Facebook: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m Disambiguating links to Rojava (link changed to Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria) using DisamAssist. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{short description|Social-networking service owned by Meta Platforms}} |
||
{{About|the social media service|its owner, formerly known as Facebook, Inc.|Meta Platforms}} |
|||
{{distinguish|Face book|The World Factbook}} |
|||
{{pp-semi-indef}} |
{{pp-semi-indef}} |
||
{{pp- |
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}} |
||
{{pp-move}} |
|||
{{Use American English|date=June 2015}} |
|||
{{Use |
{{Use American English|date=June 2015}} |
||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2024}} |
|||
{{Infobox dot-com company |
|||
{{Infobox website |
|||
| name = Facebook, Inc. |
|||
| name = Facebook |
|||
| logo = [[File:Facebook logo (June 30, 2015).png|200px]] |
|||
| logo = [[File:2023 Facebook icon.svg|50px|Facebook logo]] [[File:Facebook logo (2023).svg|150px|Facebook wordmark]] |
|||
| screenshot = Facebook (login, signup page).jpg |
|||
| logo_size = 260px |
|||
| caption = Facebook login/signup screen |
|||
| logo_caption = Logo used since September 2023 |
|||
| company_type = [[Public company|Public]] |
|||
| screenshot = Facebook user page.png |
|||
| traded_as = {{NASDAQ|FB}}<br/>[[NASDAQ-100|NASDAQ-100 Component]]<br />[[S&P 500|S&P 500 Component]] |
|||
| caption = Mark Zuckerberg's profile (viewed when [[Login|logged out]]) |
|||
| foundation = {{Start date and age|2004|02|04|df=no|p=yes|br=yes}} |
|||
| collapsible = no |
|||
| location = [[Menlo Park, California]], US |
|||
| type = [[Social networking service]] |
|||
|coordinates={{coord|37.484848|-122.148386|display=inline,title}} |
|||
| language = [[Multilingualism|Multilingual]]<br />Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Assamese, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Breton, Bulgarian, Burmese, Catalan, Cebuano, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Dutch (België), English (UK), English (US), English (upside down), Esperanto, Estonian, Faroese, Filipino, Finnish, French (Canada), French (France), Frisian, Fula, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Guarani, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Icelandic, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Japanese (Kansai), Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latvian, Lithuanian, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Marathi, Mongolian, Nepali, Norwegian (bokmal), Norwegian (nynorsk), Odia, Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazil), Portuguese (Portugal), Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Sardinian, Serbian, Shona, Silesian, Simplified Chinese (China), Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Sorani Kurdish, Spanish, Spanish (Spain), Swahili, Swedish, Syriac, Tajik, Tamazight, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Tetun, Thai, Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong), Traditional Chinese (Taiwan), Turkish, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh and Zaza |
|||
| area_served = United States (2004–05)<br />Worldwide, except [[Censorship of Facebook|blocked countries]] (2005–present) |
|||
| language_count = 112 |
|||
| founder = {{Unbulleted list|[[Mark Zuckerberg]]|[[Eduardo Saverin]]|[[Andrew McCollum]]|[[Dustin Moskovitz]]|[[Chris Hughes]]}} |
|||
| language_footnote = <ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook Interface Languages|url=https://www.facebook.com/language.php|website=Facebook (Select your language)|access-date=July 19, 2020|archive-date=January 26, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210126220101/http://www.facebook.com/language.php|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
| key_people = Mark Zuckerberg<br /><small>([[Chairman]] and [[CEO]])</small><br />[[Sheryl Sandberg]]<br /><small>([[Chief operating officer|COO]])</small> |
|||
| founded = {{Start date and age|2004|02|04}} in [[Cambridge, Massachusetts]], US |
|||
| industry = [[Internet]] |
|||
| area_served = Worldwide, except [[Censorship of Facebook|blocking countries]] |
|||
| revenue = {{Increase}} {{USD|12.466}} billion (2014)<ref name="10k2014">{{cite web |url=http://investor.fb.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1326801-14-7&CIK=1326801|title=10-K Annual Report|work=SEC Filings |publisher=Facebook |accessdate=February 7, 2014|date=January 31, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
| founder = {{Unbulleted list | [[Mark Zuckerberg]] | [[Dustin Moskovitz]] | [[Chris Hughes]] | [[Andrew McCollum]] | [[Eduardo Saverin]]}} |
|||
| operating_income = {{Increase}} {{USD|4.982}} billion (2014)<ref name="10k2014"/> |
|||
| CEO = Mark Zuckerberg<!-- Please do not link; this has been already linked. See [[WP:OVERLINK]] --> |
|||
| net_income = {{Increase}} {{USD|2.94}} billion (2014)<ref name="10k2014"/> |
|||
| url = {{URL|https://facebook.com}} |
|||
| assets = {{Increase}} {{USD|40.184}} billion (2014)<ref name="10k2014"/> |
|||
| registration = Required (to do any activity) |
|||
| equity = {{Increase}} {{USD|36.096}} billion (2014)<ref name="10k2014"/> |
|||
| users = {{increase}} 2.94 billion monthly active users ({{as of|2022|03|31|lc=yes}})<ref name="investor-report">{{cite web |title=Facebook Reports First Quarter 2022 Results |url=https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2022/Meta-Reports-First-Quarter-2022-Results/default.aspx |website=Facebook Investor Relations |access-date=April 27, 2022 |date=March 31, 2022 |archive-date=June 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230605105810/https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2022/Meta-Reports-First-Quarter-2022-Results/default.aspx |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
| num_employees = 10,082 (March 2015)<ref name=CoInfo>{{cite web | url=http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ | title=Company Info {{!}} Facebook Newsroom | publisher=Facebook |date=February 6, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
| launch_date = {{Start date and age|2004|02|04}} |
|||
| subsid = [[Instagram]]<br /> [[WhatsApp]]<br />[[Oculus VR]]<br />[[PrivateCore]] |
|||
| owner = [[Meta Platforms]] |
|||
| url = {{URL|https://www.facebook.com/}} {{Nowrap|[[Tor (anonymity network)#Hidden services|Tor]]: facebookcorewwwi.onion}}<ref name="fb-tor-note" /> |
|||
| current_status = Active |
|||
| programming_language = [[C++]], [[PHP]] (as [[HipHop Virtual Machine|HHVM]])<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/02/facebook_hiphop_unveiled/ |title=Facebook re-write takes PHP to an enterprise past |last=Clarke |first=Gavin |work=The Register |location =London |date=February 2, 2010}}</ref> and [[D language]]<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.drdobbs.com/mobile/facebook-adopts-d-language/240162694|title=Facebook Adopts D Language|last=Bridgwater|first=Adrian |work=Dr Dobb's |location =San Francisco|date=October 16, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
| programming_language = [[C++]], [[Hack (programming language)|Hack]] (as [[HHVM]]) and [[PHP]] |
|||
| alexa = {{Steady}} 2 ({{as of|2014|4|1|alt=September 2014}})<ref name="alexa">{{cite web|url= http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com |title= Facebook.com Site Info | publisher= [[Alexa Internet]] |accessdate= April 1, 2014 }}</ref><!--Updated monthly by OKBot.--> |
|||
| footnotes = <ref name="Our History">{{cite web|title=Our History|url=https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/|website=Facebook|access-date=November 7, 2018|archive-date=November 15, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151115110456/https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Gavin|last=Clarke|title=Facebook re-write takes PHP to an enterprise past|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/02/facebook_hiphop_unveiled/|website=[[The Register]]|publisher=Situation Publishing|date=February 2, 2010|access-date=March 23, 2017|archive-date=May 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200528131046/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/02/facebook_hiphop_unveiled/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/02/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-platform-publisher-lawsuit|title=Is Facebook a publisher? In public it says no, but in court it says yes|first=Sam|last=Levin|date=July 3, 2018|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=June 23, 2019|archive-date=February 21, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210221205000/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/02/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-platform-publisher-lawsuit|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
| website_type = [[Social networking service]] |
|||
| registration = Required |
|||
| num_users = {{Decrease}} 1.18 billion monthly active users (June 10, 2015)<ref name="Q1 2015 results">{{cite web | url=http://investor.fb.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=908022 | title=Facebook Reports First Quarter 2015 Results | date=April 22, 2015 | accessdate=April 26, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
| language = [[Multilingualism|Multilingual]] (70) |
|||
| current_status = Active |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Facebook sidebar}} |
|||
'''Facebook''' is a [[social media]] and [[social networking service]] owned by American technology conglomerate [[Meta Platforms|Meta]]. Created in 2004 by [[Mark Zuckerberg]] with four other [[Harvard College]] students and roommates [[Eduardo Saverin]], [[Andrew McCollum]], [[Dustin Moskovitz]], and [[Chris Hughes]], its name derives from the [[face book]] directories often given to American university students. Membership was initially limited to Harvard students, gradually expanding to other North American universities. Since 2006, Facebook allows everyone to register from 13 years old, except in the case of a handful of nations, where the age limit is 14 years.<ref>{{cite web |title=How do I report a child under the age of 14 on Facebook in South Korea, Spain or Quebec, Canada? |url=https://www.facebook.com/help/100532533374396/?helpref=related_articles%3DHow |website=Facebook |access-date=October 9, 2023 |archive-date=October 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231013215702/https://www.facebook.com/help/100532533374396/?helpref=related_articles=How |url-status=live }}</ref> {{As of|2022|December|df=US}}, Facebook claimed almost 3 billion monthly active users.<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 1, 2023 |title=Meta Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 Results |url=https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2023/Meta-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2022-Results/default.aspx |access-date=March 26, 2023 |website=Meta Investor Relations – Facebook |language=en-US |archive-date=October 31, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231031182553/https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2023/Meta-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2022-Results/default.aspx |url-status=live }}</ref> {{As of|November 2024}}, Facebook ranked as the [[List of most-visited websites|third-most-visited website in the world]], with 23% of its traffic coming from the United States.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.similarweb.com/website/facebook.com/#geography|title=facebook.com|website=similarweb.com|access-date=November 15, 2023|archive-date=November 12, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231112112639/https://www.similarweb.com/website/facebook.com/#geography|url-status=live}}</ref> It was the most downloaded [[mobile app]] of the 2010s.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://9to5mac.com/2019/12/16/apps-and-games-of-the-decade/|title=These were the most-downloaded apps and games of the decade|last=Miller|first=Chance|date=December 17, 2019|website=9to5Mac|language=en-US|access-date=December 17, 2019|archive-date=December 17, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217130013/https://9to5mac.com/2019/12/16/apps-and-games-of-the-decade/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
'''Facebook''' is an online [[social networking service]] headquartered in [[Menlo Park, California]]. Its website was launched on February 4, 2004, by [[Mark Zuckerberg]] with his college roommates and fellow [[Harvard University]] students [[Eduardo Saverin]], [[Andrew McCollum]], [[Dustin Moskovitz]] and [[Chris Hughes]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.businessinsider.com/how-facebook-was-founded-2010-3#we-can-talk-about-that-after-i-get-all-the-basic-functionality-up-tomorrow-night-1 |title=At Last – The Full Story Of How Facebook Was Founded |work=Business Insider |first=Nicholas |last=Carlson |date=March 5, 2010}}</ref> The founders had initially limited the website's membership to Harvard students, but later expanded it to colleges in the Boston area, the [[Ivy League]], and [[Stanford University]]. It gradually added support for students at various other universities and later to high-school students. Since 2006, anyone who is at least 13 years old is allowed to become a registered user of the website, though the age requirement may be higher depending on applicable local laws.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.facebook.com/help/parents |title=Information For Parents and Educators |publisher= Facebook |accessdate=March 1, 2015}}</ref> Its name comes from a colloquialism for the directory given to it by American universities students.<ref name="Growth">{{Cite news |accessdate =December 19, 2008 |url= http://venturebeat.com/2008/12/18/2008-growth-puts-facebook-in-better-position-to-make-money/ |title=2008 Growth Puts Facebook In Better Position to Make Money |work=VentureBeat |location =San Francisco |date=December 18, 2008 |author=Eldon, Eric}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook can be accessed from devices with [[Internet]] connectivity, such as [[personal computer]]s, [[Tablet computer|tablets]] and [[smartphone]]s. After registering, users can create a profile revealing personal information about themselves. They can post text, photos and multimedia which are shared with any other users who have agreed to be their [[Friending and following|friend]] or, with different [[privacy settings]], publicly. Users can also [[Instant messaging|communicate directly]] with each other with [[Messenger (software)|Messenger]], join common-interest groups, and receive notifications on the activities of their Facebook friends and the pages they follow. |
|||
After registering to use the site, users can create a [[user profile]], add other users as [[friending|"friends"]], exchange messages, post status updates and photos, share videos and receive notifications when others update their profiles. Additionally, users may join common-interest user groups, organized by workplace, school or college, or other characteristics, and categorize their friends into lists such as "People From Work" or "Close Friends". Facebook had over [[List of virtual communities with more than 100 million active users|1.44 billion monthly active users]] as of March 2015.<ref name="Q1 2015 results" /> Because of the large volume of data users submit to the service, Facebook has come under scrutiny for their privacy policies. Facebook, Inc. held its [[initial public offering]] in February 2012 and began selling stock to the public three months later, reaching an original peak market capitalization of $104 billion. As of February 2015 Facebook reached a market capitalization of $212 Billion.<ref>{{cite web|title=facebook|url=http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FB|website=Yahoo Finance|accessdate=February 17, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
The subject of [[Criticism of Facebook|numerous controversies]], Facebook has often been criticized over issues such as [[Internet privacy|user privacy]] (as with the [[Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal|Cambridge Analytica data scandal]]), political manipulation (as with the [[Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections#Social media and Internet trolls|2016 U.S. elections]]) and mass surveillance.<ref>{{cite web|date=May 24, 2018|title=Facebook accused of conducting mass surveillance through its apps|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/24/facebook-accused-of-conducting-mass-surveillance-through-its-apps|access-date=October 9, 2020|website=[[The Guardian]]|language=en|last1=Cadwalladr|first1=Carole|last2=Graham-Harrison|first2=v|archive-date=January 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114003235/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/24/facebook-accused-of-conducting-mass-surveillance-through-its-apps|url-status=live}}</ref> Facebook has also been subject to criticism over psychological effects such as [[Problematic social media use|addiction]] and low [[self-esteem]], and various controversies over content such as [[fake news]], [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], [[copyright infringement]], and [[hate speech]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/dec/21/quit-facebook-privacy-scandal-private-messages|title=Is 2019 the year you should finally quit Facebook?|first=Arwa|last=Mahdawi|date=December 21, 2018|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=January 24, 2019|archive-date=May 28, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230528063824/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/dec/21/quit-facebook-privacy-scandal-private-messages|url-status=live}}</ref> Commentators have accused Facebook of willingly facilitating the spread of such content, as well as exaggerating its number of users to appeal to advertisers.<ref name=useradappeal>{{cite news|url=https://www.theregister.com/2018/08/17/facebook_ad_reach_lawsuit/#:~:text='Made%2Dup%20PR%20numbers',to%20exaggerate%20online%20advertising%20audience&text=Facebook%20brags%20it%20has%20a,than%201.27bn%20fake%20accounts.|title=Facebook flat-out 'lies' about how many people can see its ads – lawsuit|first=Thomas|last=Claburn|publisher=The Register|date=August 17, 2018|access-date=November 18, 2020|archive-date=September 7, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230907062047/https://www.theregister.com/2018/08/17/facebook_ad_reach_lawsuit/#:~:text='Made%2Dup%20PR%20numbers',to%20exaggerate%20online%20advertising%20audience&text=Facebook%20brags%20it%20has%20a,than%201.27bn%20fake%20accounts.|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
{{Toclimit|3}} |
|||
== History == |
== History == |
||
{{ |
{{main|History of Facebook}} |
||
{{Anchor|Thefacebook}} |
|||
