Mifepristone: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Revised short description to specify type of drug Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
(760 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Antiprogestogen and antiglucocorticoid drug}} |
|||
{{For|the song RU486 by Stone Sour|House of Gold & Bones - Part 1}} |
|||
{{For|the song "RU486" by Stone Sour|House of Gold & Bones – Part 1}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2023}} |
|||
{{drugbox | Watchedfields = changed |
|||
{{cs1 config|name-list-style=vanc|display-authors=6}} |
|||
{{Infobox drug |
|||
| Watchedfields = changed |
|||
| verifiedrevid = 443306800 |
| verifiedrevid = 443306800 |
||
| image = Mifepristone structure.svg |
|||
| IUPAC_name = 11β-[''p''-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]-17β-hydroxy-17-(1-propynyl)estra-4,9-dien-3-one |
|||
| image = Mifepristone.svg |
|||
| width = 200 |
| width = 200 |
||
| alt = |
|||
| image2 = Mifepristona3D.png |
| image2 = Mifepristona3D.png |
||
|width2 = 200 |
| width2 = 200 |
||
| alt2 = |
|||
| caption = |
|||
<!--Clinical data--> |
<!-- Clinical data --> |
||
| pronounce = {{IPAc-en|ˌ|m|ɪ|f|ə|ˈ|p|r|ɪ|ˌ|s|t|oʊ|n}}<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|entry=mifepristone|entry-url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mifepristone|dictionary=Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary|publisher=[[Merriam-Webster]]|access-date=3 March 2023|archive-date=3 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230303213038/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mifepristone|url-status=live|title=Mifepristone Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster }}</ref> |
|||
| tradename = Mifegyne, Mifeprex, Korlym, others |
|||
| Drugs.com = {{drugs.com|monograph|mifepristone}} |
| Drugs.com = {{drugs.com|monograph|mifepristone}} |
||
| MedlinePlus = a600042 |
| MedlinePlus = a600042 |
||
| DailyMedID = Mifepristone |
|||
| pregnancy_US = X |
|||
| pregnancy_AU = <!-- A / B1 / B2 / B3 / C / D / X --> |
|||
| pregnancy_category = Used for terminating pregnancy |
|||
| pregnancy_AU_comment = |
|||
| pregnancy_category = Not recommended |
|||
| routes_of_administration = [[Oral administration|By mouth]] |
|||
| class = [[Antiprogestogen]]; [[Antiglucocorticoid]] |
|||
| ATC_prefix = G03 |
|||
| ATC_suffix = XB01 |
|||
| ATC_supplemental = |
|||
<!-- Legal status --> |
|||
| legal_AU = S4 |
|||
| legal_AU_comment = <ref name="Mifepristone Linepharma PI 2015" /> |
|||
| legal_BR = <!-- OTC, A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, D2, E, F --> |
|||
| legal_BR_comment = |
|||
| legal_CA = Rx-only |
|||
| legal_CA_comment = <ref>{{cite web | title=Mifegymiso Product information | website=Health Canada | date=10 January 2017 | url=https://health-products.canada.ca/dpd-bdpp/info?lang=eng&code=92881 | access-date=5 September 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=Mifiso Product information | website=Health Canada | date=16 December 2022 | url=https://health-products.canada.ca/dpd-bdpp/info?lang=eng&code=102254 | access-date=5 September 2024}}</ref> |
|||
| legal_DE = <!-- Anlage I, II, III or Unscheduled --> |
|||
| legal_DE_comment = |
|||
| legal_NZ = <!-- Class A, B, C --> |
|||
| legal_NZ_comment = |
|||
| legal_UK = <!-- GSL, P, POM, CD, CD Lic, CD POM, CD No Reg POM, CD (Benz) POM, CD (Anab) POM or CD Inv POM / Class A, B, C --> |
|||
| legal_UK_comment = |
|||
| legal_US = Rx-only |
| legal_US = Rx-only |
||
| legal_US_comment = <ref name="Korlym FDA label" /><ref>{{cite web | title=Mifepristone tablet | website=DailyMed | date=30 March 2023 | url=https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=b63fad9b-7f12-4400-9019-b0586054e534 | access-date=24 April 2023 | archive-date=10 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230410145605/https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=b63fad9b-7f12-4400-9019-b0586054e534 | url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
| legal_status = |
|||
| legal_EU = |
|||
| routes_of_administration = [[Oral administration|Oral]] |
|||
| legal_EU_comment = |
|||
| legal_UN = <!-- N I, II, III, IV / P I, II, III, IV --> |
|||
| legal_UN_comment = |
|||
| legal_status = Rx-only |
|||
<!--Pharmacokinetic data--> |
<!-- Pharmacokinetic data --> |
||
| bioavailability = 69% |
| bioavailability = 69% |
||
| protein_bound = 98% |
| protein_bound = 98% |
||
| metabolism = [[Liver |
| metabolism = [[Liver]] |
||
| metabolites = |
|||
| elimination_half-life = 18 hours |
|||
| onset = |
|||
| excretion = [[Feces|Fecal]]: 83%; [[Kidney|Renal]]: 9% |
|||
| elimination_half-life = |
|||
| duration_of_action = |
|||
| excretion = [[Feces]]: 83%<br />[[urine]]: 9% |
|||
<!--Identifiers--> |
<!-- Identifiers --> |
||
| CASNo_Ref = {{cascite|correct|CAS}} |
|||
| CAS_number_Ref = {{cascite|correct|??}} |
| CAS_number_Ref = {{cascite|correct|??}} |
||
| CAS_number = 84371-65-3 |
| CAS_number = 84371-65-3 |
||
| CAS_supplemental = |
|||
| ATC_prefix = G03 |
|||
| ATC_suffix = XB01 |
|||
| PubChem = 55245 |
| PubChem = 55245 |
||
| IUPHAR_ligand = 2805 |
| IUPHAR_ligand = 2805 |
||
Line 45: | Line 78: | ||
| ChEMBL_Ref = {{ebicite|correct|EBI}} |
| ChEMBL_Ref = {{ebicite|correct|EBI}} |
||
| ChEMBL = 157 |
| ChEMBL = 157 |
||
| NIAID_ChemDB = |
|||
| PDB_ligand = |
|||
| synonyms = RU-486; RU-38486; ZK-98296; 11β-[''p''-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]-17α-(1-propynyl)estra-4,9-dien-17β-ol-3-one |
|||
<!--Chemical data--> |
<!-- Chemical and physical data --> |
||
| IUPAC_name = (8''S'',11''R'',13''S'',14''S'',17''S'')-11-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]-17-hydroxy-13-methyl-17-prop-1-ynyl-1,2,6,7,8,11,12,14,15,16-decahydrocyclopenta[''a'']phenanthren-3-one |
|||
| C=29 | H=35 | N=1 | O=2 |
| C=29 | H=35 | N=1 | O=2 |
||
| SMILES = O=C5\C=C4/C(=C3/[C@@H](c1ccc(N(C)C)cc1)C[C@]2([C@@H](CC[C@]2(C#CC)O)[C@@H]3CC4)C)CC5 |
|||
| molecular_weight = 429.60 [[Gram|g]]/[[mole (unit)|mol]] |
|||
| smiles = O=C5\C=C4/C(=C3/[C@@H](c1ccc(N(C)C)cc1)C[C@]2([C@@H](CC[C@]2(C#CC)O)[C@@H]3CC4)C)CC5 |
|||
| InChI = 1/C29H35NO2/c1-5-15-29(32)16-14-26-24-12-8-20-17-22(31)11-13-23(20)27(24)25(18-28(26,29)2)19-6-9-21(10-7-19)30(3)4/h6-7,9-10,17,24-26,32H,8,11-14,16,18H2,1-4H3/t24-,25+,26-,28-,29-/m0/s1 |
|||
| StdInChI_Ref = {{stdinchicite|correct|chemspider}} |
| StdInChI_Ref = {{stdinchicite|correct|chemspider}} |
||
| StdInChI = 1S/C29H35NO2/c1-5-15-29(32)16-14-26-24-12-8-20-17-22(31)11-13-23(20)27(24)25(18-28(26,29)2)19-6-9-21(10-7-19)30(3)4/h6-7,9-10,17,24-26,32H,8,11-14,16,18H2,1-4H3/t24-,25+,26-,28-,29-/m0/s1 |
| StdInChI = 1S/C29H35NO2/c1-5-15-29(32)16-14-26-24-12-8-20-17-22(31)11-13-23(20)27(24)25(18-28(26,29)2)19-6-9-21(10-7-19)30(3)4/h6-7,9-10,17,24-26,32H,8,11-14,16,18H2,1-4H3/t24-,25+,26-,28-,29-/m0/s1 |
||
| StdInChI_comment = |
|||
| StdInChIKey_Ref = {{stdinchicite|correct|chemspider}} |
| StdInChIKey_Ref = {{stdinchicite|correct|chemspider}} |
||
| StdInChIKey = VKHAHZOOUSRJNA-GCNJZUOMSA-N |
| StdInChIKey = VKHAHZOOUSRJNA-GCNJZUOMSA-N |
||
| density = 1.189 |
| density = 1.189 |
||
| density_notes = |
|||
| melting_point = 194 |
| melting_point = 194 |
||
| melting_high = |
|||
| melting_notes = |
|||
| boiling_point = 629 |
| boiling_point = 629 |
||
| boiling_notes = |
|||
| solubility = |
|||
| sol_units = |
|||
| specific_rotation = |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
<!-- Definition and medical uses --> |
|||
'''Mifepristone''' (or RU-486) is a synthetic [[steroid]] compound with both antiprogesterone and antiglucocorticoid properties. The compound is a 19-nor steroid with substitutions at positions C11 and C17 (17 beta-hydroxy-11 beta-[4-dimethylamino phenyl] 17 alpha-[1-propynyl]estra-4,9-dien-3-one), which antagonizes cortisol action competitively at the receptor level.<ref name="pmid19412444">{{cite journal | author = Gallagher P, Young AH | title = Mifepristone (RU-486) treatment for depression and psychosis: a review of the therapeutic implications | journal = Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat | volume = 2 | issue = 1 | pages = 33–42 | date=March 2006 | pmid = 19412444 | pmc = 2671735 | doi = }}</ref> |
|||
'''Mifepristone''', also known by its developmental code name '''RU-486''', is a drug typically used in combination with [[misoprostol]] to bring about a [[medical abortion]] during pregnancy and manage early miscarriage.<ref name="AHFS2015">{{cite web |title=Mifepristone |url=https://www.drugs.com/monograph/mifepristone.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222083002/http://www.drugs.com/monograph/mifepristone.html |archive-date=22 December 2015 |access-date=25 February 2023 |publisher=[[American Society of Health System Pharmacists]] |via=[[Drugs.com]]}}</ref> This combination is 97% effective during the first 63 days (9 weeks) of [[pregnancy]].<ref name="Chen2015">{{cite journal |vauthors=Chen MJ, Creinin MD |date=July 2015 |title=Mifepristone With Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortion: A Systematic Review |url=http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2pw521h5 |url-status=live |journal=[[Obstetrics & Gynecology (journal)|Obstetrics and Gynecology]] |volume=126 |issue=1 |pages=12–21 |doi=10.1097/AOG.0000000000000897 |pmid=26241251 |s2cid=20800109 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726105924/https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2pw521h5 |archive-date=26 July 2020 |access-date=27 July 2019 |via=[[eScholarship]]}}</ref> It is also effective in the [[second trimester]] of pregnancy.<ref name=Rex2012/><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Wildschut H, Both MI, Medema S, Thomee E, Wildhagen MF, Kapp N | title = Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 1 | pages = CD005216 | date = January 2011 | volume = 2011 | pmid = 21249669 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2 | pmc = 8557267 }}</ref> It is taken [[by mouth]].<ref name=AHFS2015/> |
|||
<!-- Side effects --> |
|||
Mifepristone is a [[progesterone receptor antagonist]] used as an [[abortifacient]] in the first months of pregnancy, and in smaller doses as an [[emergency contraception|emergency contraceptive]]. Mifepristone is also a powerful [[glucocorticoid]] receptor antagonist, and has occasionally been used in refractory [[Cushing's Syndrome]] (due to ectopic/neoplastic ACTH/Cortisol secretion). During early trials, it was known as RU-38486 or simply '''RU-486''', its designation at the [[Roussel Uclaf]] company, which designed the drug. The drug was initially made available in France, and other countries then followed—often amid controversy. It is marketed under tradenames '''Korlym''' and '''Mifeprex''', according to [[Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations|FDA Orange Book]]. |
|||
The more common adverse effects include abdominal pain, feeling tired, and vaginal bleeding.<ref name=AHFS2015/> Serious side effects may include heavy vaginal bleeding, bacterial infection, and birth defects if the pregnancy does not end.<ref name=AHFS2015/> If used, appropriate follow-up care needs to be available.<ref name=AHFS2015/><ref name="Preg2018">{{cite web |date=20 January 2023 |title=Mifepristone Use During Pregnancy |url=https://www.drugs.com/pregnancy/mifepristone.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230423000420/https://www.drugs.com/pregnancy/mifepristone.html |archive-date=23 April 2023 |access-date=22 April 2023 |website=[[Drugs.com]]}}</ref> Mifepristone is an [[antiprogestogen]].<ref name=AHFS2015/> It works by blocking the effects of [[progesterone]], making both the [[cervix]] and uterine vessels dilate and causing uterine contraction.<ref name=AHFS2015/> |
|||
<!-- History, society and culture --> |
|||
Mifepristone was the first antiprogestin to be developed and it has been evaluated extensively for its use as an abortifacient. The original target for the research group, however, was the discovery and development of compounds with antiglucocorticoid properties.<ref>{{cite journal | author = Hazra BG, Pore VS | title = Mifepristone (RU-486), the recently developed antiprogesterone drug and its analogues. | journal = J Indian Inst Sci. | year = 2001 | volume = 81 | pages = 287–98.}}</ref> It is these antiglucocorticoid properties that are of great interest in the treatment of severe mood disorders and psychosis, although a review of published articles was inconclusive on their efficacy, and considered the use of these drugs in mood disorders at 'proof of concept' stage. |
|||
Mifepristone was developed in 1980 and came into use in France in 1987.<ref>{{cite book |title=Molecules and Medicine |vauthors=Corey EJ, Czakó B, Kürti L |date=2012 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-36173-3 |chapter=Mifepristone |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jz2GN6DYoOoC&pg=RA1-PT108 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908184336/https://books.google.com/books?id=jz2GN6DYoOoC&pg=RA1-PT108 |archive-date=8 September 2017 |url-status=live |via=Google Books}}</ref> It became available in the United States in 2000.<ref>{{cite web | title=Drug Approval Package: Mifeprex (Mifepristone) NDA #20687 | publisher=U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) | date=18 June 2001 | url=https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2000/20687_mifepristone.cfm | access-date=24 April 2023 | archive-date=21 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230421173537/https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2000/20687_mifepristone.cfm | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Rex2012">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mavb4v8w8bsC&pg=PA236 |title=Women and Health |date=2012 |publisher=Academic Press |isbn=978-0-12-384979-3 |veditors=Goldman MB, [[Rebecca J. Troisi|Troisi R]], Rexrode KM |edition=2nd |location=Oxford |page=236 |access-date=5 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908184336/https://books.google.com/books?id=mavb4v8w8bsC&pg=PA236 |archive-date=8 September 2017 |url-status=live |via=Google Books}}</ref> It is on the [[WHO Model List of Essential Medicines|World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines]].<ref name="WHO23rd">{{cite book | vauthors = ((World Health Organization)) | title = The selection and use of essential medicines 2023: web annex A: World Health Organization model list of essential medicines: 23rd list (2023) | year = 2023 | hdl = 10665/371090 | author-link = World Health Organization | publisher = World Health Organization | location = Geneva | id = WHO/MHP/HPS/EML/2023.02 | hdl-access=free }}</ref> Mifepristone was approved in Canada in January 2017.<ref>{{cite web | title=Mifepristone Product information | website=[[Health Canada]] | date=22 October 2009 | url=https://health-products.canada.ca/dpd-bdpp/info?lang=eng&code=92881 | access-date=24 April 2023 | archive-date=24 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230424143549/https://health-products.canada.ca/dpd-bdpp/info?lang=eng&code=92881 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=5 February 2017 |title=How the arrival of the abortion pill reveals a double standard |magazine=[[Maclean's]] |url=http://www.macleans.ca/society/new-pill-old-headaches/ |url-status=live |access-date=21 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170221055406/http://www.macleans.ca/society/new-pill-old-headaches/ |archive-date=21 February 2017 |vauthors=Kingston A}}</ref> |
|||
<ref>{{cite journal | author = Peter Gallagher, Navdeep Malik, James Newham, Allan H Young, Nicol Ferrier, Paul Mackin | title = Antiglucocorticoid treatments for mood disorders. | work = Cochrane Database Syst. Review | url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005168.pub2/abstract | year = 2008 }}</ref> |
|||
<!-- Society and culture --> |
|||
It is on the [[World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines]].<ref>{{cite web|title=WHO Model List of EssentialMedicines|url=http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/93142/1/EML_18_eng.pdf?ua=1|work=World Health Organization|accessdate=22 April 2014|date=October 2013}}</ref> |
|||
{{TOC limit|3}} |
|||
== |
==Medical uses== |
||
===Abortion=== |
|||
According to the current [[Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists|RCOG]] abortion [[evidence-based medicine|evidence-based]] [[medical guideline|clinical guideline]]:<!-- |
|||
Mifepristone followed by a [[prostaglandin]] [[prostaglandin analogue|analog]] ([[misoprostol]] or [[gemeprost]]) is used for [[medical abortion]].<ref name="Mifegyne SPC 2015">{{cite web |author= |date=21 November 2022 |title=Mifegyne 200 Mg Tablets Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) |url=https://mhraproducts4853.blob.core.windows.net/docs/da0a3830e2ed46fc9835502a30ab00a2be19f8fc |access-date=22 April 2023 |publisher=[[Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency]] (MHRA) |archive-date=23 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230423003527/https://mhraproducts4853.blob.core.windows.net/docs/da0a3830e2ed46fc9835502a30ab00a2be19f8fc |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="FDA Mifeprex Info 2016">{{cite web |author= |date=23 March 2023 |title=Information about Mifepristone for Medical Termination of Pregnancy Through Ten Weeks Gestation |url=https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/information-about-mifepristone-medical-termination-pregnancy-through-ten-weeks-gestation |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230421235002/https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/information-about-mifepristone-medical-termination-pregnancy-through-ten-weeks-gestation |archive-date=21 April 2023 |access-date=22 April 2023 |website=Drugs |publisher=U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) }}</ref> Medical organizations have found this combination to be safe and effective. Guidelines from the [[Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists]] describe medication abortion using mifepristone and [[misoprostol]] as effective and appropriate at any [[gestational age]].<ref name="RCOG 2011">{{cite book |url=https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/nwcjrf0o/abortion-guideline_web_1.pdf |title=The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion |date=November 2011 |publisher=[[RCOG]] Press |edition=3rd |series=Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No. 7 |location=London |pages=68–75 |access-date=25 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220526233950/https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/nwcjrf0o/abortion-guideline_web_1.pdf |archive-date=26 May 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref> The [[World Health Organization]] and the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] recommend mifepristone followed by misoprostol for first- and second-[[Trimester (pregnancy)|trimester]] medical abortion.<ref name="WHO 2012">{{cite book |author=World Health Organization |url=https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70914/9789241548434_eng.pdf |title=Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems |date=21 June 2012 |publisher=WHO |isbn=978-92-4-154843-4 |edition=2nd |location=Geneva |pages=113–116 |language=en |chapter=Annex 5 |hdl=10665/70914 |hdl-access=free |access-date=26 April 2023 |archive-date=10 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230210092721/http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70914/9789241548434_eng.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="WHO 2014">{{cite book |url=http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/97415/9789241548717_eng.pdf |title=Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion |date=10 January 2014 |publisher=[[World Health Organization]] |isbn=978-92-4-154871-7 |location=Geneva |language=en |hdl=10665/97415 |hdl-access=free |access-date=26 April 2023 |archive-date=8 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230408070843/https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/97415/9789241548717_eng.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology and the Society of Family Planning |date=October 2020 |title=Medication Abortion Up to 70 Days of Gestation |url=https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2020/10/medication-abortion-up-to-70-days-of-gestation |access-date=25 April 2023 |series=Practice Bulletin 225 |publisher=[[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] |archive-date=25 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230425173524/https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2020/10/medication-abortion-up-to-70-days-of-gestation |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="ACOG 2013">{{cite journal |last=Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology |date=June 2013 |title=Practice Bulletin No. 135: Second-Trimester Abortion |url=https://blog.utp.edu.co/maternoinfantil/files/2012/04/135-Aborto-2-trimestre.pdf |journal=[[Obstetrics & Gynecology (journal)|Obstetrics & Gynecology]] |volume=121 |issue=6 |pages=1394–1406 |doi=10.1097/01.AOG.0000431056.79334.cc |pmid=23812485 |s2cid=205384119 |via=[[Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira]] |access-date=26 April 2023 |archive-date=6 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230406064221/https://blog.utp.edu.co/maternoinfantil/files/2012/04/135-Aborto-2-trimestre.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Mifepristone alone is less effective, resulting in abortion within 1–2 weeks in anywhere from 54% to 92% of pregnancies, according to review of 13 studies.<ref name=Gross2015/> |
|||
--><ref name="rcog guideline">{{cite book |author=RCOG |year=2004 |title=The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion : Evidence-based clinical guideline number 7 |location=London |publisher=RCOG Press|url=http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/induced_abortionfull.pdf |isbn=1-904752-06-3|format=PDF|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080227213507/http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/induced_abortionfull.pdf|archivedate=February 27, 2008 |authorlink=Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists}}</ref> |
|||
* All methods of first-trimester abortion carry a small risk of failure to terminate the pregnancy. The risk for surgical abortion is around 0.23% and for medical abortion between 0.1% and 1.4% (depending on the regimen used and the experience of the centre). |
|||
* Medical abortion using mifepristone plus prostaglandin is the most effective method of abortion at gestations of less than 7 weeks. |
|||
* Conventional [[vacuum aspiration]] below 7 weeks have a higher failure rate than at later gestations. Protocols should include examination of the aspirate for the presence of the gestational sac and/or follow-up serum human chorionic gonadotrophin estimation, to ensure abortion completion. |
|||
* Early vacuum aspiration using a rigorous protocol (which includes magnification of aspirated material and indications for serum [[human chorionic gonadotropin|βhCG]] follow-up) may be used at gestations below 7 weeks, although data suggest that the failure rate is higher than for medical abortion. |
|||
* Medical abortion using mifepristone plus prostaglandin continues to be an appropriate method for women in the 7–9 week gestation band. |
|||
===Cushing's syndrome=== |
|||
Mifepristone is sold outside the United States by Exelgyn Laboratories as Mifegyne, made in France, and is approved for: |
|||
Mifepristone is used for the medical treatment of [[high blood sugar]] caused by high [[cortisol]] levels in the blood (hypercortisolism) in adults with endogenous [[Cushing's syndrome]] who also have [[diabetes mellitus type 2|type 2 diabetes mellitus]] or [[impaired glucose tolerance|glucose intolerance]] and have failed surgery or cannot have surgery.<ref name="Korlym FDA label">{{cite web |date=20 December 2022 |title=Korlym- mifepristone tablet |url=https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=542f3fae-8bc8-4f00-9228-e4b66c9ad6a9 |url-status=live |archive-date=6 October 2022 |access-date=19 March 2023 |website=[[DailyMed]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006220203/https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=542f3fae-8bc8-4f00-9228-e4b66c9ad6a9 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ciato D, Mumbach AG, Paez-Pereda M, Stalla GK |date=January 2017 |title=Currently used and investigational drugs for Cushing´s disease |journal=[[Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs]] |volume=26 |issue=1 |pages=75–84 |doi=10.1080/13543784.2017.1266338 |pmid=27894193 |doi-access=free |title-link=doi}}</ref> In a Phase III trial, it improved glycemic control, increased [[insulin sensitivity]], and reduced body weight regardless of the cause of CS.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Varlamov EV, Purnell JQ, Fleseriu M | title = Glucocorticoid Receptor Antagonism as a New "Remedy" for Insulin Resistance-Not There Yet! | journal = The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | volume = 106 | issue = 6 | pages = e2447–e2449 | date = May 2021 | pmid = 33659987 | doi = 10.1210/clinem/dgab127 | pmc = 8118574 | doi-access = free }}</ref> |
|||
#Medical termination of intrauterine pregnancies of up to 49 days [[gestational age|gestation]] (up to 63 days gestation in Britain and Sweden) |
|||
#Softening and dilatation of the cervix prior to mechanical cervical dilatation for pregnancy termination |
|||
#Use in combination with [[gemeprost]] for termination of pregnancies between 13 and 24 weeks gestation |
|||
#Labor induction in [[fetal death]] in utero.<ref name="mifegyne UK SPC"/> |
|||
Mifepristone is sold in the United States by Danco Laboratories as Mifeprex, made in China,<ref>{{cite news|title=Chinese to Make RU-486 for U.S.|work=The Washington Post|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A53938-2000Oct11|accessdate=2006-08-22 | first=Philip P. | last=Pan | date=2000-10-12}}</ref> and is U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]]-approved to terminate intrauterine pregnancies of up to 49 days gestation. Under the FDA-approved regimen, a 600 mg dose is administered by a clinician following a counseling session. Two days later, a clinician administers 400 µg of another medicine, [[misoprostol]], to induce contractions. In European studies, this method terminated 96 to 99% of pregnancies of up to 49 days gestation, but in one large [[multicenter trial]] in the United States conducted from September 1994 to September 1995, the efficacy was lower (92%), which the authors of the study suggested may have been due to lack of experience with this method in the United States and/or the design of their study.<!-- |
|||
--><ref name="spitz 1998">{{cite journal | author = Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, Robbins A | title = Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States | journal = N. Engl. J. Med. | volume = 338 | issue = 18 | pages = 1241–7 | date=April 1998 | pmid = 9562577 | doi = 10.1056/NEJM199804303381801 }}</ref> In Europe and China, an observation period of several hours is required after administration of misoprostol. If expulsion of fetal tissue does not occur during the observation period, surgical abortion is offered. There is no required observation period in the United States, but it is strongly recommended.<ref>{{cite news|author=Suzanne Daley|title=Europe Finds Abortion Pill is No Magic Cure-All| newspaper=The New York Times |date=October 5, 2000|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9F03E3D61F3DF936A35753C1A9669C8B63}}</ref> |
|||
=== Medical management of early pregnancy loss === |
|||
Mifepristone can also be used in smaller doses as an [[emergency contraception|emergency contraceptive]]; if taken after sex but before [[ovulation]], it can prevent ovulation and so prevent pregnancy. In this role, a 10 mg dose is not as effective as the 600 mg dose, but has fewer side-effects.<ref name="pmid14698075">{{cite journal | author = Piaggio G, von Hertzen H, Heng Z, Bilian X, Cheng L | title = Meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing different doses of mifepristone in emergency contraception | journal = Contraception | volume = 68 | issue = 6 | pages = 447–52 | date=December 2003 | pmid = 14698075 | doi = 10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00142-2 }}</ref> Mifeprex and Mifegyne are only available in 200 mg tablets.<ref name="pmid11126855">{{cite journal | author = Wertheimer RE | title = Emergency postcoital contraception | journal = Am Fam Physician | volume = 62 | issue = 10 | pages = 2287–92 | date=November 2000 | pmid = 11126855 | doi = | url = http://www.aafp.org/afp/2000/1115/p2287.html }}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone combined with misoprostol is the preferred medication regimen for management of early pregnancy loss. While misoprostol alone can be used, the addition of a dose of mifepristone twenty-four hours before misoprostol administration improves treatment efficacy.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Early Pregnancy Loss |url=https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2018/11/early-pregnancy-loss |access-date=2024-03-28 |website=www.acog.org |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
=== Other uses === |
|||
A review of studies in humans found that the contraceptive effects of the 10 mg dose were probably due mainly to its effects on ovulation, and not inhibition of [[Implantation (human embryo)|implantation]], but "the knowledge of the mechanism of action remains incomplete". Treatment with 200 mg of mifepristone changes steroid receptor expression in the [[fallopian tube]], inhibits endometrial development, and effectively prevents implantation.<ref name="pmid15192056">{{cite journal | author = Gemzell-Danielsson K, Marions L | title = Mechanisms of action of mifepristone and levonorgestrel when used for emergency contraception | journal = Hum. Reprod. Update | volume = 10 | issue = 4 | pages = 341–8 | year = 2004 | pmid = 15192056 | doi = 10.1093/humupd/dmh027 }}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone at low doses has been used for [[emergency contraception]].<ref name="Trussell 20132">{{cite web |date=13 February 2013 |title=Dedicated emergency contraceptive pills worldwide |url=http://ec.princeton.edu/pills/Dedicated_ECPs.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304190311/http://ec.princeton.edu/pills/Dedicated_ECPs.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2016 |access-date=4 April 2016 |publisher=Office of Population Research, Princeton University |vauthors=Trussell J, Cleland K |location=Princeton}}</ref><ref name="ICEC 20132">{{cite web |author= |year=2016 |title=EC pill types and countries of availability, by brand |url=http://www.cecinfo.org/country-by-country-information/status-availability-database/ec-pill-types-and-countries-of-availability-by-brand/ |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160405095026/http://www.cecinfo.org/country-by-country-information/status-availability-database/ec-pill-types-and-countries-of-availability-by-brand/ |archive-date=5 April 2016 |access-date=4 April 2016 |publisher=International Consortium for Emergency Contraception |location=New York}}</ref><ref name="Trussell 20162">{{cite web |date=March 2016 |title=Emergency Contraception: A Last Chance to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy |url=http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ec-review.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100923040101/http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ec-review.pdf |archive-date=23 September 2010 |access-date=7 April 2016 |publisher=Office of Population Research, Princeton University |vauthors=Trussell J, Raymond E |location=Princeton}}</ref> Mifepristone has also been used to treat symptomatic [[leiomyoma]] (uterine fibroids) and [[endometriosis]].<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Murji A, Whitaker L, Chow TL, Sobel ML |date=April 2017 |title=Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) for uterine fibroids |journal=The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |volume=2017 |issue=4 |pages=CD010770 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD010770.pub2 |pmc=6478099 |pmid=28444736 |collaboration=Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group}}</ref> As elevated cortisol levels have been implicated in [[psychotic depression]], mifepristone has been used as a treatment.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Block TS, Kushner H, Kalin N, Nelson C, Belanoff J, Schatzberg A |date=July 2018 |title=Combined Analysis of Mifepristone for Psychotic Depression: Plasma Levels Associated With Clinical Response |journal=Biological Psychiatry |volume=84 |issue=1 |pages=46–54 |doi=10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.01.008 |pmid=29523415 |doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
== |
==Side effects== |
||
Serious complications with mifepristone are rare with about 0.04%–0.09% requiring hospitalization and 0.05% requiring blood transfusion.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Cleland K, Creinin MD, Nucatola D, Nshom M, Trussell J | title = Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion | journal = Obstetrics and Gynecology | volume = 121 | issue = 1 | pages = 166–71 | date = January 2013 | pmid = 23262942 | pmc = 3711556 | doi = 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182755763 }}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone is approved for use in the United States and the EU for the treatment of Cushing's Syndrome<ref>{{cite journal | author = Healy D | year = 2009 | title = Mifepristone: an overview for Australian practice | journal = Australian Prescriber | volume = 32 | pages = 152–154 |url = http://www.australianprescriber.com/magazine/32/6/152/4/ | issue=6}}</ref><ref>[http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm292462.htm FDA approves Korlym for patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome], ''Food & Drug Administration'', February 17, 2012, Retrieved 2014-01-18</ref> via a patented preparation manufactured by [[Corcept Therapeutics]]. |
|||
