Jump to content

TNT equivalent: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted good faith edits by 88.203.2.126 (talk): "metric ton" is not ambiguous, and it's the official US spelling
 
(599 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Class of units of measurement for explosive energy}}
{{Redirect|Kiloton|the similarly named weight measurements|Tonne}}
{{Redirect|Kiloton|the similarly named weight measurements|Tonne}}
<!-- Kiloton, Megaton redirect here -->
<!-- Kiloton redirects here -->
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2022}}
[[Image:Nukecloud.png|thumb|Diagram of explosive yield vs [[mushroom cloud]] height, illustrating the difference between 22 kiloton [[Fat Man]] and 15 megaton [[Castle Bravo]] explosions]]
{{Infobox unit
'''TNT equivalent''' is a method of quantifying the energy released in explosions. The "ton of TNT" is a [[Units of energy|unit of energy]] equal to 4.184 [[gigajoule]]s, which is approximately the amount of energy released in the detonation of one [[metric ton]] of [[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]]. The "megaton of TNT" is a unit of energy equal to 4.184 [[petajoules]].<ref>[http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/joules-to-megatons-conversion.html Joules to Megatons Conversion Calculator]</ref>
| bgcolor =
| name = TNT equivalent
| image = Atomic blast Nevada Yucca 1951.jpg
| caption = The explosion from a 14-kiloton nuclear test at the [[Nevada Test Site]], in 1951
| standard = Non-standard
| quantity = Energy
| symbol = t
| symbol2 = {{em|ton of TNT}}
| extradata =
| units1 = [[SI base unit]]s
| inunits1 = ≈{{thin space}}{{val|4.184|u=gigajoules}}
| units2 = [[Centimetre–gram–second system of units|CGS]]
| inunits2 = {{val|e=9|u=calories}}
| units3 = [[United States customary units|US customary]]


}}
The kiloton and megaton of TNT have traditionally been used to rate the energy output, and hence destructive power, of [[nuclear weapon]]s (see [[nuclear weapon yield]]). This unit is written into various [[CTBT|nuclear weapon control treaties]], and gives a sense of destructiveness as compared with ordinary [[explosive]]s, like TNT. More recently, it has been used to describe the energy released in other highly destructive events, such as [[asteroid]] impacts. However, TNT is not the most energetic of conventional explosives. [[Dynamite#Difference from TNT|Dynamite]], for example, has about 60% more [[energy density]] (approximately 7.5 MJ/kg, compared to about 4.7 MJ/kg for TNT).


'''TNT equivalent''' is a convention for expressing [[energy]], typically used to describe the energy released in an explosion. The {{em|ton of [[TNT]]}} is a [[unit of energy]] defined by convention to be {{val|4.184|ul=gigajoules}} ({{val|1|ul=gigacalorie}}),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/tons-explosives-to-gigajoules-conversion.html |title=Tons (Explosives) to Gigajoules Conversion Calculator |work=unitconversion.org |access-date=2016-01-06 |archive-date=2017-03-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170317051223/http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/tons-explosives-to-gigajoules-conversion.html |url-status=live }}</ref> which is the approximate energy released in the detonation of a [[tonne|metric ton]] (1,000 kilograms) of [[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]]. In other words, for each gram of TNT exploded, {{val|4.184|u=[[kilojoules]]}} (or 4184 [[joules]]) of energy are released.
== Value ==
A gram of [[trinitrotoluene|TNT]] releases 4100–4602 [[joule]]s upon explosion. To define the '''tonne of TNT''', this was arbitrarily standardized by letting 1&nbsp;gram TNT = 4184&nbsp;[[Joule|J]] (exactly).<ref>[http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/appenB8.html NIST Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI): Appendix B8 – Factors for Units Listed Alphabetically]</ref> This conveniently defined the energy liberated by one gram of TNT as exactly one [[Calorie|kilocalorie]].


This convention intends to compare the destructiveness of an event with that of conventional [[explosive material]]s, of which TNT is a typical example, although other conventional explosives such as [[dynamite]] contain more energy.
This definition is a conventional one. The explosive's energy is normally calculated using the [[thermodynamic work]] energy of detonation, which for TNT has been accurately measured at 4686&nbsp;J/g from large numbers of air blast experiments and theoretically calculated to be 4853&nbsp;J/g.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Cooper|first= Paul|title=Explosives Engineering|location= New York|publisher= Wiley-VCH|year= 1996|page= 406}}</ref>


== Kiloton and megaton ==
The measured pure [[heat]] output of a gram of TNT is only 2724&nbsp;J,<ref>{{cite book|isbn=978-1426624599|url=http://muller.lbl.gov/teaching/Physics10/old%20physics%2010/chapters%20(old)/1-Explosions.htm |title=Physics for Future Presidents, a textbook|year= 2001–2002|first= Richard A. |last=Muller|chapter= Chapter 1. Energy, Power, and Explosions}}</ref> but this is not the important value for explosive blast effect calculations.
The "'''kiloton''' (of TNT equivalent)" is a unit of energy equal to 4.184 [[Metric prefix#List of SI prefixes|tera]]joules ({{val|4.184|e=12|u=J}}).<ref>{{Cite web |title=Convert Megaton to Joule |url=https://www.unitconverters.net/energy/megaton-to-joule.htm |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=www.unitconverters.net}}</ref> A kiloton of TNT can be visualized as a cube of TNT {{convert|8.46|m|ft}} on a side.


The "'''megaton''' (of TNT equivalent)" is a unit of energy equal to 4.184 petajoules ({{val|4.184|e=15|u=J}}).<ref>{{Cite web |title=Convert Gigaton to Joule |url=https://www.unitconverters.net/energy/gigaton-to-joule.htm |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=www.unitconverters.net}}</ref>
Alternative TNT equivalency can be calculated depending upon when in the detonation the value is measured and which property is being compared.<ref>Sorin Bastea, Laurence E. Fried, Kurt R. Glaesemann, W. Michael Howard, P. Clark Souers, Peter A. Vitello, Cheetah 5.0 User's Manual, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2007.</ref><ref>Jon L. Maienschein. Estimating equivalency of explosives through a thermochemical approach. Technical Report UCRL-JC-147683, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2002. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241114.pdf</ref><ref>Jon L. Maienschein. Tnt equivalency of different explosives – estimation for calculating load limits in heaf firing tanks. Technical Report EMPE-02-22, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2002.</ref><ref>Bruce J. Cunningham. C-4/tnt equivalency. Technical Report EMPE-01-81, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2001.</ref>


The kiloton and megaton of TNT equivalent have traditionally been used to describe the energy output, and hence the destructive power, of a [[nuclear weapon]]. The TNT equivalent appears in various [[CTBT|nuclear weapon control treaties]], and has been used to characterize the energy released in [[Impact event|asteroid impact]]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/joules-to-megatons-conversion.html|title=Joules to Megatons Conversion Calculator|work=unitconversion.org|access-date=2009-11-23|archive-date=2009-11-24|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091124011206/http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/joules-to-megatons-conversion.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
A kiloton of TNT can be visualized as a cube of TNT of {{convert|8.46|m|ft}} on a side.

== Historical derivation of the value ==

Alternative values for TNT equivalency can be calculated according to which property is being compared and when in the two detonation processes the values are measured.<ref>Sorin Bastea, Laurence E. Fried, Kurt R. Glaesemann, W. Michael Howard, P. Clark Souers, Peter A. Vitello, Cheetah 5.0 User's Manual, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2007.</ref><ref>{{cite tech report |first=Jon L. |last=Maienschein |title=Estimating equivalency of explosives through a thermochemical approach |number=UCRL-JC-147683 |institution=Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |year=2002 |url=https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241114.pdf |format=PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221173225/http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241114.pdf |archive-date=December 21, 2016 |url-status=dead |access-date=December 12, 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite tech report |first=Jon L. |last=Maienschein |title=Tnt equivalency of different explosives – estimation for calculating load limits in heaf firing tanks |number=EMPE-02-22 |institution=Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |year=2002 }}</ref><ref>{{cite tech report |first=Bruce J. |last=Cunningham |title=C-4/tnt equivalency |number=EMPE-01-81 |institution=Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |year=2001 }}</ref>

Where for example the comparison is by energy yield, an explosive's energy is normally expressed for chemical purposes as the [[thermodynamic work]] produced by its detonation. For TNT this has been accurately measured as 4,686&nbsp;J/g from a large sample of air blast experiments, and theoretically calculated to be 4,853&nbsp;J/g.<ref>{{cite book|last=Cooper|first= Paul W. |title=Explosives Engineering|location= New York|publisher= Wiley-VCH|year= 1996|page= 406 |isbn=978-0-471-18636-6}}</ref>

However even on this basis, comparing the actual energy yields of a large nuclear device and an explosion of TNT can be slightly inaccurate. Small TNT explosions, especially in the open, don't tend to burn the carbon-particle and hydrocarbon products of the explosion. Gas-expansion and pressure-change effects tend to "freeze" the burn rapidly. A large open explosion of TNT may maintain fireball temperatures high enough so that some of those products do burn up with atmospheric oxygen.<ref
name="Needham">
{{cite book
| author = Charles E. Needham
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=JXo4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA91
| title = Blast Waves
| language = en
| date = Oct 3, 2017
| isbn = 978-3319653822
| oclc = 1005353847
| page = 91
| publisher=Springer | archive-url = https://archive.today/20181226201600/https://books.google.cz/books?id=JXo4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91&dq=tnt+soot+burn+up&source=bl&ots=wZbK8Emrf6&sig=M1N5i8i8ENytJDvWgqyzaB7j5CI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjul7Chu47fAhWEmLQKHToJDtIQ6AEwAHoECAkQAQ%23v=onepage&q=tnt%20soot%20burn%20up&f=false
| archive-date = December 26, 2018
| url-status = live
| access-date = January 25, 2019
| df = mdy-all
}}</ref>

Such differences can be substantial. For safety purposes a range as wide as {{val|2673|–|6702|u=J|fmt=commas}} has been stated for a gram of [[trinitrotoluene|TNT]] upon explosion.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00629253/document|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160810225249/http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00629253/document|url-status=dead|title=Blast effects of external explosions (Section 4.8. Limitations of the TNT equivalent method)|archivedate=August 10, 2016}}</ref> Thus one can state that a nuclear bomb has a yield of 15&nbsp;kt ({{val|6.3|e=13|u=J}}), but the explosion of an actual {{val|15000|u=ton|fmt=commas}} pile of TNT may yield (for example) {{val|8|e=13|u=J}} due to additional carbon/hydrocarbon oxidation not present with small open-air charges.<ref name="Needham"/>

These complications have been sidestepped by convention. The energy released by one gram of TNT was arbitrarily defined as a matter of convention to be 4,184&nbsp;J,<ref>{{cite web|title=Appendix B8 – Factors for Units Listed Alphabetically|url=http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/appenB8.html|date=2009-07-02|access-date=2007-03-29|archive-date=2016-01-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160129233551/http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/appenB8.html|url-status=live}} In {{harvnb|NIST SI Guide|2008}}</ref> which is exactly one [[Calorie|kilocalorie]].


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Grams TNT
! Grams TNT
! Symbol
! Symbol
! Tons TNT
! Tons TNT
! Symbol
! Symbol
! Energy
! Energy [joules]
! Energy [Wh]
! Corresponding mass loss
! Corresponding mass loss{{efn|[[Mass–energy equivalence]].}}
|-
| milligram of TNT
| mg
| nanoton of TNT
| nt
| {{val|4.184|u=J}} or 4.184 joules
| 1.162 mWh
| 46.55 fg
|-
|-
| gram of TNT
| gram of TNT
Line 29: Line 82:
| microton of TNT
| microton of TNT
| μt
| μt
| 4.184{{e|3}}&nbsp;J
| {{val|4.184|e=3|u=J}} or 4.184 kilojoules
| 1.162 Wh
| 46.55 pg
| 46.55 pg
|-
|-
Line 36: Line 90:
| milliton of TNT
| milliton of TNT
| mt
| mt
| 4.184{{e|6}}&nbsp;J
| {{val|4.184|e=6|u=J}} or 4.184 megajoules
| 46.55 ng
| 1.162 kWh
| 46.55&nbsp;ng
|-
|-
| megagram of TNT
| megagram of TNT
Line 43: Line 98:
| ton of TNT
| ton of TNT
| t
| t
| 4.184{{e|9}}&nbsp;J
| {{val|4.184|e=9|u=J}} or 4.184 gigajoules
| 1.162 MWh
| 46.55 μg
| 46.55 μg
|-
|-
Line 50: Line 106:
| kiloton of TNT
| kiloton of TNT
| kt
| kt
| 4.184{{e|12}}&nbsp;J
| {{val|4.184|e=12|u=J}} or 4.184 terajoules
| 46.55 mg
| 1.162 GWh
| 46.55&nbsp;mg
|-
|-
| teragram of TNT
| teragram of TNT
Line 57: Line 114:
| megaton of TNT
| megaton of TNT
| Mt
| Mt
| 4.184{{e|15}}&nbsp;J
| {{val|4.184|e=15|u=J}} or 4.184 petajoules
| 1.162 TWh
| 46.55 g
| 46.55 g
|-
|-
Line 64: Line 122:
| gigaton of TNT
| gigaton of TNT
| Gt
| Gt
| 4.184{{e|18}}&nbsp;J
| {{val|4.184|e=18|u=J}} or 4.184 exajoules
| 46.55 kg
| 1.162 PWh
| 46.55&nbsp;kg
|}
|}

== Conversion to other units ==
1 ton of TNT equivalent is approximately:
* {{val|1.0|e=9}} [[calorie]]s<ref>{{Cite web |title=Tons Of Tnt to Calories {{!}} Kyle's Converter |url=http://www.kylesconverter.com/energy,-work,-and-heat/tons-of-tnt-to-calories |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=www.kylesconverter.com}}</ref>
* {{val|4.184|e=9}} [[joule]]s<ref>{{Cite web |title=Convert tons of TNT to joules {{!}} energy conversion |url=http://convert-to.com/conversion/energy/convert-tn-to-j.html |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=convert-to.com}}</ref>
* {{val|3.96831|e=6}} [[British thermal unit]]s<ref>{{Cite web |title=Convert tons of TNT to BTU - British Thermal Unit {{!}} energy conversion |url=http://convert-to.com/conversion/energy/convert-tn-to-btu.html |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=convert-to.com}}</ref>
* {{val|3.086|e=9}} [[foot-pounds]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Convert tons of TNT to foot pounds {{!}} energy conversion |url=http://convert-to.com/conversion/energy/convert-tn-to-ft-lb.html |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=convert-to.com}}</ref>
* {{val|1.162|e=3}} [[kilowatt-hours]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Tons Of Tnt to Kilowatt-hours {{!}} Kyle's Converter |url=http://www.kylesconverter.com/energy,-work,-and-heat/tons-of-tnt-to-kilowatt--hours |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=www.kylesconverter.com}}</ref>
* {{val|2.611|e=28}} [[electronvolts]]


== Examples ==
== Examples ==
{{Further|Orders of magnitude (energy)}}
* Conventional bombs yield range from less than 1 ton to [[FOAB]]'s 44 tonnes.