The history of Facebook traces its growth from a college networking site to a global [[social networking]] service.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2007/jul/25/media.newmedia|title=A brief history of Facebook|first=Sarah|last=Phillips|newspaper=The Guardian |date=July 25, 2007|via=www.theguardian.com}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:MarkZuckerberg-crop.jpg|thumb|left|[[Mark Zuckerberg]], co-creator of Facebook, in his [[Harvard University|Harvard]] dorm room, 2005]] |
|||
=== 2003–2005: Thefacebook, Thiel investment and name change === |
|||
Zuckerberg built a website called "Facemash" in 2003 while attending [[Harvard University]]. The site was comparable to [[Hot or Not]] and used photos from online [[face book]]s, asking users to choose the 'hotter' person".<ref name="Harvard Crimson on Facemash">{{cite web|first=Katharine A. |last=Kaplan |title=Facemash Creator Survives Ad Board |url=https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/11/19/facemash-creator-survives-ad-board-the/ |website=[[The Harvard Crimson]] |date=November 19, 2003 |access-date=June 24, 2017 |archive-date=May 4, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190504172812/https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/11/19/facemash-creator-survives-ad-board-the/ |url-status=live}}</ref> Zuckerberg was reported and faced expulsion, but the charges were dropped.<ref name="Harvard Crimson on Facemash" /> |
|||
[[File:Thefacebook screenshot (2004).png|thumb|Original layout and name of ''Thefacebook'' in 2004, showing [[Al Pacino]]'s face superimposed with [[binary number]]s as Facebook's original logo, designed by co-founder Andrew McCollum.]] |
|||
Zuckerberg wrote a program called Facemash on October 28, 2003 while attending [[Harvard University|Harvard]] as a [[Sophomore year|sophomore]]. According to ''[[The Harvard Crimson]]'', the site was comparable to [[Hot or Not]] and "used photos compiled from the online facebooks of nine houses, placing two next to each other at a time and asking users to choose the 'hotter' person"<ref name="autogenerated2007" /><ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=357292 |title=Hundreds Register for New Facebook Website |first=Alan J. |last=Tabak |date=February 9, 2004 |newspaper=The Harvard Crimson |location =Cambridge, MA |accessdate=November 7, 2008 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20050403215543/http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=357292 |archivedate=April 3, 2005}}</ref> |
|||
A "[[face book]]" is a student directory featuring photos and personal information. In January 2004, Zuckerberg coded a new site known as "TheFacebook", stating, "It is clear that the technology needed to create a centralized Website is readily available ... the benefits are many." Zuckerberg met with Harvard student [[Eduardo Saverin]], and each agreed to invest $1,000.<ref>{{cite magazine|first=Claire|last=Hoffman|title=The Battle For Facebook|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-battle-for-facebook-20100915|magazine=[[Rolling Stone]]|publisher=Wenner Media|date=September 15, 2010|access-date=July 4, 2017|archive-date=December 26, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226015320/https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/the-battle-for-facebook-242989/|url-status=dead}}</ref> On February 4, 2004, Zuckerberg launched "TheFacebook".<ref>{{cite news|first=Lily|last=Rothman|title=Happy Birthday, Facebook|url=https://time.com/3686124/happy-birthday-facebook/|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]|date=February 4, 2015|access-date=July 4, 2017|archive-date=December 26, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226015300/http://time.com/3686124/happy-birthday-facebook/%20/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
To accomplish this, Zuckerberg [[Hacker (computer security)|hacked]] into protected areas of Harvard's computer network and copied private dormitory [[Identity document|ID]] images. Harvard did not have a student "[[Facebook (directory)|Facebook]]" (a directory with photos and basic information) at the time, although individual houses had been issuing their own paper facebooks since the mid-1980s. Facemash attracted 450 visitors and 22,000 photo-views in its first four hours online.<ref name="autogenerated2007">{{Cite news |author=Locke, Laura |url= http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1644040,00.html |title= The Future of Facebook |newspaper =Time |location =New York |date= July 17, 2007 |accessdate=November 13, 2009}}</ref><ref name="fastcompany.com">{{cite news |author= McGirt, Ellen |url= http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/115/open_features-hacker-dropout-ceo.html |title= Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg: Hacker. Dropout. CEO |work= Fast Company |location =New York |date=May 1, 2007 |accessdate=November 5, 2009}}</ref> |
|||
Membership was initially restricted to students of [[Harvard College]]. [[Dustin Moskovitz]], [[Andrew McCollum]], and [[Chris Hughes]] joined Zuckerberg to help manage the growth of the site.<ref>{{cite web|first=Matt|last=Weinberger|title=33 photos of Facebook's rise from a Harvard dorm room to world domination|url=http://nordic.businessinsider.com/facebook-history-photos-2016-9|website=[[Business Insider]]|publisher=Axel Springer SE|date=September 7, 2017|access-date=December 13, 2017|archive-date=December 26, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226015226/https://nordic.businessinsider.com/facebook-history-photos-2016-9%20|url-status=live}}</ref> It became available successively to most universities in the US and [[Canada]].<ref>{{cite news|access-date=June 13, 2008|url=https://www.forbes.com/2006/09/11/facebook-opens-up-cx_rr_0911facebook.html|title=Open Facebook|work=[[Forbes]]|location=New York|date=September 11, 2006|author=Rosmarin, Rachel|archive-date=March 23, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323070616/https://www.forbes.com/2006/09/11/facebook-opens-up-cx_rr_0911facebook.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://tuftsdaily.com/archives/2004/04/12/online-network-created-by-harvard-students-flourishes/|title=Online network created by Harvard students flourishes|work=[[The Tufts Daily]]|first=Lananh|last=Nguyen|date=April 12, 2004|location=Medford, MA|access-date=November 30, 2018|archive-date=February 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210214092755/https://tuftsdaily.com/archives/2004/04/12/online-network-created-by-harvard-students-flourishes/|url-status=live}}</ref> In mid-2004, [[Napster]] co-founder [[Sean Parker]] became company president<ref name="NYT_260505">{{cite news|author=Rosen, Ellen|title=Student's Start-Up Draws Attention and $13 Million|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/26/business/26sbiz.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050529030744/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/26/business/26sbiz.html |archive-date=May 29, 2005 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=May 26, 2005|access-date=May 18, 2009}}</ref> and the company moved to [[Palo Alto, California]].<ref name="timeline">{{Cite press release|access-date=March 5, 2008|url=https://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?timeline|title=Company Timeline|publisher=Facebook|date=January 1, 2007|archive-date=January 6, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190106103736/https://newsroom.fb.com/|url-status=live}}</ref> [[PayPal]] co-founder [[Peter Thiel]], gave Facebook its first investment.<ref name="beware">{{cite news|access-date=April 30, 2008|url=http://www.theage.com.au/news/general/beware-facebook/2008/01/18/1200620184398.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2|title=Why you should beware of Facebook|work=The Age|location=Melbourne|date=January 20, 2008|archive-date=December 26, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226015255/https://www.theage.com.au/technology/why-you-should-beware-of-facebook-20080120-ge6mel.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Parker |first=Sean |date=April 16, 2015 |title=Reid Hoffman: The World's 100 Most Influential People |url=https://time.com/collection-post/3822665/reid-hoffman-2015-time-100/ |access-date=June 20, 2023 |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |archive-date=October 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231030194418/https://time.com/collection-post/3822665/reid-hoffman-2015-time-100/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2005, the company dropped "the" from its name after purchasing the [[domain name]] Facebook.com.<ref>{{cite web|first=Christopher|last=Williams|title=Facebook wins Manx battle for face-book.com|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/01/facebook_domain_dispute|website=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|date=October 1, 2007|access-date=March 23, 2017|archive-date=December 26, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226015246/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/01/facebook_domain_dispute%20|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The site was quickly forwarded to several campus group list-servers,{{clarify|date=October 2013}} but was shut down a few days later by the Harvard administration. Zuckerberg faced expulsion and was charged by the administration with breach of security, violating [[copyright]]s, and violating individual privacy. Ultimately, the charges were dropped.<ref name="facemash survives">{{cite news |accessdate=February 5, 2009 |url=http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=350143 |title= Facemash Creator Survives Ad Board |work=The Harvard Crimson |location =Cambridge, MA |date=November 19, 2003 |author=Kaplan, Katherine}}</ref> Zuckerberg expanded on this initial project that semester by creating a social study tool ahead of an [[art history]] final. He uploaded 500 [[History of Rome|Augustan]] images to a website, and each image was featured with a corresponding comments section.<ref name="fastcompany.com" /> He shared the site with his classmates and people started sharing notes. |
|||
In 2006, Facebook opened to everyone at least 13 years old with a valid [[email address]].<ref name="welcome">{{cite web|first=Carolyn|last=Abram|url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2210227130|access-date=March 8, 2008|publisher=The Facebook Blog|title=Welcome to Facebook, everyone|date=September 26, 2006|archive-date=January 11, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190111031027/https://newsroom.fb.com/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="tos">{{cite web|access-date=March 5, 2008|url=https://www.facebook.com/terms.php|title=Terms of Use|publisher=Facebook|date=November 15, 2007|archive-date=March 5, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080305190936/http://www.facebook.com/terms.php|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2006/09/facebook-expansion-enables-more-people-to-connect-with-friends-in-a-trusted-environment/|title=Facebook Expansion Enables More People to Connect with Friends in a Trusted Environment|date=September 26, 2006|work=Facebook Newsroom|access-date=February 4, 2016|archive-date=December 26, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226015312/https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2006/09/facebook-expansion-enables-more-people-to-connect-with-friends-in-a-trusted-environment/|url-status=live}}</ref> Facebook introduced key features like the [[News Feed]], which became central to user engagement. By late 2007, Facebook had 100,000 pages on which companies promoted themselves.<ref>{{cite news|title=Enterprise: Facebook, a Marketer's Friend; Site Offers Platform To Tout Products, Interact With Users|last=Richmond|first=Riva|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|location=New York|date=November 27, 2007|page=B4}}</ref> Facebook had surpassed [[MySpace]] in global traffic and became the world’s most popular [[social media]] platform. [[Microsoft]] announced that it had purchased a 1.6% share of Facebook for $240 million (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|240000000|2007}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}), giving Facebook an implied value of around $15 billion (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|15000000000|2007}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}). Facebook focused on generating revenue through [[targeted advertising]] based on user data, a model that drove its rapid financial growth. In 2012, Facebook went public with one of the largest [[initial public offering|IPOs]] in tech history. Acquisitions played a significant role in Facebook's dominance. In 2012, it purchased [[Instagram]], followed by [[WhatsApp]] and [[Oculus VR]] in 2014, extending its influence beyond social networking into messaging and [[virtual reality]]. |
|||
[[Image:Thefacebook.png|thumb|Original layout and name of Thefacebook, 2004.]] |
|||
The [[Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal]] in 2018 revealed misuse of user data to influence elections, sparking global outcry and leading to regulatory fines and hearings. Facebook’s role in global events, including its use in organizing movements like the [[Arab Spring]] and its impact on events like the [[Rohingya genocide]] in Myanmar, highlighted its dual nature as a tool for empowerment and harm. In 2021, Facebook rebranded as [[Meta Platforms|Meta]], reflecting its shift toward building the "[[metaverse]]" and focusing on virtual reality and [[augmented reality]] technologies. |
|||
The following semester, Zuckerberg began writing code for a new website in January 2004. He said he was inspired by an editorial about the Facemash incident in ''The Harvard Crimson''.<ref name="Hoffman, Claire">{{Cite news |accessdate=February 5, 2009 |url=http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/21129674/the_battle_for_facebook/ |title=The Battle for Facebook | newspaper=Rolling Stone | location = New York |date=June 28, 2008 |author=Hoffman, Claire |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080703220456/http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/21129674/the_battle_for_facebook/ |archivedate = July 3, 2008 |deadurl=yes}}</ref> On February 4, 2004, Zuckerberg launched "Thefacebook", originally located at thefacebook.com.<ref name="skepticism">{{Cite news|accessdate=April 30, 2008 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118539991204578084.html?mod=googlenews_wsj |title=Judge Expresses Skepticism About Facebook Lawsuit |work=The Wall Street Journal | location = New York |date=July 25, 2007 |author=Seward, Zachary M. }}</ref> |
|||
== Features == |
|||
Six days after the site launched, three Harvard seniors ([[Cameron Winklevoss]], [[Tyler Winklevoss]], and [[Divya Narendra]]) accused Zuckerberg of intentionally misleading them into believing he would help them build a social network called [[ConnectU|HarvardConnection.com]]. They claimed he was instead using their ideas to build a competing product.<ref name="zuckerberghacked">{{Cite news |first= Nicolas |last=Carlson |title= In 2004, Mark Zuckerberg Broke Into A Facebook User's Private Email Account |date=March 5, 2010 |url= http://www.businessinsider.com/how-mark-zuckerberg-hacked-into-the-harvard-crimson-2010-3 |work=Business Insider |location= New York |accessdate =March 5, 2010}}</ref> The three complained to ''The Harvard Crimson'' and the newspaper began an investigation. They later filed a lawsuit against Zuckerberg, subsequently settling in 2008<ref name="nytb">{{Cite news |work=New York Times blog |url=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/26/judge-ends-facebooks-feud-with-connectu/index.html |date=June 28, 2008| title=Judge Ends Facebook's Feud With ConnectU |author=Stone, Brad}}</ref> for 1.2 million [[shares]] (worth $300 million at Facebook's [[Initial public offering|IPO]]).<ref>{{cite news |author= Rushe, Dominic |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/feb/02/facebook-ipo-winklevoss-300m-fortune |title= Facebook IPO sees Winklevoss twins heading for $300m fortune |newspaper=The Guardian |location= London |date=February 2, 2012 |accessdate=April 20, 2013 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6KOXFUCYV|archivedate=October 15, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
{{Unreferenced section|date=August 2024}} |
|||
Facebook posts can have an unlimited number of characters, with images and videos. |
|||
Users can "friend" users, both sides must agree to being friends. Posts can be changed to be seen by everyone (public), friends, people in a certain group (group) or by selected friends (private). |
|||
Membership was initially restricted to students of [[Harvard College]]; within the first month, more than half the undergraduates at Harvard were registered on the service.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=March 7, 2008 |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/jul/25/media.newmedia |title= A brief history of Facebook |work=The Guardian |location= London |date=July 25, 2007 |author=Phillips, Sarah}}</ref> Eduardo Saverin (business aspects), Dustin Moskovitz (programmer), [[Andrew McCollum]] (graphic artist), and [[Chris Hughes]] joined Zuckerberg to help promote the website. In March 2004, Facebook expanded to the universities of [[Columbia University|Columbia]], [[Stanford]], and [[Yale]].<ref name="timeline">{{Cite press release |accessdate=March 5, 2008 |url=https://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?timeline |title= Company Timeline |publisher=Facebook |date= January 1, 2007}}</ref> It later opened to all [[Ivy League]] colleges, [[Boston University]], [[New York University]], [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology|MIT]], and gradually most universities in Canada and the United States.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=June 13, 2008 |url=http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/11/facebook-opens-up-cx_rr_0911facebook.html |title=Open Facebook |work=Forbes |location =New York |date= September 11, 2006 |author=Rosmarin, Rachel}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url= http://www.tuftsdaily.com/2.5541/1.600318 |title= Online network created by Harvard students flourishes |work =[[The Tufts Daily]] |first = Lananh |last= Nguyen |date= April 12, 2004 |location= Medford, MA |accessdate=August 21, 2009 |archiveurl= |
|||
http://www.webcitation.org/6KOZTvFwU |archivedate=October 15, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
Users can join groups. Groups are composed of persons with shared interests. For example, they might go to the same sporting club, live in the same suburb, have the same breed of pet or share a hobby. Posts posted in a group can be seen only by those in a group, unless set to public. |
|||
