Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimbo Slice (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
CrazyAces489 (talk | contribs) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(41 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''keep'''. ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) -- [[User:Sam Sailor|Sam Sailor]] [[User talk:Sam Sailor|<sup>''Talk!''</sup>]] 12:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Kimbo Slice]]=== |
===[[Kimbo Slice]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}} |
|||
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimbo Slice}}</ul></div> |
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimbo Slice}}</ul></div> |
||
:{{la|Kimbo Slice}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimbo Slice (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 27#{{anchorencode:Kimbo Slice}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kimbo_Slice_(3rd_nomination) Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Kimbo Slice}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimbo Slice (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 27#{{anchorencode:Kimbo Slice}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kimbo_Slice_(3rd_nomination) Stats]</span>) |
||
Line 6: | Line 12: | ||
Fails [[WP:MMANOT]] [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 05:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
Fails [[WP:MMANOT]] [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 05:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
Criteria supporting notability |
::Criteria supporting notability |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Martial arts|list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 05:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Keep'''. All of the coverage combined adds up to sufficient notability. --[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 07:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:'''comment''' Fails [[WP:MMANOT]][[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 12:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::A dodgy MMA guideline isn't the be all and end all. He is more of a fighting 'personality' than someone who can judged on his achievements in either MMA or boxing. --[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 17:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:He is known for MMA. He fails MMANOTE and BoxNote. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 20:41, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep'''. Very notable subject - plenty of coverage in national media, sufficient notability outside MMA criteria.[[User:Jordanbowden|Jordanbowden]] ([[User talk:Jordanbowden|talk]]) 09:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:'''comment''' He is an MMA fighter. Has not met criterea. Fails [[WP:MMANOT]][[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 12:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sportspeople|list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Keep''' The MMA criteria are built up through consensus and are subject to change. They give a pretty good indicator of notability but have never been meant to be a hard, dare I say legalistic, line - I would not call them dodgy. I do agree with [[User:Michig|Michig]] that he is more of a fighting 'personality' than someone who can judged on his achievements in either MMA or boxing and his coverage backs that up. He meets [[WP:GNG]]. If we are discussing strict MMA guidelines he has 2 of 3 Top Tier fights and has signed a multifight deal with Bellator with that magical third fight scheduled - I would leave it alone for that reason alone.[[User:PRehse|Peter Rehse]] ([[User talk:PRehse|talk]]) 17:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::'''comment'''He fails MMANote and BoxingNot. You also can't use [[WP:CRYSTALBALL]]. The thirds fight hasn't happened. The other "UFC" fight is for a reality show and wasn't a true UFC event. Additionally these pages were deleted for not having a third fight... [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hugo_Duarte] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jos%C3%A9_Landi-Jons] [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 20:41, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' It's debatable whether he's notable enough just for his MMA history, or his boxing history, or even his acting history. But when you combine all three, I think he is more than notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/209.90.140.72|209.90.140.72]] ([[User talk:209.90.140.72|talk]]) 23:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' Fails [[WP:NBOX]] and [[WP:MMANOT]] . Simply not fully notable as of yet. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 01:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' He had four fights in EliteXC, two of them were main events on national television. At the time of these fights, EliteXC was a "top tier MMA organization". He has also been an actor in a few movies, has a participated in several professional boxing fights, and is a well known internet personality and "street fighter". If he was just one of these things his place on Wiki would be debatable, but as the person said above, the combination of all these things make him more that notable enough to warrant a Wiki article about him. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Luxus420|Luxus420]] ([[User talk:Luxus420|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Luxus420|contribs]]) 23:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:::'''Comment''' According to [[WP:MMATIER]] EliteXC was a second tier organization. He fails [[WP:MMANOT]] and [[WP:NBOX]]. This individual just failed an AFD and is has more quality fights than Kimbo and is a well known kickboxer. [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jos%C3%A9_Landi-Jons]] [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 01:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' He doesn't meet [[WP:NMMA]], but this is one of those cases where he received so much media coverage that he meets [[WP:GNG]] in spite of that. [[User:Papaursa|Papaursa]] ([[User talk:Papaursa|talk]]) 18:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''comment'''What is reliable? Do you see the problem in that he fails [[WP:MMANOT]] and [[WP:NBOX]]. We are using it as a strict guideline and because someone is a street fighter they are now notable? Under what guidelines?![[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 03:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' CrazyAces489 nominated the article for deletion, and has made several comments restating the same opinion. Your opinion is crystal clear -- you've stated it SEVEN times now. Repeatedly stating the same point of view does nothing to further validate your opinion. [[Special:Contributions/209.90.140.72|209.90.140.72]] ([[User talk:209.90.140.72|talk]]) 00:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' He's one of the few people I know of that are famous fighters. It's Bruce Lee, Mike Tyson and Kimbo Slice. [[Special:Contributions/88.90.246.129|88.90.246.129]] ([[User talk:88.90.246.129|talk]]) 06:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' Google is not the decider of all things notable, but more than 2 million hits for "Kimbo Slice" is a fair hint that the subject is notable. [[User:Athomeinkobe|AtHomeIn神戸]] ([[User talk:Athomeinkobe|talk]]) 07:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' No doubt he received lots of coverage--even if he was overhyped. Doesn't meet any specific profession standards but does meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231]] ([[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 21:58, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' Well known street fighter, sold more PPV than most UFC champions. Will fight in Bellator against Ken Shamrock so just leave him. [[User:Master Sun Tzu|Master Sun Tzu]] ([[User talk:Master Sun Tzu|talk]]) 19:18, 3 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''merge to mma''' - this illustrates the problem of some of the guidelines. too often they are followed as a stiff law rather than a guideline.[[Special:Contributions/24.103.234.74|24.103.234.74]] ([[User talk:24.103.234.74|talk]]) 20:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
::'''Comment''' He was famous before MMA, that's why he fought in UFC. So he is not MMA fighter or Boxer he is '''youtube sensation'''. You can not fight in UFC just like that, he was brought in UFC because he is famous. Famous people have Wikipedia article. [[User:Master Sun Tzu|Master Sun Tzu]] ([[User talk:Master Sun Tzu|talk]]) 00:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
:::'''comment''' the [[Numa Numa (video)]] individual, Gary Brolsma was merged into the song's wikipedia page. He was a youtube video sensation. Does this make him notable? No, In the same way, Kimbo is NOT notable. When another MMA fight comes along he will be more notable. |
|||
⚫ | |||
::::'''comment''' that's a very weak argument. Kimbo Slice should have his own article just as Mike Tyson and Bruce Lee. Or do you think those fighters shouldn't have a similar article? Maybe merge Mike Tyson into boxing and Bruce Lee into Kong Fu? [[Special:Contributions/176.11.137.7|176.11.137.7]] ([[User talk:176.11.137.7|talk]]) 09:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
:::Now that's just silly - I don't think Kimbo is anywhere near the level in popularity, or otherwise, of Mike Tyson or Bruce Lee.[[User:PRehse|Peter Rehse]] ([[User talk:PRehse|talk]]) 11:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::::'''Comment''' You compare singing and beating the shit out of people in backyard:) Diference between Gary Brolsma and Kimbo Slice is that noone knows who Gary is and everyone knows who Kimbo is. Also Kimbo ended in world's best MMA promotion, UFC, and still noone knows who Gary is. You just hate Kimbo, people love him. [[User:Master Sun Tzu|Master Sun Tzu]] ([[User talk:Master Sun Tzu|talk]]) 12:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' looks like a bad faith attempt to game the system. -[[User:Lapinmies|<span style="color:green; font-family:system;">Lapinmies</span>]] 10:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*'''comment'''I don't understand this game the system. He simply isn't a notable fighter in either boxing or mma. He was a youtube sensation just like Gary. Gary is known as the Numa Numa guy. Kimbo's real name isn't Kimbo it's Ferguson. I actually like Kimbo but question his notability. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489|talk]]) 13:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::'''Comment''' He ended in UFC because of his street fights. Where did Numa Numa guy end? :D Also he signed with Bellator, he will be notable MMA fighter in few months. People, he is notable person. [[User:Master Sun Tzu|Master Sun Tzu]] ([[User talk:Master Sun Tzu|talk]]) 17:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 03:49, 1 March 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Kimbo Slice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:MMANOT CrazyAces489 (talk) 05:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Criteria supporting notability
- Subject of multiple independent articles/documentaries--articles should be from national or international media, not just local coverage or press releases from organizations Maybe
- Fought for the highest title of a top tier MMA organization No
- Fought at least three (3) fights for top tier MMA organizations No
- CrazyAces489 (talk) 05:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. CrazyAces489 (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. All of the coverage combined adds up to sufficient notability. --Michig (talk) 07:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- comment Fails WP:MMANOTCrazyAces489 (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- A dodgy MMA guideline isn't the be all and end all. He is more of a fighting 'personality' than someone who can judged on his achievements in either MMA or boxing. --Michig (talk) 17:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- He is known for MMA. He fails MMANOTE and BoxNote. CrazyAces489 (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Very notable subject - plenty of coverage in national media, sufficient notability outside MMA criteria.Jordanbowden (talk) 09:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- comment He is an MMA fighter. Has not met criterea. Fails WP:MMANOTCrazyAces489 (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The MMA criteria are built up through consensus and are subject to change. They give a pretty good indicator of notability but have never been meant to be a hard, dare I say legalistic, line - I would not call them dodgy. I do agree with Michig that he is more of a fighting 'personality' than someone who can judged on his achievements in either MMA or boxing and his coverage backs that up. He meets WP:GNG. If we are discussing strict MMA guidelines he has 2 of 3 Top Tier fights and has signed a multifight deal with Bellator with that magical third fight scheduled - I would leave it alone for that reason alone.