Jump to content

Talk:Ginseng: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(90 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBanners|1=
{{WikiProject China|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Dietary Supplements | importance=high }}
{{WikiProject Korea|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject China|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Plants|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Korea|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Agriculture|class=b|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Plants|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject East Asia|class=B|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Agriculture|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Alternative medicine|class=B}}
{{WikiProject East Asia|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Alternative medicine}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 12: Line 13:
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 1
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadsleft = 2
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(100d)
|algo = old(730d)
|archive = Talk:Ginseng/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Ginseng/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{archive box|auto=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=100|search=yes}}


==Wiki Education assignment: Traditional Chinese Medicine==
== Mania When Combined with Antidepressants (28) ==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Siena_College/Traditional_Chinese_Medicine_(Fall_2022) | assignments = [[User:Sf23olso|Sf23olso]] | reviewers = [[User:SienaTCM|SienaTCM]], [[User:Sienasaint13|Sienasaint13]], [[User:Cam Coe27|Cam Coe27]], [[User:Em09gatt|Em09gatt]], [[User:Mr13maye|Mr13maye]] | start_date = 2022-09-07 | end_date = 2022-12-12 }}


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Cam Coe27|Cam Coe27]] ([[User talk:Cam Coe27|talk]]) 04:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)</span>
It appears the cited study only looked at Panax Ginseng, and as such, should not be generalized to all ginseng. Additionally, I have been unable to find any evidence that Panax Ginseng has had documented interactions with any antidepressants other than MAOI's. Since there is great diversity among antidepressants, this too should be specified, and not generalized to all AD's.
[[User:MadManV|MadManV]] ([[User talk:MadManV|talk]]) 16:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


:TCM is [[quackery]] which is not used as supposed evidence of medicinal efficacy for ginseng. Read [[WP:MEDRS]] and choose reputable reviews if changes in content are warranted. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 17:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
== Holy cow. ==


== Sourcing ==
This article is a mess. It violates NOR, NPOV, and verifiability in multiple sections, most especially "Modern Science." [[User:Undiskedste|Undiskedste]] ([[User talk:Undiskedste|talk]]) 03:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


[[User:Zefr]], can you please review whether the article [[Ginseng]] is adequately sourced? [[User:Maxim Masiutin|Maxim Masiutin]] ([[User talk:Maxim Masiutin|talk]]) 07:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
== Potential references ==


:As with any consumed herbs or food ingredients, the literature supporting health effects is dubious and low-quality, exemplified by [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=ginseng+review this PubMed search], which displays sources in [[MDPI]] (predatory) and untrustworthy altmed journals. To keep the information readily understandable for non-science users, I would rely on Drugs.com and MedlinePlus [https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/natural/1000.html here] and/or [https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/natural/967.html here], i.e., it is not ''effective'' for anything. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 20:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Moved from "Further reading" section: --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 15:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
::I read this article and it didn't contain any health claims at all, but I thought you have a different pair of eyes and could notice something that I missed. [[User:Maxim Masiutin|Maxim Masiutin]] ([[User talk:Maxim Masiutin|talk]]) 20:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

:::Over the years, there have been many attempts to insert health claims. The section on traditional medicine states well the absence of clear efficacy, and the section on FDA warning letters specifies the regulatory position on US supplement companies which are still marketing ginseng products falsely claimed as therapies. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 20:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
* Pritts, K.D. (2010). ''Ginseng: How to Find, Grow, and Use America´s Forest Gold''. Stackpole Books. ISBN 978-0-8117-3634-3
::::I removed any unsourced mentions about "therapeutic" properties, can you please review this diff https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Ginseng&diff=1209426548&oldid=1209289836 to let me know whether it addresses your concern and the article content is now OK for you. [[User:Maxim Masiutin|Maxim Masiutin]] ([[User talk:Maxim Masiutin|talk]]) 21:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
* Taylor, D.A. (2006). ''Ginseng, the Divine Root: The Curious History of the Plant That Captivated the World''. Algonquin Books. ISBN 978-1-56512-401-1
* Choi, K.-T. “Botanical characteristics, pharmacological effects and medicinal components of Korea Panax ginseng C A Meyer”, [http://www.nature.com/aps/journal/v29/n9/pdf/aps2008134a.pdf Acta Pharmacologica Sinica (2008),29(9):1109-1118.]
* Qi, L.-W. et al. “Ginsenosides from American ginseng: chemical and pharmacological diversity”, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103855/pdf/nihms292266.pdf Phytochemistry (2011),72(8):689-699.]
* (No authors listed). “Panax ginseng. Monograph”, [http://www.altmedrev.com/publications/14/2/172.pdf Alternative Medicine Review: a journal of clinical therapeutics (2009),14(2):172-176.]

== Blade Runner ==

How about including the section Popular Culture mentioning that, in Blade Runner, Deckard orders ginseng to relieve stress from having killed a replicant <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/187.54.221.157|187.54.221.157]] ([[User talk:187.54.221.157|talk]]) 05:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
==Yeah, merge it==
It's a fairly short article. But the thing is you would have to merge the medicial benefits with the main "ginseng" article. Problem with this is that Korean ginseng purportedly has different medical effects. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wyattherb|Wyattherb]] ([[User talk:Wyattherb|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wyattherb|contribs]]) 13:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Merge which article?--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 14:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:31, 8 October 2024

Wiki Education assignment: Traditional Chinese Medicine

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2022 and 12 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sf23olso (article contribs). Peer reviewers: SienaTCM, Sienasaint13, Cam Coe27, Em09gatt, Mr13maye.

— Assignment last updated by Cam Coe27 (talk) 04:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TCM is quackery which is not used as supposed evidence of medicinal efficacy for ginseng. Read WP:MEDRS and choose reputable reviews if changes in content are warranted. Zefr (talk) 17:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

[edit]

User:Zefr, can you please review whether the article Ginseng is adequately sourced? Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As with any consumed herbs or food ingredients, the literature supporting health effects is dubious and low-quality, exemplified by this PubMed search, which displays sources in MDPI (predatory) and untrustworthy altmed journals. To keep the information readily understandable for non-science users, I would rely on Drugs.com and MedlinePlus here and/or here, i.e., it is not effective for anything. Zefr (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I read this article and it didn't contain any health claims at all, but I thought you have a different pair of eyes and could notice something that I missed. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Over the years, there have been many attempts to insert health claims. The section on traditional medicine states well the absence of clear efficacy, and the section on FDA warning letters specifies the regulatory position on US supplement companies which are still marketing ginseng products falsely claimed as therapies. Zefr (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed any unsourced mentions about "therapeutic" properties, can you please review this diff https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Ginseng&diff=1209426548&oldid=1209289836 to let me know whether it addresses your concern and the article content is now OK for you. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 21:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]