In mid-2004, entrepreneur [[Sean Parker]] (an informal advisor to Zuckerberg) became the company's president.<ref name="NYT_260505">{{Cite news |author=Rosen, Ellen |title= Student's Start-Up Draws Attention and $13 Million |url= http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/26/business/26sbiz.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=thefacebook+parker&st=nyt |newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 26, 2005 |accessdate=May 18, 2009}}</ref> In June 2004, Facebook moved its operations base to [[Palo Alto, California]].<ref name="timeline" /> It received its first investment later that month from [[PayPal]] co-founder [[Peter Thiel]].<ref name="beware">{{Cite news |accessdate=April 30, 2008 |url= http://www.theage.com.au/news/general/beware-facebook/2008/01/18/1200620184398.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2 |title=Why you should beware of Facebook |work=The Age |location=Melbourne |date=January 20, 2008}}</ref> In 2005, the company dropped ''the'' from its name after purchasing the [[domain name]] facebook.com for [[United States dollar|US$]]200,000.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate= June 13, 2008 |url= http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/01/facebook_domain_dispute/| title=Facebook wins Manx battle for face-book.com |work=The Register |location= London |date=October 1, 2007 |author= Williams, Chris}}|</ref> |
|||
Users can buy, sell or swap things on Facebook Marketplace or in a Buy, Swap and Sell group. Facebook users can advertise events, which can be offline, on a website other than Facebook, or on Facebook. |
|||
[[File:MarkZuckerberg-crop.jpg|thumb|[[Mark Zuckerberg]], co-creator of Facebook, in his [[Harvard University|Harvard]] dorm room, 2005.]] |
|||
== Website{{anchor|Features}} == |
|||
In May 2005, Accel partners invested $12.7 million in Facebook, and [[Jim Breyer]]<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.cnbc.com/id/47387334/Jim_Breyer_via_Accel_Partners |title= Jim Breyer (via Accel Partners) |work=CNBC |date=May 22, 2012}}</ref> added $1 million of his own money. A January 2009 [[Compete.com]] study ranked Facebook the most used social networking service by worldwide [[monthly active users]].<ref name="Kazeniac">{{Cite news |author=Kazeniac, Andy |title=Social Networks: Facebook Takes Over Top Spot, Twitter Climbs |url= http://blog.compete.com/2009/02/09/facebook-myspace-twitter-social-network/ |date=February 9, 2009 |work =Compete Pulse blog |accessdate=February 17, 2009}}</ref> ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' included the site on its end-of-the-decade "best-of" list, saying, "How on earth did we stalk our exes, remember our co-workers' birthdays, bug our friends, and play a rousing game of [[Lexulous|Scrabulous]] before Facebook?"<ref>{{Cite news |author=Geier, Thom |last2=Jensen |first2=Jeff |last3=Jordan |first3=Tina |last4= Lyons |first4= Margaret |last5= Markovitz |first5= Adam |date= December 11, 2009 |title=The 100 Greatest Movies, TV Shows, Albums, Books, Characters, Scenes, Episodes, Songs, Dresses, Music Videos, and Trends that entertained us over the 10 Years |work=Entertainment Weekly |location= New York |issue=(1079/1080):74–84}}</ref> |
|||
{{Further|List of Facebook features|Facebook Platform}} |
|||
[[File:Original-facebook.jpg|thumb|Profile shown on Thefacebook in 2005]] |
|||
[[File:Facebook.svg|thumb|Previous Facebook logo in use from August 23, 2005, until July 1, 2015]] |
|||
=== Technical aspects === |
|||
A high-school version of the site was launched in September 2005, which Zuckerberg called the next logical step.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Facebook is the go-to Web site for students looking to hook up |work=[[Dayton Daily News]] |location = Ohio |date=August 3, 2006 |author=Dempsey, Laura}}</ref> (At the time, high-school networks required an invitation to join.)<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=May 13, 2011 |url=http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20080602081817/http://www.forbes.com/security/2007/01/25/myspace-security-identity-tech-security-cx_ll_0124myspaceage.html|title=Why MySpace Doesn't Card |work=Forbes |location =New York |date=January 25, 2007 |author=Lerer, Lisa }}</ref> Facebook also expanded membership eligibility to employees of several companies, including [[Apple Inc.]] and Microsoft.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=March 9, 2008 |url= http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2006-09-11/facebook-opening-the-doors-wider |title= Facebook: Opening the Doors Wider |work= BusinessWeek |location=New York |date= September 12, 2006 |author=Lacy, Sarah}}</ref> |
|||
The site's primary color is blue as Zuckerberg is [[color blindness|red–green colorblind]], a realization that occurred after a test taken around 2007.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Generation Why?|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/nov/25/generation-why/?pagination=false|journal=The New York Review of Books|access-date=February 15, 2014|first=Zadie|last=Smith|date=November 25, 2010| volume=57 | issue=18 |archive-date=October 23, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151023213313/http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/nov/25/generation-why/?pagination=false|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|title=LETTER FROM PALO ALTO: THE FACE OF FACEBOOK|url=https://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/09/20/100920fa_fact_vargas?currentPage=all|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]|publisher=Condé Nast|access-date=February 15, 2014|author=Jose Antonio Vargas|date=September 20, 2010|archive-date=June 26, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140626160148/http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/09/20/100920fa_fact_vargas?currentPage=all|url-status=live}}</ref> Facebook was initially built using [[PHP]], a popular scripting language designed for web development.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://engineering.fb.com/2020/05/08/web/facebook-redesign/ |title=Rebuilding our tech stack for the new Facebook.com|date=May 8, 2020|first1=Ashley|last1=Atkins|first2=Royi|last2=Hagigi |access-date=March 21, 2024 |archive-date=March 21, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240321141437/https://engineering.fb.com/2020/05/08/web/facebook-redesign/ |url-status=live }}</ref> PHP was used to create dynamic content and manage data on the server side of the Facebook application. Zuckerberg and co-founders chose PHP for its simplicity and ease of use, which allowed them to quickly develop and deploy the initial version of Facebook. As Facebook grew in user base and functionality, the company encountered scalability and performance challenges with PHP. In response, Facebook engineers developed tools and technologies to optimize PHP performance. One of the most significant was the creation of the HipHop Virtual Machine ([[HHVM]]). This significantly improved the performance and efficiency of PHP code execution on Facebook's servers. |
|||
The site started switching from [[HTTP]] to [[HTTPS]] in January 2011.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Constine |first=Josh |date=2012-11-18 |title=Facebook Could Slow Down A Tiny Bit As It Starts Switching All Users To Secure HTTPS Connections |url=https://techcrunch.com/2012/11/18/facebook-https/ |access-date=2024-06-16 |website=TechCrunch |language=en-US |archive-date=June 24, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240624232427/https://techcrunch.com/2012/11/18/facebook-https/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
=== 2006–2011: public access, Microsoft alliance and rapid growth === |
|||
==== 2012 architecture ==== |
|||
On September 26, 2006, Facebook was opened to everyone at least 13 years old with a valid [[email address]].<ref name="welcome">{{cite web |first=Carolyn |last=Abram |url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2210227130 |accessdate=March 8, 2008 |publisher=The Facebook Blog |title=Welcome to Facebook, everyone | date=September 26, 2006}}</ref><ref name="tos">{{cite web |accessdate=March 5, 2008 |url= https://www.facebook.com/terms.php |title=Terms of Use |publisher=Facebook |date=November 15, 2007}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook is developed as one monolithic application. According to an interview in 2012 with Facebook build engineer Chuck Rossi, Facebook compiles into a 1.5 GB binary blob which is then distributed to the servers using a custom [[BitTorrent]]-based release system. Rossi stated that it takes about 15 minutes to build and 15 minutes to release to the servers. The build and release process has zero downtime. Changes to Facebook are rolled out daily.<ref name="Ars Technica BTS">{{cite web|first=Ryan|last=Paul|title=Exclusive: a behind-the-scenes look at Facebook release engineering|url=https://arstechnica.com/business/2012/04/exclusive-a-behind-the-scenes-look-at-facebook-release-engineering/|website=[[Ars Technica]]|publisher=[[Condé Nast]]|date=April 5, 2012|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=July 4, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170704145032/https://arstechnica.com/business/2012/04/exclusive-a-behind-the-scenes-look-at-facebook-release-engineering/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook used a combination platform based on [[HBase]] to store data across distributed machines. Using a tailing architecture, events are stored in log files, and the logs are tailed. The system rolls these events up and writes them to storage. The user interface then pulls the data out and displays it to users. Facebook handles requests as [[Ajax (programming)|AJAX]] behavior. These requests are written to a log file using [[Scribe (log server)|Scribe]] (developed by Facebook).<ref name="high scalability">{{cite web|url=http://highscalability.com/blog/2011/3/22/facebooks-new-realtime-analytics-system-hbase-to-process-20.html|title=Facebook's New Real-time Analytics System: HBase To Process 20 Billion Events Per Day|publisher=Highscalability.com|date=March 22, 2011|access-date=December 26, 2012|archive-date=January 26, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210126214712/http://highscalability.com/blog/2011/3/22/facebooks-new-realtime-analytics-system-hbase-to-process-20.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In late 2007, Facebook had 100,000 business pages (pages which allowed companies to promote themselves and attract customers). These started as group pages, but a new concept called company pages was planned.<ref>{{cite news |title= Enterprise: Facebook, a Marketer's Friend; Site Offers Platform To Tout Products, Interact With Users |last=Richmond |first=Riva |work=[[Wall Street Journal]] |location=New York |date=November 27, 2007 |page=B4}}</ref> Pages began rolling out for businesses in May 2009.<ref>{{cite web|author=Greenstein, Howard |url=http://mashable.com/2009/05/27/facebook-page-vs-group |title=Facebook Pages vs Facebook Groups: What's the Difference? |publisher=Mashable.com |date=May 27, 2009 |accessdate=August 4, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
Data is read from these log files using Ptail, an internally built tool to aggregate data from multiple Scribe stores. It tails the log files and pulls data out. Ptail data are separated into three streams and sent to clusters in different [[data center]]s (Plugin impression, News feed impressions, Actions (plugin + news feed)). Puma is used to manage periods of high data flow (Input/Output or IO). Data is processed in batches to lessen the number of times needed to read and write under high demand periods. (A hot article generates many impressions and news feed impressions that cause huge data skews.) Batches are taken every 1.5 seconds, limited by memory used when creating a [[hash table]].<ref name="high scalability" /> |
|||
On October 24, 2007, Microsoft announced that it had purchased a 1.6% share of Facebook for $240 million, giving Facebook a total implied value of around $15 billion.<ref name="MSPR1">{{Cite press release |url=http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2007/oct07/10-24FacebookPR.mspx |title=Facebook and Microsoft Expand Strategic Alliance |accessdate=November 8, 2007 |publisher=[[Microsoft]] |date=October 24, 2007 }}</ref> Microsoft's purchase included rights to place international advertisements on the social networking site.<ref name="BW-6Aug08">{{Cite news |url=http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_33/b4096000952343.htm?chan=rss_topEmailedStories_ssi_5 |title=Facebook Stock For Sale |accessdate=August 6, 2008 |work=BusinessWeek | location = New York}}</ref> |
|||
Data is then output in PHP format. The backend is written in [[Java (programming language)|Java]]. Thrift is used as the messaging format so PHP programs can query Java services. Caching solutions display pages more quickly. The data is then sent to [[MapReduce]] servers where it is queried via Hive. This serves as a backup as the data can be recovered from Hive.<ref name="high scalability" /> |
|||
In October 2008, Facebook announced that it would set up its international headquarters in [[Dublin]], Ireland.<ref>{{Cite press release |accessdate=November 30, 2008 |url=https://www.facebook.com/press/releases.php?p=59042 |title=Facebook to Establish International Headquarters in Dublin, Ireland |publisher=Facebook |date=October 2, 2008}}</ref> Almost a year later, in September 2009, Facebook said that it had turned cash-flow positive for the first time.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/09/16/tech-facebook-300-million-users.html |title=Facebook 'cash flow positive,' signs 300M users |work=CBC News | location = Toronto |date= September 16, 2009 |accessdate=March 23, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
==== Content delivery network (CDN) ==== |
|||
Traffic to Facebook increased steadily after 2009. The company announced 500 million users in July 2010<ref name="Fow" /> making it the largest online social network in the world at the time. According to the company's data, half of the site's membership use Facebook daily, for an average of 34 minutes, while 150 million users access the site by mobile. A company representative called the milestone a "quiet revolution."<ref>{{cite news|author1=Charles Arthur, Jemima Kiss|title=Facebook reaches 500 million users|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jul/21/facebook-500-million-users|accessdate=December 14, 2014|work=The Guardian|date=July 21, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook uses its own [[content delivery network]] or "edge network" under the domain fbcdn.net for serving static data.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://research.fb.com/blog/2016/04/the-evolution-of-advanced-caching-in-the-facebook-cdn/|title=The Evolution of Advanced Caching in the Facebook CDN|date=April 7, 2016|access-date=May 20, 2020|archive-date=January 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115184511/https://research.fb.com/blog/2016/04/the-evolution-of-advanced-caching-in-the-facebook-cdn/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{citation | last=Dwarakanath | first=Navya | title=What I Learned About How Facebook Infrastructure Serves Our Photos | date=August 12, 2019}}</ref> Until the mid-2010s, Facebook also relied on [[Akamai]] for CDN services.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://research.facebook.com/publications/an-analysis-of-facebook-photo-caching/|title=An Analysis of Facebook Photo Caching – Meta Research|website=Meta Research|access-date=December 18, 2021|archive-date=December 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211218093324/https://research.facebook.com/publications/an-analysis-of-facebook-photo-caching/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/85953/does-facebook-use-any-other-cdn-apart-from-akamai-encountered-fbcdn-net-subdoma|title=Does Facebook use any other CDN apart from Akamai? Encountered fbcdn.net subdomain that does not belong to Akamai|website=Web Applications Stack Exchange|access-date=May 20, 2020|archive-date=August 11, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811051533/https://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/85953/does-facebook-use-any-other-cdn-apart-from-akamai-encountered-fbcdn-net-subdoma|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Farahbakhsh | first1=Reza | last2=Cuevas | first2=Angel | last3=Ortiz | first3=Antonio M. | last4=Han | first4=Xiao | last5=Crespi | first5=Noel | s2cid=7987529 | title=How far is Facebook from me? Facebook network infrastructure analysis | journal=IEEE Communications Magazine | publisher=Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |arxiv=1705.00717 | volume=53 | issue=9 | year=2015 | issn=0163-6804 | doi=10.1109/mcom.2015.7263357 | pages=134–142}}</ref> |
|||
==== Hack programming language ==== |
|||
In November 2010, based on [[SecondMarket]] Inc. (an exchange for privately held companies' shares), Facebook's value was $41 billion. The company had slightly surpassed [[eBay]] to become the third largest American web company after [[Google]] and [[Amazon.com]].<ref>{{Cite news | title = Facebook Becomes Third Biggest US Web Company | url = http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/technology/facebook-becomes-third-biggest-us-web-company/406751 | newspaper=The Jakarta Globe | date = November 15, 2010 | first = Brian | last = Womack }}</ref> |
|||
On March 20, 2014, Facebook announced a new open-source programming language called [[Hack (programming language)|Hack]]. Before public release, a large portion of Facebook was already running and "battle tested" using the new language.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2014/03/facebook-hack/|title=Facebook Introduces 'Hack', the Programming Language of the Future|date=March 20, 2014|magazine=Wired|first=Cade|last=Metz|access-date=March 7, 2017|archive-date=March 28, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140328124125/http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2014/03/facebook-hack|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
=== User profile/personal timeline === |
|||
[[File:Facebook Headquarters Entrance Sign Menlo Park.jpg|thumb|Facebook headquarters entrance sign at 1 Hacker Way, [[Menlo Park, California]]]] |
|||
[[File:Screen of Facebook (2).PNG|thumb|Facebook login/signup screen]] |
|||
