Jump to content

Talk:Steve Jobs: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nbanato (talk | contribs)
 
(942 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|noarchives=yes|search=no}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Article history
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=PR
|action1=PR
|action1date=12 January 2005
|action1date=12 January 2005
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Steve Jobs/archive1
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Steve Jobs/archive1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=34704344
|action1oldid=34704344


|action2=GAN
|action2=GAN
|action2date=October 23, 2006
|action2date=October 23, 2006
|action2link=
|action2link=Talk:Steve Jobs/Archive 1#GA failed
|action2result=failed
|action2result=failed
|action2oldid=83099824
|action2oldid=83099824
Line 15: Line 16:
|action3=GAN
|action3=GAN
|action3date=December 15, 2011
|action3date=December 15, 2011
|action3link=Talk:Steve_Jobs/GA1
|action3link=Talk:Steve Jobs/GA1
|action3result=failed
|action3result=failed
|action3oldid=465929559
|action3oldid=465929559


|itndate=August 25, 2011
|itndate=August 25, 2011
|itndate2=October 6, 2011
|itn2date=October 6, 2011

|otddate=February 24, 2017
|otdoldid=767223863

|topic=Engineering and technology
|currentstatus=FGAN
|currentstatus=FGAN
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Jobs, Steve|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=B|s&a-priority=High|s&a-work-group=yes|listas=Jobs, Steve}}
{{WikiProject Biography|s&a-priority=High|s&a-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism|importance=High}}
{{WP1.0|class=B|importance=Mid|category=Engtech}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|class=B|importance=Top
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|importance=Top }}
{{WikiProject California|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=High|importance=mid}}
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = y
{{WikiProject Syria|importance=Low}}
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = y
{{WikiProject Internet|importance=Mid}}
| b3 <!--Structure --> = y
{{WikiProject Business|importance=High}}
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = y
{{WikiProject Animation|importance=Mid |american-animation=yes |american-animation-importance=Mid |people=yes |people-importance=Mid |pixar=yes |pixar-importance=High |portal1-name=Animation |portal1-link=Selected biography/23}}
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = y
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = y
}}
{{WikiProject California|class=B|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=High|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Syria|class=B|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Internet|class=B|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Business|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Animation|class=B|importance=Low
|B-Class-1=yes
|B-Class-2=yes
|B-Class-3=yes
|B-Class-4=yes
|B-Class-5=yes
|B-Class-6=yes
|american-animation=yes
|american-animation-importance=Mid
|people=yes
|people-importance=Mid
|pixar=yes
|pixar-importance=High
|portal1-name=Animation
|portal1-link=Selected biography/23}}
}}
}}
{{to do|collapsed=yes}}
{{onlinesource|year=2005|section=April 22-30
| author=[[Rob Enderle]]
| title=IPod's Dirty Little Secret and the Power of the Internet
| org=TechNewsWorld
| url=http://www.technewsworld.com/story/commentary/42328.html
| date=April 25, 2005}}
{{pressmulti
|author= [[Stephen Foley]]
|date= Tuesday, 3 February 2009
|url= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/so-is-wikipedia-cracking-up-1543527.html
|title= So is Wikipedia cracking up?:It was a utopian vision: an encyclopedia for the people, by the people. But eight years on, Wikipedia is plagued by endless hoaxes, and lurches from one cash crisis to another. Will it become a footnote in the history of the web?
|org= [[The Independent]]
|section= Home:Life&Style:Gadgets&Tech:Features
|collapsed=yes}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:Steve Jobs/Archive index
|target=Talk:Steve Jobs/Archive index
Line 75: Line 45:
|leading_zeros=0
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}}
|indexhere=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation|noredlinks=y}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 4
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 3
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Steve Jobs/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=30}}


== I think the correct term was that he was supposed to "modify" the circuit ==
== Apple Computer's 1997 Financial Rescue ==

Where it states:
"In mid-1975, after returning to Atari, Jobs was assigned to create [this should be "modify" I believe] a circuit board for the arcade video game Breakout.[65] According to Bushnell, Atari offered $100 (equivalent to about $500 in 2021) for each TTL chip that was eliminated in the machine. Jobs had little specialized knowledge of circuit board design and made a deal with Wozniak to split the fee evenly between them if Wozniak could minimize the number of chips. Much to the amazement of Atari engineers, Wozniak reduced the TTL count to 46, a design so tight that it was impossible to reproduce on an assembly line.[66] According to Wozniak, Jobs told him that Atari paid them only $700 (instead of the actual $5,000), and that Wozniak's share was thus $350.[67] Wozniak did not learn about the actual bonus until ten years later, but said that if Jobs had told him about it and explained that he needed the money, Wozniak would have given it to him.[68]"

You can't "eliminate" chips from a design you haven't "created" yet. It's either that or they wanted him to minimize the amount of TTL IC's to be used in a design.

But from what I've read, Atari had a board, it cost too much to make and was too large, so therefor they wanted it to be reduced in size and complexity .

But irregardless, he wasn't able to do it - Wozniak did it.

[[User:Wamnet|Wamnet]] ([[User talk:Wamnet|talk]]) 01:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

:Great question; I looked it up. That's indeed in both [https://archive.org/details/stevejobs0000isaa Isaacson 2011] ("design") and [https://archive.org/details/becomingstevejob0000schl Schlender & Tetzeli 2015] ("create"). Both books can be borrowed for free from the links I give. Also Isaacson: {{tq|There would be a bonus, Bushnell told him, for every chip fewer than fifty that he used.}} If you can find a source that contradicts, please post it here.
:I'm still not happy with the section though. Most is sourced to a blog. And Isaacson says {{tq|Wozniak used only forty-five chips. Recollections differ, but by most accounts Jobs simply gave Wozniak half of the base fee and not the bonus Bushnell paid for saving five chips}}, which contradicts what we have now. However, while Linzmayer 2004 ("Apple Confidential 2.0", a solid book) agrees on "4 days", it quotes Woz as saying: {{tq|“Nolan Bushnell wanted a game with as few chips as possible. Steve said if there were less than 50 chips, we got paid $700 and split it in half. Less than 40 chips, $1,000. After four nights, it was 42 chips. I wasn’t about to spend another second trying to reduce it by two more chips; I’ll settle for $700.”}} (notice: one says 42 chips, one says 45).
:There's also something we omit in our article: according to Isaacson (page 53), {{tq|Bushnell knew that Jobs was not a great engineer, but he assumed, correctly, that he would recruit Wozniak, who was always hanging around. “I looked at it as a two-for-one thing,” Bushnell recalled. “Woz was a better engineer.”}} (btw, "always hanging around" is supported by Malone 1999, too). I'll try to rework this later if I have time, but would rather wait until we figure out whether it was 46, 45 or 42 chips. We need a source that resolves the discrepancy. [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 18:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
::Ok, found it. In 2009, Woz said 45 chips[https://www.thehenryford.org/documents/default-source/default-document-library/transcript_wozniak_full-length.pdf?sfvrsn=4d8e2f01_0]. And [https://www.eetimes.com/steve-jobs-remembered-by-woz-bushnell/ in 2013, he said] "I got it down to 42, but it went back to 45 before it ran well". So every source is now congruent, with only the current blogspam source saying "46". [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 18:38, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

