1996 United States campaign finance controversy: Difference between revisions
DaveThomas (talk | contribs) |
|||
(725 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Chinese lobbying controversy in the United States}} |
|||
{{featured article}} |
|||
{{pp-move}} |
|||
<!-- FAIR USE of Gore-hsia.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gore-hsia.jpg for rationale --> |
<!-- FAIR USE of Gore-hsia.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gore-hsia.jpg for rationale --> |
||
<!-- FAIR USE of Clinton-chung.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Clinton-chung.jpg for rationale --> |
<!-- FAIR USE of Clinton-chung.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Clinton-chung.jpg for rationale --> |
||
{{Redirect-distinguish-text|Chinagate|things called "[[China Gate (disambiguation)|China Gate]]"}} |
|||
[[Image:Zeminhandshake.JPG|right|frame|Presidents [[Jiang Zemin]] of China and Bill Clinton of the U.S.]]The '''1996 United States campaign finance scandal''', also known as '''Chinagate''', was an alleged effort by the [[People's Republic of China]] (PRC) to influence domestic [[Politics of the United States|American politics]] prior to and during the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] as well as the [[campaign finance|fund-raising]] practices of the administration itself. |
|||
{{Use American English|date=January 2019}} |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2019}} |
|||
The '''1996 United States campaign finance controversy''', sometimes referred to as '''Chinagate''', was an effort by the [[China|People's Republic of China]] to influence domestic [[Politics of the United States|American politics]] prior to and during the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] and also involved the [[campaign finance|fundraising]] practices of the administration itself. |
|||
While questions regarding the [[Democratic Party (United States)|U.S. Democratic Party]]'s fund-raising activities first arose over a ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' article published on [[September 21]] [[1996]],<ref name=firstquestions>Miller, Alan C., [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/16703606.html?dids=16703606:16703606&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+21%2C+1996&author=ALAN+C.+MILLER&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=16&desc=Democrats+Return+Illegal+Contribution "Democrats Return Illegal Contribution"], ''Los Angeles Times'', [[September 21|Sept. 21]], [[1996]]</ref> the PRC's alleged role in the affair first gained public attention when [[Bob Woodward]] and Brian Duffy of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' published a story stating that a [[United States Department of Justice]] investigation into the fund-raising activities had uncovered evidence that agents of the PRC sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the [[Democratic National Committee]] (DNC) before the [[United States presidential election, 1996|1996 presidential campaign]]. The journalists wrote that intelligence information had shown the PRC Embassy in [[Washington, D.C.]] was used for coordinating contributions to the DNC<ref name=embassy>Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/china1.htm "Chinese Embassy Role In Contributions Probed"], ''Washington Post'', [[February 13|Feb. 13]], [[1997]] |
|||
</ref> in violation of [[law of the United States|United States law]] forbidding non-[[United States citizenship|American citizen]]s from giving monetary donations to United States politicians and political parties. The PRC government denied the accusations. |
|||
While questions regarding the [[Democratic Party (United States)|U.S. Democratic Party]]'s fundraising activities first arose over a ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' article published on September 21, 1996,<ref name=firstquestions>Miller, Alan C., [https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/16703606.html?dids=16703606:16703606&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+21%2C+1996&author=ALAN+C.+MILLER&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=16&desc=Democrats+Return+Illegal+Contribution "Democrats Return Illegal Contribution"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120912133605/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/16703606.html?dids=16703606:16703606&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+21,+1996&author=ALAN+C.+MILLER&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=16&desc=Democrats+Return+Illegal+Contribution |date=September 12, 2012 }}, ''Los Angeles Times'', September 21, 1996</ref> China's role in the affair first gained public attention when [[Bob Woodward]] and Brian Duffy of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' published a story stating that a [[United States Department of Justice]] investigation into the fundraising activities had uncovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the [[Democratic National Committee]] (DNC) before the [[1996 United States presidential election|1996 presidential campaign]]. The journalists wrote that intelligence information had shown the [[Embassy of China in Washington, D.C.|Chinese embassy]] in [[Washington, D.C.]] was used for coordinating contributions to the DNC<ref name=embassy>Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/china1.htm "Chinese Embassy Role In Contributions Probed"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180818052223/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/china1.htm |date=August 18, 2018 }}, ''The Washington Post'', February 13, 1997</ref> in violation of [[law of the United States|United States law]] forbidding non-[[Citizenship of the United States|American citizens]] or non-[[Permanent residence (United States)|permanent residents]] from giving monetary donations to United States politicians and political parties. A [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] investigator of the controversy stated that the Chinese plan targeted both presidential and congressional United States elections, while Democratic senators said the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections. The [[Government of China|government of the People's Republic of China]] denied all accusations. |
|||
Seventeen people were eventually convicted for [[fraud]] or for funneling Asian funds into the United States elections. A number of the convictions came against longtime Clinton-[[Al Gore|Gore]] friends and political appointees. |
|||
== Background == |
== Background == |
||
{{wikisource|1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns}} |
|||
=== New China lobby === |
|||
According to the [[United States Senate]] report ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns'', prior to 1995 the PRC's approach to promoting its interests in the United States was focused almost exclusively on diplomacy, including summits and meetings with high-level [[White House]] officials. In these meetings, Chinese officials often negotiated with the United States government by using the appeal of their huge commercial market.<ref name=chinalobby>[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Minority Report'', Chapter 2], U.S. Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
According to the [[United States Senate|U.S. Senate]] report, Chinese officials eventually developed a set of proposals to promote their interests with the United States government and to improve China's image with the American people. The proposals, dubbed the "China Plan", were prompted by the United States Congress's successful lobbying of President [[Bill Clinton]] to grant a visa to [[President of the Republic of China|Taiwan President]] [[Lee Teng-hui]]. [[United States Secretary of State|U.S. Secretary of State]] [[Warren Christopher]] had previously assured his Chinese counterpart [[Foreign Minister of the People's Republic of China|Chinese Foreign Minister]] [[Qian Qichen]] that granting a visa would be "inconsistent with [the United States'] unofficial relationship [with Taiwan]"<ref name=christopher>Ross, Robert S.,[http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/GOV2880/ross3.pdf "The 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and Use of Force"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060226161438/http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/GOV2880/ross3.pdf |date=2006-02-26 }}, ''[[International Security]]'', 25:2, pp. 87–123, Fall 2000, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 (PDF file)</ref> and the Clinton Administration's acquiescence to the Congressional resolutions led China to conclude that the influence of Congress over foreign policy was more significant than it had previously determined. When formulating the so-called plan, Chinese officials acknowledged that, compared to other countries, it had little knowledge of, or influence over, policy decisions made in Congress, which had a sizeable pro-Taiwan faction under the influence of a more established "[[China Lobby]]" run by the [[Kuomintang]].<ref name="MinSenCommGovAff98">Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). "Volume 4 of 6, Minority Views of Senators Glenn, Levin, Lieberman, Akaka, Durbin, Torricelli, and Cleland, Part 1. Foreign Influence, Chapter 2, The China Plan" in ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report'' (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/index.html] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191113033313/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/index.html|date=November 13, 2019}}, and [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160309182722/http://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm|date=March 9, 2016}}, accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is part of the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1997_Special_Investigation_in_Connection_with_1996_Federal_Election_Campaigns] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151007094227/https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1997_Special_Investigation_in_Connection_with_1996_Federal_Election_Campaigns|date=October 7, 2015}}, given above.</ref>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} The plan, according to the Senate report, instructed Chinese officials in the U.S. to improve their knowledge about members of Congress and increase contacts with its members, the public, and the media. The plan also suggested ways to [[Lobbying|lobby]] United States officials.<ref name= MinSenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} |
|||
United States companies were also known to lobby the U.S. government on various issues involving the companies and the PRC. In the 1990s, the news media reported on the phenomenon of U.S. companies lobbying for favorable trade policies regarding PRC and labeled this activity as the "[[China lobby|New China Lobby]]", which was contrasted with the "old" China Lobby that worked for the [[Republic of China]]. The group consisted of representatives of businesses with trade and investment interests in the PRC such as [[AT&T]], [[General Motors Corporation|General Motors]], and [[Boeing]]. In addition, prominent Americans, including several former [[United States Secretary of State|United States Secretaries of State]], were reported to be involved in promoting increased economic relationships with the PRC, including [[Henry Kissinger]] as well as [[George Shultz]], [[Cyrus Vance]], [[Lawrence Eagleburger]], [[Alexander Haig]], and [[Brent Scowcroft]]. This "New China Lobby" urged United States officials to protect China's trade relationship with the United States because American exports to mainland China were rapidly increasing and creating new American jobs.<ref name=lobby>Weeks, Jennifer, [http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997_06-07/weeks.asp "Sino-U.S. Nuclear Cooperation at a Crossroads"], Arms Control Association, June/July 1997, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref><ref name=chinatown>Judis, John B., [http://www.pacificnet.net/jue/chinanews/docs/chinatown.html "China Town"], ''[[The New Republic]]'', [[March 10]], [[1997]]</ref> |
|||
Over the years, China repeatedly denied that their lobbying efforts involved financial contributions of any kind, e.g., stating "some people and media in the United States speculated... about so-called participation by Chinese individuals in political donations during the U.S. elections. It is sheer fabrication and is intended to slander China. [China] has never, nor will we ever, use money to influence American politics"—a [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China|Chinese Foreign Ministry]] spokesperson, May 1998.<ref name=denial>Pomfret, John, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf052098b.htm "China Denies Contribution Charges"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304222430/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf052098b.htm |date=March 4, 2016 }}, ''The Washington Post'', May 20, 1998</ref> |
|||
[[Image:USexportstoChina.png|thumb|left|250px|Growing economic ties between the United States and China are one factor influencing the diplomatic and political relationship between the two nations]]The U.S. Senate report about the 1996 fund-raising investigation noted that American exports to the PRC grew from $3 billion in 1980 to $38 billion in 1994.<ref name=usdollar>All currency figures are in [[United States dollar]]s.</ref> Between 1991 and 1996, United States exports to [[mainland China]] increased by 90.5 percent, and the United States designated the PRC as one of the top ten "Big Emerging Markets" offering the largest potential for United States goods in future years.<ref name=markets>Dryfuss, Robert, [http://www.prospect.org/print/V8/30/dreyfuss-r.html "The New China Lobby"], ''[[The American Prospect]]'', Vol. 8, Iss. 30, [[January 1|Jan. 1]], [[1997]] - [[February 1|Feb. 1]], [[1997]]</ref> Total trade between the two countries had risen from $4.8 billion in 1980 to $63.5 billion in 1996, making China the fourth largest U.S. trading partner at the time.<ref name=chinalobby>[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Minority Report'', Chapter 2], U.S. Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
== Major fund-raising figures == |
|||
Given the increase in trade, critics questioned whether China should still be seen as a geopolitical rival of the United States. One explanation, according to the Senate report, was the American public's negative attitude toward [[Human rights in China|China's human rights record]], still marked by the PRC government's suppression of democratic movements, such as the crackdown on anti-government protesters in [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989|Tiananmen Square in 1989]]. Another reason, from the PRC government's perspective, according to the report, was that "the coming to power of a China-bashing U.S. Congress [was] perceived as part of an increas[ed] anti-Chinese atmosphere in Washington." According to the Senate Committee, information discovered during its investigation supported the conclusion that the PRC government, beginning in 1994, was concerned that decisions by Congress, including [[One-China policy|its stance]] toward the [[issue of Taiwan]], would harm Chinese interests.<ref name=chinalobby>[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Minority Report'', Chapter 2], U.S. Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
=== Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie === |
|||
The most significant activity by Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie (崔亞琳<ref>{{cite book|title=《調查》第28輯: 王健林一語道破天機 習家姐姐財富的流轉|publisher=調查雜誌社|date=2015-11-16|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=z0ntCgAAQBAJ&q=Yah-Lin+%22Charlie%22+Trie+%E5%B4%94%E4%BA%9E%E7%90%B3&pg=PT105 PT105]|isbn=<!--1681820331 is old-->9781681820330}}</ref>) was a $450,000 attempted donation from him to Clinton's [[legal defense fund]] (for [[Impeachment of Bill Clinton|his impeachment trials]]) which Trie allegedly delivered in two envelopes each containing several checks and money orders. The fund immediately rejected $70,000 and deposited the remainder, but ordered an investigation of the source. The investigation found that some of the money orders were made out in different names but with the same handwriting, and sequentially numbered. The fund then rejected the donation entirely, and allegedly returned the deposited funds two months after the initial contribution.<ref name=trie>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/trie.htm Campaign Finance Key Player: Yah Lin 'Charlie' Trie] {{Webarchive|url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20170405221009/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/trie.htm |date=April 5, 2017 }} Washington Post, March 4, 1998</ref> |
|||
Born in Taiwan, Trie emigrated to the U.S. in 1974. He eventually became an [[Citizenship of the United States|American citizen]] and co-owner of a restaurant in [[Little Rock, Arkansas]]. The 1997 special investigation describes Trie as having attempted to develop an international trading business (Daihatsu International Trading Corporation), having maintained or accessed accounts in Little Rock and Washington, D.C., into which [[Macau]]-based real estate businessman [[Ng Lap Seng]] wired >$1M USD from Macau and [[Banking in Hong Kong|Hong Kong accounts]], and as having never succeeded in the trading business (based on bank and tax records indicating substantive income only from [[Ng Lap Seng|Ng]]).<ref name="SenCommGovAff98">Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). "Summary of Findings" (Chapter 3), "The China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to the Effort of the People's Republic of China to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections" (Chapter 18), and "Charlie Trie's Contributions to the Presidential Legal Expense Trust (Chapter 20), in ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report'' (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/index.html] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191113033313/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/index.html|date=November 13, 2019}}, [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/1-1.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709225132/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/1-1.htm|date=July 9, 2017}}, [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/2-18.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191012025603/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/2-18.htm|date=October 12, 2019}}, and [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/2-20.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709230917/https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/2-20.htm|date=July 9, 2017}}, accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1997_Special_Investigation_in_Connection_with_1996_Federal_Election_Campaigns] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151007094227/https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1997_Special_Investigation_in_Connection_with_1996_Federal_Election_Campaigns|date=October 7, 2015}}, given above.</ref>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} |
|||
=== Taiwan and nuclear designs === |
|||
{{Main articles|[[Third Taiwan Strait Crisis]] and [[Cox Report]]}} |
|||
