Migration Period: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Davide King (talk | contribs) |
||
(726 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Period from the fourth to the sixth centuries}} |
|||
{{two other uses|European migrations in the early part of the first millennium A.D|prehistoric migrations|Human migration|the 2003 Canadian film|The Barbarian Invasions}} |
|||
{{Expand German| |
{{Expand German|date=September 2024|topic=hist}} |
||
{{about|the period of widespread migrations in Europe during the first millennium AD|prehistoric migrations|History of human migration|seasonal periods of human migrations|seasonal human migration|seasonal periods of animal migrations|animal migration}} |
|||
{{Redirect2|Barbarian invasion|Barbarian invasions|the 2003 Canadian film|The Barbarian Invasions}} |
|||
{{Infobox |
{{Infobox |
||
| above |
| above = Invasions of the Roman Empire |
||
| image |
| image = [[File:Invasions of the Roman Empire 1.png|300px|Basic view of second- to fifth-century migrations (see also [[:File:World 820.png|map of the world in 820]])|alt=Map of Europe, with colored lines denoting migration routes]] |
||
| caption |
| caption = |
||
| header1 |
| header1 = |
||
| label1 |
| label1 = {{Nowrap|Other names}} |
||
| data1 |
| data1 = |
||
| header2 |
| header2 = |
||
| label2 |
| label2 = Time |
||
| data2 = 300–800 AD (greatest estimate)<ref>Allgemein Springer (2006), der auch auf alternative Definitionen außerhalb der ''[[communis opinio]]'' hinweist. Alle Epochengrenzen sind letztlich nur ein Konstrukt und vor allem durch Konvention begründet. Vgl. auch Stefan Krautschick: ''Zur Entstehung eines Datums. 375 – Beginn der Völkerwanderung''. In: ''[[Klio (Zeitschrift)|Klio]]'' 82, 2000, S. 217–222 sowie Stefan Krautschick: ''Hunnensturm und Germanenflut: 375 – Beginn der Völkerwanderung?'' In: ''[[Byzantinische Zeitschrift]]'' 92, 1999, S. 10–67.</ref> |
|||
| data2 = 21–700 AD |
|||
| header3 |
| header3 = |
||
| label3 |
| label3 = Place |
||
| data3 |
| data3 = Europe and the [[Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean]] [[region]] |
||
| header4 |
| header4 = |
||
| label4 |
| label4 = Event |
||
| data4 |
| data4 = Tribes invading the [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|declining Roman Empire]] |
||
| header5 = |
|||
| label5 = |
|||
| data5 = |
|||
| header6 = |
|||
| label6 = |
|||
| data6 = |
|||
| header7 = |
|||
| label7 = |
|||
| data7 = |
|||
| header8 = |
|||
| label8 = |
|||
| data8 = |
|||
| header9 = |
|||
| label9 = |
|||
| data9 = |
|||
| header10 = |
|||
| label10 = |
|||
| data10 = |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''Migration Period''' (circa 300 to 600 AD), also known as the '''Barbarian Invasions''', was a period in [[History of Europe|European history]] marked by large-scale migrations that saw the [[fall of the Western Roman Empire]] and subsequent settlement of its former territories by various tribes, and the establishment of the [[barbarian kingdoms|post-Roman kingdoms]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=History of Europe - Barbarian Migrations, Invasions {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Europe/Barbarian-migrations-and-invasions |access-date=2023-08-12 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
The '''Migration Period''', also known as the '''''Völkerwanderung'''''<ref>[http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/v%C3%B6lkerwanderung ''Völkerwanderung'' according to Collins]</ref> ("migration of peoples" in [[German language|German]]) or '''''Barbarian Invasions''''', was a period of intensified [[human migration]] in [[Europe]], often defined from the period when it seriously impacted the [[Roman world]], as running from about 376 to 800 AD<ref>John Hines, Karen Høilund Nielsen, Frank Siegmund, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?ei=T-NjTrfyOY2d-wbQxazyCQ&ct=result&id=mq1mAAAAMAAJ&dq=migration+period+chronology&q=%27400-800%27#search_anchor The pace of change: studies in early-medieval chronology], Oxbow Books, 1999, p. 93, ISBN 978-1-900188-78-4</ref><ref>The delimiting dates vary; often cited are 410, the [[Sack of Rome (410)|Sack of Rome]] by [[Alaric I]]; and 751, the accession of [[Pepin the Short|Pippin the Short]] and the establishment of the [[Carolingian dynasty]].</ref> during the transition from [[Late Antiquity]] to the [[Early Middle Ages]]. This period was marked by profound changes both within the [[Roman Empire]] and beyond its "[[barbarian]] frontier". The migrants who came first were [[Germanic peoples|Germanic tribes]] such as the [[Goths]], [[Vandals]], [[Angles]], [[Saxons]], [[Lombards]], [[Suebi]], [[Frisii]], [[Jutes]] and [[Franks]]; they were later pushed westwards by the [[Huns]], [[Eurasian Avars|Avars]], [[Slavs]], [[Bulgars]] and [[Alans]].<ref>Bury, J. B., The Invasion of Europe by the Barbarians, Norton Library, 1967.</ref> |
|||
Later migrations (such as the [[Muslim conquests|Arab conquest]] and [[Vikings|Viking]], [[Normans|Norman]], [[Hungarian people|Hungarian]], [[Moors|Moorish]], [[Turkic peoples|Turkic]], and [[Mongol invasion of Europe|Mongol invasions]]) also had significant effects (especially in [[North Africa]], the [[Iberian peninsula]], [[Anatolia]] and [[Central Europe|Central]] and [[Eastern Europe]]); however, they are outside the scope of the Migration Period. |
|||
The term refers to the important role played by the migration, invasion, and settlement of various tribes, notably the [[Burgundians]], [[Vandals]], [[Goths]], [[Alemanni]], [[Alans]], [[Huns]], [[early Slavs]], [[Pannonian Avars]], [[Bulgars]] and [[Hungarians|Magyars]] within or into the territories of the [[Roman Empire]] and Europe as a whole. The period is traditionally taken to have begun in AD 375 (possibly as early as 300) and ended in 568.<ref>Halsall, Guy. ''Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568''. Cambridge University Press, 2007.</ref> Various factors contributed to this phenomenon of migration and invasion, and their role and significance are still widely discussed. |
|||
==Chronology== |
|||
{{See also|Ostrogoths|Visigoths|Burgundians|Alans|Lombards|Angles|Saxons|Jutes|Suebi|Alemanni|Gepids|Vandals}} |
|||
Historians differ as to the dates for the beginning and ending of the Migration Period. The beginning of the period is widely regarded as the invasion of Europe by the Huns from Asia in about 375 and the ending with the [[Kingdom of the Lombards|conquest of Italy by the Lombards]] in 568,<ref>For example, Halsall, (2008), ''Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568''</ref> but a more loosely set period is from as early as 300 to as late as 800.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=FYO7UBBhWKIC&pg=PA5 "The Migration period (fourth to eighth century)"], p.5 ''Migration Art, A.D. 300-800'', 1995, Metropolitan Museum of Art, ed. Katharine Reynolds Brown, {{ISBN|0870997505}}, 9780870997501</ref> For example, in the 4th century a very large group of Goths was settled as ''[[foederati]]'' within the Roman [[Balkans]], and the Franks were settled south of the [[Rhine]] in Roman [[Gaul]]. In 406 a particularly large and unexpected [[crossing of the Rhine]] was made by a group of [[Vandals]], Alans and [[Suebi]]. As central power broke down in the Western Roman Empire, the military became more important but was dominated by men of [[Barbarian kingdoms|barbarian]] origin. |
|||
=== {{anchor|Origins of the Germanic Tribes}}Origins of Germanic tribes === |
|||
[[Germanic peoples]] moved out of southern [[Scandinavia]] and [[Germany]]<ref>http://www.eurasischesmagazin.de/artikel/Anatolien-war-nicht-Ur-Heimat-der-indogermanischen-Staemme/20040313</ref><ref>Wolfram Euler, Konrad Badenheuer; "Sprache und Herkunft der Germanen: Abriss des Protogermanischen vor der Ersten Lautverschiebung"; 2009; ISBN 3-9812110-1-4, ISBN 978-3-9812110-1-6</ref> to the adjacent lands between the [[Elbe]] and [[Oder]] after 1000 BC. The first wave moved westward and southward (pushing the resident [[Celts]] west to the [[Rhine]] by about 200 BC) and moving into [[southern Germany]] up to the Roman province of [[Gaul]] by 100 BC, where they were stopped by [[Gaius Marius]] and [[Julius Caesar]]. It is this western group which was described by the Roman historian [[Tacitus]] (56–117 AD) and Julius Caesar (100–44 BC). A later wave of Germanic tribes migrated eastward and southward from [[Scandinavia]] between 600 and 300 BC to the opposite coast of the [[Baltic Sea]], moving up the [[Vistula]] near the [[Carpathian Mountains|Carpathians]]. During [[Tacitus]]' era they included lesser known tribes such as the [[Tencteri and Usipetes|Tencteri]], [[Cherusci]], [[Hermunduri]] and [[Chatti]]; however, a period of federation and intermarriage resulted in the familiar groups known as the [[Alemanni]], [[Franks]], [[Saxons]], [[Frisians]] and [[Thuringii|Thuringians]].<ref>Bury, Invasion, Ch. 1.</ref> |
|||
There are contradictory opinions as to whether the fall of the Western Roman Empire was a result of an increase in migrations, or if both the breakdown of central power and the increased importance of non-Romans created additional internal factors. Migrations, and the use of non-Romans in the military, were known in the periods before and after, and the [[Byzantine Empire|Eastern Roman Empire]] adapted and continued to exist until the [[fall of Constantinople]] to the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottomans]] in 1453. The fall of the Western Roman Empire, although it involved the establishment of competing barbarian kingdoms, was to some extent managed by the Eastern emperors. |
|||
=== {{anchor|The first phase}}First phase === |
|||
The Migration Period may be divided into two phases. |
|||
The first phase, occurring between AD 300 and 500, is partly documented by Greek and Latin historians but difficult to verify [[Archaeology|archaeologically]]. It put Germanic peoples in control of most areas of the then-[[Western Roman Empire]].<ref name = halsall51>{{harvtxt |Halsall|2006|p = 51}}</ref> The [[Tervingi]] entered Roman territory (after a clash with the [[Huns]]) in 376. Some time thereafter in [[Marcianopolis]], the escort to [[Fritigern]] (their leader) was killed while meeting with [[Lupicinus (Roman) | Lupicinus]].{{Sfn |Wolfram|2001|pp=127ff.}} The Tervingi rebelled, and the [[Visigoths]], a group derived either from the Tervingi or from a fusion of mainly Gothic groups, eventually invaded Italy and [[Sack of Rome (410)|sacked Rome]] in 410, before settling in Iberia and founding [[Visigothic Kingdom|a kingdom]] that lasted for 300 years. They were followed into Roman territory by the [[Ostrogoths]], led by [[Theodoric the Great]], who settled in Italy. In [[Gaul]] the Franks (a fusion of western Germanic tribes whose leaders had been aligned with Rome since the third century AD) entered Roman lands gradually and peacefully during the fifth century, and were accepted as rulers by the Roman-Gaulish population. Fending off challenges from the Allemanni, Burgundians, and Visigoths, the Frankish kingdom became the nucleus of the future France and Germany. The initial [[Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain]] occurred during the fifth century, when [[Roman Britain|Roman control of Britain]] had come to an end.{{Sfn | Dumville | 1990}} |
|||