Nearly all women using the mifepristone/misoprostol regimen experienced abdominal pain, uterine cramping, and vaginal bleeding or spotting for an average of 9–16 days. For most women, the most severe cramps after use of misoprostol last for less than 6 hours and can generally be managed with ibuprofen.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Friedlander EB, Soon R, Salcedo J, Davis J, Tschann M, Kaneshiro B | title = Prophylactic Pregabalin to Decrease Pain During Medication Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial | journal = Obstetrics and Gynecology | volume = 132 | issue = 3 | pages = 612–618 | date = September 2018 | pmid = 30095762 | pmc = 6105469 | doi = 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002787 }}</ref> Up to 8% of women experienced some type of bleeding for 30 days or more. Other less common side effects included [[nausea]], [[vomiting]], diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, and [[fever]].<ref name="miflabel">{{cite web | title=Mifeprex label | publisher=FDA | url=https://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2005/020687s013lbl.pdf | date=19 July 2005 | access-date=22 August 2006 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060628212659/https://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2005/020687s013lbl.pdf <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 28 June 2006}}</ref> [[Pelvic inflammatory disease]] is a very rare but serious complication.<ref name="pmid16531180">{{cite journal | vauthors = Lawton BA, Rose SB, Shepherd J | title = Atypical presentation of serious pelvic inflammatory disease following mifepristone-induced medical abortion | journal = Contraception | volume = 73 | issue = 4 | pages = 431–2 | date = April 2006 | pmid = 16531180 | doi = 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.09.003 }}</ref> Excessive bleeding and incomplete termination of a pregnancy require further intervention by a doctor (such as a repeat dose of misoprostol or a [[Suction-aspiration abortion|vacuum aspiration]]). Mifepristone is [[Contraindication|contraindicated]] in the presence of [[Adrenal gland|adrenal]] failure, long-term oral [[corticosteroid]] therapy (although inhaled and topical steroids are not contraindications), [[Bleeding|hemorrhagic]] disorders, inherited [[porphyria]], and hemophilia or [[anticoagulant]] use.<ref name="miflabel" /> Women with an [[intrauterine device]] in their uterus should remove the IUD prior to medication abortion to avoid unnecessary cramping. Mifepristone is not effective in treating [[ectopic pregnancy]]. |
|||
Other medical applications of mifepristone that have been studied in [[clinical trial]]s include regular long-term use as an [[oral contraceptive]], and treatment of [[HIV]] infection, [[uterine fibroids]], [[endometriosis]], [[clinical depression|major depression]] [[psychotic depression|with psychotic features]], [[post-traumatic stress disorder]], [[bipolar depression]] and disorders causing [[cognitive dysfunction]], [[post-traumatic stress disorder]], [[Gulf War syndrome|chronic multisymptom illness]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00691067 |title=A Controlled Trial of Mifepristone in Gulf War Veterans With Chronic Multisymptom Illness | date=June 2008 |publisher=U.S. [[National Institutes of Health]] |work=ClinicalTrials.gov}} Retrieved on November 7, 2008.</ref> [[glaucoma]], [[meningioma]]s, [[breast cancer]], [[ovarian cancer]], and [[prostate cancer]]. |
|||
A postmarketing summary found, of about 1.52 million women who had received mifepristone until April 2011 in the United States, 14 were reported to have died after application. Eight of these cases were associated with [[sepsis]]; the other six had various causes such as drug abuse and suspected murder. Other incidents reported to the FDA included 612 nonlethal hospitalizations, 339 blood transfusions, 48 severe infections, and 2,207 (0.15%) adverse events altogether.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF11G29.pdf |title=Mifepristone U.S. Postmarketing Adverse Events Summary through 04/30/2011 |access-date=14 November 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118020524/http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF11G29.pdf |archive-date=18 January 2012 }}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone showed no detectable anti-HIV activity in clinical trials.<ref name="pmid17932493">{{cite journal | author = Flexner C | title = HIV drug development: the next 25 years | journal = Nat Rev Drug Discov | volume = 6 | issue = 12 | pages = 959–66 | date=December 2007 | pmid = 17932493 | doi = 10.1038/nrd2336 }}</ref><ref name="schimmer"/><ref name="chabbert-buffet"/><ref name="tang">{{cite journal |author=Tang OS, Ho PC |year=2006 |title=Clinical applications of mifepristone |journal=Gynecol Endocrinol |volume=22 |issue=12 |pages=655–9 |pmid=17162706 |doi=10.1080/09513590601005946}}</ref> |
|||
No long-term studies to evaluate the [[carcinogenic]] potential of mifepristone have been performed. This is in accord with ICH guidelines, which do not require carcinogenicity testing in nongenotoxic drugs intended for administration for less than six months.<ref>{{cite conference | title = Guideline IH. Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals S1A. | conference = International Conference on Harmonization | date = 1996 |url=http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Safety/S1A/Step4/S1A_Guideline.pdf | url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131228140714/http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Safety/S1A/Step4/S1A_Guideline.pdf|archive-date=28 December 2013}}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone showed initial promise in [[psychotic major depression]], a form of depression that is difficult to treat,<ref name="pmid11593077">{{cite journal | author = Belanoff JK, Flores BH, Kalezhan M, Sund B, Schatzberg AF | title = Rapid reversal of psychotic depression using mifepristone | journal = J Clin Psychopharmacol | volume = 21 | issue = 5 | pages = 516–21 | date=October 2001 | pmid = 11593077 | doi = 10.1097/00004714-200110000-00009 }}</ref> however a Phase III clinical trial was terminated early due to lack of efficacy.<ref>Damian Gard for Fierce Biotech. May 7, 2014. [http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/corcept-tanks-depression-drug-comes-short-phase-iii/2014-05-07 Corcept tanks as depression drug comes up short in Phase III]</ref> |
|||
===Pregnancy=== |
|||
Mifepristone treatment produced clinical improvement in PTSD symptoms in a small clinical trial published in 2012.<ref name="pmid22611490">{{cite journal | author = Golier JA, Caramanica K, Demaria R, Yehuda R | title = A Pilot Study of Mifepristone in Combat-Related PTSD | journal = Depress Res Treat | volume = 2012 | issue = | pages = 393251 | year = 2012 | pmid = 22611490 | pmc = 3348629 | doi = 10.1155/2012/393251 }}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone alone results in abortion within 1–2 weeks in 54% to 92% of pregnancies.<ref name="Gross2015">{{cite journal |vauthors=[[Daniel Grossman (physician)|Grossman D]], White K, Harris L, Reeves M, [[Paul D. Blumenthal|Blumenthal PD]], Winikoff B, [[David Grimes (physician)|Grimes DA]] |date=September 2015 |title=Continuing pregnancy after mifepristone and "reversal" of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review |url=https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(15)00226-7/fulltext |journal=[[Contraception (journal)|Contraception]] |type=Review article |volume=92 |issue=3 |pages=206–11 |doi=10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.001 |pmid=26057457 |url-access=subscription |access-date=26 April 2023 |archive-date=8 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230408185711/https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(15)00226-7/fulltext |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iK7xrRr2p9sC|title=Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy: Comprehensive Abortion Care| veditors = Paul M, Lichtenberg S, Borgatta L, Grimes DA, Stubblefield PG, Creinin MD |date=24 August 2011|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-4443-5847-6|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908135429/https://books.google.com/books?id=iK7xrRr2p9sC|archive-date=8 September 2017}}</ref> The effectiveness increases to greater than 90% if [[misoprostol]] is given after the mifepristone.<ref>{{cite book | vauthors = | title = CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Final Recommendation Mifepristone and Misoprostol | date = 18 April 2017 | pmid = 30512906 | url = https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534607/ | publisher = Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health | series = CADTH Common Drug Reviews | access-date = 19 April 2019 | archive-date = 28 August 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210828172922/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534607/ | url-status = live }}</ref> There is no evidence that the effects of mifepristone can be reversed,<ref name=Gross2015/><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Bhatti KZ, Nguyen AT, Stuart GS | title = Medical abortion reversal: science and politics meet | journal = American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | volume = 218 | issue = 3 | pages = 315.e1–315.e6 | date = March 2018 | pmid = 29141197 | doi = 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.555 | s2cid = 205373684 }}</ref> although some [[anti-abortion]] groups claim that it can be reversed by giving progesterone.<ref>{{cite news|title=As controversial 'abortion reversal' laws increase, researcher says new data shows protocol can work |work=[[The Washington Post]] |url-access=subscription |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/04/03/as-controversial-abortion-reversal-laws-multiply-researcher-says-new-data-shows-it-can-work-critics-are-still-skeptical/|access-date=23 April 2018|archive-date=4 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180504011657/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/04/03/as-controversial-abortion-reversal-laws-multiply-researcher-says-new-data-shows-it-can-work-critics-are-still-skeptical/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=California Board of Nursing Sanctions Unproven Abortion 'Reversal' (Updated) - Rewire|url=https://rewire.news/article/2017/08/17/california-board-nursing-sanctions-unproven-abortion-reversal/|access-date=23 November 2017|work=Rewire|archive-date=1 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201034343/https://rewire.news/article/2017/08/17/california-board-nursing-sanctions-unproven-abortion-reversal/|url-status=live}}</ref> Researchers in the United States initiated a trial of the so-called "reversal" regimen in 2019, but stopped prematurely due to serious safety concerns about using mifepristone without follow-up misoprostol.<ref>{{cite news |title=Controversial 'Abortion Reversal' Regimen Is Put To The Test |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/03/22/688783130/controversial-abortion-reversal-regimen-is-put-to-the-test |newspaper=NPR |date=22 March 2019 |access-date=19 April 2019 |vauthors=Gordon M |archive-date=18 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190418231735/https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/03/22/688783130/controversial-abortion-reversal-regimen-is-put-to-the-test |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Gordon_2019">{{Cite news|vauthors=Gordon M|date=5 December 2019|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/12/05/785262221/safety-problems-lead-to-early-end-for-study-of-abortion-pill-reversal|title=Safety Problems Lead To Early End For Study Of 'Abortion Pill Reversal'|newspaper=NPR|access-date=12 December 2019|archive-date=6 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191206191742/https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/12/05/785262221/safety-problems-lead-to-early-end-for-study-of-abortion-pill-reversal|url-status=live}}</ref> Giving progesterone has not been shown to halt medication abortion, and not completing the combination regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol may cause serious bleeding.<ref name="Gordon_2019" /> |
|||
In those who continue pregnancy after use of mifepristone together with misoprostol for termination, birth defects may occur.<ref name=Preg2018/> Exposure to a single large dose of mifepristone in newborn rats was not associated with any reproductive problems, although chronic low-dose exposure of newborn rats to mifepristone was associated with structural and functional reproductive abnormalities.<ref name="miflabel"/> Studies in mice, rats, and rabbits revealed developmental abnormalities for rabbits, but not rats or mice.<ref name="miflabel"/> |
|||
Use as a [[Cervical effacement|cervical ripening]] agent has also been described.<ref name="pmid16647925">{{cite journal | author = Clark K, Ji H, Feltovich H, Janowski J, Carroll C, Chien EK | title = Mifepristone-induced cervical ripening: structural, biomechanical, and molecular events | journal = Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. | volume = 194 | issue = 5 | pages = 1391–8 | date=May 2006 | pmid = 16647925 | doi = 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.026 }}</ref> |
|||
==Pharmacology== |
|||
==Contraindications== |
|||
In [[clinical trial]]s, nearly all women using mifepristone experienced abdominal pain, uterine cramping, and vaginal bleeding or spotting for an average of 9–16 days. Up to 8% of women experienced some type of bleeding for 30 days or more. Other less common side effects included [[nausea]], [[vomiting]], diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, and [[fever]].<ref name="miflabel">{{cite web | title=Mifeprex label | publisher=FDA | url=http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2005/020687s013lbl.pdf | format=PDF | date=2005-07-19 | accessdate=2006-08-22 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20060628212659/http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2005/020687s013lbl.pdf <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2006-06-28}}</ref> [[Pelvic inflammatory disease]] (PID) is a very rare but serious complication.<ref name="pmid16531180">{{cite journal | author = Lawton BA, Rose SB, Shepherd J | title = Atypical presentation of serious pelvic inflammatory disease following mifepristone-induced medical abortion | journal = Contraception | volume = 73 | issue = 4 | pages = 431–2 | date=April 2006 | pmid = 16531180 | doi = 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.09.003 }}</ref> Excessive bleeding and incomplete termination of a pregnancy require further intervention by a doctor (such as [[Suction-aspiration abortion|vacuum aspiration]]). Between 4.5 and 7.9% of women required surgical intervention in clinical trials.<ref name="miflabel"/> Mifepristone is [[Contraindication|contraindicated]] in the presence of an [[intrauterine device]] (IUD), as well as with [[ectopic pregnancy]], [[Adrenal gland|adrenal]] failure, [[Bleeding|hemorrhagic]] disorders, inherited [[porphyria]], and [[anticoagulant]] or long-term [[corticosteroid]] therapy.<ref name="miflabel"/> |
|||
===Pharmacodynamics=== |
|||
The FDA prescribing information states that there are no data on the safety and efficacy of mifepristone in women with chronic medical conditions, and that "women who are more than 35 years of age and who also smoke 10 or more cigarettes per day should be treated with caution because such patients were generally excluded from clinical trials of mifepristone."<ref name="miflabel"/> |
|||
Mifepristone is a [[steroid]]al [[antiprogestogen]] ([[IC50|IC<sub>50</sub>]] = 0.025 nM for the [[progesterone receptor|PR]]), as well as an [[antiglucocorticoid]] (IC<sub>50</sub> = 2.2 nM for the [[glucocorticoid receptor|GR]]) and [[antiandrogen]] (IC<sub>50</sub> = 10 nM for the [[androgen receptor|AR]]) to a much lesser extent.<ref name="ProQuest2006">{{cite book|title=Nuclear Receptors as Drug Targets: Design and Biological Evaluation of Small Molecule Modulators of Nuclear Receptor Action|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4PfKejRQjQUC&pg=PA46|year=2006|isbn=978-0-549-70288-7|pages=46–}}</ref> It [[receptor antagonist|antagonizes]] [[cortisol]] action [[competitive antagonist|competitively]] at the [[receptor (biochemistry)|receptor]] level.<ref name="pmid19412444">{{cite journal |vauthors=Gallagher P, Young AH | title = Mifepristone (RU-486) treatment for depression and psychosis: a review of the therapeutic implications | journal = Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat | volume = 2 | issue = 1 | pages = 33–42 | date=March 2006 | pmid = 19412444 | pmc = 2671735 }}</ref> |
|||
In the presence of [[progesterone]], mifepristone acts as a [[competitive antagonist|competitive]] [[progesterone receptor antagonist]] (in the absence of progesterone, mifepristone acts as a [[partial agonist]]). Mifepristone is a 19-[[nor-|nor]] [[steroid]] with a bulky ''[[Arene substitution pattern#Ortho, meta, and para substitution|p]]''-(dimethylamino) [[phenyl group|phenyl]] [[substituent]] above the plane of the molecule at the 11β-position responsible for inducing or stabilizing an inactive [[steroid hormone receptor|receptor]] [[Chemical structure|conformation]] and a [[hydrophobic]] 1-[[propynyl]] substituent below the plane of the molecule at the 17α-position that increases its [[progesterone receptor]] [[ligand (biochemistry)|binding affinity]].<!-- |
|||
==Adverse effects== |
|||
--><ref name="loose">{{cite book | vauthors = Loose DS, Stancel GM |year=2006 |chapter=Estrogens and Progestins | veditors = Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL |title=Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics |edition=11th |pages=1541–1571 |location=New York |publisher=McGraw-Hill |isbn=978-0-07-142280-2}}</ref><!-- |
|||
No long-term studies to evaluate the [[carcinogenic]] potential of mifepristone have been performed. This is in accord with ICH guidelines, which do not require carcinogencity testing in non-genotoxic drugs intended for administration for fewer than 6 months.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Safety/S1A/Step4/S1A_Guideline.pdf |title=www.ich.org |format= |work= |accessdate=}}</ref> |
|||
--><ref name="schimmer">{{cite book | vauthors = Schimmer BP, Parker KL |year=2006 |chapter=Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adrenocortical Steroids and Their Synthetic Analogs; Inhibitors of the Synthesis and Actions of Adrenocortical Hormones | veditors = Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL |title=Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics |edition=11th |pages=1587–1612 |location=New York |publisher=McGraw-Hill |isbn=978-0-07-142280-2}}</ref><!-- |
|||
--><ref name="fiala">{{cite journal |vauthors=Fiala C, Gemzel-Danielsson K | title = Review of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue | journal = Contraception | volume = 74 | issue = 1 | pages = 66–86 | date=July 2006 | pmid = 16781264 | doi = 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.018 }}</ref> |
|||
In addition to being an antiprogestogen, mifepristone is also an antiglucocorticoid and a weak [[antiandrogen]]. Mifepristone's relative binding affinity at the progesterone receptor is more than twice that of [[progesterone]], its relative binding affinity at the [[glucocorticoid receptor]] is more than three times that of [[dexamethasone]] and more than ten times that of [[cortisol]].<ref name="pmid14698071">{{cite journal | vauthors = Heikinheimo O, Kekkonen R, Lähteenmäki P | title = The pharmacokinetics of mifepristone in humans reveal insights into differential mechanisms of antiprogestin action | journal = Contraception | volume = 68 | issue = 6 | pages = 421–6 | date = December 2003 | pmid = 14698071 | doi = 10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00077-5 }}</ref> Its relative binding affinity at the [[androgen receptor]] is less than one-third that of [[testosterone]], and it does not bind to the [[estrogen receptor]] or the [[mineralocorticoid receptor]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Brogden RN, Goa KL, Faulds D | title = Mifepristone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential | journal = Drugs | volume = 45 | issue = 3 | pages = 384–409 | date = March 1993 | pmid = 7682909 | doi = 10.2165/00003495-199345030-00007 | s2cid = 195691895 }}</ref><!-- |
|||
[[Neonatal]] exposure to a single large dose of mifepristone in rats was not associated with any reproductive problems, although chronic low-dose exposure of newborn rats to mifepristone was associated with structural and functional reproductive abnormalities.<ref name="miflabel"/> |
|||
--> |
|||
Mifepristone as a regular [[contraceptive]] at 2 mg daily prevents [[ovulation]] (1 mg daily does not). A single [[follicular phase|preovulatory]] 10-mg dose of mifepristone delays ovulation by three to four days and is as effective an [[emergency contraception|emergency contraceptive]] as a single 1.5-mg dose of the [[progestin]] [[levonorgestrel]].<!-- |
|||
[[Teratology]] studies in mice, rats and rabbits revealed teratogenicity for rabbits, but not rats or mice.<ref name="miflabel"/> The rate of birth defects in human infants exposed [[in utero]] to mifepristone and misoprostol is very low,<ref name="pmid16380436">{{cite journal | author = Gary MM, Harrison DJ | title = Analysis of severe adverse events related to the use of mifepristone as an abortifacient | journal = Ann Pharmacother | volume = 40 | issue = 2 | pages = 191–7 | date=February 2006 | pmid = 16380436 | doi = 10.1345/aph.1G481 }}</ref> and may be due to misoprostol alone.<ref name="pmid10759272">{{cite journal | author = Orioli IM, Castilla EE | title = Epidemiological assessment of misoprostol teratogenicity | journal = BJOG | volume = 107 | issue = 4 | pages = 519–23 | date=April 2000 | pmid = 10759272 | doi = 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13272.x }}</ref> |
|||
--><ref name="chabbert-buffet">{{cite journal |vauthors=Chabbert-Buffet N, Meduri G, Bouchard P, Spitz IM |year=2005 |title=Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications |journal=Hum Reprod Update |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=293–307 |pmid=15790602 |doi=10.1093/humupd/dmi002|doi-access=free | title-link = doi }}</ref> |
|||
In women, mifepristone at doses greater or equal to 1 mg/kg antagonizes the [[endometrium|endometrial]] and [[myometrium|myometrial]] effects of progesterone. In humans, an antiglucocorticoid effect of mifepristone is manifested at doses greater or equal to 4.5 mg/kg by a compensatory increase in [[ACTH]] and cortisol. In animals, a weak antiandrogenic effect is seen with prolonged administration of very high doses of 10 to 100 mg/kg.<!-- |
|||
A postmarketing summary found that, of about 1.52 million women who had received mifepristone until April 2011 in the United States, fourteen were reported to have died after application. Eight of these cases were associated with [[sepsis]]; the other six had various causes like drug abuse and suspected murder. Other incidents reported to the FDA included 612 non-lethal hospitalizations, 339 blood transfusions, 48 severe infections, and 2,207 (0.15%) adverse events altogether.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF11G29.pdf |title=Mifepristone U.S. Postmarketing Adverse Events Summary through 04/30/2011 |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2011-11-14}}</ref> |
|||
--><ref name="mifegyne UK SPC">{{cite web |author=Exelgyn Laboratories |date=February 2006 |title=Mifegyne UK Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) |url=http://emc.medicines.org.uk/emc/assets/c/html/displaydoc.asp?documentid=617 |access-date=9 March 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928060430/http://emc.medicines.org.uk/emc/assets/c/html/displaydoc.asp?documentid=617 |archive-date=28 September 2007 }}</ref><!-- |
|||
--><ref name="mifeprex US PI">{{cite web |author=Danco Laboratories |date=19 July 2005 | title=Mifeprex U.S. prescribing information |url=http://www.earlyoptionpill.com/pdfs/prescribing071905.pdf |access-date=9 March 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20051211142330/http://www.earlyoptionpill.com/pdfs/prescribing071905.pdf|url-status=dead <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 11 December 2005}}</ref> |
|||
In medication abortion regimens, mifepristone blockade of progesterone receptors directly causes endometrial [[decidua]]l degeneration, [[cervix|cervical]] softening and dilatation, release of [[endogenous]] [[prostaglandin]]s, and an increase in the sensitivity of the myometrium to the contractile effects of prostaglandins. Mifepristone-induced decidual breakdown indirectly leads to [[trophoblast]] detachment, resulting in decreased [[syncytiotrophoblast]] production of [[human chorionic gonadotropin|hCG]], which in turn causes decreased production of progesterone by the [[corpus luteum]] ([[pregnancy]] is dependent on progesterone production by the corpus luteum through the first nine weeks of [[Gestational age (obstetrics)|gestation]]—until [[placenta]]l progesterone production has increased enough to take the place of corpus luteum progesterone production). When followed sequentially by a prostaglandin, mifepristone 200 mg is (100 mg may be, but 50 mg is not) as effective as 600 mg in producing a medical abortion.<!-- |
|||
==Pharmacology== |
|||
--><ref name="loose"/><!-- |
|||
In the presence of [[progesterone]], mifepristone acts as a [[competitive antagonist|competitive]] [[progesterone receptor antagonist]] (in the absence of progesterone, mifepristone acts as a [[partial agonist]]). Mifepristone is a 19-[[nor-|nor]] [[steroid]] with a bulky ''[[Arene substitution pattern#Ortho.2C meta.2C and para substitution|p]]''-(dimethylamino)[[phenyl group|phenyl]] [[substituent]] above the plane of the molecule at the 11β-position responsible for inducing or stabilizing an inactive [[steroid hormone receptor|receptor]] [[Chemical structure|conformation]] and a [[hydrophobic]] 1-[[propynyl]] substituent below the plane of the molecule at the 17α-position that increases its [[progesterone receptor]] [[ligand (biochemistry)|binding affinity]].<!-- |
|||
--><ref name="fiala"/> |
|||
--><ref name="loose">{{cite book |author=Loose, Davis S.; Stancel, George M. |year=2006 |chapter=Estrogens and Progestins |editor=in Brunton, Laurence L.; Lazo, John S.; Parker, Keith L. (eds.) |title=Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics |edition=11th |pages=1541–1571 |location=New York |publisher=McGraw-Hill |isbn=0-07-142280-3}}</ref><!-- |
|||
--><ref name="schimmer">{{cite book |author=Schimmer, Bernard P.; Parker, Keith L. |year=2006 |chapter=Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adrenocortical Steroids and Their Synthetic Analogs; Inhibitors of the Synthesis and Actions of Adrenocortical Hormones |editor=in Brunton, Laurence L.; Lazo, John S.; Parker, Keith L. (eds.) |title=Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics |edition=11th |pages=1587–1612 |location=New York |publisher=McGraw-Hill |isbn=0-07-142280-3}}</ref><!-- |
|||
--><ref name="fiala">{{cite journal | author = Fiala C, Gemzel-Danielsson K | title = Review of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue | journal = Contraception | volume = 74 | issue = 1 | pages = 66–86 | date=July 2006 | pmid = 16781264 | doi = 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.018 }}</ref> |
|||
'Contragestion' is a term promoted by Étienne-Émile Baulieu in the context of his advocacy of mifepristone, defining it as inclusive of some hypothesized mechanisms of action of some contraceptives and those of mifepristone to induce abortion.<ref name="contragestion">{{cite book| vauthors = Baulieu ÉÉ |year=1985|chapter=RU 486: An antiprogestin steroid with contragestive activity in women| veditors = Baulieu ÉÉ, Segal SJ |title=The antiprogesin steroid RU 486 and human fertility control (Proceedings of a conference on the antiprogestational compound RU 486, held October 23–25, 1984, in Bellagio, Italy)|location=New York|publisher=Plenum Press|pages=1–25|isbn=978-0-306-42103-7}}<br />{{cite book| vauthors = Baulieu ÉÉ |year=1985|chapter=Contragestion by antiprogestin: a new approach to human fertility control|title=Abortion: medical progress and social implications (Symposium held at the Ciba Foundation, London, 27–29 November 1984)|series=Ciba Foundation Symposium|volume=115|location=London|publisher=Pitman|pages=192–210|isbn=978-0-272-79815-7|pmid=3849413|doi=10.1002/9780470720967.ch15}}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Baulieu EE | title = Contragestion with RU 486: a new approach to postovulatory fertility control | journal = Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Supplement | volume = 149 | issue = S149 | pages = 5–8 | date = January 1989 | pmid = 2694738 | doi = 10.1111/j.1600-0412.1989.tb08041.x | s2cid = 723825 }}<br />{{cite news|vauthors=Greenhouse S|date=12 February 1989|title=A new pill, a fierce battle|newspaper=[[The New York Times Magazine]]|page=SM22|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/12/magazine/a-new-pill-a-fierce-battle.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170901111424/http://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/12/magazine/a-new-pill-a-fierce-battle.html|archive-date=1 September 2017}}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Palca J | title = The pill of choice? | journal = Science | volume = 245 | issue = 4924 | pages = 1319–23 | date = September 1989 | pmid = 2781280 | doi = 10.1126/science.2781280 | bibcode = 1989Sci...245.1319P | jstor = 1704254 }}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Baulieu EE | title = Contragestion and other clinical applications of RU 486, an antiprogesterone at the receptor | journal = Science | volume = 245 | issue = 4924 | pages = 1351–7 | date = September 1989 | pmid = 2781282 | doi = 10.1126/science.2781282 | bibcode = 1989Sci...245.1351B | jstor = 1704267 }}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Baulieu EE | title = RU-486 as an antiprogesterone steroid. From receptor to contragestion and beyond | journal = JAMA | volume = 262 | issue = 13 | pages = 1808–14 | date = October 1989 | pmid = 2674487 | doi = 10.1001/jama.262.13.1808 }}<br />{{cite journal|vauthors=Bonner S|date=July 1991|title=Drug of choice|journal=SPIN|volume=7|issue=4|pages=55–56, 88|issn=0886-3032|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wbkGT02oWs4C&pg=PA55|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160512194531/https://books.google.com/books?id=wbkGT02oWs4C&pg=PA55|archive-date=12 May 2016}}<br />{{cite book|vauthors=Baulieu EE, Rosenblum M|date=15 November 1991|title=The "abortion pill": RU-486: a woman's choice (translation of: 'Génération pilule)|location=New York|publisher=Simon & Schuster|isbn=978-0-671-73816-7|pages=18, 26–28|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pC1pZDcibsUC&q=contragestion&pg=PA27|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160527195325/https://books.google.com/books?ei=0BRFUP-YE5SC8ASL3IEQ&id=pC1pZDcibsUC&pg=PA27&vq=contragestion|archive-date=27 May 2016}}<br />{{cite news|vauthors=Beck J|date=2 January 1992|title=RU-486 pill adds a new dimension to the abortion debate|newspaper=Chicago Tribune|page=25|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/1992/01/02/ru-486-pill-adds-a-new-dimension-to-the-abortion-debate/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218151716/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-01-02/news/9201010286_1_ru-486-so-called-abortion-pill-abortion-debate|archive-date=18 February 2013}}<br />{{cite news|vauthors=Chesler E|date=31 July 1992|title=RU-486: we need prudence, not politics|newspaper=The New York Times|page=A27|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/31/opinion/ru-486-we-need-prudence-not-politics.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304063117/http://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/31/opinion/ru-486-we-need-prudence-not-politics.html|archive-date=4 March 2016}}<br />{{cite book|vauthors=Baulieu ÉÉ|date=13 April 1993|chapter=1993: RU 486—a decade on today and tomorrow|veditors=Benet LZ, Brown SS, Dorflinger L, Donaldson MS|title=Clinical applications of mifepristone (RU 486) and other antiprogestins; assessing the science and recommending a research agenda; (Committee on Anti-progestins: Assessing the Science; Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Institute of Medicine)|location=Washington, D.C.|publisher=National Academy Press|pages=71–119|isbn=978-0-309-04949-8|chapter-url=http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=2203&page=98|url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=2203|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130327101237/http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=2203|archive-date=27 March 2013|doi=10.17226/2203|pmid=25144090}}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Baulieu ÉÉ | title = RU486: a compound that gets itself talked about | journal = Hum. Reprod. | volume = 9 | issue = Suppl 1 | pages = 1–6 | date=June 1994 | pmid = 7962455 | doi = 10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.1 }}<br />{{cite book|vauthors=Baulieu ÉÉ|year=1997|chapter=Innovative procedures in family planning|veditors=Johannisson E, Kovács L, Resch BA, Bruyniks NP|title=Assessment of research and service needs in reproductive health in Eastern Europe — concerns and commitments. Proceedings of a workshop organized by the ICRR and the WHO Collaborating Centre on Research in Human Reproduction in Szeged, Hungary, 25–27 October 1993|location=New York|publisher=Parthenon Publishing|pages=51–60|isbn=978-1-85070-696-0|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fPS5Kx6YkeQC&pg=PA53|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160503110848/https://books.google.com/books?id=fPS5Kx6YkeQC&pg=PA53|archive-date=3 May 2016}}<br />{{cite book|year=2008|chapter=contragestive|title=The American Heritage medical dictionary|location=Boston|publisher=Houghton Mifflin|isbn=978-0-618-94725-6|page=124|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kT7ykAhh3fsC&q=contragestive&pg=PA124|access-date=9 October 2020|archive-date=29 June 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220629032702/https://books.google.com/books?id=kT7ykAhh3fsC&q=contragestive&pg=PA124|url-status=live}}<blockquote>''adj.'' Capable of preventing gestation, either by preventing implantation or by causing the uterine lining to shed after implantation. —''n.'' A contragestive drug or agent.</blockquote>{{cite book|vauthors=Ammer C|year=2009|chapter=contragestive|title=The encyclopedia of women's health|edition=6th|location=New York|publisher=Facts On File|isbn=978-0-8160-7407-5|pages=124–125|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_MRDimrELCIC&q=contragestive&pg=PA124|access-date=9 October 2020|archive-date=29 June 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220629032703/https://books.google.com/books?id=_MRDimrELCIC&q=contragestive&pg=PA124|url-status=live}}<blockquote>Also ''contragestant'', ''abortion pill''. A substance called ''mifepristone'', or ''RU-486'', which was developed by Dr. Etienne Baulieu and the Roussel-Uclaf company. The contragestive blocks progesterone receptors in the endometrium (uterine lining), preventing its buildup by progesterone; hence the uterus cannot sustain a pregnancy. It does not prevent fertilization or implantation, so technically it is an ABORTIFACIENT rather than a contraceptive.</blockquote></ref> Baulieu's definition of a 'contragestive' included any birth control method that could possibly act after [[human fertilization|fertilization]] and before nine-weeks [[Gestational age (obstetrics)|gestational age]].<ref name="contragestion"/> |