* The [[MythBusters]] homemade diamonds episode used 2.5 tons of [[ANFO]] to make diamonds.
{|class=wikitable
* [[Minor Scale]], a 1985 United States conventional explosion utilizing 4,744 tons of [[ANFO]] explosive to provide a scaled equivalent airblast of an 8 kiloton (33.44 TJ) nuclear device,<ref>{{cite paper |title=Minor Scale Event, Test Execution Report |author=TECH REPS INC ALBUQUERQUE NM |year=1986 |url=http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA269600 |format=PDF}}</ref> is believed to be the largest planned detonation of conventional explosives in history.
! colspan="2" |Energy
* The [[Halifax Explosion]] in 1917 involved the accidental detonation of 3,000 tons of TNT.
! rowspan="2" |Description
* The [[Little Boy]] [[atomic bomb]] dropped on [[Hiroshima]] on August 6, 1945 exploded with an energy of about {{convert|15|ktonTNT}}, and the [[Fat Man]] [[atomic bomb]] dropped on [[Nagasaki]] on August 9, 1945 exploded with an energy of about {{convert|20|ktonTNT}}. The nuclear weapons currently in the arsenal of the United States range in [[nuclear weapon yield|yield]] from {{convert|0.3|ktonTNT|abbr=on}} to {{convert|1.2|MtonTNT|abbr=on}} equivalent, for the [[B83 nuclear bomb|B83]] strategic bomb.
|-
* During the [[Cold War]], the United States developed [[hydrogen bomb]]s with a maximum theoretical yield of {{convert|25|MtonTNT}}; the [[Soviet Union]] developed a prototype weapon, nicknamed the [[Tsar Bomba]], which was tested at {{convert|50|MtonTNT|abbr=on}}, but had a maximum theoretical yield of {{convert|100|MtonTNT|abbr=on}}.<ref>See [http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Wpngall.html Currently deployed U.S. nuclear weapon yields], [http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html Complete List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons], [http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Russia/TsarBomba.html Tsar Bomba], all from Carey Sublette's Nuclear Weapon Archive.</ref> The actual destructive potential of such weapons can vary greatly depending on conditions, such as the altitude at which they are detonated, the nature of the target they are detonated against, and the physical features of the landscape where they are detonated.
! Megatons of TNT
* The energy contained in 1 megaton of TNT (4.2 PJ) is enough to power the average American household (in the year 2007) for 103,474 years.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/electricity_faqs.asp#electricity_use_home|title=Frequently Asked Questions – Electricity |date=2009-10-06|publisher=[[United States Department of Energy]]|accessdate=2009-10-21}} (Calculated from 2007 value of 936 kWh monthly usage)</ref> For example, the {{convert|30|MtonTNT|abbr=on}} estimated upper limit blast power of the [[Tunguska event]] could power the aforementioned home for just over 3,104,226 years. To put that in perspective: the blast energy could power the entire United States for 3.27 days.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2042rank.html|title=Country Comparison :: Electricity – consumption|work=The World Factbook|publisher=[[CIA]]|accessdate=2009-10-22}} (Calculated from 2007 value of 3,892,000,000,000 kWh annual usage)</ref>
! [[Watt-hours]] [Wh]
* [[Megathrust earthquake]]s record huge ''M''<sub>W</sub> values, or total energy released. The [[2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake]] released 9,560 Gt, or 9,560,000 megatons, TNT equivalent, but its ''M''<sub>E</sub> (surface rupture energy, or potential for damage) was far smaller at {{convert|26.3|MtonTNT}}.
|-
* The total energy of all explosives used in World War Two (including the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs) is estimated to have been 3 megatons of TNT.
| {{val|1e−12}}
* The total global nuclear arsenal is about 30,000 nuclear warheads with a destructive capacity of 5,000 megatons or 5 gigatons (5,000 million tons) of TNT.
| 1.162&nbsp;Wh
* The approximate energy released when the largest fragment of [[Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9]] impacted [[Jupiter]] was estimated to be equal to 6 million megatons (or 6 trillion tons) of TNT.
| ≈ 1 food [[calorie]] (large calorie, kcal), which is the approximate amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of one [[kilogram]] of water by one degree [[Celsius]] at a pressure of one [[atmosphere (unit)|atmosphere]].
* The maximum theoretical yield from 1&nbsp;kg of matter by converting all of the mass into energy (by [[mass–energy equivalence]], ''E'' = ''mc''<sup>2</sup>) yields 89.8 petajoules or the equivalent of 21.5 megatons of TNT. No practical method of total conversion exists today, such as combining 500 grams of matter with 500 grams of antimatter. However, in the case of proton–[[antiproton]] [[annihilation]], approximately 50% of the released energy will escape in the form of [[neutrinos]], which are almost undetectable.<ref>see {{Cite conference|id={{hdl|2060/19960020441}}|doi=10.2514/6.1987-1814|first=Stanley K.|last= Borowski|url=http://www.koreadefence.net/data/board_notice/1279622538-97.pdf|title= Comparison of Fusion/Antiproton Propulsion systems|month=March|work=NASA Glenn Research Center
|-
|conference=23rd Joint Propulsion Conference|year= 1996 }}</ref> [[Electron-positron annihilation]] events emit their energy entirely as [[gamma rays]].
| {{val|1e−9}}
* The approximate energy released when the [[Chicxulub crater|Chicxulub impact]] caused the [[mass extinction]] 66 million years ago was estimated to be equal to 100 teratons (i.e. 100 exagrams or approximately 220.462 quadrillion pounds) of TNT. That is roughly 8 billion times stronger than each of the bombs that hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the most energetic event on the history of Earth for billions of years, far more powerful than any volcanic eruption, earthquake or firestorm. Such an explosion annihilated everything within a thousand miles of the impact in a split second. Such energy could also power the whole Earth for several centuries.
| 1.162&nbsp;kWh
* The amount of energy given in the [[2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami]] was more than 200,000 times the surface energy and was calculated by the USGS at 3.9×10<sup>22</sup> joules,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0001xgp/neic_c0001xgp_wmt.php |title=USGS.gov: USGS WPhase Moment Solution |publisher=Earthquake.usgs.gov |accessdate=13 March 2011| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/5x9dgiIL8 | archivedate=13 March 2011| deadurl=no}}</ref> slightly less than the 2004 Indian Ocean quake. This is equivalent to 9,320 gigatons of TNT, or approximately 600 million times the energy of the [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima bomb]].
| Under controlled conditions one kilogram of TNT can destroy (or even obliterate) a small vehicle.
* On a much grander scale, [[supernova]] explosions give off about 10<sup>44</sup> joules of energy, which is about a hundred billion yottatons (ten octillion (10<sup>28</sup>) megatons) of TNT, equivalent to the explosive force of a quantity of TNT a trillion (10<sup>12</sup>) times the mass of the planet Earth.
|-
* The largest supernova explosions witnessed, so-called [[Gamma-ray burst]]s (GRBs) released more than 10<sup>46</sup> joules of energy<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1126/science.1242279|title=GRB 130427A: A Nearby Ordinary Monster|year=2013|last1=Maselli|first1=A.|last2=Melandri|first2=A.|last3=Nava|first3=L.|last4=Mundell|first4=C. G.|last5=Kawai|first5=N.|last6=Campana|first6=S.|last7=Covino|first7=S.|last8=Cummings|first8=J. R.|last9=Cusumano|first9=G.|last10=Evans|first10=P. A.|last11=Ghirlanda|first11=G.|last12=Ghisellini|first12=G.|last13=Guidorzi|first13=C.|last14=Kobayashi|first14=S.|last15=Kuin|first15=P.|last16=La Parola|first16=V.|last17=Mangano|first17=V.|last18=Oates|first18=S.|last19=Sakamoto|first19=T.|last20=Serino|first20=M.|last21=Virgili|first21=F.|last22=Zhang|first22=B.- B.|last23=Barthelmy|first23=S.|last24=Beardmore|first24=A.|last25=Bernardini|first25=M. G.|last26=Bersier|first26=D.|last27=Burrows|first27=D.|last28=Calderone|first28=G.|last29=Capalbi|first29=M.|last30=Chiang|first30=J.|displayauthors=30|journal=Science|volume=343|issue=6166|pages=48–51|pmid=24263134 }}</ref>, an amount no longer useful to compare with TNT equivalents.
| {{Val|4.8|e=−9}}
| 5.6 kWh
| The energy to burn 1 kilogram of wood.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Timcheck |first=Jonathan |date=Fall 2017 |title=The Energy in Wildfires: The Western United States |url=http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2017/ph240/timcheck1/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180117183718/http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2017/ph240/timcheck1/ |archive-date=17 January 2018 |access-date=2022-03-31 |website=large.stanford.edu}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|1e−8}}
| 11.62&nbsp;kWh
| The approximate radiant heat energy released during 3-phase, 600&nbsp;V, 100&nbsp;kA [[Arc fault|arcing fault]] in a {{convert|20|x|20|x|20|in|m|sigfig=1|order=flip|abbr=on}} compartment within a 1-second period<!-- a "time interval" is a period-->.{{Explain|date=May 2015}}{{citation needed|date=May 2022}}
|-
| {{val|1.2e−8}}
| 13.94&nbsp;kWh
| Amount of TNT used (12&nbsp;kg) in [[Botroseya Church bombing|Coptic church explosion]] in [[Cairo]], [[Egypt]] on December 11, 2016 that left 29 dead and 47 injured<ref>{{cite news |date=4 February 2017 |title=Botroseya church bombing death toll rises to 29 victims |url=https://www.egyptindependent.com/botroseya-church-bombing-death-toll-rises-29-victims/ |publisher=[[Egypt Independent]] |access-date=8 June 2024|archive-date=24 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240524230421/https://www.egyptindependent.com/botroseya-church-bombing-death-toll-rises-29-victims/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| {{val|1.9e−6}}
| 2.90&nbsp;MWh
| The television show ''[[MythBusters]]'' used 2.5&nbsp;tons of [[ANFO]] to make "homemade" diamonds. ([[MythBusters (2009 season)#Homemade Diamonds|Episode 116]].)
|-
| {{val|2.4e−7}}–{{val|2.4e−6}}
| 280–2,800&nbsp;kWh
| The energy output released by an average [[lightning]] discharge.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2007-03-06 |title=How do Thunderstorms and Lightning Work? |url=https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/science-features/how-do-thunderstorms-and-lightning-work |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=www.thenakedscientists.com |language=en-gb}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|1|–|44|e=−6}}
| 1.16–51.14&nbsp;MWh
| Conventional bombs yield from less than one ton to [[FOAB]]'s 44&nbsp;tons. The yield of a [[Tomahawk cruise missile]] is equivalent to 500&nbsp;kg of TNT.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=syAvfwornA0C&q=10+meter+accuracy&pg=PA248|title=The Ingenuity Gap|isbn=978-0-375-71328-6|last1=Homer-Dixon|first1=Thomas F|year=2002|pages=249|publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing |access-date=2020-11-07|archive-date=2021-01-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114192246/https://books.google.com/books?id=syAvfwornA0C&q=10+meter+accuracy&pg=PA248|url-status=live}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|4.54|e=−4}}
| 581&nbsp;MWh
| A real {{convert|0.454|ktonTNT|adj=on}} charge at [[Operation Sailor Hat]]. If the charge were a full sphere, it would be {{convert|1|ktonTNT}}. [[File:Sailor Hat Shot.jpg|thumb|upright|454 tons of [[trinitrotoluene|TNT]] ({{convert|17|by|34|ft|m|0|abbr=on|order=flip}}) awaiting [[detonation]] at [[Operation Sailor Hat]].]]
|-
| {{val|1.8e−3}}
| 2.088&nbsp;GWh
| Estimated yield of the [[2020 Beirut explosions|Beirut explosion]] of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate<ref>{{cite web |last1=Fuwad |first1=Ahamad |title=Beirut Blast: How does yield of 2,750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate compare against Halifax explosion, Hiroshima bombing? |url=https://www.dnaindia.com/world/report-beirut-blast-how-does-yield-of-2750-tonnes-of-ammonium-nitrate-compare-against-halifax-explosion-hiroshima-bombing-2836137 |website=DNA India |access-date=7 August 2020 |language=en |date=5 August 2020 |archive-date=6 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806231755/https://www.dnaindia.com/world/report-beirut-blast-how-does-yield-of-2750-tonnes-of-ammonium-nitrate-compare-against-halifax-explosion-hiroshima-bombing-2836137 |url-status=live }}</ref> that killed initially 137 at and near a Lebanese port at 6 p.m. local time Tuesday August 4, 2020.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Staff |first1=W. S. J. |title=Beirut Explosion: What Happened in Lebanon and Everything Else You Need to Know |journal=Wall Street Journal |date=6 August 2020 |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/beirut-explosion-what-happened-in-lebanon-and-everything-else-you-need-to-know-11596590426 |access-date=7 August 2020 |issn=0099-9660 |archive-date=6 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806193617/https://www.wsj.com/articles/beirut-explosion-what-happened-in-lebanon-and-everything-else-you-need-to-know-11596590426 |url-status=live }}</ref> An independent study by experts from the Blast and Impact Research Group at the [[University of Sheffield]] predicts the best estimate of the yield of Beirut explosion to be 0.5 kilotons of TNT and the reasonable bound estimate as 1.12 kilotons of TNT.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Rigby|first1=S. E.|last2=Lodge|first2=T. J.|last3=Alotaibi|first3=S.|last4=Barr|first4=A. D.|last5=Clarke|first5=S. D.|last6=Langdon|first6=G. S.|author6-link=Genevieve Langdon|last7=Tyas|first7=A.|date=2020-09-22|title=Preliminary yield estimation of the 2020 Beirut explosion using video footage from social media|journal=Shock Waves|volume=30|issue=6|pages=671–675|language=en|doi=10.1007/s00193-020-00970-z|bibcode=2020ShWav..30..671R|issn=1432-2153|doi-access=free}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|1|–|2|e=−3}}
| 1.16–2.32 GWh
| Estimated yield of the [[Oppau explosion]] that killed more than 500 at a German fertilizer factory in 1921.
|-
| {{val|2.3e−3}}
| 2.67&nbsp;GWh
| Amount of [[solar energy]] falling on {{convert|1|acre|m2|order=flip|abbr=on}} of land in a year is {{convert|2650|MWh|TJ|order=flip|abbr=on}} (an average over the Earth's surface).<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Kennewell |first1=John |last2=McDonald |first2=Andrew |title=The Sun and Solar Activity - The Solar Constant |url=https://www.sws.bom.gov.au/Educational/2/1/12 |access-date=2024-11-13 |website=www.sws.bom.gov.au |language=en}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|2.9e−3}}
| 3.4&nbsp;GWh
