Jump to content

Crystal twinning: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
See also: annolink
 
(251 intermediate revisions by 72 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Two separate crystals sharing some of the same crystal lattice points in a symmetrical manner}}
[[File:Twinned crystals of Albite.png|thumb|right|300px|Diagram of twinned crystals of [[Albite]]. On the more perfect cleavage, which is parallel to the [[basal plane]] (P), is a system of fine striations, parallel to the second cleavage (M).]]
{{Sources exist|date=July 2024}}
'''Crystal twinning''' occurs when two separate crystals share some of the same [[crystal lattice]] points in a symmetrical manner. The result is an intergrowth of two separate crystals in a variety of specific configurations. A '''twin boundary''' or '''composition surface''' separates the two crystals. [[Crystallography|Crystallographers]] classify twinned crystals by a number of [[twin laws]]. These twin laws are specific to the [[crystal system]]. The type of twinning can be a diagnostic tool in mineral identification.
[[File:Quartz-rhqtz-109b.jpg|thumb|Quartz – Japan twin]]
[[File:Twinned crystals of Albite.png|thumb|upright=1.35|Diagram of twinned crystals of [[albite]]. On the more perfect cleavage, which is parallel to the [[basal plane]] (P), is a system of fine striations, parallel to the second cleavage (M).]]
'''Crystal twinning''' occurs when two or more adjacent crystals of the same mineral are oriented so that they share some of the same [[crystal lattice]] points in a symmetrical manner. The result is an intergrowth of two separate crystals that are tightly bonded to each other. The surface along which the lattice points are shared in twinned crystals is called a composition surface or twin plane.


[[Crystallography|Crystallographers]] classify twinned crystals by a number of twin laws, which are specific to the crystal structure. The type of twinning can be a diagnostic tool in mineral identification. There are three main types of twinning. The first is [[#Growth twinning (nanotwinning)|growth twinning]] which can occur both in very large and very small particles. The second is [[#Transformation twinning|transformation twinning]], where there is a change in the crystal structure. The third is [[#Deformation twinning|deformation twinning]], in which twinning develops in a crystal in response to a [[shear stress]], and is an important mechanism for permanent shape changes in a crystal.
Twinning can often be a problem in [[X-ray crystallography]], as a twinned crystal does not produce a simple [[X-ray scattering techniques|diffraction pattern]].

== Definition ==
[[File:Twin lattice (2D).png|thumb|Twin lattice (2D). The long horizontal red line is the composition plane where the two crystal segments join. The upper crystal lattice is the reflection of the lower crystal lattice. The red points are the shared crystal lattice points.]]
Twinning is a form of symmetrical intergrowth between two or more adjacent crystals of the same mineral. It differs from the ordinary random intergrowth of mineral grains in a mineral deposit, because the relative orientations of the two crystal segments show a fixed relationship that is characteristic of the mineral structure. The relationship is defined by a [[symmetry operation]] called a ''twin operation''.<ref name=Nesse2000>{{cite book |last1=Nesse |first1=William D. |title=Introduction to mineralogy |date=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=9780195106916 |pages=87–91}}</ref><ref name=HurlbutKlein1993>{{cite book |last1=Klein |first1=Cornelis |last2=Hurlbut | first2=Cornelius S. Jr. |title=Manual of mineralogy : (after James D. Dana) |date=1993 |publisher=Wiley |location=New York |isbn=047157452X |edition=21st |pages=102–106}}</ref>

The twin operation is not one of the normal symmetry operations of the untwinned crystal structure. For example, the twin operation may be reflection across a plane that is not a symmetry plane of the single crystal.<ref name=Nesse2000/><ref name=HurlbutKlein1993/>

On the microscopic level, the twin boundary is characterized by a set of atomic positions in the crystal lattice that are shared between the two orientations.<ref name=Nesse2000/><ref name=HurlbutKlein1993/> These shared lattice points give the junction between the crystal segments much greater strength than that between randomly oriented grains, so that the twinned crystals do not easily break apart.<ref name=Sinkankas1964/>

''Parallel growth'' describes a form of crystal growth that produces the appearance of a cluster of aligned crystals which could be mistaken for twins. Close examination reveals that the cluster is actually a single crystal. This is not twinning, since the crystal lattice is continuous throughout the cluster. Parallel growth likely takes place because it reduces system energy.{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|p=101}}

==Twin laws==
Twin laws are symmetry operations that define the orientation between twin crystal segments. These are as characteristic of the mineral as are its crystal face angles. For example, crystals of [[staurolite]] show twinning at angles of almost precisely 90 degrees or 30 degrees.<ref name=Sinkankas1964/> A twin law is ''not'' a symmetry operation of the full set of basis points.<ref name=HurlbutKlein1993/>

Twin laws include reflection operations, rotation operations, and the inversion operation. Reflection twinning is described by the [[Miller indices]] of the twin plane (i.e. {hkl}) while rotational twinning is described by the direction of the twin axis (i.e. <hkl>). Inversion twinning is typically equivalent to a reflection or rotation symmetry.<ref name=Nesse2000/>

Rotational twin laws are almost always 2-fold rotations, though any other permitted rotation symmetry (3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold or 6-fold) is possible. The twin axis will be perpendicular to a lattice plane.<ref name=Tulane>{{cite web |last1=Nelson |first1=Stephen A. |year=2013 |title=Twinning, Polymorphism, Polytypism, Pseudomorphism |publisher=Tulane University |access-date=19 February 2022 |url=https://www.tulane.edu/~sanelson/eens211/twinning.htm}}</ref> It is possible for a rotational twin law to share the same axis as a rotational symmetry of the individual crystal if the twin law is a 2-fold rotation and the symmetry operation is a 3-fold rotation. This is the case for [[spinel]] law twinning on <111>: The spinel structure has a 3-fold rotational symmetry on <111> and spinel is commonly twinned by 2-fold rotation on <111>.<ref name=Nesse2000/>

The boundary between crystal segments is called a ''composition surface'' or, if it is planar, a ''composition plane''. The composition plane is often, though not always, parallel to the twin law plane of a reflection law. If this is the case, the twin plane is always parallel to a possible crystal face.<ref name=HurlbutKlein1993/>

===Common twin laws===
[[File:Spinel twin.png|thumb|Spinel law contact twinning. A single crystal is shown at left with the composition plane in red. At right, the crystal has effectively been cut on the composition plane and the front half rotated by 180° to produce a contact twin. This creates reentrants at the top, lower left, and lower right of the composition plane.<ref name=Sinkankas1964>{{cite book |last1=Sinkankas |first1=John |title=Mineralogy for amateurs. |date=1964 |publisher=Van Nostrand |location=Princeton, N.J. |isbn=0442276249 |pages=96–105}}</ref>]]
In the isometric system, the most common types of twins are the Spinel Law (twin plane, parallel to an [[octahedron]]) <111>, where the twin axis is perpendicular to an octahedral face, and the Iron Cross <001>, which is the interpenetration of two pyritohedrons, a subtype of [[dodecahedron]].{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|pp=104–106}}

In the hexagonal system, [[calcite]] shows the contact twin laws {0001} and {0112}. Quartz shows the [[Brazil]] Law {1120}, and [[Dauphiné]] Law <0001>, which are penetration twins caused by transformation, and [[Japan]] Law {1122}, which is often caused by accidents during growth.{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|pp=104–106}}

In the tetragonal system, cyclical contact twins are the most commonly observed type of twin, such as in [[rutile]] titanium dioxide and [[cassiterite]] tin oxide.{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|pp=104–106}}

In the orthorhombic system, crystals usually twin on planes parallel to the prism face, where the most common is a {110} twin, which produces cyclical twins, such as in [[aragonite]], [[chrysoberyl]], and [[cerussite]].{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|pp=104–106}}

In the monoclinic system, twins occur most often on the planes {100} and {001} by the [[Ilmenau|Manebach]] Law {001}, [[Karlovy Vary|Carlsbad]] Law [001], [[Baveno]] Law {021} in [[orthoclase]], and the Swallow Tail Twins (Manebach law) {001} in [[gypsum]].{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|pp=104–106}}

In the triclinic system, the most commonly twinned crystals are the [[feldspar]] minerals [[plagioclase]] and [[microcline]]. These minerals show the Albite and Pericline Laws.<ref name=Tulane/>{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|pp=104–106}}

The most common twin operations by [[crystal system]] are tabulated below. This list is not exhaustive, particularly for the crystal systems of lowest symmetry, such as the triclinic system.{{sfn|Nesse|2000|pp=89, 214–216}}<ref name=Nesse2000/>{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|pp=104–106}}
[[File:Twin of Staurolite (cropped).JPG|thumb|upright|30° twin of staurolite]]
[[File:Staurolite 002.jpg|thumb|upright|90° twins of staurolite]]
[[File:Pyrite-254452.jpg|thumb|upright|Iron pyrite cross twin]]
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: left;"
! System !! Law !! Operation || Examples
|- valign="top"
| Triclinic || Albite law <br/>Pericline law<br/>Carlsbad law<br/>Baveno law<br/>Manebach law|| {010}<br/><010><br/><001><br/>{021}<br/>{001} || Plagioclase
|- valign="top" |
| Monoclinic || Carlsbad law<br/>Baveno law<br/>Manebach law || <001><br/>{021}<br/>{001}<br/>{100}<br/><031><br/><231> || [[Orthoclase]]<br/><br/>Gypsum<br/><br/>Staurolite
|- valign="top" |
| Orthorhombic || || {110}<br/>{101} <br/>{011} || Aragonite, cerrusite; often cyclic
|- valign="top" |
| Tetragonal || || {110}<br/>{101}<br/>{011} || Cassiterite, rutile
|- valign="top" |
| Hexagonal ||<br/><br/><br/>Brazil law<br/>Dauphine law<br/>Japan law || {01{{overline|1}}2}<br/>{0001}<br/>{10{{overline|1}}1}<br/>{11{{overline|2}}0}<br/><0001><br/>{11{{overline|2}}2} || Calcite<br/><br/><br/>Quartz
|- valign="top" |
| Isometric || Spinel law<br/><br/><br/>Iron cross law || <111><br/>{111}<br/>{001}<br/><001> || Spinel<br/><br/><br/>Pyrite
|}


==Types of twinning==
==Types of twinning==
[[File:Quartz Japan Twin Huaron Peru.jpg|thumb|Quartz - Japan twin]]
[[File:Chrysoberyl-282796 (cropped).jpg|thumb|upright|Chrysoberyl showing cyclic twinning]]
Simple twinned crystals may be contact twins or penetration twins. ''Contact twins'' meet on a single composition plane, often appearing as mirror images across the boundary. [[Plagioclase]], [[quartz]], [[gypsum]], and [[spinel]] often exhibit contact twinning.<ref name=Sinkankas1964/> ''Merohedral twinning'' occurs when the lattices of the contact twins superimpose in three dimensions, such as by relative rotation of one twin from the other.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Yeates |first1=Todd O. |title=Macromolecular Crystallography Part A |chapter=[22] Detecting and overcoming crystal twinning |series=Methods in Enzymology |date=1997 |volume=276 |pages=344–358 |doi=10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76068-3|pmid=27799105 |isbn=9780121821777 }}</ref> An example is [[metazeunerite]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Locock |first1=A. J. |last2=Burns |first2=P. C. |title=Crystal Structures and Synthesis of the Copper-Dominant Members of the Autunite and Meta-Autunite Groups: Torbernite, Zeunerite, Metatorbernite and Metazeunerite |journal=The Canadian Mineralogist |date=1 April 2003 |volume=41 |issue=2 |pages=489–502 |doi=10.2113/gscanmin.41.2.489|bibcode=2003CaMin..41..489L }}</ref> Contact twinning characteristically creates reentrant faces where faces of the crystal segments meet on the contact plane at an angle greater than 180°.<ref name=Sinkankas1964/>
[[File:Pyrite 60608.jpg|thumb|Twinned pyrite crystal group]]
Simple twinned crystals may be contact twins or penetration twins. '''Contact twins''' share a single composition surface often appearing as mirror images across the boundary. [[Plagioclase]], [[quartz]], [[gypsum]], and [[spinel]] often exhibit contact twinning. '''Merohedral twinning''' occurs when the lattices of the contact twins superimpose in three dimensions, such as by relative rotation of one twin from the other. An example is [[metazeunerite]]. In '''penetration twins''' the individual crystals have the appearance of ''passing through'' each other in a symmetrical manner. [[Orthoclase]], [[staurolite]], [[pyrite]], and [[fluorite]] often show penetration twinning.


