Potential enlargement of the European Union: Difference between revisions
→Armenia: Not "official". |
Danlaycock (talk | contribs) →Turkey: not de facto |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Potential candidates for admission into the European Union}} |
|||
{{Hatnote|This article is limited to future enlargement. For the enlargement aspect of the EU as a whole, and historical enlargements, see [[Enlargement of the European Union]].}} |
|||
{{About|potential future enlargement|the past enlargement|Enlargement of the European Union}} |
|||
[[File:Further European Union Enlargement.svg|350px|thumb| |
|||
{{Use Hiberno-English|date=October 2016}} |
|||
{{legend|#3F48CC|Member states}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2022}} |
|||
<!---{{legend|#4999E5|Acceding: None for now}}---> |
|||
{{legend|#86FDF1|Candidates: [[Accession of Albania to the European Union|Albania]], [[Accession of Iceland to the European Union|Iceland]], [[Accession of Macedonia to the European Union|Macedonia]], [[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|Montenegro]], [[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|Serbia]] and [[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|Turkey]]<ref name=status>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/check-current-status/index_en.htm|title=Enlargement - Check current status|publisher=[[European Commission]]|accessdate=27 June 2014}}</ref>}} |
|||
<!--{{legend|#B5E61D|Potential candidates which have applied for membership:}}--> |
|||
{{legend|#FFF200|Potential candidates which have not applied for membership: [[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Bosnia and Herzegovina]] and [[Kosovo–European Union relations|Kosovo*]] (''[[International recognition of Kosovo|status disputed]]'').<ref name=status/>}}]] |
|||
{{Politics of the European Union}} |
{{Politics of the European Union}} |
||
There are currently nine states recognized as candidates for [[Member state of the European Union|membership]] of the [[European Union]]: [[Accession of Albania to the European Union|Albania]], [[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Bosnia and Herzegovina]], [[Accession of Georgia to the European Union|Georgia]], [[Accession of Moldova to the European Union|Moldova]], [[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|Montenegro]], [[Accession of North Macedonia to the European Union|North Macedonia]], [[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|Serbia]], [[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|Turkey]], and [[Accession of Ukraine to the European Union|Ukraine]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Joining the EU |url=https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-enlargement_en |access-date=16 December 2023 |website=ec.europa.eu}}</ref> [[Accession of Kosovo to the European Union|Kosovo]] (the independence of which is [[International recognition of Kosovo|not recognised by five EU member states]]) formally submitted its application for membership in 2022 and is considered a potential candidate by the European Union. Due to multiple factors, talks with Turkey are at an effective standstill since December 2016.<ref name="Hahn"/> |
|||
The '''future enlargement of the European Union''' is theoretically open to any [[Europe]]an country which is [[Representative democracy|democratic]], operates a [[free market]] and is willing and able to implement all previous [[Law of the European Union|European Union law]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/the-policy/conditions-for-enlargement/index_en.htm |title=Ec.europa.eu |publisher=Ec.europa.eu |date=30 October 2010 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> [[Enlargement of the European Union|Past enlargement]] has brought membership from six to twenty-eight members since the foundation of the [[European Union]] (EU) as the [[European Coal and Steel Community]] by the [[Inner Six]] in 1952. The accession criteria are included in the [[Copenhagen criteria]], agreed in 1993, and the [[Maastricht treaty|Treaty of Maastricht]] (Article 49). Whether a country is European or not is subject to [[Copenhagen criteria#Geographic criteria|political assessment]] by the EU institutions.<ref name="briefing23">{{cite web| authors = Members of the European Parliament | title = Legal questions of enlargement | work=Enlargement of the European Union | publisher=The European Parliament | date = 19 May 1998 | url = http://www.europarl.eu.int/enlargement/briefings/23a2_en.htm | accessdate = 9 July 2008}}</ref> |
|||
Six candidates are currently engaged in active negotiations: Montenegro (since 2012), Serbia (since 2014), Albania (since 2020), North Macedonia (since 2020), Moldova and Ukraine (since 2024). The most advanced stage of the negotiations, defined as meeting the interim benchmarks for negotiation chapter 23 and 24 which allow the closing process of all negotiation chapters to start, has so far only been reached by Montenegro.<ref name="Montenegro in Closing Phase">{{Cite web |last=Council of the European Union |date=26 June 2024 |title=Sixteenth meeting of the Accession Conference with Montenegro at Ministerial level (press release by the Council of the EU) |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/06/26/sixteenth-meeting-of-the-accession-conference-with-montenegro-at-ministerial-level |access-date=1 August 2024 |website=Consilium}}</ref> Montenegro's declared political goal is to achieve membership of the EU by 2028.<ref name="Montenegro2028">{{Cite web |last1=Tatiana Marinova |last2=Simona-Alex Mihaleva |date=17 June 2024 |title=President Radev: Bulgaria Supports Montenegro's European Integration |url=https://www.bta.bg/en/news/balkans/691717-president-radev-bulgaria-supports-montenegro-s-european-integration |access-date=1 August 2024 |website=BTA}}</ref> |
|||
There are six recognised candidates for membership:<ref name=status/> |
|||
* [[Accession of Albania to the European Union|Albania]] (applied 2009) |
|||
* [[Accession of Iceland to the European Union|Iceland]] (applied 2009) |
|||
* [[Accession of Macedonia to the European Union|Macedonia]] (applied 2004) |
|||
* [[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|Montenegro]] (applied 2008) |
|||
* [[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|Serbia]] (applied 2009) |
|||
* [[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|Turkey]] (applied 1987) |
|||
The accession criteria are included in the [[Copenhagen criteria]], agreed in 1993, and the [[Treaty of Maastricht]] (Article 49). Article 49 of the Maastricht Treaty (as amended) says that any "European state" that respects the "principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law", may apply to join the EU. Whether a country is European or not is subject to [[Copenhagen criteria#Geographic criteria|political assessment]] by the EU institutions.<ref name="briefing23">{{Cite web |date=19 May 1998 |title=Legal questions of enlargement |url=http://www.europarl.eu.int/enlargement/briefings/23a2_en.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060321034825/http://www.europarl.eu.int/enlargement/briefings/23a2_en.htm |archive-date=21 March 2006 |access-date=9 July 2008 |website=The European Parliament |df=dmy-all}}</ref> [[Enlargement of the European Union|Past enlargement]] since the foundation of the European Union as the [[European Economic Community]] by the [[Inner Six]] states in 1958<ref>Current Article 1 of the [[Treaty of Maastricht|Treaty on European Union]] reads: "The Union shall be founded on the present Treaty and on the [[Treaty of Rome|Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union]]. Those [[Treaties of the EU|two Treaties]] shall have the same legal value. The Union shall replace and succeed the [[European Community]]".</ref> brought total membership of the EU to twenty-eight, although as a result of the [[Brexit|withdrawal of the United Kingdom]], the current number of EU member states is twenty-seven. |
|||
All candidate countries except Albania and Macedonia have started accession negotiations.<ref name="albcand" /><ref name="Macedonia">{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/former-yugoslav-republic-of-macedonia/index_en.htm |title=Countries preparing to join - The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |publisher=[[European Commission]] |date=27 June 2013 |accessdate=16 January 2015}}</ref> [[Accession of Kosovo to the European Union|Kosovo*]], whose independence is [[International recognition of Kosovo|not recognised by five EU member states]],<ref>{{Kosovo-note}}</ref> and [[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Bosnia and Herzegovina]] are recognised as potential candidates for membership by the EU.<ref name=status/> [[Bosnia-Herzegovina]] has signed a [[Stabilisation and Association Agreement]] (SAA) with the EU which is undergoing ratification, which generally precede the lodging of membership applications, while Kosovo has completed negotiations on their SAA.<ref name=status/><ref name="ec.europa.eu">{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/enlargement_process/accession_process/how_does_a_country_join_the_eu/sap/index_en.htm |title=Ec.europa.eu |publisher=Ec.europa.eu |date=30 October 2010 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
Of the four major [[western Europe]]an countries that are not EU members, [[Norway–European Union relations|Norway]], [[Switzerland–European Union relations|Switzerland]] and [[Accession of Iceland to the European Union|Iceland]] have submitted membership applications in the past but subsequently frozen or withdrawn them, while the [[United Kingdom]] is a former member. Norway, Switzerland, Iceland, as well as [[Liechtenstein]], participate in the [[EU Single Market]] and also in the [[Schengen Area]], which makes them closely aligned with the EU; none, however, are in the [[EU Customs Union]]. |
|||
According to an [[Eastern Partnership]] strategy paper issued in 2010, the EU is unlikely to invite any of its post-Soviet neighbors to join the bloc in the next 10 years; however it notes that [[Armenia]], [[Azerbaijan]], [[Belarus]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], [[Moldova]] and [[Ukraine]] could one day become EU members.<ref name="euobserver.com">{{cite web|author=Andrew Rettman |url=http://euobserver.com/9/31109 |title=EUobserver / EU unlikely to expand into post-Soviet east in next decade |publisher=Euobserver.com |date=22 October 2010 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> In late 2014, Ukrainian president [[Petro Poroshenko]] announced 2020 as a target for a Ukrainian EU membership application.<ref name="Reuters Sep 25, 2014"/> |
|||
==Current agenda== |
==Current agenda and applicants <span class="anchor" id="Recognised candidates"></span>== |
||
[[File:European Union member states and candidates v2.svg|thumb|285x285px| |
|||
[[File:EU Balkan enlargement.svg|thumb|Map of the EU potential candidate states in the Balkans, with the date of the latest step in the process. {{legend|#0088cc|Member states}} {{legend|lawngreen|Candidates negotiating membership}} {{legend|yellow|Candidates}} {{legend|darkorange|Potential candidates which have submitted a membership application}} {{legend|red|Potential candidates which have not submitted a membership application}}]] |
|||
{{Legend|#003399|Current members (27)}} |
|||
{{Legend|#46a43b|Candidates negotiating (6)}} |
|||
{{Legend|#71f268|Candidates (2)}} |
|||
{{Legend|#ffd617|Applicant / Potential candidate (1)}} |
|||
{{Legend|#da2131|Candidate with frozen negotiations (1)}}]] |
|||
The present enlargement agenda of the European Union regards three distinct groups of states: |
|||
The present enlargement agenda of the European Union regards [[Turkey]], the [[Western Balkans]] and [[Iceland]]. Turkey has a long standing application with the EU, but their negotiations are expected to take until at least 2023.<ref>{{cite news|title=EU enlargement: The next seven|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11283616|publisher=bbc|accessdate=7 September 2014|date=2 September 2014}}</ref> As for the Western Balkan states, the EU had pledged to include them after their [[Yugoslav wars|civil wars]]: in fact, two states have entered, three are candidates, one applied and the others have pre-accession agreements. Iceland applied but, following new elections, has suspended accession negotiations pending a referendum.<ref name="EUObserverIced">{{cite web|author=Valentina Pop |url=http://euobserver.com/enlargement/121419 |title=EUobserver / Iceland dissolves EU accession team |publisher=Euobserver.com |date=13 September 2013 |accessdate=22 September 2013}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Balkans#Western Balkans|Western Balkans]]: [[Albania]], [[Bosnia and Herzegovina]], [[Kosovo]], [[Montenegro]], [[North Macedonia]], and [[Serbia]] |
|||
* [[Association Trio]]: [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], [[Moldova]], and [[Ukraine]] |
|||
* [[Turkey]] |
|||
These states must negotiate the terms of their EU accession with the current member states, and align their domestic legislation with [[EU law]] before joining. |
|||
There are however other states{{which|date=March 2014}} in Europe which either seek membership or could potentially apply if their present foreign policy changes, or the EU gives a signal that they might now be included on the enlargement agenda. However, these are not formally part of the current agenda, which is already delayed due to bilateral disputes in the Balkans and difficulty in fully implementing the ''[[acquis communautaire]]'' (the accepted body of EU law). |
|||
There are other states in Europe that either seek membership or could potentially apply if their present foreign policy changes or the EU gives a signal that they might now be included on the enlargement agenda. However, these are not formally part of the current agenda, which is already delayed due to bilateral disputes in the Balkans and difficulty in fully implementing the ''[[acquis communautaire]]'' (the accepted body of EU law). |
|||
It was previously the norm for enlargements to see multiple entrants join the Union at once. The only previous enlargements of a single state were the 1981 admission of Greece and the 2013 admission of Croatia. However, the EU members have warned that, following the significant effect of [[2004 enlargement of the European Union|the fifth enlargement in 2004]], a more individual approach will be adopted in the future, although the entry of pairs or small groups of countries will most probably coincide.<ref>{{Cite web |title=European Union, Community Law And International Business Law |url=http://ecpd.org.rs/pdf/studies/Booklet_EU_Law.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110626095318/http://ecpd.org.rs/pdf/studies/Booklet_EU_Law.pdf |archive-date=26 June 2011 |access-date=20 November 2019 |website=European Center for Peace and Development |page=46}}</ref> |
|||
=== Procedure to become an EU member state === |
|||
For an applicant to become a member state of the EU, several [[#Timeline|procedural steps]] need to get passed. These steps will move the status of the state from applicant (potential candidate) to candidate, and later again to a negotiating candidate. The status as a negotiating candidate is reached by the mutual signing of a negotiation framework at a first intergovernmental conference. The start of substantial negotiations with the EU, is subsequently marked by the opening of the first negotiating chapters at a second intergovernmental conference. Every 35 chapters of [[acquis communautaire|the accepted body of EU law]] (divided into 6 clusters) must be opened and closed during subsequent additional intergovernmental conferences, for a state to conclude the negotiations by the signing of an accession treaty. |
|||
After a reform in 2020, the 35 chapters have been divided into six main clusters, where all chapters of the first cluster are supposed to be opened together at the same time. The opening of chapters, can only happen by a unanimous decision by the [[Council of the European Union]] once the screening procedure has been completed for the specific chapters in concern (by a report outlining which legislative changes are needed), while there can also be set some "opening benchmarks" requiring a certain amount of legislative changes/implementation to be met even before the opening of the chapter. The closure of a chapter, is done provisionally by a unanimous decision by the [[Council of the European Union]] once the state demonstrates to have implemented and aligned their domestic legislation with the EU law, for each specific chapter in concern. |
|||
There are no requirement for completion of the screening procedure for all 35 [[Acquis communautaire|negotiating chapters]], before the start of the first and second intergovernmental conference.<ref name="UKRMOLscreening">{{Cite web |last=Alexandra Brzozowski |date=31 January 2024 |title=EU Commission to start screening process for Ukraine, Moldova after 'surprise' delay |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement-neighbourhood/news/eu-commission-to-start-screening-process-for-ukraine-moldova-after-surprise-delay |access-date=8 July 2024 |publisher=Euractiv}}</ref> |
|||
=== Western Balkans === |
|||
{{See also|Strategy for the Western Balkans|Yugoslavia–European Communities relations}} |
|||
{{EUWESTBALKANS}} |
|||
The 2003 European Council summit in [[Thessaloniki]] set the integration of the Western [[Balkans]] as a priority of EU expansion. |
|||
[[Slovenia]] was the first former Yugoslav country to join the EU in [[2004 enlargement of the European Union|2004]], followed by [[Croatia]] in [[2013 enlargement of the European Union|2013]]. |
|||
[[Albania]], [[Bosnia and Herzegovina]], [[Montenegro]], [[North Macedonia]], and [[Serbia]] have all been officially granted candidate status.<ref name="AL MK rferl">{{Cite news |title=After Years Of Delay, North Macedonia, Albania Get OK To Begin EU Accession Talks |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/after-years-of-delay-north-macedonia-albania-get-ok-to-begin-eu-accession-talks/30507053.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022170806/https://www.rferl.org/a/after-years-of-delay-north-macedonia-albania-get-ok-to-begin-eu-accession-talks/30507053.html |archive-date=22 October 2020 |access-date=2020-03-28 |work=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty |language=en}}</ref><ref name="BosniaCandi">{{Cite web |date=15 December 2022 |title='Huge, historic move': EU grants Bosnia and Herzegovina Candidate Status |url=https://sarajevotimes.com/huge-historic-move-eu-grants-bosnia-and-herzegovina-candidate-status |access-date=2022-12-15 |website=Sarajevo Times}}</ref> [[Kosovo]], which is claimed by Serbia and [[International recognition of Kosovo|not recognised by 5 EU states]], applied on 14 December 2022 and is considered a potential candidate by the European Union.<ref name="Kosovo euractiv">{{Cite web |date=2022-06-10 |title=Kosovo to apply for EU membership by end of 2022 |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/all/news/kosovo-to-apply-for-eu-membership-by-end-of-2022 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220611073657/https://www.euractiv.com/section/all/news/kosovo-to-apply-for-eu-membership-by-end-of-2022 |archive-date=2022-06-11 |access-date=2022-06-11 |website=euractiv.com |language=en}}</ref><ref name="KosovoApli"/> |
|||
Serbia and Montenegro, the most advanced candidates in their negotiation processes with the EU, may join the EU sometime between 2025 and 2030.<ref name="before2025">{{Cite web |date=11 December 2017 |title=EU advances membership talks for Montenegro, Serbia |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/news/eu-advances-membership-talks-for-serbia-montenegro |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201004210856/https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/news/eu-advances-membership-talks-for-serbia-montenegro |archive-date=4 October 2020 |access-date=24 August 2019 |website=Euractiv}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Jozwiak |first=Rikard |date=Feb 5, 2018 |title=Serbia, Montenegro 'Could Potentially' Join EU In 2025 |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/eu-western-balkans-strategy-serbia-montenegro-potentially-join-2025/29020904.html |access-date=21 October 2023 |publisher=RadioFreeEurope}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=28 August 2023 |title=EU must be ready to accept new members by 2030 |url=https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2023/08/28/eu-must-be-ready-to-accept-new-members-by-2030-charles-michel |work=euronews}}</ref> Montenegro's declared political goal is to achieve membership of the EU by 2028.<ref name="Montenegro2028"/> |
|||
The European Council had endorsed starting negotiations with Albania and North Macedonia on 26 March 2020,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Staff |date=27 March 2020 |title=EU leaders give final OK to begin Albania, North Macedonia accession talks |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/eu-leaders-give-final-approval-eu-membership-talks-macedonia-albania/30512156.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205120516/https://www.rferl.org/a/eu-leaders-give-final-approval-eu-membership-talks-macedonia-albania/30512156.html |archive-date=5 December 2020 |access-date=8 July 2020 |work=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty}}</ref> however, the negotiation process was blocked by [[Bulgaria]] for over two years.<ref name="novinite.com">{{Cite web |title=Bulgaria Blocks North Macedonia's EU Accession Negotiations - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency |url=https://www.novinite.com/articles/206448/Bulgaria+Blocks+North+Macedonia%E2%80%99s+EU+Accession+Negotiations |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201118221256/https://www.novinite.com/articles/206448/Bulgaria+Blocks+North+Macedonia%E2%80%99s+EU+Accession+Negotiations |archive-date=18 November 2020 |access-date=7 November 2020 |website=novinite.com}}</ref>{{Efn|Bulgaria demanded: "good neighbourly relations to be a criterion for the Republic of North Macedonia's membership in the EU; to use the official constitutional name of the Republic of North Macedonia instead of the short North Macedonia and the wording for the language should be the "official language" of the candidate country, not Macedonian."<ref name="novinite.com"/>}} In June 2022 French President Emmanuel Macron submitted a compromise proposal which, if adopted by both countries, would pave the way for the immediate adoption of negotiating frameworks for North Macedonia and Albania by the [[Council of the European Union|EU Council]] and for the organization of intergovernmental conferences with them.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Macron Says Compromise Found On EU Membership Talks For North Macedonia |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/macedonia-eu-membership-macron-compromise/31923556.html |access-date=2022-07-15 |work=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty |language=en}}</ref> On 24 June 2022, Bulgaria's parliament approved the revised French proposal to lift the country's veto on opening EU accession talks with North Macedonia, with the [[Assembly of North Macedonia]] also doing so on 16 July 2022 allowing accession negotiations to begin. On the same day, the start of negotiations was set for 19 July 2022.<ref name="GTS">{{Cite web |date=16 July 2022 |title=North Macedonia parliament OKs deal; EU talks start July 19 |url=https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-macron-bulgaria-constitutions-32b0ff86b80818f961a1da8827867620 |access-date=16 July 2022 |website=Associated Press}}</ref> |
|||
On 8 November 2023, the [[European Commission]] adopted a new Growth Plan for the [[Western Balkans]], with the aim of bringing them closer to the EU through offering some of the [[Strategy for the Western Balkans|benefits of EU membership to the region in advance of accession]]. The Growth Plan provides €6 billion financial grants and loans for the entire region in return of implementation of structural reforms. Beside the core financial support of the growth plan, one of the additional embedded priority actions is granting access to the [[Single Euro Payments Area]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=8 November 2023 |title=New Growth Plan for the Western Balkans |url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/new-growth-plan-western-balkans_en |access-date=19 June 2024 |publisher=European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (DG NEAR)}}</ref> |
|||
On 8 November 2023, the European Commission recommended opening negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina once the necessary degree of compliance with the membership criteria is achieved.<ref name="UkraineMoldovaNegotiationsrec"/> On 12 March 2024, the European Commission recommended opening EU membership negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina, citing the positive results from important reforms the country enacted.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Sito-sucic |first=Daria |date=2024-03-12 |title=European Commission recommends opening EU membership talks with Bosnia |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/european-commission-recommend-eu-membership-talks-with-bosnia-says-eus-von-der-2024-03-12 |access-date=2024-03-12 |publisher=Reuters}}</ref><ref name="BosNegRec">{{Cite news |last=Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations |date=2024-03-12 |title=Commission proposes to open EU accession negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and updates on progress made by Ukraine and Moldova |url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-proposes-open-eu-accession-negotiations-bosnia-and-herzegovina-and-updates-progress-made-2024-03-12_en |access-date=2024-03-12 |publisher=European Commission}}</ref><ref name="BHNegotiations">{{Cite news |date=12 March 2024 |title=Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on the preparation of the European Council meeting of 21-22 March 2024 |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_24_1415 |access-date=2024-03-12}}</ref> On 21 March 2024, all 27 EU leaders, representing the [[European Council]], gathered for a summit in Brussels, where they unanimously approved opening EU membership negotiations for Bosnia and Herzegovina.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Jones |first=Mared Gwyn |date=2024-03-21 |title=European Union leaders approve opening accession talks with Bosnia and Herzegovina |url=https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/03/21/european-union-leaders-approve-opening-accession-talks-with-bosnia-and-herzegovina |access-date=2024-03-21 |publisher=EuroNews}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Petrequin |first=Samuel |date=2024-03-21 |title=EU leaders agree on opening membership talks with Bosnia, but with many strings attached |url=https://apnews.com/article/eu-enlargement-bosnia-bid-candidate-western-balkans-e2862599316dea5973a4fd7b1a2781ee |access-date=2024-03-21 |publisher=Associated Press}}</ref> |
|||
=== Association Trio === |
|||
{{Main|Association Trio}} |
|||
{{See also|Accession of Georgia to the European Union|Accession of Moldova to the European Union|Accession of Ukraine to the European Union}} |
|||
In 2005, the [[European Commission]] suggested in a strategy paper that the present enlargement agenda could potentially block the possibility of a future accession of [[Armenia]], [[Azerbaijan]], [[Belarus]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], [[Moldova]], and [[Ukraine]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=9 November 2005 |title=2005 enlargement strategy paper |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0561:FIN:EN:HTML |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180913122942/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0561:FIN:EN:HTML |archive-date=13 September 2018 |access-date=20 November 2019 |website=European Union}}</ref> [[Olli Rehn]], the [[European Commissioner for Enlargement]] between 2004 and 2010, said on the occasion that the EU should "avoid overstretching our capacity, and instead consolidate our enlargement agenda," adding, "this is already a challenging agenda for our accession process."<ref>{{Cite news |date=1 February 2006 |title=EU enlargement chief vows to press ahead, for 'stability' |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/02/01/news/eu.php |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080618060410/http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/02/01/news/eu.php |archive-date=18 June 2008 |access-date=2 June 2008 |work=International Herald Tribune}}</ref> |
|||
Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine ratified an Association Agreement with the EU, and the [[European Parliament]] passed a resolution in 2014 stating that "in accordance with Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine, as well as any other European country, have a European perspective, can apply for EU membership in compliance with the principles of democracy, respect for fundamental freedoms and human rights, minority rights and ensuring the rule of rights."<ref name="en.trend.az">{{Cite web |date=18 April 2014 |title=Georgia can apply for EU membership if it complies with democratic principles |url=https://en.trend.az/scaucasus/georgia/2264637.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116013256/https://en.trend.az/scaucasus/georgia/2264637.html |archive-date=16 November 2020 |access-date=18 October 2019 |website=en.trend.az}}</ref> They also entered the [[Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area]] with the EU, which creates "framework for modernising [...] trade relations and for economic development by the opening of markets via the progressive removal of customs tariffs and quotas, and by an extensive harmonisation of laws, norms and regulations in various trade-related sectors, creating the conditions for aligning key sectors" of their economies with EU standards.<ref name="DCFTA Ukr">[http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/april/tradoc_150981.pdf< EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area]{{Dead link |date=April 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}. trade.ec.europa.eu.</ref> However, the EU did not expand further into the [[post-Soviet states|post-Soviet space]] in the 2010s.<ref name="euobserver.com">{{Cite web |last=Rettman |first=Andrew |date=22 October 2010 |title=EU unlikely to expand into post-Soviet east in next decade |url=http://euobserver.com/9/31109 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110311223450/http://euobserver.com/9/31109 |archive-date=11 March 2011 |access-date=7 January 2011 |website=Euobserver.com}}</ref> |
|||
By January 2021, Georgia and Ukraine were preparing to formally apply for EU membership in 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |date=29 January 2019 |title=У 2024 році Україна подасть заявку на вступ до ЄС |url=https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/2629440-u-2024-roci-ukraina-podast-zaavku-na-vstup-do-es.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210606180804/https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/2629440-u-2024-roci-ukraina-podast-zaavku-na-vstup-do-es.html |archive-date=6 June 2021 |access-date=14 February 2021 |website=ukrinform.ua}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Makszimov |first=Vlagyiszlav |date=2021-01-22 |title=Georgian president visits Brussels in push for 2024 EU membership application |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/eastern-europe/news/georgian-president-visits-brussels-in-push-for-2024-eu-membership-application |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122054423/https://www.euractiv.com/section/eastern-europe/news/georgian-president-visits-brussels-in-push-for-2024-eu-membership-application |archive-date=22 January 2021 |access-date=2021-01-24 |website=euractiv.com |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Georgia-EU Relations Within Georgia's 2024 Objective to Apply for the EU Membership |url=https://www.georgianjournal.ge/politics/36727-georgia-eu-relations-within-georgias-2024-objective-to-apply-for-the-eu-membership.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103123745/https://www.georgianjournal.ge/politics/36727-georgia-eu-relations-within-georgias-2024-objective-to-apply-for-the-eu-membership.html |archive-date=3 January 2021 |access-date=2021-01-24 |website=georgianjournal.ge |language=ka}}</ref> However, following the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine|2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine]], Ukraine submitted an application for EU membership on 28 February 2022, followed by Georgia and Moldova on 3 March 2022.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Georgia, Moldova Formally Apply For EU Membership Amid Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/georgia-moldova-eu-applications/31734092.html |work=Radiofreeeurope/Radioliberty}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Moldovan president says Moldova applies for EU membership {{Pipe}} Law-Order |url=https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/1947549-moldovan-president-says-moldova-applies-for-eu-membership |website=devdiscourse.com}}</ref> On 23 June 2022, the [[European Council]] granted candidate status to Moldova and Ukraine, and recognized Georgia as a potential candidate for membership.<ref name="UA-MD-candidate-council"/> When taking its candidacy decision for Ukraine and Moldova, the Council made opening the accession negotiations conditional to addressing respectively seven and nine key areas related to strengthening the rule of law, fighting corruption and improving governance processes. |
|||
In his speech in Moldova on 28 March 2023, President of the European Council Charles Michel mentioned that "by the end of the year, the Council will have to decide on the opening negotiations with [Ukraine and Moldova]. It will be a political decision taking into account the report that will be published by the Commission. And I sincerely hope that a positive decision will be possible by the end of the year".<ref>{{Cite web |title=EC to decide on opening negotiations over EU accession of Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia by year-end - Charles Michel {{!}} Rustavi2 |url=https://rustavi2.ge/en/news/252175 |access-date=2023-03-30 |website=rustavi2.ge |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
On 8 November 2023, the European Commission recommended opening negotiations with Moldova and Ukraine, and granting candidate status to Georgia,<ref name="UkraineMoldovaNegotiationsrec"/> and this was agreed by the European Council on 14 December 2023.<ref name="MUG">{{Cite web |date=2023-12-14 |title=European Council conclusions on Ukraine, enlargement and reforms |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/12/14/european-council-conclusions-on-ukraine-enlargement-and-reforms |access-date=2023-12-14 |website=European Council}}</ref> |
|||
On 25 June 2024, the first Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) was called by the Belgian Presidency of the Council of the EU, officially marking the start of the accession negotiations with Moldova and Ukraine.<ref name="Brzozowski-2024">{{Cite web |last=Brzozowski |first=Alexandra |date=2024-06-14 |title=BREAKING: EU member states greenlight Ukraine, Moldova negotiating frameworks |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement-neighbourhood/news/breaking-eu-member-states-greenlight-ukraine-moldova-negotiating-frameworks |access-date=2024-06-15 |website=www.euractiv.com |language=en-GB}}</ref> |
|||
The Association Trio is sometimes expanded to the [[Association Trio#Trio + 1|Trio + 1]] with the inclusion of [[Armenia]], which is not formally on the EU's enlargement agenda but is considering submitting an application for membership. |
|||
On 9 July 2024, following the adoption of a law by Georgia's ruling [[Georgian Dream]] party requiring non-governmental and media entities to register as "foreign agents", the EU ambassador in Georgia announced that it had suspended the country's accession to the bloc.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-09 |title=EU announces Georgia's accession is 'stopped' after anti-West pivot |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/georgia-eu-accession-stopped-anti-west-pivot-russian-law-foreign-agent-bill |access-date=2024-07-10 |website=POLITICO |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-09 |title=EU halts Georgia's accession to the bloc, freezes financial aid over much-criticized law |url=https://apnews.com/article/georgia-eu-membership-foreign-agents-law-b812e27d5ddba6e03d8859652b8fc986 |access-date=2024-07-10 |website=AP News |language=en}}</ref> The European Union has threatened Georgia with sanctions and suspension of relations if the country becomes a "one-party state" without political opposition following parliamentary elections in October 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-04 |title=EU says Georgia may risk sanctions if it abandons democracy |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-says-georgia-may-risk-sanctions-if-it-abandons-democracy-2024-10-04/ |access-date=2024-10-07 |website=Reuters |language=en}}</ref> The EU later stopped financial aid. In November, the European parliament voted that the results of the [[2024 Georgian parliamentary election|October Georgian parliamentary election]] should not be recognised. Following this, Georgian Prime Minister [[Irakli Kobakhidze]] stated that ascension negotiations were suspended until 2028.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/11/28/georgian-prime-minister-suspends-eu-membership-talks-until-end-of-2028 |title=Georgian prime minister suspends EU membership talks until end of 2028 |author1=Lucy Davalou |author2=Andrew Naughtie |work=euronews |date=28 November 2024 |access-date=30 November 2024}}</ref> However, Kobakhidze insisted that [[Kobakhidze government|his government]] would continue to implement the reforms required for accession and that it still planned for Georgia to join the EU by 2030.<ref>{{cite web |author=Thomas Mackintosh|title=Protesters clash with police after Georgia shelves EU bid|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62jp68p315o|date=29 November 2024|access-date=29 November 2024|work=[[BBC News]]}}</ref> |
|||
=== Turkey === |
|||
{{See also|Accession of Turkey to the European Union|European Union–Turkey relations}} |
|||
Turkey's candidacy to join the EU has been a matter of major significance and considerable controversy since it was granted in 1999. Turkey has had historically close ties with the EU, having an [[Ankara Agreement|association agreement since 1964]],<ref>Official Journal of the European Communities 1973, C113 p2</ref> being in a [[European Union–Turkey Customs Union|customs union with the EU]] since 1995 and initially applying to join in 1987. Only after a summit in Brussels on 17 December 2004 (following the major [[2004 enlargement of the European Union|2004 enlargement]]) did the European Council announce that membership negotiations with Turkey were officially opened on 3 October 2005. |
|||
Turkey is the [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|eleventh largest economy in the world]] (measured as Purchasing Power Parity), and is a key [[regional power]].<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Bhalla |first1=Reva |last2=Goodrich |first2=Lauren |last3=Zeihan |first3=Peter |date=17 March 2009 |title=Turkey and Russia on the Rise |url=http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20090317_turkey_and_russia_rise |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110823084005/http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20090317_turkey_and_russia_rise |archive-date=23 August 2011 |website=Stratfor}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Friedman |first=George |date=31 July 2007 |title=The Geopolitics of Turkey |url=http://www.stratfor.com/products/premium/read_article.php?id=293204 |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20091010114854/http://www.stratfor.com/products/premium/read_article.php?id=293204 |archive-date=10 October 2009 |website=Stratfor}}</ref> In 2006, [[Carl Bildt]], former [[Minister for Foreign Affairs (Sweden)|Swedish foreign minister]], stated that "[The accession of Turkey] would give the EU a decisive role for stability in the Eastern part of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, which is clearly in the strategic interest of Europe."<ref name="ihtbildt">{{Cite news |last=Ekman |first=Ivar |date=11 December 2006 |title=Top Swedish official backs Turkey for EU |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/11/news/sweden.php |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071015125225/http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/11/news/sweden.php |archive-date=15 October 2007 |access-date=3 July 2007 |work=International Herald Tribune}}</ref> However, others, such as former [[List of presidents of France|French President]] [[Nicolas Sarkozy]] and former [[Chancellor of Germany|German Chancellor]] [[Angela Merkel]], expressed opposition to Turkey's membership. Opponents argue that Turkey does not respect the key principles that are expected in a [[liberal democracy]], such as the [[Freedom of speech|freedom of expression]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=30 April 2008 |title=BBC: EU hails Turkey free speech move |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7375327.stm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190902204820/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7375327.stm |archive-date=2 September 2019 |access-date=7 January 2011 |work=BBC News}}</ref> |
|||
Turkey's large population would also alter the balance of power in the representative European institutions. Upon joining the EU, Turkey's 84 million inhabitants would bestow it the largest number of [[Member of the European Parliament|MEP]]s in the [[European Parliament]]. It would become the most [[List of countries and dependencies by population|populous country]] in the EU.<ref name="economist2">{{Cite news |date=17 March 2007 |title=The ins and outs: The EU's most effective foreign-policy instrument has been enlargement. But how far can it go? |url=https://www.economist.com/special-report/2007/03/17/the-ins-and-outs |url-access=limited |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110701061352/http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=682266&story_id=8808134 |archive-date=1 July 2011 |access-date=18 May 2020 |newspaper=The Economist}}</ref> Another problem is that Turkey does not recognise one EU member state, [[Cyprus]], because of the [[Cyprus problem]] and the Cypriot government blocks some chapters of Turkey's talks.<ref name="Economist-161013"/><ref name="carnegie"/> |
|||
Turkey's relations with the EU have seriously deteriorated in the aftermath of the [[2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt]] and subsequent [[2016–present purges in Turkey|purges]].<ref name="Economist-161013">{{Cite magazine |date=13 October 2016 |title=Turkey's bid to join the EU is a bad joke; but don't kill it |url=https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21708693-two-cheers-hypocrisy-turkeys-bid-join-eu-bad-joke-dont-kill-it |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170911162030/https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21708693-two-cheers-hypocrisy-turkeys-bid-join-eu-bad-joke-dont-kill-it |archive-date=11 September 2017 |access-date=28 August 2017 |magazine=The Economist}}</ref><ref name="carnegie">{{Cite news |date=11 April 2017 |title=EU-Turkey Relations Reaching a Crossroads |url=http://carnegieeurope.eu/2017/04/11/eu-turkey-relations-reaching-crossroads-pub-68675 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190717122522/https://carnegieeurope.eu/2017/04/11/eu-turkey-relations-reaching-crossroads-pub-68675 |archive-date=17 July 2019 |access-date=3 May 2017 |work=carnegieeurope.eu}}</ref> On 26 July 2016, European Commission President [[Jean-Claude Juncker]] announced that Turkey's EU membership process would come to an end if the death penalty was reinstated in Turkey.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 26, 2016 |title=AB'den Türkiye'ye: İdam cezası geri gelirse... |url=https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/abden-turkiyeye-idam-cezasi-geri-gelirse-uyelik-surecini-durdururuz-40168261 |website=Hürriyet |language=tr}}</ref> On 24 November 2016, the [[European Parliament]] approved a non-binding resolution calling for the "temporary freeze of the ongoing accession negotiations with Turkey" over human rights and rule of law concerns.<ref>{{Cite web |date=24 November 2017 |title=P8_TA(2016)0450 |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bTA%2bP8-TA-2016-0450%2b0%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612165103/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bTA%2bP8-TA-2016-0450%2b0%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN |archive-date=12 June 2018 |access-date=11 November 2017 |website=European Parliament}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=Freeze EU accession talks with Turkey until it halts repression, urge MEPs |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20161117IPR51549/freeze-eu-accession-talks-with-turkey-until-it-halts-repression-urge-meps |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170310183603/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20161117IPR51549/freeze-eu-accession-talks-with-turkey-until-it-halts-repression-urge-meps |archive-date=10 March 2017 |access-date=3 May 2017 |work=European Parliament}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Weise |first=Zia |date=24 November 2016 |title=EU parliament votes overwhelmingly in favour of scrapping Turkey accession talks |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/24/eu-votes-overwhelmingly-favour-scrapping-turkey-accession-talks |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191224014723/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/24/eu-votes-overwhelmingly-favour-scrapping-turkey-accession-talks |archive-date=24 December 2019 |access-date=21 November 2019 |work=The Telegraph}}</ref> On 6 July 2017, the [[European Parliament]] accepted the call for the suspension of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 6, 2017 |title=AP: Türkiye ile müzakereler askıya alınsın |url=https://www.dw.com/tr/apden-t%C3%BCrkiye-ile-m%C3%BCzakerelerin-ask%C4%B1ya-al%C4%B1nmas%C4%B1na-onay/a-39572885 |website=DW Türkçe |language=tr}}</ref> On 13 December, the [[European Council]] (comprising the heads of state or government of the member states) resolved that it would open no new areas in Turkey's membership talks in the "prevailing circumstances",<ref name="Yahoo">{{Cite news |last=Kempf |first=Danny |date=13 December 2016 |title=EU says won't expand Turkey membership talks |url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/eu-says-wont-open-turkey-membership-chapters-165121377.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191230224317/https://www.yahoo.com/news/eu-says-wont-open-turkey-membership-chapters-165121377.html |archive-date=30 December 2019 |access-date=21 November 2019 |work=yahoo.com |agency=Agence France-Presse}}</ref> as Turkey's path toward autocratic rule made progress on EU accession impossible.<ref name="Marc Pierini">{{Cite news |last=Pierini |first=Marc |date=12 December 2016 |title=Turkey's Impending Estrangement From the West |url=http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/66408 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200206183255/https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/66408 |archive-date=6 February 2020 |access-date=21 November 2019 |work=Carnegie Europe}}</ref> On 13 March 2019, the [[European Parliament]] accepted the call for a halt to the full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 13, 2019 |title=European Parliament calls for suspension of Turkey EU accession talks |url=https://www.euronews.com/2019/03/13/european-parliament-calls-for-suspension-of-turkey-eu-accession-talks |website=Euronews |language=en}}</ref> On 19 May 2021, the European Parliament unanimously accepted the call for the suspension of accession negotiations between the EU and Turkey.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/eu-parliament-calls-for-the-suspension-of-turkeys-eu-talks/|title=EU parliament calls for the suspension of Turkey’s EU talks|language=en|date=May 19, 2021|work=EurActiv}}</ref> As of 2022, and especially following Erdoğan's victory in the [[2017 Turkish constitutional referendum|constitutional referendum]], Turkish accession talks are effectively at a standstill.<ref name="Hahn">{{Cite news |last=Emmott |first=Robin |date=2 May 2017 |title=Turkey's EU dream is over, for now, top official says |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-eu-idUSKBN17Y0U0 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112011613/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-eu-idUSKBN17Y0U0 |archive-date=12 November 2020 |access-date=21 November 2019 |work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=10 April 2017 |title="Turkey is no longer an EU candidate", MEP says |url=http://www.euronews.com/2017/04/10/turkey-is-no-longer-an-eu-candidate-mep-says |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200310131012/https://www.euronews.com/2017/04/10/turkey-is-no-longer-an-eu-candidate-mep-says |archive-date=10 March 2020 |access-date=21 November 2019 |work=Euronews}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Gonen |first=Emre |date=2 May 2017 |title=A truce with the EU? |url=https://www.dailysabah.com/columns/emre_gonen/2017/05/02/a-truce-with-the-eu |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919191307/https://www.dailysabah.com/columns/emre_gonen/2017/05/02/a-truce-with-the-eu |archive-date=19 September 2020 |access-date=21 November 2019 |work=Daily Sabah - Euronews}}</ref> |
|||
In July 2023, Erdoğan brought up Turkey's accession to EU membership up in the context of [[Sweden–NATO relations|Sweden's application for NATO membership]].<ref name="Huseyin Hayatsever 2023 k001">{{Cite web |last=Huseyin Hayatsever |first=Ece Toksabay |date=2023-07-10 |title=Erdogan links Sweden's NATO membership to Turkey's EU accession |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/erdogan-links-swedens-nato-membership-turkeys-eu-accession-2023-07-10 |access-date=2023-07-10 |website=Reuters}}</ref> However, in September 2023, he announced that the European Union was well into a rupture in its relations with Turkey and that they could part ways during Turkey's European Union membership process.<ref>{{Cite web |date=16 September 2023 |title=Turkey could part ways with EU if necessary, Erdogan says |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/turkeys-erdogan-says-country-could-part-ways-with-eu-if-necessary-2023-09-16 |publisher=Reuters}}</ref> |
|||
=== Summary table === |
|||
<!--Order of states in the table is sorted according to how far candidate negotiations progressed--> |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
! State |
|||
! Status<ref>{{Cite web |title=EU enlargement |url=https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-enlargement_en |access-date=2024-03-22 |website=European Union}}</ref> |
|||
! Chapters<br/>opened |
|||
! Chapters<br/>closed |
|||
! Latest steps |
|||
! Next step |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:95%; white-space:nowrap;" |
|||
! class="unsortable" style="width:10px; border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; line-height:95%;"| |
|||
! style="line-height:95%" | State<br/> |
|||
! style="line-height:95%" | Status<br/> |
|||
! style="line-height:95%" | [[European Union Association Agreement|Association <br/>Agreement]] |
|||
! style="line-height:95%" | Membership <br/>Application |
|||
! style="line-height:95%" | Candidate<br/>status |
|||
! style="line-height:95%" | Negotiations <br/>start |
|||
! style="line-height:95%" | Screening<br/>completed |
|||
! style="line-height:95%" | [[Acquis communautaire#Chapters of the acquis|Acquis Chapters]] <br/>open/closed{{#tag:ref|Excluding Chapters 34 (Institutions) and 35 (Other Issues) since these are not legislation chapters.|group=N}} |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Montenegro}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|accession process]])}} |
|||
! style="border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | {{flagicon|ALB}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#46a43b"| '''Candidate negotiating'''<br/>{{Small|(since June 2012)<ref name="MontenegroStatus"/>}} |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | [[Accession of Albania to the European Union|Albania]] |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|33/33<ref name="MontenegroStatus">{{Cite web |date=27 June 2024 |title=Enlargement: Montenegro |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/montenegro |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>{{Progression|33|33}} |
|||
| style="background:yellow" | {{sort|2|'''Candidate'''}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|3/33<ref name="MontenegroStatus"/>{{Progression|3|33}} |
|||
| 2009-04-01 ([[Stabilisation and Association Process|SAA]]) |
|||
| Screening completed for all [[Acquis communautaire|negotiating chapters]] in June 2013.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Montenegro Report 2022 |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022SC0335&from=EN |website=European Commission}}</ref> First chapters opened in December 2012.<ref name="MNE2012"/> |
|||
| 2009-04-28 |
|||
| Every chapter must be closed to conclude the negotiations. |
|||
| 2014-06-24<ref name=albcand>{{cite web|title=EU candidate status for Albania|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-439_en.htm|publisher=[[European Commission]]|date=2014-06-24|accessdate=2014-06-27}}</ref> |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Serbia}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|accession process]])}} |
|||
! style="border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | {{flagicon|BIH}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#46a43b"| '''Candidate negotiating'''<br/>{{Small|(since January 2014)<ref name="SerbiaStatus"/>}} |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | [[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Bosnia and <br/>Herzegovina]] |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|22/34<ref name="SerbiaStatus">{{Cite web |date=11 January 2024 |title=Enlargement: Serbia |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/serbia |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>{{Progression|22|34}} |
|||
| style="background:red" | {{sort|4|'''Potential <br/>candidate'''}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|2/34<ref name="SerbiaStatus"/>{{Progression|2|34}} |
|||
| Signed (SAA) |
|||
| Screening completed for all [[Acquis communautaire|negotiating chapters]] in March 2015.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Serbia Report 2022 |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022SC0338&from=EN |website=European Commission}}</ref> First chapters opened in December 2015.<ref name="SRB2015"/> |
|||
| – |
|||
| Every chapter must be opened and closed to conclude the negotiations. |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Albania}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Albania to the European Union|accession process]])}} |
|||
! style="border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | {{flagicon|ISL}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#46a43b"| '''Candidate negotiating'''<br/>{{Small|(since July 2022)<ref name="July2022AlMk"/>}} |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | [[Accession of Iceland to the European Union|Iceland]] |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|5/33<ref name="AlbaniaStatus">{{Cite web |date=27 January 2024 |title=Enlargement: Albania |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/albania |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>{{Progression|5|33}} |
|||
| style="background:DarkOrchid" | {{sort|1|'''Negotiations <br/>suspended'''}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|0/33<ref name="AlbaniaStatus"/>{{Progression|0|33}} |
|||
| 1994-01-01 ([[European Economic Area|EEA]]) |
|||
| Screening completed for all [[Acquis communautaire|negotiating chapters]] in November 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Albania's EU membership process |url=https://em-al.org/en/albanias-eu-membership-process |access-date=27 June 2024 |publisher=European Movement Albania}}</ref> First chapters opened in October 2024.<ref name=Albania2IGC/> |
|||
| 2009-07-16 |
|||
| Every chapter must be opened and closed to conclude the negotiations. |
|||
| 2010-06-17 |
|||
| 2010-07-27 |
|||
| 2011-06-21 |
|||
| 27/11 of 33 |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Nowrap|{{Flag|North Macedonia}}}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of North Macedonia to the European Union|accession process]])}} |
|||
! style="border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | {{flagicon|Kosovo}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#46a43b"| '''Candidate negotiating'''<br/>{{Small|(since July 2022)<ref name="July2022AlMk"/>}} |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | [[Kosovo–European Union relations|Kosovo]]<br/>(''[[International recognition of Kosovo|status disputed]]'')<ref name="http">{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/potential-candidates/index_en.htm|title=European Commission—Enlargement—Potential Candidates|accessdate=28 October 2011}}</ref> |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|0/33<ref name="MacedoniaStatus">{{Cite web |date=27 January 2024 |title=Enlargement: North Macedonia |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/republic-north-macedonia |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>{{Progression|0|33}} |
|||
| style="background:red" | {{sort|5|'''Potential <br/>candidate'''}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|0/33<ref name="MacedoniaStatus"/>{{Progression|0|33}} |
|||
| Initialled (SAA) |
|||
| Screening completed for all [[Acquis communautaire|negotiating chapters]] in December 2023.<ref name="MacedoniaStatus"/> |
|||
| – |
|||
| The opening of the first 5 negotiating chapters (''Fundamentals cluster'') at a second intergovernmental conference will not begin until the opening phase has been completed, which according to the [[Council of the European Union|Council]] conclusions of July 2022 is conditional on the [[Assembly of North Macedonia]] approving a [[constitutional amendment]] related to the Bulgarian minority.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Aleksandar Samardjiev |date=11 August 2022 |title=North Macedonia: EU membership remains a never-ending challenge |url=https://www.balcanicaucaso.org/eng/Areas/North-Macedonia/North-Macedonia-EU-membership-remains-a-never-ending-challenge-219967 |access-date=26 June 2024 |website=Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa}}</ref><ref name="CouncilDecisions2023">{{Cite web |date=12 December 2023 |title=Council conclusions on Enlargement (16707/23) |url=https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16707-2023-INIT/en/pdf |access-date=13 July 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=14 December 2023 |title=European Council conclusions on Ukraine, enlargement and reforms |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/12/14/european-council-conclusions-on-ukraine-enlargement-and-reforms/}}</ref> |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Moldova}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Moldova to the European Union|accession process]])}}<br/>{{Small|([[Moldova–European Union relations|relations]])}} |
