Jump to content

User talk:IntoThinAir: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 33) (bot
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes|}}
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes|}}
{{Atschool|type=college}}
{{User talk}}
{{User talk}}
{{Archive basics
{{Archive basics
|archive = User talk:Jinkinson/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive %(counter)d
|counter = 18
|counter = 19
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(31d)
| algo = old(31d)
| archive = User talk:Jinkinson/Archive %(counter)d
| archive = User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 18
| counter = 33
| maxarchivesize = 70K
| maxarchivesize = 70K
| archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
| archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
Line 15: Line 14:
| minthreadsleft = 4
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
}}
{{Notice|I am not an admin. Please do not ask me to delete, restore or protect pages as I cannot do so. This also means that if you are here because you think I deleted an article you created, you are mistaken--I just tagged it for deletion. Instead, check the deletion log to find out who the deleting admin was and contact them. You are free to ask me why I tagged it, though. On an unrelated note, if you want to put a template on this page, read [[WP:DTTR]] before doing so.}}
'''I am not an admin. Please do not ask me to delete, restore or protect pages as I cannot do so.'''


== New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022 ==


Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
==Please see my response to your contested deletion==
[[File:New page reviewer of the year cup.svg|thumb|right|120px]]
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination/2022 WMF letter|open letter]] finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-09-30/In focus|current issue of ''The Signpost'']]. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.


'''Awards''': Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to {{Noping|MPGuy2824}}), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to {{no ping|John B123}} for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Awards|Awards page]]. Check out the new [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Awards#NPP_Hall_of_Fame|Hall of Fame]] also.
Hello, I'm Tc8585. You flagged my post for deletion and I have responded to you on the page's talk page. Please see my comments. And please let me know what I can do to unflag my post. I think this is an important resource for an unique organization. Please note the strong educational side of this organization. And also please note that I am still figuring out how to be eloquent here. Thank you for your help.
'''Software news''': {{Noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{Noping|MPGuy2824}} have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently [[Wikipedia:Page_Curation/Suggested_improvements/Phab_tickets#Closed_tickets|here]]. The [[Wikipedia:Database_reports/Top_new_article_reviewers|reviewer report]] has also been improved.
[[File:2022-10-16 NPP backlog chart.jpg|thumb|450px|right|NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022]]
'''Suggestions''':
*There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
*Reminder: ''an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more.'' (from the [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol#Care|NPP tutorial]])
*Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
*This [[User:Lourdes/PageCuration|user script]] puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.


'''Backlog''':[[File:Everlasting Fireworks looped.gif|80px|left]] Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/October 2022|October backlog drive]] to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
[[User:Tc8585|Tc8585]] ([[User talk:Tc8585|talk]]) 23:13, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Tc8585
{{-}}
{{refbegin}}
;Reminders
*Newsletter feedback - please take this [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Newsletter|short poll]] about the newsletter.
*If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the [https://discordapp.com/invite/heF3xPu New Page Patrol Discord], where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
*Please add [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] to your watchlist.
*If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions|PERM]].
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]].
{{refend}}
<!-- Drafted by User:MB -->
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1114894896 -->


== New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023 ==
== Seralini ==


<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
In regards to your reversion of my edit. I dug a bit deeper. Well basically your revision is more correct than mine, but not exactly correct.
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
[[File:Npp backlog 2022-Dec.jpg|thumb|400px|New Page Review queue December 2022]]
;Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to {{noping|WaddlesJP13}} who led with 2084 points. See [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/October 2022|this page]] for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
;2022 Awards
[[File:New page reviewer of the year cup.svg|74px|left]]
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Rosguill}} led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Awards|Awards page]] and the [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Awards#NPP_Hall_of_Fame|Hall of Fame]]. Congratulations everyone!


'''Minimum deletion time''': The previous [[WP:NPP]] guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and [[WP:BLAR]]). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the [[Special:NewPagesFeed|feed]] are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
There was the first peer review. Went through that and was published. Then due to outside pressure, a very rare second peer review. Went through that no problem. Then the publisher, again under pressure after the post hoc reviews, retracted the study. Then the paper was submitted to a new publisher. (4 journals volunteered to republish but ESE was chosen due to it being open access) That publisher hired 3 "reviewers" to review what had already been peer reviewed twice and passed. Those three "reviewers" basically were only looking for fraud though, since the paper had already been peer reviewed twice and they found no fraud or significant changes, they recommended that there was no need for a full formal "peer review" by a third team.