|||
In addition to being an antiprogestogen, mifepristone is also an antiglucocorticoid and a weak [[antiandrogen]]. Mifepristone's relative binding affinity at the progesterone receptor is more than twice that of progesterone, its relative binding affinity at the [[glucocorticoid receptor]] is more than three times that of [[dexamethasone]] and more than ten times that of [[cortisol]]; its relative binding affinity at the [[androgen receptor]] is less than one third that of [[testosterone]]. It does not bind to the [[estrogen receptor]] or the [[mineralocorticoid receptor]].<!-- |
|||
--><ref name="heikinheimo">{{cite journal |author=Heikinheimo O, Kekkonen R, Lahteenmaki P |year=2003 |title=The pharmacokinetics of mifepristone in humans reveal insights into differential mechanisms of antiprogestin action |journal=Contraception |volume=68 |issue=6 |pages=421–6 |pmid=14698071 |doi=10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00077-5}}</ref> |
|||
===Pharmacokinetics=== |
|||
Mifepristone as a regular [[contraceptive]] at 2 mg daily prevents [[ovulation]] (1 mg daily does not). A single [[follicular phase|preovulatory]] 10 mg dose of mifepristone delays ovulation by 3 to 4 days and is as effective an [[emergency contraception|emergency contraceptive]] as a single 1.5 mg dose of the [[progestin]] [[levonorgestrel]].<!-- |
|||
The [[elimination half-life]] is complex; according to the label: "After a distribution phase, elimination is at first slow, the concentration decreasing by a half between about 12 and 72 hours, and then more rapid, giving an elimination half-life of 18 hours. With radio receptor assay techniques, the terminal half-life is of up to 90 hours, including all metabolites of mifepristone able to bind to progesterone receptors."<ref name="Mifegyne SPC 2015"/> [[Metapristone]] is the major [[metabolite]] of mifepristone.<ref name="pmid9250420">{{cite journal | vauthors = Heikinheimo O | title = Clinical pharmacokinetics of mifepristone | journal = Clin Pharmacokinet | volume = 33 | issue = 1 | pages = 7–17 | date = July 1997 | pmid = 9250420 | doi = 10.2165/00003088-199733010-00002 | s2cid = 25101911 }}</ref><ref name="pmid14698071"/><ref name="pmid24442753">{{cite journal | vauthors = Wang J, Chen J, Wan L, Shao J, Lu Y, Zhu Y, Ou M, Yu S, Chen H, Jia L | title = Synthesis, spectral characterization, and in vitro cellular activities of metapristone, a potential cancer metastatic chemopreventive agent derived from mifepristone (RU486) | journal = AAPS J | volume = 16 | issue = 2 | pages = 289–98 | date = March 2014 | pmid = 24442753 | pmc = 3933578 | doi = 10.1208/s12248-013-9559-2 }}</ref> |
|||
--><ref name="chabbert-buffet">{{cite journal |author=Chabbert-Buffet N, Meduri G, Bouchard P, Spitz IM |year=2005 |title=Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications |journal=Hum Reprod Update |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=293–307 |pmid=15790602 |doi=10.1093/humupd/dmi002}}</ref> |
|||
==Chemistry== |
|||
In women, mifepristone at doses greater or equal to 1 mg/kg antagonizes the [[endometrium|endometrial]] and [[myometrium|myometrial]] effects of progesterone. In humans, an antiglucocorticoid effect of mifepristone is manifested at doses greater or equal to 4.5 mg/kg by a compensatory increase in [[ACTH]] and cortisol. In animals, a weak antiandrogenic effect is seen with prolonged administration of very high doses of 10 to 100 mg/kg.<!-- |
|||
Mifepristone, also known as 11β-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-17α-(1-propynyl)estra-4,9-dien-17β-ol-3-one, is a [[synthetic compound|synthetic]] [[estrane]] [[steroid]] and a [[chemical derivative|derivative]] of [[steroid hormone]]s like [[progesterone]], [[cortisol]], and [[testosterone]].<ref name="pmid19412444"/> It has [[substituent|substitution]]s at the C11β and C17α positions and [[double bond]]s at the C4(5) and C9(10) positions.<ref name="pmid19412444" /> |
|||
--><ref name="mifegyne UK SPC">{{cite web |author=Exelgyn Laboratories | date=February 2006 |title=Mifegyne UK Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) |url=http://emc.medicines.org.uk/emc/assets/c/html/displaydoc.asp?documentid=617 |accessdate=2007-03-09}}</ref><!-- |
|||
--><ref name="mifeprex US PI">{{cite web |author=Danco Laboratories |date=July 19, 2005 | title=Mifeprex U.S. prescribing information |url=http://www.earlyoptionpill.com/pdfs/prescribing071905.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2007-03-09 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070107051431/http://www.earlyoptionpill.com/pdfs/prescribing071905.pdf <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2007-01-07}}</ref> |
|||
==History== |
|||
In medical abortion regimens, mifepristone blockade of progesterone receptors directly causes endometrial [[decidua]]l degeneration, [[cervix|cervical]] softening and dilatation, release of [[endogenous]] [[prostaglandin]]s and an increase in the sensitivity of the myometrium to the contractile effects of prostaglandins. Mifepristone induced decidual breakdown indirectly leads to [[trophoblast]] detachment, resulting in decreased [[syncytiotrophoblast]] production of [[human chorionic gonadotropin|hCG]], which in turn causes decreased production of progesterone by the [[corpus luteum]] ([[pregnancy]] is dependent on progesterone production by the corpus luteum through the first 9 weeks of [[gestational age|gestation]]—until [[placenta]]l progesterone production has increased enough to take the place of corpus luteum progesterone production). When followed sequentially by a prostaglandin, mifepristone 200 mg is (100 mg may be, but 50 mg is not) as effective as 600 mg in producing a medical abortion.<!-- |
|||
===1980–1987=== |
|||
--><ref name="loose"/><!-- |
|||
In April 1980, as part of a formal research project at the French pharmaceutical company [[Roussel-Uclaf]] for the development of glucocorticoid receptor antagonists, endocrinologist [[Étienne-Émile Baulieu]]<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pC1pZDcibsUC&q=%C3%89tienne-%C3%89mile+Baulieu+mifepristone|title=The "abortion Pill": RU-486, a Woman's Choice|isbn=978-0-671-73816-7|vauthors=Baulieu EE, Rosenblum M|year=1991|publisher=Simon & Schuster |access-date=20 February 2022|archive-date=29 June 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220629032703/https://books.google.com/books?id=pC1pZDcibsUC&q=%C3%89tienne-%C3%89mile+Baulieu+mifepristone|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=RuJwDwAAQBAJ&dq=%C3%89tienne-%C3%89mile+Baulieu+mifepristone&pg=PA148|title = Reproductive Medicine for Clinical Practice: Medical and Surgical Aspects|isbn = 978-3-319-78009-2|vauthors = Schenker JG, Sciarra JJ, Mettler L, Genazzani AR, Birkhaeuser M|date = 29 September 2018| publisher=Springer |access-date = 4 March 2022|archive-date = 29 June 2022|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220629032703/https://books.google.com/books?id=RuJwDwAAQBAJ&dq=%C3%89tienne-%C3%89mile+Baulieu+mifepristone&pg=PA148|url-status = live}}</ref> and chemist Georges Teutsch synthesized mifepristone (RU-38486, the 38,486th compound synthesized by Roussel-Uclaf from 1949 to 1980; shortened to RU-486), which was discovered to also be a progesterone receptor antagonist.<ref name="RU-486">{{cite book | vauthors = Baulieu ÉÉ, Rosenblum M |year=1991 |title=The "abortion pill": RU-486, a woman's choice |location=New York |publisher=Simon & Schuster |isbn=978-0-671-73816-7 |url=https://archive.org/details/abortionpillru00baul }}<br />{{cite book | vauthors = Lader L |year=1991 |title=RU 486: the pill that could end the abortion wars and why American women don't have it |location=Reading |publisher=Addison-Wesley |isbn=978-0-201-57069-4 |url=https://archive.org/details/ru486pillthatcou00lade }}<br />{{cite book| vauthors = Villaran G |chapter=RU 486 |pages=155–190 | veditors = Schlegelmilch, Bodo B |year=1998 |title=Marketing ethics: an international perspective |location=London |publisher=Thomson Learning |isbn=978-1-86152-191-0}}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Ulmann A | title = The development of mifepristone: a pharmaceutical drama in three acts | journal = Journal of the American Medical Women's Association | volume = 55 | issue = 3 Suppl | pages = 117–20 | year = 2000 | pmid = 10846319 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Teutsch G | title = RU 486 development | journal = Science | volume = 246 | issue = 4933 | pages = 985 | date = November 1989 | pmid = 2587990 | doi = 10.1126/science.2587990 | s2cid = 41144964 }}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Cherfas J | title = Dispute surfaces over paternity of RU 486 | journal = Science | volume = 246 | issue = 4933 | pages = 994 | date = November 1989 | pmid = 2587988 | doi = 10.1126/science.2587988 | bibcode = 1989Sci...246..994C }}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Philibert D, Teutsch G | title = RU 486 development | journal = Science | volume = 247 | issue = 4943 | pages = 622 | date = February 1990 | pmid = 2300819 | doi = 10.1126/science.2300819 | bibcode = 1990Sci...247..622P }}<br />{{cite magazine|doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0690-42 | vauthors = Ulmann A, Teutsch G, Philibert D |date=June 1990 |title=RU 486 |magazine=Scientific American|volume=262 |issue=6 |pages=42–8 |pmid=2343294}}<br />{{cite book | vauthors = Teutsch G, Deraedt R, Philibert D |year=1993 |chapter=Mifepristone |pages=[https://archive.org/details/chroniclesofdrug0000unse/page/1 1–43] | veditors = Lednicer D |title=Chronicles of drug discovery, Vol. 3 |location=Washington, DC |publisher=American Chemical Society |isbn=978-0-8412-2523-7 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/chroniclesofdrug0000unse/page/1 }}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Teutsch G, Philibert D | title = History and perspectives of antiprogestins from the chemist's point of view | journal = Human Reproduction | volume = 9 | issue = Suppl 1 | pages = 12–31 | date = June 1994 | pmid = 7962457 | doi = 10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.12 }}<br />{{cite book |year=2007 |chapter=Mifepristone |pages=2307–2310 | veditors = Sittig M |title=Pharmaceutical manufacturing encyclopedia |edition=3rd |location=Norwich, NY |publisher=William Andrew Publishing |isbn=978-1-60119-339-1}}<br />{{cite patent|country = US | number=4386085 |gdate = 31 May 1983 |inventor = Teutsch JG, Costerousse G, Philibert D Deraedt R |title=Novel steroids | assign1 = Roussel Uclaf | postscript = . }}</ref> In October 1981, Étienne-Émile Baulieu, a consultant to Roussel-Uclaf, arranged tests of its use for medical abortion in 11 women in [[Switzerland]] by gynecologist Walter Herrmann at the [[University of Geneva]]'s Cantonal Hospital, with successful results announced on 19 April 1982.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news | vauthors = Eder R |date=20 April 1982 |title=Birth control: 4-day pill is promising in early test |newspaper=The New York Times |page=C1 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1982/04/20/science/birth-control-4-day-pill-is-promising-in-early-test.html?&pagewanted=all |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160625131822/http://www.nytimes.com/1982/04/20/science/birth-control-4-day-pill-is-promising-in-early-test.html?&pagewanted=all |archive-date=25 June 2016 }}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Herrmann W, Wyss R, Riondel A, Philibert D, Teutsch G, Sakiz E, Baulieu EE | title = [The effects of an antiprogesterone steroid in women: interruption of the menstrual cycle and of early pregnancy] | journal = Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série III | volume = 294 | issue = 18 | pages = 933–8 | date = May 1982 | pmid = 6814714 }}</ref> On 9 October 1987, following worldwide clinical trials in 20,000 women of mifepristone with a [[prostaglandin]] analogue (initially [[sulprostone]] or [[gemeprost]], later [[misoprostol]]) for medical abortion, Roussel-Uclaf sought approval in France for their use for medical abortion, with approval announced on 23 September 1988.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news | vauthors = Kolata G |date=24 September 1988 |title=France and China allow sale of a drug for early abortion |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/09/24/us/france-and-china-allow-sale-of-a-drug-for-early-abortion.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170901111410/http://www.nytimes.com/1988/09/24/us/france-and-china-allow-sale-of-a-drug-for-early-abortion.html |archive-date=1 September 2017 }}</ref> |
|||
--><ref name="fiala"/> |
|||
===1988–1990=== |
|||
''Contragestion'' is a term promoted by Étienne-Émile Baulieu in the context of his advocacy of mifepristone, defining it as inclusive of some hypothesized mechanisms of action of some contraceptives and those of mifepristone to induce abortion.<ref name="contragestion">{{cite book|last=Baulieu|first=Étienne-Émile|year=1985|chapter=RU 486: An antiprogestin steroid with contragestive activity in women|editor1-last=Baulieu|editor1-first=Étienne-Émile|editor2-last=Segal|editor2-first=Sheldon J|title=The antiprogesin steroid RU 486 and human fertility control (Proceedings of a conference on the antiprogestational compound RU 486, held October 23–25, 1984, in Bellagio, Italy)|location=New York|publisher=Plenum Press|pages=1–25|isbn=0-306-42103-8}}<br/>{{cite book|last=Baulieu|first=Étienne-Émile|year=1985|chapter=Contragestion by antiprogestin: a new approach to human fertility control|title=Abortion: medical progress and social implications (Symposium held at the Ciba Foundation, London, 27–29 November 1984)|series=Ciba Foundation Symposium|volume=115|location=London|publisher=Pitman|pages=192–210|isbn=0-272-79815-0|pmid=3849413}}<br/>{{cite journal|last=Baulieu|first=Étienne-Émile|year=1989|title=Contragestion with RU 486: a new approach to postovulatory fertility control (from Meet the experts — Antiprogestins, edited by Baulieu, É-É; Proceedings of a meeting held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 27 October 1988)|journal=Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement|volume=149|pages=5–8|issn=0300-8835|pmid=2694738}}<br/>{{cite news|last=Greenhouse|first=Steven|date=February 12, 1989|title=A new pill, a fierce battle|newspaper=The New York Times Magazine|page=SM22|url= http://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/12/magazine/a-new-pill-a-fierce-battle.html?pagewanted=all}}<br/>{{cite journal | author = Palca J | title = The pill of choice? | journal = Science | volume = 245 | issue = 4924 | pages = 1319–23 | date=September 1989 | pmid = 2781280 | doi = 10.1126/science.2781280 | jstor = 1704254 }}<br/>{{cite journal | author = Baulieu EE | title = Contragestion and other clinical applications of RU 486, an antiprogesterone at the receptor | journal = Science | volume = 245 | issue = 4924 | pages = 1351–7 | date=September 1989 | pmid = 2781282 | doi = 10.2307/1704267 | jstor = 1704267 }}<br/>{{cite journal| author =Baulieu EE | date=October 1989 | title=The Albert Lasker Medical Awards. RU-486 as an antiprogesterone steroid. From receptor to contragestion and beyond|journal=JAMA|volume=262|issue=13|pages=1808–1814|pmid=2674487|url=http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=378851| doi=10.1001/jama.262.13.1808}}<br/> |
|||
On 21 October 1988, in response to antiabortion protests and concerns of majority (54.5%) owner Hoechst AG of Germany, Roussel-Uclaf's executives and board of directors voted 16 to 4 to stop distribution of mifepristone, which they announced on 26 October 1988.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |page=A1 | vauthors = Greenhouse S |date=27 October 1988 |title=Drug maker stops all distribution of abortion pill |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/27/us/drug-maker-stops-all-distribution-of-abortion-pill.html |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160305014315/http://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/27/us/drug-maker-stops-all-distribution-of-abortion-pill.html |archive-date=5 March 2016 }}</ref> Two days later, the French government ordered Roussel-Uclaf to distribute mifepristone in the interests of public health.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news | vauthors = Greenhouse S |date=29 October 1988 |title=France ordering company to sell its abortion drug |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/29/world/france-ordering-company-to-sell-its-abortion-drug.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304235250/http://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/29/world/france-ordering-company-to-sell-its-abortion-drug.html |archive-date=4 March 2016 }}</ref> French Health Minister [[Claude Évin]] explained: "I could not permit the abortion debate to deprive women of a product that represents medical progress. From the moment Government approval for the drug was granted, RU-486 became the moral property of women, not just the property of a drug company."<ref name="RU-486" /> Following use by 34,000 women in France from April 1988 to February 1990 of mifepristone distributed free of charge, Roussel-Uclaf began selling Mifegyne (mifepristone) to hospitals in France in February 1990 at a price (negotiated with the French government) of {{USD|48|1990}} per 600-mg dose.<ref name="RU-486" /> |
|||
{{cite journal|last=Bonner|first=Staci|date=July 1991|title=Drug of choice|journal=SPIN|volume=7|issue=4|pages=55–56, 88|issn= 0886-3032|url= http://books.google.com/books?id=wbkGT02oWs4C&pg=PA55}}<br/>{{cite book|last1=Baulieu|first1=Étienne-Émile|last2=Rosenblum|first2=Mort|date=November 15, 1991|title=The "abortion pill": RU-486: a woman's choice (translation of: 'Génération pilule)|location=New York|publisher=Simon & Schuster|isbn=0-671-73816-X|pages=18, 26–28|url=http://books.google.com/books?ei=0BRFUP-YE5SC8ASL3IEQ&id=pC1pZDcibsUC&pg=PA27&vq=contragestion}}<br/>{{cite news|last=Beck|first=Joan|date=January 2, 1992|title=RU-486 pill adds a new dimension to the abortion debate|newspaper=Chicago Tribune|page=25|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-01-02/news/9201010286_1_ru-486-so-called-abortion-pill-abortion-debate}}<br/>{{cite news|last=Chesler|first=Ellen|date=July 31, 1992|title=RU-486: we need prudence, not politics|newspaper=The New York Times|page=A27|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/31/opinion/ru-486-we-need-prudence-not-politics.html?pagewanted=all}}<br/> |
|||
{{cite book |author=Baulieu, Étienne-Émile|date=April 13, 1993|chapter=1993: RU 486—a decade on today and tomorrow|editor1-last=Donaldson|editor1-first=Molla S.|editor2-last=Dorflinger|editor2-first=Laneta|editor3-last=Brown|editor3-first=Sarah S.|editor4-last=Benet|editor4-first=Leslie Z.|title=Clinical applications of mifepristone (RU 486) and other antiprogestins; assessing the science and recommending a research agenda; (Committee on Anti-progestins: Assessing the Science; Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Institute of Medicine)|location=Washington, D.C.|publisher=National Academy Press|pages=71–119|isbn=0-309-04949-0|chapterurl=http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=2203&page=98|url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=2203}}<br/>{{cite journal | author = Baulieu EE | title = RU486: a compound that gets itself talked about | journal = Hum. Reprod. | volume = 9 Suppl 1 | issue = | pages = 1–6 | date=June 1994 | pmid = 7962455 | doi = 10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.1 }}<br/>{{cite book|last=Baulieu|first=Étienne-Émile|year=1997|chapter=Innovative procedures in family planning|editor1-last=Johannisson|editor1-first=Elisabeth|editor2-last=Kovács|editor2-first=László|editor3-last=Resch|editor3-first=Bela A|editor4-last= Bruyniks|editor4-first=Nico P|title=Assessment of research and service needs in reproductive health in Eastern Europe — concerns and commitments. Proceedings of a workshop organized by the ICRR and the WHO Collaborating Centre on Research in Human Reproduction in Szeged, Hungary, 25–27 October 1993|location=New York|publisher=Parthenon Publishing|pages=51–60|isbn=1-85070-696-4|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=fPS5Kx6YkeQC&pg=PA53}}<br/>{{cite book|author=.|year=2008|chapter=contragestive|title=The American Heritage medical dictionary|location=Boston|publisher=Houghton Mifflin|isbn=978-0-618-94725-6|page=124|chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=kT7ykAhh3fsC&pg=PA124&vq=contragestive}}<blockquote>''adj.'' Capable of preventing gestation, either by preventing implantation or by causing the uterine lining to shed after implantation. —''n.'' A contragestive drug or agent.</blockquote>{{cite book|last=Ammer|first=Christine|year=2009|chapter=contragestive|title=The encyclopedia of women's health|edition=6th|location=New York|publisher=Facts On File|isbn=978-0-8160-7407-5|pages=124–125|chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=_MRDimrELCIC&pg=PA124&vq=contragestive}}<blockquote>Also ''contragestant'', ''abortion pill''. A substance called ''mifepristone'', or ''RU-486'', which was developed by Dr. Etienne Baulieu and the Roussel-Uclaf company. The contragestive blocks progesterone receptors in the endometrium (uterine lining), preventing its buildup by progesterone; hence the uterus cannot sustain a pregnancy. It does not prevent fertilization or implantation, so technically it is an ABORTIFACIENT rather than a contraceptive.</blockquote></ref> Baulieu's definition of a ''contragestive'' included any birth control method that could possibly act after [[human fertilization|fertilization]] and before nine weeks [[gestational age]].<ref name="contragestion"/> |
|||
== |
===1991–1996=== |
||
Mifegyne was subsequently approved in Great Britain in July 1991,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Smith W |date=September 1991 |title=Great Britain second country to allow use of RU-486 |journal=Plan Parent Eur |volume=20|issue=2 |page=20 |pmid=12284548}}</ref> and in [[Sweden]] in September 1992,<ref>{{cite journal |date=December 1992 |title=RU 486 licensed in Sweden |journal=IPPF Med Bull |volume=26 |issue=6 |page=6 |pmid=12346922}}</ref> but until his retirement in April 1994, Hoechst AG chairman Wolfgang Hilger, a devout [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]],<ref name=RU486HoechtIGFarben.NYP>{{cite news |work=[[New York Post]] |title=Nazi link may keep RU-486 out | vauthors = Peyser A |date=2 July 1992 |pages=5, 18}}</ref> blocked any further expansion in availability.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref name=1993unitedstateseffort>{{cite news | vauthors = Newman B |date=22 February 1993 |title=Drug dilemma: among those wary of abortion pill is maker's parent firm; Germany's Hoechst is facing pressure from Clinton to sell RU-486 in U.S. |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |page=A1}}<br />{{cite news |agency=Associated Press |date=16 April 1993 |title=F.D.A. says company delays abortion pill |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A14 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/16/us/fda-says-company-delays-abortion-pill.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160803201914/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/16/us/fda-says-company-delays-abortion-pill.html |archive-date=3 August 2016 }}<br />{{cite news | vauthors = Jouzaitis C |date=17 October 1994 |title=Abortion pill battle surprises French firm |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |page=1 (Business) |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/24140469.html?dids=24140469:24140469&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218193337/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/24140469.html?dids=24140469%3A24140469&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS%3AFT |archive-date=18 February 2013 }}</ref> Soon after becoming U.S. President in 1993, [[Bill Clinton]] ordered the U.S. Health and Human Services Department to investigate mifepristone's potential as an abortion medication, and also pressured Hoeschst to make the RU-486 medication available in the United States.<ref name=1993unitedstateseffort /><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/2023/04/history-of-mifepristone/|title=The History of Mifepristone|publisher=Reproductive Health Access Project|date=April 18, 2023|accessdate=June 13, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-nov-05-mn-47330-story.html|title=Persistence Brought Abortion Pill to U.S.| vauthors = Bernstein S |publisher=Los Angeles|date=November 5, 2000|accessdate=June 13, 2024}}</ref> On 16 May 1994, Roussel-Uclaf announced it was donating without remuneration all rights for medical uses of mifepristone in the United States to the [[Population Council]],<ref name="Seelye 1994">{{cite news | vauthors = Seelye KQ |date=17 May 1994 |title=Accord opens way for abortion pill in U.S. in 2 years |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/17/us/accord-opens-way-for-abortion-pill-in-us-in-2-years.html?&pagewanted=all |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160803200331/http://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/17/us/accord-opens-way-for-abortion-pill-in-us-in-2-years.html?&pagewanted=all |archive-date=3 August 2016 }}</ref> which would then sponsor clinical trials for mifepristone between September 1994 and September 1995.<ref name=1990suslaunch>{{cite journal | vauthors = Simonds W, Ellertson C, Springer K, Winikoff B | title = Abortion, revised: participants in the U.S. clinical trials evaluate mifepristone | journal = Social Science & Medicine | volume = 46 | issue = 10 | pages = 1313–1323 | date = May 1998 | pmid = 9665563 | doi = 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10063-6 }}</ref> In September 1995, The Population Council licensed mifpristone to [[Danco Laboratories]], which was a new, single-product company that was intended to be resistant to antiabortion boycotts.<ref name=dancomifpristone /><ref name=dancoandfdaapproval>{{cite news | vauthors = Kolata G |date=29 September 2000 |title=U.S. approves abortion pill; drug offers more privacy and could reshape debate |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/29/us/us-approves-abortion-pill-drug-offers-more-privacy-and-could-reshape-debate.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170804114939/http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/29/us/us-approves-abortion-pill-drug-offers-more-privacy-and-could-reshape-debate.html |archive-date=4 August 2017 }}</ref> Danco entered into a manufacturing agreement with Hungarian drug manufacturer [[Gedeon Richter (company)|Gedeon Richter]].<ref name=dancomifpristone>{{cite web|url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ny-supreme-court-appellate-division/1151610.html |title=DANCO LABORATORIES LIMITED v. The Washington Post Company, Intervenor-Appellant. (2000)|publisher=Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York. |date=July 27, 2000 |accessdate=June 13, 2024 |via=caselaw.findlaw.com}}</ref> In 1996, the US [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) conditionally licensed RU-486 for early trimester abortion, pending a resolution on some remaining technical and manufacturing issues.<ref name=1990suslaunch /> |
|||
===1997–1999=== |
|||
Preclinical studies point to the potential neuroprotective actions of mifepristone. Mifepristone was found to protect rat primary hippocampal neurons, clonal mouse hippocampal cells, and organotypic hippocampal slice cultures against oxidative stress-induced neuronal cell death induced by amyloid beta protein, hydrogen peroxide, and glutamate.<ref name="pmid9182944">{{cite journal | author = Behl C, Trapp T, Skutella T, Holsboer F | title = Protection against oxidative stress-induced neuronal cell death--a novel role for RU486 | journal = Eur. J. Neurosci. | volume = 9 | issue = 5 | pages = 912–20 | date=May 1997 | pmid = 9182944 | doi = 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01442.x}}</ref> This effect was interestingly independent of the presence of glucocorticoid or progesterone receptors. Other studies have also subsequently demonstrated neuroprotective effects of mifepristone.<ref name="pmid12810951">{{cite journal | author = Ghoumari AM, Dusart I, El-Etr M, Tronche F, Sotelo C, Schumacher M, Baulieu EE | title = Mifepristone (RU486) protects Purkinje cells from cell death in organotypic slice cultures of postnatal rat and mouse cerebellum | journal = Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. | volume = 100 | issue = 13 | pages = 7953–8 | date=June 2003 | pmid = 12810951 | pmc = 164694 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.1332667100 }}</ref> Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists may have useful cognitive-enhancing and possibly antidepressant properties in bipolar disorder.<ref name="pmid15127079">{{cite journal | author = Young AH, Gallagher P, Watson S, Del-Estal D, Owen BM, Ferrier IN | title = Improvements in neurocognitive function and mood following adjunctive treatment with mifepristone (RU-486) in bipolar disorder | journal = Neuropsychopharmacology | volume = 29 | issue = 8 | pages = 1538–45 | date=August 2004 | pmid = 15127079 | doi = 10.1038/sj.npp.1300471 }}</ref> |
|||
On 8 April 1997, after buying the remaining 43.5% of Roussel-Uclaf stock in early 1997,<ref>{{cite news | vauthors = Moore SD, Kamm T, Fleming C |date=11 December 1996 |title=Hoechst to seek rest of Roussel-Uclaf; expected $3.04 billion offer would add to the wave of drug-sector linkups |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |page=A3}}<br />{{cite news | vauthors = Marshall M |date=11 December 1996 |title=Hoechst offers to pay $3.6 billion for rest of Roussel|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |page=A8}}<br />{{cite news |agency=[[Bloomberg News]] |date=11 December 1996 |title=Hoechst to buy rest of Roussel |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |page=D4 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/11/business/hoechst-to-buy-rest-of-roussel.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160625124549/http://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/11/business/hoechst-to-buy-rest-of-roussel.html |archive-date=25 June 2016 }}</ref> Hoechst AG ({{USD|30|1996}} billion annual revenue) announced the end of its manufacture and sale of Mifegyne ({{USD|3.44|1996}} million annual revenue) and the transfer of all rights for medical uses of mifepristone outside of the United States to [[Exelgyn]], a new single-product company immune to antiabortion boycotts, whose CEO was former Roussel-Uclaf CEO Édouard Sakiz.<ref>{{cite news|agency=[[Bloomberg News]]|date=9 April 1997|title=Pill for abortion ends production|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|page=D2|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1997/04/09/business/pill-for-abortion-ends-production.html|url-status=live |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160625134359/http://www.nytimes.com/1997/04/09/business/pill-for-abortion-ends-production.html|archive-date=25 June 2016}}<br />{{cite news | vauthors = Jouzaitis C |date=9 April 1997 |title=Abortion pill maker bows to boycott heat; German firm gives up RU-486 patent; little impact likely in U.S. |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |page=4 |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/11401570.html?dids=11401570:11401570&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218193350/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/11401570.html?dids=11401570%3A11401570&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS%3AFT |archive-date=18 February 2013 }}<br />{{cite news | vauthors = Lavin D |date=9 April 1997 |title=Hoechst will stop making abortion pill |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |page=A3}}<br />{{cite journal |date=18 April 1997 |title=Roussel-Uclaf to transfer RU 486 rights |journal=Reprod Freedom News |volume=6 |issue=7 |page=8 |pmid=12292550}}<br />{{cite journal | vauthors = Dorozynski A |date=19 April 1997 |title=Boycott threat forces French company to abandon RU486 |journal=BMJ |volume=314|issue=7088 |page=1150 |pmid=9146386 |pmc=2126515 |doi=10.1136/bmj.314.7088.1145m}}</ref> In 1997, Gideon Richter would withdraw from efforts to manufacture mifepristone in the United States following opposition from pro-life groups, which led to Danco filing a [[breach of contract]] lawsuit.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1997/06/12/abortion-pills-us-sponsor-suing-hungarian-drug-firm/f08f9b4e-36ea-45d1-aa1e-3c89f5496370/|title=ABORTION PILL'S U.S. SPONSOR SUING HUNGARIAN DRUG FIRM|date=1997-06-12|work=[[The Washington Post]] |url-access=subscription |access-date=2024-06-13|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> In 1999, Exelgyn won approval of Mifegyne in 11 additional countries, and in 28 more countries over the following decade.<ref name="Gynuity 2009">{{cite web|date=4 November 2009|title=List of mifepristone approval|location=New York|publisher=Gynuity Health Projects|url=http://gynuity.org/downloads/mife_approval_2009_list.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726135110/http://gynuity.org/downloads/mife_approval_2009_list.pdf|archive-date=26 July 2011|access-date=4 May 2018}}<br />{{cite web|date=4 November 2009|title=Map of mifepristone approval|location=New York|publisher=Gynuity Health Projects|url=http://gynuity.org/downloads/Mife_approval_2009_map.pdf|access-date=11 June 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726135136/http://gynuity.org/downloads/Mife_approval_2009_map.pdf|archive-date=26 July 2011}}</ref> |
|||
===2000–present=== |
|||
Mifepristone treatment was associated with a time-limited increase in cortisol awakening response and with a sustained improvement in spatial working memory performance in patients with bipolar depression compared with well-matched healthy controls.{{Unreliable medical source|sure=y|date=November 2013}}<ref name="pmid22770649">{{cite journal | author = Watson S, Gallagher P, Porter RJ, Smith MS, Herron LJ, Bulmer S, Young AH, Ferrier IN | title = A randomized trial to examine the effect of mifepristone on neuropsychological performance and mood in patients with bipolar depression | journal = Biol. Psychiatry | volume = 72 | issue = 11 | pages = 943–9 | date=December 2012 | pmid = 22770649 | doi = 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.029 | url = }}</ref> |
|||
In September 2000 Danco Laboratories, a sub-licencee of the Population Council, received approval from the US [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) to sell mifepristone under the brand name Mifeprex. |
|||