|||
! style="border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | {{flagicon|MKD}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#46a43b"| '''Candidate negotiating'''<br/>{{Small|(since June 2024)<ref name="Brzozowski-2024"/><ref>{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=Accession Conference with Moldova, 25 June 2024 |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2024/06/25/moldova |access-date=25 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>}} |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | [[Accession of Macedonia to the European Union|Macedonia]] |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|0/33<ref name="MoldovaStatus">{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=Enlargement: Moldova |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/moldova |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>{{Progression|0|33}} |
|||
| style="background:yellow" | {{sort|2|'''Candidate'''}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|0/33<ref name="MoldovaStatus"/>{{Progression|0|33}} |
|||
| 2004-04-01 (SAA) |
|||
| Screening of negotiation chapters (the explanatory phase) began in January 2024,<ref name="UKRMOLscreening"/> and the bilateral phase of the screening started in July 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=Intergovernmental conference with Moldova: press conference |url=https://video.consilium.europa.eu/event/en/27558 |access-date=10 July 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref> |
|||
| 2004-03-22 |
|||
| The opening of the first 5 negotiating chapters (''Fundamentals cluster'') at a second intergovernmental conference. Every chapter must be opened and closed to conclude the negotiations. |
|||
| 2005-12-17 |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
| – |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Ukraine}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Ukraine to the European Union|accession process]])}}<br/>{{Small|([[Ukraine–European Union relations|relations]])}} |
|||
! style="border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | {{flagicon|MNE}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#46a43b"| '''Candidate negotiating'''<br/>{{Small|(since June 2024)<ref name="Brzozowski-2024"/><ref>{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=Accession Conference with Ukraine, 25 June 2024 |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2024/06/25/ukraine |access-date=25 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>}} |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | [[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|Montenegro]] |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|0/33<ref name="UkraineStatus">{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=Enlargement: Ukraine |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/ukraine |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>{{Progression|0|33}} |
|||
| style="background:lawngreen" | {{sort|1|'''Negotiating'''}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center"|0/33<ref name="UkraineStatus"/>{{Progression|0|33}} |
|||
| 2010-05-01 (SAA) |
|||
| Screening of negotiation chapters (the explanatory phase) began in January 2024,<ref name="UKRMOLscreening"/> and the bilateral phase of the screening started in July 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=Intergovernmental conference with Ukraine: press conference |url=https://video.consilium.europa.eu/event/en/27557 |access-date=10 July 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref> |
|||
| 2008-12-15 |
|||
| The opening of the first 5 negotiating chapters (''Fundamentals cluster'') at a second intergovernmental conference. Every chapter must be opened and closed to conclude the negotiations. |
|||
| 2010-12-17 |
|||
| 2012-06-29 |
|||
| 2013-06-27 |
|||
| 16/2 of 33 |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Bosnia and Herzegovina}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|accession process]])}} |
|||
! style="border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | {{flagicon|SRB}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#71f268"| '''Candidate'''<br/>{{Small|(since December 2022)<ref name="BIHstatus">{{Cite web |date=4 May 2024 |title=Enlargement: Bosnia and Herzegovina |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/bosnia-herzegovina |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>}} |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | [[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|Serbia]] |
|||
| {{NA}} |
|||
| style="background:lawngreen" | {{sort|1|'''Negotiating'''}} |
|||
| {{NA}} |
|||
| 2013-09-01 (SAA) |
|||
| The European Council granted conditional approval for the opening of accession negotiations in March 2024.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Noestlinger |first1=Nette |last2=Sito-sucic |first2=Daria |last3=Gray |first3=Andrew |date=2024-03-21 |title=EU leaders invite Bosnia to membership talks in historic step |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/bosnia-close-eu-green-light-membership-talks-2024-03-21 |access-date=2024-03-21 |publisher=Reuters}}</ref><ref name="BIHstatus"/> Screening of negotiation chapters (the explanatory phase) began in April 2024.<ref name="BIHstatusCommission">{{Cite web |date=3 July 2024 |title=Parliamentary question - E-001049/2024(ASW): Answer given by Mr Várhelyi on behalf of the European Commission |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2024-001049-ASW_EN.html |access-date=8 July 2024 |publisher=European Parliament}}</ref> |
|||
| 2009-12-22 |
|||
| The European Commission needs to prepare a negotiating framework for adoption by the [[Council of the European Union|Council]], once all relevant steps set out in the Commission's recommendation of 12 October 2022 have been taken by Bosnia and Herzegovina.<ref name="BIHnegotiations">{{Cite web |date=22 March 2024 |title=European Council meeting (21 and 22 March 2024) – Conclusions |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/70880/euco-conclusions-2122032024.pdf |access-date=31 March 2024 |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref> As of 3 July 2024, this final condition for negotiations to start had not yet been met.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=From March to June, BiH made no progress towards the EU |url=https://sarajevotimes.com/from-march-to-june-bih-made-no-progress-towards-the-eu |access-date=18 July 2024 |publisher=Sarajevo Times}}</ref><ref name="BIHstatusCommission"/> The state claimed to meet 98% of conditions demanded by the European Commission by passing a 2024 budget and Growth Plan reform package in July 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |date=4 July 2024 |title=Bosnia adopts 2024 Budget after months of delay |url=https://n1info.ba/english/news/bosnia-adopts-2024-budget-after-months-of-delay |access-date=19 July 2024 |publisher=N1 Sarajevo}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=16 July 2024 |title=BiH Institutions should receive the Budget by the end of the Week |url=https://sarajevotimes.com/bih-institutions-should-receive-the-budget-by-the-end-of-the-week-2 |access-date=19 July 2024 |publisher=Sarajevo Times}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=19 July 2024 |title=Bosnia's House of People approves 2024 budget and amended law on judicial body |url=https://dtt-net.com/bosnias-house-of-people-approves-2024-budget-and-amended-law-on-judicial-body |access-date=19 July 2024 |publisher=DTT-net}}</ref> Final approval of the Growth Plan reform package was however blocked by four [[Cantons of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina|cantons]] on 25 July.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 July 2024 |title=Forto accuses SDA of blocking EU Growth Plan projects for political reasons |url=https://n1info.ba/english/news/forto-accuses-sda-of-blocking-eu-growth-plan-projects-for-political-reasons |access-date=29 July 2024 |publisher=N1 Sarajevo}}</ref> |
|||
| 2012-03-01 |
|||
| 2014-01-21<ref name=serbnegstart>{{cite web|url=http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2014&mm=01&dd=21&nav_id=89054|title=Serbia starts negotiations to join EU|date=2014-01-21|accessdate=2014-01-21|publisher=[[B92]]}}</ref> |
|||
| ''(March 2015)''<ref>{{cite web |url=http://eupregovori.bos.rs/pregovori-srbije-sa-eu.html |title=Proces pregovora o pristupanju Srbije Evropskoj uniji |publisher=Progovori o pregovorima |language=Serbian |trans_title=The process of negotiations on Serbia's accession to the European Union |accessdate=16 January 2015}}</ref> |
|||
|– |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Georgia}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Georgia to the European Union|accession process]])}}<br/>{{Small|([[Georgia–European Union relations|relations]])}} |
|||
! style="border-right:1px solid #f2f2f2; background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | {{flagicon|TUR}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#71f268"| '''Candidate'''<br/>{{Small|(since December 2023)<ref name="MUG"/>}} |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left;" | [[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|Turkey]] |
|||
| {{NA}} |
|||
| style="background:lawngreen" | {{sort|1|'''Negotiating'''}} |
|||
| {{NA}} |
|||
| 1964-12-01 ([[Ankara Agreement|AA]]) |
|||
| The European Council granted candidate status in December 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |date=7 February 2024 |title=Enlargement: Georgia |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/georgia |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref> |
|||
| 1987-04-14 |
|||
| The European Commission needs to recommend starting negotiations. |
|||
| 1999-12-12 |
|||
| 2005-10-03 |
|||
| 2006-10-13 |
|||
| 14/1 of 33 |
|||
|} |
|||
|- |
|||
{{Reflist|group=N}} |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Kosovo}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Kosovo to the European Union|accession process]])}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#ffd617"| '''Applicant / Potential candidate''' |
|||
| {{NA}} |
|||
| {{NA}} |
|||
| Application for membership submitted in December 2022.<ref name="KosovoApli">{{Cite news |last1=Xhabafti |first1=Erion |last2=Semini |first2=Llazar |date=2022-12-14 |title=Kosovo leaders sign application request to join EU |url=https://apnews.com/article/europe-kosovo-european-union-308669f8d15bc217ec047e5d9805b278 |access-date=2022-12-14 |work=Associated Press}}</ref> |
|||
| The [[Council of the European Union|Council]] needs to by unanimous decision request the European Commission to submit an opinion. |
|||
|- |
|||
===Recognised candidates=== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | {{Flag|Turkey}}<br/>{{Small|([[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|accession process]])}}<br/>{{Small|([[European Union–Turkey relations|relations]])}} |
|||
There are at present six "candidate countries", who have applied to the EU and been accepted in principle.<ref name="status"/> These states have begun, or will begin shortly, the accession process by adopting EU law to bring the states in line with the rest of the Union. While most of these countries have applied only recently, Turkey is a long-standing candidate, having applied in 1987 and gaining candidate status in 1999.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/candidate-countries/turkey/eu_turkey_relations_en.htm |title=Ec.europa.eu |publisher=Ec.europa.eu |date=18 February 2008 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> This is due to the political issues surrounding the accession of the country.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/eu-turkey-relations/article-129678 |title=Euractiv.com |publisher=Euractiv.com |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
| style="text-align:center; background:#da2131"| '''Candidate with frozen negotiations'''<br/>{{Small|(opened in October 2005,<ref name="TUR2006"/> but frozen since December 2016)<ref name="Yahoo"/>}} |
|||
! style="text-align:center"|16/33<ref name="TurkeyStatus">{{Cite web |date=11 January 2024 |title=Enlargement: Türkiye |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/turkey |access-date=27 June 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref>{{Progression|16|33}} |
|||
! style="text-align:center"|1/33<ref name="TurkeyStatus"/>{{Progression|1|33}} |
|||
| Screening completed for all [[Acquis communautaire|negotiating chapters]] in October 2006.<ref name="TUR2006"/> First chapters opened in June 2006.<ref name="TUR2006"/> Chapter opening frozen in December 2016, due to backsliding in the areas of democracy, rule of law, and fundamental rights.<ref name="Yahoo"/> Chapter closing dialogue frozen since June 2018.<ref name="CouncilDecisions2018">{{Cite web |date=26 June 2018 |title=Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association process - Council conclusions (10555/18) |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35863/st10555-en18.pdf |access-date=16 July 2024 |website=Consilium |publisher=General Secretariat of the Council}}</ref><ref name="TurkeyStatus"/> |
|||
| Negotiations frozen, with no further chapters being considered for opening or closing, which has been reconfirmed by the [[Council of the European Union|Council]] each year since 2018.<ref name="CouncilDecisions2018"/><ref name="TurkeyReport2021">{{Cite web |title=Turkey Report 2021 |url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/system/files/2021-10/Turkey%202021%20report.PDF |website=European Commission}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=18 July 2023 |title=AP raporu: Türkiye'nin AB üyelik süreci mevcut koşullarda devam edemez |url=https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/ap-raporu-turkiyenin-ab-uyelik-sureci-mevcut-kosullarda-devam-edemez-haber-1628680 |publisher=Gazete Duvar |language=tr}}</ref><ref name="TurkeyReport2023">{{Cite web |date=8 November 2023 |title=Turkey Report 2023 |url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/eb90aefd-897b-43e9-8373-bf59c239217f_en?filename=SWD_2023_696%20T%C3%BCrkiye%20report.pdf |access-date=15 July 2024 |website=European Commission}}</ref><ref name="CouncilDecisions2023"/><ref name="TurkeyStatus"/> |
|||
|} |
|||
Membership is not a certainty in some of these candidate states. Serbia faces opposition from most EU states regarding its position on Kosovo, and many think that the EU is using the promise of membership as a way to force its politics onto Serbia. In Iceland, fishing rights and the consequences of the 2009 financial crisis keeps membership unpopular. In a [[Accession of Iceland to the European Union#Public opinion|poll taken in Iceland]] in February 2012, only one third of those questioned stated they would vote in favour of EU accession. |
|||
====Albania==== |
|||
{{Main|Accession of Albania to the European Union}} |
|||
[[File:European Union Albania Locator.svg|thumb|Albania shown in orange]] |
|||
[[Albania]] applied for EU membership on 28 April 2009. Officially recognised by the EU as a "potential candidate country", Albania started negotiations on a [[Stabilisation and Association Agreement]] (SAA) in 2003. The SAA was signed on 12 June 2006 and entered force on 1 April 2009, thus completing the first major step towards EU membership. |
|||
=== Timeline === |
|||
Following the same path as the recently admitted [[2004 enlargement of the European Union|Central European and Mediterranean countries in 2004]] and 2007, Albania has been extensively engaged with EU institutions, and joined [[NATO]] as a full member in 2009. It has also maintained its position as a stability factor and a strong ally of the [[European Union]] and the [[United States]] in the troubled and divided region of the [[Balkans]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/2008/09/11/afx5414005.html|title=Interview—Albania could apply next year to join EU|work=Forbes |date=11 September 2008|accessdate=12 September 2008|deadurl=yes}} {{Dead link|date=August 2012|bot=RjwilmsiBot}}</ref> |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center; font-size:95%" |
|||
! Major events |
|||
! [[European Union Association Agreement|Association<br/>Agreement]]<br/>(with link) |
|||
! Membership<br/>application |
|||
! Candidate<br/>status |
|||
! Negotiations<br/>start<br/>(1st [[Intergovernmental conference|IGC]]) |
|||
! Substantial<br/>negotiations<br/>start<br/>(2nd [[Intergovernmental conference|IGC]]) |
|||
! Accession<br/>Treaty<br/>signed |
|||
|- |
|||
After the application for EU membership was sent by the Albanian Government, on 16 November 2009 the [[Council of the European Union]] asked the [[European Commission]] (EC) to prepare an assessment concerning the readiness of the Republic of Albania to start accession negotiations, a process lasting about a year usually.<ref>{{cite web|author=Leigh Phillips |url=http://euobserver.com/9/29001 |title=Euobserver.com |publisher=Euobserver.com |date=17 November 2009 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> On 16 December 2009 the EC submitted the questionnaire on accessing preparation to the Albanian Government. Albania returned the questionnaire's answers to the EC on 14 April 2010.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/newsbriefs/setimes/newsbriefs/2010/04/15/nb-07|title=Albania's Berisha delivers questionnaire responses to Brussels|date=15 April 2010|accessdate=19 April 2010}}</ref> Candidacy status was not recognised by the EU along with Montenegro in December 2010, due to the long-lasting political row in the country.<ref>MEMO/10/553: Key findings of the Opinion on Albania; [http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/press_corner/key-documents/reports_nov_2010_en.htm Enlargement Strategy and Progress Report 2010]</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/press_corner/all_news/news/2010/2010_11_10_01_en.htm |title=European Union - EEAS (European External Action Service) | EU Enlargement Package: candidate status for Montenegro, final phase of talks with Croatia |publisher=Eeas.europa.eu |date=2010-10-25 |accessdate=2013-03-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/albania-political-crisis-thwarts-its-eu-candidate-status-bid|publisher=Balkan Insight|title=albania political crisis thwarts its eu candidate status bid}}</ref> In December 2010, Albanian citizens were given the right by the European Union to travel without visas to the Schengen area.<ref>{{cite web|author=|url=http://sofiaecho.com/2009/12/19/832874_serbian-macedonian-and-montenegrin-citizens-gain-visa-free-access-to-europe |title=Sofia Echo |publisher=Sofia Echo |date=19 December 2009 |accessdate=2 June 2011}}</ref> |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|TUR}} [[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|Turkey]] |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|1964-12-01}} ([[Ankara Agreement|AA]]) |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|1987-04-14}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|1999-12-12}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2005-10-03}}<ref name="TUR2005">{{Cite web |date=9 November 2005 |title=Turkey 2005 Progress Report |url=https://ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2005.pdf |access-date=15 July 2024 |publisher=European Commission}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2006-06-12}}<ref name="TUR2006">{{Cite web |date=8 November 2006 |title=Turkey 2006 Progress Report |url=https://ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2006.pdf |access-date=15 July 2024 |publisher=European Commission}}</ref><ref name="TURABDER2006">{{Cite web |date=2024 |title=Turkey-EU relations: Accession-process (current situation) |url=https://turabder.org/en/turkey-eu/turkey-eu-relations/accession-process/current-situation |access-date=15 July 2024 |publisher=Turkey European Union Association (TURABDER)}}</ref> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
On 10 October 2012, the [[European Commission]] evaluated Albania's compliance with the twelve key priorities that were defined in November 2010 as necessary to be met before the country could be approved as an EU candidate and start negotiations for accession. Of these, four were found to be met, while two were well in progress and the remaining six were in moderate progress.<ref>{{cite news|last=Commission|first=European|title=2012 Strategy and Progress reports: Albania Conclusions 2012|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/al_conclusions_2012_en.pdf|date=10 October 2012|accessdate=21 October 2012}}</ref> The Commission recommended in its assessment conclusions that Albania: |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|MNE}} [[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|Montenegro]] |
|||
{{Quote box|should be granted an official EU candidate status subject to completion of key measures in the areas of judicial and public administration reform and the revision of the parliamentary rules of procedures are revised. In order to be able to move to the next stage and open accession negotiations, Albania will have in particular to demonstrate sustained implementation of commitments already undertaken and completion of the remaining key priorities which have not been met in full. The focus should be on the rule of law and fundamental rights. Sustainable political dialogue will remain essential for a successful reform process. The conduct of the [[Albanian parliamentary election, 2013|2013 parliamentary elections]] will be a crucial test in this regard and a pre-condition for any recommendation to open negotiations.<ref>{{cite news|last=Commission|first=European|title=Key findings of the 2012 Progress Report on Albania|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-763_en.pdf|accessdate=11 October 2012}}</ref>}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2010-05-01}} (SAA) |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2008-12-15}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2010-12-17}}<ref name="MNEcandidate">{{Cite web |date=17 December 2010 |title=Montenegro is officially awarded EU candidate status |url=http://euobserver.com/news/31534 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919012925/https://euobserver.com/news/31534 |archive-date=19 September 2015 |access-date=16 September 2013 |website=euobserver.com}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2012-06-29}}<ref name="MontenegroStatus"/> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2012-12-18}}<ref name="MNE2012">{{Cite web |date=18 December 2012 |title=Press release – Marking the start of substantial negotiations with Montenegro |url=http://www.cy2012.eu/index.php/en/news-categories/areas/foreign-affairs/press-release-marking-the-start-of-substantial-negotiations-with-montenegro |access-date=15 July 2024 |website=CY2012 |publisher=Cyprus Presidency of the Council of the European Union}}</ref> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
On 16 October 2013 the European Commission released its annual report which concluded that the Albanian election was held in an "orderly manner" and that progress had been made in meeting other conditions; as such it recommended granting Albania candidate status.<ref name=2013reports>{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-930_en.htm|title=EU enlargement: priorities for 2014|date=2013-10-16|accessdate=2013-10-16|publisher=[[European Commission]]}}</ref> However, several states, including Denmark and the Netherlands, remained opposed to granting Albania candidate status until it demonstrates that its recent progress can be sustained.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lse.co.uk/AllNews.asp?code=hom3d2xj&headline=Serbia_Expected_To_Get_EU_Membership_Boost_Delay_For_Albania|title=Serbia Expected To Get EU Membership Boost; Delay For Albania|date=2013-12-17|accessdate=2013-12-17}}</ref> Consequently, the [[Council of the European Union]] at its meeting in December 2013, agreed to postpone the decision on candidate status until June 2014.<ref name=2013cofEU>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/140142.pdf|title=Council conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process|date=2013-12-17|accessdate=2013-12-17|publisher=[[Council of the European Union]]}}</ref> |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|SRB}} [[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|Serbia]] |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2013-09-01}} (SAA) |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2009-12-22}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2012-03-01}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2014-01-21}}<ref name="SRBnegotiations">{{Cite web |date=21 January 2014 |title=Serbia starts negotiations to join EU |url=http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2014&mm=01&dd=21&nav_id=89054 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008041626/http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2014&mm=01&dd=21&nav_id=89054 |archive-date=8 October 2014 |access-date=21 January 2014 |website=b92.net}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2015-12-14}}<ref name="SRB2015">{{Cite web |date=14 December 2015 |title=EU opens first chapters in accession negotiations with Serbia |url=https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2015/12/14/eu-starts-accession-negotiations-with-serbia |access-date=15 July 2024 |publisher=European Western Balkans}}</ref> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
On 24 June 2014 the [[Council of the European Union]] agreed to grant Albania candidate status,<ref name=albcand/> which was endorsed by the [[European Council]] a few days later.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/143478.pdf|title=EUROPEAN COUNCIL 26/27 JUNE 2014 - CONCLUSIONS|date=2014-06-27|accessdate=2014-06-27|publisher=[[European Council]]}}</ref> |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|ALB}} [[Accession of Albania to the European Union|Albania]] |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2009-04-01}} ([[Stabilisation and Association Process|SAA]]) |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2009-04-28}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2014-06-27}}<ref name="ALBcandidate">{{Cite web |date=23 June 2014 |title=EU candidate status for Albania |url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-439_en.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150918203628/http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-439_en.htm |archive-date=18 September 2015 |access-date=21 November 2019 |website=European Commission}}</ref><ref name="ALBcandidate approved">{{Cite web |date=27 June 2014 |title=European Council - 26/27 June 2014 - Conclusions |url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/143478.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111211510/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/143478.pdf |archive-date=11 November 2020 |access-date=21 November 2019 |website=European Council}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-07-19}}<ref name="July2022AlMk"/> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2024-10-15}}<ref name=Albania2IGC/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
====Iceland==== |
|||
{{ |
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|MKD}} [[Accession of North Macedonia to the European Union|North Macedonia]] |
||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2004-04-01}} (SAA) |
|||
[[File:European Union Iceland Locator.svg|thumb|Iceland shown in orange]] |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2004-03-22}} |
|||
[[Iceland]] applied to join the EU in July 2009 following an [[Icelandic financial crisis|economic crisis]]. Prior to that, its relations with the EU were defined by its membership of the [[European Economic Area]] (EEA), which gave it access to the EU's [[single market]] and the [[Schengen Area]]. As a result of their EEA membership, Iceland already applies many major economic EU laws and negotiations were expected to proceed rapidly (although research by the EFTA Secretariat in 2005 found that only 6.5% of laws had actually been adopted;<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.mbl.is/mm/frettir/innlent/2005/05/09/6_5_prosent_af_esb_gerdum_tekin_inn_i_ees_samningin/ | title = 6,5% af ESB-gerðum tekin inn í EES-samninginn síðasta áratug| accessdate =10 December 2008| date = 9 May 2005| publisher=Morgunblaðið}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Hjörtur J. Guðmundsson |url=http://euobserver.com/15/28502 |title=Euobserver.com |publisher=Euobserver.com |date=29 July 2009 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> see [[Future enlargement of the European Union#Progress|below]] for European Commission assessment). |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2005-12-17}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-07-19}}<ref name="July2022AlMk"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
As in Norway, Iceland's fear of losing control over its fishery resources in its territorial waters was the most important reason for its reluctance to join the EU. However the economic downturn in Iceland accelerated the debate, and the [[Independence Party (Iceland)|Independence Party]], then the largest opposition party, agreed to the opening of accession negotiations after a referendum (and subject to a further referendum).<ref name="reuters.com">{{Cite news|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSLR972301 |title=Reuters.com |publisher=Reuters |date= 27 March 2009|accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> A proposal to begin negotiations with the EU was put before the [[Althing|Icelandic parliament]] in July 2009<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.althingi.is/dba-bin/ferill.pl?ltg=137&mnr=38 | title=Aðildarumsókn að Evrópusambandinu—Þingsályktunartillaga | publisher=[[Icelandic Parliament]] | accessdate=4 June 2009}}</ref> and approved (without a pre-negotiation referendum) by a slim majority on 16 July 2009. Iceland submitted its application to the Swedish presidency in a letter dated 16 July, and the application was acknowledged by the [[Council of the European Union]] on 27 July.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/showFocus.aspx?id=1&focusId=393&lang=en|title= Iceland's application acknowledged}}</ref> On 8 September, the EU commission sent Iceland a list of 2,500 questions about its fulfilment of convergence criteria and adoption of EU law. Iceland replied to the commission on 22 October 2009. On 2 November, Iceland selected a chief negotiator for the membership negotiations with the EU: Stefan Haukur Johannesson, Iceland's Ambassador to Belgium. In February 2010, the European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy recommended to the Council of the European Union to start accession negotiations with Iceland. The [[European Council]] decided in June that negotiations should start,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/759&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en |title=Commission welcomes European Council's decision to open accession negotiations with Iceland |publisher=Europa.eu |date=17 June 2010 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> and on 17 June 2010 the EU granted official candidate status to Iceland by formally approving the opening of membership talks.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://article.wn.com/view/2010/06/17/EU_summit_approves_membership_talks_for_Iceland_1st_Lead/|title=EU summit approves membership talks for Iceland|publisher=World News|date=17 June 2010}}</ref> On 26 July 2010, European Union foreign ministers formally gave the green light for negotiations to begin and agreed to start the talks on the following day.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bcbb4310-98b0-11df-a0b7-00144feab49a.html|publisher= The Financial Times|date=26 July 2010|accessdate=16 September 2013|title=EU gives go-ahead for Iceland entry talks}}</ref> |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|Moldova}} [[Accession of Moldova to the European Union|Moldova]] |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2016-07-01}} ([[Moldova–European Union Association Agreement|AA]]) |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-03-03}}<ref name="MDAapplication">{{Cite news |last=Tanas |first=Alexander |date=3 March 2022 |title=With war on its doorstep, Moldova applies for EU membership |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/moldovan-president-says-moldova-applies-eu-membership-2022-03-03 |access-date=3 March 2022 |work=Reuters |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-06-23}}<ref name="UA-MD-candidate-council">{{Cite web |date=24 June 2022 |title=European Council conclusions, 23-24 June 2022 |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/06/24/european-council-conclusions-23-24-june-2022 |access-date=25 June 2022 |website=European Council}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2024-06-25}}<ref name="MDAnegotiations">{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=EU opens accession negotiations with Moldova |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/06/25/eu-opens-accession-negotiations-with-moldova |access-date=1 July 2024 |publisher=[[European Union]]}}</ref> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
The first annual report on the negotiations was published in November 2010;<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/is_rapport_2010_en.pdf|format=PDF|accessdate=9 December 2013|publisher=European Commission|title=ICELAND 2010 PROGRESS REPORT}}</ref> the main issues at stake remained the [[fisheries]] sector and [[whale hunting]], while progress had been made concerning the [[Icesave dispute]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/en/pressroom/content/20110318IPR15863/html/MEPs-welcome-Iceland%27s-progress-towards-EU-membership|publisher=European Parliament|title=MEPs welcome Iceland's progress towards EU membership|date= 22 March 2011}}</ref> |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|Ukraine}} [[Accession of Ukraine to the European Union|Ukraine]] |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2017-09-01}} ([[European Union–Ukraine Association Agreement|AA]]) |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-02-28}}<ref name="UKRapplication">{{Cite news |date=28 February 2022 |title=Zelensky signs application for Ukraine's membership to EU |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/zelensky-signs-application-for-ukraine-s-membership-to-eu-101646068821785.html |access-date=28 February 2022 |work=Hindustan Times |agency=Associated Press}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-06-23}}<ref name="UA-MD-candidate-council"/> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2024-06-25}}<ref name="UKRnegotiations">{{Cite web |date=25 June 2024 |title=EU opens accession negotiations with Ukraine |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/06/25/eu-opens-accession-negotiations-with-ukraine |access-date=1 July 2024 |publisher=[[European Union]]}}</ref> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
In February 2013, the Icelandic chief negotiator stated that the main driving force for Iceland joining the EU was the benefit to the country of adopting the euro to replace the inflation-plagued [[Icelandic króna]]. Iceland's [[HICP|HICP inflation]] and related long-term government interest rates were both recorded to be around 6% on average for 2012. Most importantly, however, while the country retained the Icelandic kronur, it was unable to lift the [[capital controls]] recently introduced in the turmoil of the economic crisis. Introduction of the euro, a far stronger currency, would allow the country to lift these capital controls and achieve an increased inward flow of foreign economic capital, which ultimately would ensure higher and more stable economic growth. To be eligible to adopt the euro, Iceland would need to join the EU, as unilateral euro adoption had previously been refused by the EU.<ref name="Status made by Icelandic chief negotiator">{{cite web|url=http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/29269/icelands-eu-negotiations-continue-to-advance-exclusive-from-the-lithuania-tribune-201329269/ |title=Iceland’s EU negotiations continue to advance (article)|publisher=Lithuania Tribune|date=12 February 2013|accessdate=25 February 2013}}<br>{{cite web|url=http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/29455/icelands-eu-negotiations-continue-to-advance-exclusive-from-the-lithuania-tribune-2-201329455/ |title=Iceland’s EU negotiations continue to advance (video interview: part 1)|publisher=Lithuania Tribune|date=14 February 2013|accessdate=25 February 2013}}<br>{{cite web|url=http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/29457/theres-a-majority-against-membership-icelands-chief-eu-accession-negotiator-201329457/ |title=Iceland’s EU negotiations continue to advance (video interview: part 2)|publisher=Lithuania Tribune|date=15 February 2013|accessdate=25 February 2013}}<br>{{cite web|url=http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/29581/icelands-chief-eu-accession-negotiator-part-3-201329581/ |title=Iceland’s EU negotiations continue to advance (video interview: part 3)|publisher=Lithuania Tribune|date=16 February 2013|accessdate=25 February 2013}}</ref> |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|BIH}} [[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Bosnia and Herzegovina]] |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2015-06-01}} (SAA)<ref name="BIH SAA">{{Cite web |title=SAA Agreement with Bosnia |url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=2008023 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171019183708/http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=2008023 |archive-date=19 October 2017 |access-date=2010-04-20 |website=Council of the European Union}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2016-02-15}}<ref name="BIHapplication">{{Cite web |date=15 February 2016 |title=Bosnia and Herzegovina applied for EU membership today |url=http://english.eu2016.nl/latest/news/2016/02/15/bosnia-and-herzegovina-applied-for-eu-membership-today |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160216091652/http://english.eu2016.nl/latest/news/2016/02/15/bosnia-and-herzegovina-applied-for-eu-membership-today |archive-date=16 February 2016 |access-date=15 February 2016 |website=The Netherlands EU Presidency 2016}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-12-15}}<ref name="BosniaCandi"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
On 14 January 2013, the two governing parties of Iceland, the [[Social Democratic Alliance]] and [[Left-Green Movement]], announced that because it was no longer possible to complete [[Accession of Iceland to the European Union|EU accession negotiations]] before the [[Icelandic parliamentary election, 2013|parliamentary elections in April 2013]], they had decided to slow down the process and the six remaining unopened chapters would not be opened until after the election. However, negotiations would continue for the 16 chapters currently open.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.icelandreview.com/icelandreview/daily_news/BREAKING_NEWS_Iceland_to_Slow_Down_EU_Talks_0_396859.news.aspx|title=BREAKING NEWS: Iceland to Slow Down EU Talks|date=2013-01-14|accessdate=2013-01-14|publisher=[[Iceland Review]]}}</ref> The new party [[Bright Future (Iceland)|Bright Future]] supports the completion of negotiations,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mbl.is/frettir/innlent/2013/01/14/reidubunir_ad_halda_malinu_afram/|title=Ready to proceed|language=Icelanding|publisher=MBL.is|date=14 January 2013|accessdate=15 January 2013}}</ref> while the other two opposition parties, [[Independence Party (Iceland)|Independence Party]] and [[Progressive Party (Iceland)|Progressive Party]], argue that negotiations should be completely stopped.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.althingi.is/dba-bin/Aferill.pl?ltg=141&mnr=96|title=Proposal for: Withdrawal of Iceland's application for EU membership (issue 96, document 96, session 141)|language=Icelandic|date=14 September 2012|accessdate=26 December 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mbl.is/frettir/innlent/2012/12/18/vidraedurnar_verdi_settar_a_is/|title=Viðræðurnar við ESB verði settar á ís|publisher=MBL.is|language=Icelandic|accessdate=9 December 2013}}</ref> In February 2013, the national congress of both the Independence Party and Progressive Party reconfirmed their policy that further membership negotiations with the EU should be stopped and not resumed unless they are first approved by a national referendum,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mbl.is/frettir/innlent/2013/02/09/islandi_best_borgid_utan_esb/ |title=Icelandic interests best served outside EU|language=Icelandic|publisher=Mbl.is|date=9 February 2013|accessdate=9 February 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mbl.is/frettir/innlent/2013/02/23/betur_borgid_utan_esb/ |title=Better off outside EU|language=Icelandic|publisher=Mbl.is|date=23 February 2013|accessdate=25 February 2013}}</ref> while the national congresses of the Social Democratic Alliance, Bright Future and Left-Green Movement reiterated their support for the completion of EU accession negotiations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mbl.is/frettir/innlent/2013/02/25/esb_alyktanir_hvor_i_sina_attina/ |title=EU Resolutions at main parties national congresses point each in different directions|language=Icelandic|publisher=Mbl.is|date=25 February 2013|accessdate=25 February 2013}}</ref> Iceland's current chief negotiator stated in an interview in February 2013 that if the newly elected parliament supported the continuation of EU membership negotiations, it would be possible to complete negotiations by the spring of 2015, with a referendum on membership to be held after that.<ref name="Status made by Icelandic chief negotiator"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mbl.is/frettir/innlent/2013/02/15/komin_langt_a_veg_vorid_2015/ |title=Come a long way in the spring of 2015?|language=Icelandic|publisher=Mbl.is|date=15 February 2013|accessdate=25 February 2013}}</ref> |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|Georgia}} [[Accession of Georgia to the European Union|Georgia]] |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2016-07-01}} ([[Georgia–European Union relations#Association Agreement (2013–present)|AA]]) |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-03-03}}<ref name="ge-candidacy">{{Cite news |date=3 March 2022 |title=Georgia's PM Signs Application to Join the EU |url=https://civil.ge/archives/477258 |access-date=3 March 2022 |work=Civil.ge}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2023-12-14}}<ref name="MUG"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
Following the [[Icelandic parliamentary election, 2013|April 2013 Icelandic election]], the new Icelandic government announced that they were indefinitely extending the previous government's freeze on EU accession talks, pending a national [[Icelandic European Union membership referendum|referendum on the application]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Valdimarsson |first=Omar R. |url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-05-22/iceland-freezes-eu-plans-as-new-government-shuns-euro-crisis |title=Nobel Laureate Phelps Warns Against EU as Iceland Drops Bid (1) |publisher=Businessweek |accessdate=2013-09-16}}</ref> On 13 June, Iceland's Foreign Minister [[Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson]] informed the European Commission that the newly elected government intended to "put negotiations on hold".<ref name="icelandover">{{cite web |url=http://euobserver.com/political/120501 |title=Iceland's EU bid is over, commission told |last=Fox |first=Benjamin |publisher=Reuters |date=16 June 2013 |accessdate=16 June 2013}}</ref> European Commission President Manuel Barroso responded on 16 July 2013 by requesting that the new Icelandic Prime Minister make a decision on the continuation of their accession bid "without further delay".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/enlargement/barroso-tells-iceland-decide-fas-news-529332|title=Barroso tells Iceland to make up its mind on joining the EU|date=2013-07-17|accessdate=2013-07-19|publisher=[[EurActiv]]}}</ref> Iceland has subsequently dissolved its accession negotiations team.<ref name="EUObserverIced"/> |
|||
! style="background:#F2F2F2; text-align:left" | {{Flagicon|Kosovo}} [[Accession of Kosovo to the European Union|Kosovo]]{{Refn|The [[European Union]] remains divided on its policy towards Kosovo, with five [[EU member states]] not recognising its [[2008 Kosovo declaration of independence|independence]].|name=KOS|group=Note}} |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2016-04-01}} (SAA)<ref name="KOS SAA">{{Cite web |date=2016-03-24 |title=Information relating to the entry into force of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo, of the other part |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.078.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2016:078:TOC |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160326020030/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.078.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2016:078:TOC |archive-date=26 March 2016 |access-date=2016-03-24 |website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2022-12-14}}<ref name=KosovoApli/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0"|(tbd) |
|||
|} |
|||
====Macedonia==== |
|||
{{Main|Accession of Macedonia to the European Union}} |
|||
[[File:European Union and Republic of Macedonia locator map.svg|thumb|Macedonia shown in orange]] |
|||
{|class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="text-align:center; font-size:85%" |
|||
[[Republic of Macedonia|Macedonia]] applied to become an official candidate on 22 March 2004. On 9 November 2005, the European Commission recommended that it attain candidate status. EU leaders agreed to this recommendation on 17 December, formally naming the country an official candidate. However, no starting date for negotiations has been announced yet. |
|||
! rowspan=2 | <big>All events</big> |
|||
! colspan=6 | Candidates negotiating |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! colspan=2 | Candidates |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! Applicant /<br/>Potential candidate |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! Candidate with frozen negotiations |
|||
|- |
|||
Peace is maintained with underlying ethnic tensions over Albanians in the west of the country, who achieved greater autonomy through the implementation of the [[Ohrid Agreement|Ohrid Accords]]. Unlike Serbia, Macedonia has maintained sovereignty over all its territory. In 2006, Prime Minister [[Nikola Gruevski]] suggested that the country could join the EU in 2012 or 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://derstandard.at/?id=2650785|title=Mazedoniens Premier Gruevski im Interview: "Beitrittsverhandlungen ab 2008"|work=[[Der Standard]]|date=7 November 2006|accessdate=7 November 2006}}</ref> However, the EU never recognised this suggested time period. |
|||
! [[Accession of Albania to the European Union|Albania]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Moldova to the European Union|Moldova]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|Montenegro]] |
|||
! [[Accession of North Macedonia to the European Union|North Macedonia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|Serbia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Ukraine to the European Union|Ukraine]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Bosnia and Herzegovina]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Georgia to the European Union|Georgia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Kosovo to the European Union|Kosovo]]{{Refn|name=KOS|group=Note}} |
|||
! [[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|Turkey]] |
|||
|- |
|||
On 17 December 2005, the [[European Council]] welcomed and congratulated the country's achievements in implementing multiple reforms and agreements ([[Copenhagen criteria]], [[Stabilisation and Association process]], [[Ohrid Agreement]]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/87642.pdf |title=Presidency Conclusions – Brussels|date=15 December 2005 |format=PDF |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" | [[European Union Association Agreement|EU Association Agreement]]{{Refn|EU Association Agreement type: [[Stabilisation and Association Agreement]] (SAA) for the Western [[Balkans]] states participating in the [[Stabilisation and Association process]] of the EU (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Kosovo through the [[Stabilisation Tracking Mechanism|STM]]); [[European Union Association Agreement|Association Agreement]] and [[Customs Union]] [[European Union–Turkey Customs Union|for Turkey]]; [[European Economic Area]] (EEA) for Iceland and Finland (reference state of the Fourth Enlargement); [[Europe Agreement]] for the reference states of the Fifth Enlargement.|name=AA|group=Note}} |
|||
|- |
|||
The country has a dispute over its name with its southern neighbour and current EU member, [[Greece]]. Greece rejects the name "Macedonia" because it says it implies territorial ambitions towards Greece's own northern province of [[Macedonia (Greece)|Macedonia]] (see: [[Macedonia naming dispute]]). Because of this, the EU refers to the country only by the provisional appellation "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (FYRoM). The resolution of the name issue has become a precondition for accession,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/macedonia-pm-greek-outburst-eu-summit/article-173577 |title=Macedonia PM in Greek outburst after EU summit |publisher=Euractiv.com |date=23 June 2008 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> since Greece has repeatedly confirmed it would use its right to block accession without a prior settlement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20080306/tpl-uk-macedonia-greece-43a8d4f.html|title=Greece threatens Macedonia NATO veto|publisher=Yahoo! News UK}}{{dead link|date=January 2011}}</ref> Concerns over the country's difficulties in reaching European standards on the rule of law and the economy<ref>{{cite news|last=Bilefsky |first=Dan |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/02/world/europe/02macedonia.html |title=Violence Erupts in Macedonian Election |location=Macedonia |work=New York Times |date=2 June 2008 |accessdate=2 June 2011}}</ref> and over violence and irregularities in the 2008 parliamentary elections<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-06/2008-06-02-voa41.cfm?CFID=30475382&CFTOKEN=15879369|title=International Observers Criticise Macedonia Election|publisher=Voice of AMerica}}{{dead link|date=June 2011}}</ref> have also cast doubts on the country's candidacy. The European Commission has recommended that Macedonia begin accession talks in three successive meetings since 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/features/setimes/features/2012/03/12/feature-03|title=Macedonia beginning accession dialogue with the EU|publisher=setimes.com |date=13 March 2012}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |EU Association Agreement negotiations start |
|||
| 31 Jan 2003 |
|||
| Jan 2010<ref>IDIS 'Viitorul', ''[https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/121696/IDIS_1.pdf Some reflections on the timing of Moldova's negotiations of the EU Association Agreement.]'' Moldova's Foreign Policy Statewatch, Issue 1, March 2010.</ref> |
|||
| 10 Oct 2005{{Refn|[[Montenegro]] started negotiations in November 2005 while a part of [[Serbia and Montenegro]]. Separate technical negotiations were conducted regarding issues of sub-state organizational competency. A mandate for direct negotiations with Montenegro was established in July 2006. Direct negotiations were initiated on 26 September 2006 and concluded on 1 December 2006.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2006-12-01 |title=EU, Montenegro complete negotiations on pre-membership deal to bring country closer to bloc |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/12/01/europe/EU_GEN_Montenegro_EU.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080925180017/http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/12/01/europe/EU_GEN_Montenegro_EU.php |archive-date=2008-09-25 |access-date=2011-04-04 |work=International Herald Tribune |agency=The Associated Press}}</ref>|name=MON|group=Note}} |
|||
| 5 Apr 2000<!-- |
|||
| 1990--> |
|||
| 10 Oct 2005{{Refn|[[Serbia]] started negotiations in November 2005 while part of [[Serbia and Montenegro]], with a modified mandate from July 2006.|name=SER|group=Note}} |
|||
| 5 Mar 2007 |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| 25 Nov 2005 |
|||
| Jan 2010 |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| 28 Oct 2013<ref name="kossaa">{{Cite web |date=2013-10-28 |title=Kosovo Launches Crucial SAA Talks With EU |url=http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/kosovo-launches-saa-dailogue-with-the-eu |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117032719/http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/kosovo-launches-saa-dailogue-with-the-eu |archive-date=17 November 2015 |access-date=2013-10-28 |website=Balkan Insight}}</ref> |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| 1959<sup>AA</sup><br/>1970<sup>CU</sup> |
|||
|- |
|||
A solution for the long lasting naming dispute however moved considerably closer, when the Greek foreign minister on 4 October 2012 forwarded a draft for a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to settle the question. According to the Euractive website the proposal was answered positively by the Macedonian foreign minister on 8 November 2012.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite1_1_08/11/2012_469083|title=FYROM appears to welcome Avramopoulos proposal |publisher=Kathimerini (English edition)|date=8 November 2012|accessdate=9 November 2012}}</ref> For Macedonia to begin accession negotiations, the country however still – besides solving the issue with Greece – needs to convince Bulgaria about removing their veto and block of negotiations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/enlargement/bulgaria-vetoes-macedonia-eu-acc-news-515809|title=Bulgaria vetoes Macedonia’s EU accession talks|date=2 November 2012|accessdate=2 November 2012|publisher=[[EurActive]]}}</ref> On 11 December 2012, the [[Council of the European Union]] concluded that Macedonia could start accession negotiations as early as the second quarter of 2013, conditional on reaching an agreement on its dispute with Bulgaria and Greece. The Council was encouraged that progress on the latter dispute had recently been made by a [[United Nations|UN]] [[Mediation|mediator]].<ref name="Status meeting for enlargement process (Dec.2012)">{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/134234.pdf|title=Council conclusions on enlargement and stabilisation and association process (3210th general affairs council meeting)|format=PDF|publisher=Council of the EU|date=11 December 2012|accessdate=26 December 2012}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |EU Association Agreement signature |
|||
| 12 Jun 2006 |
|||
| 27 Jun 2014 |
|||
| 15 Oct 2007 |
|||
| 9 Apr 2001<!-- |
|||
| 2 May 1992--> |
|||
| 29 Apr 2008 |
|||
| 21 Mar 2014<sup>AA</sup><br/>27 Jun 2014<sup>DCFTA</sup> |
|||
| 16 Jun 2008 |
|||
| 27 Jun 2014 |
|||
| 27 Oct 2015<ref name="KOSSIGN">{{Cite press release |title=Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and Kosovo signed |date=26 October 2015 |url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5928_en.htm |access-date=21 November 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190816150942/https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5928_en.htm |archive-date=16 August 2019 |work=European Commission}}</ref> |
|||
| 12 Sep 1963<sup>AA</sup><br/>1995<sup>CU</sup> |
|||
|- |
|||
In early 2013, political instability stemming from the Macedonian parliament's approval of its 2013 fiscal budget through an undemocratic procedure threatened to derail the country's request to start accession negotiations with the EU. However, the crisis was resolved when EU brokered a compromise between Macedonia's political parties on 1 March 2013.<ref name="2013 Macedonian political crisis">{{cite web|url=http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2013/march/eu-ends-macedonian-deadlock/76563.aspx|title=EU ends Macedonian deadlock|publisher=European Voice|date=2 March 2013|accessdate=22 March 2014}}</ref> At the most recent meeting of the Council of the European Union in December 2013, the Council for the fifth consecutive year concluded that "the political criteria continue to be sufficiently met", but in regards to making the final decision to open accession negotiations it was only agreed to revisit the issue in 2014. The decision whether or not to start accession negotiations will be made "on the basis of an update by the Commission on further implementation of reforms in the context of the High Level Accession Dialogue, including the implementation of the 1 March 2013 political agreement – and on tangible steps taken to promote good neighborly relations – and to reach a negotiated and mutually accepted solution to the name issue".<ref name=2013cofEU>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/140142.pdf|title=Council conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process|date=2013-12-17|accessdate=2013-12-17|publisher=[[Council of the European Union]]}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |EU Association Agreement entry into force |
|||
| 1 Apr 2009 |
|||
| 1 Jul 2016 |
|||
| 1 May 2010 |
|||
| 1 Apr 2004<!-- |
|||
| 1 Jan 1994--> |
|||
| 1 Sep 2013 |
|||
| 1 Sep 2017 |
|||
| 1 Jun 2015<ref name="BIH SAA"/> |
|||
| 1 Jul 2016 |
|||
| 1 Apr 2016<ref name="KOS SAA"/> |
|||
| 1 Dec 1964<sup>AA</sup><br/>31 Dec 1995<sup>CU</sup><!-- CU entry into force--><ref>{{Cite web |date=Feb 13, 1996 |title=21996D0213(01) - EN |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:21996D0213(01):EN:HTML |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527055647/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:21996D0213%2801%29:EN:HTML |archive-date=27 May 2019 |access-date=2013-09-16 |website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