In Little Rock, Trie befriended Clinton, then [[List of Governors of Arkansas|Governor of Arkansas]]. In addition to the attempted donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie and his immediate family donated $220,000 to the DNC which was also later returned.<ref name= SenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} Immediately after the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie sent a letter to President Clinton that expressed concern about America's intervention in tensions arising from China's military exercises being conducted near Taiwan. Trie told the President in his letter that war with China was a possibility should [[Third Taiwan Strait Crisis#1996 tensions and Taiwan election|U.S. intervention]] continue: |
|||
In early 1995, President of the Republic of China [[Lee Teng-hui]] requested a visa to enter the United States to attend events associated with his graduate school reunion at [[Cornell University]] scheduled to be held in June 1995. By May of that year, Congress passed a resolution calling on President Clinton to grant a visa to President Lee. After the [[United States Department of State|State Department]] granted Lee's visa, the PRC government immediately protested the decision and, working through traditional diplomatic channels, suspended ongoing treaty negotiations and recalled its ambassador to the United States.<ref name=chinaprotest>Sciolino, Elaine, [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60614F9345C0C748DDDAF0894DD494D81&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/L/Lee%20Teng-Hui "Angered Over Taiwan, China Recalls Its Ambassador in U.S."], ''New York Times'', [[June 17]], [[1995]]</ref> The PRC government considers Taiwan a rogue province of the country. On [[May 15]], [[1995]], China conducted the first in a series of underground nuclear tests.<ref name=chinatests>[http://www.nti.org/db/china/testlist.htm Nuclear Threat Initiative], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> Around the same time, PRC intelligence services had a [[walk-in agent]] approach the United States [[Central Intelligence Agency]] (CIA) office in Taiwan. The "walk-in" provided an official PRC document classified "Secret" that contained design information of all America's nuclear warheads.<ref name=cox>[http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house/hr105851-html/ch2bod.html#anchor4775503 ''Report of the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China''], Chapter 2, The "Walk-In", U.S. House of Representatives, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> The [[People's Liberation Army]] (PLA) then began conducting a series of missile tests in the waters near Taiwan in July of that year. |
|||
{{blockquote|[O]nce the hard parties of the Chinese military incline to grasp U.S. involvement as foreign intervention, is {{sic}} U.S. ready to face such [a] challenge[?]... [I]t is highly possible for China to launch real war based on its past behavior in {{sic}} [[Sino-Vietnamese War|Sino-Vietnam War]] and [[Sino-Soviet border conflict|Zhen Bao Tao war]] with Russia. (Charlie Trie, letter to President Clinton, March 21, 1996)."<ref name= SenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} }} |
|||
After Congressional investigations turned to Trie in late 1996, he left the country for China.<ref name= SenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} Trie returned to the U.S. in 1998 and was convicted and sentenced to three years' probation and four months' home detention for violating federal campaign finance laws by making political contributions in someone else's name and for causing a false statement to be made to the [[Federal Election Commission]] (FEC).<ref name=guiltyplea>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/05/21/trie/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060805092557/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/05/21/trie/|title=Fund-raiser Charlie Trie pleads guilty under plea agreement|publisher=CNN|date=May 21, 1999|archive-date=August 5, 2006}}</ref> |
|||
=== China plan === |
|||
=== Johnny Chung === |
|||
After these crises, according to the Senate report, Chinese officials eventually developed a set of proposals to promote their interests with the United States government and to improve China's image with the American people. The proposals, dubbed the "China Plan", were prompted by the United States Congress's successful lobbying of the president to grant the visa to President Lee. United States Secretary of State [[Warren Christopher]] had previously assured his Chinese counterpart [[Qian Qichen]] that granting a visa would be "inconsistent with [the United States'] unofficial relationship [with Taiwan]"<ref name=christopher>Ross, Robert S.,[http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/GOV2880/ross3.pdf "The 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and Use of Force"], ''[[International Security]]'', 25:2, pp.87-123, Fall 2000, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]] (PDF file)</ref> and the Clinton Administration's acquiescence to the Congressional resolutions led the PRC to conclude that the influence of Congress over foreign policy was more significant than it had previously determined. When formulating the so-called plan, Chinese officials acknowledged that, compared to other countries, it had little knowledge of, or influence over, policy decisions made in Congress, which had a sizeable pro-Taiwan faction under the influence of a more established "China Lobby" run by the [[Kuomintang]].<ref name=chinalobby>[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Minority Report'', Chapter 2], United States Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
Born in Taiwan, [[Johnny Chung]] went from being the owner of a [[Junk fax|"blastfaxing"]] business (an automated system that quickly sends out [[fax]]es to thousands of businesses) in [[California]] to being in the middle of the Washington, D.C. elite within a couple weeks of his first donations to the Democratic Party. Called a "hustler" by a [[United States National Security Council|U.S. National Security Council]] (NSC) aide,<ref name=chung>Jackson, David and Sun, Lena H., [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/liu052498.htm "Liu's Deals With Chung: An Intercontinental Puzzle"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170818222136/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/liu052498.htm |date=August 18, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', May 24, 1998</ref> Chung made forty-nine separate visits to the White House between February 1994 and February 1996.<ref name=chung1>{{cite web|last=Isikoff|first=Michael|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2004/02/08/cash-and-kerry.html|title=Cash and Kerry|work=Newsweek|date=February 9, 2004|access-date=October 7, 2011|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130204152534/http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2004/02/08/cash-and-kerry.html|archive-date=February 4, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> One of his purposes in making these trips was to obtain photographs of himself with the Clintons, which he believed would help him to get business in China by giving people the impression that he had connections and influence in Washington—he used a brochure that included at least ten photographs of himself with Hillary Clinton along with a personal note from her.<ref>{{cite news|last=Bunting|first=Glenn F.|author2=Alan C. Miller|author3=Rich Connell|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-11-28-mn-3722-story.html|title=Donor Enjoyed Broad Access to White House|work=Los Angeles Times|date=November 28, 1996|access-date=October 7, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120309193544/http://articles.latimes.com/1996-11-28/news/mn-3722_1_white-house-tours|archive-date=March 9, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> During one of the [[United States Department of Commerce|U.S. Commerce Department]] trade missions to China, Chung befriended former Chinese Lt. Col. [[Liu Chaoying]], then an executive at [[China Aerospace International Holdings]] (中國航天國際控股有限公司), which is the Hong Kong-based subsidiary of the government-controlled [[China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation|CASC]] (中國航天科技集團公司), China's premier satellite launching company. She is the daughter of former General [[Liu Huaqing]]. |
|||
Between 1994 and 1996, Chung donated $366,000 to the DNC. Once the truth of this situation was revealed to the public, all of the money was allegedly returned. Chung told federal investigators that $35,000 of the money he donated came from Liu Chaoying and, in turn, China's military intelligence.<ref name=chung/> |
|||
The plan, according the Senate report, instructed Chinese officials in the U.S. to improve their knowledge about members of Congress and increase contacts with its members, the public, and the media. The plan also allegedly suggested ways to lobby United States officials.<ref name=chinalobby>[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Minority Report'', Chapter 2], U.S. Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
Specifically, Chung testified under oath to the U.S. House Committee investigating the issue in May 1999 that he was introduced to Chinese Gen. [[Ji Shengde]], then the head of Chinese [[military intelligence]], by Liu Chaoying. Chung said that Ji told him: "We like your president very much. We would like to see him reelect{{sic}}. I will give you 300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to the president and the Democrat{{sic}} Party."<ref name=welike>Johnston, David, [https://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/12/us/committee-told-of-beijing-cash-for-democrats.html "Committee Told Of Beijing Cash For Democrats "] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912201037/http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/12/us/committee-told-of-beijing-cash-for-democrats.html |date=September 12, 2017 }}, ''The New York Times'', May 12, 1999</ref> Both Liu and the Chinese government denied the claims.<ref name=liudenial>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/21/china.money/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080524033516/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/21/china.money/|title=Chinese Aerospace Official Denies Giving To Dems|publisher=CNN|date=May 21, 1998|archive-date=May 24, 2008}}</ref> |
|||
Over the years, the PRC repeatedly denied these lobbying efforts involved financial contributions of any kind: |
|||
Chung was eventually sentenced to five years' probation and community service following an agreement to plea guilty to [[bank fraud]], [[tax evasion]], and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law.<ref name=justice1>[http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/January/017crm.htm "James Riady Pleads Guilty"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051129095054/http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/January/017crm.htm |date=2005-11-29 }}, Department of Justice, press release, January 11, 2001, Retrieved: April 14, 2006</ref> |
|||
{{cquote|[S]ome people and media in the United States speculated… about so-called participation by Chinese individuals in political donations during the U.S. elections. It is sheer fabrication and is intended to slander China. [ [[Government of the People's Republic of China|Beijing]] ] has never, nor will we ever, use money to influence American politics — China's [[Foreign Ministry]] spokesman, May 1998.<ref name=denial>Pomfret, John, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf052098b.htm "China Denies Contribution Charges"], ''Washington Post'', [[May 20]], [[1998]]</ref>}} |
|||
Though the ultimate level of participation or non-participation by the PRC government in the fund-raising schemes may never be fully known, investigations by the American media, the U.S. Justice Department, and the U.S. Congress, did prove there was a conspiracy by individuals to influence American elections with Asian funds prior to 1996. |
|||
== Major fund-raising figures and groups == |
|||
==== Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie and Wang Jun ==== |
|||
[[Image:potuswang.jpg|thumb|right|180px|Clinton with Wang Jun at the White House in 1996]]The most significant of the illegal foreign contributions was a $460,000 donation by [[Charlie Trie|Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie]] to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund. The donation was made by delivery of an envelope containing $460,000 in $1,000 contributions, some on sequentially numbered money orders made out in different names but with the same handwriting.<ref name=trie>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/op080397.htm "The Exploits of Charlie Trie"], ''Washington Post'', [[August 3|Aug. 3]], 1997</ref> |
|||
Born in Taiwan, Trie emigrated to the U.S. in 1974. He eventually became an American citizen and co-owner of a restaurant in [[Little Rock, Arkansas]] where he befriended then Governor Clinton. In addition to the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie and his immediate family donated $220,000 to the DNC which was later returned.<ref name=senate>[http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/3.pdf ''1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns'': Section 3, pp. 11-14], U.S. Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]] (PDF file)</ref> |
|||
Immediately after the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie sent a letter to President Clinton that expressed concern about America's intervention in tensions arising from China's military exercises being conducted near Taiwan. Trie told the President in his letter that war with China was a possibility should [[Third Taiwan Strait Crisis#Runup to the 1996 election|U.S. intervention]] continue: |
|||
{{cquote|...[O]nce the hard parties of the Chinese military incline to grasp U.S. involvement as foreign intervention, is [''sic''] U.S. ready to face such [a] challenge[?]... [I]t is highly possible for China to launch [''sic''] real war based on its past behavior in [''sic''] [[Sino-Vietnamese War|Sino-Vietnam war]] and [[Sino-Soviet border conflict|Zhen Bao Tao war]] with Russia — Charlie Trie in a letter to President Clinton, [[March 21]], [[1996]]<ref name=trieletter>[http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/20.pdf ''1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns'': Section 20, page 13], U.S. Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]] (PDF file)</ref>}} |
|||
After questions arose regarding Charlie Trie's fund-raising activities during Congressional investigations in late 1996, he left the country for the PRC.<ref name=senate>[http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/3.pdf 1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns'': Section 3, pp. 11-14], U.S. Senate (PDF file)</ref> Trie returned to the U.S. in 1998 and was convicted and sentenced to three years probation and four months home detention for violating federal campaign finance laws by making political contributions in someone else's name and for causing a false statement to be made to the [[Federal Election Commission]] (FEC).<ref name=guiltyplea>[http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/05/21/trie/ "Fund-raiser Charlie Trie pleads guilty under plea agreement"], ''CNN.com'', [[May 21]], [[1999]]</ref> |
|||
In February 1996, Trie brought [[Wang Jun]], chairman of [[CITIC]], the chief investment arm of the [[government of the People's Republic of China]], and [[Poly Technologies]] (a "front company for the [[People's Liberation Army|Chinese military]]" <ref name=nti>[http://www.nti.org/db/china/baoli.htm Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI)], Retrieved: [[February 10|Feb. 10]], [[2006]]</ref><ref name=poly>Russell, Richard L., [http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2005/issue3/jv9no3a6.html "China's WMD Foot in the Greater Middle East's Door"], ''[[The Middle East Review of International Affairs]]'', Vol. 9, No. 3, Article 6, Sep. 2005</ref> that was later charged with smuggling 2,000 [[AK-47]] automatic rifles into the U.S.), to a White House "coffee" with the president.<ref name=trie2>Jackson, Brooks, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/02/24/forsale/ "Clinton's Re-election Road Paved With Money"], ''[[CNN]].com'', [[February 24|Feb. 24]], [[1997]]</ref><ref name=highlights>[http://www.cnn.com/US/9905/25/cox.report.highlights/ "Highlights of U.S. report on alleged China spying"], ''CNN.com'', [[May 25]], [[1999]]</ref> President Clinton later admitted Wang's attendance at the White House was "clearly inappropriate."<ref name=jun>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/jun.htm "Campaign Finance Key Player: Wang Jun"], ''Washington Post'', [[July 27]], [[1997]]</ref><ref name=jun1>Duffy, Michael, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/analysis/time/9702/03/duffy.html "How Huang Makes Two Nominations Harder"], ''[[Time (magazine)|TIME]]'', [[February 3|Feb. 3]], 1997</ref> According to Clinton, the event attended by Wang was a small group discussion with people from "different walks of life." |
|||
{{cquote|I'd talk for five or 10 minutes and then we'd ... go around the table and let people say whatever they wanted to say. I'm not sure that [Wang] ever said anything... I can tell you for sure nothing inappropriate came from it in terms of any governmental action on my part... We have to do a better job of screening people who come in and out of here — President Clinton, [[December 20|Dec. 20]], [[1996]].<ref name=potuswang>Yost, Pete, [http://www.chron.com/content/chronicle/page1/96/12/21/china-arms.html "Clinton calls arms dealer's White House visit inappropriate"], ''[[Associated Press]]'', [[December 20|Dec. 20]], [[1996]]</ref>}} |
|||
Four days prior to Wang's White House visit, President Clinton granted Wang Jun's company Poly Technologies import permits that would allow the shipment of over 100,000 [[Semi-automatic firearm|semi-automatic weapons]] and millions of rounds of ammunition to a [[Detroit]] company (China Jiang An) that had ties to the Chinese military. Robert Sanders, a U.S. lawyer representing the Chinese, could not explain why the special permits were granted. "All of a sudden, there was a breakthrough," Sanders said. "I can't account for it." <ref name=pistol>Daly, Michael, "This Prez Donor a Real Pistol", ''[[New York Daily News]]'', [[March 26]], [[1997]]</ref><ref name=sanders>Hedges, Michael, [http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:RH9K9ZybxZMJ:ggnra.org/hottopics/clinton1.shtml+%22Robert+Sanders%22+attorney+chinese&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1 "Permits Were Approved for Massive Chinese Arms Shipment"], [[E.W. Scripps Company|Scripps-Howard News Service]], [[Arkansas Democrat-Gazette]], [[March 14]], [[1997]]</ref> |
|||