The migrants comprised war bands or tribes of 10,000 to 20,000 people.<ref name="Heather2003">{{cite book|author=Peter Heather|title=The Visigoths from the Migration Period to the Seventh Century: An Ethnographic Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4MADmH2eaGIC&pg=PA54|year=2003|publisher=Boydell & Brewer Ltd|isbn=978-1-84383-033-7|page=54}}</ref> Immigration was common throughout the time of the Roman Empire,<ref>Giovanni Milani-Santarpia, [http://www.mariamilani.com/ancient_rome/immigration_roman_empire.htm "Immigration Roman Empire"], MariaMilani.com</ref> but over the course of 100 years, the migrants numbered not more than 750,000 in total,{{citation needed|date=July 2020}} compared to an average 40 million population of the Roman Empire at that time. The first migrations of peoples were made by [[Germanic peoples|Germanic tribes]] such as the Goths (including the [[Visigoths]] and the [[Ostrogoths]]), the Vandals, the [[Anglo-Saxons]], the Lombards, the Suebi, the [[Frisii]], the [[Jutes]], the [[Burgundians]], the Alemanni, the [[Sciri]] and the Franks; they were later pushed westward by the Huns, the Avars, the Slavs and the Bulgars.<ref>Bury, J. B., ''The Invasion of Europe by the Barbarians'', Norton Library, 1967.</ref> Later invasions, such as the [[Vikings]], the [[Normans]], the [[Varangians]], the [[Hungarians]], the [[Arabs]], the [[Turkic peoples|Turks]], and the [[Mongols]] also had significant effects (especially in [[North Africa]], the [[Iberian Peninsula]], [[Anatolia]] and [[Central Europe|Central]] and [[Eastern Europe]]). |
|||
=== {{anchor|The second phase}}Second phase === |
|||
The second phase took place between 500 and 700 and saw Slavic tribes settling in [[Central Europe|central]] and eastern Europe (particularly in eastern [[Germania|Magna Germania]]), gradually making it predominantly Slavic.<ref name=kob530>Zbigniew Kobyliński. The Slavs ''in'' Paul Fouracre. The New Cambridge Medieval History pp. 530–537</ref> Additionally, Turkic tribes such as the [[Eurasian Avars|Avars]] were involved in this phase. In 567, the Avars and the Lombards destroyed much of the [[Gepids|Gepid Kingdom]]. The [[Lombards]], a Germanic people, settled in [[northern Italy]] in the region now known as [[Lombardy]]. The [[Central Asia|Central Asian]] [[Bulgars]] had occupied the [[Pontic steppe]] north of [[Caucasus]] since the second century, but after, pushed by the [[Khazars]], the majority of them migrated west and dominated [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine]] territories along the [[First Bulgarian Empire|lower Danube]] in the seventh century. |
|||
== Chronology == |
|||
During the early [[Byzantine–Arab Wars]] the [[Rashidun army|Arab armies]] attempted to invade [[Balkans|southeast Europe]] via [[Anatolia|Asia Minor]] during the late seventh and early eighth centuries, but were defeated at the [[Siege of Constantinople (717–718)|siege of Constantinople]] by the joint forces of Byzantium and the [[Bulgars]]. During the [[Khazar–Arab Wars]], the [[Khazars]] stopped the [[Muslim conquests|Arab expansion]] into [[Europe]] across the [[Caucasus]]. At the same time, the Moors (consisting of [[Arab]]s and [[Berber people|Berbers]]) invaded Europe via [[Gibraltar]] ([[Umayyad conquest of Hispania|conquering Hispania]]—the [[Iberian Peninsula]]—from the [[Visigothic Kingdom]] in 711), before being halted by the Franks at the [[Battle of Tours]] in 732. These battles largely fixed the frontier between [[Christendom]] and [[Muslim world|Islam]] for the next [[millennium]]. The following centuries saw the Muslims successful in [[History of Islam in southern Italy|conquering Sicily]] from the Christians. |
|||
{{see|Pre-modern human migration}} |
|||
=== Germanic tribes prior to migration === |
|||
{{further|Proto-Germanic language|Pre-Roman Iron Age (Northern Europe)|Marcomannic Wars}} |
|||
[[Germanic peoples]] moved out of southern [[Scandinavia]] and northern Germany<ref>{{cite web |title=Anatolien war nicht Ur-Heimat der indogermanischen Stämme |url=http://www.eurasischesmagazin.de/artikel/Anatolien-war-nicht-Ur-Heimat-der-indogermanischen-Staemme/20040313 |access-date=2016-02-03 |publisher=Eurasischesmagazin.de}}</ref><ref>Wolfram Euler, Konrad Badenheuer; "Sprache und Herkunft der Germanen: Abriss des Protogermanischen vor der Ersten Lautverschiebung"; 2009; {{ISBN|3-9812110-1-4|978-3-9812110-1-6}}</ref> to the adjacent lands between the [[Elbe]] and [[Oder]] after 1000 BC. The first wave moved westward and southward (pushing the resident [[Celts]] west to the [[Rhine]] around 200 BC), moving into [[southern Germany]] up to the Roman provinces of [[Gaul]] and [[Cisalpine Gaul]] by 100 BC, where they were stopped by [[Gaius Marius]] and later by [[Julius Caesar]]. It is this western group which was described by the Roman historian [[Tacitus]] (AD 56–117) and Julius Caesar (100–44 BC). A later wave of Germanic tribes migrated eastward and southward from Scandinavia, between 600 and 300 BC, to the opposite coast of the [[Baltic Sea]], moving up the [[Vistula]] near the [[Carpathian Mountains]]. During [[Tacitus]]' era they included lesser-known tribes such as the [[Tencteri]], [[Cherusci]], [[Hermunduri]] and [[Chatti]]; however, a period of federation and intermarriage resulted in the familiar groups known as the [[Alemanni]], [[Franks]], [[Saxons]], [[Frisians]] and [[Thuringii|Thuringians]].<ref>Bury, Invasion, Ch. 1.</ref> |
|||
The [[Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin]] from around 895, and the [[Viking expansion]] from the late 8th century may be taken to mark the last large movements of the period. All the barbarian peoples were [[Christianization#Christianization_of_Europe_.287th-15th_centuries.29|gradually Christianized]] and integrated into the medieval Christian order. |
|||
=== First wave === |
|||
=={{anchor|Causes}}Climatic factors== |
|||
{{further|Roman Iron Age (Northern Europe)}} |
|||
A number of contemporary historical references worldwide refer to an extended period of [[Extreme weather events of 535-536|extreme weather during 535–536]]. Evidence of this cold period is also found in [[dendrochronology]] and ice cores. The consequences of this cold period are debated. |
|||
{{See also|Ostrogoths|Visigoths|Burgundians|Alans|Lombards|Angles (tribe)|Saxons|Jutes|Suebi|Alemanni|Gepids|Vandals|Huns}} |
|||
[[File:Bracteate from Funen, Denmark (DR BR42).jpg|thumb|upright|A Migration Period Germanic gold [[bracteate]] depicting a bird, horse, and stylized human head with a [[Suebian knot]]]] |
|||
The first wave of invasions, between AD 300 and 500, is partly documented by Greek and Latin historians but is difficult to verify archaeologically. It puts Germanic peoples in control of most areas of what was then the [[Western Roman Empire]].{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|p=51}} |
|||
=={{anchor|Modern discourse}}Discussions== |
|||
The [[Thervingi|Tervingi]] crossed the [[Danube]] into Roman territory in 376, in a migration fleeing the invading [[Huns]]. Some time later in [[Marcianopolis]], the escort to their leader [[Fritigern]] was killed while meeting with Roman commander [[Lupicinus (comes per Thracias)|Lupicinus]].{{Sfn |Wolfram|2001|pp=127ff.}} The Tervingi rebelled, and the Visigoths, a group derived either from the Tervingi or from a fusion of mainly [[Goths|Gothic]] groups, eventually invaded Italy and [[Sack of Rome (410)|sacked Rome in 410]] before settling in Gaul. Around 460, they founded the [[Visigothic Kingdom]] in Iberia. They were followed into Roman territory first by a confederation of [[Heruli]]an, [[Rugii|Rugian]], and [[Sciri|Scirian]] warriors under [[Odoacer]], that deposed [[Romulus Augustulus]] in 476, and later by the [[Ostrogoths]], led by [[Theodoric the Great]], who settled in Italy. |
|||
===Barbarian identity=== |
|||
The analysis of barbarian identity and how it was created and expressed during the Migration Age has elicited discussion among scholars. Herwig Wolfram (a historian of the Goths),<ref>Wolfram, Thomas J. Dunlap, tr. ''History of the Goths'' (1979) 1988:5</ref> in discussing the equation of ''migratio gentium'' with ''Völkerwanderung'', observes that Michael Schmidt introduced the equation in his 1778 history of the Germans. Wolfram observed that the significance of ''[[gens]]'' as a biological community was shifting even during the early Middle Ages; "to complicate matters, we have no way of devising a terminology that is not derived from the concept of [[nationhood]] created during the [[French Revolution]]". |
|||
In [[Gaul]], the Franks (a fusion of western [[List of ancient Germanic peoples|Germanic tribes]] whose leaders had been aligned with Rome since the 3rd century) entered Roman lands gradually during the 5th century, and after consolidating power under [[Childeric I|Childeric]] and his son [[Clovis I|Clovis's]] decisive victory over [[Syagrius]] in 486, established themselves as rulers of northern Roman Gaul. Fending off challenges from the Alemanni, Burgundians, and Visigoths, the [[Francia|Frankish kingdom]] became the nucleus of what would later become France and Germany. |
|||
The "primordialistic"<ref>Anthony D. Smith, ''The Ethnic Origins of Nations'' (Oxford, 1966) pp. 6ff, coined the term to separate these thinkers from those who view ethnicity as a situational construct, the product of history, rather than a cause, influenced by a variety of political, economic, and cultural factors.</ref> paradigm prevailed during the 19th century. Scholars such as German linguist [[Johann Gottfried Herder]] viewed tribes as coherent biological (racial) entities, using the term to refer to discrete ethnic groups.<ref>{{harvtxt|Noble|2006|p = 29}}</ref> He believed that the ''Volk'' were an organic whole, with a core identity and spirit evident in art, literature and language. These were seen as intrinsic characteristics unaffected by external influences, even conquest.<ref name = "harvtxt|Kulikowski|2007|p = 46">{{harvtxt|Kulikowski|2007|p = 46}}</ref> Language, in particular, was seen as the most important expression of ethnicity. They argued that groups sharing the same (or similar) language possessed a common identity and ancestry.<ref>This was influenced by the 'family tree' model (''Stammbaun'') of linguistics, in that relationships between related languages being the result derivation from a [[Common descent|common ancestor]]. This model still is very influential in linguistics</ref> The Romantic ideal that there had once been a single German, Celtic or Slavic people who originated from a common homeland and spoke a [[Lingua franca|common tongue]] helped provide a [[conceptual framework]] for [[political movement]]s of the 18th and 19th centuries such as [[Pan-Germanism]] and [[Pan-Slavism]].<ref name = "harvtxt|Kulikowski|2007|p = 46"/> |
|||
The initial [[Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain]] occurred during the 5th century, when [[Roman Britain|Roman control of Britain]] had come to an end.{{Sfn|Dumville|1990}} The Burgundians settled in northwestern Italy, Switzerland and Eastern France in the 5th century. |
|||
Beginning in the 1960s a reinterpretation of archaeological and historic evidence prompted scholars (such as Goffart and Todd) to propose new models for explaining the construction of barbarian identity, maintaining that no sense of shared identity was perceived by the ''Germani'';<ref name="Halsall 2008 17">{{harvtxt|Halsall|2008|p = 17}}</ref><ref>{{harvtxt|Todd|pp = 8–10}} There is no indication that the Germani possessed a feeling that they were a "separate people, nation, or group of tribes"</ref><ref>{{harvtxt|Noble|p = 29}}</ref> a similar theory has been proposed for Celtic and Slavic groups.<ref>E.g. see ''The Celtic World'', Miranda Green (1996), Page 3 and ''The Making of the Slavs''. Floring Curta (2001)</ref> This theory states that the primordialist mode of thinking was encouraged by a ''[[prima facie]]'' interpretation of [[Greco-Roman world|Graeco-Roman]] sources, which grouped together many tribes under such labels as ''Germani'', ''Keltoi'' or ''Sclavenoi'' (encouraging their perception as distinct peoples). Modernists argue that the uniqueness perceived by specific groups was based on common political and [[economic interest]]s, rather than biological or racial distinctions. |
|||
=== Second wave === |
|||