The UN mediator, [[Matthew Nimetz]], has invited Greece and Macedonia to a new round of "name dispute" negotiations to begin on 26 March 2014.<ref name="2014 negotiations start">{{cite web|url=http://www.focus-fen.net/news/2014/03/21/330532/utrinski-vesnik-macedonia-matthew-nimetz-sets-new-round-of-name-issue-talks.html|title=Utrinski Vesnik, Macedonia: Matthew Nimetz sets new round of name issue talks|publisher=FOCUS News Agency|date=21 March 2014|accessdate=22 March 2014}}</ref> In February 2014, the [[European Parliament]] passed a resolution stating that according to its assessment, the [[Copenhagen criteria]] has been sufficiently fulfilled for Macedonia to begin negotiations for EU accession, and called on the [[Council of the European Union]] to confirm the date for the launch of accession negotiations straight away, as bilateral disputes must not be an obstacle for the start of talks – although they must be solved before the accession.<ref name="2014 EP resolution">{{cite web|url=http://www.balkaneu.com/european-parliament-passes-resolution-fyr-macedonia/|title=European Parliament passes the Resolution on FYR Macedonia|publisher=Independent Balkan News Agency|date=6 February 2014|accessdate=22 March 2014}}</ref> However, it remains to be seen whether or not the Council decides to agree with the parliament's opinion at its next meeting in June 2014. |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" | Membership application |
|||
|- |
|||
As of May 2014 the name dispute was still unresolved,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.worldbulletin.net/news/135773/greece-macedonia-to-consider-regional-security|title=Greece, Macedonia to consider regional security|publisher=Worldbulletin News|date=8 May 2014}}</ref> but it was announced that negotiations were to be resumed after the Greek [[European Parliament election, 2014 (Greece)|EP election]] and [[Greek local elections, 2014|local elections]] on 25 May.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.mk/articles/4801/Greek+Diplomatic+Sources+The+Name+Negotiations+to+Continue+after+the+Greek+Elections|title=Greek Diplomatic Sources: The Name Negotiations to Continue after the Greek Elections|publisher=Independent.mk|date=8 May 2014}}</ref> At the most recent Council meeting in June 2014, the fixing of a start date for Macedonia's accession negotiations was not on the agenda.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mactel.com.au/newsite/index.php?page=news&news=53462&lang=en|title=Macedonia not on the agenda of the June European Council summit|publisher=Mactel|date=26 June 2014}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Membership application submitted |
|||
| 28 Apr 2009 |
|||
| 3 Mar 2022<ref name="MDAapplication"/> |
|||
| 15 Dec 2008 |
|||
| 22 Mar 2004<!-- |
|||
| 16 Jul 2009--> |
|||
| 22 Dec 2009 |
|||
| 28 Feb 2022<ref name="UKRapplication"/> |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| 15 Feb 2016<ref name="BIHapplication"/> |
|||
| 3 Mar 2022<ref name="ge-candidacy"/> |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| 14 Dec 2022<ref name=KosovoApli/> |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| 14 Apr 1987 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Montenegro==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |[[Council of the European Union|Council]] asks [[European Commission|Commission]] for ''opinion'' |
|||
{{Main|Accession of Montenegro to the European Union}} |
|||
| 16 Nov 2009 |
|||
[[File:European Union Montenegro Locator.svg|thumb|Montenegro shown in orange]] |
|||
| 7 Mar 2022<ref name="Council opinion on UA/GE/MD trio"/> |
|||
In the [[Montenegrin independence referendum, 2006|independence referendum]] of 21 May 2006, the Montenegrin people voted for [[Montenegro]] to leave the state union of [[Serbia and Montenegro]] and become an independent state. After obtaining independence, Montenegro officially submitted its EU membership application to the [[European Commission]] (EC) on 15 December 2008.<ref name=MontenegroKeyEvents>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/policies/enlargement/montenegro?lang=en|publisher=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/|accessdate=9 December 2013|title=Montenegro}}</ref> However, Montenegro has been experiencing ecological, judicial and crime-related problems that could slow or hinder its bid. |
|||
| 23 Apr 2009 |
|||
| 17 May 2004<!-- |
|||
| 27 Jul 2009--> |
|||
| 25 Oct 2010<ref>{{Cite news |last=Castle |first=Stephen |date=25 October 2010 |title=Serbia Moves Closer to Joining E.U. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/26/world/europe/26serbia.html?_r=1&src=twrhp |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160719035812/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/26/world/europe/26serbia.html?_r=1&src=twrhp |archive-date=19 July 2016 |access-date=16 September 2013 |work=The New York Times}}</ref> |
|||
| 7 Mar 2022<ref name="Council opinion on UA/GE/MD trio">{{Cite web |last=Jacopo Barigazzi |date=7 March 2022 |title=EU to officially examine Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia's bids to join the bloc |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-examine-ukraine-moldova-georgia-membership-bid |access-date=11 March 2022 |publisher=Politico}}</ref> |
|||
| 20 Sep 2016<ref>{{Cite web |title=Council conclusions on the application of Bosnia and Herzegovina for membership of the EU |url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/09/20-conclusions-bosnia |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921200846/http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/09/20-conclusions-bosnia |archive-date=21 September 2016 |access-date=20 September 2016 |website=Council of the European Union}}</ref> |
|||
| 7 Mar 2022<ref name="Council opinion on UA/GE/MD trio"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| 27 Apr 1987 |
|||
|- |
|||
Montenegro unilaterally adopted the [[euro]] as its currency at its launch in 2002, having previously used the [[German mark]]. Negotiations over the [[Stabilisation and Association Agreement]] (SAA) started in September 2006.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/montenegro/index_en.htm|publisher=http://ec.europa.eu|title=Montenegro|accessdate=9 December 2013}}</ref> SAA was officially signed on 15 October 2007 and came into force on 1 May 2010, after all the 27 member-states of EU had ratified it.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=05&dd=01&nav_id=66853|title=SAA comes into force for Montenegro}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n218346|title=Montenegro: Stabilization and Association Agreement comes into force}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Commission presents legislative questionnaire to applicant |
|||
| 16 Dec 2009 |
|||
| 11 Apr 2022 (Part I)<br/>19 Apr 2022 (Part II)<ref name="GEMDQ"/> |
|||
| 22 Jul 2009 |
|||
| 1 Oct 2004<!-- additional clarifications: 22 Apr 2005 --><!-- |
|||
| 8 Sep 2009 --> |
|||
| 24 Nov 2010<!-- additional clarifications: 25 Mar 2011 http://b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=03&dd=29&nav_id=73501 --> |
|||
| 8 Apr 2022 (Part I)<br/>13 Apr 2022 (Part II)<ref>{{Cite web |date=8 April 2022 |title=Євросоюз передав Києву опитувальник для отримання статусу кандидата |trans-title=The European Union has sent Kyiv a questionnaire to obtain candidate status |url=https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2022/04/8/7137497 |access-date=8 April 2022 |website=European Pravda |language=uk}}</ref> |
|||
| 9 Dec 2016<ref>{{Cite web |date=9 December 2016 |title=Hahn: Questionnaire is a game changer for future of BiH |url=http://europa.ba/?p=46485 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180906053312/http://europa.ba/?p=46485 |archive-date=6 September 2018 |access-date=9 December 2016 |website=Delegation of the European Union to Bosnia and Herzegovina}}</ref> |
|||
| 11 Apr 2022 (Part I)<br/>19 Apr 2022 (Part II)<ref name="GEMDQ">{{Cite web |date=2022-04-11 |title=Remarks by Commissioner Várhelyi on the handing over of the questionnaires to Georgia and Moldova |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/varhelyi/announcements/remarks-commissioner-varhelyi-handing-over-questionnaires-georgia-and-moldova_en |access-date=2022-04-15 |website=European Commission}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=11 April 2022 |title=Georgia Receives EU Membership Questionnaire |url=https://civil.ge/archives/485147 |access-date=2022-04-11 |website=civil.ge}}</ref> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
On 22 July 2009, a questionnaire to assess Montenegro's application was presented to the Montenegrin Government by the EC. On 9 December 2009, Montenegro delivered its answers to the EC questionnaire. On 9 November 2010, the [[European Commission]] recommended that the [[Council of the European Union]] grant Montenegro the status of candidate country.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/mn_opinion_2010_en.pdf|title=Commission Opinion on Montenegro's application for membership of the European Union}}</ref> On 17 December 2010, Montenegro became an official EU candidate country.<ref>{{cite web|last=PALOKAJ|first=AUGUSTIN|title=Montenegro is officially awarded EU candidate status|url=http://waz.euobserver.com/887/31534|publisher=WAZ EU Observer|accessdate=17 December 2010|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20101218223716/http://waz.euobserver.com/887/31534|archivedate=18 December 2010}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Applicant responds to questionnaire |
|||
| 11 Jun 2010<!--initial set of answers: 14 Apr 2010 --> |
|||
| 22 Apr 2022 (Part I)<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 April 2022 |title=Молдова заповнила опитувальник для отримання статусу кандидата на членство у ЄС |trans-title=Moldova has completed a questionnaire to obtain EU candidate status |url=https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2022/04/22/7138226 |access-date=22 April 2022 |website=European Pravda |language=uk}}</ref><br/>12 May 2022 (Part II)<ref>{{Cite web |date=12 May 2022 |title=Moldova transfers 2nd part of completed questionnaire for EU accession |url=https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/79084 |access-date=12 May 2022 |website=interfax.com}}</ref> |
|||
| 12 Apr 2010<!--initial set of answers: 9 Dec 2009--> |
|||
| 10 May 2005<!--initial set of answers: 14 Feb 2005 --><!-- |
|||
| 22 Oct 2009--> |
|||
| 22 Apr 2011<!--initial set of answers: 31 Jan 2011 http://www.seio.gov.rs/serbia-and-eu/history.60.html --> |
|||
| 17 Apr 2022 (Part I)<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 April 2022 |title=Шлях до членства у ЄС - Україна вже завершила роботу над опитувальником |trans-title=The road to EU membership - Ukraine has completed work on the questionnaire |url=https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2022/04/17/7137973 |access-date=17 April 2022 |website=European Pravda |language=uk}}</ref><br/>9 May 2022 (Part II)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Obtaining Ukraine's EU membership candidate status is of great importance for the Ukrainian people - President during a conversation with Ursula von der Leyen |url=https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/otrimannya-ukrayinoyu-statusu-kandidata-na-chlenstvo-v-yes-m-74933 |access-date=10 May 2022 |website=president.gov.ua}}</ref> |
|||
| 28 Feb 2018 |
|||
| 2 May 2022 (Part I)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Irakli Garibashvili submits EU questionnaire's part one to Carl Hartzell |url=https://www.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=574&info_id=81885 |access-date=2 May 2022}}</ref><br/>10 May 2022 (Part II)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Irakli Garibashvili submits EU questionnaire's 2nd part to Carl Hartzell |url=https://www.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=574&info_id=81946 |access-date=10 May 2022}}</ref> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
In 2011 Montenegro's population was overwhelmingly for joining the EU, 76.2% being in favour according to polling and only 9.8% against.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cedem.me/fajlovi/editor_fajlovi/istrazivanja/CEDEM_oktobar09.pdf |title=Cedem.me |format=PDF |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Commission issues its opinion (and subsequent reports) |
|||
| 2010-2013 |
|||
| 17 Jun 2022<ref name="UMGCM"/> |
|||
| 9 Nov 2010 |
|||
| 2005–2009<!--9 Nov 2005 (candidate status recommendation), 8 Nov 2006, 6 Nov 2007, 5 Nov 2008, 14 Oct 2009 (negotiations start recommendation) --><!-- |
|||
| 24 Feb 2010--> |
|||
| 12 Oct 2011 |
|||
| 17 Jun 2022<ref name="UMGCM"/> |
|||
| 2019<ref>{{Cite web |date=29 May 2019 |title=Key findings of the Opinion on Bosnia and Herzegovina's EU membership application and analytical report |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/COUNTRY_19_2778 |access-date=12 June 2022 |website=European Commission}}</ref>–2022<!--29 May 2019 first report --> |
|||
| 17 Jun 2022<ref name="UMGCM">{{Cite web |title=The European Commission recommends to Council confirming Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia's perspective to become members of the EU and provides its opinion on granting them candidate status |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_3790 |access-date=17 June 2022 |website=ec.europa.eu}}</ref> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| 1989, 1997–2004<!--18 Dec 1989, 15 Jul 1997, 4 Nov 1998, 13 Oct 1999 (candidate status recommendation), 8 Nov 2000, 13 Nov 2001, 9 Oct 2002, 5 Nov 2003, 6 Oct 2004 (negotiations start recommendation) --> |
|||
|- |
|||
====Serbia==== |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" | Candidate status |
|||
{{Main|Accession of Serbia to the European Union}} |
|||
[[File:European Union Serbia Locator.svg|thumb|Serbia shown in orange; Kosovo shown in red]] |
|||
|- |
|||
Negotiations on a [[European Union Association Agreement|Stabilisation and Association Agreement]] started in November 2005.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52006SC0885:EN:HTML |title=Eur-lex.europa.eu |publisher=Eur-lex.europa.eu |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> Serbia's candidacy has been hindered by its relations with the breakaway state of the [[Kosovo|Republic of Kosovo]]. Serbia has made numerous concessions on this to achieve candidate status, such as allowing Kosovo to participate in regional forums, and jointly managing their border.<ref name="BBCCandidacy">{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17225415 |title=EU leaders grant Serbia candidate status |publisher=BBC News |date=1 March 2012 |accessdate=2 March 2012}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Commission recommends granting of candidate status |
|||
| 16 Oct 2013<ref>{{Cite web |date=16 October 2013 |title=Albania: EU Commission OKs status of membership candidate |url=http://www.ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/politics/2013/10/16/Albania-EU-Commission-OKs-status-membership-candidate_9469789.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102182631/http://www.ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/politics/2013/10/16/Albania-EU-Commission-OKs-status-membership-candidate_9469789.html |archive-date=2 November 2013 |access-date=16 October 2013 |website=ansamed.info}}</ref> |
|||
| 17 Jun 2022<ref name="UMGCM"/> |
|||
| 9 Nov 2010 |
|||
| 9 Nov 2005<!-- |
|||
| 24 Feb 2010--> |
|||
| 12 Oct 2011 |
|||
| 17 Jun 2022<ref name="UMGCM"/> |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
| 12 Oct 2022<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-10-12 |title=EU's von der Leyen: proposed candidate status for Bosnia and Herzegovina |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eus-von-der-leyen-proposed-candidate-status-bosnia-herzegovina-2022-10-12 |website=Reuters}}</ref> |
|||
| 8 Nov 2023<ref name="UkraineMoldovaNegotiationsrec">{{Cite web |date=2023-11-08 |title=Commission adopts 2023 Enlargement package, recommends to open negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, to grant candidate status to Georgia and to open accession negotiations with BiH, once the necessary degree of compliance is achieved |url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-adopts-2023-enlargement-package-recommends-open-negotiations-ukraine-and-moldova-grant-2023-11-08_en |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231108124942/https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-adopts-2023-enlargement-package-recommends-open-negotiations-ukraine-and-moldova-grant-2023-11-08_en |archive-date=2023-11-08 |access-date=2023-11-08 |website=europa.eu}}</ref> |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
| 13 Oct 1999 |
|||
|- |
|||
On 29 April 2008, [[Serbia]]n officials signed an [[Stabilisation and Association Process|SAA]] with the [[European Union|EU]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ana.gr/anaweb/user/showplain?maindoc=6383357&maindocimg=5981478&service=102 |title=EU signs accords with Serbia |publisher=ANA |accessdate=29 December 2008|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080612135019/http%3A//www.ana.gr/anaweb/user/showplain%3Fmaindoc%3D6383357%26maindocimg%3D5981478%26service%3D102 |archivedate=12 June 2008|deadurl=yes}}</ref> and the Serbian President sought official candidate status by the end of 2008.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSL2952262420080429 |title=Serb president seeks EU candidate status this year |publisher=Reuters |accessdate=29 December 2008 |first=David |last=Brunnstrom |date=29 April 2008}}</ref> The Dutch government refused to ratify the agreement while [[Ratko Mladić]] was not captured. He was captured in Serbia on 26 May 2011, removing the main obstacle for obtaining candidate status. As of January 2009, the Serbian government has started to implement its obligations under the agreement unilaterally.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20110728013544/http://www.emportal.rs/en/news/serbia/63987.html |title=Rehn: Four areas for unilateral implementation of SAA|publisher=Emportal.rs|date=26 September 2008 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> The effects remain to be evaluated by the European Commission. Despite its setbacks in the political field, on 7 December 2009, EU unfroze the trade agreement with Serbia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europeanforum.net/news/791/eu_unfreezes_trade_agreement_with_serbia|title=EU unfreezes trade agreement with Serbia|accessdate=25 December 2009|publisher=europeanforum.net}}</ref> Serbian citizens gained visa-free travel to the Schengen zone on 19 December 2009,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8387938.stm|title=EU scraps visas for three Balkan states|publisher=BBC|accessdate=25 December 2009 |date=1 December 2009}}</ref> and Serbia officially applied for the EU membership on 22 December 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/12/22/serbia_applies_for_eu_membership|title=Serbia applies for the EU membership|publisher=Swedish Presidency of the European Union|accessdate=25 December 2009}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |[[European Council]] grants ''candidate status'' to Applicant |
|||
| 27 Jun 2014<ref name="ALBcandidate"/><ref name="ALBcandidate approved"/> |
|||
| 23 Jun 2022<ref name="UA-MD-candidate-council"/> |
|||
| 17 Dec 2010<ref name="MNEcandidate"/> |
|||
| 17 Dec 2005<!-- |
|||
| 17 Jun 2010--> |
|||
| 1 Mar 2012 |
|||
| 23 Jun 2022<ref name="UA-MD-candidate-council"/> |
|||
| 15 Dec 2022<ref name="BosniaCandi"/> |
|||
| 14 Dec 2023<ref name="MUG"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| 12 Dec 1999 |
|||
|- |
|||
In November 2010, ''The Economist'' stated that "EU Foreign Ministers have agreed to pass Serbia's request for membership to the European Commission".<ref>{{cite news|title=Brussels beckons|url=http://www.economist.com/node/17363537|work=The Economist |accessdate=5 November 2010|date=28 October 2010}}</ref> The European Commission sent a legislative questionnaire of around 2,500 questions<ref>{{cite web|title=EU questionnaire for Serbia|url=http://www6.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=10&dd=27&nav_id=70529|publisher=b92|date=27 October 2010}}</ref> and Serbia answered to on 31 January 2011. On 12 October 2011, the [[European Commission]] has recommended that Serbia should be granted an official EU candidate status following its successful application for the EU membership.<ref>{{cite news|last=Commission|first=European|title=Opinion of European Commission on Serbia's application for EU membership|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2011/package/sr_rapport_2011_en.pdf|accessdate=12 October 2011}}</ref> |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" | Accession negotiations |
|||
|- |
|||
A deal was reached with Romania in late February 2012 over the rights of the 30,000 [[Vlachs of Serbia|'Vlachs']] in Serbia, removing Romanian objections to candidacy.<ref name="BBCCandidacy" /> On 28 February, [[Carl Bildt]], Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs, confirmed that the EU foreign ministers agreed to grant green light for Serbia candidacy status. Candidacy status was granted by the [[European Council]] on 1 March 2012.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/eu-foreign-ministers-mull-granting-serbia-candidacy-for-membership-in-the-bloc/2012/02/28/gIQADCvWfR_story.html|title=EU foreign ministers recommend EU candidate status for Serbia after agreements with Kosovo|agency=Associated Press|work=The Washington Post|date=28 February 2012|accessdate=29 February 2012|deadurl=yes}} {{dead link|date=August 2012|bot=RjwilmsiBot}}</ref> On 22 April 2013, the European Commission recommended the start of EU entry talks with Serbia.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/22/us-eu-serbia-idUSBRE93L0AQ20130422|title=EU Commission recommends start of Serbia membership talks|date=2013-04-22|accessdate=2013-06-20|publisher=Reuters|first=Justyna|last=Pawlak}}</ref> On 28 June 2013 the European Council endorsed the Council of Ministers conclusions and recommendations to open accession negotiations with Serbia, and announced that they would commence by January 2014 at the latest.<ref>{{cite web|title=European Council 27/28 June 2013 Conclusions|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/137634.pdf|publisher=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/|accessdate=16 September 2013|format=PDF}}</ref> The following day, the Head of the EU Delegation to Serbia, Vincent Degert, stated that the screening of the [[Community acquis|acquis]] had commenced.<ref name=serbscreen>{{cite web|url=http://www.tanjug.rs/news/91986/degert--screening-process--preparation-of-framework-begin.htm|title=Degert: Screening process, preparation of framework begin|date=2013-06-29|accessdate=2013-07-19|publisher=[[Tanjug]]}}</ref> Screening of the acquis started on 25 September 2013.<ref name=serbscreen2>{{cite web|url=http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2013&mm=09&dd=25&nav_id=87785|title=Screening of Serbia's legal system starts in Brussels|date=2013-09-25|accessdate=2013-09-26|publisher=[[b92]]}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Commission recommends to open negotiations |
|||
| 9 Nov 2016<ref name="AlbaniaNegotiations">{{Cite web |date=2016-11-09 |title=Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions |url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2016/20161109_strategy_paper_en.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161110043235/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2016/20161109_strategy_paper_en.pdf |archive-date=10 November 2016 |access-date=2016-11-09 |website=europa.eu}}</ref> |
|||
| 8 Nov 2023<ref name="UkraineMoldovaNegotiationsrec"/> |
|||
| 12 Oct 2011 |
|||
| 14 Oct 2009<!-- |
|||
| 24 Feb 2010--> |
|||
| 22 Apr 2013<ref name="SerbiaNegotiationsrec">{{Cite news |last=Pawlak |first=Justyna |date=22 April 2013 |title=EU opens to Serbia after Kosovo deal |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-eu-serbia-idUKBRE93L0AJ20130422 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210827115726/https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-eu-serbia-idUKBRE93L0AJ20130422?edition-redirect=uk |archive-date=27 August 2021 |access-date=2013-09-16 |agency=Uk.reuters.com}}</ref> |
|||
| 8 Nov 2023<ref name="UkraineMoldovaNegotiationsrec"/> |
|||
! rowspan=6 | |
|||
| 12 Mar 2024<ref name="BosNegRec"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
! rowspan=6 | |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
! rowspan=6 | |
|||
| 6 Oct 2004 |
|||
|- |
|||
In December 2013 the Council of the European Union approved opening negotiations on Serbia's accession in January 2014,<ref name=2013cofEU /> and the first Intergovernmental Conference was held on 21 January at the European Council in Brussels. Serbia was represented by Prime Minister [[Ivica Dačić]] and his first deputy [[Aleksandar Vučić]], while the EU was represented by their Enlargement Commissioner [[Stefan Fule]] and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Greece [[Evangelos Venizelos]].<ref name=serbnegstart /> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | [[European Council]] decides to open negotiations |
|||
| 26 Jun 2018<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-06-28 |title=European Council conclusions, 28 June 2018 |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/06/29/20180628-euco-conclusions-final |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115031647/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/06/29/20180628-euco-conclusions-final |archive-date=15 November 2020 |access-date=2020-03-29 |website=European Council}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-06-26 |title=Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process - Council conclusions |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35863/st10555-en18.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722040617/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35863/st10555-en18.pdf |archive-date=22 July 2018 |access-date=2020-03-29 |website=European Council}}</ref><ref name="AlbaniaMacedoniaNegotiations"/> |
|||
| 14 Dec 2023<ref name="consilium.europa.eu">{{Cite web |date=2023-12-14 |title=European Council conclusions on Ukraine, enlargement and reforms |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/12/14/european-council-conclusions-on-ukraine-enlargement-and-reforms |access-date=2023-12-30 |website=[[Council of the European Union]] |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
| 28 Jun 2012<ref name="MontenegroStatus"/> |
|||
| 18 Jun 2019<ref name="AlbaniaMacedoniaNegotiations">{{Cite web |title=Council conclusions on enlargement and stabilisation and association process - Consilium |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/06/18/council-conclusions-on-enlargement-and-stabilisation-and-association-process |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190630225305/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/06/18/council-conclusions-on-enlargement-and-stabilisation-and-association-process |archive-date=30 June 2019 |access-date=30 June 2019 |website=consilium.europa.eu}}</ref> |
|||
| 28 Jun 2013<ref>{{Cite web |title=Serbia |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/serbia |access-date=2023-12-31 |website=[[Council of the European Union]] |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
| 14 Dec 2023<ref name="consilium.europa.eu"/> |
|||
| 21 Mar 2024<ref name="BIHnegotiations"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| 16 Dec 2004<ref>{{Cite web |title=Türkiye |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/turkey |access-date=2023-12-31 |website=[[Council of the European Union]] |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
====Turkey==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |[[Council of the European Union|Council]] sets ''negotiations start'' date |
|||
| 24 Mar 2020<ref name="RFE/RL's Balkan Service">{{Cite web |last=RFE/RL's Balkan Service |date=24 March 2020 |title=After Years of Delay, North Macedonia, Albania Get OK To Begin EU Accession Talks |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/after-years-of-delay-north-macedonia-albania-get-ok-to-begin-eu-accession-talks/30507053.html |publisher=[[Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty]]}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:European Union Turkey Locator.svg|thumb|Turkey shown in orange]] |
|||
| 21 Jun 2024<ref name="Council-nego-Ukraine-Moldova">{{Cite web |date=2024-06-21 |title=EU countries agree to begin membership talks with Moldova and Ukraine |url=https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240621-eu-countries-agree-to-begin-membership-talks-with-moldova-and-ukraine |access-date=2024-06-21 |website=[[France 24]]}}</ref> |
|||
| 26 Jun 2012<ref>{{Cite web |title=Council conclusions on Montenegro |url=http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/131206.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130619074745/http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/131206.pdf |archive-date=19 June 2013 |access-date=16 September 2013 |website=ue.eu.in |df=dmy-all}}</ref> |
|||
| 24 Mar 2020<ref name="RFE/RL's Balkan Service"/> |
|||
| 17 Dec 2013<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-12-17 |title=Council conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process |url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/140142.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131217221046/http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/140142.pdf |archive-date=17 December 2013 |access-date=2013-12-17 |website=Council of the European Union}}</ref> |
|||
| 21 Jun 2024<ref name="Council-nego-Ukraine-Moldova"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| 17 Dec 2004 |
|||
|- |
|||
The status of [[Turkey]] with regard to the EU has become a matter of major significance and considerable controversy in recent years. Turkey is one of the founding members of the [[Council of Europe]] since 1949 and has been an "associate member" of the European Union and its predecessors since 1964, as a result of the [[Ankara Agreement|EEC–Turkey Association Agreement]] (''Ankara Agreement'') that was signed on 12 September 1963.<ref>Official Journal of the European Communities 1973, C113 p2</ref> The country formally applied for full membership on 14 April 1987, but 12 years passed before it was recognised as a candidate country at the Helsinki Summit in 1999. After a summit in Brussels on 17 December 2004 (following the major [[2004 enlargement of the European Union|2004 enlargement]]), the European Council announced that membership negotiations with Turkey were officially opened on 3 October 2005. The screening process which began on 20 October 2005 was completed on 18 October 2006. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Membership negotiations start (first [[Intergovernmental conference|IGC]]) |
|||
| 19 Jul 2022<ref name="July2022AlMk">{{Cite web |last=Gijs |first=Camille |date=2022-07-19 |title=EU launches accession talks with North Macedonia, Albania |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-launch-accession-talks-north-macedonia-albania |access-date=2022-07-19 |website=politico.eu}}</ref> |
|||
| 25 Jun 2024<ref name="MDAnegotiations"/> |
|||
| 29 Jun 2012<ref name="MontenegroStatus"/> |
|||
| 19 Jul 2022<ref name="July2022AlMk"/> |
|||
| 21 Jan 2014<ref name="SRBnegotiations"/> |
|||
| 25 Jun 2024<ref name="UKRnegotiations"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--BIH--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--GEO--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--KOS--> |
|||
| 3 Oct 2005<ref name="TUR2005"/> |
|||
|- |
|||
Turkey, with the [[Economy of Turkey|seventh largest economy]] in the [[Council of Europe]]<!--behind Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Russia, and Spain--> and the [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|fifteenth largest economy in the world]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GDP_PPP.pdf|format=PDF|title=The World Bank: World Development Indicators Database|accessdate=24 April 2009|publisher=World Bank}}</ref> is part of the common EU [[customs union|customs territory]] since the entering into force of the [[European Union–Turkey Customs Union|EU–Turkey Customs Union]] in 1996. Turkey was a founding member of the [[Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]] in 1961, a founding member of the [[Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe]] in 1973 and was an associate member of the [[Western European Union]] from 1992 until its dissolution in 2011. Turkey is also a founding member of the [[G-20 major economies]] (1999), which has close ties with the European Union. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |First negotiating chapters opened (second [[Intergovernmental conference|IGC]]) |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2024-10-15}}<ref name="Albania2IGC">{{cite web |date=2024-10-11 |title=Second Accession Conference with Albania, 15 October 2024 |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2024/10/15/ |access-date=2024-10-11 |website=Consilium}}</ref><!--ALB--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--MDA--> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2012-12-18}}<!--MNE--><ref name="MNE2012"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--North Macedonia--> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2015-12-14}}<!--SRB--><ref name="SRB2015"/> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--UKR--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--BIH--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--GEO--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--KOS--> |
|||
| {{Dts|format=dmy|abbr=on|2006-06-12}}<ref name="TUR2006"/><ref name="TURABDER2006"/> |
|||
|- |
|||
Proponents of Turkey's membership argue that it is a key [[regional power]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20090317_turkey_and_russia_rise|publisher=Stratfor|title=Turkey and Russia on the Rise|first1=Reva|last1=Bhalla|first2=Lauren |last2=Goodrich|first3=Peter|last3=Zeihan|date=17 March 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.stratfor.com/products/premium/read_article.php?id=293204|publisher=Stratfor|title=The Geopolitics of Turkey|first=George|last=Friedman|date=31 July 2007}}</ref> with [[Economy of Turkey|a large economy]] and [[Turkish Armed Forces|the second largest military force of NATO]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nato.int/turkey/turkey2.htm|publisher=[[NATO]]|title=My country & NATO: Turkey}}{{dead link|date=January 2011}}</ref><ref name="economist2">{{Cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/world/europe/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=7971046 |title=Turkey, America and Europe: Who is losing Turkey? |work=The Economist |date=28 September 2006 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> that will enhance the EU's position as a global geostrategic player; given Turkey's geographic location and economic, political and cultural ties in regions with that are in the immediate vicinity of the EU's geopolitical sphere of influence; such as the [[Mediterranean Sea|East Mediterranean]] and [[Black Sea]] coasts, the [[Balkan]] peninsula, the [[Middle East]], the [[Caspian Sea]] basin and [[Central Asia]].<ref name="Atatürk">{{Cite book|title=Ataturk|first=Andrew|last=Mango|publisher=Overlook|year=2000|isbn=1-58567-011-1}}</ref><ref name="Ottoman_Turkey">{{Cite book|title=History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey|first=Stanford Jay|last=Shaw|coauthors=Kural Shaw, Ezel|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|year=1977|isbn=0-521-29163-1}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Membership negotiations end |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--ALB--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--MDA--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--MNE--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--North Macedonia--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--SRB--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--UKR--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--BIH--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--GEO--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--KOS--> |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd)<!--TUR--> |
|||
|- |
|||
According to [[Carl Bildt]], [[Minister for Foreign Affairs (Sweden)|Swedish foreign minister]], "[The accession of Turkey] would give the EU a decisive role for stability in the Eastern part of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, which is clearly in the strategic interest of Europe."<ref name="ihtbildt">{{Cite news|last = Ekman|first = Ivar|title=Top Swedish official backs Turkey for EU|work=International Herald Tribune |date=11 December 2006|url = http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/11/news/sweden.php|accessdate=3 July 2007}}</ref> One of Turkey's key supporters for its bid to join the EU is the [[United Kingdom]]. In May 2008, [[Queen Elizabeth II]] said during a visit to Turkey, that "Turkey is uniquely positioned as a bridge between the East and West at a crucial time for the European Union and the world in general."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/turkey/8927125.asp?gid=231&sz=72094 |title=Hürriyet: ''Britain's Queen Elizabeth's visit to Turkey continues.'' hurriyet.com.tr Link accessed 15 May 2008 |publisher=Hurriyet.com.tr |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" | Accession treaty and joining the EU |
|||
|- |
|||
However others, such as former [[List of presidents of France|French President]] [[Nicolas Sarkozy]] and [[Chancellor of Germany|German Chancellor]] [[Angela Merkel]], maintain an opposition to Turkey's membership. Opponents argue that Turkey does not respect the key principles that are expected in a [[liberal democracy]], such as the [[freedom of expression]];<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7375327.stm |title=BBC: EU hails Turkey free speech move. 30 April 2008 |publisher=BBC News |date=30 April 2008 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> and because of the significant role of the army on the Turkish administrative foreground through the [[National Security Council (Turkey)|National Security Council]]; whose military-dominated structure was reformed on 23 July 2003, in line with the requests from the EU.<ref>Financial Times: ''A quiet revolution: Less power for Turkey's army is a triumph for the EU.'' 31 July 2003.</ref> Turkey's large population would also alter the balance of power in the representative European institutions. Upon joining the EU, Turkey's 70 million inhabitants would bestow it the second largest number of [[Member of the European Parliament|MEP]]s in the [[European Parliament]].<ref name="economist2"/> Demographic projections indicate that Turkey would surpass Germany in the number of seats by 2020.<ref name="economist2"/> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Accession Treaty signature |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
Other opponents to Turkey's membership state that it would also affect future enlargement plans, especially the number of nations seeking EU membership,<ref name="economist2"/> grounds by which [[Valéry Giscard d'Estaing]] has opposed Turkey's admission. Giscard d'Estaing has suggested that it would lead to demands for accession by [[Morocco]]. Morocco's application was already rejected on geographic grounds, and Turkey, unlike Morocco, has [[Eastern Thrace|territory in Europe]]. [[President of France|French President]] [[Nicolas Sarkozy]] (then a candidate) stated in January 2007 that "enlarging Europe with no limit risks destroying European political union, and that I do not accept...I want to say that Europe must give itself borders, that not all countries have a vocation to become members of Europe, beginning with Turkey which has no place inside the European Union."<ref name="sarkozyquote">{{cite web|url=http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=159133|title=Turkey has no place in EU: Sarkozy|accessdate=13 April 2007}}</ref> Only a small fraction of the Turkish territory (around 3%) lies in the present common geographical definition of Europe, with approximately 97% of its land mass being in [[Asia]], including the capital [[Ankara]]. The vast majority of its population lives in the Asian side of the country. On the other hand, the country's largest city, [[Istanbul]], lies mostly in Europe. The population in the commonly defined as European part of Turkey is approximately ten million inhabitants, which is larger than Sweden, Austria, or 15 out of the 28 present EU members. In addition, the EU already has a member state located entirely in Asia—[[Cyprus]] to the south east of [[Anatolia]] and part of Anatolia's continental shelf. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |EU joining date |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
| style="color:#aa0" |(tbd) |
|||
|- |
|||
Further, some oppose the accession of a largely Muslim country. In 2004, future [[President of the European Council]] [[Herman Van Rompuy]] reportedly stated, "An enlargement [of the EU] with Turkey is not in any way comparable with previous enlargement waves. Turkey is not Europe and will never be Europe." He continued, "But it's a matter of fact that the universal values which are in force in Europe, and which are also the fundamental values of Christianity, will lose vigour with the entry of a large Islamic country such as Turkey."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.lgcnews.com/rompuy-strong-supporter-of-turkeys-eu-entry/#|agency=Lemon Grove Cyprus News|title=Rompuy strong supporter of Turkey’s EU entry|date=24 May 2013|accessdate=21 September 2013}}</ref> Turkish Minister for EU Affairs [[Egemen Bagis]] said in September 2013 that he believed prejudice by EU member states would ultimately prevent Turkey from ever joining the bloc, although he suggested it could have a "very closely aligned" relationship with the EU [[Norway–European Union relations|akin to]] [[Norway]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/turkey/10325218/Turkey-will-probably-never-be-EU-member.html|title=Turkey 'will probably never be EU member'|date=21 September 2013|accessdate=21 September 2013|agency=Telegraph|location=London|work=The Daily Telegraph}}</ref> |
|||
| colspan=14 | {{Reflist|group=Note}} |
|||
|} |
|||
Another concern is the [[Cyprus dispute]]. The northern third of the island of Cyprus is considered by the EU and most states in the world to be part of the [[Republic of Cyprus]], an EU member state, but is ''de facto'' controlled by the government of [[Northern Cyprus]], which is recognised by Turkey. Turkey, for its part, does not recognise the Republic of Cyprus pending a resolution to the dispute under the auspices of the United Nations, and has 40,000 troops stationed on territory controlled by the Northern Cypriot government. The UN-backed [[Annan Plan for Cyprus|Annan Plan for the re-unification of Cyprus]] was actively supported by the EU and Turkey. Separate referendums held in April 2004 produced different results on either side of the island: while accepted by the [[Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus|Turkish Cypriots]] in the north, the plan was rejected by the Greek Cypriots in the south. |
|||
=== Level of preparation for acquis chapters === |
|||
===Potential candidates that have not yet applied for EU membership=== |
|||
==== |
==== Current situation ==== |
||
The table below shows the level of preparation of applicant countries with EU standards ([[acquis communautaire]]) on a 5-point scale, using data from the European Commission's 2024 reports. The analysis is based on the analysis performed by the online media outlet ''[[European Pravda]]'' for Ukraine; scores for other countries, as well as additional sections (public administration reform and economic criteria) were added based on official data from the European Commission's reports.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2024/10/31/7197377/|title=Від "корупції" до телемарафону: що ЄС чекає від України та як оцінює готовність до вступу|date=2024-10-31|website=[[European Pravda]]|language=uk|accessdate=2024-10-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/strategy-and-reports_en|title=Strategy and Reports - European Commission|date=2024-10-30|website=neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu|language=en|access-date=2024-10-31}}</ref> |
|||
The EU's relations with the [[Western Balkans]] states were moved from the "[[Directorate-General for External Relations (European Commission)|External Relations]]" to the "[[Directorate-General for Enlargement|Enlargement]]" policy segment in 2005. Those states which have not been recognised as candidate countries are considered "potential candidate countries".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/potential-candidates/index_en.htm|title=Potential candidates|publisher=European Union}}</ref> The move to [[Directorate-General for Enlargement|Enlargement directorate]] was a consequence of the advancement of the [[Stabilisation and Association process]]. |
|||
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; font-size:85%" |
|||
The 2003 European Council summit in [[Thessaloniki]] set integration of the Western [[Balkans]] as a priority of EU expansion. |
|||
! rowspan=2 | <big>Chapter</big> |
|||
! colspan=6 | Candidates negotiating |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! colspan=2 | Candidates |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! Applicant /<br/>Potential candidate |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! Candidate with frozen negotiations |
|||
|- |
|||
On 9 November 2005, the [[European Commission]] suggested in a strategy paper that the enlargement agenda of the time (Croatia, [[Turkey]] and the Western Balkans) could potentially block the possibility of a future accession of [[Armenia]], [[Azerbaijan]], [[Belarus]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], [[Moldova]], and [[Ukraine]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0561:FIN:EN:HTML|title=2005 enlargement strategy paper|publisher=European Union}}</ref> [[Olli Rehn]] has said on occasion that the EU should "avoid overstretching our capacity, and instead consolidate our enlargement agenda," adding, "this is already a challenging agenda for our accession process."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/02/01/news/eu.php|title=EU enlargement chief vows to press ahead, for 'stability'|publisher=International Herald Tribune|date=1 February 2006}}</ref> |
|||
! [[Accession of Albania to the European Union|Albania]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Moldova to the European Union|Moldova]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|Montenegro]] |
|||
! [[Accession of North Macedonia to the European Union|North Macedonia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|Serbia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Ukraine to the European Union|Ukraine]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Bosnia and Herzegovina]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Georgia to the European Union|Georgia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Kosovo to the European Union|Kosovo]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|Turkey]] |
|||
|- |
|||
====Bosnia and Herzegovina==== |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 1: The fundamentals of the accession process |
|||
{{Main|Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union}} |
|||
|- |
|||
[[File:European Union Bosnia and Herzegovina Locator.svg|thumb|Bosnia and Herzegovina shown in orange]] |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Public administration reform |
|||
[[Bosnia and Herzegovina]] still has many economic as well as political problems. Recently{{when|date=April 2014}} it has been making slow but steady progress, including co-operation with the [[International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia|war crimes tribunal]] at [[The Hague]]. |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan="8" | |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
! rowspan="8" | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan="8" | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |23. Judiciary and fundamental rights |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
Negotiations on a [[Stabilisation and Association Agreement]] started during the year 2005 and concluded December 2007. This is the first step before making an application for candidate status and membership negotiations. The negotiations were expected to be finalised in late 2007,<ref name=GermanPresidency>[http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/features/setimes/features/2006/12/28/feature-01 Germany prepares to take over EU presidency], ''[[Southeast European Times]]'', 19 December 2006. Retrieved 10 January 2007.</ref> but due to the failure of the government to decide in time on police reform in line with EU principles they could be finalised in late 2008 at the earliest.{{Citation needed|date=March 2011}} Due to this setback and the hard-line positions of most Bosnian politicians, [[High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina|High Representative]] [[Miroslav Lajčák]] has stated that he will shift more of his focus for the time being from EU accession to reforms which would improve the standard of living in the country.{{Citation needed|date=March 2011}} |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |24. Justice, freedom and security |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |The existence of a functioning market economy |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#3288bd" | 5 |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |The capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 5. Public procurement |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
The Union may show some leniency over economic requirements due to the political issues at stake. Former President of the European Commission [[Romano Prodi]] has stated that Bosnia and Herzegovina has a chance of joining the EU soon after [[Croatia]], but it is entirely dependent on the country's progress.{{Citation needed|date=March 2011}} |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |18. Statistics |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
The SAA was initialed on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 by Enlargement Commissioner [[Olli Rehn]] and caretaker Prime Minister [[Nikola Špirić]]. The initialing came in the wake of successful negotiations by [[Miroslav Lajčák]] in regards to passing his new quorum rules laws and also the commitment of Bosnian and Herzegovinian politicians to implementing police reform. The [[Stabilisation and Association Process|SAA]] was signed on 16 June 2008. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |32. Financial control |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
|- |
|||
According to the Foreign Minister [[Sven Alkalaj]], Bosnia and Herzegovina planned to submit an application for membership between April and June 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dnevnik.hr/vijesti/svijet/bih-podnosi-kandidaturu-za-clanstvo-u-eu-2009.html |title=BiH podnosi kandidaturu za članstvo u EU 2009 |publisher=Dnevnik.hr |date=16 December 2008 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> However, an application was ultimately not submitted in this time frame. In February 2010, Alkalaj stated that Bosnia now planned to submit their membership application by the end of the year.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/newsbriefs/setimes/newsbriefs/2010/02/28/nb-08 |title=Setimes.com |publisher=Setimes.com |date=28 February 2010 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> Again, no application was actually filed. |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 2: Internal Market |
|||
|- |
|||
Citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina gained visa-free travel to the EU in December 2010. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 1. Free movement of goods |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
! rowspan=9 | |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=9 | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
! rowspan=9 | |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Kosovo*==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 2. Freedom of movement for workers |
|||
{{Main|Accession of Kosovo to the European Union}} |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
[[File:European Union Kosovo Locator.svg|thumb|Kosovo shown in orange]] |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
{{As of|2013|July}}, 5 of the 28 member states do not [[International recognition of Kosovo|recognise]] the Republic of Kosovo as an independent state. As a result, the [[European Union]] itself refers only to "Kosovo*", with an asterisked footnote containing the text agreed to by the [[Belgrade–Pristina negotiations]]: "This designation is without prejudice to [[Kosovo status process|positions on status]], and is in line with [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244|UNSCR 1244]] and the [[International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence|ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence]]." |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
A [[Stabilisation Tracking Mechanism|Stabilisation Tracking Mechanism (STM)]] was launched by EU for Kosovo on 6 November 2002. It is an association process specially devised to promote policy dialogue between the EU and the Kosovan authorities on EU approximation matters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/potential-candidate-countries/kosovo/eu_kosovo_relations_en.htm|title=Main steps towards the EU|publisher=ec.europa.eu|accessdate=28 April 2008}}</ref> As confirmed by the Thessaloniki Summit in June 2003, [[Kosovo]] was through the initiated STM process now anchored in the framework of the [[Stabilisation and Association Process]], the EU policy which applies to the Western Balkans. On 20 April 2005 the European Commission adopted the Communication on [[Kosovo]] to the Council, "''A European Future for Kosovo''", which reinforces the Commission’s commitment to [[Kosovo]]. Furthermore, on 20 January 2006, the Council adopted a [[European Partnership]] for [[Serbia and Montenegro]], including [[Kosovo]] as defined by UNSCR1244. The European Partnership is a means to materialise the European perspective of the Western Balkan countries within the framework of the stabilisation and association process. The Provisional Institutions of Self Government (PISG) adopted an Action Plan for the Implementation of the [[European Partnership]] in August 2006. The PISG regularly reports on the implementation of this action plan.<ref name="EU-Kosovo relations">[http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/potential-candidates/kosovo/relation/index_en.htm European Commission—Enlargement—Kosovo—EU—Kosovo relations]</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 3. Right of establishment and freedom to provide services |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
The [[Kosovo|Republic of Kosovo]]'s [[2008 Kosovo declaration of independence|declaration of independence]] from [[Serbia]] was enacted on 17 February 2008 by a vote of members of the [[Assembly of Kosovo]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7249034.stm|title=Kosovo MPs proclaim independence|publisher=BBC News|date=17 February 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.economist.com/node/10727947 |accessdate=24 September 2012 |title=Kosovo: The world's newest state |publisher=The Economist |work=[[The Economist]] |date=23 February 2008}}</ref> The fact that their independence was not [[International recognition of Kosovo|recognised]] by Serbia, and consequently also not recognised by five EU member states (Spain, Slovakia, Romania, Greece and Cyprus), did not prevent the country from continuing its STM programme, which aimed to gradually integrate its national policies on legal, economic and social matters with EU, so that at some point in the future they would qualify for EU membership. Kosovo's politicians announced in April 2008 that they expected Kosovo to join the EU in 2015,<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL23782005 |title=Reuters.com |publisher=Reuters |date= 23 April 2008|accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> and the 15th STM meeting was successfully held between EU and Kosovo in December 2008. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 4. Free movement of capital |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
Negotiations for EU membership will only start once the country becomes an [[Future enlargement of the European Union#Recognised candidates|official candidate for EU membership]], and for that to happen Kosovo first needs to sign a [[Stabilisation and Association Agreement|Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA)]] with EU. Before becoming a member they will also likely need to be fully recognised as a sovereign state by all EU member states.<ref>{{Citation |url=http://www.europeanforum.net/news/724/ex_un_envoy_ahtisaari_ldquo_refusal_to_recognise_kosovo_hampers_eu_enlargement_rdquo |title=Ex-UN envoy Ahtisaari: 'Refusal to recognise Kosovo hampers EU enlargement' |date=8 September 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.harrimaninstitute.org/MEDIA/01285.pdf |title=Kosovo´s Semi-Sovereign Status and its Effects on EU Accession for the Western Balkans |format=PDF |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oxan.com/display.aspx?ItemID=DB156740|title=Pressure eases on anti-independence five|publisher=http://www.oxan.com}}</ref> On 10 October 2012 the [[European Commission]] found that there were no legal obstacles to Kosovo signing a SAA with the EU, as full sovereignty is not required for such an agreement, and recommended that negotiations start as soon as Kosovo had made further progress on issues in four areas: "Rule of law", "Public administration", "Protection of minorities", and "Trade".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/ks_feasibility_2012_en.pdf|title=Feasibility Study for a Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and Kosovo |format=PDF|publisher=European Commission|date=10 October 2012|accessdate=24 October 2012}}</ref> On 15 October 2012 this invitation was answered positively by the [[Prime Minister of Kosovo]], who together with the Ministerial Council on European Integration agreed on a to-do list for public authorities to secure ''"Fulfillment in record time of the technical criteria for the start of negotiations on a Stabilisation and Association Agreement"''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kryeministri-ks.net/?page=2,9,3129|title=Prime Minister Thaçi: The Feasibility Study confirmed that the state of Kosovo is ready to start official negotiations for a Stabilization and Association Agreement |publisher=Republic of Kosovo - The Office of the Prime Minister|date=15 October 2012|accessdate=15 November 2012}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |6. Company law |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#3288bd" | 5 |
|||
|- |
|||
