User talk:Trut-h-urts man: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:38, 19 November 2024

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

Welcome

Hello, Trut-h-urts man! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! User:OlEnglish 03:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Trut-h-urts man. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edited without loggining in

I am only using one account and it's the one you blocked from editing (Aggiefan47). Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:45A0:A9E0:E8B7:9F58:DF4E:B708 (talk) 18:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for admitting you are abusing IP accounts to continue to edit Wikipedia. These IPs and any others you use will be blocked. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 18:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dee Gordon

It's on espn the athletic and MLB trade rumors. What else do u need ? Mr Gordon to call you himself to tell you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliastroadmire (talk • contribs) 22:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The teams involved need to confirm the trade, which is more than likely pending physical evaluations. They have not done this yet. This is standard WP:BASEBALL practice. Trades can and have been cancelled due to the results of physicals. We wait until it becomes official. If you continue to disrupt the page you will be blocked from editing. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 22:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And 30 seconds later, it's official. See the difference? Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 22:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A different Dee Gordon complaint

Dee Gordon will not be playing second base for the Mariner’s - would be nice to see accurate information - thanks :) TravelBud (talk) 00:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hasn't happened yet. Per WP:CRYSTAL, we don't predict the future. Stating the Mariners plan to play him in the outfield (with a reliable citation) in the Mariners section would be best for now. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 01:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No one said anything about predicting the future - it’s stated by the team - why than put a position for each player - please include citation where you got that he is a second baseman for the Mariner’s TravelBud (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon hasn't played a single MLB out in the outfield (See the standard fielding section). Regardless of where the Mariners intend to play him, the infobox can and should reflect the position(s) he has played for the majority of his career to this point, and definitely should not include positions he has not played yet. By placing "outfielder" in the infobox, you are attempting to predict an expected future event, which violates WP:CRYSTAL (and specifically, "Avoid predicted sports team line-ups, which are inherently unverifiable and speculative.") It's for that reason that we also do not add "Seattle Mariners (2018–present)" to Gordon's infobox until he appears in a regular season game for Seattle. I don't know how I can explain this any clearer to you, so I now consider the matter closed. If you want to take it further please open a discussion at WP:BASEBALL, though you shouldn't expect to find support for your position. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 17:17, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jake McGee

I didn't realize the initial vandalism preceded the article. Good job putting that timeline together. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've had that gem in cold-storage until today. Someone is trying to "pull a Mike Trout". Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 22:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You'd think he'd be more creative, or pick a bigger target. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be a good idea to document this on Talk:Jake McGee, much as you did at WP:RPP. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will do - hopefully it'll be of some use to other editors unfortunate enough to get dragged into this. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 22:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting my edits

The MLB YouTube channel has confirmed Carlos Santana's signing with the Philadelphia Phillies, yet you still reverted my changes. Can you please not. Also I would apprecate if you re-enstated my changes cause im not doing it for a 3rd time and I shouldnt have to. Aqrez (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I'm getting kind of tired of explaining this to people. Read this article. Take note of the part that says "The deal, which the team has not confirmed because it is pending a physical". If he hasn't passed a physical, the signing isn't official. Take a look at the Phillies official Twitter page. See a posting announcing the signing? Neither do I. The "MLB YouTube channel" (which you didn't provide) is irrelevant. The team announces when a signing is official. Since they haven't done that yet, it isn't official. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 02:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You must be real fun at parties Aqrez (talk) 04:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess reading was too much to ask. It's not difficult. Then again, reading seems like a problem for you. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 17:27, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

With respect, I don't think this was an appropriate use of rollback, per WP:RBK. The preceding edit was clearly made in good faith, and, aside from the MOS:DATEFORMAT issue, seemed quite reasonable. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 03:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 10:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Dirks

I add recent stuff on him and you change it back please stop Dragonfan96 (talk) 04:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're adding unsourced content in violation of Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people, as I have told you repeatedly. You've also abused multiple IPs and now a registered account to do so. If you continue you will be blocked from editing. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 04:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capitals

So, if someone is a president, their title is generally President, and you initial cap it, as with a President of Team X. See http://cleveland.indians.mlb.com/team/front_office.jsp?c_id=cle --2604:2000:E016:A700:6051:4F46:43BD:6EA8 (talk) 01:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, you do not. You would if using it before the name of a country's president (as in, President George Washington), or if used immediately preceding a person's name (as in, "team President Mark Shapiro...") in American English usage, per Grammarist. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 01:24, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you do. When it is understood that it is his title, understood that your are referring to "President of x" you say President .. as in President Trump .. and when you are just referring to generically "a" president you just say "president." https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/285685/capitalization-of-president-and-state-of-the-united-states

It depends whether you are referring to an official title -- which is what we are doing here .. or whether we are are describing a type of position. https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/capitalizing-job-titles 2604:2000:E016:A700:6051:4F46:43BD:6EA8 (talk) 01:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gurriel

