User talk:Doncram: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 01:17, 13 November 2024

This Wikipedian is deceased. Respectful comments of remembrance may be left below.
See Obituary.

(e) as of Dec2010 as of Dec2014

Condolences

I am a friend of this user IRL. Unfortunately, he died suddenly July 9, 2023. His many, many thousands of edits here will remain testament to his passionate regard for Wikipedia. lvklock (talk · contribs) 08:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wherever you go from here, bro, make every edit count. Thanks for the privilege of knowing you, if only online. SN54129 20:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to learn of this. Doncram was so welcoming and helpful to me when I first started writing NRHP articles. I will miss him. Schazjmd (talk) 20:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What a loss! BD2412 T 20:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, damn. I recall we didn't get off on the best foot, after he thought I was saying his draft article was no longer worthy as I had created one in the mainspace, but he was a diligent editor, especially on articles and categories in support of Savannah, Georgia, such as Category:Savannah Historic District. User:Bubba73 likely remembers him too. Seasider53 (talk) 22:11, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoyed reading his article on Great Hill Place. Others may, as well. Seasider53 (talk) 22:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I remember him very well. He did so much for the National Historic Register project. Unfortunately he rubbed some people the wrong way, especially when he created a lot of stubs. Many of the stubs were deleted. I was always on good terms with him and tried to flesh out a few things. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 22:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry for his family and friends. He was a giant in his arena on Wikipedia. Doncram was a relentless contributor and always attempting to standardize and source in NHRP pages. Such an enormous body of stable and important work on historical sites he created himself from lists he also helped create. Few have had such dedication to improving pages on historic American locations as he. His edits will endure. BusterD (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have lost another one of the greats. He was so kind and creative and his work on the US National Historic Register entries and US Nat'l Historic Landmarks was stellar. I am very sad to hear this news. My condolences go out to his loved ones. He did a lot of good work here. Netherzone (talk) 03:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don did a huge amount of work himself, and I'm sure I've run across only a small slice of it. But he also worked with other editors to help us do better work, which will continue to bear fruit. I appreciate his encouragement and guidance. --Jeff the quiet (talk) 04:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Damn. RIP. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He did so much foundational work for the NRHP WikiProject - any of us who have worked in that arena have his shoulders to stand on, among others. May his memory be a blessing. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't always see eye-to-eye with Doncram, especially with his method of creating articles. But, I appreciated his dedication to the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject and his eye for detail. He helped me improve the NRHP infobox generator, as well. His memory will live on in his legacy of Wikipedia edits. My condolences to his family. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 18:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A real loss. I never had to double check his edits. Carptrash (talk) 19:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is terrible news. Like Elkman, I found Doncram difficult to deal with a decade ago, but after that blew up into an ArbCom case, he came back and continued to edit prolifically in the area of dispute for many years without major trouble. Most people either wind up getting blocked or quitting when something like that happens, and I think it speaks really well of him that he pulled it off. He put everything he had into improving our NRHP coverage, and his unstinting energy and enthusiasm have helped maintain a vibrant editorial community in that part of the encyclopedia. I was going to answer his last question, and then I found this...it's really sad. My condolences to his friends and family. I'm really going to miss him and his work. Choess (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what to say... Don was always full of good ideas, always complimenting others products, very hard working. He is going to be missed, and we've lost a great contributor. Thank you Don. 25or6to4 (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow, what a loss. We ran into one another on a lot of museums and historic sites and while we didn't always see eye to eye, I learned a lot from him. My condolences to lvklock and others who knew him. Star Mississippi 13:28, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Like many others, I worked closely with Don in the NRHP space 15 years ago. He sometimes rubbed people the wrong way, but no one doubted his desire to improve Wikipedia. I met him and lvklock in NYC for dinner once. It was nice to put a face to the user, but also to see beyond the sometimes abrasive tone and see someone who cared deeply. Condolences to his family, friends, and fellow editors who worked with him. dm (talk) 11:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't worked with him in a while, largely because I'm not as an active a creator of NRHP articles as I was a decade or so ago, but I will miss him and no one can deny that he put a lot of energy into making WP:NRHP one of our more active projects when it might not have been all by itself. Yes, he could be stubborn when he had his mind up, but I never personally had a problem with him over that. I had the chance to briefly meet him at a WM-NYC event, and in that time I, like Dmadeo, came away with my good impression of him reinforced. My condolences to lvklock (who was also with him) as well. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Saddened to hear this, he was such a prolific contributor when it came to historic sites. Despite our handful of disagreements, I was always pleased to see his edits that formed such a wide base of subjects and thoughtful analysis. Reywas92^Talk 19:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking at the obituary of Eagleash and saw that Doncram had also died this month. Two long-time Wikipedians. I wasn't always on the same side of in discussions as Doncram but he worked passionately and devotedly on subjects that he valued and cared about. He really was one of a kind. He will be missed. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits will endure, and You will be missed. R.I.P! — Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was also sorry to read of Doncram’s death. Unconventional, certainly, and sometimes challenging to deal with, but his body of work in the NRHP space was phenomenal. He was also generous with his advice and, even if I didn’t always follow it, his thoughts were exceptionally useful in developing the coverage of historic places in Wales. RIP. KJP1 (talk) 07:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A loss... you helped me when I was brand-new, inspiring me to check out the NHRP WikiProject. You will be missed. --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 23:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Cram. I miss you. You were so good. Rest in perfect peace, my friend. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 00:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A real loss. One Wikipedian I always enjoyed interacting with and even looked forward to interact with in the articles we intersected. May he rest in peace. Mercy11 (talk) 01:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
RIP. Thoughts and prayers to the family. Bobherry Talk My Edits 10:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doncram was the first editor to give me a barnstar (a the cleanup one!), and that early encouragement no doubt contributed to my continuing work; so, expressing my thanks for their encouragement of others. Klbrain (talk) 11:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was recently working on a new Wikipedia article, that linked to a Doncram sandbox page and I came by to chat about it. I am saddened to read of your passing. May you rest in peace, and thank you for all you did here. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 02:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Given your article work @PigeonChickenFish you might like the last section if you have time to help save these. Star Mississippi 13:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Surprised it took me this long to see this. Doncram was very helpful when I started editing NRHP articles. Their support of a new-ish editor is still appreciated! - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Haven't been too active in the past couple years, but stumbled upon Doncram's talk page today to find this. My interests scratched at the surface of his knowledge, it's a shame we've lost this editor who was a great asset to Wikipedia. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 02:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We never interacted much but I always saw Doncram either improving the project or helping editors, RIP Doncram, My sincere condolences to friends and family, –Davey2010^Talk 00:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am so sorry I didn't see this earlier. I enjoyed very much working with Don on numerous articles on historic sites and architects. My favorite experience with Don was a trip we made together with my two young boys (now grown men) to the Pico Canyon Oilfield -- can't believe that was 16 year ago! I've attached a photo we took on that trip -- I recall being disappointed that this was all that was left to mark the spot of the first historic drill site. Don was a pleasure to work with, had such strong intellectual curiosity, and was truly dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of our historic sites. If an afterlife exists, I'm sure Don is busy there working on ways to preserve its history. Rest in peace, my friend. Your contributions here will not be forgotten. Cbl62 (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was going through my earlier AfD nominations and came across my first and only interaction with Doncram. I am shocked to see that a treasure passed away many months ago. Rest in peace. Aintabli (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very saddening, no age at all. I only just now learned of this, seeing Doncram's name on a Talk page. I collaborated with him on a few articles, particularly on List of named corners of the Snaefell Mountain Course. Worse still, learning of Eagleash (from Liz's post above), with whom I worked on the motorcycle articles and whom I knew had been unwell, some time ago.--82.13.47.210 (talk) 00:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC) (User:Rocknrollmancer no longer logging in).[reply]

