Jump to content

Short Cockle: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
restore images
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout. -->
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout. -->
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2017}}
{{Use British English|date=January 2017}}
{|{{Infobox Aircraft Begin
{|{{Infobox Aircraft Begin
| name=S.1 Cockle
| name=S.1 Cockle
| image=File:Short Cockle, motoring (Montagu, Cars and Motor-Cycles, 1928).jpg
| image=Short Cockle, motoring (Montagu, Cars and Motor-Cycles, 1928).jpg
| caption=Cockle on the [[River Medway]], [[Rochester, Kent|Rochester]] in 1924 - original fin.
| caption=Cockle on the [[River Medway]], [[Rochester, Kent|Rochester]] in 1924 - original fin
}}{{Infobox Aircraft Type
}}{{Infobox Aircraft Type
| type=Sport flying boat
| type=Sport flying boat
Line 20: Line 22:
|}
|}


The '''Short S.1 Cockle''' was a single-seat sport [[monoplane]] [[flying boat]], with a novel [[monocoque]] [[duralumin]] hull. It was underpowered and so did not leave the water easily, but it proved that watertight and [[corrosion]] resistant hulls could be built from metal.
The '''Short S.1 Cockle''' was a single-seat sport [[monoplane]] [[flying boat]], with a novel [[monocoque]] [[duralumin]] hull. It was underpowered and so did not leave the water easily, but it proved that watertight and [[corrosion]]-resistant hulls could be built from metal.


==Development==
==Development==
From about 1921, [[Oswald Short]] had been thinking about the construction of seaplane floats and flying boat hulls made from metal, specifically [[duralumin]], rather than the traditional wood. The latter always suffered from water retention and did not last well in the tropics. He assembled a team, including C. P. T. Liscomb who had extensive experience with that alloy to look into the hydrodynamics and corrosion characteristics of such hulls, and by 1924 was looking out for an opportunity to apply their results. It came with an Australian order for an aircraft suitable for fishing trips around Botany Bay, which Short proposed should be a small flying boat.<ref name="Barnes"/> It was named the '''Stellite''' and was the first aircraft to have a Short's design index number, '''S.1''' When it was built and registered as ''G-EBKA'' the Air Ministry objected to the name on the reasonable grounds that the Short Stellite might well be confused with the Short Satellite, built at much the same time; it was therefore renamed the Short S.1 Cockle. It was the smallest flying boat ever built at that time.<ref name="Barnes">{{Harvnb|Barnes|1989|pages=180–3, 186}}</ref> A contemporary source<ref name=Flight24-220/> claimed it as "the first light seaplane to be built <nowiki>[in the United Kingdom]</nowiki> and possibly in the world" and the first British all-metal flying boat.
From about 1921, [[Oswald Short]] had been thinking about the construction of seaplane floats and flying boat hulls made from metal, specifically [[duralumin]], rather than the traditional wood. The latter always suffered from water retention and did not last well in the tropics. He assembled a team, including C. P. T. Liscomb who had extensive experience with that alloy to look into the hydrodynamics and corrosion characteristics of such hulls, and by 1924 was looking out for an opportunity to apply their results. It came with an Australian order for an aircraft suitable for fishing trips around Botany Bay, which Short proposed should be a small flying boat.<ref name="Barnes"/> It was named the '''Stellite''' and was the first aircraft to have a Short's design index number, '''S.1'''. When it was built and registered as ''G-EBKA'' the Air Ministry objected to the name on the reasonable grounds that the Short Stellite might well be confused with the Short Satellite, built at much the same time; it was therefore renamed the Short S.1 Cockle. It was the smallest flying boat ever built at that time.<ref name="Barnes">{{Harvnb|Barnes|1989|pages=180–3, 186}}</ref> A contemporary source<ref name=Flight24-220/> claimed it to be "the first light seaplane to be built <nowiki>[in the United Kingdom]</nowiki> and possibly in the world" and the first British all-metal flying boat.