| The [[Halifax Explosion]] in 1917 was the accidental detonation of 200&nbsp;tons of TNT and 2,300&nbsp;tons of [[Picric acid]]<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Ruffman |first1=Alan |title=Ground Zero: A Reassessment of the 1917 Explosion in Halifax Harbour |last2=Howell |first2=Colin |publisher=Nimbus Publishing |year=1994 |isbn=978-1-55109-095-5}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|3.2e−3}}
| 3.6&nbsp;GWh
| The [[Operation Big Bang]] on April 18, 1947, blasted the bunkers on [[Heligoland]]. It accumulated 6700 metric tons of surplus World War II ammunition placed in various locations around the island and set off. The energy released was {{val|1.3e13|u=J}}, or about 3.2 kilotons of TNT equivalent.<ref name="Willmore">{{cite journal|title=Seismic Experiments on the North German Explosions, 1946 to 1947|last=Willmore |first=PL|journal=[[Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]]|volume=242|issue=843|pages=123–151|year=1949|jstor = 91443|issn=0080-4614|doi=10.1098/rsta.1949.0007 |bibcode=1949RSPTA.242..123W|doi-access=free}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|4e−3}}
| 9.3&nbsp;GWh
| [[Minor Scale]], a 1985 United States conventional explosion, using 4,744&nbsp;tons of [[ANFO]] explosive to provide a scaled equivalent airblast of an eight kiloton (33.44&nbsp;TJ) nuclear device,<ref>{{cite web |title=Minor Scale Event, Test Execution Report |author=Tech Reps |location=Albuerque, NM |year=1986 |hdl=100.2/ADA269600 | url=https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA269600.pdf}}</ref> is believed to be the largest planned detonation of conventional explosives in history.
|-
| {{val|1.5|–|2|e=−2}}
| 17.4–23.2&nbsp;GWh
| The [[Little Boy]] [[atomic bomb]] dropped on [[Hiroshima]] on August 6, 1945, exploded with an energy of about {{convert|15|ktonTNT}} killing between 90,000 and 166,000 people,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|date=2012-08-09|title=Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Long Term Health Effects|url=http://www.k1project.org/explore-health/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-the-long-term-health-effects|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150723042220/http://k1project.org/explore-health/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-the-long-term-health-effects|archive-date=2015-07-23|access-date=2021-01-07|website=K1 project}}</ref> and the [[Fat Man]] [[atomic bomb]] dropped on [[Nagasaki]] on August 9, 1945, exploded with an energy of about {{convert|20|ktonTNT}} killing over 60,000.<ref name=":0" /> The modern nuclear weapons in the United States arsenal range in [[nuclear weapon yield|yield]] from {{convert|0.3|ktonTNT|abbr=on}} to {{convert|1.2|MtonTNT|abbr=on}} equivalent, for the [[B83 nuclear bomb|B83]] strategic bomb.
|-
| >{{val|2.4e-1}}
| 280 GWh
| The typical energy yield of severe [[thunderstorm]]s.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Crook |first=Aaron |date=10 February 2010 |title=The gathering storms |url=http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/3302/full |website=Cosmos |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120404113209/http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/3302/full |archive-date=4 April 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
|-
| {{Val|1.5|e=−5}} – {{Val|6|e=−1}}
| 20 MWh – 700 GWh
| The estimated [[kinetic energy]] of [[tornado]]s.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fricker |first1=Tyler |last2=Elsner |first2=James B. |date=2015-07-01 |title=Kinetic Energy of Tornadoes in the United States |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=10 |issue=7 |pages=e0131090 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0131090 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=4489157 |pmid=26132830|bibcode=2015PLoSO..1031090F |doi-access=free }}</ref>
|-
| 1
| 1.16&nbsp;TWh
| The energy contained in one megaton of TNT (4.2&nbsp;PJ) is enough to power the average American household for 103,000 years.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/electricity_faqs.asp#electricity_use_home|title=Frequently Asked Questions – Electricity|date=2009-10-06|publisher=[[United States Department of Energy]]|access-date=2009-10-21|archive-date=2010-11-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123165406/http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/electricity_faqs.asp#electricity_use_home|url-status=live}} (Calculated from 2007 value of 936 kWh monthly usage)</ref> The {{convert|30|MtonTNT|abbr=on}} estimated upper limit blast power of the [[Tunguska event]] could power the same average home for more than 3,100,000&nbsp;years. The energy of that blast could power the entire United States for 3.27&nbsp;days.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2042rank.html |title=Country Comparison :: Electricity – consumption |work=The World Factbook |publisher=[[CIA]] |access-date=2009-10-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120128032332/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2042rank.html |archive-date=2012-01-28 }} (Calculated from 2007 value of 3,892,000,000,000&nbsp;kWh annual usage)</ref>
|-
| 8.6
| 10&nbsp;TWh
| The energy output that would be released by a typical [[tropical cyclone]] in one minute, primarily from water condensation. Winds constitute 0.25% of that energy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/D7.html|title=NOAA FAQ: How much energy does a hurricane release?|date=August 2001|access-date=2009-06-30|publisher=[[National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration]]|archive-date=2017-11-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171102212903/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/D7.html|url-status=live}} cites 6E14&nbsp;watts continuous.</ref>
|-
| 16
| 18.6&nbsp;TWh
| The approximate radiated surface energy released in a magnitude 8 [[earthquake]].<ref>{{cite web| url=https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/earthquakes/energy.html| title=How much energy does an earthquake release?|website = Volcano Discovery|date = 12 June 2023}}</ref>
|-
| 21.5
| 25&nbsp;TWh
| The complete conversion of 1&nbsp;kg of matter into pure energy would yield [[mass–energy equivalence|the theoretical maximum]] (''E'' = ''mc''<sup>2</sup>) of 89.8&nbsp;petajoules, which is equivalent to 21.5&nbsp;megatons of TNT. No such method of total conversion as combining 500&nbsp;grams of matter with 500&nbsp;grams of antimatter has yet been achieved. In the event of proton–[[antiproton]] [[annihilation]], approximately 50% of the released energy will escape in the form of [[neutrinos]], which are almost undetectable.<ref>{{cite conference|hdl=2060/19960020441|doi=10.2514/6.1987-1814|first=Stanley K.|last=Borowski|title=Comparison of Fusion/Antiproton Propulsion systems|work=NASA Glenn Research Center|conference=23rd Joint Propulsion Conference|date=March 1996}}</ref> [[Electron–positron annihilation]] events emit their energy entirely as [[gamma rays]].
|-
| 24
| 28&nbsp;TWh
| Approximate total yield of the [[1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Mount St. Helens – From the 1980 Eruption to 2000, Fact Sheet 036-00 |url=https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2000/fs036-00/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512162409/http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2000/fs036-00/ |archive-date=12 May 2013 |access-date=2022-04-23 |website=pubs.usgs.gov}}</ref>
|-
| 26.3
| 30.6&nbsp;TWh
| Energy released by the [[2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami|2004 Indian Ocean earthquake]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2010-04-04 |title=USGS Earthquake Hazards Program: Energy and Broadband Solution: Off W Coast of Northern Sumatra |url=http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2004/eq_041226/neic_slav_e.html |access-date=2023-02-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100404013939/http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2004/eq_041226/neic_slav_e.html |archive-date=April 4, 2010 }}</ref>[[File:2004 Indonesia Tsunami Complete.gif|thumb|An animation of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami]]
|-
| {{val|45}}
| 53&nbsp;TWh
| The energy released in the [[2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami]] was over 200,000 times the surface energy and was calculated by the USGS at {{val|1.9|e=17}}<!-- The source gives 1.9+0.5e17. I have interpreted the +0.5 as a statistical +- value, given that the quake would otherwise be much stronger than the 2004 Indian Ocean one. --> joules,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0001xgp/neic_c0001xgp_wmt.php |title=USGS.gov: USGS WPhase Moment Solution |publisher=Earthquake.usgs.gov |access-date=13 March 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110314185317/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0001xgp/neic_c0001xgp_wmt.php |archive-date=14 March 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2011-03-16 |title=USGS Energy and Broadband Solution |url=http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0001xgp/neic_c0001xgp_e.php |access-date=2023-02-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110316002625/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0001xgp/neic_c0001xgp_e.php |archive-date=March 16, 2011 }}</ref> slightly less than the 2004 Indian Ocean quake. It was estimated at a moment magnitude of 9.0–9.1.[[File:2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami damage Matsushima, Miyagi.JPG|thumb|The damage caused by the 2011 Tōhoku tsunami]]
|-
| 50–56
| 58&nbsp;TWh
| The [[Soviet Union]] developed a prototype thermonuclear device, nicknamed the [[Tsar Bomba]], which was tested at {{convert|50–56|MtonTNT|abbr=on}}, but had a maximum theoretical design yield of {{convert|100|MtonTNT|abbr=on}}.<ref>See [http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Wpngall.html Currently deployed U.S. nuclear weapon yields] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160907072820/http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Wpngall.html |date=September 7, 2016 }}, [http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html Complete List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081216000000/http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html |date=December 16, 2008 }}, [http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Russia/TsarBomba.html Tsar Bomba] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160617080324/http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Russia/TsarBomba.html |date=June 17, 2016 }}, all from Carey Sublette's Nuclear Weapon Archive.</ref> The effective destructive potential of such a weapon varies greatly, depending on such conditions as the altitude at which it is detonated, the characteristics of the target, the terrain, and the physical landscape upon which it is detonated.
|-
|61
|70.9 TWh
|The energy released by the [[2021–22 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haʻapai eruption and tsunami|2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haʻapai volcanic eruption]], in the southern Pacific Ocean, is estimated to have been equivalent to 61 Megatons of TNT.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Díaz |first1=J. S. |last2=Rigby |first2=S. E. |date=2022-08-09 |title=Energetic output of the 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha‘apai volcanic eruption from pressure measurements |journal=Shock Waves |volume=32 |issue=6 |pages=553–561 |language=en |doi=10.1007/s00193-022-01092-4 |bibcode=2022ShWav..32..553D |s2cid=251480018 |issn=1432-2153|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|-
| 84
| 97.04 TWh
| The solar irradiance on Earth every second.{{efn|reference=The solar constant of the sun is 1370 watts per square meter and Earth has a [[Cross section (geometry)|cross-sectional]] [[surface area]] of {{Val|2.6|e=14}} square meters.}}
|-
| 200
| 230&nbsp;TWh
| The total energy released by the [[1883 eruption of Krakatoa]] in the Dutch East Indies (present-day Indonesia).<ref>{{Cite web|date=5 April 2012|title=The eruption of Krakatoa, August 27, 1883|url=http://www.bom.gov.au/tsunami/history/1883.shtml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160318213128/http://www.bom.gov.au/tsunami/history/1883.shtml|archive-date=2016-03-18|access-date=23 February 2022|website=Commonwealth of Australia 2012, Bureau of Meteorology.}}</ref>
|-
| 540
| 630&nbsp;TWh
| The [[List of nuclear weapons tests|total energy produced worldwide by all nuclear testing and combat]] usage combined, from the 1940s to the present, is about 540&nbsp;megatons.
|-
| 1,460
| 1.69&nbsp;PWh
| The total global nuclear arsenal is about 15,000 nuclear warheads<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces |title=Status of World Nuclear Forces |work=fas.org |access-date=2017-05-04 |archive-date=2017-05-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170508145916/https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat |title=Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance |work=armscontrol.org |access-date=2017-05-04 |archive-date=2018-01-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180124043430/https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2016/global-nuclear-weapons-downsizing-modernizing |title=Global nuclear weapons: downsizing but modernizing |publisher=[[Stockholm International Peace Research Institute]] |date=13 June 2016 |access-date=4 May 2017 |archive-date=7 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161007002121/https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2016/global-nuclear-weapons-downsizing-modernizing |url-status=live }}</ref> with a destructive capacity of around 1460&nbsp;megatons<ref>{{cite journal|title=Russian nuclear forces, 2016|journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists|first1=Hans M.|last1=Kristensen|first2=Robert S.|last2=Norris|date=May 3, 2016|volume=72|issue=3|pages=125–134|doi=10.1080/00963402.2016.1170359|bibcode=2016BuAtS..72c.125K|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1177/0096340215571913|title=US nuclear forces, 2015|journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists|volume=71|issue=2|pages=107|year=2015|last1=Kristensen|first1=Hans M|last2=Norris|first2=Robert S|bibcode=2015BuAtS..71b.107K|s2cid=145260117|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/nudb/datab14.asp |title=Minimize Harm and Security Risks of Nuclear Energy |access-date=2017-05-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140924062304/http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/nudb/datab14.asp |archive-date=2014-09-24 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1177/0096340215591247|title=Chinese nuclear forces, 2015|journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists|volume=71|issue=4|pages=77|year=2015|last1=Kristensen|first1=Hans M|last2=Norris|first2=Robert S|bibcode=2015BuAtS..71d..77K|s2cid=145759562}}</ref> or 1.46&nbsp;gigatons (1,460&nbsp;million&nbsp;tons) of TNT. This is the equivalent of {{val|6.11|e=18}} joules of energy