User subpages to complete

Doncram has left over 170 userspace subpages, many of them drafts for articles on historic buildings. I would suggest that we come up with some plan for reviewing them and finishing those that can be finished. BD2412 T 01:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a privilege, BD2412, in honour and in memory. SN54129 14:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in. His work frequently intersected with mine in the museum world, which is how I "knew" him. Flagging too for @CT55555 and @Netherzone, my art partners in crime if any are of interest. Star Mississippi 13:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course I'm in! I will start with his suggestions for a two new articles that he recently left on my user talk page regarding the group/colony of artists and architects who were part of the Camino del Monte Sol Historic District in Santa Fe. These include Alice Clark Myers and Leonora Frances Curtin Paloheimo (a.k.a. Leonora Paloheimo). Doncram left behind an awesome legacy of articles and I am happy to help out with his other drafts. He will be sorely missed, and may he rest in peace. We lost another one of the greats. Netherzone (talk) 15:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Working Drafts

Starting a work in progress tracker. Feel free to reorganize as you see helpful. Star Mississippi 01:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Perdue Hill Masonic Lodge - see below, restored from G13. Star Mississippi 16:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:United States Forest Service Recreation Residence Program - this draft can be deleted. Working from Doncram's notes, I merged the content and sources to an existing article with an incorrect name for the Forest Service program (USFS Recreation Residences). Following his instructions, I moved that article to the correct name United States Forest Service Recreation Residence Program. The draft is no longer needed, although it can continue to be improved. Netherzone (talk) 19:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No action needed

User:Doncram/Marian Cruger Coffin exists in mainspace as Marian Cruger Coffin and Doncram's draft predated that so doesn't appear to be situation where he was using it as a scratch pad. Star Mississippi 01:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Doncram/February DYKs/Gillespie-Selden Historic District just a tracker/local copy of his DYK
User:Doncram/Working Girls' Vacation Society Historic District also still exists, despite the presence of Working Girls' Vacation Society Historic District. Honestly, I'm not sure of which of his sandboxes I'd like to take over. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 23:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles now in mainspace thanks to editors' work

R.T. Frazier House, new article from Doncram draft PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ephram Harrod House, new article from Doncram draft PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cranston Voting House No. 12, new article from Doncram draft PigeonChickenFish (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Philomen Bird House, new article from Doncram draft PigeonChickenFish (talk) 08:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Snook House, new article from Doncram draft PigeonChickenFish (talk) 09:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Greenwood Lodge, new article from Doncram draft
Tandy Community Center, new article from Doncram draft
Newport Beach Hotel & Suites, I'm only about 90% certain on this, but if it were at AfC I'd accept so I've mainspaced. Star Mississippi 14:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Temple Emanuel (Pueblo, Colorado), new article from Doncram draft
Tubac Golf Resort and Spa, Copying this acceptance here for Doncram. He did the bulk of the research and work, I just cleaned it up.
Tubac Golf Resort and Spa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Star Mississippi 15:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kingman Santa Fe Depot - new article from Doncram draft. Netherzone (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Colburn Hotel - new article from a Doncram draft. Netherzone (talk) 16:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How did you set it so he was credited as submitter @Netherzone? I got it for Tubac but entirely unearned. Star Mississippi 16:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Star Mississippi there's a couple ways. The easiest is {{subst:submit|Doncram}} or if you use the submit button, after submitting change the User parameter from you to Doncram (u=xxxx). S0091 (talk) 16:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked on "Review (AFCH) which I think is a Twinkle tool (it's what I use when doing reviews on the top of the editing pane window), and because it had not previously been submitted to AfC, there was a green button to "submit". When I clicked that, a sub-menu option appeared for submitting as one's own user name or another editor's name. I don't see that option on drafts that have already been submitted, so not sure if it is always an option. Netherzone (talk) 16:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Netherzone if it's after submitting see my note above about changing the User parameter. S0091 (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @S0091 for this helpful info, and for reviewing the past two drafts of Doncram recently submitted. Such wonderful teamwork here! Netherzone (talk) 16:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Buffalo Presbyterian Church (Montello, Wisconsin), new article from Doncram draft — MarkH₂₁^talk 09:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted drafts of no concern

I started to go through the bot's list (thank you again S0091! and made a list of those not to worry about to save others the time. Some notes below, all me at this time for now but feel free to adjust my sig if needed. Also if any non admin is curious or wants a draft, just ask. None of these need to go through Refund when enough of us are here. Star Mississippi 02:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Whoop-Up Trail, now in mainspace at Whoop-Up Trail. Doncram had redirected it to an alternate name, and then there were a couple page swaps, but no attribution/preservation needed here.