== Innovations and designs section ==

Don't like this section. It should explain his role in these products, his decision-making, etc., not just plainly describe the products. And I think the description of his role would best fit within the general chronology of the biography, rather than as a separate "Products" section. [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 23:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


== Reverts to lead ==
'''PREAMBLE'''


{{re|Flyedit32}} why do you persist in reverting despite policy? In articles, when unsourced content is reverted, it stays out until affirmative consensus is reached ([[WP:BURDEN]]).
The Wikipedia entry for Steve Jobs repeats a statement the subject and his biographer have claimed:


The first sentence is for occupations. Making one investment in Pixar doesn't make Jobs an investor. You've removed entrepreneur, which is verifiable and [[WP:BLUESKY]], and reinstated "magnate", which is neither. I'd have added "innovator" (along with proper sources) but inventor is fine too. [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 21:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
"Jobs brought Apple from near bankruptcy to profitability by 1998."
:In [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Steve_Jobs&diff=prev&oldid=1151536771 a more recent edit], you've hinted that your disputed changes are covered by [[MOS:LEAD]]. That is false, since neither labels ("magnate" and "investor") are cited in the body. I've [[User_talk:Flyedit32#Please_self-revert_on_Steve_Jobs |explained on your talk page]] that the first lead sentence is for definitional labels; to call him an investor, we need a multitude of sources that call him that, not just sources that show he made one investment at one point in his life. You've edit warred to keep your preferred unsourced wording in the lead, and then refused to discuss, perhaps in the hopes that it gets to stay in. This is neither productive nor collaborative. Again, please self-revert. [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 22:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


== Obscure and incorrectly written acronym or initialism “woo” ==
This however has not been proven true or confirmed by any other party than the subject and his biographer. Publicly available government filings suggest that this was highly likely not true.


Section “Health problems”, second paragraph, last word in the following excerpt:
'''SOURCE AND ANALYSIS'''


''However, cancer researcher and alternative medicine critic David Gorski wrote that "it's impossible to know whether and by how much he might have decreased his chances of surviving his cancer through his flirtation with woo.''
Steve Jobs has publicly claimed that Apple Computer, Inc., currently renamed as Apple, Inc. (both referred herein as "Apple"), was 90 days from bankruptcy when he rejoined the company in 1997. His biographer, Walter Isaacson, has repeated such claims in interviews. A review of the facts show clearly otherwise.


Both of the references for the above excerpt contain “woo”. I note that “WOO” or “WoO” stands for “Window of Opportunity” per the following:
Reference is made below to the Apple Computer, Inc. Form 10-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC) December 5, 1997 and conforming to an annual fiscal period ending September 26, 1997 (the "Filing"). The Filing is found here: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/0001047469-97-006960.txt.


https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.29_suppl.181#:~:text=Background%3A%20In%20%E2%80%9Cwindow%20of%20opportunity,and%20definitive%20anti%2Dcancer%20treatment.
The Filing states:
''In “window of opportunity” (WOO) clinical trials, people with newly diagnosed early-stage cancer are exposed to an experimental drug during the period of time between diagnosis and definitive anti-cancer treatment. These trials allow investigators to study drug efficacy in untreated disease, which can expedite drug development. However, for trial participants, the WOO approach requires them to decide about an altruistic clinical trial during an intense time immediately after cancer diagnosis. This qualitative study aimed to understand patient perspectives on WOO clinical trials.''


https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04644289
:"Over the last two years, the Company's debt ratings have been downgraded to non-investment grade. In October 1997, the Company's senior and subordinated long-term debt were downgraded to B- and CCC, respectively, by Standard and Poor's Rating Agency. In the second quarter of 1997, the Company's debt ratings were downgraded to B3 and Caa2, respectively, by Moody's Investor Services. Both Standard and Poor's Rating Agency and Moody's Investor Services have the Company on negative outlook. These actions may increase the Company's cost of funds in future periods. In addition, the Company may be required to pledge additional collateral with respect to certain of its borrowings and letters of credit and to agree to more stringent covenants than in the past.
''WoO: Window of Opportunity Trial of Olaparib and Durvalumab in Histologically Proven EOC (WoO)''
:
:'''The Company believes that its balances of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, and continued short-term borrowings from banks, will be sufficient to meet its cash requirements over the next twelve months.''' Expected cash requirements over the next twelve months include an estimated $130 million to effect actions under the restructuring plan, most of which will be effected during the first half of fiscal 1998. No assurance can be given that the $25 million in short-term borrowings from banks can be continued, or that any additional required financing could be obtained should the restructuring plan take longer to implement than anticipated or be unsuccessful. '''If the Company is unable to obtain such financing, its liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.'''"
:


Should a reference to the meaning of “woo” (I don’t know whether it’s an acronym or an initialism) and the fact that it should have been written as “WOO” or “WoO” (if both are considered to be correct) in the excerpt’s references be included? I suppose the easiest thing would be to replace “woo” with “[WOO]” (if that’s considered acceptable) and make it a link to the ascopubs.org page above which defines it. [[User:Dbsx|Dbsx]] ([[User talk:Dbsx|talk]]) 13:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
In the Filing, Apple reported that it had $1.459bn in cash and short-term securities at its 1997 fiscal year-end--this is after paying $319mn in cash to purchase NeXT Software, Inc.,--and accounts receivable, including allowances for doubtful accounts, greater than $1bn. Note that the often-purported $150mn "rescue financing" from Microsoft Corp. ("Microsoft") is relatively minor compared to Apple's cash ($1.018bn) and short-term investments ($212mn) balances totaling $1.23bn the fiscal quarter before Microsoft's investment of $150mn. The SEC filing for the quarter ending Jun 27, 1997 can be found here: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/0000320193-97-000014.txt.