According to Wang, during a [[United Nations]] conference on women's rights in Beijing in 1995, he received an invitation from [[First Lady of the United States|First Lady]] [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] to attend a reception, but his schedule was fully booked. Wang has also met with Alexander Haig and Henry Kissinger (whom he calls "a good friend") in addition to former President George H. W. Bush after he left office. During his two-day visit to Washington in 1996, Wang also held talks with Bill Clinton's [[United States Commerce Department|Commerce Secretary]], [[Ron Brown (U.S. politician)|Ron Brown]], whom he had met once before at a trade mission in [[Hong Kong]].<ref name=wangvisits>Mufson, Steven, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/campfin/stories/deny16.htm "Chinese Denies Seeking White House Visit"], ''Washington Post'', [[March 16]], [[1997]]</ref> |
|||
=== Ron Brown and Bernard Schwartz === |
|||
[[Image:RonBrownUS.JPG|left|thumb| Commerce Secretary Ron Brown]]A close business associate of [[Ron Brown (U.S. politician)|Ron Brown]] testified in court in 1998 that Brown had told her that Commerce Department trade missions were used for partisan political fund-raising at the behest of President Clinton and the First Lady. Specifically, she said trade mission plane seats were sold to business people who gave at least $50,000 each to the DNC.<ref name=hill>Frieden, Terry, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/03/23/trade.sale/ "Ex-Ron Brown Partner Claims Clintons Backed 'Sale' Of Trade Seats"], ''[[CNN]].com'', [[March 23]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
A Commerce Department official reportedly threw away official government documents concerning the department's trade missions to China after a judge ordered they be turned over to [[Judicial Watch]], a [[American conservatism|conservative]] government watchdog group. According to the court: "No adequate explanation has been given as to why these documents were destroyed."<ref name=memoopinion>[http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/95cv133.pdf Memorandum Opinion Judicial Watch vs. Department of Commerce, page 14], [[U.S. District Court]] for the [[District of Columbia]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]] (PDF file)</ref> |
|||
Some of the trade missions to Asia were attended by [[Bernard L. Schwartz|Bernard Schwartz]], then CEO of [[Loral Space and Communications]] (an American maker of [[satellite|satellites]]). Schwartz donated over $600,000 to the DNC and President Clinton's 1996 reelection effort.<ref name=satellitewaiver>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/17/satellite.review/ "Justice May Probe Links Between China Policy, Campaign Cash"], ''CNN.com'', [[May 17]], [[1998]]</ref> Loral was fined $14 million in 2002 for its involvement in illegally transferring missile technology to China in 1996.<ref name=loralfine>Mintz, John, [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/01/01/MN153988.DTL "2 U.S. space giants accused of aiding China Hughes, Boeing allegedly gave away missile technology illegally"], ''[[Washington Post]]'', [[January 1|Jan. 1]], [[2003]]</ref> The transfer of classified secrets occurred in February 1996 during an investigation into the failed launch and explosion of a [[Long March rocket]] that was to carry a Loral satellite into [[Outer space|space]]. President Clinton signed the special waivers that allowed China to launch the Loral satellite.<ref name=loralwaiver>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/22/china.money/ "Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver"], ''[[CNN.com]]'', [[May 22]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
Brown, who had been under investigation for fraud and [[bribery]] allegations, died in a plane crash in [[Croatia]] in April 1996.<ref name=browninvestigation>Frieden, Terry, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/news/9611/14/ron.brown/index.shtml "Independent Counsel: No Conclusions On Brown Probe"], CNN.com, [[November 14|Nov. 14]], [[1996]]</ref> |
|||
=== Johnny Chung and Liu Chaoying === |
|||
[[Image:Clinton-chung.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Johnny Chung (far left) with the Clintons]][[Johnny Chung]] also attended some of Ron Brown's Commerce Department trade missions to [[Asia]]. Born in Taiwan, Chung went from being the owner of a [[Junk fax|"blastfaxing"]] business (an automated system that quickly sends out faxes to thousands of businesses) in [[California]] to being in the middle of the Washington, D.C. elite within a couple weeks of his first donations to the Democratic Party. Called a "hustler" by a [[United States National Security Council|U.S. National Security Council]] (NSC) aide,<ref name=chung>Jackson, David and Sun, Lena H., [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/liu052498.htm "Liu's Deals With Chung: An Intercontinental Puzzle"], ''Washington Post'', [[May 24]], [[1998]]</ref> Chung made forty-nine separate visits to the White House between February 1994 and February 1996.<ref name=chung1>Isikoff, Michael, [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4121890 "Cash and Kerry"], ''[[Newsweek]]'', [[February 9|Feb. 9]], [[2004]]</ref> During one of the Commerce Department trade missions to China, Chung befriended former Chinese Lt. Col. [[Liu Chaoying]], then an executive at China Aerospace Holdings (China's main satellite company) and daughter of former General [[Liu Huaqing]]. |
|||
Between 1994 and 1996, Chung donated $366,000 to the DNC. Eventually, all of the money was returned. Chung told federal investigators that $35,000 of the money he donated came from Liu Chaoying and, in turn, China's military intelligence.<ref name=chung>Jackson, David and Sun, Lena H., [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/liu052498.htm "Liu's Deals With Chung: An Intercontinental Puzzle"], ''Washington Post'', [[May 24]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
Specifically, Chung testified under oath to the U.S. House Committee investigating the issue in May 1999 that he was introduced to Chinese Gen. [[Ji Shengde]],<ref name=retreat>Gen. Ji was [[Capital punishment|sentenced to death]] by PRC President Jiang Zemin in mid-2000 after being implicated in a smuggling scandal in China shortly after Chung testified before the U.S. Congress in 1999. A compromise sentence of 20 years in jail was eventually reached. Source: Wo-Lap Lam, Willy, [http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/15/china.willy.column/index.html "How China retreats to attack"], ''CNN.com'', [[May 15]], [[2001]]</ref> then the head of Chinese [[military intelligence]], by Liu Chaoying. Chung said that Ji told him: "We like your president very much. We would like to see him reelect [''sic'']. I will give you 300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to the president and the Democrat Party."<ref name=welike>Johnston, David, [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00B16FA385B0C718DDDAC0894D1494D81 "Committee Told Of Beijing Cash For Democrats "], ''New York Times'', [[May 12]], [[1999]]</ref> Both Liu and the Chinese government denied the claims.<ref name=liudenial>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/21/china.money/ "Chinese Aerospace Official Denies Giving To Dems"], ''CNN.com'', [[May 21]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
Chung was eventually convicted of bank fraud, tax evasion, and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law.<ref name=justice1>[http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/January/017crm.htm James Riady Pleads Guilty], Department of Justice, press release, [[January 11|Jan. 11]], [[2001]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
=== John Huang and James Riady === |
=== John Huang and James Riady === |
||
[[File:James Riady.jpg|thumb|[[James Riady]].|200px]] |
|||
[[Image:Clinton-riady-huang.jpg|thumb|left|255px|John Huang (center) with Bill Clinton, James Riady (right), and Clinton aide [[Mark Middleton]] (with back to camera) in the [[Oval Office]]]][[John Huang]] (pronounced "Hwä[ng]"), was another major figure convicted. Born in 1945 in [[Nanping]], [[Fujian]], Huang and his father fled to Taiwan at the end of the [[Chinese Civil War]] before he eventually emigrated to the United States in 1969. A former employee of the Indonesian company [[Lippo Group]]'s [[Lippo Bank]] and its owners [[Mochtar Riady]] and his son [[James Riady|James]] (whom Huang first met along with Bill Clinton at a financial seminar in Little Rock, Arkansas in 1980), Huang became a key fund-raiser within the DNC in 1995. While there, he raised $3.4 million for the party. Nearly half had to be returned when questions arose regarding their source during later investigations by Congress.<ref name=riady>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/huang.htm "Campaign Finance Key Player: John Huang"], ''Washington Post'', [[July 27]], [[1997]]</ref> |
|||
[[John Huang]] (pronounced "Hwa[ng]"), was another major figure convicted. Born in 1945 in [[Nanping]], [[Fujian]], Huang and his father [[Republic of China retreat to Taiwan|fled to Taiwan]] at the end of the [[Chinese Civil War]] before he eventually emigrated to the United States in 1969. A former employee of the [[Indonesia]]n company [[Lippo Group]]'s [[CIMB Niaga|Lippo Bank]] and its owners [[Mochtar Riady]] and his son [[James Riady|James]] (whom Huang first met along with Bill Clinton at a financial seminar in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1980), Huang became a key fund-raiser within the DNC in 1995. While there, he raised $3.4 million for the party. Nearly half had to be returned when questions arose regarding their source during later investigations by Congress.<ref name=riady>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/huang.htm "Campaign Finance Key Player: John Huang"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170811203813/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/huang.htm |date=August 11, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', July 27, 1997</ref> |
|||
According to [[United States Secret Service|U.S. Secret Service]] logs, Huang visited the White House 78 times while working as a DNC fund-raiser.<ref name=timeline>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/time9610.html "The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Timeline"], ''CNN.com'', |
According to [[United States Secret Service|U.S. Secret Service]] logs, Huang visited the [[White House]] 78 times while working as a DNC fund-raiser.<ref name=timeline>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/time9610.html "The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Timeline"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050818022009/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/time9610.html |date=August 18, 2005 }}, ''CNN.com'', July 1, 1997</ref> James Riady visited the White House 20 times (including six personal visits to President Clinton).<ref name=visits>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/characters.html "The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Cast of Characters"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050909053106/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/characters.html |date=September 9, 2005 }}, ''CNN.com'', July 1, 1997</ref> |
||
Immediately prior to joining the DNC, Huang worked in President Clinton's Commerce Department as deputy assistant secretary for international economic affairs. His position made him responsible for Asia-U.S. trade matters. He was appointed to the position by President Clinton in December 1993. His position at the Commerce Department gave him access to classified intelligence on China. While at the department, it was later learned, Huang met 9 times with Chinese embassy officials |
Immediately prior to joining the DNC, Huang worked in President Clinton's Commerce Department as deputy assistant secretary for international economic affairs. His position made him responsible for Asia-U.S. trade matters. He was appointed to the position by President Clinton in December 1993. His position at the Commerce Department gave him access to classified intelligence on China. While at the department, it was later learned, Huang met 9 times with Chinese embassy officials.<ref name=highlights>[http://www.cnn.com/US/9905/25/cox.report.highlights/ "Highlights of U.S. report on alleged China spying"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060216053814/http://www.cnn.com/US/9905/25/cox.report.highlights/ |date=February 16, 2006 }}, ''CNN.com'', May 25, 1999</ref> |
||
Huang eventually pleaded guilty to conspiring to reimburse Lippo Group employees' campaign contributions with corporate or foreign funds.<ref name=huangfelon>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/08/12/huang.sentence/ "Former Democratic fund-raiser John Huang pleads guilty"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050929143317/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/08/12/huang.sentence/ |date=September 29, 2005 }}, ''CNN.com'', Aug. 12, 1999</ref> James Riady was later convicted of campaign finance violations relating to the same scheme as well, and was sentenced to pay a large fine. Shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of then-Governor Clinton's campaign for the presidency, contributions made by Huang had been reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. Also, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with [[wire transfer]]s from foreign Lippo Group entities.<ref name=justice1/> |
|||
{{cquote|Your honor, mistakes have been made, which I regret. I did not have to come back here [to the United States] but I wanted to own up to what I did and put this all behind me. I am grateful for the opportunity to be here today — James Riady, [[March 19]], [[2001]].<ref name=court>[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/03/20/politics/main280178.shtml "Clinton Donor Pleads Guilty"], ''[[CBS]]News.com'', [[March 20]], [[2001]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref>}} |
|||
An unclassified [[United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs|U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs]] report issued in 1998 stated that both James Riady and his father Mochtar had "had a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency." According to journalist [[Bob Woodward]], details of the relationship came from highly classified intelligence information supplied to the committee by both the CIA and [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] (FBI).<ref name=riady1>Woodward, Bob, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf021098.htm "Findings Link Clinton Allies to Chinese Intelligence"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170802135126/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf021098.htm |date=August 2, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', Feb. 10, 1998</ref> |
|||
According to the Justice Department some of those "mistakes" included reimbursing contributions made by Huang and various employees of Lippo Bank with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account maintained by John Huang at a bank in Hong Kong. Shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of then-Governor Clinton's campaign for the presidency, contributions made by Huang were reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. Also, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with [[wire transfer]]s from foreign Lippo Group entities.<ref name=justice1>[http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/January/017crm.htm James Riady Pleads Guilty], Department of Justice, press release, [[January 11|Jan. 11]], [[2001]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
The most well-known of John Huang's fund-raisers involved Vice President [[Al Gore]], Maria Hsia, and the [[Hsi Lai Temple|Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple]] in California. |
|||
An unclassified [[United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs|U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs]] report issued in 1998 stated that both James Riady and his father Mochtar had "had a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency." According to a story by journalist Bob Woodward, "the report was drawn from highly classified intelligence information supplied by both the CIA and [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] (FBI) that was not revealed during several months of public committee hearings the [previous] year."<ref name=riady1>Woodward, Bob, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf021098.htm "Findings Link Clinton Allies to Chinese Intelligence"], ''Washington Post'', [[February 10|Feb. 10]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
=== Maria Hsia === |
|||
The most well-known of John Huang's fund-raisers involved Vice President [[Al Gore]], [[Maria Hsia]], and the [[Hsi Lai Temple|Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple]] in California. |
|||
Taiwan-born Maria Hsia (pronounced "Shya"), a long time fund raiser for [[Al Gore]], California immigration consultant, and business associate of John Huang and James Riady since 1988, facilitated $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions through her efforts at [[Hsi Lai Temple]], a [[Chinese Buddhism|Chinese Buddhist]] temple associated with [[Taiwan]] in [[Hacienda Heights, California]]. This money went to the DNC, to the Clinton–Gore campaign, and to [[U.S. House of Representatives|U.S. Representative]] [[Patrick J. Kennedy|Patrick Kennedy]] of [[Rhode Island]]. After a trial, Hsia was convicted in March 2000.<ref name=hsiaconviction> |
|||
Eskenazi, Michael, [http://transcripts.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/03/gore3_3.a.tm/index.html "For both Gore and GOP, a guilty verdict to watch"], ''CNN.com'', March 3, 2000 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130403040001/http://transcripts.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/03/gore3_3.a.tm/index.html |date=April 3, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |
|||
|first=Neil A. |
|||
|last=Lewis |
|||
|author-link=Neil A. Lewis |
|||
|title=Veteran Gore Fund-Raiser Goes on Trial |
|||
|date=February 8, 2000 |
|||
|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/08/us/veteran-gore-fund-raiser-goes-on-trial.html |
|||
|work=The New York Times |
|||
|access-date=January 3, 2009 |
|||
|quote=The real donors were ineligible to give the money either because the amount of their donations exceeded legal limits or they were foreign nationals who were prohibited from giving campaign contributions. |
|||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111054854/http://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/08/us/veteran-gore-fund-raiser-goes-on-trial.html |
|||
|archive-date=November 11, 2012 |
|||
|url-status=live |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
The Democratic National Committee eventually returned the money donated by the temple's monks and nuns. Twelve nuns and employees of the temple, including temple abbess Venerable Yi Kung (who resigned her post after being subpoenaed), refused to answer questions by pleading the [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fifth Amendment]] when they were [[subpoena]]ed to testify before Congress.<ref name=witnesses>Abse, Nathan, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/fifth060998.htm "A Look at the 94 Who Aren't Talking"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810165126/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/fifth060998.htm |date=August 10, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', June 9, 1998</ref> Two other Buddhist nuns admitted destroying lists of donors and other documents related to the controversy because they felt the information would embarrass the temple. A Temple-commissioned videotape of the fund raiser also went missing and the nuns' attorney claimed it may have been shipped off to Taiwan.<ref name=docdestoyed>{{cite news|url=http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/09/04/thompson/hearings.main/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090424170714/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/09/04/thompson/hearings.main/|title=Buddhist Nuns Admit Destroying Documents|publisher=CNN|date=September 4, 1997|archive-date=April 24, 2009}}</ref> |
