Talk:Marxism: Difference between revisions
→Welfare vs Welfare spending: Reply |
|||
(283 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} |
{{Skip to talk}} |
||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Round in circles|search=yes}} |
{{Round in circles|search=yes}} |
||
{{Communism Portal selected|article}} |
|||
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Society|class=C}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Not a forum}} |
{{Not a forum}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|||
{{Backwardscopy |
|||
⚫ | |||
|author = Surhone, L. M., Timpledon, M. T., & Marseken, S. F. |
|||
⚫ | |||
|year = 2010 |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|org = Betascript Publishing |
|||
{{WikiProject History|importance=Mid}} |
|||
|comments = {{OCLC|642007342}}, ISBN 9786130348038. |
|||
{{WikiProject European history|importance=Mid}} |
|||
|bot = LivingBot |
|||
{{WikiProject Cold War|importance=Mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject China|importance=top}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | {{Backwardscopy|author=Surhone, L. M., Timpledon, M. T., & Marseken, S. F.|year=2010|title=Nicos Poulantzas: Political sociology, Marxism, structural Marxism, Leninism, Eurocommunism, social class, instrumentalism, cultural hegemony|org=Betascript Publishing|comments={{OCLC|642007342}}, {{ISBN|9786130348038}}.|bot=LivingBot}} |
||
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=40|small=no|dounreplied=yes}} |
|||
{{Annual readership}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
{{section sizes}} |
|||
|archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config|archiveheader={{Talkarchivenav}}|maxarchivesize=100K|counter=4|minthreadsleft=3|algo=old(40d)|archive=Talk:Marxism/Archive %(counter)d}} |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|||
{{Broken anchors|links= |
|||
|counter = 3 |
|||
* <nowiki>[[Ideology#Ideology as an instrument of social reproduction|ideology]]</nowiki> The anchor (#Ideology as an instrument of social reproduction) [[Special:Diff/502440930|has been deleted]]. <!-- {"title":"Ideology as an instrument of social reproduction","appear":{"revid":4950246,"parentid":4950194,"timestamp":"2004-08-01T17:00:11Z","removed_section_titles":[],"added_section_titles":["Ideology as an instrument of social reproduction"]},"disappear":{"revid":502440930,"parentid":502440644,"timestamp":"2012-07-15T15:54:40Z","removed_section_titles":["Ideology as an instrument of social reproduction"],"added_section_titles":["Marxist view"]},"very_different":"46≥12","rename_to":"Marxist view"} --> |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 3 |
|||
|algo = old(40d) |
|||
|archive = Talk:Marxism/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== |
== Revolutionary marxism == |
||
This page currently opens: '''Marxism''' is a socio-economic and political worldview or inquiry based on a [[historical materialism|materialist interpretation of historical development]], a [[dialectic]]al view of social transformation, an analysis of class-relations and conflict within society. Marxist methodology informs an [[economic]] and sociopolitical enquiry applying to the analysis and critique of the development of [[capitalism]] and the role of class struggle in systemic economic change. |
|||
These sentences are inaccessible. While I see that this has been brought up in the archive, users who raise this concern seem to either be ignored or told that there's no problem. |
|||
First, "a socio-economic and political worldview or inquiry" is linguistically vague - what clauses are the "or" connecting? Is our choice between a socio-economic and political worldview or an inquiry? Is it between worldview that is both socio-economic and political or an inquiry? Or is it just a choice between the political worldview or an inquiry? |
|||
Furthermore, what does "socio-economic" mean in this context? Is this distinct from the political? Doesn't a list which includes "an analysis of class-relations and conflict within society" imply both of these descriptors anyway? |
|||
We then learn that Marxist methodology (methodology relating to what? practice? action? what is a Marxist method? why is methodology being discussed in the second sentence when it isn't mentioned again until the last paragraph of the entire article?) informs an "economic and sociopolitical 'enquiry'". So once the reader has wrapped their head around the "socio-economic and political... inquiry," they are then instructed to comprehend an "economic and sociopolitical" approach. Is this supposed to be significant? I have absolutely no idea. |
|||
Is there a need to create a section on Revolutionary Marxism or does it already exist somewhere else and I can't find it? [[User talk:Pallikari|Pallikari ap' ta Sfakia]] 17:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I believe the opening paragraph should follow in the footsteps of [[Kantian ethics]] - describe Marxism as an influential economic and political theory put forth by Karl Marx in the first sentence and provide a very brief summary of major concepts (historical materialism, dialectics, class conflict, critique of capitalism). Thoughts? I don't feel that opening unclear prose and barrage of jargon is something that blue links can successfully satisfy. --[[User:Lunar Jesters|Lunar Jesters]] <sub>([[User talk:Lunar Jesters|talk]])</sub> 17:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:: Doesn't Marxism culminate in revolution by its very nature? Doesn't Marx postulate that revolution is the natural outgrowth of class conflict, class consciousness of the proletariat, and the eventual desire of the proletariat to capture ownership of their own means of production, an ownership the bourgeoisie will never hand over willingly? Isn't Revolutionary Marxism redundant? [[User:Kelelain|Kelelain]] ([[User talk:Kelelain|talk]]) 17:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: Indeed. Like many wiki articles, the lead is full of jargon and does not satisfy the conditions set out at [[wp:lead]] : "the lead should be written in a clear, accessible style". Too many big words. [[User:Poujeaux|Poujeaux]] ([[User talk:Poujeaux|talk]]) 18:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Terrible == |
|||
== "Libertarian socialists"?! == |
|||
You keep talking around the subject and never explain it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.241.240.42|67.241.240.42]] ([[User talk:67.241.240.42#top|talk]]) 22:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== [[Draft:Ideological aracialism]] == |
|||