:See [[wiktionary:woo#Etymology 3]], which leads to [[wiktionary:woo woo#Noun]] — [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 19:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
In contrast, Apple had outstanding on the same date $661mn par value unsecured convertible subordinated notes maturing 2001, $300mn par value unsecured notes maturing 2004 and $25mn in notes payable to banks refinanced every quarter (see below) all totaling $986mn. The only other material itemized liability was $685mn for accounts payable.
:This entire section has GOT to be a [[Poe's law|POE]], right? This comment proceeds from a false assumption that woo is an initialization or acronym; '''it isn't'''.
:The term [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Woo woo] generally refers to pseudoscientific pursuits — particularly pseudoscientific modalities in medicine. We all have blind spots, but to have failed to perform a simple Google search for: "woo medicine" is a hell of an oversight.
:So perhaps today was the day you and other readers learned that woo is a term used extensively by science communicators. It's even used [[Quantum mysticism|right here]] on Wikipedia
:themoreyouknow.gif [[User:Jeffnathan|Jeffnathan]] ([[User talk:Jeffnathan|talk]]) 07:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


::I strongly concur with [[User:Dbsx]]. I specialized in the history of science as an undergraduate in one of the highest-ranked history departments in the world and I've never heard of that term.
Apple had a net cash balance of $473mn as of its fiscal year-end 1997. These figures suggest that Apple during this period had significant liquidity to meet its financial obligations and undergo significant restructuring. Furthermore, Apple's large accounts receivable balance could have added further liquidity had the company gone into further decline.
::I just ran some Google searches against skepticalinquirer.org. It looks like the term "woo" was very rare before 2018. Even if the term is becoming more commonly used in pseudoscience circles, it is still unheard of in the mainstream media. For example, searching Google News returns a lot of recent results for [[Bryan Woo]], and one mention of the longer related term "woo-woo" from the ''New York Post''.
::This looks like a straightforward application of [[WP:NOT]]. WP is not a soapbox or means of promotion or an indiscriminate collection of information. This article is not the place to go about promoting such an obscure term. --[[User:Coolcaesar|Coolcaesar]] ([[User talk:Coolcaesar|talk]]) 07:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:::It's just how Gorski speaks, and he's not soapboxing to promote the word. I checked and it's in the Oxford dictionary (both long-form and short-form). There's nothing to see here, he's an expert, why would we literally argue over semantics? [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 08:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:::It's tempting to dive into a treatise on the timeline of the use of the term woo-woo (now frequently shortened to woo) and how James Randi may have coined the term (and that he began holding [[The Amazing Meeting]] conference in ''2003''. Or that David Gorski is an editor of [[Science-Based Medicine]]. Or Jerry Coyne, University of Chicago evolutionary biology professor and author of [[Why Evolution is True]] wrote in 2011 that [https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2011/10/21/woo-may-have-killed-steve-jobs/ Woo may have killed Steve Jobs].
:::There's extensive support for the premise that Jobs belief and adherence to pseudoscientific treatments delayed his receiving appropriate treatment. As a compromise may I suggest using the term woo within the body of related text but not as the basis of a section heading? [[User:Jeffnathan|Jeffnathan]] ([[User talk:Jeffnathan|talk]]) 18:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


== Should we create a template series for Jobs? ==
The Filing further reports:


Should we create a series template for Jobs like there is for [[Template:Elon Musk series|Musk]] or [[Template:Bill Gates series|Gates]]? It wouldn't have to be too long or anything, but I do feel like there is plenty to use for it, and it could help with reader navigation, too. Thanks. ~ [[User:Flyedit32|Flyedit32]] ([[User talk:Flyedit32|talk]]) 15:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
:NOTES PAYABLE TO BANKS
:
: The weighted average interest rate for Japanese yen-denominated notes
:payable to banks as of September 26, 1997, and September 27, 1996, was
:approximately 1.3%. The Company had no U.S. dollar-denominated notes payable to
:banks as of September 26, 1997 or September 27, 1996. The carrying amount of
:notes payable to banks approximates their fair value due to '''their less than
:90-day maturities'''.
:


== Steve Jobs was not an inventor ==
It is supposed that the subject's claim that "We [Apple] were 90 days from going bankrupt." relates to Apple's Japanese operation's ability to continue to refinance its yen-denominated $25mn bank note. This small debt was immaterial to the organization and could have been immediately repaid if necessary. For the unfamiliar, SEC securities-issuing registrants will customarily state such worst-case scenarios where refinancing risks exists in order to reduce potential or perceived future legal liabilities, however remote such risks may be.


He was a businessman that revealed technology to mass media and the public. [[User:Mechanical Keyboarder|Mechanical Keyboarder]] ([[User talk:Mechanical Keyboarder|talk]]) 04:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
The downgrading of Apple's credit rating to "CCC" and "Caa" was not very meaningful either. With exception to the most established technology companies, most of the sector's credit instrument issuing companies are rated below investment grade ("BB" and lower) and most commonly "CCC". Apple's downgrade brought it in line with the average as it was no longer a leading company in the personal computing sector in 1997.


== Early Venture capital Jobs talked to ==
'''CONCLUSION'''


{{edit semi-protected|Steve Jobs|answered=yes}}
Further analysis of the referenced SEC document will indicate that Apple was not facing insolvency. In addition, it was still well regarded in Silicon Valley so additional financing may have been possible--if it needed it. This is evidenced by Apple raising $661mn in a private placement of 6% unsecured convertible subordinated notes the year before.
Add in "Pre-Apple"
Nolan Bushnell recommended Steve Jobs to Don Valentine who in turn introduced him to Mike Markkula.
https://articles.sequoiacap.com/apple-story
Linzmayer 2004, pp. 8–10 [[Special:Contributions/207.96.32.81|207.96.32.81]] ([[User talk:207.96.32.81|talk]]) 00:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)


:{{Not done|Not specific enough.}} Hello, and thank you for your edit request. So that I can implement those changes, I'd like you to provide me with those 2 things:
The subject and his biographer's claim that Apple Computer, Inc. was "near-bankrupt" or facing any other insolvency is not substantiated by the company's Filing with the SEC, which contains the signature of its full board of directors, including the subject.
:*The text you wish to add; and
:*Where exactly (between which sentences) the given text should be added.
:Thank you! [[User:Cocobb8|Cocobb8]] ([[User talk:Cocobb8|talk]]) 15:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


== [[Draft:Reed Jobs]], the son of Steve Jobs ==
[[User:Pdunbarny|Pdunbarny]] ([[User talk:Pdunbarny|talk]]) 00:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


I recently created a draft for [[Draft:Reed Jobs|Reed Jobs]]. Any help would be appreciated. [[User:Thriley|Thriley]] ([[User talk:Thriley|talk]]) 02:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
<ref>http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/0001047469-97-006960.txt</ref>
<ref>http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/0000320193-97-000014.txt</ref>