The Cockle <ref name="Barnes"/><ref name=Flight24-220>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200220.html ''Flight'' 17 April 1924 pp. 220-3]</ref> was an all-metal aircraft apart from the fabric covered flying surfaces. The hull was a duralumin monocoque structure with a concave V-shaped planing bottom incorporating two steps, the main one near the centre of gravity. These steps were external to the monocoque to prevent step damage leading to water leakage into the hull. The top of the hull was rounded, with a single-seat open cockpit near the nose. The wings had steel spars and were mounted on the top of the fuselage, with pairs of bracing struts to the chines. The wings carried full span ailerons which could be drooped together, flap-like, for landing. There were stabilising floats near the wing tips in trouser like fairings. The two engines were mounted on top of the wing at about mid-chord, the twin-bladed propellers being driven via long extension shafts to the leading edge. Originally the Cockle had a shallow triangular fin and rudder,<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200221.html ''Flight'' 17 April 1924 p. 221]</ref><ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200778.html ''Flight'' 11 December 1924 p. 778]</ref> but this was later extended upwards to a curved and slightly pointed profile which more than doubled the area, to cope better with single-engine flying.<ref name="Barnes"/> A tube ran transversely across the hull just above the main step, into which the axle of a pair of ground-handling wheels could be inserted.<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200223.html ''Flight'' 17 April 1924 p. 223]</ref>
The Cockle <ref name="Barnes"/><ref name=Flight24-220>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200220.html ''Flight'' 17 April 1924 pp. 220-3]</ref> was an all-metal aircraft apart from the fabric-covered flying surfaces. The hull was a duralumin monocoque structure with a concave V-shaped planing bottom incorporating two steps, the main one near the centre of gravity. These steps were external to the monocoque to prevent step damage leading to water leakage into the hull. The top of the hull was rounded, with a single-seat open cockpit near the nose. The wings had steel spars and were mounted on the top of the fuselage, with pairs of bracing struts to the chines. The wings carried full-span ailerons which could be drooped together, flap-like, for landing. There were stabilising floats near the wingtips in trouser-like fairings. The two engines were mounted on top of the wing at about mid-chord, the twin-bladed propellers being driven via long extension shafts to the leading edge. Originally the Cockle had a shallow triangular fin and rudder,<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200221.html ''Flight'' 17 April 1924 p. 221]</ref><ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200778.html ''Flight'' 11 December 1924 p. 778]</ref> but this was later extended upwards to a curved and slightly pointed profile which more than doubled the area, to cope better with single-engine flying.<ref name="Barnes"/> A tube ran transversely across the hull just above the main step, into which the axle of a pair of ground-handling wheels could be inserted.<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200223.html ''Flight'' 17 April 1924 p. 223]</ref>


Deterred from using 32&nbsp;hp (24&nbsp;kW) [[Bristol Cherub]] flat twin engines by vibration problems, the Cockle began life with a pair of Vee-twin [[Blackburne Tomtit]]s. Ungeared and so limited to the maximum 2,400 rpm of the propellers, the Tomtits could only produce 16&nbsp;hp (12&nbsp;kW).<ref name="Barnes"/> It is not surprising that, when it came to the first flight, the Cockle was underpowered. Before the aircraft was complete the bare hull (always Short's main concern) was floated for a day in April 1924 and found to be satisfactorily watertight.<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200222.html ''Flight'' 17 April 1924 p. 222]</ref> Attempts to get it off the water began in September, but did not succeed until 7 November 1924, with its wing at a higher angle of incidence and its pilot lightly dressed. It has been suggested that it only flew because the atmospheric pressure was exceptionally high that day.<ref name="Barnes"/>
Deterred from using 32&nbsp;hp (24&nbsp;kW) [[Bristol Cherub]] flat-twin engines owing to vibration problems, the Cockle began with a pair of V-twin [[Blackburne Tomtit]]s. Ungeared and so limited to the maximum 2,400 rpm of the propellers, the Tomtits could produce only 16&nbsp;hp (12&nbsp;kW).<ref name="Barnes"/> It is not surprising that, when it came to the first flight, the Cockle was underpowered. Before the aircraft was complete the bare hull (always Short's main concern) was floated for a day in April 1924 and found to be satisfactorily watertight.<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200222.html ''Flight'' 17 April 1924 p. 222]</ref> Attempts to get it off the water began in September, but did not succeed until 7 November 1924, with its wing at a higher angle of incidence and its pilot lightly dressed. It has been suggested that it flew only because the atmospheric pressure was exceptionally high that day.<ref name="Barnes"/>