Several days after [[Kosovo–Serbia relations#2008–2013|Kosovo and Serbia reached an agreement]] further normalizing their relations, the European Commission recommended authorizing the launch of negotiations on a [[Stabilisation and Association Agreement]] between the EU and Kosovo,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2013/ks_recommendation_2013_en.pdf|title=Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on a Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and Kosovo|publisher=[[European Commission]]|date=2013-04-22|accessdate=2013-08-17}}</ref> and on 28 June 2013 the European Council endorsed the Council of the European Union's conclusions on opening negotiations with Kosovo.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/137614.pdf|title=Press Release - 3251st Council meeting|date=2013-06-25|accessdate=2013-08-17|publisher=[[Council of the European Union]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/137634.pdf|title=European Council 27/28 June 2013 Conclusions|date=2013-06-28|accessdate=2013-08-17|publisher=[[European Council]]}}</ref> Negotiations were started on 28 October,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/kosovo-launches-saa-dailogue-with-the-eu|title=Kosovo Launches Crucial SAA Talks With EU|date=2013-10-28|accessdate=2013-10-28|publisher=[[Balkan Insight]]}}</ref> and were completed on 2 May 2014.<ref name=negdone>{{cite news|url=http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/kosovo/press_corner/all_news/news/2014/20140502_03_en.htm|title= Stabilisation and Association Agreement negotiations successfully completed|date=2014-05-02|accessdate=2014-05-02|publisher=[[European External Action Service]]}}</ref> The agreement was initialled on 25 July.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mei-ks.net/?page=2,5,1011|title=Stabilization and Association Agreement is initialled|date=2014-07-25|accessdate=2014-07-25|publisher=Ministry of European Integration of the Republic of Kosovo}}</ref> [[Enver Hoxhaj]], Kosovo's [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Kosovo)|Minister of Foreign Affairs]], expressed hope that the SAA could be signed by the end of the year,<ref name=saavisa>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfa-ks.net/?page=2,4,2404|title=Hoxhaj meets with Mogherini, SAA and visa liberalization to be realized during the Italian presidency of the EU|date=2014-07-24|accessdate=2014-07-25|publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Kosovo}}</ref> though [[Štefan Füle]], [[European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy]], had said in June 2014 that the treaty could be signed by the following spring if progress is made by authorities in Kosovo in enacting reforms and normalizing relations with Serbia.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.tanjug.rs/news/127809/fuele--kosovo-has-to-work-more-on-reforms.htm|title=Fuele: Kosovo has to work more on reforms|date=2014-06-05|accessdate=2014-06-19|publisher=[[Tanjug]]}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |7. Intellectual property law |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#66c2a5" | 4.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
|- |
|||
===Progress of current and potential candidate countries=== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |8. Competition policy |
|||
It was previously the norm for enlargements to see multiple entrants join the Union at once. The only previous enlargements of a single state were the 1981 admission of Greece and the 2013 admission of Croatia. |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
However, the EU members have warned that, following the significant impact of the fifth enlargement in 2004, a more individual approach will be adopted in the future, although the entry of pairs or small groups of countries will most probably coincide.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ecpd.org.rs/pdf/studies/Booklet_EU_Law.pdf|format=PDF|publisher=http://ecpd.org.rs|page=46|title=EUROPEAN UNION, COMMUNITY LAW AND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |9. Financial services |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
|- |
|||
In July 2014, [[Jean-Claude Juncker]], the President-elect of the European Commission, announced that the EU has no plans to expand in the next five years.<ref>http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/better-together-junckers-eu-comments-harm-yes-camp.1405434338</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |28. Consumer and health protection |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
|- |
|||
{{Progress in future enlargement of the European Union}} |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 3: Competitiveness and inclusive growth |
|||
|- |
|||
==States not on the agenda== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |10. Digital transformation and media |
|||
{{main|Foreign relations of the European Union}} |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
{{Multiple issues|section=yes| |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
{{Off-topic|date=October 2011}} |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
{{Synthesis|date=January 2012}}}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
The [[Maastricht Treaty]] states that any European country that is committed to [[democracy]] may apply for membership in the European Union.<ref name=Cfm>{{cite web|title=Conditions for membership|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/policy/conditions-membership/index_en.htm|publisher=European Commission|accessdate=21 December 2014}}</ref> In addition to European states, other countries have also been speculated or proposed as future members of the EU. |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
! rowspan=8 | |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=8 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=8 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
===EFTA states=== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |16. Taxation |
|||
{{See also|European Free Trade Association|European Economic Area}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
[[File:EU and EFTA.svg|thumb|200px|The European Union (blue)<br/>and [[European Free Trade Association|EFTA]] countries (green)]] |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland are members of a free trade area (EFTA) developed in parallel to the EU. Most prior members of EFTA left to join the EU and the remaining countries, except Switzerland, formed the [[European Economic Area]] with the EU. None has current aspirations to join the EU, although Iceland was previously in discussions to do so and is still a candidate country (see above). |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Liechtenstein==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |17. Economic and monetary policy |
|||
{{Main|Liechtenstein–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
[[Liechtenstein]] is, like Norway and Iceland, a member of the [[European Economic Area]] and hence is already heavily integrated with the EU. Although it currently has no intention of joining, it might consider joining the EU if Switzerland joins, as it did with the [[Schengen Area|Schengen Agreement]]. If it attained membership, it would become the smallest member state (the current smallest is [[Malta]]). |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Norway==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |19. Social policy and employment |
|||
{{Main|Norway–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
{{Refimprove section|date=June 2008}} |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
[[Norway]] is not an EU member state, but adopts some EU legislation as a result of its participation in the [[European Economic Area]] (EEA) through the [[European Free Trade Association]] (EFTA). Additionally, Norway has chosen to opt into some of the Union's programmes, institutions and activities.<ref name="mossavis">{{cite web|title=Vårt skjulte EU-medlemskap|publisher=Moss-avis|url=http://www.moss-avis.no/article/20071107/AKTUELLKOMMENTAR/711070001/1021|accessdate=19 November 2007|language=no}}</ref> Whether or not the country should apply for full membership has been a dominant and divisive issue. Division within the governing [[Red–green coalition (Norway)|red–green coalition]] (2005–2013) has blocked the issue since the [[Norwegian parliamentary election, 2005|2005 parliamentary elections]].{{Citation needed|date=October 2008}} Norway has applied four times for EEC and EU membership. In 1962 and 1967 France effectively vetoed Norway's entry, while the later [[Norwegian EC referendum, 1972|1972 referendum]] and the [[Norwegian EU referendum, 1994|1994 referendum]] were both lost by the government. |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
Norway's application for EU membership has been frozen but not withdrawn. It could be resumed at any time following renewed domestic political will, as happened in the case of [[Malta]]. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |20. Enterprise and industrial policy |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
A large issue for Norway is its fishing resources, which are a significant part of the [[economy of Norway|national economy]] and which would come under the [[Common Fisheries Policy]] if Norway were to accede to the EU. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |25. Science and research |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#3288bd" | 5 |
|||
|- |
|||
Norway has high [[GNP]] per capita, and would have to pay a high membership fee. The country has a limited amount of agriculture, and few underdeveloped areas, which means that Norway would receive little economic support from the EU. However, as of 2009, Norway has chosen to opt into many EU projects and since its total financial contribution linked to the EEA agreement consists of contributions related to the participation in these projects, and a part made available to development projects for reducing social and economic disparities in the EU ([[EEA and Norway Grants]]),<ref name="mossavis"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.eu-norway.org/ARKIV/newsarchives/EEA_agreement_facts |title=10 Basic facts about the European Economic Area |accessdate=27 October 2009 |publisher=The Norwegian Mission to the EU}}</ref> its participation is on an equal footing with that of [[Budget of the European Union#State by state analysis|EU member states]]. The total EEA EFTA commitment amounts to 2.4% of the overall EU programme budget. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |26. Education and culture |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
Norway is a member of the [[European Economic Area]] (the EU [[common market]]), the [[Schengen treaty]] (and was an associate member of the [[Western European Union]] until the organisation terminated in 2011), as well as other treaties and agreements normally considered as under the EU umbrella. Norway was a founding member of [[NATO]] in 1949. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |29. Customs union |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Switzerland==== |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 4: The Green agenda and sustainable connectivity |
|||
{{Main|Switzerland–European Union relations}} |
|||
[[Switzerland]] took part in negotiating the [[European Economic Area|EEA]] agreement with the EU and signed the agreement on 2 May 1992 and submitted an application for accession to the EU on 20 May 1992. A Swiss referendum held on 6 December 1992 rejected EEA membership. As a consequence, the Swiss Government decided to suspend negotiations for EU accession until further notice, but its application remains open. The popular initiative entitled "Yes to Europe!", calling for the opening of immediate negotiations for EU membership, was rejected in a 4 March 2001 referendum. The Swiss Federal Council, which is in favour of EU membership, had advised the population to vote against this referendum since the preconditions for the opening of negotiations had not been met. It is thought that the fear of a loss of [[Neutral country|neutrality]] and independence is the key issue against membership among [[Euroscepticism|eurosceptics]]. Switzerland has relatively little amount of land area with agriculture, to which a large part of the EU budget goes. |
|||
|- |
|||
EU membership continued to be the objective of the government and is a "long-term aim" of the [[Federal Council of Switzerland|Federal Council]]. Furthermore, the Swiss population agreed to their country's participation in the [[Schengen Agreement]]. As a result of that, Switzerland joined the area in December 2008.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.bfm.admin.ch/bfm/en/home/themen/einreise.html | title=Entry to Switzerland | publisher=Swiss Federal Office for Migration | accessdate=24 November 2008}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |14. Transport |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=4 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=4 | |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=4 | |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
The Swiss federal government has recently undergone several substantial U-turns in policy, however, concerning specific agreements with the EU on freedom of movement for people, workers and areas concerning [[tax evasion]] have been addressed within the [[Swiss banking]] system. This was a result of the first Switzerland–EU summit in May 2004 where nine bilateral agreements were signed. [[Romano Prodi]], former President of the European Commission, said the agreements "moved Switzerland closer to Europe." [[Joseph Deiss]] of the [[Swiss Federal Council]] said, "We might not be at the very centre of Europe but we're definitely at the heart of Europe". He continued, "We're beginning a new era of relations between our two entities."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europa.admin.ch |title=Europa.admin.ch |publisher=Europa.admin.ch |date=14 December 2010 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |15. Energy |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
The Swiss government declared in September 2009 that bilateral treaties are not solutions and the membership debate has to be checked again.<ref>{{Citation |url=http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/kultur/literatur_und_kunst/bundesrat_verweist_auf_grenzen_des_bilateralen_wegs_1.3648199.html |title=Bundesrat verweist auf Grenzen des bilateralen Wegs |newspaper=[[Neue Zürcher Zeitung]] |date=23 September 2009 |language=de}}.</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |21. Trans-European networks |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#3288bd" | 5 |
|||
|- |
|||
Results of the [[Swiss immigration referendum, February 2014|February 2014 referendum]] on limiting mass immigration is threatening Switzerland's relations with the EU. Due to the refusal of Switzerland to grant Croatia free movement of persons, the EU accepted Switzerland's access to the Erasmus+ student mobility program only as a "partner country", as opposed to a "programme country", and the EU has frozen negotiations on access to the EU electricity market. Proposal of a new referendum to deal exclusively with the nine accords with the EU was backed by 75% of people in a recent survey. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |27. Environment and climate change |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
===Non-EFTA microstates=== |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 5: Resources, agriculture and cohesion |
|||
[[File:European microstates map.svg|thumb|275px|The five [[European microstates]] bordered by the European Union (blue):<br/>{{flag|Andorra}}<br/>{{flag|Liechtenstein}}<br/>{{flag|Monaco}}<br/>{{flag|San Marino}}<br/>{{flag|Vatican City}}]] |
|||
{{Main|Microstates and the European Union}} |
|||
Within western Europe, there are [[European microstates|five microstates]]: [[Andorra]], [[Monaco]], [[San Marino]], the [[Vatican City]] and [[Liechtenstein]]. Liechtenstein is a member of EFTA (see section ''[[#EFTA states|EFTA states]]'' for its details). The other non-EFTA microstates have signed agreements allowing them not only to use the euro, but also to mint their own [[Euro coins|coins]]. The non-EFTA microstates are also ''de facto'' part of the [[Schengen agreement]] or have a largely open border with the EU and have close relations with their neighbouring state. For example, Monaco is a full part of the EU's [[customs]] territory via France, and applies most EU measures relating to [[Value-added tax|VAT]] and [[excise duties]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/comm/external_relations/monaco/intro/index.htm|title=The EU's relations with Monaco|publisher=[[European Commission]]|date= December 2005}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
Close cooperation and inclusion in systems like the [[Eurozone]] are offered to them. This does not come without conditions. For example, the EU requires cooperation in tax control in return. Monaco has already implemented the EU Directive on the taxation of savings interest. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |11. Agriculture and rural development |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Andorra==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |12. Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy |
|||
{{main|Andorra–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
In Andorra (the largest European microstate), the government has said that "for the time being" there is no need to join the EU;<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.internationalspecialreports.com/archives/99/andorra/2.html |title=The Washington Times—Andorra |publisher=Internationalspecialreports.com |accessdate=15 March 2011}}</ref> however, the opposition [[Social Democratic Party (Andorra)|Social Democratic Party]] is in favour. |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 2.5 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Monaco==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |13. Fisheries and aquaculture |
|||
{{main|Monaco–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
Monaco joined the [[Council of Europe]] in 2004,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3397.htm|title=Background Note: Monaco|publisher=[[Department of State]]|date=March 2006}}</ref> a move that required it to renegotiate its relations with France, which previously had the right to nominate various ministers. This was seen as part of a general move toward Europe.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ena.lu/?doc=18061&lang=2|title=Monaco admis au sein du Conseil de l'Europe|publisher=European Navigator (originally published in [[Tageblatt]])|date=6 October 2004}}</ref> One concern is that, unlike the [[constitutional monarchies]] within the EU, the [[Prince of Monaco]] has considerable executive powers and is not merely a figurehead. |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
====San Marino==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |22. Regional policy and coordination of structural instruments |
|||
{{main|San Marino–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
In San Marino the centrist [[Popular Alliance (San Marino)|Popular Alliance]] has been reported to be in favour of joining the EU, which the ruling [[Sammarinese Christian Democratic Party]] opposed in 2006.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19377806-29677,00.html|title='Oldest republic' torn by poll-rig claims|publisher=[[The Australian]]|date=6 June 2006}}</ref> In 2010 the Parliament tasked the government to open negotiations for further integration with the European Union,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.esteri.sm/on-line/en/Home/SanMarinoandtheEuropeanUnion/documento1027987.html|format=PDF|title=Decision submitted by the Parliamentary Groups of the Majority for a better integration of the Republic of San Marino with the European Union, approved by the Great and General Council during its sitting of 15 December 2010}}</ref> and subsequently a technical group prepared a report on the topic including the options of EU and EEA membership.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.esteri.sm/on-line/en/Home/SanMarinoandtheEuropeanUnion/documento1027990.html|title=Summary of the Final Report prepared by the Technical Group for the Assessment of new Policies for the Integration with the European Union|date=February 2011}}</ref> A planned referendum on an EU membership application for 27 March 2011 was cancelled by the government.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europasanmarino.sm/|publisher=europasanmarino.sm|title=Comitato Promotore Del Referendum Propositivo Sulla Richiesta Di Adesione All'Unione Europea|language=Italian}}</ref> A second referendum was held on [[Sammarinese referendums, 2013|20 October 2013]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxyZWZlcmVuZHVtZXVyc218Z3g6NTkxZWRmOTk2Y2E3NmMw|title=DECRETO REGGENZIALE 23 luglio 2013 n.88|date=2013-07-23|accessdate=2013-09-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/07/25/referendum-si-vota-20-ottobre|title=Referendum: si vota il 20 ottobre|date=2013-07-25|accessdate=2013-09-15|publisher=[[SMtv San Marino (TV channel)|SMtv San Marino]]}}</ref> and although voters narrowly approved submitting an application, the percentage of eligible voters supporting the motion was not sufficient to meet the requirements for it to formally pass.<ref>{{cite web|last=Keating |first=Dave |url=http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/san-marino-rejects-eu-accession/78535.aspx |title=San Marino rejects EU accession |publisher=European Voice |date=2013-10-24 |accessdate=2013-12-09}}</ref> |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#f46d43" | 1.5 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Vatican City==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |33. Financial and budgetary provisions |
|||
{{main|Holy See–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
The [[Vatican City]] (the smallest state in the world<ref name="factbook">{{cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/vt.html|title=Holy See (Vatican City)|accessdate=13 August 2013|work=CIA—The World Factbook}}</ref>) is an [[Ecclesiology|ecclesiastical]]<ref name="factbook"/> or [[Sacerdotal state|sacerdotal]]-[[Monarchy|monarchical]]<ref name=pages>{{cite web|url=http://www.catholic-pages.com/vatican/vatican_city.asp |title=Vatican City |publisher=Catholic-Pages.com |accessdate=12 August 2013}}</ref> state, and as such does not have the democratic credentials to join the EU (Art. 49 TEU) and is unlikely to attain them given its unique status.{{citation needed|date=October 2013}} Additionally its [[Economy of Vatican City|economy]] is also of a unique non-commercial nature. Overall, the mission of the [[Vatican City]] state, which is tied to the mission of the [[Holy See]], has little to do with the objectives of the EU Treaty.<ref name="Dimitry Kochenov 2008, p. 25">"EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality" (European Monographs #59), by Dimitry Kochenov, Kluwer Law International, 2008, p. 25</ref> Thus EU membership is not discussed, even though it is in the heart of an EU member state.<ref name="Dimitry Kochenov 2008, p. 25"/> |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
|— |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
===Eastern Partnership states=== |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 6: External relations |
|||
{{See also|Eastern Partnership|European Neighbourhood Policy}} |
|||
[[File:Further European Union Enlargement to Eastern Partnership.svg|200px|thumb| {{legend|#4169e1|EU Member states}} {{legend|#008000|Current Enlargement agenda}} {{legend|#8b4513|Eastern Partnership ENP participants}} {{legend|#d2691e|Other Eastern Partnership states}}]] |
|||
|- |
|||
Since the dissolution of the [[Soviet Union]], the former Soviet republics in [[Eastern Europe]] and [[South Caucasus]] have been looked upon as potential candidates for EU enlargement. The majority of them are or have been closely linked to [[Russia]] and would need to concentrate more on other European partners to attain candidate status. It is expected that these states will remain outside the Union for a significant amount of time, because they are not currently on any enlargement agenda (in contrast to the Western Balkan states, Turkey, and Iceland). |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |30. External relations |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
However, a summit in [[Mamaia]], Romania, in May 2004 showed enlargement to be a definite possibility, though only [[Ukraine]] and [[Moldova]] were present, as [[Belarus]] was not concerned with membership. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |31. Foreign, security and defence policy |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#e6f598" | 3.5 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 3 |
|||
|— |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
The South Caucasus states of [[Armenia]], [[Azerbaijan]], and [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] have been the site of much instability since the 1990s. Their EU membership would be conditional on the [[Copenhagen criteria#Geographic criteria|political assessment]] by the [[European Council]] about whether they are considered European. Nevertheless, all three states have been admitted as full members into the [[Council of Europe]] (like [[Cyprus]]) after a similar assessment process. Before the first official visit of [[European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy|external relations commissioner]] [[Benita Ferrero-Waldner]] to the three Caucasus states, it was stated that if she were asked about enlargement, she would not rule it out.<ref>{{cite web|author=Andrew Rettman |url=http://euobserver.com/?aid=20904&rk=1 |title=Euobserver.com |publisher=Euobserver.com |date=15 February 2006 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> It is unclear as to when they may move towards membership, even though they are part of the [[European Neighbourhood Policy]] and are often referred to as part of "a wider Europe". Since their only land contact with European states is through Russia and Turkey, it is possible that they would only join after Turkey did so. However, on 12 January 2002, the [[European Parliament]] noted that Armenia and Georgia may enter the EU in the future regardless.<ref name="Zahorka">{{cite web|last=Juergen-Zahorka |first=Hans |accessdate=23 December 2006 |url=http://www.libertas-institut.com/de/PDF/Armenia%20ante%20portas.pdf |format=PDF|title=How Armenia Could Approach the European Union |publisher=LIBERTAS—Europaeisches Institut GmbH}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Average level |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 2.82 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.99 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 3.18 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 3.06 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 3.13 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 2.22 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.64 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 2.18 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.99 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 2.99 |
|||
|- |
|||
The [[European Neighbourhood Policy#European Neighbourhood Policy|ENP Action Plans]] adopted by the EU and each individual partner state (Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan) states that "the EU takes note of expressed European aspirations by the ENP partner". |
|||
| colspan=14 | |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#3288bd|text=5|Well advanced}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#66c2a5|text={{Small|4.5}}|Good / Well advanced}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#abdda4|text=4|Good level of preparation}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#e6f598|text={{Small|3.5}}|Moderate / Good}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#ffffbf|text=3|Moderately prepared}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#fee08b|text={{Small|2.5}}|Some / Moderate}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#fdae61|text=2|Some level of preparation}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#f46d43|text={{Small|1.5}}|Early stage / Some}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#d53e4f|text=1|Early stage}} |
|||
|} |
|||
In May 2008, Poland and Sweden put forward a joint proposal for an "[[Eastern Partnership]]" with Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, with Russia and Belarus participating in some aspects. Eventually, Belarus joined the initiative as a full member, while Russia does not participate at all. The Polish foreign minister [[Radosław Sikorski]] said "''We all know the EU has enlargement fatigue. We have to use this time to prepare as much as possible so that when the fatigue passes, membership becomes something natural''"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://euobserver.com/9/26211/?rk=1|title='Eastern Partnership' could lead to enlargement, Poland says|publisher=[[EU Observer]]|date=27 May 2008}}</ref> In May 2009, the Eastern Partnership was inaugurated. Its members include the European Union as well as the [[post-Soviet states]] Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. |
|||
==== Progress over the past year ==== |
|||
With the inauguration of the [[Barroso Commission#Second term – College|second Barroso Commission]] in February 2010, the [[European Neighbourhood Policy]] was transferred from the portfolio of the [[European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy|External Relations Commissioner]] (replaced by the [[High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy|High Representative]]) to the [[European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy|Enlargement Commissioner]]. |
|||
The table below shows the progress over the past year of applicant countries on a 4-point scale, using data from the European Commission's 2024 reports. The analysis is based on the analysis performed by the online media outlet ''European Pravda'' for Ukraine; scores for other countries, as well as additional sections (public administration reform and economic criteria) were added based on official data from the European Commission's reports.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2024/10/31/7197377/|title=Від "корупції" до телемарафону: що ЄС чекає від України та як оцінює готовність до вступу|date=2024-10-31|website=[[European Pravda]]|language=uk|accessdate=2024-10-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/strategy-and-reports_en|title=Strategy and Reports - European Commission|date=2024-10-30|website=neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu|language=en|access-date=2024-10-31}}</ref> |
|||
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; font-size:85%" |
|||
A Polish–Swedish authored EU strategy sees the Eastern section of the Neighbourhood policy being split off and combined with the Eastern Partnership. These states would be offered full integration short of membership, but no enlargement would be on the agenda in the short to medium term.<ref name="euobserver.com"/> |
|||
! rowspan=2 | <big>Chapter</big> |
|||
! colspan=6 | Candidates negotiating |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! colspan=2 | Candidates |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! Applicant /<br/>Potential candidate |
|||
! rowspan=2 | |
|||
! Candidate with frozen negotiations |
|||
|- |
|||
====Armenia==== |
|||
! [[Accession of Albania to the European Union|Albania]] |
|||
{{Main|Armenia–European Union relations}} |
|||
! [[Accession of Moldova to the European Union|Moldova]] |
|||
[[Armenia]] is geographically located entirely within Western Asia. However, like [[Cyprus]], it has been regarded by some as culturally associated with Europe because of its connections with European society, through a [[Armenian diaspora|diaspora]] and a religious criterion of being Christian. Armenia is still in conflict over the status of [[Nagorno-Karabakh]] (Artsakh) and some surrounding, Armenian-occupied territory, internationally recognised as integral parts of Azerbaijan. Since 1994, a ceasefire has been in place, but tensions remain very high between the two countries. Although the country's economy had one of the world's fastest growth rates in the past few years, this comes following a low base and many years of near-continuous recession.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.armenialiberty.org/armeniareport/report/en/2006/06/78236A02-837E-4301-ADD0-54D8AB01BA56.ASP |title=IMF Heaps More Praise On Armenia |accessdate=13 January 2007 |last=Markarian |first=Atom}}</ref> |
|||
! [[Accession of Montenegro to the European Union|Montenegro]] |
|||
! [[Accession of North Macedonia to the European Union|North Macedonia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Serbia to the European Union|Serbia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Ukraine to the European Union|Ukraine]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Bosnia and Herzegovina]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Georgia to the European Union|Georgia]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Kosovo to the European Union|Kosovo]] |
|||
! [[Accession of Turkey to the European Union|Turkey]] |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 1: The fundamentals of the accession process |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Public administration reform |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan="8" | |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan="8" | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan="8" | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |23. Judiciary and fundamental rights |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#d53e4f" | -4 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
The [[Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant|Metsamor nuclear power plant]], which is situated some {{convert|40|km|0|abbr=on}} west of Yerevan, is built on top of an active seismic zone and is a matter of negotiation between Armenia and the EU. Towards the end of 2007, Armenia approved a plan to shut down the Metsamor plant in compliance with the New European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan.<ref>{{Cite news |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |24. Justice, freedom and security |
|||
| title = 2007 Review: Foreign policy and the pursuit of Nagorno-Karabakh settlement |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| publisher=ArmeniaNow.com |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| date = 11 January 2008 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| url =http://armenianow.com/?action=viewArticle&AID=2704&CID=2669&IID=&lng=eng |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| accessdate =16 January 2008 }}</ref> This is likely to take place by 2016 when the operating term of the Metsamor facility expires.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf113.html |title=Nuclear Power in Armenia : WNA |publisher=World-nuclear.org |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |The existence of a functioning market economy |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |The capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |5. Public procurement |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
Several Armenian officials have expressed the desire for their country to eventually become an EU member state,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.arminfo.am/political-issue22.html|publisher=Arminfo.am|title=independent armenian news agency}}</ref> with some predicting an official bid for membership.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1493/is_200307/ai_n9111910 |title=Armenian officials express desire to become EU member |deadurl=yes}} {{Dead link|date=August 2010|bot=RjwilmsiBot}}</ref> Public opinion in Armenia suggests the move for membership would be welcomed, with 64% out of a sample of 2,000 being in favour and only 11.8% being against.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.armeniaforeignministry.am/news/inthenews/050107_eu.html|title=RFE/RL Caucasus Report|publisher=Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs|date=7 January 2005}}</ref> The EU is Armenia's largest trading partner and as of January 10, 2013, citizens of the EU will no longer need visas to travel to Armenia. Armenia negotiated an association agreement, including a free trade area, with the EU,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://asbarez.com/105814/armenia-drops-visas-for-eu-citizens/ |title=Armenia Drops Visas For EU Citizens | Asbarez Armenian News |publisher=Asbarez.com |date=2013-01-10 |accessdate=2013-09-16}}</ref> but in 2013 Armenia announced plans to instead join the [[Eurasian Economic Community customs union]].<ref name=BBCArmenia>{{cite news|last=Peter|first=Laurence|title=Armenia rift over trade deal fuels EU-Russia tension|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-23975951|accessdate=1 April 2014|newspaper=BBC News|date=5 September 2013}}</ref><ref name=Sahakyan>{{cite news|last=Sahakyan|first=Armen|title=Armenia’s Emerging New Foreign Policy|url=http://www.armenianweekly.com/2014/03/31/armenias-emerging-new-foreign-policy/|accessdate=1 April 2014|newspaper=The Armenian Weekly|date=31 March 2014}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |18. Statistics |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Azerbaijan==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |32. Financial control |
|||
{{Main|Azerbaijan–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
Corruption is a serious issue in [[Azerbaijan]], and recent presidential elections were disputed and have been criticised for not being free, fair or democratic by international observers. Together with Armenia, Azerbaijan also needs to resolve tension concerning the situation of the unilateral declaration of independence of [[Nagorno-Karabakh]] and neighbouring territory occupied by Armenia. The EU wishes to see the easing of tensions in the area. |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Belarus==== |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 2: Internal Market |
|||
{{Main|Belarus–European Union relations}} |
|||
The EU's relations with [[Belarus]] are strained as the EU has condemned the government of Belarus several times for authoritarian and anti-democratic practices, and even imposed sanctions on the country.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/comm/external_relations/belarus/intro/|title=The EU's external relations with Belarus|publisher=European Union}}</ref> Under its current president, Belarus has instead sought a close [[Union of Russia and Belarus|confederation with Russia]], short of [[political union|political reunion]]. |
|||
According to the initial [[European Neighbourhood Policy|ENP]] plan in 2004 Belarus is considered a potential participant, but not yet ready. Because of warming moves by both sides,<ref name=Korosteleva2009>Korosteleva, E.A., “The Limits of the EU Governance: Belarus ' Response to the European Neighbourhood Policy”, Contemporary Politics, Vol. 15(2), June 2009, pp. 229–45</ref> Belarus became a member of the [[Eastern Partnership]] in 2009 despite its non-participation in the ENP. |
|||
|- |
|||
====Georgia==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 1. Free movement of goods |
|||
{{Main|Georgia–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
[[File:European Union Georgia Locator 2013.png|thumb|Georgia shown in orange]] |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
Georgia's former President [[Mikheil Saakashvili]] has expressed a desire for Georgia to join the EU. This view has been explicitly expressed on several occasions as links to the United States, EU and [[NATO]] have been strengthened in an attempt to move away from the Russian sphere of influence. Territorial integrity issues in [[Ajaria]] were dealt with after the [[Rose Revolution]], when leader [[Aslan Abashidze]] was forced to resign in May 2004. However, unresolved territorial integrity issues have again risen to the forefront in [[South Ossetia]] and [[Abkhazia]] as a result of the [[2008 South Ossetia War]]. |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=9 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
! rowspan=9 | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=9 | |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
On 11 November 2010, Georgian Deputy Prime Minister Giorgi Baramidze announced that Georgia wants to cooperate with Ukraine in their attempt to join the European Union.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/53292/|title=Georgia proposes Ukraine cooperate in bidding to join EU|publisher=Interfax}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 2. Freedom of movement for workers |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
The EU and Georgia began a visa liberalisation dialogue to allow for visa free travel of Georgian citizens to the European Union. The action plan was delivered to Georgia on 25 February 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-156_en.htm?locale=en|title=Commissioner Malmström presents Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation with Georgia|date=25 February 2013|accessdate=17 March 2013|publisher=Europa.eu}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 3. Right of establishment and freedom to provide services |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
A ceremony on the initialling of an [[Association Agreement]] between Georgia and the European Union was held on 29 November 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.trend.az/regions/scaucasus/georgia/2216514.html|title= Georgia-EU association agreement initialled}}</ref> The agreement was signed in June 2014.<ref name=AHiggins/> At the signing ceremony, Georgian Prime Minister [[Irakli Garibashvili]] called the agreement a "road map" towards further integration and eventual membership in the [[European Union]].<ref name=AHiggins/> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" | 4. Free movement of capital |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
The European Parliament passed a resolution in 2014 stating that "in accordance with Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, as well as any other European country, have a European perspective and can apply for EU membership in compliance with the principles of democracy, respect for fundamental freedoms and human rights, minority rights and ensuring the rule of rights."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.trend.az/regions/scaucasus/georgia/2264637.html|title= Georgia can apply for EU membership if it complies with democratic principles}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |6. Company law |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Moldova==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |7. Intellectual property law |
|||
{{Main|Moldova–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
[[File:European Union Moldova Locator.svg|thumb|Moldova shown in orange]] |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
The government of [[Moldova]] has stated that the country has European aspirations but there has been little progress.{{Citation needed|date=July 2010}} In 2005, the ruling [[Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova]] reoriented their foreign policy towards Europe.{{Citation needed|date=August 2007}} The unresolved territorial integrity [[Disputed status of Transnistria|issue of the breakaway republic]] of [[Transnistria]] is a major barrier to any progress. On 6 October 2005, the EU opened its permanent mission in [[Chișinău]], the capital city of Moldova. |
|||
| style="background:#66c2a5" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
As of 2009, Moldova aspires to join the European Union and is implementing its first three-year action plan within the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) of the EU. The Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) represents the legal framework for the Republic of Moldova—European Union relationship.<ref name=eueaMol>{{cite web| title =Moldova | publisher=European Union External Action | url =http://eeas.europa.eu/moldova/index_en.htm | accessdate =1 August 2010}}</ref> The agreement was signed on 28 November 1994 and entered into force on 1 July 1998 for the next 10 years. This arrangement provides for a basis of cooperation with the EU in the political, commercial, economic, legal, cultural, and scientific areas. The EU is developing an increasingly close relationship with Moldova, going beyond co-operation, to gradual economic integration and a deepening of political co-operation. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |8. Competition policy |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
In August 2009, four Moldovan parties agreed to create a governing coalition, called [[Alliance for European Integration]]. The Liberal Democratic Party, Liberal Party, Democratic Party, and Our Moldova have committed themselves to achieving such goals as European integration and promoting a balanced, consistent, and responsible foreign policy. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |9. Financial services |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
In April 2014, whilst visiting the Moldovan-Romanian border at [[Sculeni]], Moldovan Prime Minister [[Iurie Leanca]] stated; "We have an ambitious target but I consider that we can reach it: doing everything possible for Moldova to become a full member of the European Union when Romania will hold the presidency of the EU in 2019".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/news/world/europe/story/moldova-wants-join-eu-2019-20140429|title=Moldova wants to join EU in 2019|date=2014-04-29|accessdate=2014-05-14|newspaper=[[The Straits Times]]}}</ref> Moldova and the EU signed an [[European Union Association Agreement|Association Agreement]] in June 2014.<ref name=AHiggins/> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |28. Consumer and health protection |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
Some political parties within both Moldova and Romania advocate a merging of the two countries. Such a scenario would incorporate the current territory of Moldova into Romania and thus into the EU, though the Transnistria problem would still be an issue.<ref name=JHU>{{cite web| last =Phinnemore | first =David | title =Moldova: a step too far for EU enlargement? | work=3rd Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, Istanbul, Turkey | publisher=[[Johns Hopkins University]] | date =21–23 September 2006 | url =http://www.jhubc.it/ecpr-istanbul/virtualpaperroom/031.pdf | format =PDF | accessdate =1 August 2010}}</ref><ref name=spon>{{cite web| last =Klussmann | first =Uwe | title =Reunification with Romania? EU Dreams in Communist Moldova |work=Der Spiegel | date =4 February 2009 | url =http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,617005,00.html | accessdate =1 August 2010}}</ref> |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 3: Competitiveness and inclusive growth |
|||
|- |
|||
====Ukraine==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |10. Digital transformation and media |
|||
{{Main|Ukraine–European Union relations|Ukraine–European Union Association Agreement}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
[[File:European Union Ukraine Locator.svg|thumb|Ukraine in orange]] |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
Many political factions of [[Ukraine]] advocate joining the EU and developing ties with Europe. Since the [[Orange Revolution]] of late 2004, Ukraine's membership prospects have improved. The then opposition leader [[Viktor Yushchenko]] hinted that he would press the EU for deeper ties, and described a four-point plan: the acknowledgment of Ukraine as a market economy, entry in the [[World Trade Organisation]], associate membership with the EU, and lastly full membership.<ref>[http://www.euobserver.com/?sid=24&aid=17977 EUobserver article] (subscription only){{dead link|date=December 2013}}</ref> However, following ambiguous signals from the EU, [[Ukrainian President]] Yushchenko responded to the apathetic mood of the Commission by stating that he intended to send an application for EU membership "in the near future". In September 2009 two Ukrainian diplomats, backed by a number of others, argued that Ukraine should submit a formal application for membership in 2010 in order to get a clearer message from Brussels,<ref name=Rettman>{{cite web|last=Rettman|first=Andrew|date=17 September 2009|url=http://euobserver.com/9/28676|title=Ukraine diplomats take a risk on EU application|publisher= EUobserver}}</ref> however it was never lodged.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/country_profiles/1107869.stm|title=Ukraine timeline|publisher=[[BBC News]] | date=20 March 2014}}</ref> [[Ukraine–European Union relations#Popular support to EU integration of Ukraine in European Union|Public support in Ukraine for EU membership]] regularly polls higher than opposition. In a December 2012 poll by [[Razumkov Center]], support had grown to 48% while the "against" had shrunk to 10.5% (32% supported Ukraine's accession to the [[Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia]]).<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/poll-almost-half-of-ukrainians-back-ukraines-accession-to-eu-318650.html|title=Poll: Almost half of Ukrainians back Ukraine's accession to EU|publisher=[[Kyiv Post]]|date=10 January 2012}}</ref> |
|||
| style="background:#66c2a5" | 4 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=8 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=8 | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=8 | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
Inside the EU, opinion is split. Several EU leaders have already stated strong support for closer economic ties with Ukraine but have stopped short of direct support for such a bid. In 2005, Polish Foreign Minister [[Adam Daniel Rotfeld]] noted that Poland will in every way promote Ukraine's desire to be integrated with the EU, get the status of a market-economy country and join the WTO. Portugal also publicly stated it supports Ukraine's EU accession.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90853/6435741.html|title= Portugal supports Ukraine's accession bid to NATO, EU|publisher=People's Daily Online}}</ref> On 13 January 2005 the [[European Parliament]] almost unanimously (467 votes to 19 in favour) passed a [[motion (democracy)|motion]] stating the wish of the Parliament to establish closer ties with Ukraine with the possibility of EU membership. A 2005 poll of the six largest EU nations showed that the European public would be more likely to accept Ukraine as a future EU member than any other country that was not currently an official candidate. In 2002, then-Enlargement Commissioner [[Günter Verheugen]] said that "a European perspective" for [[Ukraine]] does not necessarily mean membership in 10 or 20 years, however, that does not mean it is not a possibility. The [[European Commission]] has stated that future EU membership will not be ruled out and in 2005 [[President of the European Commission|Commission President]] [[José Manuel Barroso]] said that the future of Ukraine is in the EU. Late 2005 then-[[European Commissioner for Enlargement|Enlargement Commissioner]] [[Olli Rehn]] stated that the EU should avoid overstretch, adding that the enlargement agenda at the time was already very heavy.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://euobserver.com/9/20289|title= Blow to Kiev as Brussels closes door to further enlargement|publisher=[[EUobserver]]|date=9 November 2005}}''(subscription only)''</ref> In September 2011 [[European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy]] [[Štefan Füle]] refused to include "Ukraine’s prospects for membership of the European Union" in the [[European Union Association Agreement]] [[Ukraine–European Union relations#European Union Association Agreement|between the EU and Ukraine]].<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.interfax.co.uk/ukraine-news/mentioning-of-eu-membership-prospects-in-association-agreement-important-to-ukraine-says-azarov/|title=Mentioning of EU membership prospects in association agreement important to Ukraine, says Azarov|publisher=[[Interfax-Ukraine]]|date=20 September 2011}}</ref> At the 16th<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/politics/ukraine-eu-summit-begins-in-brussels-320886.html|title= Ukraine-EU summit begins in Brussels|publisher=[[Kyiv Post]]|date=25 February 2013}}</ref> EU-Ukraine summit of 25 February 2013 a joint statement of Ukraine and the EU "reaffirmed their cooperation on political association and economic integration of Ukraine with the European Union on the basis of respect for shared values and their effective promotion".<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/kyiv-brussels-confirmed-their-intention-for-cooperation-reads-joint-statement-320907.html?flavour=mobile|title= Kyiv, Brussels confirm their intention for cooperation, reads joint statement|publisher=[[Kyiv Post]]|date=25 February 2013}}</ref> Ukrainian and EU officials convened in [[Yalta, Ukraine|Yalta]] in September 2013 for a summit<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nrcu.gov.ua/en/148/542384/|agency=NRCU|title=Ukrainian, Lithuanian presidents to open 10th Yalta Annual Meeting|date=18 September 2013|accessdate=21 September 2013}}</ref> at which the issue of jailed opposition leader and former Prime Minister [[Yulia Tymoshenko]]'s incarceration appeared to be a sticking point between President [[Viktor Yanukovych]] and EU leaders.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/09/20/eu-insists-ukraine-free-jailed-ex-premier-to-sign-treaty/|agency=Fox News|date=20 September 2013|accessdate=21 September 2013|title=EU insists Ukraine free jailed ex-premier to sign treaty}}</ref> Even still, Ukrainian officials received encouragement from [[Poland|Polish]] Foreign Minister [[Radoslaw Sikorski]] to sign a free trade and political association agreement with the EU.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/09/21/3640992/russia-warns-ukraine-against-eu.html|agency=Miami Herald|title=Russia warns Ukraine against EU deal|date=21 September 2013|accessdate=21 September 2013}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |16. Taxation |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
During a summit in November 2013, Ukraine refused to sign their [[Ukraine–European Union Association Agreement|Association Agreement]] with the EU, due to Russian pressure.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2013/11/putin-says-ukraine-eu-deal-threat-russia-20131126235224640384.html|title=Putin says Ukraine-EU deal a threat to Russia|date=2013-11-27|accessdate=2013-12-09|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]}}</ref> President [[Viktor Yanukovych|Yanukovych]] described the agreement as disadvantageous for Ukraine. This sparked massive [[2013 Ukraine pro-European Union protests|pro-EU protests]], with thousands of people chanting "Ukraine is Europe", that ultimately led to the [[2014 Ukrainian revolution|fall of the Ukrainian government]]. EU Commission President [[José Manuel Barroso]] later said "We are embarked on a long journey, helping Ukraine to become, as others, what we call now, 'new member states'. But we have to set aside short-term political calculations." <ref>{{cite news|author=Chris Morris |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25154618 |title=BBC News - EU rejects Russia 'veto' on Ukraine agreement |publisher=Bbc.co.uk |date=2013-11-29 |accessdate=2013-12-09}}</ref> On 27 February 2014 the European Parliament passed a resolution that recognized Ukraine's right to "apply to become a Member of the Union, provided that it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and human and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law".<ref>http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20140221IPR36637/html/Ukraine-MEPs-urge-EU-to-help-financial-rescue-but-enact-targeted-sanctions-too Ukraine: MEPs urge EU to help financial rescue, but enact targeted sanctions too</ref><ref>http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/martin-schulz-the-european-parliament-endorses-the-european-perspective-of-ukraine-337794.html?flavour=mobile KyivPost, Martin Schulz: The European Parliament endorses the European perspective of Ukraine</ref> In March 2014, the [[First Yatsenyuk Government|interim Ukrainian government]] signed the "core elements" of the Association Agreement with the EU, but parts of the agreement agreement concerning free trade were left out of the deal pending [[Ukrainian presidential election, 2014|May elections]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/21/us-ukraine-crisis-eu-agreement-idUSBREA2K0JY20140321|title=European Union signs landmark association agreement with Ukraine|work=Reuters|date=21 March 2014|accessdate=29 March 2014}}</ref> Following the election, new [[President of Ukraine|President]] [[Petro Poroshenko]] signed the agreement,<ref name=AHiggins/> which he described as Ukraine's "first but most decisive step" towards EU membership.<ref name="DW 16.09.2014"/> Later that year Poroshenko set 2020 as a target for a EU membership application.<ref name="Reuters Sep 25, 2014"/> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |17. Economic and monetary policy |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
|- |
|||
===Other states with European territory=== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |19. Social policy and employment |
|||
[[File:Eastern Europe outside the ENP and EaP (cropped).png|thumb|right|334px|{{legend|#4169e1|[[List of EU member states|Current EU Member states]]}} {{legend|#32cd32|[[Future enlargement of the European Union#States and entities on the current agenda|Current Enlargement agenda]]}} {{legend|#8b4513|[[Eastern Partnership|EaP]] participants}} {{legend|#ff8c00|Ex-Soviet republics outside EaP with some European territory}}]] |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Kazakhstan==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |20. Enterprise and industrial policy |
|||
{{Main|Kazakhstan–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
The Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with Kazakhstan has been the legal framework for EU–Kazakhstan bilateral relations since it entered into force in 1999.<ref name=eueaKaz>{{cite web| title =Kazakhstan | publisher=European union External Action | url =http://eeas.europa.eu/kazakhstan/index_en.htm | accessdate =1 August 2010}}</ref> "Kazakhstan has a westward extension, which makes a strong case geographically for its European Neighbourhood status."<ref name=charlestannock>[http://www.charlestannock.com/speech.asp?id=1150 Kazakhstan], Speech delivered by Charles Tannock in the plenary of the European Parliament on 16 March 2005.</ref> In 2009, the ambassador of [[Kazakhstan]] to Russia, [[Adilbek Dzhaksybekov]] said "We would like to join in the future the European Union, but to join not as [[Estonia]] and [[Latvia]], but as an equal partner".<ref>{{cite web| url=http://news-en.trend.az/cis/kazakhstan/1460523.html|title= Kazakhstan expects to become European Union member|publisher=Trend|date=24 April 2009}}</ref> This statement is mostly visionary and about long term perspective, because currently Kazakhstan is not even participating in the [[European Neighbourhood Policy]] (ENP) although the Kazakh Foreign Ministry has expressed interest in the ENP. [[Member of the European Parliament|MEP]] Charles Tannock has suggested Kazakhstan's inclusion in the ENP, while emphasizing that "there are still concerns regarding democracy and [[human rights]] in Kazakhstan".<ref name=charlestannock/> |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Russia==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |25. Science and research |
