acting)[125]
bb. Andrei Iancu (February 8, 2018 – January 20, 2021)[126]
cc. Kathi Vidal (2022–present)

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Records of the Patent and Trademark office". National Archives and Records Administration. August 15, 2016.
  2. ^ An act to promote the progress of the useful arts, and to repeal all acts and parts of acts heretofore made for that purpose, ch. 356, 5 Stat. 117 (1836)
  3. ^ a b c d e f "FY 2022 Agency Financial Report" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved October 25, 2023.
  4. ^ a b Schliep, Theresa (December 16, 2024). "USPTO Chief Of Staff Steps Up To Acting Deputy Director - Law360". Law 360. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  5. ^ "Vaishali Udupa". U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Retrieved December 18, 2023.
  6. ^ "David S. Gooder". U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Retrieved December 18, 2023.
  7. ^ a b c Bohle, Shannon (February 2014). "A Four Part Series on Open Notebook Science (Part 4)". Nature.com. Archived from the original on February 19, 2014. Retrieved February 19, 2014.
  8. ^ "USPTO 2014–2018 Strategic Plan" (PDF). United States Patent and Trademark Office. February 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 22, 2014. Retrieved February 19, 2014.
  9. ^ "Derrick Brent: Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office". U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  10. ^ "The United States Constitution". The U.S. National Archives. January 2014. Archived from the original on January 25, 2014. Retrieved February 19, 2014.
  11. ^ "USPTO Campus". usptocareers.gov. Archived from the original on October 14, 2012. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  12. ^ Public Information Services Group (September 27, 2009). "Visiting the USPTO – Map – Alexandria Headquarters". USPTO. Archived from the original on January 8, 2015. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  13. ^ "USPTO Alexandria Campus". USPTO. Archived from the original on April 29, 2017. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  14. ^ "Silicon Valley wins in securing U.S. patent office". SFGate. July 4, 2012. Archived from the original on November 13, 2017. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  15. ^ "Patent Reform Act of 2011 Amendment" (pdf). Congressional Record 112th Congress (2011–2012). Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2012. Retrieved March 5, 2011.
  16. ^ "USPTO to Open First Ever Satellite Office in Detroit" (pdf) (Press release). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. December 16, 2010. Archived from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  17. ^ Anders, Melissa (July 13, 2012). "Detroit beats Silicon Valley in opening first-ever patent office outside Washington, D.C." MLive.com. Archived from the original on July 19, 2012. Retrieved July 13, 2012.
  18. ^ Markowitz, Eric (March 1, 2012). "What Does a Patent Office Mean For Detroit?". Inc.com. Archived from the original on May 22, 2012. Retrieved July 10, 2012.
  19. ^ "Patent office prepares to open Detroit location". The Detroit News. Detroit, Michigan. Associated Press. July 11, 2012. Retrieved July 11, 2012.[permanent dead link]
  20. ^ "Silicon Valley Patent Office Shelved". NPR. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 22, 2013. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
  21. ^ Office, Silicon Valley Regional. "Silicon Valley U.S. Patent and Trademark Office". United States Patent and Trademark Office. Archived from the original on January 8, 2015. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  22. ^ a b "USPTO Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2009" (PDF). United States Patent and Trademark Office. p. 140. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 3, 2011. Retrieved January 16, 2010.
  23. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 17" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 15, 2019. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  24. ^ a b c d e f "Agency Financial Report" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 28, 2024. Retrieved September 26, 2024.
  25. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2021" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 22, 2022. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  26. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2020" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  27. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2019" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  28. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2018" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  29. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2017" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  30. ^ a b c d e f g h "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2016" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  31. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2015" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  32. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2014" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  33. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2013" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  34. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2012" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  35. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2011" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 1, 2022. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  36. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2010" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  37. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2009" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  38. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2008" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  39. ^ "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2007" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  40. ^ a b c d e f g "Performance & Accountability Report FY 2006" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  41. ^ "PTO at a glance / Acknowledgements". USPTO. Archived from the original on July 4, 2022. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  42. ^ "1996 Annual Review - Additional Information". USPTO. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  43. ^ a b c d "Table 2. Patent Applications Filed". USPTO. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  44. ^ a b c d "Table 17. Trademark Applications Filed". USPTO. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  45. ^ "Setting The Course For Our Future - A Patent and Trademark Office Review - Fiscal Year 1995" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  46. ^ a b c "Working for Our Customers - A Patent and Trademark Office Review - Fiscal Year 1994" (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  47. ^ "1705 Examiner Docket, Time, and Activity Recordation [R-5] – 1700 Miscellaneous". United States Patent and Trademark Office. Archived from the original on May 28, 2010. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
  48. ^ 35 U.S.C. § 145.