== birth name ==


Actually, Steve's original birth name was Abdul Lateef John Jandali. [[Special:Contributions/97.118.121.7|97.118.121.7]] ([[User talk:97.118.121.7|talk]]) 22:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
<span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pdunbarny|Pdunbarny]] ([[User talk:Pdunbarny|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pdunbarny|contribs]]) 21:55, 24 February 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:We need a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that says that. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 23:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
:Jobs was known to exaggerate/lie about his importance in things. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 22:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
:This was [[Talk:Steve_Jobs/Archive_6#Disputed_information:_Birth_name|previously discussed]], where the conclusion was that GulfNews was the only outlet saying this, and wasn't independently confirmed, so the sourcing isn't good enough to include. And given Jobs's fame, and the large number of books written about him, anything that didn't make the cut in those books would likely be undue anyway. [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 00:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
::Are you presenting this as an argument that the article should be changed? If so, there could be the issue that this is [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]] and makes use of synthesis. [[User:BashBrannigan|BashBrannigan]] ([[User talk:BashBrannigan|talk]]) 05:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
::Also, slight [[WP:OR]]: per Isaacson's biography, his 'birth' mother planned (not fully by choice, mind you) to put him for adoption before he was born, and he was placed in a family immediately upon birth. Intuitively that would mean that his "real" birth name is what his adoptive parents picked. [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 00:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
All of my above statement is based on Apple Computer, Inc.'s documents provided to the US government and is in the public domain. The only exception is the clearly stated supposition that the claimed "90 days to bankruptcy" may relate to Apple's Japanese yen refinancing and is the only remote connection to an insolvency.


== Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2023 ==
The Wikipedia article includes a statement as fact, "Jobs brought Apple from near bankruptcy to profitability by 1998." and provides no other source for this statement than that of the subject and his biographer.


{{edit semi-protected|Steve Jobs|answered=yes}}
To date, no other party--either trade creditors / vendors, bank lenders, Wall Street research analysts or then-employees--have confirmed this statement. Auditors of Apple's financial statements, both Ernst & Young LLP in 1996 and KPMG Peat Marwick LLP in 1997, and its board of directors who approved the statements would have been misrepresenting the state of the company and conducting a fraud if the company was within days of bankruptcy and had not disclosed it to the financial markets.
Hi Wikipedia,
I have a lot of knowledge I have read from books and would like to share with everyone, I am an enthusiastic person, and trustworthy, I would like to share my prior and current knowledge with everyone using Wikipedia


Thank You,
The Wikipedia article should either remove the statement or make clear that it is, at best, an unconfirmed claim made by the subject. It does not appear factual and is thus far unconfirmed by any of thousands of parties that would have been affected had Apple filed for bankruptcy in 1997.
BobYan69 [[User:BobYan69|BobYan69]] ([[User talk:BobYan69|talk]]) 06:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> '''<span style="color:#f535aa">—</span> [[User:Paper9oll|<span style="background:#f535aa;color:#fff;padding:2px;border-radius:5px">Paper9oll</span>]] <span style="color:#f535aa">([[User talk:Paper9oll|🔔]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paper9oll|📝]])</span>''' 06:33, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


== Need help resolving this lead sentence edit-war ==
[[User:Pdunbarny|Pdunbarny]] ([[User talk:Pdunbarny|talk]]) 08:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
::I don't think you understand the issue. Wikipedia cannot use original research. Perhaps others may disagree, but to me this appears to be from your own research and analysis. The "90 Days" statement is well-sourced and can't be removed or modified without a source explicitly saying its incorrect. [[User:BashBrannigan|BashBrannigan]] ([[User talk:BashBrannigan|talk]]) 22:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
:::Not true. The source is just what Jobs said in an interview. Thus it comes from a primary source. You need to find a better source to keep it there, and it a disputed tag can be added to it. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 22:58, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


: Steven Paul Jobs (February 24, 1955 – October 5, 2011) was an American business magnate, inventor, and investor best known as the co-founder [...]
The below quote on Apple Computer, Inc.'s agreement with Microsoft Corp. in 1997 and referenced article from ''Fortune'' was published Sep 8, 1997, before the subject agreed to undertake the CEO position in Apple.


The lead sentence has been repeatedly changed this past year, with slow-motion edit warring instead of talk page discussions. I disputed "business magnate" and "investor" above as against [[MOS:ROLEBIO]], and the user who reinstated them didn't discuss on talk. {{u|Mechanical Keyboarder}} disputed {{u|Flyedit32}}'s bold addition of "inventor", and I've come to agree since it's redundant with the end of the first paragraph, but this was reinstated several times without discussion.
"[D]espite Apple's losses, with roughly $1 billion in the bank it doesn't really need cash now"


Could we all collaborate on what the lead sentence should say? How about the simplest, "American entrepreneur"? The relevant guidelines are [[MOS:FIRSTBIO]] and [[MOS:ROLEBIO]]. [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 08:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
It is philosophically impossible to "prove" a false statement certainly incorrect. One can conclude however that there is no evidence that the subject financially rescued Apple from its being 90-days to bankruptcy other than the subject's claim, his biographer's repeating it and some media republishing it.


== Semi-protected edit request on 24 November 2023 ==
It may be said that Apple may not have become as successful as it is without the leadership of the subject person, however that is conjecture and speculation and a matter for readers to decide.


{{Edit semi-protected|Steve Jobs|answered=yes}}
The Wikipedia article's quote that "Jobs brought Apple from near bankruptcy to profitability by 1998." has a high probability of being a false statement based on the below referenced article and the US government documents referenced earlier.
In the Health problems > Death section, add at the end of the 5th paragraph:


''[[Richard Stallman]] commented on his death: "I'm not glad he's dead, but I'm glad he's gone".<ref>https://www.zdnet.com/article/richard-m-stallman-on-steve-jobs-im-not-glad-hes-dead-but-im-glad-hes-gone/</ref>'' [[User:Flakesosa|Flakesosa]] ([[User talk:Flakesosa|talk]]) 21:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
<ref>{{cite journal|last=Schlender|first=Brent|journal=Fortune|date=8|year=1997|month=Sep|volume=136|issue=5|page=93|pages=93|url=http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1997/09/08/230846/index.htm|accessdate=26 February 2013}}</ref>
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:''' please establish a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for this alteration '''[[Wikipedia:Edit requests|before]]''' using the {{Tlx|Edit semi-protected}} template.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[WP:NOTDB|Why?]] [[User:Pinchme123|Pinchme123]] ([[User talk:Pinchme123|talk]]) 04:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


{{reflist-talk}}
The quoted ''Fortune'' article can also be found here: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1997/09/08/230846/index.htm


== Infobox photo ==
[[User:Pdunbarny|Pdunbarny]] ([[User talk:Pdunbarny|talk]]) 09:54, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


Can we get a better infobox photo? Why do we have the infobox photo of him near the end of his life? The 1984 portrait of him is better for the infobox photo in my humble opinion. [[User:Ccole2006|Ccole2006]] ([[User talk:Ccole2006|talk]]) 03:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The article and its quote have been registered for a dispute resolution case, which can be found here: [[Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Apple Computer's 1997 Financial Rescue]]


== Need to be paraphrased ==
Civil and balanced thoughts and comments are welcome.