A type of twinning involving 180° relationships is called ''hemitropism'' or ''hemitropy''.
[[Image:Galvanized spangle.jpg|thumb|240px|right|[[Galvanization|Galvanized]] surface with macroscopic crystalline features. Twin boundaries are visible as striations within each [[crystallite]], most prominently in the bottom-left and top-right.]]

If several twin crystal parts are aligned by the same twin law they are referred to as '''multiple''' or '''repeated twins'''. If these multiple twins are aligned in parallel they are called '''polysynthetic twins'''. When the multiple twins are not parallel they are '''cyclic twins'''. [[Albite]], [[calcite]], and [[pyrite]] often show polysynthetic twinning. Closely spaced polysynthetic twinning is often observed as [[:wikt:striation|striation]]s or fine parallel lines on the crystal face. [[Rutile]], [[aragonite]], [[cerussite]], and [[chrysoberyl]] often exhibit cyclic twinning, typically in a radiating pattern.
In ''penetration twins'' the individual crystals have the appearance of ''passing through'' each other in a symmetrical manner.<ref name=Sinkankas1964/> [[Orthoclase]], [[staurolite]], [[pyrite]], and [[fluorite]] often show penetration twinning. The composition surface in penetration twins is usually irregular and extends to the center of the crystal.<ref name=HurlbutKlein1993/>

Contact twinning can arise from either reflection or rotation, whereas penetration twinning is usually produced by rotation.<ref name=HurlbutKlein1993/>

{{anchor|Polysynthetic twinning}}
If several twin crystal parts are aligned by the same twin law they are referred to as ''multiple'' or ''repeated twins''. If these multiple twins are aligned in parallel they are called '''polysynthetic twins'''. When the multiple twins are not parallel they are ''cyclic twins''. [[Albite]], [[calcite]], and [[pyrite]] often show polysynthetic twinning. Closely spaced polysynthetic twinning is often observed as [[:wikt:striation|striation]]s or fine parallel lines on the crystal face. {{anchor|Cyclic twinning}}Cyclic twins are caused by repeated twinning around a rotation axis. This type of twinning occurs around three, four, five, six, or eight-fold axes, the corresponding patterns are called threelings, fourlings, [[Fiveling|fivelings]], sixlings, and eightlings. Sixlings are common in aragonite.<ref name="DG4143">{{harvnb|Dyar|Gunter|2008}}, pp. 41–43</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Chesterman|Lowe|2008}}, p. 39</ref> [[Rutile]], [[aragonite]], [[cerussite]], and [[chrysoberyl]] often exhibit cyclic twinning, typically in a radiating pattern.<ref name=Sinkankas1964/><ref name=HurlbutKlein1993/>

For rotational twinning the relationship between the twin axis and twin plane falls into one of three types:<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Alexander C. |last1=Tobi |title=The recognition of plagioclase twins in sections normal to the composition plane |journal=American Mineralogist |year=1961 |volume=46 |number=11–12 |pages=1470–1488 |url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article-abstract/46/11-12/1470/541849/The-recognition-of-plagioclase-twins-in-sections |access-date=19 February 2022}}</ref>
:#parallel twinning, when the twin axis and compositional plane lie parallel to each other,
:#normal twinning, when the twin plane and compositional plane lie normally, and
:#complex twinning, a combination of parallel twinning and normal twinning on one compositional plane.


==Modes of formation==
==Modes of formation==
[[File:Pyromorphite-171937.jpg|thumb|upright|Parallel growth of pyromorphite]]
There are three modes of formation of twinned crystals. '''Growth twins''' are the result of an interruption or change in the lattice during formation or growth due to a possible deformation from a larger substituting ion. '''Annealing''' or '''transformation twins''' are the result of a change in crystal system during cooling as one ''form'' becomes unstable and the crystal structure must re-organize or ''transform'' into another more stable form. '''Deformation''' or '''gliding twins''' are the result of stress on the crystal after the crystal has formed. If a '''FCC''' metal like aluminum experiences extreme stresses, it will experience twinning as seen in the case of explosions. Deformation twinning is a common result of [[regional metamorphism]].
There are three modes of formation of twinned crystals.


* ''Growth twins'' are the result of an interruption or change in the lattice during formation or growth. This may be due to a larger substituting ion, statistics as the energy difference to nucleate a new plane of atoms in a twin orientation is small, or because the twins lead to a lower energy structure.
Crystals that grow adjacent to each other may be aligned to resemble twinning. This '''parallel growth''' simply reduces system energy and is not twinning.
* ''Annealing'' or ''transformation twins'' are the result of a change in crystal system during cooling as one ''form'' becomes unstable and the crystal structure must re-organize or ''transform'' into another more stable form.
* ''Deformation'' or ''gliding twins'' are the result of stress on the crystal after the crystal has formed. Because growth twins are formed during the initial growth of the crystal, they are described as ''primary'', whereas transformation or deformation twins are formed in an existing crystal and are described as ''secondary''.{{sfn|Klein|Hurlbut|1993|p=167}}


===Growth twinning (nanotwinning)===
==Twin boundaries==
[[File:Twin2.jpg|thumb|left|upright|Fivefold twinning in a [[gold]] nanoparticle ([[Transmission electron microscope|electron microscope]] image).]]
[[File:Twin2.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Fiveling|Fivefold twin]] in a [[gold nanoparticle]] ([[Transmission electron microscope|electron microscope micrograph]]).]]
There are two types of twinning that can occur during growth, accidental and ones where the twinned structure has lower energy.
Twin boundaries occur when two [[crystal]]s of the same type intergrow, so that only a slight misorientation exists between them. It is a highly symmetrical interface, often with one crystal the mirror image of the other; also, atoms are shared by the two crystals at regular intervals. This is also a much lower-energy interface than the [[grain boundaries]] that form when crystals of arbitrary orientation grow together.


In accidental growth twinning an atom joins a crystal face in a less than ideal position, forming a seed for growth of a twin. The original crystal and its twin then grow together and closely resemble each other. This is characteristic enough of certain minerals to suggest that it is thermodynamically or kinetically favored under conditions of rapid growth.<ref name="Sinkankas1964" /><ref name="Nesse2000" />
Twin boundaries are partly responsible for [[shock hardening]] and for many of the changes that occur in [[cold work]] of metals with limited [[dislocation|slip systems]] or at very low temperatures. They also occur due to [[martensite|martensitic transformations]]: the motion of twin boundaries is responsible for the pseudoelastic and shape-memory behavior of [[nitinol]], and their presence is partly responsible for the hardness due to [[quench]]ing of [[steel]]. In certain types of high strength steels, very fine deformation twins act as primary obstacles against dislocation motion. These steels are referred to as 'TWIP' steels, where TWIP stands for TWinning Induced Plasticity.<ref name=tripmar2>{{citation|last= Steinmetz|first=D.R.|last2= Jäpel|first2 =T.|last3= Wietbrock|first3=B. |last4= Eisenlohr|first4=P.|last5= Gutierrez-Urrutia|first5=I. |last6= Saeed- Revealing the strain-hardening behavior of twinning-induced plasticity steels: Theory, simulations, experiments|publisher= Acta Materialia|page=494|year=2013|volume=61|doi= DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.064}}.</ref>


Different from these are twins found in nanoparticles such as the image here, these fivefold or [[Fiveling|decahedral nanoparticles]] being one of the most common.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hofmeister |first=H. |date=1998 |title=Forty Years Study of Fivefold Twinned Structures in Small Particles and Thin Films |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-4079(1998)33:1<3::aid-crat3>3.0.co;2-3 |journal=Crystal Research and Technology |volume=33 |issue=1 |pages=3–25 |doi=10.1002/(sici)1521-4079(1998)33:1<3::aid-crat3>3.0.co;2-3 |bibcode=1998CryRT..33....3H |issn=0232-1300}}</ref> These cyclic twins occur as they are lower in energy at small sizes.<ref>{{Citation |last=Marks |first=Laurence. D. |title=Shape, thermodynamics and kinetics of nanoparticles |date=2023 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822425-0.00082-8 |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Nanomaterials |pages=383–417 |access-date=2023-07-11 |publisher=Elsevier |doi=10.1016/b978-0-12-822425-0.00082-8 |isbn=978-0-12-822423-6}}</ref> For the five-fold case shown, there is a [[disclination]] along the common axis<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wit |first=R de |date=1972 |title=Partial disclinations |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0022-3719/5/5/004 |journal=Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics |volume=5 |issue=5 |pages=529–534 |doi=10.1088/0022-3719/5/5/004 |bibcode=1972JPhC....5..529D |issn=0022-3719}}</ref> which leads to an additional strain energy.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Howie |first1=A. |last2=Marks |first2=L. D. |date=1984 |title=Elastic strains and the energy balance for multiply twinned particles |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01418618408233432 |journal=Philosophical Magazine A |language=en |volume=49 |issue=1 |pages=95–109 |doi=10.1080/01418618408233432 |bibcode=1984PMagA..49...95H |issn=0141-8610}}</ref> Balancing this there is a reduction in the surface free energy, in large part due to more (111) surface facets.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Marks |first=L. D. |date=1984 |title=Surface structure and energetics of multiply twinned particles |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01418618408233431 |journal=Philosophical Magazine A |language=en |volume=49 |issue=1 |pages=81–93 |doi=10.1080/01418618408233431 |bibcode=1984PMagA..49...81M |issn=0141-8610}}</ref> In small nanoparticles the decahedral and a more complicated icosahedral structure (with twenty units) are lower energy, but at larger energies single crystals become lower energy.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Baletto |first1=Francesca |last2=Ferrando |first2=Riccardo |date=2005 |title=Structural properties of nanoclusters: Energetic, thermodynamic, and kinetic effects |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.371 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |language=en |volume=77 |issue=1 |pages=371–423 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.77.371 |bibcode=2005RvMP...77..371B |issn=0034-6861}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rogers |first1=Blake |last2=Lehr |first2=Alexander |last3=Velázquez-Salazar |first3=J. Jesús |last4=Whetten |first4=Robert |last5=Mendoza-Cruz |first5=Ruben |last6=Bazan-Diaz |first6=Lourdes |last7=Bahena-Uribe |first7=Daniel |last8=José Yacaman |first8=Miguel |date=2023 |title=Decahedra and Icosahedra Everywhere: The Anomalous Crystallization of Au and Other Metals at the Nanoscale |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crat.202200259 |journal=Crystal Research and Technology |language=en |volume=58 |issue=4 |doi=10.1002/crat.202200259 |bibcode=2023CryRT..5800259R |issn=0232-1300}}</ref> However, they do not have to transform into single crystals and can grow very large, and are known as fivelings, documented as early as 1831 by [[Gustav Rose]];<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rose |first=Gustav |date=1831 |title=Ueber die Krystallformen des Goldes und des Silbers |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.18310991003 |journal=Annalen der Physik |language=en |volume=99 |issue=10 |pages=196–204 |doi=10.1002/andp.18310991003 |bibcode=1831AnP....99..196R |issn=0003-3804}}</ref> further drawings are available in the Atlas der Kristallformen, and see also the article on [[fiveling]]s.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Goldschmidt |first=V |url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433084029887 |title=Atlas der Kristallformen, V4, Plates |date=1918 |publisher=Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung |pages=Tafel 48, Fig. 21. (Gold)|hdl=2027/nyp.33433084029887 }}</ref>
== Deformation twins ==

