Talk:Whale oil: Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Cetaceans}}, {{WikiProject Technology}}. Tag: |
|||
(17 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
⚫ | |||
{{reqphoto|energy subjects|animals}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Technology}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{American English}} |
|||
== Smell == |
== Smell == |
||
Does whale oil smell bad when burned? Is it smokeless as I've heard someone claim? Please respond. I'm curious. |
Does whale oil smell bad when burned? Is it smokeless as I've heard someone claim? Please respond. I'm curious. |
||
== Norwegian == |
== Norwegian == |
||
We should erase the Norwegian link, as it refers to "Tran", which is cod liver oil, not anything extracted from whales. It should direct to "Hvalolje" in Norwegian. --[[User:Henrik46|Henrik46]] ([[User talk:Henrik46|talk]]) 02:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC) |
We should erase the Norwegian link, as it refers to "Tran", which is cod liver oil, not anything extracted from whales. It should direct to "Hvalolje" in Norwegian. --[[User:Henrik46|Henrik46]] ([[User talk:Henrik46|talk]]) 02:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
yes <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.159.66.254|212.159.66.254]] ([[User talk:212.159.66.254|talk]]) 08:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
yes <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.159.66.254|212.159.66.254]] ([[User talk:212.159.66.254|talk]]) 08:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
==Hubble Space Telescope== |
==Hubble Space Telescope== |
||
The sensationalist History Channel documentary "America:The Story of Us" in episode 4 makes the breathless claim that the Hubble Space Telescope "runs" on whale oil. I don't know if they just meant that some parts are lubed with it, but they said "run" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.249.51.220|98.249.51.220]] ([[User talk:98.249.51.220|talk]]) 04:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The sensationalist History Channel documentary "America:The Story of Us" in episode 4 makes the breathless claim that the Hubble Space Telescope "runs" on whale oil. I don't know if they just meant that some parts are lubed with it, but they said "run" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.249.51.220|98.249.51.220]] ([[User talk:98.249.51.220|talk]]) 04:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:I did a bit of research into this after seeing this documentary. The [https://twitter.com/NASA_Hubble/status/13322397664 official word from NASA] is that Hubble contains no whale oil, as far as the Hubble chief engineer knows. It may be used in small quantities for lubricant, but all of the documentation that would confirm this would be in paper documents at NASA; as far as I know nobody has actually gone to NASA to research this. The only other sources I've found for this assertion are various websites of dubious validity. — [[User:Wolfgang42|Wolfgang42]] ([[User talk:Wolfgang42|talk]]) 20:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Train Oil == |
== Train Oil == |
||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
== Another lit ref to whale-oil == |
== Another lit ref to whale-oil == |
||
Lit ref 'whale oil' it is referred to in 'The Pied Piper of Hamelin' (Robert Browning 'Dramatic Lyrics'1842) Ln 133 when the rats imagine they hear "... a drwing of corks of trai-oil flasks." <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.172.50.157|86.172.50.157]] ([[User talk:86.172.50.157|talk]]) 10:45, 4 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Lit ref 'whale oil' it is referred to in 'The Pied Piper of Hamelin' (Robert Browning 'Dramatic Lyrics'1842) Ln 133 when the rats imagine they hear "... a drwing of corks of trai-oil flasks." <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.172.50.157|86.172.50.157]] ([[User talk:86.172.50.157|talk]]) 10:45, 4 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Chemistry == |
== Chemistry == |
||
The article states that for the glyceride portions of whale oil "most of the fatty acids in these triglycerides are located at the 1- and 3- positions on the glycerol molecule." The statement is confusing because triglycerides by definition have 3 fatty acids, hence the -tri prefix, taking all three positions on the glycerol. |
The article states that for the glyceride portions of whale oil "most of the fatty acids in these triglycerides are located at the 1- and 3- positions on the glycerol molecule." The statement is confusing because triglycerides by definition have 3 fatty acids, hence the -tri prefix, taking all three positions on the glycerol. |
||
[[User:Zimmsky|Zimmsky]] ([[User talk:Zimmsky|talk]]) 21:36, 26 December 2012 (UTC) |
[[User:Zimmsky|Zimmsky]] ([[User talk:Zimmsky|talk]]) 21:36, 26 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