In 2019, the first generic form of mifepristone in the United States became available, manufactured by [[GenBioPro]].<ref>{{Cite web| vauthors = North A |date=20 August 2019|title=The first generic abortion pill just hit the US market. Here's what that means.|url=https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/8/20/20750226/abortion-pill-mifepristone-pregnancy-genbiopro-mifeprex-generic|access-date=14 July 2020|website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]]|archive-date=13 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200713184519/https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/8/20/20750226/abortion-pill-mifepristone-pregnancy-genbiopro-mifeprex-generic|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
==History== |
|||
==Society and culture== |
|||
In April 1980, as part of a formal research project at Roussel-Uclaf for the development of [[glucocorticoid receptor]] [[receptor antagonist|antagonist]]s, chemist Georges Teutsch synthesized mifepristone (RU-38486, the 38,486th compound synthesized by Roussel-Uclaf from 1949 to 1980; shortened to RU-486); which was discovered to also be a [[progesterone receptor]] antagonist.<ref name="RU-486">{{cite book |author=Baulieu, Étienne-Émile; Rosenblum, Mort |year=1991 |title=The "abortion pill" : RU-486, a woman's choice |location=New York |publisher=Simon & Schuster |isbn=0-671-73816-X}}<br />{{cite book |author=Lader, Lawrence |year=1991 |title=RU 486 : the pill that could end the abortion wars and why American women don't have it |location=Reading |publisher=Addison-Wesley |isbn=0-201-57069-6}}<br />{{cite book|author=Villaran, Gilda |chapter=RU 486 |pages=155–190 |editor=Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. (ed.) |year=1998 |title=Marketing ethics : an international perspective |location=London |publisher=Thomson Learning |isbn=1-86152-191-X}}<br />{{cite journal |author=Ulmann, André |year=2000 |title=The development of mifepristone: a pharmaceutical drama in three acts|journal=J Am Med Womens Assoc |volume=55 |issue=3 Suppl |pages=117–20 |pmid=10846319}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|author=Teutsch, Georges |date=November 24, 1989 |title=RU 486 development |journal=Science |volume=246 |issue=4933|page=985 |doi=10.1126/science.2587990 |pmid=2587990}}<br />{{cite journal |last1=Cherfas |first1=J |date=November 24, 1989 |title=Dispute surfaces over paternity of RU 486 |journal=Science |volume=246 |issue=4933|page=994 |doi=10.1126/science.2587988 |pmid=2587988}}<br />{{cite journal |last1=Philibert |first1=D |last2=Teutsch|first2=G |date=February 9, 1990 |title=RU 486 development |journal=Science|volume=246 |issue=4943 |page=622 |doi=10.1126/science.2300819 |pmid=2300819}}<br />{{cite journal|doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0690-42 |last1=Ulmann |first1=A |last2=Teutsch |first2=G |last3=Philibert |first3=D|date=June 1990 |title=RU 486 |journal=Scientific American|volume=262 |issue=6 |pages=42–8 |pmid=2343294}}<br />{{cite book |author=Teutsch, G.; Deraedt, R.; Philibert, D.|year=1993 |chapter=Mifepristone |pages=1–43 |editor=Lednicer, Daniel (ed.) |title=Chronicles of drug discovery, Vol. 3|location=Washington, DC |publisher=American Chemical Society |isbn=0-8412-2523-0}}<br />{{cite journal |last1=Teutsch|first1=G |last2=Philibert |first2=D |date=June 1994 |title=History and perspectives of antiprogestins from the chemist's point of view |journal=Human Reprod |volume=9 |issue=Suppl 1|pages=12–31 |pmid=7962457 |doi=10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.12}}<br />{{cite book |author= |year=2007 |chapter=Mifepristone |pages=2307–2310 |editor=Sittig, Marshall (ed.) |title=Pharmaceutical manufacturing encyclopedia |edition=3rd |location=Norwich, NY |publisher=William Andrew Publishing |isbn=1-60119-339-4}}<br />{{US patent reference|number=4,386,085|y=1983|m=05|d=31|inventor=Teutsch, Jean G.; Costerousse, Germain; Philibert, Daniel; Deraedt, Roger|title=Novel steroids}} assigned to Roussel Uclaf</ref> In October 1981, endocrinologist [[Étienne-Émile Baulieu]], a consultant to Roussel-Uclaf, arranged tests of its use for [[medical abortion]] in eleven women in [[Switzerland]] by gynecologist Walter Herrmann at the [[University of Geneva]]'s Cantonal Hospital, with successful results announced on April 19, 1982.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news |author=Eder, Richard |date=April 20, 1982 |title=Birth control: 4-day pill is promising in early test |newspaper=The New York Times|page=C1 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1982/04/20/science/birth-control-4-day-pill-is-promising-in-early-test.html?&pagewanted=all}}<br />{{cite journal |author=Herrmann, Walter; Wyss, Rolf; Riondel, Anne; Philibert, Daniel; Teutsch, Georges; Sakiz, Edouard; Baulieu, Étienne-Émile |date=May 17, 1982 |title=The effects of an antiprogesterone steroid in women: interruption of the menstrual cycle and of early pregnancy |journal=C R Seances Acad Sci III |volume=294 |issue=18|pages=933–8 |pmid=6814714}}</ref> On October 9, 1987, following worldwide clinical trials in 20,000 women of mifepristone with a [[prostaglandin]] analogue (initially [[sulprostone]] or [[gemeprost]], later [[misoprostol]]) for medical abortion, Roussel-Uclaf sought approval in France for their use for medical abortion, with approval announced on September 23, 1988.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news |last=Kolata |first=Gina |date=September 24, 1988 |title=France and China allow sale of a drug for early abortion |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1988/09/24/us/france-and-china-allow-sale-of-a-drug-for-early-abortion.html?pagewanted=all}}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone is on the [[WHO Model List of Essential Medicines|World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines]].<ref name="WHO23rd" /> Since 2005, it has been included on the core list, with misoprostol, with a special note "where permitted under national law and where culturally acceptable".<ref>{{cite book | vauthors = ((World Health Organization)) | title = The selection and use of essential medicines : report of the WHO Expert Committee, 2005 : (including the 14th model list of essential medicines) | year = 2005 | hdl = 10665/43292 | author-link = World Health Organization | publisher = World Health Organization | location = Geneva | isbn = 924120933X | hdl-access=free }}</ref> |
|||
=== Economics === |
|||
On October 21, 1988, in response to antiabortion protests and concerns of majority (54.5%) owner Hoechst AG of Germany, Roussel-Uclaf’s executives and board of directors voted 16 to 4 to stop distribution of mifepristone, which they announced on October 26, 1988.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news |author=Greenhouse, Steven |date=October 27, 1988 |title=Drug maker stops all distribution of abortion pill |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/27/us/drug-maker-stops-all-distribution-of-abortion-pill.html?pagewanted=all}}</ref> Two days later, the French government ordered Roussel-Uclaf to distribute mifepristone in the interests of public health.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news |author=Greenhouse, Steven |date=October 29, 1988 |title=France ordering company to sell its abortion drug |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/29/world/france-ordering-company-to-sell-its-abortion-drug.html?pagewanted=all}}</ref> French Health Minister [[Claude Évin]] explained that: "I could not permit the abortion debate to deprive women of a product that represents medical progress. From the moment Government approval for the drug was granted, RU-486 became the moral property of women, not just the property of a drug company."<ref name="RU-486" /> Following use by 34,000 women in France from April 1988 to February 1990 of mifepristone distributed free of charge, Roussel-Uclaf began selling Mifegyne (mifepristone) to hospitals in France in February 1990 at a price (negotiated with the French government) of $48 per 600 mg dose.<ref name="RU-486" /> |
|||
Cost and availability limit access in many parts of the world.<ref>{{cite book| veditors = Hussein J, McCaw-Binns A, Webber R |title=Maternal and perinatal health in developing countries |date=2012 |publisher=CABI |location= Wallingford, Oxfordshire |isbn=978-1-84593-746-1 |page=104|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BlRMxAOSeNIC&pg=PA104|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908184336/https://books.google.com/books?id=BlRMxAOSeNIC&pg=PA104|archive-date=8 September 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Winikoff B, Sheldon W | title = Use of medicines changing the face of abortion | journal = International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health | volume = 38 | issue = 3 | pages = 164–6 | date = September 2012 | pmid = 23018138 | doi = 10.1363/3816412 | doi-access = free | title-link = doi }}</ref> |
|||
===Frequency of use=== |
|||
Mifegyne was subsequently approved in [[Great Britain]] on July 1, 1991,<ref>{{cite journal |author=Smith, W.|date=September 1991 |title=Great Britain second country to allow use of RU-486 |journal=Plan Parent Eur |volume=20|issue=2 |page=20 |pmid=12284548}}</ref> and in [[Sweden]] in September 1992,<ref>{{cite journal |author=. |date=December 1992 |title=RU 486 licensed in Sweden |journal=IPPF Med Bull |volume=26 |issue=6 |page=6 |pmid=12346922}}</ref> but until his retirement in late April 1994, Hoechst AG chairman Wolfgang Hilger, a devout [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]], blocked any further expansion in availability.<ref name="RU-486" /><ref>{{cite news |author=Newman, Barry |date=February 22, 1993 |title=Drug dilemma: among those wary of abortion pill is maker's parent firm; Germany's Hoechst is facing pressure from Clinton to sell RU-486 in U.S. |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |page=A1}}<br />{{cite news|agency=Associated Press |date=April 16, 1993 |title=F.D.A. says company delays abortion pill |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A14 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/16/us/fda-says-company-delays-abortion-pill.html}}<br />{{cite news|author=Jouzaitis, Carol |date=October 17, 1994 |title=Abortion pill battle surprises French firm |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |page=1 (Business) |url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/24140469.html?dids=24140469:24140469&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT}}</ref> On May 16, 1994, Roussel-Uclaf announced that it was donating without remuneration all rights for medical uses of mifepristone in the United States to the [[Population Council]],<ref name="Seelye 1994">{{cite news |author=Seelye, Katharine Q. |date=May 17, 1994 |title=Accord opens way for abortion pill in U.S. in 2 years |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/17/us/accord-opens-way-for-abortion-pill-in-us-in-2-years.html?&pagewanted=all}}</ref> which subsequently licensed mifepristone to [[Danco Laboratories]], a new single-product company immune to antiabortion boycotts, which won [[Food and Drug Administration (United States)|FDA]] approval as Mifeprex on September 28, 2000.<ref>{{cite news |last=Kolata |first=Gina |date=September 29, 2000 |title=U.S. approves abortion pill; drug offers more privacy and could reshape debate |newspaper=The New York Times |page=A1|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/29/us/us-approves-abortion-pill-drug-offers-more-privacy-and-could-reshape-debate.html?pagewanted=all}}</ref> |
|||
====United States==== |
|||
On April 8, 1997, after buying the remaining 43.5% of Roussel-Uclaf stock in early 1997,<ref>{{cite news |author=Moore, Stephen D.; Kamm, Thomas; Fleming, Charles |date=December 11, 1996 |title=Hoechst to seek rest of Roussel-Uclaf; expected $3.04 billion offer would add to the wave of drug-sector linkups |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |page=A3}}<br />{{cite news |author=Marshall, Matt |date=December 11, 1996 |title=Hoechst offers to pay $3.6 billion for rest of Roussel|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |page=A8}}<br />{{cite news |author=Bloomberg Business News |date=December 11, 1996|title=Hoechst to buy rest of Roussel |newspaper=The New York Times |page=D4|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/11/business/hoechst-to-buy-rest-of-roussel.html}}</ref> Hoechst AG ($30 billion annual revenue) announced the end of its manufacture and sale of Mifegyne ($3.44 million annual revenue) and the transfer of all rights for medical uses of mifepristone outside of the United States to Exelgyn S.A., a new single-product company immune to antiabortion boycotts, whose CEO was former Roussel-Uclaf CEO Édouard Sakiz.<ref>{{cite news |author=Bloomberg News|date=April 9, 1997 |title=Pill for abortion ends production |newspaper=The New York Times |page=D2|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1997/04/09/business/pill-for-abortion-ends-production.html}}<br />{{cite news|author=Jouzaitis, Carol |date=April 9, 1997 |title=Abortion pill maker bows to boycott heat; German firm gives up RU-486 patent; little impact likely in U.S. |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |page=4|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/11401570.html?dids=11401570:11401570&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT}}<br />{{cite news |author=Lavin, Douglas |date=April 9, 1997 |title=Hoechst will stop making abortion pill |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal |page=A3}}<br />{{cite journal |author=. |date=April 18, 1997 |title=Roussel-Uclaf to transfer RU 486 rights |journal=Reprod Freedom News |volume=6 |issue=7 |page=8 |pmid=12292550}}<br />{{cite journal |author=Dorozynski, Alexander |date=April 19, 1997 |title=Boycott threat forces French company to abandon RU486 |journal=BMJ |volume=314|issue=7088 |page=1150 |pmid=9146386 |pmc=2126515 |doi=10.1136/bmj.314.7088.1145m}}</ref> In 1999, Exelgyn won approval of Mifegyne in 11 additional countries, and in 28 more countries over the following decade.<ref name="Gynuity 2009">{{cite web |author=. |date=November 4, 2009 |title=List of mifepristone approval |location=New York |publisher=Gynuity Health Projects|url=http://gynuity.org/downloads/mife_approval_2009_list.pdf}}<br />{{cite web |author=. |date=November 4, 2009|title=Map of mifepristone approval |location=New York |publisher=Gynuity Health Projects|url=http://gynuity.org/downloads/Mife_approval_2009_map.pdf |accessdate=2010-06-11}}</ref> |
|||
Medication abortions voluntarily reported by 33 US states<ref>excluding Alabama, California, Connecticut, Washington, D.C., Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Wisconsin</ref> to the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] (CDC) have increased as a percentage of total abortions every year since the approval of mifepristone: 1.0% in 2000, 2.9% in 2001, 5.2% in 2002, 7.9% in 2003, 9.3% in 2004, 9.9% in 2005, 10.6% in 2006, and 13.1% in 2007 (20.3% of those at less than 9 weeks gestation).<ref name="Pazol 2011">{{cite journal | vauthors = Berg C, Cook DA, Gamble SB, Hall LR, Hamdan S, Parker WY, Pazol K, Zane SB | collaboration = Division of Reproductive Health |date=25 February 2011 |title=Abortion surveillance — United States, 2007 |journal=MMWR Surveill Summ |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=1–44 |pmid=21346710 |url=<!-- Official URL --> https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6001.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110406111142/http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6001.pdf |archive-date=6 April 2011 }}</ref> |
|||
A [[Guttmacher Institute]] survey of abortion providers estimated that medication abortions accounted for 17% of all abortions and slightly over 25% of abortions before 9 weeks gestation in the United States in 2008 (94% of nonhospital medication abortions used mifepristone and misoprostol, 6% used [[methotrexate]] and misoprostol).<ref name="Jones 2011">{{cite journal | vauthors = Jones RK, Kooistra K |date=March 2011 |title=Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008 |journal=Perspect Sex Reprod Health |volume=43 |issue=1 |pages=41–50 |doi=10.1363/4304111 |pmid=21388504 |s2cid=2045184 |url=http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/4304111.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927030139/http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/4304111.pdf |archive-date=27 September 2011 }}<br />{{cite news | vauthors = Stein R |date=11 January 2011 |title=Decline in U.S. abortion rate stalls |work=[[The Washington Post]] |page=A3 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/11/AR2011011107331.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304091118/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/11/AR2011011107331.html |archive-date=4 March 2016 }}</ref> Medication abortions accounted for 32% of first trimester abortions at [[Planned Parenthood]] clinics in the United States in 2008.<ref name="Fjerstad 2009">{{cite journal | vauthors = Fjerstad M, Trussell J, Sivin I, Lichtenberg ES, Cullins V | title = Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion | journal = The New England Journal of Medicine | volume = 361 | issue = 2 | pages = 145–51 | date = July 2009 | pmid = 19587339 | pmc = 3568698 | doi = 10.1056/NEJMoa0809146 }}<br />{{cite news |vauthors=Allday E |date=9 July 2009 |title=Change cuts infections linked to abortion pill |newspaper=San Francisco Chronicle |page=A1 |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2009/07/09/MNJE18L6TR.DTL |access-date=29 June 2022 |archive-date=14 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200414180754/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2009%2F07%2F09%2FMNJE18L6TR.DTL |url-status=live }}</ref> Considering abortions performed in non-hospital facilities, medication abortions accounted for 24% in 2011 and 31% in 2014. In 2014, facilities that provided a relatively small number of abortions (fewer than 400 procedures per year) were more likely to perform them with medication.<ref name="pmid28094905">{{Cite journal|vauthors=Jones RK, Jerman J|date=March 2017|title=Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States 2014|url=https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2017/01/abortion-incidence-and-service-availability-united-states-2014|journal=Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health|volume=49-1|issue=1|pages=17–27|doi=10.1363/psrh.12015|pmid=28094905|pmc=5487028|access-date=16 October 2017|archive-date=17 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171017044955/https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2017/01/abortion-incidence-and-service-availability-united-states-2014|url-status=live}}</ref> Medication abortions accounted for 39% of all US abortions in 2017,<ref>{{Cite web|date=26 April 2017|title=Medication Abortion|url=https://www.guttmacher.org/evidence-you-can-use/medication-abortion|access-date=22 September 2021|website=Guttmacher Institute|archive-date=21 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210921114046/https://www.guttmacher.org/evidence-you-can-use/medication-abortion|url-status=live}}</ref> and 54% in 2020.<ref name=Guttmacher_2022-02 >{{cite web | url=https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/02/medication-abortion-now-accounts-more-half-all-us-abortions | title=Medication Abortion Now Accounts for More Than Half of All US Abortions | vauthors=Jones RK | work=[[Guttmacher Institute]] | date=24 February 2022 | access-date=10 May 2022 | archive-date=10 May 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220510232112/https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/02/medication-abortion-now-accounts-more-half-all-us-abortions | url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
==Legal status== |
|||
=== |
====Europe==== |
||
In France, the percentage of medication abortions of all abortions continues to increase: 38% in 2003, 42% in 2004, 44% in 2005, 46% in 2006, 49% in 2007 (vs. 18% in 1996).<ref>{{cite web| vauthors = Vilain A |date=December 2009 |title=Voluntary terminations of pregnancies in 2007 |publisher=DREES, Ministry of Health |url=http://www.sante.gouv.fr/drees/etude-resultat/er-pdf/er713.pdf |access-date=9 June 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100331210210/http://www.sante.gouv.fr/drees/etude-resultat/er-pdf/er713.pdf |archive-date=31 March 2010 }}</ref> In England and Wales, 52% of early abortions (less than 9 weeks gestation) in 2009 were medication-based; the percentage of all abortions that are medication-based has increased every year for the past 14 years (from 5% in 1995 to 40% in 2009) and has more than doubled in the last five years.<ref>{{cite web |author=Department of Health |date=25 May 2010 |title=Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2009 |publisher=Department of Health (United Kingdom) |url=http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_116039 |access-date=9 June 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101115103350/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_116039 |archive-date=15 November 2010 }}</ref> In Scotland, 81.2% of early abortions in 2009 were medication-based (up from 55.8% in 1992 when medication abortion was introduced); the percentage of all abortions that are medication-based has increased every year for the past 17 years (from 16.4% in 1992 to 69.9% in 2009).<ref>{{cite web |author=ISD Scotland |date=25 May 2010 |title=Abortion Statistics, year ending December 2009 |publisher=Information Services Division (ISD), NHS National Services Scotland |url=http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/1918.html |access-date=9 June 2010 |archive-date=21 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100421091655/http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/1918.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In Sweden, 85.6% of early abortions and 73.2% of abortions before the end of the 12th week of gestation in 2009 were medication-based; 68.2% of all abortions in 2009 were medication-based.<ref>{{cite web |author=National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden |date=12 May 2010 |title=Induced Abortions 2010 |publisher=National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden |url=http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/18031/2010-5-12.pdf |access-date=9 June 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727140340/http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/18031/2010-5-12.pdf |archive-date=27 July 2011 }}</ref> In Great Britain and Sweden, mifepristone is licensed for use with vaginal gemeprost or oral misoprostol. As of 2000, more than 620,000 women in Europe had had medication abortions using a mifepristone regimen.<ref>{{cite web|title=FDA Approves Mifepristone for the Termination of Early Pregnancy|publisher=FDA |year=2000 |access-date=27 April 2009|url=https://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/NEW00737.html |archive-url = http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20060910174529/http%3A//www%2Efda%2Egov/bbs/topics/news/NEW00737%2Ehtml <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 10 September 2006 }}</ref> In Denmark, mifepristone was used in between 3,000 and 4,000 of just over 15,000 abortions in 2005.<ref>{{cite web |title= The abortion pill Mifegyne tested for adverse reactions |publisher= Danish Medicines Agency |date= 27 July 2005 |access-date= 20 September 2006 |url= http://www.dkma.dk/1024/visUKLSArtikel.asp?artikelI=1%7Cd=6496 }} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> |
|||
Roussel Uclaf did not seek U.S. approval, so in the United States legal availability was not initially possible.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Klitsch M|title=Antiprogestins and the abortion controversy: a progress report|journal=Fam Plann Perspect|date=Nov–December 1991|volume=23|issue=6|pmid=1786809|pages=275–82|doi=10.2307/2135779|jstor=2135779}}</ref> The United States banned importation of mifepristone for personal use in 1989, a decision supported by Roussel Uclaf. In 1994 Roussel Uclaf gave the U.S. drug rights to the [[Population Council]] in exchange for immunity from any product liability claims.<ref name="Seelye 1994"/><ref>{{cite news|author=Nancy Gibbs|title=The Pill Arrives|publisher=Cnn.com|date=October 2, 2000|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/2000/10/09/pill.html}}</ref> The Population Council sponsored clinical trials in the United States.<ref>{{cite news|author=Tamar Lewin|title=Clinical Trials Giving Glimpse of Abortion Pill| newspaper=The New York Times |date=January 30, 1995|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE6D9173DF933A05752C0A963958260&sec=health&pagewanted=1}}</ref> The drug went on approvable status from 1996. Production was intended to begin through the Danco Group in 1996 but they withdrew briefly in 1997 due to a corrupt business partner, delaying availability again.<ref>{{cite news|author=Tamar Lewin|title=Lawsuits' Settlement Brings New Hope for Abortion Pill| newspaper=The New York Times |date=November 13, 1997|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9906E7DB1638F930A25752C1A961958260}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Sharon Lerner|title=RU Pissed Off Yet?| newspaper=The Village Voice | date=August 2000 |accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0035,lerner,17757,1.html}}</ref> Mifepristone was approved for abortion in the United States by the FDA, in September 2000.<ref>{{cite web|title=FDA approval letter for Mifepristone| publisher=FDA |date=September 28, 2000|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/appletter/2000/20687appltr.htm |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20060829010626/http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/appletter/2000/20687appltr.htm <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2006-08-29}}</ref> It is legal and available in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., [[Guam]], and [[Puerto Rico]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Medication Abortion in the United States: Mifepristone Fact Sheet|year=2005|publisher=Gynuity Health Projects|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20070924010831/http://www.gynuity.org/documents/mife_fact_sheet.pdf}}</ref> It is a prescription drug, but it is not available to the public through pharmacies; its distribution is restricted to specially qualified licensed physicians, sold by [[Danco Laboratories]] under the tradename '''Mifeprex'''. |
|||
===Legal status=== |
|||
Medical abortions voluntarily reported by 33 U.S. states<ref>excluding [[Alabama]], [[California]], [[Connecticut]], [[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]], [[Florida]], [[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]], [[Hawaii]], [[Illinois]], [[Kentucky]], [[Louisiana]], [[Massachusetts]], [[Maryland]], [[Nebraska]], [[Nevada]], [[New Hampshire]], [[Rhode Island]], [[Tennessee]], and [[Wisconsin]].</ref> to the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|CDC]] have increased as a percentage of total abortions every year since the approval of mifepristone: 1.0% in 2000, 2.9% in 2001, 5.2% in 2002, 7.9% in 2003, 9.3% in 2004, 9.9% in 2005, 10.6% in 2006, 13.1% in 2007 (20.3% of those at less than 9 weeks gestation).<ref name="Pazol 2011">{{cite journal |author=Pazol, Karen; Zane, Suzanne B.; Parker, Wilda, Y.; Hall, Laura R.; Gamble, Sonya B.; Hamdan, Saeed; Berg, Cynthia; Cook, Douglas A.; Division of Reproductive Health |date=February 25, 2011 |title=Abortion surveillance — United States, 2007 |journal=MMWR Surveill Summ. |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=1–44 |pmid=21346710 |url=http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6001.pdf }}</ref> A [[Guttmacher Institute]] survey of abortion providers estimated that medical abortions accounted for 17% of all abortions and slightly over 25% of abortions before 9 weeks gestation in the United States in 2008 (94% of non-hospital medical abortions used mifepristone and misoprostol, 6% used [[methotrexate]] and misoprostol).<ref name="Jones 2011">{{cite journal |author=Jones, Rachel K.; Kooistra, Kathryn |date=March 2011 |title=Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008 |journal=Perspect Sex Reprod Health. |volume=43 |issue=1 |pages=41–50 |doi= 10.1363/4304111 |pmid=21388504 |url=http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/4304111.pdf}}<br/>{{cite news |author=Stein, Rob |date=January 11, 2011 |title=Decline in U.S. abortion rate stalls |newspaper=The Washington Post |page=A3 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/11/AR2011011107331.html}}</ref> Medical abortions accounted for 32% of first trimester abortions at [[Planned Parenthood]] clinics in the United States in 2008.<ref name="Fjerstad 2009">{{cite journal |author=Fjerstad, Mary; Trussell, James; Sivin, Irving; Lichtenberg, E. Steve; Cullins, Vanessa |date=July 9, 2009 |title=Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion |journal=New England Journal of Medicine |volume=361 |issue=2 |pages=145–151 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa0809146 |pmid=19587339 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/reprint/361/2/145.pdf |pmc=3568698}}<br/>{{cite news |author=Allday, Erin |date=July 9, 2009 |title=Change cuts infections linked to abortion pill |newspaper=San Francisco Chronicle |page=A1 |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2009/07/09/MNJE18L6TR.DTL}}</ref> |
|||
====In the United States==== |
|||
Mifepristone was approved for abortion in the United States by the FDA in September 2000.<ref>{{cite web|title=FDA approval letter for Mifepristone| publisher=FDA |date=28 September 2000|access-date=16 September 2006|url=https://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/appletter/2000/20687appltr.htm |archive-url = http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20011116012552/http%3A//www%2Efda%2Egov/cder/foi/appletter/2000/20687appltr%2Ehtm <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 16 November 2001 }}</ref> {{As of|2007}}, it was legal and available in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., [[Guam]], and [[Puerto Rico]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Medication Abortion in the United States: Mifepristone Fact Sheet |year=2005 |publisher=Gynuity Health Projects |url=http://www.gynuity.org/documents/mife_fact_sheet.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070924010831/http://www.gynuity.org/documents/mife_fact_sheet.pdf |archive-date=24 September 2007 }}</ref> It is a prescription drug, but was not initially available to the public through pharmacies; its distribution is primarily restricted to specially qualified licensed physicians, sold by [[Danco Laboratories]] under the brand name Mifeprex. As of September 2021, in 32 states, the drug could only be provided by a licensed physician, and in 19 states, the prescribing clinician was required to be physically in the room with the patient while they are taking the drug.<ref name="pmid28094905" /> |
|||
Roussel Uclaf did not seek US approval, so in the United States legal availability was not initially possible.<ref>{{cite journal| vauthors = Klitsch M |title=Antiprogestins and the abortion controversy: a progress report|journal=Fam Plann Perspect|date=November{{ndash}}December 1991|volume=23|issue=6|pmid=1786809|pages=275–82|doi=10.2307/2135779|jstor=2135779}}</ref> The United States banned importation of mifepristone for personal use in 1989,<ref name=RU486USAevenPersonalUse>{{cite news |work=[[New York Post]] |title=U.S. Grabs Banned Abort Pill From an Activist here | vauthors = Garcilazo M |date=2 July 1992 |page=5}}</ref> a decision supported by Roussel Uclaf. In 1994, Roussel Uclaf gave the U.S. drug rights to the Population Council in exchange for immunity from any product liability claims.<ref name="Seelye 1994"/><ref>{{cite news| vauthors = Gibbs N |title=The Pill Arrives|publisher=Cnn.com|date=2 October 2000|access-date=20 September 2006|url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/2000/10/09/pill.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061006031705/http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/2000/10/09/pill.html|archive-date=6 October 2006}}</ref> The Population Council sponsored clinical trials in the United States.<ref>{{cite news| vauthors = Lewin T |title=Clinical Trials Giving Glimpse of Abortion Pill|newspaper=The New York Times|date=30 January 1995|access-date=20 September 2006|url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE6D9173DF933A05752C0A963958260&sec=health&pagewanted=1|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071128093915/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE6D9173DF933A05752C0A963958260|archive-date=28 November 2007}}</ref> The drug went on approvable status from 1996. Production was intended to begin through the Danco Group in 1996, but they withdrew briefly in 1997 due to a corrupt business partner, delaying availability again.<ref>{{cite news| vauthors = Lewin T |title=Lawsuits' Settlement Brings New Hope for Abortion Pill|newspaper=The New York Times|date=13 November 1997|access-date=16 September 2006|url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9906E7DB1638F930A25752C1A961958260|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070210071338/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health|archive-date=10 February 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| vauthors = Lerner S |title=RU Pissed Off Yet?|newspaper=The Village Voice|date=August 2000|access-date=16 September 2006|url=http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0035,lerner,17757,1.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061107151729/http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0035%2Clerner%2C17757%2C1.html|archive-date=7 November 2006}}</ref> |
|||