Of the three common crystalline structures [[body-centered cubic|BCC]], [[face-centered cubic|FCC]], and [[hexagonal close packed|HCP]], the HCP structure is the most likely to form deformation twins when strained, because they rarely have a sufficient number of [[dislocation|slip systems]] for an arbitrary shape change. High strain rates, low [[Stacking-fault energy]] and low temperatures facilitate deformation twinning.
===Transformation twinning===
[[File:Transform twin.png|thumb|Illustration of transformation twinning in 2-D. The orthorhombic crystal at left transforms to a monoclinic crystal at right, with two parallel twinning planes (polysynthetic twinning)]]
Transformation and [[Annealing (materials science)|annealing]] twinning takes place when a cooling crystal experiences a displacive polymorphic transition. For example, [[leucite]] has an isometric crystal structure above about {{convert|665|C||sp=us}}, but becomes tetragonal below this temperature. Any one of the three original axes of a crystal can become the long axis when this phase change takes place. Twinning results when different parts of the crystal break their isometric symmetry along a different choice of axis. This is typically polysynthetic twinning, which enables the crystal to maintain its isometric shape by averaging out the displacement in each direction. This produces a [[pseudomorph]]ic crystal that appears to have isometric symmetry. Potassium feldspar likewise experiences polysynthetic twinning as it transforms from a monoclinic structure ([[orthoclase]]) to a triclinic structure ([[microcline]]) on slow cooling.<ref name=Nesse2000/>

===Deformation twinning===
[[File:Output JqJHfp.gif|thumb|Animation of deformation twinning of crystal]]
Deformation twinning is a response to shear stress. The crystal structure is displaced along successive planes of the crystal, a process also called ''glide''. The twinning is always reflection twinning and the glide plane is also the mirror plane. Deformation twinning can be observed in a calcite cleavage fragment by applying gentle pressure with a knife blade near an edge. This particular glide twinning, {102}, is found almost universally in deformed rock beds containing calcite.<ref name=Nesse2000/>

Twinning and [[Slip (materials science)|slip]] are competitive mechanisms for [[crystal deformation]]. Each mechanism is dominant in certain crystal systems and under certain conditions.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mahajan |first1=S. |last2=Williams |first2=D. F. |title=Deformation Twinning in Metals and Alloys |journal=International Metallurgical Reviews |date=June 1973 |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=43–61 |doi=10.1179/imtlr.1973.18.2.43}}</ref> In [[cubic crystal system|fcc metals]], slip is almost always dominant because the stress required is far less than twinning stress.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Beyerlein |first1=Irene J. |last2=Mara |first2=Nathan A. |last3=Bhattacharyya |first3=Dhriti |last4=Alexander |first4=David J. |last5=Necker |first5=Carl T. |title=Texture evolution via combined slip and deformation twinning in rolled silver–copper cast eutectic nanocomposite |journal=International Journal of Plasticity |date=January 2011 |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=121–146 |doi=10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.05.007}}</ref>

Twinning can occur by cooperative displacement of atoms along the face of the twin boundary. This displacement of a large quantity of atoms simultaneously requires significant energy to perform. Therefore, the theoretical stress required to form a twin is quite high. It is believed that twinning is associated with dislocation motion on a coordinated scale, in contrast to slip, which is caused by independent glide at several locations in the [[crystal]].

Compared to slip, twinning produces a deformation pattern that is more [[heterogeneous]] in nature. This deformation produces a local gradient across the material and near intersections between twins and grain boundaries. The deformation gradient can lead to fracture along the boundaries, particularly in bcc transition metals at low temperatures.

Of the three common crystalline structures [[body-centered cubic|bcc]], [[face-centered cubic|fcc]], and [[hexagonal close packed|hcp]], the hcp structure is the most likely to form deformation twins when strained, because they rarely have a sufficient number of [[dislocation|slip systems]] for an arbitrary shape change. High strain rates, low [[stacking-fault energy]] and low temperatures facilitate deformation twinning.<ref name="Courtney">Courtney, Thomas H. (2000) ''Mechanical Behavior of Materials'', 2nd ed. McGraw Hill. {{ISBN|1-57766-425-6}}</ref>

If a metal with [[Cubic crystal system|face-centered cubic]] (fcc) structure, like Al, Cu, Ag, Au, etc., is subjected to stress, it will experience twinning. The formation and migration of twin boundaries is partly responsible for [[ductility]] and malleability of fcc metals.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1080/14686996.2019.1585145|pmid=30956731|pmc=6442207|title=Synthesis and modelling of the mechanical properties of Ag, Au and Cu nanowires|journal=Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.|year=2019|volume=20|issue=1|pages=225–261|first1=Lah |last1=Nurul Akmal Che |last2=Trigueros |first2=Sonia |bibcode=2019STAdM..20..225L}}</ref>

Twin boundaries are partly responsible for [[shock hardening]] and for many of the changes that occur in [[cold work]] of metals with limited [[dislocation|slip systems]] or at very low temperatures. They also occur due to [[martensite|martensitic transformations]]: the motion of twin boundaries is responsible for the pseudoelastic and shape-memory behavior of [[nitinol]], and their presence is partly responsible for the hardness due to [[quench]]ing of [[steel]]. In certain types of high strength steels, very fine deformation twins act as primary obstacles against dislocation motion. These steels are referred to as 'TWIP' steels, where TWIP stands for ''twinning-induced plasticity''.<ref name=tripmar2>{{citation|last1= Steinmetz|first1=D.R.|last2= Jäpel|first2 =T.|last3= Wietbrock|first3=B. |last4= Eisenlohr|first4=P.|last5= Gutierrez-Urrutia|first5=I. |last6= Saeed|title=Revealing the strain-hardening behavior of twinning-induced plasticity steels: Theory, simulations, experiments|journal=Acta Materialia|page=494|year=2013|volume=61|issue=2|doi= 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.064|bibcode=2013AcMat..61..494S}}.</ref>

==== Deformation twinning crystallography ====
[[File:Deformation_twinning.png|thumb|405x405px|Deformation twinning crystallographic planes]]
Twinning is crystallographically defined by its twin plane 𝑲<sub>𝟏</sub>, the mirror plane in the twin and parent material, and 𝜼<sub>𝟏,</sub> which is the twinning shear direction. Deformation twins in Zr are generally lenticular in shape, lengthening in the 𝜼<sub>𝟏</sub> direction and thickening along the 𝑲<sub>𝟏</sub> plane normal.<ref name="Christian 1995 1–157">{{Cite journal |last1=Christian |first1=J.W. |last2=Mahajan |first2=S. |date=1995 |title=Deformation twinning |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0079642594000077 |journal=Progress in Materials Science |language=en |volume=39 |issue=1–2 |pages=1–157 |doi=10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7}}</ref>

The twin plane, shear direction, and shear plane form the basis vectors of an orthogonal set. The axis-angle misorientation relationship between the parent and twin is a rotation of angle 𝜉 about the shear plane's normal direction 𝑷.

More generally, twinning can be described as a 180° rotation about an axis (𝑲<sub>𝟏</sub> for type I twins or 𝜼<sub>𝟏</sub> for type II twins normal direction) , or a mirror reflection in a plane (𝑲<sub>𝟏</sub> or 𝜼<sub>𝟏</sub> normal plane).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Calhoun |first1=C.A. |last2=Garlea |first2=E. |last3=Sisneros |first3=T.A. |last4=Agnew |first4=S.R. |date=April 2018 |title=In-situ neutron diffraction characterization of temperature dependence deformation in α-uranium |journal=Journal of Nuclear Materials |language=en |volume=502 |pages=60–67 |doi=10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.01.036|bibcode=2018JNuM..502...60C |osti=1478070 |doi-access=free }}</ref>

In addition to a homogeneous shear, atomic shuffles are sometimes required to reform the correct crystal structure in the twinned lattice. For each twin variant, a reciprocal twin with swapped 𝑲<sub>𝟏</sub> and 𝑲<sub>'''2''',</sub> 𝜼<sub>𝟏</sub> and 𝜼<sub>'''2'''</sub> is possible, but one variant may appear more frequently in reality due to complexities with the required shuffles.<ref>{{Cite journal |date=1965-10-26 |title=The theory of the crystallography of deformation twinning |url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1965.0216 |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences |language=en |volume=288 |issue=1413 |pages=240–255 |doi=10.1098/rspa.1965.0216 |bibcode=1965RSPSA.288..240B |s2cid=120566509 |issn=0080-4630|last1=Bilby |first1=B. A. |last2=Crocker |first2=A. G. }}</ref>

there are only two crystallographic planes in a shearing action that do not change their shape and size as a consequence of the shear. The first 𝑲<sub>𝟏</sub> is the plane defining the upper and lower surfaces of the sheared volume. This plane contains the shear direction. The other plane, designated C. The shear direction is shown with an arrow and labelled with its customary designation 𝜼<sub>𝟏</sub>. It follows from the above that there are three ways that a crystal lattice can be sheared while still retaining its crystal structure and symmetry:

# When 𝑲<sub>𝟏</sub> is a rational plane and 𝜼'''<sub>2</sub>''' a rational direction, a twin of the first kind
# When 𝑲'''<sub>2</sub>''' is a rational plane and 𝜼<sub>𝟏</sub> a rational direction, a twin of the second kind, rare
# When all four elements 𝑲<sub>𝟏</sub>'','' 𝑲'''<sub>2</sub>''', 𝜼<sub>𝟏</sub>, and 𝜼'''<sub>2</sub>''' are rational, a compound twin

==== Deformation twinning configuration ====
[[File:Crystal Lines.JPG|thumb|305x305px|Regular twinning planes in calcite crystal. Crossed nicols image, magnification 10× (Field of view = 2&nbsp;mm)]]
A deformation twin embryo forms in [[Cubic crystal system|BCC]] metal by accumulating stacking faults, with a variant selection governed by the local stress state.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Cahn |first=R.W. |date=Oct 1954 |title=Twinned crystals |journal=Advances in Physics |language=en |volume=3 |issue=12 |pages=363–445 |doi=10.1080/00018735400101223 |bibcode=1954AdPhy...3..363C |issn=0001-8732}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Wang |first1=S. |last2=Schuman |first2=C. |last3=Bao |first3=L. |last4=Lecomte |first4=J.S. |last5=Zhang |first5=Y. |last6=Raulot |first6=J.M. |last7=Philippe |first7=M.J. |last8=Zhao |first8=X. |last9=Esling |first9=C. |date=May 2012 |title=Variant selection criterion for twin variants in titanium alloys deformed by rolling |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=60 |issue=9 |pages=3912–3919 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.046|bibcode=2012AcMat..60.3912W |url=https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03864487/file/rolling%20version2.pdf }}</ref><ref name="Christian2002">{{cite book |last=Christian |first=J.W. |chapter=Deformation Twinning |date=2002 |title=The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys |pages=859–960 |publisher=Elsevier |language=en |doi=10.1016/b978-008044019-4/50025-8 |isbn=978-0-08-044019-4}}</ref> Variation of the stress field close to twins inferred from HR-[[Electron backscatter diffraction|EBSD]] experimental<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Abdolvand |first1=Hamidreza |last2=Sedaghat |first2=Omid |last3=Guo |first3=Yi |date=Oct 2018 |title=Nucleation and growth of { 11{{overline|2}}2 } twins in titanium: Elastic energy and stress fields at the vicinity of twins |journal=Materialia |language=en |volume=2 |pages=58–62 |doi=10.1016/j.mtla.2018.06.012|s2cid=139852253 }}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last1=Guo |first1=Y. |last2=Schwiedrzik |first2=J. |last3=Michler |first3=J. |last4=Maeder |first4=X. |date=2016-11-01 |title=On the nucleation and growth of {112¯2} twin in commercial purity titanium: In situ investigation of the local stress field and dislocation density distribution |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=120 |pages=292–301 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.073 |issn=1359-6454}}</ref> and crystal plasticity finite element ([https://damask.mpie.de/index.html CPFE]) simulation data indicated that twins nucleate on sites with maximum [[Strain energy density function|strain energy density]] and twin resolved [[shear stress]]; thus, reducing the total elastic energy after formation. This relaxation depends on the twin thickness and is a deciding factor in the spacing between twins.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Paudel |first1=YubRaj |last2=Barrett |first2=Christopher D. |last3=Tschopp |first3=Mark A. |last4=Inal |first4=Kaan |last5=El Kadiri |first5=Haitham |date=July 2017 |title=Beyond initial twin nucleation in hcp metals: Micromechanical formulation for determining twin spacing during deformation |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=133 |pages=134–146 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.013 |bibcode=2017AcMat.133..134P |issn=1359-6454|doi-access=free }}</ref> Experimental<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Paramatmuni |first1=Chaitanya |last2=Zheng |first2=Zebang |last3=Rainforth |first3=W. Mark |last4=Dunne |first4=Fionn P. E. |date=2020-12-01 |title=Twin nucleation and variant selection in Mg alloys: An integrated crystal plasticity modelling and experimental approach |journal=International Journal of Plasticity |language=en |volume=135 |pages=102778 |doi=10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102778 |s2cid=224887964 |issn=0749-6419|url=https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/171770/3/WE43_twin_nucleation_paper.pdf }}</ref> and three-dimensional<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Paramatmuni |first1=Chaitanya |last2=Guo |first2=Yi |last3=Withers |first3=Philip J. |last4=Dunne |first4=Fionn P. E. |date=2021-08-01 |title=A three-dimensional mechanistic study of the drivers of classical twin nucleation and variant selection in Mg alloys: A mesoscale modelling and experimental study |journal=International Journal of Plasticity |language=en |volume=143 |pages=103027 |doi=10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103027 |hdl=10044/1/90290 |s2cid=236612852 |issn=0749-6419|hdl-access=free }}</ref> analysis has focussed on the (stored) [[Strain energy density function|strain energy density]] measured along a path. This highly localised stress field can provide a sufficient driving force for concurrent twin nucleation<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Arul Kumar |first1=M. |last2=Beyerlein |first2=I. J. |last3=Tomé |first3=C. N. |date=2016-09-01 |title=Effect of local stress fields on twin characteristics in HCP metals |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=116 |pages=143–154 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.042 |bibcode=2016AcMat.116..143A |issn=1359-6454|doi-access=free }}</ref> and inter/intra-granular [[Fracture|crack]] nucleation.