The role of language in constructing and maintaining group identity can be ephemeral, since large-scale language shifts occur commonly in history.<ref>''Archaeology and LanguageL:Correlating Archaeological and Linguistic Hypotheses''. "The Eurasian Spread Zone and the Indo-European Dispersal." [[Johanna Nichols]]. Pg 224</ref> Modernists propose the idea of "imagined communities"; the barbarian polities in late antiquity were social constructs, rather than changeless lines of blood kinship.<ref>{{harvtxt|Kulikowski|2007|p = 48}}</ref> The process of forming tribal units was called "[[ethnogenesis]]", a term coined by [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] scholar [[Yulian Bromley | Julian Bromley]].<ref>{{harvtxt |Halsall|2008|p = 15}}</ref> The Austrian school (led by Reinhard Wenskus) popularized this idea, which influenced medievalists such as Herwig Wolfram, Walter Pohl and Patrick Geary.<ref name="Halsall 2008 17"/> It argues that the stimulus for forming tribal polities was perpetuated by a small nucleus of people, known as the ''Traditionskern'' ("kernel of tradition"), who were a military or aristocratic elite. This core group formed a standard for larger units, gathering adherents by employing amalgamative metaphors such as kinship and aboriginal commonality and claiming that they perpetuated an ancient, divinely-sanctioned lineage.<ref name = "harvtxt|Geary|2003|p = 77">{{harvtxt|Geary|2003|p = 77}}</ref> |
|||
{{See also|Early Slavs|Slavic migrations to Southeastern Europe|Pannonian Avars|Magyars|Bulgars}} |
|||
[[File:Migration of Early Slavs.png|thumb|Migration of [[early Slavs]] in Europe in the 6th–7th centuries]] |
|||
[[File:Old Great Bulgaria and migration of Bulgarians.png|thumb|Migration and settlement of the [[Bulgars]] during the 6th–7th centuries AD]] |
|||
[[File:Pair of radiate-head bow brooches, Slavic, 2 of 2, c. 600-650 AD, copper alloy, gilding - Morgan Library & Museum - New York City - DSC06620.jpg|thumb|upright|Slavic [[Fibula (brooch)|fibula brooch]] made of [[copper]] dating back to the Migration Period, {{Circa|600}}–650 AD]] |
|||
Between AD 500 and 700, Slavic tribes settled more areas of central Europe and pushed farther into southern and eastern Europe, gradually making the eastern half of Europe predominantly Slavic-speaking.<ref> |
|||
A capable soldier would be able to assume the group identity without being born into the "tribe". "A victorious campaign confirmed [the leaders'] right to rule and drew [to] them an ever-growing people who accepted and shared in their identity".<ref name = "harvtxt|Geary|2003|p = 77"/> In time, these heterogeneous armies grew into a new people possessing "a strong belief in a common biological origin".<ref>{{harvtxt|Curta|2001|p = 16}}</ref> Halsall argues that no objectively-definable criterion can be consistently used to distinguish [[ethnic group]]s from one another: language, social customs, geographic habitation, religion or a common origin. "The only common factor in defining ethnicity is belief: in the reality of your group and the difference to others".<ref name = "harvtxt|Halsall|2008|p = 37">{{harvtxt|Halsall|2008|p = 37}}</ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|last1 = Kobylinski |
|||
|first1 = Zbigniew |
|||
|author-link1 = Zbigniew Kobylinski |
|||
|author-mask5 = Fouracre |
|||
|editor-last1 = Paul |
|||
|editor-first1 = Paul Fouracre |
|||
|editor-link1 = McKitterick |
|||
|editor-last2 = Rosamond |
|||
|editor-first2 = Rosamond McKitterick |
|||
|editor-link2 = Abulafia |
|||
|editor-last3 = David |
|||
|editor-first3 = David Abulafia |
|||
|year = 2005 |
|||
|chapter = The Slavs |
|||
|title = The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 1, C.500-c.700 |
|||
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=JcmwuoTsKO0C |
|||
|series = The New Cambridge Medieval History, volume 1, C.500-c.700 |
|||
|publication-place = Cambridge |
|||
|publisher = Cambridge University Press |
|||
|pages = 524ff |
|||
|isbn = 9780521362917 |
|||
|access-date = 23 October 2024 |
|||
}} |
|||
</ref> |
|||
Additionally, [[Turkic peoples|Turkic]] tribes such as the Avars and - later - [[Ugric languages|Ugric-speaking]] Magyars became involved in this second wave. In AD 567, the Avars and the [[Lombards]] destroyed much of the [[Gepids|Gepid Kingdom]]. The Lombards, a Germanic people, settled in Italy with their Herulian, Suebian, Gepid, Thuringian, Bulgar, [[Sarmatians|Sarmatian]] and [[Saxons|Saxon]] allies in the 6th century.<ref name="DBI">Bertolini 1960, pp. 34–38.</ref><ref>Schutz 2002, p. 82</ref> They were later followed by the [[Bavarian dynasty|Bavarians]] and the Franks, who conquered and ruled most of the Italian peninsula. |
|||
The Bulgars, originally a nomadic group probably from [[Central Asia]], occupied the [[Pontic–Caspian steppe|Pontic steppe]] north of [[Caucasus]] from the 2nd century. Later, pushed by the [[Khazars]], the majority of them migrated west and dominated [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine]] territories along the [[First Bulgarian Empire|lower Danube]] in the 7th century. From that time the demographic picture of the [[Balkans]] changed permanently, becoming predominantly Slavic-speaking, while pockets of native people survived in the mountains of the Balkans.<ref>Fine, John Van Antwerp (1983), ''The Early Medieval Balkans'', University of Michigan Press, {{ISBN|0-472-08149-7}}, p. 31.</ref><ref>The Miracles of Saint Demetrius</ref> |
|||
Walter Pohl highlights the dynamic nature of group identity, proposing that during the Migration Period people could live in circumstances of "ethnic ambiguity". Given that ethnicity was important for the [[Social class|upper classes]], they could adopt multiple ethnicities to secure the allegiance of their partners and followers: a phenomenon referred to as "situational ethnicity".<ref name = "harvtxt|Halsall|2008|p = 37"/> To advance socially, one needed to "grow into a dominating group with high prestige, to copy its lifestyle".<ref>{{harvtxt|Pohl|1998|p = 17}}</ref> The process of assimilation could produce "a wide variety of transitional stages".<ref>{{harvtxt|Pohl|1998|pp = 16, 17}}</ref> Followers could also disband from larger units. Factions arose, challenging the right to lead the people and uphold their traditions. Conversely defeat by an external power could mean the end of a ruler and his people, who were absorbed into the victorious confederacy.<ref>{{harvtxt|Geary|2003|p = 78}}</ref> "Seen in this light, 'ethnic' identity among barbarians was extraordinarily fluid, as new groups emerged and old ones disappeared". |
|||
Croats settled in modern Croatia and Western Bosnia, bringing with them the Serbs who settled in Rascia, an area around Montenegro - South-West Serbia.<ref name=malcolm2>Chapter 2 in Noel Malcolm's ''Kosovo, a Short History'', Macmillan, London, 1998, pp. 22-40</ref> By the mid seventh century, Serb tribes were invading northern Albania.<ref name=malcolm2 /> By the ninth century, the central Balkans (corresponding to modern Kosovo, Serbia and Macedonia) and the area of southern and central Albania became invaded and settled by Bulgars.<ref name=malcolm2 /> |
|||
[[Peter Heather]] suggests that [[Constructionism (learning theory)|constructionism]] and [[modernism]] represent two extremes of the spectrum of possibilities. The process of assimilation and appropriation of new group identity varied from group to group. He alludes to literary sources, which describe two contrasting models of interaction: the [[Early Slavs|''Sclavenes'']] were prepared (after a given period) to accept prisoners as full and free members of their tribal groups; on the other hand, the Huns (although incorporating non-Hun groups) kept them separate and subordinate. Rather than being aristocratic kernels, he argues that the identity of tribal groups was maintained by a contingent of "notables" and freemen. He clarifies that while groups like the Goths were multi-ethnic, full assimilation was not the rule.<ref>{{harvtxt|Heather|1998|p = 93}}</ref> He proposes that conquered groups held a subordinate status either as otherwise-autonomous tribute-payers or as disadvantaged strata within mixed settlements. Even when a homogeneous [[Archaeological culture|material culture]] arose, disparate groups were likely to preserve their unique identity and language.<ref>{{harvtxt|Heather|1998|p = 92}}</ref> |
|||
During the early [[Arab–Byzantine wars|Byzantine–Arab Wars]], [[Rashidun army|Arab armies]] attempted to invade southeast Europe via [[Anatolia|Asia Minor]] during the late 7th and early 8th centuries but were defeated at the [[siege of Constantinople (717–718)]] by the joint forces of Byzantium and the Bulgars. During the [[Arab–Khazar wars|Khazar–Arab Wars]], the [[Khazars]] stopped the [[Early Muslim conquests|Arab expansion]] into Europe across the Caucasus (7th and 8th centuries). At the same time, the so-called [[Moors]] (consisting of [[Arabs]] and [[Berbers]]) invaded Europe via [[Gibraltar]] ([[Umayyad conquest of Hispania|conquering Hispania]] from the Visigothic Kingdom in 711), before being halted by the Franks at the [[Battle of Tours]] in Gaul. These campaigns led to broadly demarcated frontiers between [[Christendom]] and [[Muslim world|Islam]] for the next millennium. The following centuries saw the Muslims successful in [[History of Islam in southern Italy|conquering most of Sicily]] from the Christians by 902. |
|||
Whatever the case, this process of building large-scale group identity was particularly evident along the Roman frontier, prompted by the example of Roman provincial life and the threat of Roman attack.<ref>{{harvtxt|Kulikowski|2007|p = 41}}</ref> Ethnicity was a complex, subjective and multi-layered process, and the Migration Period saw groups rise and fall. Confederations like the Huns and the Vandals arose, to vanish abruptly within a few generations. Other, previously-obscure groups (like the Angles and the Franks) created enduring polities. Even ancient groups like the Goths (who existed from late antiquity until the [[Middle Ages]]) underwent profound transformation. Given constant migrations, changing allegiances, and new cultural appropriations, all that remained constant was their Gothic name.<ref>{{harvtxt|Geary|2003|p = 118}}</ref> As Thomas Noble states, "tribes are no longer imagined to have been "marching for centuries at a time in ordered ranks with homogeneous ethnic compositions" from a distant, localized homeland across Europe into a settlement on Roman soil: |
|||
The [[Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin]] from around AD 895 and the subsequent [[Hungarian invasions of Europe]] and the [[Viking expansion]] from the late 8th century conventionally mark the last large migration movements of the period. Christian missionaries from Ireland, the Roman West and Byzantium [[Christianization#Christianization of Europe (6th–9th centuries)|gradually converted]] the non-Islamic newcomers and integrated them into Christendom. |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
"The common, track-filled map of the ''Völkerwanderung'' may illustrate such [a] course of events, but it misleads. Unfolded over long periods of time, the changes of position that took place were necessarily irregular ... (with) periods of emphatic discontinuity. For decades and possibly centuries, the tradition bearers idled, and the tradition itself hibernated. There was ample time for forgetfulness to do its work".<ref>{{harvtxt|Noble|2006|p = 97}} |
|||
</ref> |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
== Discussions == |
|||
==="Invasion" versus "migration"=== |
|||
=== Barbarian identity === |
|||
Historians have postulated several explanations for the appearance of "barbarians" on the Roman frontier: weather and crops, population pressure, a "primeval urge" to push into the Mediterranean, or the "domino effect" (whereby the Huns fell upon the Goths who, in turn, pushed other Germanic tribes before them). Entire barbarian tribes (or nations) flooded into [[Roman province]]s,{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} ending classical [[urbanism]] and beginning new types of rural settlements.<ref name="fouracre35">{{harvtxt|Halsall|2006|loc=chpt. 2}} |