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- commentHe fails MMANote and BoxingNot. You also can't use WP:CRYSTALBALL. The thirds fight hasn't happened. The other "UFC" fight is for a reality show and wasn't a true UFC event. Additionally these pages were deleted for not having a third fight... [1] and [2] CrazyAces489 (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep It's debatable whether he's notable enough just for his MMA history, or his boxing history, or even his acting history. But when you combine all three, I think he is more than notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. 209.90.140.72 (talk) 23:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Fails WP:NBOX and WP:MMANOT . Simply not fully notable as of yet. CrazyAces489 (talk) 01:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep He had four fights in EliteXC, two of them were main events on national television. At the time of these fights, EliteXC was a "top tier MMA organization". He has also been an actor in a few movies, has a participated in several professional boxing fights, and is a well known internet personality and "street fighter". If he was just one of these things his place on Wiki would be debatable, but as the person said above, the combination of all these things make him more that notable enough to warrant a Wiki article about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luxus420 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment According to WP:MMATIER EliteXC was a second tier organization. He fails WP:MMANOT and WP:NBOX. This individual just failed an AFD and is has more quality fights than Kimbo and is a well known kickboxer. [[3]] CrazyAces489 (talk) 01:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep He doesn't meet WP:NMMA, but this is one of those cases where he received so much media coverage that he meets WP:GNG in spite of that. Papaursa (talk) 18:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- commentWhat is reliable? Do you see the problem in that he fails WP:MMANOT and WP:NBOX. We are using it as a strict guideline and because someone is a street fighter they are now notable? Under what guidelines?!CrazyAces489 (talk) 03:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment CrazyAces489 nominated the article for deletion, and has made several comments restating the same opinion. Your opinion is crystal clear -- you've stated it SEVEN times now. Repeatedly stating the same point of view does nothing to further validate your opinion. 209.90.140.72 (talk) 00:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep He's one of the few people I know of that are famous fighters. It's Bruce Lee, Mike Tyson and Kimbo Slice. 88.90.246.129 (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Google is not the decider of all things notable, but more than 2 million hits for "Kimbo Slice" is a fair hint that the subject is notable. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No doubt he received lots of coverage--even if he was overhyped. Doesn't meet any specific profession standards but does meet WP:GNG. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Well known street fighter, sold more PPV than most UFC champions. Will fight in Bellator against Ken Shamrock so just leave him. Master Sun Tzu (talk) 19:18, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- merge to mma - this illustrates the problem of some of the guidelines. too often they are followed as a stiff law rather than a guideline.24.103.234.74 (talk) 20:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment He was famous before MMA, that's why he fought in UFC. So he is not MMA fighter or Boxer he is youtube sensation. You can not fight in UFC just like that, he was brought in UFC because he is famous. Famous people have Wikipedia article. Master Sun Tzu (talk) 00:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- comment the Numa Numa (video) individual, Gary Brolsma was merged into the song's wikipedia page. He was a youtube video sensation. Does this make him notable? No, In the same way, Kimbo is NOT notable. When another MMA fight comes along he will be more notable.
- comment that's a very weak argument. Kimbo Slice should have his own article just as Mike Tyson and Bruce Lee. Or do you think those fighters shouldn't have a similar article? Maybe merge Mike Tyson into boxing and Bruce Lee into Kong Fu? 176.11.137.7 (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Now that's just silly - I don't think Kimbo is anywhere near the level in popularity, or otherwise, of Mike Tyson or Bruce Lee.Peter Rehse (talk) 11:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment You compare singing and beating the shit out of people in backyard:) Diference between Gary Brolsma and Kimbo Slice is that noone knows who Gary is and everyone knows who Kimbo is. Also Kimbo ended in world's best MMA promotion, UFC, and still noone knows who Gary is. You just hate Kimbo, people love him. Master Sun Tzu (talk) 12:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- comment the Numa Numa (video) individual, Gary Brolsma was merged into the song's wikipedia page. He was a youtube video sensation. Does this make him notable? No, In the same way, Kimbo is NOT notable. When another MMA fight comes along he will be more notable.
- Comment He was famous before MMA, that's why he fought in UFC. So he is not MMA fighter or Boxer he is youtube sensation. You can not fight in UFC just like that, he was brought in UFC because he is famous. Famous people have Wikipedia article. Master Sun Tzu (talk) 00:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment looks like a bad faith attempt to game the system. -Lapinmies 10:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- commentI don't understand this game the system. He simply isn't a notable fighter in either boxing or mma. He was a youtube sensation just like Gary. Gary is known as the Numa Numa guy. Kimbo's real name isn't Kimbo it's Ferguson. I actually like Kimbo but question his notability. CrazyAces489 (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment He ended in UFC because of his street fights. Where did Numa Numa guy end? :D Also he signed with Bellator, he will be notable MMA fighter in few months. People, he is notable person. Master Sun Tzu (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.