|-
| 2,680{{Dubious|date=February 2023|reason=Value is out of line with similar events.}}<!-- Not sure if this value is correct as the source gives a smaller one, but appears to compute a seismic equivalent. An editor more knowledgeable in the subject should please assess this. I computed this from the energy given in Joules, and divided by 1e9*4.184. -->
| 3&nbsp;PWh
| The energy yield of the [[1960 Valdivia earthquake]], was estimated at a moment magnitude of 9.4–9.6. This is the most powerful earthquake recorded in history.<ref>{{Cite web |date=1 September 2009 |title=Measuring the Size of an Earthquake |url=http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/topics/measure.php |access-date=17 January 2010 |website=U.S. Geological Survey |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090901233601/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/topics/measure.php |archive-date=1 September 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-12-07 |title=Table-Top Earthquakes |url=https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/ofr-98-0767/ |access-date=2023-02-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221207190454/https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/ofr-98-0767/ |archive-date=December 7, 2022 }}</ref>[[File:Valdivia after earthquake, 1960.jpg|thumb|The aftermath of the 1960 Valdivia earthquake.]]
|-
| 2,870
| 3.34 PWh
| The energy released by a hurricane per day during condensation.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Hurricane FAQ – NOAA's Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory |url=https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd-faq/ |access-date=2022-03-21 |language=en-US}}</ref>
|-
| 33,000
| 38.53&nbsp;PWh
| The total energy released by the [[1815 eruption of Mount Tambora]] in the island of Sumbawa in Indonesia. Yielded the equivalent of 2.2 million [[Little Boy]]s (the first atomic bomb to drop on [[Japan]]) or one-quarter of the entire world's annual energy consumption.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Klemetti |first=Erik |date=April 2022 |title=Tambora 1815: Just How Big Was The Eruption? |url=https://www.wired.com/2015/04/tambora-1815-just-big-eruption/amp |magazine=Wired |language=en |access-date=2022-06-07}}</ref> This eruption was 4-10 times more destructive than the [[1883 eruption of Krakatoa|1883 Krakatoa eruption]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Evans |first=Robert |date=July 2002 |title=Blast from the Past |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/blast-from-the-past-65102374/ |website=Smithsonian Magazine}}</ref>
|-
| 240,000
| 280&nbsp;PWh
| The approximate total yield of the super-eruption of the [[La Garita Caldera]] is 10,000 times more powerful than the [[1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens|1980 Mount St. Helens eruption]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-08-25 |title=La Garita Mountains grew from volcanic explosions 35 million years ago |url=https://www.fs.usda.gov/features/la-garita-mountains-grew-volcanic-explosions-35-million-years-ago |access-date=2022-04-23 |website=US Forest Service |language=en}}</ref> It was the second most energetic event to have occurred on Earth since the [[Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event]] 66 million years ago.[[File:WheelerGACO.jpg|thumb|A photo of the La Garita Caldera]]
|-
| 301,000
| 350&nbsp;PWh
| The total solar irradiance energy received by Earth in the upper atmosphere per hour.{{efn|name="NoteA"|reference=The solar constant of the sun is 1370 watts per square meter and Earth has a cross-sectional surface area of {{Val|2.6|e=14}} square meters.}}{{efn|1 hour is equivalent to 3600 seconds.}}
|-
| 875,000
| 1.02&nbsp;EWh
| Approximate yield of the last eruption of the [[Yellowstone supervolcano]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The thought experiment: What would happen if the supervolcano under Yellowstone erupted? |url=https://www.sciencefocus.com/planet-earth/the-thought-experiment-what-would-happen-if-the-supervolcano-under-yellowstone-erupted/ |access-date=2022-04-23 |website=BBC Science Focus Magazine |language=en}}</ref>[[File:Yellowstone Caldera.svg|thumb|Image of the Yellowstone supervolcano.]]
|-
| {{Val|3.61|e=6}}
| 4.2 EWh
| The solar irradiance of the Sun every 12 hours.{{efn|name="NoteA"}}{{efn|1 day is equivalent to 86400 seconds.}}
|-
| {{val|6|e=6}}
| 7&nbsp;EWh
| The estimated energy at impact when the largest fragment of [[Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9]] struck [[Jupiter]] is equivalent to 6&nbsp;million&nbsp;megatons (6&nbsp;trillion&nbsp;tons) of TNT.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Comet/Jupiter Collision FAQ – Post-Impact|url=http://www.physics.sfasu.edu/astro/sl9/cometfaq2.html#Q3.1|access-date=2022-02-24|website=www.physics.sfasu.edu|archive-date=August 28, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210828080844/http://www.physics.sfasu.edu/astro/sl9/cometfaq2.html#Q3.1|url-status=dead}}</ref>[[File:Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 Impact Site on Jupiter.jpg|thumb|The impact site of the Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9]]
|-
| {{val|7.2|e=7}}
| 116&nbsp;EWh
| Estimates in 2010 show that the kinetic energy of the [[Chicxulub crater|Chicxulub impact event]] yielded 72 teratons of TNT equivalent (1 teraton of TNT equals 10<sup>6</sup> megatons of TNT) which caused the [[Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event|K-Pg extinction event]], wiping out 75% of all species on Earth.<ref name="Richards"/><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Jablonski |first1=David |last2=Chaloner |first2=William Gilbert |last3=Lawton |first3=John Hartley |last4=May |first4=Robert McCredie |date=1994-04-29 |title=Extinctions in the fossil record |url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rstb.1994.0045 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences |volume=344 |issue=1307 |pages=11–17 |doi=10.1098/rstb.1994.0045}}</ref> This is far more destructive than any natural disaster recorded in history. Such an event would've caused global [[volcanism]], earthquakes, [[megatsunami]]s, and global [[climate change]].<ref name="Richards">{{Cite journal |last1=Richards |first1=Mark A. |last2=Alvarez |first2=Walter |last3=Self |first3=Stephen |last4=Karlstrom |first4=Leif |last5=Renne |first5=Paul R. |last6=Manga |first6=Michael |last7=Sprain |first7=Courtney J. |last8=Smit |first8=Jan |last9=Vanderkluysen |first9=Loÿc |last10=Gibson |first10=Sally A. |date=2015-11-01 |title=Triggering of the largest Deccan eruptions by the Chicxulub impact |url=https://doi.org/10.1130/B31167.1 |journal=[[Geological Society of America Bulletin]] |volume=127 |issue=11–12 |pages=1507–1520 |doi=10.1130/B31167.1 |bibcode=2015GSAB..127.1507R |s2cid=3463018 |issn=0016-7606}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kornei |first=Katherine |date=2018-12-20 |title=Huge Global Tsunami Followed Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Impact |url=http://eos.org/articles/huge-global-tsunami-followed-dinosaur-killing-asteroid-impact |access-date=2022-03-21 |website=Eos |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name="Chicxulub Impact Event">{{Cite web |title=Chicxulub Impact Event |url=https://www.lpi.usra.edu/science/kring/Chicxulub/regional-effects/ |access-date=2022-04-23 |website=www.lpi.usra.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Henehan |first1=Michael J. |last2=Ridgwell |first2=Andy |last3=Thomas |first3=Ellen |author3-link=Ellen Thomas (scientist) |last4=Zhang |first4=Shuang |last5=Alegret |first5=Laia |last6=Schmidt |first6=Daniela N. |last7=Rae |first7=James W. B. |last8=Witts |first8=James D. |last9=Landman |first9=Neil H. |last10=Greene |first10=Sarah E. |last11=Huber |first11=Brian T. |date=2019-10-21 |title=Rapid ocean acidification and protracted Earth system recovery followed the end-Cretaceous Chicxulub impact |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=116 |issue=45 |pages=22500–22504 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1905989116 |issn=0027-8424 |pmc=6842625 |pmid=31636204|bibcode=2019PNAS..11622500H |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Nield |first=David |title=That Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Instantly Acidified Our World's Oceans, Too |url=https://www.sciencealert.com/the-dino-killing-asteroid-caused-mass-extinction-by-instantly-acidifying-the-oceans |access-date=2022-04-23 |website=ScienceAlert |date=October 22, 2019 |language=en-gb}}</ref> [[File:Chicxulub-animation.gif|thumb|The animation of the Chicxulub impact.]]
|-
| >{{Val|2.4|e=10}}
| >28&nbsp;ZWh
| The impact energy of Archean asteroids.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Zahnle |first=K. J. |date=2018-08-26 |title=Climatic Effect of Impacts on the Ocean |journal=Comparative Climatology of Terrestrial Planets III: From Stars to Surfaces |volume=2065 |page=2056 |bibcode=2018LPICo2065.2056Z |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180006692 |language=en}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|9.1|e=10}}
| 106&nbsp;ZWh
| The total energy output of the Sun per second.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Carroll |first=Carroll |date=2017 |title=Sun: Amount of Energy the Earth Gets from the Sun |url=http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sun.html#sunenergymass |website=Ask a Physicist |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000816180724/http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sun.html#sunenergymass |archive-date=16 August 2000 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|2.4|e=11}}
| 280&nbsp;ZWh
| The kinetic energy of the [[Caloris Planitia]] impactor.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lü |first1=Jiangning |last2=Sun |first2=Youshun |last3=Nafi Toksöz |first3=M. |last4=Zheng |first4=Yingcai |last5=Zuber |first5=Maria T. |date=2011-12-01 |title=Seismic effects of the Caloris basin impact, Mercury |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063311002340 |journal=Planetary and Space Science |language=en |volume=59 |issue=15 |pages=1981–1991 |doi=10.1016/j.pss.2011.07.013 |bibcode=2011P&SS...59.1981L |hdl=1721.1/69472 |issn=0032-0633|hdl-access=free }}</ref>[[File:The Mighty Caloris (PIA19213) cropped.png|thumb|The photo of the Caloris Planitia on Mercury. Taken by the [[MESSENGER]] orbiter.]]
|-
| {{val|5.972|e=15}}
| {{val|6.94}}&nbsp;RWh
| The explosive energy of a quantity of TNT of the [[Earth mass|mass of Earth]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Luzum |first1=Brian |last2=Capitaine |first2=Nicole |last3=Fienga |first3=Agnès |last4=Folkner |first4=William |last5=Fukushima |first5=Toshio |last6=Hilton |first6=James |last7=Hohenkerk |first7=Catherine |last8=Krasinsky |first8=George |last9=Petit |first9=Gérard |last10=Pitjeva |first10=Elena |last11=Soffel |first11=Michael |date=2011-07-10 |title=The IAU 2009 system of astronomical constants: the report of the IAU working group on numerical standards for Fundamental Astronomy |journal=Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy |language=en |volume=110 |issue=4 |pages=293 |doi=10.1007/s10569-011-9352-4 |bibcode=2011CeMDA.110..293L |s2cid=122755461 |issn=1572-9478|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|-
| {{val|7.89|e=15}}
| {{val|9.17}}&nbsp;RWh
| Total solar output in all directions per day.<ref>{{Cite web |date=16 August 2000 |title=Ask A Physicist: Sun |url=http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sun.html#sunenergymass |access-date=23 February 2022 |website=Cosmic Helospheric Learning Center |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000816180724/http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sun.html#sunenergymass |archive-date=16 August 2000 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|1.98|e=21}}
| {{Val|2.3|e=33}}&nbsp;Wh
| The explosive energy of a quantity of TNT of the [[Solar mass|mass of the Sun]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sun Fact Sheet |url=https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html |access-date=2022-03-22 |website=nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|2.4|–|4.8|e=28}}
| {{val|2.8|–|5.6|e=40}}&nbsp;Wh
| A [[type Ia supernova]] explosion gives off 1–{{val|2|e=44}} joules of energy, which is about 2.4–4.8&nbsp;hundred&nbsp;billion&nbsp;yottatons (24–48&nbsp;octillion (2.4–{{val|4.8|e=28}})&nbsp;megatons) of TNT, equivalent to the explosive force of a quantity of TNT over a trillion (10<sup>12</sup>) times the mass of the planet Earth. This is the astrophysical [[Cosmic distance ladder#Standard candles|standard candle]] used to determine galactic distances.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Khokhlov |first1=A. |last2=Mueller |first2=E. |last3=Hoeflich |first3=P. |date=1993-03-01 |title=Light curves of type IA supernova models with different explosion mechanisms. |url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&A...270..223K |journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics |volume=270 |pages=223–248 |bibcode=1993A&A...270..223K |issn=0004-6361}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|2.4|–|4.8|e=30}}
| {{val|2.8|–|5.6|e=42}}&nbsp;Wh
| The largest type of supernova observed, [[gamma-ray burst]]s (GRBs) release more than 10<sup>46</sup>&nbsp;joules of energy.<ref>{{cite journal| doi=10.1126/science.1242279| title=GRB 130427A: A Nearby Ordinary Monster| year=2014| last1=Maselli| first1=A.| last2=Melandri| first2=A.| last3=Nava| first3=L.| last4=Mundell| first4=C. G.| last5=Kawai| first5=N.| last6=Campana| first6=S.| last7=Covino| first7=S.| last8=Cummings| first8=J. R.| last9=Cusumano| first9=G.| last10=Evans|first10=P. A.| last11=Ghirlanda| first11=G.| last12=Ghisellini| first12=G.| last13=Guidorzi| first13=C.| last14=Kobayashi| first14=S.| last15=Kuin| first15=P.| last16=LaParola| first16=V.| last17=Mangano| first17=V.| last18=Oates| first18=S.| last19=Sakamoto| first19=T.| last20=Serino| first20=M.| last21=Virgili| first21=F.| last22=Zhang| first22=B.- B.| last23=Barthelmy| first23=S.| last24=Beardmore| first24=A.| last25=Bernardini| first25=M. G.| last26=Bersier| first26=D.| last27=Burrows| first27=D.| last28=Calderone| first28=G.| last29=Capalbi| first29=M.| last30=Chiang| first30=J.| journal=Science| volume=343| issue=6166| pages=48–51| pmid=24263134| arxiv=1311.5254| bibcode=2014Sci...343...48M| s2cid=9782862}}</ref>
|-
| {{val|1.3|e=32}}
| {{val|1.5|e=44}}&nbsp;Wh
| A merger of two black holes, resulting in the [[first observation of gravitational waves]], released {{val|5.3|e=47}}&nbsp;joules<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=The LIGO Scientific Collaboration|last2=the Virgo Collaboration|last3=Abbott|first3=B. P.|last4=Abbott|first4=R.|last5=Abbott|first5=T. D.|last6=Abernathy|first6=M. R.|last7= Acernese|first7=F.|last8=Ackley|first8=K.|last9=Adams|first9=C.|date=2016-06-14|title=Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914|arxiv=1602.03840|journal= Physical Review Letters|volume=116|issue=24|pages=241102|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241102|pmid=27367378|bibcode=2016PhRvL.116x1102A|s2cid=217406416|issn=0031-9007}}</ref>
|-
| {{Val|9.6|e=53}}
| {{Val|1.12|e=66}} Wh
| Estimated mass-energy of the observable universe.<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 February 1998 |title=Big Bang Energy (Ask an Astrophysicist) |url=http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980211b.html |access-date=23 March 2022 |website=Imagine the Universe!|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140819120709/http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980211b.html |archive-date=2014-08-19 }}</ref>
|}