Each registered user on Facebook has a personal profile that shows their posts and content.<ref>{{cite web|first=Kate|last=Knibbs|title=How Facebook's design has changed over the last 10 years|url=https://www.dailydot.com/debug/old-facebook-profiles-news-feeds/|website=[[The Daily Dot]]|date=December 11, 2015|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=November 13, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201113195420/https://www.dailydot.com/debug/old-facebook-profiles-news-feeds/|url-status=live}}</ref> The format of individual user pages was revamped in September 2011 and became known as "Timeline", a chronological feed of a user's stories,<ref>{{cite web|first=Jacob|last=Schulman|title=Facebook introduces Timeline: 'a new way to express who you are'|url=https://www.theverge.com/2011/09/22/facebook-introduces-timeline-a-express-are|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=September 22, 2011|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=June 13, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180613234847/https://www.theverge.com/2011/09/22/facebook-introduces-timeline-a-express-are|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|first=Chris|last=Gayomali|title=Facebook Introduces 'Timeline': The 'Story' of Your Life|url=https://techland.time.com/2011/09/22/facebook-introduces-timeline-the-story-of-your-life/|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]|date=September 22, 2011|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=August 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200817180846/https://techland.time.com/2011/09/22/facebook-introduces-timeline-the-story-of-your-life/|url-status=live}}</ref> including status updates, photos, interactions with apps and events.<ref name="TNW Timeline">{{cite web|first=Matthew|last=Panzarino|title=Facebook introduces radical new profile design called Timeline: The story of your life [Video]|url=https://thenextweb.com/facebook/2011/09/22/facebook-introduces-timeline-the-story-of-your-life/|website=The Next Web|date=September 22, 2011|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=November 27, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127003430/https://thenextweb.com/facebook/2011/09/22/facebook-introduces-timeline-the-story-of-your-life/|url-status=live}}</ref> The layout let users add a "cover photo".<ref name="TNW Timeline" /> Users were given more privacy settings.<ref name="TNW Timeline" /> In 2007, Facebook launched Facebook Pages for brands and celebrities to interact with their fanbases.<ref>{{cite web|first=Jason|last=Weaver|title=The Evolution of Facebook for Brands|url=http://mashable.com/2012/03/30/facebook-for-brands/|website=[[Mashable]]|date=March 30, 2012|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=October 25, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201025204744/https://mashable.com/2012/03/30/facebook-for-brands/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Before Graph Search: Facebook's Biggest Changes|url=http://uk.pcmag.com/internet-products/58174/gallery/before-graph-search-facebooks-biggest-changes?p=3|website=PC Magazine|publisher=[[Ziff Davis]]|access-date=June 14, 2017|date=January 15, 2013|archive-date=July 1, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180701055248/http://uk.pcmag.com/internet-products/58174/gallery/before-graph-search-facebooks-biggest-changes?p=3|url-status=live}}</ref> 100,000 Pages{{explain|date=February 2022}} launched in November.<ref>{{cite news|first=Rob|last=Hof|title=Facebook Declares New Era for Advertising|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2007-11-05/facebook-declares-new-era-for-advertising|website=[[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg]]|date=November 6, 2007|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=August 7, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200807010529/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2007-11-05/facebook-declares-new-era-for-advertising|url-status=live}}</ref> In June 2009, Facebook introduced a "Usernames" feature, allowing users to choose a unique nickname used in the [[Uniform resource locator|URL]] for their personal profile, for easier sharing.<ref>{{cite web|first=Ben|last=Parr|title=Facebook to Launch Vanity URLs for All|url=http://mashable.com/2009/06/09/facebook-vanity-urls/|website=[[Mashable]]|date=June 9, 2009|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=January 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214520/https://mashable.com/2009/06/09/facebook-vanity-urls/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Nick|last=O'Neill|title=Facebook Begins Rolling Out Free Profile Usernames For Vanity URLs|url=http://www.adweek.com/digital/facebook-begins-rolling-out-free-profile-usernames-for-vanity-urls/|website=[[Adweek]]|publisher=Beringer Capital|date=June 9, 2009|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=November 9, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109035625/https://www.adweek.com/digital/facebook-begins-rolling-out-free-profile-usernames-for-vanity-urls/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In early 2011, Facebook announced plans to move its headquarters to the former [[Sun Microsystems]] campus in Menlo Park, California.<ref name="parr_ben_facebooks_new_offices_feb_2011">Parr, Ben (February 7, 2011). [http://mashable.com/2011/02/07/facebook-menlo-park-pics/ "These Are Facebook's New Offices [PHOTOS]"]. ''[[Mashable]]'' (New York). Retrieved April 6, 2011.</ref><ref>Brundage, Sandy (February 8, 2011). [http://www.almanacnews.com/news/show_story.php?id=8270 "Facebook moving headquarters to Menlo Park: Social-networking giant to move into former Sun/Oracle campus"]. ''The Almanac'' (Menlo Park, CA).</ref> In March 2011, it was reported that Facebook was removing approximately 20,000 profiles offline every day for violations such as spam, graphic content, and underage use, as part of its efforts to boost [[cyber security]].<ref>{{Cite news |title=Facebook deletes 20,000 underage profiles daily |url=http://ibnlive.in.com/news/facebook-deletes-20000-underage-profiles-daily/146972-11.html| date = March 24, 2011 | accessdate=March 24, 2011 | work=IBN Live | agency=Press Trust of India | location = Noida, Uttar Pradesh}}</ref> |
|||
In February 2014, Facebook expanded the gender setting, adding a custom input field that allows users to choose from a wide range of gender identities. Users can also set which set of gender-specific pronoun should be used in reference to them throughout the site.<ref>{{cite news|first1=Jordan|last1=Crook|first2=Josh|last2=Constine|title=Facebook Opens Up LGBTQ-Friendly Gender Identity And Pronoun Options|url=https://techcrunch.com/2014/02/13/facebook-gender-identity/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=February 13, 2014|access-date=March 23, 2017|archive-date=November 29, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201129225712/https://techcrunch.com/2014/02/13/facebook-gender-identity/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook expands gender options: transgender activists hail 'big advance'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/13/transgender-facebook-expands-gender-options|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=February 14, 2014|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=February 13, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210213081408/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/13/transgender-facebook-expands-gender-options|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Alexei|last=Oreskovic|title=In new profile feature, Facebook offers choices for gender identity|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-gender-idUSBREA1C1RU20140214|website=[[Reuters]]|publisher=[[Thomson Reuters]]|date=February 13, 2014|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=November 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124054546/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-gender-idUSBREA1C1RU20140214|url-status=live}}</ref> In May 2014, Facebook introduced a feature to allow users to ask for information not disclosed by other users on their profiles. If a user does not provide key information, such as location, hometown, or relationship status, other users can use a new "ask" button to send a message asking about that item to the user in a single click.<ref>{{cite web|first=Sam|last=Machkovech|title=Facebook adds naggy "ask" button to profile pages|url=https://arstechnica.com/business/2014/05/facebook-introduces-naggy-ask-function-into-profile-pages/|website=Ars Technica|publisher=Condé Nast|date=May 16, 2014|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=February 24, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170224180048/https://arstechnica.com/business/2014/05/facebook-introduces-naggy-ask-function-into-profile-pages/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Laura|last=Stampler|title=Facebook's New 'Ask' Button Gives You a Whole New Way to Badger Friends About Their Relationship Status|url=https://time.com/104720/facebooks-new-ask-button-gives-you-a-whole-new-way-to-badger-friends-about-their-relationship-status/|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]|date=May 19, 2014|access-date=June 14, 2017|archive-date=January 26, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210126130949/https://time.com/104720/facebooks-new-ask-button-gives-you-a-whole-new-way-to-badger-friends-about-their-relationship-status/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Release of statistics by [[DoubleClick]] showed that Facebook reached one trillion page views in the month of June 2011, making it the most visited website tracked by DoubleClick.<ref>{{cite news|last=Titlow|first=John Paul|title=Facebook Hits 1 Trillion Pageviews|url=https://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_hits_1_trillion_pageviews.php|accessdate=November 17, 2011|newspaper=ReadWriteWeb|date=August 24, 2011|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110911044951/https://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_hits_1_trillion_pageviews.php|archivedate=September 11, 2011}}</ref> According to a Nielsen Media Research study, released in December 2011, Facebook had become the second-most accessed website in the U.S. behind Google.<ref>{{cite web |author=Fernandes, Rossi |date=December 31, 2011 |url=http://tech2.in.com/news/web-services/facebook-second-most-accessed-site-behind-google-in-the-us/268862 |title=Facebook second most accessed sit behind Google in the US}}</ref> |
|||
=== News Feed === |
|||
=== 2012–2013: IPO, lawsuits and one-billionth user === |
|||
{{Further|News Feed}} |
|||
{{main|Initial public offering of Facebook}} |
|||
[[News Feed]] appears on every user's homepage and highlights information including profile changes, upcoming events and friends' birthdays.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2207967130|title=Facebook Gets a Facelift|access-date=February 11, 2008|last=Sanghvi|first=Ruchi|date=September 6, 2006|publisher=The Facebook Blog|archive-date=June 10, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610185832/http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2207967130|url-status=live}}</ref> This enabled spammers and other users to manipulate these features by creating illegitimate events or posting fake birthdays to attract attention to their profile or cause.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.colnect.com/2010/03/facebook-celebrate-your-birthday-every.html|title=Facebook: Celebrate Your Birthday Every Day|publisher=Colnect blog|access-date=March 9, 2010|archive-date=July 7, 2012|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120707122502/http://blog.colnect.com/2010/03/facebook-celebrate-your-birthday-every.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Initially, the News Feed caused dissatisfaction among Facebook users; some complained it was too cluttered and full of undesired information, others were concerned that it made it too easy for others to track individual activities (such as relationship status changes, events, and conversations with other users).<ref>{{cite news|access-date=June 28, 2008|url=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2006/tc20060908_536553.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061106135528/http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2006/tc20060908_536553.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 6, 2006|title=Facebook Learns from Its Fumble|work=BusinessWeek|location=New York|date=September 8, 2006|author=Lacy, Sarah|author-link=Sarah Lacy}}</ref> Zuckerberg apologized for the site's failure to include appropriate privacy features. Users then gained control over what types of information are shared automatically with friends. Users are now able to prevent user-set categories of friends from seeing updates about certain types of activities, including profile changes, Wall posts and newly added friends.<ref>{{cite news|access-date=June 28, 2008|url=http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/ebusiness/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192700574|title=Facebook Founder Apologizes in Privacy Flap; Users Given More Control|work=[[InformationWeek]]|location=New York|date=September 8, 2006|author=Gonsalves, Antone|archive-date=March 2, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100302235804/http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/ebusiness/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192700574|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
On February 23, 2010, Facebook was granted a patent<ref>{{cite patent|country=US|number=7669123|status=patent}}</ref> on certain aspects of its News Feed. The patent covers News Feeds in which links are provided so that one user can participate in the activity of another user.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://themelis-cuiper.com/22/us-patent-no-7669123.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110515155132/http://themelis-cuiper.com/22/us-patent-no-7669123.html|archive-date=May 15, 2011|title=US Patent No. 7669123|access-date=March 9, 2010|publisher=Social Media|date=March 1, 2010}}</ref> The sorting and display of stories in a user's News Feed is governed by the [[EdgeRank]] algorithm.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://edgerank.net/|title=EdgeRank|date=October 29, 2007|publisher=EdgeRank|access-date=February 16, 2013|archive-date=January 26, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210126062416/http://edgerank.net/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook eventually filed for an [[initial public offering]] on February 1, 2012.<ref name="sec.gov">{{cite web |url= http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AFB&fstype=ii&ei=000LUahGxqaVBfunAQ |title=Facebook, Inc. Financial Statements |publisher=Securities and Exchange Commission |date= February 1, 2013 |accessdate= February 1, 2013}}</ref> Facebook [[Initial public offering of Facebook|held an initial public offering]] on May 17, 2012, negotiating a share price of US$38. The company was valued at $104 billion, the largest valuation to date for a newly listed public company.<ref name="fb-104">{{cite news|authors=Mark Milian and Marcus Chan|title=Facebook's Valuation: What $104 Billion Is Worth|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2012-05-17/facebook-s-valuation-what-104-billion-is-worth.html|accessdate=January 11, 2014|newspaper=Bloomberg Technology|date=May 18, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Kerr|first=Dara|title=Facebook stock hits a record high, since IPO|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57600166-93/facebook-stock-hits-a-record-high-since-ipo/|work=C{{!}}Net News|publisher=C{{!}}Net|accessdate=August 27, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-facebook-pricing-20120518,0,3426310.story |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120518023059/http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-facebook-pricing-20120518,0,3426310.story |archivedate=May 18, 2012 |title=Stakes are high on Facebook's first day of trading |author=Andrew Tangel and Walter Hamilton |date=May 17, 2012 |work=The Los Angeles Times |accessdate=May 17, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Facebook features#Photo and video uploads|Photos]] application allows users to upload albums and photos.<ref>{{cite web|first=Michael|last=Arrington|author-link=Michael Arrington|title=Facebook Launches Facebook Platform; They are the Anti-MySpace|url=https://techcrunch.com/2007/05/24/facebook-launches-facebook-platform-they-are-the-anti-myspace/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=May 24, 2007|access-date=March 23, 2017|archive-date=May 30, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190530101941/https://techcrunch.com/2007/05/24/facebook-launches-facebook-platform-they-are-the-anti-myspace/|url-status=live}}</ref> Each album can contain 200 photos.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=87157517130|title=Share More Memories with Larger Photo Albums|access-date=January 4, 2010|archive-date=May 10, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110510013328/http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=87157517130|url-status=live}}</ref> Privacy settings apply to individual albums. Users can "[[tag (metadata)|tag]]", or label, friends in a photo. The friend receives a notification about the tag with a link to the photo.<ref>{{cite web|access-date=March 15, 2008|url=https://www.facebook.com/help.php?page=7|title=Photos|publisher=Facebook|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080731205244/https://www.facebook.com/help.php?page=7|archive-date=July 31, 2008}}</ref> This photo tagging feature was developed by Aaron Sittig, now a Design Strategy Lead at Facebook, and former Facebook engineer Scott Marlette back in 2006 and was only granted a [[patent]] in 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/facebooks-first-20-employees-2011-5#aaron-sittig-was-brought-on-by-sean-parker-he-created-the-concept-of-tagging-friends-in-facebook-pictures-4|title=The First 20 Facebook Employees: Where Are They Now?|last=Shontell|first=Alyson|date=May 13, 2011|website=[[Business Insider]]|access-date=September 10, 2019|archive-date=July 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200724092424/https://www.businessinsider.com/facebooks-first-20-employees-2011-5#aaron-sittig-was-brought-on-by-sean-parker-he-created-the-concept-of-tagging-friends-in-facebook-pictures-4|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.adweek.com/digital/facebook-patent-photo-tagging/|title=Facebook Wins Patents For Tagging in Photos, Other Digital Media|last=Cutler|first=Kim-Mai|date=May 17, 2011|website=[[Adweek]]|access-date=September 10, 2019|archive-date=October 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022180917/https://www.adweek.com/digital/facebook-patent-photo-tagging/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook Inc. began selling stock to the public and trading on the [[NASDAQ]] on May 18, 2012.<ref>{{cite news |title= Birthday boy Mark Zuckerberg to get $100bn gift |url= http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/social-media/Facebook-CEOs-big-birthday-gift-100bn/articleshow/13131192.cms/ |date=May 14, 2012 |agency= Associated Press |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20120514180811/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/social-media/Birthday-boy-Mark-Zuckerberg-to-get-100bn-gift/articleshow/13131192.cms |archivedate= May 14, 2012 |newspaper =The Times of India}}</ref> Based on its 2012 income of $5 billion, Facebook joined the [[Fortune 500]] list for the first time in May 2013, ranked in position 462.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/05/06/facebook-fortune-500-2013/2139223/ |title= Facebook squeaks onto the Fortune 500 |newspaper= USA Today |date=May 6, 2013 |accessdate=May 19, 2013 |first1=Matt |last1=Krantz}}</ref> |