To be honest, some parts of early life section is a bit confusing to me. Paul, Jobs, Paul Jobs, Clara, Clara Hagopian. Arggh, sometimes I saw no clear distinction of what refers to what. [[User:Natsuikomin|Natsuikomin]] ([[User talk:Natsuikomin|talk]]) 13:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[[User:Pdunbarny|Pdunbarny]] ([[User talk:Pdunbarny|talk]]) 13:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2024 ==
The DRN process failed. There is an alternate source supporting Apple's alleged probability of filing for bankruptcy.


{{Edit semi-protected|Steve Jobs|answered=yes}}
In the subject person's authorized biography, Ed Woolard, former CEO of DuPont, is quoted as saying at a board meeting: “If we stay with Gil as CEO, I think there’s only a 10% chance we will avoid bankruptcy,...If we fire him and convince Steve to come take over, we have a 60% chance of surviving. If we fire Gil, don’t get Steve back, and have to search for a new CEO, then we have a 40% chance of surviving.”
According to Wozniak, Jobs told him that Atari paid them only $750 (instead of the actual $5,000), and that Wozniak's share was thus $375.


Change the wording to be the same as Steve Wozniak's page, where it is much clearer that Steve Jobs scammed his best friend. It is ambiguous enough here to where I didn't realize what had happened. It sounds like he was only paid $750.
The "90 days to bankruptcy" statement from the subject person still seems exaggerated, considering the company had about $1bn in cash with little debt coming due and the director, Woolard, attesting by signature to the company's financial statements that the company had adequate cash and adequate financing.


'''Corrected version (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Wozniak) :'''
Since no corporate insider at the company is widely-known to have disputed the statement from the director confirming the assertion of the company's potential insolvency, it should nonetheless be part of the record.
Jobs had little knowledge of circuit board design and made a deal with Wozniak to split the fee evenly between them if Wozniak could minimize the number of chips. Wozniak reduced the number of chips by 50, by using RAM for the brick representation. The fact that this prototype had no scoring or coin mechanisms meant Woz's prototype could not be used. Jobs was paid the full bonus regardless. Jobs told Wozniak that Atari gave them only $700 and that Wozniak's share was thus $350 (equivalent to $2,400 in 2023).[33][5]: 147–148, 180  Wozniak did not learn about the actual $5,000 bonus (equivalent to $34,300 in 2023) until ten years later. While dismayed, he said that if Jobs had told him about it and had said he needed the money, Wozniak would have given it to him.[34]: 104–107  [[User:Quantumcon|Quantumcon]] ([[User talk:Quantumcon|talk]]) 09:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> Other Wikipedia articles are not considered reliable sources per [[WP:CIRCULAR]]. <code><nowiki>'''[[</nowiki>'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> ([[User talk:CanonNi|talk]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/CanonNi|contribs]]) 09:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


== Infobox photo ==
The current reference footnotes 16 and 17 to a blog and CNET should be replaced or appended with the biography as a source ''{{cite book|last=Isaacson|first=Walter|title=Steve Jobs|year=2011|publisher=Simon & Schuster|location=New York|isbn=978-1-4516-4853-9|page=358|edition=1st Simon & Schuster hardcover ed.}}.''
I think the 1984 portrait of him is better for the infobox than the cuurent one, which shows him at the near end of his life. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ccole2006|Ccole2006]] ([[User talk:Ccole2006#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ccole2006|contribs]]) 19:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


[[User:Pdunbarny|Pdunbarny]] ([[User talk:Pdunbarny|talk]]) 16:19, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
:The current photo shows him as he was known holding his greatest business achievement. [[User:Trillfendi|Trillfendi]] ([[User talk:Trillfendi|talk]]) 20:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
::The Mac could have also arguably been one of his greatest achievements too. [[User:Ccole2006|Ccole2006]] ([[User talk:Ccole2006|talk]]) 23:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
:::That's......why it's aleady there. You reposted that same image for no reason which is already in the article, and you already posted this topic on this very page with the same meaningless rationale. This is a "good" status and very stable article so please stop the broken record of nitpicking. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Smuckola|Smuckola]][[User talk:Smuckola|(talk)]]</span> 01:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
::::Fine. At the very least, can we get a cropped photo of the 2010 photo? That's seem to be a standard for BLP's. [[User:Ccole2006|Ccole2006]] ([[User talk:Ccole2006|talk]]) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 12 July 2024 ==
:Reference 18 added. Thank you very much for your contribution to the article. [[User:Darrell Greenwood|Darrell_Greenwood]] ([[User talk:Darrell Greenwood|talk]]) 19:19, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


{{edit semi-protected|Steve Jobs|answered=y}}
== Notice of Dispute resolution discussion ==
Add “[[né]] Abdullateef Jandali” in first line. [[Special:Contributions/207.96.32.81|207.96.32.81]] ([[User talk:207.96.32.81|talk]]) 21:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[#birth name]]. [[User:Hyphenation Expert|Hyphenation Expert]] ([[User talk:Hyphenation Expert|talk]]) 21:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 30 July 2024 ==
[[File:Peacedove.svg|70px|left]]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding a content dispute that has been discussed on this talk page. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "[[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Apple Computer's 1997 Financial Rescue|Apple Computer's 1997 Financial Rescue]]". There is a Guide for participants at the top of the [[WP:DRN]] page. Please feel free to review the guide and join the discussion. Thanks! {{clear}} --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 05:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


{{edit semi-protected|Steve Jobs|answered=yes}}
== Jobs did help design the NeXT computer ==
Please change this introduction phrase:


He died of respiratory arrest related to the tumor
Some edit warring going on about this being listed as a sub category in the "inventions and design" section. I have read his biography and he did help design the NeXT computer, showing off the parts inside, showing how neat and orderly and beautiful it was, he obsessed with making things look nice that no one would ever see. The design was his inside and out. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 18:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
:You can't just say that because you've read his biography (and I have too, probably 4 times), he designed the NEXT computer. What I'm saying is that the site that the included citation linked to did NOT state that Jobs "designed" or "invented" the NEXT computer, hence why I removed it from the sub-heading "Inventions and designs". Plus, there isn't an official patent for the "NEXT computer" as a whole system, so I don't know how Jobs can be credited as being involved in the "inventing" of it. Also, if you can find a quote in the book that supports what you're saying, then I'd be happy for you to reword this part to make it clear that Jobs only "designed" the aesthetics of it.
([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 18:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC))


to:


