User talk:64.4.93.100: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13) |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Blanked IP talk}} |
|||
==[[Stu Barnes]]== |
|||
{{#if: | |
|||
|{{#switch: {{{1}}} |
|||
|The Original Barnstar = {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Original_Barnstar.png|100px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I hereby award this barnstar for your work on BLPs. [[Special:Contributions/207.157.121.52|207.157.121.52]] ([[User talk:207.157.121.52|talk]]) 18:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
| |
|||
}} |
|||
[[Image:Original_Barnstar.png|100px|thumb|left|I hereby award this barnstar for your work on BLPs. [[Special:Contributions/207.157.121.52|207.157.121.52]] ([[User talk:207.157.121.52|talk]]) 18:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC)]]}} |
|||
==Talkback== |
|||
{{talkback|Ashbeckjonathan|ts=19:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)}} |
|||
[[User:Ashbeckjonathan|Ashbeckjonathan]] ([[User talk:Ashbeckjonathan|talk]]) 19:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you. Though many patrollers are careless at least some apologize. [[Special:Contributions/64.4.93.100|64.4.93.100]] ([[User talk:64.4.93.100#top|talk]]) 19:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:::I guess I need to pay attention next time when it comes to undoing vandalism. To me I thought it was vandalism. Now I know it was reasonable why you removed that section Wikiquotes from Jim Nantz. [[User:Ashbeckjonathan|Ashbeckjonathan]] ([[User talk:Ashbeckjonathan|talk]]) 23:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== A cookie for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Choco_chip_cookie.png|120px]] |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your work supporting the [[WP:QUOTE]] guideline, removing miscellaneous quotes that belong on Wikiquote instead of Wikipedia. I checked a lot of your edits and I believe you were right to remove them. [[User:BZTMPS|<font color="blue">'''''BZTMPS''''' ★</font>]] · [[User talk:BZTMPS|<font color="maroon">(talk?</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/BZTMPS|<font color="maroon">contribs?)</font>]] 20:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:Yum, thank you. [[Special:Contributions/64.4.93.100|64.4.93.100]] ([[User talk:64.4.93.100#top|talk]]) 20:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:64.4.93.100 reported by User:Benhen1997 (Result: Both IPs blocked)]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Benhen1997|Ben]]<sup>[[User talk:Benhen1997|Yes?]]</sup> 20:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Edit warring about quotes == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''3 days''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report of this case is at [[Special:Permalink/615164839#User:64.4.93.100_reported_by_User:Benhen1997_.28Result:_Both_IPs_blocked.29 |the 3RR noticeboard (permalink)]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I didn't know about the talk pages so I gave my reasons in the edit summary. But the other person didn't give any reasons and didn't tell me why they were stalking me to undo all my edits so I didn't know what to do. After the report I found the talk pages and gave my reasons there instead of undoing the other person but you blocked me the next day while I was on holiday so now I can't go back and finish discussing. [[Special:Contributions/64.4.93.100|64.4.93.100]] ([[User talk:64.4.93.100#top|talk]]) 13:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC) | decline = Your unblock reason is essentially that you didn't know about talk pages, so you couldn't discuss your edits. However, you were responding to talk page messages about your disruptive editing at least as far back as 23 June, and continued to make huge numbers of the same kind of edits after that, so your claim is clearly without foundation. Also, '''after''' you had posted numerous times at [Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] you made several of the same kind of edits, so your pretence that you didn't know how to discuss the issues, and were blocked without being given a chance to do so is totally disingenuous. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 20:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{admin help-helped}} The unblock request is supposed to put me on the list to be unblocked but I'm not there [[CAT:UNBLOCK]] why not? [[Special:Contributions/64.4.93.100|64.4.93.100]] ([[User talk:64.4.93.100#top|talk]]) 14:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:The table appears to be stuck as of three days ago and hasn't updated. I'll try and catch an admin's attention to flag the issue and get you unblocked. Regards <span style="background-color:lightblue">''''' [[User:Velella|Velella]] '''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue"> <sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup> </span> 16:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::The table at the top of that page is not being updated for some reason, and that is being looked at; but you ''are'' in the actual list of "Pages in category" lower down the page, which is what admins usually check. There is a backlog, so it may take a little time before someone gets round to reviewing your request. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 18:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:::A request for attention has been posted at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Unblock notification not working]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 18:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
EdJohnston you are wrong, I did not file the report, BenHen1997 did. You also did not block the other person but only one of the several IPs they were using. [[Special:Contributions/64.4.93.100|64.4.93.100]] ([[User talk:64.4.93.100#top|talk]]) 18:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for the correction; I removed the statement that you filed the 3RR. Let me ask you to explain why you've been removing so many quotes from articles. Your previous quote removals were mentioned in the 3RR report by [[User:Velella]] and [[User:David J Johnson]]. So while you were cited for breaking 3RR just on the [[Oona King]] article, you've been removing quotes for quite some time. In the last ten days of June, you triggered [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&offset=&limit=250&wpSearchUser=64.4.93.100 our section blanking edit filter] 250 times. Do you think you got consensus somewhere to make these 250 removals? People who get flagged so many times by the edit filter are usually vandals. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::I am not a vandal! Like the policy [[WP:NOT]] says lists of quotations do not belong on Wikipedia but should only be on Wikiquote. Even so I do not remove all quotation sections but leave ones that are justifiable like at Yogi Berra. I also remove stuff without sources from BLP articles because the notice at the top of the editing page says to do that. [[Special:Contributions/64.4.93.100|64.4.93.100]] ([[User talk:64.4.93.100#top|talk]]) 19:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:12, 7 August 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.