Duh. For some reason I thought he debuted yesterday, forgot it was Friday. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - I'm pretty glad he debuted on Friday, otherwise the Jays could be staring at a sweep today. Severino sharp once again. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 19:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Braden Smith

I can resolve this battle you are having at Braden Smith. NFL.com lists what a player was listed at in college for rookies (see his college profile). Team websites on the other hand, usually will the most updated information. These editors are getting 315 from his Colts profile. Please use height and weight from team websites for rookies.--Rockchalk7 17 17:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't call it a battle. An editor made unsourced edits to the page and I corrected it. Or so I thought. Had they explained themselves with an edit summary I would have known where they were getting their information. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 02:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol?

Hi Trut-h-urts man,

I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join New Page Patrol, and from your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; we could use some additional help from an experienced user like yourself.

Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR.

Cheers, and hope to see you around, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 13:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey, So I was looking at the Blue Jays and the White Sox roster and I saw two things that caught my eye Taylor Guerrieri and Thyago Viera weren't on the 40 man roster and on each teams AAA website it says they aren't on the 40 man but I have seen nothing of either player being DFA'd or outrighted. What should I do for their pages?. Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 22:34, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible that these roster moves were made very recently and haven't been announced yet, though that seems unlikely, and I suppose it is also possible that the moves were made without announcement, but the DFA/outright assignment should still appear on the teams transactions log and they don't (Vieira was on the 25-man roster for a day in June, Guerrieri's last transaction was in March). I honestly have no idea what to do with it, but I suppose for now the reliable sources are saying the players aren't on the 40-man (in the sense that they don't say they are). Go with the official pages and hide them from the roster templates (maybe with an explanation that they aren't presently listed on the team's official roster pages). It can always be changed back if/when they reappear. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 23:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danny Jansen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Jansen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Jansen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for catching my mistake on Steve Pearce (baseball) - I accidentally undid the wrong IP edit! PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Trut-h-urts man. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Trut-h-urts man, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Everedux (talk) 14:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Proposed deletion of Matt Smoral

The article Matt Smoral has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nevber appeared in a major leaguegame

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Colts draft navbox TfDs.

Hello there is a TfD regarding alot of the Indianapolis Colts draft navigational boxes here. -UCO2009bluejay (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Trut-h-urts man,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quenton Nelson

I have left a valid source on my edits multiple times and you continue to reverse them. Let me reiterate, again: QUENTON NELSON, the person the article is about, used his own voice and spoke into a microphone that his middle name is EMERSON. This was done so on Monday, April 6, 2020, on Pardon My Take, the most popular sports podcast in the world, which hundreds of thousands of people listen to. There’s your source. It isn’t a guess. It isn’t fake. It came from the actual person the entire page is dedicated to. Do some damn research before you just reverse an edit to get high off your “power” of your Wikipedia profile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:802:8300:1D0:F4FA:FF33:C896:F91A (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have not left a valid source. Drmies, an administrator for Wikipedia, removed the PMT source here, with proper explanation. You have continued to add the unsourced information to the page, in clear violation of WP:BLP. And you continue to push an unsourced edit after being issued numerous warnings, which is why I have now both reported your IP range for blocking and recommended the page be protected against further BLP violations. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 18:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

someone is going to lie about their middle name to impress someone?!? Lmfao. Alright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:802:8300:1D0:F4FA:FF33:C896:F91A (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty clear you have no intention of making useful and meaningful contributions, which may also be why you're now blocked. Should you return please take the time necessary to familiarize yourself with policies. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 18:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A Man Without Honor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Man Without Honor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Man Without Honor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Second Sons and other articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Man Without Honor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Corey Copping

The article Corey Copping has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable minor league baseball player

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spanneraol (talk) 23:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Fourteenth First Edit Day!

Hey, Trut-h-urts man. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 16:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hey, I was wondering how you can edit redirects? Specifically regarding Jasseel De La Cruz I put his into from the Atlanta Braves minor league players to the Oakland Athletics but it still redirects to Atlanta could use some help please! Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 18:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and changed the redirect, but the way I do it is to search the page, then click the link near the top of the page under the title. So when you now search for De La Cruz, the page that comes up is the Oakland minor leaguers page. At the top it says

Oakland Athletics minor league players

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redirected from Jasseel De La Cruz

I click that link and it takes you to the non-redirected page, where you can edit the redirect.

Additionally, while I've "got you here", please stop describing players as "currently a free agent", as the word current is both time-sensitive and unnecessary. As well, please properly source player transactions (major or minor) and update player team histories in leads if/when they change teams or become free agents. Thanks Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 19:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Trut-h-urts man!

Happy New Year!

Trut-h-urts man,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy (Belated) First Edit Day!

P.S. I am so sorry for the lateness. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]