He died of tumor-related respiratory arrest
:I'm not sure how much input Jobs had in the design, but I believe the section should be reinserted. I don't think we need to be slaves to the definition of "invent". Jobs is closely associated with its development that its appropriate to have the section in the article. [[User:Jojhutton|<font color="#A81933">JOJ</font>]] [[User talk:Jojhutton|<font color="#CC9900"><sup>Hutton</sup>]]</font> 18:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
::But that's not what the sub-heading is. The sub-heading is "Inventions and designs". Inventions are those that are certified by the USPTO (the NEXT computer isn't a USPTO certified invention), and unless a source specifically and explicitly says that Jobs designed something, it cannot be listed under his name in this sub-heading. ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 18:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC))
:::The spirit of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedia of information so that general users can gain a grasp of the subject. You shouldn't let some technical definition if a word hinder our ability to create this encyclopedia. His involvement in that technology is well documented and the spirit of the encyclopedia is improved with its inclusion. [[User:Jojhutton|<font color="#A81933">JOJ</font>]] [[User talk:Jojhutton|<font color="#CC9900"><sup>Hutton</sup>]]</font> 19:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
So Wikipedia isn't about providing accurate and reliable information? What I'm saying is that the cited source (for this particular part) doesn't say that Jobs designed or invented the Next computer,and therefore the inclusion of the NEXT computer in this sub-heading is unjustified. Agree or disagree? ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 19:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC))
:Jobs founded, created, funded, and as CEO directed the company whose first product was the NeXT computer. The NeXT computer was Jobs's innovation. I've changed the heading being discussed to include innovations. [[User:Darrell Greenwood|Darrell_Greenwood]] ([[User talk:Darrell Greenwood|talk]]) 20:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
::Accidentally submitted my edit before finishing the edit summary. An innovation is defined simply as a "new product". In terms of the technology at the time, the NEXT was NOT considered "new" technology by any standards. Jobs wasn't the only one that funded NEXT. When it began to fail, Ross Perot invested $20 million into the company (Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson, page 174). ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 03:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC))
:::There you go with technical definitions again. The spirit of the section is to list products that he is closely associated with. Now did he sit at a desk and actually write the code and actually design the entire device? I don't know. But he is very closely associated with its development, mainly because it was his company. And listing it as it is is still correct and reliable.--[[User:Jojhutton|<font color="#A81933">JOJ</font>]] [[User talk:Jojhutton|<font color="#CC9900"><sup>Hutton</sup>]]</font> 13:11, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
::::Jojhutton, the spirit of the section ''isn't'' to list all the products that he's closely associated with. Listing anything without evidence that supports its listing is not considered to be correct or reliable. ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 13:48, 6 April 2013 (UTC))
::::Call the section "Things Jobs helped create" then. Seriously, "design" is fine. Designed the appearance, directed what the operating system would look like, what the inside of it would look like, how it would be, etc. He designed it. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 13:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
:::::Dream Focus, I'm not disputing that because that isn't the what this discussion's about. If you can find evidence that supports your statement, then you're welcome to add that Jobs was involved in the designing of the aesthetics of the first NEXT computer! Reread what my edit was about, and then tell me what you disagree about it. ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 13:48, 6 April 2013 (UTC))
::::::You want to find a better reference, then do so, but don't remove information if you don't sincerely doubt it is true. And the section "Inventions and Design" means things he invented and/or designed, he not having to do both on everything in the list. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 14:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
:::::::I removed it because the cited source does not support its inclusion under the sub-heading of "Inventions and designs". It doesn't mention that he invented it, nor does it say anything about him designing it. If the heading was "Things that Jobs' companies did while Jobs was their CEO", then I'd be happy to let it stay there. ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 14:07, 6 April 2013 (UTC))
::::::::Three people have said it should be there, one person wants it done. Consensus is clear. Leave it in. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 14:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
::::::::: You still haven't explained why it should be kept there. The cited source doesn't support it. If there isn't any evidence for it to be there, then why ''shouldn't'' it be deleted? Do you have any other suggestions that might help us reach a conclusion? We have ''not'' reached a consensus.([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 14:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC))
::::::::::I explained fine as have others. You have not convinced anyone else it should be deleted. Consensus is to have it there. Follow consensus and don't go edit warring again. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 15:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::::Asserting your opinions as fact without the slightest form of evidence for your assertions is not explaining it. "I've read somewhere that it's true, and therefore you should listen to what I say." It is the same as editing without giving a reason in the edit summary. You may keep the NEXT computer there if you find a source that supports your argument. Unfortunately, we have not reached a consensus, and consensus without reasoning doesn't warrant anything. See [[WP:BRD]] Also, you haven't actually commented on what you thought was wrong about my reasoning for the edit. That's what I think should be discussed. ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 15:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC))


Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/123.51.107.94|123.51.107.94]] ([[User talk:123.51.107.94|talk]]) 00:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Darrell_Greenwood, do you agree that the cited reference does NOT mention that the NEXT computer was designed or invented by Steve Jobs? ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 06:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC))
:Yes. But easily fixed. [[User:Darrell Greenwood|Darrell_Greenwood]] ([[User talk:Darrell Greenwood|talk]]) 18:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Charliehdb|Charliehdb]] ([[User talk:Charliehdb|talk]]) 10:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Again, see my above explanation for why I don't consider the NEXT computer as being an innovation. ([[User:Nbanato|Nbanato]] ([[User talk:Nbanato|talk]]) 03:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC))

Latest revision as of 16:30, 19 December 2024

Former good article nomineeSteve Jobs was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 12, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
October 23, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
December 15, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
In the news News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on August 25, 2011, and October 6, 2011.
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 24, 2017.
Current status: Former good article nominee


I think the correct term was that he was supposed to "modify" the circuit

[edit]

Where it states: "In mid-1975, after returning to Atari, Jobs was assigned to create [this should be "modify" I believe] a circuit board for the arcade video game Breakout.[65] According to Bushnell, Atari offered $100 (equivalent to about $500 in 2021) for each TTL chip that was eliminated in the machine. Jobs had little specialized knowledge of circuit board design and made a deal with Wozniak to split the fee evenly between them if Wozniak could minimize the number of chips. Much to the amazement of Atari engineers, Wozniak reduced the TTL count to 46, a design so tight that it was impossible to reproduce on an assembly line.[66] According to Wozniak, Jobs told him that Atari paid them only $700 (instead of the actual $5,000), and that Wozniak's share was thus $350.[67] Wozniak did not learn about the actual bonus until ten years later, but said that if Jobs had told him about it and explained that he needed the money, Wozniak would have given it to him.[68]"

You can't "eliminate" chips from a design you haven't "created" yet. It's either that or they wanted him to minimize the amount of TTL IC's to be used in a design.