|||
On June 7, 2012, Facebook launched its App Center to help users find games and other applications.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Facebook-to-launch-App-Center/articleshow/13920641.cms|title=Facebook to launch App Center|date=June 8, 2012|work=The Times Of India|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120608112718/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Facebook-to-launch-App-Center/articleshow/13920641.cms|archive-date=June 8, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook filed their S1 document with the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] on February 1, 2012. The company applied for a $5 billion IPO, one of the biggest offerings in the history of technology.<ref>{{cite news |accessdate=February 1, 2012 |date=February 1, 2012 |title=Facebook Officially Files for $5 Billion IPO |agency=KeyNoodle |url=http://www.keynoodle.com/facebook-officially-files-for-5-billion-ipo |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6KT0ELXzO |archivedate=October 18, 2013}}</ref> The IPO raised $16 billion, making it the third-largest in U.S. history.<ref name="NYT517">{{cite news |url=http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05/17/facebook-raises-16-billion-in-i-p-o/?hp |title=Facebook Raises $16 Billion in I.P.O. |author=Evelyn M. Rusli and Peter Eavis |date=May 17, 2012 |work=The New York Times |accessdate=May 17, 2012}}</ref><ref name="USN517">{{cite news |url=http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2012/05/17/questions-and-answers-on-blockbuster-facebook-ipo |title=Questions and answers on blockbuster Facebook IPO |author=Bernard Condon |date=May 17, 2012 |work=U.S. News |agency=Associated Press |accessdate=May 17, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
On May 13, 2015, Facebook in association with major news portals launched "Instant Articles" to provide news on the Facebook news feed without leaving the site.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://media.fb.com/2015/05/12/instantarticles/|title=Introducing Instant Articles – Facebook Media|work=fb.com|access-date=May 15, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150514162847/http://media.fb.com/2015/05/12/instantarticles/|archive-date=May 14, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://previewtech.net/facebook-launches-instant-articles/|title=Facebook launches "Instant Articles"|work=Preview Tech|date=May 14, 2015|access-date=May 15, 2015|archive-date=December 4, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201204110610/https://previewtech.net/facebook-launches-instant-articles/|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
The shares began trading on May 18; the stock struggled to stay above the IPO price for most of the day, but set a record for the trading volume of an IPO (460 million shares).<ref>{{cite news |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120518-710783.html? |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120524053446/http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120518-710783.html? |archivedate=May 24, 2012 |title=Facebook Sets Record For IPO Trading Volume |date=May 18, 2012 |work=The Wall Street Journal |accessdate=May 18, 2012}}</ref> The first day of trading was marred by technical glitches that prevented orders from going through;<ref name="forbes 2012/05/20">[http://www.forbes.com/sites/billsinger/2012/05/20/tepid-honeymoon-of-facebook-and-nasdaq-does-not-deliver-the-big-bang/ Tepid honeymoon of Facebook and NASDAQ does not deliver the big bang]. forbes.com</ref> only the technical problems and artificial support from underwriters prevented the stock price from falling below the IPO price on the day.<ref>{{cite web|author=MARCY GORDON |url=http://news.yahoo.com/regulators-probe-banks-role-facebook-ipo-040840829--finance.html |title=Regulators probe banks role Facebook IPO |publisher=News.yahoo.com |date=May 23, 2012 |accessdate=January 18, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
In January 2017, Facebook launched Facebook Stories for iOS and Android in Ireland. The feature, following the format of [[Snapchat]] and Instagram stories, allows users to upload photos and videos that appear above friends' and followers' News Feeds and disappear after 24 hours.<ref>{{cite web|first=Josh|last=Constine|title=Facebook Stories puts a Snapchat clone above the News Feed|url=https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/25/facebook-stories/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=January 25, 2017|access-date=March 23, 2017|archive-date=February 21, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210221205103/https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/25/facebook-stories/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
In March 2012, Facebook announced App Center, a store selling applications that operate via the site. The store was to be available on [[iPhone]]s, [[Android (operating system)|Android]] devices, and mobile web users.<ref>{{cite news |date=May 10, 2012 |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18017379 |title=Facebook app store launches amid mobile revenue worries | work=BBC News}}</ref> |
|||
On October 11, 2017, Facebook introduced the [[Facebook 3D Posts|3D Posts]] feature to allow for uploading interactive 3D assets.<ref>{{cite web|first=Rachel|last=Franklin|title=Building Connections Through Creativity and Opening VR to Everyone|url=https://www.oculus.com/blog/building-connections-through-creativity-and-opening-vr-to-everyone/|website=Oculus|date=October 11, 2017|access-date=February 28, 2018|archive-date=October 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201024054539/https://www.oculus.com/blog/building-connections-through-creativity-and-opening-vr-to-everyone/|url-status=live}}</ref> On January 11, 2018, Facebook announced that it would change News Feed to prioritize friends/family content and de-emphasize content from media companies.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/11/technology/facebook-news-feed.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180112003129/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/11/technology/facebook-news-feed.html |archive-date=January 12, 2018 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Facebook Overhauls News Feed to Focus on What Friends and Family Share|last=Isaac|first=Mike|date=2018|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=January 17, 2018|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Facebook on Nasdaq.jpeg|thumb|Billboard on the [[Thomson Reuters]] building welcomes Facebook to NASDAQ, 2012]] |
|||
In February 2020, Facebook announced it would spend $1 billion (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|1000000000|2020}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) to license news material from publishers for the next three years; a pledge coming as the company falls under scrutiny from governments across the globe over not paying for news content appearing on the platform. The pledge would be in addition to the $600 million (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|600000000|2020}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) paid since 2018 through deals with news companies such as ''[[The Guardian]]'' and ''[[Financial Times]]''.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Ziobro|first=Paul|date=February 24, 2021|title=Facebook to Spend $1 Billion on News Content Over Three Years|language=en-US|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-to-spend-1-billion-on-news-content-over-three-years-11614187391|access-date=February 24, 2021|issn=0099-9660|archive-date=February 25, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225004635/https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-to-spend-1-billion-on-news-content-over-three-years-11614187391|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=UPDATE 1-Facebook says it inadvertently blocked content during Australia news ban|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/1-facebook-says-inadvertently-blocked-115740188.html|access-date=February 24, 2021|website=finance.yahoo.com|date=February 24, 2021|language=en-US|archive-date=February 24, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224190827/https://finance.yahoo.com/news/1-facebook-says-inadvertently-blocked-115740188.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Barker|first=Alex|title=Facebook pledges to pay $1bn for news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/business/media-and-marketing/facebook-pledges-to-pay-1bn-for-news-1.4493909|access-date=February 24, 2021|newspaper=The Irish Times|language=en|archive-date=February 24, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224204916/https://www.irishtimes.com/business/media-and-marketing/facebook-pledges-to-pay-1bn-for-news-1.4493909|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
On May 22, 2012, the Yahoo! Finance website reported that Facebook's lead underwriters, [[Morgan Stanley]] (MS), [[JPMorgan Chase|JP Morgan]] (JPM), and [[Goldman Sachs]] (GS), cut their earnings forecasts for the company in the middle of the IPO process.<ref name="yahoo 133648905">{{cite web|author1=Henry Blodget|title=Facebook Bankers Secretly Cut Facebook's Revenue Estimates In Middle Of IPO Roadshow|url=http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/facebook-bankers-secretly-cut-facebook-revenue-estimates-middle-133648905.html|website=Yahoo! Finance|publisher=Yahoo!, Inc|accessdate=December 14, 2014|date=May 22, 2012}}</ref> The stock had begun its freefall by this time, closing at 34.03 on May 21 and 31.00 on May 22. A [[trading curb|"circuit breaker"]] was used in an attempt to slow down the stock price's decline.<ref>[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304019404577420093138995160.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs Another Facebook First: Tripping a Circuit-Breake]. WSJ Online</ref> Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman [[Mary Schapiro]], and [[Financial Industry Regulatory Authority]] (FINRA) Chairman Rick Ketchum, called for a review of the circumstances surrounding the IPO.<ref name="yahoo 134021024">[https://web.archive.org/web/20120528230445/http://finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-shares-fall-valuation-doubts-134021024.html Facebook shares fall valuation doubts]. Yahoo! Finance</ref> |
|||
In March and April 2021, in response to Apple announcing changes to its iOS device's [[Identifier for Advertisers]] policy, which included requiring app developers to directly request to users the ability to track on an opt-in basis, Facebook purchased full-page newspaper advertisements attempting to convince users to allow tracking, highlighting the effects targeted ads have on small businesses.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook Takes Out Full-Page Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's iOS Privacy Changes|url=https://www.macrumors.com/2020/12/16/facebook-takes-out-full-page-ads-to-attack-apple/|access-date=May 12, 2021|website=MacRumors|date=December 16, 2020|language=en|archive-date=May 12, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512183223/https://www.macrumors.com/2020/12/16/facebook-takes-out-full-page-ads-to-attack-apple/|url-status=live}}</ref> Facebook's efforts were ultimately unsuccessful, as Apple released iOS 14.5 in late April 2021, containing the feature for users in what has been deemed "App Tracking Transparency". Moreover, statistics from [[Verizon Communications]] subsidiary Flurry Analytics show 96% of all iOS users in the United States are not permitting tracking at all, and only 12% of worldwide iOS users are allowing tracking, which some news outlets deem "Facebook's nightmare", among similar terms.<ref>{{cite web|last=Datti|first=Sharmishte|date=May 12, 2021|title=Apple's App Tracking Transparency Becomes Facebook's Nightmare: Only 4% Allow Tracking|url=https://www.gizbot.com/mobile/news/apple-app-tracking-transparency-becomes-facebook-nightmare-only-4-percent-allow-tracking-074217.html|access-date=May 12, 2021|website=gizbot.com|language=en|archive-date=June 4, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210604024443/https://www.gizbot.com/mobile/news/apple-app-tracking-transparency-becomes-facebook-nightmare-only-4-percent-allow-tracking-074217.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Apple Might Have Just Put and End to Facebook|url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/apple-s-app-tracking-transparency-update-is-turning-out-to-be-the-worst-case-scenario-for-facebook/ar-BB1gDK55|access-date=May 12, 2021|website=www.msn.com|archive-date=May 12, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512183221/https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/apple-s-app-tracking-transparency-update-is-turning-out-to-be-the-worst-case-scenario-for-facebook/ar-BB1gDK55|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=May 9, 2021|title=Apple vs Facebook: 96 Percent Users Disabling App Tracking So Far, Claims Report|url=https://www.news18.com/news/tech/apple-vs-facebook-96-percent-users-disabling-app-tracking-so-far-claims-report-3720917.html|access-date=May 12, 2021|website=www.news18.com|language=en|archive-date=May 12, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512183221/https://www.news18.com/news/tech/apple-vs-facebook-96-percent-users-disabling-app-tracking-so-far-claims-report-3720917.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Heisler|first=Yoni|date=May 11, 2021|title=New data shows how devastating Apple's new anti-tracking feature is for Facebook|url=https://bgr.com/tech/ios-14-update-app-tracking-transparency-facebook-percentage-5924882/|access-date=May 12, 2021|website=BGR|language=en-US|archive-date=May 11, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210511224832/https://bgr.com/tech/ios-14-update-app-tracking-transparency-facebook-percentage-5924882/|url-status=live}}</ref> Despite the news, Facebook has stated that the new policy and software update would be "manageable".<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook Says Impact of iOS 14.5's App Tracking Transparency Will Be 'Manageable'|url=https://www.macrumors.com/2021/04/28/facebook-att-impact-manageable/|access-date=May 12, 2021|website=MacRumors|date=April 28, 2021|language=en|archive-date=May 12, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512183220/https://www.macrumors.com/2021/04/28/facebook-att-impact-manageable/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook's IPO was consequently investigated, and was compared to a [[pump and dump]] scheme.<ref name="forbes 2012/05/20" /><ref name="yahoo 133648905" /><ref name="yahoo 134021024" /><ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/05/22/BU3K1OLCV5.DTL Facebook IPO underscores shutting out the masses]. sfgate.com</ref> A class-action lawsuit was filed in May 2012 because of the trading glitches, which led to botched orders.<ref name="yahoo 005837771">[http://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-finra-review-facebook-issues-005837771.html SEC-FINRA review Facebook issues]{{dead link|date=January 2014}}. finance.yahoo.com</ref><ref>[http://finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-morgan-stanley-sued-firm-125616633.html Morgan Stanley sued firm]. yahoo.com</ref> Lawsuits were filed, alleging that an underwriter for Morgan Stanley selectively revealed adjusted earnings estimates to preferred clients.<ref>{{cite web|title=Listing of Recent Securities Lawsuits Filed Against Facebook|url=https://www.docketalarm.com/search/dockets/?q=facebook+morgan+stanley&f=nos_exact-850+Securities%2FCommodities|accessdate=July 19, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
=== Like button === |
|||
The other underwriters (MS, JPM, GS), Facebook's CEO and board, and NASDAQ also faced litigation after numerous lawsuits were filed, while SEC and FINRA both launched investigations.<ref>{{cite web|author1=Matt Nesto|title=Fury Over Facebook IPO Grows, Lawsuits Mount|url=http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/fury-over-facebook-ipo-grows-lawsuits-mount-150039330.html|website=Yahoo! Finance|publisher=Yahoo!, Inc|accessdate=December 14, 2014|date=May 23, 2012}}</ref> It was believed that adjustments to earnings estimates were communicated to the underwriters by a Facebook financial officer, who used the information to cash out on their positions while leaving the general public with overpriced shares.<ref>{{cite web|author1=Henry Blodget|title=EXCLUSIVE: Here's The Inside Story Of What Happened On The Facebook IPO|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/exclusive-heres-the-inside-story-of-what-happened-on-the-facebook-ipo-2012-5?op=1|website=Business Insider|publisher=Business Insider Inc|accessdate=December 14, 2014|date=May 22, 2012}}</ref> By the end of May 2012, Facebook's stock lost over a quarter of its starting value, which led the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' to label the IPO a "fiasco".<ref>{{cite news | url = http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304821304577436873952633672.html | title = Facebook IPO Facts, Fiction and Flops | work=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref> |
|||
{{Further|Facebook like button}} |
|||
[[File:Facebook_Like_React.png|thumb|The Facebook "like" button]] |
|||