In 2016, the US [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) approved mifepristone, to end a pregnancy through 70 days gestation (70 days or less since the first day of a woman's last menstrual period). The approved dosing regimen is 200 mg of mifepristone taken by mouth (swallowed). 24 to 48 hours after taking mifepristone, 800 mcg (micrograms) of misoprostol is taken [[Buccal administration|buccally]] (in the cheek pouch), at a location appropriate for the patient.<ref name="FDA Mifeprex Info 2016"/><ref name="Mifeprex PI 2016">{{cite web|author=Danco Laboratories|date=29 March 2016|title=Mifeprex prescribing information|publisher=U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA)|url=http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/020687s020lbl.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160330220744/http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/020687s020lbl.pdf|archive-date=30 March 2016}}</ref><ref name="ACOG 2016">{{cite web|author=American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists|date=30 March 2016|title=ACOG Statement on Medication Abortion|location=Washington, D.C.|publisher=ACOG|url=http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Statements/2016/ACOG-Statement-on-Medication-Abortion|access-date=7 April 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160403194210/http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Statements/2016/ACOG-Statement-on-Medication-Abortion|archive-date=3 April 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm111323.htm|title=Postmarket Drug Safety Information for Patients and Providers|date=30 March 2016|website=US Food & Drug Administration|access-date=16 October 2017|archive-date=3 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160403194206/https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm111323.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone tablets have a marketing authorization in the United States for the treatment of high blood sugar caused by high [[cortisol]] levels in the blood (hypercortisolism) in adults with [[Cushing's syndrome#Exogenous vs. endogenous|endogenous]] [[Cushing's syndrome]] who have [[diabetes mellitus type 2|type 2 diabetes mellitus]] or [[impaired glucose tolerance|glucose intolerance]] and have failed surgery or cannot have surgery.<ref name="Korlym FDA label"/> |
|||
Due to the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], safe access to mifepristone was a concern, and the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] among other groups filed a lawsuit to relax the FDA's rule as to allow mifepristone to be acquired from mail-order and retail pharmacies. While the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|Fourth Circuit]] had granted a preliminary injunction to allow this distribution, the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] issued a stay order in January 2021 to retain the FDA's rule pending the results of the ongoing litigation.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.vox.com/22227912/supreme-court-anti-abortion-amy-coney-barrett-era-fda-american-college-sonia-sotomayor-john-roberts | title = The Supreme Court hands down its first anti-abortion decision of the Amy Coney Barrett era | vauthors = Millhauser I | date = 13 January 2021 | access-date = 13 January 2021 | work = [[Vox (website)|Vox]] | archive-date = 13 January 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210113003935/https://www.vox.com/22227912/supreme-court-anti-abortion-amy-coney-barrett-era-fda-american-college-sonia-sotomayor-john-roberts | url-status = live }}</ref> |
|||
On 16 December 2021, the FDA voluntarily adopted a new rule permanently relaxing the requirement that the pill be obtained in person, allowing it to be sent through the mail. A prescription is still required, so that a doctor can screen for risk factors that would make taking the pill unsafe for the mother.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.npr.org/2021/12/16/1064951611/today-is-the-fda-s-deadline-to-complete-a-review-of-its-rules-for-abortion-pill |title=FDA relaxes restrictions on abortion pill |website=NPR.org |access-date=17 December 2021 |archive-date=17 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211217001550/https://www.npr.org/2021/12/16/1064951611/today-is-the-fda-s-deadline-to-complete-a-review-of-its-rules-for-abortion-pill |url-status=live }}</ref> In January 2023, the FDA further relaxed rules, allowing any retail pharmacy to become certified to fill mifepristone prescriptions.<ref name="mailed">{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/01/04/abortion-pills-mailed-legal/ |title=Justice Dept.: Postal Service may deliver abortion pills in any state |work=[[The Washington Post]] |url-access=subscription |access-date=5 January 2023 |archive-date=4 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230104235818/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/01/04/abortion-pills-mailed-legal/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=WSJ_2023-01-03 >{{cite news | url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-pills-to-be-available-more-widely-under-new-fda-rules-11672789765 | title=Abortion Pills to Be Available More Widely Under New FDA Rules - Patients will be able to get the drug, called mifepristone, from bricks-and-mortar pharmacies | vauthors = Whyte LE | newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]] | date=3 January 2023 | access-date=7 January 2023 | archive-date=7 January 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230107011153/https://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-pills-to-be-available-more-widely-under-new-fda-rules-11672789765 | url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
After regulations on abortion early in pregnancy were ruled constitutional by the 2022 decision ''[[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization]]'', some states enacted restrictions on abortions and abortion pills. In January 2023, the [[United States Department of Justice]] issued an interpretation of the [[Comstock Act]]<ref name="NYT-20240402">{{cite news | vauthors = Smith T |authorlink=Tina Smith |title=I Hope to Repeal an Arcane Law That Could Be Misused to Ban Abortion Nationwide |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/02/opinion/comstock-act-abortion-repeal.html |date=April 2, 2024 |work=[[The New York Times]] |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20240402124934/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/02/opinion/comstock-act-abortion-repeal.html |archivedate=April 2, 2024 |accessdate=April 2, 2024 }}</ref> that it was legal for [[United States Postal Service]] employees to deliver the pills in any state, because they could not know whether the pills would be used for an abortion or other purposes.<ref name="mailed" /> |
|||
In January 2023, GenBioPro filed suit to overturn state laws that prohibit sale of mifepristone, claiming that such laws are invalid because it is a federally approved drug.<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Belluck P | title=New Lawsuit Challenges State Bans on Abortion Pills | website=The New York Times | date=25 January 2023 | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/25/health/abortion-pills-ban-genbiopro.html | access-date=19 March 2023 | archive-date=25 January 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230125191039/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/25/health/abortion-pills-ban-genbiopro.html | url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
The argument that state laws seeking to ban or restrict the use of mifepristone are preempted by the FDA's decision to make the drug available is supported by a number of Supreme Court decisions, including opinions by the traditionally more conservative Justices.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors=Grossi P, O'Connor D | title=FDA preemption of conflicting state drug regulation and the looming battle over abortion medications | journal=The Journal of Law and the Biosciences | date=2023 | volume=10 | issue=1 | pages=lsad005 | doi=10.1093/jlb/lsad005 | pmid=36938304 | pmc=10017072 | url=https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad005}}</ref> |
|||
In March 2023, Wyoming became the first US state to ban the pill.<ref>{{cite news | vauthors=Horti S | title=Abortion pills banned in Wyoming as Texas judge considers nationwide decision | website=[[BBC News Online]] | date=18 March 2023 | url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64998920 | access-date=1 April 2023 | archive-date=27 March 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327173353/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64998920 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | title=Wyoming Becomes First State to Outlaw the Use of Pills for Abortion | website=[[The New York Times]] | date=18 March 2023 | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/17/us/wyoming-abortion-pills-ban.html | access-date=2 April 2023 | archive-date=2 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230402023506/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/17/us/wyoming-abortion-pills-ban.html | url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In April 2023, in a lawsuit brought by 17 US states and the [[District of Columbia]], federal district judge [[Thomas O. Rice]] issued a temporary injunction that the FDA should not reduce access to mifepristone in these states and the district.<ref>{{cite news |title=Judge in Washington orders feds to keep abortion pill access |url=https://apnews.com/article/washington-abortion-pills-lawsuit-fda-1857d1a4fd356c61ad76e00621e93b44 |access-date=8 April 2023 |work=[[Associated Press]] |date=7 April 2023 |archive-date=8 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230408000944/https://apnews.com/article/washington-abortion-pills-lawsuit-fda-1857d1a4fd356c61ad76e00621e93b44 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |vauthors=Ables K, Rosenzweig-Ziff D |title=Who is Thomas Rice, the Washington judge who ruled mifepristone is safe? |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/08/washington-judge-abortion-thomas-rice/ |url-access=subscription |access-date=8 April 2023 |work=[[The Washington Post]] |date=8 April 2023 |archive-date=8 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230408083946/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/08/washington-judge-abortion-thomas-rice/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In May 2024, the state of Louisiana classified mifepristone and misoprostol as controlled substances, with penalties for possession without a prescription. The move follows concerns over coerced abortion and has drawn criticism from over 240 doctors in the state.<ref>{{Cite news | vauthors = Wax-Thibodeaux E |date=2024-05-13 |title=Louisiana moves to make abortion pills 'controlled dangerous substances' |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/05/13/abortion-pills-louisiana-controlled-substance/ |url-access=subscription |access-date=2024-05-13 |work=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | last=McGill | first=Kevin | title=Louisiana governor signs bill making two abortion drugs controlled dangerous substances | website=Associated Press | date=24 May 2024 | url=https://apnews.com/article/abortion-pills-louisiana-controlled-dangerous-substances-0984bfed536a5110997dd9c8264bf9e3 | access-date=5 September 2024}}</ref> |
|||
====FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine==== |
|||
{{main|FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine}} |
|||
In April 2023, in the FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine lawsuit, federal district judge [[Matthew J. Kacsmaryk]] issued a preliminary [[injunction]] suspending the 2000 approval of mifepristone, which would take effect a week later.<ref>{{cite news |archive-url=https://archive.today/20230408075712/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/07/health/abortion-pills-ruling-texas.html | vauthors = Belluck P |archive-date=8 April 2023| title=Texas Judge Invalidates FDA Approval of the Abortion Pill Mifepristone | work=The New York Times | date=7 April 2023 | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/07/health/abortion-pills-ruling-texas.html | access-date=7 April 2023}}</ref> The [[Fifth Circuit]] reversed parts of Kacsmaryk's injunction, but placed a temporary injunction on the 2016 REMS change to mifepristone. On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Court stayed both injunctions on 21 April 2023, with only Justices [[Samuel Alito]] and [[Clarence Thomas]] stating their dissent. The stay allowed mifepristone to remain legally available while the lower courts consider the merits of the case. |
|||
In June 2024, the US Supreme Court unanimously overturned judge [[Matthew Kacsmaryk|Kacsmaryk]]'s Fifth Circuit decision on the grounds that the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine had no [[Standing (law)|standing]] to challenge the FDA's regulations of mifepristone.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-abortion-mifepristone-fda-4073b9a7b1cbb1c3641025290c22be2a|title=Unanimous Supreme Court preserves access to widely used abortion medication| vauthors = Sherman M |publisher=Associated Press|date=June 13, 2024|accessdate=June 13, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-bid-restrict-access-abortion-pill-rcna151308|title=Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill| vauthors = Hurley L |publisher=NBC News|date=June 13, 2024|access-date=June 13, 2024}}</ref> The Supreme Court ruled that Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine did not demonstrate that they would suffer harm to warrant standing. The Court did not rule on the substance of mifepristone, abortion, or the FDA's procedures.<ref>{{cite court |litigants= Food and Drug Administration et al. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al. |vol= 602|reporter= U.S. |opinion= 23-235 |pinpoint= |court= United States Supreme Court|date= 13 June 2004 |url= https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-235_n7ip.pdf |quote= |postscript= }}</ref> |
|||
====Subsection H==== |
====Subsection H==== |
||
Some drugs are approved by the FDA under subsection H, which has two subparts. The first sets forth ways to rush experimental drugs, such as aggressive HIV and cancer treatments, to market when speedy approval is deemed vital to the health of potential patients. The second part of subsection H applies to drugs that not only must meet restrictions for use due to safety requirements, but also are required to meet [[postmarketing surveillance]] to establish that the safety results shown in clinical trials are seconded by use in a much wider population. Until December 2021, Mifepristone was approved under the second part of subsection H. The result is that women could not pick the drug up at a [[pharmacy]], but were required to receive it directly from a doctor. Due to the possibility of adverse reactions such as excessive bleeding, which may require a [[blood transfusion]], and incomplete abortion, which may require surgical intervention, the drug was only considered safe if a physician who is capable of administering a blood transfusion or a surgical abortion is available to the patient in the event of such emergencies.<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Woodcock J | title = Testimony on RU-486 | work = Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives | publisher = FDA | date = 12 May 2006 | url = https://www.fda.gov/ola/2006/mifepristone0517.html | access-date = 19 August 2006 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060927090806/https://www.fda.gov/ola/2006/mifepristone0517.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 27 September 2006}}</ref> The approval of mifepristone under subsection H included a [[black box warning]]. |
|||
====European Union==== |
|||
Some drugs are approved by the FDA under sub-section H, which has two sub-parts. The first sets forth ways to rush experimental drugs, such as aggressive HIV and cancer treatments, to market when speedy approval is deemed vital to the health of potential patients. The second part of sub-section H applies to drugs that not only must meet restrictions for use due to safety requirements, but also are required to meet [[postmarketing surveillance]] to establish that the safety results shown in clinical trials are seconded by use in a much wider population. Mifepristone was approved under the second part of sub-section H. The result is that women cannot pick the drug up at a [[pharmacy]] but must now receive it directly from a doctor. Due to the possibility of adverse reactions such as excessive bleeding, which may require a [[blood transfusion]] and incomplete abortion, which may require surgical intervention, the drug is only considered safe if a physician who is capable of administering a blood transfusion or a surgical abortion is available to the patient in the event of such emergencies.<ref>{{cite web | last = Woodcock | first = Janet | title = Testimony on RU-486 | work = Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives | publisher = FDA | date = 2006-05-12 | url = http://www.fda.gov/ola/2006/mifepristone0517.html | accessdate = 2006-08-19 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20060927090806/http://www.fda.gov/ola/2006/mifepristone0517.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2006-09-27}}</ref> The approval of mifepristone under Subsection H included a [[black box warning]]. |
|||
Outside the United States, mifepristone is marketed and distributed by Exelgyn Laboratories under the brand name Mifegyne. It was approved for use in [[Abortion in France|France]] in 1988 (initial marketing in 1989), the [[Abortion in the United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] in 1991, [[Abortion in Sweden|Sweden]] in 1992, then [[Abortion in Austria|Austria]], [[Abortion in Belgium|Belgium]], [[Abortion in Denmark|Denmark]], [[Abortion in Finland|Finland]], [[Abortion in Germany|Germany]], [[Abortion in Greece|Greece]], [[Abortion in Luxembourg|Luxembourg]], [[Abortion in the Netherlands|the Netherlands]], [[Abortion in Spain|Spain]], and [[Abortion in Switzerland|Switzerland]] in 1999.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Christin-Maitre S, Bouchard P, Spitz IM | title = Medical termination of pregnancy | journal = The New England Journal of Medicine | volume = 342 | issue = 13 | pages = 946–56 | date = March 2000 | pmid = 10738054 | doi = 10.1056/NEJM200003303421307 }}</ref> In 2000, it was approved in Norway, Russia and Ukraine. Serbia and Montenegro approved it in 2001,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Stojnić J, Ljubić A, Jeremić K, Radunović N, Tulić I, Bosković V, Dukanac J | title = [Medicamentous abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Serbia and Montenegro] | journal = Vojnosanitetski Pregled | volume = 63 | issue = 6 | pages = 558–63 | date = June 2006 | pmid = 16796021 | doi = 10.2298/VSP0606558S | doi-access = free | title-link = doi }}</ref> [[Abortion in Belarus|Belarus]] and [[Abortion in Latvia|Latvia]] in 2002, [[Abortion in Estonia|Estonia]] in 2003, [[Abortion in Moldova|Moldova]] in 2004, [[Abortion in Albania|Albania]] and [[Abortion in Hungary|Hungary]] in 2005, [[Abortion in Portugal|Portugal]] in 2007, [[Abortion in Romania|Romania]] in 2008,<ref name="Gynuity 2009"/> [[Abortion in Bulgaria|Bulgaria]], [[Abortion in the Czech Republic|Czech Republic]] and [[Abortion in Slovenia|Slovenia]] in 2013.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://gynuity.org/resources/read/llist-of-mifepristone-approval-en/ |title=List of Mifepristone Approvals | work = Gynuity Health Projects | date = March 2017 |access-date=28 September 2017 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170926164348/http://gynuity.org/resources/read/llist-of-mifepristone-approval-en |archive-date=26 September 2017 |url-status=dead }}</ref> In [[Abortion in Italy|Italy]], clinical trials have been constrained by protocols requiring women be hospitalized for three days, but the drug was finally approved on 30 July 2009 (officialized later in the year), despite strong opposition from the Vatican. In Italy, the pill must be prescribed and used in a clinical structure and is not sold at chemists.<ref>{{cite news |date=31 July 2009 |title=Abortion pill approved in Italy |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8178152.stm |work=BBC News |access-date=31 July 2009 |archive-date=8 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908184336/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8178152.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> It was approved in Hungary in 2005, but as of 2005 had not been released on the market yet, and was the target of protests.<ref>{{cite news|title=Abortion pill sparks bitter protest|newspaper=The Budapest Times|date=19 September 2005|access-date=16 September 2006|url=http://www.budapesttimes.hu/index.php?art=1077|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070111100214/http://www.budapesttimes.hu/index.php?art=1077|archive-date=11 January 2007}}</ref> Mifepristone is licensed in [[Abortion in the Republic of Ireland|Ireland]] for use of abortions up to 12 weeks since it was legalised in 2018.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/pcrs/circulars/pharmacy/pharmacy-circular-040-2018.pdf | vauthors = Hoey AM |title= Medicines for Termination of Pregnancy Services | work = Health Service Executive. Primary Care Reimbursement Service | location = Dublin, Ireland | date = 20 December 2018 |access-date=28 June 2022 |archive-date=2 April 2022 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20220402045614/https://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/pcrs/circulars/pharmacy/pharmacy-circular-040-2018.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Mifepristone is not available in [[Abortion in Poland|Poland]], where abortion is highly restricted.<ref>{{cite news| vauthors = Green PS |title=A Rocky Landfall for a Dutch Abortion Boat|newspaper=The New York Times|date=24 June 2003|access-date=16 September 2006|url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9F02E3D7153BF937A15755C0A9659C8B63|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070210071338/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health|archive-date=10 February 2007}}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone 200 mg tablets (Mifegyne, Mifepristone Linepharma, Medabon) have marketing authorizations in the [[European Economic Area]] from the [[European Medicines Agency]] (EMA) for:<ref name="Mifegyne SPC 2015"/><ref name="Mifepristone Linepharma SPC 2014">{{cite web|author=Linepharma|date=7 November 2014|title=Mifepristone Linepharma Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)|location=London|publisher=Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)|url=http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/spcpil/documents/spcpil/con1452842392219.pdf|access-date=14 April 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160602234626/http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/spcpil/documents/spcpil/con1452842392219.pdf|archive-date=2 June 2016}}</ref><ref name="Medabon SPC 2015">{{cite web|author=Sun Pharmaceuticals|date=4 March 2015|title=Medabon Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)|location=London|publisher=Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)|url=http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/spcpil/documents/spcpil/con1454653236118.pdf|access-date=4 April 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160603014327/http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/spcpil/documents/spcpil/con1454653236118.pdf|archive-date=3 June 2016}}</ref> |
|||
====FDA controversy==== |
|||
* Early first trimester medication abortion when followed by a prostaglandin analog (misoprostol or gemeprost) through 63 days gestational age |
|||
* Second trimester medication abortion when followed by a prostaglandin analog |
|||
* [[Cervical dilation|Cervical softening and dilation]] prior to first trimester [[abortion#Surgical|surgical abortion]] |
|||
* [[Labor induction|Induction of labor]] after fetal death in utero when prostaglandin analogs and [[oxytocin]] are contraindicated |
|||
====Other countries==== |
|||
Many [[pro-life]] groups in the United States actively campaigned against the approval of mifepristone,<ref>{{cite web|author=Paige Comstock Cunningham, Leanne McCoy, Clarke D. Ferguson|title=Citizen Petition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration|publisher=Americans United for Life|date=February 28, 1995|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://www.fnsa.org/v1n3/americans1.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Margaret Talbot|title=The Little White Bombshell| newspaper=The New York Times |date=July 11, 1999|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D00E5DC113DF932A25754C0A96F958260&sec=health&pagewanted=2}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Abortion Foes To Boycott Drugs (Altace) Made By RU-486 Manufacturer| newspaper=The Virginia Pilot |date=July 8, 1994|accessdate=2006-09-15|url=http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pilot/issues/1994/vp940708/07080818.htm}}</ref> and continue to actively campaign for its withdrawal.<ref>{{cite web|author=Stan Guthrie|title=Counteroffensive Launched on RU-486| newspaper=Christianity Today |date=June 11, 2001|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2001/008/13.58.html}}</ref> They cite either ethical issues with abortion or safety concerns regarding the drug and the adverse reactions associated with it.<ref>{{cite news|author=Gina Kolata|title=Death at 18 Spurs Debate Over a Pill For Abortion| newspaper=The New York Times |date=September 24, 2003|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A03E7DD173DF937A1575AC0A9659C8B63&sec=health&pagewanted=1}}</ref> Religious and pro-life groups outside the United States have also protested mifepristone, especially in Germany<ref>{{cite web|author=John L. Allen|title=Abortion debates rock Germany: introduction of abortion pill exacerbates controversy| newspaper=National Catholic Reporter |date=February 12, 1999|accessdate=2006-09-14|url=http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_15_35/ai_53924378}}</ref> and Australia.<ref>{{cite web|title=Catholic and Evangelical students join Muslims in RU-486 fight| newspaper=Catholic News |date=February 9, 2006|accessdate=2006-09-18|url=http://hcgchica.com/buy-hcg-injections-worldwide/}} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Death Toll Rises to 11 Women|publisher=Australians Against RU-486|year=2006|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://www.aaru486.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=26}}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone was banned in Australia in 1996. In 2005, a private member's bill was introduced to the Australian Senate to lift the ban and transfer the power of approval to the [[Therapeutic Goods Administration]] (TGA). The move caused much debate in the Australian media and among politicians. The bill passed the Senate in February 2006, and mifepristone is legal in Australia. It is provided regularly at several specialized abortion clinics per state.<ref>{{cite web|title=Marie Stopes International Australia – Medical Abortion |year=2010 |access-date=15 December 2010 |url=http://www.mariestopes.org.au/our-services/women/abortion/medical-abortion |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101122164158/http://www.mariestopes.org.au/our-services/women/abortion/medical-abortion |archive-date=22 November 2010 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Abortion pill – RU486 (mifepristone) |publisher=Better Health Channel Victoria |date=July 2010 |access-date=15 December 2010 |url=http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/abortion_pill_ru486_%28mifepristone%29?open |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100814183721/http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Abortion_pill_RU486_%28mifepristone%29?open |archive-date=14 August 2010 }}</ref> Mifepristone 200 mg tablets have marketing authorizations in Australia from the TGA for early first trimester medication abortion when followed by the prostaglandin analog misoprostol through 63 days gestational age<ref name="Mifepristone Linepharma (MS-2 Step) PI 2014">{{cite web|author=MS Health|date=24 December 2014|title=Mifepristone Linepharma (MS-2 Step) 200 mg tablet product information|location=Symonston, Australian Capital Territory, Australia|publisher=Therapeutic Goods Administration|url=https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2014-PI-01965-1|access-date=4 April 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908184336/https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2014-PI-01965-1|archive-date=8 September 2017}}</ref> and second trimester medication abortion when followed by a prostaglandin analog.<ref name="Mifepristone Linepharma PI 2015">{{cite web|author=MS Health|date=12 May 2015|title=Mifepristone Linepharma 200 mg tablet product information|location=Symonston, Australian Capital Territory, Australia|publisher=Therapeutic Goods Administration|url=https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2012-PI-02513-1|access-date=4 April 2016|archive-date=9 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909005923/https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2012-PI-02513-1|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=Mifepristone (Mifepristone Linepharma) followed by misoprostol (GyMiso) for terminating early pregnancy | website=NPS MedicineWise | date=16 February 2015 | url=https://www.nps.org.au/news/mifepristone-mifepristone-linepharma-followed-by-misoprostol-gy-miso-for-terminating-early-pregnancy | access-date=5 September 2024}}</ref> |
|||
In New Zealand, pro-abortion rights doctors established an import company, Istar, and submitted a request for approval to [[Medsafe]], the New Zealand pharmaceutical regulatory agency. After a court case brought by Right to Life New Zealand failed, use of mifepristone was permitted.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sparrow MJ | title = A woman's choice | journal = The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | volume = 44 | issue = 2 | pages = 88–92 | date = April 2004 | pmid = 15089829 | doi = 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00190.x | s2cid = 27365359 }}</ref> |
|||
===Europe=== |
|||
Mifepristone was approved in Israel in 1999.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Baulieu EE, Seidman DS, Hajri S | title = Mifepristone (RU486) and voluntary termination of pregnancy: enigmatic variations or anecdotal religion-based attitudes? | journal = Human Reproduction | volume = 16 | issue = 10 | pages = 2243–4 | date = October 2001 | pmid = 11574524 | doi = 10.1093/humrep/16.10.2243 | doi-access = free | title-link = doi }}</ref> |
|||
Outside the United States it is marketed and distributed by Exelgyn Laboratories under the tradename '''Mifegyne'''. Mifepristone was approved for use in France in 1988 (initial marketing in 1989), the United Kingdom in 1991, Sweden in 1992, then Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland in 1999.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Christin-Maitre, S., Bouchard, P., Spitz, I. M. |year=2000 |title=Medical termination of pregnancy |journal=New England Journal of Medicine|volume=342 |pages=946–56 |pmid=10738054 |doi=10.1056/NEJM200003303421307 |issue=13}}</ref> In 2000, it was approved in Norway, Russia and Ukraine. Serbia and Montenegro approved it in 2001,<ref>{{cite journal|author=Stojnic J|title=Medicamentous abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Serbia and Montenegro|year=2006|volume=63|issue=6|pmid=16796021|pages=558–63|journal=Vojnosanitetski pregled. Military-medical and pharmaceutical review|author-separator=,|display-authors=1|doi=10.2298/VSP0606558S|last2=Ljubić|first2=A|last3=Jeremić|first3=K|last4=Radunović|first4=N|last5=Tulić|first5=I|last6=Bosković|first6=V|last7=Dukanac|first7=J}}</ref> Belarus and Latvia in 2002, Estonia in 2003, Moldova in 2004, Albania and Hungary in 2005, Portugal in 2007, and Romania in 2008.<ref name="Gynuity 2009"/> In Italy clinical trials have been constrained by protocols requiring women be hospitalized for three days, but the drug was finally approved on the July 30, 2009 (officialized later in the year), despite strong opposition from the Vatican. In Italy the pill must be prescribed and used in a clinical structure and is not sold at chemists.<ref>{{cite news |date=July 31, 2009 |title=Abortion pill approved in Italy |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8178152.stm |publisher=BBC News |accessdate=2009-07-31}}</ref> It was approved in Hungary in 2005, but as of 2005 had not been released on the market yet, and was the target of protests.<ref>{{cite web|title=Abortion pill sparks bitter protest|publisher=The Budapest Times|date=September 19, 2005|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://www.budapesttimes.hu/index.php?art=1077}}</ref> Mifepristone is not approved in Ireland, where abortion is illegal, or Poland, where abortion is highly restricted.<ref>{{cite news|author=Peter S. Green|title=A Rocky Landfall for a Dutch Abortion Boat| newspaper=The New York Times |date=June 24, 2003|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9F02E3D7153BF937A15755C0A9659C8B63}}</ref> |
|||
Clinical trials of mifepristone in China began in 1985. In October 1988, China became the first country in the world to approve mifepristone. Chinese organizations tried to purchase mifepristone from [[Roussel Uclaf]], which refused to sell it to them, so in 1992 China began its own domestic production of mifepristone. In 2000, the cost of medication abortion with mifepristone was higher than surgical abortion and the percentage of medication abortions varied greatly, ranging from 30% to 70% in cities to being almost nonexistent in rural areas.<!-- |
|||
In France, the percentage of medical abortions of all abortions continues to increase: 38% in 2003, 42% in 2004, 44% in 2005, 46% in 2006, 49% in 2007 (vs. 18% in 1996).<ref>{{cite web |author=Vilain, Annick |date=December 2009 |title=Voluntary terminations of pregnancies in 2007 |publisher=DREES, Ministry of Health |url=http://www.sante.gouv.fr/drees/etude-resultat/er-pdf/er713.pdf |accessdate=2010-06-09}} {{Dead link|date=November 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> In England and Wales, 52% of early abortions (less than 9 weeks gestation) in 2009 were medical; the percentage of all abortions that are medical has increased every year for the past 14 years (from 5% in 1995 to 40% in 2009) and has more than doubled in the last five years.<ref>{{cite web |author=Department of Health |date=May 25, 2010 |title=Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2009 |publisher=Department of Health (United Kingdom) |url=http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_116039 |accessdate=2010-06-09}}</ref> In Scotland, 81.2% of early abortions (less than 9 weeks gestation) in 2009 were medical (up from 55.8% in 1992 when medical abortion was introduced); the percentage of all abortions that are medical has increased every year for the past 17 years (from 16.4% in 1992 to 69.9% in 2009).<ref>{{cite web |author=ISD Scotland |date=May 25, 2010 |title=Abortion Statistics, year ending December 2009 |publisher=Information Services Division (ISD), NHS National Services Scotland |url=http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/1918.html |accessdate=2010-06-09}}</ref> In Sweden, 85.6% of early abortions (before the end of the 9th week of gestation) and 73.2% of abortions before the end of the 12th week of gestation in 2009 were medical; 68.2% of all abortions in 2009 were medical.<ref>{{cite web |author=National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden |date=May 12, 2010 |title=Induced Abortions 2010 |publisher=National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden |url=http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/18031/2010-5-12.pdf |accessdate=2010-06-09}}</ref> In Great Britain and Sweden, mifepristone is licensed for use with vaginal [[gemeprost]] or oral misoprostol. As of 2000, more than 620,000 women in Europe had had medical abortions using a mifepristone regimen.<ref>{{cite web|title=FDA Approves Mifepristone for the Termination of Early Pregnancy|publisher=FDA press release/U.S. Gov|year=2000 |accessdate=2009-04-27|url=http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/NEW00737.html |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20060910174529/http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/NEW00737.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2006-09-10}}</ref> In Denmark, mifepristone was used in between 3,000 and 4,000 of just over 15,000 abortions in 2005.<ref>{{cite web|title=The abortion pill Mifegyne tested for adverse reactions|publisher=Danish Medicines Agency|date=July 27, 2005|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://www.dkma.dk/1024/visUKLSArtikel.asp?artikelI=1 <!-- | d=6496 -->}} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> |