|||
{{Main|Russia–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
During the preparation stages of the ENP, [[Russia]] insisted on the creation of the four [[EU-Russia Common Spaces]] instead of ENP participation, as it saw the ENP as "unequal" arrangement with a dominant role of the EU.<ref name="European Political Economy Review">{{cite web|url=http://eper.htw-berlin.de/no9/kratochvil.pdf|title=Discursive Constructions of the EU’s Identity in the Neighbourhood: An Equal Among Equals or the Power Centre? |format=PDF|publisher=European Political Economy Review|date=Autumn 2009|accessdate=28 January 2014}}</ref> In the framework of the EU-Russia Common Spaces in May 2005, a roadmap was adopted with similar content to the ENP Action Plans. Both the ENP and the EU-Russia Common Spaces are implemented by the EU through the [[European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument]]. |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
Among the most vocal supporters of Russian membership of the EU has been former Italian Prime Minister [[Silvio Berlusconi]]; in October 2008 he said "I consider Russia to be a Western country and my plan is for the Russian Federation to be able to become a member of the European Union in the coming years" and stated that he had this vision for years.<ref>{{Cite news|agency=AFP |url=http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g2INfqbAE6C9LjlXFkwDrF1l8zbw |title=Berlusconi says he wants Russia to join the EU |publisher=Google |date=15 October 2008 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> Russian permanent representative to the EU Vladimir Chizhov commented on this by saying that Russia has no plans of joining the EU.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.panarmenian.net/news/eng/?nid=27387 |title=Russia not planning to join EU |publisher=Panarmenian.net |date=17 October 2008 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> Russian Prime Minister [[Vladimir Putin]] has said that Russia joining the EU would not be in the interests of either Russia or the EU, although he advocated close integration in various dimensions including establishment of [[European Union-Russia Common Spaces|four common spaces]] between Russia and the EU, including united economic, educational and scientific spaces as it was declared in the agreement in 2003.<ref>[http://www.ancentr.ru/portal/article3057.html "Four spaces" of Russia and European Union, "Special opinion" program on Russian Radio] (in Russian)</ref><ref>[http://www.rg.ru/2005/11/10/rossia-es.html Four spaces, Rossiyskaya newspaper] (in Russian)</ref><ref>[http://rian.ru/politics/20041125/743119.html Interview of official Ambassador of Russian Foreign Ministry on relations with the EU] (in Russian)</ref><ref>[http://www.tks.ru/cgi-bin/text.pl?file=2004042302&id=reviews Four spaces, TKS] (in Russian)</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |26. Education and culture |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
At present, the prospect of Russia joining the EU any time in the near future is slim. Former German Chancellor [[Gerhard Schröder]] has also said that though Russia must "find its place both in NATO, and, in the longer term, in the European Union, and if conditions are created for this to happen" that such a thing is not economically feasible in the near future.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.paksearch.com/br2002/Mar/8/Schroeder%20says%20Russia%20must%20find%20place%20in%20NATO,%20EU.htm|title= Schroeder says Russia must find place in NATO, EU}}{{dead link|date=January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |29. Customs union |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
===States outside Europe=== |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 4: The Green agenda and sustainable connectivity |
|||
[[File:European Neighbourhood Policy member map.svg|thumb|right|285px|EU neighbouring countries: {{legend|#0000ff|European Union}} {{legend|#7fffff|Official candidates}} |
|||
{{legend|#007f00|[[European Neighbourhood Policy]]}} |
|||
]] |
|||
In the [[Maastricht treaty|Treaty of Maastricht]] (Article 49), it is stated that any ''European country (as defined by the [[Copenhagen criteria#Geographic criteria|EU political assessment]])'' that respects the principles of the European Union may apply to join. No mention is made of enlarging the EU to include non-European countries, though an exception has been made for Cyprus and has been envisioned by some for states such as Armenia, and the precedents of turning down [[Morocco]]'s application and defining [[Israel]]'s closest integration as "just short of full membership" suggest that currently states outside geographic Europe are unlikely to obtain full EU membership. |
|||
|- |
|||
Despite such precedents, [[Cape Verde]] has expressed its desire to join the EU.<ref>{{Cite news| author=Staff writer | url=http://www.afrol.com/articles/17267 | title=Cape Verde PM discusses special partnership with EU | publisher=afrol News | date=15 November 2005 | accessdate=6 May 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news| author=Staff writer | url=http://www.afrol.com/articles/15920 | title=EU membership for Cape Verde proposed in Portugal | publisher=afrol News | date=16 March 2005 | accessdate=6 May 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news| author=Staff writer | url=http://www.afrol.com/articles/18640 | title=EU, Cape Verde display different interests in integration | publisher=afrol News | date=30 March 2006 | accessdate=10 May 2006 }}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |14. Transport |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=4 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=4 | |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=4 | |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
However, some non-European states have different degrees of integration with the EU stipulated by agreements, always short of membership. Alternatively such countries could be integrated into a larger regional block or an overlapping block such as [[Nicolas Sarkozy]]'s proposal to create a [[Mediterranean Union]], or a lesser organisation such as the [[Euro-Mediterranean free trade area]]. The current frameworks for development of such agreements are the [[Barcelona Conference|Barcelona process]] and the [[European Union Association Agreement|European Neighbourhood Policy]]. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |15. Energy |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Canada==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |21. Trans-European networks |
|||
It has been speculated that [[Canada]] could, and some say should,<ref>{{cite news|last=Garton Ash|first=Timothy|title=I've found a perfect new member for the EU. If only it were in Europe Canada shares nearly all the values of the new Europe - as well as the most characteristic of its weaknesses|url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/jun/29/comment.eu|accessdate=26 January 2014|newspaper=The Guardian|date=28 June 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Johal|first=Am|title=Why doesn't Canada join the European Union|url=http://rabble.ca/news/why-doesnt-canada-join-european-union|publisher=Rabble.ca|accessdate=26 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=German Papers: It's Time For Canada to Join the EU Canada shares the longest undefended border in the world with the United States. Their economies are deeply intertwined with hundreds of billions in trade. But this week's decision by Ottawa to reject Washington's missile defense plan shows that politically, Canadians are from Venus and Americans from Mars. Plus, Germany's official traveling salesman stumps in the Middle East.|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/german-papers-it-s-time-for-canada-to-join-the-eu-a-344556.html|accessdate=26 January 2014|newspaper=Der Spiegel|date=3 March 2005}}</ref> join the European Union, even though Canada is not located in Europe. |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Cape Verde==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |27. Environment and climate change |
|||
{{Main|Cape Verde–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
[[Cape Verde]] is an [[island nation]] of the Atlantic Ocean and a former [[Portugal|Portuguese]] colony. In March 2005 former Portuguese president [[Mário Soares]] launched a petition urging the European Union to start membership talks with it, saying that Cape Verde could act as a bridge between Africa, Latin America and the EU.<ref>[http://www.eubusiness.com/europe/portugal/050507114923.9ivv9852 Cape Verde could seek EU membership this year] EUbusiness - 07 May 2005</ref><ref>[http://www.eubusiness.com/afp/050316181530.d8wf8n81/ Eubusiness.com] {{Dead link|date=August 2008}}</ref> |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
Cape Verde's [[List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita|per capita GDP]] is lower than any of the current member states, accession countries, or candidate countries. Most of the imports and exports of Cape Verde are from and to the European Union, and it has a service-based economy. Its currency, the [[Cape Verdean escudo|escudo]], is [[Fixed exchange rate|pegged]] to the euro. |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 5: Resources, agriculture and cohesion |
|||
|- |
|||
Although the Cape Verde [[archipelago]] is geographically in Africa, there have been similar situations before. [[Cyprus]] is an island nation which, despite being geographically in Asia, has already joined both the Council of Europe and the EU. Furthermore, the Cape Verde islands are part of the same island group as the [[Canary Islands]] (part of Spain) and [[Madeira Islands]] (part of Portugal), known as [[Macaronesia]]. There is currently no political recognition by the EU of Cape Verde as a European state, but unlike in the case of [[Morocco]], there is no formal rejection either. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |11. Agriculture and rural development |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
! rowspan=5 | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
Recently Cape Verde has been distancing itself from its regional African partners{{citation needed|date=September 2011}} and forging closer ties with the EU. In a move signaling its preparation to loosen ties with the West African [[regional bloc]],{{citation needed|date=September 2011}} the government of Cape Verde in September 2006 declared its intentions on suspending the ECOWAS free movement of goods and trade. Prime Minister [[José Maria Neves]] announced that his country will start imposing restrictions on the entrance of citizens from all ECOWAS member states. This is also an effort to limit the recent rise of illegal immigration of other West African nationals using Cape Verde and its proximity to the Canary Islands as a springboard towards Europe. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |12. Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Israel==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |13. Fisheries and aquaculture |
|||
{{Main|Israel–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
The principle of [[Israel]] joining the European Union has been supported by some politicians in both Israel and Europe, including the former Israeli Foreign Minister, [[Silvan Shalom]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cephas-library.com/israel/israel_weighing_eu_membership.html|title=Analysis: Israel Weighing EU Membership|publisher=[[United Press International]]|date=21 May 2003}}</ref> Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs [[Avigdor Lieberman]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogcentral.jpost.com/index.php?cat_id=6&blog_id=52&blog_post_id=640|title=We need to be part of EU and NATO|publisher=Jerusalem Post|date=January 2007}}</ref> and former Italian Prime Minister, [[Silvio Berlusconi]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3142884.stm|title=Jewish communities split over Berlusconi|publisher=BBC News|date=26 September 2003|first=Irene|last=Peroni}}</ref> Two Italian [[Member of the European Parliament|MEP]]s campaigned in favour of Israeli membership as recently as 2006.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=786185&contrassID=1&subContrassID=1|title=Two Italians, Marco Pannella and Marco Cappato of the Nonviolent Radical Party, in European Parliament campaign for Israel to enter EU|publisher=[[Haaretz]]|date=10 November 2006}}</ref> An opinion poll in 2004 showed that 85% of Israelis would support an application for membership.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hildegardmueller-mdb.de/image/inhalte/EU_Israel_280604.pdf|format=PDF|title=The case for a privileged partnership between the EU and Israel|publisher=[[Hildegard Müller]]|date=28 June 2006}}</ref> Another survey in 2011 showed support for EU membership is 81%.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=228926|title=81% of Israelis support EU membership, BGU poll finds|publisher=[[JPost]]|date=12 July 2011}}</ref> |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
The Israeli government has hinted several times that an EU membership bid is a possibility, but the EU itself proposes instead the closest possible integration "just short of full membership." Faster advancement of such plans is somewhat hampered by the current instability in the Middle East and conflicts in the [[West Bank]], [[Gaza Strip]], and [[Lebanon]]. European public opinion of some of Israel's policies, especially those related to the aforementioned areas of conflict is, in general, poor.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.twf.org/News/Y2003/1031-Poll.html|title= Poll (requested by the European Commission)|publisher=www.twf.org|date=31 October 2003}}</ref> Proponents of Israel's accession to the EU suggest that such accession would help promote peace, because being a part of a strong alliance like the EU would allow Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories with no fear of risking its security.{{citation needed|date=June 2012}} |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |22. Regional policy and coordination of structural instruments |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
The [[European Council]] has not been asked to take a stance regarding whether or not Israel is a European state, but similar circumstances to Morocco (being geographically outside Europe and without exceptional features such as [[Council of Europe|CoE membership]]) will most likely preclude its inclusion as a full member into the EU as well. However, it can obtain a large degree of integration through the current and future EU Neighbourhood Policies – the former Spanish foreign minister [[Miguel Ángel Moratinos]] spoke out for a "[[privileged partnership]], offering all the benefits of EU membership, without participation in the institutions". On 11 January 2005, industry commissioner and vice president of the commission [[Günter Verheugen]] even suggested the possibility of a [[monetary union]] and [[common market]] with Israel. |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |33. Financial and budgetary provisions |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|— |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
An argument<ref>http://www.zmag.org/Sustainers/Content/2003-12/16noll.cfm {{dead link|date=September 2013}}</ref> for the inclusion of Israel into the EU as a full member is that it has a partly "European" culture, because the large number of [[Jews]] immigrated to [[Israel]] from [[Europe]]. Israel also has a GDP per capita similar to many richer European countries. Some claim that allowing Israel into the EU would create a precedent for other geographically non-European countries to apply for membership, but in fact<ref>The UN [http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm#asia classification of world regions]</ref> this precedent already exists as [[Cyprus]], which is already a member state, is geographically in Asia. Proponents of Israel's accession to the EU claim that Israel's situation is similar to that of Cyprus—a country outside of Europe geographically, but a part of Europe culturally and socially.{{citation needed|date=October 2013}} |
|||
! colspan=14 style="text-align:left" |Cluster 6: External relations |
|||
|- |
|||
In 2014, former [[Spanish Prime Minister]] [[José María Aznar]] said Israel is needed by the European Union, in an address at the [[British House of Commons]]. Aznar said his report recommends that due to its Western culture and the benefits it brings the European Union, Israel should become a full member of the EU without pre-conditions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/02/07/former-spanish-pm-aznar-israel-needed-by-european-union-should-be-accepted-as-member-state/|title=Former Spanish PM Aznar: Israel Needed by European Union, Should be Accepted as Member State|date=7 February 2014}}</ref> |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |30. External relations |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| style="background:#fee08b" | 1 |
|||
! rowspan=3 | |
|||
| style="background:#ffffbf" | 2 |
|||
|- |
|||
====Morocco==== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |31. Foreign, security and defence policy |
|||
{{Main|Morocco–European Union relations}} |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
[[Morocco]] submitted an application to join the EU (then [[European Communities|EEC]]) in July 1987, but it was rejected by the [[European Council]] later in the year on the grounds that it "did not consider Morocco a European country". Although there are factors such as the developing economy or unresolved border issues with several of its neighbours and the occupation of [[Western Sahara]], a [[European Union Association Agreement]] similar to that applied to [[Tunisia]] and [[Algeria]] is implemented between [[Morocco]] and the EU. The Moroccan government argues that a "substantial" amount of its territory is already part of the European Union, specifically [[Plazas de soberanía|Spanish enclaves]] in Northern Africa that Morocco says are [[Military occupation|occupied territory]].{{citation needed|date=November 2010}} |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#abdda4" | 3 |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|— |
|||
| style="background:#fdae61" | 0 |
|||
|- |
|||
==Special territories of member states== |
|||
! style="text-align:left" |Average progress |
|||
{{Refimprove|date=January 2012}} |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.56 |
|||
[[File:European Union OCTs Locator.png|thumb|right|400px|{{legend|#3C62DD|[[Member states of the European Union]]}} {{legend|#38DD6E|[[Future enlargement of the European Union#Current agenda|Current enlargement agenda]]}} {{legend|#804000|[[Special Member State territories and the European Union|Special member state territories]] outside the EU}} {{legend|#FF8040|[[Exclusive Economic zone|EEZ]] of [[Special Member State territories and the European Union|special member state territories]] outside the EU}}]] |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.89 |
|||
<!-- [[File:EU special territories (en).svg|thumb|400px|'''Map of European Union in the world''' {{legend|#000a9f|European Union}} {{legend|#000eff|Outermost regions}} {{legend|#078002|Overseas countries and territories}}]] --> |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.83 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.39 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.08 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.78 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 0.61 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.06 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.50 |
|||
! style="background:#e9ecf0" | 1.08 |
|||
|- |
|||
There are multiple [[special member state territories and their relations with the EU|Special member state territories]], some of them are not fully covered by the EU treaties and apply EU law only partially, if at all. It is possible for a dependency to change its status regarding the EU and/or some particular treaty or law provision. The territory may change its status from participation to leaving or from being outside to joining. |
|||
| colspan=14 | |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#66c2a5|text=4|Very good progress}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#abdda4|text=3|Good progress}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#e6f598|text={{Small|2.5}}|Some / Good progress}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#ffffbf|text=2|Some progress}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#fee08b|text=1|Limited progress}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#fdae61|text=0|No progress}} |
|||
{{Leftlegend|#d53e4f|text=-4|Backsliding}} |
|||
|} |
|||
===British dependencies=== |
|||
;British Overseas Territories |
|||
==States not on the agenda== |
|||
The only country with the status of [[British Overseas Territory]] that is part of the EU is [[Gibraltar]], which joined the EEC together with the United Kingdom in 1973. The other overseas territories are defined as [[Overseas Countries and Territories]] of the EU. All of them{{spaced ndash}}except [[Bermuda]]{{spaced ndash}}are associated with the EU (meaning they apply some parts of EU law) and their nationals are in principle EU citizens.<ref name="ReferenceB">[http://ec.europa.eu/development/geographical/regionscountries/regionscountriesocts_en.cfm?CFID=3037247&CFTOKEN=41189270&jsessionid=0806d9edad8a3561a60e Ec.europa.eu]{{dead link|date=January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Foreign relations of the European Union}} |
|||
[[File:European Union future possible members 2.0.svg|thumb|Countries that could join the European Union |
|||
;Crown Dependencies |
|||
{{Legend|#003399|Current members}} |
|||
Special terms were negotiated for the [[Channel Islands]] and the [[Isle of Man]] on the UK’s accession to the [[European Economic Community]]. These are contained in Protocol 3 to the Treaty of Accession 1973. The effect of the protocol is that the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man are within the Common Customs Area and the Common External Tariff (i.e. they enjoy access to European Union countries of physical exports without tariff barriers). Other Community rules do not apply to the Islands. |
|||
{{Legend|#46a43b|Candidates}} |
|||
{{Legend|#ffd617|Applicants}} |
|||
{{Legend|#f29527|Membership possible}} |
|||
{{Legend|#c39467|Countries located (at least partially) in Europe}} |
|||
{{Legend|#da2131|Application rejected by the European Council}}]] |
|||
The [[Maastricht Treaty]] (Article 49) states that any European country (as defined by a [[Copenhagen criteria#Geographic criteria|European Council assessment]]) that is committed to [[democracy]] may apply for membership in the European Union.<ref name="Cfm">{{Cite web |title=Conditions for membership |url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/policy/conditions-membership/index_en.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161127153649/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/policy/conditions-membership/index_en.htm |archive-date=27 November 2016 |access-date=21 December 2014 |website=European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations |publisher=European Commission}}</ref> In addition to European states, other countries have also been speculated or proposed as future members of the EU. |
|||
;Sovereign Base Areas |
|||
The UK [[UK sovereign base|Sovereign Base Areas]], [[Akrotiri and Dhekelia]] on Cyprus did not join the European Union when the United Kingdom joined. [[Treaty of Accession 2003|Cyprus' Accession Treaty]] specifically stated that this would not change with the accession of Cyprus to the European Union. However, currently, some provisions of the [[European Union Law|EU Law]] are applicable there—mainly [[border]] management, [[food safety]] and free movement of people and goods. |
|||
States in Europe that have chosen, for various reasons, not to join the EU have integrated with it to different extents according to their circumstances. Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein participate directly in the single market via the [[European Economic Area|EEA]], Switzerland does so via bilateral treaties and the other [[European microstates]] ([[Andorra]], [[Monaco]], [[San Marino]], [[Vatican City]]) have specific agreements with the EU and neighbouring countries, including their use of the [[euro]] as their currency. Most of these countries are also part of the [[Schengen Area]]. Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland have all previously had live applications to join the EU, which have been withdrawn or otherwise frozen. Such applications could be resubmitted in the event of a change in the political landscape. |
|||
===Danish self-governing communities=== |
|||
;Faroe Islands |
|||
{{Main|Faroe Islands and the European Union}} |
|||
On 5 March 2024, Armenian prime minister [[Nikol Pashinyan]] said that his country would apply for EU candidacy by autumn 2024 at the latest.<ref name="hraparak.am">{{Cite web |title=Nikol Pashinyan said that you should apply to become a candidate for EU membership before autumn at the latest |url=https://hraparak.am/post/c1bb9ccbee31e8bfe4661e7849e99a75 |website=hraparak.am}}</ref> On 12 March 2024, the European Parliament passed a resolution confirming Armenia met [[Maastricht Treaty]] [[s:Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union/Title VI: Final Provisions#Article 49|Article 49]] requirements and that the country may apply for EU membership.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Joint Motion for a Resolution on closer ties between the EU and Armenia and the need for a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia | RC-B9-0163/2024 | European Parliament |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-9-2024-0163_EN.html |website=www.europarl.europa.eu}}</ref> At the 2024 [[Alliance of Democracies|Copenhagen Democracy Summit]], Pashinyan stated that he would like Armenia to become a member of the European Union "this year."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Siranush Ghazanchyan |date=May 14, 2024 |title=Democracy a strategy for Armenia։ PM Pashinyan participates in Copenhagen Democracy Summit |url=https://en.armradio.am/2024/05/14/democracy-a-strategy-for-armenia%D6%89-pm-pashinyan-participates-in-copenhagen-democracy-summit |website=[[Public Radio of Armenia]]}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Faroe Islands]], a self-governing nation within the [[Kingdom of Denmark]], are not part of the EU, as explicitly asserted by both Rome treaties.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html |title=Treaty establishing the European community, last revision from Nice 2001, Art.299(6)a |publisher=Eur-lex.europa.eu |date=1 January 2004 |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> The relations with the EU are governed by a Fisheries Agreement (1977) and a [[Free Trade Agreement]] (1991, revised 1998). The main reason for remaining outside the EU is disagreements about the [[Common Fisheries Policy]],<ref>{{cite web|author=Helena Spongenberg |url=http://euobserver.com/9/21516 |title=EUobserver.com |publisher=EUobserver.com |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> which disfavours countries with large fish resources. Also, every member has to pay for the [[Common Agricultural Policy]], which favours countries having much agriculture which the Faroe Islands does not. |
|||
<!--NOTE - AVOID WP:CRYSTAL BY KEEPING SPECULATION AND VAGUE PROPOSALS TO THE RELEVANT RELATIONS PAGES (i.e. Belarus–European Union relations) |
|||
Nevertheless, there are politicians, mainly in the right-wing [[Union Party (Faroe Islands)|Union Party]] (''Sambandsflokkurin''), led by their chairman [[Kaj Leo Johannesen]], who would like to see the Faroes as a member of the EU. However, the chairman of the left-wing [[Republic (Faroe Islands)|Republic]] (''Tjóðveldi''), [[Høgni Hoydal]], has expressed concerns that if the Faroes were to join the EU as is, they might vanish inside the EU, comparing this with the situation of the [[Shetland Islands]] and [[Åland]] today, and wants the local government to solve the political situation between the Faroes and Denmark first.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.portal.fo/sub_page/grein_pdf.php?ide=46055 |title=Portal.fo |accessdate=7 January 2011}}</ref> |
|||
As discussed on talk page, we're including those with reasonable backing. That is that the proposal for membership must have one of the following; |
|||
-Official government policy from within the last 5 years to pursue membership (not just a statement by someone that it would be nice) - examples: Serbia, Bosnia, Ukraine are all actively pursuing membership is a live government agenda. Ukraine has a European perspective and is making serious reforms even if they are not on the agenda as the first two are. |
|||
-Party policy of one of the two largest parties in the national parliament from within the past 5 years - examples: San Marino membership is backed by most political parties, including ones who have been the largest recently, but is not government policy. It did however result in a referendum so realistic moves can be expected. |
|||
-A previous application to join the EU. - examples: Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland. Debates remain live in these countries and applications have been unfrozen in the past. |
|||
If your source is merely someone, even in government, saying they'd like to pursue it - especially if that country has no European perspective - please keep it to the relations article until it progresses enough that it is a realistic possibility.--> |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
|||
On 26 September 2008, Kaj Leo Johannesen became Prime Minister of the Faroe Islands, and according to him his new government is actively going to seek a progressive Europe-policy, even stating that membership of the EU is a strong possibility.{{Citation needed|date=September 2008}} |
|||
! colspan=3 | {{Flag|Armenia}} |
|||
|- |
|||
! rowspan=6 style="width:200px" | [[File:European Union Armenia Locator.svg|200px]] |
|||
| style="width:100px"| '''Main article:''' |
|||
| [[Armenia–European Union relations]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Relationship:''' |
|||
| [[Armenia–EU Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=3 October 2018 |title=Armenia-EU finalize new deal |url=http://asbarez.com/160565/eu-armenia-finalize-new-deal-on-closer-ties |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180829000428/http://asbarez.com/160565/eu-armenia-finalize-new-deal-on-closer-ties |archive-date=29 August 2018 |access-date=3 October 2018 |website=Asbarez News Agency}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Main obstacles:''' |
|||
| Membership of competing [[Eurasian Economic Union]], security dependency on [[Russia]].<ref>{{Citation |last=Anahit Shirinyan |title=Armenia's Foreign Policy Balancing in an Age of Uncertainty Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank |date=14 March 2019 |url=https://www.chathamhouse.org/2019/03/armenias-foreign-policy-balancing-age-uncertainty}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Proponents:''' |
|||
| [[Armenian National Movement Party]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=Armenia outside European integration process – Ararat Zurabyan |url=https://www.tert.am/en/news/2013/10/08/ararat-zurabyan3/885845 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220624193339/https://www.tert.am/en/news/2013/10/08/ararat-zurabyan3/885845 |archive-date=24 June 2022 |access-date=23 June 2022 |website=tert.am}}</ref> [[Bright Armenia]], [[Civil Contract (Armenia)|Civil Contract]],<ref name="hraparak.am"/><ref>{{Cite web |title=Will Armenia apply to become a candidate for EU membership in the coming days? |url=https://radar.am/en/news/press-2618720505 |website=radar.am}}</ref> [[European Party of Armenia]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=Օր առաջ դուրս գալ ԵԱՏՄ-ից. "Հայաստանի Եվրոպական կուսակցությունը" համագումար է... |url=http://a1plus.am/hy/article/196009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190509120602/https://a1plus.am/hy/article/196009 |archive-date=9 May 2019 |access-date=12 January 2020 |website=a1plus.am}}</ref> [[For The Republic Party]], [[Free Democrats (Armenia)|Free Democrats]], [[Heritage (Armenia)|Heritage]],<ref name="about">{{Cite web |title=About Us |url=http://heritage.am/en/about |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140530220513/http://heritage.am/en/about |archive-date=30 May 2014 |website=Heritage Party Website}}</ref> [[People's Party of Armenia]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=8 December 2006 |title=People's Party of Armenia Changes Orientation |url=https://armenpress.am/eng/news/518567 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190719164138/https://armenpress.am/eng/news/518567 |archive-date=19 July 2019 |access-date=21 November 2019 |website=Armenpress}}</ref> [[Hanrapetutyun Party|Republic Party]], [[Orinats Yerkir|Rule of Law]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shahunyan |first=Tatevik |date=26 September 2005 |title=Interview With RA National Assembly Speaker Artur Baghdasaryan |url=http://arminfo.am/political-issue22.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070607153503/http://arminfo.am/political-issue22.html |archive-date=7 June 2007 |access-date=21 November 2019 |website=arminfo.am}},</ref> [[Sovereign Armenia Party]],<ref>{{Cite web |title="Ժողովրդին պարտադրում են ընտրություն կատարել նախկիններ եւ ներկաներ տիրույթում, ինձ համար բոլորն էլ արդեն նախկին են". Դավիթ Սանասարյանի կուսակցության համագումարը |url=https://www.aravot.am/2021/04/23/1186345 |website=aravot.am}}</ref> [[Union for National Self-Determination]]<ref>{{Cite web |last=Union for National Self-Determination Party |title=The views of Armenian and Azerbaijani Political Parties on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and conflict resolution process |url=http://commonspace.eu/user_upload/karabakh/21_Union_for_National_Self-Determination.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190619191041/http://commonspace.eu/user_upload/karabakh/21_Union_for_National_Self-Determination.pdf |archive-date=19 June 2019 |access-date=21 November 2019 |website=commonspace.eu}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Opponents:''' |
|||
| [[Prosperous Armenia]],<ref>{{Cite news |last=Danielyan |first=Emil |date=18 October 2019 |title=Tsarukian Endorsed By Eurosceptic EU Politicians |url=https://www.azatutyun.am/a/28382654.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731040605/https://www.azatutyun.am/a/28382654.html |archive-date=31 July 2020 |access-date=18 October 2019 |work=azatutyun.am |agency=[[RFE/RL]]}}</ref> [[Republican Party of Armenia]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=3 September 2013 |title=Armenia chooses Russia over EU |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/armenia-chooses-russia-over-eu |work=[[Politico]]}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Public opinion:''' |
|||
| 58% in favour, 13% against (2024 poll)<ref>[https://www.iri.org/news/iri-armenia-poll-finds-majorities-support-eu-membership-peace-treaty-with-azerbaijan/ IRI Armenia Poll Finds Majorities Support EU Membership, Peace Treaty with Azerbaijan]</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan=3 | {{Flag|Belarus}} |
|||
|- |
|||
! rowspan=6 style="width:200px" | [[File:European Union Belarus Locator.svg|200px]] |
|||
| style="width:100px"| '''Main article:''' |
|||
| [[Belarus–European Union relations#Membership|Belarus–European Union relations]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Relationship:''' |
|||
| Participation in the [[Eastern Partnership]] (suspended on 28 June 2021). As of 2020 the [[European Union]] does not recognise [[Alexander Lukashenko]] as the legitimate president of [[Belarus]]. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Main obstacles:''' |
|||
| [[Alexander Lukashenko]]'s authoritarian rule, [[Eurosceptic]] government, Russian political influence, [[Union State]] (integration with Russia). |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Proponents:''' |
|||
| [[Belarusian Christian Democracy]], [[BPF Party]], [[United Democratic Forces of Belarus]], [[Belarusian Liberal Party of Freedom and Progress]], [[United Civic Party of Belarus]], [[Belarusian Social Democratic Party (Assembly)]], [[Belarusian Social Democratic Assembly]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Opponents:''' |
|||
| Russian government, [[Alexander Lukashenko]], [[Belaya Rus]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Public opinion:''' |
|||
|42.1% in favour (2013 poll with several options)<ref>{{Cite web |date=12 April 2013 |title=Do Belarusians Want to Join the EU? |url=https://belarusdigest.com/story/do-belarusians-want-to-join-the-eu |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201023091542/https://belarusdigest.com/story/do-belarusians-want-to-join-the-eu |archive-date=23 October 2020 |access-date=10 August 2020 |website=Belarus Digest}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan=3 | {{Flag|Iceland}} |
|||
|- |
|||
! rowspan=6 style="width:200px" | [[File:European Union Iceland Locator.svg|200px]] |
|||
| style="width:100px"| '''Main article:''' |
|||
| [[Iceland–European Union relations]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Relationship:''' |
|||
| Member of the [[European Economic Area]] and [[Schengen Area]], frozen membership application. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Main obstacles:''' |
|||
| [[Common Fisheries Policy]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ingebritsen |first=Christine |url=https://archive.org/details/nordicstateseuro00inge |title=The Nordic States and European Unity |publisher=Cornell University Press |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-8014-3484-6 |url-access=registration}}</ref> [[Iceland–European Union relations#Explanations for Iceland's non-membership of the European Union|and others]]. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Proponents:''' |
|||
| [[Social Democratic Alliance]], [[Viðreisn|Liberal Reform Party]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Opponents:''' |
|||
| [[Independence Party (Iceland)|Independence Party]], [[Progressive Party (Iceland)|Progressive Party]], [[Left-Green Movement]], [[People's Party (Iceland)|People's Party]], [[Centre Party (Iceland)|Centre Party]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Public opinion:''' |
|||
|47% in favour, 33% against (2022 poll).<ref>{{Cite news |title=Afstaða til veru Íslands í NATO og aðildar að ESB |url=https://www.gallup.is/frettir/nato-og-esb |access-date=9 March 2022 |language=is}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan=3 | {{Flag|Norway}} |
|||
|- |
|||
! rowspan=6 style="width:200px" | [[File:European Union Norway Locator.svg|200px]] |
|||
| style="width:100px"| '''Main article:''' |
|||
| [[Norway–European Union relations#Membership debate|Norway–European Union relations]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Relationship:''' |
|||
| Member of the [[European Economic Area]] and [[Schengen Area]], frozen application, but not withdrawn. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Main obstacles:''' |
|||
| [[Common Fisheries Policy]] [[Norway–European Union relations#Membership debate|and others]], public opinion. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Proponents:''' |
|||
| [[Conservative Party (Norway)|Conservative Party]], [[Labour Party (Norway)|Labour Party]], [[Liberal Party (Norway)|Liberal Party]], [[Green Party (Norway)|Green Party]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Opponents:''' |
|||
| [[Progress Party (Norway)|Progress Party]], [[Centre Party (Norway)|Centre Party]], [[Red Party (Norway)|Red Party]], [[Socialist Left Party (Norway)|Socialist Left Party]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Public opinion:''' |
|||
| 26% in favour, 53% against (2022 poll).<ref>{{Cite web |last=NTB |date=2022-04-04 |title=Måling: En av fem er usikker på norsk EU-medlemskap |url=https://www.rb.no/5-43-1766922 |access-date=2022-04-19 |website=Romerikes Blad |language=no}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan=3 | {{Flag|Russia}} |
|||
|- |
|||
! rowspan=6 style="width:200px" | [[File:European Union Russia Locator.svg|200px]] |
|||
| style="width:100px"| '''Main article:''' |
|||
| [[Russia–European Union relations#Membership|Russia–European Union relations]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Relationship:''' |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Main obstacles:''' |
|||
| [[Vladimir Putin]]'s authoritarian rule, [[Eurosceptic]] government, and occupation of territories within [[Occupied territories of Georgia|Georgia]], [[Russian military presence in Transnistria|Moldova]], and [[Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine|Ukraine]]. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Proponents:''' |
|||
| [[Yabloko]], [[People's Freedom Party (Russia)|People's Freedom Party]], [[Russia of the Future]], [[Democratic Party of Russia]], [[5th of December Party]], [[Green Alternative (Russia)|Green Alternative]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Opponents:''' |
|||
| [[Vladimir Putin]], [[United Russia]], [[Communist Party of the Russian Federation]], [[Liberal Democratic Party of Russia]], [[For Truth]], [[National Patriotic Forces of Russia]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Public opinion:''' |
|||
|38% in favour, 40% against (2013 poll).<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-11-19 |title=Меньшинство россиян за быстрое вступление в ЕС |url=https://www.dw.com/ru/dw-trend-%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%88%D1%8C-%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE-%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F%D0%BD-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5-%D0%B2%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%B2-%D0%B5%D1%81/a-17237388 |access-date=2023-11-09 |website=Deutsche Welle |language=ru}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan=3 | {{Flag|San Marino}} |
|||
|- |
|||
! rowspan=6 style="width:200px" | [[File:European Union San Marino Locator.png|200px]] |
|||
| style="width:100px"| '''Main article:''' |
|||
| [[San Marino–European Union relations#Full membership|San Marino–European Union relations]] {{Small|([[Microstates and the European Union]])}} |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Relationship:''' |
|||
| Bilateral treaties, open border, customs union, and euro adoption. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Main obstacles:''' |
|||
| Small size.<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 November 2013 |title=EU Relations with the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco and the Republic of San Marino: Options for their participation in the Internal Market |url=http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2013/EN/1-2013-793-EN-F1-1.Pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200911060130/https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2013/EN/1-2013-793-EN-F1-1.Pdf |archive-date=11 September 2020 |access-date=20 November 2013 |website=European Commission}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Proponents:''' |
|||
| [[United Left (San Marino)|United Left]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=9 September 2013 |title=Referendum "europeo": Sinistra Unita dice "Sì" |url=http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/09/referendum-europeo-sinistra-unita-dice-si |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001061613/http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/09/referendum-europeo-sinistra-unita-dice-si |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=15 September 2013 |website=SMtv San Marino}}</ref> [[Future Republic]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=6 September 2013 |title=Referendum Ue: sì convinto dall'Upr |url=http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/06/referendum-ue-si-convinto-dall-upr |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001063956/http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/06/referendum-ue-si-convinto-dall-upr |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=15 September 2013 |website=SMtv San Marino}}</ref> [[Libera San Marino]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 September 2013 |title=Civico 10. Su Europa e referendum |url=http://www.sanmarinonotizie.com/?p=77406 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130927053434/http://www.sanmarinonotizie.com/?p=77406 |archive-date=27 September 2013 |access-date=26 September 2013}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=5 September 2013 |title=Civico10 sul referendum sull'Europa: vietato votare 'no' |url=http://www.giornale.sm/san-marino-civico10-sul-referendum-sulleuropa-vietato-votare-no-25228/#.Ui_Qtz-FZ24 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130911032317/http://www.giornale.sm/san-marino-civico10-sul-referendum-sulleuropa-vietato-votare-no-25228/#.Ui_Qtz-FZ24 |archive-date=11 September 2013 |access-date=15 September 2013}}</ref> [[Party of Socialists and Democrats]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=19 September 2013 |title=Congresso Psd: si cerca la mediazione su un nome che rappresenti le diverse anime |url=http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/19/congresso-psd-si-cerca-mediazione-nome-rappresenti-diverse-anime |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928141712/http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/19/congresso-psd-si-cerca-mediazione-nome-rappresenti-diverse-anime |archive-date=28 September 2013 |access-date=26 September 2013 |website=SMtv San Marino}}</ref> [[Socialist Party (San Marino)|Socialist Party]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=10 September 2013 |title=Referendum Europa: il Ps è per il sì |url=http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/10/referendum-europa-ps-si |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001061856/http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/10/referendum-europa-ps-si |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=15 September 2013 |website=SMtv San Marino}}</ref> For San Marino<ref>{{Cite web |date=6 October 2013 |title=Referendum 2013: Per San Marino invita a votare sì |url=http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/san-marino/elezioni/referendum-2013/referendum-news/2013/10/06/referendum-2013-san-marino-invita-votare-si |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150610201748/http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/san-marino/elezioni/referendum-2013/referendum-news/2013/10/06/referendum-2013-san-marino-invita-votare-si |archive-date=10 June 2015 |access-date=8 October 2013 |website=SMtv San Marino}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=5 September 2013 |title=Referendum sull'Europa, Psm spinge verso "l'inizio di una trattativa lunga e difficile" |url=http://www.giornale.sm/san-marino-referendum-sulleuropa-psm-spinge-verso-linizio-di-una-trattativa-lunga-e-difficile-24059 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131015005201/http://www.giornale.sm/san-marino-referendum-sulleuropa-psm-spinge-verso-linizio-di-una-trattativa-lunga-e-difficile-24059 |archive-date=15 October 2013 |access-date=15 September 2013}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Opponents:''' |
|||
| [[Sammarinese Christian Democratic Party]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=20 September 2013 |title=DC, maggiore integrazione all'Europa non significa adesione |url=http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/20/dc-maggiore-integrazione-europa-non-significa-adesione |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928141618/http://www.smtvsanmarino.sm/politica/2013/09/20/dc-maggiore-integrazione-europa-non-significa-adesione |archive-date=28 September 2013 |access-date=26 September 2013 |website=SMtv San Marino}}</ref> Sammarinese Social Right Movement |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Public opinion:''' |
|||
| A [[2013 San Marino referendum|referendum in 2013 on applying for EU membership]] resulted in 50.3% approving, but it failed due to insufficient turnout.<ref>{{Cite web |date=23 October 2013 |title=San Marino rejects EU accession |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/san-marino-rejects-eu-accession |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171029065303/https://www.politico.eu/article/san-marino-rejects-eu-accession |archive-date=29 October 2017 |access-date=23 December 2017 |website=politico.eu}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan=3 | {{Flag|Switzerland}} |
|||
|- |
|||
! rowspan=6 style="width:200px" | [[File:European Union Switzerland Locator.svg|200px]] |
|||
| style="width:100px"| '''Main article:''' |
|||
| [[Switzerland–European Union relations#Proposals for EU membership|Switzerland–European Union relations]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Relationship:''' |
|||
| Bilateral treaties allowing participation in the [[European Single Market]], member of the [[Schengen Area]], withdrawn membership application. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Main obstacles:''' |
|||
| Swiss public opinion and direct democracy. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Proponents:''' |
|||
| [[Green Party of Switzerland|Green Party]], [[Social Democratic Party of Switzerland|Social Democratic Party]],<ref>{{Cite news |date=8 February 2009 |title=Linke lanciert neue EU-Beitrittsdebatte |url=http://bazonline.ch/schweiz/standard/Linke-lanciert-neue-EUBeitrittsdebatte/story/14787303 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090719094025/http://bazonline.ch/schweiz/standard/Linke-lanciert-neue-EUBeitrittsdebatte/story/14787303 |archive-date=19 July 2009 |access-date=9 February 2009 |work=baz.online |language=de}}</ref> [[Green Liberal Party of Switzerland|Green Liberal Party]],<ref name="EuropeElectsCH"/> [[Volt Switzerland]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Our vision for a United Europe |url=https://www.voltswitzerland.org/party/vision |access-date=2022-11-17 |website=Volt Switzerland |language=en-CH}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Opponents:''' |
|||
| [[Swiss People's Party]], [[Evangelical People's Party of Switzerland|Evangelical People's Party]], [[Ticino League]], [[Federal Democratic Union of Switzerland|Federal Democratic Union]], [[Swiss Party of Labour]], [[Solidarity (Switzerland)|Solidarity]],<ref name="EuropeElectsCH">{{Cite web |title=Switzerland — Parties |url=https://europeelects.eu/switzerland |access-date=18 January 2022 |website=Europe Elects}}</ref> [[Campaign for an Independent and Neutral Switzerland]]<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kuenzi |first=Renat |date=15 May 2014 |title='We're Not the Only EU Sceptics' |url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/conservative-pressure-group_-we-re-not-the-only-eu-sceptics-/38582264 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200218032314/http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/conservative-pressure-group_-we-re-not-the-only-eu-sceptics-/38582264 |archive-date=18 February 2020 |access-date=21 November 2019 |website=Swissinfo}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Über Uns |url=http://auns.ch/ueber-uns |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160413063201/http://auns.ch/ueber-uns |archive-date=13 April 2016 |access-date=4 April 2016 |website=Campaign for an Independent and Neutral Switzerland official website}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Public opinion:''' |
|||
| A [[2001 Swiss referendums|Swiss referendum on restarting EU membership negotiations in 2001]] was defeated by 76.8%.<ref>{{Cite web |date=4 March 2001 |title=Swiss say 'no' to EU |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1201133.stm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090220225800/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1201133.stm |archive-date=20 February 2009 |access-date=5 May 2008 |website=BBC News}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
! colspan=3 | {{Flag|United Kingdom}} |
|||
|- |
|||
! rowspan=6 style="width:200px" | [[File:European Union United Kingdom Locator.svg|200px]] |
|||
| style="width:100px"| '''Main article:''' |
|||
| [[United Kingdom–European Union relations]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Relationship:''' |
|||
| [[Brexit withdrawal agreement|Withdrawal agreement]], [[EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement]], [[United Kingdom membership of the European Union|past membership]]. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Main obstacles:''' |
|||
| [[Brexit|January 2020 withdrawal]]. |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Proponents:''' |
|||
| [[Liberal Democrats (UK)|Liberal Democrats]],<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Brack |first1=Duncan |last2=Moran |first2=Layla |author-link2=Layla Moran |date=2 August 2021 |title=The UK–EU relationship: the Liberal Democrat position |url=https://www.libdems.org.uk/eu-relationship |access-date=2021-10-25 |website=libdems.org.uk |language=en}}</ref> [[Green Party of England and Wales|Green Party]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-10-02 |title=Greens call for re-joining the EU 'as soon as political situation is favourable' |url=https://greenparty.org.uk/news/2022/10/02/greens-call-for-re-joining-the-eu-%E2%80%9Cas-soon-as-political-situation-is-favourable%E2%80%9D |publisher=[[Green Party of England and Wales|Green Party]]}}</ref> [[Scottish National Party]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Opponents:''' |
|||
| [[Keir Starmer]],<ref>{{cite news |last=Gutteridge |first=Nick |date=31 May 2023 |title=Keir Starmer faces Labour Brexit backlash for vowing to stay outside EU |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/31/keir-starmer-eu-brexit-pro-european-labour-mp/ |url-access=limited |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230608065837/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/31/keir-starmer-eu-brexit-pro-european-labour-mp/ |archive-date=8 June 2023 |access-date=15 June 2023 |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph}}</ref> [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]], [[Reform UK]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Public opinion:''' |
|||
| {{Main|Potential re-accession of the United Kingdom to the European Union}} |
|||
51% in favour of rejoining, 35% against, 12% neither/ don't know (23-25 May 2024, ''Deltapoll'').<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-05-26 |title=Voting Intention and Deltapoll Trackers (26th May 2024) {{!}} Deltapoll |url=https://deltapoll.co.uk/polls/voteint240526 |access-date=2024-05-31 |website=Deltapoll {{!}} Deltapoll}}</ref> |
|||
|} |
|||
===Other proposals=== |
|||
;Greenland |
|||
* [[Andorra]], [[Liechtenstein]], [[Monaco]], and [[Vatican City]] are [[European microstates]] that are not on the agenda of the EU to be members, nor their own. (See: [[Microstates and the European Union]]) |
|||
* [[Azerbaijan]] and [[Kazakhstan]] are transcontinental states with some territory in Europe. These countries are not on the agenda of the EU to be members, nor their own. (See: [[Azerbaijan–European Union relations]] and [[Kazakhstan–European Union relations]]) |
|||
* [[Canada]] is a non-European country with values, culture, trade, and politics closely linked with the [[European Union|EU]]. Its membership has been proposed due to this.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://knowledge.insead.edu/strategy/what-if-eu-invited-canada-join-its-bloc|title=What if the EU Invited Canada to Join Its Bloc?|first1=John |last1=Hulsman |first2=Boris|last2=Liedtke|date=8 June 2018|website=INSEAD Knowledge}}</ref> (See: [[Canada–European Union relations]]) |
|||
* [[Cape Verde]] and [[Israel]] are non-European countries with close historical and political relations with the EU. (See: [[Cape Verde–European Union relations]] and [[Israel–European Union relations]]) |
|||
* The [[Sovereign Military Order of Malta]] is a sovereign entity without territory that has extraterritorial headquarters in [[Palazzo Malta]] and [[Villa del Priorato di Malta|Villa Malta]], as well as observer status in the [[United Nations]] and the [[Council of Europe]]. (See: [[Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations]]) |
|||
* [[Scotland]] is a [[Countries of the United Kingdom|country of the United Kingdom]] that was part of the European Union as a result of the UK's membership, until [[Brexit|the latter withdrew from the EU]]. The [[Scottish National Party]], which leads Scotland's [[Devolution in the United Kingdom|devolved]] [[Scottish Government|government]], supports Scotland regaining its independence and rejoining the EU.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2019-11-25 |title=General Election 2019: Scotland would 'seek a way back in' to EU |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50545372 |access-date=2021-10-25 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref> (See: [[Scottish independence]] and [[Proposed second Scottish independence referendum]]) |
|||
==Internal enlargement scenarios== |
|||
[[Greenland]], a self-governing community that is part of the [[Kingdom of Denmark]], held a second referendum on membership after the establishment of Greenland's [[home rule]] in 1979 (effective from 1980). The result was to leave, so on 1 February 1985, [[Greenland]] left the [[European Economic Community|EEC]] and [[EURATOM]]. Its status was changed to that of an Overseas Country.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> Danish nationals residing in Greenland (i.e. all native population) are nonetheless fully European citizens; they are not, however, entitled to vote in European elections. |
|||
{{See also|Withdrawal from the European Union}} |
|||