Star Mississippi 03:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:International Museum of Muslim Cultures, already in mainspace as International Museum of Muslim Cultures. Nothing pertinent worth restoring to redirect, although not against someone else adding if they wish.
Draft:Carnegie Center for Literacy and Learning, now a section of Carnegie Library (Lexington, Kentucky) via User:Doncram/Carnegie Center for Literacy and Learning. I don't think it merits a standalone, nor apparently did Doncram.
Draft:List of female fashion photographers he didn't get far with this, and I imagine it's too large a scope now to be a list? But if someone wants to give it a go, happy to try.

Doncram drafts coming due for deletion

Hello, friends,

The most recent SDZeroBot/G13 soon report shows about 100 Doncram drafts that are coming due for deletion on November 12th UTC (it's still at Nov. 11th in my time zone). You can find them by looking at the 06:00 UTC hour. He made a minor edit to delay their deletion back on May 12th. They all have some connection to National Register of Historic Places. I'll ping User:DanTD, User:Star Mississippi, User:Netherzone, User:BD2412 from the discussion above this one in case anyone is interested in either taking over these drafts or taking the time to postpone deletion on any of these drafts they think are promising. There might be other ones spread throughout the day but, again, the huge influx is at 06:20 UTC and onward. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THanks so much @Liz. My on wiki time is spotty so adding @CT55555 to your pings as they worked with me and @Netherzone on Possibly's. Will see what I can handle. Star Mississippi 01:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would hate to see things like Draft:Buildings in the Charleston Historic District lost! Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 01:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I put a notice up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, where there is likely interest in saving them. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 01:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same @Bubba73. There's some extensive research that went in there. Star Mississippi 02:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, deleting this would be terrible. While we're at it, I wouldn't mind seeing the gallery at Sag Harbor Village District reformatted in a list similar to Draft:Buildings in the Charleston Historic District or similar articles. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 04:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz and @Star Mississippi, thanks for the heads-up. I will have a look at the drafts. There are some interesting ones and I have marked a few with the "Promising Draft" template. Will have a deeper look in the days ahead, as it seems there is a lot of good content in these drafts. Netherzone (talk) 02:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! That's a lot. I just checked the Draft:United States Forest Service Recreation Residence Program with a Google search, and found there actually are such links, but most are linked to individual forests of USFS. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 04:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder, that these drafts just need a minor edit to delay deletion for another 6 months. So, you don't have to take responsibility for updating 100 draft articles in the next 5 days, just delay their CSD G13 speedy deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I'm glad to take that up. BD2412 T 19:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Liz will deletion notices be posted here? I would like to know if any of his drafts are deleted. Better yet I'd like to see them before they are deleted if possible. I've looked through the list but I don't know which I've missed. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FloridaArmy if we missed any from the report @Liz referenced, I'm happy to restore. @BD2412 made a search, wonder if there's a way to see overlap with @SDZeroBot's so we can catch them first like we mostly did with Possibly. I'd imagine Fastily's bot will leave notices here for some and Liz and others who patrol CSD will so hopefully we can grab them. Star Mississippi 03:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, just posting a reminder that about 100 of Don's drafts will be coming up for deletion around 06:20 UTC (see this list). Firefly Bot normally posts notifications but it only does so once and it looks like so many of these drafts are coming due because Don went and did a minor edit on each to delay their CSD G13 deletion. This is not uncommon but it means that Firefly Bot didn't send a second notice. As far as deletion notices, Explicit and I do the majority of the CSD G13 draft/sandbox deletions, I post a deletion notice on the User talk page, Explicit doesn't. Years ago we tried to talk about this difference but I've found it's almost impossible to convince a longtime editor/admin to change their editing habits. And it is very common among admins to not leave talk page notifications when they delete a page through speedy deletion, unfortunately. I've been meaning to write a post about this on WP:AN but there it is.

