Talk:Rigid constitution: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
AtagoKohun (talk | contribs) →about Wikidata: new section |
Gnomingstuff (talk | contribs) rv test edits |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=| |
|||
{{WP Law}} }} |
|||
== about Wikidata == |
== about Wikidata == |
||
| Line 4: | Line 7: | ||
[[Entrenched clause]] are confused with this article. |
[[Entrenched clause]] are confused with this article. |
||
--[[User:AtagoKohun|AtagoKohun]] ([[User talk:AtagoKohun|talk]]) 14:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC) |
--[[User:AtagoKohun|AtagoKohun]] ([[User talk:AtagoKohun|talk]]) 14:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Ten years after! There are several articles which refer to "entrenched constitution" but no article or redirect with that term. We do have [[entrenchment clause]], which redirects to [[entrenched clause]], and the "warning" (right in this section of the talk page) that [[entrenched clause]] should be distinguished from [[rigid constitution]]. |
|||
:I suggest that these are really all variations on the same concept (i.e. a provision that demands an extraordinary process in order to make a change) and that these are best handled in a single article, e.g. ''Entrenchment provision'', replacing the existing "entrenched clause" and "rigid constitution" articles. Looking for feedback. [[User:Fabrickator|Fabrickator]] ([[User talk:Fabrickator|talk]]) 21:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:25, 20 December 2024
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
about Wikidata
[edit]I am planning to edit wikidata, Entrenched clause are confused with this article. --AtagoKohun (talk) 14:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ten years after! There are several articles which refer to "entrenched constitution" but no article or redirect with that term. We do have entrenchment clause, which redirects to entrenched clause, and the "warning" (right in this section of the talk page) that entrenched clause should be distinguished from rigid constitution.
- I suggest that these are really all variations on the same concept (i.e. a provision that demands an extraordinary process in order to make a change) and that these are best handled in a single article, e.g. Entrenchment provision, replacing the existing "entrenched clause" and "rigid constitution" articles. Looking for feedback. Fabrickator (talk) 21:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)