But from what I've read, Atari had a board, it cost too much to make and was too large, so therefor they wanted it to be reduced in size and complexity .

But irregardless, he wasn't able to do it - Wozniak did it.

Wamnet (talk) 01:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great question; I looked it up. That's indeed in both Isaacson 2011 ("design") and Schlender & Tetzeli 2015 ("create"). Both books can be borrowed for free from the links I give. Also Isaacson: There would be a bonus, Bushnell told him, for every chip fewer than fifty that he used. If you can find a source that contradicts, please post it here.
I'm still not happy with the section though. Most is sourced to a blog. And Isaacson says Wozniak used only forty-five chips. Recollections differ, but by most accounts Jobs simply gave Wozniak half of the base fee and not the bonus Bushnell paid for saving five chips, which contradicts what we have now. However, while Linzmayer 2004 ("Apple Confidential 2.0", a solid book) agrees on "4 days", it quotes Woz as saying: “Nolan Bushnell wanted a game with as few chips as possible. Steve said if there were less than 50 chips, we got paid $700 and split it in half. Less than 40 chips, $1,000. After four nights, it was 42 chips. I wasn’t about to spend another second trying to reduce it by two more chips; I’ll settle for $700.” (notice: one says 42 chips, one says 45).
There's also something we omit in our article: according to Isaacson (page 53), Bushnell knew that Jobs was not a great engineer, but he assumed, correctly, that he would recruit Wozniak, who was always hanging around. “I looked at it as a two-for-one thing,” Bushnell recalled. “Woz was a better engineer.” (btw, "always hanging around" is supported by Malone 1999, too). I'll try to rework this later if I have time, but would rather wait until we figure out whether it was 46, 45 or 42 chips. We need a source that resolves the discrepancy. DFlhb (talk) 18:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, found it. In 2009, Woz said 45 chips[1]. And in 2013, he said "I got it down to 42, but it went back to 45 before it ran well". So every source is now congruent, with only the current blogspam source saying "46". DFlhb (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Innovations and designs section

[edit]

Don't like this section. It should explain his role in these products, his decision-making, etc., not just plainly describe the products. And I think the description of his role would best fit within the general chronology of the biography, rather than as a separate "Products" section. DFlhb (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts to lead

[edit]

@Flyedit32: why do you persist in reverting despite policy? In articles, when unsourced content is reverted, it stays out until affirmative consensus is reached (WP:BURDEN).

The first sentence is for occupations. Making one investment in Pixar doesn't make Jobs an investor. You've removed entrepreneur, which is verifiable and WP:BLUESKY, and reinstated "magnate", which is neither. I'd have added "innovator" (along with proper sources) but inventor is fine too. DFlhb (talk) 21:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In a more recent edit, you've hinted that your disputed changes are covered by MOS:LEAD. That is false, since neither labels ("magnate" and "investor") are cited in the body. I've explained on your talk page that the first lead sentence is for definitional labels; to call him an investor, we need a multitude of sources that call him that, not just sources that show he made one investment at one point in his life. You've edit warred to keep your preferred unsourced wording in the lead, and then refused to discuss, perhaps in the hopes that it gets to stay in. This is neither productive nor collaborative. Again, please self-revert. DFlhb (talk) 22:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obscure and incorrectly written acronym or initialism “woo”

[edit]

Section “Health problems”, second paragraph, last word in the following excerpt:

However, cancer researcher and alternative medicine critic David Gorski wrote that "it's impossible to know whether and by how much he might have decreased his chances of surviving his cancer through his flirtation with woo.

Both of the references for the above excerpt contain “woo”. I note that “WOO” or “WoO” stands for “Window of Opportunity” per the following:

https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.29_suppl.181#:~:text=Background%3A%20In%20%E2%80%9Cwindow%20of%20opportunity,and%20definitive%20anti%2Dcancer%20treatment. In “window of opportunity” (WOO) clinical trials, people with newly diagnosed early-stage cancer are exposed to an experimental drug during the period of time between diagnosis and definitive anti-cancer treatment. These trials allow investigators to study drug efficacy in untreated disease, which can expedite drug development. However, for trial participants, the WOO approach requires them to decide about an altruistic clinical trial during an intense time immediately after cancer diagnosis. This qualitative study aimed to understand patient perspectives on WOO clinical trials.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04644289 WoO: Window of Opportunity Trial of Olaparib and Durvalumab in Histologically Proven EOC (WoO)

Should a reference to the meaning of “woo” (I don’t know whether it’s an acronym or an initialism) and the fact that it should have been written as “WOO” or “WoO” (if both are considered to be correct) in the excerpt’s references be included? I suppose the easiest thing would be to replace “woo” with “[WOO]” (if that’s considered acceptable) and make it a link to the ascopubs.org page above which defines it. Dbsx (talk) 13:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See wiktionary:woo#Etymology 3, which leads to wiktionary:woo woo#NounDFlhb (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This entire section has GOT to be a POE, right? This comment proceeds from a false assumption that woo is an initialization or acronym; it isn't.
The term woo generally refers to pseudoscientific pursuits — particularly pseudoscientific modalities in medicine. We all have blind spots, but to have failed to perform a simple Google search for: "woo medicine" is a hell of an oversight.
So perhaps today was the day you and other readers learned that woo is a term used extensively by science communicators. It's even used right here on Wikipedia
themoreyouknow.gif Jeffnathan (talk) 07:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly concur with User:Dbsx. I specialized in the history of science as an undergraduate in one of the highest-ranked history departments in the world and I've never heard of that term.
I just ran some Google searches against skepticalinquirer.org. It looks like the term "woo" was very rare before 2018. Even if the term is becoming more commonly used in pseudoscience circles, it is still unheard of in the mainstream media. For example, searching Google News returns a lot of recent results for Bryan Woo, and one mention of the longer related term "woo-woo" from the New York Post.
This looks like a straightforward application of WP:NOT. WP is not a soapbox or means of promotion or an indiscriminate collection of information. This article is not the place to go about promoting such an obscure term. --Coolcaesar (talk) 07:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's just how Gorski speaks, and he's not soapboxing to promote the word. I checked and it's in the Oxford dictionary (both long-form and short-form). There's nothing to see here, he's an expert, why would we literally argue over semantics? DFlhb (talk) 08:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's tempting to dive into a treatise on the timeline of the use of the term woo-woo (now frequently shortened to woo) and how James Randi may have coined the term (and that he began holding The Amazing Meeting conference in 2003. Or that David Gorski is an editor of Science-Based Medicine. Or Jerry Coyne, University of Chicago evolutionary biology professor and author of Why Evolution is True wrote in 2011 that Woo may have killed Steve Jobs.
There's extensive support for the premise that Jobs belief and adherence to pseudoscientific treatments delayed his receiving appropriate treatment. As a compromise may I suggest using the term woo within the body of related text but not as the basis of a section heading? Jeffnathan (talk) 18:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we create a template series for Jobs?

