Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia S. Fontaines: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:25, 5 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Number 5 7 13:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anastasia S. Fontaines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR. A couple of the references cannot be found in the online versions of the magazines so it's hard to know whether, e.g., the Marie Claire article is actually primarily about Fontaines, but the sources that can be checked online do not show sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. This is a new article created by a new editor so I have devoted some time to trying to find sources and improving the article instead of nominating it for deletion; sadly, I have been unsuccessful. bonadea contributions talk 12:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 18:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As far as references go, I stand by my opinion that there is not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. The article's author is making contradictory claims (probably based on not understanding how references work) on my user talk page, but has not been able to produce any actual evidence of notability: there are a couple of Hungarian-language articles written by a freelance journalist for a couple of different magazines, which mention the actress (such as one article where she presents her favourite recipe), and a couple of radio interviews for a minor radio station. That is not significant coverage. As for WP:NACTOR, there is no claim that it is met, as there are only minor roles. --bonadea contributions talk 16:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete insufficient evidence to meet WP:BIO or NACTOR LibStar (talk) 12:49, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Written by a single-purpose account, which seems to belong to the same person, in other words autobiography. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 07:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was  '''delete'''. [[User:Number 57|<span style="color:orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color:green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color:blue;">7</span>]] 13:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 ===[[Anastasia S. Fontaines]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Anastasia S. Fontaines}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia S. Fontaines|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 11#{{anchorencode:Anastasia S. Fontaines}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anastasia_S._Fontaines Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 9: / Line 16: @@
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
-:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909;color:#909'>czar&nbsp;[[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 18:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909;color:#909'>czar&nbsp;[[User:Czar|<span style="color:#909;">♔</span>]]</span> 18:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 *'''Comment''' As far as references go, I stand by my opinion that there is not enough coverage to meet [[WP:GNG]]. The article's author is making contradictory claims (probably based on not understanding how references work) [[User_talk:Bonadea#Hello_Bonadea|on my user talk page]], but has not been able to produce any actual evidence of notability: there are a couple of Hungarian-language articles written by a freelance journalist for a couple of different magazines, which mention the actress (such as one article where she presents her favourite recipe), and a couple of radio interviews for a minor radio station. That is not significant coverage. As for [[WP:NACTOR]], there is no claim that it is met, as there are only minor roles.  --''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 16:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 *'''delete''' insufficient evidence to meet WP:BIO or NACTOR [[User:LibStar|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar|talk]]) 12:49, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' Written by a single-purpose account, which seems to belong to the same person, in other words autobiography. --[[User:Why should I have a User Name?|Why should I have a User Name?]] ([[User talk:Why should I have a User Name?|talk]]) 07:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>