The "like" button, stylized as a "thumbs up" icon, was first enabled on February 9, 2009,<ref>{{cite web|first=Jason|last=Kincaid|title=Facebook Activates "Like" Button; FriendFeed Tires Of Sincere Flattery|url=https://techcrunch.com/2009/02/09/facebook-activates-like-button-friendfeed-tires-of-sincere-flattery/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=February 9, 2009|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=July 1, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180701055146/https://techcrunch.com/2009/02/09/facebook-activates-like-button-friendfeed-tires-of-sincere-flattery/|url-status=live}}</ref> and enables users to easily interact with status updates, comments, photos and videos, links shared by friends, and advertisements. Once clicked by a user, the designated content is more likely to appear in friends' [[News Feed]]s.<ref>{{cite web|first=JP|last=Mangalindan|title=Facebook Likes don't go as far as they used to in News Feed update|url=http://mashable.com/2015/04/21/news-feed-facebook-likes/|website=[[Mashable]]|date=April 21, 2015|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=October 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201019223547/https://mashable.com/2015/04/21/news-feed-facebook-likes/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Josh|last=Constine|title=How Facebook News Feed Works|url=https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/06/ultimate-guide-to-the-news-feed/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=September 6, 2016|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=January 29, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129023716/https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/06/ultimate-guide-to-the-news-feed/|url-status=live}}</ref> The button displays the number of other users who have liked the content.<ref>{{cite web|title=Like and React to Posts|url=https://www.facebook.com/help/1624177224568554/|website=Facebook Help Center|publisher=Facebook|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=January 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210106073457/https://www.facebook.com/help/1624177224568554|url-status=live}}</ref> The like button was extended to comments in June 2010.<ref>{{cite web|first=Chloe|last=Albanesius|title=Facebook Adds Ability to 'Like' Comments|url=https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365190,00.asp|website=PC Magazine|publisher=Ziff Davis|date=June 17, 2010|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=January 26, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190126091323/https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365190,00.asp|url-status=live}}</ref> In February 2016, Facebook expanded Like into "Reactions", choosing among five pre-defined emotions, including "Love", "Haha", "Wow", "Sad", or "Angry".<ref name="verge-reactions">{{cite web|first=Casey|last=Newton|title=Facebook rolls out expanded Like button reactions around the world|url=https://www.theverge.com/2016/2/24/11094374/facebook-reactions-like-button|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=February 24, 2016|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=February 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210214164910/https://www.theverge.com/2016/2/24/11094374/facebook-reactions-like-button|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|first=Liz|last=Stinson|title=Facebook Reactions, the Totally Redesigned Like Button, Is Here|url=https://www.wired.com/2016/02/facebook-reactions-totally-redesigned-like-button|journal=[[Wired (website)|Wired]]|date=February 24, 2016|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=December 3, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203233726/https://www.wired.com/2016/02/facebook-reactions-totally-redesigned-like-button/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Natt|last=Garun|title=Facebook reactions have now infiltrated comments|url=https://www.theverge.com/2017/5/3/15536812/facebook-reactions-now-available-comments|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=May 3, 2017|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=June 20, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180620180635/https://www.theverge.com/2017/5/3/15536812/facebook-reactions-now-available-comments|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=David|last=Cohen|title=Facebook Just Extended Reactions to Comments|url=http://www.adweek.com/digital/facebook-reactions-comments/|website=[[Adweek]]|publisher=Beringer Capital|date=May 3, 2017|access-date=May 31, 2017|archive-date=February 21, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210221205130/https://www.adweek.com/performance-marketing/facebook-reactions-comments/|url-status=live}}</ref> In late April 2020, during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], a new "Care" reaction was added.<ref name="Verge: Care button">{{cite web |last1=Lyles |first1=Taylor |title=Facebook adds a 'care' reaction to the like button 5 |url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/17/21224805/facebook-care-reaction-like-button-messenger-app |website=[[The Verge]] |date=April 17, 2020 |access-date=May 2, 2020 |archive-date=May 23, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220523223255/https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/17/21224805/facebook-care-reaction-like-button-messenger-app |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
=== Instant messaging === |
|||
Zuckerberg announced to the media at the start of October 2012 that Facebook had passed the monthly active users mark of one billion—Facebook defines active users as a logged-in member who visits the site, or accesses it through a third-party site connected to Facebook, at least once a month. Fake accounts were not mentioned in the announcement, but the company continued to remove them after it found that 8.7% of its users were not real in August 2012. The company's data also revealed 600 million mobile users, 140 billion friend connections since the inception of Facebook, and the median age of a user as 22 years.<ref name="Fow">{{cite news|author1=Geoffrey Fowler|title=Facebook: One Billion and Counting|url=http://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10000872396390443635404578036164027386112?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10000872396390443635404578036164027386112.html|accessdate=December 14, 2014|work=The Wall Street Journal|date=October 4, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Facebook Messenger}} |
|||
Facebook Messenger is an [[instant messaging]] service and software application. It began as Facebook Chat in 2008,<ref>{{cite web|first=Mark|last=Hendrickson|title=Facebook Chat Launches, For Some|url=https://techcrunch.com/2008/04/06/facebook-chat-enters-pre-release-beta/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=April 6, 2008|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=October 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017053152/https://techcrunch.com/2008/04/06/facebook-chat-enters-pre-release-beta/|url-status=live}}</ref> was revamped in 2010<ref>{{cite web|first=MG|last=Siegler|title=Facebook's Modern Messaging System: Seamless, History, And A Social Inbox|url=https://techcrunch.com/2010/11/15/facebook-messaging/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=November 15, 2010|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=October 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201019030531/https://techcrunch.com/2010/11/15/facebook-messaging/|url-status=live}}</ref> and eventually became a standalone mobile app in August 2011, while remaining part of the user page on browsers.<ref>{{cite web|first=Jason|last=Kincaid|title=Facebook Launches Standalone iPhone/Android Messenger App (And It's Beluga)|url=https://techcrunch.com/2011/08/09/facebook-launches-standalone-mobile-messenger-app-and-it%E2%80%99s-beluga/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=August 9, 2011|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=October 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201005063853/https://techcrunch.com/2011/08/09/facebook-launches-standalone-mobile-messenger-app-and-it%E2%80%99s-beluga/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Complementing regular conversations, Messenger lets users make one-to-one<ref>{{cite web|first=Hope|last=King|title=Facebook Messenger now lets you make video calls|url=https://money.cnn.com/2015/04/27/technology/facebook-messenger-mobile-video-call/|website=[[CNN]]|date=April 27, 2015|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=June 11, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200611021040/https://money.cnn.com/2015/04/27/technology/facebook-messenger-mobile-video-call/|url-status=live}}</ref> and group<ref>{{cite web|first=Nick|last=Statt|title=Facebook Messenger now lets you video chat with up to 50 people|url=https://www.theverge.com/2016/12/19/14006752/facebook-messenger-group-video-chat-feature-update|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=December 19, 2016|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108105746/http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/19/14006752/facebook-messenger-group-video-chat-feature-update|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Voice over IP|voice]]<ref>{{cite web|first=Ellis|last=Hamburger|title=Facebook launches free calling for all iPhone users in the US|url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3883538/facebook-launches-free-calling-in-messenger-for-iphone-us|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=January 16, 2013|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112022932/http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3883538/facebook-launches-free-calling-in-messenger-for-iphone-us|url-status=live}}</ref> and [[Videotelephony|video calls]].<ref>{{cite web|first=Josh|last=Constine|title=Facebook Messenger Launches Free VOIP Video Calls Over Cellular And Wi-Fi|url=https://techcrunch.com/2015/04/27/facebook-messenger-video-chat/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=April 27, 2015|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=September 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919222052/https://techcrunch.com/2015/04/27/facebook-messenger-video-chat/|url-status=live}}</ref> Its Android app has integrated support for [[SMS]]<ref>{{cite web|first=Charles|last=Arthur|title=Facebook turns Messenger into a text message killer|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/dec/04/facebook-messenger-android-sms-killer|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=December 4, 2012|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=September 19, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919180035/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/dec/04/facebook-messenger-android-sms-killer|url-status=live}}</ref> and "Chat Heads", which are round profile photo icons appearing on-screen regardless of what app is open,<ref>{{cite web|title=Chat Heads come to Facebook Messenger for Android|url=https://www.theverge.com/2013/4/12/4216838/facebook-updates-messenger-adds-chat-heads|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=April 12, 2013|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=September 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920055844/https://www.theverge.com/2013/4/12/4216838/facebook-updates-messenger-adds-chat-heads|url-status=live}}</ref> while both apps support multiple accounts,<ref>{{cite web|first=Sarah|last=Perez|title=Facebook Tests SMS Integration in Messenger, Launches Support For Multiple Accounts|url=https://techcrunch.com/2016/02/11/facebook-tests-sms-integration-in-messenger-launches-support-for-multiple-accounts/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=February 11, 2016|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=December 2, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201202010903/https://techcrunch.com/2016/02/11/facebook-tests-sms-integration-in-messenger-launches-support-for-multiple-accounts/|url-status=live}}</ref> conversations with optional [[end-to-end encryption]]<ref>{{cite journal|first=Andy|last=Greenberg|title=You Can All Finally Encrypt Facebook Messenger, So Do It|url=https://www.wired.com/2016/10/facebook-completely-encrypted-messenger-update-now/|journal=[[Wired (website)|Wired]]|date=October 4, 2016|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122050204/https://www.wired.com/2016/10/facebook-completely-encrypted-messenger-update-now/|url-status=live}}</ref> and "Instant Games".<ref>{{cite web|first=Josh|last=Constine|title=Facebook Messenger launches Instant Games|url=https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/29/messenger-instant-games/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=November 29, 2016|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108101121/https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/29/messenger-instant-games/|url-status=live}}</ref> Some features, including sending money<ref name="US-feature">{{cite web|first=Josh|last=Constine|title=Facebook Introduces Free Friend-To-Friend Payments Through Messages|url=https://techcrunch.com/2015/03/17/facebook-pay/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=March 17, 2015|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=August 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200815173100/https://techcrunch.com/2015/03/17/facebook-pay/|url-status=live}}</ref> and requesting transportation,<ref>{{cite web|first=Andrew J.|last=Hawkins|title=Facebook Messenger now lets you hail an Uber car|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/12/16/10303878/facebook-messenger-uber-app-integration-API|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=December 16, 2015|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108092109/http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/16/10303878/facebook-messenger-uber-app-integration-API|url-status=live}}</ref> are limited to the United States.<ref name="US-feature" /> In 2017, Facebook added "Messenger Day", a feature that lets users share photos and videos in a story-format with all their friends with the content disappearing after 24 hours;<ref>{{cite web|first=James|last=Vincent|title=Facebook's Snapchat stories clone, Messenger Day, is now rolling out globally|url=https://www.theverge.com/2017/3/9/14867192/facebook-messenger-snapchat-stories-clone-day|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=March 9, 2017|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112020809/http://www.theverge.com/2017/3/9/14867192/facebook-messenger-snapchat-stories-clone-day|url-status=live}}</ref> Reactions, which lets users tap and hold a message to add a reaction through an [[emoji]];<ref name="verge-mentions">{{cite web|first=James|last=Vincent|title=Facebook Messenger gets reactions for individual messages and @ notifications|url=https://www.theverge.com/2017/3/23/15033810/facebook-messenger-notifications-reactions|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=March 23, 2017|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112033205/http://www.theverge.com/2017/3/23/15033810/facebook-messenger-notifications-reactions|url-status=live}}</ref> and Mentions, which lets users in group conversations type @ to give a particular user a notification.<ref name="verge-mentions" /> |
|||
=== 2013–present: site developments, A4AI and 10th anniversary === |
|||
In April 2020, Facebook began rolling out a new feature called [[Facebook Messenger Rooms|Messenger Rooms]], a video chat feature that allows users to chat with up to 50 people at a time.<ref>{{cite web |last=O'Flaherty |first=Kate |title=Facebook Users Beware: Here's Why Messenger Rooms Is Not Actually That Private |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2020/04/26/facebooks-messenger-rooms-is-not-actually-all-that-private-heres-why/ |access-date=May 14, 2020 |website=Forbes |language=en}}</ref> In July 2020, Facebook added a new feature in Messenger that lets iOS users to use Face ID or Touch ID to lock their chats. The feature is called App Lock and is a part of several changes in Messenger regarding privacy and security.<ref>{{cite web |last=Kastrenakes |first=Jacob |date=July 22, 2020 |title=Facebook Messenger can now lock your chats behind Face ID |url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/22/21333945/facebook-messenger-app-lock-security-iphone-ipad-face-id |access-date=July 23, 2020 |website=The Verge |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Mendiratta |first=Hemant |date=August 7, 2020 |title=How To View Only Unread Messages On Facebook Messenger |url=https://www.techuntold.com/view-only-unread-messages-facebook-messenger |access-date=September 14, 2021 |website=TechUntold |quote=}}</ref> On October 13, 2020, the Messenger application introduced cross-app messaging with Instagram, which was launched in September 2021.<ref>{{Cite web |date=September 30, 2021 |title=Facebook Messenger releases cross-app group chats, further integrating with Instagram |url=https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/30/facebook-messenger-releases-cross-app-group-chats-further-integrating-with-instagram/ |access-date=April 8, 2022 |website=TechCrunch |language=en-US}}</ref> In addition to the integrated messaging, the application announced the introduction of a new logo, which will be an amalgamation of the Messenger and Instagram logo.<ref>{{cite web |date=October 13, 2020 |title=The Future of Messaging is Now |url=https://messengernews.fb.com/2020/10/13/the-future-of-messaging-is-now/ |access-date=October 13, 2020 |website=Messenger News}}</ref> |
|||
On January 15, 2013, Facebook announced [[Facebook Graph Search]], which provides users with a "precise answer," rather than a link to an answer by leveraging the data present on its site.<ref>{{cite news |title= Facebook introduces social search feature |url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/facebook-introduces-social-search-feature/2013/01/15/599c6f7e-5f3d-11e2-9940-6fc488f3fecd_story.html?|newspaper=The Washington Post |author= Tsukayama, Hayley |date=January 15, 2013}}</ref> Facebook emphasized that the feature would be "privacy-aware," returning only results from content already shared with the user.<ref>Claburn, Thomas (January 16, 2013). [http://www.informationweek.com/security/privacy/meet-facebooks-graph-search-tool/240146350 "Meet Facebook's Graph Search Tool"]. ''Information Week''.</ref> |
|||