|||
{{Main|Barbarian}} |
|||
</ref> In general, French and Italian scholars have tended to view this as a catastrophic event: the destruction of a civilization and the beginning of a "Dark Age" which set Europe back a millennium.<ref name="fouracre35"/> In contrast, German and English historians have tended to see it as the replacement of a "tired, effete and decadent Mediterranean civilization" with a "more virile, martial, Nordic one".<ref name="fouracre35"/> Rather than "invasion", German and Slavic scholars use the term "migration" ({{lang-de|Völkerwanderung}}, {{lang-cs|Stěhování národů}}, {{lang-sv|folkvandring}} and {{lang-hu|népvándorlás}}), aspiring to the idea of a dynamic and "wandering [[Indo-European languages|Indo-Germanic]] people".<ref>{{harvtxt|Noble|p = 236}}</ref> |
|||
Analysis of barbarian [[Cultural identity|identity]] and how it was created and expressed during the Barbarian Invasions has elicited discussion among scholars. [[Herwig Wolfram]], a historian of the Goths,<ref>Wolfram, Thomas J. Dunlap, tr. ''History of the Goths'' (1979) 1988:5</ref> in discussing the equation of ''migratio gentium'' with ''{{lang|de|Völkerwanderung}}'', observes that {{ill|Michael Ignaz Schmidt|de|lt=Michael Schmidt}} introduced the equation in his 1778 history of the Germans. Wolfram observed that the significance of ''[[gens]]'' as a biological community was shifting, even during the [[early Middle Ages]] and that "to complicate matters, we have no way of devising a terminology that is not derived from the concept of [[Nation|nationhood]] created during the [[French Revolution]]". |
|||
The scholar Guy Halsall has seen the barbarian movement as the result of the fall of the Roman Empire, not as its cause.<ref name="fouracre35"/> Archaeological finds have confirmed that Germanic and Slavic tribes were settled agriculturalists<ref>{{harvtxt|Noble|p = 247}}</ref> who were probably merely "drawn into the politics of an empire already falling apart for quite a few other causes". The [[Crisis of the Third Century]] caused significant changes within the Roman Empire, in both its western and eastern portions.<ref>{{harvtxt|Curta|2001|P = 120}} ''[T]he archaeological evidence of late fourth- and fifth-century barbarian graves between the Rhine and Loire suggests that a process of small-scale cultural and demographic change took place on both sides of the Roman frontier. Can we envisage Roman-Slavic relations in a similar way?''</ref> In particular, economic fragmentation removed many of the political, cultural and economic forces which had held the empire together.<ref>{{harvtxt|Halsall|2006|p = 42}}</ref> The rural population in Roman provinces became distanced from the metropolis, and there was little to differentiate them from other peasants across the Roman frontier. In addition, Rome increasingly used foreign mercenaries to defend itself. This "barbarisation" of the Empire was paralleled by changes within ''barbaricum''. For example, the Roman Empire played a vital role in building up barbarian groups along its frontier. Propped up with imperial support and gifts, the armies of allied barbarian chieftains served as buffers against hostile barbarian groups. The disintegration of Roman [[economic power]] weakened groups that had come to depend on Roman gifts for the maintenance of their own power. With the arrival of the Huns, this prompted many groups to invade the provinces for economic reasons.<ref>{{harvtxt|Halsall|2006|p = 49}}</ref> |
|||
The "primordialistic"<ref>Anthony D. Smith, ''The Ethnic Origins of Nations'' (Oxford, 1966) pp. 6ff., coined the term to separate these thinkers from those who view ethnicity as a situational construct, the product of history, rather than a cause, influenced by a variety of political, economic and cultural factors.</ref> paradigm prevailed during the 19th century. Scholars, such as German linguist [[Johann Gottfried Herder]], viewed tribes as coherent biological (racial) entities, using the term to refer to discrete ethnic groups.{{sfn|Geary|2006|p=29}} He also believed that the ''Volk'' were an organic whole, with a core identity and spirit evident in art, literature and language. These characteristics were seen as intrinsic, unaffected by external influences, even conquest.{{sfn|Kulikowski|2007|p=46}} Language, in particular, was seen as the most important expression of ethnicity. They argued that groups sharing the same (or similar) language possessed a common identity and ancestry.<ref>That was influenced by the 'family tree' model (''{{lang|de|Stammbaun}}'') of linguistics in that relationships between related languages were seen to be the result of derivation from a [[common descent|common ancestor]]. The model still is very influential in linguistics</ref> This was the [[Romanticism|Romantic]] ideal that there once had been a single German, Celtic or Slavic people who originated from a common homeland and spoke a [[lingua franca|common tongue]], helping to provide a [[conceptual framework]] for [[political movement]]s of the 18th and 19th centuries such as [[Pan-Germanism]] and [[Pan-Slavism]].{{sfn|Kulikowski|2007|p=46}} |
|||
The nature of the barbarian takeover of former Roman provinces varied from region to region. For example, in [[Aquitaine]] the provincial administration was largely self-reliant. Halsall has argued that local rulers simply "handed over" military rule to the Ostrogoths, acquiring the identity of the newcomers.<ref name="halsall51"/> In Gaul the collapse of imperial rule resulted in anarchy: the Franks and [[Alamanni|Alemanni]] were pulled into the ensuing "power vacuum",<ref>{{harvtxt|Halsall|2006|p = 50}}</ref> resulting in conflict. In Spain local aristocrats maintained independent rule for some time, raising their own armies against the [[Vandals]]. Meanwhile, the Roman withdrawal from lowland England resulted in conflict between Saxons and the Brythonic chieftains (whose centres of power retreated westward as a result). The [[Eastern Roman Empire]] attempted to maintain control of the Balkan provinces, despite a thinly-spread imperial army that relied mainly on local militias and an extensive effort to re-fortify the Danubian ''limes''. The ambitious fortification efforts collapsed, worsening the impoverished conditions of the local populace and resulting in colonization by Slavic warriors and their families.<ref>{{harvtxt|Curta|2001|pp = 120–180}}</ref> |
|||
From the 1960s, a reinterpretation of archaeological and historical evidence prompted scholars, such as Goffart and Todd, to propose new models for explaining the construction of barbarian identity. They maintained that no sense of shared identity was perceived by the ''Germani'';<ref name="Halsall 2008 17">{{harvtxt|Halsall|2008|p=17}}</ref><ref>{{harvtxt|Todd|pp=8–10}} There is no indication that the Germani possessed a feeling that they were a "separate people, nation, or group of tribes"</ref>{{sfn|Geary|2006|p=29}} a similar theory having been proposed for Celtic and Slavic groups.<ref>For example, ''The Celtic World'', Miranda Green (1996), p. 3 and ''The Making of the Slavs''. Floring Curta (2001)</ref> |
|||
Halsall and Noble have argued that such changes stemmed from the breakdown in Roman political control, which exposed the weakness of local Roman rule. Instead of large-scale migrations, there were military takeovers by small groups of warriors and their families (who usually numbered in the tens of thousands). This process involved active, conscious decision-making by Roman provincial populations. The collapse of centralized control severely weakened the sense of Roman identity in the provinces, which may explain why the provinces underwent dramatic cultural changes at this time even though few barbarians settled in them.<ref>{{harvtxt|Halsall|2006|pp = 50–52}}</ref> Ultimately, the Germanic groups in the [[Western Roman Empire]] were accommodated without "dispossessing or overturning indigenous society" and maintained a structured and hierarchical (albeit attenuated) form of Roman administration.<ref>{{harvtxt|Noble|p = 251}}</ref> Ironically, they lost their unique identity as a result of this accommodation and were absorbed into Latinhood. In contrast, in the east, Slavic tribes maintained a more "spartan and egalitarian"<ref>{{harvtxt|Barford|2001|p = 46}}</ref> existence bound to the land "even in times when they took their part in plundering Roman provinces".<ref> |
|||
{{harvtxt|Pohl1998|p = 20}}</ref> Their organizational models were not Roman, and their leaders were not normally dependent on Roman gold for success. Thus, they arguably had a greater effect on their region than the Goths, Franks or [[Saxons]] had on theirs.<ref>{{harvtxt|Geary|2003|p = 146}}</ref> |
|||
A theory states that the primordialist mode of thinking was encouraged by a ''[[prima facie]]'' interpretation of [[Greco-Roman world|Graeco-Roman]] sources, which grouped together many tribes under such labels as ''Germanoi'', ''Keltoi'' or ''Sclavenoi'', thus encouraging their perception as distinct peoples. Modernists argue that the uniqueness perceived by specific groups was based on common political and [[economic interest]]s rather than biological or racial distinctions. Indeed, on this basis, some schools of thought in recent scholarship urge that the concept of ''Germanic'' peoples be jettisoned altogether.<ref name ="Halsall 2008 24">{{harvtxt|Halsall|2008|p=24}}</ref><ref>{{harvtxt|Friedrich & Harland|2020|}}</ref> |
|||
===Ethnicity=== |
|||
Based on the belief that particular types of artifacts (generally elements of personal adornment found in a funerary context) are thought to indicate the race and/or ethnicity of the person buried, the "Culture-History" school of archaeology assumed that archaeological cultures represent the ''[[Urheimat]]'' (homeland) of tribal polities named in historical sources.<ref>{{harvtxt|Pohl1998|pp = 17–23}}</ref> As a consequence, the shifting extensions of material cultures were interpreted as the expansion of peoples.<ref name="Kulikowski 2007 61">{{harvtxt|Kulikowski|2007|p = 61}}</ref> Influenced by constructionism, process-driven archaeologists rejected the [[Cultural-history archaeology|Culture-Historical]] doctrine;<ref name="Kulikowski 2007 61"/> they marginalized the discussion of ethnicity altogether, and focused on the intragroup dynamics which generated such material remains. Moreover, they argued that adoption of new cultures could occur through trade or internal political developments rather than military takeovers. |
|||
The role of language in constructing and maintaining group identity can be ephemeral since large-scale language shifts occur commonly in history.<ref>''Archaeology and Language: Correlating Archaeological and Linguistic Hypotheses''. "The Eurasian Spread Zone and the Indo-European Dispersal." [[Johanna Nichols]]. p. 224</ref> Modernists propose the idea of "imagined communities"; the barbarian polities in late antiquity were social constructs rather than unchanging lines of blood kinship.{{sfn|Kulikowski|2007|p=48}} The process of forming tribal units was called "[[ethnogenesis]]", a term coined by [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] scholar [[Yulian Bromley]].<ref>{{harvtxt |Halsall|2008|p=15}}</ref> The [[Vienna School of History|Austrian school]] (led by [[Reinhard Wenskus]]) popularized this idea, which influenced medievalists such as Herwig Wolfram, [[Walter Pohl]] and [[Patrick J. Geary]].<ref name="Halsall 2008 17" /> It argues that the stimulus for forming tribal polities was perpetuated by a small nucleus of people, known as the ''{{lang|de|Traditionskern}}'' ("kernel of tradition"), who were a military or aristocratic elite. This core group formed a standard for larger units, gathering adherents by employing amalgamative metaphors such as kinship and aboriginal commonality and claiming that they perpetuated an ancient, divinely-sanctioned lineage.<ref name="harvtxt|Geary|2003|p = 77">{{harvtxt|Geary|2003|p=77}}</ref> |