== Relative effectiveness factor ==<!-- Other articles link here. -->
The relative effectiveness factor (RE factor) relates an explosive's demolition power to that of TNT, in units of the TNT equivalent/kg (TNTe/kg). The RE factor is the relative mass of TNT to which an explosive is equivalent: The greater the RE, the more powerful the explosive.

This enables engineers to determine the proper masses of different explosives when applying blasting formulas developed specifically for TNT. For example, if a timber-cutting formula calls for a charge of 1&nbsp;kg of TNT, then based on [[octanitrocubane]]'s RE factor of 2.38, it would take only 1.0/2.38 (or 0.42) kg of it to do the same job. Using [[PETN]], engineers would need 1.0/1.66 (or 0.60) kg to obtain the same effects as 1&nbsp;kg of TNT. With [[ANFO]] or [[ammonium nitrate]], they would require 1.0/0.74 (or 1.35) kg or 1.0/0.32 (or 3.125) kg, respectively.

Calculating a single RE factor for an explosive is, however, impossible. It depends on the specific case or use. Given a pair of explosives, one can produce 2× the shockwave output (this depends on the distance of measuring instruments) but the difference in direct metal cutting ability may be 4× higher for one type of metal and 7× higher for another type of metal. The relative differences between two explosives with shaped charges will be even greater. The table below should be taken as an example and not as a precise source of data.

{| style="font-size: 100%; text-align: right;" class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
|+ Some relative effectiveness factor examples{{citation needed|reason=sources needed for these figures|date=April 2019}}
|- style="text-align: center"
! Explosive, grade
! data-sort-type="number" | Density<br />(g/ml)
! data-sort-type="number" | [[Table of explosive detonation velocities|Detonation <br />vel. (m/s)]]
! data-sort-type="number" | Relative <br />effectiveness
|-
| align=left|[[Ammonium nitrate]] (AN + <0.5%&nbsp;H<sub>2</sub>O)
| 0.88
| 2,700<ref>''US Army FM 3–34.214: Explosives and Demolition'', 2007, page 1–2.</ref>
| 0.32<ref name="Török&Zoltán2015">{{Cite journal| volume = 14| issue = 11| pages = 2671–2678| last1 = Török| first1 = Zoltán| last2 = Ozunu| first2 = Alexandru| title = Hazardous properties of ammonium nitrate and modeling of explosions using TNT equivalency.| journal = Environmental Engineering & Management Journal | date = 2015| doi = 10.30638/eemj.2015.284}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Queensland Government |title=Storage requirements for security sensitive ammonium nitrate (SSAN) |url=https://www.dnrme.qld.gov.au/business/mining/safety-and-health/alerts-and-bulletins/explosives/storage-req-security-sensitive-ammonium-nitrate-ssan |access-date=24 August 2020 |archive-date=22 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022034302/https://www.dnrme.qld.gov.au/business/mining/safety-and-health/alerts-and-bulletins/explosives/storage-req-security-sensitive-ammonium-nitrate-ssan |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| align=left|[[Mercury(II) fulminate]]
| 4.42
| 4,250
| 0.51<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://whitehall-paraindustries.com/Hero/Conversions/explosives.htm |title=Whitehall Paraindistries |access-date=2017-03-31 |archive-date=2017-02-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170210152757/http://whitehall-paraindustries.com/Hero/Conversions/explosives.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| align=left|[[Gunpowder|Black powder]] (75%&nbsp;[[Potassium nitrate|KNO<sub>3</sub>]] + 19%&nbsp;[[Carbon|C]] + 6%&nbsp;[[Sulfur|S]], ancient [[low explosive]])
| 1.65
| 400
| 0.55<ref>{{cite web |title=FM 5–250 |url=https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/amd-us-archive/fm5-250%2892%29.pdf |website=bits.de |publisher=United States Department of the Army |access-date=23 October 2019 |archive-date=5 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805043954/https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/amd-us-archive/fm5-250%2892%29.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| align=left| [[Hexamethylenetetramine|Hexamine dinitrate]] (HDN)
| 1.30
| 5,070
| 0.60
|-
| align=left|[[Dinitrobenzene]] (DNB)
| 1.50
| 6,025
| 0.60
|-
| align=left|[[HMTD]] ([[Hexamethylene triperoxide diamine|hexamine peroxide]])
| 0.88
| 4,520
| 0.74
|-
| align=left|[[ANFO]] (94%&nbsp;[[Ammonium nitrate|AN]] + 6%&nbsp;fuel&nbsp;oil)
| 0.92
| 4,200
| 0.74
|-
| align=left|[[Urea nitrate]]
| 1.67
| 4,700
| 0.77
|-
| align=left|[[TATP]] ([[acetone peroxide]])
| 1.18
| 5,300
| 0.80
|-
| align=left|[[Tovex]] Extra ([[Ammonium nitrate|AN]] water gel) commercial product
| 1.33
| 5,690
| 0.80
|-
| align=left|Hydromite 600 ([[Ammonium nitrate|AN]] water [[emulsion]]) commercial product
| 1.24
| 5,550
| 0.80
|-
| align=left| ANNMAL (66%&nbsp;[[Ammonium nitrate|AN]] + 25%&nbsp;[[Nitromethane|NM]] + 5%&nbsp;[[Aluminium|Al]] + 3%&nbsp;[[Carbon|C]] + 1% [[Triethylenetetramine|TETA]])
| 1.16
| 5,360
| 0.87
|-
| align=left|[[Amatol]] (50%&nbsp;[[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]] + 50%&nbsp;[[Ammonium nitrate|AN]])
| 1.50
| 6,290
| 0.91
|-
| align=left|[[Nitroguanidine]]
| 1.32
| 6,750
| 0.95
|-
| align=left|'''[[Trinitrotoluene]] (TNT)'''
| '''1.60'''
| '''6,900'''
| '''1.00'''
|-
| align=left|[[Hexanitrostilbene]] (HNS)
| 1.70
| 7,080
| 1.05
|-
| align=left|[[Nitrourea]]
| 1.45
| 6,860
| 1.05
|-
| align=left|[[Tritonal]] (80%&nbsp;[[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]] + 20%&nbsp;[[aluminium]]){{efn|name=TBX-EBX|TBX (thermobaric explosives) or EBX (enhanced blast explosives), in a small, confined space, may have over twice the power of destruction. The total power of aluminized mixtures strictly depends on the condition of explosions.}}
| 1.70
| 6,650
| 1.05
|-
| align=left|[[Nickel hydrazine nitrate]] (NHN)
| 1.70
| 7,000
| 1.05
|-
| align=left|[[Amatol]] (80%&nbsp;[[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]] + 20%&nbsp;[[Ammonium nitrate|AN]])
| 1.55
| 6,570
| 1.10
|-
| align=left|[[Nitrocellulose]] (13.5% N, NC; AKA guncotton)
| 1.40
| 6,400
| 1.10
|-
| align=left|[[Nitromethane]] (NM)
| 1.13
| 6,360
| 1.10
|-
| align=left| PBXW-126 (22% NTO, 20% [[RDX]], 20% [[Ammonium perchlorate|AP]], 26% [[Aluminium|Al]], 12% [[Polyurethane|PU]]'s system){{efn|name=TBX-EBX}}
| 1.80
| 6,450
| 1.10
|-
| align=left|[[Diethylene glycol dinitrate]] (DEGDN)
| 1.38
| 6,610
| 1.17
|-
| align=left| PBXIH-135 EB (42% [[HMX]], 33% [[Aluminium|Al]], 25% [[Polycaprolactone|PCP]]-[[TMETN]]'s system){{efn|name=TBX-EBX}}
| 1.81
| 7,060
| 1.17
|-
| align=left| PBXN-109 (64% [[RDX]], 20% [[Aluminium|Al]], 16% [[HTPB]]'s system){{efn|name=TBX-EBX}}
| 1.68
| 7,450
| 1.17
|-
| align=left| [[Triaminotrinitrobenzene]] (TATB)
| 1.80
| 7,550
| 1.17
|-
| align=left|[[Picric acid]] (TNP)
| 1.71
| 7,350
| 1.17
|-
| align=left|[[Trinitrobenzene]] (TNB)
| 1.60
| 7,300
| 1.20
|-
| align=left|[[Tetrytol]] (70%&nbsp;[[tetryl]] + 30%&nbsp;[[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]])
| 1.60
| 7,370
| 1.20
|-
| align=left|[[Dynamite]], Nobel's (75% [[Nitroglycerin|NG]] + 23% [[Diatomaceous earth|diatomite]])
| 1.48
| 7,200
| 1.25
|-
| align=left|[[Tetryl]]
| 1.71
| 7,770
| 1.25
|-
| align=left|[[Torpex]] (aka HBX, 41%&nbsp;[[RDX]] + 40%&nbsp;[[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]] + 18% [[Aluminium|Al]] + 1% [[wax]]){{efn|name=TBX-EBX}}
| 1.80
| 7,440
| 1.30
|-
| align=left|[[Composition B]] (63%&nbsp;[[RDX]] + 36%&nbsp;[[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]] + 1%&nbsp;[[wax]])
| 1.72
| 7,840
| 1.33
|-
| align=left|[[C-3 (explosive)|Composition C-3]] (78%&nbsp;[[RDX]])
| 1.60
| 7,630
| 1.33
|-
| align=left|[[C-4 (explosive)|Composition C-4]] (91%&nbsp;[[RDX]])
| 1.59
| 8,040
| 1.34
|-
| align=left|[[Pentolite]] (56% [[PETN]] + 44%&nbsp;[[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]])
| 1.66
| 7,520
| 1.33
|-
| align=left|[[Semtex]] 1A (76%&nbsp;[[PETN]] + 6%&nbsp;[[RDX]])
| 1.55
| 7,670
| 1.35
|-
| align=left| [[A-IX-2|Hexal]] (76% [[RDX]] + 20% [[Aluminium|Al]] + 4% [[wax]]){{efn|name=TBX-EBX}}
|1.79
|7,640
|1.35
|-
| align=left| RISAL P (50%&nbsp;[[Isopropyl nitrate|IPN]] + 28%&nbsp;[[RDX]] + 15%&nbsp;[[Aluminium|Al]] + 4%&nbsp;[[Magnesium|Mg]] + 1%&nbsp;[[Zirconium|Zr]] + 2%&nbsp;[[Nitrocellulose|NC]]){{efn|name=TBX-EBX}}
| 1.39
| 5,980
| 1.40
|-
| align=left| [[Hydrazine nitrate]]
| 1.59
| 8,500
| 1.42
|-
| align=left| Mixture: 24% [[nitrobenzene]] + 76% [[Tetranitromethane|TNM]]
| 1.48
| 8,060
| 1.50
|-
| align=left| Mixture: 30% [[nitrobenzene]] + 70% [[nitrogen tetroxide]]
| 1.39
| 8,290
| 1.50
|-
| align=left|[[Nitroglycerin]] (NG)
| 1.59
| 7,700
| 1.54
|-
| align=left|[[Methyl nitrate]] (MN)
| 1.21
| 7,900
| 1.54
|-
| align=left|[[Octol]] (80% [[HMX]] + 19% [[Trinitrotoluene|TNT]] + 1% [[Dinitrotoluene|DNT]])
| 1.83
| 8,690
| 1.54
|-
| align=left|[[Nitrotriazolone|Nitrotriazolon]] (NTO)
| 1.87
| 8,120
| 1.60
|-
| align=left|DADNE ([[FOX-7|1,1-diamino-2,2-dinitroethene]], FOX-7)
| 1.77
| 8,330
| 1.60
|-
| align=left|[[Gelignite]] (92% [[Nitroglycerin|NG]] + 7% [[nitrocellulose]])
| 1.60
| 7,970
| 1.60
|-
| align=left|Plastics Gel® (in toothpaste tube: 45% [[PETN]] + 45% [[Nitroglycerin|NG]] + 5% [[diethylene glycol dinitrate|DEGDN]] + 4% [[Nitrocellulose|NC]])
| 1.51
| 7,940
| 1.60
|-
|align=left|Composition A-5 (98% [[RDX]] + 2% [[stearic acid]])
| 1.65
| 8,470
| 1.60
|-
| align=left|[[Erythritol tetranitrate]] (ETN)
| 1.72
| 8,206
| 1.60
|-
| align=left|[[Hexogen]] (RDX)
| 1.78
| 8,600
| 1.60
|-
| align=left| PBXW-11 (96% [[HMX]], 1% [[Acrylic rubber|HyTemp]], 3% [[Dioctyl adipate|DOA]])
| 1.81
| 8,720
| 1.60
|-
| align=left|[[Pentaerythritol tetranitrate|Penthrite]] ([[PETN]])
| 1.77
| 8,400
| 1.66
|-
| align=left|[[Ethylene glycol dinitrate]] ([[Ethylene glycol dinitrate|EGDN]])
| 1.49
| 8,300
| 1.66
|-
|align=left|MEDINA (Methylene dinitroamine)<ref>{{Cite web |last=PubChem |title=Medina |url=https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/26524 |access-date=2024-05-20 |website=pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=methylenedinitramine {{!}} CH4N4O4 {{!}} ChemSpider |url=http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.24707.html |access-date=2024-05-20 |website=www.chemspider.com}}</ref>
| 1.65
| 8,700
| 1.70
|-
| align=left|[[Trinitroazetidine]] (TNAZ)
| 1.85
| 9,597
| 1.70
|-
| align=left|[[Octogen]] ([[HMX]] grade B)
| 1.86
| 9,100
| 1.70
|-
|align=left|[[Hexanitrobenzene]] (HNB)
| 1.97
| 9,340
| 1.80
|-
|align=left|[[Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane]] (HNIW; AKA CL-20)
| 1.97
| 9,500
| 1.90
|-
| align=left|DDF ([[4,4’-Dinitro-3,3’-diazenofuroxan]])
| 1.98
| 10,000
| 1.95
|-
| align=left|[[Heptanitrocubane]] (HNC){{efn|name=predicted|Predicted values}}
| 1.92
| 9,200
| N/A
|-
| align=left|[[Octanitrocubane]] (ONC)
| 1.95
| 10,600
| 2.38
|-
| align=left|[[Octaazacubane]] (OAC){{efn|name=predicted}}
| 2.69
| 15,000
| |{{nts|5.00|prefix=>}}