|||
=== Maria Hsia and the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple === |
|||
[[Image:gore-hsia.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Vice President [[Al Gore]] with Venerable Master [[Hsing Yun]] ([[Fo Guang Shan]]'s Founder) Maria Hsia (left of Master Hsing Yun), [[Ted Sioeng]] (right), and John Huang (2nd from right in background)]]A close business associate of John Huang and James Riady since 1988, Taiwan-born Maria Hsia (pronounced "shyä") began her association with Al Gore the same year as well. The association began after Hsia sent the then-senator a letter inviting him to come visit Taiwan: "If you decide to join this trip, I will persuade all my colleagues in the future to play a leader [''sic''] role in your presidential race..."<ref name=hsia>Suro, Roberto, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf022398.htm "Gore's Ties to Hsia Cast Shadow on 2000 Race"], ''Washington Post'', [[February 23|Feb. 23]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
The temple event became particularly controversial because it was attended by Vice President Gore. In an interview on the January 24, 1997, edition of the ''[[Today (U.S. TV program)|Today]]'' show, Gore said: |
|||
Gore went, and the two began an eight-year relationship. Gore said his dealings with Hsia were strictly business in nature, but, at least at one point, Gore sent a letter to Hsia and Howard Hom (a business partner of Hsia) referring to them as "special friends" for support during a serious injury of Gore's son, Albert.<ref name=hsia>Suro, Roberto, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf022398.htm "Gore's Ties to Hsia Cast Shadow on 2000 Race"], ''Washington Post'', [[February 23|Feb. 23]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
{{blockquote|I did not know that it was a fund-raiser. But I knew it was a political event, and I knew there were finance people that were going to be present, and so that alone should have told me, 'This is inappropriate and this is a mistake; don't do this.' And I take responsibility for that. It was a mistake.<ref name=goremistake>{{cite news|url=http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/01/24/gore.fundraiser/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090424170710/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/01/24/gore.fundraiser/|title=Gore Admits Temple Fund-Raiser Was A 'Mistake'|publisher=CNN|date=January 24, 1997|archive-date=April 24, 2009}}</ref>}} |
|||
[[Image:Mountain Gate of Hsi Lai Temple.JPG|thumb|The Hsi Lai Temple in [[Hacienda Heights, California]]]] |
|||
Regardless, their relationship came to an end when she was charged with money-laundering in early 1998. The Justice Department alleged Hsia facilitated $100,000 in illegal contributions to the 1996 Clinton-Gore reelection campaign through her efforts at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in California. Hsia was eventually convicted by a jury in March 2000.<ref name=hsiaconviction>Eskenazi, Michael, [http://transcripts.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/03/gore3_3.a.tm/index.html "For both Gore and GOP, a guilty verdict to watch"], ''CNN.com'', [[March 3]], [[2000]]</ref> The Democratic National Committee eventually returned the money donated by the Temple's monks and nuns. Twelve nuns and employees of the Temple refused to answer questions by pleading the [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fifth Amendment]] when they were [[subpoena]]ed to testify before Congress.<ref name=witnesses>Abse, Nathan, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/fifth060998.htm "A Look at the 94 Who Aren't Talking"], ''Washington Post'', [[June 9]], [[1998]]</ref> Vice President Gore said he had no idea the Temple meeting was financial in nature: |
|||
In response, the [[United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs|U.S. Senate Governmental Affairs Committee]] that investigated the controversy said: |
|||
{{cquote|I did not know that it was a fund-raiser. But I knew it was a political event, and I knew there were finance people that were going to be present, and so that alone should have told me, 'This is inappropriate and this is a mistake; don't do this.' And I take responsibility for that. It was a mistake — Vice President Al Gore on [[NBC]] TV's ''[[The Today Show|Today]]'' show, [[January 24|Jan. 24]], [[1997]].<ref name=goremistake>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/01/24/gore.fundraiser/ "Gore Admits Temple Fund-Raiser Was A 'Mistake'"], ''CNN.com'', [[January 24|Jan. 24]], [[1997]]</ref>}} |
|||
{{blockquote|The Vice President's staff ... knew that the temple event was a fundraiser. In March 1996, Deputy Chief of Staff David Strauss had helped arrange a meeting in the White House with the founder of the temple, [[Hsing Yun]]—a meeting which Strauss believed would 'lead to a lot of $.' The White House staff repeatedly referred to the event as a 'fundraiser' in internal correspondence, and assigned to it a 'ticket price' of '1,000–5,000 [dollars per] head'.<ref name=hsia1>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/execsumm030698.htm "Senate Governmental Affairs Committee's Majority Report Executive Summary"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904173230/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/execsumm030698.htm |date=September 4, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', March 8, 1998</ref>|sign=|source=}} |
|||
John Huang's memo to Vice President Gore's assistant Kimberly Tilley specifically mentioned that the temple meeting was a fundraising event. Gore later acknowledged that he had known the visit was "finance-related."<ref name=memo>Huang, John, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/09/03/gore.docs/documents/huang.memo.gif "Memo for Kim Tilley"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060226161413/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/09/03/gore.docs/documents/huang.memo.gif |date=February 26, 2006 }}, April 11, 1996</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Neil A. |last=Lewis |author-link=Neil A. Lewis |title=THE 2000 CAMPAIGN: CAMPAIGN FINANCE; Longtime Fund-Raiser for Gore Convicted in Donation Scheme |date=March 3, 2000 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/03/us/2000-campaign-campaign-finance-longtime-fund-raiser-for-gore-convicted-donation.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=January 3, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111054900/http://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/03/us/2000-campaign-campaign-finance-longtime-fund-raiser-for-gore-convicted-donation.html |archive-date=November 11, 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Lightmatter Hsi Lai Temple 2.jpg|left|thumb|180px|The Hsi Lai Temple in [[Hacienda Heights, California]]]]In response, the U.S. Senate Governmental Affairs Committee that investigated the controversy said: |
|||
{{cquote|The Vice President's staff... knew that the Temple event was a fundraiser. In March 1996, Deputy Chief of Staff David Strauss had helped arrange a meeting in the White House with the head of the Temple, Master Hsing Yun – a meeting which Strauss believed would 'lead to a lot of $.' The White House staff repeatedly referred to the event as a 'fundraiser' in internal correspondence, and assigned to it a 'ticket price' of '1000-5000 [dollars per] head'.<ref name=hsia1>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/execsumm030698.htm Senate Governmental Affairs Committee's Majority Report Executive Summary], ''Washington Post'', [[March 8]], [[1998]]</ref>}} |
|||
<!-- It is illegal for religious organizations to hold political fund-raising events in the U.S. due to their tax-exempt status. --> |
|||
In the U.S., religious organizations enjoy a [[Tax exemption|tax exempt status]]. Political activity is prohibited for such tax exempt entities. |
|||
The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee also said they learned that Hsia had served as an "agent" of the PRC government.<ref name=hsia1 |
The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee also said they learned that Hsia had served as an "agent" of the PRC government.<ref name=hsia1/> Hsia denied the claim. |
||
=== Ted Sioeng === |
=== Ted Sioeng === |
||
Ted Sioeng, an Indonesian entrepreneur who donated money to both Democrats and Republicans, was the sixth individual whose donations were investigated by the Senate committee. Suspect contributions associated with Sioeng include $250,000 to the DNC and $100,000 to Republican [[California State Treasurer]] [[Matt Fong]]. Fong returned the money in April 1997.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-04-23-mn-51508-story.html|title=Fong Returns $100,000 in Gifts|date=April 23, 1997|author=Jacobs, Paul|author2=Morain, Dan|journal=Los Angeles Times|access-date=March 10, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402152727/http://articles.latimes.com/1997-04-23/news/mn-51508_1_democratic-national-committee|archive-date=April 2, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Another notable figure involved in the affair was Ted Sioeng (pictured above with Vice President Gore) who illegally donated money to both Democrats and [[Republican Party (United States)|Republicans]]. Sioeng, who could not speak English, found himself invited to sit side-by-side with President Clinton or Vice President Gore at three different fund-raising events.<ref name=sioeng>[http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/18.pdf ''China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to Efforts of PRC to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections'', page 9], U.S. Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]] (PDF file)</ref> According to the U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, $200,000 of the $400,000 that Sioeng and his family gave to Democrats was "funded by transfer from overseas accounts." All the money was eventually returned. |
|||
Sieong sat with Bill Clinton or Al Gore at two fundraising events.<ref name= SenCommGovAff98/>{{page needed|date=October 2015}} Sioeng also joined Fong at a meeting with then Republican [[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives|House Speaker]] [[Newt Gingrich]] in mid-1995. Gingrich called the meeting a "[[photo op]]".<ref name=photoop>{{cite news|url=http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/05/12/chinese.donor/|title=FBI Probes Businessman As Possible Chinese Agent|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090423050727/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/05/12/chinese.donor/|archive-date=April 23, 2009|publisher=CNN|date=May 12, 1997}}</ref> Gingrich was the guest of honor at a Sioeng-organized luncheon the day after a Sioeng family company gave |
|||
Also, from their report: |
|||
the $50,000 think-tank donation, solicited by a Gingrich adviser.<ref name="fas.org">{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/6-9.htm |title=Response To Majority Report |publisher=Fas.org |access-date=March 19, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604045834/http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/6-9.htm |archive-date=June 4, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
{{cquote|[I]n late July 1997... [t]he Committee learned that Chinese government officials... were aware of, and possibly encouraged, [Ted] Sioeng's purchase of a Los Angeles-based newspaper... in 1995 and succeeded in having the paper report from a pro-Beijing perspective. There was also information suggesting that Sioeng met with Chinese officials in 1995 and 1996.}} |
|||
[[United States Attorney General|Attorney General]] [[Janet Reno]] and the directors of the FBI, CIA and [[National Security Agency]] (NSA) told members of the Senate committee they had credible intelligence information indicating Sioeng acted on behalf of China. A spokesman for Sioeng denied the allegations.<ref name=chinaagent>Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf091297b.htm "Senate Panel Is Briefed on China Probe Figure"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170811010632/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf091297b.htm |date=August 11, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', September 12, 1997</ref> Sioeng left the country shortly thereafter, and no charges were filed.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/18/exclusive-commerce-pick-tied-china-cash/|title=Commerce pick tied to China cash|work=The Washington Times|date=March 18, 2009|access-date=December 27, 2014|author1=Seper, Jerry|author2=Gertz, Bill|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150101151923/http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/18/exclusive-commerce-pick-tied-china-cash/|archive-date=January 1, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
[[Image:MFong.jpg|thumb|left|100px|Matt Fong]]Furthermore, |
|||
{{cquote|Sioeng also may have been involved in directing or funding contributions to American political entities and campaigns. The public information obtained by the Committee suggests that Sioeng personally directed contributions to Republican California officials in 1995. According to public information, Sioeng was involved in these contributions, but the source of the contributions is difficult to determine. The non-public information suggests that approximately half of the just over $100,000 used for these contributions may have come from unknown sources in China. According to public information, one of the officials, Republican California State Treasurer, [[Matt Fong]], has returned the $100,000 he received from Sioeng.<ref name=senate3>[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-7.htm ''1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns (Minority Report)'': Volume 4, part 1.7], U.S. Senate, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref>}} |
|||
=== Bernard Schwartz === |
|||
Attorney General [[Janet Reno]] and the directors of the FBI, CIA and [[National Security Agency]] (NSA) told members of the Senate committee they had credible intelligence information indicating Sioeng acted on behalf of China.<ref name=chinaagent>Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf091297b.htm "Senate Panel Is Briefed on China Probe Figure"], ''Washington Post'', [[September 12|Sept. 12]],[[1997]]</ref> |
|||
[[Bernard L. Schwartz]] CEO of [[Loral Space & Communications]], a satellite communications company, donated over $600,000 to the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Justice May Probe Links Between China Policy, Campaign Cash - May 17, 1998|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/17/satellite.review/|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> Schwartz said he did not expect, need, or receive any special treatment from the Clinton administration as a result of his donations.<ref>{{Cite web|title=washingtonpost.com: Campaign Finance Special Report|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/loral052598.htm|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> In 1998 Loral was under investigation for illegally transferring satellite technology to China.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/25/time/china.missles.html|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> |
|||
In February 1998 during the time Loral was under investigation, Loral requested Clinton to sign a waiver which would allow Loral to ship satellite technology to China. Clinton's justice department advised against signing the waiver because they believed that a jury wouldn't convict Loral if they received a waiver from Clinton.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/25/time/china.missles.html|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> Clinton did eventually sign the waiver.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver - May 22, 1998|url=https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/22/china.money/|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/25/time/china.missles.html|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.cnn.com}}</ref> The U.S space technology received by China may have furthered Beijing's military development of nuclear missiles.<ref name="Mintz">{{Cite web|last=Mintz|first=John|date=2003-01-01|title=2 U.S. space giants accused of aiding China / Hughes, Boeing allegedly gave away missile technology illegally|url=https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/2-U-S-space-giants-accused-of-aiding-China-2688259.php|access-date=2022-01-27|website=SFGATE|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Washingtonpost.com: Panel Faults Space Aid to China|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/satellite123198.htm|access-date=2022-01-27|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> In 2002 Loral would later be fined $14 million for its involvement in illegally transferring classified secrets to China.<ref name="Mintz"/> |
|||
== Department of Justice investigation == |
|||
[[Image:Janetrenoportrait.jpg|thumb|120px|Attorney General Janet Reno]]The Justice Department opened a task force in late 1996 to begin investigating allegations of campaign fund-raising abuses by the Clinton/Gore re-election campaign. It expanded its internal investigation to include activities related to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund in December 1997.<ref name=defense>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/9612/19/justice.expand/ "Justice To Expand Inquiry To Clinton's Legal Fund"], ''CNN.com'', [[December 19|Dec. 19]], [[1997]]</ref> |
|||
== Investigations == |
|||
=== Department of Justice investigation === |
|||
[[Image:Janet Reno-us-Portrait.jpg|thumb|upright=.545|Attorney General Janet Reno]]The Justice Department opened a task force in late 1996 to begin investigating allegations of campaign fundraising abuses by the Clinton/Gore re-election campaign. It expanded its internal investigation to include activities related to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund in December 1996.<ref name=defense>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/9612/19/justice.expand/ "Justice To Expand Inquiry To Clinton's Legal Fund"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050909025007/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/9612/19/justice.expand/ |date=September 9, 2005 }}, ''CNN.com'', December 19, 1996</ref> |
|||
President Clinton announced in February 1997 that he thought there should be a "vigorous" and "thorough" investigation into reports that the People's Republic of China tried to direct financial contributions from overseas sources to the Democratic National Committee. The president stopped short of calling for an independent prosecutor, saying that was the decision of the Justice Department. |