  49. ^ Kappos, David (September 18, 2012). "PTAB Submissions Have Commenced". USPTO. Archived from the original on May 13, 2017. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  50. ^ Brittain, Blake (October 26, 2021). "Biden nominates Winston & Strawn partner Kathi Vidal to lead USPTO". Reuters.
  51. ^ "USPTO Welcomes New Director Kathi Vidal". United States Patent and Trademark Office. April 13, 2022. Retrieved April 13, 2022.
  52. ^ "Office of the Commissioner for Patents". January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2023.
  53. ^ "Vaishali Udupa to join USPTO as new Commissioner for Patents". United States Patent and Trademark Office. December 16, 2022. Archived from the original on December 16, 2022. Retrieved June 29, 2024.
  54. ^ "President's proposed budget ends USPTO fee diversion in FY 2005" (Press release). United States Patent and Trademark Office. February 2, 2004. Archived from the original on January 6, 2007. Retrieved November 24, 2006.
  55. ^ Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform Archived August 20, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Intellectual Property Watch, July 19, 2011. Consulted on August 8, 2011.
  56. ^ "Strategic Plan for the 21st Century". United States Patent and Trademark Office. February 24, 2006. Archived from the original on December 25, 2006. Retrieved November 24, 2006.
  57. ^ Zuhn, Donald (May 20, 2009). "Docs at BIO: Panel Offers Suggestions for Fixing the USPTO – Updated". PatentDocs.org. Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved May 24, 2009.
  58. ^ "USPTO gets $3.6 billion in President's FY 2018 budget, avoids fee diversion". IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. May 23, 2017. Retrieved May 27, 2022.
  59. ^ "Diversion of USPTO user fees is a tax on innovation". IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. May 17, 2016. Retrieved May 27, 2022.
  60. ^ de Rassenfosse, Gaétan; van Pottelsberghe, Bruno (2012). "On the price elasticity of demand for patents" (PDF). Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 74 (1): 58–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00638.x. S2CID 43660064. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 9, 2017. Retrieved February 16, 2021.
  61. ^ de Rassenfosse, Gaétan; Jaffe, Adam (2018). "Are patent fees effective at weeding out low-quality patents?" (PDF). Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 27 (1): 134–148. doi:10.1111/jems.12219. S2CID 158435358.
  62. ^ "Anniversary of the First Patent Issued in the United States".
  63. ^ "U.S. Patent Activity Calendar Years 1790 to the Present". United States Patent and Trademark Office. December 12, 2012. Archived from the original on December 2, 2012. Retrieved December 12, 2012.
  64. ^ "United States Issues Patent Number 10,000,000". June 19, 2018. Archived from the original on June 19, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
  65. ^ @uspto (June 19, 2018). "Today, @POTUS signed patent ten..." (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  66. ^ Fung, Brian (February 14, 2024). "Only real people, not AI, can patent inventions, US government says | CNN Business". CNN. Retrieved February 15, 2024.
  67. ^ "First U.S. Patent: Traction Wheels" (pdf). ppubs.uspto.gov/. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
  68. ^ "Millionth U.S. Patent: Vehicle Tire" (pdf). ppubs.uspto.gov/. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
  69. ^ "2 Millionths U.S. Patent: Vehicle Wheel Construction" (pdf). ppubs.uspto.gov/. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
  70. ^ "3 Millionth U.S. Patent: Automatic Reading System" (pdf). ppubs.uspto.gov/. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
  71. ^ "4 Millionth U.S. Patent: Process for Recycling Asphalt-Aggregate Compositions" (pdf). ppubs.uspto.gov/. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
  72. ^ "5 Millionth U.S. Patent: Ethanol Production by Escherichia Coli Strains". ppubs.uspto.gov/.