Deformation twin growth can be perceived as a two-step process of i) thickening that is mediated by the interaction between the residual and mobile twin partials at the coherent twin-parent interface,<ref name="Beyerlein2018">{{Cite journal |last1=Beyerlein |first1=Irene J. |last2=Zhang |first2=Xinghang |last3=Misra |first3=Amit |date=July 2014 |title=Growth Twins and Deformation Twins in Metals |journal=Annual Review of Materials Research |language=en |volume=44 |issue=1 |pages=329–363 |doi=10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113304 |bibcode=2014AnRMS..44..329B |issn=1531-7331|doi-access=free }}</ref> and ii) dislocation mobility along the twin shear direction.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Britton |first1=T. B. |last2=Dunne |first2=F. P. E. |last3=Wilkinson |first3=A. J. |date=2015-06-08 |title=On the mechanistic basis of deformation at the microscale in hexagonal close-packed metals |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences |volume=471 |issue=2178 |pages=20140881 |doi=10.1098/rspa.2014.0881|bibcode=2015RSPSA.47140881B |s2cid=138085929 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The twin propagates when the homogeneous shear [[Stress (mechanics)|stress]] reaches a critical value, and a twin-parent interface advances inside the parent grain [240]. The propagating deformation twin generates a stress field due to its confinement by the surrounding parent crystal, and deformation twins develop a 3D oblate spheroid shape (which appears in 2D sections as a [[bi-convex lens]]) with a mixed coherent and non-coherent interface (Figure b).<ref name=":0" />

Kannan ''et al.''<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Y. |last2=Tang |first2=P. Z. |last3=Gong |first3=M. Y. |last4=McCabe |first4=R. J. |last5=Wang |first5=J. |last6=Tomé |first6=C. N. |date=2019-07-25 |title=Three-dimensional character of the deformation twin in magnesium |journal=Nature Communications |language=en |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=3308 |doi=10.1038/s41467-019-10573-7 |issn=2041-1723 |pmc=6658514 |pmid=31346160|bibcode=2019NatCo..10.3308L }}</ref> found, using in-situ ultra-high-speed optical imaging, that twin nucleation in single-crystal [[magnesium]] is [[Stress (mechanics)|stress]]-driven accompanied by instantaneous propagation at a speed of 1&nbsp;km/s (initially) that prioritises volume lateral thickening over forward propagation, past a critical width where growth is then become faster along the shear direction. Barnett<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Barnett |first=M. R. |date=2007-08-25 |title=Twinning and the ductility of magnesium alloys: Part I: "Tension" twins |journal=Materials Science and Engineering: A |language=en |volume=464 |issue=1 |pages=1–7 |doi=10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.037 |issn=0921-5093}}</ref> also indicated that growth is due to twin tip extension. Furthermore, elastic simulations of the local [[Stress (mechanics)|stress]] field surrounding the ellipsoidal twin tip find that the field can be described using its lens angle (<math>\beta</math>) and that the [[Stress (mechanics)|stress]] field magnitude increases with twin thickness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Arul Kumar |first1=M. |last2=Kanjarla |first2=A. K. |last3=Niezgoda |first3=S. R. |last4=Lebensohn |first4=R. A. |last5=Tomé |first5=C. N. |date=2015-02-01 |title=Numerical study of the stress state of a deformation twin in magnesium |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=84 |pages=349–358 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.048 |issn=1359-6454|doi-access=free }}</ref>

[[File:Twinforescatter diode.tif|thumb|(a) [[Scattered electron imaging|forescatter electron]] diode (FSD) image for deformation twins at grain boundary in age-hardened ferrite at I) 18&nbsp;mm working distance and II) 38&nbsp;mm working distance. (b) Schematic of a lenticular twin with interface dislocations and (c) Twin band.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last1=Koko |first1=Abdalrhaman |last2=Elmukashfi |first2=Elsiddig |last3=Dragnevski |first3=Kalin |last4=Wilkinson |first4=Angus J. |last5=Marrow |first5=Thomas James |date=2021-10-01 |title=J-integral analysis of the elastic strain fields of ferrite deformation twins using electron backscatter diffraction |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=218 |pages=117203 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117203 |bibcode=2021AcMat.21817203K |issn=1359-6454|url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:4071edea-3bfc-4d2b-8d32-c3b05bd73372 }}</ref>|376x376px]]
In practice, plastic accommodation occurs in the parent [[crystal]]; thus, it also depends on the material’s yield stress, the anisotropic elastic stiffness of the parent crystal lattice, and the deformation twinning shear magnitude.<ref name=Beyerlein2018/> This can also be accompanied by long-range diffusion of elements and elemental segregation (e.g., [[Chromium|Cr]] and [[Cobalt|Co]] in single crystal [[Nickel|Ni]]-based superalloy MD2), which occurs at the twin boundary to facilitate twin growth by lowering the critical stacking fault energy.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Barba |first1=D. |last2=Alabort |first2=E. |last3=Pedrazzini |first3=S. |last4=Collins |first4=D. M. |last5=Wilkinson |first5=A. J. |last6=Bagot |first6=P. A. J. |last7=Moody |first7=M. P. |last8=Atkinson |first8=C. |last9=Jérusalem |first9=A. |last10=Reed |first10=R. C. |date=2017-08-15 |title=On the microtwinning mechanism in a single crystal superalloy |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=135 |pages=314–329 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.072 |bibcode=2017AcMat.135..314B |s2cid=55924981 |issn=1359-6454|doi-access=free |hdl=10044/1/63276 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> A linear variation has been observed between twin thickness, stacking fault energy and grain size,<ref name="Mahajan 43–61">{{Cite journal |last1=Mahajan |first1=S. |last2=Williams |first2=D. F. |date=1973-06-01 |title=Deformation Twinning in Metals and Alloys |journal=International Metallurgical Reviews |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=43–61 |doi=10.1179/imtlr.1973.18.2.43 |issn=0367-9020}}</ref> and to a lesser degree, the stress state of the twinning grain ([[Schmid Factor]]).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Beyerlein |first1=I.J. |last2=Capolungo |first2=L. |last3=Marshall |first3=P.E. |last4=McCabe |first4=R.J. |last5=Tomé |first5=C.N. |date=2010-05-28 |title=Statistical analyses of deformation twinning in magnesium |journal=Philosophical Magazine |language=en |volume=90 |issue=16 |pages=2161–2190 |doi=10.1080/14786431003630835 |bibcode=2010PMag...90.2161B |s2cid=136111937 |issn=1478-6435}}</ref> The twin thickness saturated once a critical residual dislocations’ density reached the coherent twin-parent crystal boundary.<ref name=Christian2002/><ref name=Lloyd2018>{{Cite journal |last=Lloyd |first=J. T. |date=2018-02-28 |title=A dislocation-based model for twin growth within and across grains |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences |volume=474 |issue=2210 |pages=20170709 |doi=10.1098/rspa.2017.0709 |pmc=5832837 |pmid=29507516|bibcode=2018RSPSA.47470709L }}</ref>

Significant attention has been paid to the [[crystallography]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Venables |first=J. A. |date=1961-03-01 |title=Deformation twinning in face-centred cubic metals |journal=The Philosophical Magazine |volume=6 |issue=63 |pages=379–396 |doi=10.1080/14786436108235892 |bibcode=1961PMag....6..379V |issn=0031-8086}}</ref> morphology<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Johansson |first1=Johan |last2=Odén |first2=Magnus |date=2000-06-01 |title=Load sharing between austenite and ferrite in a duplex stainless steel during cyclic loading |journal=Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A |language=en |volume=31 |issue=6 |pages=1557–1570 |doi=10.1007/s11661-000-0166-3 |bibcode=2000MMTA...31.1557J |s2cid=137142133 |issn=1543-1940}}</ref> and macro mechanical effects<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Marrow |first1=T. J. |last2=King |first2=J. E. |date=1994-06-15 |title=Fatigue crack propagation mechanisms in a thermally aged duplex stainless steel |journal=Materials Science and Engineering: A |language=en |volume=183 |issue=1 |pages=91–101 |doi=10.1016/0921-5093(94)90893-1 |issn=0921-5093}}</ref> of deformation twinning. Although the criterion for deformation twin growth is not entirely understood, it is a tip-controlled phenomenon linked to the interaction between the residual and mobile twin partials at the twin interface; thermodynamically, this involves the elastic energy of the strained lattice, the interface and volume free-energy of the twin, and the dissipated energy of the growth mechanism.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Christian |first1=J. W. |last2=Mahajan |first2=S. |date=1995-01-01 |title=Deformation twinning |journal=Progress in Materials Science |language=en |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=1–157 |doi=10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 |issn=0079-6425}}</ref> To fully understand the interactions between microstructure (i.e., grain size, texture), temperature and strain rate on deformation twinning, it is crucial to characterise the (high) local [[Stress (mechanics)|stress]] and strain field associated with twin thickening and propagation. This is especially important for materials where [[Cleavage (crystal)|cleavage fracture]] can be initiated by twinning (e.g., iron-silicon, the ferrite phase of age-hardened duplex stainless-steel, and single-crystal [[magnesium]]) as a stress-relieving mechanism.