|||
Many scholars take a more moderate position. While recognizing that artifacts do not possess an inherent "ethnic ascription", some artifacts may have been used as "emblems in identity and otherness – of belonging and exclusions".<ref>{{harvtxt|Kulikowski|2007|p = 62}}</ref> Peter Heather suggests that although shifts in culture should not solely rely on migratory explanations, there is no reason to ''a priori'' rule them out (especially if there is evidence from literary sources).<ref>{{harvtxt|Heather|1998|pp=17–18}}</ref> Profound changes in culture (and language) could occur through the influx of a [[Ruling class|ruling elite]] with minimal (or no) impact on overall population composition,<ref>Wording from ''Y Chromosome Evidence for Anglo-Saxon Mass Migration''. Michael E. Weale et al. & references therein</ref> especially if it occurs when the [[Indigenous peoples|indigenous population]] is receptive to such changes. |
|||
<blockquote>The common, track-filled map of the ''{{lang|de|Völkerwanderung}}'' may illustrate such [a] course of events, but it misleads. Unfolded over long periods of time, the changes of position that took place were necessarily irregular ... (with) periods of emphatic discontinuity. For decades and possibly centuries, the tradition bearers idled, and the tradition itself hibernated. There was ample time for forgetfulness to do its work.{{sfn|Wood|2006|p=97}}</blockquote> |
|||
==Depiction in media== |
|||
* ''[[Terry Jones' Barbarians]]'', a 4-part TV documentary series first broadcast on BBC 2 in 2006 |
|||
* ''[[Rome: Total War: Barbarian Invasion]]'' and ''[[Total War: Attila]]'', turn based strategy games by ''[[The Creative Assembly]]'' |
|||
* |
|||
== |
=== Viewpoints === |
||
{{Blockquote |
|||
{{hidden begin|title={{center|Detailed map of invasion routes}}}} |
|||
|text=''Völkerwanderung'' is a German word, borrowed from German historiography, that refers to the early migrations of the Germanic peoples. In a broader sense it can mean the mass migration of whole tribes or ethnic groups. |
|||
[[File:Routes of Barbarian Invasions.jpg|1100px]] |
|||
|source=Bell-Fialkoff, Andrew. ''The Role of Migration'', p. 15 |
|||
{{hidden end}} |
|||
}} |
|||
[[File:East-Hem 100ad.jpg|thumb|270px|Location of [[Xiongnu]] and other steppe nations in 100 AD. Some historians believe that the [[Huns]] originated from the Xiongnu.]] |
|||
Rather than "invasion", German and Slavic scholars speak of "migration" (see {{langx|de|Völkerwanderung}}, {{langx|cs|Stěhování národů}}, {{langx|sv|folkvandring}} and {{langx|hu|népvándorlás}}), aspiring to the idea of a dynamic and "wandering [[Indo-European languages|Indo-Germanic]] people".{{sfn|Halsall|2006b|p=236}} |
|||
In contrast, the standard terms in French and Italian historiography translate to "barbarian invasions", or even "barbaric invasions" ({{langx|fr|Invasions barbares}}, {{langx|it|Invasioni barbariche}}). |
|||
Historians have postulated several explanations for the appearance of "barbarians" on the Roman frontier: climate change, weather and crops, [[population pressure]], a "primeval urge" to push into the Mediterranean, the construction of the [[Great Wall of China]] causing a "domino effect" of tribes being forced westward, leading to the Huns falling upon the Goths who, in turn, pushed other Germanic tribes before them.<ref>Wright, David Curtis (1997). "The Hsiung-Nu-Hun Equation Revisited". ''Eurasian Studies Yearbook''. 69: 77–112.</ref> In general, French and Italian scholars have tended to view this as a catastrophic event, the destruction of a civilization and the beginning of a "Dark Age" that set Europe back a millennium.{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|p=35}} In contrast, German and English historians have tended to see Roman–Barbarian interaction as the replacement of a "tired, effete and decadent Mediterranean civilization" with a "more virile, martial, Nordic one".{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|p=35}} |
|||
[[File:Barbarian invasions from 3rd century.png|thumb|270px|[[Barbarian invasions of the 3rd century|Barbarian invasions against the Roman Empire in the 3rd century]]]] |
|||
The scholar [[Guy Halsall]] has seen the barbarian movement as the result of the fall of the Roman Empire, not its cause.{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|p=35}} Archaeological discoveries have confirmed that Germanic and Slavic tribes were settled agriculturalists who were probably merely "drawn into the politics of an empire already falling apart for quite a few other causes".{{sfn|Heather|2006|p=247}} Goffart argues that the process of settlement was connected to ''hospitalitas'', the Roman practice of quartering soldiers among the civilian population. The Romans, by granting land and the right to levy taxes to allied (Germanic) armies, hoped to reduce the financial burdens of the empire.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Henri J. M. Claessen, Jarich Gerlof Oosten |title=Ideology and the Formation of Early States |date=1996 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=9789004104709 |page=222}}</ref> The [[Crisis of the Third Century]] caused significant changes within the Roman Empire in both its western and its eastern portions.<ref>{{harvtxt|Curta|2001|p=120}} "[T]he archaeological evidence of late fourth- and fifth-century barbarian graves between the Rhine and Loire suggests that a process of small-scale cultural and demographic change took place on both sides of the Roman frontier. Can we envisage Roman-Slavic relations in a similar way?"</ref> In particular, economic fragmentation removed many of the political, cultural and economic forces that had held the empire together.{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|p=42}} |
|||
The rural population in Roman provinces became distanced from the metropolis, and there was little to differentiate them from other peasants across the Roman frontier. In addition, Rome increasingly used foreign mercenaries to defend itself. That "barbarisation" parallelled changes within [[Barbaricum]]. To this end, noted linguist Dennis Howard Green wrote, "the first centuries of our era witness not merely a progressive Romanisation of barbarian society, but also an undeniable barbarisation of the Roman world."{{sfn|Green|1998|p=143}} |
|||
For example, the Roman Empire played a vital role in building up barbarian groups along its frontier. Propped up with imperial support and gifts, the armies of allied barbarian chieftains served as buffers against other, hostile, barbarian groups. The disintegration of Roman [[economic power]] weakened groups that had come to depend on Roman gifts for the maintenance of their own power. The arrival of the Huns helped prompt many groups to invade the provinces for economic reasons.{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|p=49}} |
|||
[[File:Europe and the Near East at 476 AD.png|thumb|270px|[[Barbarian kingdoms]] and peoples after the end of the [[Western Roman Empire]] in 476 AD]] |
|||
The nature of the barbarian takeover of former Roman provinces varied from region to region. For example, in [[Aquitaine]], the provincial administration was largely self-reliant. Halsall has argued that local rulers simply "handed over" military rule to the [[Ostrogoths]], acquiring the identity of the newcomers.{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|p=51}} In [[Gaul]], the collapse of imperial rule resulted in anarchy: the Franks and [[Alamanni|Alemanni]] were pulled into the ensuing "power vacuum",{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|p=50}} resulting in conflict. In Hispania, local aristocrats maintained independent rule for some time, raising their own armies against the [[Vandals]]. Meanwhile, the Roman withdrawal from lowland England resulted in conflict between [[Saxons]] and the [[Celtic Britons|Brittonic]] chieftains (whose centres of power retreated westward as a result). The [[Eastern Roman Empire]] attempted to maintain control of the Balkan provinces despite a thinly-spread imperial army relying mainly on local militias and an extensive effort to refortify the Danubian ''[[Limes (Roman Empire)|limes]]''. The ambitious fortification efforts collapsed, worsening the impoverished conditions of the local populace and resulting in colonization by Slavic warriors and their families.<ref>{{harvtxt|Curta|2001|pp=120–180}}</ref> |
|||
Halsall and Noble have argued that such changes stemmed from the breakdown in Roman political control, which exposed the weakness of local Roman rule. Instead of large-scale migrations, there were military takeovers by small groups of warriors and their families, who usually numbered only in the tens of thousands. The process involved active, conscious decision-making by Roman provincial populations. |
|||
The collapse of centralized control severely weakened the sense of Roman identity in the provinces, which may explain why the provinces then underwent dramatic cultural changes even though few barbarians settled in them.{{sfn|Halsall|2006a|pp=50–52}} Ultimately, the Germanic groups in the [[Western Roman Empire]] were accommodated without "dispossessing or overturning indigenous society", and they maintained a structured and hierarchical (but attenuated) form of Roman administration.{{sfn|Heather|2006|p=251}} |
|||
Ironically, they lost their unique identity as a result of such an accommodation and were absorbed into Latinhood. In contrast, in the east, Slavic tribes maintained a more "spartan and egalitarian"<ref>{{harvtxt|Barford|2001|p=46}}</ref> existence bound to the land "even in times when they took their part in plundering Roman provinces".<ref>{{harvtxt|Pohl1998|p=20}}</ref> Their organizational models were not Roman, and their leaders were not normally dependent on Roman gold for success. Thus they arguably had a greater effect on their region than the Goths, the Franks or the [[Saxons]] had on theirs.<ref>{{harvtxt|Geary|2003|p=146}}</ref> |
|||
=== Ethnicity === |
|||
Based on the belief that particular types of artifacts, elements of personal adornment generally found in a funerary context, are thought to indicate the [[ethnicity]] of the person buried, the "Culture-History" school of archaeology assumed that archaeological cultures represent the ''{{lang|de|[[Urheimat]]}}'' (homeland) of tribal polities named in historical sources.<ref>{{harvtxt|Pohl|1998|pp=17–23}}</ref> As a consequence, the shifting extensions of material cultures were interpreted as the expansion of peoples.{{sfn|Kulikowski|2007|p=61}} |
|||
Influenced by [[social constructionism|constructionism]], process-driven archaeologists rejected the [[culture-historical archaeology|culture-historical]] doctrine{{sfn|Kulikowski|2007|p=61}} and marginalized the discussion of ethnicity altogether and focused on the intragroup dynamics that generated such material remains. Moreover, they argued that adoption of new cultures could occur through trade or internal political developments rather than only military takeovers. |
|||
== Depiction in media == |
|||
* ''[[Terry Jones' Barbarians]]'', a four-part TV documentary series first broadcast on [[BBC 2]] in 2006 |
|||
* ''[[Rome: Total War: Barbarian Invasion]]'' and ''[[Total War: Attila]]'', strategy video games by [[The Creative Assembly]] |
|||
* ''[[Barbarians (miniseries)|Barbarians]]'', 2004 documentary miniseries on [[History (U.S. TV channel)|The History Channel]] |
|||
==See also== |
== See also == |
||
* [[Barbarian invasions of the 3rd century]] |
|||
{{Portal|Ancient Germanic culture}} |
|||
* [[Bond event]] |
|||
* [[Dark Ages (historiography)]] |
* [[Dark Ages (historiography)]] |
||
* [[Environmental migrant]] |
|||
* [[Five Barbarians]] and [[Sixteen Kingdoms]] |
|||
* [[Genetic history of the British Isles]] |
* [[Genetic history of the British Isles]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Germanic peoples]] |
