Minimal prime ideal: Difference between revisions
oops.. |
No edit summary |
||
(53 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[mathematics]], especially in |
In [[mathematics]], especially in [[commutative algebra]], certain [[prime ideal]]s called '''minimal prime ideals''' play an important role in understanding [[ring (mathematics)|rings]] and [[module (mathematics)|modules]]. The notion of [[height (ring theory)|height]] and [[Krull's principal ideal theorem]] use minimal prime ideals. |
||
==Definition== |
==Definition== |
||
A prime ideal ''P'' is said to be a '''minimal prime ideal''' over an ideal ''I'' if it is minimal among all prime ideals containing ''I''. (Note |
A prime ideal ''P'' is said to be a '''minimal prime ideal''' over an ideal ''I'' if it is minimal among all prime ideals containing ''I''. (Note: if ''I'' is a prime ideal, then ''I'' is the only minimal prime over it.) A prime ideal is said to be a '''minimal prime ideal''' if it is a minimal prime ideal over the [[zero ideal]]. |
||
A minimal prime ideal over an ideal ''I'' in a ring ''R'' is precisely a minimal [[associated prime]] (also called isolated prime) of <math> |
A minimal prime ideal over an ideal ''I'' in a [[Noetherian ring]] ''R'' is precisely a minimal [[associated prime]] (also called isolated prime) of <math>R/I</math>; this follows for instance from the [[primary decomposition]] of ''I''. |
||
==Examples== |
==Examples== |
||
* In a commutative [[ |
* In a commutative [[Artinian ring]], every [[maximal ideal]] is a minimal prime ideal. |
||
* In an [[integral domain]], the only minimal prime ideal is the zero ideal. |
* In an [[integral domain]], the only minimal prime ideal is the zero ideal. |
||
* In the ring '''Z''' of [[integer]]s, the minimal prime ideals over a nonzero [[principal ideal]] (''n'') are the principal ideals (''p''), where ''p'' is a prime divisor of ''n''. The only minimal prime ideal over the zero ideal is the zero ideal itself. Similar statements hold for any [[principal ideal domain]]. |
* In the ring '''Z''' of [[integer]]s, the minimal prime ideals over a nonzero [[principal ideal]] (''n'') are the principal ideals (''p''), where ''p'' is a prime divisor of ''n''. The only minimal prime ideal over the zero ideal is the zero ideal itself. Similar statements hold for any [[principal ideal domain]]. |
||
* If ''I'' is a ''p''-[[primary ideal]] (for example, a power of ''p''), then ''p'' is the unique minimal prime ideal over ''I''. |
* If ''I'' is a ''p''-[[primary ideal]] (for example, a [[symbolic power of an ideal | symbolic power]] of ''p''), then ''p'' is the unique minimal prime ideal over ''I''. |
||
* The ideals <math>(x)</math> and <math>(y)</math> are the minimal prime ideals in <math>\mathbb{C}[x,y]/(xy)</math> since they are the [[Extension and contraction of ideals|extension]] of prime ideals for the morphism <math>\mathbb{C}[x,y] \to \mathbb{C}[x,y]/(xy)</math>, contain the zero ideal (which is not prime since <math>x\cdot y = 0 \in (0)</math>, but, neither <math>x</math> nor <math>y</math> are contained in the zero ideal) and are not contained in any other prime ideal. |
|||
* In <math>\mathbb{C}[x,y,z]</math> the minimal primes over the ideal <math>((x^3 - y^3 - z^3)^4 (x^5 + y^5 + z^5)^3)</math> are the ideals <math>(x^3 - y^3 - z^3)</math> and <math>(x^5 + y^5 + z^5)</math>. |
|||
* Let <math>A = \mathbb{C}[x,y]/(x^3 y, x y^3)</math> and <math>\overline{x}, \overline{y}</math> the images of ''x'', ''y'' in ''A''. Then <math>(\overline{x})</math> and <math>(\overline{y})</math> are the minimal prime ideals of ''A'' (and there are no others). Let <math>D</math> be the set of zero-divisors in ''A''. Then <math>\overline{x} + \overline{y}</math> is in ''D'' (since it kills nonzero <math>\overline{x}^2 \overline{y} - \overline{x}\overline{y}^2</math>) while neither in <math>(\overline{x})</math> nor <math>(\overline{y})</math>; so <math>(\overline{x}) \cup (\overline{y}) \subsetneq D</math>. |
|||
==Properties== |
==Properties== |
||
All rings are assumed to be [[unit ring|unital]]. |
All rings are assumed to be commutative and [[unit ring|unital]]. |
||
* Every [[proper ideal]] ''I'' in a |
* Every [[proper ideal]] ''I'' in a ring has at least one minimal prime ideal above it. The proof of this fact uses [[Zorn's lemma]].<ref>{{harvnb|Kaplansky|1974|p=6}}</ref> Any [[maximal ideal]] containing ''I'' is prime, and such ideals exist, so the set of prime ideals containing ''I'' is non-empty. The intersection of a decreasing chain of prime ideals is prime. Therefore, the set of prime ideals containing ''I'' has a minimal element, which is a minimal prime over ''I''. |