President Clinton announced in February 1997 that he thought there should be a "vigorous" and "thorough" investigation into reports that the People's Republic of China tried to direct financial contributions from overseas sources to the Democratic National Committee. The president stopped short of calling for an independent prosecutor, saying that was the decision of the Justice Department. |
||
"[O]bviously it would be a very serious matter for the United States if any country were to attempt to funnel funds to one of our parties for any reason whatever," President Clinton said.<ref name=serious>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/02/13/chinese.money/ "Clinton Wants Probe Of Possible Chinese Involvement"], ''CNN.com'', |
"[O]bviously it would be a very serious matter for the United States if any country were to attempt to funnel funds to one of our parties for any reason whatever," President Clinton said.<ref name=serious>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/02/13/chinese.money/ "Clinton Wants Probe Of Possible Chinese Involvement"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041215081947/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/02/13/chinese.money/ |date=December 15, 2004 }}, ''CNN.com'', February 13, 1997</ref> |
||
By July 1997, the administration determined that no evidence of any such thing had yet been proven. |
By July 1997, the administration determined that no evidence of any such thing had yet been proven. |
||
"We have received the relevant [FBI] briefings," [[White House Press Secretary]] [[Mike McCurry]] said. "We believe there's no basis for any change in our policy toward China, which is one of engagement."<ref name=congressconcerns>Harris, John F., [ |
"We have received the relevant [FBI] briefings," [[White House Press Secretary]] [[Mike McCurry (press secretary)|Mike McCurry]] said. "We believe there's no basis for any change in our policy toward China, which is one of engagement."<ref name=congressconcerns>Harris, John F., [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf072097.htm "White House Unswayed By China Allegations"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170802131239/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf072097.htm |date=August 2, 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', July 20, 1997</ref> |
||
"I do not know whether it is true or not," President Clinton stated. "Therefore, since I don't know, it can't... and shouldn't affect the larger long-term strategic interests of the American people in our foreign policy."<ref name=congressconcerns |
"I do not know whether it is true or not," President Clinton stated. "Therefore, since I don't know, it can't... and shouldn't affect the larger long-term strategic interests of the American people in our foreign policy."<ref name="congressconcerns" /> |
||
Members of Congress of both parties reached |
Members of Congress of both parties reached disparate conclusions. According to ''The Washington Post'', Senator [[Fred Dalton Thompson|Fred Thompson]] (a Republican from [[Tennessee]]) and chairman of the committee investigating the fundraising controversy, said he believed the Chinese plan targeted presidential and congressional elections while Democratic Senators [[Joe Lieberman]] and [[John Glenn]] said they believed the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections.<ref name="congressconcerns" /> |
||
=== Congressional investigations === |
|||
=== Calls for an independent counsel === |
|||
With regard to their overall efficacy, investigators are on record as having stated that the Congressional investigations were hamstrung due to lack of co-operation of witnesses. Ninety-four people either refused to be questioned, pled the Fifth Amendment, or left the country altogether.<ref name="witnesses" /><ref name=yourcampaign>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/op100897.htm Remarks by Senator Fred Thompson before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304122457/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/op100897.htm |date=March 4, 2016 }}, ''The Washington Post'', October 8, 1997</ref><ref>"[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/glenn.htm Campaign Finance Key Player: John Glenn] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160928081622/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/glenn.htm |date=September 28, 2016 }}" (March 4, 1998) ''The Washington Post''</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Louisfreeh.jpeg|thumb|120px|FBI Director Louis Freeh]]President Clinton's FBI Director [[Louis Freeh]] wrote in a 22-page memorandum to then Attorney General Janet Reno in November 1997 that "It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an [[United States Office of the Independent Counsel|independent counsel]]."<ref name=freeh>Lewis, Neil A., [http://ishipress.com/misread.htm "Freeh Says Reno Clearly Misread Prosecutor Law"], ''New York Times'', [[June 16]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Fred Thompson.jpg|thumb|upright=.5|U.S. Sen. [[Fred Thompson]] ([[Republican Party (United States)|R]]-[[Tennessee|TN]])]] |
|||
In July 1998, the Justice Department's campaign finance task force head, [[Charles La Bella]], sent a report to Janet Reno also recommending she seek an independent counsel to investigate alleged fund-raising abuses by Democratic party officials.<ref name=labella>Thomas, Pierre, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/07/23/labella/ "Reno Aide Recommends Independent Campaign Finance Probe"], ''CNN.com'', [[July 23]], [[1998]]</ref> The media reported that LaBella believed there was clearly an appearance of a conflict of interest by Reno.<ref name=lehrer>[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec98/reno_8-4a.html Politics and Prosecution Discussion], [[NewsHour with Jim Lehrer]], transcript, ''[[PBS]]'', [[August 4|Aug. 4]], [[1998]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> In his report to Reno he wrote: " [A] pattern [of events] suggests a level of knowledge within the White House -- including the President's and First Lady's offices -- concerning the injection of foreign funds into the reelection effort."<ref name=labellanote>La Bella, Charles,[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/documents/Labella_index.html La Bella Memo], Introduction, page 51, [[July 16]], [[1998]], Retrieved: [[April 19]], [[2006]]</ref> Additionally, La Bella stated: "If these allegations involved anyone other than the president, vice president, senior White House or DNC and Clinton-Gore '96 officials, an appropriate investigation would have commenced months ago without hesitation."<ref name=labellanote1>La Bella, Charles, [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/documents/Labella_index.html La Bella Memo], Introduction, page 14, [[July 16]], [[1998]], Retrieved: [[April 19]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
The U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs held public hearings into the campaign finance issues from July to October 1997. The Committee, chaired by Republican [[Fred Thompson]], adopted a Republican-written final report (the Wikisource referenced and appearing herein) on a straight party-line vote, 8 in favor and 7 opposing, in March 1998. Thompson described the findings as "not any one real big thing" but "a lot of things strung together that paint a real ugly picture."<ref name="CNN" /> The Democrats published a minority report dissenting with most of the conclusions of the final report, stating the evidence "does not support the conclusion that the China plan was aimed at, or affected, the 1996 presidential election."<ref name="CNN">Crowley, Candy (1998) [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/03/05/campaign.finance/ Thompson Committee Wraps Up Its Work] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071212202252/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/03/05/campaign.finance/ |date=December 12, 2007 }} ''CNN'' (online, March 5), accessed 5 October 2015.</ref> Considerable acrimony was displayed during the hearings between [[Fred Thompson|Thompson]] and the ranking minority member, Democrat [[John Glenn]], with the public disagreements between the two leaders reaching a level seldom seen in recent years in Congressional committees.<ref>Rosenbaum, David E. (1997). [https://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/24/us/campaign-finance-the-hearings-anger-flares-as-focus-shifts-to-campaign-remedies.html "Campaign Finance: The Hearings; Anger Flares as Focus Shifts to Campaign Remedies,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907233931/http://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/24/us/campaign-finance-the-hearings-anger-flares-as-focus-shifts-to-campaign-remedies.html |date=September 7, 2017 }} ''[[The New York Times]]'' (online, September 24), accessed 6 November 2015.</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Burton Dan.jpg|thumb|upright=.5|left|U.S. Rep. [[Dan Burton]] ([[Republican Party (United States)|R]]-[[Indiana|IN]])]] |
|||
[[Robert Conrad, Jr.]], who later became head of the task force, called on Reno in Spring 2000 to appoint an independent counsel to look into the fund-raising practices of Vice President Gore.<ref name=lehrer1>[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june00/gore_6-23.html Fund-raising Investigation Discussion], NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, transcript, ''PBS'', [[June 23]], [[2000]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
A [[United States House of Representatives|House]] investigation, headed by Indiana Republican [[Dan Burton]] focused on allegations of campaign finance abuse, including the contributions channeled through Chung, Huang, and Trie. The investigation was lengthy, spanning both the 105th and 106th Congresses, and according to a Democratic report had cost over $7.4 million as of August 31, 1998, making it the most expensive Congressional investigation ever (the Senate [[Watergate scandal|Watergate]] investigation cost $7 million in 1998 dollars).<ref name=cost>[http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050124115157-73108.pdf ''Cost of Congressional Campaign Finance Investigations to the U.S. Taxpayer, Minority Report'': page 8] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060127053227/http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050124115157-73108.pdf |date=2006-01-27 }}, U.S. House of Representatives, Retrieved: April 14, 2006</ref> |
|||
[[Norman Ornstein]], a Congressional expert at the [[American Enterprise Institute]] said in May 1998, "Barring some dramatic change, I think the Burton investigation is going to be remembered as a case study in how not to do a congressional investigation and as a prime example of investigation as farce."<ref name=partisian>Lacey, Marc, [https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/29150984.html?dids=29150984:29150984&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+2,+1998&author=MARC+LACEY&pub=Los+Angeles&edition=&startpage=14&desc=NEWS+ANALYSIS "House Probe of Campaign Fund-Raising Uncovers Little, Piles Up Partisan Ill Will"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121107114538/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/29150984.html?dids=29150984:29150984&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+2,+1998&author=MARC+LACEY&pub=Los+Angeles&edition=&startpage=14&desc=NEWS+ANALYSIS |date=November 7, 2012 }}, ''Los Angeles Times'', May 2, 1998</ref> In a May 5, 1998, letter to other Republicans on the committee, Burton admitted that "mistakes and omissions were made" in tape transcripts released to the public of phone calls made by [[Webster Hubbell]]. A committee investigator who was an advocate of releasing the tapes resigned at Burton's request.<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/06/hubbell.tapes/ "Burton Apologizes In Hubbell Tapes Furor: House committee investigator quits; Democrats want Burton out], ''CNN'', May 8, 1998 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081119031208/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/06/hubbell.tapes/ |date=November 19, 2008 }}</ref> |
|||
Janet Reno rejected all of these requests: |
|||
{{cquote|I try to do one thing: what's right. I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress. If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute — Janet Reno, [[December 4|Dec. 4]], 1997.<ref name=reno>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/12/04/reno.briefing/ "Reno Defends Independent Counsel Decision"], ''CNN.com'', [[December 4|Dec. 4]], [[1997]]</ref>}} |
|||
=== Calls for an independent counsel === |
|||
Six weeks after this statement, Attorney General Reno agreed to [[Whitewater (controversy)|Whitewater]] independent counsel [[Kenneth Starr]]'s request to look into allegations that President Clinton had committed [[perjury]] and [[obstruction of justice]] relating to the [[sexual harassment]] lawsuit brought against him by [[Paula Jones]] (a former Arkansas state employee during Clinton's governorship there).<ref name=jones>Baker, Peter, et al., [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/clinton012198.htm "Clinton Accused of Urging Aide to Lie"], ''Washington Post'', [[January 21|Jan. 21]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Louisfreeh.jpeg|thumb|upright=.545|FBI Director Louis Freeh]]President Clinton's [[Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI Director]] [[Louis Freeh]] wrote in a 22-page memorandum to then Clinton's critics called of the scandal, nicknamed "Chinagate."<ref>Yuwu Song, ed., ''Encyclopedia of Chinese-American Relations'' (McFarland, 2009) p 63.</ref> Attorney General Janet Reno said in November 1997 that "It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an [[United States Office of the Independent Counsel|independent counsel]]."<ref name=freeh>Lewis, Neil A., [https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0913FF3C540C758DDDAE0894D0494D81 "Freeh Says Reno Clearly Misread Prosecutor Law"], ''The New York Times'', June 16, 1998</ref> |
|||
Critics such as columnists [[Charles Krauthammer]] and [[Morton Kondracke]], as well as a number of FBI agents, suggested that the investigations into the improper fund-raising allegations were impeded as part of a [[Cover-up|cover-up]].<ref name=critic>Krauthammer, Charles, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/op101097.htm "Reno's Humiliation"] (Opinion), ''Washington Post'', [[October 10|Oct. 10]], [[1997]]</ref><ref name=critic1>Kondracke, Morton, [http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/kondracke080999.asp "GOP must launch new probe of Chinagate "] (Opinion), ''[[Jewish World Review]]'', [[August 9|Aug. 9]], [[1999]]</ref><ref name=critic2>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/finance/ncfin359.htm "FBI agents criticize Justice Department"], ''[[Associated Press]]'', [[July 22|Sept. 22]], [[1999]]</ref> |
|||
=== Notable convictions secured === |
|||
Even without an appointment of an independent counsel, the Justice Department's internal investigation was fruitful. The task force created to investigate campaign fund-raising irregularities during the 1996 U.S. elections secured criminal convictions against 17 people by 2001. |
|||
In addition to the convictions against John Huang, Johnny Chung, Charlie Trie, Maria Hsia, and James Riady (who was fined $8.6 million – the largest fine ever levied against an individual), Clinton friend [[Ernest Green]], a former member of the [[Little Rock Nine]], pleaded guilty in 2001 to failure to declare and pay taxes on $30,000 in income which he received in 1995 from Charlie Trie for a planned business venture between the two. |
|||
[[Image:T000317.jpg|thumb|120px|left|Senator Robert Torricelli (Democrat-[[New Jersey]])]]Donors to former Democratic Senator [[Robert Torricelli]] (a member of the Senate Government Affairs Committee during the time its investigations took place) were particularly affected by the criminal investigations. David Chang, a member of the 1996 Torricelli Campaign Finance Committee, pled guilty to violating federal election law by making illegal contributions to Torricelli's campaign. Chang also pled guilty to witness tampering in connection with the campaign financing task force investigation. Chang's co-defendant, Audrey Yu, pled guilty to obstruction of justice under the same superseding indictment. Lawrence Penna, the former president of a now-defunct New Jersey securities firm, was charged with violating election laws by funneling illegal campaign contributions to the 1996 federal election campaigns of both President Clinton and Senator Torricelli. Cha-Kuek Koo, a New Jersey businessman, pled guilty to violating federal election law by making illegal contributions to the Torricelli campaign. Koo admitted to assisting David Chang in making conduit contributions using Koo's employees at [[LG Group]]. Berek Don, a former Republican party leader in [[Bergen County, New Jersey]], pleaded guilty to another conduit contribution scheme to the Senator's campaign. Carmine Alampi, a Bergen County New Jersey attorney, pleaded guilty to the same scheme.<ref name=justice>[http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/December/01_crm_662.htm Ernest G. Green Pleads Guilty to Tax Violations], Department of Justice, press release, [[December 21|Dec. 21]], [[2001]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref><ref name=justice1>[http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/January/017crm.htm James Riady Pleads Guilty], Department of Justice, press release, [[January 11|Jan. 11]], [[2001]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
In July 1998, the Justice Department's campaign finance task force head, [[Charles La Bella]], sent a report to Janet Reno also recommending she seek an independent counsel to investigate alleged fundraising abuses by Democratic party officials.<ref name=labella>Thomas, Pierre, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/07/23/labella/ "Reno Aide Recommends Independent Campaign Finance Probe"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060210100107/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/07/23/labella/ |date=February 10, 2006 }}, ''CNN.com'', July 23, 1998</ref> The media reported that La Bella believed there was clearly an appearance of a conflict of interest by Reno.<ref name=lehrer>[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec98/reno_8-4a.html Politics and Prosecution Discussion], [[NewsHour with Jim Lehrer]], transcript, ''[[PBS]]'', August 4, 1998, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060516201550/http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec98/reno_8-4a.html |date=May 16, 2006 }}</ref> |
|||
Senator Torricelli announced on [[October 1]], [[2002]] he would not stand for re-election as a result of the controversy.<ref name=nj>[http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/09/30/elec02.nj.s.torricelli.race/ "Torricelli drops out of N.J. race"], ''CNN.com'', [[October 1|Oct. 1]], 2002</ref> |
|||
[[Robert Conrad, Jr.]], who later became head of the task force, called on Reno in Spring 2000 to appoint an independent counsel to look into the fundraising practices of Vice President Gore.<ref name=lehrer1>[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june00/gore_6-23.html Fund-raising Investigation Discussion], NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, transcript, ''PBS'', June 23, 2000, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041012130742/http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june00/gore_6-23.html |date=October 12, 2004 }}</ref> |