'''New draftify script''': In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly [[Help:Unreviewed new page|explanation page]]. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your [[Special:MyPage/common.js|common.js]] or vector.js file from <code>User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js</code> to <code>User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js</code>'''
So in a way both versions of the story are correct, yet both are a bit slanted to produce bias. ESE did "review" as they do peer review all the studies they publish. But the 3 member review they did was not exactly what would be considered a formal "peer review" in the traditional sense, due to the unique circumstances. That 3rd review was more checking to see if the first two reviews was sufficient or if Seralini had fudged any raw data or any changes like that in the new version submitted for republishing. They found that the original peer reviews were competent, and no need to go through the full formal process again.


'''Redirects''': Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirects|this guide]], [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol#Redirect_checklist|this checklist]], and spend some time at [[WP:RFD]].
I have no axe to grind here though. Since technically the third review was not exactly a "peer review" in the traditional meaning, the version you produced is closer to the truth. So I am going to leave that alone. The one thing the article needs though is an update that includes this information. ''Conflicts of interests, confidentiality and censorship in health risk assessment: the example of an herbicide and a GMO'' http://www.enveurope.com/content/26/1/13 Which was published as commentary at the same time as the republishing. I'll let you add that though. I don't want to start an edit war on an obviously controversial page.[[User:Redddbaron|Redddbaron]] ([[User talk:Redddbaron|talk]]) 10:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


'''Discussions with the WMF''' The [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination/2022 WMF letter|PageTriage open letter]] signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted [[gerrit:q/repo:mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage+is:merged+NOT+author:Libraryupgrader+NOT+author:L10n-bot+before:2022-12-31|dozens of patches]] in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as {{noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{noping|MPGuy2824}} have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also [[Wikipedia talk:Growth Team features#Meeting details|had a video conference]] with the NPP coordinators to discuss [[User:Novem Linguae/Drafts/New landing page proposal|revamping the landing pages]] that new users see.
== Thanks, and a question ==


{{refbegin}}
Thanks for adding a category to that Philosophia (journal) stub. I only found it by accident when I started working on an article for philoSOPHIA. Do you know much about how to handle problems with lowercase title publications? [[User:Lightbreather|Lightbreather]] ([[User talk:Lightbreather|talk]]) 19:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
;Reminders
:I think it is covered here: [[Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(technical_restrictions)#Lowercase_first_letter]] [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="red">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] 21:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
*Newsletter feedback - please take this [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Newsletter|short poll]] about the newsletter.
::Thanks, I tried that, but it didn't work. Still, thanks. [[User:Lightbreather|Lightbreather]] ([[User talk:Lightbreather|talk]]) 21:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
*There is live chat with patrollers on the [https://discordapp.com/invite/heF3xPu New Page Patrol Discord].
*Please add [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] to your watchlist.
*If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions|PERM]].
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]].
{{refend}}
<!-- Drafted by User:MB, Reviewed by Novem Linguae, Kudpung -->
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1130464022 -->
</div>
== New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023 ==


<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
== Sockpuppet investigations listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per [[H:DL]], causes errors for screen readers -->
[[File:Information.svg|40px|left]]
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Sockpuppet investigations]]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Sockpuppet investigations'' redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 September 12#Sockpuppet investigations|the redirect discussion]] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 09:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
[[File:NPP April-June 2023 backlog.svg|thumb|400px|New Page Review queue April to June 2023]]
'''Backlog'''


'''Redirect drive''': In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with '''23851''' reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to '''0''' (momentarily). Congratulations to {{Noping|Hey man im josh}} who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by {{noping|Meena}} and {{noping|Greyzxq}} with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2023|this page]] for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
== Hi ==
I do not want [[Charge(game)]] to be deleted.I shall improve my article if that is what has to be done.I erased the two sources that is unacceptable.Please help me to stop this page being deleted.
:OK, so what you need to do is find independent, [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that discuss the game in depth and add them to the article. If you can find such sources and add a substantial number of them, I (or maybe someone else) will remove the prod tag. [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="red">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] 01:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much.