|}

===Nuclear examples===
{| style="font-size: 100%; text-align: right;" class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
|+ Nuclear weapons and the most powerful non-nuclear weapon examples
|- style="text-align: center"
! [[Nuclear weapon|Weapon]]
! data-sort-type="number" | [[Nuclear weapon yield|Total yield]] <br />([[kilotons of TNT]])
! data-sort-type="number" | Mass <br />(kg)
! Relative <br />effectiveness
|-
| align="left" |GBU-57 bomb ([[Massive Ordnance Penetrator]], MOP)
| 0.0035
| 13,600
| 0.26
|-
| align="left" |[[Grand Slam (bomb)|Grand Slam]] ([[Earthquake bomb]], M110)
| 0.0065
| 9,900
| 0.66
|-
| align=left|[[Oklahoma City bombing#Gathering materials|Bomb used in Oklahoma City]] ([[ANFO]] based on [[Nitromethane|racing fuel]])
| 0.0018
| 2,300
| 0.78
|-
| align=left|[[BLU-82]] (Daisy Cutter)
| 0.0075
| 6,800
| 1.10
|-
| align=left|[[MOAB]] (non-nuclear bomb, GBU-43)
| 0.011
| 9,800
| 1.13
|-
| align=left|[[FOAB]] (advanced [[thermobaric bomb]], ATBIP)
| 0.044
| 9,100
| 4.83
|-
| align=left|[[W54]], Mk-54 ([[Davy Crockett (nuclear device)|Davy Crockett]])
| 0.022
| 23
| 1,000
|-
| align="left" |[[Little Boy]] (dropped on [[Hiroshima]]) [[A-bomb]]
|15
|4,400
|4,000
|-
| align="left" |[[Fat Man]] (dropped on [[Nagasaki]]) [[A-bomb]]
| 20
| 4,600
| 4,500
|-
| align=left|[[W54]], B54 (SADM)
| 1.0
| 23
| 43,500
|-
| align="left" |Classic (one-stage) fission [[A-bomb]]
| 22
| 420
| 50,000
|-
| align=left|Hypothetical [[suitcase nuke]]
| 2.5
| 31
| 80,000
|-
| align=left|Typical (two-stage) [[nuclear bomb]]
| 500–1000
| 650–1,120
| 900,000
|-
| align="left" |[[W88]] modern thermonuclear warhead ([[MIRV]])
| 470
| 355
| 1,300,000
|-
| align="left" |[[Tsar Bomba|Tsar nuclear bomb]] (three-stage)
| 50,000–56,000
| 26,500
| 2,100,000
|-
| align="left" |[[B53 nuclear bomb]] (two-stage)
| 9,000
| 4,050
| 2,200,000
|-
| align="left" |[[Operation Dominic]] ''[[Operation Dominic#Housatonic|Housatonic]]''<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://i.imgur.com/yHlPKb4.png | title=Ripple | format=PNG}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web | url=https://i.imgur.com/nTirCcn.png | title=Postulated Ripple design (Dominic Housatonic) | format=PNG}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |title=Nuclear weapon design |date=2024-05-28 |work=Wikipedia |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_weapon_design&oldid=1226041993 |access-date=2024-07-07 |language=en}}</ref> (two-stage)
|9,960
|3,239
|3,042,400
|-
| align=left|[[W56]] thermonuclear warhead
|1,200
|272–308
|4,960,000
|-
| align=left|[[B41 nuclear bomb]] (three-stage)
| 25,000
| 4,850
| 5,100,000
|-
| align=left|Theoretical [[antimatter weapon]]
|43,000
|1
|43,000,000,000
|}

== See also ==
* [[Brisance]]
* [[Net explosive quantity]]
* [[Nuclear weapon yield]]
* [[Orders of magnitude (energy)]]
* [[Table of explosive detonation velocities]]
* [[Tonne of oil equivalent]], a unit of energy almost exactly 10 tonnes of TNT


==See also==
== References ==
===Footnotes===
{{notelist}}


===Citations===
*[[Nuclear arms race]]
{{Reflist|30em}}
*[[Orders of magnitude (energy)]]
*[[Relative effectiveness factor]]
*[[Ton]]
*[[Tonne]]
*[[Tonne of oil equivalent]], a unit of energy almost exactly 10 tonnes of TNT
*[[Table of explosive detonation velocities]]


==References==
==External links==
* {{cite journal |first1=A. |last1=Thompson |first2=B.N. |last2=Taylor |title=Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) |journal=NIST |publisher=National Institute of Standards and Technology |date=July 2008 |series=NIST Special Publication |volume=811 |id=Version 3.2 |url=http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/contents.html |ref={{harvid|NIST SI Guide|2008}}}}
<references/>
* [http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/contents.html Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)]
* [http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq1.html#nfaq1.3 Nuclear Weapons FAQ Part 1.3]
* [http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq1.html#nfaq1.3 Nuclear Weapons FAQ Part 1.3]
* Rhodes, Richard. ''The Making of the Atomic Bomb'', New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986.
* {{cite book |first=Richard |last=Rhodes |title=The Making of the Atomic Bomb |edition=25th Anniversary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2G2TlJOhGI8C |year=2012 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |isbn=978-1-4516-7761-4}}
*{{Citation
|last= Cooper
|first= Paul W.
|title= Explosives Engineering
|location= New York
|publisher= Wiley-VCH
|year= 1996
|isbn= 978-0-471-18636-6
}}
*{{Citation
|last=HQ Department of the Army
|title=Field Manual 5-25: Explosives and Demolitions
|pages= 83–84
|location= Washington, D.C.
|publisher= Pentagon Publishing
|year=2004
|orig-year= 1967
|isbn= 978-0-9759009-5-6
}}
*{{Citation
|last= Urbański
|first= Tadeusz
|title= Chemistry and Technology of Explosives
|others= Volumes I–IV
|location= Oxford
|publisher= Pergamon
|year=1985
|edition= second
|orig-year= 1984
}}
*{{Citation
|first1= Jörg |last1=Mathieu |first2= Hans |last2=Stucki
|title= Military High Explosives
|pages= 383–389
|journal= CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry
|year= 2004
|volume= 58|issue=6
|issn=0009-4293|doi=10.2533/000942904777677669|doi-access= free}}
*{{Cite book
|url= http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309091608/html/16.html
|chapter= 3. Thermobaric Explosives
|title= Advanced Energetic Materials
|publisher= The National Academies Press, nap.edu
|date= 2004
|doi=10.17226/10918|isbn= 978-0-309-09160-2
}}


{{Nuclear Technology}}
{{Nuclear technology}}


[[Category:Explosives]]
[[Category:Explosives]]
[[Category:Explosives engineering]]
[[Category:Scales]]
[[Category:Units of energy]]
[[Category:Units of energy]]
[[Category:Equivalent units]]
[[Category:Trinitrotoluene]]

Latest revision as of 05:25, 28 December 2024

TNT equivalent
The explosion from a 14-kiloton nuclear test at the Nevada Test Site, in 1951
General information
Unit systemNon-standard
Unit ofEnergy
Symbolt, ton of TNT
Conversions
1 t in ...... is equal to ...
   SI base units   4.184 gigajoules
   CGS   109 calories

TNT equivalent is a convention for expressing energy, typically used to describe the energy released in an explosion. The ton of TNT is a unit of energy defined by convention to be 4.184 gigajoules (gigacalorie),[1] which is the approximate energy released in the detonation of a metric ton (1,000 kilograms) of TNT. In other words, for each gram of TNT exploded, 4.184 kilojoules (or 4184 joules) of energy are released.

This convention intends to compare the destructiveness of an event with that of conventional explosive materials, of which TNT is a typical example, although other conventional explosives such as dynamite contain more energy.

Kiloton and megaton

[edit]

The "kiloton (of TNT equivalent)" is a unit of energy equal to 4.184 terajoules (4.184×1012 J).[2] A kiloton of TNT can be visualized as a cube of TNT 8.46 metres (27.8 ft) on a side.

The "megaton (of TNT equivalent)" is a unit of energy equal to 4.184 petajoules (4.184×1015 J).[3]

The kiloton and megaton of TNT equivalent have traditionally been used to describe the energy output, and hence the destructive power, of a nuclear weapon. The TNT equivalent appears in various nuclear weapon control treaties, and has been used to characterize the energy released in asteroid impacts.[4]

Historical derivation of the value

[edit]

Alternative values for TNT equivalency can be calculated according to which property is being compared and when in the two detonation processes the values are measured.[5][6][7][8]

Where for example the comparison is by energy yield, an explosive's energy is normally expressed for chemical purposes as the thermodynamic work produced by its detonation. For TNT this has been accurately measured as 4,686 J/g from a large sample of air blast experiments, and theoretically calculated to be 4,853 J/g.[9]

However even on this basis, comparing the actual energy yields of a large nuclear device and an explosion of TNT can be slightly inaccurate. Small TNT explosions, especially in the open, don't tend to burn the carbon-particle and hydrocarbon products of the explosion. Gas-expansion and pressure-change effects tend to "freeze" the burn rapidly. A large open explosion of TNT may maintain fireball temperatures high enough so that some of those products do burn up with atmospheric oxygen.[10]

Such differences can be substantial. For safety purposes a range as wide as 2,673–6,702 J has been stated for a gram of TNT upon explosion.[11] Thus one can state that a nuclear bomb has a yield of 15 kt (6.3×1013 J), but the explosion of an actual 15,000 ton pile of TNT may yield (for example) 8×1013 J due to additional carbon/hydrocarbon oxidation not present with small open-air charges.[10]

These complications have been sidestepped by convention. The energy released by one gram of TNT was arbitrarily defined as a matter of convention to be 4,184 J,[12] which is exactly one kilocalorie.

Grams TNT Symbol Tons TNT Symbol Energy [joules] Energy [Wh] Corresponding mass loss[a]
milligram of TNT mg nanoton of TNT nt 4.184 J or 4.184 joules 1.162 mWh 46.55 fg
gram of TNT g microton of TNT μt 4.184×103 J or 4.184 kilojoules 1.162 Wh 46.55 pg
kilogram of TNT kg milliton of TNT mt 4.184×106 J or 4.184 megajoules 1.162 kWh 46.55 ng
megagram of TNT Mg ton of TNT t 4.184×109 J or 4.184 gigajoules 1.162 MWh 46.55 μg
gigagram of TNT Gg kiloton of TNT kt 4.184×1012 J or 4.184 terajoules 1.162 GWh 46.55 mg
teragram of TNT Tg megaton of TNT Mt 4.184×1015 J or 4.184 petajoules 1.162 TWh 46.55 g
petagram of TNT Pg gigaton of TNT Gt 4.184×1018 J or 4.184 exajoules 1.162 PWh 46.55 kg

Conversion to other units

[edit]

1 ton of TNT equivalent is approximately:

Examples

[edit]
Energy Description
Megatons of TNT Watt-hours [Wh]
1×10−12 1.162 Wh ≈ 1 food calorie (large calorie, kcal), which is the approximate amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of one kilogram of water by one degree Celsius at a pressure of one atmosphere.
1×10−9 1.162 kWh Under controlled conditions one kilogram of TNT can destroy (or even obliterate) a small vehicle.
4.8×10−9 5.6 kWh The energy to burn 1 kilogram of wood.[18]
1×10−8 11.62 kWh The approximate radiant heat energy released during 3-phase, 600 V, 100 kA arcing fault in a 0.5 m × 0.5 m × 0.5 m (20 in × 20 in × 20 in) compartment within a 1-second period.[further explanation needed][citation needed]
1.2×10−8 13.94 kWh Amount of TNT used (12 kg) in Coptic church explosion in Cairo, Egypt on December 11, 2016 that left 29 dead and 47 injured[19]
1.9×10−6 2.90 MWh The television show MythBusters used 2.5 tons of ANFO to make "homemade" diamonds. (Episode 116.)
2.4×10−72.4×10−6 280–2,800 kWh The energy output released by an average lightning discharge.[20]
(1–44)×10−6 1.16–51.14 MWh Conventional bombs yield from less than one ton to FOAB's 44 tons. The yield of a Tomahawk cruise missile is equivalent to 500 kg of TNT.[21]
4.54×10−4 581 MWh A real 0.454-kiloton-of-TNT (1.90 TJ) charge at Operation Sailor Hat. If the charge were a full sphere, it would be 1 kiloton of TNT (4.2 TJ).
454 tons of TNT (5 by 10 m (17 by 34 ft)) awaiting detonation at Operation Sailor Hat.
1.8×10−3 2.088 GWh Estimated yield of the Beirut explosion of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate[22] that killed initially 137 at and near a Lebanese port at 6 p.m. local time Tuesday August 4, 2020.[23] An independent study by experts from the Blast and Impact Research Group at the University of Sheffield predicts the best estimate of the yield of Beirut explosion to be 0.5 kilotons of TNT and the reasonable bound estimate as 1.12 kilotons of TNT.[24]
(1–2)×10−3 1.16–2.32 GWh Estimated yield of the Oppau explosion that killed more than 500 at a German fertilizer factory in 1921.
2.3×10−3 2.67 GWh Amount of solar energy falling on 4,000 m2 (1 acre) of land in a year is 9.5 TJ (2,650 MWh) (an average over the Earth's surface).[25]
2.9×10−3 3.4 GWh The Halifax Explosion in 1917 was the accidental detonation of 200 tons of TNT and 2,300 tons of Picric acid[26]
3.2×10−3 3.6 GWh The Operation Big Bang on April 18, 1947, blasted the bunkers on Heligoland. It accumulated 6700 metric tons of surplus World War II ammunition placed in various locations around the island and set off. The energy released was 1.3×1013 J, or about 3.2 kilotons of TNT equivalent.[27]
4×10−3 9.3 GWh Minor Scale, a 1985 United States conventional explosion, using 4,744 tons of ANFO explosive to provide a scaled equivalent airblast of an eight kiloton (33.44 TJ) nuclear device,[28] is believed to be the largest planned detonation of conventional explosives in history.
(1.5–2)×10−2 17.4–23.2 GWh The Little Boy atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, exploded with an energy of about 15 kilotons of TNT (63 TJ) killing between 90,000 and 166,000 people,[29] and the Fat Man atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, exploded with an energy of about 20 kilotons of TNT (84 TJ) killing over 60,000.[29] The modern nuclear weapons in the United States arsenal range in yield from 0.3 kt (1.3 TJ) to 1.2 Mt (5.0 PJ) equivalent, for the B83 strategic bomb.
>2.4×10−1 280 GWh The typical energy yield of severe thunderstorms.[30]
1.5×10−56×10−1 20 MWh – 700 GWh The estimated kinetic energy of tornados.[31]
1 1.16 TWh The energy contained in one megaton of TNT (4.2 PJ) is enough to power the average American household for 103,000 years.[32] The 30 Mt (130 PJ) estimated upper limit blast power of the Tunguska event could power the same average home for more than 3,100,000 years. The energy of that blast could power the entire United States for 3.27 days.[33]
8.6 10 TWh The energy output that would be released by a typical tropical cyclone in one minute, primarily from water condensation. Winds constitute 0.25% of that energy.[34]
16 18.6 TWh The approximate radiated surface energy released in a magnitude 8 earthquake.[35]
21.5 25 TWh The complete conversion of 1 kg of matter into pure energy would yield the theoretical maximum (E = mc2) of 89.8 petajoules, which is equivalent to 21.5 megatons of TNT. No such method of total conversion as combining 500 grams of matter with 500 grams of antimatter has yet been achieved. In the event of proton–antiproton annihilation, approximately 50% of the released energy will escape in the form of neutrinos, which are almost undetectable.[36] Electron–positron annihilation events emit their energy entirely as gamma rays.
24 28 TWh Approximate total yield of the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens.[37]
26.3 30.6 TWh Energy released by the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake.[38]
An animation of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami
45 53 TWh The energy released in the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami was over 200,000 times the surface energy and was calculated by the USGS at 1.9×1017 joules,[39][40] slightly less than the 2004 Indian Ocean quake. It was estimated at a moment magnitude of 9.0–9.1.
The damage caused by the 2011 Tōhoku tsunami
50–56 58 TWh The Soviet Union developed a prototype thermonuclear device, nicknamed the Tsar Bomba, which was tested at 50–56 Mt (210–230 PJ), but had a maximum theoretical design yield of 100 Mt (420 PJ).[41] The effective destructive potential of such a weapon varies greatly, depending on such conditions as the altitude at which it is detonated, the characteristics of the target, the terrain, and the physical landscape upon which it is detonated.
61 70.9 TWh The energy released by the 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haʻapai volcanic eruption, in the southern Pacific Ocean, is estimated to have been equivalent to 61 Megatons of TNT.[42]
84 97.04 TWh The solar irradiance on Earth every second.[b]
200 230 TWh The total energy released by the 1883 eruption of Krakatoa in the Dutch East Indies (present-day Indonesia).[43]
540 630 TWh The total energy produced worldwide by all nuclear testing and combat usage combined, from the 1940s to the present, is about 540 megatons.
1,460 1.69 PWh The total global nuclear arsenal is about 15,000 nuclear warheads[44][45][46] with a destructive capacity of around 1460 megatons[47][48][49][50] or 1.46 gigatons (1,460 million tons) of TNT. This is the equivalent of 6.11×1018 joules of energy
2,680[dubiousdiscuss] 3 PWh The energy yield of the 1960 Valdivia earthquake, was estimated at a moment magnitude of 9.4–9.6. This is the most powerful earthquake recorded in history.[51][52]
The aftermath of the 1960 Valdivia earthquake.
2,870 3.34 PWh The energy released by a hurricane per day during condensation.[53]
33,000 38.53 PWh The total energy released by the 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora in the island of Sumbawa in Indonesia. Yielded the equivalent of 2.2 million Little Boys (the first atomic bomb to drop on Japan) or one-quarter of the entire world's annual energy consumption.[54] This eruption was 4-10 times more destructive than the 1883 Krakatoa eruption.[55]
240,000 280 PWh The approximate total yield of the super-eruption of the La Garita Caldera is 10,000 times more powerful than the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption.[56] It was the second most energetic event to have occurred on Earth since the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 66 million years ago.
A photo of the La Garita Caldera
301,000 350 PWh The total solar irradiance energy received by Earth in the upper atmosphere per hour.[c][d]
875,000 1.02 EWh Approximate yield of the last eruption of the Yellowstone supervolcano.[57]
Image of the Yellowstone supervolcano.
3.61×106 4.2 EWh The solar irradiance of the Sun every 12 hours.[c][e]
6×106 7 EWh The estimated energy at impact when the largest fragment of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 struck Jupiter is equivalent to 6 million megatons (6 trillion tons) of TNT.[58]
The impact site of the Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9
7.2×107 116 EWh Estimates in 2010 show that the kinetic energy of the Chicxulub impact event yielded 72 teratons of TNT equivalent (1 teraton of TNT equals 106 megatons of TNT) which caused the K-Pg extinction event, wiping out 75% of all species on Earth.[59][60] This is far more destructive than any natural disaster recorded in history. Such an event would've caused global volcanism, earthquakes, megatsunamis, and global climate change.[59][61][62][63][64]
The animation of the Chicxulub impact.
>2.4×1010 >28 ZWh The impact energy of Archean asteroids.[65]
9.1×1010 106 ZWh The total energy output of the Sun per second.[66]
2.4×1011 280 ZWh The kinetic energy of the Caloris Planitia impactor.[67]
The photo of the Caloris Planitia on Mercury. Taken by the MESSENGER orbiter.
5.972×1015 6.94 RWh The explosive energy of a quantity of TNT of the mass of Earth.[68]
7.89×1015 9.17 RWh Total solar output in all directions per day.[69]
1.98×1021 2.3×1033 Wh The explosive energy of a quantity of TNT of the mass of the Sun.[70]
(2.4–4.8)×1028 (2.8–5.6)×1040 Wh A type Ia supernova explosion gives off 1–2×1044 joules of energy, which is about 2.4–4.8 hundred billion yottatons (24–48 octillion (2.4–4.8×1028) megatons) of TNT, equivalent to the explosive force of a quantity of TNT over a trillion (1012) times the mass of the planet Earth. This is the astrophysical standard candle used to determine galactic distances.[71]
(2.4–4.8)×1030 (2.8–5.6)×1042 Wh The largest type of supernova observed, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) release more than 1046 joules of energy.[72]
1.3×1032 1.5×1044 Wh A merger of two black holes, resulting in the first observation of gravitational waves, released 5.3×1047 joules[73]
9.6×1053 1.12×1066 Wh Estimated mass-energy of the observable universe.[74]