|||
The Justice Department did not bring criminal charges against the Democratic National Committee, but in 2002 the Federal Election Commission fined the DNC $115,000 for its role in illegal fund-raising during the 1996 U.S. election campaigns. The FEC's [[general counsel]] recommended more severe penalties, but the three Democratic election commissioners on the committee blocked the recommendation on a 3-3 tie vote.<ref name=fecfines>[http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/09/23/elec02.fec.dnc/ "DNC fined for illegal 1996 fund raising"], ''CNN.com'', [[September 23|Sept. 23]], [[2002]]</ref> |
|||
Janet Reno declined all requests: |
|||
== Congressional investigations == |
|||
{{blockquote|I try to do one thing: what's right. I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress. If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute |
|||
=== Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs === |
|||
—Janet Reno, December 4, 1997.<ref name=reno>[http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/12/04/reno.briefing/ "Reno Defends Independent Counsel Decision"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060517213044/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/12/04/reno.briefing/ |date=May 17, 2006 }}, ''CNN.com'', December 4, 1997</ref>|sign=|source=}} |
|||
[[Image:Fred Thompson.jpg|thumb|100px|Senator Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.)]]On [[July 8]] [[1997]], the U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs began its public hearings into the campaign finance scandal. Chairman [[Fred Dalton Thompson|Fred Thompson]] suspended the public hearings on October 31 of that year. The Committee's final report was released to the public on [[March 5]] [[1998]]. |
|||
A [[CNN]]/''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' poll taken in May 1998 found 58 percent of Americans felt an independent counsel should have been appointed to investigate the controversy. Thirty-three percent were opposed. The same poll found that 47 percent of Americans believed a ''[[quid pro quo]]'' existed between the Clinton administration and the PRC government.<ref name=poll1>Holland, Keating, [http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/20/poll/ "Poll: Independent Counsel Should Investigate China Policy Decisions"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070102041219/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/20/poll/ |date=January 2, 2007 }}, ''CNN''.com, May 20, 1998</ref> |
|||
Opening statements of public hearings from Senate Committee Chairman Senator Fred Thompson: |
|||
{{cquote|I would like to turn our attention to one of the most troublesome areas of this investigation. I speak of allegations concerning a plan... by the Chinese government and designed to pour illegal money into American political campaigns. The plan had a goal: to buy access and influence in furtherance of Chinese government interests... The committee believes that... Chinese government officials crafted a plan to increase China's influence over the U.S. political process. The committee has identified specific steps taken in furtherance of the plan. Implementation of the plan has been handled by Chinese government officials and individuals enlisted to assist in the effort... Our investigation suggests that the plan continues today. Although most discussions of the plan focuses on Congress, our investigation suggests it affected the 1996 presidential race and state elections as well. The government of China is believed to have allocated substantial sums of money to achieve its objectives. Another aspect of the plan is remarkable because it shows that the PRC is interested in developing long-term relationships with... up and coming government... officials at state and local levels. The intent is to establish relations that can be cultivated as the officials rise through the ranks to higher office.<ref name=opening>[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/campaign/july97/hearing_7-8.html NewsHour with Jim Lehrer], transcript, ''PBS'', [[July 8]], [[1997]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref>}} |
|||
=== Calls for impeachment === |
|||
[[Image:Glenn.gif|thumb|100px|right|Senator John Glenn (D-Ohio)]]Opening comments from the Committee's Minority Leader, Senator [[John Glenn]] (a Democrat from [[Ohio]]): |
|||
{{Main|Efforts to impeach Bill Clinton}} |
|||
{{cquote|According to the press the Chinese government intended to use a relatively modest amount of money to gain influence in the Washington [[lobbying]] game, and it intended to do this by focusing on the legislative branch of government. Now, I mention these reports here because I am greatly concerned about how the reports are sometimes discussed by individuals in this body and in the press. I've heard language like infiltration, foreign [[espionage|spies]], foreigners, as we're jeopardizing our [[national security]]. Well, on this issue the committee should go just as far as the facts take us, recognizing that it's the FBI that's in a much better position to do an espionage investigation. Now, let's be careful, however, not to jump to conclusions that [[treason]] has been committed based on a partial story with ambiguous information. But wherever the trail leads let's look at it.<ref name=opening>[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/campaign/july97/hearing_7-8.html NewsHour with Jim Lehrer], transcript, ''PBS'', [[July 8]], [[1997]], Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref>}} |
|||
In 1997 [[Bob Barr]] and eighteen other Republicans signed a resolution to impeach Bill Clinton for alleged campaign finance law violations and obstruction of congressional investigations.<ref>{{Cite web|title=17 Nov 1997, Page 3 - Asheville Citizen-Times at Newspapers.com|url=http://www.newspapers.com/image/197738955/|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Newspapers.com|language=en}}</ref> Anti Clinton activists collected 100,000 signatures supporting his impeachment.<ref>{{Cite web|title=5 Dec 1997, Page 20 - Standard-Speaker at Newspapers.com|url=http://www.newspapers.com/image/59665755/|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Newspapers.com|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
=== House Government Reform and Oversight Committee === |
|||
[[Image:Burton_Dan.jpg|thumb|100px|left|Representative [[Dan Burton]] (R-[[Indiana|Ind.]])]]A [[United States House of Representatives]] investigation, headed by Republican [[Dan Burton]], also focused on allegations of campaign finance abuse, including the contributions channeled through Chung, Huang, Trie, et al. |
|||
=== Criticism of investigation === |
|||
The investigation was lengthy, spanning both the 105th and 106th Congresses, and according to a Democratic report had cost over $7.4 million as of [[August 31]] [[1998]], making it the most expensive Congressional investigation ever (the Senate [[Watergate scandal|Watergate]] investigation cost $7 million in 1998 dollars).<ref name=cost>[http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050124115157-73108.pdf ''Cost of Congressional Campaign Finance Investigations to the U.S. Taxpayer, Minority Report'': page 8], U.S. House of Representatives, Retrieved: [[April 14]], [[2006]]</ref> |
|||
In addition to partisan complaints from Republicans, columnists [[Charles Krauthammer]], [[William Safire]], and [[Morton Kondracke]], as well as a number of FBI agents, suggested the investigations into the fundraising controversies were willfully impeded.<ref name=critic>Krauthammer, Charles, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/op101097.htm "Reno's Humiliation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170417221229/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/op101097.htm |date=April 17, 2017 }} (Opinion), ''The Washington Post'', October 10, 1997</ref><ref name=chineseagents>Safire, William, [https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0C12FB3E550C748CDDA90994D1494D81 "Those Chinese Agents"] (Opinion), ''The New York Times'', October 7, 1999</ref><ref name=critic1>Kondracke, Morton, [http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/kondracke080999.asp "GOP must launch new probe of Chinagate"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050828170419/http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/kondracke080999.asp |date=August 28, 2005 }} (Opinion), ''[[Jewish World Review]]'', August 9, 1999</ref> |
|||
FBI agent Ivian Smith wrote a letter to FBI Director Freeh that expressed "a lack of confidence" in the Justice Department's attorneys regarding the fundraising investigation. He wrote: "I am convinced the team at... [the Department of Justice] leading this investigation is, at best, simply not up to the task... The impression left is the emphasis on how not to prosecute matters, not how to aggressively conduct investigations leading to prosecutions." Smith and three other FBI agents later testified before Congress in late 1999 that Justice Department prosecutors impeded their inquiry. FBI agent Daniel Wehr told Congress that the first head U.S. attorney in the investigation, Laura Ingersoll, told the agents they should "not pursue any matter related to solicitation of funds for access to the president. The reason given was, 'That's the way the American political process works.' I was scandalized by that," Wehr said. The four FBI agents also said that Ingersoll prevented them from executing [[search warrant]]s to stop destruction of evidence and micromanaged the case beyond all reason.<ref name=critic2>[https://www.usatoday.com/news/index/finance/ncfin359.htm "FBI agents criticize Justice Department"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011006073736/http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/finance/ncfin359.htm |date=October 6, 2001 }}, ''Associated Press'', September 22, 1999</ref> |
|||
The investigation itself was controversial, attracting criticism from partisans and moderates. Norman Ornstein, a Congressional expert at the [[American Enterprise Institute]] said in May 1998, "Barring some dramatic change, I think the Burton investigation is going to be remembered as a case study in how not to do a congressional investigation and as a prime example of investigation as farce."<ref name=partisian>Lacey, Marc, [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/29150984.html?dids=29150984:29150984&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+2,+1998&author=MARC+LACEY&pub=Los+Angeles&edition=&startpage=14&desc=NEWS+ANALYSIS "House Probe of Campaign Fund-Raising Uncovers Little, Piles Up Partisan Ill Will"], ''Los Angeles Times'', [[May 2]], [[1998]]</ref> A ''[[New York Times]]'' editorial characterized the committee's investigation as a "travesty" and a "parody".<ref name=nyeditorial>Editorial, ''New York Times'', [[March 20]], [[1997]]</ref> A ''Washington Post'' editorial called the House investigation "its own cartoon, a joke, and a deserved embarrassment".<ref name=posteditorial>Editorial, ''Washington Post'', [[April 12]], [[1997]]</ref> |
|||
FBI agents were also denied the opportunity to ask President Clinton and Vice President Gore questions during Justice Department interviews in 1997 and 1998 and were only allowed to take notes. During the interviews, neither Clinton nor Gore were asked any questions about fund-raisers John Huang and James Riady, nor the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple fundraising event led by Maria Hsia and attended by Huang and Ted Sioeng.<ref name=neverquestioned>[https://www.usatoday.com/news/index/finance/ncfin363.htm "Justice's Clinton, Gore inquiry criticized"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040704194809/http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/finance/ncfin363.htm |date=July 4, 2004 }}, ''Associated Press'', December 16, 1999</ref> |
|||
Investigators, however, complained the investigation took so long due to the unprecedented lack of co-operation of witnesses. Ninety-four people either refused to be questioned, pled the [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fifth Amendment]], or left the country altogether.<ref name=witnesses>Abse, Nathan, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/fifth060998.htm "A Look at the 94 Who Aren't Talking"], ''Washington Post'', [[June 9]], [[1998]]</ref> |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
*[[2019 Australian Parliament infiltration plot]] |
|||
*[[Campaign finance reform]] |
|||
*[[China–United States relations]] |
|||
*[[Clinton/China timeline]] |
|||
*[[Chinese government interference in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections]] |
|||
*[[Citizens United v. FEC]] |
|||
*[[Barry Gardiner#Links to Chinese agent|Christine Lee]] |
|||
*[[Follow the money]] |
|||
*[[Commerce Department trade mission controversy]] |
|||
*[[Lincoln Bedroom for contributors controversy]] |
|||
*[[China Lobby]] |
|||
*[[Campaign finance in the United States]] |
|||
*[[Campaign finance reform in the United States]] |
|||
*[[Frontline (American TV program)|Frontline]]: [https://archive.org/details/TheFixers "The Fixers", Season 15, Episode 6] |
|||
*Legal dispute between former New Zealand Members of Parliament [[Simon Bridges#MP expenses saga|Simon Bridges]] and [[Jami-Lee Ross#Simon Bridges expense scandal and corruption allegations|Jami-Lee Ross]] which stemmed from a donation to Bridges by Chinese businessman Yikun Zhang |
|||
== |
== References == |
||
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} |
|||
<div class="references-small"> |
|||
<references/> |
|||
</div> |
|||
==Further reading== |
|||
== External links == |
|||
* Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). E.g., "Summary of Findings" (Chapter 3), "The China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to the Effort of the People's Republic of China to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections" (Chapter 18), and "Charlie Trie's Contributions to the Presidential Legal Expense Trust (Chapter 20), in ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report'' (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/index.html], [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/1-1.htm], [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/2-18.htm], and [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/2-20.htm], accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1997_Special_Investigation_in_Connection_with_1996_Federal_Election_Campaigns], given above. |
|||
* [http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/sireport.htm 1997 (U.S. Senate) Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns: Final Report] (PDF files) |
|||
* Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). E.g., "Volume 4 of 6, Minority Views of Senators Glenn, Levin, Lieberman, Akaka, Durbin, Torricelli, and Cleland, Part 1. Foreign Influence, Chapter 2, The China Plan" in ''Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report'' (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/index.html], and [https://fas.org/irp/congress/1998_rpt/sgo-sir/4-2.htm], accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is part of the full citation and an alternative web location of the WikiSource, [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1997_Special_Investigation_in_Connection_with_1996_Federal_Election_Campaigns], given above. |
|||
* [http://www.cia.gov Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)] |
|||
* [http://clinton6.nara.gov/ Clinton Presidential Materials Project] |
|||
* [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/documents/Labella_index.html Copy of official Charles La Bella memo to Janet Reno] |
|||
* [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/documents/Freeh_index.html Copy of official Louis Freeh memo to Janet Reno] |
|||
* [http://dnc.org/ Democratic National Committee (DNC)] |
|||
* [http://www.fbi.gov Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)] |
|||
* [http://www.fec.gov Federal Election Commission (FEC)] |
|||
* [http://www.fas.org/ Federation of American Scientists] |
|||
* [http://www.opensecrets.org/ Open Secrets] |
|||
* [http://www.usdoj.gov U. S. Department of Justice] |
|||
* [http://reform.house.gov/ U.S House Committee on Government Reform] |
|||
* [http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/ U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs] |
|||
* [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/campfin.htm Washington Post Special Report: Campaign Finance] |
|||
==External links== |
|||
== Bibliography == |
|||
*Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Report in full: ''[https://web.archive.org/web/20110722205840/http://hsgac.senate.gov/sireport.htm 1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns]'' |
|||
*{{cite book |
|||
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/background.htm Washington Post archives of campaign finance controversy stories, 1997-1999] |
|||
| first = Bill |
|||
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/politics/specials/allegations/96funds/ Washington Post archives of campaign finance controversy stories, 1998–2002] |
|||
| last = Clinton |
|||
| year = 2000 |
|||
| title = The Clinton Foreign Policy Reader |
|||
| publisher = M.E. Sharpe |
|||
| id = ISBN 0765605848 |
|||
}} |
|||
*{{cite book |
|||
| first = Bill |
|||
| last = Gertz |
|||
| year = 2002 |
|||
| title = The China Threat: How the People's Republic Targets America |
|||
| publisher = Regnery Publishing |
|||
| id = ISBN 0895261871 |
|||
}} |
|||
*{{cite book |
|||
| first = Edward |
|||
| last = Timperlake |
|||
| coauthors = William Triplett |
|||
| year = 1998 |
|||
| title = Year of the Rat |
|||
| publisher = Regnery Publishing |
|||
| id = ISBN 0895263335 |
|||
}} |
|||
*{{cite book |
|||
| first = Ezra F. |
|||
| last = Vogel |
|||
| year = 1997 |
|||
| title = Living With China |
|||
| publisher = W. W. Norton & Company |
|||
| id = ISBN 039331734X |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Presidency of Bill Clinton}} |
|||
[[Category:American political scandals]] |
|||
[[Category:Clinton administration scandals]] |
|||
[[Category:Espionage]] |
|||
[[Category:Sino-American relations]] |
|||
[[Category:1996 in American politics|United States Campaign]] |
|||
[[io:Usana kampaniala financo-skandalo di 1996]] |
|||
[[ |
[[Category:1996 in China|United States]] |
||
[[Category:1996 controversies in the United States]] |
|||
[[zh:1996年美国竞选财务丑闻]] |
|||
[[Category:1996 in economic history]] |
|||
[[Category:China–United States relations]] |
|||
[[Category:Clinton administration controversies]] |
|||
[[Category:Chinese foreign electoral intervention]] |
|||
[[Category:Campaign finance in the United States]] |
|||
[[Category:1996 United States presidential election]] |
Latest revision as of 10:49, 7 December 2024
The 1996 United States campaign finance controversy, sometimes referred to as Chinagate, was an effort by the People's Republic of China to influence domestic American politics prior to and during the Clinton administration and also involved the fundraising practices of the administration itself.