'''Redirect autopatrol''': All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list#Requests|here]].
== Article for deletion ==


'''WMF work on PageTriage''': The [[mw:Moderator Tools|WMF Moderator Tools team]], consisting of {{noping|Samwalton9 (WMF)|label1=Sam|JSherman (WMF)|label2=Jason|SCardenas (WMF)|label3=Susana}}, and also some patches from {{noping|Jon (WMF)|label1=Jon}}, has been hard at work [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/2023 Moderator Tools project|updating PageTriage]]. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in [[beta test]] where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of [[Special:NewPagesFeed]], to help find bugs. We will post more details at [[WT:NPPR]] when we are ready for beta testers.


'''Articles for Creation (AFC)''': All new page reviewers are now '''automatically approved''' for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at [[WT:AFCP]] like was required previously). To install the [[WP:AFCH|AFC helper script]], visit [[Special:Preferences]], visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit [[Special:NewPagesFeed]], and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
I do not want this article to be deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadeem_Bhabha . I would like to improve it and trying to improve it. Please help me to improve the article by suggesting what to remove from the previous information.


You can review the AFC workflow at [[WP:AFCR]]. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that [[WP:DRAFTOBJECT|draftspace is optional]], so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
thanks
[[User:Nadeembahoo|Nadeembahoo]] ([[User talk:Nadeembahoo|talk]]) 15:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
:You need to find independent reliable sources that discuss Nadeem Bhabha in detail. Also, if you are Nadeem Bhabha you probably shouldn't edit the page yourself, so instead, add links to these sources on the article's talk page and propose they be added to the article. [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="red">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] 16:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Disappearance of Hannah Graham]] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Disappearance of Hannah Graham]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].


'''Pro tip''': Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own [[WP:SNG|SNG]]? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is [[WP:ARTIST]] 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Hannah Graham ]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.


{{refbegin}}
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 06:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
'''Reminders'''
*Newsletter feedback - please take this [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Newsletter|short poll]] about the newsletter.
*There is live chat with patrollers on the [https://discordapp.com/invite/heF3xPu New Page Patrol Discord] and {{IRC|wikimedia-npp}} on IRC.
*Please add [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] to your watchlist.
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]].
{{refend}}
</div>
<!-- Drafted by Novem Linguae, MPGuy2824 and Zippybonzo. Sent by Zippybonzo. -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1160196052 -->


== New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive ==
==Disambiguation link notification for September 24==


{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Tangled Tales (album)]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Bluegrass]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/January 2025|January 2025 Backlog Drive]] | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''[[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|New pages patrol]]''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | [[File:NPP Barnstar.png|right|100px]]
|-
|
* On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
* Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
* [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/January 2025#Streak awards|Streak awards]] will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
* Barnstars will also be granted for [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/January 2025#Re-reviewing|re-reviewing articles]] previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* Interested in taking part? '''[[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/January 2025/Participants|Sign up here]]'''.
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]]
|}
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1263150419 -->


==Happy Birthday!==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->

{{ombox
== Deletion discussion ==
| name = Happy Birthday

| image = [[File:Twemoji12 1f382.svg{{!}}alt=Birthday cake emoji|50px]]
There is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Shore League (2nd nomination)]] that may be of interest to you.--[[User:Paulmcdonald|Paul McDonald]] ([[User talk:Paulmcdonald|talk]]) 14:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
| imageright = [[File:Twemoji2 1f389.svg{{!}}alt=Party popper emoji|50px]]

| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #a1ffce, #faffd1);
== Can you check it please? ==
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;

| text = <big>'''Happy birthday!'''</big><br />Hi IntoThinAir! On behalf of the [[WP:Birthday Committee|Birthday Committee]], I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! [[User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives|DaniloDaysOfOurLives]] ([[User talk:DaniloDaysOfOurLives|talk]]) 04:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi. Lacking elements with [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revival in Nagaland|this AfD]]. Thanks. --[[User:Why should I have a User Name?|Why should I have a User Name?]] ([[User talk:Why should I have a User Name?|talk]]) 22:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
:{{Done}} I have added some (but not all) of the stuff that's supposed to be there. The stuff I didn't add I skipped because I thought it would be too tedious to add.[[User:Jinkinson|<font color="red">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] 22:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

== Deletion sorting ==

Hi Jinkinson: Thanks for your work in adding deletion sorting to AfD discussions. Just a note regarding [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Odense Boldklub squads]]: for articles that have lists of people, it's preferable to delete sort under "Lists of people", rather than "Lists" as you performed there. Just a heads up, and cheers. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 06:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

== GA Cup - September 2014 Newsletter ==

{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #58FA58; {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"

| <span style="font-size: 110%;"><center>'''[[WP:WPGA|WikiProject Good Articles's]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup|2014-15 GA Cup]] - September 2014'''</center></span>