Given the poor performance, it is not surprising that the Australian customer declined delivery. In January 1925 the fin and rudder modifications were made and in March there were unsuccessful attempts to get certification. In July it went on loan to the [[Air Ministry]] at [[Felixstowe]], with the serial ''N193''. It was not easy to get into the air, but [[John Lankester Parker|John Parker]], Short's test pilot gave a demonstration in September. Despite the performance limitations, the aircraft impressed because of its corrosion resistance. In August 1926 the Cockle was returned to Short Brothers and re-engined with a pair of geared-down Cherubs. It flew several times in June and July before being purchased by the Air Ministry and returned to Felixstowe. It flew at least one more time, again with Parker as pilot, thereafter being used for corrosion testing.<ref name="Barnes"/>
Given the poor performance, it is not surprising that the Australian customer declined delivery. In January 1925 the fin and rudder modifications were made and in March there were unsuccessful attempts to get certification. In July it went on loan to the [[Air Ministry]] at [[RAF Felixstowe|Felixstowe]], with the serial ''N193''. It was not easy to get into the air, but [[John Lankester Parker|John Parker]], Short's test pilot gave a demonstration in September. Despite the performance limitations, the aircraft impressed because of its corrosion resistance. In August 1926 the Cockle was returned to Short Brothers and re-engined with a pair of geared-down Cherubs. It flew several times in June and July before being purchased by the Air Ministry and returned to Felixstowe. It flew at least one more time, again with Parker as pilot, thereafter being used for corrosion testing.<ref name="Barnes"/>


Though not a successful flyer, the Cockle gave Short Brothers valuable experience in building metal hulls for flying boats. Their first large hull, the [[Short S.2]] metal replacement for the wooden hull of a [[Felixstowe F5]] was started at the same time as that of the Cockle, but the smaller hull progressed faster and the solution to problems encountered with it transferred to the S.2. The S.2 experience led on to the successful [[Short Singapore|Singapore]] and [[Short Calcutta]] of 1926 and 1928.<ref name="Barnes"/>
Though not a successful flyer, the Cockle gave Short Brothers valuable experience in building metal hulls for flying boats. Their first large hull, the [[Short S.2]] metal replacement for the wooden hull of a [[Felixstowe F5]] was started at the same time as that of the Cockle, but the smaller hull progressed faster and the solution to problems encountered with it transferred to the S.2. The S.2 experience led on to the successful [[Short Singapore|Singapore]] and [[Short Calcutta]] of 1926 and 1928.<ref name="Barnes"/>
Line 39: Line 41:
[[File:Short Cockle, overhead (Montagu, Cars and Motor-Cycles, 1928).jpg|right|thumb]]
[[File:Short Cockle, overhead (Montagu, Cars and Motor-Cycles, 1928).jpg|right|thumb]]
[[File:Short Cockle, from astern (Montagu, Cars and Motor-Cycles, 1928).jpg|right|thumb| Cockle in 1924 with original fin]]
[[File:Short Cockle, from astern (Montagu, Cars and Motor-Cycles, 1928).jpg|right|thumb| Cockle in 1924 with original fin]]
{{Aircraft specs
{{aerospecs
|ref={{Harvnb|Barnes|1989|pages=186}}
|ref=<ref>{{Harvnb|Barnes|1989|pages=186}}</ref>
|prime units?=imp
|met or eng?=eng<!-- eng for US/UK aircraft, met for all others. You MUST include one or the other here, or no specifications will show -->
<!--
|crew=1
General characteristics
-->