Relative effectiveness factor

[edit]

The relative effectiveness factor (RE factor) relates an explosive's demolition power to that of TNT, in units of the TNT equivalent/kg (TNTe/kg). The RE factor is the relative mass of TNT to which an explosive is equivalent: The greater the RE, the more powerful the explosive.

This enables engineers to determine the proper masses of different explosives when applying blasting formulas developed specifically for TNT. For example, if a timber-cutting formula calls for a charge of 1 kg of TNT, then based on octanitrocubane's RE factor of 2.38, it would take only 1.0/2.38 (or 0.42) kg of it to do the same job. Using PETN, engineers would need 1.0/1.66 (or 0.60) kg to obtain the same effects as 1 kg of TNT. With ANFO or ammonium nitrate, they would require 1.0/0.74 (or 1.35) kg or 1.0/0.32 (or 3.125) kg, respectively.

Calculating a single RE factor for an explosive is, however, impossible. It depends on the specific case or use. Given a pair of explosives, one can produce 2× the shockwave output (this depends on the distance of measuring instruments) but the difference in direct metal cutting ability may be 4× higher for one type of metal and 7× higher for another type of metal. The relative differences between two explosives with shaped charges will be even greater. The table below should be taken as an example and not as a precise source of data.

Some relative effectiveness factor examples[citation needed]
Explosive, grade Density
(g/ml)
Detonation
vel. (m/s)
Relative
effectiveness
Ammonium nitrate (AN + <0.5% H2O) 0.88 2,700[75] 0.32[76][77]
Mercury(II) fulminate 4.42 4,250 0.51[78]
Black powder (75% KNO3 + 19% C + 6% S, ancient low explosive) 1.65 400 0.55[79]
Hexamine dinitrate (HDN) 1.30 5,070 0.60
Dinitrobenzene (DNB) 1.50 6,025 0.60
HMTD (hexamine peroxide) 0.88 4,520 0.74
ANFO (94% AN + 6% fuel oil) 0.92 4,200 0.74
Urea nitrate 1.67 4,700 0.77
TATP (acetone peroxide) 1.18 5,300 0.80
Tovex Extra (AN water gel) commercial product 1.33 5,690 0.80
Hydromite 600 (AN water emulsion) commercial product 1.24 5,550 0.80
ANNMAL (66% AN + 25% NM + 5% Al + 3% C + 1% TETA) 1.16 5,360 0.87
Amatol (50% TNT + 50% AN) 1.50 6,290 0.91
Nitroguanidine 1.32 6,750 0.95
Trinitrotoluene (TNT) 1.60 6,900 1.00
Hexanitrostilbene (HNS) 1.70 7,080 1.05
Nitrourea 1.45 6,860 1.05
Tritonal (80% TNT + 20% aluminium)[f] 1.70 6,650 1.05
Nickel hydrazine nitrate (NHN) 1.70 7,000 1.05
Amatol (80% TNT + 20% AN) 1.55 6,570 1.10
Nitrocellulose (13.5% N, NC; AKA guncotton) 1.40 6,400 1.10
Nitromethane (NM) 1.13 6,360 1.10
PBXW-126 (22% NTO, 20% RDX, 20% AP, 26% Al, 12% PU's system)[f] 1.80 6,450 1.10
Diethylene glycol dinitrate (DEGDN) 1.38 6,610 1.17
PBXIH-135 EB (42% HMX, 33% Al, 25% PCP-TMETN's system)[f] 1.81 7,060 1.17
PBXN-109 (64% RDX, 20% Al, 16% HTPB's system)[f] 1.68 7,450 1.17
Triaminotrinitrobenzene (TATB) 1.80 7,550 1.17
Picric acid (TNP) 1.71 7,350 1.17
Trinitrobenzene (TNB) 1.60 7,300 1.20
Tetrytol (70% tetryl + 30% TNT) 1.60 7,370 1.20
Dynamite, Nobel's (75% NG + 23% diatomite) 1.48 7,200 1.25
Tetryl 1.71 7,770 1.25
Torpex (aka HBX, 41% RDX + 40% TNT + 18% Al + 1% wax)[f] 1.80 7,440 1.30
Composition B (63% RDX + 36% TNT + 1% wax) 1.72 7,840 1.33
Composition C-3 (78% RDX) 1.60 7,630 1.33
Composition C-4 (91% RDX) 1.59 8,040 1.34
Pentolite (56% PETN + 44% TNT) 1.66 7,520 1.33
Semtex 1A (76% PETN + 6% RDX) 1.55 7,670 1.35
Hexal (76% RDX + 20% Al + 4% wax)[f] 1.79 7,640 1.35
RISAL P (50% IPN + 28% RDX + 15% Al + 4% Mg + 1% Zr + 2% NC)[f] 1.39 5,980 1.40
Hydrazine nitrate 1.59 8,500 1.42
Mixture: 24% nitrobenzene + 76% TNM 1.48 8,060 1.50
Mixture: 30% nitrobenzene + 70% nitrogen tetroxide 1.39 8,290 1.50
Nitroglycerin (NG) 1.59 7,700 1.54
Methyl nitrate (MN) 1.21 7,900 1.54
Octol (80% HMX + 19% TNT + 1% DNT) 1.83 8,690 1.54
Nitrotriazolon (NTO) 1.87 8,120 1.60
DADNE (1,1-diamino-2,2-dinitroethene, FOX-7) 1.77 8,330 1.60
Gelignite (92% NG + 7% nitrocellulose) 1.60 7,970 1.60
Plastics Gel® (in toothpaste tube: 45% PETN + 45% NG + 5% DEGDN + 4% NC) 1.51 7,940 1.60
Composition A-5 (98% RDX + 2% stearic acid) 1.65 8,470 1.60
Erythritol tetranitrate (ETN) 1.72 8,206 1.60
Hexogen (RDX) 1.78 8,600 1.60
PBXW-11 (96% HMX, 1% HyTemp, 3% DOA) 1.81 8,720 1.60
Penthrite (PETN) 1.77 8,400 1.66
Ethylene glycol dinitrate (EGDN) 1.49 8,300 1.66
MEDINA (Methylene dinitroamine)[80][81] 1.65 8,700 1.70
Trinitroazetidine (TNAZ) 1.85 9,597 1.70
Octogen (HMX grade B) 1.86 9,100 1.70
Hexanitrobenzene (HNB) 1.97 9,340 1.80
Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (HNIW; AKA CL-20) 1.97 9,500 1.90
DDF (4,4’-Dinitro-3,3’-diazenofuroxan) 1.98 10,000 1.95
Heptanitrocubane (HNC)[g] 1.92 9,200 N/A
Octanitrocubane (ONC) 1.95 10,600 2.38
Octaazacubane (OAC)[g] 2.69 15,000 >5.00

Nuclear examples

[edit]
Nuclear weapons and the most powerful non-nuclear weapon examples
Weapon Total yield
(kilotons of TNT)
Mass
(kg)
Relative
effectiveness
GBU-57 bomb (Massive Ordnance Penetrator, MOP) 0.0035 13,600 0.26
Grand Slam (Earthquake bomb, M110) 0.0065 9,900 0.66
Bomb used in Oklahoma City (ANFO based on racing fuel) 0.0018 2,300 0.78
BLU-82 (Daisy Cutter) 0.0075 6,800 1.10
MOAB (non-nuclear bomb, GBU-43) 0.011 9,800 1.13
FOAB (advanced thermobaric bomb, ATBIP) 0.044 9,100 4.83
W54, Mk-54 (Davy Crockett) 0.022 23 1,000
Little Boy (dropped on Hiroshima) A-bomb 15 4,400 4,000
Fat Man (dropped on Nagasaki) A-bomb 20 4,600 4,500
W54, B54 (SADM) 1.0 23 43,500
Classic (one-stage) fission A-bomb 22 420 50,000
Hypothetical suitcase nuke 2.5 31 80,000
Typical (two-stage) nuclear bomb 500–1000 650–1,120 900,000
W88 modern thermonuclear warhead (MIRV) 470 355 1,300,000
Tsar nuclear bomb (three-stage) 50,000–56,000 26,500 2,100,000
B53 nuclear bomb (two-stage) 9,000 4,050 2,200,000
Operation Dominic Housatonic[82][83][84] (two-stage) 9,960 3,239 3,042,400
W56 thermonuclear warhead 1,200 272–308 4,960,000
B41 nuclear bomb (three-stage) 25,000 4,850 5,100,000
Theoretical antimatter weapon 43,000 1 43,000,000,000

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ Mass–energy equivalence.
  2. ^ The solar constant of the sun is 1370 watts per square meter and Earth has a cross-sectional surface area of 2.6×1014 square meters.
  3. ^ a b The solar constant of the sun is 1370 watts per square meter and Earth has a cross-sectional surface area of 2.6×1014 square meters.
  4. ^ 1 hour is equivalent to 3600 seconds.
  5. ^ 1 day is equivalent to 86400 seconds.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g TBX (thermobaric explosives) or EBX (enhanced blast explosives), in a small, confined space, may have over twice the power of destruction. The total power of aluminized mixtures strictly depends on the condition of explosions.
  7. ^ a b Predicted values