|||
--><ref name="ulmann">{{cite journal | vauthors = Ulmann A |year=2000 |title=The development of mifepristone: a pharmaceutical drama in three acts |journal=J Am Med Women's Assoc |volume=55 |issue=3 Suppl |pages=117–20 |pmid=10846319}}</ref><!-- |
|||
--><ref name="wu">{{cite journal | vauthors = Wu S |year=2000 |title=Medical abortion in China |journal=J Am Med Women's Assoc |volume=55 |issue=3 Suppl |pages=197–9, 204 |pmid=10846339}}</ref> |
|||
A report from the [[United States Embassy]] in Beijing in 2000 said mifepristone had been widely used in Chinese cities for about two years, and that according to press reports, a [[black market]] had developed with many women starting to buy it illegally (without a prescription) from private clinics and drugstores for about {{USD|15|2000}}, causing Chinese authorities to worry about medical complications from use without physician supervision.<ref>{{cite web|title=Family planning in China: RU-486, abortion, and population trends |publisher=U.S. Embassy Beijing |year=2000 |access-date=14 September 2006 |url=http://www.usembassy-china.org.cn/sandt/ru486.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020311164554/http://www.usembassy-china.org.cn/sandt/ru486.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=11 March 2002 }}</ref> |
|||
In 2001, mifepristone was approved in Taiwan.<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Tsai EM, Yang CH, Lee JN |title=Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: a clinical trial in Taiwanese women|journal=J Formos Med Assoc|year=2002|volume=101|issue=4|pmid=12101864|pages=277–82}}</ref> Vietnam included mifepristone in the National Reproductive Health program in 2002.<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Ganatra B, Bygdeman M, Nguyen DV, Vu ML, Phan BT |title=From research to reality: the challenges of introducing medical abortion into service delivery in Vietnam|journal=Reprod Health Matters|year=2004|volume=12|issue=24|pages=105–13|pmid=15938163|doi=10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24022-8|s2cid=23303852}}</ref> |
|||
===Other countries=== |
|||
Mifepristone was banned in Australia in 1996. In late 2005, a Private Member's bill was introduced to the Australian Senate to lift the ban and transfer the power of approval to the [[Therapeutic Goods Administration]] (TGA). The move caused much debate in the Australian media and amongst politicians. The Bill passed the Senate on 10 February 2006, and mifepristone is now legal in Australia. It is provided regularly at several specialized abortion clinics per state.<ref>{{cite web|title=Marie Stopes International Australia - Medical Abortion| year=2010|accessdate=2010-12-15|url=http://www.mariestopes.org.au/our-services/women/abortion/medical-abortion}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Abortion pill - RU486 (mifepristone)|publisher=Better Health Channel Victoria| date=July 2010 |accessdate=2010-12-15|url=http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/abortion_pill_ru486_%28mifepristone%29?open}}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone is approved in only one sub-Saharan African country—South Africa, where it was approved in 2001.<ref>{{cite web|title=Medical Abortion-Implications for Africa|publisher=[[Ipas (non-profit)|Ipas]]|year=2003|access-date=16 September 2006|url=http://www.ipas.org/publications/en/Medical_Abortion/med_ab_africa_web_only_en.pdf.|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928082424/http://www.ipas.org/publications/en/Medical_Abortion/med_ab_africa_web_only_en.pdf.|archive-date=28 September 2007}}</ref> It is also approved in one north African country—Tunisia, also in 2001.<ref>{{cite journal| vauthors = Hajri S|title=Medication abortion: the Tunisian experience|journal=Afr J Reprod Health|year=2004|volume=8|issue=1|pmid=15487615|pages=63–9|doi=10.2307/3583307|jstor=3583307|hdl=1807/3883|hdl-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
In New Zealand, pro-choice doctors established an import company, Istar, and submitted a request for approval to MedSafe, the New Zealand pharmaceutical regulatory agency. After a court case brought by Right to Life New Zealand failed, use of mifepristone was permitted.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Sparrow MJ|title=A woman's choice|journal=Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol|year=2004|volume=44|issue=2|pages=88–92|pmid=15089829|doi=10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00190.x}}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone was approved for use in India in 2002, where medication abortion is referred to as "medical termination of pregnancy". It is only available under medical supervision, not by prescription, due to adverse reactions such as excessive bleeding, and criminal penalties are given for buying or selling it on the black market or over-the-counter at pharmacies.<ref>{{cite web|title=Mifepristone can be sold only to approved MTP Centres: Rajasthan State HRC|publisher=Indian Express Health Care Management|year=2000|url=http://www.expresshealthcaremgmt.com/20040515/oped01.shtml|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120124021131/http://www.expresshealthcaremgmt.com/20040515/oped01.shtml|archive-date=24 January 2012}}</ref> |
|||
The drug was approved in Israel in 1999.<ref>{{cite web|author=Etienne-Emile Baulieu, Daniel S. Seidman, Selma Hajri|title=Mifepristone(RU-486) and voluntary termination of prgnancy: enigmatic variations or anecdotal religion-based attitudes?|publisher=Human Reproduction| date=October 2001 |accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/16/10/2243}}</ref> |
|||
Medication induced abortion used to be available in Canada but on a limited basis using methotrexate and misoprostol. Clinical trials were done in 2000 in various Canadian cities comparing methotrexate to mifepristone, after approbation by the federal government. While both drugs had overall similar results, mifepristone was found to act faster.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.cbctrust.com/ru486_trials_canada.php | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060621162826/http://www.cbctrust.com/ru486_trials_canada.php | archive-date = 21 June 2006 | title = Results of the Canadian trials of RU486, the 'Abortion Pill | access-date = 8 December 2006 }}</ref> Health Canada gave approval to mifepristone in July 2015.<ref>{{Cite web|title = RU-486 abortion pill approved by Health Canada|url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/ru-486-abortion-pill-approved-by-health-canada-1.3173515?cmp=rss|access-date = 30 July 2015|url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150731021931/http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/ru-486-abortion-pill-approved-by-health-canada-1.3173515?cmp=rss |archive-date = 31 July 2015 }}</ref> Initially, its use was limited to seven weeks into a pregnancy, but this was changed to nine weeks in 2017. The previous requirement of written consent from the woman was also ended at the same time. It can be dispensed directly to a patient by a pharmacist or a prescribing health professional. Women are required to have an ultrasound to ensure the pregnancy is not [[ectopic pregnancy|ectopic]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Health Canada eases restrictions on abortion pill Mifegymiso |work=CBC News |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/mifegymiso-abortion-pill-health-canada-1.4391267 |access-date=28 April 2018 |archive-date=8 May 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508043809/http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/mifegymiso-abortion-pill-health-canada-1.4391267 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
Clinical trials of mifepristone in China began in 1985. In October 1988, China became the first country in the world to approve mifepristone. Chinese organizations tried to purchase mifepristone from [[Roussel Uclaf]], who refused to sell it to them, so in 1992 China began its own domestic production of mifepristone. In 2000, the cost of medical abortion with mifepristone was higher than surgical abortion and the percentage of medical abortions varied greatly, ranging from 30% to 70% in cities to being almost nonexistent in rural areas.<!-- |
|||
--><ref name="ulmann">{{cite journal |author=Ulmann A |year=2000 |title=The development of mifepristone: a pharmaceutical drama in three acts |journal=J Am Med Women's Assoc |volume=55 |issue=3 Suppl |pages=117–20 |pmid=10846319}}</ref><!-- |
|||
--><ref name="wu">{{cite journal |author=Wu S |year=2000 |title=Medical abortion in China |journal=J Am Med Women's Assoc |volume=55 |issue=3 Suppl |pages=197–9, 204 |pmid=10846339}}</ref> |
|||
A report from the [[United States Embassy]] in Beijing in 2000 said mifepristone had been widely used in Chinese cities for about two years, and that according to press reports a [[black market]] had developed with many women starting to buy it illegally (without a prescription) from private clinics and drugstores for about $15, causing Chinese authorities to worry about medical complications from use without physician supervision.<ref>{{cite web|title=Family planning in China: RU-486, abortion, and population trends|publisher=U.S. Embassy Beijing|year=2000|accessdate=2006-09-14|url=http://www.usembassy-china.org.cn/sandt/ru486.html}}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone was registered for use in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Uzbekistan in 2002, in Guyana and Moldova in 2004, in Mongolia in 2005, and in Armenia in 2007.<ref name="Gynuity 2009"/><ref>{{cite web|title=Medication Abortion|publisher=Ibis|year=2002|access-date=19 September 2006|url=http://www.medicationabortion.com/mifepristone/index.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061104040928/http://www.medicationabortion.com/mifepristone/index.html|archive-date=4 November 2006}}</ref> |
|||
In 2001, mifepristone was approved in Taiwan.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Tsai EM, Yang CH, Lee JN|title=Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: a clinical trial in Taiwanese women|journal=J Formos Med Assoc|year=2002|volume=101|issue=4|pmid=12101864|pages=277–82}}</ref> Vietnam included mifepristone in the National Reproductive Health program in 2002.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Ganatra B, Bygdeman M, Nguyen DV, Vu ML, Phan BT|title=From research to reality: the challenges of introducing medical abortion into service delivery in Vietnam|journal=Reprod Health Matters|year=2004|volume=12|issue=24|pages=105–13|pmid=15938163|doi=10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24022-8}}</ref> |
|||
Low dose mifepristone tablets for emergency contraception are available directly from a pharmacist without a prescription and with a prescription in China.<ref name="Trussell 2013">{{cite web |date=13 February 2013 |title=Dedicated emergency contraceptive pills worldwide |url=http://ec.princeton.edu/pills/Dedicated_ECPs.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304190311/http://ec.princeton.edu/pills/Dedicated_ECPs.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2016 |access-date=4 April 2016 |publisher=Office of Population Research, Princeton University |vauthors=Trussell J, Cleland K |location=Princeton}}</ref><ref name="ICEC 2013">{{cite web |author= |year=2016 |title=EC pill types and countries of availability, by brand |url=http://www.cecinfo.org/country-by-country-information/status-availability-database/ec-pill-types-and-countries-of-availability-by-brand/ |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160405095026/http://www.cecinfo.org/country-by-country-information/status-availability-database/ec-pill-types-and-countries-of-availability-by-brand/ |archive-date=5 April 2016 |access-date=4 April 2016 |publisher=International Consortium for Emergency Contraception |location=New York}}</ref><ref name="Trussell 2016">{{cite web |date=March 2016 |title=Emergency Contraception: A Last Chance to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy |url=http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ec-review.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100923040101/http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ec-review.pdf |archive-date=23 September 2010 |access-date=7 April 2016 |publisher=Office of Population Research, Princeton University |vauthors=Trussell J, Raymond E |location=Princeton}}</ref> |
|||
It is approved in only one subsaharan African country—South Africa, where it was approved in 2001.<ref>{{cite web|title=Medical Abortion-Implications for Africa|publisher=[[Ipas (non-profit)|Ipas]]|year=2003|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://www.ipas.org/publications/en/Medical_Abortion/med_ab_africa_web_only_en.pdf.}}</ref> It is also approved in one north African country—Tunisia, also in 2001.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Hajri S|title=Medication abortion: the Tunisian experience|journal=Afr J Reprod Health|year=2004|volume=8|issue=1|pmid=15487615|pages=63–9|doi=10.2307/3583307|jstor=3583307}}</ref> |
|||
Low dose mifepristone tablets for emergency contraception are available by prescription in Armenia (Gynepriston), Russia (Agesta, Gynepriston, Mifepristone 72, Negele), Ukraine (Gynepriston), and Vietnam (Mifestad 10, Ciel EC).<ref name="Trussell 2013"/><ref name="ICEC 2013"/><ref name="Trussell 2016"/> |
|||
Mifepristone was approved for use in India in 2002, where medical abortion is referred to as "Medical Termination of Pregnancy" (MTP). It is only available under medical supervision, not by prescription, due to adverse reactions such as excessive bleeding, and there are criminal penalties for buying or selling it on the [[black market]] or over-the-counter at pharmacies.<ref>{{cite web|title=Mifepristone can be sold only to approved MTP Centres: Rajasthan State HRC|publisher=Indian Express Health Care Management|year=2000|url=http://www.expresshealthcaremgmt.com/20040515/oped01.shtml}}</ref> |
|||
===Controversy=== |
|||
[[Medical abortion]] is available in Canada on a limited basis using [[methotrexate]] and [[misoprostol]]; mifepristone is not legally approved, and importation of that drug into Canada is currently illegal. Clinical trials were done in 2000 in various Canadian cities comparing methotrexate to mifepristone, after approbation by the federal government. While both drugs had overall similar results, mifepristone was found to act faster.<ref>."[http://www.cbctrust.com/ru486_trials_canada.php Results of the Canadian trials of RU486, the 'Abortion Pill']." (n.d.). Retrieved 2006-12-08.</ref> As of January 2014, it is unclear whether or when RU-486 will be approved for use in Canada.<ref>{{cite web|author= Laura Payton |title=Abortion debate may return as Health Canada weighs RU-486 approval|publisher=CBC News|date=Jan 28, 2014|accessdate=2014-01-28|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/abortion-debate-may-return-as-health-canada-weighs-ru-486-approval-1.2508447}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Abortion debate}} |
|||
Many [[anti-abortion]] groups in the United States actively campaigned against the approval of mifepristone<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Cunningham PC, McCoy L, Ferguson CD |title= Citizen Petition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration |publisher= Americans United for Life |date= 28 February 1995 |access-date= 20 September 2006 |url= http://www.fnsa.org/v1n3/americans1.html |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061003131224/http://www.fnsa.org/v1n3/americans1.html |archive-date= 3 October 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |vauthors= Talbot M |title= The Little White Bombshell |newspaper= The New York Times |date= 11 July 1999 |access-date= 20 September 2006 |url= https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D00E5DC113DF932A25754C0A96F958260&sec=health&pagewanted=2 |url-access=subscription |archive-date= 28 August 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210828172922/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/07/11/magazine/the-little-white-bombshell.html |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Abortion Foes to Boycott Drugs (Altace) Made By RU-486 Manufacturer |newspaper=The Virginia Pilot |date=8 July 1994 |access-date=15 September 2006 |url=http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pilot/issues/1994/vp940708/07080818.htm |archive-url=https://archive.today/20080220223236/http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pilot/issues/1994/vp940708/07080818.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=20 February 2008 }}</ref> and continue to actively campaign for its withdrawal.<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Guthrie S |title= Counteroffensive Launched on RU-486 |newspaper= Christianity Today |date= 11 June 2001 |access-date= 20 September 2006 |url= http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2001/008/13.58.html |url-status= live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20060920105409/http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2001/008/13.58.html |archive-date= 20 September 2006 }}</ref> They cite either ethical issues with abortion or safety concerns regarding the drug and the adverse reactions associated with it.<ref>{{cite news |vauthors= Kolata G |title= Death at 18 Spurs Debate Over a Pill For Abortion |newspaper= The New York Times |date= 24 September 2003 |access-date= 20 September 2006 |url= https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A03E7DD173DF937A1575AC0A9659C8B63&sec=health&pagewanted=1 |archive-date= 28 August 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210828172952/https://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/24/us/death-at-18-spurs-debate-over-a-pill-for-abortion.html |url-status= live }}</ref> |
|||
Mifepristone was registered for use in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Uzbekistan in 2002, in Guyana and Moldova in 2004, in Mongolia in 2005, and in Armenia in 2007.<ref name="Gynuity 2009"/><ref>{{cite web|title=Medication Abortion|publisher=Ibis|year=2002|accessdate=2006-09-19|url=http://www.medicationabortion.com/mifepristone/index.html}}</ref> |
|||
Religious and [[anti-abortion]] groups outside the United States have also protested mifepristone, especially in Germany<ref>{{cite web| vauthors = Allen JL |title=Abortion debates rock Germany: introduction of abortion pill exacerbates controversy |newspaper=National Catholic Reporter |date=12 February 1999 |access-date=14 September 2006 |url=http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_15_35/ai_53924378 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050528125020/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_15_35/ai_53924378 |url-status=dead |archive-date=28 May 2005 }}</ref> and Australia.<ref>{{cite web |title= Catholic and Evangelical students join Muslims in RU-486 fight |newspaper= Catholic News |date= 9 February 2006 |access-date= 18 September 2006 |url= http://www.cathnews.com/news/602/54.php |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061027200522/http://www.cathnews.com/news/602/54.php |archive-date= 27 October 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= Death Toll Rises to 11 Women |publisher= Australians Against RU-486 |year= 2006 |access-date= 20 September 2006 |url= http://www.aaru486.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=26 |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20060820140044/http://www.aaru486.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=26 |archive-date= 20 August 2006 }}</ref> |
|||
==Notes and references== |
|||
{{reflist|30em}} |
|||
A court case that originated in Texas in 2023 argued that mifepristone was unsafe and women should no longer be able to order it by mail. This case was won in Texas but was appealed, and in June 2024, the [[Supreme Court of the United States|US Supreme Court]] ruled unanimously on that case to keep mifepristone available on grounds that those who originally filed the lawsuit did not have standing to file.<ref name=MIFE>[https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/supreme-court-rejects-abortion-pill-challenge-preserving-wide-access-to-drug-f78f3320?st=4qzabwgst2uclm2&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink Supreme Court Rejects Abortion Pill Challenge, Preserving Wide Access to Drug] by Laura Kusisto and Jess Bravin in the Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2024.</ref> |
|||
==External links== |
|||
*[http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/mifepristone/ U.S. Food and Drug Administration] Mifeprex (mifepristone) Information |
|||
==Research== |
|||
*[http://www.ru486.com/topics/articles/article_73.asp Commonly asked questions about RU-486] from the education arm of the [[National Coalition of Abortion Providers]] |
|||
The original target for the research group was the discovery and development of compounds with antiglucocorticoid properties.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors= Hazra BG, Pore VS |title= Mifepristone (RU-486), the recently developed antiprogesterone drug and its analogues |journal= J Indian Inst Sci |year= 2001 |volume= 81 |pages= 287–298 | url = https://journal.iisc.ac.in/index.php/iisc/article/view/2024/2089 }}</ref> |
|||
*[http://www.earlyoptionpill.com/ Danco product web site - EarlyOptionPill.com] |
|||
*[http://www.earlyoptionpill.com/pdfs/prescribing071905.pdf Danco prescribing information] |
|||
Use of mifepristone as a [[Cervical dilation|cervical ripening]] agent has been described.<ref name="pmid16647925">{{cite journal |vauthors= Clark K, Ji H, Feltovich H, Janowski J, Carroll C, Chien EK |title= Mifepristone-induced cervical ripening: structural, biomechanical, and molecular events |journal= Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. |volume= 194 |issue= 5 |pages= 1391–8 |date= May 2006 |pmid= 16647925 |doi= 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.026 }}</ref> The medication has been studied as an antiandrogen in the treatment of [[prostate cancer]].<ref name="pmid18399827">{{cite journal | vauthors = Taplin ME, Manola J, Oh WK, Kantoff PW, Bubley GJ, Smith M, Barb D, Mantzoros C, Gelmann EP, Balk SP | title = A phase II study of mifepristone (RU-486) in castration-resistant prostate cancer, with a correlative assessment of androgen-related hormones | journal = BJU Int. | volume = 101 | issue = 9 | pages = 1084–9 | year = 2008 | pmid = 18399827 | doi = 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07509.x | s2cid = 205538600 }}</ref><ref name="AdisInsight">{{Cite web | url=http://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs/800001657 | title=Mifepristone - Corcept Therapeutics - AdisInsight | access-date=27 December 2017 | archive-date=27 December 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171227235346/http://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs/800001657 | url-status=live }}</ref> Mifepristone showed no detectable anti-HIV activity in clinical trials.<ref name="schimmer"/><ref name="chabbert-buffet"/><ref name="pmid17932493">{{cite journal | vauthors = Flexner C |title= HIV drug development: the next 25 years |journal= Nat Rev Drug Discov |volume= 6 |issue=12 |pages= 959–66 |date= December 2007 |pmid= 17932493 |doi= 10.1038/nrd2336 |s2cid= 31261997 }}</ref><ref name="tang">{{cite journal |vauthors= Tang OS, Ho PC |year=2006 |title= Clinical applications of mifepristone |journal= Gynecol Endocrinol |volume=22 |issue=12 |pages= 655–9 |pmid= 17162706 |doi= 10.1080/09513590601005946|s2cid=23295715 }}</ref> |
|||
*[http://www.ru486.org.au Australians for RU-486] - established in February 2006 to lobby for passage of bill in Australia's Parliament to enable the availability of Mifepristone |
|||
Mifepristone showed initial promise in [[psychotic major depression]], a difficult-to-treat form of depression,<ref name="pmid11593077">{{cite journal | vauthors = Belanoff JK, Flores BH, Kalezhan M, Sund B, Schatzberg AF | title = Rapid reversal of psychotic depression using mifepristone | journal = Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology | volume = 21 | issue = 5 | pages = 516–21 | date = October 2001 | pmid = 11593077 | doi = 10.1097/00004714-200110000-00009 | s2cid = 3067889 }}</ref><ref name="Howland_2013">{{cite journal | vauthors = Howland RH | title = Mifepristone as a therapeutic agent in psychiatry | journal = Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services | volume = 51 | issue = 6 | pages = 11–4 | date = June 2013 | pmid = 23814820 | doi = 10.3928/02793695-20130513-01 }}</ref> but a phase-III clinical trial was terminated early due to lack of efficacy.<ref>{{cite news | vauthors = Gard D | work = Fierce Biotech | date = 7 May 2014 | url = http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/corcept-tanks-depression-drug-comes-short-phase-iii/2014-05-07 | title = Corcept tanks as depression drug comes up short in Phase III | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160302191829/http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/corcept-tanks-depression-drug-comes-short-phase-iii/2014-05-07 | archive-date = 2 March 2016 }}</ref> It has been studied in bipolar disorder,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Soria V, González-Rodríguez A, Huerta-Ramos E, Usall J, Cobo J, Bioque M, Barbero JD, García-Rizo C, Tost M, Monreal JA, Labad J | title = Targeting hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones and sex steroids for improving cognition in major mood disorders and schizophrenia: a systematic review and narrative synthesis | journal = Psychoneuroendocrinology | volume = 93 | pages = 8–19 | date = July 2018 | pmid = 29680774 | doi = 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.012 | s2cid = 5041081 }}</ref> post traumatic stress disorder,<ref name="Howland_2013" /> and anorexia nervosa.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Bou Khalil R, Souaiby L, Farès N | title = The importance of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis as a therapeutic target in anorexia nervosa | journal = Physiology & Behavior | volume = 171 | pages = 13–20 | date = March 2017 | pmid = 28043861 | doi = 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.12.035 | s2cid = 6329552 }}</ref> |
|||
==References== |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
== External links == |
|||
* [https://gynuity.org/assets/resources/mapmifelist_en.pdf Map and list of mifepristone approvals by year] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230529053718/https://gynuity.org/assets/resources/mapmifelist_en.pdf |date=29 May 2023 }} |
|||
{{Progestogens}} |
|||
{{Abortion}} |
{{Abortion}} |
||
{{Progestogens and antiprogestogens}} |
|||
{{Steroidergics}} |
|||
{{Obstetric drugs}} |
|||
{{Glucocorticoids and antiglucocorticoids}} |
|||
{{Other sex hormones and modulators of the genital system}} |
|||
{{Navboxes |
|||
| title = [[Pharmacodynamics]] |
|||
| titlestyle = background:#ccccff |
|||
| list1 = |
|||
{{Androgen receptor modulators}} |
|||
{{Glucocorticoid receptor modulators}} |
|||
{{Monoamine reuptake inhibitors}} |
|||
{{Progesterone receptor modulators}} |
|||
{{Xenobiotic-sensing receptor modulators}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Portal bar | Medicine}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Abortifacients]] |
[[Category:Abortifacients]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Alkyne derivatives]] |
||
[[Category:Anilines]] |
|||
[[Category:Antiglucocorticoids]] |
[[Category:Antiglucocorticoids]] |
||
[[Category:Antiprogestogens]] |
[[Category:Antiprogestogens]] |
||
[[Category:CYP3A4 inhibitors]] |
|||
[[Category:CYP17A1 inhibitors]] |
|||
[[Category:Estranes]] |
|||
[[Category:French inventions]] |
|||
[[Category:Methods of abortion]] |
[[Category:Methods of abortion]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Pregnane X receptor agonists]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Selective progesterone receptor modulators]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Serotonin reuptake inhibitors]] |
||
[[Category:Steroidal antiandrogens]] |
|||
[[Category:World Health Organization essential medicines]] |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia medicine articles ready to translate]] |
Latest revision as of 11:04, 10 January 2025
Clinical data | |
---|---|
Pronunciation | /ˌmɪfəˈprɪˌstoʊn/[1] |
Trade names | Mifegyne, Mifeprex, Korlym, others |
Other names | RU-486; RU-38486; ZK-98296; 11β-[p-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]-17α-(1-propynyl)estra-4,9-dien-17β-ol-3-one |
AHFS/Drugs.com | Monograph |
MedlinePlus | a600042 |
License data |
|
Pregnancy category |
|
Routes of administration | By mouth |
Drug class | Antiprogestogen; Antiglucocorticoid |
ATC code | |
Legal status | |
Legal status | |
Pharmacokinetic data | |
Bioavailability | 69% |
Protein binding | 98% |
Metabolism | Liver |
Excretion | Feces: 83% urine: 9% |
Identifiers | |
| |
CAS Number | |
PubChem CID | |
IUPHAR/BPS | |
DrugBank | |
ChemSpider | |
UNII | |
KEGG | |
ChEBI | |
ChEMBL | |
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | |
ECHA InfoCard | 100.127.911 |
Chemical and physical data | |
Formula | C29H35NO2 |
Molar mass | 429.604 g·mol−1 |
3D model (JSmol) | |
Density | 1.189 g/cm3 |
Melting point | 194 °C (381 °F) |
Boiling point | 629 °C (1,164 °F) |
| |
| |
(verify) |
Mifepristone, also known by its developmental code name RU-486, is a drug typically used in combination with misoprostol to bring about a medical abortion during pregnancy and manage early miscarriage.[8] This combination is 97% effective during the first 63 days (9 weeks) of pregnancy.[9] It is also effective in the second trimester of pregnancy.[10][11] It is taken by mouth.[8]
The more common adverse effects include abdominal pain, feeling tired, and vaginal bleeding.[8] Serious side effects may include heavy vaginal bleeding, bacterial infection, and birth defects if the pregnancy does not end.[8] If used, appropriate follow-up care needs to be available.[8][12] Mifepristone is an antiprogestogen.[8] It works by blocking the effects of progesterone, making both the cervix and uterine vessels dilate and causing uterine contraction.[8]
Mifepristone was developed in 1980 and came into use in France in 1987.[13] It became available in the United States in 2000.[14][10] It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines.[15] Mifepristone was approved in Canada in January 2017.[16][17]
Medical uses
[edit]Abortion
[edit]Mifepristone followed by a prostaglandin analog (misoprostol or gemeprost) is used for medical abortion.[18][19] Medical organizations have found this combination to be safe and effective. Guidelines from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists describe medication abortion using mifepristone and misoprostol as effective and appropriate at any gestational age.[20] The World Health Organization and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend mifepristone followed by misoprostol for first- and second-trimester medical abortion.[21][22][23][24] Mifepristone alone is less effective, resulting in abortion within 1–2 weeks in anywhere from 54% to 92% of pregnancies, according to review of 13 studies.[25]
Cushing's syndrome
[edit]Mifepristone is used for the medical treatment of high blood sugar caused by high cortisol levels in the blood (hypercortisolism) in adults with endogenous Cushing's syndrome who also have type 2 diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance and have failed surgery or cannot have surgery.[6][26] In a Phase III trial, it improved glycemic control, increased insulin sensitivity, and reduced body weight regardless of the cause of CS.[27]
Medical management of early pregnancy loss
[edit]Mifepristone combined with misoprostol is the preferred medication regimen for management of early pregnancy loss. While misoprostol alone can be used, the addition of a dose of mifepristone twenty-four hours before misoprostol administration improves treatment efficacy.[28]
Other uses
[edit]Mifepristone at low doses has been used for emergency contraception.[29][30][31] Mifepristone has also been used to treat symptomatic leiomyoma (uterine fibroids) and endometriosis.[32] As elevated cortisol levels have been implicated in psychotic depression, mifepristone has been used as a treatment.[33]
Side effects
[edit]Serious complications with mifepristone are rare with about 0.04%–0.09% requiring hospitalization and 0.05% requiring blood transfusion.[34]
Nearly all women using the mifepristone/misoprostol regimen experienced abdominal pain, uterine cramping, and vaginal bleeding or spotting for an average of 9–16 days. For most women, the most severe cramps after use of misoprostol last for less than 6 hours and can generally be managed with ibuprofen.[35] Up to 8% of women experienced some type of bleeding for 30 days or more. Other less common side effects included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, and fever.[36] Pelvic inflammatory disease is a very rare but serious complication.[37] Excessive bleeding and incomplete termination of a pregnancy require further intervention by a doctor (such as a repeat dose of misoprostol or a vacuum aspiration). Mifepristone is contraindicated in the presence of adrenal failure, long-term oral corticosteroid therapy (although inhaled and topical steroids are not contraindications), hemorrhagic disorders, inherited porphyria, and hemophilia or anticoagulant use.[36] Women with an intrauterine device in their uterus should remove the IUD prior to medication abortion to avoid unnecessary cramping. Mifepristone is not effective in treating ectopic pregnancy.