||
* [[Hephthalite Empire]] |
|||
* [[Immigration]] |
|||
* [[Late antiquity|Late Antiquity]] |
|||
* [[Medieval demography]] |
* [[Medieval demography]] |
||
* [[Middle Ages]] |
|||
* [[Migration Period art]] |
* [[Migration Period art]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Turkic migration]] |
||
== |
== References == |
||
{{Reflist| |
{{Reflist|20em}} |
||
== |
== Bibliography == |
||
{{refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} |
|||
* {{Citation|last = Barford|first = Paul M|year = 2001|publisher = Cornell University Press|title = The Early Slavs: Culture and Society in Early Medieval Eastern Europe|isbn = 0-8014-3977-9}} |
|||
* {{Cite book|last = Barford|first = Paul M|year = 2001|publisher = Cornell University Press|title = The Early Slavs: Culture and Society in Early Medieval Eastern Europe|isbn = 0-8014-3977-9}} |
|||
* Börm, Henning (2013), ''Westrom. Von Honorius bis Justinian'', W. Kohlhammer, ISBN 978-3-17-023276-1 |
|||
* {{Cite book|editor-last=Bell-Fialkoff|editor-first=Andrew|title=The Role of Migration in the History of the Eurasian Steppe: Sedentary Civilization vs. 'Barbarian' and Nomad (Role Migrant History Eurasian Step)|publisher=Macmillan|location=Basingstoke|isbn=978-1-349-61839-2|year=2000}} |
|||
* {{Citation|last = Curta|first = Florin|year = 2001|publisher = Cambridge University Press|title = The Making of the Slavs: History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region, C. 500–700|isbn = 0-521-80202-4}} |
|||
* Börm, Henning (2013), ''Westrom. Von Honorius bis Justinian'', [[Kohlhammer Verlag]], {{ISBN|978-3-17-023276-1}} |
|||
* {{Citation|last = Dumville|first = David|year = 1990|title = Histories and pseudo-histories of the insular Middle Ages|place = Aldershot, Hampshire|publisher = Variorum}} |
|||
* {{Cite book|last=Curta|first=Florin|author-link=Florin Curta|title=The Making of the Slavs: History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region, c. 500–700|year=2001|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rcFGhCVs0sYC|isbn=978-1-139-42888-0}} |
|||
* {{Citation|last = Geary|first = Patrick|year = 2003|publisher = Princeton Paperbacks|title = Myth of Nations. The Medieval Origins of Europe|isbn = 0-691-11481-1}} |
|||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book|last=Curta|first=Florin|author-link=Florin Curta|title=Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250|year=2006|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|url=https://archive.org/details/southeasterneuro0000curt|url-access=registration|isbn=978-0-521-81539-0}} |
||
* {{Cite book|last = Dumville|first = David|year = 1990|title = Histories and pseudo-histories of the insular Middle Ages|place = Aldershot, Hampshire|publisher = Variorum}} |
|||
* {{Citation|editor-last = Fouracre|chapter=The Barbarian invasions|editor-first = Paul|last = Halsall|first = Guy|year = 2006|publisher = Cambridge University Press|title = The New Cambridge Medieval History, Vol. 1: c. 500 – c. 700|isbn = 0-521-36291-1}} |
|||
* Friedrich, Matthias and Harland, James M., eds. (2020): Interrogating the "Germanic": A Category and its Use in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. De Gruyter. {{ISBN|978-3-11-069976-0}}. |
|||
* {{Citation|last = Halsall|first = Guy|year = 2008|publisher = Cambridge University Press|title = Barbarian migrations and the Roman West, 376–568|isbn = 0-521-43491-2}} |
|||
* {{ |
* {{Cite book|last = Geary|first = Patrick|year = 2003|publisher = Princeton Paperbacks|title = Myth of Nations. The Medieval Origins of Europe|isbn = 0-691-11481-1|url-access = registration|url = https://archive.org/details/mythofnationsmed0000gear}} |
||
* {{Cite book|last=Geary|first=Patrick|chapter=The crisis of European identity|title=From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms|year=2006|editor=Thomas F.X. Noble|place=New York and London |publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-32742-3}} |
|||
* Kleineberg, A.; Marx, Chr.; Knobloch, E.; Lelgemann, D.: Germania und die Insel Thule. Die Entschlüsselung von Ptolemaios' "Atlas der Oikumene". WBG 2010. ISBN 978-3-534-23757-9. |
|||
* {{cite book | last1 = Green | first1 = D. H. | author-link1 = Dennis Howard Green | year = 1998 | title = [[Language and history in the early Germanic world]] | location = Cambridge and New York | publisher = Cambridge University Press| isbn = 978-0-521-79423-7}} |
|||
* {{Citation|last = Kulikowski|first = Michael|year = 2007|publisher = Cambridge University Press|title = Rome's Gothic Wars: from the third century to Alaric|isbn = 0-521-84633-1}} |
|||
* {{Cite book|last=Halsall|first=Guy|chapter=The Barbarian invasions|year=2006a|editor=Paul Fouracre|publisher=Cambridge University Press|title=The New Cambridge Medieval History, Vol. 1: c. 500 – c. 700|isbn = 0-521-36291-1}} |
|||
*{{Citation|last1 = Noble|first1 = Thomas|last2 = Goffart|first2 = Walter|title = From Roman provinces to Medieval kingdoms|year = 2006|publisher = Routledge|isbn = 0-415-32742-3}} |
|||
* {{Cite book|last=Halsall|first=Guy|chapter=Movers and shakers: the barbarians and the fall of Rome|title=From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms|year=2006b|editor=Thomas F.X. Noble|place=New York and London |publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-32742-3}} |
|||
* {{Citation |
|||
* {{Cite book|last = Halsall|first = Guy|year = 2008|publisher = Cambridge University Press|title = Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568|isbn = 978-0-521-43491-1}} |
|||
|last1 = Pohl |
|||
* {{Cite book|last = Heather|first = Peter J|year = 1998|publisher = Wiley-Blackwell|title = The Goths|isbn = 0-631-20932-8}} |
|||
|first1 = Walter |
|||
* {{Cite book|last=Heather|first=Peter|chapter=Foedera and foederati of the fourth century|title=From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms|year=2006|editor=Thomas F.X. Noble|place=New York and London |publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-32742-3}} |
|||
|author3-link = Walter Pohl |
|||
* Kleineberg, A.; Marx, Chr.; Knobloch, E.; Lelgemann, D.: Germania und die Insel Thule. Die Entschlüsselung von Ptolemaios' "Atlas der Oikumene". WBG 2010. {{ISBN|978-3-534-23757-9}}. |
|||
|year=1998 |
|||
* {{cite book|last = Kulikowski|first = Michael|year = 2007|publisher = Cambridge University Press|title = Rome's Gothic Wars: From the Third Century to Alaric|isbn = 978-0-521-84633-2}} |
|||
| editor1-last = Little |
|||
* {{Cite book|editor-last= Noble|editor-first=Thomas F.X.|title = From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms|year = 2006|publisher = Routledge|isbn = 0-415-32742-3}} |
|||
| editor1-first = Lester K |
|||
* {{Cite book|last1 = Pohl|first1 = Walter|year = 1998|editor1-last = Little|editor1-first = Lester K|editor2-last = Rosenwein|editor2-first = Barbara|publisher = Wiley-Blackwell|title = Debating the Middle Ages: Issues and Readings|chapter = Conceptions of Ethnicity in Early Medieval Studies|isbn = 1-57718-008-9|chapter-url-access = registration|chapter-url = https://archive.org/detail/debatingmiddleag0000unse}} |
|||
| editor2-last = Rosenwein |
|||
* {{Cite book|last = Todd|first = Malcolm|publisher = Blackwell Publishing|title = The Early Germans|isbn = 0-631-19904-7|date = 1996-02-12}} |
|||
| editor2-first = Barbara |
|||
* {{Cite book|last = Wolfram|first = Herwig|year = 2001|title = Die Goten. Von den Anfängen bis zur Mitte des sechsten Jahrhunderts|location = München|publisher = C. H. Beck}} |
|||
|publisher = Wiley-Blackwell |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Wood|first=Ian|chapter=Defining the Franks: Frankish origins in early medieval historiography|title=From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms|year=2006|editor=Thomas F.X. Noble|place=New York and London|publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-32742-3}} |
|||
|title = Debating the Middle Ages: issues and readings |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
|chapter = Conceptions of ethnicity in Early Medieval Studies |
|||
|isbn = 1-57718-008-9}} |
|||
* {{Citation|last = Todd|first = Malcolm|publisher = Blackwell Publishing|title = The Early Germans|isbn = 0-631-19904-7}} |
|||
* {{Citation|last = Wolfram|first = Herwig|year = 2001|title = Die Goten. Von den Anfängen bis zur Mitte des sechsten Jahrhunderts|publication-place = München|publisher = C. H. Beck}} |
|||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
* {{Commons category-inline|Migration period}} |
* {{Commons category-inline|Migration period}} |
||
{{Barbarian kingdoms}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Migration Period}} |
|||
{{Timeline of the history of Scandinavia}} |
|||
{{Germanic peoples}} |
|||
{{Middle Ages}} |
|||
{{History of Europe}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Historical migrations]] |
|||
[[Category:Migration Period| ]] |
[[Category:Migration Period| ]] |
||
[[Category:Historiography]] |
[[Category:Historiography]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Germanic history]] |
||
[[Category:Middle Ages]] |
|||
[[Category:Germanic archaeology]] |
[[Category:Germanic archaeology]] |
||
[[Category:1st millennium in Europe]] |
|||
[[Category:1st millennium in Asia]] |
|||
[[Category:1st millennium in Africa]] |
|||
[[Category:Historical eras]] |
|||
[[Category:Dark ages]] |
|||
[[Category:Barbarians]] |
Latest revision as of 23:37, 7 December 2024
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (September 2024) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Invasions of the Roman Empire | |
---|---|
Time | 300–800 AD (greatest estimate)[1] |
Place | Europe and the Mediterranean region |
Event | Tribes invading the declining Roman Empire |
The Migration Period (circa 300 to 600 AD), also known as the Barbarian Invasions, was a period in European history marked by large-scale migrations that saw the fall of the Western Roman Empire and subsequent settlement of its former territories by various tribes, and the establishment of the post-Roman kingdoms.[2]
The term refers to the important role played by the migration, invasion, and settlement of various tribes, notably the Burgundians, Vandals, Goths, Alemanni, Alans, Huns, early Slavs, Pannonian Avars, Bulgars and Magyars within or into the territories of the Roman Empire and Europe as a whole. The period is traditionally taken to have begun in AD 375 (possibly as early as 300) and ended in 568.[3] Various factors contributed to this phenomenon of migration and invasion, and their role and significance are still widely discussed.
Historians differ as to the dates for the beginning and ending of the Migration Period. The beginning of the period is widely regarded as the invasion of Europe by the Huns from Asia in about 375 and the ending with the conquest of Italy by the Lombards in 568,[4] but a more loosely set period is from as early as 300 to as late as 800.[5] For example, in the 4th century a very large group of Goths was settled as foederati within the Roman Balkans, and the Franks were settled south of the Rhine in Roman Gaul. In 406 a particularly large and unexpected crossing of the Rhine was made by a group of Vandals, Alans and Suebi. As central power broke down in the Western Roman Empire, the military became more important but was dominated by men of barbarian origin.
There are contradictory opinions as to whether the fall of the Western Roman Empire was a result of an increase in migrations, or if both the breakdown of central power and the increased importance of non-Romans created additional internal factors. Migrations, and the use of non-Romans in the military, were known in the periods before and after, and the Eastern Roman Empire adapted and continued to exist until the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453. The fall of the Western Roman Empire, although it involved the establishment of competing barbarian kingdoms, was to some extent managed by the Eastern emperors.