If you want to create a list, just take the SDZeroBot list for 11/12, sort it by the time/date column, copy all of the drafts during the 06-07 UTC hour and delete all of the content but the page titles. It's a pain but that's what I got for you. The only good point is that this list will live on in the page history of the SDZeroBot G13 soon page so if you can't get to it today, you can always check at a future date and see which drafts were deleted. But it's much easier to postpone drafts now than go to WP:REFUND and ask for dozens of drafts to be restored. The admins there will do it for you, but you might hear a groan over the internet. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder, Liz. I went thru the whole list and marked a selection of the drafts (mostly those on historical buildings and homes on the NRHP registry since there should be documentation/sources available), with either a "promising draft" template or by adding a dummy edit. Looks like some drafts have already been improved and/or moved to main space. Netherzone (talk) 20:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like no pages were deleted! A lot of editors helped out but especially Netherzone and Explicit delayed deletion of these drafts. And I think at least a dozen were moved into main space or were draft versions of main space articles so they were Redirected. So, I think that is quite a success! Most of these drafts still need some finishing up but at least there won't be 100 that have to be addressed over 20 minutes, they are now spread out over several weeks in May. Thanks for the response especially for those editors who brushed up the content. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Liz for flagging and @Explicit, @Netherzone and @BD2412 for the rescue. Amazing team work. Star Mississippi 13:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I recently started working on two drafts in one, but I still want more information on them. I also hope that if there's any reason one of us can't work on some of these drafts that other editors take over the job. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 05:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a list of drafts / userspace drafts? FloridaArmy (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, as of this writing, quite a significant number of these have been lost. I don't know how many are missing, or which ones I would've been interested in restoring in order to work on, but if anybody wants to work on the ones that were eliminated they should start submitting requests for restorations of those drafts. As for me, one of his drafts that I've been focusing on is a certain New England diner. I need more info on that one. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need to go through Refund @DanTD.

I'm happy to restore G13s and I'm sure the same is true for other admins watching here. Do you have a list of those that have been deleted? I caught the one below since I saw Josh's notice. Star Mississippi 17:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can recheck the link posted by the OP. I see a lot of redlinks there. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know which you'd like restored and I'm happy to do so. I also wonder whether @SDZero's bot has the ability to just generate a list for us? @BD2412 I know you've helped FloridaArmy and I before. Any insight? Thanks either way. Star Mississippi 19:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

let's try that again, with a ping to @SD0001. Star Mississippi 19:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi Can you briefly state the requirement? What list is to be generated? – SD0001 (talk) 20:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @SD0001

As I understand it, your bot generates a list of drafts about to expire. What I wondered is whether it's possible to have a list of just Doncram's drafts that have or are about to expire so we can tackle as a to do. If this isn't possible (I really am not versed in the tech aspects), don't worry. It was more of a question than a request. Thank you either way. Star Mississippi 20:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, replied in #List of drafts below. – SD0001 (talk) 04:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SD Netherzone (talk) 05:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much @SD0001. This is perfect.

and @BD2412 me too until I saw the G13 notice. Look forward to tackling it. Star Mississippi 14:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still glad to help out. I had tinkered with some of these drafts, and then kind of lost track of this project. BD2412 T 01:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doncram would be pleased at all of you helping to finish his work. Thank you. Lvklock (talk) 01:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw Draft:Campbell House (Lexington, Kentucky) go by. I looked and it's very much a notes scratch pad. Happy to restore if anyone wants to work on it now or in the future. Star Mississippi 02:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just restored Draft:Mid-Century Modern schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota as I think there's some substance for a list. Star Mississippi 02:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Perdue Hill Masonic Lodge

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Perdue Hill Masonic Lodge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh no issue at all with the G13, just letting you know I restored as I think it has promise. cc @PigeonChickenFish @Netherzone and others who have helped with these drafts. Star Mississippi 15:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: No worries at all, I'll never be offended if a page I G13 gets restored :) Hey man im josh (talk) 15:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made some minor improvements to the draft. Thanks for restoring the draft, hope to get to cleaning it up eventually! It definitely seems notable to me, as it's listed in two historical registries. Netherzone (talk) 00:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of drafts

I asked above if there was a list of drafts and didn't see a clear reaponse so I al sectioning out. Is there a way to see a list of Doncram's drafts and userspace articles under construction?