:My apologies, this was an embarrassing mistake.[[User:Kurzon|Kurzon]] ([[User talk:Kurzon|talk]]) 14:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC) |
:My apologies, this was an embarrassing mistake.[[User:Kurzon|Kurzon]] ([[User talk:Kurzon|talk]]) 14:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
== No uses? == |
|||
If Whale oil is inferior in every way to modern alternatives, as this article seems to be written to state, then why was environmental regulations necessary? Is there really no usage that the oil is superior in? I've been lead to believe that it is better for delicate machinery but I don't have any citations.--[[User:Drewder|Drewder]] ([[User talk:Drewder|talk]]) 19:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Actually there is a large scale usage of whale oil. But that is something very troublesome and you will find absolutely no official sources on this on the internet --- please try. Whale ois is used as a lubricant in applications in space and the particular man-made environments where the ionizing radiation is present. It doesn't try out there unlike the synthetic oils. I am sorry that I have to announce this as a dogmatic truth. But I have no option. Please do the deductive reasoning with the premises we do know about the whale oil and the ionizing radiation. And note that the deduction will result a valid, logically certain conclusion even without any external document of the actual usage. All yours, sincerely. [[Special:Contributions/91.154.29.13|91.154.29.13]] ([[User talk:91.154.29.13|talk]]) 11:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::It is also an excellent lubricant for whales, and prevents them from squeaking. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.61.153.75|68.61.153.75]] ([[User talk:68.61.153.75|talk]]) 03:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Natural fats in general outperform petroleum and synthetics for [[boundary lubrication.]] I'm a mechanical engineer and chemistry isn't my strong suit, but my understanding is that the polar fatty acids cling to surfaces better than simple hydrocarbons. See for example the extensive literature supporting the use of small amounts of [[biodiesel]] as an additive to improve the lubricity of [[ULSD]] and [[JP-8]] (when used in diesel engines). My tribology professor used to claim that whale oil was the best of the bunch for this purpose although I couldn't give you a firm citation. [[User:JMT32|JMT32]] ([[User talk:JMT32|talk]]) 21:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:Drewder|@Drewder]] Why were environmental regulations necessary? According to the International Whaling Commission dwindling whale populations lead to the conclusion, that whales were hunted nearly to extinction. The reason regulation is necessary is precisely the belief it is better for specific applications. Regulators forbid harvest to prevent a viable market for whale oil from developing. [[Special:Contributions/2603:7080:AF05:13B8:E8D6:B7BE:231A:B3D7|2603:7080:AF05:13B8:E8D6:B7BE:231A:B3D7]] ([[User talk:2603:7080:AF05:13B8:E8D6:B7BE:231A:B3D7|talk]]) 08:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Discovery of vegetable oil == |
|||
The current lead of the article states: "With the discovery of substitutes such as kerosene and vegetable oils, the use of whale oils declined considerably." But [[vegetable oil]]s have been part of human culture for millennia, long before the considerable decline in the use of whale oil. So should we conclude that vegetable oils were discovered only millenia after having been part of human culture? --[[User talk:Lambiam|Lambiam]] 00:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Competing claims of displacement by alcohol lamps not kerosene == |
|||
Alcohol lamps became popular in the 1830s, and alcohol was considerably cheaper. In the US kerosene for lamps became popular as a result of very high tax on alcohol. This account does not explain the huge production boom of whale oil in the mid 1800s though. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.48.171.183|216.48.171.183]] ([[User talk:216.48.171.183|talk]]) 21:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Minor edits == |
|||
I contributed a few minor edits to this excellent article. Nice to have an equally minor role in its presentation. Thanks to the author for a fine contribution. KC 23:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Whale oil]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=707511310 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130601101102/http://www.wdcs.org/submissions_bin/trade_report_201006.pdf to http://www.wdcs.org/submissions_bin/trade_report_201006.pdf |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 07:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:18, 11 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Whale oil article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Smell
[edit]Does whale oil smell bad when burned? Is it smokeless as I've heard someone claim? Please respond. I'm curious.