Internal enlargement is the process of new member states arising from the break-up of an existing member state.<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 June 2017 |title=The Internal Enlargement of the European Union |url=https://www.ideasforeurope.eu/publication/the-internal-enlargement-of-the-european-union |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180105070055/https://www.ideasforeurope.eu/publication/the-internal-enlargement-of-the-european-union |archive-date=5 January 2018 |access-date=4 January 2018 |website=Centre Maurits Coppieters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=1 May 2014 |title=The 'internal' enlargement of the European Union – is it possible? |url=https://blog.oup.com/2014/05/internal-enlargement-of-european-union-legal-possibility |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190620013056/https://blog.oup.com/2014/05/internal-enlargement-of-european-union-legal-possibility |archive-date=20 June 2019 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=The Internal Enlargement of the European Union |url=https://www.ideasforeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/The-internal-enlargement-of-the-EU-Final.pdf.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209061146/https://www.ideasforeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/The-internal-enlargement-of-the-EU-Final.pdf.pdf |archive-date=9 February 2018 |website=Centre Maurits Coppieters}}</ref> There have been and are a number of [[List of active separatist movements in Europe|active separatist movements within member states]] (for example in [[Catalan independentism|Catalonia]] and [[Partition of Belgium|Flanders]]) but there are no clear agreements, treaties or precedents covering the scenario of an existing EU member state breaking into two or more states, both of which wish to remain EU member states. The question is whether one state is a successor and one a new applicant or, alternatively, both are new states which must be admitted to the EU.<ref>Edward, David, "Scotland's Position in the European Union", Scottish Parliamentary Review, Vol. I, No. 2 (Jan 2014) [Edinburgh: Blacket Avenue Press]</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=25 January 2013 |title=Scottish independence: Irish minister says EU application 'would take time' |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-21195630 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231192520/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-21195630 |archive-date=31 December 2019 |access-date=2 February 2013 |website=BBC}}</ref> |
|||
In some cases, a region desires to leave its state and the EU, namely those regions wishing to [[enlargement of Switzerland#Proposals for expansion|join Switzerland]]. But most, namely the two movements that held referendums during the 2010s, Scotland and Catalonia, see their future as independent states within the EU. This results in great interest in whether, once independent, they would retain EU membership or conversely whether they would have to re-apply. In the later case, since new members must be approved unanimously, any other state which has an interest in blocking their membership to deter similar independence movements could do so.<ref name="scot apply">{{Cite news |last1=Rankin |first1=Jennifer |last2=Carrell |first2=Severin |date=13 March 2017 |title=Independent Scotland 'would have to apply to join EU' – Brussels official |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/13/independent-scotland-would-have-to-apply-to-join-eu-commission-says |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112020836/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/13/independent-scotland-would-have-to-apply-to-join-eu-commission-says |archive-date=12 November 2020 |access-date=20 September 2018 |work=The Guardian}}</ref><ref name="cat pro eu">[http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/10/10/the-catalan-independence-movement-is-pro-eu-but-will-the-eu-accept-it The Catalan independence movement is pro-EU – but will the EU accept it?] {{Webarchive |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200809090815/https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/10/10/the-catalan-independence-movement-is-pro-eu-but-will-the-eu-accept-it |date=9 August 2020}}, London School of Economics 10/OCT/17</ref> Additionally, it is unclear whether the successor state would retain any [[Opt-outs in the European Union|opt-outs]] that the parent state was entitled to. |
|||
There has been some speculation as to whether Greenland may consider rejoining the European Union. On 4 January 2007 the Danish daily [[Jyllands-Posten]] quoted the former Danish [[minister for Greenland]], [[Tom Høyem]], as saying "I would not be surprised if Greenland again becomes a member of the EU... The EU needs the [[Arctic window]] and Greenland cannot alone manage the gigantic Arctic possibilities".<ref>{{Cite news |
|||
| title = Greenland could re-join the EU |
|||
| publisher=EUobserver Review |
|||
| date = 5 January 2007 |
|||
| url =http://euobserver.com/844/23194?rss_rk=1 |
|||
| accessdate =25 June 2007 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080120191436/http://euobserver.com/844/23194?rss_rk=1 <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 20 January 2008}}</ref> Greenland has a lot of natural resources, and Greenland has contracted private companies to exploit some of them, but the cost is considered too high, as Greenland is remote and severely lacks infrastructure. |
|||
; Opinions on membership |
|||
===Dutch constituent countries and special municipalities=== |
|||
* '''European Commission''' |
|||
The islands of [[Aruba]], [[Curaçao]], [[Sint Maarten]] are constituent countries of the [[Kingdom of the Netherlands]], while [[Bonaire]], [[Sint Eustatius]] and [[Saba]] are [[BES islands|special Dutch municipalities]]. All are [[Overseas Countries and Territories]] (OCT) under Annex II of the EC treaty.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> OCTs are considered to be "associated" with the EU and apply some portions of EU law. The islands are opting to become an [[Outermost regions|Outermost Region]] (OMR) of the EU, the same status the [[Azores]], [[Madeira]], the [[Canary Islands]] and the [[French overseas departments]] have. |
|||
** [[Jean-Claude Juncker]], [[President of the European Commission]] (2014-2019): "If there were to be a 'yes' vote in favour of Catalan independence, then we will respect that opinion. But Catalonia will not be able to be an EU member state on the day after such a vote."<ref>{{Cite web |date=14 September 2017 |title=Independent Catalonia would need to apply to join EU -Juncker |url=https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-spain-politics-eu/independent-catalonia-would-need-to-apply-to-join-eu-juncker-idUKKCN1BP20W |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191011165319/https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-spain-politics-eu/independent-catalonia-would-need-to-apply-to-join-eu-juncker-idUKKCN1BP20W |archive-date=11 October 2019 |website=Reuters}}</ref> This was repeated in October in an official press release: ''"We [...] reiterate the legal position held by this Commission as well as by its predecessors. If a referendum were to be organised in line with the Spanish Constitution it would mean that the territory leaving would find itself outside of the European Union."''<ref>{{Cite press release |title=European Commission - Statement on the events in Catalonia |url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-17-3626_en.htm |language=en |access-date=9 December 2017 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191101111059/https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-17-3626_en.htm |archive-date=1 November 2019 |website=europa.eu}}</ref> |
|||
** [[José Manuel Barroso]], President of the European Commission (2004-2014), stated in 2012 in the context of the [[2014 Scottish independence referendum|2014 referendum for independence in Scotland]], that any newly independent country would have to apply for membership and negotiate its terms, but that the [[Rump state|rest of the original country]] would not have to re-negotiate its position and would continue its membership.<ref name="bbc.co.uk">[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20664907 Scottish independence: EC's Barroso says new states need 'apply to join EU'] {{Webarchive |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201112020903/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20664907 |date=12 November 2020}}, BBC News, 10 December 2012</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=correspondence from Mr Barroso to the House of lords |url=http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/economic-affairs/ScottishIndependence/EA68_Scotland_and_the_EU_Barroso%27s_reply_to_Lord_Tugendhat_101212.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191116231143/https://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/economic-affairs/ScottishIndependence/EA68_Scotland_and_the_EU_Barroso's_reply_to_Lord_Tugendhat_101212.pdf |archive-date=16 November 2019 |access-date=10 December 2012}}</ref> In 2014 he said that it would have been 'very difficult' for an independent Scotland to join the EU, 'if not impossible', because of the difficulty of getting the approval of all member states, particularly Spain, which fears a possible secession of [[Catalonia]] and has blocked [[Kosovo]]'s accession to the EU.<ref name="Telegraph16Feb2014a">{{Cite news |last=Holehouse |first=Matthew |date=16 February 2014 |title=Jose Manuel Barroso: nearly impossible for Scotland to join EU |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/10641833/Jose-Manuel-Barroso-nearly-impossible-for-Scotland-to-join-EU.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920190813/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/10641833/Jose-Manuel-Barroso-nearly-impossible-for-Scotland-to-join-EU.html |archive-date=20 September 2020 |access-date=4 September 2014 |work=Sunday Telegraph |location=London |quote=Spain, which fears the separation of the Catalonia region, has blocked the accession of Kosovo ... [[Jose Manuel Barroso]], the [[president of the European Commission]] ... went on: 'It will be extremely difficult to get the approval of all the other member states to have a new member coming from one member state.' 'We have seen that Spain has been opposing even the recognition of Kosovo, for instance. It's to some extent a similar case because it's a new country, and so I believe it's going to be extremely difficult, if not impossible.'}}</ref> |
|||
** [[Joaquín Almunia]] (Spanish, being at the time an EU Commissioner) in 2013 claimed that Catalonia would have to apply for EU membership in the event of secession from Spain.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Nikolaj |first=Nielsen |date=17 September 2013 |title=EU commission: Catalonia must leave EU if it leaves Spain |url=http://euobserver.com/enlargement/121466 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108093348/https://euobserver.com/enlargement/121466 |archive-date=8 November 2020 |access-date=19 September 2013 |work=EUObserver}}</ref> |
|||
* '''Government of Spain''' |
|||
** Spanish Prime Minister [[Mariano Rajoy]], said in November 2013 that an independent Scotland's entry to the EU would require the consent of all existing members and that an independent Scotland or other regions gaining independence, taken as a reference to Catalonia, would end up outside of the EU.<ref name="Telegraph-Rajoy">{{Cite news |last=Johnson |first=Simon |date=27 November 2013 |title=Spanish PM: Independent Scotland would be kicked out of the EU |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10479461/Spanish-PM-Independent-Scotland-would-be-out-of-the-EU.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112010839/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10479461/Spanish-PM-Independent-Scotland-would-be-out-of-the-EU.html |archive-date=12 November 2020 |access-date=3 April 2018 |work=The Daily Telegraph |location=London}}</ref><ref name="Scotsman03Feb2014a">{{Cite news |date=3 February 2014 |title=Scottish independence: Spain warning over EU entry |url=http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/scottish-independence-spain-warning-over-eu-entry-1-3292575 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924145840/http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/scottish-independence-spain-warning-over-eu-entry-1-3292575 |archive-date=24 September 2015 |access-date=20 November 2019 |work=The Scotsman |location=Edinburgh |quote='They have to resolve a mountain of problems, as [[Better Together (campaign)|Better Together]] has explained very well,' he said.'You have to achieve candidate status. You have to negotiate 35 chapters . It has to be ratified by the institutions of the EU. It then has to be ratified by 28 national parliaments.'}}</ref> |
|||
** Spanish Foreign Minister [[José García-Margallo y Marfil|José García-Margallo]], having said in February 2012 that Spain would not veto Scottish accession to the EU, provided Scottish independence had UK agreement (thus making it different from Catalan independence).<ref name="Express26Feb2012a">{{Cite news |last=Murray |first=Graeme |date=26 February 2012 |title=Spain will not veto an independent Scotland joining EU |url=http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/304495/Spain-will-not-veto-an-independent-Scotland-joining-EU |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111225102/https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/304495/Spain-will-not-veto-an-independent-Scotland-joining-EU |archive-date=11 November 2020 |access-date=4 September 2014 |work=Sunday Express |location=London}}</ref> |
|||
===Basque Country=== |
|||
When Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba were established as Dutch public bodies after the [[dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles]] (which was an OCT) in 2010, their status within the EU were raised. Rather than change their status from an OCT to an outermost region, as their change in status within the Netherlands would imply, it was decided that their status would remain the same for at least five years. After those five years, their status would be reviewed. |
|||
{{Main|Basque nationalism}} |
|||
The presence of a strong Basque Nationalist movement, strongly majoritary in several territories of the [[Basque Country (greater region)|Basque Country]], makes possible the future existence of an independent Basque Country under different potential territorial configurations. In overall terms the Basque nationalism is pro-European. |
|||
===Catalonia=== |
|||
If it was decided that one or all of the islands wish to integrate more with the EU then the [[Treaty of Lisbon]] provides for that following a unanimous decision from the [[European Council]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/cg00014.en07.pdf|format=PDF|title=Treaty of Lisbon Article 2, point 293}}</ref> Former [[European Commissioner for Enlargement]] [[Danuta Hübner]] has said before the [[European Parliament]] that she doesn't expect many problems to occur with such a status change, as the population of the islands is only a few thousand people. |
|||
{{Main|Catalan independence movement}} |
|||
On 1 October 2017, the [[Catalan government]] held a [[2017 Catalan independence referendum|referendum on independence]], which had been declared illegal by the [[Constitutional Court of Spain]], with potential polling stations being cordoned off by riot police. The subsequent events constituted a political crisis for Catalonia. The EU's position is to keep distance from the crisis while supporting Spain's territorial integrity and constitution.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Richard |first=Youngs |date=11 July 2017 |title=EU needs a smarter response to the Catalonia crisis |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/catalonia-mariano-rajoy-eu-needs-a-smarter-response-to-the-catalonia-crisis |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109030409/https://www.politico.eu/article/catalonia-mariano-rajoy-eu-needs-a-smarter-response-to-the-catalonia-crisis |archive-date=9 November 2020 |access-date=21 November 2019 |work=Politico}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Teffer |first=Peter |date=22 December 2017 |title=Separatist 'win' does not change EU view on Catalonia |url=https://euobserver.com/elections/140401 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180708220731/https://euobserver.com/elections/140401 |archive-date=8 July 2018 |access-date=21 November 2019 |website=EU Observer}}</ref> While the debate around Scotland's referendum may inform the Catalan crisis, Catalonia is in a distinct situation from Scotland whereby the central government does not recognise the legitimacy of any independence declaration from Catalonia. If Spain does not recognise the independence of a Catalan state, Catalonia cannot separately join the EU and it is still recognised as part of Spain's EU membership. |
|||
===Corsica=== |
|||
===French overseas departments and territories=== |
|||
{{Main|Corsican nationalism}} |
|||
The territories of [[French Guiana]], [[Guadeloupe]], [[Martinique]], [[Mayotte]] and [[Réunion]] are ''[[overseas department]]s'' of France and at the same time mono-departmental ''overseas region''s. According to the EC treaty (article 299 2), all of these departments are ''[[outermost regions]]'' (OMR) of the EU—hence provisions of the EC treaty apply there while derogations are allowed. The status of the [[Overseas collectivity]] of [[Saint-Martin]] is also defined as OMR by the [[Treaty of Lisbon]]. New Caledonia and the overseas collectivities of French Polynesia, Saint-Barthelemy, Saint Pierre et Miquelon and Wallis and Futuna are [[Overseas Countries and Territories]] of the EU.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> |
|||
[[Corsica]] has a strong and electorally successful [[Corsican nationalism|nationalist movement]], with positions ranging from autonomy to outright independence, the latter option with around 10–15% public support.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Fourquet |first1=Jérôme |author-link=Jérôme Fourquet |last2=Kraus |first2=François |last3=Bourgine |first3=Alexandre |title=Les Corses et leur perception de la situation sur l'île: Résultats détaillés |url=http://www.ifop.com/media/poll/1904-1-study_file.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304050613/http://www.ifop.com/media/poll/1904-1-study_file.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2016 |access-date=19 July 2016 |website=ifop.com}}</ref> The independist party [[Corsica Libera]] envisions an independent Corsica within the European Union as a union of various European peoples, as well as recommendations for alignment within European directives.<ref>{{Citation |title=Corsica 21: U prughjettu |work=Corsica Libera |pages=1–150 |date=2015 |url=https://fr.calameo.com/read/006259250183428f1211c |language=fr}}</ref> |
|||
;New Caledonia |
|||
[[New Caledonia]] is an [[Overseas France|overseas territory]] of France with its own unique status under the French Constitution, which is distinct from that of overseas departments and collectivities. It is defined as an "overseas country" under the 1998 [[Nouméa Accord]], and enjoys a high degree of self-government.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Countries/Pacific/New-Caledonia.php |title=Countries - Pacific - New Caledonia - Information Paper - NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |publisher=Mfat.govt.nz |accessdate=2013-12-09}}</ref> Currently, in regard to the EU, it is one of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT). |
|||
===Flanders=== |
|||
As a result of the [[Nouméa Accord]], New Caledonians will vote on an independence referendum scheduled between 2014 and 2019. This referendum will determine whether the territory remains a part of the French Republic as a "sui generis collectivity", or whether it will become an independent state. The accords also specify a gradual devolution of powers to the local New Caledonian assembly. |
|||
{{Further|Flemish Movement|Partition of Belgium}} |
|||
There is an [[Flemish Movement|active movement]] towards [[Flemish Movement#Separatists|Flemish independence]] or [[Greater Netherlands thought|union with the Netherlands]]. The future status of [[Wallonia]] and [[Brussels]] (the [[Brussels and the European Union|''de facto'' capital of the EU]]) are unclear as viable political states, perhaps producing a unique situation from [[Scottish independence|Scotland]] and [[Catalonian independence|Catalonia]]. There are various proposals, both within and outside the independentist movement, for [[Partition of Belgium#Brussels|what should happen to Brussels]], ranging from staying part of the Belgian rump state, to joining the hypothetical Flemish state, to becoming a separate political entity.<ref name="uclouvain">{{Cite web |last=Van Parijs |first=Philippe |date=4 October 2007 |title=Brussels after Belgium: fringe town or city state ? |url=http://www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/etes/documents/2007zp.Brussels_Bulletin.final.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303210907/http://www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/etes/documents/2007zp.Brussels_Bulletin.final.pdf |archive-date=3 March 2016 |access-date=29 November 2007 |website=The Bulletin}}</ref><ref name="cafebabel">{{Cite web |last=Feki |first=Donya |date=29 November 2007 |title=Jean Quatremer: a nation has been born—Flanders |url=http://www.cafebabel.co.uk/article/23093/jean-quatremer-a-nation-has-been-born-flanders.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100309223853/http://www.cafebabel.co.uk/article/23093/jean-quatremer-a-nation-has-been-born-flanders.html |archive-date=9 March 2010 |access-date=29 November 2007 |website=Café Babel}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Sardinia=== |
||
{{Main|Sardinian nationalism}} |
|||
{{Further|Northern Cyprus and the European Union}} |
|||
[[Sardinia]] has a strong and electorally successful [[Sardinian nationalism|nationalist movement]], with positions ranging from autonomy to outright independence. Generally associated with [[left-wing politics]], the Sardinian movement is largely pro-European and pro-[[environmentalism]].<ref>Hechter (M.), ''The Dynamics of Secession'', Acta Sociologica, vol. 35, 1992, p. 267.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=9 April 2014 |title=Entrevista A Marcel Farinelli (1): "Córcega Y Cerdeña Forman Un Archipiélago Invisible Al Tener Sus Islas Nacionalismos De Signo Opuesto" |url=https://xaviercasals.wordpress.com/2014/04/09/entrevista-a-marcel-farinelli-1-corcega-y-cerdena-forman-un-archipielago-invisible-al-tener-sus-islas-nacionalismos-de-signo-opuesto/}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:EU and TRNC.png|thumb|250px|Area shown in orange under control of Northern Cyprus]] |
|||
Officially, the [[island country|island nation]] [[Cyprus]] is part of the European Union, under the [[de jure]] sovereignty of the [[Republic of Cyprus]]. [[Turkish Cypriots]] are citizens of the Republic of Cyprus and thus of the European Union, and were entitled to vote in the 2004 [[European Parliament election, 2004|European Parliament election]] (though only a few hundred registered). The EU's [[acquis communautaire]] is suspended indefinitely in the northern third of the island, which has remained outside the control of the Republic of Cyprus since the [[Turkish invasion of Cyprus|Turkish invasion of 1974]]. The [[Greek Cypriots|Greek Cypriot]] community rejected the [[Annan Plan for Cyprus|Annan Plan]] for the settlement of the [[Cyprus dispute]] in a [[2004 Annan Plan Referendum|referendum]] on 24 April 2004. Had the referendum been in favour of the settlement proposal, the island (excluding the British [[Sovereign Base Areas]]) would have joined the European Union as the ''United Cyprus Republic''. |
|||
According to a 2012 survey conducted in a joint effort between the [[University of Cagliari]] and that of [[University of Edinburgh|Edinburgh]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/eve-hepburn/what-next-for-independence-movements-in-europe|title=What next for independence movements in Europe? | openDemocracy}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Identità e autonomia in Sardegna – FocuSardegna |url=http://www.focusardegna.com/index.php/eventi/257-identita-e-autonomia-in-sardegna |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714195345/http://www.focusardegna.com/index.php/eventi/257-identita-e-autonomia-in-sardegna |archive-date=14 July 2014}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=9 November 2015 |title=La Sardegna che vorrebbe l'indipendenza come i catalani |url=https://www.lastampa.it/cronaca/2015/11/09/news/la-sardegna-che-vorrebbe-l-indipendenza-come-i-catalani-1.35206167 |website=La Stampa}}</ref> 41% of [[Sardinian people|Sardinians]] would be in favour of independence (with 10% choosing it from both Italy and the European Union, and 31% only from Italy with Sardinia remaining in the EU), whilst another 46% would rather have a larger autonomy within Italy and the EU, including fiscal power; 12% of people would be content to remain part of Italy and the EU with a Regional Council without any fiscal powers, and 1% in Italy and the EU without a Regional Council and fiscal powers.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Gianmario Demuro |title=Identità e Autonomia in Sardegna e Scozia |last2=Ilenia Ruggiu |last3=Francesco Mola |publisher=Maggioli Editore |date=2013 |isbn=978-8-8387-8243-5 |pages=35–39}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Focus: La questione identitaria e indipendentista in Sardegna - University of Cagliari, Ilenia Ruggiu |url=http://people.unica.it/ileniaruggiu/files/2014/05/8%C2%B0-La-questione-identitaria-e-indipendentista-in-Sardegna.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815181145/http://people.unica.it/ileniaruggiu/files/2014/05/8%C2%B0-La-questione-identitaria-e-indipendentista-in-Sardegna.pdf |archive-date=15 August 2017 |access-date=17 March 2022}}</ref><ref name="Ruggiu">{{Cite journal |last=Ruggiu |first=Ilenia |date=26 June 2014 |title=The Scottish Referendum: The View from Italy and Sardinia |url=https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3366/scot.2014.0039 |journal=Scottish Affairs |volume=23 |issue=3 |pages=407–414 |doi=10.3366/scot.2014.0039}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Indipendentista il 40% dei sardi (Conferenza delle Regioni e delle Province autonome) |url=http://www.regioni.it/riforme/2015/06/24/sar-regione-pigliaru-indipendentista-il-40-dei-sardi-410441 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304065604/http://www.regioni.it/riforme/2015/06/24/sar-regione-pigliaru-indipendentista-il-40-dei-sardi-410441 |archive-date=4 March 2016 |access-date=17 January 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=1 May 2012 |title=La Sardegna vuole l'indipendenza. Favorevoli 4 sardi su 10 |url=https://www.controcampus.it/2012/05/la-sardegna-vuole-lindipendenza-favorevoli-4-sardi-su-10 |website=controcampus.it}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=30 April 2012 |title=gianfrancopintore: Il 40% dei sardi è per l'indipendenza; il resto per la sovranità |url=http://gianfrancopintore.blogspot.com/2012/04/il-40-dei-sardi-e-per-lindipendenza-il.html}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Delibere - Regione Autonoma della Sardegna |url=http://www.regione.sardegna.it/j/v/491?s=198436&v=2&c=27&t=1 |website=regione.sardegna.it}}</ref> A 2017 poll by the Ixè Institute found that 51% of those questioned identified as Sardinian (as opposed to an Italian average of 15% identifying by their region of origin), rather than Italian (19%), European (11%) and/or citizen of the world (19%).<ref>''La Sardegna: lo stato delle cose fra "percepito" e ossatura reale'', Istituto Ixè, Fondazione di Sardegna; Vissuto – identità, table n. |
|||
The European Union's relations with the ''Turkish Cypriot Community'' are handled by the [[European Commission]]'s [[Directorate-General for Enlargement (European Commission)|Directorate-General for Enlargement]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/turkish_cypriot_community/index_en.htm|publisher=[[European Commission]]— [[Directorate-General for Enlargement (European Commission) Directorate-General for Enlargement]]|title= Turkish Cypriot community|date=3 January 2007}}</ref> |
|||
44</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=7 December 2017 |title=L'Isola ha paura del futuro Fiducia solo sul turismo – Regione |url=http://www.lanuovasardegna.it/regione/2017/12/07/news/l-isola-ha-paura-del-futuro-fiducia-solo-sul-turismo-1.16213029}}</ref> |
|||
Sardinian nationalists address a number of issues, such as the [[Environmental degradation|environmental damage]] caused by the military forces<ref>{{Cite web |title=Dark truth behind Sardinia's holiday oasis |url=http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/other-industries/dark-truth-behind-sardinias-holiday-oasis/news-story/8a372818be6d3d0d2c969ab24914df05 |website=news.com.au}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Sardinia: Militarization, Contamination and Cancer in Paradise |url=http://warisacrime.org/downloads/sardinia.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160626131218/http://warisacrime.org/downloads/sardinia.pdf |archive-date=26 June 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Sardegna, La Protesta Contro Le Servitu' |url=http://www.rai.tv/dl/RaiTV/programmi/media/ContentItem-0af16d58-204d-4bc0-aa70-b91b1e7086ed.html |website=rai.tv}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Così in Sardegna si è riacceso l'indipendentismo, Nicola Mirenzi – Europa Quotidiano |url=http://www.europaquotidiano.it/2014/09/17/cosi-in-sardegna-si-e-riacceso-lindipendentismo/}}</ref><ref><<In chiave antimilitarista, nel quadro del tradizionale attivismo contestativo contro la presenza di strutture militari sul territorio nazionale, a fronte del tono minore che ha caratterizzato l'impegno dei comitati siciliani contro il sistema satellitare MUOS, si è rilevato un innalzamento della tensione mobilitativa in Sardegna, ove espressioni dell'antagonismo e dell'indipendentismo sardo hanno rivitalizzato la protesta contro le esercitazioni nei poligoni e nelle installazioni militari dell'Isola, reclamando la smilitarizzazione del territorio.>> [https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/sisr.nsf/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/relazione-2014.pdf Relazione sulla politica dell'informazione per la sicurezza, pg.69]</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=15 September 2014 |title=Capo Frasca, la nuova Pratobello |url=https://lindro.it/capo-frasca-la-nuova-pratobello |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816105146/https://lindro.it/capo-frasca-la-nuova-pratobello |archive-date=16 August 2022 |access-date=6 May 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=15 September 2014 |title=Oltre 5mila per dire no ai poligoni festa identitaria davanti ai cancelli |url=https://www.lanuovasardegna.it/regione/2014/09/14/news/oltre-5mila-per-dire-no-ai-poligoni-festa-identitaria-davanti-ai-cancelli-1.9932445 |website=La Nuova Sardegna}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Marrocco |first=Adalgisa |title=Indipendentismo sardo, questo sconosciuto |url=https://www.contrappunti.info/novita/indipendentismo-sardo-questo-sconosciuto |website=Contrappunti}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Be On The Citizen Side Of Things |url=https://citizenside.com |website=citizenside.com}}</ref> (about 60% of such bases in Italy are located on the island),<ref>Mattu, Katjuscia. ''Internal colonialism in Western Europe: the case of Sardinia''</ref> the financial and economic exploitation of the island's resources by the Italian state and mainland industrialists,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.lacanas.it/2012/05/21/i-fondamenti-storici-dellindipendenza-sarda/|title=I fondamenti storici dell'indipendenza sarda – Lacanas}}</ref> the lack of any political representation both in Italy and in the [[European Parliament]]<ref>{{Cite web |date=30 May 2023 |title=Parties, associations ask for direct representation of Sardinia in European Parliament |url=https://www.nationalia.info/new/10199/parties-associations-ask-for-direct-representation-of-sardinia-in-european-parliament |website=Nationalia}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=8 May 2014 |title=Europee, in Sardegna campagna "Eu non voto". C'è anche Zappadu |url=http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2014/05/08/europee-in-sardegna-campagna-per-lastensione-eu-non-voto-ce-anche-zappadu/978509 |website=Il Fatto Quotidiano}}</ref> (due to an unbalanced electoral constituency that still remains to this day,<ref>{{Cite web |date=19 March 2014 |title=Il Senato affonda il collegio Sardegna, per l'Isola nessun europarlamentare |url=https://www.sardiniapost.it/politica/il-senato-affonda-il-collegio-sardegna-per-lisola-nessun-europarlamentare/}}</ref> Sardinia has not had its own MEP since 1994),<ref>Eve Hepburn, ''New Challenges for Stateless Nationalist and Regionalist Parties'', Routledge, 2010, pp.121</ref> the nuclear power and [[nuclear waste|waste]] (on which a referendum was proposed by a Sardist party,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Referendum consultivo in Sardegna |url=https://www.assonucleare.it |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304192012/http://www.nuclearnews.it/news-2519/referendum-consultivo-in-sardegna |archive-date=4 March 2016 |website=Assonucleare.it}}</ref> being held in 2011<ref>{{Cite web |title=Referendum nucleare Sardegna: concluse verifiche Comuni, i SI al 97,13% - Regione Autonoma della Sardegna |url=http://www.regione.sardegna.it/j/v/25?s=166748&v=2&c=86&t=1 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221229112613/https://www.regione.sardegna.it/j/v/25?s=166748&v=2&c=86&t=1 |archive-date=29 December 2022 |access-date=17 March 2022 |website=regione.sardegna.it}}</ref>) and the ongoing process of depopulation and Italianization that would destroy the Sardinian indigenous culture.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sardegna: paradiso turistico o la lenta morte di un popolo? Di Marco Oggianu, 21.12.2006 |url=https://www.gfbv.it/3dossier/eu-min/sardi-it.html |website=gfbv.it}}</ref> |
|||
==Secession from a member state== |
|||
There have been and are a number of [[List of active separatist movements in Europe|active separatist movements within member states]], for example in [[Catalan independentism|Catalonia]], [[Partition of Belgium|Flanders]], the [[Basque nationalism|Basque Country]] and [[Scottish independence|Scotland]].<!---THIS IS JUST MENTIONING THREE EXAMPLES FROM DIFFERENT MEMBER STATES, PLEASE DO NOT TURN IT INTO A LIST OF EVERY INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT IN EUROPE---> If such a movement resulted in independence for a region, the newly created state may wish to become a member of the EU. |
|||
===Veneto=== |
|||
In December 2012, the president of the [[European Commission]] [[José Manuel Barroso]] stated, in the context of the [[Scottish independence referendum, 2014|2014 referendum for independence in Scotland]], that any new independent country would have to apply for membership and negotiate its terms, but that the [[rump state|rest of the original country]] (UK) would not have to re-negotiate its position and would continue its membership.<ref name="bbc.co.uk">[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20664907 Scottish independence: EC's Barroso says new states need 'apply to join EU'], BBC News, 10 December 2012</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/economic-affairs/ScottishIndependence/EA68_Scotland_and_the_EU_Barroso%27s_reply_to_Lord_Tugendhat_101212.pdf|format=PDF|title=correspondence from Mr Barroso to the House of lords}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Venetian nationalism}} |
|||
Similarly to Sardinia, [[Veneto]] has a strong and electorally successful [[Venetian nationalism|nationalist movement]], with positions ranging from autonomy to outright independence. In a [[2014 Venetian independence referendum|controversial online poll]] held in 2014, 89% of participants were in favour of Veneto becoming "a federal, independent and sovereign state" and 55% supported accession to European Union membership.<ref name="RischioCalcolato">{{Cite web |title=Veneto Libero, Indipendente (nella Nato in Europa e con l'Euro.... Il Problema è lo STATO ITALIANO) - Rischio Calcolato |url=http://www.rischiocalcolato.it/2014/03/veneto-libero-indipendente-nato-in-europa-leuro-problema-italiano.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20140322124151/http://www.rischiocalcolato.it/2014/03/veneto-libero-indipendente-nato-in-europa-leuro-problema-italiano.html |archive-date=2014-03-22 |access-date=2014-03-25 |publisher=rischiocalcolato.it}}</ref> Three years later, in the [[2017 Venetian autonomy referendum|2017 autonomy referendum]], with a 58% turnout, 98% of the participants voted in favour of "further forms and special conditions of autonomy to be attributed to the Region of Veneto".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://referendum2017.consiglioveneto.it//sites/index.html#!/riepilogo|title=Referendum consultivo|website=referendum2017.consiglioveneto.it}}</ref> Consequently, negotiations between the Venetian government and the Italian one started. |
|||
The longstanding and largest Venetist party, [[Liga Veneta]] (LV), was established in 1979 under the slogan "farther from [[Rome]], closer to [[Europe]]",<ref>{{Cite web |date=2 July 1993 |title=L'Europa Secondo la Lega |url=https://www.limesonline.com/cartaceo/leuropa-secondo-la-lega}}</ref> but has later adopted more [[Euroscepticism|Eurosceptic]] positions. [[Luca Zaia]], a LV member who has served as [[president of Veneto]] since 2010, usually self-describes as a [[pro-Europeanism|pro-Europeanist]] and has long advocated for a "Europe of regions" and "macro-regions".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.regione.veneto.it/web/sede-di-bruxelles/dettaglio-news?articleId=2856147|title=dettaglio news - Regione del Veneto}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.liberoquotidiano.it/news/politica/11609672/europee-zaia-serve-un-europa-forte-e-delle-regioni.html|title=Europee: Zaia, serve un'Europa forte e delle Regioni|website=www.liberoquotidiano.it}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=22 September 2017 |title=Zaia: "Noi come la CatalognaMi farei anche arrestare" |url=https://corrieredelveneto.corriere.it/veneto/cronaca/17_settembre_22/noi-come-catalognaandremo-fino-fondomi-farei-anche-arrestare-1b08e6cc-9f5f-11e7-8953-3e421c8e7b9d.shtml}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=10 October 2023 |title=Zaia: "Risorse Ue sono soldi anche nostri, vanno spesi bene" |url=https://www.eunews.it/2023/10/10/zaia-risorse-ue-sono-soldi-anche-nostri}}</ref> |
|||
The current EU treaties do not contain any provisions for secessionist scenarios but it is expected that if a seceding province/country re-applied for EU membership, admission would need to be approved unanimously by existing members.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/oct/24/scotland-eu-membership-spain?CMP=twt_gu |title='Join the queue' for EU membership, Spain tells Alex Salmond |work=The Guardian |publisher=Guardian News and Media |date=24 October 2012 |accessdate=24 October 2012 |first1=Giles |last1=Tremlett |first2=Severin |last2=Carrell |location=London}}</ref> |
|||
==Member state expansion scenarios== |
|||
===Precedents=== |
|||
===Cyprus=== |
|||
There are no precedents for a region seceding from an existing member state becoming a separate member state of the EU, though some areas have left the EU/EEC for autonomy or full independence without desiring to rejoin. |
|||
{{Further|European Union–Northern Cyprus relations}} |
|||
[[File:EU and TRNC.svg|thumb|Area shown in orange under control of [[Northern Cyprus]]]] |
|||
Officially, the [[island country|island nation]] of [[Cyprus]] is part of the European Union, under the [[de jure]] sovereignty of the [[Republic of Cyprus]]. [[Turkish Cypriots]] are citizens of the Republic of Cyprus and thus of the European Union, and were entitled to vote in the [[2004 European Parliament election]] (though only a few hundred registered). The EU's ''[[acquis communautaire]]'' is suspended indefinitely in the northern third of the island, which has remained outside the control of the Republic of Cyprus since the [[Turkish invasion of Cyprus|Turkish invasion of 1974]]. The [[Greek Cypriots|Greek Cypriot]] community rejected the [[Annan Plan for Cyprus|Annan Plan]] for the settlement of the [[Cyprus dispute]] in a [[2004 Annan Plan Referendum|referendum]] on 24 April 2004. Had the referendum been in favour of the settlement proposal, the island (excluding the British [[Sovereign Base Areas]]) would have joined the European Union as the ''United Cyprus Republic''. The European Union's relations with the ''Turkish Cypriot Community'' are handled by the [[European Commission]]'s [[Directorate-General for Enlargement (European Commission)|Directorate-General for Enlargement]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=3 January 2007 |title=Turkish Cypriot community |url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/turkish_cypriot_community/index_en.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101210081344/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/turkish_cypriot_community/index_en.htm |archive-date=10 December 2010 |website=European Commission — Directorate-General for Enlargement}}</ref> |
|||
===Ireland=== |
|||
Algeria is the only region or territory of an existing member state to leave the EU/EEC upon becoming an independent state. Prior to 1962, it was an overseas department of France, an outermost region in EEC terminology,<ref>{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=1peIxEyy1o0C&pg=PA22&lpg=PA22&dq=%22french+union%22+international+law&source=bl&ots=gShCsS3fCj&sig=jgF_j8FCyfc86ffAimSexDw8WNI&hl=es&sa=X&ei=gvryUbC-MYPO9ASC_IGoBw&ved=0CEUQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22french%20union%22%20international%20law&f=false |title=Associated Statehood in International Law - Masahiro Igarashi - Google Libros |publisher=Books.google.com |date=1946-05-19 |accessdate=2013-09-16|pages=19–20}}</ref> and has not attempted to join the [[European Economic Community|EEC]]/EU after independence. |
|||
{{Further|United Ireland}} |
|||
The [[European Council]] has recognised that following the [[Brexit|UK withdrawal from the EU]], if [[Northern Ireland]] were to be incorporated into a [[united Ireland]] it would automatically rejoin the EU under the current Irish membership. A historical precedent for this was the incorporation of [[East Germany]] into the [[Federal Republic of Germany]] as a single European Communities member state.<ref>{{Cite web |date=1 May 2017 |title=Outcome of the special European Council (Article 50) meeting of 29 April 2017 |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2017/603226/EPRS_ATA%282017%29603226_EN.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181228040144/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2017/603226/EPRS_ATA(2017)603226_EN.pdf |archive-date=28 December 2018 |access-date=26 December 2017 |website=European Parliament}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Rankin |first=Jennifer |date=28 April 2017 |title=Europe could allow a united Ireland to join EU after Brexit |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/27/eu-to-debate-recognising-united-ireland-to-allow-swift-return-for-north |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812075200/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/27/eu-to-debate-recognising-united-ireland-to-allow-swift-return-for-north |archive-date=12 August 2020 |access-date=23 July 2020 |work=The Guardian}}</ref> |
|||
===Romania=== |
|||
[[Greenlandic European Economic Community membership referendum, 1982|Greenland voted to leave the EEC]] (the predecessor to the EU) after gaining greater autonomy from [[Denmark]] in 1982. However, the similarity between this and other proposed scenarios is disputed.<ref>Happold, Matthew (1999) [http://www.cer.org.uk/pdf/cerwp2.pdf Scotland Europa: independence in Europe?], [[Centre for European Reform]]. Retrieved 14 June 2010 (PDF)</ref> |
|||
{{Further|Unification of Moldova and Romania}} |
|||
Opinion polls in both [[Moldova]] and [[Romania]] show significant support for the unification of the two countries, based on their reciprocal historical and cultural ties.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Nescutu |first=Madalin |date=7 April 2021 |title=Numărul unioniștilor, în creștere accelerată în Moldova: cel mai recent sondaj arată că 44% dintre ei vor unirea cu România |trans-title=The number of unionists, growing rapidly in Moldova: the latest poll shows that 44% of them want union with Romania |url=https://www.g4media.ro/numarul-unionistilor-in-crestere-accelerata-in-moldova-cel-mai-recent-sondaj-arata-ca-44-dintre-ei-vor-unirea-cu-romania.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506175041/https://www.g4media.ro/numarul-unionistilor-in-crestere-accelerata-in-moldova-cel-mai-recent-sondaj-arata-ca-44-dintre-ei-vor-unirea-cu-romania.html |archive-date=6 May 2021 |access-date=6 July 2021 |website=g4media.ro |language=ro-RO}}</ref><ref name="gisreportsonline.com">{{Cite web |date=5 September 2023 |title=Romania-Moldova reunification: Three scenarios |url=https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/romania-moldova-reunification/}}</ref> Such a scenario would result in Moldova becoming part of an enlarged Romania and therefore receiving the benefits and obligations of the latter's EU membership.<ref>{{Cite web |date=5 March 2015 |title=A union between Moldova and Romania: On the cards? |url=https://euobserver.com/beyond-brussels/127824 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108190246/https://euobserver.com/beyond-brussels/127824 |archive-date=8 November 2020 |website=EUObserver}}</ref> An obstacle would be the existence of the breakaway [[Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic]] (Transnistria), which is considered by Moldova and most of the international community to be ''de jure'' part of Moldova's sovereign territory but is ''de facto'' independent. Transnistria's absence of strong historical or cultural links to Romania and its close political and military relationship with Russia have been seen as major hurdles to integration of the region with both Romania and the EU.<ref name="gisreportsonline.com"/> Another likely barrier from within Moldova would be opposition on the part of the autonomous territory of [[Gagauzia]], whose population has been mostly against integration with Romania since at least the 1990s.<ref>{{Cite web |date=27 July 2023 |title=Moldova and Romania: A Long and Complicated Relationship | Origins |url=https://origins.osu.edu/read/moldova-and-romania-long-and-complicated-relationship?language_content_entity=en}}</ref> A 2014 referendum held by the Gagauzian government showed both overwhelming support for the region joining the [[Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union]] and a similar level of rejection to closer ties with the EU.<ref>{{Cite news |date=4 February 2014 |title=Gagauzia Voters Choose Russia over EU |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/moldova-gagauz-referendum-counting/25251251.html |work=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty}}</ref> |
|||
==Possible incorporation of special member state territories== |
|||
[[Saint Barthélemy]] left the EU in 2012. This change in status (from "overseas countries and territories" to "outer-most regions") was made possible by a provision of the Lisbon Treaty which allows the [[European Council]] to change the EU status of a Danish, Dutch or French territory on the initiative of the member state concerned.{{#tag:ref|The relevant decision of the European Council was made on 29 October 2010|group=Footnote}}<ref>{{cite web|title=Official Journal of the European Union|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:FULL:EN:PDF|publisher=http://eur-lex.europa.eu|accessdate=16 September 2013|location=Article 355(6)|page=83|format=PDF|date=March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=DECISIONS|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:325:0004:0005:EN:PDF|publisher=http://eur-lex.europa.eu|accessdate=16 September 2013|format=PDF}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Special member state territories and the European Union.svg|thumb|{{Legend|#003399|European Union}}{{Legend|#3366CC|Outermost regions}}{{Legend|#33CC33|Overseas countries and territories}}{{Legend|#8E00B4|Special cases}}{{Legend|#CC3333|Other special territories}}]]<!-- [[File:EU special territories (en).svg|thumb|400px|'''Map of European Union in the world''' {{Legend|#000a9f|European Union}} {{Legend|#000eff|Outermost regions}} {{Legend|#078002|Overseas countries and territories}}]] --> |
|||
There are multiple [[special member state territories and their relations with the EU|special member state territories]], some of which are not fully covered by the EU treaties and apply EU law only partially, if at all. It is possible for a dependency to change its status regarding the EU or some particular treaty or law provision. The territory may change its status from participation to leaving or from being outside to joining. |
|||
===Possible future scenarios=== |
|||
====Scotland==== |
|||
{{Further|Scottish independence referendum, 2014}} |
|||
During the campaigns around the [[Scottish independence referendum, 2014|2014 independence referendum in Scotland]], there was debate over what would happen to an independent Scotland's EU membership. The Scottish Government, leading the [[Yes Scotland|campaign for independence]], claims that Scotland could continue its membership of the EU after an expedited period of negotiations, and inherit the UK's opt-outs of the [[euro]] and the [[Schengen Agreement]] because of the [[Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties]] (VCSS), adopted 1978.<ref name="Borgen CJ 2010">Borgen CJ (2010), "From Kosovo to Catalonia: separatism and integration in Europe". ''Goettingen Journal of International Law'', '''2''', 997-1033.</ref><ref>"Choosing Scotland's future: a national conversation: independence and responsibility in the modern world", Scottish Government, 2007, paragraph 3.19</ref><ref>"Independence in Europe dossier", Scottish National Party press office, 28 May 1999</ref> However, some commentators and academic analyses have rejected this claim.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/oct/23/alex-salmond-eu-legal-advice-scotland|title= Alex Salmond accused of misleading Scottish voters about EU legal advice|first=Severin|last=Carrell|publisher=The Guardian|date=23 October 2012|location=London}}</ref><ref>Furby, Daniel (2012) ''In Depth: Scottish Independence and EU Accession'', Business For Europe</ref><ref name="docstoc.com">James S (2008), "EU Reactions to Kosovo's Independence: The Lessons for Scotland." UCL Constitution Unit. [http://www.docstoc.com/docs/39433019/EU-Reactions-to-Kosovos-Independence-The-Lessons-for-Scotland Web]</ref> |
|||
===Danish self-governing territories=== |
|||
Borgen (2010) argues that the case based on the VCSS is "difficult to sustain."<ref name="Borgen CJ 2010"/> Murkens (2002) and Borgen (2010) point out that the VCSS is not applied if it would be (quoting the original convention) "incompatible with [the] object and purpose of the treaty or would radically change the conditions of its operations", which would be the case with the [[Treaty of Rome]] as a new member state would require voting rights in the Council of Ministers and seats in the European Parliament, ''etc.''<ref name="Borgen CJ 2010"/><ref>Murkens JE (2002), ''Scottish independence: A practical guide'', Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press</ref> The VCSS is also only ratified by twenty-two parties and not by most of the EU states.<ref name="Borgen CJ 2010"/> James (2008) argues that, in addition to these points, whatever the legal argument, the [[realpolitik]] of the situation is such that it would be difficult for a newly independent Scotland "to force its way into the European Union against the wishes of a sizeable number of its members [...]. This is more a matter of power politics than law".<ref name="docstoc.com"/> |
|||
====Faroe Islands==== |
|||
{{Main|Faroe Islands and the European Union}} |
|||
The [[Faroe Islands]], a self-governing nation within the [[Kingdom of Denmark]], is not part of the EU, as explicitly asserted by both Rome treaties.<ref>{{Cite web |date=1 January 2004 |title=Treaty establishing the European community, last revision from Nice 2001, Art.299(6)a |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131116105433/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html |archive-date=16 November 2013 |access-date=7 January 2011 |website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> The relations with the EU are governed by a Fisheries Agreement (1977) and a [[Free Trade Agreement]] (1991, revised 1998). The main reason for remaining outside the EU is disagreements about the [[Common Fisheries Policy]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Spongenberg |first=Helena |date=4 May 2006 |title=Fish keep Faroe Islands at a distance from EU |url=http://euobserver.com/9/21516 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605073827/http://euobserver.com/9/21516 |archive-date=5 June 2011 |access-date=21 November 2019 |website=EUobserver.com}}</ref> which disfavours countries with large fish resources. Also, every member has to pay for the [[Common Agricultural Policy]], which favours countries having much agriculture which the Faroe Islands does not. When Iceland was in membership negotiations around 2010, there was a hope of better conditions for fish-rich countries{{Citation needed|date=March 2022}}, but to no avail. The Common Fisheries Policy was introduced in 1970 for the very reason of getting access for the first EC members to waters of candidate countries, namely the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Denmark including the Faroe Islands{{Citation needed|date=March 2022}}. |
|||
Nevertheless, there are politicians, mainly in the right-wing [[Union Party (Faroe Islands)|Union Party]] (''Sambandsflokkurin''), led by their chairman [[Kaj Leo Johannesen]], who would like to see the Faroes as a member of the EU. However, the chairman of the left-wing [[Republic (Faroe Islands)|Republic]] (''Tjóðveldi''), [[Høgni Hoydal]], has expressed concerns that if the Faroes were to join the EU as is, they might vanish inside the EU, comparing this with the situation of the [[Shetland Islands]] and [[Åland]] today, and wants the local government to solve the political situation between the Faroes and Denmark first.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Portal.fo |url=http://www.portal.fo/sub_page/grein_pdf.php?ide=46055 |access-date=7 January 2011 |language=fo}}{{Dead link |date=May 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> |
|||
Since then, a number of legal experts and politicians have voiced their opinion on either side of the divide. [[Graham Avery]], [[David Scheffer]], [[Lucinda Creighton]], and [[James Crawford (professor)|James Crawford]] are among those who agree that Scotland would be able to negotiate its continued EU membership by the Scottish Government's planned date of independence in 2016.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.yesscotland.net/legal_expert_says_independent_scotland_would_be_equal_member_of_eu|title=International law expert: 'Independent Scotland would be equal member of EU'|date=2013-01-19|accessdate=2012-03-18}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.snp.org/blog/post/2013/feb/legal-opinion-own-goal-uk-government|title=Legal opinion - an own goal for UK government|date=2013-02-11|accessdate=2013-02-18}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scotreferendum.com/2013/01/26/irelands-minister-for-european-affairs/|title=Ireland’s Minister for European Affairs|publisher=Scottish Government|date=2013-01-26|accessdate=2013-02-02}}</ref> However, Avery also contradicted Salmond's claims that an independent Scotland would not have to sign up to the euro and the [[Schengen Agreement]].<ref name="guardian.co.uk">[http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/nov/01/alex-salmond-scotland-eu-membership Westminster rejects Alex Salmond claim on Scotland's EU membership], by Severin Carrell, ''The Guardian'', 1 November 2012</ref> The UK Government, citing individuals including [[José Manuel Barroso]], president of the European Commission, said that "the remainder of the UK would continue to exercise the UK's existing international rights and obligations and Scotland would form a new state".<ref name="guardian.co.uk"/> In response, the Deputy First Minister for Scotland, the SNP's [[Nicola Sturgeon]], said that the SNP government did not agree an independent Scotland would have to reapply for EU membership.<ref name="bbc.co.uk"/> |
|||
====Greenland==== |
|||
Former European Court judge, Professor Sir David Edward, argued in a December 2012 paper <ref>{{cite web|title=David Edward: Scotland and the European Union|url=http://www.scottishconstitutionalfutures.org/OpinionandAnalysis/ViewBlogPost/tabid/1767/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/852/David-Edward-Scotland-and-the-European-Union.aspx|publisher=http://www.scottishconstitutionalfutures.org|accessdate=16 September 2013}}</ref> that both Barroso and the SNP were incorrect. Given the situation would be unprecedented and the absence of any express provision in existing EU treaties on how to handle the situation, he stressed the "obligations of good faith, sincere cooperation and solidarity" in the EU treaties, arguing that lengthy negotiations would have to take place but that these would do so prior to the date of independence and that they would lead to a treaty amendment rather than an accession treaty.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20757450 |title=BBC News - Scottish independence: Sir David Edward says Jose Manuel Barroso 'wrong' on EU |publisher=Bbc.co.uk |date=2012-12-17 |accessdate=2013-03-12}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Greenland and the European Union}} |
|||
[[Greenland]] is part of the [[Kingdom of Denmark]], and became part of the EEC (the predecessor entity of the EU) when Denmark joined in 1973. After the establishment of Greenland's [[home rule]] in 1979, which made it an autonomous community, Greenland held a referendum on EEC membership. The result was (mainly because of the [[Common Fisheries Policy]]) to leave, so on 1 February 1985, [[Greenland]] left the [[European Economic Community|EEC]] and [[EURATOM]]. Its status was changed to that of an Overseas Country.<ref name="ReferenceB">{{Cite web |date=22 June 2016 |title=Greenland's exit warning to Britain |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/greenland-exit-warning-to-britain-brexit-eu-referendum-europe-vote-news-denmark |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018153048/https://www.politico.eu/article/greenland-exit-warning-to-britain-brexit-eu-referendum-europe-vote-news-denmark |archive-date=18 October 2019 |access-date=18 October 2019 |website=Polotico.eu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |date=1 February 1985 |title=Legislation (Greenland) |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:1985:029:FULL&from=EL |url-status=live |journal=Official Journal of the European Communities |volume=28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201211102030/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:1985:029:FULL&from=EL |archive-date=11 December 2020 |access-date=27 December 2020}}</ref> Danish nationals residing in Greenland (i.e. all native population) are nonetheless fully European citizens; they are not, however, entitled to vote in European elections. |
|||