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ "Tons (Explosives) to Gigajoules Conversion Calculator". unitconversion.org. Archived from the original on March 17, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
  2. ^ "Convert Megaton to Joule". www.unitconverters.net. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  3. ^ "Convert Gigaton to Joule". www.unitconverters.net. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  4. ^ "Joules to Megatons Conversion Calculator". unitconversion.org. Archived from the original on November 24, 2009. Retrieved November 23, 2009.
  5. ^ Sorin Bastea, Laurence E. Fried, Kurt R. Glaesemann, W. Michael Howard, P. Clark Souers, Peter A. Vitello, Cheetah 5.0 User's Manual, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2007.
  6. ^ Maienschein, Jon L. (2002). Estimating equivalency of explosives through a thermochemical approach (PDF) (Technical report). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. UCRL-JC-147683. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 21, 2016. Retrieved December 12, 2012.
  7. ^ Maienschein, Jon L. (2002). Tnt equivalency of different explosives – estimation for calculating load limits in heaf firing tanks (Technical report). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. EMPE-02-22.
  8. ^ Cunningham, Bruce J. (2001). C-4/tnt equivalency (Technical report). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. EMPE-01-81.
  9. ^ Cooper, Paul W. (1996). Explosives Engineering. New York: Wiley-VCH. p. 406. ISBN 978-0-471-18636-6.
  10. ^ a b Charles E. Needham (October 3, 2017). Blast Waves. Springer. p. 91. ISBN 978-3319653822. OCLC 1005353847. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved January 25, 2019.
  11. ^ "Blast effects of external explosions (Section 4.8. Limitations of the TNT equivalent method)". Archived from the original on August 10, 2016.
  12. ^ "Appendix B8 – Factors for Units Listed Alphabetically". July 2, 2009. Archived from the original on January 29, 2016. Retrieved March 29, 2007. In NIST SI Guide 2008
  13. ^ "Tons Of Tnt to Calories | Kyle's Converter". www.kylesconverter.com. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  14. ^ "Convert tons of TNT to joules | energy conversion". convert-to.com. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  15. ^ "Convert tons of TNT to BTU - British Thermal Unit | energy conversion". convert-to.com. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  16. ^ "Convert tons of TNT to foot pounds | energy conversion". convert-to.com. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  17. ^ "Tons Of Tnt to Kilowatt-hours | Kyle's Converter". www.kylesconverter.com. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  18. ^ Timcheck, Jonathan (Fall 2017). "The Energy in Wildfires: The Western United States". large.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on January 17, 2018. Retrieved March 31, 2022.
  19. ^ "Botroseya church bombing death toll rises to 29 victims". Egypt Independent. February 4, 2017. Archived from the original on May 24, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
  20. ^ "How do Thunderstorms and Lightning Work?". www.thenakedscientists.com. March 6, 2007. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  21. ^ Homer-Dixon, Thomas F (2002). The Ingenuity Gap. Knopf Doubleday Publishing. p. 249. ISBN 978-0-375-71328-6. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  22. ^ Fuwad, Ahamad (August 5, 2020). "Beirut Blast: How does yield of 2,750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate compare against Halifax explosion, Hiroshima bombing?". DNA India. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved August 7, 2020.
  23. ^ Staff, W. S. J. (August 6, 2020). "Beirut Explosion: What Happened in Lebanon and Everything Else You Need to Know". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved August 7, 2020.
  24. ^ Rigby, S. E.; Lodge, T. J.; Alotaibi, S.; Barr, A. D.; Clarke, S. D.; Langdon, G. S.; Tyas, A. (September 22, 2020). "Preliminary yield estimation of the 2020 Beirut explosion using video footage from social media". Shock Waves. 30 (6): 671–675. Bibcode:2020ShWav..30..671R. doi:10.1007/s00193-020-00970-z. ISSN 1432-2153.
  25. ^ Kennewell, John; McDonald, Andrew. "The Sun and Solar Activity - The Solar Constant". www.sws.bom.gov.au. Retrieved November 13, 2024.
  26. ^ Ruffman, Alan; Howell, Colin (1994). Ground Zero: A Reassessment of the 1917 Explosion in Halifax Harbour. Nimbus Publishing. ISBN 978-1-55109-095-5.
  27. ^ Willmore, PL (1949). "Seismic Experiments on the North German Explosions, 1946 to 1947". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 242 (843): 123–151. Bibcode:1949RSPTA.242..123W. doi:10.1098/rsta.1949.0007. ISSN 0080-4614. JSTOR 91443.
  28. ^ Tech Reps (1986). "Minor Scale Event, Test Execution Report" (PDF). Albuerque, NM. hdl:100.2/ADA269600.
  29. ^ a b "Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Long Term Health Effects". K1 project. August 9, 2012. Archived from the original on July 23, 2015. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  30. ^ Crook, Aaron (February 10, 2010). "The gathering storms". Cosmos. Archived from the original on April 4, 2012.
  31. ^ Fricker, Tyler; Elsner, James B. (July 1, 2015). "Kinetic Energy of Tornadoes in the United States". PLOS ONE. 10 (7): e0131090. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1031090F. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131090. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4489157. PMID 26132830.
  32. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions – Electricity". United States Department of Energy. October 6, 2009. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010. Retrieved October 21, 2009. (Calculated from 2007 value of 936 kWh monthly usage)
  33. ^ "Country Comparison :: Electricity – consumption". The World Factbook. CIA. Archived from the original on January 28, 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2009. (Calculated from 2007 value of 3,892,000,000,000 kWh annual usage)
  34. ^ "NOAA FAQ: How much energy does a hurricane release?". National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. August 2001. Archived from the original on November 2, 2017. Retrieved June 30, 2009. cites 6E14 watts continuous.
  35. ^ "How much energy does an earthquake release?". Volcano Discovery. June 12, 2023.
  36. ^ Borowski, Stanley K. (March 1996). Comparison of Fusion/Antiproton Propulsion systems. 23rd Joint Propulsion Conference. NASA Glenn Research Center. doi:10.2514/6.1987-1814. hdl:2060/19960020441.
  37. ^ "Mount St. Helens – From the 1980 Eruption to 2000, Fact Sheet 036-00". pubs.usgs.gov. Archived from the original on May 12, 2013. Retrieved April 23, 2022.
  38. ^ "USGS Earthquake Hazards Program: Energy and Broadband Solution: Off W Coast of Northern Sumatra". April 4, 2010. Archived from the original on April 4, 2010. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  39. ^ "USGS.gov: USGS WPhase Moment Solution". Earthquake.usgs.gov. Archived from the original on March 14, 2011. Retrieved March 13, 2011.
  40. ^ "USGS Energy and Broadband Solution". March 16, 2011. Archived from the original on March 16, 2011. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  41. ^ See Currently deployed U.S. nuclear weapon yields Archived September 7, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Complete List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons Archived December 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Tsar Bomba Archived June 17, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, all from Carey Sublette's Nuclear Weapon Archive.
  42. ^ Díaz, J. S.; Rigby, S. E. (August 9, 2022). "Energetic output of the 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai volcanic eruption from pressure measurements". Shock Waves. 32 (6): 553–561. Bibcode:2022ShWav..32..553D. doi:10.1007/s00193-022-01092-4. ISSN 1432-2153. S2CID 251480018.
  43. ^ "The eruption of Krakatoa, August 27, 1883". Commonwealth of Australia 2012, Bureau of Meteorology. April 5, 2012. Archived from the original on March 18, 2016. Retrieved February 23, 2022.
  44. ^ "Status of World Nuclear Forces". fas.org. Archived from the original on May 8, 2017. Retrieved May 4, 2017.
  45. ^ "Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance". armscontrol.org. Archived from the original on January 24, 2018. Retrieved May 4, 2017.
  46. ^ "Global nuclear weapons: downsizing but modernizing". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. June 13, 2016. Archived from the original on October 7, 2016. Retrieved May 4, 2017.
  47. ^ Kristensen, Hans M.; Norris, Robert S. (May 3, 2016). "Russian nuclear forces, 2016". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 72 (3): 125–134. Bibcode:2016BuAtS..72c.125K. doi:10.1080/00963402.2016.1170359.
  48. ^ Kristensen, Hans M; Norris, Robert S (2015). "US nuclear forces, 2015". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 71 (2): 107. Bibcode:2015BuAtS..71b.107K. doi:10.1177/0096340215571913. S2CID 145260117.
  49. ^ "Minimize Harm and Security Risks of Nuclear Energy". Archived from the original on September 24, 2014. Retrieved May 4, 2017.
  50. ^ Kristensen, Hans M; Norris, Robert S (2015). "Chinese nuclear forces, 2015". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 71 (4): 77. Bibcode:2015BuAtS..71d..77K. doi:10.1177/0096340215591247. S2CID 145759562.
  51. ^ "Measuring the Size of an Earthquake". U.S. Geological Survey. September 1, 2009. Archived from the original on September 1, 2009. Retrieved January 17, 2010.
  52. ^ "Table-Top Earthquakes". December 7, 2022. Archived from the original on December 7, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  53. ^ "Hurricane FAQ – NOAA's Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory". Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  54. ^ Klemetti, Erik (April 2022). "Tambora 1815: Just How Big Was The Eruption?". Wired. Retrieved June 7, 2022.
  55. ^ Evans, Robert (July 2002). "Blast from the Past". Smithsonian Magazine.
  56. ^ "La Garita Mountains grew from volcanic explosions 35 million years ago". US Forest Service. August 25, 2021. Retrieved April 23, 2022.
  57. ^ "The thought experiment: What would happen if the supervolcano under Yellowstone erupted?". BBC Science Focus Magazine. Retrieved April 23, 2022.
  58. ^ "Comet/Jupiter Collision FAQ – Post-Impact". www.physics.sfasu.edu. Archived from the original on August 28, 2021. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  59. ^ a b Richards, Mark A.; Alvarez, Walter; Self, Stephen; Karlstrom, Leif; Renne, Paul R.; Manga, Michael; Sprain, Courtney J.; Smit, Jan; Vanderkluysen, Loÿc; Gibson, Sally A. (November 1, 2015). "Triggering of the largest Deccan eruptions by the Chicxulub impact". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 127 (11–12): 1507–1520. Bibcode:2015GSAB..127.1507R. doi:10.1130/B31167.1. ISSN 0016-7606. S2CID 3463018.
  60. ^ Jablonski, David; Chaloner, William Gilbert; Lawton, John Hartley; May, Robert McCredie (April 29, 1994). "Extinctions in the fossil record". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 344 (1307): 11–17. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0045.
  61. ^ Kornei, Katherine (December 20, 2018). "Huge Global Tsunami Followed Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Impact". Eos. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  62. ^ "Chicxulub Impact Event". www.lpi.usra.edu. Retrieved April 23, 2022.
  63. ^ Henehan, Michael J.; Ridgwell, Andy; Thomas, Ellen; Zhang, Shuang; Alegret, Laia; Schmidt, Daniela N.; Rae, James W. B.; Witts, James D.; Landman, Neil H.; Greene, Sarah E.; Huber, Brian T. (October 21, 2019). "Rapid ocean acidification and protracted Earth system recovery followed the end-Cretaceous Chicxulub impact". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (45): 22500–22504. Bibcode:2019PNAS..11622500H. doi:10.1073/pnas.1905989116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6842625. PMID 31636204.
  64. ^ Nield, David (October 22, 2019). "That Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Instantly Acidified Our World's Oceans, Too". ScienceAlert. Retrieved April 23, 2022.
  65. ^ Zahnle, K. J. (August 26, 2018). "Climatic Effect of Impacts on the Ocean". Comparative Climatology of Terrestrial Planets III: From Stars to Surfaces. 2065: 2056. Bibcode:2018LPICo2065.2056Z.
  66. ^ Carroll, Carroll (2017). "Sun: Amount of Energy the Earth Gets from the Sun". Ask a Physicist. Archived from the original on August 16, 2000.
  67. ^ Lü, Jiangning; Sun, Youshun; Nafi Toksöz, M.; Zheng, Yingcai; Zuber, Maria T. (December 1, 2011). "Seismic effects of the Caloris basin impact, Mercury". Planetary and Space Science. 59 (15): 1981–1991. Bibcode:2011P&SS...59.1981L. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2011.07.013. hdl:1721.1/69472. ISSN 0032-0633.
  68. ^ Luzum, Brian; Capitaine, Nicole; Fienga, Agnès; Folkner, William; Fukushima, Toshio; Hilton, James; Hohenkerk, Catherine; Krasinsky, George; Petit, Gérard; Pitjeva, Elena; Soffel, Michael (July 10, 2011). "The IAU 2009 system of astronomical constants: the report of the IAU working group on numerical standards for Fundamental Astronomy". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 110 (4): 293. Bibcode:2011CeMDA.110..293L. doi:10.1007/s10569-011-9352-4. ISSN 1572-9478. S2CID 122755461.
  69. ^ "Ask A Physicist: Sun". Cosmic Helospheric Learning Center. August 16, 2000. Archived from the original on August 16, 2000. Retrieved February 23, 2022.
  70. ^ "Sun Fact Sheet". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  71. ^ Khokhlov, A.; Mueller, E.; Hoeflich, P. (March 1, 1993). "Light curves of type IA supernova models with different explosion mechanisms". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 270: 223–248. Bibcode:1993A&A...270..223K. ISSN 0004-6361.
  72. ^ Maselli, A.; Melandri, A.; Nava, L.; Mundell, C. G.; Kawai, N.; Campana, S.; Covino, S.; Cummings, J. R.; Cusumano, G.; Evans, P. A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Ghisellini, G.; Guidorzi, C.; Kobayashi, S.; Kuin, P.; LaParola, V.; Mangano, V.; Oates, S.; Sakamoto, T.; Serino, M.; Virgili, F.; Zhang, B.- B.; Barthelmy, S.; Beardmore, A.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bersier, D.; Burrows, D.; Calderone, G.; Capalbi, M.; Chiang, J. (2014). "GRB 130427A: A Nearby Ordinary Monster". Science. 343 (6166): 48–51. arXiv:1311.5254. Bibcode:2014Sci...343...48M. doi:10.1126/science.1242279. PMID 24263134. S2CID 9782862.
  73. ^ The LIGO Scientific Collaboration; the Virgo Collaboration; Abbott, B. P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T. D.; Abernathy, M. R.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C. (June 14, 2016). "Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914". Physical Review Letters. 116 (24): 241102. arXiv:1602.03840. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116x1102A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241102. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 27367378. S2CID 217406416.
  74. ^ "Big Bang Energy (Ask an Astrophysicist)". Imagine the Universe!. February 11, 1998. Archived from the original on August 19, 2014. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  75. ^ US Army FM 3–34.214: Explosives and Demolition, 2007, page 1–2.
  76. ^ Török, Zoltán; Ozunu, Alexandru (2015). "Hazardous properties of ammonium nitrate and modeling of explosions using TNT equivalency". Environmental Engineering & Management Journal. 14 (11): 2671–2678. doi:10.30638/eemj.2015.284.
  77. ^ Queensland Government. "Storage requirements for security sensitive ammonium nitrate (SSAN)". Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved August 24, 2020.
  78. ^ "Whitehall Paraindistries". Archived from the original on February 10, 2017. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
  79. ^ "FM 5–250" (PDF). bits.de. United States Department of the Army. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 5, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  80. ^ PubChem. "Medina". pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved May 20, 2024.
  81. ^ "methylenedinitramine | CH4N4O4 | ChemSpider". www.chemspider.com. Retrieved May 20, 2024.
  82. ^ "Ripple" (PNG).
  83. ^ "Postulated Ripple design (Dominic Housatonic)" (PNG).
  84. ^ "Nuclear weapon design", Wikipedia, May 28, 2024, retrieved July 7, 2024
[edit]