While questions regarding the U.S. Democratic Party's fundraising activities first arose over a Los Angeles Times article published on September 21, 1996,[1] China's role in the affair first gained public attention when Bob Woodward and Brian Duffy of The Washington Post published a story stating that a United States Department of Justice investigation into the fundraising activities had uncovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before the 1996 presidential campaign. The journalists wrote that intelligence information had shown the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C. was used for coordinating contributions to the DNC[2] in violation of United States law forbidding non-American citizens or non-permanent residents from giving monetary donations to United States politicians and political parties. A Republican investigator of the controversy stated that the Chinese plan targeted both presidential and congressional United States elections, while Democratic senators said the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections. The government of the People's Republic of China denied all accusations.
Background
[edit]According to the U.S. Senate report, Chinese officials eventually developed a set of proposals to promote their interests with the United States government and to improve China's image with the American people. The proposals, dubbed the "China Plan", were prompted by the United States Congress's successful lobbying of President Bill Clinton to grant a visa to Taiwan President Lee Teng-hui. U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher had previously assured his Chinese counterpart Chinese Foreign Minister Qian Qichen that granting a visa would be "inconsistent with [the United States'] unofficial relationship [with Taiwan]"[3] and the Clinton Administration's acquiescence to the Congressional resolutions led China to conclude that the influence of Congress over foreign policy was more significant than it had previously determined. When formulating the so-called plan, Chinese officials acknowledged that, compared to other countries, it had little knowledge of, or influence over, policy decisions made in Congress, which had a sizeable pro-Taiwan faction under the influence of a more established "China Lobby" run by the Kuomintang.[4][page needed] The plan, according to the Senate report, instructed Chinese officials in the U.S. to improve their knowledge about members of Congress and increase contacts with its members, the public, and the media. The plan also suggested ways to lobby United States officials.[4][page needed]
Over the years, China repeatedly denied that their lobbying efforts involved financial contributions of any kind, e.g., stating "some people and media in the United States speculated... about so-called participation by Chinese individuals in political donations during the U.S. elections. It is sheer fabrication and is intended to slander China. [China] has never, nor will we ever, use money to influence American politics"—a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, May 1998.[5]
Major fund-raising figures
[edit]Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie
[edit]The most significant activity by Yah-Lin "Charlie" Trie (崔亞琳[6]) was a $450,000 attempted donation from him to Clinton's legal defense fund (for his impeachment trials) which Trie allegedly delivered in two envelopes each containing several checks and money orders. The fund immediately rejected $70,000 and deposited the remainder, but ordered an investigation of the source. The investigation found that some of the money orders were made out in different names but with the same handwriting, and sequentially numbered. The fund then rejected the donation entirely, and allegedly returned the deposited funds two months after the initial contribution.[7]
Born in Taiwan, Trie emigrated to the U.S. in 1974. He eventually became an American citizen and co-owner of a restaurant in Little Rock, Arkansas. The 1997 special investigation describes Trie as having attempted to develop an international trading business (Daihatsu International Trading Corporation), having maintained or accessed accounts in Little Rock and Washington, D.C., into which Macau-based real estate businessman Ng Lap Seng wired >$1M USD from Macau and Hong Kong accounts, and as having never succeeded in the trading business (based on bank and tax records indicating substantive income only from Ng).[8][page needed]
In Little Rock, Trie befriended Clinton, then Governor of Arkansas. In addition to the attempted donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie and his immediate family donated $220,000 to the DNC which was also later returned.[8][page needed] Immediately after the donation to Clinton's defense fund, Trie sent a letter to President Clinton that expressed concern about America's intervention in tensions arising from China's military exercises being conducted near Taiwan. Trie told the President in his letter that war with China was a possibility should U.S. intervention continue:
[O]nce the hard parties of the Chinese military incline to grasp U.S. involvement as foreign intervention, is [sic] U.S. ready to face such [a] challenge[?]... [I]t is highly possible for China to launch real war based on its past behavior in [sic] Sino-Vietnam War and Zhen Bao Tao war with Russia. (Charlie Trie, letter to President Clinton, March 21, 1996)."[8][page needed]
After Congressional investigations turned to Trie in late 1996, he left the country for China.[8][page needed] Trie returned to the U.S. in 1998 and was convicted and sentenced to three years' probation and four months' home detention for violating federal campaign finance laws by making political contributions in someone else's name and for causing a false statement to be made to the Federal Election Commission (FEC).[9]
Johnny Chung
[edit]Born in Taiwan, Johnny Chung went from being the owner of a "blastfaxing" business (an automated system that quickly sends out faxes to thousands of businesses) in California to being in the middle of the Washington, D.C. elite within a couple weeks of his first donations to the Democratic Party. Called a "hustler" by a U.S. National Security Council (NSC) aide,[10] Chung made forty-nine separate visits to the White House between February 1994 and February 1996.[11] One of his purposes in making these trips was to obtain photographs of himself with the Clintons, which he believed would help him to get business in China by giving people the impression that he had connections and influence in Washington—he used a brochure that included at least ten photographs of himself with Hillary Clinton along with a personal note from her.[12] During one of the U.S. Commerce Department trade missions to China, Chung befriended former Chinese Lt. Col. Liu Chaoying, then an executive at China Aerospace International Holdings (中國航天國際控股有限公司), which is the Hong Kong-based subsidiary of the government-controlled CASC (中國航天科技集團公司), China's premier satellite launching company. She is the daughter of former General Liu Huaqing.
Between 1994 and 1996, Chung donated $366,000 to the DNC. Once the truth of this situation was revealed to the public, all of the money was allegedly returned. Chung told federal investigators that $35,000 of the money he donated came from Liu Chaoying and, in turn, China's military intelligence.[10]
Specifically, Chung testified under oath to the U.S. House Committee investigating the issue in May 1999 that he was introduced to Chinese Gen. Ji Shengde, then the head of Chinese military intelligence, by Liu Chaoying. Chung said that Ji told him: "We like your president very much. We would like to see him reelect [sic]. I will give you 300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to the president and the Democrat [sic] Party."[13] Both Liu and the Chinese government denied the claims.[14]
Chung was eventually sentenced to five years' probation and community service following an agreement to plea guilty to bank fraud, tax evasion, and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law.[15]
John Huang and James Riady
[edit]John Huang (pronounced "Hwa[ng]"), was another major figure convicted. Born in 1945 in Nanping, Fujian, Huang and his father fled to Taiwan at the end of the Chinese Civil War before he eventually emigrated to the United States in 1969. A former employee of the Indonesian company Lippo Group's Lippo Bank and its owners Mochtar Riady and his son James (whom Huang first met along with Bill Clinton at a financial seminar in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1980), Huang became a key fund-raiser within the DNC in 1995. While there, he raised $3.4 million for the party. Nearly half had to be returned when questions arose regarding their source during later investigations by Congress.[16]
According to U.S. Secret Service logs, Huang visited the White House 78 times while working as a DNC fund-raiser.[17] James Riady visited the White House 20 times (including six personal visits to President Clinton).[18]
Immediately prior to joining the DNC, Huang worked in President Clinton's Commerce Department as deputy assistant secretary for international economic affairs. His position made him responsible for Asia-U.S. trade matters. He was appointed to the position by President Clinton in December 1993. His position at the Commerce Department gave him access to classified intelligence on China. While at the department, it was later learned, Huang met 9 times with Chinese embassy officials.[19]
Huang eventually pleaded guilty to conspiring to reimburse Lippo Group employees' campaign contributions with corporate or foreign funds.[20] James Riady was later convicted of campaign finance violations relating to the same scheme as well, and was sentenced to pay a large fine. Shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of then-Governor Clinton's campaign for the presidency, contributions made by Huang had been reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. Also, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with wire transfers from foreign Lippo Group entities.[15]
An unclassified U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs report issued in 1998 stated that both James Riady and his father Mochtar had "had a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency." According to journalist Bob Woodward, details of the relationship came from highly classified intelligence information supplied to the committee by both the CIA and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).[21]
The most well-known of John Huang's fund-raisers involved Vice President Al Gore, Maria Hsia, and the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in California.
Maria Hsia
[edit]Taiwan-born Maria Hsia (pronounced "Shya"), a long time fund raiser for Al Gore, California immigration consultant, and business associate of John Huang and James Riady since 1988, facilitated $100,000 in illegal campaign contributions through her efforts at Hsi Lai Temple, a Chinese Buddhist temple associated with Taiwan in Hacienda Heights, California. This money went to the DNC, to the Clinton–Gore campaign, and to U.S. Representative Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island. After a trial, Hsia was convicted in March 2000.[22][23]
The Democratic National Committee eventually returned the money donated by the temple's monks and nuns. Twelve nuns and employees of the temple, including temple abbess Venerable Yi Kung (who resigned her post after being subpoenaed), refused to answer questions by pleading the Fifth Amendment when they were subpoenaed to testify before Congress.[24] Two other Buddhist nuns admitted destroying lists of donors and other documents related to the controversy because they felt the information would embarrass the temple. A Temple-commissioned videotape of the fund raiser also went missing and the nuns' attorney claimed it may have been shipped off to Taiwan.[25]
The temple event became particularly controversial because it was attended by Vice President Gore. In an interview on the January 24, 1997, edition of the Today show, Gore said:
I did not know that it was a fund-raiser. But I knew it was a political event, and I knew there were finance people that were going to be present, and so that alone should have told me, 'This is inappropriate and this is a mistake; don't do this.' And I take responsibility for that. It was a mistake.[26]
In response, the U.S. Senate Governmental Affairs Committee that investigated the controversy said:
The Vice President's staff ... knew that the temple event was a fundraiser. In March 1996, Deputy Chief of Staff David Strauss had helped arrange a meeting in the White House with the founder of the temple, Hsing Yun—a meeting which Strauss believed would 'lead to a lot of $.' The White House staff repeatedly referred to the event as a 'fundraiser' in internal correspondence, and assigned to it a 'ticket price' of '1,000–5,000 [dollars per] head'.[27]
John Huang's memo to Vice President Gore's assistant Kimberly Tilley specifically mentioned that the temple meeting was a fundraising event. Gore later acknowledged that he had known the visit was "finance-related."[28][29]
In the U.S., religious organizations enjoy a tax exempt status. Political activity is prohibited for such tax exempt entities. The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee also said they learned that Hsia had served as an "agent" of the PRC government.[27] Hsia denied the claim.
Ted Sioeng
[edit]Ted Sioeng, an Indonesian entrepreneur who donated money to both Democrats and Republicans, was the sixth individual whose donations were investigated by the Senate committee. Suspect contributions associated with Sioeng include $250,000 to the DNC and $100,000 to Republican California State Treasurer Matt Fong. Fong returned the money in April 1997.[30]
Sieong sat with Bill Clinton or Al Gore at two fundraising events.[8][page needed] Sioeng also joined Fong at a meeting with then Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich in mid-1995. Gingrich called the meeting a "photo op".[31] Gingrich was the guest of honor at a Sioeng-organized luncheon the day after a Sioeng family company gave the $50,000 think-tank donation, solicited by a Gingrich adviser.[32]
Attorney General Janet Reno and the directors of the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency (NSA) told members of the Senate committee they had credible intelligence information indicating Sioeng acted on behalf of China. A spokesman for Sioeng denied the allegations.[33] Sioeng left the country shortly thereafter, and no charges were filed.[34]
Bernard Schwartz
[edit]Bernard L. Schwartz CEO of Loral Space & Communications, a satellite communications company, donated over $600,000 to the Democratic Party.[35] Schwartz said he did not expect, need, or receive any special treatment from the Clinton administration as a result of his donations.[36] In 1998 Loral was under investigation for illegally transferring satellite technology to China.[37]
In February 1998 during the time Loral was under investigation, Loral requested Clinton to sign a waiver which would allow Loral to ship satellite technology to China. Clinton's justice department advised against signing the waiver because they believed that a jury wouldn't convict Loral if they received a waiver from Clinton.[38] Clinton did eventually sign the waiver.[39][40] The U.S space technology received by China may have furthered Beijing's military development of nuclear missiles.[41][42] In 2002 Loral would later be fined $14 million for its involvement in illegally transferring classified secrets to China.[41]
Investigations
[edit]Department of Justice investigation
[edit]The Justice Department opened a task force in late 1996 to begin investigating allegations of campaign fundraising abuses by the Clinton/Gore re-election campaign. It expanded its internal investigation to include activities related to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund in December 1996.[43]
President Clinton announced in February 1997 that he thought there should be a "vigorous" and "thorough" investigation into reports that the People's Republic of China tried to direct financial contributions from overseas sources to the Democratic National Committee. The president stopped short of calling for an independent prosecutor, saying that was the decision of the Justice Department.
"[O]bviously it would be a very serious matter for the United States if any country were to attempt to funnel funds to one of our parties for any reason whatever," President Clinton said.[44]
By July 1997, the administration determined that no evidence of any such thing had yet been proven.