[edit]

Should we create a series template for Jobs like there is for Musk or Gates? It wouldn't have to be too long or anything, but I do feel like there is plenty to use for it, and it could help with reader navigation, too. Thanks. ~ Flyedit32 (talk) 15:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Jobs was not an inventor

[edit]

He was a businessman that revealed technology to mass media and the public. Mechanical Keyboarder (talk) 04:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Early Venture capital Jobs talked to

[edit]

Add in "Pre-Apple" Nolan Bushnell recommended Steve Jobs to Don Valentine who in turn introduced him to Mike Markkula. https://articles.sequoiacap.com/apple-story Linzmayer 2004, pp. 8–10 207.96.32.81 (talk) 00:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not specific enough. Hello, and thank you for your edit request. So that I can implement those changes, I'd like you to provide me with those 2 things:
  • The text you wish to add; and
  • Where exactly (between which sentences) the given text should be added.
Thank you! Cocobb8 (talk) 15:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Reed Jobs, the son of Steve Jobs

[edit]

I recently created a draft for Reed Jobs. Any help would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 02:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

birth name

[edit]

Actually, Steve's original birth name was Abdul Lateef John Jandali. 97.118.121.7 (talk) 22:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need a reliable source that says that. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was previously discussed, where the conclusion was that GulfNews was the only outlet saying this, and wasn't independently confirmed, so the sourcing isn't good enough to include. And given Jobs's fame, and the large number of books written about him, anything that didn't make the cut in those books would likely be undue anyway. DFlhb (talk) 00:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, slight WP:OR: per Isaacson's biography, his 'birth' mother planned (not fully by choice, mind you) to put him for adoption before he was born, and he was placed in a family immediately upon birth. Intuitively that would mean that his "real" birth name is what his adoptive parents picked. DFlhb (talk) 00:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2023

[edit]

Hi Wikipedia, I have a lot of knowledge I have read from books and would like to share with everyone, I am an enthusiastic person, and trustworthy, I would like to share my prior and current knowledge with everyone using Wikipedia

Thank You, BobYan69 BobYan69 (talk) 06:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 06:33, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need help resolving this lead sentence edit-war

[edit]
Steven Paul Jobs (February 24, 1955 – October 5, 2011) was an American business magnate, inventor, and investor best known as the co-founder [...]

The lead sentence has been repeatedly changed this past year, with slow-motion edit warring instead of talk page discussions. I disputed "business magnate" and "investor" above as against MOS:ROLEBIO, and the user who reinstated them didn't discuss on talk. Mechanical Keyboarder disputed Flyedit32's bold addition of "inventor", and I've come to agree since it's redundant with the end of the first paragraph, but this was reinstated several times without discussion.

Could we all collaborate on what the lead sentence should say? How about the simplest, "American entrepreneur"? The relevant guidelines are MOS:FIRSTBIO and MOS:ROLEBIO. DFlhb (talk) 08:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 November 2023

[edit]

In the Health problems > Death section, add at the end of the 5th paragraph:

Richard Stallman commented on his death: "I'm not glad he's dead, but I'm glad he's gone".[1] Flakesosa (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. Why? Pinchme123 (talk) 04:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Infobox photo

[edit]

Can we get a better infobox photo? Why do we have the infobox photo of him near the end of his life? The 1984 portrait of him is better for the infobox photo in my humble opinion. Ccole2006 (talk) 03:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need to be paraphrased

[edit]

To be honest, some parts of early life section is a bit confusing to me. Paul, Jobs, Paul Jobs, Clara, Clara Hagopian. Arggh, sometimes I saw no clear distinction of what refers to what. Natsuikomin (talk) 13:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2024

[edit]

According to Wozniak, Jobs told him that Atari paid them only $750 (instead of the actual $5,000), and that Wozniak's share was thus $375.

Change the wording to be the same as Steve Wozniak's page, where it is much clearer that Steve Jobs scammed his best friend. It is ambiguous enough here to where I didn't realize what had happened. It sounds like he was only paid $750.

Corrected version (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Wozniak) : Jobs had little knowledge of circuit board design and made a deal with Wozniak to split the fee evenly between them if Wozniak could minimize the number of chips. Wozniak reduced the number of chips by 50, by using RAM for the brick representation. The fact that this prototype had no scoring or coin mechanisms meant Woz's prototype could not be used. Jobs was paid the full bonus regardless. Jobs told Wozniak that Atari gave them only $700 and that Wozniak's share was thus $350 (equivalent to $2,400 in 2023).[33][5]: 147–148, 180  Wozniak did not learn about the actual $5,000 bonus (equivalent to $34,300 in 2023) until ten years later. While dismayed, he said that if Jobs had told him about it and had said he needed the money, Wozniak would have given it to him.[34]: 104–107  Quantumcon (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Other Wikipedia articles are not considered reliable sources per WP:CIRCULAR. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo

[edit]

I think the 1984 portrait of him is better for the infobox than the cuurent one, which shows him at the near end of his life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccole2006 (talkcontribs) 19:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The current photo shows him as he was known holding his greatest business achievement. Trillfendi (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Mac could have also arguably been one of his greatest achievements too. Ccole2006 (talk) 23:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's......why it's aleady there. You reposted that same image for no reason which is already in the article, and you already posted this topic on this very page with the same meaningless rationale. This is a "good" status and very stable article so please stop the broken record of nitpicking. — Smuckola(talk) 01:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine. At the very least, can we get a cropped photo of the 2010 photo? That's seem to be a standard for BLP's. Ccole2006 (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 July 2024

[edit]

Add “ Abdullateef Jandali” in first line. 207.96.32.81 (talk) 21:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: #birth name. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 21:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 July 2024

[edit]

Please change this introduction phrase:

He died of respiratory arrest related to the tumor

to:

He died of tumor-related respiratory arrest

Thank you. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 00:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Charliehdb (talk) 10:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]