Early studies of deformation twins arrested within grains of [[niobium]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sleeswyk |first=A. W |date=1962-08-01 |title=Emissary dislocations: Theory and experiments on the propagation of deformation twins in α-iron |journal=Acta Metallurgica |language=en |volume=10 |issue=8 |pages=705–725 |doi=10.1016/0001-6160(62)90040-8 |issn=0001-6160}}</ref> and [[iron]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Spreadborough |first1=J. |last2=Langheinrich |first2=D. |last3=Anderson |first3=E. |last4=Brandon |first4=D. |date=Dec 1964 |title=Etch-Pit Observations Concerning Twins in Iron and Iron Alloys |journal=Journal of Applied Physics |language=en |volume=35 |issue=12 |pages=3585–3587 |doi=10.1063/1.1713275 |bibcode=1964JAP....35.3585S |issn=0021-8979}}</ref> visualised the highly local strain concentration at the twin tip using an etch-pit procedure. More recently, high-resolution electron backscatter diffraction (HR-[[Electron backscatter diffraction|EBSD]]) has been used to investigate the strain 'singularity' ahead of a twin tip in hexagonal close-packed (HCP) [[zirconium]] alloy. A deformation twin in commercial purity [[titanium]] was characterised similarly and then quantified using a local [[Schmid Factor|Schmid factor]] (LSF) at the twin tip,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Guo |first1=Y. |last2=Abdolvand |first2=H. |last3=Britton |first3=T. B. |last4=Wilkinson |first4=A. J. |date=2017-03-01 |title=Growth of {11{{overline|2}}2} twins in titanium: A combined experimental and modelling investigation of the local state of deformation |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=126 |pages=221–235 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.066 |s2cid=136128910 |issn=1359-6454|doi-access=free |hdl=10044/1/67478 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> as described in equation below.

<math display="block">\mathrm{LSF} = \frac{\boldsymbol{\sigma} : \boldsymbol{P}^i}{\|\boldsymbol{\sigma}\|}, \quad \boldsymbol{S}^i = \boldsymbol{d}^i \otimes \mathbf{n}^i </math>

where '''''σ''''' is the stress tensor, '''''S'''''<sup>''i''</sup> is the Schmid tensor, '''''P'''''<sup>''i''</sup> is its symmetric part, '''''d'''''<sup>''i''</sup> is the shear direction and '''''n'''''<sup>''i''</sup> is the shear plane normal for ''i''th [[Slip (materials science)|slip]] system. The authors concluded that conditions at the twin tip control thickening and propagation in a manner analogous to the operation of [[dislocation]] sources ahead of a crack-tip.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Baxevanakis |first1=K. P. |last2=Gourgiotis |first2=P. A. |last3=Georgiadis |first3=H. G. |date=July 2017 |title=Interaction of cracks with dislocations in couple-stress elasticity. Part I: Opening mode |journal=International Journal of Solids and Structures |language=en |volume=118-119 |pages=179–191 |doi=10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.019 |s2cid=55155535 |issn=0020-7683|doi-access=free }}</ref> In the analysis, a broad region of high LSF ahead of the twin tip favoured propagation, whereas a narrow region of high LSF promoted thickening. Since then, it has been argued<ref name="Kacher 44–51">{{Cite journal |last1=Kacher |first1=Josh |last2=Sabisch |first2=Julian E. |last3=Minor |first3=Andrew M. |date=2019-07-01 |title=Statistical analysis of twin/grain boundary interactions in pure rhenium |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=173 |pages=44–51 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.051 |bibcode=2019AcMat.173...44K |issn=1359-6454|doi-access=free }}</ref> that the LSF firmly controls the twin variant selection, as twinning has strong polarity.

The LSF novelty – compared to other criteria to describe conditions at the twin<ref name="Mahajan 43–61"/> – lies in combining a geometrical criterion with the deformation field in the parent grain to provide an approximate indication of the local twin mode (i.e., thickening or propagation). However, the LSF analysis does not take advantage of the available full-field data, relies on global information on the applied [[Stress (mechanics)|stress]], and does not consider the energy balance that drives twin growth. There have been few in-situ experiments to quantify the strain field ahead of a propagating deformation twin.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Such observations might validate geometrical or hybrid geometrical-energy-based criteria<ref name="Kacher 44–51"/> for growth. Nanoscale testing (i.e., [[transmission electron microscopy]]) may not represent the behaviour in bulk samples due to plasticity starvation, i.e., large surface area to volume ratio,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Gong |first1=Mingyu |last2=Hirth |first2=John P. |last3=Liu |first3=Yue |last4=Shen |first4=Yao |last5=Wang |first5=Jian |date=2017-11-03 |title=Interface structures and twinning mechanisms of twins in hexagonal metals |journal=Materials Research Letters |volume=5 |issue=7 |pages=449–464 |doi=10.1080/21663831.2017.1336496|s2cid=136448819 |doi-access=free }}</ref> so a suitable analysis method is needed.

Lloyd<ref name=Lloyd2018/> described the stress concentration field ahead of the twin tip using a two-dimensional [[dislocation]]-based model within a single [[magnesium]] grain. Wang and Li,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Wang |first1=Yunzhi |last2=Li |first2=Ju |date=2010-02-01 |title=Phase field modeling of defects and deformation |journal=Acta Materialia |language=en |volume=58 |issue=4 |pages=1212–1235 |doi=10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.041 |bibcode=2010AcMat..58.1212W |issn=1359-6454}}</ref> who considered microscopic phase-field (MPF) models of cracks, noted that the [[Stress (mechanics)|stress]] fields were similar for [[dislocation]]s, deformation twinning and [[Martensite|martensitic]] transformations, with differences only in the traction of the created surface, i.e., there is 100% traction recovery for dislocations and a traction-free surface for a crack. They highlighted that the stress field [[Singularity (mathematics)|singularity]] regulates the advancement of the crack-tip and [[dislocation]]s. This [[Stress (mechanics)|stress]] concentration can be characterised using a [[J-integral|path-independent line integral]], as shown by [[John D. Eshelby|Eshelby]] for [[dislocation]]s considering the contribution from the surface traction and ellipsoidal [[Inclusions in Aluminium Alloys|inclusions]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Eshelby |first1=John Douglas |last2=Mott |first2=Nevill Francis |date=1951-11-06 |title=The force on an elastic singularity |url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.1951.0016 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences |volume=244 |issue=877 |pages=87–112 |doi=10.1098/rsta.1951.0016|bibcode=1951RSPTA.244...87E |s2cid=14703976 }}</ref> and [[James R. Rice|Rice]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rice |first=J. R. |date=1968-06-01 |title=A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks |url=https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/appliedmechanics/article/35/2/379/392117/A-Path-Independent-Integral-and-the-Approximate |journal=Journal of Applied Mechanics |language=en |volume=35 |issue=2 |pages=379–386 |doi=10.1115/1.3601206 |bibcode=1968JAM....35..379R |issn=0021-8936}}</ref> for cracks and stress concentrations with traction-free surfaces. Furthermore, Venables<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Venables |first=J. A |date=1964-07-01 |title=The electron microscopy of deformation twinning |journal=Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids |language=en |volume=25 |issue=7 |pages=685–692 |doi=10.1016/0022-3697(64)90177-5 |bibcode=1964JPCS...25..685V |issn=0022-3697}}</ref> noted that the oblate [[Spheroid|spheroid shape]] of the twin tip is the ideal example of an ellipsoid inclusion or a notch.

== See also ==


==See also==
{{Commons category|Twinned crystals}}
{{Commons category|Twinned crystals}}
* {{annotated link|Icosahedral twins}}
* [[Macle]]
* {{annotated link|Macle}}
* [[Tin cry]]
* {{annotated link|Slip bands}}
* {{annotated link|Slip (materials science)}}
* {{annotated link|Tin cry}}


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
* Hurlbut, Cornelius S.; Klein, Cornelis, 1985, Manual of Mineralogy, 20th ed., ISBN 0-471-80580-7

* {{1911}}
==Sources==
* {{cite book |last1=Chesterman |first1=C.W. |last2=Lowe |first2=K.E. |title=Field guide to North American rocks and minerals |publisher=Random House of Canada |location=Toronto |date=2008 |isbn=978-0-394-50269-4}}
* {{cite book |title=Mineralogy and Optical Mineralogy |last1=Dyar |first1=M.D. |last2=Gunter |first2=M.E. |publisher=[[Mineralogical Society of America]] |location=Chantilly, VA|date=2008 |isbn=978-0-939950-81-2}}


==External links==
==External links==
*[http://www.tulane.edu/~sanelson/eens211/twinning.htm Tulane Edu. crystal twinning]
*[https://www.enggstudy.com/2019/10/mechanism-of-plastic-deformation-slip-twinning.html Slip and twinning mechanism in detail]
*[http://mineral.galleries.com/minerals/twins.htm Mineral galleries – twins]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20050826094537/http://mineral.galleries.com/Minerals/twins.htm Mineral galleries – twins]
*[http://www.crystallography.fr/mathcryst/twins.htm Mathematical and Theoretical Crystallography]
*[http://www.crystallography.fr/mathcryst/twins.htm Mathematical and Theoretical Crystallography]
*[http://quartzpage.de/crs_twins.html Quartz Crystals – Twinning]
*[http://quartzpage.de/crs_twins.html Quartz Crystals – Twinning]
*[http://www.tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/def_en/kap_7/backbone/r7_1_1.html Grain Boundary Twinning]
*[http://www.tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/def_en/kap_7/backbone/r7_1_1.html Grain Boundary Twinning]

{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Crystallography]]
[[Category:Crystallography]]
[[Category:Materials science]]
[[Category:Materials science]]
[[Category:Mineralogy]]

[[uk:Двійники]]

Latest revision as of 21:25, 20 October 2024

Quartz – Japan twin
Diagram of twinned crystals of albite. On the more perfect cleavage, which is parallel to the basal plane (P), is a system of fine striations, parallel to the second cleavage (M).

Crystal twinning occurs when two or more adjacent crystals of the same mineral are oriented so that they share some of the same crystal lattice points in a symmetrical manner. The result is an intergrowth of two separate crystals that are tightly bonded to each other. The surface along which the lattice points are shared in twinned crystals is called a composition surface or twin plane.

Crystallographers classify twinned crystals by a number of twin laws, which are specific to the crystal structure. The type of twinning can be a diagnostic tool in mineral identification. There are three main types of twinning. The first is growth twinning which can occur both in very large and very small particles. The second is transformation twinning, where there is a change in the crystal structure. The third is deformation twinning, in which twinning develops in a crystal in response to a shear stress, and is an important mechanism for permanent shape changes in a crystal.

Definition

[edit]
Twin lattice (2D). The long horizontal red line is the composition plane where the two crystal segments join. The upper crystal lattice is the reflection of the lower crystal lattice. The red points are the shared crystal lattice points.