<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">[[File:Symbol support vote.svg|100px|link=]]</div>
<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
Welcome to the '''GA Cup'''! In less than 72 hours, the competition will begin! Before you all start reviewing nominations we want to make sure you understand the following:

*This is a friendly competition so we don't want any cheating/breaking of the rules. However, if you do believe someone is going against the rules, notify the judges. All the rules are listed [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Scoring|here]].
*If you are a new editor or new to reviewing Good article nominations, it is imperative that you read the 4 essays/guides listed under [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/FAQ|FAQ #4]]. If you do not understand something, ask a judge for clarification ASAP!
*The competition is not entirely about who can review the most nominations. Per the "[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Scoring|Scoring]]" page, there is different criteria in which you can earn more points. Theoretically, you could review 10 nominations and have 80 points but another user could have reviewed 5 nominations and have 100 points. Yes, we want you to review as many nominations as you can as this will greatly increase the number of points you earn, but you must also keep in mind that '''every single review''' will be looked over by a judge. If we find that you are "rubber-stamping" (in other words, the review is not complete but you still passed/failed the article) you may be disqualified without warning.

Also, rather than creating a long list on what to remember, make sure you have read the "Scoring", "Submissions", and "FAQ" pages.

Now for the one question that we guarantee you have: how on earth will the rounds work???

Yes, we never actually had a solid platform regarding how the rounds would work because we had no idea how many people would sign-up. Even though the competition is about to begin, because sign-ups are still open, it is impossible to say exactly how each round will work. As of now, we can confirm that Round 1 will have everyone compete in one big pool. Depending on the final number of participants after sign-ups close, a to-be-determined number of participants will move on (highest scorers will move on) to Round 2. We guarantee that the top 15 will move on, so make sure you aim for those top positions! Moving on to Round 2, participants will be split into pools of even numbers (for example, every pool will have 6 participants). The pools will be determined by a computer program that places participants by random. More details regarding Round 2 will be sent out at the end of Round 1.

It is important to note that the GA Cup will run on [[UTC]] time, so make sure you know what time that is for where you live! On that note, the GA Cup will start on '''October 1 at 0:00:01 UTC'''; Round 1 will end on '''October 29 at 23:59:59 UTC'''; Round 2 will commence on '''November 1 at 0:00:01 UTC'''. All reviews must be started ''after or on'' the start time of the round. If you qualify for Round 2 but do not complete a review before the end of Round 1, the review can be carried over to Round 2; however that review will not count for Round 1. Prior to the start of the the second round, participants who qualify to move on will be notified.

Finally, if you know anyone else that might be interesting in participating, let them know! Sign-ups close on October 15 so there is still plenty of time to join in on the action!

If you have any further questions, contact one of the judges or leave a message [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup|here]].

''On October 16 or 17, 2014, check the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Pools/Round 1|Pools]] page as we will post the exact number of participants that will move on to the next round. Because this number will be determined past the halfway mark of Round 1, we encourage you to aim to be in the top 15 as the top 15 at the end of the round are guaranteed to move on.''

Cheers from {{noping|NickGibson3900}}, {{noping|Dom497}}, {{noping|TheQ Editor}} and {{noping|Figureskatingfan}}.

{{center
| <small>To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Newsletter/Send|our mailing list]]. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.</small>
}}
}}
|}

--[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Dom497@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Good_articles/GA_Cup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=627348130 -->

== Hi, Jinkinson! ==

Oh hi, how are you doing on Wikipedia? --<span style="font-family: agency fb">[[User:AllenHAcNguyen|<font color="0000ff">Allen</font>]]</span> <sup>([[User talk:AllenHAcNguyen|talk to me!]] / [[Special:Contributions/AllenHAcNguyen|ctrb]] / [[Special:EmailUser/AllenHAcNguyen|E-mail me]])</sup> 13:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

== GA Cup ==

Hi, can you please tell me what you thought the purpose of the GA Cup was? This will allow us to clarify the same confusion that other editors may have.--[[User:Dom497|<span style="color:#1F75FE">'''Dom497'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Dom497|<span style="color:#00308F">'''talk'''</span>]]) 17:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
:I thought it was about writing good articles, not reviewing them. [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="red">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] 17:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
::Ah, I see. For the first year, we are trying to keep things simple. If this year is successful, we already have plans to include writing GA's next year.--[[User:Dom497|<span style="color:#1F75FE">'''Dom497'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Dom497|<span style="color:#00308F">'''talk'''</span>]]) 17:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

== I would like to be adopted ==

Hello Jinkinson, I'd liked to be adopted. I think it's funny how as a freshman in college I'm now spending spare time studying for class and editing Wikipedia instead of studying and playing video games. I don't know if I'm supposed to post under a talk page to ask for someone to adopt me, or if users are picked by random. I just felt I could use help refining my skills because I often find myself looking things up. If you're able to help me, thanks! --[[User:Dekema2|Dekema2]] ([[User talk:Dekema2|talk]]) 02:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
:Sure, I'll adopt you. Just ask me something here if you need help. [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="red">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] 02:23, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
::Thanks a lot and see you around!! --[[User:Dekema2|Dekema2]] ([[User talk:Dekema2|talk]]) 02:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Talk:Pollock Rip Shoal|ts=16:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)}}
[[User Talk:DissidentAggressor|The Dissident Aggressor]] 16:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

== September 2014 ==

[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello Jinkinson. You tagged "[[Pollock Rip Shoal]]" for speedy deletion, but you did not notify the article's creator that it had been so tagged. There is strong consensus that the creators of articles tagged for speedy deletion should be warned and that the person placing the tag has that responsibility. All of the major speedy deletion templates contain a pre-formatted warning for this purpose—just copy and paste to the creator's talk page. Thank you.{{z19}}<!--Template:SD warn-needed--> [[User Talk:DissidentAggressor|The Dissident Aggressor]] 16:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

==Belle Knox AFD #2==
The second AFD for [[Belle Knox]] has been overturned and relisted. As you commented on the original AFD, you may wish to comment on this one as well. As there have been developments and sources created since the time of the original AFD, please review to see if your comments/!vote are the same or may have changed. [[User:Gaijin42|Gaijin42]] ([[User talk:Gaijin42|talk]])

==Hoagland==
I saw this on new pages, and did a quick touch-up to clarify notability. I imagine you intend to work on it further. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 00:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
:<nowiki>*Blushes*</nowiki> Well I wasn't really, but there's clearly a lot of potential there and the subject is clearly notable, so maybe I could. The problem is there aren't many online sources since its subject has been dead for over 50 years. [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="red">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] 00:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 1==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Tangled Tales (album)]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Scat]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
== I have unreviewed a page you curated ==

Hi, I'm Infernus 780. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, [[Lordkohla]], and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on [[User_talk:Infernus 780|my talk page]]. Thank you. [[User:Infernus_780|<span style="background-color: #000"><span style="color: #b00">Infernus</span><span style="color: #c00;">Is</span><span style="color: #d00;">Hiding</span></span>]][[User talk:Infernus_780|<span style="color:Black">-Talk</span>]] 18:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


==AfD Opinion==
I've modified the page [[Murat Pak]] - what do you think now? I would love it to survive so I'd love to hear your opinions on it's current state. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gnihton|Gnihton]] ([[User talk:Gnihton|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gnihton|contribs]]) 07:16, 4 October 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Alpocalypse HD deletion ==

I'm the one that created the Alpocalypse HD page, and I now see it was deleted because you listed it on AfD. Why didn't you tell me you were listing it? -[[User:Joltman|Joltman]] ([[User talk:Joltman|talk]]) 12:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
:I don't know, because I use Twinkle, which automatically notifies articles creators when I nominate a page for deletion. It notified [[User:Largerthanlife147]], not you, so sorry if I was supposed to notify you instead but I had no idea I was. [[User:Jinkinson|<font color="red">Jinkinson</font>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] 12:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

== Hoos In Treble Deletion ==

Hi, I'm the creator of this page. Could you give me some pointers as to why its possibly being deleted and how to prevent it from being so? Other acapella groups at the same university have already had pages made and this particular group is making one for the sole purpose of documenting achievements. They are seeking no support through wiki as it is not appropriate to try to find fans via wiki; it is for documentation, as I said, of awards and to give others an idea of the group for any research/personal interest purposes along with the 6 other acapella groups who are part of the same foundation at UVa. Thats why I'm confused as to why the page's content is being questioned.

Latest revision as of 19:27, 6 January 2025

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

[edit]

Hello IntoThinAir,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

[edit]

Hello IntoThinAir,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

[edit]

Hello IntoThinAir,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]