||
* [[Emmy Noether]] showed that in a |
* [[Emmy Noether]] showed that in a [[Noetherian ring]], there are only finitely many minimal prime ideals over any given ideal.<ref>{{harvnb|Kaplansky|1974|p=59}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Eisenbud|1995|p=47}}</ref> The fact remains true if "Noetherian" is replaced by the [[ascending chain conditions on radical ideals]]. |
||
* The [[Radical of an ideal|radical]] <math>\sqrt{I}</math> of any proper ideal ''I'' coincides with the intersection of the minimal prime ideals over ''I''. |
* The [[Radical of an ideal|radical]] <math>\sqrt{I}</math> of any proper ideal ''I'' coincides with the intersection of the minimal prime ideals over ''I''. This follows from the fact that every prime ideal contains a minimal prime ideal. |
||
* The set of [[zero divisor]]s of a given |
* The set of [[zero divisor]]s of a given ring contains the union of the minimal prime ideals.<ref>{{harvnb|Kaplansky|1974|p=57}}</ref> |
||
* [[Krull's |
* [[Krull's principal ideal theorem]] says that, in a Noetherian ring, each minimal prime over a principal ideal has height at most one. |
||
* Each proper ideal ''I'' of a Noetherian ring contains a product of the possibly repeated minimal prime ideals over it (Proof: <math>\sqrt{I} = \bigcap_i^r \mathfrak{p}_i</math> is the intersection of the minimal prime ideals over ''I''. For some ''n'', <math>\sqrt{I}^n \subset I</math> and so ''I'' contains <math>\prod_1^r \mathfrak{p}_i^n</math>.) |
|||
* A prime ideal <math>\mathfrak{p}</math> in a ring ''R'' is a unique minimal prime over an ideal ''I'' if and only if <math>\sqrt{I} = \mathfrak{p}</math>, and such an ''I'' is <math>\mathfrak{p}</math>-primary if <math>\mathfrak{p}</math> is maximal. This gives a local criterion for a minimal prime: a prime ideal <math>\mathfrak{p}</math> is a minimal prime over ''I'' if and only if <math>I R_{\mathfrak{p}}</math> is a <math>\mathfrak{p} R_{\mathfrak{p}}</math>-primary ideal. When ''R'' is a Noetherian ring, <math>\mathfrak{p}</math> is a minimal prime over ''I'' if and only if <math>R_{\mathfrak{p}}/I R_{\mathfrak{p}}</math> is an [[Artinian ring]] (i.e., <math>\mathfrak{p} R_{\mathfrak{p}}</math> is nilpotent module ''I''). The pre-image of <math>I R_{\mathfrak{p}}</math> under <math>R \to R_{\mathfrak{p}}</math> is a primary ideal of <math>R</math> called the <math>\mathfrak{p}</math>-[[primary component]] of ''I''. |
|||
* When <math>A</math> is Noetherian [[local ring|local]], with maximal ideal <math>P</math>, <math>P\supseteq I</math> is minimal over <math>I</math> if and only if there exists a number <math>m</math> such that <math>P^m\subseteq I</math>. |
|||
== Equidimensional ring == |
|||
⚫ | |||
For a minimal prime ideal <math>\mathfrak{p}</math> in a local ring <math>A</math>, in general, it need not be the case that <math>\dim A/\mathfrak{p} = \dim A</math>, the [[Krull dimension]] of <math>A</math>.<!-- It is not trivial to give a counterexample; one has to consider a non-catenary ring, I think.--> |
|||
A Noetherian local ring <math>A</math> is said to be '''equidimensional''' if for each minimal prime ideal <math>\mathfrak{p}</math>, <math>\dim A/\mathfrak{p} = \dim A</math>. For example, a local Noetherian [[integral domain]] and a local [[Cohen–Macaulay ring]] are equidimensional. |
|||
{{Refimprove|date=March 2008}} |
|||
See also [[equidimensional scheme]] and [[quasi-unmixed ring]]. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== See also == |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[ |
* [[Extension and contraction of ideals]] |
||
* [[Normal scheme#The normalization|Normalization]] |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Abstract-algebra-stub}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
==Further reading== |
|||
* http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/035E |
|||
* http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/035P |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Prime ideals]] |
Latest revision as of 15:29, 6 February 2024
In mathematics, especially in commutative algebra, certain prime ideals called minimal prime ideals play an important role in understanding rings and modules. The notion of height and Krull's principal ideal theorem use minimal prime ideals.