Twinning is a form of symmetrical intergrowth between two or more adjacent crystals of the same mineral. It differs from the ordinary random intergrowth of mineral grains in a mineral deposit, because the relative orientations of the two crystal segments show a fixed relationship that is characteristic of the mineral structure. The relationship is defined by a symmetry operation called a twin operation.[1][2]

The twin operation is not one of the normal symmetry operations of the untwinned crystal structure. For example, the twin operation may be reflection across a plane that is not a symmetry plane of the single crystal.[1][2]

On the microscopic level, the twin boundary is characterized by a set of atomic positions in the crystal lattice that are shared between the two orientations.[1][2] These shared lattice points give the junction between the crystal segments much greater strength than that between randomly oriented grains, so that the twinned crystals do not easily break apart.[3]

Parallel growth describes a form of crystal growth that produces the appearance of a cluster of aligned crystals which could be mistaken for twins. Close examination reveals that the cluster is actually a single crystal. This is not twinning, since the crystal lattice is continuous throughout the cluster. Parallel growth likely takes place because it reduces system energy.[4]

Twin laws

[edit]

Twin laws are symmetry operations that define the orientation between twin crystal segments. These are as characteristic of the mineral as are its crystal face angles. For example, crystals of staurolite show twinning at angles of almost precisely 90 degrees or 30 degrees.[3] A twin law is not a symmetry operation of the full set of basis points.[2]

Twin laws include reflection operations, rotation operations, and the inversion operation. Reflection twinning is described by the Miller indices of the twin plane (i.e. {hkl}) while rotational twinning is described by the direction of the twin axis (i.e. <hkl>). Inversion twinning is typically equivalent to a reflection or rotation symmetry.[1]

Rotational twin laws are almost always 2-fold rotations, though any other permitted rotation symmetry (3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold or 6-fold) is possible. The twin axis will be perpendicular to a lattice plane.[5] It is possible for a rotational twin law to share the same axis as a rotational symmetry of the individual crystal if the twin law is a 2-fold rotation and the symmetry operation is a 3-fold rotation. This is the case for spinel law twinning on <111>: The spinel structure has a 3-fold rotational symmetry on <111> and spinel is commonly twinned by 2-fold rotation on <111>.[1]

The boundary between crystal segments is called a composition surface or, if it is planar, a composition plane. The composition plane is often, though not always, parallel to the twin law plane of a reflection law. If this is the case, the twin plane is always parallel to a possible crystal face.[2]

Common twin laws

[edit]
Spinel law contact twinning. A single crystal is shown at left with the composition plane in red. At right, the crystal has effectively been cut on the composition plane and the front half rotated by 180° to produce a contact twin. This creates reentrants at the top, lower left, and lower right of the composition plane.[3]

In the isometric system, the most common types of twins are the Spinel Law (twin plane, parallel to an octahedron) <111>, where the twin axis is perpendicular to an octahedral face, and the Iron Cross <001>, which is the interpenetration of two pyritohedrons, a subtype of dodecahedron.[6]

In the hexagonal system, calcite shows the contact twin laws {0001} and {0112}. Quartz shows the Brazil Law {1120}, and Dauphiné Law <0001>, which are penetration twins caused by transformation, and Japan Law {1122}, which is often caused by accidents during growth.[6]

In the tetragonal system, cyclical contact twins are the most commonly observed type of twin, such as in rutile titanium dioxide and cassiterite tin oxide.[6]

In the orthorhombic system, crystals usually twin on planes parallel to the prism face, where the most common is a {110} twin, which produces cyclical twins, such as in aragonite, chrysoberyl, and cerussite.[6]

In the monoclinic system, twins occur most often on the planes {100} and {001} by the Manebach Law {001}, Carlsbad Law [001], Baveno Law {021} in orthoclase, and the Swallow Tail Twins (Manebach law) {001} in gypsum.[6]

In the triclinic system, the most commonly twinned crystals are the feldspar minerals plagioclase and microcline. These minerals show the Albite and Pericline Laws.[5][6]

The most common twin operations by crystal system are tabulated below. This list is not exhaustive, particularly for the crystal systems of lowest symmetry, such as the triclinic system.[7][1][6]

30° twin of staurolite
90° twins of staurolite
Iron pyrite cross twin
System Law Operation Examples
Triclinic Albite law
Pericline law
Carlsbad law
Baveno law
Manebach law
{010}
<010>
<001>
{021}
{001}
Plagioclase
Monoclinic Carlsbad law
Baveno law
Manebach law
<001>
{021}
{001}
{100}
<031>
<231>
Orthoclase

Gypsum

Staurolite
Orthorhombic {110}
{101}
{011}
Aragonite, cerrusite; often cyclic
Tetragonal {110}
{101}
{011}
Cassiterite, rutile
Hexagonal


Brazil law
Dauphine law
Japan law
{0112}
{0001}
{1011}
{1120}
<0001>
{1122}
Calcite


Quartz
Isometric Spinel law


Iron cross law
<111>
{111}
{001}
<001>
Spinel


Pyrite

Types of twinning

[edit]
Chrysoberyl showing cyclic twinning

Simple twinned crystals may be contact twins or penetration twins. Contact twins meet on a single composition plane, often appearing as mirror images across the boundary. Plagioclase, quartz, gypsum, and spinel often exhibit contact twinning.[3] Merohedral twinning occurs when the lattices of the contact twins superimpose in three dimensions, such as by relative rotation of one twin from the other.[8] An example is metazeunerite.[9] Contact twinning characteristically creates reentrant faces where faces of the crystal segments meet on the contact plane at an angle greater than 180°.[3]

A type of twinning involving 180° relationships is called hemitropism or hemitropy.

In penetration twins the individual crystals have the appearance of passing through each other in a symmetrical manner.[3] Orthoclase, staurolite, pyrite, and fluorite often show penetration twinning. The composition surface in penetration twins is usually irregular and extends to the center of the crystal.[2]

Contact twinning can arise from either reflection or rotation, whereas penetration twinning is usually produced by rotation.[2]

If several twin crystal parts are aligned by the same twin law they are referred to as multiple or repeated twins. If these multiple twins are aligned in parallel they are called polysynthetic twins. When the multiple twins are not parallel they are cyclic twins. Albite, calcite, and pyrite often show polysynthetic twinning. Closely spaced polysynthetic twinning is often observed as striations or fine parallel lines on the crystal face. Cyclic twins are caused by repeated twinning around a rotation axis. This type of twinning occurs around three, four, five, six, or eight-fold axes, the corresponding patterns are called threelings, fourlings, fivelings, sixlings, and eightlings. Sixlings are common in aragonite.[10][11] Rutile, aragonite, cerussite, and chrysoberyl often exhibit cyclic twinning, typically in a radiating pattern.[3][2]

For rotational twinning the relationship between the twin axis and twin plane falls into one of three types:[12]

  1. parallel twinning, when the twin axis and compositional plane lie parallel to each other,
  2. normal twinning, when the twin plane and compositional plane lie normally, and
  3. complex twinning, a combination of parallel twinning and normal twinning on one compositional plane.

Modes of formation

[edit]
Parallel growth of pyromorphite

There are three modes of formation of twinned crystals.

  • Growth twins are the result of an interruption or change in the lattice during formation or growth. This may be due to a larger substituting ion, statistics as the energy difference to nucleate a new plane of atoms in a twin orientation is small, or because the twins lead to a lower energy structure.
  • Annealing or transformation twins are the result of a change in crystal system during cooling as one form becomes unstable and the crystal structure must re-organize or transform into another more stable form.
  • Deformation or gliding twins are the result of stress on the crystal after the crystal has formed. Because growth twins are formed during the initial growth of the crystal, they are described as primary, whereas transformation or deformation twins are formed in an existing crystal and are described as secondary.[13]

Growth twinning (nanotwinning)

[edit]
Fivefold twin in a gold nanoparticle (electron microscope micrograph).

There are two types of twinning that can occur during growth, accidental and ones where the twinned structure has lower energy.

In accidental growth twinning an atom joins a crystal face in a less than ideal position, forming a seed for growth of a twin. The original crystal and its twin then grow together and closely resemble each other. This is characteristic enough of certain minerals to suggest that it is thermodynamically or kinetically favored under conditions of rapid growth.[3][1]

Different from these are twins found in nanoparticles such as the image here, these fivefold or decahedral nanoparticles being one of the most common.[14] These cyclic twins occur as they are lower in energy at small sizes.[15] For the five-fold case shown, there is a disclination along the common axis[16] which leads to an additional strain energy.[17] Balancing this there is a reduction in the surface free energy, in large part due to more (111) surface facets.[18] In small nanoparticles the decahedral and a more complicated icosahedral structure (with twenty units) are lower energy, but at larger energies single crystals become lower energy.[19][20] However, they do not have to transform into single crystals and can grow very large, and are known as fivelings, documented as early as 1831 by Gustav Rose;[21] further drawings are available in the Atlas der Kristallformen, and see also the article on fivelings.[22]

Transformation twinning

[edit]
Illustration of transformation twinning in 2-D. The orthorhombic crystal at left transforms to a monoclinic crystal at right, with two parallel twinning planes (polysynthetic twinning)

Transformation and annealing twinning takes place when a cooling crystal experiences a displacive polymorphic transition. For example, leucite has an isometric crystal structure above about 665 °C (1,229 °F), but becomes tetragonal below this temperature. Any one of the three original axes of a crystal can become the long axis when this phase change takes place. Twinning results when different parts of the crystal break their isometric symmetry along a different choice of axis. This is typically polysynthetic twinning, which enables the crystal to maintain its isometric shape by averaging out the displacement in each direction. This produces a pseudomorphic crystal that appears to have isometric symmetry. Potassium feldspar likewise experiences polysynthetic twinning as it transforms from a monoclinic structure (orthoclase) to a triclinic structure (microcline) on slow cooling.[1]

Deformation twinning

[edit]
Animation of deformation twinning of crystal

Deformation twinning is a response to shear stress. The crystal structure is displaced along successive planes of the crystal, a process also called glide. The twinning is always reflection twinning and the glide plane is also the mirror plane. Deformation twinning can be observed in a calcite cleavage fragment by applying gentle pressure with a knife blade near an edge. This particular glide twinning, {102}, is found almost universally in deformed rock beds containing calcite.[1]

Twinning and slip are competitive mechanisms for crystal deformation. Each mechanism is dominant in certain crystal systems and under certain conditions.[23] In fcc metals, slip is almost always dominant because the stress required is far less than twinning stress.[24]

Twinning can occur by cooperative displacement of atoms along the face of the twin boundary. This displacement of a large quantity of atoms simultaneously requires significant energy to perform. Therefore, the theoretical stress required to form a twin is quite high. It is believed that twinning is associated with dislocation motion on a coordinated scale, in contrast to slip, which is caused by independent glide at several locations in the crystal.

Compared to slip, twinning produces a deformation pattern that is more heterogeneous in nature. This deformation produces a local gradient across the material and near intersections between twins and grain boundaries. The deformation gradient can lead to fracture along the boundaries, particularly in bcc transition metals at low temperatures.

Of the three common crystalline structures bcc, fcc, and hcp, the hcp structure is the most likely to form deformation twins when strained, because they rarely have a sufficient number of slip systems for an arbitrary shape change. High strain rates, low stacking-fault energy and low temperatures facilitate deformation twinning.[25]

If a metal with face-centered cubic (fcc) structure, like Al, Cu, Ag, Au, etc., is subjected to stress, it will experience twinning. The formation and migration of twin boundaries is partly responsible for ductility and malleability of fcc metals.[26]

Twin boundaries are partly responsible for shock hardening and for many of the changes that occur in cold work of metals with limited slip systems or at very low temperatures. They also occur due to martensitic transformations: the motion of twin boundaries is responsible for the pseudoelastic and shape-memory behavior of nitinol, and their presence is partly responsible for the hardness due to quenching of steel. In certain types of high strength steels, very fine deformation twins act as primary obstacles against dislocation motion. These steels are referred to as 'TWIP' steels, where TWIP stands for twinning-induced plasticity.[27]

Deformation twinning crystallography

[edit]
Deformation twinning crystallographic planes

Twinning is crystallographically defined by its twin plane 𝑲𝟏, the mirror plane in the twin and parent material, and 𝜼𝟏, which is the twinning shear direction. Deformation twins in Zr are generally lenticular in shape, lengthening in the 𝜼𝟏 direction and thickening along the 𝑲𝟏 plane normal.[28]

The twin plane, shear direction, and shear plane form the basis vectors of an orthogonal set. The axis-angle misorientation relationship between the parent and twin is a rotation of angle 𝜉 about the shear plane's normal direction 𝑷.

