Jump to content

User talk:MatthewJ00: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Welcoming user (HG)
 
Tag: MassMessage delivery
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 65: Line 65:
|}
|}
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->

== New discussions on Portal: Capitalism ==

[[Portal_talk:Capitalism|Here]], your input is appreciated. [[User:Lbertolotti|Lbertolotti]] ([[User talk:Lbertolotti|talk]]) 18:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

== [[:Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates|Category:Wikipedians who like ''NationStates'']] ==

Hey! Based on your edits to ''[[NationStates]]'', I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a [[:Category:NationStates user templates|series of userboxes]] for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-[[User:DoctorWho42|<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00">🐦Do☭torWho42</span>]]<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00"> ([[User talk:DoctorWho42|<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00">⭐</span>]])</span> 06:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

== ''The Right Stuff'' June 2018 ==

<!-- HEADER -->
<div style="background-color:#FFFACD;"> <!--:#FFFACD #FFF-->
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:5px 5px;">
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:6px;">[[File:The right stuff.png|center|270px|alt=The Right Stuff|link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/June 2018]]</div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:100%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; text-align:center;"><span style="white-space:nowrap; line-height:120%; font-size:155%;">June 2018<br /></span></div></div>

<!-- LEFT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:left; width:49%;">
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
FROM THE EDITOR<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">The Right Stuff Returns<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of [[WP:WikiProject Conservatism|WikiProject Conservatism]]. And considering the recent [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-04-26/From_the_editors|downsizing at ''The Signpost'']] the timing could not be better. ''The Right Stuff'' will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. ''The Right Stuff'' welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Conservatism/News|here]].

Add the [[WT:RYT|Project Discussion]] page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism {{Clickable button 2|Watch|url={{fullurl:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Conservatisam|action=watch}}|style=line-height: 1.5em; padding: 0 1em 0 1em}} [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
ARBITRATION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Russian Agents Editing at American Politics?<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

After a ''series of unfortunate events'' largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin {{u|Andrevan}} was the subject of an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Advanced_permissions_of_Andrevan|Arbitration case]] for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including {{u|Winkelvi}} and the notorious {{u|MONGO}}.

Editors who faced Enforcement action include {{u|SPECIFICO}} (no action), {{u|Factchecker atyourservice}} (three month topic ban ARBAPDS), {{u|Netoholic}} (no action) and {{u|Anythingyouwant}} (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>

</div><!-- RIGHT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
IN THE MEDIA<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Breitbart Versus Wikipedia<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

''[[Breitbart News]]'', in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The [https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-breitbart-declares-war-on-wikipedia-in-facebook-s-fight-against-fake-news-1.5991915 article in ''Haaretz''] describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. ''Breitbart's'' targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to ''Haaretz''. There is no love lost between ''Breitbart'' and Wikipedia where editors at the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard|Reliable Sources Noticeboard]] have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to ''The Daily Mail''. [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
DISCUSSION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Liberty and Trump and Avi, Oh my!<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

<div id="mp-tfa-img" style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">{{main page image|President_Trump_speaking_at_Liberty_University_commencement.jpg|width=220|''President Donald Trump Speaks at Liberty University Commencement Ceremony''|title=Liberty is one of the largest Christian universities in the world and the largest private non-profit university in the United States. Described as a "bastion of the Christian right" in American politics, the university plays a prominent role in Republican politics. President Donald J. Trump gave his first college commencement speech as sitting president at Liberty University.}}<!-- copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Liberty_University&oldid=844931767--> </div>There are several [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/Article_alerts|open discussions]] at the Project:
{{Block indent|left=0.2|1=<nowiki />
* There is an RFC regarding [[Liberty University]] and its relationship to President Trump; see [[Talk:Liberty_University#rfctag|discussion]]
* Activist and commentator [[Avi Yemini]] is listed at AFD; see [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Avi_Yemini_(2nd_nomination)|discussion]]
}}Recently closed discussions include [[Anti-abortion movements]] which was [[Talk:Anti-abortion_movements#reqmovetag|not renamed]], and an [[Talk:Trump–Russia_dossier#RFC_on_stating_no_public_evidence_of_collusion|RFC]] at [[Trump–Russia dossier]]. [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>

</div><div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
<!-- FOOTER -->
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:3px;">
{| style="background:none; clear:both; text-align:center; font-size:90%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; width:100%;"
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism|WPConservatism]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News|Newsroom]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism|Discuss a story]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism/News|Suggestions]]
|}</div></div></div>
<small>Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Lionelt@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/News/Subscribe&oldid=845519790 -->

== ''The Right Stuff:'' July 2018 ==

<!-- HEADER -->
<div style="background-color:#FFFACD;"> <!--:#FFFACD #FFF-->
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:5px 5px;">
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:6px;">[[File:The right stuff.png|center|270px|alt=The Right Stuff|link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/July 2018]]</div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:100%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; text-align:center;"><span style="white-space:nowrap; line-height:120%; font-size:155%;">July 2018<br /></span></div></div>

<!-- LEFT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:left; width:49%;">
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
DISCUSSION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

WikiProject Conservatism was a [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive985#Vote_stacking_concern|topic of discussion]] at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the [[WP:Canvassing]] guideline.

At one point the discussion segued to feedback about ''The Right Stuff.'' Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."

Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion.
''Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.''

Add the [[WT:RYT|Project Discussion]] page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism {{Clickable button 2|Watch|url={{fullurl:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Conservatisam|action=watch}}|style=line-height: 1.5em; padding: 0 1em 0 1em}} [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
ARTICLES REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

[[Margaret Thatcher]] is the first article promoted at the new [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/Assessment/A-Team|WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review]]. Congratulations to {{u|Neveselbert}}. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/Assessment/A-Team|here]]. [[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>

</div><!-- RIGHT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
RECENT RESEARCH<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Research About AN/I<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

''Reprinted in part from the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-04-26/In_focus|April 26, 2018 issue]] of The Signpost; written by {{u|Zarasophos}}''

<div style="float:right;margin-left:10px">{{Graph:Chart|width=70|height=70|type=pie|legend=Satisfaction with AN/I|x=Satisfied,Not satisfied|y1=27,73|showValues=}}</div>
Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a [[Wikipedia:Community_health_initiative_on_English_Wikipedia/Research_about_Administrators%27_Noticeboard_Incidents|recent survey]] . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "[[Wikipedia:BOOMERANG|boomerang effect]]" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an [[Wikipedia:Community_health_initiative_on_English_Wikipedia/Research_about_Administrators%27_Noticeboard_Incidents/Quantitative_data_analysis|analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I]]. Some notable takeaways:

* 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
* "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
* "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."

In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at [[Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/2018-04-26/In_focus|''The Signpost'']] and [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive298#AN_/_ANI_boards_under_criticism|also at AN/I]]. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas [[Wikipedia_talk:Community_health_initiative_on_English_Wikipedia/Improved_tools_and_workflows_to_report_harassment|here]].
[[WT:WikiProject Conservatism|(Discuss this story)]]</div>

</div><div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
<!-- FOOTER -->
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:3px;">
{| style="background:none; clear:both; text-align:center; font-size:90%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; width:100%;"
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism|WPConservatism]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News|Newsroom]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism|Discuss a story]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/Archives|Archives]]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism/News|Suggestions]]
|}</div></div></div>
<small>Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Lionelt@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Conservatism/News/Subscribe&oldid=846049468 -->

== 2019 US Banknote Contest ==

{| style="border-spacing: 2px; border: 1px solid darkgray; width: 100%;"
! rowspan="2" style="text-align: center;" width="1%" |[[File:Commons WikiProject Numismatics concept logo (2017).png|100px]]
! style="text-align: center; font-family: Tw Cen MT; font-size: 40px;" |US Banknote Contest
! rowspan="2" style="text-align: center;" width="1%" |[[File:Flag of the United States.svg|100px]]
|-
! style="text-align: center; font-family: Tw Cen MT; font-size: 20px;" |November-December 2019
|-
| colspan="3"|
----

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of [[Banknotes of the United States dollar|United States banknotes]], yet only a fraction of these are represented on [[c:Main Page|Wikimedia Commons]] in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, [[Colonial history of the United States|Colonial America]], the [[Confederate States of America|Confederate States]], the [[Republic of Texas]], multiple [[List of states and territories of the United States|states and territories]], communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, [[WP:WikiProject Numismatics|WikiProject Numismatics]] will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the [[c:COM:US Banknote Contest/2019|2019 US Banknote Contest]]. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on [[m:Complete list of Wikimedia projects|all Wikimedia projects]]. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive [[c:COM:US Banknote Contest/2019#Awards|awards]]. Whether you want to claim the [[Template:GoldenWiki|Gold Wiki]] or you just want to have fun, all are invited to [[c:COM:US Banknote Contest/2019#How to participate|participate]].

----

<span style="font-size:85%;">If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions [[wikipedia:US Banknote Contest/2019/invite list|here]]</span>
|}
<span style="font-size:85%;">Sent by [[User:ZLEA|ZLEA]] at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]])</span>
<!-- Message sent by User:ZLEA@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:US_Banknote_Contest/2019/invite_list&oldid=922099028 -->

Latest revision as of 23:30, 19 October 2019

Welcome!

Hello, MatthewJ00! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

New discussions on Portal: Capitalism

[edit]

Here, your input is appreciated. Lbertolotti (talk) 18:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 () 06:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Right Stuff June 2018

[edit]
The Right Stuff
June 2018
FROM THE EDITOR
The Right Stuff Returns

By Lionelt

Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. And considering the recent downsizing at The Signpost the timing could not be better. The Right Stuff will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. The Right Stuff welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions here.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism Watch (Discuss this story)

ARBITRATION REPORT
Russian Agents Editing at American Politics?

By Lionelt

After a series of unfortunate events largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin Andrevan was the subject of an Arbitration case for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including Winkelvi and the notorious MONGO.

Editors who faced Enforcement action include SPECIFICO (no action), Factchecker atyourservice (three month topic ban ARBAPDS), Netoholic (no action) and Anythingyouwant (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). (Discuss this story)
IN THE MEDIA
Breitbart Versus Wikipedia

By Lionelt

Breitbart News, in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The article in Haaretz describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Breitbart's targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to Haaretz. There is no love lost between Breitbart and Wikipedia where editors at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to The Daily Mail. (Discuss this story)

DISCUSSION REPORT
Liberty and Trump and Avi, Oh my!

By Lionelt

Liberty is one of the largest Christian universities in the world and the largest private non-profit university in the United States. Described as a "bastion of the Christian right" in American politics, the university plays a prominent role in Republican politics. President Donald J. Trump gave his first college commencement speech as sitting president at Liberty University.
President Donald Trump Speaks at Liberty University Commencement Ceremony
There are several open discussions at the Project:
Recently closed discussions include Anti-abortion movements which was not renamed, and an RFC at Trump–Russia dossier. (Discuss this story)

Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

The Right Stuff: July 2018

[edit]
The Right Stuff
July 2018
DISCUSSION REPORT
WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire

By Lionelt

WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.

At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."

Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion. Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism Watch (Discuss this story)

ARTICLES REPORT
Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again

By Lionelt

Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to Neveselbert. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)
RECENT RESEARCH
Research About AN/I

By Lionelt

Reprinted in part from the April 26, 2018 issue of The Signpost; written by Zarasophos

Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:

  • 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
  • "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
  • "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."

In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here.

(Discuss this story)

Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

[edit]
US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]