Definition
[edit]A prime ideal P is said to be a minimal prime ideal over an ideal I if it is minimal among all prime ideals containing I. (Note: if I is a prime ideal, then I is the only minimal prime over it.) A prime ideal is said to be a minimal prime ideal if it is a minimal prime ideal over the zero ideal.
A minimal prime ideal over an ideal I in a Noetherian ring R is precisely a minimal associated prime (also called isolated prime) of ; this follows for instance from the primary decomposition of I.
Examples
[edit]- In a commutative Artinian ring, every maximal ideal is a minimal prime ideal.
- In an integral domain, the only minimal prime ideal is the zero ideal.
- In the ring Z of integers, the minimal prime ideals over a nonzero principal ideal (n) are the principal ideals (p), where p is a prime divisor of n. The only minimal prime ideal over the zero ideal is the zero ideal itself. Similar statements hold for any principal ideal domain.
- If I is a p-primary ideal (for example, a symbolic power of p), then p is the unique minimal prime ideal over I.
- The ideals and are the minimal prime ideals in since they are the extension of prime ideals for the morphism , contain the zero ideal (which is not prime since , but, neither nor are contained in the zero ideal) and are not contained in any other prime ideal.
- In the minimal primes over the ideal are the ideals and .
- Let and the images of x, y in A. Then and are the minimal prime ideals of A (and there are no others). Let be the set of zero-divisors in A. Then is in D (since it kills nonzero ) while neither in nor ; so .
Properties
[edit]All rings are assumed to be commutative and unital.
- Every proper ideal I in a ring has at least one minimal prime ideal above it. The proof of this fact uses Zorn's lemma.[1] Any maximal ideal containing I is prime, and such ideals exist, so the set of prime ideals containing I is non-empty. The intersection of a decreasing chain of prime ideals is prime. Therefore, the set of prime ideals containing I has a minimal element, which is a minimal prime over I.
- Emmy Noether showed that in a Noetherian ring, there are only finitely many minimal prime ideals over any given ideal.[2][3] The fact remains true if "Noetherian" is replaced by the ascending chain conditions on radical ideals.
- The radical of any proper ideal I coincides with the intersection of the minimal prime ideals over I. This follows from the fact that every prime ideal contains a minimal prime ideal.
- The set of zero divisors of a given ring contains the union of the minimal prime ideals.[4]
- Krull's principal ideal theorem says that, in a Noetherian ring, each minimal prime over a principal ideal has height at most one.
- Each proper ideal I of a Noetherian ring contains a product of the possibly repeated minimal prime ideals over it (Proof: is the intersection of the minimal prime ideals over I. For some n, and so I contains .)
- A prime ideal in a ring R is a unique minimal prime over an ideal I if and only if , and such an I is -primary if is maximal. This gives a local criterion for a minimal prime: a prime ideal is a minimal prime over I if and only if is a -primary ideal. When R is a Noetherian ring, is a minimal prime over I if and only if is an Artinian ring (i.e., is nilpotent module I). The pre-image of under is a primary ideal of called the -primary component of I.
- When is Noetherian local, with maximal ideal , is minimal over if and only if there exists a number such that .
Equidimensional ring
[edit]For a minimal prime ideal in a local ring , in general, it need not be the case that , the Krull dimension of .
A Noetherian local ring is said to be equidimensional if for each minimal prime ideal , . For example, a local Noetherian integral domain and a local Cohen–Macaulay ring are equidimensional.
See also equidimensional scheme and quasi-unmixed ring.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Kaplansky 1974, p. 6
- ^ Kaplansky 1974, p. 59
- ^ Eisenbud 1995, p. 47
- ^ Kaplansky 1974, p. 57
References
[edit]- Eisenbud, David (1995), Commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5350-1, ISBN 978-0-387-94268-1, MR 1322960
- Kaplansky, Irving (1974), Commutative rings, University of Chicago Press, MR 0345945