Businesses and users can interact through Messenger with features such as tracking purchases and receiving notifications, and interacting with customer service representatives. Third-party developers can integrate apps into Messenger, letting users enter an app while inside Messenger and optionally share details from the app into a chat.<ref>{{cite web|first=Hope|last=King|title=7 big changes coming to Facebook|url=https://money.cnn.com/2015/03/25/technology/facebook-f8-messenger/|website=[[CNN]]|date=March 25, 2015|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=March 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200301180343/https://money.cnn.com/2015/03/25/technology/facebook-f8-messenger/|url-status=live}}</ref> Developers can build [[Software agent|chatbots]] into Messenger, for uses such as news publishers building bots to distribute news.<ref>{{cite web|first=Casey|last=Newton|title=Facebook launches a bot platform for Messenger|url=https://www.theverge.com/2016/4/12/11395806/facebook-messenger-bot-platform-announced-f8-conference|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=April 12, 2016|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108162709/http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/12/11395806/facebook-messenger-bot-platform-announced-f8-conference|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[M (virtual assistant)|M virtual assistant]] (U.S.) scans chats for keywords and suggests relevant actions, such as its payments system for users mentioning money.<ref>{{cite web|first=Nick|last=Statt|title=Facebook's AI assistant will now offer suggestions inside Messenger|url=https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/6/15200836/facebook-messenger-m-suggestions-ai-assisant|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=April 6, 2017|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=November 11, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111192857/http://www.theverge.com/2017/4/6/15200836/facebook-messenger-m-suggestions-ai-assisant|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Josh|last=Constine|title=Facebook Messenger's AI 'M' suggests features to use based on your convos|url=https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/06/facebook-messengers-ai-m-suggests-features-to-use-based-on-your-convos/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=April 6, 2017|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=October 26, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201026170208/https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/06/facebook-messengers-ai-m-suggests-features-to-use-based-on-your-convos/|url-status=live}}</ref> Group chatbots appear in Messenger as "Chat Extensions". A "Discovery" tab allows finding bots, and enabling special, branded [[QR code]]s that, when scanned, take the user to a specific bot.<ref>{{cite web|first=Josh|last=Constine|title=Facebook Messenger launches group bots and bot discovery tab|url=https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/18/facebook-bot-discovery/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=April 18, 2017|access-date=June 2, 2017|archive-date=October 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022040938/https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/18/facebook-bot-discovery/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
The company became the subject of a lawsuit by Rembrandt Social Media in February 2013, for patents involving the "Like" button.<ref name="BBCLikeButtton">{{cite news |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21411622|title=Facebook sued over 'like' button |publisher=BBC News |date=February 11, 2013 |accessdate=February 11, 2013}}</ref> On April 3, 2013, Facebook unveiled [[Facebook Home]], a user-interface layer for Android devices offering greater integration with the site. [[HTC]] announced the [[HTC First]], a [[smartphone]] with Home pre-loaded.<ref name="verge-firstlaunch">{{cite news |title= HTC and Facebook announce the First smartphone with AT&T, arriving April 12 for $99.99 |url= http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/4/4182302/htc-and-facebook-announce-the-first-smartphone |work=The Verge |date=April 4, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
=== Privacy policy === |
|||
On April 15, 2013, Facebook announced an alliance across 19 states with the National Association of Attorneys General, to provide teenagers and parents with information on tools to manage social networking profiles.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://techcrunch.com/2013/04/15/facebook-links-up-with-attorneys-general-in-19-u-s-states-for-teen-online-safety-program/ |title= Facebook Links Up With Attorneys General In 19 U.S. States For Teen Social Networking Safety Program |work=TechCrunch |date=April 15, 2013 |accessdate=April 20, 2013}}</ref> On April 19, 2013, Facebook officially modified its logo to remove the faint blue line at the bottom of the "F" icon. The letter F moved closer to the edge of the box.<ref>{{cite news |author=Murphy, Samantha |url= http://mashable.com/2013/04/19/facebook-logo-update/ |title=New Facebook Logo Made Official |work=Mashable |date=November 18, 2011 |accessdate=April 20, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
{{See also|#Privacy}} |
|||
Facebook's data policy outlines its policies for collecting, storing, and sharing user's data.<ref name="Data Policy">{{cite web|access-date=October 20, 2021|work=Facebook.com|title="Data Policy"|url=https://www.facebook.com/about/privacy/previous|archive-date=October 21, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211021031157/https://www.facebook.com/about/privacy/previous|url-status=live}}</ref> Facebook enables users to control access to individual posts and their profile<ref>{{cite web|access-date=June 13, 2009|url=https://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=search|title=Search Privacy|publisher=Facebook|archive-date=November 9, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109220522/http://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=search|url-status=live}}</ref> through [[privacy settings]].<ref name="Choose Your Privacy Settings">{{cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy|title=Choose Your Privacy Settings|publisher=Facebook|access-date=September 10, 2009}}</ref> The user's name and profile picture (if applicable) are public. |
|||
Facebook's revenue depends on targeted advertising, which involves analyzing user data to decide which ads to show each user. Facebook buys data from third parties, gathered from both online and offline sources, to supplement its own data on users. Facebook maintains that it does not share data used for targeted advertising with the advertisers themselves.<ref>{{Cite news|title="What Facebook's privacy policy allows may surprise you"|last1=Ortutay|first1=Barbare|date=March 25, 2018|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-facebook-privacy-policy-20180325-story.html}}</ref> The company states: |
|||
Following a campaign by 100 advocacy groups, Facebook agreed to update its policy on hate speech. The campaign highlighted content promoting domestic and sexual violence against women, and used over 57,000 tweets and more than 4,900 emails that caused withdrawal of advertising from the site by 15 companies, including Nissan UK, House of Burlesque and Nationwide UK. The social media website initially responded by stating that "while it may be vulgar and offensive, distasteful content on its own does not violate our policies".<ref>{{cite news |title=#FBrape: Will Facebook Heed Open Letter Protesting 'Endorsement Of Rape & Domestic Violence'? |url= http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/05/28/fbrape-will-facebook-heed-open-letter-protesting-endorsement-rape-domestic-violence_n_3346520.html?utm_hp_ref=uk |accessdate=May 29, 2013 |newspaper=The Huffington Post UK |date=May 28, 2013 |author= Nelson, Sara C.}}</ref> It decided to take action on May 29, 2013, after it "become clear that our systems to identify and remove hate speech have failed to work as effectively as we would like, particularly around issues of gender-based hate."<ref>{{cite news |title= Facebook gives way to campaign against hate speech on its pages |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/may/29/facebook-campaign-violence-against-women |accessdate=May 29, 2013 |newspaper=The Guardian |location =London |date=May 29, 2013 |author=Carroll, Rory}}</ref> |
|||
<blockquote>"We provide advertisers with reports about the kinds of people seeing their ads and how their ads are performing, but we don't share information that personally identifies you (information such as your name or email address that by itself can be used to contact you or identifies who you are) unless you give us permission. For example, we provide general demographic and interest information to advertisers (for example, that an ad was seen by a woman between the ages of 25 and 34 who lives in Madrid and likes software engineering) to help them better understand their audience. We also confirm which Facebook ads led you to make a purchase or take an action with an advertiser."<ref name="Data Policy" /></blockquote> |
|||
On June 12, 2013, Facebook announced on its newsroom that it was introducing clickable [[hashtag]]s to help users follow trending discussions, or search what others are talking about on a topic.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.techstake.org/2013/06/facebook-introduces-hashtags-to-its-users.html |title= Facebook Introduces Hashtags to its Users |author= Dey, Aditya |work=TechStake-Technology News Blog |date=June 13, 2013}}</ref> A July 2013 ''Wall Street Journal'' article identified the Facebook IPO as the cause of a change in the U.S.' national economic statistics, as the local government area of the company's headquarters, [[San Mateo County]], California, became the top wage-earning county in the country after the fourth quarter of 2012. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the average weekly wage in the county was [[United States dollar|US$]]3,240, 107% higher than the previous year. It noted the wages were "the equivalent of $168,000 a year, and more than 50% higher than the next-highest county, [[New York County]] (better known as [[Manhattan]]), at $2,107 a week, or roughly $110,000 a year."<ref>{{cite news |title= How Facebook's IPO Created the Best-Paid County In America |url= http://blogs.wsj.com/corporate-intelligence/2013/07/02/how-facebooks-ipo-created-the-best-paid-county-in-america/ |accessdate=July 4, 2013 |work=Corporate Intelligence blog |publisher=The Wall Street Journal |date=July 2, 2013 |author=Thurm, Scott}}</ref> |
|||
{{As of|October 2021}}, Facebook claims it uses the following policy for sharing user data with third parties: |
|||
Russian internet firm Mail.Ru sold its Facebook shares for US$525 million on September 5, 2013, following its initial $200 million investment in 2009. Partly owned by Russia's richest man, [[Alisher Usmanovhe]], the firm owned a total of 14.2 million remaining shares prior to the sale.<ref>{{cite news|title=Russia's Mail.Ru Sells Remaining Facebook Stock|url=http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/09/05/business/05reuters-mailru-results.html?ref=business&_r=0|accessdate=September 8, 2013|newspaper=The New York Times|date=September 5, 2013|author=Vladimir Soldatkin|author2=Sophie Walker|author3=Mark Potter}}</ref> In the same month, the Chinese government announced that it will lift the ban on Facebook in the [[Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone|Shanghai Free Trade Zone]] "to welcome foreign companies to invest and to let foreigners live and work happily in the free-trade zone." Facebook was first blocked in China in 2009.<ref>{{cite news|title=China will unblock Facebook, Twitter and The New York Times to boost its new free trade zone|url=http://qz.com/127615/china-will-unblock-facebook-twitter-and-the-new-york-times-to-boost-its-new-free-trade-zone/|accessdate=September 24, 2013|newspaper=Quartz|date=September 24, 2013|author=Heather Timmons}}</ref> |
|||
<blockquote>Apps, websites, and third-party integrations on or using our Products. |
|||
Facebook was announced as a member of [[The Alliance for Affordable Internet]] (A4AI) in October 2013, when the A4AI was launched. The A4AI is a coalition of public and private organisations that includes [[Google]], [[Intel]] and Microsoft. Led by [[Sir Tim Berners-Lee]], the A4AI seeks to make Internet access more affordable so that access is broadened in the developing world, where only 31% of people are online. Google will help to decrease Internet access prices so that they fall below the UN Broadband Commission's worldwide target of 5% of monthly income.<ref>{{cite news|title=Sir Tim Berners-Lee and Google lead coalition for cheaper internet|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/oct/07/google-berners-lee-alliance-broadband-africa?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2&et_cid=51918&et_rid=7107573&Linkid=http%3a%2f%2fwww.theguardian.com%2ftechnology%2f2013%2foct%2f07%2fgoogle-berners-lee-alliance-broadband-africa|accessdate=October 8, 2013|newspaper=The Guardian|date=October 7, 2013|author=Samuel Gibbs}}</ref> |
|||
When you choose to use third-party apps, websites, or other services that use, or are integrated with, our Products, they can receive information about what you post or share. For example, when you play a game with your Facebook friends or use a Facebook Comment or Share button on a website, the game developer or website can receive information about your activities in the game or receive a comment or link that you share from the website on Facebook. Also, when you download or use such third-party services, they can access your public profile on Facebook, and any information that you share with them. Apps and websites you use may receive your list of Facebook friends if you choose to share it with them. But apps and websites you use will not be able to receive any other information about your Facebook friends from you, or information about any of your Instagram followers (although your friends and followers may, of course, choose to share this information themselves). Information collected by these third-party services is subject to their own terms and policies, not this one. |
|||
Devices and operating systems providing native versions of Facebook and Instagram (i.e. where we have not developed our own first-party apps) will have access to all information you choose to share with them, including information your friends share with you, so they can provide our core functionality to you. |
|||
A [[Reuters]] report, published on December 11, 2013, stated that [[Standard & Poor's]] announced the placement of Facebook on its [[S&P 500]] index "after the close of trading on December 20."<ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook to join S&P 500|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/11/us-sp500-facebook-idUSBRE9BA1AQ20131211|publisher=Reuters|accessdate=December 17, 2013|date=December 11, 2013}}</ref> Facebook announced Q4 2013 earnings of $523 million (20 cents per share), an increase of $64 million from the previous year,<ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook 4Q Earnings, Revenue Grow Sharply|url=http://www.moneynews.com/Companies/Facebook-earnings-profit-social-media/2014/01/29/id/549797|agency=Associated Press|accessdate=January 29, 2014}}</ref> as well as 945 million mobile users. |
|||
Note: We are in the process of restricting developers' data access even further to help prevent abuse. For example, we will remove developers' access to your Facebook and Instagram data if you haven't used their app in 3 months, and we are changing Login, so that in the next version, we will reduce the data that an app can request without app review to include only name, Instagram username and bio, profile photo and email address. Requesting any other data will require our approval.<ref name="Data Policy" /></blockquote> |
|||
By January 2014, Facebook's market capitalization had risen to over $134 billion.<ref name="fb-104" /><ref name="Marketwatch FB">{{cite web|title=Facebook Inc. Overview|url=http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/fb|publisher=Marketwatch|accessdate=January 30, 2014}}</ref> At the end of January 2014, 1.23 billion users were active on the website every month. |
|||
Facebook will also share data with [[law enforcement]] if needed to.<ref name="Data Policy" /> |
|||
The company celebrated its 10th anniversary during the week of February 3, 2014.<ref name="Rush">{{cite news|title=Facebook posts record quarterly results and reports $1.5bn profit for 2013|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/29/facebook-record-quarterly-results?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2|accessdate=January 30, 2014|newspaper=The Guardian|date=January 29, 2014|author=Dominic Rushe}}</ref> In each of the first three months of 2014, over one billion users logged into their Facebook account on a mobile device.<ref>{{cite web|last=McDuling |first=John |url=http://qz.com/202349/facebook-mobile-user-base-has-crossed-the-1-billion-threshhold/ |title=Facebook's mobile user base has crossed the 1 billion threshold – Quartz |publisher=Qz.com |date= |accessdate=April 24, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook's policies have changed repeatedly since the service's debut, amid a series of controversies covering everything from how well it secures user data, to what extent it allows users to control access, to the kinds of access given to third parties, including businesses, political campaigns and governments. These facilities vary according to country, as some nations require the company to make data available (and limit access to services), while the European Union's [[General Data Protection Regulation|GDPR]] regulation mandates additional privacy protections.<ref name=wsj15>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebooks-timeline-15-years-in-11549276201|title=Facebook's Timeline: 15 Years In|last1=Wilberding|first1=Kurt|date=February 4, 2019|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|access-date=February 6, 2019|last2=Wells|first2=Georgia|issn=0099-9660}}</ref> |
|||
In February 2014, Facebook announced that it would be buying mobile messaging company Whatsapp for US$19 billion in cash and stock.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook to buy Whatsapp for $19 billion- Reasons for acquisition|url=http://equity.blogspot.in/2014/02/facebook-buys-whatsapp-reasons-what-was.html|accessdate= February 19, 2014}}</ref> In June 2014, Facebook announced the acquisition of Pryte, a Finnish mobile data-plan firm that aims to make it easier for mobile phone users in underdeveloped parts of the world to use wireless Internet apps.<ref>{{cite news|author1=ALEXEI ORESKOVIC|title=Facebook acquires mobile data plan firm Pryte|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/03/us-facebook-pryte-idUSKBN0EE1DG20140603|accessdate=August 13, 2014|work=Reuters U.S.|date=June 3, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
=== Bug Bounty Program === |
|||
At the start of July 2014, Facebook announced the acquisition of [[LiveRail]], a San Francisco, California-based online video advertising company. LiveRail's technology facilitates the sale of video inventory across different devices. The terms of the deal were undisclosed, but ''TechCrunch'' reported that Facebook paid between US$400 million and $500 million.<ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook To Improve Video Ads Through LiveRail Acquisition|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/amitchowdhry/2014/07/03/facebook-to-improve-video-ads-through-liverail-acquisition/|publisher=Forbes LLC|accessdate=July 3, 2014|date=July 3, 2014|author=Amit Chowdhry}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author1=Josh Constine|title=Facebook Acquires LiveRail For $400M To $500M To Serve Video Ads Everywhere, Improve Its Own|url=http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/02/facebook-liverail/|website=TechCrunch|publisher=AOL Inc|accessdate=August 13, 2014|date=July 2, 2014}}</ref> As part of the company's second quarter results, Facebook announced in late July 2014 that mobile accounted for 62% of its advertising revenue, which is an increase of 21% from the previous year.<ref>{{cite web|author1=Lewis DVorkin|title=Inside Forbes: Mobile Part II, Or 4 More Charts That Offer a Peek Into the Future of Journalism|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/lewisdvorkin/2014/07/29/inside-forbes-mobile-part-ii-or-4-more-charts-that-offer-a-peak-into-the-future-of-journalism/|website=Forbes|publisher=Forbes LLC|accessdate=August 13, 2014|date=July 29, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Facebook t-shirt with whitehat debit card for Hackers.jpg|thumb|A Facebook "[[White hat (computer security)|White Hat]]" debit card, given to researchers who report [[security bug]]s]] |