There has been some speculation as to whether Greenland may consider rejoining the now-European Union. On 4 January 2007, the Danish daily [[Jyllands-Posten]] quoted the former Danish [[minister for Greenland]], [[Tom Høyem]], as saying "I would not be surprised if Greenland again becomes a member of the EU... The EU needs the [[Arctic window]] and Greenland cannot alone manage the gigantic Arctic possibilities".<ref>{{Cite news |date=5 January 2007 |title=Greenland could re-join the EU |url=http://euobserver.com/844/23194?rss_rk=1 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080120191436/http://euobserver.com/844/23194?rss_rk=1 |archive-date=20 January 2008 |access-date=25 June 2007 |work=EUobserver Review}}</ref> Greenland has a lot of natural resources, and Greenland has, especially during the [[2000s commodities boom]], contracted foreign private companies to exploit some of them, but the cost is considered too high, as Greenland is remote and severely lacks infrastructure which has to be built. After 2013 prices declined so such efforts stalled. |
|||
Roland Vaubel, a member of the Advisory Council to the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, published a paper in May 2013 titled ''The Political Economy of Secession in the European Union'', which stated that Scotland would remain a member of the European Union upon independence. The paper suggested that there would need to be a negotiation between the Scottish Government and the British Government on "how they wished to share the rights and obligations of the predecessor state". Vaubel also stated that Barroso's comments on the status of Scotland after independence "has no basis in the European treaties".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/adviser-to-german-government-indy-scotland-would-still-be-in-europe.20948699|title=Adviser to German government: 'indy Scotland would still be in Europe'|date=12 May 2013|accessdate=14 May 2013}}</ref> |
|||
The Brexit debate has reignited talk about the EU in Greenland with calls for the island to join the Union again.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Baume |first=Maïa de La |date=22 June 2016 |title=Greenland's exit warning to Britain |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/greenland-exit-warning-to-britain-brexit-eu-referendum-europe-vote-news-denmark |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018153048/https://www.politico.eu/article/greenland-exit-warning-to-britain-brexit-eu-referendum-europe-vote-news-denmark |archive-date=18 October 2019 |access-date=18 October 2019 |website=politico.eu}}</ref> |
|||
Professor Lars Bo Kaspersen, Head of Political Science at the [[University of Copenhagen]], said that he believed independence "could be a fairly quick transition". He continued: "I'm sure that the European Union in general would strongly support Scottish membership and the same goes for NATO. I can’t think of anyone who wouldn't think it was a good idea."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://nationalcollective.com/2013/07/10/exclusive-scottish-eu-membership-straightforward-and-in-denmarks-interest/|title=Exclusive: ‘Scottish EU Membership Straightforward and in Denmark’s Interest’|date=10 July 2013|accessdate=10 July 2013}}</ref> |
|||
===Dutch Caribbean territories=== |
|||
In November 2013, the Spanish Prime Minister, [[Mariano Rajoy]], stated that an independent Scotland's entry to the EU would require the consent of all the existing members and that an independent Scotland or other regions gaining independence would end up outside of the EU.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10479461/Spanish-PM-Independent-Scotland-would-be-out-of-the-EU.html |title=Spanish PM: Independent Scotland would be out of the EU |publisher=Telegraph |accessdate=2013-12-09 |location=London |first=Simon |last=Johnson |date=27 November 2013}}</ref> |
|||
The islands of [[Aruba]] and [[Curaçao]], as well as [[Sint Maarten]], are constituent countries of the [[Kingdom of the Netherlands]], while [[Bonaire]], [[Sint Eustatius]] and [[Saba (island)|Saba]] are [[BES islands|special Dutch municipalities]]. All are [[Overseas Countries and Territories]] (OCT) under Annex II of the EC treaty.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> OCTs are considered to be "associated" with the EU and apply some portions of EU law. The islands are opting to become an [[Outermost regions|Outermost Region]] (OMR) of the EU, a status in which the islands form a part of the European Union, though they benefit from [[derogation]]s (exceptions) from some EU laws due to their geographical remoteness from mainland Europe. The islands are focusing on gaining the same status as the [[Azores]], [[Madeira]], the [[Canary Islands]], and the [[French overseas departments]]. |
|||
When Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba were established as Dutch public bodies after the [[dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles]] (which was an OCT) in 2010, their status within the EU was raised. Rather than change their status from an OCT to an outermost region, as their change in status within the Netherlands would imply, it was decided that their status would remain the same for at least five years. After those five years, their status would be reviewed.{{Update inline|date=January 2021}} |
|||
The referendum rejected independence, leaving the matter theoretical. |
|||
If it was decided that if one or all of the islands wish to integrate more with the EU then the [[Treaty of Lisbon]] provides for that following a unanimous decision from the [[European Council]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Treaty of Lisbon Article 2, point 293 |url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/cg00014.en07.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171025165313/http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/cg00014.en07.pdf |archive-date=25 October 2017 |access-date=2 June 2008}}</ref> Former [[European Commissioner for Enlargement]] [[Danuta Hübner]] has said before the [[European Parliament]] that she does not expect many problems to occur with such a status change, as the population of the islands is only a few thousand people.{{Citation needed|date=September 2018}} |
|||
====Catalonia==== |
|||
{{Further|Catalan self-determination referendum, 2014}} |
|||
===French overseas departments and collectivities=== |
|||
Since the announcement by the Catalan Prime-Minister [[Artur Mas]] in December 2012 that a referendum would be held on Catalan independence, different scenarios regarding the status of Catalonia in the European Union have been proposed. Similar to the situation with the Scottish referendum, the executive has argued that Catalonia will be a successor state to the Kingdom of Spain and hence would automatically continue as a member of the European Union. The Spanish Prime-Minister [[Mariano Rajoy]] argues that Catalonia would need to re-apply for admission to the EU. On a European level, Spanish EU Commissioner [[Joaquin Almunia]] said in 2013 that Catalonia would have to apply for EU membership in the event of secession from Spain.<ref>{{cite news|last=Nikolaj|first=Nielsen|title=EU commission: Catalonia must leave EU if it leaves Spain|url=http://euobserver.com/enlargement/121466|accessdate=19 September 2013|newspaper=EUObserver.com|date=17 September 2013}}</ref> A similar position was expressed by the European Commission President [[Manuel Barroso]]. |
|||
The territories of [[French Guiana]], [[Guadeloupe]], [[Martinique]], [[Mayotte]] and [[Réunion]] are ''[[overseas department]]s'' of France and at the same time mono-departmental ''overseas regions''. According to the EC treaty (article 299 2), all of these departments are ''[[outermost regions]]'' (OMR) of the EU—hence provisions of the EC treaty apply there while derogations are allowed. The status of the [[Overseas collectivity]] of [[Collectivity of Saint Martin|Saint-Martin]] is also defined as OMR by the [[Treaty of Lisbon]]. [[New Caledonia]] and the overseas collectivities of [[French Polynesia]], [[Saint-Barthelemy]], [[Saint Pierre and Miquelon]], and [[Wallis and Futuna]] are [[Overseas Countries and Territories]] of the EU.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> |
|||
==== |
====New Caledonia==== |
||
[[New Caledonia]] is an [[Overseas France|overseas part]] of France with its own unique status under the French Constitution, which is distinct from that of overseas departments and collectivities. It is defined as an "[[overseas country of France]]" under the 1998 [[Nouméa Accord]], and enjoys a high degree of self-government.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Countries - Pacific - New Caledonia - Information Paper - NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |url=http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Countries/Pacific/New-Caledonia.php |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130128203127/http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Countries/Pacific/New-Caledonia.php |archive-date=28 January 2013 |access-date=9 December 2013 |website=mfat.govt.nz}}</ref> Currently, in regard to the EU, it is one of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT). |
|||
In case of a Flemish secession from Belgium, the future status of [[Brussels]] (the [[Brussels and the European Union|''de facto'' capital of the EU]]) could be unclear. There are proposals for Brussels to stay part of the remnant-Belgium, to become an EU [[Capital districts and territories|capital district]] (such as [[Canberra]], [[Washington, D.C.]], [[Brazilian Federal District|Brasília]] and [[Mexican Federal District|Mexico City]]), a member state with heavy involvement and subsidy from the EU or to be part of an independent Flanders.<ref name="uclouvain">{{cite web|last=Van Parijs|first=Philippe|title=Brussels after Belgium: fringe town or city state ? |date=4 October 2007|publisher=The Bulletin|url=http://www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/etes/documents/2007zp.Brussels_Bulletin.final.pdf|format=PDF|accessdate=29 November 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Feki|first=Donya|title=Jean Quatremer: a nation has been born—Flanders|date=29 November 2007|publisher=Café Babel|url=http://www.cafebabel.co.uk/article/23093/jean-quatremer-a-nation-has-been-born-flanders.html|accessdate=29 November 2007}}</ref> |
|||
As a result of the [[Nouméa Accord]], New Caledonians voted in three consecutive independence referendums in [[2018 New Caledonian independence referendum|2018]], [[2020 New Caledonian independence referendum|2020]], and [[2021 New Caledonian independence referendum|2021]]. The referendums were to determine whether the territory would remain a part of the French Republic as a "sui generis collectivity", or whether it would become an independent state. The accords also specify a gradual devolution of powers to the local New Caledonian assembly. The results of all three referendums determined that New Caledonia would remain a part of the French Republic. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Eastern Partnership]] |
|||
* [[Euronest Parliamentary Assembly]] |
|||
* [[European integration]] |
* [[European integration]] |
||
* [[EU Strategy for the South Caucasus]] |
|||
* [[Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance]], a funding mechanism for EU candidate countries |
|||
* [[Politics of Europe]] |
|||
* [[Treaty of Accession 1994]] |
|||
* [[Treaty of Accession 2003]] |
|||
* [[Treaty of Accession 2005]] |
|||
* [[Treaty of Accession 2011]] |
* [[Treaty of Accession 2011]] |
||
* [[Withdrawal from the European Union# |
* [[Withdrawal from the European Union#Withdrawals|Withdrawal from the European Union]] |
||
== Notes == |
|||
{{European Union candidates|state=expanded}} |
|||
{{Notelist}} |
|||
==References== |
|||
==Notes and references== |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
== Further reading == |
|||
===Footnotes=== |
|||
{{Reflist|group=Footnote}} |
|||
* {{Cite web |date=16 September 2014 |title=Ukraine ratifies EU association agreement |url=http://www.dw.de/ukraine-ratifies-eu-association-agreement/a-17925681 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150317063405/http://www.dw.de/ukraine-ratifies-eu-association-agreement/a-17925681 |archive-date=17 March 2015 |access-date=27 December 2020 |website=Deutsche Welle}} |
|||
===References=== |
|||
* {{Cite web |date=17 July 2014 |title=European Parliament resolution of 17 July 2014 on Ukraine (2014/2717(RSP)) |url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160124035423/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2014-0009 |archive-date=24 January 2016 |access-date=20 July 2015 |website=European Parliament |quote=pursuant to Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine – like any other European state - have a European perspective and may apply to become members of the Union provided that they adhere to the principles of democracy, respect fundamental freedoms and human and minority rights and ensure the rule of law;}} |
|||
{{Reflist|30em |
|||
|refs= |
|||
<ref name="DW 16.09.2014">[http://www.dw.de/ukraine-ratifies-eu-association-agreement/a-17925681 Ukraine ratifies EU association agreement]. [[Deutsche Welle]]. 16 September 2014.</ref> |
|||
<ref name="Reuters Sep 25, 2014">Richard Balmforth and Natalia Zinets. [http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/09/25/uk-ukraine-crisis-president-idUKKCN0HK0OE20140925 Ukraine president sets 2020 as EU target date, defends peace plan]. [[Reuters]]. 25 September 2014.</ref> |
|||
<ref name="AHiggins">{{cite news|last1=Higgins|first1=Andrew|last2=Herszenhorn|first2=David|title=Ukraine Signs Trade Agreement With European Union|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/28/world/europe/ukraine-signs-trade-agreement-with-european-union.html|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=27 June 2014|accessdate=27 June 2014}}</ref> |
|||
}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* [https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-enlargement_en EU enlargement] – [[Europa (web portal)]] |
|||
{{Commons category|Enlargement of the European Union}} |
|||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070930204403/http://www.ena.lu/?lang=2&doc=20806 European Union Member States and applicant countries] – [[European NAvigator]] |
|||
*{{Official website|http://europa.eu/about-eu/countries/on-the-road-to-eu-membership/index_en.htm}} |
|||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Bahhouth |first1=Victor |last2=Ziemnowicz |first2=Christopher |date=6 March 2018 |title=Meeting the Global Challenges of Doing Business in the Five Candidate Countries on the Road to Join the European Union |journal=Journal of the Knowledge Economy |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=1297–1318 |doi=10.1007/s13132-018-0531-3 |s2cid=158074120}} |
|||
*[http://europa.eu/pol/enlarg/index_en.htm Enlargement] – [[Europa (web portal)|Europa]] |
|||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Dimitrijevic |first1=Vojin |last2=Hartmann |first2=Florence |last3=Jovic |first3=Dejan |last4=Memisevic |first4=Tija |date=June 2009 |title=War crimes, conditionality and EU integration in the Western Balkans |url=http://www.iss.europa.eu/nc/actualites/actualite/article/war-crimes-conditionality-and-eu-integration-in-the-western-balkans |url-status=dead |journal=Chaillot Papers |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091223124202/http://www.iss.europa.eu/nc/actualites/actualite/article/war-crimes-conditionality-and-eu-integration-in-the-western-balkans |archive-date=2009-12-23 |number=116 |editor-first1=Judy |editor-last1=Batt |editor-first2=Jelena |editor-last2=Obradović}} |
|||
*[http://www.ena.lu?lang=2&doc=20806 European Union Member States and applicant countries] – [[European NAvigator]] |
|||
*[http://www.iss.europa.eu/nc/actualites/actualite/article/war-crimes-conditionality-and-eu-integration-in-the-western-balkans/ War crimes, conditionality and EU integration in the Western Balkans], by Vojin Dimitrijevic, Florence Hartmann, Dejan Jovic, Tija Memisevic, edited by Judy Batt, Jelena Obradović, Chaillot Paper No. 116, June 2009, [[European Union Institute for Security Studies]] |
|||
{{EU countries and candidates}} |
{{EU countries and candidates}} |
||
{{European Union topics}} |
{{European Union topics}} |
||
{{ |
{{Portal bar|European Union| Europe}} |
||
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2012}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Future Enlargement Of The European Union}} |
|||
[[Category:Enlargement of the European Union]] |
[[Category:Enlargement of the European Union]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Lists of proposals|European Union]] |
||
[[Category:Public policy proposals]] |
|||
[[Category:European integration]] |
Latest revision as of 15:13, 1 December 2024
This article is part of a series on |
European Union portal |
There are currently nine states recognized as candidates for membership of the European Union: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey, and Ukraine.[1] Kosovo (the independence of which is not recognised by five EU member states) formally submitted its application for membership in 2022 and is considered a potential candidate by the European Union. Due to multiple factors, talks with Turkey are at an effective standstill since December 2016.[2]
Six candidates are currently engaged in active negotiations: Montenegro (since 2012), Serbia (since 2014), Albania (since 2020), North Macedonia (since 2020), Moldova and Ukraine (since 2024). The most advanced stage of the negotiations, defined as meeting the interim benchmarks for negotiation chapter 23 and 24 which allow the closing process of all negotiation chapters to start, has so far only been reached by Montenegro.[3] Montenegro's declared political goal is to achieve membership of the EU by 2028.[4]
The accession criteria are included in the Copenhagen criteria, agreed in 1993, and the Treaty of Maastricht (Article 49). Article 49 of the Maastricht Treaty (as amended) says that any "European state" that respects the "principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law", may apply to join the EU. Whether a country is European or not is subject to political assessment by the EU institutions.[5] Past enlargement since the foundation of the European Union as the European Economic Community by the Inner Six states in 1958[6] brought total membership of the EU to twenty-eight, although as a result of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, the current number of EU member states is twenty-seven.
Of the four major western European countries that are not EU members, Norway, Switzerland and Iceland have submitted membership applications in the past but subsequently frozen or withdrawn them, while the United Kingdom is a former member. Norway, Switzerland, Iceland, as well as Liechtenstein, participate in the EU Single Market and also in the Schengen Area, which makes them closely aligned with the EU; none, however, are in the EU Customs Union.
Current agenda and applicants
[edit]The present enlargement agenda of the European Union regards three distinct groups of states:
- Western Balkans: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia
- Association Trio: Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine
- Turkey
These states must negotiate the terms of their EU accession with the current member states, and align their domestic legislation with EU law before joining.
There are other states in Europe that either seek membership or could potentially apply if their present foreign policy changes or the EU gives a signal that they might now be included on the enlargement agenda. However, these are not formally part of the current agenda, which is already delayed due to bilateral disputes in the Balkans and difficulty in fully implementing the acquis communautaire (the accepted body of EU law).
It was previously the norm for enlargements to see multiple entrants join the Union at once. The only previous enlargements of a single state were the 1981 admission of Greece and the 2013 admission of Croatia. However, the EU members have warned that, following the significant effect of the fifth enlargement in 2004, a more individual approach will be adopted in the future, although the entry of pairs or small groups of countries will most probably coincide.[7]
Procedure to become an EU member state
[edit]For an applicant to become a member state of the EU, several procedural steps need to get passed. These steps will move the status of the state from applicant (potential candidate) to candidate, and later again to a negotiating candidate. The status as a negotiating candidate is reached by the mutual signing of a negotiation framework at a first intergovernmental conference. The start of substantial negotiations with the EU, is subsequently marked by the opening of the first negotiating chapters at a second intergovernmental conference. Every 35 chapters of the accepted body of EU law (divided into 6 clusters) must be opened and closed during subsequent additional intergovernmental conferences, for a state to conclude the negotiations by the signing of an accession treaty.
After a reform in 2020, the 35 chapters have been divided into six main clusters, where all chapters of the first cluster are supposed to be opened together at the same time. The opening of chapters, can only happen by a unanimous decision by the Council of the European Union once the screening procedure has been completed for the specific chapters in concern (by a report outlining which legislative changes are needed), while there can also be set some "opening benchmarks" requiring a certain amount of legislative changes/implementation to be met even before the opening of the chapter. The closure of a chapter, is done provisionally by a unanimous decision by the Council of the European Union once the state demonstrates to have implemented and aligned their domestic legislation with the EU law, for each specific chapter in concern.
There are no requirement for completion of the screening procedure for all 35 negotiating chapters, before the start of the first and second intergovernmental conference.[8]
Western Balkans
[edit]The 2003 European Council summit in Thessaloniki set the integration of the Western Balkans as a priority of EU expansion.
Slovenia was the first former Yugoslav country to join the EU in 2004, followed by Croatia in 2013.
Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia have all been officially granted candidate status.[9][10] Kosovo, which is claimed by Serbia and not recognised by 5 EU states, applied on 14 December 2022 and is considered a potential candidate by the European Union.[11][12]
Serbia and Montenegro, the most advanced candidates in their negotiation processes with the EU, may join the EU sometime between 2025 and 2030.[13][14][15] Montenegro's declared political goal is to achieve membership of the EU by 2028.[4]
The European Council had endorsed starting negotiations with Albania and North Macedonia on 26 March 2020,[16] however, the negotiation process was blocked by Bulgaria for over two years.[17][a] In June 2022 French President Emmanuel Macron submitted a compromise proposal which, if adopted by both countries, would pave the way for the immediate adoption of negotiating frameworks for North Macedonia and Albania by the EU Council and for the organization of intergovernmental conferences with them.[18] On 24 June 2022, Bulgaria's parliament approved the revised French proposal to lift the country's veto on opening EU accession talks with North Macedonia, with the Assembly of North Macedonia also doing so on 16 July 2022 allowing accession negotiations to begin. On the same day, the start of negotiations was set for 19 July 2022.[19]
On 8 November 2023, the European Commission adopted a new Growth Plan for the Western Balkans, with the aim of bringing them closer to the EU through offering some of the benefits of EU membership to the region in advance of accession. The Growth Plan provides €6 billion financial grants and loans for the entire region in return of implementation of structural reforms. Beside the core financial support of the growth plan, one of the additional embedded priority actions is granting access to the Single Euro Payments Area.[20]
On 8 November 2023, the European Commission recommended opening negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina once the necessary degree of compliance with the membership criteria is achieved.[21] On 12 March 2024, the European Commission recommended opening EU membership negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina, citing the positive results from important reforms the country enacted.[22][23][24] On 21 March 2024, all 27 EU leaders, representing the European Council, gathered for a summit in Brussels, where they unanimously approved opening EU membership negotiations for Bosnia and Herzegovina.[25][26]
Association Trio
[edit]In 2005, the European Commission suggested in a strategy paper that the present enlargement agenda could potentially block the possibility of a future accession of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine.[27] Olli Rehn, the European Commissioner for Enlargement between 2004 and 2010, said on the occasion that the EU should "avoid overstretching our capacity, and instead consolidate our enlargement agenda," adding, "this is already a challenging agenda for our accession process."[28]
Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine ratified an Association Agreement with the EU, and the European Parliament passed a resolution in 2014 stating that "in accordance with Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine, as well as any other European country, have a European perspective, can apply for EU membership in compliance with the principles of democracy, respect for fundamental freedoms and human rights, minority rights and ensuring the rule of rights."[29] They also entered the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area with the EU, which creates "framework for modernising [...] trade relations and for economic development by the opening of markets via the progressive removal of customs tariffs and quotas, and by an extensive harmonisation of laws, norms and regulations in various trade-related sectors, creating the conditions for aligning key sectors" of their economies with EU standards.[30] However, the EU did not expand further into the post-Soviet space in the 2010s.[31]
By January 2021, Georgia and Ukraine were preparing to formally apply for EU membership in 2024.[32][33][34] However, following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Ukraine submitted an application for EU membership on 28 February 2022, followed by Georgia and Moldova on 3 March 2022.[35][36] On 23 June 2022, the European Council granted candidate status to Moldova and Ukraine, and recognized Georgia as a potential candidate for membership.[37] When taking its candidacy decision for Ukraine and Moldova, the Council made opening the accession negotiations conditional to addressing respectively seven and nine key areas related to strengthening the rule of law, fighting corruption and improving governance processes.
In his speech in Moldova on 28 March 2023, President of the European Council Charles Michel mentioned that "by the end of the year, the Council will have to decide on the opening negotiations with [Ukraine and Moldova]. It will be a political decision taking into account the report that will be published by the Commission. And I sincerely hope that a positive decision will be possible by the end of the year".[38]
On 8 November 2023, the European Commission recommended opening negotiations with Moldova and Ukraine, and granting candidate status to Georgia,[21] and this was agreed by the European Council on 14 December 2023.[39]
On 25 June 2024, the first Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) was called by the Belgian Presidency of the Council of the EU, officially marking the start of the accession negotiations with Moldova and Ukraine.[40]
The Association Trio is sometimes expanded to the Trio + 1 with the inclusion of Armenia, which is not formally on the EU's enlargement agenda but is considering submitting an application for membership.
On 9 July 2024, following the adoption of a law by Georgia's ruling Georgian Dream party requiring non-governmental and media entities to register as "foreign agents", the EU ambassador in Georgia announced that it had suspended the country's accession to the bloc.[41][42] The European Union has threatened Georgia with sanctions and suspension of relations if the country becomes a "one-party state" without political opposition following parliamentary elections in October 2024.[43] The EU later stopped financial aid. In November, the European parliament voted that the results of the October Georgian parliamentary election should not be recognised. Following this, Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze stated that ascension negotiations were suspended until 2028.[44] However, Kobakhidze insisted that his government would continue to implement the reforms required for accession and that it still planned for Georgia to join the EU by 2030.[45]
Turkey
[edit]Turkey's candidacy to join the EU has been a matter of major significance and considerable controversy since it was granted in 1999. Turkey has had historically close ties with the EU, having an association agreement since 1964,[46] being in a customs union with the EU since 1995 and initially applying to join in 1987. Only after a summit in Brussels on 17 December 2004 (following the major 2004 enlargement) did the European Council announce that membership negotiations with Turkey were officially opened on 3 October 2005.
Turkey is the eleventh largest economy in the world (measured as Purchasing Power Parity), and is a key regional power.[47][48] In 2006, Carl Bildt, former Swedish foreign minister, stated that "[The accession of Turkey] would give the EU a decisive role for stability in the Eastern part of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, which is clearly in the strategic interest of Europe."[49] However, others, such as former French President Nicolas Sarkozy and former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, expressed opposition to Turkey's membership. Opponents argue that Turkey does not respect the key principles that are expected in a liberal democracy, such as the freedom of expression.[50]
Turkey's large population would also alter the balance of power in the representative European institutions. Upon joining the EU, Turkey's 84 million inhabitants would bestow it the largest number of MEPs in the European Parliament. It would become the most populous country in the EU.[51] Another problem is that Turkey does not recognise one EU member state, Cyprus, because of the Cyprus problem and the Cypriot government blocks some chapters of Turkey's talks.[52][53]
Turkey's relations with the EU have seriously deteriorated in the aftermath of the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt and subsequent purges.[52][53] On 26 July 2016, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker announced that Turkey's EU membership process would come to an end if the death penalty was reinstated in Turkey.[54] On 24 November 2016, the European Parliament approved a non-binding resolution calling for the "temporary freeze of the ongoing accession negotiations with Turkey" over human rights and rule of law concerns.[55][56][57] On 6 July 2017, the European Parliament accepted the call for the suspension of full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.[58] On 13 December, the European Council (comprising the heads of state or government of the member states) resolved that it would open no new areas in Turkey's membership talks in the "prevailing circumstances",[59] as Turkey's path toward autocratic rule made progress on EU accession impossible.[60] On 13 March 2019, the European Parliament accepted the call for a halt to the full membership negotiations between the EU and Turkey.[61] On 19 May 2021, the European Parliament unanimously accepted the call for the suspension of accession negotiations between the EU and Turkey.[62] As of 2022, and especially following Erdoğan's victory in the constitutional referendum, Turkish accession talks are effectively at a standstill.[2][63][64]
In July 2023, Erdoğan brought up Turkey's accession to EU membership up in the context of Sweden's application for NATO membership.[65] However, in September 2023, he announced that the European Union was well into a rupture in its relations with Turkey and that they could part ways during Turkey's European Union membership process.[66]
Summary table
[edit]State | Status[67] | Chapters opened |
Chapters closed |
Latest steps | Next step | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Montenegro (accession process) |
Candidate negotiating (since June 2012)[68] |
33/33[68]
|
3/33[68]
|
Screening completed for all negotiating chapters in June 2013.[69] First chapters opened in December 2012.[70] | Every chapter must be closed to conclude the negotiations. | ||||||||
Serbia (accession process) |
Candidate negotiating (since January 2014)[71] |
22/34[71]
|
2/34[71]
|
Screening completed for all negotiating chapters in March 2015.[72] First chapters opened in December 2015.[73] | Every chapter must be opened and closed to conclude the negotiations. | ||||||||
Albania (accession process) |
Candidate negotiating (since July 2022)[74] |
5/33[75]
|
0/33[75]
|
Screening completed for all negotiating chapters in November 2023.[76] First chapters opened in October 2024.[77] | Every chapter must be opened and closed to conclude the negotiations. | ||||||||
North Macedonia (accession process) |
Candidate negotiating (since July 2022)[74] |
0/33[78]
|
0/33[78]
|
Screening completed for all negotiating chapters in December 2023.[78] | The opening of the first 5 negotiating chapters (Fundamentals cluster) at a second intergovernmental conference will not begin until the opening phase has been completed, which according to the Council conclusions of July 2022 is conditional on the Assembly of North Macedonia approving a constitutional amendment related to the Bulgarian minority.[79][80][81] | ||||||||
Moldova (accession process) (relations) |
Candidate negotiating (since June 2024)[40][82] |
0/33[83]
|
0/33[83]
|
Screening of negotiation chapters (the explanatory phase) began in January 2024,[8] and the bilateral phase of the screening started in July 2024.[84] | The opening of the first 5 negotiating chapters (Fundamentals cluster) at a second intergovernmental conference. Every chapter must be opened and closed to conclude the negotiations. | ||||||||
Ukraine (accession process) (relations) |
Candidate negotiating (since June 2024)[40][85] |
0/33[86]
|
0/33[86]
|
Screening of negotiation chapters (the explanatory phase) began in January 2024,[8] and the bilateral phase of the screening started in July 2024.[87] | The opening of the first 5 negotiating chapters (Fundamentals cluster) at a second intergovernmental conference. Every chapter must be opened and closed to conclude the negotiations. | ||||||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina (accession process) |
Candidate (since December 2022)[88] |
— | — | The European Council granted conditional approval for the opening of accession negotiations in March 2024.[89][88] Screening of negotiation chapters (the explanatory phase) began in April 2024.[90] | The European Commission needs to prepare a negotiating framework for adoption by the Council, once all relevant steps set out in the Commission's recommendation of 12 October 2022 have been taken by Bosnia and Herzegovina.[91] As of 3 July 2024, this final condition for negotiations to start had not yet been met.[92][90] The state claimed to meet 98% of conditions demanded by the European Commission by passing a 2024 budget and Growth Plan reform package in July 2024.[93][94][95] Final approval of the Growth Plan reform package was however blocked by four cantons on 25 July.[96] | ||||||||
Georgia (accession process) (relations) |
Candidate (since December 2023)[39] |
— | — | The European Council granted candidate status in December 2023.[97] | The European Commission needs to recommend starting negotiations. | ||||||||
Kosovo (accession process) |
Applicant / Potential candidate | — | — | Application for membership submitted in December 2022.[12] | The Council needs to by unanimous decision request the European Commission to submit an opinion. | ||||||||
Turkey (accession process) (relations) |
Candidate with frozen negotiations (opened in October 2005,[98] but frozen since December 2016)[59] |
16/33[99]
|
1/33[99]
|
Screening completed for all negotiating chapters in October 2006.[98] First chapters opened in June 2006.[98] Chapter opening frozen in December 2016, due to backsliding in the areas of democracy, rule of law, and fundamental rights.[59] Chapter closing dialogue frozen since June 2018.[100][99] | Negotiations frozen, with no further chapters being considered for opening or closing, which has been reconfirmed by the Council each year since 2018.[100][101][102][103][80][99] |
Timeline
[edit]Major events | Association Agreement (with link) |
Membership application |
Candidate status |
Negotiations start (1st IGC) |
Substantial negotiations start (2nd IGC) |
Accession Treaty signed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turkey | 1 Dec 1964 (AA) | 14 Apr 1987 | 12 Dec 1999 | 3 Oct 2005[104] | 12 Jun 2006[98][105] | (tbd) |
Montenegro | 1 May 2010 (SAA) | 15 Dec 2008 | 17 Dec 2010[106] | 29 Jun 2012[68] | 18 Dec 2012[70] | (tbd) |
Serbia | 1 Sep 2013 (SAA) | 22 Dec 2009 | 1 Mar 2012 | 21 Jan 2014[107] | 14 Dec 2015[73] | (tbd) |
Albania | 1 Apr 2009 (SAA) | 28 Apr 2009 | 27 Jun 2014[108][109] | 19 Jul 2022[74] | 15 Oct 2024[77] | (tbd) |
North Macedonia | 1 Apr 2004 (SAA) | 22 Mar 2004 | 17 Dec 2005 | 19 Jul 2022[74] | (tbd) | (tbd) |
Moldova | 1 Jul 2016 (AA) | 3 Mar 2022[110] | 23 Jun 2022[37] | 25 Jun 2024[111] | (tbd) | (tbd) |
Ukraine | 1 Sep 2017 (AA) | 28 Feb 2022[112] | 23 Jun 2022[37] | 25 Jun 2024[113] | (tbd) | (tbd) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 Jun 2015 (SAA)[114] | 15 Feb 2016[115] | 15 Dec 2022[10] | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) |
Georgia | 1 Jul 2016 (AA) | 3 Mar 2022[116] | 14 Dec 2023[39] | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) |
Kosovo[Note 1] | 1 Apr 2016 (SAA)[117] | 14 Dec 2022[12] | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) |
All events | Candidates negotiating | Candidates | Applicant / Potential candidate |
Candidate with frozen negotiations | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albania | Moldova | Montenegro | North Macedonia | Serbia | Ukraine | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Georgia | Kosovo[Note 1] | Turkey | ||||
EU Association Agreement[Note 2] | |||||||||||||
EU Association Agreement negotiations start | 31 Jan 2003 | Jan 2010[118] | 10 Oct 2005[Note 3] | 5 Apr 2000 | 10 Oct 2005[Note 4] | 5 Mar 2007 | 25 Nov 2005 | Jan 2010 | 28 Oct 2013[120] | 1959AA 1970CU | |||
EU Association Agreement signature | 12 Jun 2006 | 27 Jun 2014 | 15 Oct 2007 | 9 Apr 2001 | 29 Apr 2008 | 21 Mar 2014AA 27 Jun 2014DCFTA |
16 Jun 2008 | 27 Jun 2014 | 27 Oct 2015[121] | 12 Sep 1963AA 1995CU | |||
EU Association Agreement entry into force | 1 Apr 2009 | 1 Jul 2016 | 1 May 2010 | 1 Apr 2004 | 1 Sep 2013 | 1 Sep 2017 | 1 Jun 2015[114] | 1 Jul 2016 | 1 Apr 2016[117] | 1 Dec 1964AA 31 Dec 1995CU[122] | |||
Membership application | |||||||||||||
Membership application submitted | 28 Apr 2009 | 3 Mar 2022[110] | 15 Dec 2008 | 22 Mar 2004 | 22 Dec 2009 | 28 Feb 2022[112] | 15 Feb 2016[115] | 3 Mar 2022[116] | 14 Dec 2022[12] | 14 Apr 1987 | |||
Council asks Commission for opinion | 16 Nov 2009 | 7 Mar 2022[123] | 23 Apr 2009 | 17 May 2004 | 25 Oct 2010[124] | 7 Mar 2022[123] | 20 Sep 2016[125] | 7 Mar 2022[123] | (tbd) | 27 Apr 1987 | |||
Commission presents legislative questionnaire to applicant | 16 Dec 2009 | 11 Apr 2022 (Part I) 19 Apr 2022 (Part II)[126] |
22 Jul 2009 | 1 Oct 2004 | 24 Nov 2010 | 8 Apr 2022 (Part I) 13 Apr 2022 (Part II)[127] |
9 Dec 2016[128] | 11 Apr 2022 (Part I) 19 Apr 2022 (Part II)[126][129] |
(tbd) | ||||
Applicant responds to questionnaire | 11 Jun 2010 | 22 Apr 2022 (Part I)[130] 12 May 2022 (Part II)[131] |
12 Apr 2010 | 10 May 2005 | 22 Apr 2011 | 17 Apr 2022 (Part I)[132] 9 May 2022 (Part II)[133] |
28 Feb 2018 | 2 May 2022 (Part I)[134] 10 May 2022 (Part II)[135] |
(tbd) | ||||
Commission issues its opinion (and subsequent reports) | 2010-2013 | 17 Jun 2022[136] | 9 Nov 2010 | 2005–2009 | 12 Oct 2011 | 17 Jun 2022[136] | 2019[137]–2022 | 17 Jun 2022[136] | (tbd) | 1989, 1997–2004 | |||
Candidate status | |||||||||||||
Commission recommends granting of candidate status | 16 Oct 2013[138] | 17 Jun 2022[136] | 9 Nov 2010 | 9 Nov 2005 | 12 Oct 2011 | 17 Jun 2022[136] | 12 Oct 2022[139] | 8 Nov 2023[21] | (tbd) | 13 Oct 1999 | |||
European Council grants candidate status to Applicant | 27 Jun 2014[108][109] | 23 Jun 2022[37] | 17 Dec 2010[106] | 17 Dec 2005 | 1 Mar 2012 | 23 Jun 2022[37] | 15 Dec 2022[10] | 14 Dec 2023[39] | (tbd) | 12 Dec 1999 | |||
Accession negotiations | |||||||||||||
Commission recommends to open negotiations | 9 Nov 2016[140] | 8 Nov 2023[21] | 12 Oct 2011 | 14 Oct 2009 | 22 Apr 2013[141] | 8 Nov 2023[21] | 12 Mar 2024[23] | (tbd) | (tbd) | 6 Oct 2004 | |||
European Council decides to open negotiations | 26 Jun 2018[142][143][144] | 14 Dec 2023[145] | 28 Jun 2012[68] | 18 Jun 2019[144] | 28 Jun 2013[146] | 14 Dec 2023[145] | 21 Mar 2024[91] | (tbd) | (tbd) | 16 Dec 2004[147] | |||
Council sets negotiations start date | 24 Mar 2020[148] | 21 Jun 2024[149] | 26 Jun 2012[150] | 24 Mar 2020[148] | 17 Dec 2013[151] | 21 Jun 2024[149] | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | 17 Dec 2004 | |||
Membership negotiations start (first IGC) | 19 Jul 2022[74] | 25 Jun 2024[111] | 29 Jun 2012[68] | 19 Jul 2022[74] | 21 Jan 2014[107] | 25 Jun 2024[113] | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | 3 Oct 2005[104] | |||
First negotiating chapters opened (second IGC) | 15 Oct 2024[77] | (tbd) | 18 Dec 2012[70] | (tbd) | 14 Dec 2015[73] | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | 12 Jun 2006[98][105] | |||
Membership negotiations end | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | |||
Accession treaty and joining the EU | |||||||||||||
Accession Treaty signature | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | |||
EU joining date | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | (tbd) | |||
|
Level of preparation for acquis chapters
[edit]Current situation
[edit]The table below shows the level of preparation of applicant countries with EU standards (acquis communautaire) on a 5-point scale, using data from the European Commission's 2024 reports. The analysis is based on the analysis performed by the online media outlet European Pravda for Ukraine; scores for other countries, as well as additional sections (public administration reform and economic criteria) were added based on official data from the European Commission's reports.[152][153]
Chapter | Candidates negotiating | Candidates | Applicant / Potential candidate |
Candidate with frozen negotiations | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albania | Moldova | Montenegro | North Macedonia | Serbia | Ukraine | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Georgia | Kosovo | Turkey | ||||
Cluster 1: The fundamentals of the accession process | |||||||||||||
Public administration reform | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | |||
23. Judiciary and fundamental rights | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | |||
24. Justice, freedom and security | 3 | 2 | 3.5 | 3 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||
The existence of a functioning market economy | 4 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |||
The capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union | 2 | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
5. Public procurement | 3 | 2 | 3.5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
18. Statistics | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||
32. Financial control | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||
Cluster 2: Internal Market | |||||||||||||
1. Free movement of goods | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2.5 | 4 | |||
2. Freedom of movement for workers | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||
3. Right of establishment and freedom to provide services | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||
4. Free movement of capital | 3 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||
6. Company law | 3 | 1.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |||
7. Intellectual property law | 3 | 2 | 4.5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
8. Competition policy | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||
9. Financial services | 3.5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
28. Consumer and health protection | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
Cluster 3: Competitiveness and inclusive growth | |||||||||||||
10. Digital transformation and media | 3.5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
16. Taxation | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | |||
17. Economic and monetary policy | 3.5 | 2 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |||
19. Social policy and employment | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | |||
20. Enterprise and industrial policy | 3.5 | 2 | 4 | 3.5 | 3 | 2.5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||
25. Science and research | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |||
26. Education and culture | 3 | 2.5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |||
29. Customs union | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | |||
Cluster 4: The Green agenda and sustainable connectivity | |||||||||||||
14. Transport | 2 | 2 | 3.5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||
15. Energy | 3.5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||
21. Trans-European networks | 2 | 2 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |||
27. Environment and climate change | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
Cluster 5: Resources, agriculture and cohesion | |||||||||||||
11. Agriculture and rural development | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
12. Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | |||
13. Fisheries and aquaculture | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||
22. Regional policy and coordination of structural instruments | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||
33. Financial and budgetary provisions | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | |||
Cluster 6: External relations | |||||||||||||
30. External relations | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||
31. Foreign, security and defence policy | 4 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | — | 2 | |||
Average level | 2.82 | 1.99 | 3.18 | 3.06 | 3.13 | 2.22 | 1.64 | 2.18 | 1.99 | 2.99 | |||
5 Well advanced
4.5 Good / Well advanced
4 Good level of preparation
3.5 Moderate / Good
3 Moderately prepared
2.5 Some / Moderate
2 Some level of preparation
1.5 Early stage / Some
1 Early stage
|
Progress over the past year
[edit]The table below shows the progress over the past year of applicant countries on a 4-point scale, using data from the European Commission's 2024 reports. The analysis is based on the analysis performed by the online media outlet European Pravda for Ukraine; scores for other countries, as well as additional sections (public administration reform and economic criteria) were added based on official data from the European Commission's reports.[154][155]
Chapter | Candidates negotiating | Candidates | Applicant / Potential candidate |
Candidate with frozen negotiations | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albania | Moldova | Montenegro | North Macedonia | Serbia | Ukraine | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Georgia | Kosovo | Turkey | ||||
Cluster 1: The fundamentals of the accession process | |||||||||||||
Public administration reform | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
23. Judiciary and fundamental rights | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -4 | 1 | 0 | |||
24. Justice, freedom and security | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
The existence of a functioning market economy | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |||
The capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
5. Public procurement | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
18. Statistics | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
32. Financial control | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
Cluster 2: Internal Market | |||||||||||||
1. Free movement of goods | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |||
2. Freedom of movement for workers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
3. Right of establishment and freedom to provide services | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
4. Free movement of capital | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
6. Company law | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |||
7. Intellectual property law | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |||
8. Competition policy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
9. Financial services | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
28. Consumer and health protection | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
Cluster 3: Competitiveness and inclusive growth | |||||||||||||
10. Digital transformation and media | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
16. Taxation | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |||
17. Economic and monetary policy | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
19. Social policy and employment | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |||
20. Enterprise and industrial policy | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
25. Science and research | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
26. Education and culture | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
29. Customs union | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |||
Cluster 4: The Green agenda and sustainable connectivity | |||||||||||||
14. Transport | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
15. Energy | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||
21. Trans-European networks | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
27. Environment and climate change | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
Cluster 5: Resources, agriculture and cohesion | |||||||||||||
11. Agriculture and rural development | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||
12. Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |||
13. Fisheries and aquaculture | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |||
22. Regional policy and coordination of structural instruments | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
33. Financial and budgetary provisions | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | |||
Cluster 6: External relations | |||||||||||||
30. External relations | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
31. Foreign, security and defence policy | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | |||
Average progress | 1.56 | 1.89 | 1.83 | 1.39 | 1.08 | 1.78 | 0.61 | 1.06 | 1.50 | 1.08 | |||
4 Very good progress
3 Good progress
2.5 Some / Good progress
2 Some progress
1 Limited progress
0 No progress
-4 Backsliding
|
States not on the agenda
[edit]The Maastricht Treaty (Article 49) states that any European country (as defined by a European Council assessment) that is committed to democracy may apply for membership in the European Union.[156] In addition to European states, other countries have also been speculated or proposed as future members of the EU.
States in Europe that have chosen, for various reasons, not to join the EU have integrated with it to different extents according to their circumstances. Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein participate directly in the single market via the EEA, Switzerland does so via bilateral treaties and the other European microstates (Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, Vatican City) have specific agreements with the EU and neighbouring countries, including their use of the euro as their currency. Most of these countries are also part of the Schengen Area. Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland have all previously had live applications to join the EU, which have been withdrawn or otherwise frozen. Such applications could be resubmitted in the event of a change in the political landscape.
On 5 March 2024, Armenian prime minister Nikol Pashinyan said that his country would apply for EU candidacy by autumn 2024 at the latest.[157] On 12 March 2024, the European Parliament passed a resolution confirming Armenia met Maastricht Treaty Article 49 requirements and that the country may apply for EU membership.[158] At the 2024 Copenhagen Democracy Summit, Pashinyan stated that he would like Armenia to become a member of the European Union "this year."[159]
Other proposals
[edit]- Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, and Vatican City are European microstates that are not on the agenda of the EU to be members, nor their own. (See: Microstates and the European Union)
- Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan are transcontinental states with some territory in Europe. These countries are not on the agenda of the EU to be members, nor their own. (See: Azerbaijan–European Union relations and Kazakhstan–European Union relations)
- Canada is a non-European country with values, culture, trade, and politics closely linked with the EU. Its membership has been proposed due to this.[199] (See: Canada–European Union relations)
- Cape Verde and Israel are non-European countries with close historical and political relations with the EU. (See: Cape Verde–European Union relations and Israel–European Union relations)
- The Sovereign Military Order of Malta is a sovereign entity without territory that has extraterritorial headquarters in Palazzo Malta and Villa Malta, as well as observer status in the United Nations and the Council of Europe. (See: Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations)
- Scotland is a country of the United Kingdom that was part of the European Union as a result of the UK's membership, until the latter withdrew from the EU. The Scottish National Party, which leads Scotland's devolved government, supports Scotland regaining its independence and rejoining the EU.[200] (See: Scottish independence and Proposed second Scottish independence referendum)
Internal enlargement scenarios
[edit]Internal enlargement is the process of new member states arising from the break-up of an existing member state.[201][202][203] There have been and are a number of active separatist movements within member states (for example in Catalonia and Flanders) but there are no clear agreements, treaties or precedents covering the scenario of an existing EU member state breaking into two or more states, both of which wish to remain EU member states. The question is whether one state is a successor and one a new applicant or, alternatively, both are new states which must be admitted to the EU.[204][205]
In some cases, a region desires to leave its state and the EU, namely those regions wishing to join Switzerland. But most, namely the two movements that held referendums during the 2010s, Scotland and Catalonia, see their future as independent states within the EU. This results in great interest in whether, once independent, they would retain EU membership or conversely whether they would have to re-apply. In the later case, since new members must be approved unanimously, any other state which has an interest in blocking their membership to deter similar independence movements could do so.[206][207] Additionally, it is unclear whether the successor state would retain any opt-outs that the parent state was entitled to.
- Opinions on membership
- European Commission
- Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission (2014-2019): "If there were to be a 'yes' vote in favour of Catalan independence, then we will respect that opinion. But Catalonia will not be able to be an EU member state on the day after such a vote."[208] This was repeated in October in an official press release: "We [...] reiterate the legal position held by this Commission as well as by its predecessors. If a referendum were to be organised in line with the Spanish Constitution it would mean that the territory leaving would find itself outside of the European Union."[209]
- José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission (2004-2014), stated in 2012 in the context of the 2014 referendum for independence in Scotland, that any newly independent country would have to apply for membership and negotiate its terms, but that the rest of the original country would not have to re-negotiate its position and would continue its membership.[210][211] In 2014 he said that it would have been 'very difficult' for an independent Scotland to join the EU, 'if not impossible', because of the difficulty of getting the approval of all member states, particularly Spain, which fears a possible secession of Catalonia and has blocked Kosovo's accession to the EU.[212]
- Joaquín Almunia (Spanish, being at the time an EU Commissioner) in 2013 claimed that Catalonia would have to apply for EU membership in the event of secession from Spain.[213]
- Government of Spain
- Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, said in November 2013 that an independent Scotland's entry to the EU would require the consent of all existing members and that an independent Scotland or other regions gaining independence, taken as a reference to Catalonia, would end up outside of the EU.[214][215]
- Spanish Foreign Minister José García-Margallo, having said in February 2012 that Spain would not veto Scottish accession to the EU, provided Scottish independence had UK agreement (thus making it different from Catalan independence).[216]
Basque Country
[edit]The presence of a strong Basque Nationalist movement, strongly majoritary in several territories of the Basque Country, makes possible the future existence of an independent Basque Country under different potential territorial configurations. In overall terms the Basque nationalism is pro-European.
Catalonia
[edit]On 1 October 2017, the Catalan government held a referendum on independence, which had been declared illegal by the Constitutional Court of Spain, with potential polling stations being cordoned off by riot police. The subsequent events constituted a political crisis for Catalonia. The EU's position is to keep distance from the crisis while supporting Spain's territorial integrity and constitution.[217][218] While the debate around Scotland's referendum may inform the Catalan crisis, Catalonia is in a distinct situation from Scotland whereby the central government does not recognise the legitimacy of any independence declaration from Catalonia. If Spain does not recognise the independence of a Catalan state, Catalonia cannot separately join the EU and it is still recognised as part of Spain's EU membership.