  73. ^ "6 Millionth U.S. Patent: Extendible Method and Apparatus for Synchronizing Multiple Files on Two Different Computer Systems". ppubs.uspto.gov/.
  74. ^ "7 Millionth U.S. Patent: Polysaccharide Fibers". ppubs.uspto.gov/.
  75. ^ "8 Millionth U.S. Patent: Visual Prosthesis". ppubs.uspto.gov/.
  76. ^ "9 Millionth U.S. Patent: Windshield Washer Conditioner". ppubs.uspto.gov/.
  77. ^ "10 Millionth U.S. Patent: Coherent Ladar Using Intra-Pixel Quadrature Detection". ppubs.uspto.gov/.
  78. ^ "11 Millionth U.S. Patent: Repositioning Wires and Methods for Repositioning Prosthetic Heart Valve Devices within a Heart Chamber". ppubs.uspto.gov/.
  79. ^ "12 Millionth U.S. Patent: Labeled Nucleotide Analogs, Reaction Mixtures, and Methods and System for Sequencing". ppubs.uspto.gov/.
  80. ^ Trademarks. "Basis for Filing". USPTO. Archived from the original on January 15, 2019. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  81. ^ "State Trademark Information". FindLaw For Small Business. February 11, 2008. Archived from the original on March 2, 2008. Retrieved February 11, 2008.
  82. ^ "Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)". United States Patent and Trademark Office. February 11, 2008. Archived from the original on September 3, 2010. Retrieved February 11, 2008. Note: click on "Trademarks" then click on "TESS" tab.
  83. ^ "Trademark FAQs". United States Patent and Trademark Office. Archived from the original on September 12, 2015. Retrieved September 14, 2015.
  84. ^ "USPTO Annual Report FY2000" (PDF). USPTO.gov. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 24, 2018. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  85. ^ Erik (January 6, 2019). "USPTO received more than 458,000 trademark applications in 2018 – a new record, but slower growth". Erik M Pelton & Associates, PLLC. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  86. ^ Gershman, Jacob (May 5, 2018). "Flood of Trademark Applications From China Alarms U.S. Officials". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  87. ^ Trademarks. "About the USPTO's National Trademark Exposition". USPTO. Archived from the original on January 15, 2019. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  88. ^ Trademarks. "2014 National Trademark Expo". USPTO. Archived from the original on January 15, 2019. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  89. ^ "2018 National Trademark Exposition". USPTO. Archived from the original on January 15, 2019. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  90. ^ Cushing, Tim (December 4, 2014). "USPTO Acts Like A Three-Letter Agency, Redacts A Bunch Of Stuff About Its Kid-Friendly 'T. Markey' Character". Techdirt. Archived from the original on January 15, 2019. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  91. ^ "USPTO Kids". USPTO. Archived from the original on December 3, 2018. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  92. ^ "USPTO Director Andrei Iancu speaks on pandemic's effect on intellectual property". americanbar.org. American Bar Association. October 30, 2020. Archived from the original on October 11, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  93. ^ a b "General Information Concerning Patents: Attorneys and Agents". United States Patent and Trademark Office. Archived from the original on January 23, 2010. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
  94. ^ "Becoming a trademark practitioner". United States Patent and Trademark Office. USPTO. Archived from the original on December 6, 2018. Retrieved December 5, 2018.
  95. ^ "37 CFR 11.7 – Requirements for registration". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  96. ^ "Decision on Petition Under 37 C.F.R. § 10.2(c)" (PDF). May 9, 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2010. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
  97. ^ Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, Chapter 400 Archived November 27, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  98. ^ "Patent Attorney/Agent Search". Office of Enrollment and Discipline, United States Patent and Trademark Office. Archived from the original on October 15, 2011. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  99. ^ Nowotarski, Mark, "Searching the USPTO patent database", Insurance IP Bulletin, February 2012 Archived March 9, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  100. ^ "PatFT Full-Text Images". USPTO. Archived from the original on September 1, 2013. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  101. ^ a b Philip E. Ross, Patently Absurd Archived July 29, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, Forbes.com, May 29, 2000.
