Jump to content

User talk:Vfrickey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DevSolar (talk | contribs)
Apologies.: new section
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
 
(335 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
== August 2008 ==
| age=2160
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for making a report {{#if:|about {{userblock|{{{1}}}}}}} on [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and [[Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism|all users are encouraged]] to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in [[WP:VAND|vandalism]], or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately [[WP:WARN|warned]]. Please note there is a difference between [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] and unhelpful or misguided edits made in [[WP:AGF|good faith]]. If they continue to vandalise after a ''recent'' final warning, please re-report it. Thank you!<!--Template:Uw-AIV--> ''{{AIV|nv}}. This is a content dispute that should be brought directly in the article's discussion page or directly with the user.'' -- [[User:Lucasbfr|<span style="color:#002BB8;">lucasbfr</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<span style="color:#001F7F;">talk</span>]]</sup> 15:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
| archiveprefix=User talk:Vfrickey/Archives/
| minkeepthreads=4
| minarchthreads=1
| format=Y/F
}}


{{Archive box | auto=long }}
== response to Lucasbfr re: vandalism of entry on Nadhmi Auchi ==
As I understand it, edits should be commented on, as should content disputes. Neither has happened with respect to the changes made this morning to the entry on Nadhmi Auchi. Whoever made the change just went in and made it with no explanation or comment whatever, making it very difficult to differentiate between this change and any other bit of politically-motivated vandalism.[[User:Vfrickey|vfrickey]] ([[User talk:Vfrickey#top|talk]]) 15:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
:Hi, I agree that explaining the edits you make are a courtesy (I always do it, at least for my own sake). However we can't hold all users to that high a standard, and many of them don't do it. I see an otehr user reverted the changes, though. Feel free to do it when you disagree with a change (as long as you are not "[[WP:EW|edit warring]]". I personally only revert once a change I disagree with, if I am reverted myself I bring the matter with the user/on the talk page) -- [[User:Lucasbfr|<span style="color:#002BB8;">lucasbfr</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<span style="color:#001F7F;">talk</span>]]</sup> 11:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


== American politics discretionary sanctions notice ==
::The problem is that in the current Presidential campaign here in the US, one of the candidates, Barack Obama, has had his campaign aggressively "editing" every reference to him that can even tangentially be considered adverse. That's what happened, apparently. I DID have an "edit war" going on with respect to another article (on the US Senate Subcommittee on European Affairs, in which the other "editor" tried to cover up Obama's nonfeasance up to that point as subcommitee chairman - in a year and a half in the Senate, he didn't call a single meeting of his subcommittee. Some of us feel Europe deserves more attention than that). :-) [[User:Vfrickey|vfrickey]] ([[User talk:Vfrickey#top|talk]]) 00:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
== Terribly short notice: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes America/Boulder, Colorado|Boulder WLM on 15 September]] ==


You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.
Apologies for getting this out so late, but this is all [[User:Pharos|Pharos]]' fault. Please blame everything on Pharos.


For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
That said, this message is just to let you know that we're having a photo hunt for [http://wikilovesmonuments.us/ Wiki Loves Monuments] at 11:00 in the morning of Saturday the 15th [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes America/Boulder, Colorado|in Boulder]], probably somewhere around CU, though the exact location hasn't yet been decided. Since you have previously attended or expressed interest in other meetups in the area, hopefully you might be able to come.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 08:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for February 23==
Please [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes America/Boulder, Colorado|sign up as soon as possible]] if you're interested; we'd love to have you along to help postpone the squirrel apocalypse. Or at least get some decent images. -— [[User:Isarra|Isarra]] [[User talk:Isarra|༆]] 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Blackwater fever]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[John Brunner]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Blackwater_fever check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Blackwater_fever?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).
== Apologies. ==


([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 13:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sir, apparently you took offense at my recent post to your talk page. I might have chosen the wrong wording to express my confusion. If that is the case, I aplogize. I just wondered why you deemed it necessary to edit old talk-page contributions of yourself, which made the page in question show up on my watchlist. Since I did not want to drag the article talk page into a "meta" discussion, I took this to your user talk page, ''which is the appropriate place to discuss such matters.'' As such, please refrain from referring to such inquiry as "shit", "unsolicited" and "trolling", thank you. -- [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] ([[User talk:DevSolar|talk]]) 10:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

== Forecasting nuclear proliferation ==

{{re|Vfickey}} Might you have time and interest to review "[[v:Forecasting nuclear proliferation]]" (on Wikiversity)?