"We have received the relevant [FBI] briefings," White House Press Secretary Mike McCurry said. "We believe there's no basis for any change in our policy toward China, which is one of engagement."[45]
"I do not know whether it is true or not," President Clinton stated. "Therefore, since I don't know, it can't... and shouldn't affect the larger long-term strategic interests of the American people in our foreign policy."[45]
Members of Congress of both parties reached disparate conclusions. According to The Washington Post, Senator Fred Thompson (a Republican from Tennessee) and chairman of the committee investigating the fundraising controversy, said he believed the Chinese plan targeted presidential and congressional elections while Democratic Senators Joe Lieberman and John Glenn said they believed the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections.[45]
Congressional investigations
[edit]With regard to their overall efficacy, investigators are on record as having stated that the Congressional investigations were hamstrung due to lack of co-operation of witnesses. Ninety-four people either refused to be questioned, pled the Fifth Amendment, or left the country altogether.[24][46][47]
The U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs held public hearings into the campaign finance issues from July to October 1997. The Committee, chaired by Republican Fred Thompson, adopted a Republican-written final report (the Wikisource referenced and appearing herein) on a straight party-line vote, 8 in favor and 7 opposing, in March 1998. Thompson described the findings as "not any one real big thing" but "a lot of things strung together that paint a real ugly picture."[48] The Democrats published a minority report dissenting with most of the conclusions of the final report, stating the evidence "does not support the conclusion that the China plan was aimed at, or affected, the 1996 presidential election."[48] Considerable acrimony was displayed during the hearings between Thompson and the ranking minority member, Democrat John Glenn, with the public disagreements between the two leaders reaching a level seldom seen in recent years in Congressional committees.[49]
A House investigation, headed by Indiana Republican Dan Burton focused on allegations of campaign finance abuse, including the contributions channeled through Chung, Huang, and Trie. The investigation was lengthy, spanning both the 105th and 106th Congresses, and according to a Democratic report had cost over $7.4 million as of August 31, 1998, making it the most expensive Congressional investigation ever (the Senate Watergate investigation cost $7 million in 1998 dollars).[50]
Norman Ornstein, a Congressional expert at the American Enterprise Institute said in May 1998, "Barring some dramatic change, I think the Burton investigation is going to be remembered as a case study in how not to do a congressional investigation and as a prime example of investigation as farce."[51] In a May 5, 1998, letter to other Republicans on the committee, Burton admitted that "mistakes and omissions were made" in tape transcripts released to the public of phone calls made by Webster Hubbell. A committee investigator who was an advocate of releasing the tapes resigned at Burton's request.[52]
Calls for an independent counsel
[edit]President Clinton's FBI Director Louis Freeh wrote in a 22-page memorandum to then Clinton's critics called of the scandal, nicknamed "Chinagate."[53] Attorney General Janet Reno said in November 1997 that "It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an independent counsel."[54]
In July 1998, the Justice Department's campaign finance task force head, Charles La Bella, sent a report to Janet Reno also recommending she seek an independent counsel to investigate alleged fundraising abuses by Democratic party officials.[55] The media reported that La Bella believed there was clearly an appearance of a conflict of interest by Reno.[56]
Robert Conrad, Jr., who later became head of the task force, called on Reno in Spring 2000 to appoint an independent counsel to look into the fundraising practices of Vice President Gore.[57]
Janet Reno declined all requests:
I try to do one thing: what's right. I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress. If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute —Janet Reno, December 4, 1997.[58]
A CNN/Time poll taken in May 1998 found 58 percent of Americans felt an independent counsel should have been appointed to investigate the controversy. Thirty-three percent were opposed. The same poll found that 47 percent of Americans believed a quid pro quo existed between the Clinton administration and the PRC government.[59]
Calls for impeachment
[edit]In 1997 Bob Barr and eighteen other Republicans signed a resolution to impeach Bill Clinton for alleged campaign finance law violations and obstruction of congressional investigations.[60] Anti Clinton activists collected 100,000 signatures supporting his impeachment.[61]
Criticism of investigation
[edit]In addition to partisan complaints from Republicans, columnists Charles Krauthammer, William Safire, and Morton Kondracke, as well as a number of FBI agents, suggested the investigations into the fundraising controversies were willfully impeded.[62][63][64]
FBI agent Ivian Smith wrote a letter to FBI Director Freeh that expressed "a lack of confidence" in the Justice Department's attorneys regarding the fundraising investigation. He wrote: "I am convinced the team at... [the Department of Justice] leading this investigation is, at best, simply not up to the task... The impression left is the emphasis on how not to prosecute matters, not how to aggressively conduct investigations leading to prosecutions." Smith and three other FBI agents later testified before Congress in late 1999 that Justice Department prosecutors impeded their inquiry. FBI agent Daniel Wehr told Congress that the first head U.S. attorney in the investigation, Laura Ingersoll, told the agents they should "not pursue any matter related to solicitation of funds for access to the president. The reason given was, 'That's the way the American political process works.' I was scandalized by that," Wehr said. The four FBI agents also said that Ingersoll prevented them from executing search warrants to stop destruction of evidence and micromanaged the case beyond all reason.[65]
FBI agents were also denied the opportunity to ask President Clinton and Vice President Gore questions during Justice Department interviews in 1997 and 1998 and were only allowed to take notes. During the interviews, neither Clinton nor Gore were asked any questions about fund-raisers John Huang and James Riady, nor the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple fundraising event led by Maria Hsia and attended by Huang and Ted Sioeng.[66]
See also
[edit]- 2019 Australian Parliament infiltration plot
- China–United States relations
- Chinese government interference in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections
- Citizens United v. FEC
- Christine Lee
- Follow the money
- Commerce Department trade mission controversy
- Lincoln Bedroom for contributors controversy
- China Lobby
- Campaign finance in the United States
- Campaign finance reform in the United States
- Frontline: "The Fixers", Season 15, Episode 6
- Legal dispute between former New Zealand Members of Parliament Simon Bridges and Jami-Lee Ross which stemmed from a donation to Bridges by Chinese businessman Yikun Zhang
References
[edit]- ^ Miller, Alan C., "Democrats Return Illegal Contribution" Archived September 12, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times, September 21, 1996
- ^ Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, "Chinese Embassy Role In Contributions Probed" Archived August 18, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, February 13, 1997
- ^ Ross, Robert S.,"The 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and Use of Force" Archived 2006-02-26 at the Wayback Machine, International Security, 25:2, pp. 87–123, Fall 2000, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 (PDF file)
- ^ a b Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). "Volume 4 of 6, Minority Views of Senators Glenn, Levin, Lieberman, Akaka, Durbin, Torricelli, and Cleland, Part 1. Foreign Influence, Chapter 2, The China Plan" in Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see [1] Archived November 13, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, and [2] Archived March 9, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is part of the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, [3] Archived October 7, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, given above.
- ^ Pomfret, John, "China Denies Contribution Charges" Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, May 20, 1998
- ^ 《調查》第28輯: 王健林一語道破天機 習家姐姐財富的流轉. 調查雜誌社. November 16, 2015. p. PT105. ISBN 9781681820330.
- ^ Campaign Finance Key Player: Yah Lin 'Charlie' Trie Archived April 5, 2017, at Archive-It Washington Post, March 4, 1998
- ^ a b c d e Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). "Summary of Findings" (Chapter 3), "The China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to the Effort of the People's Republic of China to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections" (Chapter 18), and "Charlie Trie's Contributions to the Presidential Legal Expense Trust (Chapter 20), in Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see [4] Archived November 13, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, [5] Archived July 9, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, [6] Archived October 12, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, and [7] Archived July 9, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, [8] Archived October 7, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, given above.
- ^ "Fund-raiser Charlie Trie pleads guilty under plea agreement". CNN. May 21, 1999. Archived from the original on August 5, 2006.
- ^ a b Jackson, David and Sun, Lena H., "Liu's Deals With Chung: An Intercontinental Puzzle" Archived August 18, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, May 24, 1998
- ^ Isikoff, Michael (February 9, 2004). "Cash and Kerry". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 4, 2013. Retrieved October 7, 2011.
- ^ Bunting, Glenn F.; Alan C. Miller; Rich Connell (November 28, 1996). "Donor Enjoyed Broad Access to White House". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 9, 2012. Retrieved October 7, 2011.
- ^ Johnston, David, "Committee Told Of Beijing Cash For Democrats " Archived September 12, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, May 12, 1999
- ^ "Chinese Aerospace Official Denies Giving To Dems". CNN. May 21, 1998. Archived from the original on May 24, 2008.
- ^ a b "James Riady Pleads Guilty" Archived 2005-11-29 at the Wayback Machine, Department of Justice, press release, January 11, 2001, Retrieved: April 14, 2006
- ^ "Campaign Finance Key Player: John Huang" Archived August 11, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, July 27, 1997
- ^ "The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Timeline" Archived August 18, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, July 1, 1997
- ^ "The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Cast of Characters" Archived September 9, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, July 1, 1997
- ^ "Highlights of U.S. report on alleged China spying" Archived February 16, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, May 25, 1999
- ^ "Former Democratic fund-raiser John Huang pleads guilty" Archived September 29, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, Aug. 12, 1999
- ^ Woodward, Bob, "Findings Link Clinton Allies to Chinese Intelligence" Archived August 2, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, Feb. 10, 1998
- ^ Eskenazi, Michael, "For both Gore and GOP, a guilty verdict to watch", CNN.com, March 3, 2000 Archived April 3, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Lewis, Neil A. (February 8, 2000). "Veteran Gore Fund-Raiser Goes on Trial". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2012. Retrieved January 3, 2009.
The real donors were ineligible to give the money either because the amount of their donations exceeded legal limits or they were foreign nationals who were prohibited from giving campaign contributions.
- ^ a b Abse, Nathan, "A Look at the 94 Who Aren't Talking" Archived August 10, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, June 9, 1998
- ^ "Buddhist Nuns Admit Destroying Documents". CNN. September 4, 1997. Archived from the original on April 24, 2009.
- ^ "Gore Admits Temple Fund-Raiser Was A 'Mistake'". CNN. January 24, 1997. Archived from the original on April 24, 2009.
- ^ a b "Senate Governmental Affairs Committee's Majority Report Executive Summary" Archived September 4, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, March 8, 1998
- ^ Huang, John, "Memo for Kim Tilley" Archived February 26, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, April 11, 1996
- ^ Lewis, Neil A. (March 3, 2000). "THE 2000 CAMPAIGN: CAMPAIGN FINANCE; Longtime Fund-Raiser for Gore Convicted in Donation Scheme". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2012. Retrieved January 3, 2009.
- ^ Jacobs, Paul; Morain, Dan (April 23, 1997). "Fong Returns $100,000 in Gifts". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 10, 2015.
- ^ "FBI Probes Businessman As Possible Chinese Agent". CNN. May 12, 1997. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009.
- ^ "Response To Majority Report". Fas.org. Archived from the original on June 4, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian "Senate Panel Is Briefed on China Probe Figure" Archived August 11, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, September 12, 1997
- ^ Seper, Jerry; Gertz, Bill (March 18, 2009). "Commerce pick tied to China cash". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on January 1, 2015. Retrieved December 27, 2014.
- ^ "Justice May Probe Links Between China Policy, Campaign Cash - May 17, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
- ^ "washingtonpost.com: Campaign Finance Special Report". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
- ^ "Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
- ^ "Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
- ^ "Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver - May 22, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
- ^ "Red Face Over China - June 1, 1998". www.cnn.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
- ^ a b Mintz, John (January 1, 2003). "2 U.S. space giants accused of aiding China / Hughes, Boeing allegedly gave away missile technology illegally". SFGATE. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
- ^ "Washingtonpost.com: Panel Faults Space Aid to China". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved January 27, 2022.
- ^ "Justice To Expand Inquiry To Clinton's Legal Fund" Archived September 9, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, December 19, 1996
- ^ "Clinton Wants Probe Of Possible Chinese Involvement" Archived December 15, 2004, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, February 13, 1997
- ^ a b c Harris, John F., "White House Unswayed By China Allegations" Archived August 2, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, July 20, 1997
- ^ Remarks by Senator Fred Thompson before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, October 8, 1997
- ^ "Campaign Finance Key Player: John Glenn Archived September 28, 2016, at the Wayback Machine" (March 4, 1998) The Washington Post
- ^ a b Crowley, Candy (1998) Thompson Committee Wraps Up Its Work Archived December 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine CNN (online, March 5), accessed 5 October 2015.
- ^ Rosenbaum, David E. (1997). "Campaign Finance: The Hearings; Anger Flares as Focus Shifts to Campaign Remedies," Archived September 7, 2017, at the Wayback Machine The New York Times (online, September 24), accessed 6 November 2015.
- ^ Cost of Congressional Campaign Finance Investigations to the U.S. Taxpayer, Minority Report: page 8 Archived 2006-01-27 at the Wayback Machine, U.S. House of Representatives, Retrieved: April 14, 2006
- ^ Lacey, Marc, "House Probe of Campaign Fund-Raising Uncovers Little, Piles Up Partisan Ill Will" Archived November 7, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Los Angeles Times, May 2, 1998
- ^ "Burton Apologizes In Hubbell Tapes Furor: House committee investigator quits; Democrats want Burton out, CNN, May 8, 1998 Archived November 19, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Yuwu Song, ed., Encyclopedia of Chinese-American Relations (McFarland, 2009) p 63.
- ^ Lewis, Neil A., "Freeh Says Reno Clearly Misread Prosecutor Law", The New York Times, June 16, 1998
- ^ Thomas, Pierre, "Reno Aide Recommends Independent Campaign Finance Probe" Archived February 10, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, July 23, 1998
- ^ Politics and Prosecution Discussion, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, transcript, PBS, August 4, 1998, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 Archived May 16, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Fund-raising Investigation Discussion, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, transcript, PBS, June 23, 2000, Retrieved: April 14, 2006 Archived October 12, 2004, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Reno Defends Independent Counsel Decision" Archived May 17, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, December 4, 1997
- ^ Holland, Keating, "Poll: Independent Counsel Should Investigate China Policy Decisions" Archived January 2, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, CNN.com, May 20, 1998
- ^ "17 Nov 1997, Page 3 - Asheville Citizen-Times at Newspapers.com". Newspapers.com. Retrieved November 21, 2021.
- ^ "5 Dec 1997, Page 20 - Standard-Speaker at Newspapers.com". Newspapers.com. Retrieved November 21, 2021.
- ^ Krauthammer, Charles, "Reno's Humiliation" Archived April 17, 2017, at the Wayback Machine (Opinion), The Washington Post, October 10, 1997
- ^ Safire, William, "Those Chinese Agents" (Opinion), The New York Times, October 7, 1999
- ^ Kondracke, Morton, "GOP must launch new probe of Chinagate" Archived August 28, 2005, at the Wayback Machine (Opinion), Jewish World Review, August 9, 1999
- ^ "FBI agents criticize Justice Department" Archived October 6, 2001, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, September 22, 1999
- ^ "Justice's Clinton, Gore inquiry criticized" Archived July 4, 2004, at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, December 16, 1999
Further reading
[edit]- Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). E.g., "Summary of Findings" (Chapter 3), "The China Connection: Summary of Committee's Findings Relating to the Effort of the People's Republic of China to Influence U.S. Policies and Elections" (Chapter 18), and "Charlie Trie's Contributions to the Presidential Legal Expense Trust (Chapter 20), in Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see [9], [10], [11], and [12], accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is the full citation and an alternate web location of the WikiSource, [13], given above.
- Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1998). E.g., "Volume 4 of 6, Minority Views of Senators Glenn, Levin, Lieberman, Akaka, Durbin, Torricelli, and Cleland, Part 1. Foreign Influence, Chapter 2, The China Plan" in Investigation of Illegal or Improper Activities in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns, Final Report (Senate Report 105-167, March 10, 1998, 105th Congress, 2d Session), see [14], and [15], accessed 6 October 2015. Note, this is part of the full citation and an alternative web location of the WikiSource, [16], given above.
External links
[edit]- Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Report in full: 1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns
- Washington Post archives of campaign finance controversy stories, 1997-1999
- Washington Post archives of campaign finance controversy stories, 1998–2002