A postmarketing summary found, of about 1.52 million women who had received mifepristone until April 2011 in the United States, 14 were reported to have died after application. Eight of these cases were associated with sepsis; the other six had various causes such as drug abuse and suspected murder. Other incidents reported to the FDA included 612 nonlethal hospitalizations, 339 blood transfusions, 48 severe infections, and 2,207 (0.15%) adverse events altogether.[38]
No long-term studies to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of mifepristone have been performed. This is in accord with ICH guidelines, which do not require carcinogenicity testing in nongenotoxic drugs intended for administration for less than six months.[39]
Pregnancy
[edit]Mifepristone alone results in abortion within 1–2 weeks in 54% to 92% of pregnancies.[25][40] The effectiveness increases to greater than 90% if misoprostol is given after the mifepristone.[41] There is no evidence that the effects of mifepristone can be reversed,[25][42] although some anti-abortion groups claim that it can be reversed by giving progesterone.[43][44] Researchers in the United States initiated a trial of the so-called "reversal" regimen in 2019, but stopped prematurely due to serious safety concerns about using mifepristone without follow-up misoprostol.[45][46] Giving progesterone has not been shown to halt medication abortion, and not completing the combination regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol may cause serious bleeding.[46]
In those who continue pregnancy after use of mifepristone together with misoprostol for termination, birth defects may occur.[12] Exposure to a single large dose of mifepristone in newborn rats was not associated with any reproductive problems, although chronic low-dose exposure of newborn rats to mifepristone was associated with structural and functional reproductive abnormalities.[36] Studies in mice, rats, and rabbits revealed developmental abnormalities for rabbits, but not rats or mice.[36]
Pharmacology
[edit]Pharmacodynamics
[edit]Mifepristone is a steroidal antiprogestogen (IC50 = 0.025 nM for the PR), as well as an antiglucocorticoid (IC50 = 2.2 nM for the GR) and antiandrogen (IC50 = 10 nM for the AR) to a much lesser extent.[47] It antagonizes cortisol action competitively at the receptor level.[48]
In the presence of progesterone, mifepristone acts as a competitive progesterone receptor antagonist (in the absence of progesterone, mifepristone acts as a partial agonist). Mifepristone is a 19-nor steroid with a bulky p-(dimethylamino) phenyl substituent above the plane of the molecule at the 11β-position responsible for inducing or stabilizing an inactive receptor conformation and a hydrophobic 1-propynyl substituent below the plane of the molecule at the 17α-position that increases its progesterone receptor binding affinity.[49][50][51]
In addition to being an antiprogestogen, mifepristone is also an antiglucocorticoid and a weak antiandrogen. Mifepristone's relative binding affinity at the progesterone receptor is more than twice that of progesterone, its relative binding affinity at the glucocorticoid receptor is more than three times that of dexamethasone and more than ten times that of cortisol.[52] Its relative binding affinity at the androgen receptor is less than one-third that of testosterone, and it does not bind to the estrogen receptor or the mineralocorticoid receptor.[53]
Mifepristone as a regular contraceptive at 2 mg daily prevents ovulation (1 mg daily does not). A single preovulatory 10-mg dose of mifepristone delays ovulation by three to four days and is as effective an emergency contraceptive as a single 1.5-mg dose of the progestin levonorgestrel.[54]
In women, mifepristone at doses greater or equal to 1 mg/kg antagonizes the endometrial and myometrial effects of progesterone. In humans, an antiglucocorticoid effect of mifepristone is manifested at doses greater or equal to 4.5 mg/kg by a compensatory increase in ACTH and cortisol. In animals, a weak antiandrogenic effect is seen with prolonged administration of very high doses of 10 to 100 mg/kg.[55][56]
In medication abortion regimens, mifepristone blockade of progesterone receptors directly causes endometrial decidual degeneration, cervical softening and dilatation, release of endogenous prostaglandins, and an increase in the sensitivity of the myometrium to the contractile effects of prostaglandins. Mifepristone-induced decidual breakdown indirectly leads to trophoblast detachment, resulting in decreased syncytiotrophoblast production of hCG, which in turn causes decreased production of progesterone by the corpus luteum (pregnancy is dependent on progesterone production by the corpus luteum through the first nine weeks of gestation—until placental progesterone production has increased enough to take the place of corpus luteum progesterone production). When followed sequentially by a prostaglandin, mifepristone 200 mg is (100 mg may be, but 50 mg is not) as effective as 600 mg in producing a medical abortion.[49][51]
'Contragestion' is a term promoted by Étienne-Émile Baulieu in the context of his advocacy of mifepristone, defining it as inclusive of some hypothesized mechanisms of action of some contraceptives and those of mifepristone to induce abortion.[57] Baulieu's definition of a 'contragestive' included any birth control method that could possibly act after fertilization and before nine-weeks gestational age.[57]
Pharmacokinetics
[edit]The elimination half-life is complex; according to the label: "After a distribution phase, elimination is at first slow, the concentration decreasing by a half between about 12 and 72 hours, and then more rapid, giving an elimination half-life of 18 hours. With radio receptor assay techniques, the terminal half-life is of up to 90 hours, including all metabolites of mifepristone able to bind to progesterone receptors."[18] Metapristone is the major metabolite of mifepristone.[58][52][59]
Chemistry
[edit]Mifepristone, also known as 11β-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-17α-(1-propynyl)estra-4,9-dien-17β-ol-3-one, is a synthetic estrane steroid and a derivative of steroid hormones like progesterone, cortisol, and testosterone.[48] It has substitutions at the C11β and C17α positions and double bonds at the C4(5) and C9(10) positions.[48]
History
[edit]1980–1987
[edit]In April 1980, as part of a formal research project at the French pharmaceutical company Roussel-Uclaf for the development of glucocorticoid receptor antagonists, endocrinologist Étienne-Émile Baulieu[60][61] and chemist Georges Teutsch synthesized mifepristone (RU-38486, the 38,486th compound synthesized by Roussel-Uclaf from 1949 to 1980; shortened to RU-486), which was discovered to also be a progesterone receptor antagonist.[62][63] In October 1981, Étienne-Émile Baulieu, a consultant to Roussel-Uclaf, arranged tests of its use for medical abortion in 11 women in Switzerland by gynecologist Walter Herrmann at the University of Geneva's Cantonal Hospital, with successful results announced on 19 April 1982.[62][64] On 9 October 1987, following worldwide clinical trials in 20,000 women of mifepristone with a prostaglandin analogue (initially sulprostone or gemeprost, later misoprostol) for medical abortion, Roussel-Uclaf sought approval in France for their use for medical abortion, with approval announced on 23 September 1988.[62][65]
1988–1990
[edit]On 21 October 1988, in response to antiabortion protests and concerns of majority (54.5%) owner Hoechst AG of Germany, Roussel-Uclaf's executives and board of directors voted 16 to 4 to stop distribution of mifepristone, which they announced on 26 October 1988.[62][66] Two days later, the French government ordered Roussel-Uclaf to distribute mifepristone in the interests of public health.[62][67] French Health Minister Claude Évin explained: "I could not permit the abortion debate to deprive women of a product that represents medical progress. From the moment Government approval for the drug was granted, RU-486 became the moral property of women, not just the property of a drug company."[62] Following use by 34,000 women in France from April 1988 to February 1990 of mifepristone distributed free of charge, Roussel-Uclaf began selling Mifegyne (mifepristone) to hospitals in France in February 1990 at a price (negotiated with the French government) of US$48 (equivalent to $111.94 in 2023) per 600-mg dose.[62]
1991–1996
[edit]Mifegyne was subsequently approved in Great Britain in July 1991,[68] and in Sweden in September 1992,[69] but until his retirement in April 1994, Hoechst AG chairman Wolfgang Hilger, a devout Roman Catholic,[70] blocked any further expansion in availability.[62][71] Soon after becoming U.S. President in 1993, Bill Clinton ordered the U.S. Health and Human Services Department to investigate mifepristone's potential as an abortion medication, and also pressured Hoeschst to make the RU-486 medication available in the United States.[71][72][73] On 16 May 1994, Roussel-Uclaf announced it was donating without remuneration all rights for medical uses of mifepristone in the United States to the Population Council,[74] which would then sponsor clinical trials for mifepristone between September 1994 and September 1995.[75] In September 1995, The Population Council licensed mifpristone to Danco Laboratories, which was a new, single-product company that was intended to be resistant to antiabortion boycotts.[76][77] Danco entered into a manufacturing agreement with Hungarian drug manufacturer Gedeon Richter.[76] In 1996, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conditionally licensed RU-486 for early trimester abortion, pending a resolution on some remaining technical and manufacturing issues.[75]
1997–1999
[edit]On 8 April 1997, after buying the remaining 43.5% of Roussel-Uclaf stock in early 1997,[78] Hoechst AG (US$30 (equivalent to $58.28 in 2023) billion annual revenue) announced the end of its manufacture and sale of Mifegyne (US$3.44 (equivalent to $6.68 in 2023) million annual revenue) and the transfer of all rights for medical uses of mifepristone outside of the United States to Exelgyn, a new single-product company immune to antiabortion boycotts, whose CEO was former Roussel-Uclaf CEO Édouard Sakiz.[79] In 1997, Gideon Richter would withdraw from efforts to manufacture mifepristone in the United States following opposition from pro-life groups, which led to Danco filing a breach of contract lawsuit.[80] In 1999, Exelgyn won approval of Mifegyne in 11 additional countries, and in 28 more countries over the following decade.[81]
2000–present
[edit]In September 2000 Danco Laboratories, a sub-licencee of the Population Council, received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to sell mifepristone under the brand name Mifeprex.
In 2019, the first generic form of mifepristone in the United States became available, manufactured by GenBioPro.[82]
Society and culture
[edit]Mifepristone is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines.[15] Since 2005, it has been included on the core list, with misoprostol, with a special note "where permitted under national law and where culturally acceptable".[83]
Economics
[edit]Cost and availability limit access in many parts of the world.[84][85]
Frequency of use
[edit]United States
[edit]Medication abortions voluntarily reported by 33 US states[86] to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have increased as a percentage of total abortions every year since the approval of mifepristone: 1.0% in 2000, 2.9% in 2001, 5.2% in 2002, 7.9% in 2003, 9.3% in 2004, 9.9% in 2005, 10.6% in 2006, and 13.1% in 2007 (20.3% of those at less than 9 weeks gestation).[87]
A Guttmacher Institute survey of abortion providers estimated that medication abortions accounted for 17% of all abortions and slightly over 25% of abortions before 9 weeks gestation in the United States in 2008 (94% of nonhospital medication abortions used mifepristone and misoprostol, 6% used methotrexate and misoprostol).[88] Medication abortions accounted for 32% of first trimester abortions at Planned Parenthood clinics in the United States in 2008.[89] Considering abortions performed in non-hospital facilities, medication abortions accounted for 24% in 2011 and 31% in 2014. In 2014, facilities that provided a relatively small number of abortions (fewer than 400 procedures per year) were more likely to perform them with medication.[90] Medication abortions accounted for 39% of all US abortions in 2017,[91] and 54% in 2020.[92]
Europe
[edit]In France, the percentage of medication abortions of all abortions continues to increase: 38% in 2003, 42% in 2004, 44% in 2005, 46% in 2006, 49% in 2007 (vs. 18% in 1996).[93] In England and Wales, 52% of early abortions (less than 9 weeks gestation) in 2009 were medication-based; the percentage of all abortions that are medication-based has increased every year for the past 14 years (from 5% in 1995 to 40% in 2009) and has more than doubled in the last five years.[94] In Scotland, 81.2% of early abortions in 2009 were medication-based (up from 55.8% in 1992 when medication abortion was introduced); the percentage of all abortions that are medication-based has increased every year for the past 17 years (from 16.4% in 1992 to 69.9% in 2009).[95] In Sweden, 85.6% of early abortions and 73.2% of abortions before the end of the 12th week of gestation in 2009 were medication-based; 68.2% of all abortions in 2009 were medication-based.[96] In Great Britain and Sweden, mifepristone is licensed for use with vaginal gemeprost or oral misoprostol. As of 2000, more than 620,000 women in Europe had had medication abortions using a mifepristone regimen.[97] In Denmark, mifepristone was used in between 3,000 and 4,000 of just over 15,000 abortions in 2005.[98]
Legal status
[edit]In the United States
[edit]Mifepristone was approved for abortion in the United States by the FDA in September 2000.[99] As of 2007[update], it was legal and available in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., Guam, and Puerto Rico.[100] It is a prescription drug, but was not initially available to the public through pharmacies; its distribution is primarily restricted to specially qualified licensed physicians, sold by Danco Laboratories under the brand name Mifeprex. As of September 2021, in 32 states, the drug could only be provided by a licensed physician, and in 19 states, the prescribing clinician was required to be physically in the room with the patient while they are taking the drug.[90]
Roussel Uclaf did not seek US approval, so in the United States legal availability was not initially possible.[101] The United States banned importation of mifepristone for personal use in 1989,[102] a decision supported by Roussel Uclaf. In 1994, Roussel Uclaf gave the U.S. drug rights to the Population Council in exchange for immunity from any product liability claims.[74][103] The Population Council sponsored clinical trials in the United States.[104] The drug went on approvable status from 1996. Production was intended to begin through the Danco Group in 1996, but they withdrew briefly in 1997 due to a corrupt business partner, delaying availability again.[105][106]
In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved mifepristone, to end a pregnancy through 70 days gestation (70 days or less since the first day of a woman's last menstrual period). The approved dosing regimen is 200 mg of mifepristone taken by mouth (swallowed). 24 to 48 hours after taking mifepristone, 800 mcg (micrograms) of misoprostol is taken buccally (in the cheek pouch), at a location appropriate for the patient.[19][107][108][109]
Mifepristone tablets have a marketing authorization in the United States for the treatment of high blood sugar caused by high cortisol levels in the blood (hypercortisolism) in adults with endogenous Cushing's syndrome who have type 2 diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance and have failed surgery or cannot have surgery.[6]
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, safe access to mifepristone was a concern, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists among other groups filed a lawsuit to relax the FDA's rule as to allow mifepristone to be acquired from mail-order and retail pharmacies. While the Fourth Circuit had granted a preliminary injunction to allow this distribution, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a stay order in January 2021 to retain the FDA's rule pending the results of the ongoing litigation.[110]
On 16 December 2021, the FDA voluntarily adopted a new rule permanently relaxing the requirement that the pill be obtained in person, allowing it to be sent through the mail. A prescription is still required, so that a doctor can screen for risk factors that would make taking the pill unsafe for the mother.[111] In January 2023, the FDA further relaxed rules, allowing any retail pharmacy to become certified to fill mifepristone prescriptions.[112][113]
After regulations on abortion early in pregnancy were ruled constitutional by the 2022 decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, some states enacted restrictions on abortions and abortion pills. In January 2023, the United States Department of Justice issued an interpretation of the Comstock Act[114] that it was legal for United States Postal Service employees to deliver the pills in any state, because they could not know whether the pills would be used for an abortion or other purposes.[112]
In January 2023, GenBioPro filed suit to overturn state laws that prohibit sale of mifepristone, claiming that such laws are invalid because it is a federally approved drug.[115]
The argument that state laws seeking to ban or restrict the use of mifepristone are preempted by the FDA's decision to make the drug available is supported by a number of Supreme Court decisions, including opinions by the traditionally more conservative Justices.[116]
In March 2023, Wyoming became the first US state to ban the pill.[117][118]
In April 2023, in a lawsuit brought by 17 US states and the District of Columbia, federal district judge Thomas O. Rice issued a temporary injunction that the FDA should not reduce access to mifepristone in these states and the district.[119][120]
In May 2024, the state of Louisiana classified mifepristone and misoprostol as controlled substances, with penalties for possession without a prescription. The move follows concerns over coerced abortion and has drawn criticism from over 240 doctors in the state.[121][122]
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
[edit]In April 2023, in the FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine lawsuit, federal district judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk issued a preliminary injunction suspending the 2000 approval of mifepristone, which would take effect a week later.[123] The Fifth Circuit reversed parts of Kacsmaryk's injunction, but placed a temporary injunction on the 2016 REMS change to mifepristone. On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Court stayed both injunctions on 21 April 2023, with only Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas stating their dissent. The stay allowed mifepristone to remain legally available while the lower courts consider the merits of the case.
In June 2024, the US Supreme Court unanimously overturned judge Kacsmaryk's Fifth Circuit decision on the grounds that the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine had no standing to challenge the FDA's regulations of mifepristone.[124][125] The Supreme Court ruled that Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine did not demonstrate that they would suffer harm to warrant standing. The Court did not rule on the substance of mifepristone, abortion, or the FDA's procedures.[126]
Subsection H
[edit]Some drugs are approved by the FDA under subsection H, which has two subparts. The first sets forth ways to rush experimental drugs, such as aggressive HIV and cancer treatments, to market when speedy approval is deemed vital to the health of potential patients. The second part of subsection H applies to drugs that not only must meet restrictions for use due to safety requirements, but also are required to meet postmarketing surveillance to establish that the safety results shown in clinical trials are seconded by use in a much wider population. Until December 2021, Mifepristone was approved under the second part of subsection H. The result is that women could not pick the drug up at a pharmacy, but were required to receive it directly from a doctor. Due to the possibility of adverse reactions such as excessive bleeding, which may require a blood transfusion, and incomplete abortion, which may require surgical intervention, the drug was only considered safe if a physician who is capable of administering a blood transfusion or a surgical abortion is available to the patient in the event of such emergencies.[127] The approval of mifepristone under subsection H included a black box warning.
European Union
[edit]Outside the United States, mifepristone is marketed and distributed by Exelgyn Laboratories under the brand name Mifegyne. It was approved for use in France in 1988 (initial marketing in 1989), the United Kingdom in 1991, Sweden in 1992, then Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland in 1999.[128] In 2000, it was approved in Norway, Russia and Ukraine. Serbia and Montenegro approved it in 2001,[129] Belarus and Latvia in 2002, Estonia in 2003, Moldova in 2004, Albania and Hungary in 2005, Portugal in 2007, Romania in 2008,[81] Bulgaria, Czech Republic and Slovenia in 2013.[130] In Italy, clinical trials have been constrained by protocols requiring women be hospitalized for three days, but the drug was finally approved on 30 July 2009 (officialized later in the year), despite strong opposition from the Vatican. In Italy, the pill must be prescribed and used in a clinical structure and is not sold at chemists.[131] It was approved in Hungary in 2005, but as of 2005 had not been released on the market yet, and was the target of protests.[132] Mifepristone is licensed in Ireland for use of abortions up to 12 weeks since it was legalised in 2018.[133] Mifepristone is not available in Poland, where abortion is highly restricted.[134]
Mifepristone 200 mg tablets (Mifegyne, Mifepristone Linepharma, Medabon) have marketing authorizations in the European Economic Area from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for:[18][135][136]
- Early first trimester medication abortion when followed by a prostaglandin analog (misoprostol or gemeprost) through 63 days gestational age
- Second trimester medication abortion when followed by a prostaglandin analog
- Cervical softening and dilation prior to first trimester surgical abortion
- Induction of labor after fetal death in utero when prostaglandin analogs and oxytocin are contraindicated
Other countries
[edit]Mifepristone was banned in Australia in 1996. In 2005, a private member's bill was introduced to the Australian Senate to lift the ban and transfer the power of approval to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The move caused much debate in the Australian media and among politicians. The bill passed the Senate in February 2006, and mifepristone is legal in Australia. It is provided regularly at several specialized abortion clinics per state.[137][138] Mifepristone 200 mg tablets have marketing authorizations in Australia from the TGA for early first trimester medication abortion when followed by the prostaglandin analog misoprostol through 63 days gestational age[139] and second trimester medication abortion when followed by a prostaglandin analog.[3][140]
In New Zealand, pro-abortion rights doctors established an import company, Istar, and submitted a request for approval to Medsafe, the New Zealand pharmaceutical regulatory agency. After a court case brought by Right to Life New Zealand failed, use of mifepristone was permitted.[141]
Mifepristone was approved in Israel in 1999.[142]
Clinical trials of mifepristone in China began in 1985. In October 1988, China became the first country in the world to approve mifepristone. Chinese organizations tried to purchase mifepristone from Roussel Uclaf, which refused to sell it to them, so in 1992 China began its own domestic production of mifepristone. In 2000, the cost of medication abortion with mifepristone was higher than surgical abortion and the percentage of medication abortions varied greatly, ranging from 30% to 70% in cities to being almost nonexistent in rural areas.[143][144] A report from the United States Embassy in Beijing in 2000 said mifepristone had been widely used in Chinese cities for about two years, and that according to press reports, a black market had developed with many women starting to buy it illegally (without a prescription) from private clinics and drugstores for about US$15 (equivalent to $26.54 in 2023), causing Chinese authorities to worry about medical complications from use without physician supervision.[145]
In 2001, mifepristone was approved in Taiwan.[146] Vietnam included mifepristone in the National Reproductive Health program in 2002.[147]
Mifepristone is approved in only one sub-Saharan African country—South Africa, where it was approved in 2001.[148] It is also approved in one north African country—Tunisia, also in 2001.[149]
Mifepristone was approved for use in India in 2002, where medication abortion is referred to as "medical termination of pregnancy". It is only available under medical supervision, not by prescription, due to adverse reactions such as excessive bleeding, and criminal penalties are given for buying or selling it on the black market or over-the-counter at pharmacies.[150]
Medication induced abortion used to be available in Canada but on a limited basis using methotrexate and misoprostol. Clinical trials were done in 2000 in various Canadian cities comparing methotrexate to mifepristone, after approbation by the federal government. While both drugs had overall similar results, mifepristone was found to act faster.[151] Health Canada gave approval to mifepristone in July 2015.[152] Initially, its use was limited to seven weeks into a pregnancy, but this was changed to nine weeks in 2017. The previous requirement of written consent from the woman was also ended at the same time. It can be dispensed directly to a patient by a pharmacist or a prescribing health professional. Women are required to have an ultrasound to ensure the pregnancy is not ectopic.[153]
Mifepristone was registered for use in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Uzbekistan in 2002, in Guyana and Moldova in 2004, in Mongolia in 2005, and in Armenia in 2007.[81][154]
Low dose mifepristone tablets for emergency contraception are available directly from a pharmacist without a prescription and with a prescription in China.[155][156][157]
Low dose mifepristone tablets for emergency contraception are available by prescription in Armenia (Gynepriston), Russia (Agesta, Gynepriston, Mifepristone 72, Negele), Ukraine (Gynepriston), and Vietnam (Mifestad 10, Ciel EC).[155][156][157]
Controversy
[edit]Many anti-abortion groups in the United States actively campaigned against the approval of mifepristone[158][159][160] and continue to actively campaign for its withdrawal.[161] They cite either ethical issues with abortion or safety concerns regarding the drug and the adverse reactions associated with it.[162]
Religious and anti-abortion groups outside the United States have also protested mifepristone, especially in Germany[163] and Australia.[164][165]
A court case that originated in Texas in 2023 argued that mifepristone was unsafe and women should no longer be able to order it by mail. This case was won in Texas but was appealed, and in June 2024, the US Supreme Court ruled unanimously on that case to keep mifepristone available on grounds that those who originally filed the lawsuit did not have standing to file.[166]
Research
[edit]The original target for the research group was the discovery and development of compounds with antiglucocorticoid properties.[167]
Use of mifepristone as a cervical ripening agent has been described.[168] The medication has been studied as an antiandrogen in the treatment of prostate cancer.[169][170] Mifepristone showed no detectable anti-HIV activity in clinical trials.[50][54][171][172]
Mifepristone showed initial promise in psychotic major depression, a difficult-to-treat form of depression,[173][174] but a phase-III clinical trial was terminated early due to lack of efficacy.[175] It has been studied in bipolar disorder,[176] post traumatic stress disorder,[174] and anorexia nervosa.[177]
References
[edit]- ^ "mifepristone". Mifepristone Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 3 March 2023. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
- ^ "FDA-sourced list of all drugs with black box warnings (Use Download Full Results and View Query links.)". nctr-crs.fda.gov. FDA. Retrieved 22 October 2023.
- ^ a b MS Health (12 May 2015). "Mifepristone Linepharma 200 mg tablet product information". Symonston, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Therapeutic Goods Administration. Archived from the original on 9 September 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ "Mifegymiso Product information". Health Canada. 10 January 2017. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ "Mifiso Product information". Health Canada. 16 December 2022. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ a b c "Korlym- mifepristone tablet". DailyMed. 20 December 2022. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
- ^ "Mifepristone tablet". DailyMed. 30 March 2023. Archived from the original on 10 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Mifepristone". American Society of Health System Pharmacists. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 25 February 2023 – via Drugs.com.
- ^ Chen MJ, Creinin MD (July 2015). "Mifepristone With Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortion: A Systematic Review". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 126 (1): 12–21. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000897. PMID 26241251. S2CID 20800109. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 27 July 2019 – via eScholarship.
- ^ a b Goldman MB, Troisi R, Rexrode KM, eds. (2012). Women and Health (2nd ed.). Oxford: Academic Press. p. 236. ISBN 978-0-12-384979-3. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 5 September 2017 – via Google Books.
- ^ Wildschut H, Both MI, Medema S, Thomee E, Wildhagen MF, Kapp N (January 2011). "Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011 (1): CD005216. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2. PMC 8557267. PMID 21249669.
- ^ a b "Mifepristone Use During Pregnancy". Drugs.com. 20 January 2023. Archived from the original on 23 April 2023. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
- ^ Corey EJ, Czakó B, Kürti L (2012). "Mifepristone". Molecules and Medicine. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-36173-3. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Drug Approval Package: Mifeprex (Mifepristone) NDA #20687". U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 18 June 2001. Archived from the original on 21 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2023.
- ^ a b World Health Organization (2023). The selection and use of essential medicines 2023: web annex A: World Health Organization model list of essential medicines: 23rd list (2023). Geneva: World Health Organization. hdl:10665/371090. WHO/MHP/HPS/EML/2023.02.
- ^ "Mifepristone Product information". Health Canada. 22 October 2009. Archived from the original on 24 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2023.
- ^ Kingston A (5 February 2017). "How the arrival of the abortion pill reveals a double standard". Maclean's. Archived from the original on 21 February 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- ^ a b c "Mifegyne 200 Mg Tablets Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)". Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). 21 November 2022. Archived from the original on 23 April 2023. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
- ^ a b "Information about Mifepristone for Medical Termination of Pregnancy Through Ten Weeks Gestation". Drugs. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 23 March 2023. Archived from the original on 21 April 2023. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
- ^ The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion (PDF). Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No. 7 (3rd ed.). London: RCOG Press. November 2011. pp. 68–75. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2023.
- ^ World Health Organization (21 June 2012). "Annex 5". Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems (PDF) (2nd ed.). Geneva: WHO. pp. 113–116. hdl:10665/70914. ISBN 978-92-4-154843-4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 February 2023. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
- ^ Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion (PDF). Geneva: World Health Organization. 10 January 2014. hdl:10665/97415. ISBN 978-92-4-154871-7. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
- ^ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology and the Society of Family Planning (October 2020). "Medication Abortion Up to 70 Days of Gestation". Practice Bulletin 225. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Archived from the original on 25 April 2023. Retrieved 25 April 2023.
- ^ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology (June 2013). "Practice Bulletin No. 135: Second-Trimester Abortion" (PDF). Obstetrics & Gynecology. 121 (6): 1394–1406. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000431056.79334.cc. PMID 23812485. S2CID 205384119. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 April 2023. Retrieved 26 April 2023 – via Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira.
- ^ a b c Grossman D, White K, Harris L, Reeves M, Blumenthal PD, Winikoff B, et al. (September 2015). "Continuing pregnancy after mifepristone and "reversal" of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review". Contraception (Review article). 92 (3): 206–11. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.001. PMID 26057457. Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
- ^ Ciato D, Mumbach AG, Paez-Pereda M, Stalla GK (January 2017). "Currently used and investigational drugs for Cushing´s disease". Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 26 (1): 75–84. doi:10.1080/13543784.2017.1266338. PMID 27894193.
- ^ Varlamov EV, Purnell JQ, Fleseriu M (May 2021). "Glucocorticoid Receptor Antagonism as a New "Remedy" for Insulin Resistance-Not There Yet!". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 106 (6): e2447 – e2449. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgab127. PMC 8118574. PMID 33659987.
- ^ "Early Pregnancy Loss". www.acog.org. Retrieved 28 March 2024.
- ^ Trussell J, Cleland K (13 February 2013). "Dedicated emergency contraceptive pills worldwide" (PDF). Princeton: Office of Population Research, Princeton University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ "EC pill types and countries of availability, by brand". New York: International Consortium for Emergency Contraception. 2016. Archived from the original on 5 April 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ Trussell J, Raymond E (March 2016). "Emergency Contraception: A Last Chance to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy" (PDF). Princeton: Office of Population Research, Princeton University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 September 2010. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
- ^ Murji A, Whitaker L, Chow TL, Sobel ML, et al. (Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group) (April 2017). "Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) for uterine fibroids". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017 (4): CD010770. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010770.pub2. PMC 6478099. PMID 28444736.
- ^ Block TS, Kushner H, Kalin N, Nelson C, Belanoff J, Schatzberg A (July 2018). "Combined Analysis of Mifepristone for Psychotic Depression: Plasma Levels Associated With Clinical Response". Biological Psychiatry. 84 (1): 46–54. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.01.008. PMID 29523415.
- ^ Cleland K, Creinin MD, Nucatola D, Nshom M, Trussell J (January 2013). "Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 121 (1): 166–71. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182755763. PMC 3711556. PMID 23262942.
- ^ Friedlander EB, Soon R, Salcedo J, Davis J, Tschann M, Kaneshiro B (September 2018). "Prophylactic Pregabalin to Decrease Pain During Medication Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 132 (3): 612–618. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002787. PMC 6105469. PMID 30095762.
- ^ a b c d "Mifeprex label" (PDF). FDA. 19 July 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 June 2006. Retrieved 22 August 2006.
- ^ Lawton BA, Rose SB, Shepherd J (April 2006). "Atypical presentation of serious pelvic inflammatory disease following mifepristone-induced medical abortion". Contraception. 73 (4): 431–2. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.09.003. PMID 16531180.
- ^ "Mifepristone U.S. Postmarketing Adverse Events Summary through 04/30/2011" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 January 2012. Retrieved 14 November 2011.
- ^ Guideline IH. Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals S1A (PDF). International Conference on Harmonization. 1996. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 December 2013.
- ^ Paul M, Lichtenberg S, Borgatta L, Grimes DA, Stubblefield PG, Creinin MD, eds. (24 August 2011). Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy: Comprehensive Abortion Care. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-5847-6. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017.
- ^ CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Final Recommendation Mifepristone and Misoprostol. CADTH Common Drug Reviews. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. 18 April 2017. PMID 30512906. Archived from the original on 28 August 2021. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
- ^ Bhatti KZ, Nguyen AT, Stuart GS (March 2018). "Medical abortion reversal: science and politics meet". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 218 (3): 315.e1–315.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.555. PMID 29141197. S2CID 205373684.
- ^ "As controversial 'abortion reversal' laws increase, researcher says new data shows protocol can work". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 4 May 2018. Retrieved 23 April 2018.
- ^ "California Board of Nursing Sanctions Unproven Abortion 'Reversal' (Updated) - Rewire". Rewire. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 23 November 2017.
- ^ Gordon M (22 March 2019). "Controversial 'Abortion Reversal' Regimen Is Put To The Test". NPR. Archived from the original on 18 April 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
- ^ a b Gordon M (5 December 2019). "Safety Problems Lead To Early End For Study Of 'Abortion Pill Reversal'". NPR. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 12 December 2019.