I'm scheduled to make a presentation at the [https://www.mors.org/Events/Symposium/88th-Symposium 88th Military Operations Research Society Symposium], June 15-19; my talk is scheduled for June 18. I'm asking you, because in [[Talk:Abdul Qadeer Khan]], you said you had "researched nuclear proliferation issues" yourself, which suggests you might be able to identify and help me correct deficiencies in that article. Of course, I hope you would also find it interesting and useful for your own work.

If you'd like, I can send you a link to the slides for my presentation, and I'll be happy to give you the talk via videoconferencing at some mutually convenient time. I'm UTC-5. Thanks for your many contributions to Wikipedia. [[User:DavidMCEddy|DavidMCEddy]] ([[User talk:DavidMCEddy|talk]]) 20:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|DavidMCEddy}}With the caveats that I have no formal qualifications as a student of nuclear proliferation and my research has solely been conducted as an amateur, yes, I don't mind reviewing your presentation. Video conferencing is problematic over my satellite Internet connection, but I"d be happy to review your slide deck. FWIW, I'm UTC-6 (US Central Daylight Savings time).

:Thanks for your praise - I work when I can, and when I can replace heat with light in the sometimes contentious fields of Wikipedia. --[[User:Vfrickey|loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Vfrickey#top|talk]]) 02:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

::My draft slides are available at [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13hrDB1rKqOvOojcSb3ECvL9rD8ORJaJaikpYLi1gaTQ/edit?usp=sharing Google Slides "Predicting the Time to Next Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons"]. (I'm Graves, the lead author on those slides.)

::I'm confused regarding time zones: I'm also in US Central Daylight Savings Time. However, as I'm writing this, [https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/ "The World Clock"] says it's approximately 10 PM in Kansas City and Chicago, and UTC is approximately 3 AM tomorrow. That sounds to me like Kansas City and Chicago are UTC-5, not UTC-6. ???

::Thanks, [[User:DavidMCEddy|DavidMCEddy]] ([[User talk:DavidMCEddy|talk]]) 03:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

:::Thanks for the link. I got the data on my time zone from Microsoft's automated Internet Time service: "(UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada)". However, when I lived in central Indiana, I had a similar issue - until recently that part of Indiana did not observe Daylight Savings Time, so half the year we had the same local time as the US Eastern Time Zine. --[[User:Vfrickey|loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Vfrickey#top|talk]]) 03:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

::::I've commented on your slide presentation (both factual issues in recounting patterns in past nuclear proliferation and other historical and current issues that perhaps were more than you asked for). --[[User:Vfrickey|loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Vfrickey#top|talk]]) 12:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->

Latest revision as of 00:39, 5 October 2021


American politics discretionary sanctions notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackwater fever, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Brunner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forecasting nuclear proliferation

[edit]

@Vfickey: Might you have time and interest to review "v:Forecasting nuclear proliferation" (on Wikiversity)?

I'm scheduled to make a presentation at the 88th Military Operations Research Society Symposium, June 15-19; my talk is scheduled for June 18. I'm asking you, because in Talk:Abdul Qadeer Khan, you said you had "researched nuclear proliferation issues" yourself, which suggests you might be able to identify and help me correct deficiencies in that article. Of course, I hope you would also find it interesting and useful for your own work.

If you'd like, I can send you a link to the slides for my presentation, and I'll be happy to give you the talk via videoconferencing at some mutually convenient time. I'm UTC-5. Thanks for your many contributions to Wikipedia. DavidMCEddy (talk) 20:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidMCEddy:With the caveats that I have no formal qualifications as a student of nuclear proliferation and my research has solely been conducted as an amateur, yes, I don't mind reviewing your presentation. Video conferencing is problematic over my satellite Internet connection, but I"d be happy to review your slide deck. FWIW, I'm UTC-6 (US Central Daylight Savings time).
Thanks for your praise - I work when I can, and when I can replace heat with light in the sometimes contentious fields of Wikipedia. --loupgarous (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My draft slides are available at Google Slides "Predicting the Time to Next Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons". (I'm Graves, the lead author on those slides.)
I'm confused regarding time zones: I'm also in US Central Daylight Savings Time. However, as I'm writing this, "The World Clock" says it's approximately 10 PM in Kansas City and Chicago, and UTC is approximately 3 AM tomorrow. That sounds to me like Kansas City and Chicago are UTC-5, not UTC-6.  ???
Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 03:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link. I got the data on my time zone from Microsoft's automated Internet Time service: "(UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada)". However, when I lived in central Indiana, I had a similar issue - until recently that part of Indiana did not observe Daylight Savings Time, so half the year we had the same local time as the US Eastern Time Zine. --loupgarous (talk) 03:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've commented on your slide presentation (both factual issues in recounting patterns in past nuclear proliferation and other historical and current issues that perhaps were more than you asked for). --loupgarous (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]