More generally, twinning can be described as a 180° rotation about an axis (𝑲𝟏 for type I twins or 𝜼𝟏 for type II twins normal direction) , or a mirror reflection in a plane (𝑲𝟏 or 𝜼𝟏 normal plane).[29]

In addition to a homogeneous shear, atomic shuffles are sometimes required to reform the correct crystal structure in the twinned lattice. For each twin variant, a reciprocal twin with swapped 𝑲𝟏 and 𝑲2, 𝜼𝟏 and 𝜼2 is possible, but one variant may appear more frequently in reality due to complexities with the required shuffles.[30]

there are only two crystallographic planes in a shearing action that do not change their shape and size as a consequence of the shear. The first 𝑲𝟏 is the plane defining the upper and lower surfaces of the sheared volume. This plane contains the shear direction. The other plane, designated C. The shear direction is shown with an arrow and labelled with its customary designation 𝜼𝟏. It follows from the above that there are three ways that a crystal lattice can be sheared while still retaining its crystal structure and symmetry:

  1. When 𝑲𝟏 is a rational plane and 𝜼2 a rational direction, a twin of the first kind
  2. When 𝑲2 is a rational plane and 𝜼𝟏 a rational direction, a twin of the second kind, rare
  3. When all four elements 𝑲𝟏, 𝑲2, 𝜼𝟏, and 𝜼2 are rational, a compound twin

Deformation twinning configuration

[edit]
Regular twinning planes in calcite crystal. Crossed nicols image, magnification 10× (Field of view = 2 mm)

A deformation twin embryo forms in BCC metal by accumulating stacking faults, with a variant selection governed by the local stress state.[31][32][33] Variation of the stress field close to twins inferred from HR-EBSD experimental[34][35] and crystal plasticity finite element (CPFE) simulation data indicated that twins nucleate on sites with maximum strain energy density and twin resolved shear stress; thus, reducing the total elastic energy after formation. This relaxation depends on the twin thickness and is a deciding factor in the spacing between twins.[36] Experimental[37] and three-dimensional[38] analysis has focussed on the (stored) strain energy density measured along a path. This highly localised stress field can provide a sufficient driving force for concurrent twin nucleation[39] and inter/intra-granular crack nucleation.

Deformation twin growth can be perceived as a two-step process of i) thickening that is mediated by the interaction between the residual and mobile twin partials at the coherent twin-parent interface,[40] and ii) dislocation mobility along the twin shear direction.[41] The twin propagates when the homogeneous shear stress reaches a critical value, and a twin-parent interface advances inside the parent grain [240]. The propagating deformation twin generates a stress field due to its confinement by the surrounding parent crystal, and deformation twins develop a 3D oblate spheroid shape (which appears in 2D sections as a bi-convex lens) with a mixed coherent and non-coherent interface (Figure b).[41]

Kannan et al.[42] found, using in-situ ultra-high-speed optical imaging, that twin nucleation in single-crystal magnesium is stress-driven accompanied by instantaneous propagation at a speed of 1 km/s (initially) that prioritises volume lateral thickening over forward propagation, past a critical width where growth is then become faster along the shear direction. Barnett[43] also indicated that growth is due to twin tip extension. Furthermore, elastic simulations of the local stress field surrounding the ellipsoidal twin tip find that the field can be described using its lens angle () and that the stress field magnitude increases with twin thickness.[44]

(a) forescatter electron diode (FSD) image for deformation twins at grain boundary in age-hardened ferrite at I) 18 mm working distance and II) 38 mm working distance. (b) Schematic of a lenticular twin with interface dislocations and (c) Twin band.[45]

In practice, plastic accommodation occurs in the parent crystal; thus, it also depends on the material’s yield stress, the anisotropic elastic stiffness of the parent crystal lattice, and the deformation twinning shear magnitude.[40] This can also be accompanied by long-range diffusion of elements and elemental segregation (e.g., Cr and Co in single crystal Ni-based superalloy MD2), which occurs at the twin boundary to facilitate twin growth by lowering the critical stacking fault energy.[46] A linear variation has been observed between twin thickness, stacking fault energy and grain size,[47] and to a lesser degree, the stress state of the twinning grain (Schmid Factor).[48] The twin thickness saturated once a critical residual dislocations’ density reached the coherent twin-parent crystal boundary.[33][49]

Significant attention has been paid to the crystallography,[50] morphology[51] and macro mechanical effects[52] of deformation twinning. Although the criterion for deformation twin growth is not entirely understood, it is a tip-controlled phenomenon linked to the interaction between the residual and mobile twin partials at the twin interface; thermodynamically, this involves the elastic energy of the strained lattice, the interface and volume free-energy of the twin, and the dissipated energy of the growth mechanism.[53] To fully understand the interactions between microstructure (i.e., grain size, texture), temperature and strain rate on deformation twinning, it is crucial to characterise the (high) local stress and strain field associated with twin thickening and propagation. This is especially important for materials where cleavage fracture can be initiated by twinning (e.g., iron-silicon, the ferrite phase of age-hardened duplex stainless-steel, and single-crystal magnesium) as a stress-relieving mechanism.

Early studies of deformation twins arrested within grains of niobium[54] and iron[55] visualised the highly local strain concentration at the twin tip using an etch-pit procedure. More recently, high-resolution electron backscatter diffraction (HR-EBSD) has been used to investigate the strain 'singularity' ahead of a twin tip in hexagonal close-packed (HCP) zirconium alloy. A deformation twin in commercial purity titanium was characterised similarly and then quantified using a local Schmid factor (LSF) at the twin tip,[56] as described in equation below.

where σ is the stress tensor, Si is the Schmid tensor, Pi is its symmetric part, di is the shear direction and ni is the shear plane normal for ith slip system. The authors concluded that conditions at the twin tip control thickening and propagation in a manner analogous to the operation of dislocation sources ahead of a crack-tip.[57] In the analysis, a broad region of high LSF ahead of the twin tip favoured propagation, whereas a narrow region of high LSF promoted thickening. Since then, it has been argued[58] that the LSF firmly controls the twin variant selection, as twinning has strong polarity.

The LSF novelty – compared to other criteria to describe conditions at the twin[47] – lies in combining a geometrical criterion with the deformation field in the parent grain to provide an approximate indication of the local twin mode (i.e., thickening or propagation). However, the LSF analysis does not take advantage of the available full-field data, relies on global information on the applied stress, and does not consider the energy balance that drives twin growth. There have been few in-situ experiments to quantify the strain field ahead of a propagating deformation twin.[45][35] Such observations might validate geometrical or hybrid geometrical-energy-based criteria[58] for growth. Nanoscale testing (i.e., transmission electron microscopy) may not represent the behaviour in bulk samples due to plasticity starvation, i.e., large surface area to volume ratio,[59] so a suitable analysis method is needed.

Lloyd[49] described the stress concentration field ahead of the twin tip using a two-dimensional dislocation-based model within a single magnesium grain. Wang and Li,[60] who considered microscopic phase-field (MPF) models of cracks, noted that the stress fields were similar for dislocations, deformation twinning and martensitic transformations, with differences only in the traction of the created surface, i.e., there is 100% traction recovery for dislocations and a traction-free surface for a crack. They highlighted that the stress field singularity regulates the advancement of the crack-tip and dislocations. This stress concentration can be characterised using a path-independent line integral, as shown by Eshelby for dislocations considering the contribution from the surface traction and ellipsoidal inclusions,[61] and Rice[62] for cracks and stress concentrations with traction-free surfaces. Furthermore, Venables[63] noted that the oblate spheroid shape of the twin tip is the ideal example of an ellipsoid inclusion or a notch.

See also

[edit]
  • Icosahedral twins – Structure found in atomic clusters and nanoparticles
  • Macle – Term used in crystallography
  • Slip bands – Deformation mechanism in crystallines
  • Slip (materials science) – Displacement between parts of a crystal along a crystallographic plane
  • Tin cry – Sound made by bending tin