|crew=one
|capacity=
|capacity=
|length m=7.52
|length m=
|length ft=24
|length ft=24
|length in=8
|length in=8
|span m=10.97
|span m=
|span ft=36
|span ft=36
|span in=0
|span in=0
|swept m=<!-- swing-wings -->
|swept ft=<!-- swing-wings -->
|swept in=<!-- swing-wings -->
|rot number=<!-- helicopters -->
|rot dia m=<!-- helicopters -->
|rot dia ft=<!-- helicopters -->
|rot dia in=<!-- helicopters -->
|dia m=<!-- airships etc -->
|dia ft=<!-- airships etc -->
|dia in=<!-- airships etc -->
|width m=<!-- if applicable -->
|width ft=<!-- if applicable -->
|width in=<!-- if applicable -->
|height m=
|height m=
|height ft=
|height ft=
|height in=
|height in=
|wing area sqm=19.50
|wing area sqm=
|wing area sqft=210
|wing area sqft=210
|empty weight kg=
|swept area sqm=<!-- swing-wings -->
|swept area sqft=<!-- swing-wings -->
|rot area sqm=<!-- helicopters -->
|rot area sqft=<!-- helicopters -->
|volume m3=<!-- lighter-than-air -->
|volume ft3=<!-- lighter-than-air -->
|aspect ratio=<!-- sailplanes -->
|wing profile=<!-- sailplanes -->
|empty weight kg=400
|empty weight lb=880
|empty weight lb=880
|gross weight kg=57
|gross weight kg=
|gross weight lb=1,205
|gross weight lb=1205
|fuel capacity=
|lift kg=<!-- lighter-than-air -->
<!--
|lift lb=<!-- lighter-than-air -->
Powerplant
-->
|eng1 number=2
|eng1 number=2
|eng1 type=[[Bristol Cherub]] flat twin
|eng1 name=[[Bristol Cherub]]
|eng1 type=flat twin
|eng1 kw=24<!-- prop engines -->
|eng1 kw=<!-- prop engines -->
|eng1 hp=32<!-- prop engines -->
|eng1 hp=32<!-- prop engines -->

|eng1 kn=<!-- jet/rocket engines -->
|eng1 lbf=<!-- jet/rocket engines -->
|prop blade number=<!-- propeller aircraft -->
|prop name=
|eng1 kn-ab=<!-- afterburners -->
|eng1 lbf-ab=<!-- afterburners -->
|prop dia m=<!-- propeller aircraft -->
|prop dia ft=<!-- propeller aircraft -->
|eng2 number=
|prop dia in=<!-- propeller aircraft -->
|eng2 type=

|eng2 kw=<!-- prop engines -->
<!--
|eng2 hp=<!-- prop engines -->
Performance
|eng2 kn=<!-- jet/rocket engines -->
-->
|eng2 lbf=<!-- jet/rocket engines -->

|eng2 kn-ab=<!-- afterburners -->
|max speed kmh=
|eng2 lbf-ab=<!-- afterburners -->
|max speed kmh=117
|max speed mph=73
|max speed mph=73
|max speed kts=
|max speed mach=<!-- supersonic aircraft -->
|max speed mach=<!-- supersonic aircraft -->
|cruise speed kmh=<!-- if max speed unknown -->
|cruise speed kmh=<!-- if max speed unknown -->
|cruise speed mph=<!-- if max speed unknown -->
|cruise speed mph=<!-- if max speed unknown -->
|cruise speed kts=
|stall speed kmh=<!-- aerobatic and STOL aircraft -->
|stall speed mph=<!-- aerobatic and STOL aircraft -->
|range km=
|range km=
|range miles=
|range miles=
|range nmi=
|endurance h=<!-- if range unknown -->
|endurance min=<!-- if range unknown -->
|ceiling m=
|ceiling m=
|ceiling ft=
|ceiling ft=
|g limits=<!-- aerobatic aircraft -->
|roll rate=<!-- aerobatic aircraft -->
|glide ratio=<!-- sailplanes -->
|climb rate ms=
|climb rate ms=
|climb rate ftmin=
|climb rate ftmin=
|more performance=
|sink rate ms=<!-- sailplanes -->