I found this link above but it inckudes drafts from lots of editors and is hard for me to parse. How do I fond Doncram's work? Which ones have been deleted since he passed away? FloridaArmy (talk) 04:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have put up the lists in User:Doncram/Drafts. For the deleted drafts, suggest using User:SD0001/deleted-metadata-link to view snippets. (Or if you're an admin, use User:SD0001/quickViewDeleted.js to quickly see the full content.) – SD0001 (talk) 04:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lake Youngs Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lake Youngs Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Youngs Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DirtyHarry991 (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mount Vernon slaves has been nominated for merging

Category:Mount Vernon slaves has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A New England dining car still listed as a draft

I just want some of you to know that Donwell's Diner-Worcester Lunch Car Company Diner No. 774 is still listed in User:Doncram/Drafts, despite no longer being a draft page. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

I just found that you basically singlehandedly created the bridges with buildings page and would like to inform you of how interesting of a read it was. The style was unlike other articles and included more personal explications, which I found cool, especially for such a niche topic. Having read through your user page I must commend you for your dedication to wikipedia. I appreciate the work you do and hope to see more of your works and eventually be as useful of a contributor. NeVandCookies (talk) 18:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:United States Forest Service Recreation Residence Program

Draft:United States Forest Service Recreation Residence Program, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:United States Forest Service Recreation Residence Program and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:United States Forest Service Recreation Residence Program during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 23:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Acceptances

Starting these to keep them together since we know now how to credit Doncram. Rearrange if you see fit, but seemed a good way to aggregate them. Star Mississippi 21:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Colburn Hotel has been accepted

Colburn Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perdue Hill Masonic Lodge has been accepted

Perdue Hill Masonic Lodge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salt Museum (Liverpool, New York) has been accepted

Salt Museum (Liverpool, New York), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grant Road (Los Alamos, New Mexico) has been accepted

Grant Road (Los Alamos, New Mexico), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 01:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Back Log House and Farm has been accepted

David Back Log House and Farm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 01:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EM Ranch has been accepted

EM Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 12:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Empson Cannery has been accepted

Empson Cannery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 00:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miner's Hat has been accepted

Miner's Hat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 00:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ellis-Shackelford House has been accepted

Ellis-Shackelford House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 23:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: McCutchen Theatre has been accepted

McCutchen Theatre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 17:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grimes House and Mill Complex has been accepted

Grimes House and Mill Complex, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simpson Logging Company Locomotive No. 7 and Peninsular Railway Caboose No. 700 has been accepted

Simpson Logging Company Locomotive No. 7 and Peninsular Railway Caboose No. 700, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 01:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carnegie Building (Syracuse, New York) has been accepted

Carnegie Building (Syracuse, New York), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 01:14, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Chuck E. Cheez" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Chuck E. Cheez has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § Chuck E. Cheez until a consensus is reached. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fargo-Moorhead YMCA Sign

I just published an NRHP article under the common name and, when I went to create a redirect under the NRHP listing name, I found one of Doncram's drafts. (Obviously no disrespect was intended.) Fortunately, it was very preliminary and was mostly a copy of another listing waiting to be overwritten. which is how I write articles too.