Norwegian
[edit]We should erase the Norwegian link, as it refers to "Tran", which is cod liver oil, not anything extracted from whales. It should direct to "Hvalolje" in Norwegian. --Henrik46 (talk) 02:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC) yes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.66.254 (talk) 08:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hubble Space Telescope
[edit]The sensationalist History Channel documentary "America:The Story of Us" in episode 4 makes the breathless claim that the Hubble Space Telescope "runs" on whale oil. I don't know if they just meant that some parts are lubed with it, but they said "run" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.249.51.220 (talk) 04:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- I did a bit of research into this after seeing this documentary. The official word from NASA is that Hubble contains no whale oil, as far as the Hubble chief engineer knows. It may be used in small quantities for lubricant, but all of the documentation that would confirm this would be in paper documents at NASA; as far as I know nobody has actually gone to NASA to research this. The only other sources I've found for this assertion are various websites of dubious validity. — Wolfgang42 (talk) 20:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Train Oil
[edit]Smollett refers to Train-Oil in his 1748 novel Roderick Random, book II, chapter called Siege of St. Lazar, p 114 in the very old edition I am looking at. Middle English Trane? tear drop. The oil is pressed drop by drop supposedly? CharlesKiddell (talk) 06:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Another lit ref to whale-oil
[edit]Lit ref 'whale oil' it is referred to in 'The Pied Piper of Hamelin' (Robert Browning 'Dramatic Lyrics'1842) Ln 133 when the rats imagine they hear "... a drwing of corks of trai-oil flasks." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.50.157 (talk) 10:45, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Chemistry
[edit]The article states that for the glyceride portions of whale oil "most of the fatty acids in these triglycerides are located at the 1- and 3- positions on the glycerol molecule." The statement is confusing because triglycerides by definition have 3 fatty acids, hence the -tri prefix, taking all three positions on the glycerol.
Zimmsky (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- My apologies, this was an embarrassing mistake.Kurzon (talk) 14:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
No uses?
[edit]If Whale oil is inferior in every way to modern alternatives, as this article seems to be written to state, then why was environmental regulations necessary? Is there really no usage that the oil is superior in? I've been lead to believe that it is better for delicate machinery but I don't have any citations.--Drewder (talk) 19:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Actually there is a large scale usage of whale oil. But that is something very troublesome and you will find absolutely no official sources on this on the internet --- please try. Whale ois is used as a lubricant in applications in space and the particular man-made environments where the ionizing radiation is present. It doesn't try out there unlike the synthetic oils. I am sorry that I have to announce this as a dogmatic truth. But I have no option. Please do the deductive reasoning with the premises we do know about the whale oil and the ionizing radiation. And note that the deduction will result a valid, logically certain conclusion even without any external document of the actual usage. All yours, sincerely. 91.154.29.13 (talk) 11:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- It is also an excellent lubricant for whales, and prevents them from squeaking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.153.75 (talk) 03:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Natural fats in general outperform petroleum and synthetics for boundary lubrication. I'm a mechanical engineer and chemistry isn't my strong suit, but my understanding is that the polar fatty acids cling to surfaces better than simple hydrocarbons. See for example the extensive literature supporting the use of small amounts of biodiesel as an additive to improve the lubricity of ULSD and JP-8 (when used in diesel engines). My tribology professor used to claim that whale oil was the best of the bunch for this purpose although I couldn't give you a firm citation. JMT32 (talk) 21:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Drewder Why were environmental regulations necessary? According to the International Whaling Commission dwindling whale populations lead to the conclusion, that whales were hunted nearly to extinction. The reason regulation is necessary is precisely the belief it is better for specific applications. Regulators forbid harvest to prevent a viable market for whale oil from developing. 2603:7080:AF05:13B8:E8D6:B7BE:231A:B3D7 (talk) 08:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Discovery of vegetable oil
[edit]The current lead of the article states: "With the discovery of substitutes such as kerosene and vegetable oils, the use of whale oils declined considerably." But vegetable oils have been part of human culture for millennia, long before the considerable decline in the use of whale oil. So should we conclude that vegetable oils were discovered only millenia after having been part of human culture? --Lambiam 00:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Competing claims of displacement by alcohol lamps not kerosene
[edit]Alcohol lamps became popular in the 1830s, and alcohol was considerably cheaper. In the US kerosene for lamps became popular as a result of very high tax on alcohol. This account does not explain the huge production boom of whale oil in the mid 1800s though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.48.171.183 (talk) 21:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Minor edits
[edit]I contributed a few minor edits to this excellent article. Nice to have an equally minor role in its presentation. Thanks to the author for a fine contribution. KC 23:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Whale oil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130601101102/http://www.wdcs.org/submissions_bin/trade_report_201006.pdf to http://www.wdcs.org/submissions_bin/trade_report_201006.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)