|sink rate ftmin=<!-- sailplanes -->
|avionics=
|armament1=
|armament2=
|armament3=
|armament4=
|armament5=
|armament6=
}}
}}


Line 135: Line 113:
|lists=<!-- related lists -->
|lists=<!-- related lists -->
*[[Short Mussel]]
*[[Short Mussel]]
*[[List of seaplanes and amphibious aircraft]]
*[[List of flying boats and floatplanes]]
}}
}}


==References==
==References==

===Notes===
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

===Bibliography===
==Bibliography==
{{commons category|Short Cockle}}
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite book |title= Shorts Aircraft since 1900|last= Barnes|first=C.H.|year=1989 |publisher=Putnam Publishing |location=London |isbn= 0-87021-662-7|ref=harv}}
*{{cite book |title= Shorts Aircraft since 1900|last= Barnes|first=C.H.|year=1989 |publisher=Putnam Publishing |location=London |isbn= 0-87021-662-7}}
*{{cite magazine |title=The Short All-Metal Light Flying Boat: Two 696 c.c. Blackburne Engines |magazine=[[Flight International|Flight]] |date=17 April 1924 |volume=XVI |issue=799 |pages=220–223 |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200220.html |access-date=26 March 2019 |ref={{harvid|''Flight'' 17 April 1924}} }}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}

==External links==
{{commons category-inline|Short Cockle}}


{{Short Brothers aircraft}}
{{Short Brothers aircraft}}
{{Aviation lists}}


[[Category:Short Brothers aircraft|Cockle]]
[[Category:Short Brothers aircraft|Cockle]]
[[Category:British sport aircraft 1920–1929]]
[[Category:1920s British experimental aircraft]]
[[Category:1920s British sport aircraft]]
[[Category:Flying boats]]
[[Category:Flying boats]]
[[Category:Twin-engined tractor aircraft]]
[[Category:High-wing aircraft]]
[[Category:High-wing aircraft]]
[[Category:Aircraft first flown in 1924]]
[[Category:Twin piston-engined tractor aircraft]]

Latest revision as of 15:31, 3 January 2024

S.1 Cockle
Cockle on the River Medway, Rochester in 1924 - original fin
Role Sport flying boat
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Short Brothers
First flight 7 November 1924
Number built 1

The Short S.1 Cockle was a single-seat sport monoplane flying boat, with a novel monocoque duralumin hull. It was underpowered and so did not leave the water easily, but it proved that watertight and corrosion-resistant hulls could be built from metal.

Development

[edit]

From about 1921, Oswald Short had been thinking about the construction of seaplane floats and flying boat hulls made from metal, specifically duralumin, rather than the traditional wood. The latter always suffered from water retention and did not last well in the tropics. He assembled a team, including C. P. T. Liscomb who had extensive experience with that alloy to look into the hydrodynamics and corrosion characteristics of such hulls, and by 1924 was looking out for an opportunity to apply their results. It came with an Australian order for an aircraft suitable for fishing trips around Botany Bay, which Short proposed should be a small flying boat.[1] It was named the Stellite and was the first aircraft to have a Short's design index number, S.1. When it was built and registered as G-EBKA the Air Ministry objected to the name on the reasonable grounds that the Short Stellite might well be confused with the Short Satellite, built at much the same time; it was therefore renamed the Short S.1 Cockle. It was the smallest flying boat ever built at that time.[1] A contemporary source[2] claimed it to be "the first light seaplane to be built [in the United Kingdom] and possibly in the world" and the first British all-metal flying boat.