  102. ^ de Rassenfosse, Gaetan; Griffiths, William; Jaffe, Adam; Webster, Elizabeth (2020). "Low-Quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners". Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 37 (3): 607–636. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewaa026.
  103. ^ a b Hal H. Varian (October 21, 2004). "Patent Protection Gone Awry". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 28, 2015.
  104. ^ Lauren Weinstein (October 21, 2002). "Stop the Patent Process Madness". Wired News. Archived from the original on January 19, 2014.
  105. ^ Sara Schaefer Muñoz (April 5, 2005). "Patent No. 6,004,596: Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on July 10, 2017.
  106. ^ Reexamination certificate no. US 6,004,596 C1, September 25, 2007, retrieved from USPTO Public Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) Archived January 14, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, December 1, 2008 (request PAIR entry for Reexamination Control Number 90/005949 as "Application Number").
  107. ^ U.S. patent 6,025,810, col. 1, lines 30–34.
  108. ^ a b Jeff Hecht (April 17, 2002). "Boy takes swing at US patents". New Scientist. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011.
  109. ^ Teresa Riordan (May 13, 2002). "Patents; The Patent Office faces huge backlogs, extremely technical inventions, and absurd ones". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 16, 2017.
  110. ^ Reexamination certificate no. US 6,368,227 C1, July 1, 2003, retrieved from USPTO Public Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) Archived January 14, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, August 22, 2008
  111. ^ Ball, Philip (November 10, 2005). "Antigravity craft slips past patent officers". Nature. 438 (7065): 139. Bibcode:2005Natur.438Q.139B. doi:10.1038/438139a. PMID 16280998.
  112. ^ United Press International (2005). "Patent issued for anti-gravity device". Phyorg.com. Archived from the original on December 10, 2006. Retrieved November 24, 2006.
  113. ^ Brian Handwerk (November 11, 2005). "Antigravity Machine Patent Draws Physicists' Ire". National Geographic News. Archived from the original on November 14, 2006. Retrieved November 24, 2006.
  114. ^ An untraceable link was also included here as an additional reference.[full citation needed] Archived December 4, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  115. ^ Ramon M Barrera (examiner) (June 7, 2005). "Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)" (PDF). 11/079,670 Space Vehicle Propelled by the Pressure of Inflationary Vacuum State. United States Patent and Trademark Office. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 1, 2016. Retrieved September 5, 2014. Note: Navigate to the 'Image File Wrapper' to find the file; download and open with a PDF reader. The specific passage from the document follows: "The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: None of the prior art of record taught or disclosed the claimed superconducting shield and electromagnetic field generating means structure."
  116. ^ Shah, Agam. "Dell Tries to Trademark 'cloud Computing'". cio.com. Archived from the original on April 16, 2014. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  117. ^ "Dell Cloud Computing Trademark Rejected". eweek.com. August 19, 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  118. ^ "A netbook by any other name, or how Psion is going discover you have to use it or lose it". Archived from the original on February 5, 2009.
  119. ^ U.S. Patent Activity 1790 to the Present, USPTO, archived from the original on December 2, 2012.
  120. ^ "Accelerated Examination". USPTO. Archived from the original on September 16, 2009. Retrieved May 6, 2018.
  121. ^ USPTO grants first patent under accelerated review option Archived April 28, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Press Release
  122. ^ Gene Quinn, How to Fix the USPTO Archived March 27, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, IPWatchdog, November 21, 2008. Consulted on December 6, 2008.
  123. ^ "United States Patent and Trademark Office". Archived from the original on February 20, 2013. Retrieved February 23, 2013. December 2012 Patents Data
  124. ^ Rein, Lisa (August 10, 2014). "Patent office filters out worst telework abuses in report to its watchdog". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 12, 2014.
  125. ^ "Joseph Matal". Archived from the original on June 26, 2017. Retrieved June 15, 2017.
  126. ^ Fucito, Paul (February 8, 2018). "Andrei Iancu Begins Role as New Director of United States Patent and Trademark Office". U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Archived from the original on February 10, 2018. Retrieved February 16, 2018.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]