The migrants comprised war bands or tribes of 10,000 to 20,000 people.[6] Immigration was common throughout the time of the Roman Empire,[7] but over the course of 100 years, the migrants numbered not more than 750,000 in total,[citation needed] compared to an average 40 million population of the Roman Empire at that time. The first migrations of peoples were made by Germanic tribes such as the Goths (including the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths), the Vandals, the Anglo-Saxons, the Lombards, the Suebi, the Frisii, the Jutes, the Burgundians, the Alemanni, the Sciri and the Franks; they were later pushed westward by the Huns, the Avars, the Slavs and the Bulgars.[8] Later invasions, such as the Vikings, the Normans, the Varangians, the Hungarians, the Arabs, the Turks, and the Mongols also had significant effects (especially in North Africa, the Iberian Peninsula, Anatolia and Central and Eastern Europe).
Chronology
[edit]Germanic tribes prior to migration
[edit]Germanic peoples moved out of southern Scandinavia and northern Germany[9][10] to the adjacent lands between the Elbe and Oder after 1000 BC. The first wave moved westward and southward (pushing the resident Celts west to the Rhine around 200 BC), moving into southern Germany up to the Roman provinces of Gaul and Cisalpine Gaul by 100 BC, where they were stopped by Gaius Marius and later by Julius Caesar. It is this western group which was described by the Roman historian Tacitus (AD 56–117) and Julius Caesar (100–44 BC). A later wave of Germanic tribes migrated eastward and southward from Scandinavia, between 600 and 300 BC, to the opposite coast of the Baltic Sea, moving up the Vistula near the Carpathian Mountains. During Tacitus' era they included lesser-known tribes such as the Tencteri, Cherusci, Hermunduri and Chatti; however, a period of federation and intermarriage resulted in the familiar groups known as the Alemanni, Franks, Saxons, Frisians and Thuringians.[11]
First wave
[edit]The first wave of invasions, between AD 300 and 500, is partly documented by Greek and Latin historians but is difficult to verify archaeologically. It puts Germanic peoples in control of most areas of what was then the Western Roman Empire.[12]
The Tervingi crossed the Danube into Roman territory in 376, in a migration fleeing the invading Huns. Some time later in Marcianopolis, the escort to their leader Fritigern was killed while meeting with Roman commander Lupicinus.[13] The Tervingi rebelled, and the Visigoths, a group derived either from the Tervingi or from a fusion of mainly Gothic groups, eventually invaded Italy and sacked Rome in 410 before settling in Gaul. Around 460, they founded the Visigothic Kingdom in Iberia. They were followed into Roman territory first by a confederation of Herulian, Rugian, and Scirian warriors under Odoacer, that deposed Romulus Augustulus in 476, and later by the Ostrogoths, led by Theodoric the Great, who settled in Italy.
In Gaul, the Franks (a fusion of western Germanic tribes whose leaders had been aligned with Rome since the 3rd century) entered Roman lands gradually during the 5th century, and after consolidating power under Childeric and his son Clovis's decisive victory over Syagrius in 486, established themselves as rulers of northern Roman Gaul. Fending off challenges from the Alemanni, Burgundians, and Visigoths, the Frankish kingdom became the nucleus of what would later become France and Germany.
The initial Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain occurred during the 5th century, when Roman control of Britain had come to an end.[14] The Burgundians settled in northwestern Italy, Switzerland and Eastern France in the 5th century.
Second wave
[edit]Between AD 500 and 700, Slavic tribes settled more areas of central Europe and pushed farther into southern and eastern Europe, gradually making the eastern half of Europe predominantly Slavic-speaking.[15] Additionally, Turkic tribes such as the Avars and - later - Ugric-speaking Magyars became involved in this second wave. In AD 567, the Avars and the Lombards destroyed much of the Gepid Kingdom. The Lombards, a Germanic people, settled in Italy with their Herulian, Suebian, Gepid, Thuringian, Bulgar, Sarmatian and Saxon allies in the 6th century.[16][17] They were later followed by the Bavarians and the Franks, who conquered and ruled most of the Italian peninsula.
The Bulgars, originally a nomadic group probably from Central Asia, occupied the Pontic steppe north of Caucasus from the 2nd century. Later, pushed by the Khazars, the majority of them migrated west and dominated Byzantine territories along the lower Danube in the 7th century. From that time the demographic picture of the Balkans changed permanently, becoming predominantly Slavic-speaking, while pockets of native people survived in the mountains of the Balkans.[18][19]
Croats settled in modern Croatia and Western Bosnia, bringing with them the Serbs who settled in Rascia, an area around Montenegro - South-West Serbia.[20] By the mid seventh century, Serb tribes were invading northern Albania.[20] By the ninth century, the central Balkans (corresponding to modern Kosovo, Serbia and Macedonia) and the area of southern and central Albania became invaded and settled by Bulgars.[20]
During the early Byzantine–Arab Wars, Arab armies attempted to invade southeast Europe via Asia Minor during the late 7th and early 8th centuries but were defeated at the siege of Constantinople (717–718) by the joint forces of Byzantium and the Bulgars. During the Khazar–Arab Wars, the Khazars stopped the Arab expansion into Europe across the Caucasus (7th and 8th centuries). At the same time, the so-called Moors (consisting of Arabs and Berbers) invaded Europe via Gibraltar (conquering Hispania from the Visigothic Kingdom in 711), before being halted by the Franks at the Battle of Tours in Gaul. These campaigns led to broadly demarcated frontiers between Christendom and Islam for the next millennium. The following centuries saw the Muslims successful in conquering most of Sicily from the Christians by 902.
The Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin from around AD 895 and the subsequent Hungarian invasions of Europe and the Viking expansion from the late 8th century conventionally mark the last large migration movements of the period. Christian missionaries from Ireland, the Roman West and Byzantium gradually converted the non-Islamic newcomers and integrated them into Christendom.
Discussions
[edit]Barbarian identity
[edit]Analysis of barbarian identity and how it was created and expressed during the Barbarian Invasions has elicited discussion among scholars. Herwig Wolfram, a historian of the Goths,[21] in discussing the equation of migratio gentium with Völkerwanderung, observes that Michael Schmidt introduced the equation in his 1778 history of the Germans. Wolfram observed that the significance of gens as a biological community was shifting, even during the early Middle Ages and that "to complicate matters, we have no way of devising a terminology that is not derived from the concept of nationhood created during the French Revolution".
The "primordialistic"[22] paradigm prevailed during the 19th century. Scholars, such as German linguist Johann Gottfried Herder, viewed tribes as coherent biological (racial) entities, using the term to refer to discrete ethnic groups.[23] He also believed that the Volk were an organic whole, with a core identity and spirit evident in art, literature and language. These characteristics were seen as intrinsic, unaffected by external influences, even conquest.[24] Language, in particular, was seen as the most important expression of ethnicity. They argued that groups sharing the same (or similar) language possessed a common identity and ancestry.[25] This was the Romantic ideal that there once had been a single German, Celtic or Slavic people who originated from a common homeland and spoke a common tongue, helping to provide a conceptual framework for political movements of the 18th and 19th centuries such as Pan-Germanism and Pan-Slavism.[24]
From the 1960s, a reinterpretation of archaeological and historical evidence prompted scholars, such as Goffart and Todd, to propose new models for explaining the construction of barbarian identity. They maintained that no sense of shared identity was perceived by the Germani;[26][27][23] a similar theory having been proposed for Celtic and Slavic groups.[28]
A theory states that the primordialist mode of thinking was encouraged by a prima facie interpretation of Graeco-Roman sources, which grouped together many tribes under such labels as Germanoi, Keltoi or Sclavenoi, thus encouraging their perception as distinct peoples. Modernists argue that the uniqueness perceived by specific groups was based on common political and economic interests rather than biological or racial distinctions. Indeed, on this basis, some schools of thought in recent scholarship urge that the concept of Germanic peoples be jettisoned altogether.[29][30]
The role of language in constructing and maintaining group identity can be ephemeral since large-scale language shifts occur commonly in history.[31] Modernists propose the idea of "imagined communities"; the barbarian polities in late antiquity were social constructs rather than unchanging lines of blood kinship.[32] The process of forming tribal units was called "ethnogenesis", a term coined by Soviet scholar Yulian Bromley.[33] The Austrian school (led by Reinhard Wenskus) popularized this idea, which influenced medievalists such as Herwig Wolfram, Walter Pohl and Patrick J. Geary.[26] It argues that the stimulus for forming tribal polities was perpetuated by a small nucleus of people, known as the Traditionskern ("kernel of tradition"), who were a military or aristocratic elite. This core group formed a standard for larger units, gathering adherents by employing amalgamative metaphors such as kinship and aboriginal commonality and claiming that they perpetuated an ancient, divinely-sanctioned lineage.[34]
The common, track-filled map of the Völkerwanderung may illustrate such [a] course of events, but it misleads. Unfolded over long periods of time, the changes of position that took place were necessarily irregular ... (with) periods of emphatic discontinuity. For decades and possibly centuries, the tradition bearers idled, and the tradition itself hibernated. There was ample time for forgetfulness to do its work.[35]
Viewpoints
[edit]Völkerwanderung is a German word, borrowed from German historiography, that refers to the early migrations of the Germanic peoples. In a broader sense it can mean the mass migration of whole tribes or ethnic groups.
— Bell-Fialkoff, Andrew. The Role of Migration, p. 15
Rather than "invasion", German and Slavic scholars speak of "migration" (see German: Völkerwanderung, Czech: Stěhování národů, Swedish: folkvandring and Hungarian: népvándorlás), aspiring to the idea of a dynamic and "wandering Indo-Germanic people".[36]
In contrast, the standard terms in French and Italian historiography translate to "barbarian invasions", or even "barbaric invasions" (French: Invasions barbares, Italian: Invasioni barbariche).
Historians have postulated several explanations for the appearance of "barbarians" on the Roman frontier: climate change, weather and crops, population pressure, a "primeval urge" to push into the Mediterranean, the construction of the Great Wall of China causing a "domino effect" of tribes being forced westward, leading to the Huns falling upon the Goths who, in turn, pushed other Germanic tribes before them.[37] In general, French and Italian scholars have tended to view this as a catastrophic event, the destruction of a civilization and the beginning of a "Dark Age" that set Europe back a millennium.[38] In contrast, German and English historians have tended to see Roman–Barbarian interaction as the replacement of a "tired, effete and decadent Mediterranean civilization" with a "more virile, martial, Nordic one".[38]
The scholar Guy Halsall has seen the barbarian movement as the result of the fall of the Roman Empire, not its cause.[38] Archaeological discoveries have confirmed that Germanic and Slavic tribes were settled agriculturalists who were probably merely "drawn into the politics of an empire already falling apart for quite a few other causes".[39] Goffart argues that the process of settlement was connected to hospitalitas, the Roman practice of quartering soldiers among the civilian population. The Romans, by granting land and the right to levy taxes to allied (Germanic) armies, hoped to reduce the financial burdens of the empire.[40] The Crisis of the Third Century caused significant changes within the Roman Empire in both its western and its eastern portions.[41] In particular, economic fragmentation removed many of the political, cultural and economic forces that had held the empire together.[42]
The rural population in Roman provinces became distanced from the metropolis, and there was little to differentiate them from other peasants across the Roman frontier. In addition, Rome increasingly used foreign mercenaries to defend itself. That "barbarisation" parallelled changes within Barbaricum. To this end, noted linguist Dennis Howard Green wrote, "the first centuries of our era witness not merely a progressive Romanisation of barbarian society, but also an undeniable barbarisation of the Roman world."[43]
For example, the Roman Empire played a vital role in building up barbarian groups along its frontier. Propped up with imperial support and gifts, the armies of allied barbarian chieftains served as buffers against other, hostile, barbarian groups. The disintegration of Roman economic power weakened groups that had come to depend on Roman gifts for the maintenance of their own power. The arrival of the Huns helped prompt many groups to invade the provinces for economic reasons.[44]
The nature of the barbarian takeover of former Roman provinces varied from region to region. For example, in Aquitaine, the provincial administration was largely self-reliant. Halsall has argued that local rulers simply "handed over" military rule to the Ostrogoths, acquiring the identity of the newcomers.[12] In Gaul, the collapse of imperial rule resulted in anarchy: the Franks and Alemanni were pulled into the ensuing "power vacuum",[45] resulting in conflict. In Hispania, local aristocrats maintained independent rule for some time, raising their own armies against the Vandals. Meanwhile, the Roman withdrawal from lowland England resulted in conflict between Saxons and the Brittonic chieftains (whose centres of power retreated westward as a result). The Eastern Roman Empire attempted to maintain control of the Balkan provinces despite a thinly-spread imperial army relying mainly on local militias and an extensive effort to refortify the Danubian limes. The ambitious fortification efforts collapsed, worsening the impoverished conditions of the local populace and resulting in colonization by Slavic warriors and their families.[46]
Halsall and Noble have argued that such changes stemmed from the breakdown in Roman political control, which exposed the weakness of local Roman rule. Instead of large-scale migrations, there were military takeovers by small groups of warriors and their families, who usually numbered only in the tens of thousands. The process involved active, conscious decision-making by Roman provincial populations.