- ^ Nuclear Receptors as Drug Targets: Design and Biological Evaluation of Small Molecule Modulators of Nuclear Receptor Action. 2006. pp. 46–. ISBN 978-0-549-70288-7.
- ^ a b c Gallagher P, Young AH (March 2006). "Mifepristone (RU-486) treatment for depression and psychosis: a review of the therapeutic implications". Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2 (1): 33–42. PMC 2671735. PMID 19412444.
- ^ a b Loose DS, Stancel GM (2006). "Estrogens and Progestins". In Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL (eds.). Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 1541–1571. ISBN 978-0-07-142280-2.
- ^ a b Schimmer BP, Parker KL (2006). "Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adrenocortical Steroids and Their Synthetic Analogs; Inhibitors of the Synthesis and Actions of Adrenocortical Hormones". In Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL (eds.). Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 1587–1612. ISBN 978-0-07-142280-2.
- ^ a b Fiala C, Gemzel-Danielsson K (July 2006). "Review of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue". Contraception. 74 (1): 66–86. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.018. PMID 16781264.
- ^ a b Heikinheimo O, Kekkonen R, Lähteenmäki P (December 2003). "The pharmacokinetics of mifepristone in humans reveal insights into differential mechanisms of antiprogestin action". Contraception. 68 (6): 421–6. doi:10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00077-5. PMID 14698071.
- ^ Brogden RN, Goa KL, Faulds D (March 1993). "Mifepristone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential". Drugs. 45 (3): 384–409. doi:10.2165/00003495-199345030-00007. PMID 7682909. S2CID 195691895.
- ^ a b Chabbert-Buffet N, Meduri G, Bouchard P, Spitz IM (2005). "Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications". Hum Reprod Update. 11 (3): 293–307. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmi002. PMID 15790602.
- ^ Exelgyn Laboratories (February 2006). "Mifegyne UK Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)". Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
- ^ Danco Laboratories (19 July 2005). "Mifeprex U.S. prescribing information" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 December 2005. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
- ^ a b Baulieu ÉÉ (1985). "RU 486: An antiprogestin steroid with contragestive activity in women". In Baulieu ÉÉ, Segal SJ (eds.). The antiprogesin steroid RU 486 and human fertility control (Proceedings of a conference on the antiprogestational compound RU 486, held October 23–25, 1984, in Bellagio, Italy). New York: Plenum Press. pp. 1–25. ISBN 978-0-306-42103-7.
Baulieu ÉÉ (1985). "Contragestion by antiprogestin: a new approach to human fertility control". Abortion: medical progress and social implications (Symposium held at the Ciba Foundation, London, 27–29 November 1984). Ciba Foundation Symposium. Vol. 115. London: Pitman. pp. 192–210. doi:10.1002/9780470720967.ch15. ISBN 978-0-272-79815-7. PMID 3849413.
Baulieu EE (January 1989). "Contragestion with RU 486: a new approach to postovulatory fertility control". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Supplement. 149 (S149): 5–8. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.1989.tb08041.x. PMID 2694738. S2CID 723825.
Greenhouse S (12 February 1989). "A new pill, a fierce battle". The New York Times Magazine. p. SM22. Archived from the original on 1 September 2017.
Palca J (September 1989). "The pill of choice?". Science. 245 (4924): 1319–23. Bibcode:1989Sci...245.1319P. doi:10.1126/science.2781280. JSTOR 1704254. PMID 2781280.
Baulieu EE (September 1989). "Contragestion and other clinical applications of RU 486, an antiprogesterone at the receptor". Science. 245 (4924): 1351–7. Bibcode:1989Sci...245.1351B. doi:10.1126/science.2781282. JSTOR 1704267. PMID 2781282.
Baulieu EE (October 1989). "RU-486 as an antiprogesterone steroid. From receptor to contragestion and beyond". JAMA. 262 (13): 1808–14. doi:10.1001/jama.262.13.1808. PMID 2674487.
Bonner S (July 1991). "Drug of choice". SPIN. 7 (4): 55–56, 88. ISSN 0886-3032. Archived from the original on 12 May 2016.
Baulieu EE, Rosenblum M (15 November 1991). The "abortion pill": RU-486: a woman's choice (translation of: 'Génération pilule). New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 18, 26–28. ISBN 978-0-671-73816-7. Archived from the original on 27 May 2016.
Beck J (2 January 1992). "RU-486 pill adds a new dimension to the abortion debate". Chicago Tribune. p. 25. Archived from the original on 18 February 2013.
Chesler E (31 July 1992). "RU-486: we need prudence, not politics". The New York Times. p. A27. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016.
Baulieu ÉÉ (13 April 1993). "1993: RU 486—a decade on today and tomorrow". In Benet LZ, Brown SS, Dorflinger L, Donaldson MS (eds.). Clinical applications of mifepristone (RU 486) and other antiprogestins; assessing the science and recommending a research agenda; (Committee on Anti-progestins: Assessing the Science; Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Institute of Medicine). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. pp. 71–119. doi:10.17226/2203. ISBN 978-0-309-04949-8. PMID 25144090. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013.
Baulieu ÉÉ (June 1994). "RU486: a compound that gets itself talked about". Hum. Reprod. 9 (Suppl 1): 1–6. doi:10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.1. PMID 7962455.
Baulieu ÉÉ (1997). "Innovative procedures in family planning". In Johannisson E, Kovács L, Resch BA, Bruyniks NP (eds.). Assessment of research and service needs in reproductive health in Eastern Europe — concerns and commitments. Proceedings of a workshop organized by the ICRR and the WHO Collaborating Centre on Research in Human Reproduction in Szeged, Hungary, 25–27 October 1993. New York: Parthenon Publishing. pp. 51–60. ISBN 978-1-85070-696-0. Archived from the original on 3 May 2016.
"contragestive". The American Heritage medical dictionary. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 2008. p. 124. ISBN 978-0-618-94725-6. Archived from the original on 29 June 2022. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
Ammer C (2009). "contragestive". The encyclopedia of women's health (6th ed.). New York: Facts On File. pp. 124–125. ISBN 978-0-8160-7407-5. Archived from the original on 29 June 2022. Retrieved 9 October 2020.adj. Capable of preventing gestation, either by preventing implantation or by causing the uterine lining to shed after implantation. —n. A contragestive drug or agent.
Also contragestant, abortion pill. A substance called mifepristone, or RU-486, which was developed by Dr. Etienne Baulieu and the Roussel-Uclaf company. The contragestive blocks progesterone receptors in the endometrium (uterine lining), preventing its buildup by progesterone; hence the uterus cannot sustain a pregnancy. It does not prevent fertilization or implantation, so technically it is an ABORTIFACIENT rather than a contraceptive.
- ^ Heikinheimo O (July 1997). "Clinical pharmacokinetics of mifepristone". Clin Pharmacokinet. 33 (1): 7–17. doi:10.2165/00003088-199733010-00002. PMID 9250420. S2CID 25101911.
- ^ Wang J, Chen J, Wan L, Shao J, Lu Y, Zhu Y, et al. (March 2014). "Synthesis, spectral characterization, and in vitro cellular activities of metapristone, a potential cancer metastatic chemopreventive agent derived from mifepristone (RU486)". AAPS J. 16 (2): 289–98. doi:10.1208/s12248-013-9559-2. PMC 3933578. PMID 24442753.
- ^ Baulieu EE, Rosenblum M (1991). The "abortion Pill": RU-486, a Woman's Choice. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-671-73816-7. Archived from the original on 29 June 2022. Retrieved 20 February 2022.
- ^ Schenker JG, Sciarra JJ, Mettler L, Genazzani AR, Birkhaeuser M (29 September 2018). Reproductive Medicine for Clinical Practice: Medical and Surgical Aspects. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-78009-2. Archived from the original on 29 June 2022. Retrieved 4 March 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Baulieu ÉÉ, Rosenblum M (1991). The "abortion pill": RU-486, a woman's choice. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-671-73816-7.
Lader L (1991). RU 486: the pill that could end the abortion wars and why American women don't have it. Reading: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-201-57069-4.
Villaran G (1998). "RU 486". In Schlegelmilch, Bodo B (eds.). Marketing ethics: an international perspective. London: Thomson Learning. pp. 155–190. ISBN 978-1-86152-191-0.
Ulmann A (2000). "The development of mifepristone: a pharmaceutical drama in three acts". Journal of the American Medical Women's Association. 55 (3 Suppl): 117–20. PMID 10846319. - ^ Teutsch G (November 1989). "RU 486 development". Science. 246 (4933): 985. doi:10.1126/science.2587990. PMID 2587990. S2CID 41144964.
Cherfas J (November 1989). "Dispute surfaces over paternity of RU 486". Science. 246 (4933): 994. Bibcode:1989Sci...246..994C. doi:10.1126/science.2587988. PMID 2587988.
Philibert D, Teutsch G (February 1990). "RU 486 development". Science. 247 (4943): 622. Bibcode:1990Sci...247..622P. doi:10.1126/science.2300819. PMID 2300819.
Ulmann A, Teutsch G, Philibert D (June 1990). "RU 486". Scientific American. Vol. 262, no. 6. pp. 42–8. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0690-42. PMID 2343294.
Teutsch G, Deraedt R, Philibert D (1993). "Mifepristone". In Lednicer D (ed.). Chronicles of drug discovery, Vol. 3. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. pp. 1–43. ISBN 978-0-8412-2523-7.
Teutsch G, Philibert D (June 1994). "History and perspectives of antiprogestins from the chemist's point of view". Human Reproduction. 9 (Suppl 1): 12–31. doi:10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.12. PMID 7962457.
Sittig M, ed. (2007). "Mifepristone". Pharmaceutical manufacturing encyclopedia (3rd ed.). Norwich, NY: William Andrew Publishing. pp. 2307–2310. ISBN 978-1-60119-339-1.
US 4386085, Teutsch JG, Costerousse G, Philibert D Deraedt R, "Novel steroids", issued 31 May 1983, assigned to Roussel Uclaf. - ^ Eder R (20 April 1982). "Birth control: 4-day pill is promising in early test". The New York Times. p. C1. Archived from the original on 25 June 2016.
Herrmann W, Wyss R, Riondel A, Philibert D, Teutsch G, Sakiz E, et al. (May 1982). "[The effects of an antiprogesterone steroid in women: interruption of the menstrual cycle and of early pregnancy]". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série III. 294 (18): 933–8. PMID 6814714. - ^ Kolata G (24 September 1988). "France and China allow sale of a drug for early abortion". The New York Times. p. A1. Archived from the original on 1 September 2017.
- ^ Greenhouse S (27 October 1988). "Drug maker stops all distribution of abortion pill". The New York Times. p. A1. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016.
- ^ Greenhouse S (29 October 1988). "France ordering company to sell its abortion drug". The New York Times. p. A1. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016.
- ^ Smith W (September 1991). "Great Britain second country to allow use of RU-486". Plan Parent Eur. 20 (2): 20. PMID 12284548.
- ^ "RU 486 licensed in Sweden". IPPF Med Bull. 26 (6): 6. December 1992. PMID 12346922.
- ^ Peyser A (2 July 1992). "Nazi link may keep RU-486 out". New York Post. pp. 5, 18.
- ^ a b Newman B (22 February 1993). "Drug dilemma: among those wary of abortion pill is maker's parent firm; Germany's Hoechst is facing pressure from Clinton to sell RU-486 in U.S.". The Wall Street Journal. p. A1.
"F.D.A. says company delays abortion pill". The New York Times. Associated Press. 16 April 1993. p. A14. Archived from the original on 3 August 2016.
Jouzaitis C (17 October 1994). "Abortion pill battle surprises French firm". Chicago Tribune. p. 1 (Business). Archived from the original on 18 February 2013. - ^ "The History of Mifepristone". Reproductive Health Access Project. 18 April 2023. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- ^ Bernstein S (5 November 2000). "Persistence Brought Abortion Pill to U.S." Los Angeles. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- ^ a b Seelye KQ (17 May 1994). "Accord opens way for abortion pill in U.S. in 2 years". The New York Times. p. A1. Archived from the original on 3 August 2016.
- ^ a b Simonds W, Ellertson C, Springer K, Winikoff B (May 1998). "Abortion, revised: participants in the U.S. clinical trials evaluate mifepristone". Social Science & Medicine. 46 (10): 1313–1323. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10063-6. PMID 9665563.
- ^ a b "DANCO LABORATORIES LIMITED v. The Washington Post Company, Intervenor-Appellant. (2000)". Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York. 27 July 2000. Retrieved 13 June 2024 – via caselaw.findlaw.com.
- ^ Kolata G (29 September 2000). "U.S. approves abortion pill; drug offers more privacy and could reshape debate". The New York Times. p. A1. Archived from the original on 4 August 2017.
- ^ Moore SD, Kamm T, Fleming C (11 December 1996). "Hoechst to seek rest of Roussel-Uclaf; expected $3.04 billion offer would add to the wave of drug-sector linkups". The Wall Street Journal. p. A3.
Marshall M (11 December 1996). "Hoechst offers to pay $3.6 billion for rest of Roussel". The Wall Street Journal. p. A8.
"Hoechst to buy rest of Roussel". The New York Times. Bloomberg News. 11 December 1996. p. D4. Archived from the original on 25 June 2016. - ^ "Pill for abortion ends production". The New York Times. Bloomberg News. 9 April 1997. p. D2. Archived from the original on 25 June 2016.
Jouzaitis C (9 April 1997). "Abortion pill maker bows to boycott heat; German firm gives up RU-486 patent; little impact likely in U.S." Chicago Tribune. p. 4. Archived from the original on 18 February 2013.
Lavin D (9 April 1997). "Hoechst will stop making abortion pill". The Wall Street Journal. p. A3.
"Roussel-Uclaf to transfer RU 486 rights". Reprod Freedom News. 6 (7): 8. 18 April 1997. PMID 12292550.
Dorozynski A (19 April 1997). "Boycott threat forces French company to abandon RU486". BMJ. 314 (7088): 1150. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7088.1145m. PMC 2126515. PMID 9146386. - ^ "ABORTION PILL'S U.S. SPONSOR SUING HUNGARIAN DRUG FIRM". The Washington Post. 12 June 1997. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- ^ a b c "List of mifepristone approval" (PDF). New York: Gynuity Health Projects. 4 November 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
"Map of mifepristone approval" (PDF). New York: Gynuity Health Projects. 4 November 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2010. - ^ North A (20 August 2019). "The first generic abortion pill just hit the US market. Here's what that means". Vox. Archived from the original on 13 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- ^ World Health Organization (2005). The selection and use of essential medicines : report of the WHO Expert Committee, 2005 : (including the 14th model list of essential medicines). Geneva: World Health Organization. hdl:10665/43292. ISBN 924120933X.
- ^ Hussein J, McCaw-Binns A, Webber R, eds. (2012). Maternal and perinatal health in developing countries. Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CABI. p. 104. ISBN 978-1-84593-746-1. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017.
- ^ Winikoff B, Sheldon W (September 2012). "Use of medicines changing the face of abortion". International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 38 (3): 164–6. doi:10.1363/3816412. PMID 23018138.
- ^ excluding Alabama, California, Connecticut, Washington, D.C., Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Wisconsin
- ^ Berg C, Cook DA, Gamble SB, Hall LR, Hamdan S, Parker WY, et al. (Division of Reproductive Health) (25 February 2011). "Abortion surveillance — United States, 2007" (PDF). MMWR Surveill Summ. 60 (1): 1–44. PMID 21346710. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 April 2011.
- ^ Jones RK, Kooistra K (March 2011). "Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008" (PDF). Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 43 (1): 41–50. doi:10.1363/4304111. PMID 21388504. S2CID 2045184. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 September 2011.
Stein R (11 January 2011). "Decline in U.S. abortion rate stalls". The Washington Post. p. A3. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. - ^ Fjerstad M, Trussell J, Sivin I, Lichtenberg ES, Cullins V (July 2009). "Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion". The New England Journal of Medicine. 361 (2): 145–51. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0809146. PMC 3568698. PMID 19587339.
Allday E (9 July 2009). "Change cuts infections linked to abortion pill". San Francisco Chronicle. p. A1. Archived from the original on 14 April 2020. Retrieved 29 June 2022. - ^ a b Jones RK, Jerman J (March 2017). "Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States 2014". Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 49–1 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1363/psrh.12015. PMC 5487028. PMID 28094905. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
- ^ "Medication Abortion". Guttmacher Institute. 26 April 2017. Archived from the original on 21 September 2021. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
- ^ Jones RK (24 February 2022). "Medication Abortion Now Accounts for More Than Half of All US Abortions". Guttmacher Institute. Archived from the original on 10 May 2022. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
- ^ Vilain A (December 2009). "Voluntary terminations of pregnancies in 2007" (PDF). DREES, Ministry of Health. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 March 2010. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
- ^ Department of Health (25 May 2010). "Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2009". Department of Health (United Kingdom). Archived from the original on 15 November 2010. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
- ^ ISD Scotland (25 May 2010). "Abortion Statistics, year ending December 2009". Information Services Division (ISD), NHS National Services Scotland. Archived from the original on 21 April 2010. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
- ^ National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden (12 May 2010). "Induced Abortions 2010" (PDF). National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
- ^ "FDA Approves Mifepristone for the Termination of Early Pregnancy". FDA. 2000. Archived from the original on 10 September 2006. Retrieved 27 April 2009.
- ^ "The abortion pill Mifegyne tested for adverse reactions". Danish Medicines Agency. 27 July 2005. Retrieved 20 September 2006. [dead link ]
- ^ "FDA approval letter for Mifepristone". FDA. 28 September 2000. Archived from the original on 16 November 2001. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- ^ "Medication Abortion in the United States: Mifepristone Fact Sheet" (PDF). Gynuity Health Projects. 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2007.
- ^ Klitsch M (November–December 1991). "Antiprogestins and the abortion controversy: a progress report". Fam Plann Perspect. 23 (6): 275–82. doi:10.2307/2135779. JSTOR 2135779. PMID 1786809.
- ^ Garcilazo M (2 July 1992). "U.S. Grabs Banned Abort Pill From an Activist here". New York Post. p. 5.
- ^ Gibbs N (2 October 2000). "The Pill Arrives". Cnn.com. Archived from the original on 6 October 2006. Retrieved 20 September 2006.
- ^ Lewin T (30 January 1995). "Clinical Trials Giving Glimpse of Abortion Pill". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 November 2007. Retrieved 20 September 2006.
- ^ Lewin T (13 November 1997). "Lawsuits' Settlement Brings New Hope for Abortion Pill". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 February 2007. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- ^ Lerner S (August 2000). "RU Pissed Off Yet?". The Village Voice. Archived from the original on 7 November 2006. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- ^ Danco Laboratories (29 March 2016). "Mifeprex prescribing information" (PDF). U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 March 2016.
- ^ American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (30 March 2016). "ACOG Statement on Medication Abortion". Washington, D.C.: ACOG. Archived from the original on 3 April 2016. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
- ^ "Postmarket Drug Safety Information for Patients and Providers". US Food & Drug Administration. 30 March 2016. Archived from the original on 3 April 2016. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
- ^ Millhauser I (13 January 2021). "The Supreme Court hands down its first anti-abortion decision of the Amy Coney Barrett era". Vox. Archived from the original on 13 January 2021. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
- ^ "FDA relaxes restrictions on abortion pill". NPR.org. Archived from the original on 17 December 2021. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
- ^ a b "Justice Dept.: Postal Service may deliver abortion pills in any state". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 4 January 2023. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
- ^ Whyte LE (3 January 2023). "Abortion Pills to Be Available More Widely Under New FDA Rules - Patients will be able to get the drug, called mifepristone, from bricks-and-mortar pharmacies". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 7 January 2023. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
- ^ Smith T (2 April 2024). "I Hope to Repeal an Arcane Law That Could Be Misused to Ban Abortion Nationwide". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 April 2024. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
- ^ Belluck P (25 January 2023). "New Lawsuit Challenges State Bans on Abortion Pills". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 January 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
- ^ Grossi P, O'Connor D (2023). "FDA preemption of conflicting state drug regulation and the looming battle over abortion medications". The Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 10 (1): lsad005. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsad005. PMC 10017072. PMID 36938304.
- ^ Horti S (18 March 2023). "Abortion pills banned in Wyoming as Texas judge considers nationwide decision". BBC News Online. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023. Retrieved 1 April 2023.
- ^ "Wyoming Becomes First State to Outlaw the Use of Pills for Abortion". The New York Times. 18 March 2023. Archived from the original on 2 April 2023. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
- ^ "Judge in Washington orders feds to keep abortion pill access". Associated Press. 7 April 2023. Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
- ^ Ables K, Rosenzweig-Ziff D (8 April 2023). "Who is Thomas Rice, the Washington judge who ruled mifepristone is safe?". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
- ^ Wax-Thibodeaux E (13 May 2024). "Louisiana moves to make abortion pills 'controlled dangerous substances'". The Washington Post. Retrieved 13 May 2024.
- ^ McGill K (24 May 2024). "Louisiana governor signs bill making two abortion drugs controlled dangerous substances". Associated Press. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ Belluck P (7 April 2023). "Texas Judge Invalidates FDA Approval of the Abortion Pill Mifepristone". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 7 April 2023.
- ^ Sherman M (13 June 2024). "Unanimous Supreme Court preserves access to widely used abortion medication". Associated Press. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- ^ Hurley L (13 June 2024). "Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill". NBC News. Retrieved 13 June 2024.
- ^ Food and Drug Administration et al. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al., 602 U.S. 23-235 (United States Supreme Court 13 June 2004).
- ^ Woodcock J (12 May 2006). "Testimony on RU-486". Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives. FDA. Archived from the original on 27 September 2006. Retrieved 19 August 2006.
- ^ Christin-Maitre S, Bouchard P, Spitz IM (March 2000). "Medical termination of pregnancy". The New England Journal of Medicine. 342 (13): 946–56. doi:10.1056/NEJM200003303421307. PMID 10738054.
- ^ Stojnić J, Ljubić A, Jeremić K, Radunović N, Tulić I, Bosković V, et al. (June 2006). "[Medicamentous abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Serbia and Montenegro]". Vojnosanitetski Pregled. 63 (6): 558–63. doi:10.2298/VSP0606558S. PMID 16796021.
- ^ "List of Mifepristone Approvals". Gynuity Health Projects. March 2017. Archived from the original on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 28 September 2017.
- ^ "Abortion pill approved in Italy". BBC News. 31 July 2009. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 31 July 2009.
- ^ "Abortion pill sparks bitter protest". The Budapest Times. 19 September 2005. Archived from the original on 11 January 2007. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- ^ Hoey AM (20 December 2018). "Medicines for Termination of Pregnancy Services" (PDF). Health Service Executive. Primary Care Reimbursement Service. Dublin, Ireland. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 April 2022. Retrieved 28 June 2022.
- ^ Green PS (24 June 2003). "A Rocky Landfall for a Dutch Abortion Boat". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 February 2007. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- ^ Linepharma (7 November 2014). "Mifepristone Linepharma Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)" (PDF). London: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 June 2016. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
- ^ Sun Pharmaceuticals (4 March 2015). "Medabon Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)" (PDF). London: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 June 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ "Marie Stopes International Australia – Medical Abortion". 2010. Archived from the original on 22 November 2010. Retrieved 15 December 2010.
- ^ "Abortion pill – RU486 (mifepristone)". Better Health Channel Victoria. July 2010. Archived from the original on 14 August 2010. Retrieved 15 December 2010.
- ^ MS Health (24 December 2014). "Mifepristone Linepharma (MS-2 Step) 200 mg tablet product information". Symonston, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Therapeutic Goods Administration. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ "Mifepristone (Mifepristone Linepharma) followed by misoprostol (GyMiso) for terminating early pregnancy". NPS MedicineWise. 16 February 2015. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ Sparrow MJ (April 2004). "A woman's choice". The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 44 (2): 88–92. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00190.x. PMID 15089829. S2CID 27365359.
- ^ Baulieu EE, Seidman DS, Hajri S (October 2001). "Mifepristone (RU486) and voluntary termination of pregnancy: enigmatic variations or anecdotal religion-based attitudes?". Human Reproduction. 16 (10): 2243–4. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.10.2243. PMID 11574524.
- ^ Ulmann A (2000). "The development of mifepristone: a pharmaceutical drama in three acts". J Am Med Women's Assoc. 55 (3 Suppl): 117–20. PMID 10846319.
- ^ Wu S (2000). "Medical abortion in China". J Am Med Women's Assoc. 55 (3 Suppl): 197–9, 204. PMID 10846339.
- ^ "Family planning in China: RU-486, abortion, and population trends". U.S. Embassy Beijing. 2000. Archived from the original on 11 March 2002. Retrieved 14 September 2006.
- ^ Tsai EM, Yang CH, Lee JN (2002). "Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: a clinical trial in Taiwanese women". J Formos Med Assoc. 101 (4): 277–82. PMID 12101864.
- ^ Ganatra B, Bygdeman M, Nguyen DV, Vu ML, Phan BT (2004). "From research to reality: the challenges of introducing medical abortion into service delivery in Vietnam". Reprod Health Matters. 12 (24): 105–13. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24022-8. PMID 15938163. S2CID 23303852.
- ^ "Medical Abortion-Implications for Africa". Ipas. 2003. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 16 September 2006.
- ^ Hajri S (2004). "Medication abortion: the Tunisian experience". Afr J Reprod Health. 8 (1): 63–9. doi:10.2307/3583307. hdl:1807/3883. JSTOR 3583307. PMID 15487615.
- ^ "Mifepristone can be sold only to approved MTP Centres: Rajasthan State HRC". Indian Express Health Care Management. 2000. Archived from the original on 24 January 2012.
- ^ "Results of the Canadian trials of RU486, the 'Abortion Pill". Archived from the original on 21 June 2006. Retrieved 8 December 2006.
- ^ "RU-486 abortion pill approved by Health Canada". Archived from the original on 31 July 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
- ^ "Health Canada eases restrictions on abortion pill Mifegymiso". CBC News. Archived from the original on 8 May 2018. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
- ^ "Medication Abortion". Ibis. 2002. Archived from the original on 4 November 2006. Retrieved 19 September 2006.
- ^ a b Trussell J, Cleland K (13 February 2013). "Dedicated emergency contraceptive pills worldwide" (PDF). Princeton: Office of Population Research, Princeton University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ a b "EC pill types and countries of availability, by brand". New York: International Consortium for Emergency Contraception. 2016. Archived from the original on 5 April 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ a b Trussell J, Raymond E (March 2016). "Emergency Contraception: A Last Chance to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy" (PDF). Princeton: Office of Population Research, Princeton University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 September 2010. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
- ^ Cunningham PC, McCoy L, Ferguson CD (28 February 1995). "Citizen Petition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration". Americans United for Life. Archived from the original on 3 October 2006. Retrieved 20 September 2006.
- ^ Talbot M (11 July 1999). "The Little White Bombshell". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 August 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2006.
- ^ "Abortion Foes to Boycott Drugs (Altace) Made By RU-486 Manufacturer". The Virginia Pilot. 8 July 1994. Archived from the original on 20 February 2008. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
- ^ Guthrie S (11 June 2001). "Counteroffensive Launched on RU-486". Christianity Today. Archived from the original on 20 September 2006. Retrieved 20 September 2006.
- ^ Kolata G (24 September 2003). "Death at 18 Spurs Debate Over a Pill For Abortion". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 August 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2006.
- ^ Allen JL (12 February 1999). "Abortion debates rock Germany: introduction of abortion pill exacerbates controversy". National Catholic Reporter. Archived from the original on 28 May 2005. Retrieved 14 September 2006.
- ^ "Catholic and Evangelical students join Muslims in RU-486 fight". Catholic News. 9 February 2006. Archived from the original on 27 October 2006. Retrieved 18 September 2006.
- ^ "Death Toll Rises to 11 Women". Australians Against RU-486. 2006. Archived from the original on 20 August 2006. Retrieved 20 September 2006.
- ^ Supreme Court Rejects Abortion Pill Challenge, Preserving Wide Access to Drug by Laura Kusisto and Jess Bravin in the Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2024.
- ^ Hazra BG, Pore VS (2001). "Mifepristone (RU-486), the recently developed antiprogesterone drug and its analogues". J Indian Inst Sci. 81: 287–298.
- ^ Clark K, Ji H, Feltovich H, Janowski J, Carroll C, Chien EK (May 2006). "Mifepristone-induced cervical ripening: structural, biomechanical, and molecular events". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 194 (5): 1391–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.026. PMID 16647925.
- ^ Taplin ME, Manola J, Oh WK, Kantoff PW, Bubley GJ, Smith M, et al. (2008). "A phase II study of mifepristone (RU-486) in castration-resistant prostate cancer, with a correlative assessment of androgen-related hormones". BJU Int. 101 (9): 1084–9. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07509.x. PMID 18399827. S2CID 205538600.
- ^ "Mifepristone - Corcept Therapeutics - AdisInsight". Archived from the original on 27 December 2017. Retrieved 27 December 2017.
- ^ Flexner C (December 2007). "HIV drug development: the next 25 years". Nat Rev Drug Discov. 6 (12): 959–66. doi:10.1038/nrd2336. PMID 17932493. S2CID 31261997.
- ^ Tang OS, Ho PC (2006). "Clinical applications of mifepristone". Gynecol Endocrinol. 22 (12): 655–9. doi:10.1080/09513590601005946. PMID 17162706. S2CID 23295715.
- ^ Belanoff JK, Flores BH, Kalezhan M, Sund B, Schatzberg AF (October 2001). "Rapid reversal of psychotic depression using mifepristone". Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 21 (5): 516–21. doi:10.1097/00004714-200110000-00009. PMID 11593077. S2CID 3067889.
- ^ a b Howland RH (June 2013). "Mifepristone as a therapeutic agent in psychiatry". Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 51 (6): 11–4. doi:10.3928/02793695-20130513-01. PMID 23814820.
- ^ Gard D (7 May 2014). "Corcept tanks as depression drug comes up short in Phase III". Fierce Biotech. Archived from the original on 2 March 2016.
- ^ Soria V, González-Rodríguez A, Huerta-Ramos E, Usall J, Cobo J, Bioque M, et al. (July 2018). "Targeting hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones and sex steroids for improving cognition in major mood disorders and schizophrenia: a systematic review and narrative synthesis". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 93: 8–19. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.012. PMID 29680774. S2CID 5041081.
- ^ Bou Khalil R, Souaiby L, Farès N (March 2017). "The importance of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis as a therapeutic target in anorexia nervosa". Physiology & Behavior. 171: 13–20. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.12.035. PMID 28043861. S2CID 6329552.
External links
[edit]- Map and list of mifepristone approvals by year Archived 29 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine
- Abortifacients
- Alkyne derivatives
- Anilines
- Antiglucocorticoids
- Antiprogestogens
- CYP3A4 inhibitors
- CYP17A1 inhibitors
- Estranes
- French inventions
- Methods of abortion
- Pregnane X receptor agonists
- Selective progesterone receptor modulators
- Serotonin reuptake inhibitors
- Steroidal antiandrogens
- World Health Organization essential medicines