Corsica
[edit]Corsica has a strong and electorally successful nationalist movement, with positions ranging from autonomy to outright independence, the latter option with around 10–15% public support.[219] The independist party Corsica Libera envisions an independent Corsica within the European Union as a union of various European peoples, as well as recommendations for alignment within European directives.[220]
Flanders
[edit]There is an active movement towards Flemish independence or union with the Netherlands. The future status of Wallonia and Brussels (the de facto capital of the EU) are unclear as viable political states, perhaps producing a unique situation from Scotland and Catalonia. There are various proposals, both within and outside the independentist movement, for what should happen to Brussels, ranging from staying part of the Belgian rump state, to joining the hypothetical Flemish state, to becoming a separate political entity.[221][222]
Sardinia
[edit]Sardinia has a strong and electorally successful nationalist movement, with positions ranging from autonomy to outright independence. Generally associated with left-wing politics, the Sardinian movement is largely pro-European and pro-environmentalism.[223][224]
According to a 2012 survey conducted in a joint effort between the University of Cagliari and that of Edinburgh,[225][226][227] 41% of Sardinians would be in favour of independence (with 10% choosing it from both Italy and the European Union, and 31% only from Italy with Sardinia remaining in the EU), whilst another 46% would rather have a larger autonomy within Italy and the EU, including fiscal power; 12% of people would be content to remain part of Italy and the EU with a Regional Council without any fiscal powers, and 1% in Italy and the EU without a Regional Council and fiscal powers.[228][229][230][231][232][233][234] A 2017 poll by the Ixè Institute found that 51% of those questioned identified as Sardinian (as opposed to an Italian average of 15% identifying by their region of origin), rather than Italian (19%), European (11%) and/or citizen of the world (19%).[235][236]
Sardinian nationalists address a number of issues, such as the environmental damage caused by the military forces[237][238][239][240][241][242][243][244][245] (about 60% of such bases in Italy are located on the island),[246] the financial and economic exploitation of the island's resources by the Italian state and mainland industrialists,[247] the lack of any political representation both in Italy and in the European Parliament[248][249] (due to an unbalanced electoral constituency that still remains to this day,[250] Sardinia has not had its own MEP since 1994),[251] the nuclear power and waste (on which a referendum was proposed by a Sardist party,[252] being held in 2011[253]) and the ongoing process of depopulation and Italianization that would destroy the Sardinian indigenous culture.[254]
Veneto
[edit]Similarly to Sardinia, Veneto has a strong and electorally successful nationalist movement, with positions ranging from autonomy to outright independence. In a controversial online poll held in 2014, 89% of participants were in favour of Veneto becoming "a federal, independent and sovereign state" and 55% supported accession to European Union membership.[255] Three years later, in the 2017 autonomy referendum, with a 58% turnout, 98% of the participants voted in favour of "further forms and special conditions of autonomy to be attributed to the Region of Veneto".[256] Consequently, negotiations between the Venetian government and the Italian one started.
The longstanding and largest Venetist party, Liga Veneta (LV), was established in 1979 under the slogan "farther from Rome, closer to Europe",[257] but has later adopted more Eurosceptic positions. Luca Zaia, a LV member who has served as president of Veneto since 2010, usually self-describes as a pro-Europeanist and has long advocated for a "Europe of regions" and "macro-regions".[258][259][260][261]
Member state expansion scenarios
[edit]Cyprus
[edit]Officially, the island nation of Cyprus is part of the European Union, under the de jure sovereignty of the Republic of Cyprus. Turkish Cypriots are citizens of the Republic of Cyprus and thus of the European Union, and were entitled to vote in the 2004 European Parliament election (though only a few hundred registered). The EU's acquis communautaire is suspended indefinitely in the northern third of the island, which has remained outside the control of the Republic of Cyprus since the Turkish invasion of 1974. The Greek Cypriot community rejected the Annan Plan for the settlement of the Cyprus dispute in a referendum on 24 April 2004. Had the referendum been in favour of the settlement proposal, the island (excluding the British Sovereign Base Areas) would have joined the European Union as the United Cyprus Republic. The European Union's relations with the Turkish Cypriot Community are handled by the European Commission's Directorate-General for Enlargement.[262]
Ireland
[edit]The European Council has recognised that following the UK withdrawal from the EU, if Northern Ireland were to be incorporated into a united Ireland it would automatically rejoin the EU under the current Irish membership. A historical precedent for this was the incorporation of East Germany into the Federal Republic of Germany as a single European Communities member state.[263][264]
Romania
[edit]Opinion polls in both Moldova and Romania show significant support for the unification of the two countries, based on their reciprocal historical and cultural ties.[265][266] Such a scenario would result in Moldova becoming part of an enlarged Romania and therefore receiving the benefits and obligations of the latter's EU membership.[267] An obstacle would be the existence of the breakaway Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic (Transnistria), which is considered by Moldova and most of the international community to be de jure part of Moldova's sovereign territory but is de facto independent. Transnistria's absence of strong historical or cultural links to Romania and its close political and military relationship with Russia have been seen as major hurdles to integration of the region with both Romania and the EU.[266] Another likely barrier from within Moldova would be opposition on the part of the autonomous territory of Gagauzia, whose population has been mostly against integration with Romania since at least the 1990s.[268] A 2014 referendum held by the Gagauzian government showed both overwhelming support for the region joining the Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union and a similar level of rejection to closer ties with the EU.[269]
Possible incorporation of special member state territories
[edit]There are multiple special member state territories, some of which are not fully covered by the EU treaties and apply EU law only partially, if at all. It is possible for a dependency to change its status regarding the EU or some particular treaty or law provision. The territory may change its status from participation to leaving or from being outside to joining.
Danish self-governing territories
[edit]Faroe Islands
[edit]The Faroe Islands, a self-governing nation within the Kingdom of Denmark, is not part of the EU, as explicitly asserted by both Rome treaties.[270] The relations with the EU are governed by a Fisheries Agreement (1977) and a Free Trade Agreement (1991, revised 1998). The main reason for remaining outside the EU is disagreements about the Common Fisheries Policy,[271] which disfavours countries with large fish resources. Also, every member has to pay for the Common Agricultural Policy, which favours countries having much agriculture which the Faroe Islands does not. When Iceland was in membership negotiations around 2010, there was a hope of better conditions for fish-rich countries[citation needed], but to no avail. The Common Fisheries Policy was introduced in 1970 for the very reason of getting access for the first EC members to waters of candidate countries, namely the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Denmark including the Faroe Islands[citation needed].
Nevertheless, there are politicians, mainly in the right-wing Union Party (Sambandsflokkurin), led by their chairman Kaj Leo Johannesen, who would like to see the Faroes as a member of the EU. However, the chairman of the left-wing Republic (Tjóðveldi), Høgni Hoydal, has expressed concerns that if the Faroes were to join the EU as is, they might vanish inside the EU, comparing this with the situation of the Shetland Islands and Åland today, and wants the local government to solve the political situation between the Faroes and Denmark first.[272]
Greenland
[edit]Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and became part of the EEC (the predecessor entity of the EU) when Denmark joined in 1973. After the establishment of Greenland's home rule in 1979, which made it an autonomous community, Greenland held a referendum on EEC membership. The result was (mainly because of the Common Fisheries Policy) to leave, so on 1 February 1985, Greenland left the EEC and EURATOM. Its status was changed to that of an Overseas Country.[273][274] Danish nationals residing in Greenland (i.e. all native population) are nonetheless fully European citizens; they are not, however, entitled to vote in European elections.
There has been some speculation as to whether Greenland may consider rejoining the now-European Union. On 4 January 2007, the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten quoted the former Danish minister for Greenland, Tom Høyem, as saying "I would not be surprised if Greenland again becomes a member of the EU... The EU needs the Arctic window and Greenland cannot alone manage the gigantic Arctic possibilities".[275] Greenland has a lot of natural resources, and Greenland has, especially during the 2000s commodities boom, contracted foreign private companies to exploit some of them, but the cost is considered too high, as Greenland is remote and severely lacks infrastructure which has to be built. After 2013 prices declined so such efforts stalled.
The Brexit debate has reignited talk about the EU in Greenland with calls for the island to join the Union again.[276]
Dutch Caribbean territories
[edit]The islands of Aruba and Curaçao, as well as Sint Maarten, are constituent countries of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, while Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba are special Dutch municipalities. All are Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) under Annex II of the EC treaty.[273] OCTs are considered to be "associated" with the EU and apply some portions of EU law. The islands are opting to become an Outermost Region (OMR) of the EU, a status in which the islands form a part of the European Union, though they benefit from derogations (exceptions) from some EU laws due to their geographical remoteness from mainland Europe. The islands are focusing on gaining the same status as the Azores, Madeira, the Canary Islands, and the French overseas departments.
When Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba were established as Dutch public bodies after the dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles (which was an OCT) in 2010, their status within the EU was raised. Rather than change their status from an OCT to an outermost region, as their change in status within the Netherlands would imply, it was decided that their status would remain the same for at least five years. After those five years, their status would be reviewed.[needs update]
If it was decided that if one or all of the islands wish to integrate more with the EU then the Treaty of Lisbon provides for that following a unanimous decision from the European Council.[277] Former European Commissioner for Enlargement Danuta Hübner has said before the European Parliament that she does not expect many problems to occur with such a status change, as the population of the islands is only a few thousand people.[citation needed]
French overseas departments and collectivities
[edit]The territories of French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte and Réunion are overseas departments of France and at the same time mono-departmental overseas regions. According to the EC treaty (article 299 2), all of these departments are outermost regions (OMR) of the EU—hence provisions of the EC treaty apply there while derogations are allowed. The status of the Overseas collectivity of Saint-Martin is also defined as OMR by the Treaty of Lisbon. New Caledonia and the overseas collectivities of French Polynesia, Saint-Barthelemy, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, and Wallis and Futuna are Overseas Countries and Territories of the EU.[273]
New Caledonia
[edit]New Caledonia is an overseas part of France with its own unique status under the French Constitution, which is distinct from that of overseas departments and collectivities. It is defined as an "overseas country of France" under the 1998 Nouméa Accord, and enjoys a high degree of self-government.[278] Currently, in regard to the EU, it is one of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT).
As a result of the Nouméa Accord, New Caledonians voted in three consecutive independence referendums in 2018, 2020, and 2021. The referendums were to determine whether the territory would remain a part of the French Republic as a "sui generis collectivity", or whether it would become an independent state. The accords also specify a gradual devolution of powers to the local New Caledonian assembly. The results of all three referendums determined that New Caledonia would remain a part of the French Republic.
See also
[edit]- Eastern Partnership
- Euronest Parliamentary Assembly
- European integration
- EU Strategy for the South Caucasus
- Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, a funding mechanism for EU candidate countries
- Politics of Europe
- Treaty of Accession 1994
- Treaty of Accession 2003
- Treaty of Accession 2005
- Treaty of Accession 2011
- Withdrawal from the European Union
Notes
[edit]- ^ Bulgaria demanded: "good neighbourly relations to be a criterion for the Republic of North Macedonia's membership in the EU; to use the official constitutional name of the Republic of North Macedonia instead of the short North Macedonia and the wording for the language should be the "official language" of the candidate country, not Macedonian."[17]
References
[edit]- ^ "Joining the EU". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 16 December 2023.
- ^ a b Emmott, Robin (2 May 2017). "Turkey's EU dream is over, for now, top official says". Reuters. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ Council of the European Union (26 June 2024). "Sixteenth meeting of the Accession Conference with Montenegro at Ministerial level (press release by the Council of the EU)". Consilium. Retrieved 1 August 2024.
- ^ a b Tatiana Marinova; Simona-Alex Mihaleva (17 June 2024). "President Radev: Bulgaria Supports Montenegro's European Integration". BTA. Retrieved 1 August 2024.
- ^ "Legal questions of enlargement". The European Parliament. 19 May 1998. Archived from the original on 21 March 2006. Retrieved 9 July 2008.
- ^ Current Article 1 of the Treaty on European Union reads: "The Union shall be founded on the present Treaty and on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Those two Treaties shall have the same legal value. The Union shall replace and succeed the European Community".
- ^ "European Union, Community Law And International Business Law" (PDF). European Center for Peace and Development. p. 46. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2019.
- ^ a b c Alexandra Brzozowski (31 January 2024). "EU Commission to start screening process for Ukraine, Moldova after 'surprise' delay". Euractiv. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- ^ "After Years Of Delay, North Macedonia, Albania Get OK To Begin EU Accession Talks". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- ^ a b c "'Huge, historic move': EU grants Bosnia and Herzegovina Candidate Status". Sarajevo Times. 15 December 2022. Retrieved 15 December 2022.
- ^ "Kosovo to apply for EU membership by end of 2022". euractiv.com. 10 June 2022. Archived from the original on 11 June 2022. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
- ^ a b c d Xhabafti, Erion; Semini, Llazar (14 December 2022). "Kosovo leaders sign application request to join EU". Associated Press. Retrieved 14 December 2022.
- ^ "EU advances membership talks for Montenegro, Serbia". Euractiv. 11 December 2017. Archived from the original on 4 October 2020. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
- ^ Jozwiak, Rikard (5 February 2018). "Serbia, Montenegro 'Could Potentially' Join EU In 2025". RadioFreeEurope. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
- ^ "EU must be ready to accept new members by 2030". euronews. 28 August 2023.
- ^ Staff (27 March 2020). "EU leaders give final OK to begin Albania, North Macedonia accession talks". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Archived from the original on 5 December 2020. Retrieved 8 July 2020.
- ^ a b "Bulgaria Blocks North Macedonia's EU Accession Negotiations - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency". novinite.com. Archived from the original on 18 November 2020. Retrieved 7 November 2020.
- ^ "Macron Says Compromise Found On EU Membership Talks For North Macedonia". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 15 July 2022.
- ^ "North Macedonia parliament OKs deal; EU talks start July 19". Associated Press. 16 July 2022. Retrieved 16 July 2022.
- ^ "New Growth Plan for the Western Balkans". European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (DG NEAR). 8 November 2023. Retrieved 19 June 2024.
- ^ a b c d e "Commission adopts 2023 Enlargement package, recommends to open negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, to grant candidate status to Georgia and to open accession negotiations with BiH, once the necessary degree of compliance is achieved". europa.eu. 8 November 2023. Archived from the original on 8 November 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
- ^ Sito-sucic, Daria (12 March 2024). "European Commission recommends opening EU membership talks with Bosnia". Reuters. Retrieved 12 March 2024.
- ^ a b Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations (12 March 2024). "Commission proposes to open EU accession negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and updates on progress made by Ukraine and Moldova". European Commission. Retrieved 12 March 2024.
- ^ "Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on the preparation of the European Council meeting of 21-22 March 2024". 12 March 2024. Retrieved 12 March 2024.
- ^ Jones, Mared Gwyn (21 March 2024). "European Union leaders approve opening accession talks with Bosnia and Herzegovina". EuroNews. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- ^ Petrequin, Samuel (21 March 2024). "EU leaders agree on opening membership talks with Bosnia, but with many strings attached". Associated Press. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- ^ "2005 enlargement strategy paper". European Union. 9 November 2005. Archived from the original on 13 September 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2019.
- ^ "EU enlargement chief vows to press ahead, for 'stability'". International Herald Tribune. 1 February 2006. Archived from the original on 18 June 2008. Retrieved 2 June 2008.
- ^ "Georgia can apply for EU membership if it complies with democratic principles". en.trend.az. 18 April 2014. Archived from the original on 16 November 2020. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
- ^ < EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area[permanent dead link ]. trade.ec.europa.eu.
- ^ Rettman, Andrew (22 October 2010). "EU unlikely to expand into post-Soviet east in next decade". Euobserver.com. Archived from the original on 11 March 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
- ^ "У 2024 році Україна подасть заявку на вступ до ЄС". ukrinform.ua. 29 January 2019. Archived from the original on 6 June 2021. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
- ^ Makszimov, Vlagyiszlav (22 January 2021). "Georgian president visits Brussels in push for 2024 EU membership application". euractiv.com. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
- ^ "Georgia-EU Relations Within Georgia's 2024 Objective to Apply for the EU Membership". georgianjournal.ge (in Georgian). Archived from the original on 3 January 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
- ^ "Georgia, Moldova Formally Apply For EU Membership Amid Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine". Radiofreeeurope/Radioliberty.
- ^ "Moldovan president says Moldova applies for EU membership | Law-Order". devdiscourse.com.
- ^ a b c d e "European Council conclusions, 23-24 June 2022". European Council. 24 June 2022. Retrieved 25 June 2022.
- ^ "EC to decide on opening negotiations over EU accession of Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia by year-end - Charles Michel | Rustavi2". rustavi2.ge. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
- ^ a b c d "European Council conclusions on Ukraine, enlargement and reforms". European Council. 14 December 2023. Retrieved 14 December 2023.
- ^ a b c Brzozowski, Alexandra (14 June 2024). "BREAKING: EU member states greenlight Ukraine, Moldova negotiating frameworks". www.euractiv.com. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- ^ "EU announces Georgia's accession is 'stopped' after anti-West pivot". POLITICO. 9 July 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- ^ "EU halts Georgia's accession to the bloc, freezes financial aid over much-criticized law". AP News. 9 July 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- ^ "EU says Georgia may risk sanctions if it abandons democracy". Reuters. 4 October 2024. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
- ^ Lucy Davalou; Andrew Naughtie (28 November 2024). "Georgian prime minister suspends EU membership talks until end of 2028". euronews. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
- ^ Thomas Mackintosh (29 November 2024). "Protesters clash with police after Georgia shelves EU bid". BBC News. Retrieved 29 November 2024.
- ^ Official Journal of the European Communities 1973, C113 p2
- ^ Bhalla, Reva; Goodrich, Lauren; Zeihan, Peter (17 March 2009). "Turkey and Russia on the Rise". Stratfor. Archived from the original on 23 August 2011.
- ^ Friedman, George (31 July 2007). "The Geopolitics of Turkey". Stratfor. Archived from the original on 10 October 2009.
- ^ Ekman, Ivar (11 December 2006). "Top Swedish official backs Turkey for EU". International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on 15 October 2007. Retrieved 3 July 2007.
- ^ "BBC: EU hails Turkey free speech move". BBC News. 30 April 2008. Archived from the original on 2 September 2019. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
- ^ "The ins and outs: The EU's most effective foreign-policy instrument has been enlargement. But how far can it go?". The Economist. 17 March 2007. Archived from the original on 1 July 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
- ^ a b "Turkey's bid to join the EU is a bad joke; but don't kill it". The Economist. 13 October 2016. Archived from the original on 11 September 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2017.
- ^ a b "EU-Turkey Relations Reaching a Crossroads". carnegieeurope.eu. 11 April 2017. Archived from the original on 17 July 2019. Retrieved 3 May 2017.
- ^ "AB'den Türkiye'ye: İdam cezası geri gelirse..." Hürriyet (in Turkish). 26 July 2016.
- ^ "P8_TA(2016)0450". European Parliament. 24 November 2017. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
- ^ "Freeze EU accession talks with Turkey until it halts repression, urge MEPs". European Parliament. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 3 May 2017.
- ^ Weise, Zia (24 November 2016). "EU parliament votes overwhelmingly in favour of scrapping Turkey accession talks". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 24 December 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ "AP: Türkiye ile müzakereler askıya alınsın". DW Türkçe (in Turkish). 6 July 2017.
- ^ a b c Kempf, Danny (13 December 2016). "EU says won't expand Turkey membership talks". yahoo.com. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ Pierini, Marc (12 December 2016). "Turkey's Impending Estrangement From the West". Carnegie Europe. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ "European Parliament calls for suspension of Turkey EU accession talks". Euronews. 13 March 2019.
- ^ "EU parliament calls for the suspension of Turkey's EU talks". EurActiv. 19 May 2021.
- ^ ""Turkey is no longer an EU candidate", MEP says". Euronews. 10 April 2017. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ Gonen, Emre (2 May 2017). "A truce with the EU?". Daily Sabah - Euronews. Archived from the original on 19 September 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ Huseyin Hayatsever, Ece Toksabay (10 July 2023). "Erdogan links Sweden's NATO membership to Turkey's EU accession". Reuters. Retrieved 10 July 2023.
- ^ "Turkey could part ways with EU if necessary, Erdogan says". Reuters. 16 September 2023.
- ^ "EU enlargement". European Union. Retrieved 22 March 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f "Enlargement: Montenegro". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 27 June 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ "Montenegro Report 2022". European Commission.
- ^ a b c "Press release – Marking the start of substantial negotiations with Montenegro". CY2012. Cyprus Presidency of the Council of the European Union. 18 December 2012. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ a b c "Enlargement: Serbia". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 11 January 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ "Serbia Report 2022". European Commission.
- ^ a b c "EU opens first chapters in accession negotiations with Serbia". European Western Balkans. 14 December 2015. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f Gijs, Camille (19 July 2022). "EU launches accession talks with North Macedonia, Albania". politico.eu. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
- ^ a b "Enlargement: Albania". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 27 January 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ "Albania's EU membership process". European Movement Albania. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ a b c "Second Accession Conference with Albania, 15 October 2024". Consilium. 11 October 2024. Retrieved 11 October 2024.
- ^ a b c "Enlargement: North Macedonia". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 27 January 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ Aleksandar Samardjiev (11 August 2022). "North Macedonia: EU membership remains a never-ending challenge". Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
- ^ a b "Council conclusions on Enlargement (16707/23)". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 12 December 2023. Retrieved 13 July 2024.
- ^ "European Council conclusions on Ukraine, enlargement and reforms". 14 December 2023.
- ^ "Accession Conference with Moldova, 25 June 2024". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- ^ a b "Enlargement: Moldova". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ "Intergovernmental conference with Moldova: press conference". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- ^ "Accession Conference with Ukraine, 25 June 2024". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- ^ a b "Enlargement: Ukraine". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ "Intergovernmental conference with Ukraine: press conference". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- ^ a b "Enlargement: Bosnia and Herzegovina". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 4 May 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ Noestlinger, Nette; Sito-sucic, Daria; Gray, Andrew (21 March 2024). "EU leaders invite Bosnia to membership talks in historic step". Reuters. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- ^ a b "Parliamentary question - E-001049/2024(ASW): Answer given by Mr Várhelyi on behalf of the European Commission". European Parliament. 3 July 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- ^ a b "European Council meeting (21 and 22 March 2024) – Conclusions" (PDF). General Secretariat of the Council. 22 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
- ^ "From March to June, BiH made no progress towards the EU". Sarajevo Times. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 18 July 2024.
- ^ "Bosnia adopts 2024 Budget after months of delay". N1 Sarajevo. 4 July 2024. Retrieved 19 July 2024.
- ^ "BiH Institutions should receive the Budget by the end of the Week". Sarajevo Times. 16 July 2024. Retrieved 19 July 2024.
- ^ "Bosnia's House of People approves 2024 budget and amended law on judicial body". DTT-net. 19 July 2024. Retrieved 19 July 2024.
- ^ "Forto accuses SDA of blocking EU Growth Plan projects for political reasons". N1 Sarajevo. 25 July 2024. Retrieved 29 July 2024.
- ^ "Enlargement: Georgia". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 7 February 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ a b c d e "Turkey 2006 Progress Report" (PDF). European Commission. 8 November 2006. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ a b c d "Enlargement: Türkiye". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 11 January 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ a b "Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association process - Council conclusions (10555/18)" (PDF). Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 26 June 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2024.
- ^ "Turkey Report 2021" (PDF). European Commission.
- ^ "AP raporu: Türkiye'nin AB üyelik süreci mevcut koşullarda devam edemez" (in Turkish). Gazete Duvar. 18 July 2023.
- ^ "Turkey Report 2023" (PDF). European Commission. 8 November 2023. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ a b "Turkey 2005 Progress Report" (PDF). European Commission. 9 November 2005. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ a b "Turkey-EU relations: Accession-process (current situation)". Turkey European Union Association (TURABDER). 2024. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ a b "Montenegro is officially awarded EU candidate status". euobserver.com. 17 December 2010. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 16 September 2013.
- ^ a b "Serbia starts negotiations to join EU". b92.net. 21 January 2014. Archived from the original on 8 October 2014. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
- ^ a b "EU candidate status for Albania". European Commission. 23 June 2014. Archived from the original on 18 September 2015. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ a b "European Council - 26/27 June 2014 - Conclusions" (PDF). European Council. 27 June 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ a b Tanas, Alexander (3 March 2022). "With war on its doorstep, Moldova applies for EU membership". Reuters. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
- ^ a b "EU opens accession negotiations with Moldova". European Union. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 1 July 2024.
- ^ a b "Zelensky signs application for Ukraine's membership to EU". Hindustan Times. Associated Press. 28 February 2022. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ a b "EU opens accession negotiations with Ukraine". European Union. 25 June 2024. Retrieved 1 July 2024.
- ^ a b "SAA Agreement with Bosnia". Council of the European Union. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 20 April 2010.
- ^ a b "Bosnia and Herzegovina applied for EU membership today". The Netherlands EU Presidency 2016. 15 February 2016. Archived from the original on 16 February 2016. Retrieved 15 February 2016.
- ^ a b "Georgia's PM Signs Application to Join the EU". Civil.ge. 3 March 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
- ^ a b "Information relating to the entry into force of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo, of the other part". EUR-Lex. 24 March 2016. Archived from the original on 26 March 2016. Retrieved 24 March 2016.
- ^ IDIS 'Viitorul', Some reflections on the timing of Moldova's negotiations of the EU Association Agreement. Moldova's Foreign Policy Statewatch, Issue 1, March 2010.
- ^ "EU, Montenegro complete negotiations on pre-membership deal to bring country closer to bloc". International Herald Tribune. The Associated Press. 1 December 2006. Archived from the original on 25 September 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2011.
- ^ "Kosovo Launches Crucial SAA Talks With EU". Balkan Insight. 28 October 2013. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
- ^ "Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and Kosovo signed". European Commission (Press release). 26 October 2015. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ "21996D0213(01) - EN". EUR-Lex. 13 February 1996. Archived from the original on 27 May 2019. Retrieved 16 September 2013.
- ^ a b c Jacopo Barigazzi (7 March 2022). "EU to officially examine Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia's bids to join the bloc". Politico. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
- ^ Castle, Stephen (25 October 2010). "Serbia Moves Closer to Joining E.U." The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 July 2016. Retrieved 16 September 2013.
- ^ "Council conclusions on the application of Bosnia and Herzegovina for membership of the EU". Council of the European Union. Archived from the original on 21 September 2016. Retrieved 20 September 2016.
- ^ a b "Remarks by Commissioner Várhelyi on the handing over of the questionnaires to Georgia and Moldova". European Commission. 11 April 2022. Retrieved 15 April 2022.
- ^ "Євросоюз передав Києву опитувальник для отримання статусу кандидата" [The European Union has sent Kyiv a questionnaire to obtain candidate status]. European Pravda (in Ukrainian). 8 April 2022. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
- ^ "Hahn: Questionnaire is a game changer for future of BiH". Delegation of the European Union to Bosnia and Herzegovina. 9 December 2016. Archived from the original on 6 September 2018. Retrieved 9 December 2016.
- ^ "Georgia Receives EU Membership Questionnaire". civil.ge. 11 April 2022. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
- ^ "Молдова заповнила опитувальник для отримання статусу кандидата на членство у ЄС" [Moldova has completed a questionnaire to obtain EU candidate status]. European Pravda (in Ukrainian). 22 April 2022. Retrieved 22 April 2022.
- ^ "Moldova transfers 2nd part of completed questionnaire for EU accession". interfax.com. 12 May 2022. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
- ^ "Шлях до членства у ЄС - Україна вже завершила роботу над опитувальником" [The road to EU membership - Ukraine has completed work on the questionnaire]. European Pravda (in Ukrainian). 17 April 2022. Retrieved 17 April 2022.
- ^ "Obtaining Ukraine's EU membership candidate status is of great importance for the Ukrainian people - President during a conversation with Ursula von der Leyen". president.gov.ua. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
- ^ "Irakli Garibashvili submits EU questionnaire's part one to Carl Hartzell". Retrieved 2 May 2022.
- ^ "Irakli Garibashvili submits EU questionnaire's 2nd part to Carl Hartzell". Retrieved 10 May 2022.
- ^ a b c d e "The European Commission recommends to Council confirming Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia's perspective to become members of the EU and provides its opinion on granting them candidate status". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
- ^ "Key findings of the Opinion on Bosnia and Herzegovina's EU membership application and analytical report". European Commission. 29 May 2019. Retrieved 12 June 2022.
- ^ "Albania: EU Commission OKs status of membership candidate". ansamed.info. 16 October 2013. Archived from the original on 2 November 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
- ^ "EU's von der Leyen: proposed candidate status for Bosnia and Herzegovina". Reuters. 12 October 2022.
- ^ "Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions" (PDF). europa.eu. 9 November 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ Pawlak, Justyna (22 April 2013). "EU opens to Serbia after Kosovo deal". Uk.reuters.com. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 16 September 2013.
- ^ "European Council conclusions, 28 June 2018". European Council. 28 June 2018. Archived from the original on 15 November 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2020.
- ^ "Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process - Council conclusions" (PDF). European Council. 26 June 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 July 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2020.
- ^ a b "Council conclusions on enlargement and stabilisation and association process - Consilium". consilium.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 30 June 2019. Retrieved 30 June 2019.
- ^ a b "European Council conclusions on Ukraine, enlargement and reforms". Council of the European Union. 14 December 2023. Retrieved 30 December 2023.
- ^ "Serbia". Council of the European Union. Retrieved 31 December 2023.
- ^ "Türkiye". Council of the European Union. Retrieved 31 December 2023.
- ^ a b RFE/RL's Balkan Service (24 March 2020). "After Years of Delay, North Macedonia, Albania Get OK To Begin EU Accession Talks". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
- ^ a b "EU countries agree to begin membership talks with Moldova and Ukraine". France 24. 21 June 2024. Retrieved 21 June 2024.
- ^ "Council conclusions on Montenegro" (PDF). ue.eu.in. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 June 2013. Retrieved 16 September 2013.
- ^ "Council conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process" (PDF). Council of the European Union. 17 December 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 December 2013. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
- ^ "Від "корупції" до телемарафону: що ЄС чекає від України та як оцінює готовність до вступу". European Pravda (in Ukrainian). 31 October 2024. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
- ^ "Strategy and Reports - European Commission". neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu. 30 October 2024. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
- ^ "Від "корупції" до телемарафону: що ЄС чекає від України та як оцінює готовність до вступу". European Pravda (in Ukrainian). 31 October 2024. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
- ^ "Strategy and Reports - European Commission". neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu. 30 October 2024. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
- ^ "Conditions for membership". European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations. European Commission. Archived from the original on 27 November 2016. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
- ^ a b "Nikol Pashinyan said that you should apply to become a candidate for EU membership before autumn at the latest". hraparak.am.
- ^ "Joint Motion for a Resolution on closer ties between the EU and Armenia and the need for a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia | RC-B9-0163/2024 | European Parliament". www.europarl.europa.eu.
- ^ Siranush Ghazanchyan (14 May 2024). "Democracy a strategy for Armenia։ PM Pashinyan participates in Copenhagen Democracy Summit". Public Radio of Armenia.
- ^ "Armenia-EU finalize new deal". Asbarez News Agency. 3 October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 August 2018. Retrieved 3 October 2018.
- ^ Anahit Shirinyan (14 March 2019), Armenia's Foreign Policy Balancing in an Age of Uncertainty Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank
- ^ "Armenia outside European integration process – Ararat Zurabyan". tert.am. Archived from the original on 24 June 2022. Retrieved 23 June 2022.
- ^ "Will Armenia apply to become a candidate for EU membership in the coming days?". radar.am.
- ^ "Օր առաջ դուրս գալ ԵԱՏՄ-ից. "Հայաստանի Եվրոպական կուսակցությունը" համագումար է..." a1plus.am. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
- ^ "About Us". Heritage Party Website. Archived from the original on 30 May 2014.
- ^ "People's Party of Armenia Changes Orientation". Armenpress. 8 December 2006. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ Shahunyan, Tatevik (26 September 2005). "Interview With RA National Assembly Speaker Artur Baghdasaryan". arminfo.am. Archived from the original on 7 June 2007. Retrieved 21 November 2019.,
- ^ ""Ժողովրդին պարտադրում են ընտրություն կատարել նախկիններ եւ ներկաներ տիրույթում, ինձ համար բոլորն էլ արդեն նախկին են". Դավիթ Սանասարյանի կուսակցության համագումարը". aravot.am.
- ^ Union for National Self-Determination Party. "The views of Armenian and Azerbaijani Political Parties on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and conflict resolution process" (PDF). commonspace.eu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 June 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ Danielyan, Emil (18 October 2019). "Tsarukian Endorsed By Eurosceptic EU Politicians". azatutyun.am. RFE/RL. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
- ^ "Armenia chooses Russia over EU". Politico. 3 September 2013.
- ^ IRI Armenia Poll Finds Majorities Support EU Membership, Peace Treaty with Azerbaijan
- ^ "Do Belarusians Want to Join the EU?". Belarus Digest. 12 April 2013. Archived from the original on 23 October 2020. Retrieved 10 August 2020.
- ^ Ingebritsen, Christine (1998). The Nordic States and European Unity. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-3484-6.
- ^ "Afstaða til veru Íslands í NATO og aðildar að ESB" (in Icelandic). Retrieved 9 March 2022.
- ^ NTB (4 April 2022). "Måling: En av fem er usikker på norsk EU-medlemskap". Romerikes Blad (in Norwegian). Retrieved 19 April 2022.
- ^ "Меньшинство россиян за быстрое вступление в ЕС". Deutsche Welle (in Russian). 19 November 2013. Retrieved 9 November 2023.
- ^ "EU Relations with the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco and the Republic of San Marino: Options for their participation in the Internal Market". European Commission. 18 November 2013. Archived from the original on 11 September 2020. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
- ^ "Referendum "europeo": Sinistra Unita dice "Sì"". SMtv San Marino. 9 September 2013. Archived from the original on 1 October 2013. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
- ^ "Referendum Ue: sì convinto dall'Upr". SMtv San Marino. 6 September 2013. Archived from the original on 1 October 2013. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
- ^ "Civico 10. Su Europa e referendum". 26 September 2013. Archived from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2013.
- ^ "Civico10 sul referendum sull'Europa: vietato votare 'no'". 5 September 2013. Archived from the original on 11 September 2013. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
- ^ "Congresso Psd: si cerca la mediazione su un nome che rappresenti le diverse anime". SMtv San Marino. 19 September 2013. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2013.
- ^ "Referendum Europa: il Ps è per il sì". SMtv San Marino. 10 September 2013. Archived from the original on 1 October 2013. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
- ^ "Referendum 2013: Per San Marino invita a votare sì". SMtv San Marino. 6 October 2013. Archived from the original on 10 June 2015. Retrieved 8 October 2013.
- ^ "Referendum sull'Europa, Psm spinge verso "l'inizio di una trattativa lunga e difficile"". 5 September 2013. Archived from the original on 15 October 2013. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
- ^ "DC, maggiore integrazione all'Europa non significa adesione". SMtv San Marino. 20 September 2013. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2013.
- ^ "San Marino rejects EU accession". politico.eu. 23 October 2013. Archived from the original on 29 October 2017. Retrieved 23 December 2017.
- ^ "Linke lanciert neue EU-Beitrittsdebatte". baz.online (in German). 8 February 2009. Archived from the original on 19 July 2009. Retrieved 9 February 2009.
- ^ a b "Switzerland — Parties". Europe Elects. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
- ^ "Our vision for a United Europe". Volt Switzerland. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
- ^ Kuenzi, Renat (15 May 2014). "'We're Not the Only EU Sceptics'". Swissinfo. Archived from the original on 18 February 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ "Über Uns". Campaign for an Independent and Neutral Switzerland official website. Archived from the original on 13 April 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- ^ "Swiss say 'no' to EU". BBC News. 4 March 2001. Archived from the original on 20 February 2009. Retrieved 5 May 2008.
- ^ Brack, Duncan; Moran, Layla (2 August 2021). "The UK–EU relationship: the Liberal Democrat position". libdems.org.uk. Retrieved 25 October 2021.
- ^ "Greens call for re-joining the EU 'as soon as political situation is favourable'". Green Party. 2 October 2022.
- ^ Gutteridge, Nick (31 May 2023). "Keir Starmer faces Labour Brexit backlash for vowing to stay outside EU". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 8 June 2023. Retrieved 15 June 2023.
- ^ "Voting Intention and Deltapoll Trackers (26th May 2024) | Deltapoll". Deltapoll | Deltapoll. 26 May 2024. Retrieved 31 May 2024.
- ^ Hulsman, John; Liedtke, Boris (8 June 2018). "What if the EU Invited Canada to Join Its Bloc?". INSEAD Knowledge.
- ^ "General Election 2019: Scotland would 'seek a way back in' to EU". BBC News. 25 November 2019. Retrieved 25 October 2021.
- ^ "The Internal Enlargement of the European Union". Centre Maurits Coppieters. 22 June 2017. Archived from the original on 5 January 2018. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
- ^ "The 'internal' enlargement of the European Union – is it possible?". Oxford University Press. 1 May 2014. Archived from the original on 20 June 2019.
- ^ "The Internal Enlargement of the European Union" (PDF). Centre Maurits Coppieters. 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 February 2018.
- ^ Edward, David, "Scotland's Position in the European Union", Scottish Parliamentary Review, Vol. I, No. 2 (Jan 2014) [Edinburgh: Blacket Avenue Press]
- ^ "Scottish independence: Irish minister says EU application 'would take time'". BBC. 25 January 2013. Archived from the original on 31 December 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2013.
- ^ Rankin, Jennifer; Carrell, Severin (13 March 2017). "Independent Scotland 'would have to apply to join EU' – Brussels official". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
- ^ The Catalan independence movement is pro-EU – but will the EU accept it? Archived 9 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine, London School of Economics 10/OCT/17
- ^ "Independent Catalonia would need to apply to join EU -Juncker". Reuters. 14 September 2017. Archived from the original on 11 October 2019.
- ^ "European Commission - Statement on the events in Catalonia". europa.eu (Press release). Archived from the original on 1 November 2019. Retrieved 9 December 2017.
- ^ Scottish independence: EC's Barroso says new states need 'apply to join EU' Archived 12 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, 10 December 2012
- ^ "correspondence from Mr Barroso to the House of lords" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 November 2019. Retrieved 10 December 2012.
- ^ Holehouse, Matthew (16 February 2014). "Jose Manuel Barroso: nearly impossible for Scotland to join EU". Sunday Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 4 September 2014.
Spain, which fears the separation of the Catalonia region, has blocked the accession of Kosovo ... Jose Manuel Barroso, the president of the European Commission ... went on: 'It will be extremely difficult to get the approval of all the other member states to have a new member coming from one member state.' 'We have seen that Spain has been opposing even the recognition of Kosovo, for instance. It's to some extent a similar case because it's a new country, and so I believe it's going to be extremely difficult, if not impossible.'
- ^ Nikolaj, Nielsen (17 September 2013). "EU commission: Catalonia must leave EU if it leaves Spain". EUObserver. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 19 September 2013.
- ^ Johnson, Simon (27 November 2013). "Spanish PM: Independent Scotland would be kicked out of the EU". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
- ^ "Scottish independence: Spain warning over EU entry". The Scotsman. Edinburgh. 3 February 2014. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 20 November 2019.
'They have to resolve a mountain of problems, as Better Together has explained very well,' he said.'You have to achieve candidate status. You have to negotiate 35 chapters . It has to be ratified by the institutions of the EU. It then has to be ratified by 28 national parliaments.'
- ^ Murray, Graeme (26 February 2012). "Spain will not veto an independent Scotland joining EU". Sunday Express. London. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 4 September 2014.
- ^ Richard, Youngs (11 July 2017). "EU needs a smarter response to the Catalonia crisis". Politico. Archived from the original on 9 November 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ Teffer, Peter (22 December 2017). "Separatist 'win' does not change EU view on Catalonia". EU Observer. Archived from the original on 8 July 2018. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ Fourquet, Jérôme; Kraus, François; Bourgine, Alexandre. "Les Corses et leur perception de la situation sur l'île: Résultats détaillés" (PDF). ifop.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 19 July 2016.
- ^ "Corsica 21: U prughjettu", Corsica Libera (in French), pp. 1–150, 2015
- ^ Van Parijs, Philippe (4 October 2007). "Brussels after Belgium: fringe town or city state ?" (PDF). The Bulletin. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 29 November 2007.
- ^ Feki, Donya (29 November 2007). "Jean Quatremer: a nation has been born—Flanders". Café Babel. Archived from the original on 9 March 2010. Retrieved 29 November 2007.
- ^ Hechter (M.), The Dynamics of Secession, Acta Sociologica, vol. 35, 1992, p. 267.
- ^ "Entrevista A Marcel Farinelli (1): "Córcega Y Cerdeña Forman Un Archipiélago Invisible Al Tener Sus Islas Nacionalismos De Signo Opuesto"". 9 April 2014.
- ^ "What next for independence movements in Europe? | openDemocracy".
- ^ "Identità e autonomia in Sardegna – FocuSardegna". Archived from the original on 14 July 2014.
- ^ "La Sardegna che vorrebbe l'indipendenza come i catalani". La Stampa. 9 November 2015.
- ^ Gianmario Demuro; Ilenia Ruggiu; Francesco Mola (2013). Identità e Autonomia in Sardegna e Scozia. Maggioli Editore. pp. 35–39. ISBN 978-8-8387-8243-5.
- ^ "Focus: La questione identitaria e indipendentista in Sardegna - University of Cagliari, Ilenia Ruggiu" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 August 2017. Retrieved 17 March 2022.
- ^ Ruggiu, Ilenia (26 June 2014). "The Scottish Referendum: The View from Italy and Sardinia". Scottish Affairs. 23 (3): 407–414. doi:10.3366/scot.2014.0039.
- ^ "Indipendentista il 40% dei sardi (Conferenza delle Regioni e delle Province autonome)". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
- ^ "La Sardegna vuole l'indipendenza. Favorevoli 4 sardi su 10". controcampus.it. 1 May 2012.
- ^ "gianfrancopintore: Il 40% dei sardi è per l'indipendenza; il resto per la sovranità". 30 April 2012.
- ^ "Delibere - Regione Autonoma della Sardegna". regione.sardegna.it.
- ^ La Sardegna: lo stato delle cose fra "percepito" e ossatura reale, Istituto Ixè, Fondazione di Sardegna; Vissuto – identità, table n. 44
- ^ "L'Isola ha paura del futuro Fiducia solo sul turismo – Regione". 7 December 2017.
- ^ "Dark truth behind Sardinia's holiday oasis". news.com.au.
- ^ "Sardinia: Militarization, Contamination and Cancer in Paradise" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2016.
- ^ "Sardegna, La Protesta Contro Le Servitu'". rai.tv.
- ^ "Così in Sardegna si è riacceso l'indipendentismo, Nicola Mirenzi – Europa Quotidiano".
- ^ <<In chiave antimilitarista, nel quadro del tradizionale attivismo contestativo contro la presenza di strutture militari sul territorio nazionale, a fronte del tono minore che ha caratterizzato l'impegno dei comitati siciliani contro il sistema satellitare MUOS, si è rilevato un innalzamento della tensione mobilitativa in Sardegna, ove espressioni dell'antagonismo e dell'indipendentismo sardo hanno rivitalizzato la protesta contro le esercitazioni nei poligoni e nelle installazioni militari dell'Isola, reclamando la smilitarizzazione del territorio.>> Relazione sulla politica dell'informazione per la sicurezza, pg.69
- ^ "Capo Frasca, la nuova Pratobello". 15 September 2014. Archived from the original on 16 August 2022. Retrieved 6 May 2022.
- ^ "Oltre 5mila per dire no ai poligoni festa identitaria davanti ai cancelli". La Nuova Sardegna. 15 September 2014.
- ^ Marrocco, Adalgisa. "Indipendentismo sardo, questo sconosciuto". Contrappunti.
- ^ "Be On The Citizen Side Of Things". citizenside.com.
- ^ Mattu, Katjuscia. Internal colonialism in Western Europe: the case of Sardinia
- ^ "I fondamenti storici dell'indipendenza sarda – Lacanas".
- ^ "Parties, associations ask for direct representation of Sardinia in European Parliament". Nationalia. 30 May 2023.
- ^ "Europee, in Sardegna campagna "Eu non voto". C'è anche Zappadu". Il Fatto Quotidiano. 8 May 2014.
- ^ "Il Senato affonda il collegio Sardegna, per l'Isola nessun europarlamentare". 19 March 2014.
- ^ Eve Hepburn, New Challenges for Stateless Nationalist and Regionalist Parties, Routledge, 2010, pp.121
- ^ "Referendum consultivo in Sardegna". Assonucleare.it. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016.
- ^ "Referendum nucleare Sardegna: concluse verifiche Comuni, i SI al 97,13% - Regione Autonoma della Sardegna". regione.sardegna.it. Archived from the original on 29 December 2022. Retrieved 17 March 2022.
- ^ "Sardegna: paradiso turistico o la lenta morte di un popolo? Di Marco Oggianu, 21.12.2006". gfbv.it.
- ^ "Veneto Libero, Indipendente (nella Nato in Europa e con l'Euro.... Il Problema è lo STATO ITALIANO) - Rischio Calcolato". rischiocalcolato.it. Archived from the original on 22 March 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
- ^ "Referendum consultivo". referendum2017.consiglioveneto.it.
- ^ "L'Europa Secondo la Lega". 2 July 1993.
- ^ "dettaglio news - Regione del Veneto".
- ^ "Europee: Zaia, serve un'Europa forte e delle Regioni". www.liberoquotidiano.it.
- ^ "Zaia: "Noi come la CatalognaMi farei anche arrestare"". 22 September 2017.
- ^ "Zaia: "Risorse Ue sono soldi anche nostri, vanno spesi bene"". 10 October 2023.
- ^ "Turkish Cypriot community". European Commission — Directorate-General for Enlargement. 3 January 2007. Archived from the original on 10 December 2010.
- ^ "Outcome of the special European Council (Article 50) meeting of 29 April 2017" (PDF). European Parliament. 1 May 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 December 2018. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
- ^ Rankin, Jennifer (28 April 2017). "Europe could allow a united Ireland to join EU after Brexit". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 23 July 2020.
- ^ Nescutu, Madalin (7 April 2021). "Numărul unioniștilor, în creștere accelerată în Moldova: cel mai recent sondaj arată că 44% dintre ei vor unirea cu România" [The number of unionists, growing rapidly in Moldova: the latest poll shows that 44% of them want union with Romania]. g4media.ro (in Romanian). Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
- ^ a b "Romania-Moldova reunification: Three scenarios". 5 September 2023.
- ^ "A union between Moldova and Romania: On the cards?". EUObserver. 5 March 2015. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020.
- ^ "Moldova and Romania: A Long and Complicated Relationship | Origins". 27 July 2023.
- ^ "Gagauzia Voters Choose Russia over EU". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 4 February 2014.
- ^ "Treaty establishing the European community, last revision from Nice 2001, Art.299(6)a". EUR-Lex. 1 January 2004. Archived from the original on 16 November 2013. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
- ^ Spongenberg, Helena (4 May 2006). "Fish keep Faroe Islands at a distance from EU". EUobserver.com. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ "Portal.fo" (in Faroese). Retrieved 7 January 2011.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ a b c "Greenland's exit warning to Britain". Polotico.eu. 22 June 2016. Archived from the original on 18 October 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
- ^ "Legislation (Greenland)". Official Journal of the European Communities. 28. 1 February 1985. Archived from the original on 11 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
- ^ "Greenland could re-join the EU". EUobserver Review. 5 January 2007. Archived from the original on 20 January 2008. Retrieved 25 June 2007.
- ^ Baume, Maïa de La (22 June 2016). "Greenland's exit warning to Britain". politico.eu. Archived from the original on 18 October 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
- ^ "Treaty of Lisbon Article 2, point 293" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 October 2017. Retrieved 2 June 2008.
- ^ "Countries - Pacific - New Caledonia - Information Paper - NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade". mfat.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 28 January 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
Further reading
[edit]- "Ukraine ratifies EU association agreement". Deutsche Welle. 16 September 2014. Archived from the original on 17 March 2015. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
- "European Parliament resolution of 17 July 2014 on Ukraine (2014/2717(RSP))". European Parliament. 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 24 January 2016. Retrieved 20 July 2015.
pursuant to Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine – like any other European state - have a European perspective and may apply to become members of the Union provided that they adhere to the principles of democracy, respect fundamental freedoms and human and minority rights and ensure the rule of law;
External links
[edit]- EU enlargement – Europa (web portal)
- European Union Member States and applicant countries – European NAvigator
- Bahhouth, Victor; Ziemnowicz, Christopher (6 March 2018). "Meeting the Global Challenges of Doing Business in the Five Candidate Countries on the Road to Join the European Union". Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 10 (3): 1297–1318. doi:10.1007/s13132-018-0531-3. S2CID 158074120.
- Dimitrijevic, Vojin; Hartmann, Florence; Jovic, Dejan; Memisevic, Tija (June 2009). Batt, Judy; Obradović, Jelena (eds.). "War crimes, conditionality and EU integration in the Western Balkans". Chaillot Papers (116). Archived from the original on 23 December 2009.