The collapse of centralized control severely weakened the sense of Roman identity in the provinces, which may explain why the provinces then underwent dramatic cultural changes even though few barbarians settled in them.[47] Ultimately, the Germanic groups in the Western Roman Empire were accommodated without "dispossessing or overturning indigenous society", and they maintained a structured and hierarchical (but attenuated) form of Roman administration.[48]
Ironically, they lost their unique identity as a result of such an accommodation and were absorbed into Latinhood. In contrast, in the east, Slavic tribes maintained a more "spartan and egalitarian"[49] existence bound to the land "even in times when they took their part in plundering Roman provinces".[50] Their organizational models were not Roman, and their leaders were not normally dependent on Roman gold for success. Thus they arguably had a greater effect on their region than the Goths, the Franks or the Saxons had on theirs.[51]
Ethnicity
[edit]Based on the belief that particular types of artifacts, elements of personal adornment generally found in a funerary context, are thought to indicate the ethnicity of the person buried, the "Culture-History" school of archaeology assumed that archaeological cultures represent the Urheimat (homeland) of tribal polities named in historical sources.[52] As a consequence, the shifting extensions of material cultures were interpreted as the expansion of peoples.[53]
Influenced by constructionism, process-driven archaeologists rejected the culture-historical doctrine[53] and marginalized the discussion of ethnicity altogether and focused on the intragroup dynamics that generated such material remains. Moreover, they argued that adoption of new cultures could occur through trade or internal political developments rather than only military takeovers.
Depiction in media
[edit]- Terry Jones' Barbarians, a four-part TV documentary series first broadcast on BBC 2 in 2006
- Rome: Total War: Barbarian Invasion and Total War: Attila, strategy video games by The Creative Assembly
- Barbarians, 2004 documentary miniseries on The History Channel
See also
[edit]- Barbarian invasions of the 3rd century
- Bond event
- Dark Ages (historiography)
- Environmental migrant
- Five Barbarians and Sixteen Kingdoms
- Genetic history of the British Isles
- Germanic peoples
- Hephthalite Empire
- Immigration
- Late Antiquity
- Medieval demography
- Middle Ages
- Migration Period art
- Turkic migration
References
[edit]- ^ Allgemein Springer (2006), der auch auf alternative Definitionen außerhalb der communis opinio hinweist. Alle Epochengrenzen sind letztlich nur ein Konstrukt und vor allem durch Konvention begründet. Vgl. auch Stefan Krautschick: Zur Entstehung eines Datums. 375 – Beginn der Völkerwanderung. In: Klio 82, 2000, S. 217–222 sowie Stefan Krautschick: Hunnensturm und Germanenflut: 375 – Beginn der Völkerwanderung? In: Byzantinische Zeitschrift 92, 1999, S. 10–67.
- ^ "History of Europe - Barbarian Migrations, Invasions | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2023-08-12.
- ^ Halsall, Guy. Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
- ^ For example, Halsall, (2008), Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568
- ^ "The Migration period (fourth to eighth century)", p.5 Migration Art, A.D. 300-800, 1995, Metropolitan Museum of Art, ed. Katharine Reynolds Brown, ISBN 0870997505, 9780870997501
- ^ Peter Heather (2003). The Visigoths from the Migration Period to the Seventh Century: An Ethnographic Perspective. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. p. 54. ISBN 978-1-84383-033-7.
- ^ Giovanni Milani-Santarpia, "Immigration Roman Empire", MariaMilani.com
- ^ Bury, J. B., The Invasion of Europe by the Barbarians, Norton Library, 1967.
- ^ "Anatolien war nicht Ur-Heimat der indogermanischen Stämme". Eurasischesmagazin.de. Retrieved 2016-02-03.
- ^ Wolfram Euler, Konrad Badenheuer; "Sprache und Herkunft der Germanen: Abriss des Protogermanischen vor der Ersten Lautverschiebung"; 2009; ISBN 3-9812110-1-4, 978-3-9812110-1-6
- ^ Bury, Invasion, Ch. 1.
- ^ a b Halsall 2006a, p. 51.
- ^ Wolfram 2001, pp. 127ff..
- ^ Dumville 1990.
- ^ Kobylinski, Zbigniew (2005). "The Slavs". In Paul, Paul Fouracre; Rosamond, Rosamond McKitterick; David, David Abulafia (eds.). The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 1, C.500-c.700. The New Cambridge Medieval History, volume 1, C.500-c.700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 524ff. ISBN 9780521362917. Retrieved 23 October 2024.
- ^ Bertolini 1960, pp. 34–38.
- ^ Schutz 2002, p. 82
- ^ Fine, John Van Antwerp (1983), The Early Medieval Balkans, University of Michigan Press, ISBN 0-472-08149-7, p. 31.
- ^ The Miracles of Saint Demetrius
- ^ a b c Chapter 2 in Noel Malcolm's Kosovo, a Short History, Macmillan, London, 1998, pp. 22-40
- ^ Wolfram, Thomas J. Dunlap, tr. History of the Goths (1979) 1988:5
- ^ Anthony D. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations (Oxford, 1966) pp. 6ff., coined the term to separate these thinkers from those who view ethnicity as a situational construct, the product of history, rather than a cause, influenced by a variety of political, economic and cultural factors.
- ^ a b Geary 2006, p. 29.
- ^ a b Kulikowski 2007, p. 46.
- ^ That was influenced by the 'family tree' model (Stammbaun) of linguistics in that relationships between related languages were seen to be the result of derivation from a common ancestor. The model still is very influential in linguistics
- ^ a b Halsall (2008, p. 17)
- ^ Todd, pp. 8–10) There is no indication that the Germani possessed a feeling that they were a "separate people, nation, or group of tribes"
- ^ For example, The Celtic World, Miranda Green (1996), p. 3 and The Making of the Slavs. Floring Curta (2001)
- ^ Halsall (2008, p. 24)
- ^ Friedrich & Harland (2020)
- ^ Archaeology and Language: Correlating Archaeological and Linguistic Hypotheses. "The Eurasian Spread Zone and the Indo-European Dispersal." Johanna Nichols. p. 224
- ^ Kulikowski 2007, p. 48.
- ^ Halsall (2008, p. 15)
- ^ Geary (2003, p. 77)
- ^ Wood 2006, p. 97.
- ^ Halsall 2006b, p. 236.
- ^ Wright, David Curtis (1997). "The Hsiung-Nu-Hun Equation Revisited". Eurasian Studies Yearbook. 69: 77–112.
- ^ a b c Halsall 2006a, p. 35.
- ^ Heather 2006, p. 247.
- ^ Henri J. M. Claessen, Jarich Gerlof Oosten (1996). Ideology and the Formation of Early States. BRILL. p. 222. ISBN 9789004104709.
- ^ Curta (2001, p. 120) "[T]he archaeological evidence of late fourth- and fifth-century barbarian graves between the Rhine and Loire suggests that a process of small-scale cultural and demographic change took place on both sides of the Roman frontier. Can we envisage Roman-Slavic relations in a similar way?"
- ^ Halsall 2006a, p. 42.
- ^ Green 1998, p. 143.
- ^ Halsall 2006a, p. 49.
- ^ Halsall 2006a, p. 50.
- ^ Curta (2001, pp. 120–180)
- ^ Halsall 2006a, pp. 50–52.
- ^ Heather 2006, p. 251.
- ^ Barford (2001, p. 46)
- ^ Pohl1998, p. 20)
- ^ Geary (2003, p. 146)
- ^ Pohl (1998, pp. 17–23)
- ^ a b Kulikowski 2007, p. 61.
Bibliography
[edit]- Barford, Paul M (2001). The Early Slavs: Culture and Society in Early Medieval Eastern Europe. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-3977-9.
- Bell-Fialkoff, Andrew, ed. (2000). The Role of Migration in the History of the Eurasian Steppe: Sedentary Civilization vs. 'Barbarian' and Nomad (Role Migrant History Eurasian Step). Basingstoke: Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-349-61839-2.
- Börm, Henning (2013), Westrom. Von Honorius bis Justinian, Kohlhammer Verlag, ISBN 978-3-17-023276-1
- Curta, Florin (2001). The Making of the Slavs: History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region, c. 500–700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-42888-0.
- Curta, Florin (2006). Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-81539-0.
- Dumville, David (1990). Histories and pseudo-histories of the insular Middle Ages. Aldershot, Hampshire: Variorum.
- Friedrich, Matthias and Harland, James M., eds. (2020): Interrogating the "Germanic": A Category and its Use in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-069976-0.
- Geary, Patrick (2003). Myth of Nations. The Medieval Origins of Europe. Princeton Paperbacks. ISBN 0-691-11481-1.
- Geary, Patrick (2006). "The crisis of European identity". In Thomas F.X. Noble (ed.). From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-32742-3.
- Green, D. H. (1998). Language and history in the early Germanic world. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-79423-7.
- Halsall, Guy (2006a). "The Barbarian invasions". In Paul Fouracre (ed.). The New Cambridge Medieval History, Vol. 1: c. 500 – c. 700. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36291-1.
- Halsall, Guy (2006b). "Movers and shakers: the barbarians and the fall of Rome". In Thomas F.X. Noble (ed.). From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-32742-3.
- Halsall, Guy (2008). Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-43491-1.
- Heather, Peter J (1998). The Goths. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-20932-8.
- Heather, Peter (2006). "Foedera and foederati of the fourth century". In Thomas F.X. Noble (ed.). From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-32742-3.
- Kleineberg, A.; Marx, Chr.; Knobloch, E.; Lelgemann, D.: Germania und die Insel Thule. Die Entschlüsselung von Ptolemaios' "Atlas der Oikumene". WBG 2010. ISBN 978-3-534-23757-9.
- Kulikowski, Michael (2007). Rome's Gothic Wars: From the Third Century to Alaric. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84633-2.
- Noble, Thomas F.X., ed. (2006). From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-32742-3.
- Pohl, Walter (1998). "Conceptions of Ethnicity in Early Medieval Studies". In Little, Lester K; Rosenwein, Barbara (eds.). Debating the Middle Ages: Issues and Readings. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 1-57718-008-9.
- Todd, Malcolm (1996-02-12). The Early Germans. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0-631-19904-7.
- Wolfram, Herwig (2001). Die Goten. Von den Anfängen bis zur Mitte des sechsten Jahrhunderts. München: C. H. Beck.
- Wood, Ian (2006). "Defining the Franks: Frankish origins in early medieval historiography". In Thomas F.X. Noble (ed.). From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-32742-3.
External links
[edit]- Media related to Migration period at Wikimedia Commons