The Cockle [1][2] was an all-metal aircraft apart from the fabric-covered flying surfaces. The hull was a duralumin monocoque structure with a concave V-shaped planing bottom incorporating two steps, the main one near the centre of gravity. These steps were external to the monocoque to prevent step damage leading to water leakage into the hull. The top of the hull was rounded, with a single-seat open cockpit near the nose. The wings had steel spars and were mounted on the top of the fuselage, with pairs of bracing struts to the chines. The wings carried full-span ailerons which could be drooped together, flap-like, for landing. There were stabilising floats near the wingtips in trouser-like fairings. The two engines were mounted on top of the wing at about mid-chord, the twin-bladed propellers being driven via long extension shafts to the leading edge. Originally the Cockle had a shallow triangular fin and rudder,[3][4] but this was later extended upwards to a curved and slightly pointed profile which more than doubled the area, to cope better with single-engine flying.[1] A tube ran transversely across the hull just above the main step, into which the axle of a pair of ground-handling wheels could be inserted.[5]

Deterred from using 32 hp (24 kW) Bristol Cherub flat-twin engines owing to vibration problems, the Cockle began with a pair of V-twin Blackburne Tomtits. Ungeared and so limited to the maximum 2,400 rpm of the propellers, the Tomtits could produce only 16 hp (12 kW).[1] It is not surprising that, when it came to the first flight, the Cockle was underpowered. Before the aircraft was complete the bare hull (always Short's main concern) was floated for a day in April 1924 and found to be satisfactorily watertight.[6] Attempts to get it off the water began in September, but did not succeed until 7 November 1924, with its wing at a higher angle of incidence and its pilot lightly dressed. It has been suggested that it flew only because the atmospheric pressure was exceptionally high that day.[1]

Given the poor performance, it is not surprising that the Australian customer declined delivery. In January 1925 the fin and rudder modifications were made and in March there were unsuccessful attempts to get certification. In July it went on loan to the Air Ministry at Felixstowe, with the serial N193. It was not easy to get into the air, but John Parker, Short's test pilot gave a demonstration in September. Despite the performance limitations, the aircraft impressed because of its corrosion resistance. In August 1926 the Cockle was returned to Short Brothers and re-engined with a pair of geared-down Cherubs. It flew several times in June and July before being purchased by the Air Ministry and returned to Felixstowe. It flew at least one more time, again with Parker as pilot, thereafter being used for corrosion testing.[1]

Though not a successful flyer, the Cockle gave Short Brothers valuable experience in building metal hulls for flying boats. Their first large hull, the Short S.2 metal replacement for the wooden hull of a Felixstowe F5 was started at the same time as that of the Cockle, but the smaller hull progressed faster and the solution to problems encountered with it transferred to the S.2. The S.2 experience led on to the successful Singapore and Short Calcutta of 1926 and 1928.[1]

Specifications (Cherub)

[edit]
Cockle in 1924 with original fin

Data from [7]

General characteristics

  • Crew: one
  • Length: 24 ft 8 in (7.52 m)
  • Wingspan: 36 ft 0 in (10.97 m)
  • Wing area: 210 sq ft (20 m2)
  • Empty weight: 880 lb (399 kg)
  • Gross weight: 1,205 lb (547 kg)
  • Powerplant: 2 × Bristol Cherub flat twin, 32 hp (24 kW) each

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 73 mph (117 km/h, 63 kn)

See also

[edit]

Related lists

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Barnes, C.H. (1989). Shorts Aircraft since 1900. London: Putnam Publishing. ISBN 0-87021-662-7.
  • "The Short All-Metal Light Flying Boat: Two 696 c.c. Blackburne Engines". Flight. Vol. XVI, no. 799. 17 April 1924. pp. 220–223. Retrieved 26 March 2019.