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i Nesse, William D. (2000). Introduction to mineralogy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 87–91. ISBN 9780195106916.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Klein, Cornelis; Hurlbut, Cornelius S. Jr. (1993). Manual of mineralogy : (after James D. Dana) (21st ed.). New York: Wiley. pp. 102–106. ISBN 047157452X.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Sinkankas, John (1964). Mineralogy for amateurs. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand. pp. 96–105. ISBN 0442276249.
  4. ^ Klein & Hurlbut 1993, p. 101.
  5. ^ a b Nelson, Stephen A. (2013). "Twinning, Polymorphism, Polytypism, Pseudomorphism". Tulane University. Retrieved 19 February 2022.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Klein & Hurlbut 1993, pp. 104–106.
  7. ^ Nesse 2000, pp. 89, 214–216.
  8. ^ Yeates, Todd O. (1997). "[22] Detecting and overcoming crystal twinning". Macromolecular Crystallography Part A. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 276. pp. 344–358. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76068-3. ISBN 9780121821777. PMID 27799105.
  9. ^ Locock, A. J.; Burns, P. C. (1 April 2003). "Crystal Structures and Synthesis of the Copper-Dominant Members of the Autunite and Meta-Autunite Groups: Torbernite, Zeunerite, Metatorbernite and Metazeunerite". The Canadian Mineralogist. 41 (2): 489–502. Bibcode:2003CaMin..41..489L. doi:10.2113/gscanmin.41.2.489.
  10. ^ Dyar & Gunter 2008, pp. 41–43
  11. ^ Chesterman & Lowe 2008, p. 39
  12. ^ Tobi, Alexander C. (1961). "The recognition of plagioclase twins in sections normal to the composition plane". American Mineralogist. 46 (11–12): 1470–1488. Retrieved 19 February 2022.
  13. ^ Klein & Hurlbut 1993, p. 167.
  14. ^ Hofmeister, H. (1998). <3::aid-crat3>3.0.co;2-3 "Forty Years Study of Fivefold Twinned Structures in Small Particles and Thin Films". Crystal Research and Technology. 33 (1): 3–25. Bibcode:1998CryRT..33....3H. doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4079(1998)33:1<3::aid-crat3>3.0.co;2-3. ISSN 0232-1300.
  15. ^ Marks, Laurence. D. (2023), "Shape, thermodynamics and kinetics of nanoparticles", Encyclopedia of Nanomaterials, Elsevier, pp. 383–417, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822425-0.00082-8, ISBN 978-0-12-822423-6, retrieved 2023-07-11
  16. ^ Wit, R de (1972). "Partial disclinations". Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics. 5 (5): 529–534. Bibcode:1972JPhC....5..529D. doi:10.1088/0022-3719/5/5/004. ISSN 0022-3719.
  17. ^ Howie, A.; Marks, L. D. (1984). "Elastic strains and the energy balance for multiply twinned particles". Philosophical Magazine A. 49 (1): 95–109. Bibcode:1984PMagA..49...95H. doi:10.1080/01418618408233432. ISSN 0141-8610.
  18. ^ Marks, L. D. (1984). "Surface structure and energetics of multiply twinned particles". Philosophical Magazine A. 49 (1): 81–93. Bibcode:1984PMagA..49...81M. doi:10.1080/01418618408233431. ISSN 0141-8610.
  19. ^ Baletto, Francesca; Ferrando, Riccardo (2005). "Structural properties of nanoclusters: Energetic, thermodynamic, and kinetic effects". Reviews of Modern Physics. 77 (1): 371–423. Bibcode:2005RvMP...77..371B. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.371. ISSN 0034-6861.
  20. ^ Rogers, Blake; Lehr, Alexander; Velázquez-Salazar, J. Jesús; Whetten, Robert; Mendoza-Cruz, Ruben; Bazan-Diaz, Lourdes; Bahena-Uribe, Daniel; José Yacaman, Miguel (2023). "Decahedra and Icosahedra Everywhere: The Anomalous Crystallization of Au and Other Metals at the Nanoscale". Crystal Research and Technology. 58 (4). Bibcode:2023CryRT..5800259R. doi:10.1002/crat.202200259. ISSN 0232-1300.
  21. ^ Rose, Gustav (1831). "Ueber die Krystallformen des Goldes und des Silbers". Annalen der Physik. 99 (10): 196–204. Bibcode:1831AnP....99..196R. doi:10.1002/andp.18310991003. ISSN 0003-3804.
  22. ^ Goldschmidt, V (1918). Atlas der Kristallformen, V4, Plates. Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung. pp. Tafel 48, Fig. 21. (Gold). hdl:2027/nyp.33433084029887.
  23. ^ Mahajan, S.; Williams, D. F. (June 1973). "Deformation Twinning in Metals and Alloys". International Metallurgical Reviews. 18 (2): 43–61. doi:10.1179/imtlr.1973.18.2.43.
  24. ^ Beyerlein, Irene J.; Mara, Nathan A.; Bhattacharyya, Dhriti; Alexander, David J.; Necker, Carl T. (January 2011). "Texture evolution via combined slip and deformation twinning in rolled silver–copper cast eutectic nanocomposite". International Journal of Plasticity. 27 (1): 121–146. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.05.007.
  25. ^ Courtney, Thomas H. (2000) Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 2nd ed. McGraw Hill. ISBN 1-57766-425-6
  26. ^ Nurul Akmal Che, Lah; Trigueros, Sonia (2019). "Synthesis and modelling of the mechanical properties of Ag, Au and Cu nanowires". Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 20 (1): 225–261. Bibcode:2019STAdM..20..225L. doi:10.1080/14686996.2019.1585145. PMC 6442207. PMID 30956731.
  27. ^ Steinmetz, D.R.; Jäpel, T.; Wietbrock, B.; Eisenlohr, P.; Gutierrez-Urrutia, I.; Saeed (2013), "Revealing the strain-hardening behavior of twinning-induced plasticity steels: Theory, simulations, experiments", Acta Materialia, 61 (2): 494, Bibcode:2013AcMat..61..494S, doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.064.
  28. ^ Christian, J.W.; Mahajan, S. (1995). "Deformation twinning". Progress in Materials Science. 39 (1–2): 1–157. doi:10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7.
  29. ^ Calhoun, C.A.; Garlea, E.; Sisneros, T.A.; Agnew, S.R. (April 2018). "In-situ neutron diffraction characterization of temperature dependence deformation in α-uranium". Journal of Nuclear Materials. 502: 60–67. Bibcode:2018JNuM..502...60C. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.01.036. OSTI 1478070.
  30. ^ Bilby, B. A.; Crocker, A. G. (1965-10-26). "The theory of the crystallography of deformation twinning". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 288 (1413): 240–255. Bibcode:1965RSPSA.288..240B. doi:10.1098/rspa.1965.0216. ISSN 0080-4630. S2CID 120566509.
  31. ^ Cahn, R.W. (Oct 1954). "Twinned crystals". Advances in Physics. 3 (12): 363–445. Bibcode:1954AdPhy...3..363C. doi:10.1080/00018735400101223. ISSN 0001-8732.
  32. ^ Wang, S.; Schuman, C.; Bao, L.; Lecomte, J.S.; Zhang, Y.; Raulot, J.M.; Philippe, M.J.; Zhao, X.; Esling, C. (May 2012). "Variant selection criterion for twin variants in titanium alloys deformed by rolling" (PDF). Acta Materialia. 60 (9): 3912–3919. Bibcode:2012AcMat..60.3912W. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.046.
  33. ^ a b Christian, J.W. (2002). "Deformation Twinning". The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys. Elsevier. pp. 859–960. doi:10.1016/b978-008044019-4/50025-8. ISBN 978-0-08-044019-4.
  34. ^ Abdolvand, Hamidreza; Sedaghat, Omid; Guo, Yi (Oct 2018). "Nucleation and growth of { 1122 } twins in titanium: Elastic energy and stress fields at the vicinity of twins". Materialia. 2: 58–62. doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2018.06.012. S2CID 139852253.
  35. ^ a b Guo, Y.; Schwiedrzik, J.; Michler, J.; Maeder, X. (2016-11-01). "On the nucleation and growth of {112¯2} twin in commercial purity titanium: In situ investigation of the local stress field and dislocation density distribution". Acta Materialia. 120: 292–301. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.073. ISSN 1359-6454.
  36. ^ Paudel, YubRaj; Barrett, Christopher D.; Tschopp, Mark A.; Inal, Kaan; El Kadiri, Haitham (July 2017). "Beyond initial twin nucleation in hcp metals: Micromechanical formulation for determining twin spacing during deformation". Acta Materialia. 133: 134–146. Bibcode:2017AcMat.133..134P. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.013. ISSN 1359-6454.
  37. ^ Paramatmuni, Chaitanya; Zheng, Zebang; Rainforth, W. Mark; Dunne, Fionn P. E. (2020-12-01). "Twin nucleation and variant selection in Mg alloys: An integrated crystal plasticity modelling and experimental approach" (PDF). International Journal of Plasticity. 135: 102778. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102778. ISSN 0749-6419. S2CID 224887964.
  38. ^ Paramatmuni, Chaitanya; Guo, Yi; Withers, Philip J.; Dunne, Fionn P. E. (2021-08-01). "A three-dimensional mechanistic study of the drivers of classical twin nucleation and variant selection in Mg alloys: A mesoscale modelling and experimental study". International Journal of Plasticity. 143: 103027. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103027. hdl:10044/1/90290. ISSN 0749-6419. S2CID 236612852.
  39. ^ Arul Kumar, M.; Beyerlein, I. J.; Tomé, C. N. (2016-09-01). "Effect of local stress fields on twin characteristics in HCP metals". Acta Materialia. 116: 143–154. Bibcode:2016AcMat.116..143A. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.042. ISSN 1359-6454.
  40. ^ a b Beyerlein, Irene J.; Zhang, Xinghang; Misra, Amit (July 2014). "Growth Twins and Deformation Twins in Metals". Annual Review of Materials Research. 44 (1): 329–363. Bibcode:2014AnRMS..44..329B. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113304. ISSN 1531-7331.
  41. ^ a b Britton, T. B.; Dunne, F. P. E.; Wilkinson, A. J. (2015-06-08). "On the mechanistic basis of deformation at the microscale in hexagonal close-packed metals". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 471 (2178): 20140881. Bibcode:2015RSPSA.47140881B. doi:10.1098/rspa.2014.0881. S2CID 138085929.
  42. ^ Liu, Y.; Tang, P. Z.; Gong, M. Y.; McCabe, R. J.; Wang, J.; Tomé, C. N. (2019-07-25). "Three-dimensional character of the deformation twin in magnesium". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 3308. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.3308L. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10573-7. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 6658514. PMID 31346160.
  43. ^ Barnett, M. R. (2007-08-25). "Twinning and the ductility of magnesium alloys: Part I: "Tension" twins". Materials Science and Engineering: A. 464 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.037. ISSN 0921-5093.
  44. ^ Arul Kumar, M.; Kanjarla, A. K.; Niezgoda, S. R.; Lebensohn, R. A.; Tomé, C. N. (2015-02-01). "Numerical study of the stress state of a deformation twin in magnesium". Acta Materialia. 84: 349–358. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.048. ISSN 1359-6454.
  45. ^ a b Koko, Abdalrhaman; Elmukashfi, Elsiddig; Dragnevski, Kalin; Wilkinson, Angus J.; Marrow, Thomas James (2021-10-01). "J-integral analysis of the elastic strain fields of ferrite deformation twins using electron backscatter diffraction". Acta Materialia. 218: 117203. Bibcode:2021AcMat.21817203K. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117203. ISSN 1359-6454.
  46. ^ Barba, D.; Alabort, E.; Pedrazzini, S.; Collins, D. M.; Wilkinson, A. J.; Bagot, P. A. J.; Moody, M. P.; Atkinson, C.; Jérusalem, A.; Reed, R. C. (2017-08-15). "On the microtwinning mechanism in a single crystal superalloy". Acta Materialia. 135: 314–329. Bibcode:2017AcMat.135..314B. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.072. hdl:10044/1/63276. ISSN 1359-6454. S2CID 55924981.
  47. ^ a b Mahajan, S.; Williams, D. F. (1973-06-01). "Deformation Twinning in Metals and Alloys". International Metallurgical Reviews. 18 (2): 43–61. doi:10.1179/imtlr.1973.18.2.43. ISSN 0367-9020.
  48. ^ Beyerlein, I.J.; Capolungo, L.; Marshall, P.E.; McCabe, R.J.; Tomé, C.N. (2010-05-28). "Statistical analyses of deformation twinning in magnesium". Philosophical Magazine. 90 (16): 2161–2190. Bibcode:2010PMag...90.2161B. doi:10.1080/14786431003630835. ISSN 1478-6435. S2CID 136111937.
  49. ^ a b Lloyd, J. T. (2018-02-28). "A dislocation-based model for twin growth within and across grains". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 474 (2210): 20170709. Bibcode:2018RSPSA.47470709L. doi:10.1098/rspa.2017.0709. PMC 5832837. PMID 29507516.
  50. ^ Venables, J. A. (1961-03-01). "Deformation twinning in face-centred cubic metals". The Philosophical Magazine. 6 (63): 379–396. Bibcode:1961PMag....6..379V. doi:10.1080/14786436108235892. ISSN 0031-8086.
  51. ^ Johansson, Johan; Odén, Magnus (2000-06-01). "Load sharing between austenite and ferrite in a duplex stainless steel during cyclic loading". Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 31 (6): 1557–1570. Bibcode:2000MMTA...31.1557J. doi:10.1007/s11661-000-0166-3. ISSN 1543-1940. S2CID 137142133.
  52. ^ Marrow, T. J.; King, J. E. (1994-06-15). "Fatigue crack propagation mechanisms in a thermally aged duplex stainless steel". Materials Science and Engineering: A. 183 (1): 91–101. doi:10.1016/0921-5093(94)90893-1. ISSN 0921-5093.
  53. ^ Christian, J. W.; Mahajan, S. (1995-01-01). "Deformation twinning". Progress in Materials Science. 39 (1): 1–157. doi:10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7. ISSN 0079-6425.
  54. ^ Sleeswyk, A. W (1962-08-01). "Emissary dislocations: Theory and experiments on the propagation of deformation twins in α-iron". Acta Metallurgica. 10 (8): 705–725. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(62)90040-8. ISSN 0001-6160.
  55. ^ Spreadborough, J.; Langheinrich, D.; Anderson, E.; Brandon, D. (Dec 1964). "Etch-Pit Observations Concerning Twins in Iron and Iron Alloys". Journal of Applied Physics. 35 (12): 3585–3587. Bibcode:1964JAP....35.3585S. doi:10.1063/1.1713275. ISSN 0021-8979.
  56. ^ Guo, Y.; Abdolvand, H.; Britton, T. B.; Wilkinson, A. J. (2017-03-01). "Growth of {1122} twins in titanium: A combined experimental and modelling investigation of the local state of deformation". Acta Materialia. 126: 221–235. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.066. hdl:10044/1/67478. ISSN 1359-6454. S2CID 136128910.
  57. ^ Baxevanakis, K. P.; Gourgiotis, P. A.; Georgiadis, H. G. (July 2017). "Interaction of cracks with dislocations in couple-stress elasticity. Part I: Opening mode". International Journal of Solids and Structures. 118–119: 179–191. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.019. ISSN 0020-7683. S2CID 55155535.
  58. ^ a b Kacher, Josh; Sabisch, Julian E.; Minor, Andrew M. (2019-07-01). "Statistical analysis of twin/grain boundary interactions in pure rhenium". Acta Materialia. 173: 44–51. Bibcode:2019AcMat.173...44K. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.051. ISSN 1359-6454.
  59. ^ Gong, Mingyu; Hirth, John P.; Liu, Yue; Shen, Yao; Wang, Jian (2017-11-03). "Interface structures and twinning mechanisms of twins in hexagonal metals". Materials Research Letters. 5 (7): 449–464. doi:10.1080/21663831.2017.1336496. S2CID 136448819.
  60. ^ Wang, Yunzhi; Li, Ju (2010-02-01). "Phase field modeling of defects and deformation". Acta Materialia. 58 (4): 1212–1235. Bibcode:2010AcMat..58.1212W. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.041. ISSN 1359-6454.
  61. ^ Eshelby, John Douglas; Mott, Nevill Francis (1951-11-06). "The force on an elastic singularity". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 244 (877): 87–112. Bibcode:1951RSPTA.244...87E. doi:10.1098/rsta.1951.0016. S2CID 14703976.
  62. ^ Rice, J. R. (1968-06-01). "A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks". Journal of Applied Mechanics. 35 (2): 379–386. Bibcode:1968JAM....35..379R. doi:10.1115/1.3601206. ISSN 0021-8936.
  63. ^ Venables, J. A (1964-07-01). "The electron microscopy of deformation twinning". Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 25 (7): 685–692. Bibcode:1964JPCS...25..685V. doi:10.1016/0022-3697(64)90177-5. ISSN 0022-3697.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]