The section about "communism" contains this funny little oxymoron. I'd like to ask the editors to remove it, as it's factually wrong, and completely meaningless. Libertarianism is an ideology in and of itself, and is in total opposition with any form of communism or socialism. The word the writer must have been seraching for is "anarcho-communist", or, if we're talking about mainstream social democrats, "democratic socialists". There is no such thing as a libertarian socialist. [[Special:Contributions/64.134.152.35|64.134.152.35]] ([[User talk:64.134.152.35|talk]]) 18:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Aracialism isn't necessarily South-African or Marxist but the main article isn't analytical enough. |
|||
create the pages: [[ideological aracialism]], [[ideological statelessness]] (chosen, [usually] not because of the circumstances), [[ethnocultural nonconformity]] |
|||
:Are you [[Libertarian Marxism|sure]]? --[[User:Drowninginlimbo|Drowninginlimbo]] ([[User talk:Drowninginlimbo|talk]]) 19:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::[[Noam Chomsky]] would disagree with you.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxbeyn2xMQE] <span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 21:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:::I think most theorists would disagree with him, if not just for his absurd simplification of two hugely complicated concepts--[[User:Drowninginlimbo|Drowninginlimbo]] ([[User talk:Drowninginlimbo|talk]]) 21:28, 18 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Welfare]] vs [[Welfare spending]] == |
|||
== General improvements == |
|||
@[[User:Frost|Frost]] seems to feel that linking to [[Welfare spending]] is more appropriate than linking to [[Welfare]]. On the surface I don't see it but I'd be open to hearing their reasoning. [[User:Simonm223|Simonm223]] ([[User talk:Simonm223|talk]]) 17:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Is there anyone who would be opposed to a complete rewrite of the article? <span style="font-family:Euclid Fraktur; background:white;">→[[User:Σ|<font color="#BA0000">Σ</font>]][[User talk:Σ|<font color="#036">σ</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Σ|<font color="#036">ς</font>]]. <small>([[User:Σ|Sigma]])</small></span> 07:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
: |
:I know [[Welfare]] is pointing to a disambiguation link but I don't think [[Welfare spending]] is the right target. Suggest [[Social services]] instead? [[User:Simonm223|Simonm223]] ([[User talk:Simonm223|talk]]) 17:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
::The link was originally pointing to the same [[welfare spending|article]], which was [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Welfare_spending&diff=prev&oldid=1244381165 moved] in September. The disambiguation page then took over the article's previous title per this [[Talk:Welfare#Requested move 19 December 2024|RM]]. My update was to reflect this change. [[User:Frost|<span style="color: #9cbfe8; font-family: Bahnschrift">Frost</span>]] 17:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:27, 3 January 2025
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marxism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 40 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Marxism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Marxism at the Reference desk. |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Revolutionary marxism
[edit]Is there a need to create a section on Revolutionary Marxism or does it already exist somewhere else and I can't find it? Pallikari ap' ta Sfakia 17:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't Marxism culminate in revolution by its very nature? Doesn't Marx postulate that revolution is the natural outgrowth of class conflict, class consciousness of the proletariat, and the eventual desire of the proletariat to capture ownership of their own means of production, an ownership the bourgeoisie will never hand over willingly? Isn't Revolutionary Marxism redundant? Kelelain (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Terrible
[edit]You keep talking around the subject and never explain it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.240.42 (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Aracialism isn't necessarily South-African or Marxist but the main article isn't analytical enough.
create the pages: ideological aracialism, ideological statelessness (chosen, [usually] not because of the circumstances), ethnocultural nonconformity
@Frost seems to feel that linking to Welfare spending is more appropriate than linking to Welfare. On the surface I don't see it but I'd be open to hearing their reasoning. Simonm223 (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I know Welfare is pointing to a disambiguation link but I don't think Welfare spending is the right target. Suggest Social services instead? Simonm223 (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- The link was originally pointing to the same article, which was moved in September. The disambiguation page then took over the article's previous title per this RM. My update was to reflect this change. Frost 17:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class Economics articles
- High-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Top-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class socialism articles
- Top-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- High-importance sociology articles
- B-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class European history articles
- Mid-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- B-Class Cold War articles
- Mid-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- B-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- B-Class China-related articles
- Top-importance China-related articles
- B-Class China-related articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- B-Class Soviet Union articles
- Top-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- B-Class Russia articles
- High-importance Russia articles
- High-importance B-Class Russia articles
- B-Class Russia (science and education) articles
- Science and education in Russia task force articles
- B-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class ethics articles
- High-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- B-Class social and political philosophy articles
- High-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- B-Class philosophy of religion articles
- High-importance philosophy of religion articles
- Philosophy of religion task force articles
- B-Class Continental philosophy articles
- High-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles