Sons of Liberty: Difference between revisions
[pending revision] | [accepted revision] |
No edit summary |
Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Whoop whoop pull up - 22381 |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Dissident organization during the American Revolution}} |
|||
{{Other uses}} |
{{Other uses}} |
||
{{pp-pc1}} |
|||
[[File:Sons of Liberty Broadside, 1765.jpg|thumb|1765 [[Broadside (printing)|Broadside]]]] |
|||
{{Infobox militant organization |
|||
| name = Sons of Liberty |
|||
| logo = US Sons OfLiberty 9Stripes Flag.svg |
|||
| caption = [[The Sons of Liberty Flag|The Rebellious Stripes Flag]] |
|||
| native_name = |
|||
| native_name_lang = |
|||
| other_name = |
|||
| leaders = ''[[Sons of Liberty#Famous Sons of Liberty|See below]]'' |
|||
| foundation = |
|||
| dates = {{Start date|1765}}–{{End date|1776}} |
|||
| dissolved = |
|||
| merger = |
|||
| split = |
|||
| predecessor = |
|||
| merged = |
|||
| successor = |
|||
| country = |
|||
| allegiance = |
|||
| motives = Before 1766:<br />Opposition to the [[Stamp Act 1765|Stamp Act]] <br /> After 1766:<br />Independence of the [[United Colonies]] from [[Kingdom of Great Britain|Great Britain]] |
|||
| area = |
|||
[[Province of Massachusetts Bay|Massachusetts Bay]]<br />[[Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations|Rhode Island]]<br />[[Province of New Hampshire|New Hampshire]]<br />[[Province of New Jersey|New Jersey]]<br />[[Province of New York|New York]]<br />[[Province of Maryland|Maryland]]<br />[[Province of Virginia|Virginia]] |
|||
| headquarters = |
|||
| newspaper = |
|||
| ideology = Initial phase:<br />[[Rights of Englishmen]] <br />"[[No taxation without representation]]"<br /> Later phase:<br />[[Liberalism]]<br />[[Republicanism]] |
|||
| position = |
|||
| crimes = [[Demonstration (political)|Public demonstrations]], [[direct action]], [[Vandalism|destruction]] of Crown goods and property, [[boycotts]], [[tar and feathering]], [[pamphleteering]] |
|||
| attacks = [[Gaspee Affair]], [[Boston Tea Party]], attack on [[John Malcolm (Loyalist)|John Malcolm]] |
|||
| status = |
|||
| size = |
|||
| revenue = |
|||
| financing = |
|||
| partof = |
|||
| allies = {{Flagdeco|United States|1776}} [[Patriots (American Revolution)|Patriot revolutionaries]] |
|||
| opponents = {{flagicon image|Flag of Great Britain (1707-1800).svg}} [[Parliament of Great Britain]]<br />{{flagicon image|Red Ensign of Great Britain (1707-1800).svg}} [[Colonial government in the Thirteen Colonies|Royal Colonial Governments]]<br />{{flagicon image|Flag of the United Empire Loyalists.svg}} [[Tory|Tories]] and other [[Loyalist (American Revolution)|Crown Loyalists]] |
|||
| battles = |
|||
| flag = |
|||
| website = <!-- {{URL|example.com}} --> |
|||
| module = |
|||
| module2 = |
|||
| module3 = |
|||
| module4 = |
|||
| module5 = |
|||
| module6 = |
|||
}} |
|||
[[File:Sons of Liberty Broadside, 1765.jpg|thumb|right|300px|A 1765 [[Handbill (printing)|handbill]], announcing an upcoming "Sons of Liberty" public event.]] |
|||
The '''Sons of Liberty''' was a loosely organized, clandestine, sometimes violent, [[political organization]] active in the [[Thirteen Colonies|Thirteen American Colonies]] founded to advance the [[Rights of Englishmen|rights of the colonists]] and to fight taxation by the British government. It played a major role in most colonies in battling the [[Stamp Act 1765|Stamp Act]] in 1765<ref>John Phillips Resch, ed., culture, and the homefront'' (MacMillan Reference Library, 2005) 1: 174–75</ref> and throughout the entire period of the [[American Revolution]]. Historian David C. Rapoport called the activities of the Sons of Liberty "mob terror."<ref name="Rapoport">{{cite journal |last1=Rapoport |first1=David C. |title=Before the Bombs There Were the Mobs: American Experiences with Terror |journal=Terrorism and Political Violence |date=2008 |volume=20 |issue=2 |page=168 |doi=10.1080/09546550701856045}}</ref> |
|||
The '''Sons of Liberty''' was an organization of dissidents that originated in Disneyland |
|||
. The secret society was formed to protect the [[Rights of Englishmen|rights of the colonists]] and to fight the abuses of taxation by the British government. They are best known for undertaking the [[Boston Tea Party]] in 1773 in reaction to new taxes. Britain responded with the [[Intolerable Acts]] (an intense crackdown by the British government), and a counter-mobilization by the Patriots.<ref>Fremont-Barnes, ''Encyclopedia of the Age of Political Revolutions and New Ideologies'' (2007) 1:688</ref> |
|||
In |
In popular thought, the Sons of Liberty was a formal underground organization with recognized members and leaders. More likely, the name was an underground term for any men resisting new Crown taxes and laws.<ref name="GregoryFremontBarnes">Gregory Fremont-Barnes, ''Encyclopedia of the Age of Political Revolutions and New Ideologies'' (2007) 1:688</ref> The well-known label allowed organizers to make or create anonymous summons to a [[Liberty Tree]], "[[Liberty Pole]]", or other public meeting-place. Furthermore, a unifying name helped to promote inter-Colonial efforts against Parliament and the Crown's actions. Their motto became "[[No taxation without representation]]."<ref>{{cite book|author=Frank Lambert|title=James Habersham: loyalty, politics, and commerce in colonial Georgia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1O8bFseJBfkC&pg=PA173|year=2005|publisher=U. of Georgia Press|isbn=978-0-8203-2539-2|page=173}}</ref> |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
[[File:Philip Dawe (attributed), The Bostonians Paying the Excise-man, or Tarring and Feathering (1774).jpg|thumb| |
[[File:Philip Dawe (attributed), The Bostonians Paying the Excise-man, or Tarring and Feathering (1774) - 02.jpg|thumb|right|250px|''The Bostonian Paying the Excise-Man'', 1774 British anti-American propaganda cartoon, referring to the tarring and feathering of Boston Commissioner of Customs [[John Malcolm (Loyalist)|John Malcolm]] four weeks after the Boston Tea Party. The men also are shown pouring "Tea" down Malcolm's throat; note the noose hanging on the [[Liberty Tree]] and the [[Stamp Act]] posted upside-down]] |
||
In 1765, the British government needed money to afford the 10,000 officers and soldiers living in the colonies, and intended that the colonists living there should contribute.<ref>John C. Miller, ''Origins of the American Revolution'' (Boston, 1943) p. 74.</ref> The British passed a series of taxes aimed at the colonists, and many of the colonists refused to pay certain taxes; they argued that they should not be held accountable for taxes which were decided upon without any form of their consent through a representative. This became commonly known as "[[No Taxation without Representation]]." Parliament insisted on its right to rule the colonies despite the fact that the colonists had no representative in Parliament.<ref>John C. Miller, ''Origins of the American Revolution'' (Boston, 1943)</ref> The most incendiary tax was the [[Stamp Act 1765|Stamp Act of 1765]], which caused a firestorm of opposition through legislative resolutions (starting in the colony of [[History of Virginia|Virginia]]), public demonstrations,<ref>Such as by the local judges and Frederick, Maryland. See {{cite book|author=Thomas John Chew Williams|title=History of Frederick County, Maryland|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=h6w1YPiY0nYC&pg=PA79|year=1979|publisher=Genealogical Publishing Co.|pages=78–79|isbn=978-0806379739}}</ref> threats, and occasional hurtful losses.<ref>Miller, ''Origins of the American Revolution'' pp. 121, 129–130</ref> |
|||
The name is presumed to have been inspired by the phrase's use in a pro-American, anti-taxation speech in the House of Commons on February 6, 1765, by Irish MP [[Isaac Barré]].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Shain|first=Barry Alan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6naaAwAAQBAJ&q=Sons+of+Liberty+name+speech+Parliament+by+Isaac+Barr%C3%A9+February+1765|title=The Declaration of Independence in Historical Context: American State Papers, Petitions, Proclamations, and Letters of the Delegates to the First National Congresses|date=2014-06-10 |publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=978-0-300-15874-8|pages=104|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last1=Flexner|first1=Stuart Berg |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FlANAQAAMAAJ&q=Sons+of+Liberty+name+speech+Parliament+by+Isaac+Barr%C3%A9+February+1765|title=Speaking Freely: A Guided Tour of American English from Plymouth Rock to Silicon Valley|last2=Soukhanov|first2=Anne H.|date=1997|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-510692-3|pages=316|language=en}}</ref> A precursor of the Sons of Liberty in Boston was the [[Loyal Nine]], which burned effigies of Stamp Act commissioner [[Andrew Oliver]] in Boston on August 14, 1765. When he did not resign, the group escalated to burning down his office building. Even after he resigned, they almost destroyed the whole house of his close associate Lieutenant Governor [[Thomas Hutchinson (governor)|Thomas Hutchinson]]. It is believed that the Sons of Liberty did this to excite the lower classes and get them actively involved in rebelling against the authorities. Their actions made many of the stamp distributors resign in fear. |
|||
The organization spread month by month, after independent starts in several different colonies. August 1765 celebrated the founding of the group in Boston.<ref>Anger, p. 135</ref> By November 6, a committee was set up in New York to correspond with other colonies. In December an alliance was formed between groups in New York and Connecticut. January bore witness to a correspondence link between Boston and New York City, and by March, Providence had initiated connections with New York, [[Province of New Hampshire|New Hampshire]], and [[Newport, Rhode Island]]. March also marked the emergence of Sons of Liberty organizations in New Jersey, Maryland, and Norfolk, Virginia, and a local group established in North Carolina was attracting interest in South Carolina and Georgia.<ref>Mainers pp. 78–81</ref> |
|||
The organization spread after independent starts in several different colonies under various names.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Maier |first=Pauline |title=From Resistance To Revolution: Colonial Radicals & The Development Of American Opposition To Britain |date=1991 |publisher=WW Norton |isbn=9780393308259 |location=United Kingdom |pages=78–93}}</ref> The name Sons of Liberty was used beginning in November in New York and Connecticut. By November 6, a committee was set up in [[New York City]] to correspond with other colonies, and by November 11 a meeting in [[Windham, Connecticut]] laid out organizational plans. In December an alliance was formed between groups in New York and Connecticut, and the name of Sons of Liberty was first used in Boston. January bore witness to a correspondence link between Boston and New York City, and by March, [[Providence, Rhode Island]] had initiated connections with New York, [[Province of New Hampshire|New Hampshire]], and [[Newport, Rhode Island]]. March also marked the emergence of Sons of Liberty organizations in New Jersey, Maryland, and Virginia. |
|||
[[File:Boston tea party.jpg|thumb|right|1846 artist's impression of the [[Boston Tea Party]]]] |
|||
The leaders of the Sons of Liberty heralded mostly from the middle class, artisans, traders, lawyers and local politicians. Samuel Adams and his cousin John were not members of the Sons of Liberty. However there were members of the Sons of Liberty who had influential power with the people such as Benjamin Edes, a printer, and John Gill of the ''[[Boston Gazette]].'' They produced a steady stream of news and opinion.”<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/sons.htm |title=The Sons of Liberty |publisher=ushistory.org}}</ref> Samuel Adams was connected to the ''Boston Gazette'' and published many articles under a pen name. This implies that Samuel Adams probably was participatory in the organization through writing, shared opinion, and association with prominent members. Though they were speaking out against the actions of the British government, they still claimed to be loyal to the Crown. Their initial goal was to ensure their rights as Englishmen. Throughout the Stamp Act Crisis, the Sons of Liberty professed continued loyalty to the King because they maintained a "fundamental confidence" in the expectation that Parliament would do the right thing and repeal the tax.<ref>[[Pauline Maier|Maier]] p. 101-106; Miller p. 139. Miller wrote, "Had Great Britain attempted to enforce the Stamp Act, there can be little doubt that British troops and embattled Americans would have shed each others' blood ten years before Lexington. As Benjamin Franklin remarked, '[Britain] would not have found a rebellion in the American colonies in 1765 but it would have made one.' In addition to believing the patriotic movements "they fell down and died".</ref> |
|||
To celebrate the repeal of the Stamp Act in 1766, the Sons of Liberty in [[Dedham, Massachusetts]], erected the [[Pillar of Liberty]].<ref name="images">{{cite book|author=Dedham Historical Society|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cRpMDQffkGsC|title=Images of America: Dedham|publisher=Arcadia Publishing|year=2001|isbn=978-0-7385-0944-0|page=104|access-date=August 11, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
To add weight to their cause, the Sons of Liberty knew they needed to appeal to the masses that made up the lower classes.<ref>Miller, ''Origins of the American Revolution'' p. 131</ref> Several members of the Sons of Liberty were printers/publishers and distributed articles about the meetings and demonstrations the Sons of Liberty held, as well as about the fundamental political beliefs of the group and what they wanted to accomplish. They related in print the major events of the struggle against the new acts to promote their cause and vilify the local officers of the British government. Office holders identified by the Sons of Liberty as being part of the Stamp Act injustice quickly fell out of favor and lost their positions once local elections were held again. The Sons of Liberty would hold meetings to decide which candidates to support—those that would bring about the desired political change. In return, the British authorities attempted to denigrate the Sons of Liberty by referring to them as the "Sons of Violence" or the "Sons of Iniquity."<ref>Christopher Hibbert, ''Redcoats and rebels: the American Revolution through British eyes'' (2002) p 9</ref> |
|||
The Sons of Liberty popularized the use of [[tarring and feathering|tar and feathering]] to punish and humiliate offending government officials starting in 1767. This method was also used against British Loyalists during the American Revolution. This punishment had long been used by sailors to punish their mates.<ref>Benjamin H. Irvin, "Tar, feathers, and the enemies of American liberties, 1768–1776." ''New England Quarterly'' (2003): 197–238. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1559903 in JSTOR]</ref> |
|||
Furthermore, the inter-communication afforded the Colonies by the widespread nature of the Sons of Liberty allowed for decisive action against the [[Townshend Act]] in 1768. One by one the groups penned agreements limiting trade with Britain and imposing a highly effective boycott against importation and sale of British goods.<ref>Gary Minda, ''Boycott in America: how imagination and ideology shape the legal mind'' (1999) p. 33</ref> |
|||
On August 14, 1769, the Boston Sons of Liberty held a public rally in celebration of the 4th Anniversary of their founding. At 11 in the morning they gathered at the Liberty Tree in Boston where they gave speeches and made toasts; they then paraded to the Liberty Tree Tavern in nearby Dorchester, where they held a celebratory dinner of 300 members of the organization in a tent set up next to the tavern, where "Music played, and at proper Intervals Cannon were fired. [...] About Five o'Clock the Company left [the tavern] in a Procession that extended near a Mile and a half, and before Dark entered the City, went round the State House and retired each to his own House."<ref name="Untitled news item, column 1">{{cite news |author=<!--not stated--> |date=21 August 1769 |title=Untitled news item, column 1 |work=The Boston Evening-Post |location=Massachusetts Historical Society |url=https://www.masshist.org/dorr/volume/2/sequence/674 |access-date=22 September 2022}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Gaspee Affair.jpg|thumb|right|The burning of the [[Gaspée Affair|HMS ''Gaspée'']].]] |
|||
In many cases their public meetings turned violent.<ref>Carroll Smith-Rosenberg, ''This violent empire: the birth of an American national identity'' (2010) p 91</ref> Though the lower classes often agreed with the ideas presented by the Sons of Liberty, they wanted more action than words and simple shows of numbers. As such, the property of the gentry, customs officers and other British authorities often fell victim to the volatile nature of mobs.<ref>Smith-Rosenberg, ''This violent empire: the birth of an American national identity'' (2010) p 125</ref> |
|||
At this time in the history of their organization they still considered themselves to be loyal subjects of the monarchy of Great Britain; when it came time at both events to give a round of toasts, the first toasts were to "The King, the Queen and the Royal Family";<ref name="Untitled news item, column 1"/> only much later during the course of the Revolution did they begin to stridently oppose giving any support to the monarchy. |
|||
In New York City the Sons of Liberty would put up liberty poles to stand as a testament to their resolve. The British soldiers would tear them down almost as soon as they were put up. This back and forth action resulted in several skirmishes between the two sides. Most notable among these engagements was the [[Battle of Golden Hill]] on January 19, 1770, in which many people were injured and at least one killed. Violent outbreaks over the pole raged intermittently from 1766 until the [[Patriot (American Revolution)|Patriots]] gained [[New York Provincial Congress|control of New York City government]] in April 1775. |
|||
The Bostonian branch of the Sons of Liberty were responsible for organizing and executing the famous [[Boston Tea Party]] of 1773 in response to the [[Tea Act]]. |
|||
In Boston, another example of the violence they committed could be found in their treatment of a local stamp distributor, [[Andrew Oliver]]. They burned his effigy in the streets. When he did not resign, they escalated to burning down his office building. Even after he resigned, they almost destroyed the whole house of his close associate, Lieutenant Governor [[Thomas Hutchinson (governor)|Thomas Hutchinson]]. It is believed that the Sons of Liberty did this to excite the lower classes and get them actively involved in rebelling against the authorities. Their violent actions made many of the stamp distributors resign in fear. |
|||
Early in the American Revolution, the former Sons of Liberty generally joined more formal groups, such as the [[Committees of safety (American Revolution)|Committee of Safety]]. |
|||
The Sons of Liberty were also responsible for the [[Gaspée Affair|burning of HMS ''Gaspée'']] in 1772. |
|||
===New York=== |
|||
In December 1773, the Sons of Liberty issued and distributed a declaration in New York City called the ''Association of the Sons of Liberty in New York'', which formally stated their opposition to the [[Tea Act]] and that anyone who assisted in the execution of the act was "an enemy to the liberties of America" and that "whoever shall transgress any of these resolutions, we will not deal with, or employ, or have any connection with him". The Sons of Liberty took direct action to enforce their opposition to the Tea Act at the [[Boston Tea Party]]. Members of the group, wearing disguises meant to evoke the appearance of Native American Indians, poured several tons of tea into the Boston Harbor in protest of the Tea Act. The Sons of Liberty sat in the long room above member Benjamin Edes's print shop and planned the famous tea party. During the planning, the Sons of Liberty drank from a punch bowl later donated to the [[Massachusetts Historical Society]] in Boston. |
|||
"The association of the Sons of Liberty was organized in 1765, soon after the passage of the Stamp Act, and extended throughout the colonies, from Massachusetts to South Carolina. It appears that New York was the central post from which communications were dispatched, to and from the east and to the south as far as Maryland..."<ref>{{cite book |last=Leake |first=Isaac |date=1850 |title=Memoir of the life and times of General John Lamb |url=https://archive.org/details/memoiroflifetime01leak/page/2/mode/2up |location=Internet Archive |publisher=J. Munsell |page=2 et seq |oclc=1048816315}}</ref> |
|||
While the exact name "Sons of Liberty" may not have been taken up as their official moniker by the leaders of the New York opposition to the Stamp Act in 1765 - they were popularly known there around that time as "[[The Liberty Boys]]" - it appears that they were known to other "Sons of Liberty" organizations in other states by that name not long after that time. There is a letter written by the "Sons of Liberty" in Baltimore, Maryland, "to the Sons of Liberty in New York", dated 6 March 1766 in which the Baltimore "Sons" thanked their New York brethren for having forced [[Zachariah Hood]], who had been appointed stamp-master for Maryland, into resigning his commission. Hood had arrived in New York on a ship from London, and as soon as his mission became known to The Liberty Boys of New York, they arranged for a meeting with him at which they reasoned with him in their own inimitable way and thus secured his "resignation."<ref>{{cite book |last=Dawson |first=Henry |date=3 May 1859 |title=The Sons of Liberty in New York |url=https://archive.org/details/sonsoflibertyinn00daws_0/mode/1up |location=Internet Archive |publisher=New York State Historical Society |page=72 et. seq |oclc=1157513559}}</ref> |
|||
Early in the American Revolution, the Sons of Liberty generally evolved into or were superseded by more formal groups such as the [[Committee of Safety (American Revolution)|Committee of Safety]]. |
|||
A list of New York members of the Sons of Liberty compiled by the Sons in Maryland, written on 1 March 1766, lists the following correspondents in the colony of New York: "New York [city] — [[John Lamb (general)|John Lamb]], [[Isaac Sears]], [[William Wiley (American revolutionary)|William Wiley]], Edward Laight, Thomas Robinson, Flores Bancker, Charles Nicoll, [[Joseph Allicoke]], and Gershom Mott. |
|||
After the end of the [[American Revolutionary War]], [[Isaac Sears]] along with [[Marinus Willet]] and [[John Lamb (general)|John Lamb]], in New York City, revived the Sons of Liberty. In March 1784, they rallied an enormous crowd that called for the expulsion of any remaining Loyalists from the state starting May 1. The Sons of Liberty were able to gain enough seats in the New York assembly elections of December 1784 to have passed a set of punitive laws against Loyalists. In violation of the [[Treaty of Paris (1783)]] they called for the confiscation of the property of Loyalists.<ref>Schecter, pg. 382</ref> [[Alexander Hamilton]] defended the Loyalists citing the supremecy of the treaty. |
|||
[[Jeremiah Van Rensselaer|Jer. Van Rensselaer]], Maynard Roseboom, Rob. Henry, and [[Thomas Young (American revolutionary)|Thos. Young]], Albany. |
|||
[[John S. Hobart]], Gilbert Potter, Thomas Brush, Cornelius Conklin, and Nathaniel Williams, Huntington, Long Island. |
|||
George Townsend, Barack Sneething, Benjamin Townsend, George Weeks, Michael Weeks, and Rowland Chambers, Oyster Bay, Long Island."<ref>{{cite book |last=Leake |first=Isaac |date=1850 |title=Memoir of the life and times of General John Lamb |url=https://archive.org/details/memoiroflifetime01leak/page/4/mode/2up |location=Internet Archive |publisher=J. Munsell |page=4 |oclc=1048816315}}</ref> |
|||
In December 1773, a new group calling itself the Sons of Liberty issued and distributed a declaration in New York City called the ''Association of the Sons of Liberty in New York'', which formally stated that they were opposed to the [[Tea Act]] and that anyone who assisted in the execution of the act was ''"an enemy to the liberties of America"'' and that ''"whoever shall transgress any of these resolutions, we will not deal with, or employ, or have any connection with him."<ref>{{cite book|author=T. H. Breen|title=The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Skum_IkNN5gC&pg=PT446|year=2004|publisher=Oxford UP|page=446|isbn=978-0199840113}}</ref>'' |
|||
After the end of the [[American Revolutionary War]], [[Isaac Sears]], [[Marinus Willet]], and [[John Lamb (general)|John Lamb]] revived in New York City the Sons of Liberty. In March 1784, they rallied an enormous crowd that called for the expulsion of any remaining Loyalists from the state starting May 1. The Sons of Liberty were able to gain enough seats in the New York assembly elections of December 1784 to have passed a set of punitive laws against Loyalists. In violation of the [[Treaty of Paris (1783)]], they called for the confiscation of the property of Loyalists.<ref>Schecter, p. 382</ref> [[Alexander Hamilton]] defended the Loyalists, citing the supremacy of the treaty. |
|||
==Flags== |
==Flags== |
||
An original flag flown from the Liberty Tree is in the collection of Revolutionary Spaces in Boston at the Old State House. The flag is wool with nine vertical stripes, four white and five red. The owner of the flag post-Revolution, Samuel "Rat-Trap" Adams, claimed that the flag was used by the Sons of Liberty, although there is no contemporary documentation of a non-British striped flag used by the Sons of Liberty. [[Continental Navy|A flag having 13 horizontal red and white stripes]] was used by the Continental Navy and by American merchant ships during the war, although the two styles of flag do not appear to be related.<ref>{{cite web |date=13 August 2014 |title=Not That Samuel Adams |url=https://bostonhistory.squarespace.com/kingstreet/2014/08/not-that-samuel-adams-chasing.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230507102502/https://bostonhistory.squarespace.com/kingstreet/2014/08/not-that-samuel-adams-chasing.html |archive-date=May 7, 2023 |access-date=5 May 2023 |website=[[Old State House (Boston)|Old State House]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=raven&id=raven_2004_0011_0001_0060|title=The First Navy Jack|first1=Peter|last1=Ansoff|first2=North American Vexillological Association / Association nord-américaine de|last2=vexillologie|date=1 July 2004|journal=Raven: A Journal of Vexillology|volume=11|pages=1–60|access-date=10 January 2018|doi=10.5840/raven2004111}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:US Sons OfLiberty 9Stripes Flag.svg|thumb|right|220px|Nine stripe Sons of Liberty flag]] |
|||
In 1767, the Sons of Liberty adopted a [[flag]] called the [[Rebellion|rebellious]] stripes flag with nine uneven vertical stripes (five red and four white). It is supposed that ''nine'' represented the Loyal Nine. [[Ensign of the United States|A flag having 13 horizontal red and black |
|||
stripes]], used by American merchant ships during the war, was also associated with the Sons of Liberty. While red and white were common |
|||
colors of the flags, other color combinations, such as green and white, in addition to yellow and white, were used.<ref>[http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us^rv.html Colonial and Revolutionary War Flags (U.S.)]</ref><ref>[http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us-librt.html#sons Liberty Flags (U.S.)]</ref> |
|||
==Famous Sons of Liberty== |
|||
==Notable members== |
|||
[[File:Sons of Liberty.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|'''1st row:''' [[Samuel Adams]] • [[Benedict Arnold]] • [[John Hancock]] • [[Patrick Henry]] • [[James Otis, Jr.]] '''2nd row:''' [[Paul Revere]] • [[James Swan (financier)|James Swan]] • [[Alexander McDougall]] • [[Benjamin Rush]] • [[Charles Thomson]] '''3rd row:''' [[Joseph Warren]] • [[Marinus Willett]] • [[Oliver Wolcott]] • [[Christopher Gadsden]] • [[Haym Salomon]] <br />'''Not pictured''': [[Hercules Mulligan]], [[Thomas Melvill (American patriot)|Thomas Melvill]], [[Isaac Sears]]]] |
|||
[[File:Sons of Liberty.jpg|400px|thumb|{{small| |
|||
'''1st Row:''' [[Samuel Adams]] • [[Benedict Arnold]] • [[John Hancock]] • [[Patrick Henry]] • [[James Otis, Jr.]] |
|||
=== Boston === |
|||
'''2nd Row:''' [[Paul Revere]] • [[James Swan (financier)|James Swan]] • [[Alexander McDougall]] • [[Benjamin Rush]] • [[Charles Thomson]] |
|||
* [[Samuel Adams]] – political writer, [[tax collector]], cousin of [[John Adams]], fire warden. Founded the Sons Of Liberty |
|||
* [[Benjamin Church (physician)|Benjamin Church]] – first Surgeon-General of the United States Army and known traitor. Banished from Massachusetts in 1778. |
|||
'''3rd Row:''' [[Joseph Warren]] • [[Marinus Willett]] • [[Oliver Wolcott]] • [[Christopher Gadsden]] • [[Haym Salomon]] |
|||
* [[Benjamin Edes]] – [[journalist]]/publisher ''[[Boston Gazette]]'' |
|||
}}]] |
|||
* [[ |
* [[Benjamin Kent]] – Attorney General |
||
* [[John Hancock]] – merchant, [[smuggler]], fire warden<ref>{{cite book|author=Ira Stoll|title=Samuel Adams: A Life|url=https://archive.org/details/samueladamslife00stol|url-access=registration|year=2008|publisher=Free Press|pages=[https://archive.org/details/samueladamslife00stol/page/76 76]–77|isbn=978-1416594567}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Samuel Adams]] – political writer, tax collector/fire warden, Boston |
|||
* [[Benedict Arnold]] – businessman, later General in the Continental Army and then the British Army, Norwich<ref>{{cite book|author=Dave R. Plamer|title=George Washington and Benedict Arnold: A Tale of Two Patriots|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=zANrP6rOOJkC&pg=PA3|year=2010|publisher=Regnery Publishing|page=3}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Benjamin Edes]] – journalist/publisher ''Boston Gazette'', Boston |
|||
* [[Christopher Gadsden]] – merchant, Charleston, South Carolina |
|||
* [[John Hancock]] – merchant/smuggler/fire warden, Boston <ref>{{cite book|author=Ira Stoll|title=Samuel Adams: A Life|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=soOJNEAhmnkC&pg=PA76|year=2008|publisher=Free Press|pages=76–77}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Patrick Henry]] – lawyer/fire warden Virginia |
|||
* [[John Holt (publisher)|John Holt]], colonial publisher for 3 American colonies |
|||
* [[John Lamb (general)|John Lamb]] – trader, New York City |
|||
* [[Alexander McDougall]] – captain of privateers, New York City |
|||
* [[James Otis, Jr.|James Otis]] – lawyer, Massachusetts |
* [[James Otis, Jr.|James Otis]] – lawyer, Massachusetts |
||
* [[Paul Revere]] – [[silversmith]], fire warden<ref>{{cite book|author=David H. Fischer|title=Paul Revere's ride|url=https://archive.org/details/paulreveresride00fisc|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=[https://archive.org/details/paulreveresride00fisc/page/22 22]|isbn=978-0195098310}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Charles Willson Peale]] - Portrait painter and saddle maker, Annapolis, MD |
|||
* [[James Swan (financier)|James Swan]] – financier |
|||
* [[Paul Revere]] – silversmith/fire warden, Boston <ref>{{cite book|author=David H. Fischer|title=Paul Revere's ride|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ZAvQfZFbLp4C&pg=PA22|year=1995|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=22}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Isaiah Thomas (publisher)|Isaiah Thomas]] – printer, Boston then Worcester, first to read Declaration of Independence in Massachusetts<ref>{{cite book|author=Paul Della Valle|title=Massachusetts Troublemakers: Rebels, Reformers, and Radicals from the Bay State|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hyAJpdtGwXkC&pg=PA57|year=2009|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|page=57|isbn=978-0762757954}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Benjamin Rush]] – physician, Philadelphia |
|||
* [[ |
* [[Joseph Warren]] – doctor, soldier |
||
* [[Thomas Young (American revolutionary)|Thomas Young]] – doctor |
|||
* [[Haym Solomon]] – financial broker, New York and Philadelphia |
|||
* [[James Swan (financier)|James Swan]] – American patriot and financier, Boston |
|||
* [[Charles Thomson]] – tutor/secretary, Philadelphia |
|||
* [[Joseph Warren]] – doctor/soldier, Boston |
|||
* [[Thomas Young (American Revolutionary)|Thomas Young]] – doctor, Boston |
|||
* [[Marinus Willett]] – cabinetmaker/soldier, New York |
|||
* [[Oliver Wolcott]] – lawyer, Connecticut |
|||
== |
=== New York === |
||
* [[Joseph Allicocke]] – One of the leaders of the Sons, and possibly of [[Africa]]n ancestry.<ref>Donald A. Grinde Jr, "Joseph Allicocke: African-American Leader of the Sons of Liberty." ''Afro-Americans in New York Life and History'' 14#.2 (1990): 61–69.</ref> |
|||
{{Refimprove section|date=October 2012}} |
|||
* [[John Lamb (general)|John Lamb]] – trader |
|||
* [[Alexander McDougall]] – captain of [[privateer]]s |
|||
* [[Hercules Mulligan]] – [[haberdasher]], spy under [[George Washington]] for the [[Continental Army]], friend of [[Alexander Hamilton]] |
|||
* [[Isaac Sears]] – captain of privateers |
|||
* [[Haym Salomon]] – financial broker, New York and Philadelphia |
|||
* [[Marinus Willett]] – militia officer, cabinet maker, student<ref>{{cite book|author=Daniel Elbridge Wager|title=Col. Marinus Willett, the Hero of Mohawk Valley|publisher=Society|url=https://archive.org/details/colmarinuswille00wage|year=1891|page=[https://archive.org/details/colmarinuswille00wage/page/10 10]}}</ref> |
|||
=== Other === |
|||
At various times and places in later American history, there were groups and societies either claiming to be a continuation of the historic Sons of Liberty or taking up the name in the service of very divergent causes and issues. |
|||
* [[Benedict Arnold]] – businessman, later General in the Continental Army and then the British Army<ref>{{cite book|author=Dave R. Plamer|title=George Washington and Benedict Arnold: A Tale of Two Patriots|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zANrP6rOOJkC&pg=PA3|year=2010|publisher=Regnery Publishing|page=3|isbn=978-1596981645}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Timothy Bigelow (soldier)|Timothy Bigelow]] – [[blacksmith]], [[Worcester, Massachusetts]] |
|||
* [[John Brown (Rhode Island politician)|John Brown]] – business leader of [[Providence, Rhode Island]] |
|||
* [[Samuel Chase]] – signer of the [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]] |
|||
* [[John Crane (soldier)|John Crane]] – [[carpenter]], colonel in command of the [[3rd Continental Artillery Regiment]], [[Braintree, Massachusetts]] |
|||
* [[William Ellery]] – signer of the Declaration of Independence |
|||
* [[Christopher Gadsden]] – merchant, [[Charleston, South Carolina]] |
|||
* [[William Goddard (publisher)|William Goddard]] (1740-1817) – publisher, co-founder of the US Post Office with Benjamin Franklin |
|||
* [[Patrick Henry]] – lawyer, Virginia |
|||
* [[Jedediah Huntington]] – General in the [[Continental Army]] |
|||
* [[Samuel Huntington (Connecticut politician)|Samuel Huntington]] – signer of the [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]]<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ushistory.org/declaration/signers/huntington.html | title=Signers of the Declaration of Independence: Samuel Huntington }}</ref> |
|||
* [[William Paca]] – signer of the Declaration of Independence |
|||
* [[Charles Willson Peale]] – portrait painter and saddle maker, [[Annapolis, Maryland]] |
|||
* [[Matthew Phripp]] – merchant, chairman of the Norfolk committee of safety, prominent [[Freemason]], and colonel of the militia. [[Norfolk, Virginia]]<ref>{{cite book|author=Louis Bellet Plamer|title=Prominent Virginia Families|year=1976|publisher=Genealogical Publishing Com |isbn=978-0806307220|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wEL-bI-QNmYC&q=matthew+phripp+mason&pg=PA618}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Benjamin Rush]] – physician, [[Philadelphia]] |
|||
* [[Charles Thomson]] – tutor, secretary, Philadelphia<ref>{{cite book|author=Chris Alexander|title=Two Truths Two Justices|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hJS2FkRdPOsC&pg=PA146|year=2010|publisher=Xulon Press|page=146|isbn=978-1612154527}}</ref> |
|||
* [[William Williams (Connecticut politician)|William Williams]] – signer of the [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]] |
|||
==Later societies== |
|||
===Improved Order of Red Men=== |
|||
At various times, small secret organizations took the name "Sons of Liberty". They generally left very few records. In the early 19th century, there was an organization in [[Bennington, Vermont]], named the Sons of Liberty, that included local notables such as military officer [[Martin Scott (military officer)|Martin Scott]] and Hiram Harwood.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Shalhope |first=Robert |title=A Tale of New England |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |year=2003 |isbn=0-8018-7127-1 |location=Baltimore |pages=92–96}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Improved Order of Red Men]], |
The [[Improved Order of Red Men]], established in 1834, claimed to be descended from the original Sons of Liberty, noting that the Sons participated in the [[Boston Tea Party]] dressed as their idea of "Indians". |
||
The name was also used during the [[American Civil War]].<ref>Baker, p. 341</ref> The [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperhead]] group, the [[Knights of the Golden Circle]], reorganized in 1863 as the "Order of American Knights". In 1864, it became the '''Order of the Sons of Liberty''', with the Ohio politician [[Clement L. Vallandigham]], most prominent of the Copperheads, as its supreme commander. In most areas, only a minority of its membership was radical enough to discourage enlistments, resist the draft, and shield deserters. The group held numerous peace meetings. A few agitators, some of them encouraged by Southern money, talked of a revolt in the [[Old Northwest]], with the goal of ending the war.<ref>Hesseline, William B. (1948) ''Lincoln and the War Governors''. p.312. New York: Knopf. {{OCLC|445066}}</ref> In 1864, both the KGC and the Order of the Sons of Liberty were prosecuted for treason by federal authorities, especially in Indiana.<ref>{{cite book |author=Keehn, David C. |title=Knights of the Golden Circle: Secret Empire, Southern Secession, Civil War |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yZWIaUunq60C&pg=PA173 |year=2013 |publisher=Louisiana State University Press |location=Baton Rouge, Louisiana |page=173 |isbn=978-0807150047}}</ref> |
|||
In 1948, a radical wing of the [[Zionism|Zionist movement]], calling itself the "Sons of Liberty", launched a boycott of British films in the U.S., in response to British policies in [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]].<ref>{{cite book |author=Kerry Segrave |title=Foreign Films in America: A History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LVVp0omSDBIC&pg=PA86 |year=2004 |publisher=McFarland |isbn=978-0-7864-8162-0 |page=86}}</ref> |
|||
===Civil War era=== |
|||
{{unreferenced section|date=November 2013}} |
|||
The name was also used during the [[American Civil War]].<ref>Baker, pg. 341</ref> Early in 1865, the [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperhead]] organization, the [[Knights of the Golden Circle]], was reorganized as the ''Order of the Sons of Liberty''. Like their namesakes, these Sons of Liberty spoke out and acted against what they saw as an injustice of thwarted rights. In this case, the injustice was being committed by the United States government by denying the rights of the Southern States to leave the Union. The Order of the Sons of Liberty, found mostly in the Northwestern states of the time—[[Indiana]], [[Illinois]], [[Ohio]], [[Missouri]] and [[Kentucky]]—agreed with the idea that the Union was a voluntary establishment and held the view that any state wishing to leave and create its own form of government should be allowed to do so. |
|||
Unlike the pre-independence era Sons of Liberty, the Civil War era Order of the Sons of Liberty was a highly doctrinal, hierarchical organization. The original Sons of Liberty were united simply in their desire to change the political attitude of the British government, but they often differed on the methods that were supposed to be used and on the specifics of the end result. The Order of the Sons of Liberty required members to swear an oath of allegiance to its cause, and it had a strict list of purposes that were supposed to be followed on pain of punishment. Whereas, the eighteenth century Sons of Liberty tried to avoid large scale military conflicts, the nineteenth century organization planned for them, collecting and distributing guns and ammunition to its members. The Order of the Sons of Liberty opposed the Union draft and planned to fight with Southern troops. |
|||
Furthermore, after the Revolutionary War, the original Sons of Liberty were looked upon as patriots and as great leaders of the new country. After the Civil War, the new Order of the Sons of Liberty faced charges of [[treason]]. |
|||
===Anti-British in the 1940s=== |
|||
In the late 1940s, the name "Sons of Liberty" was taken up by an anti-British group active in the US and calling for the boycott of British films and products. At the time, the group's activities were described as in a news item entitled ''"UK bitter at US picketing of films"'' published in "[[The Argus (Australia)|The Argus]]" at [[Melbourne]], [[Australia]]. |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
"A bunch of outlaws" was the term applied by Mr. William Heineman, vice-president of [[Eagle-Lion]], to the American "Sons of Liberty" who are picketing cinemas that show British films in the US. Eagle-Lion are the distributors for [[J. Arthur Rank]] productions. Heineman added that some exhibitors, especially those who were Jewish, were influenced by the "unlawful pressure" of the Sons of Liberty. |
|||
Sir [[Alexander Korda]], the British producer, has decided to send no more films to America until the picketing of American cinemas by the Sons of Liberty stops. The league is an anti-British body formed by Professor [[John Amertenko]], who was not allowed to stay in Britain. |
|||
Sir Alexander said: "The Sons of Liberty have not stopped British cloth and Scotch whiskey from being sold, but films are taken off immediately. |
|||
It was reported that picketed films are [[An Ideal Husband (1947 film)|An Ideal Husband]], [[Anna Karenina (1948 film)|Anna Karenina]], and [[Mine Own Executioner]]. |
|||
Korda added: "It would appear that some American interests might use the boycott as retaliation for the British Government's quota, limiting American films in Britain to 55 in every 100."'' <ref>[http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/22691761 The Argus (Melbourne, Vic,, Australia), Saturday 21 August 1948]</ref></blockquote> |
|||
Jewish exhibitors being receptive to the group's pressure might be due to bitterness over the confrontation taking place at the time between British authorities in [[Mandatory Palestine]] and the Zionist Jewish organizations there, to whom many American Jews were sympathetic. |
|||
==Modern references== |
|||
{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2011}} |
|||
The patriotic spirit of the Sons of Liberty has been immortalized in modern times by [[Walt Disney Pictures]] through their [[Johnny Tremain (film)|film adaptation]] of [[Esther Forbes|Esther Forbes's]] novel ''[[Johnny Tremain]]''. Within the movie the Sons of Liberty sing a rousing song titled "The Liberty Tree". This song raises the Liberty Tree to a national icon in a manner similar to the way [[George M. Cohan|George M. Cohan's]] "[[You're a Grand Old Flag]]" revitalized adoration for the American flag in the early twentieth century. |
|||
The Sons of Liberty are also referenced in the 2001 [[video game]] ''[[Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty]]''. It references them in the title, while a group within the game calls itself, and models itself after, the Sons of Liberty. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Loyal Nine]], precursor to the Sons of Liberty |
|||
* [[Battle of Golden Hill]] |
|||
* [[Boston Massacre]] |
|||
* [[Boston Tea Party]] |
|||
* [[Daughters of Liberty]] |
* [[Daughters of Liberty]] |
||
* [[Declaratory Act]] |
|||
* [[Stamp Act Congress]] |
* [[Stamp Act Congress]] |
||
* [[Patriot (American Revolution)]] |
|||
* [[United Irishmen]] |
|||
* [[Sons of Liberty (miniseries)|''Sons of Liberty'' (miniseries)]] |
|||
* [[United Scotsmen]] |
|||
*[[Liberty Tree (Charleston)]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
'''Notes''' |
|||
{{Reflist|2}} |
|||
{{Reflist|30em}} |
|||
'''Further reading''' |
|||
==Bibliography== |
|||
* {{citation |last=Baker |first=Jean |title=Affairs of Party: The Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid-Nineteenth Century |year=1983 |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca, New York |isbn=0-8014-1513-6 }} |
|||
:'''18th century Sons''' |
|||
{{refbegin|40em}} |
|||
* {{Citation |last=Becker |first=Carl |year=1901 |title=Growth of Revolutionary Parties and Methods in New York Province 1765–1774 |journal=American Historical Review |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=56–76 |issn=0002-8762 |doi=10.2307/1832532 |jstor=1832532 }} |
* {{Citation |last=Becker |first=Carl |year=1901 |title=Growth of Revolutionary Parties and Methods in New York Province 1765–1774 |journal=American Historical Review |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=56–76 |issn=0002-8762 |doi=10.2307/1832532 |jstor=1832532 }} |
||
* Carson, Clayborne, Jake Miller, and James Miller. "Sons of Liberty." in ''Civil Disobedience: An Encyclopedic History of Dissidence in the United States'' (2015): 276+ |
|||
* {{Citation |last=Champagne |first=Roger J. |lastauthoramp= |year=1967 |title=Liberty Boys and Mechanics of New York City, 1764–1774 |journal=Labor History |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=115–135 |issn=0023-656X }} |
|||
* {{Citation |last=Champagne |first=Roger J. |year=1967 |title=Liberty Boys and Mechanics of New York City, 1764–1774 |journal=Labor History |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=115–135 |doi=10.1080/00236566708584011 |issn=0023-656X }} |
|||
* {{Citation |last=Champagne |first=Roger J. |year=1964 |title=New York's Radicals and the Coming of Independence |journal=Journal of American History |volume=51 |issue=1 |pages=21–40 |issn=0021-8723 |doi=10.2307/1917932 |jstor=1917932 }} |
* {{Citation |last=Champagne |first=Roger J. |year=1964 |title=New York's Radicals and the Coming of Independence |journal=Journal of American History |volume=51 |issue=1 |pages=21–40 |issn=0021-8723 |doi=10.2307/1917932 |jstor=1917932 }} |
||
* Dawson, Henry Barton. ''The Sons of Liberty in New York'' (1859) 118 pages; [ |
* Dawson, Henry Barton. ''The Sons of Liberty in New York'' (1859) 118 pages; [https://archive.org/details/sonslibertyinne00socigoog online edition] |
||
*Foner, Philip Sheldon. ''Labor and the American Revolution'' (1976) Westport, CN: Greenwood. 258 pages |
*Foner, Philip Sheldon. ''Labor and the American Revolution'' (1976) Westport, CN: Greenwood. 258 pages |
||
*{{citation |last=Hoffer |first=Peter Charles |title=Seven Fires: The Urban Infernos The Reshaped America |year=2006|publisher=Public Affairs |
*{{citation |last=Hoffer |first=Peter Charles |title=Seven Fires: The Urban Infernos The Reshaped America |year=2006 |publisher=Public Affairs |location=New York |isbn=1-58648-355-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/sevenfiresurbani00hoff }} |
||
* {{Citation |last=Irvin |first=Benjamin H. |year=2003 |title=Tar, Feathers, and the Enemies of American Liberties, 1768–1776 |journal=New England Quarterly |volume=76 |issue=2 |pages=197–238 |issn=0028-4866 |doi=10.2307/1559903 |jstor=1559903 }} |
* {{Citation |last=Irvin |first=Benjamin H. |year=2003 |title=Tar, Feathers, and the Enemies of American Liberties, 1768–1776 |journal=New England Quarterly |volume=76 |issue=2 |pages=197–238 |issn=0028-4866 |doi=10.2307/1559903 |jstor=1559903 }} |
||
* Labaree, Benjamin Woods. ''The Boston Tea Party'' (1964). |
* Labaree, Benjamin Woods. ''The Boston Tea Party'' (1964). |
||
* {{citation |last=Maier |first=Pauline | |
* {{citation |last=Maier |first=Pauline |author-link=Pauline Maier |title=From Resistance to Revolution: Colonial Radicals and the Development of American Opposition to Britain, 1765–1776 |year=1972 |publisher=W.W. Norton |location=New York }} |
||
* Maier, Pauline. "Reason and Revolution: The Radicalism of Dr. Thomas Young," ''American Quarterly'' Vol. 28, No. 2, (Summer |
* Maier, Pauline. "Reason and Revolution: The Radicalism of Dr. Thomas Young," ''American Quarterly'' Vol. 28, No. 2, (Summer 1976), pp. 229–249 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2712351 in JSTOR] |
||
* {{citation |last= |
* {{citation |last=Middlekauff |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Middlekauff |title=The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789 |year=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=019531588X }} |
||
* {{citation |last=Miller |first=John C. |title=Origins of the American Revolution |year=1943 |publisher=Little, Brown and Company |location=Boston |url=https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=493183 |access-date=2017-09-14 |archive-date=2009-10-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091023114525/http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=493183 |url-status=dead }} |
|||
* {{citation |last=Middlekauff |first=Robert |authorlink=Robert Middlekauff |title=The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789 |year=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=019531588X }} |
|||
* {{citation |last=Morais |first=Herbert M. |editor-last=Morris |editor-first=Richard B. |chapter=The Sons of Liberty in New York |title=The Era of the American Revolution |year=1939 | |
* {{citation |last=Morais |first=Herbert M. |editor-last=Morris |editor-first=Richard B. |chapter=The Sons of Liberty in New York |title=The Era of the American Revolution |year=1939 |pages=269–289 |chapter-url=https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=29142025 |access-date=2017-09-14 |archive-date=2009-10-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091023115030/http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=29142025 |url-status=dead }}, a Marxist interpretation |
||
* {{citation |last=Nash |first=Gary B. |title=The Unknown Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America |year=2005 |publisher=Viking |location=London |isbn=0-670-03420-7 }} |
* {{citation |last=Nash |first=Gary B. |title=The Unknown Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America |year=2005 |publisher=Viking |location=London |isbn=0-670-03420-7 }} |
||
* {{citation |last=Schecter |first=Barnet |title=The Battle of New York |year=2002 |publisher=Walker |location=New York |isbn=0-8027-1374-2 }} |
* {{citation |last=Schecter |first=Barnet |title=The Battle of New York |year=2002 |publisher=Walker |location=New York |isbn=0-8027-1374-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/battlefornewyork00sche }} |
||
* {{citation |last=Smith |first=Page |title=A New Age Now Begins |year=1976 |publisher=McGraw-Hill |location=New York |isbn=0-07-059097-4 }} |
|||
* {{citation |last=Unger |first=Harlow |title=John Hancock: Merchant King and American Patriot |year=2000 |publisher=Castle Books |location=Edison, NJ |isbn=0-7858-2026-4 }} |
* {{citation |last=Unger |first=Harlow |title=John Hancock: Merchant King and American Patriot |year=2000 |publisher=Castle Books |location=Edison, NJ |isbn=0-7858-2026-4 }} |
||
* Walsh, Richard. ''Charleston's Sons of Liberty: A Study of the Artisans, 1763–1789'' (1968) |
* Walsh, Richard. ''Charleston's Sons of Liberty: A Study of the Artisans, 1763–1789'' (1968) |
||
* Warner, William B. ''Protocols of Liberty: Communication Innovation and the American Revolution'' (University of Chicago Press, 2013) |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
:'''Later groups''' |
|||
* {{citation |last=Baker |first=Jean |title=Affairs of Party: The Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid-Nineteenth Century |year=1983 |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca, NY |isbn=0-8014-1513-6 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/affairsofpartypo0000bake }} |
|||
* Churchill, Robert. "Liberty, conscription, and a party divided-The Sons of Liberty conspiracy, 1863–1864." ''Prologue-Quarterly of the National Archives'' 30#4 (1998): 294–303. |
|||
* Rodgers, Thomas E. "Copperheads or a Respectable Minority: Current Approaches to the Study of Civil War-Era Democrats." ''Indiana Magazine of History'' 109#2 (2013): 114–146. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5378/indimagahist.109.2.0114 in JSTOR] |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* [http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/sons.htm ''The Sons of Liberty'', ushistory.org] |
* [http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/sons.htm ''The Sons of Liberty'', ushistory.org] |
||
* [http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h635.html ''The Sons of Liberty'', u-s-history.com] |
* [http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h635.html ''The Sons of Liberty'', u-s-history.com] |
||
* [http://www.nysm.nysed.gov/albany/solconst.html#students Albany Sons of Liberty Constitution] |
* [http://www.nysm.nysed.gov/albany/solconst.html#students Albany Sons of Liberty Constitution] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308084802/http://www.nysm.nysed.gov/albany/solconst.html#students |date=2016-03-08 }} |
||
* [ |
* [https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/assoc_sons_ny_1773.asp Association of the Sons of Liberty in New York, December 15, 1773] |
||
<!--spacing--> |
|||
{{New York in the American Revolutionary War}} |
{{New York in the American Revolutionary War}} |
||
{{American Revolutionary War}} |
{{American Revolutionary War|state=collapsed}} |
||
{{Samuel Adams}} |
|||
{{John Hancock}} |
|||
{{Patrick Henry}} |
|||
{{Paul Revere}} |
|||
{{Charles Thomson}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Liberty, Sons Of}} |
|||
[[Category:1765 establishments in the Thirteen Colonies]] |
[[Category:1765 establishments in the Thirteen Colonies]] |
||
[[Category:American Revolution]] |
[[Category:American Revolution]] |
||
[[Category:National liberation movements]] |
[[Category:National liberation movements]] |
||
[[Category:New York in the American Revolution]] |
[[Category:New York (state) in the American Revolution]] |
||
[[Category:Patriotic societies]] |
[[Category:Patriotic societies]] |
||
[[Category:Patriots in the American Revolution]] |
[[Category:Patriots in the American Revolution]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Secret societies in the United States]] |
||
[[Category:Tarring and feathering in the United States]] |
|||
[[Category:Samuel Adams]] |
|||
[[Category:John Hancock]] |
|||
[[Category:Patrick Henry]] |
|||
[[Category:Paul Revere]] |
Latest revision as of 06:32, 6 January 2025
Sons of Liberty | |
---|---|
Leaders | See below |
Dates of operation | 1765 | –1776
Motives | Before 1766: Opposition to the Stamp Act After 1766: Independence of the United Colonies from Great Britain |
Active regions | Massachusetts Bay Rhode Island New Hampshire New Jersey New York Maryland Virginia |
Ideology | Initial phase: Rights of Englishmen "No taxation without representation" Later phase: Liberalism Republicanism |
Major actions | Public demonstrations, direct action, destruction of Crown goods and property, boycotts, tar and feathering, pamphleteering |
Notable attacks | Gaspee Affair, Boston Tea Party, attack on John Malcolm |
Allies | Patriot revolutionaries |
Opponents | Parliament of Great Britain Royal Colonial Governments Tories and other Crown Loyalists |
The Sons of Liberty was a loosely organized, clandestine, sometimes violent, political organization active in the Thirteen American Colonies founded to advance the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government. It played a major role in most colonies in battling the Stamp Act in 1765[1] and throughout the entire period of the American Revolution. Historian David C. Rapoport called the activities of the Sons of Liberty "mob terror."[2]
In popular thought, the Sons of Liberty was a formal underground organization with recognized members and leaders. More likely, the name was an underground term for any men resisting new Crown taxes and laws.[3] The well-known label allowed organizers to make or create anonymous summons to a Liberty Tree, "Liberty Pole", or other public meeting-place. Furthermore, a unifying name helped to promote inter-Colonial efforts against Parliament and the Crown's actions. Their motto became "No taxation without representation."[4]
History
[edit]In 1765, the British government needed money to afford the 10,000 officers and soldiers living in the colonies, and intended that the colonists living there should contribute.[5] The British passed a series of taxes aimed at the colonists, and many of the colonists refused to pay certain taxes; they argued that they should not be held accountable for taxes which were decided upon without any form of their consent through a representative. This became commonly known as "No Taxation without Representation." Parliament insisted on its right to rule the colonies despite the fact that the colonists had no representative in Parliament.[6] The most incendiary tax was the Stamp Act of 1765, which caused a firestorm of opposition through legislative resolutions (starting in the colony of Virginia), public demonstrations,[7] threats, and occasional hurtful losses.[8]
The name is presumed to have been inspired by the phrase's use in a pro-American, anti-taxation speech in the House of Commons on February 6, 1765, by Irish MP Isaac Barré.[9][10] A precursor of the Sons of Liberty in Boston was the Loyal Nine, which burned effigies of Stamp Act commissioner Andrew Oliver in Boston on August 14, 1765. When he did not resign, the group escalated to burning down his office building. Even after he resigned, they almost destroyed the whole house of his close associate Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson. It is believed that the Sons of Liberty did this to excite the lower classes and get them actively involved in rebelling against the authorities. Their actions made many of the stamp distributors resign in fear.
The organization spread after independent starts in several different colonies under various names.[11] The name Sons of Liberty was used beginning in November in New York and Connecticut. By November 6, a committee was set up in New York City to correspond with other colonies, and by November 11 a meeting in Windham, Connecticut laid out organizational plans. In December an alliance was formed between groups in New York and Connecticut, and the name of Sons of Liberty was first used in Boston. January bore witness to a correspondence link between Boston and New York City, and by March, Providence, Rhode Island had initiated connections with New York, New Hampshire, and Newport, Rhode Island. March also marked the emergence of Sons of Liberty organizations in New Jersey, Maryland, and Virginia.
To celebrate the repeal of the Stamp Act in 1766, the Sons of Liberty in Dedham, Massachusetts, erected the Pillar of Liberty.[12]
The Sons of Liberty popularized the use of tar and feathering to punish and humiliate offending government officials starting in 1767. This method was also used against British Loyalists during the American Revolution. This punishment had long been used by sailors to punish their mates.[13]
On August 14, 1769, the Boston Sons of Liberty held a public rally in celebration of the 4th Anniversary of their founding. At 11 in the morning they gathered at the Liberty Tree in Boston where they gave speeches and made toasts; they then paraded to the Liberty Tree Tavern in nearby Dorchester, where they held a celebratory dinner of 300 members of the organization in a tent set up next to the tavern, where "Music played, and at proper Intervals Cannon were fired. [...] About Five o'Clock the Company left [the tavern] in a Procession that extended near a Mile and a half, and before Dark entered the City, went round the State House and retired each to his own House."[14]
At this time in the history of their organization they still considered themselves to be loyal subjects of the monarchy of Great Britain; when it came time at both events to give a round of toasts, the first toasts were to "The King, the Queen and the Royal Family";[14] only much later during the course of the Revolution did they begin to stridently oppose giving any support to the monarchy.
The Bostonian branch of the Sons of Liberty were responsible for organizing and executing the famous Boston Tea Party of 1773 in response to the Tea Act.
Early in the American Revolution, the former Sons of Liberty generally joined more formal groups, such as the Committee of Safety.
New York
[edit]"The association of the Sons of Liberty was organized in 1765, soon after the passage of the Stamp Act, and extended throughout the colonies, from Massachusetts to South Carolina. It appears that New York was the central post from which communications were dispatched, to and from the east and to the south as far as Maryland..."[15]
While the exact name "Sons of Liberty" may not have been taken up as their official moniker by the leaders of the New York opposition to the Stamp Act in 1765 - they were popularly known there around that time as "The Liberty Boys" - it appears that they were known to other "Sons of Liberty" organizations in other states by that name not long after that time. There is a letter written by the "Sons of Liberty" in Baltimore, Maryland, "to the Sons of Liberty in New York", dated 6 March 1766 in which the Baltimore "Sons" thanked their New York brethren for having forced Zachariah Hood, who had been appointed stamp-master for Maryland, into resigning his commission. Hood had arrived in New York on a ship from London, and as soon as his mission became known to The Liberty Boys of New York, they arranged for a meeting with him at which they reasoned with him in their own inimitable way and thus secured his "resignation."[16]
A list of New York members of the Sons of Liberty compiled by the Sons in Maryland, written on 1 March 1766, lists the following correspondents in the colony of New York: "New York [city] — John Lamb, Isaac Sears, William Wiley, Edward Laight, Thomas Robinson, Flores Bancker, Charles Nicoll, Joseph Allicoke, and Gershom Mott. Jer. Van Rensselaer, Maynard Roseboom, Rob. Henry, and Thos. Young, Albany. John S. Hobart, Gilbert Potter, Thomas Brush, Cornelius Conklin, and Nathaniel Williams, Huntington, Long Island. George Townsend, Barack Sneething, Benjamin Townsend, George Weeks, Michael Weeks, and Rowland Chambers, Oyster Bay, Long Island."[17]
In December 1773, a new group calling itself the Sons of Liberty issued and distributed a declaration in New York City called the Association of the Sons of Liberty in New York, which formally stated that they were opposed to the Tea Act and that anyone who assisted in the execution of the act was "an enemy to the liberties of America" and that "whoever shall transgress any of these resolutions, we will not deal with, or employ, or have any connection with him."[18]
After the end of the American Revolutionary War, Isaac Sears, Marinus Willet, and John Lamb revived in New York City the Sons of Liberty. In March 1784, they rallied an enormous crowd that called for the expulsion of any remaining Loyalists from the state starting May 1. The Sons of Liberty were able to gain enough seats in the New York assembly elections of December 1784 to have passed a set of punitive laws against Loyalists. In violation of the Treaty of Paris (1783), they called for the confiscation of the property of Loyalists.[19] Alexander Hamilton defended the Loyalists, citing the supremacy of the treaty.
Flags
[edit]An original flag flown from the Liberty Tree is in the collection of Revolutionary Spaces in Boston at the Old State House. The flag is wool with nine vertical stripes, four white and five red. The owner of the flag post-Revolution, Samuel "Rat-Trap" Adams, claimed that the flag was used by the Sons of Liberty, although there is no contemporary documentation of a non-British striped flag used by the Sons of Liberty. A flag having 13 horizontal red and white stripes was used by the Continental Navy and by American merchant ships during the war, although the two styles of flag do not appear to be related.[20][21]
Famous Sons of Liberty
[edit]Boston
[edit]- Samuel Adams – political writer, tax collector, cousin of John Adams, fire warden. Founded the Sons Of Liberty
- Benjamin Church – first Surgeon-General of the United States Army and known traitor. Banished from Massachusetts in 1778.
- Benjamin Edes – journalist/publisher Boston Gazette
- Benjamin Kent – Attorney General
- John Hancock – merchant, smuggler, fire warden[22]
- James Otis – lawyer, Massachusetts
- Paul Revere – silversmith, fire warden[23]
- James Swan – financier
- Isaiah Thomas – printer, Boston then Worcester, first to read Declaration of Independence in Massachusetts[24]
- Joseph Warren – doctor, soldier
- Thomas Young – doctor
New York
[edit]- Joseph Allicocke – One of the leaders of the Sons, and possibly of African ancestry.[25]
- John Lamb – trader
- Alexander McDougall – captain of privateers
- Hercules Mulligan – haberdasher, spy under George Washington for the Continental Army, friend of Alexander Hamilton
- Isaac Sears – captain of privateers
- Haym Salomon – financial broker, New York and Philadelphia
- Marinus Willett – militia officer, cabinet maker, student[26]
Other
[edit]- Benedict Arnold – businessman, later General in the Continental Army and then the British Army[27]
- Timothy Bigelow – blacksmith, Worcester, Massachusetts
- John Brown – business leader of Providence, Rhode Island
- Samuel Chase – signer of the Declaration of Independence
- John Crane – carpenter, colonel in command of the 3rd Continental Artillery Regiment, Braintree, Massachusetts
- William Ellery – signer of the Declaration of Independence
- Christopher Gadsden – merchant, Charleston, South Carolina
- William Goddard (1740-1817) – publisher, co-founder of the US Post Office with Benjamin Franklin
- Patrick Henry – lawyer, Virginia
- Jedediah Huntington – General in the Continental Army
- Samuel Huntington – signer of the Declaration of Independence[28]
- William Paca – signer of the Declaration of Independence
- Charles Willson Peale – portrait painter and saddle maker, Annapolis, Maryland
- Matthew Phripp – merchant, chairman of the Norfolk committee of safety, prominent Freemason, and colonel of the militia. Norfolk, Virginia[29]
- Benjamin Rush – physician, Philadelphia
- Charles Thomson – tutor, secretary, Philadelphia[30]
- William Williams – signer of the Declaration of Independence
Later societies
[edit]At various times, small secret organizations took the name "Sons of Liberty". They generally left very few records. In the early 19th century, there was an organization in Bennington, Vermont, named the Sons of Liberty, that included local notables such as military officer Martin Scott and Hiram Harwood.[31]
The Improved Order of Red Men, established in 1834, claimed to be descended from the original Sons of Liberty, noting that the Sons participated in the Boston Tea Party dressed as their idea of "Indians".
The name was also used during the American Civil War.[32] The Copperhead group, the Knights of the Golden Circle, reorganized in 1863 as the "Order of American Knights". In 1864, it became the Order of the Sons of Liberty, with the Ohio politician Clement L. Vallandigham, most prominent of the Copperheads, as its supreme commander. In most areas, only a minority of its membership was radical enough to discourage enlistments, resist the draft, and shield deserters. The group held numerous peace meetings. A few agitators, some of them encouraged by Southern money, talked of a revolt in the Old Northwest, with the goal of ending the war.[33] In 1864, both the KGC and the Order of the Sons of Liberty were prosecuted for treason by federal authorities, especially in Indiana.[34]
In 1948, a radical wing of the Zionist movement, calling itself the "Sons of Liberty", launched a boycott of British films in the U.S., in response to British policies in Palestine.[35]
See also
[edit]- Loyal Nine, precursor to the Sons of Liberty
- Daughters of Liberty
- Stamp Act Congress
- Patriot (American Revolution)
- Sons of Liberty (miniseries)
- Liberty Tree (Charleston)
References
[edit]Notes
- ^ John Phillips Resch, ed., culture, and the homefront (MacMillan Reference Library, 2005) 1: 174–75
- ^ Rapoport, David C. (2008). "Before the Bombs There Were the Mobs: American Experiences with Terror". Terrorism and Political Violence. 20 (2): 168. doi:10.1080/09546550701856045.
- ^ Gregory Fremont-Barnes, Encyclopedia of the Age of Political Revolutions and New Ideologies (2007) 1:688
- ^ Frank Lambert (2005). James Habersham: loyalty, politics, and commerce in colonial Georgia. U. of Georgia Press. p. 173. ISBN 978-0-8203-2539-2.
- ^ John C. Miller, Origins of the American Revolution (Boston, 1943) p. 74.
- ^ John C. Miller, Origins of the American Revolution (Boston, 1943)
- ^ Such as by the local judges and Frederick, Maryland. See Thomas John Chew Williams (1979). History of Frederick County, Maryland. Genealogical Publishing Co. pp. 78–79. ISBN 978-0806379739.
- ^ Miller, Origins of the American Revolution pp. 121, 129–130
- ^ Shain, Barry Alan (2014-06-10). The Declaration of Independence in Historical Context: American State Papers, Petitions, Proclamations, and Letters of the Delegates to the First National Congresses. Yale University Press. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-300-15874-8.
- ^ Flexner, Stuart Berg; Soukhanov, Anne H. (1997). Speaking Freely: A Guided Tour of American English from Plymouth Rock to Silicon Valley. Oxford University Press. p. 316. ISBN 978-0-19-510692-3.
- ^ Maier, Pauline (1991). From Resistance To Revolution: Colonial Radicals & The Development Of American Opposition To Britain. United Kingdom: WW Norton. pp. 78–93. ISBN 9780393308259.
- ^ Dedham Historical Society (2001). Images of America: Dedham. Arcadia Publishing. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-7385-0944-0. Retrieved August 11, 2019.
- ^ Benjamin H. Irvin, "Tar, feathers, and the enemies of American liberties, 1768–1776." New England Quarterly (2003): 197–238. in JSTOR
- ^ a b "Untitled news item, column 1". The Boston Evening-Post. Massachusetts Historical Society. 21 August 1769. Retrieved 22 September 2022.
- ^ Leake, Isaac (1850). Memoir of the life and times of General John Lamb. Internet Archive: J. Munsell. p. 2 et seq. OCLC 1048816315.
- ^ Dawson, Henry (3 May 1859). The Sons of Liberty in New York. Internet Archive: New York State Historical Society. p. 72 et. seq. OCLC 1157513559.
- ^ Leake, Isaac (1850). Memoir of the life and times of General John Lamb. Internet Archive: J. Munsell. p. 4. OCLC 1048816315.
- ^ T. H. Breen (2004). The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence. Oxford UP. p. 446. ISBN 978-0199840113.
- ^ Schecter, p. 382
- ^ "Not That Samuel Adams". Old State House. 13 August 2014. Archived from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved 5 May 2023.
- ^ Ansoff, Peter; vexillologie, North American Vexillological Association / Association nord-américaine de (1 July 2004). "The First Navy Jack". Raven: A Journal of Vexillology. 11: 1–60. doi:10.5840/raven2004111. Retrieved 10 January 2018.
- ^ Ira Stoll (2008). Samuel Adams: A Life. Free Press. pp. 76–77. ISBN 978-1416594567.
- ^ David H. Fischer (1995). Paul Revere's ride. Oxford University Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0195098310.
- ^ Paul Della Valle (2009). Massachusetts Troublemakers: Rebels, Reformers, and Radicals from the Bay State. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 57. ISBN 978-0762757954.
- ^ Donald A. Grinde Jr, "Joseph Allicocke: African-American Leader of the Sons of Liberty." Afro-Americans in New York Life and History 14#.2 (1990): 61–69.
- ^ Daniel Elbridge Wager (1891). Col. Marinus Willett, the Hero of Mohawk Valley. Society. p. 10.
- ^ Dave R. Plamer (2010). George Washington and Benedict Arnold: A Tale of Two Patriots. Regnery Publishing. p. 3. ISBN 978-1596981645.
- ^ "Signers of the Declaration of Independence: Samuel Huntington".
- ^ Louis Bellet Plamer (1976). Prominent Virginia Families. Genealogical Publishing Com. ISBN 978-0806307220.
- ^ Chris Alexander (2010). Two Truths Two Justices. Xulon Press. p. 146. ISBN 978-1612154527.
- ^ Shalhope, Robert (2003). A Tale of New England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 92–96. ISBN 0-8018-7127-1.
- ^ Baker, p. 341
- ^ Hesseline, William B. (1948) Lincoln and the War Governors. p.312. New York: Knopf. OCLC 445066
- ^ Keehn, David C. (2013). Knights of the Golden Circle: Secret Empire, Southern Secession, Civil War. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana State University Press. p. 173. ISBN 978-0807150047.
- ^ Kerry Segrave (2004). Foreign Films in America: A History. McFarland. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-7864-8162-0.
Further reading
- 18th century Sons
- Becker, Carl (1901), "Growth of Revolutionary Parties and Methods in New York Province 1765–1774", American Historical Review, 7 (1): 56–76, doi:10.2307/1832532, ISSN 0002-8762, JSTOR 1832532
- Carson, Clayborne, Jake Miller, and James Miller. "Sons of Liberty." in Civil Disobedience: An Encyclopedic History of Dissidence in the United States (2015): 276+
- Champagne, Roger J. (1967), "Liberty Boys and Mechanics of New York City, 1764–1774", Labor History, 8 (2): 115–135, doi:10.1080/00236566708584011, ISSN 0023-656X
- Champagne, Roger J. (1964), "New York's Radicals and the Coming of Independence", Journal of American History, 51 (1): 21–40, doi:10.2307/1917932, ISSN 0021-8723, JSTOR 1917932
- Dawson, Henry Barton. The Sons of Liberty in New York (1859) 118 pages; online edition
- Foner, Philip Sheldon. Labor and the American Revolution (1976) Westport, CN: Greenwood. 258 pages
- Hoffer, Peter Charles (2006), Seven Fires: The Urban Infernos The Reshaped America, New York: Public Affairs, ISBN 1-58648-355-2
- Irvin, Benjamin H. (2003), "Tar, Feathers, and the Enemies of American Liberties, 1768–1776", New England Quarterly, 76 (2): 197–238, doi:10.2307/1559903, ISSN 0028-4866, JSTOR 1559903
- Labaree, Benjamin Woods. The Boston Tea Party (1964).
- Maier, Pauline (1972), From Resistance to Revolution: Colonial Radicals and the Development of American Opposition to Britain, 1765–1776, New York: W.W. Norton
- Maier, Pauline. "Reason and Revolution: The Radicalism of Dr. Thomas Young," American Quarterly Vol. 28, No. 2, (Summer 1976), pp. 229–249 in JSTOR
- Middlekauff, Robert (2005), The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789, Oxford University Press, ISBN 019531588X
- Miller, John C. (1943), Origins of the American Revolution, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, archived from the original on 2009-10-23, retrieved 2017-09-14
- Morais, Herbert M. (1939), "The Sons of Liberty in New York", in Morris, Richard B. (ed.), The Era of the American Revolution, pp. 269–289, archived from the original on 2009-10-23, retrieved 2017-09-14, a Marxist interpretation
- Nash, Gary B. (2005), The Unknown Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America, London: Viking, ISBN 0-670-03420-7
- Schecter, Barnet (2002), The Battle of New York, New York: Walker, ISBN 0-8027-1374-2
- Unger, Harlow (2000), John Hancock: Merchant King and American Patriot, Edison, NJ: Castle Books, ISBN 0-7858-2026-4
- Walsh, Richard. Charleston's Sons of Liberty: A Study of the Artisans, 1763–1789 (1968)
- Warner, William B. Protocols of Liberty: Communication Innovation and the American Revolution (University of Chicago Press, 2013)
- Later groups
- Baker, Jean (1983), Affairs of Party: The Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid-Nineteenth Century, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, ISBN 0-8014-1513-6
- Churchill, Robert. "Liberty, conscription, and a party divided-The Sons of Liberty conspiracy, 1863–1864." Prologue-Quarterly of the National Archives 30#4 (1998): 294–303.
- Rodgers, Thomas E. "Copperheads or a Respectable Minority: Current Approaches to the Study of Civil War-Era Democrats." Indiana Magazine of History 109#2 (2013): 114–146. in JSTOR
External links
[edit]- The Sons of Liberty, ushistory.org
- The Sons of Liberty, u-s-history.com
- Albany Sons of Liberty Constitution Archived 2016-03-08 at the Wayback Machine
- Association of the Sons of Liberty in New York, December 15, 1773
- 1765 establishments in the Thirteen Colonies
- American Revolution
- National liberation movements
- New York (state) in the American Revolution
- Patriotic societies
- Patriots in the American Revolution
- Secret societies in the United States
- Tarring and feathering in the United States
- Samuel Adams
- John Hancock
- Patrick Henry
- Paul Revere