I redirected Draft:Fargo-Moorhead YMCA Sign to YMCA Sign for now but wasn't sure if that was the right action at this point. - RevelationDirect (talk) 03:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NRISref errors has been nominated for deletion

Category:NRISref errors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SWinxy (talk) 23:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oil Spring

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Oil Spring".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THanks @Hey man im josh for the notification. I restored this and am watching it now. Hopefully we can get to it this summer. Star Mississippi 17:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: No problem at all! Best of luck, and thanks for the work you're doing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given that Oil Springs is a disambiguation page, I would suggest also adding a disambiguator to this title. Cheers! BD2412 T 19:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I've started the cleanup and when it lands in mainspace I think (Colorado) works as a dab. Star Mississippi 01:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be perfect, thanks. BD2412 T

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Doncram! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mid 19th Century Revival architecture has been nominated for merging

Category:Mid 19th Century Revival architecture has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mid 19th Century Revival architecture in the United States has been nominated for splitting

Category:Mid 19th Century Revival architecture in the United States has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Knickerbocker Building ( New Rochelle, New York)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Knickerbocker Building ( New Rochelle, New York) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 17 § Knickerbocker Building ( New Rochelle, New York) until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Todd County Courthouse ( Long Prairie, Minnesota)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Todd County Courthouse ( Long Prairie, Minnesota) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 17 § Todd County Courthouse ( Long Prairie, Minnesota) until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 21:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tuttle House (Fredericktown, Ohio)

Thanks for your note @Bkissin. So many losses. Moving a response here so we don't have to play AfC comment chat. I don't have the on wiki time at the moment, but pinging @FloridaArmy & @PigeonChickenFish who have edited on historic folks and places who may have some time. I've also watch listed it and will help when I can. Feel free to drop a note here and if there's a critical mass we can do a Donc-adjacent Drafts subpage. Star Mississippi 01:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much @PigeonChickenFish! Star Mississippi 01:47, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Campbell House (Lexington, Kentucky)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Campbell House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Doncram. Thank you for your work on Denver Central Library. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alerting @Pespinol whose article this actually is. Star Mississippi 12:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"St. Mark's Episcopal Chapel ( Corinna Township, Minnesota)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect St. Mark's Episcopal Chapel ( Corinna Township, Minnesota) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14 § St. Mark's Episcopal Chapel ( Corinna Township, Minnesota) until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 17:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DANFSsection

Template:DANFSsection has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Door surrounds has been nominated for splitting

Category:Door surrounds has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beechwood Cemetery (Durham, North Carolina)

The article Beechwood Cemetery (Durham, North Carolina) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 04:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification @Reywas92. I have declined the PROD as I found some sourcing. As it's said to be historic, I think it needs an AfD if you believe it still needs deleted but this should be enough for now. @FloridaArmy, this overlaps with some of your areas of interest. Anything in the Wikipedia Library or other sourcing? Star Mississippi 12:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pointers to WMF tools has been nominated for renaming

Category:Pointers to WMF tools has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Legoktm (talk) 04:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mid-Century Modern schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mid-Century Modern schools in Grand Forks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To friends of Doncram

I'm continuing to delay CSD 13 speedy deletion of some old drafts of Doncram, when I spot them in time, and I just wondered if anyone is actually working on them, getting them ready for mainspace. There are dozens and dozens of them and I just wanted to check in and see if any editors had been spending time on them. If so, I'll continue to delay their deletion as stale drafts when I come across them. Many thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A recent example is Draft:Old Riverside Hutterite Colony. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been @Liz.

If easier for your workflow, just post the notice here and I can undelete some. I've let a few go that are just scratch pads but otherwise trying to improve Star Mississippi 19:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to help work on them. Can you or someone post a list here? Not sure how to find them otherwise. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, undeletion is not necessary, I've postponed deletion on all "Doncram drafts" when I come across them. I'll try to put together a list of what they are. I think there are somewhere like 30-100 drafts, in various states of preparation. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:38, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer reviews with no or minimal feedback

August 20 Hard Scrabble and Snow Town August 28 Windracers September 4 University of Canterbury Faculty of Law September 9 Hadhramaut September 9 Urien September 10 Fraser Valley Heritage Railway Society September 10 Spit (album) September 12 Elm Farm Ollie September 24 History of chocolate September 26 Lucky Loser (book) September 29 History of The New York Times (1945–1998) September 30 Lake Michigan Monster September 31 Spoiler effect November 25 Fabienne Wohlwend November 30 4th Army (France)
If your review is not in the list of unanswered reviews, you can add it.
v t e