|||
On July 29, 2011, Facebook announced its Bug Bounty Program that paid security researchers a minimum of $500 (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|500|2011}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) for reporting security holes. The company promised not to pursue "white hat" hackers who identified such problems.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://facebook.com/whitehat|title=Facebook|publisher=Facebook|access-date=August 4, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2389460,00.asp|title=Facebook Offers $500 Bounty for Reporting Bugs: Why So Cheap|magazine=PC Magazine|access-date=January 18, 2015}}</ref> This led researchers in many countries to participate, particularly in India and Russia.<ref>{{cite web|last=Bug Bounty|first=((Facebook))|title=Facebook Bug Bounty|url=https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-bug-bounty/bug-bounty-highlights-and-updates/818902394790655|publisher=Facebook Security|access-date=April 3, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
Alongside other American technology figures like [[Jeff Bezos]] and [[Tim Cook]], Zuckerberg hosted visiting Chinese politician Lu Wei, known as the "Internet czar" for his influence in the enforcement of China's online policy, at Facebook's headquarters on December 8, 2014. The meeting occurred after Zuckerberg participated in a Q&A session at Tsinghua University in Beijing, China, on October 23, 2014, where he attempted to converse in Mandarin—although Facebook is banned in China, Zuckerberg is highly regarded among the people and was at the university to help fuel the nation's burgeoning entrepreneur sector.<ref>{{cite news|author1=Alex Hern, Jonathan Kaiman|title=Mark Zuckerberg addresses Chinese university in Mandarin|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/23/mark-zuckerberg-chinese-university-fluent-mandarin-video|accessdate=December 14, 2014|work=The Guardian|date=October 23, 2014}}</ref> A book of Chinese president Xi Xinping found on Zuckerberg's office desk attracted a great deal of attention in the media, after the Facebook founder explained to Lu, "I want them [Facebook staff] to understand socialism with Chinese characteristics."<ref>{{cite news|author1=Adam Taylor|title=Why would Mark Zuckerberg want Facebook employees to read the Chinese president's book?|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/12/08/why-does-mark-zuckerberg-want-facebook-employees-to-read-the-chinese-presidents-book/|accessdate=December 14, 2014|work=The Washington Post|date=December 8, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
== Reception == |
|||
Zuckerberg fielded questions during a live Q&A session at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park on December 11, 2014. The question of whether the platform would adopt a dislike button was raised again, and Zuckerberg said, "We're [Facebook] thinking about it [dislike button] ... It's an interesting question," and said that he likes the idea of Facebook users being able to express a greater variety of emotions.<ref>{{cite news|author1=Maria Tadeo|title=Mark Zuckerberg Q&A: What we learnt about the Facebook founder|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/mark-zuckerberg-qa-what-we-learnt-about-the-facebook-founder-9921582.html|accessdate=December 14, 2014|work=The Independent|date=December 12, 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sam">{{cite web|author1=Sam Colt|title=Facebook May Be Adding a 'Dislike' Button|url=http://www.inc.com/business-insider/Facebook-may-be-adding-a-dislike-button.html?cid=em01011week50day12d|website=Inc.|publisher=Monsueto Ventures|accessdate=December 14, 2014|date=December 12, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
=== Userbase === |
|||
As of January 21, 2015, Facebook's algorithm is programmed to filter out false or misleading content, such as fake news stories and hoaxes, and will be supported by users who select the option to flag a story as "purposefully fake or deceitful news." According to Reuters, such content is "being spread like a wildfire" on the social media platform. Facebook maintained that "satirical" content, "intended to be humorous, or content that is clearly labeled as satire," will be taken into account and should not be intercepted.<ref>{{cite news|author1=ALEXEI ORESKOVIC|title=Facebook clamps down on fake news stories|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/20/us-facebook-hoaxes-idUSKBN0KT2C820150120|accessdate=February 4, 2015|work=Reuters|date=January 20, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook's rapid growth began as soon as it became available and continued through 2018, before beginning to decline. |
|||
Facebook passed 100 million registered users in 2008,<ref>{{cite web|first=Stan|last=Schroeder|title=Facebook's 100 Million Users: How Much are They Worth?|url=http://mashable.com/2008/08/26/facebook-100-million-users/|website=[[Mashable]]|date=August 26, 2008|access-date=June 4, 2017}}</ref> and 500 million in July 2010.<ref name="500 million">{{cite web|first=Robin|last=Wauters|title=Zuckerberg Makes It Official: Facebook Hits 500 Million Members|url=https://techcrunch.com/2010/07/21/facebook-500-million/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=July 21, 2010|access-date=June 4, 2017}}</ref> According to the company's data at the July 2010 announcement, half of the site's membership used Facebook daily, for an average of 34 minutes, while 150 million users accessed the site by mobile.<ref name="Quiet revolution">{{cite web|first1=Charles|last1=Arthur|first2=Jemima|last2=Kiss|title=Facebook reaches 500 million users|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jul/21/facebook-500-million-users|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=July 21, 2010|access-date=March 23, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
==Corporate affairs== |
|||
In October 2012, Facebook's monthly active users passed one billion,<ref name="One billion users">{{cite web|first1=Aaron|last1=Smith|first2=Laurie|last2=Segal|first3=Stacy|last3=Cowley|title=Facebook reaches one billion users|url=https://money.cnn.com/2012/10/04/technology/facebook-billion-users/|website=[[CNN]]|date=October 4, 2012|access-date=June 4, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Jemima|last=Kiss|title=Facebook hits 1 billion users a month|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/oct/04/facebook-hits-billion-users-a-month|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=October 4, 2012|access-date=June 4, 2017}}</ref> with 600 million mobile users, 219 billion photo uploads, and 140 billion friend connections.<ref name="Billion statistics">{{cite web|first=Daniel|last=Ionescu|title=Facebook rules the social networking world with 1 billion users|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2011123/facebook-rules-the-social-networking-world-with-1-billion-users.html|website=[[PC World]]|publisher=[[International Data Group]]|date=October 4, 2012|access-date=June 4, 2017}}</ref> The 2 billion user mark was crossed in June 2017.<ref>{{cite web|first=Chris|last=Welch|title=Facebook crosses 2 billion monthly users|url=https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/27/15880494/facebook-2-billion-monthly-users-announced|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=June 27, 2017|access-date=June 27, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Josh|last=Constine|title=Facebook now has 2 billion monthly users ... and responsibility|url=https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/27/facebook-2-billion-users/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=June 27, 2017|access-date=July 1, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
===Management=== |
|||
The ownership percentages of the company, {{As of|2012|lc=y}}, are: |
|||
* [[Mark Zuckerberg]]: 28%,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://whoownsfacebook.com/#Zuckerberg |title=Facebook's $5bn IPO falls short of expectations |publisher=WhoOwnsFacebook.com |accessdate= September 17, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Accel Partners]]: 10% |
|||
* [[Mail.Ru Group]]: 10%<ref>{{Cite news |title=Facebook's friend in Russia |url=http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/10/04/facebooks-friend-in-russia/?source=cnn_bin&hpt=Sbin |accessdate=December 18, 2010 |work =Fortune |date=October 4, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Dustin Moskovitz]]: 6% |
|||
* [[Eduardo Saverin]]: 5% |
|||
* [[Sean Parker]]: 4% |
|||
* [[Peter Thiel]]: 3% |
|||
* [[Greylock Partners]]: between 1 to 2% |
|||
* [[Meritech Capital Partners]]: between 1 to 2% each |
|||
* [[Microsoft]]: 1.3% |
|||
* [[Li Ka-shing]]: 0.8% |
|||
* [[Interpublic Group]]: less than 0.5% |
|||
In November 2015, after skepticism about the accuracy of its "monthly active users" measurement, Facebook changed its definition to a logged-in member who visits the Facebook site through the web browser or mobile app, or uses the [[Facebook Messenger]] app, in the 30-day period prior to the measurement. This excluded the use of third-party services with Facebook integration, which was previously counted.<ref>{{cite web|first=David|last=Cohen|title=Facebook Changes Definition of Monthly Active Users|url=http://www.adweek.com/digital/monthly-active-users-definition-revised/|website=[[Adweek]]|publisher=Beringer Capital|date=November 6, 2015|access-date=June 4, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
A small group of current and former employees and celebrities own less than 1% each, including [[Matt Cohler]], Jeff Rothschild, [[Adam D'Angelo]], Chris Hughes, and [[Owen Van Natta]], while [[Reid Hoffman]] and [[Mark Pincus]] have sizable holdings of the company. The remaining 30% or so are owned by employees, an undisclosed number of celebrities, and outside investors.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Facebook effect: the inside story of the company that is connecting the world |author= Kirkpatrick, David |url= https://books.google.com/?id=RRUkLhyGZVgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Facebook+Effect#v=onepage&q=outside%20investors&f=false |isbn=978-1-4391-0980-9 |publisher =Simon & Schuster |location =New York |year=2010}}</ref> Adam D'Angelo, former chief technology officer and friend of Zuckerberg, resigned in May 2008. Reports claimed that he and Zuckerberg began quarreling, and that he was no longer interested in partial ownership of the company.<ref>{{Cite news |title=As Facebook goes corporate, Mark Zuckerberg loses an early player |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-9941488-36.html| work =[[CNET.com]] |date=May 11, 2008 |last=McCarthy |first=Caroline |accessdate=July 12, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
From 2017 to 2019, the percentage of the U.S. population over the age of 12 who use Facebook has declined, from 67% to 61% (a decline of some 15 million U.S. users), with a higher drop-off among younger Americans (a decrease in the percentage of U.S. 12- to 34-year-olds who are users from 58% in 2015 to 29% in 2019).<ref name=Heeti>Abrar Al-Heeti, [https://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-lost-15-million-us-users-in-the-past-two-years-report-says/ Facebook lost 15 million US users in the past two years, report says], CNET (March 6, 2019).</ref><ref name=Statt>Nick Statt, [https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/6/18253274/facebook-users-decline-15-million-people-united-states-privacy-scandals Facebook's US user base declined by 15 million since 2017, according to survey], ''The Verge'' (March 6, 2019).</ref> The decline coincided with an increase in the popularity of Instagram, which is also owned by Meta.<ref name=Heeti /><ref name=Statt /> |
|||
Key management personnel consist of: [[Chris Cox (Facebook)|Chris Cox]] (Chief Product Officer), Sandberg (COO), and Zuckerberg (Chairman and CEO). [[Mike Vernal]] is considered to be the company's top engineer.<ref name="Wired Nov 2012">{{cite news|last1=Tate|first1=Ryan|title=How Facebook's Top Engineer is Trying to Read Your Mind|url=http://www.wired.com/2012/11/mike-vernal-facebook/|accessdate=June 1, 2015|work=Wired|publisher=Wired|date=November 28, 2012|ref=Wired}}</ref> {{As of|2011|4|df=US}}, Facebook has over 7,000 employees, and offices in 15 countries.<ref>{{cite web |title=Facebook Factsheet|url=https://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?factsheet |accessdate=April 10, 2011}}</ref> Other managers include chief financial officer [[David Wehner]] and public relations head [[Elliot Schrage]].<ref>[[Michael Wolff (journalist)|Wolff, Michael]], [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/01/facebook-ipo-billion-user-ambition "The Facebook IPO: billion-user ambition at a $1bn price"], ''The Guardian'', February 1, 2012. Retrieved February 1, 2012.</ref> |
|||
The number of daily active users experienced a quarterly decline for the first time in the last quarter of 2021, down to 1.929 billion from 1.930 billion,<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-60238565|title=Facebook: Daily active users fall for first time in 18-year history|work=[[BBC News]] |date=February 3, 2022}}</ref> but increased again the next quarter despite being banned in Russia.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61250669|title=Daily Facebook users up again after first-ever decline|work=[[BBC News]] |date=April 27, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook was named the 5th best company to work for in 2014 by company-review site Glassdoor as part of its sixth annual Employees' Choice Awards. The website stated that 93% of Facebook employees would recommend the company to a friend.<ref>{{cite news|title=The Best Companies To Work For in 2014|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/12/best-companies_n_4436190.html?ir=Business|accessdate=December 15, 2013|newspaper=The Huffington Post|date=December 13, 2013|first=Lydia|last=Oconnor}}</ref> |
|||
Historically, commentators have offered predictions of Facebook's decline or end, based on causes such as a declining user base;<ref>{{cite web|last1=Heaven|first1=Will|title=Is this the beginning of the end for Facebook?|url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/willheaven/100092236/is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-facebook/|website=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314014241/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/willheaven/100092236/is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-facebook/|archive-date=March 14, 2012|url-status=dead|date=June 14, 2011}}</ref> the legal difficulties of being a [[closed platform]], inability to generate revenue, inability to offer user privacy, inability to adapt to mobile platforms, or Facebook ending itself to present a next generation replacement;<ref name="Silverman 2012">{{cite web|last1=Silverman|first1=Matt|title=The End of Facebook: What Will It Take to Kill the King of Social?|url=https://mashable.com/2012/06/13/facebook-decline|website=[[Mashable]]|language=en|date=June 13, 2012}}</ref> or Facebook's role in [[Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections]].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bilton|first1=Nick|title=This Could Be the End of Facebook|url=https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/this-could-be-the-end-of-facebook-hive-podcast|website=[[Vanity Fair (magazine)|Vanity Fair]]|language=en|date=October 27, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
===Revenue=== |
|||
{{Facebook revenue}} |
|||
Most of Facebook's revenue comes from advertising.<ref>{{cite web|author=January 17, 2011 by Jolie O'Dell 203 |url=http://mashable.com/2011/01/17/facebooks-ad-revenue-hit-1-86b-for-2010/ |title=Facebook's Ad Revenue Hit $1.86B for 2010 |publisher=Mashable.com |date=January 17, 2011 |accessdate=December 21, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Womack |first=Brian |url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-20/facebook-revenue-will-reach-4-27-billion-emarketer-says-1-.html |title=Facebook Revenue Will Reach $4.27 Billion, EMarketer Says |publisher=Bloomberg |date=September 20, 2011 |accessdate=December 21, 2011}}</ref> Facebook generally has a lower [[clickthrough rate]] (CTR) for advertisements than most major Web sites. According to BusinessWeek.com, banner advertisements on Facebook have generally received one-fifth the number of clicks compared to those on the Web as a whole,<ref>{{cite web |accessdate= July 18, 2010 |url=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2007/tc20071128_366355_page_2.htm |title= Facebook May Revamp Beacon |work=BusinessWeek |location =New York |date=November 28, 2007}}</ref> although specific comparisons can reveal a much larger disparity. For example, while [[Google]] users click on the first advertisement for search results an average of 8% of the time (80,000 clicks for every one million searches),<ref>{{cite web |accessdate=July 18, 2010 |url=http://www.accuracast.com/seo-weekly/adwords-clickthrough.php |title= Google AdWords Click Through Rates Per Position |publisher= AccuraCast |date= October 9, 2009}}</ref> Facebook's users click on advertisements an average of 0.04% of the time (400 clicks for every one million pages).<ref>{{cite news |accessdate=July 18, 2010 |url= http://valleywag.gawker.com/242234/facebook-consistently-the-worst-performing-site |title= Facebook 'consistently the worst performing site' |work= Gawker |date=March 7, 2007 |author=Denton, Nick}}</ref> |
|||
{{Image frame |
|||
Sarah Smith, who was Facebook's Online Sales Operations Manager until 2012,<ref>{{cite web|title=How did Sarah Smith get recruited to Quora?|url=http://www.quora.com/Quora-Recruitment-Stories/How-did-Sarah-Smith-get-recruited-to-Quora|work=Quora|publisher=Quora|accessdate=January 30, 2014|date=October 28, 2012}}</ref> reported that successful [[advertising campaign]]s on the site can have clickthrough rates as low as 0.05% to 0.04%, and that CTR for ads tend to fall within two weeks.<ref>{{cite news |accessdate=July 18, 2010 |url=http://techpulse360.com/2009/08/12/facebook-says-its-click-through-rates-do-not-match-those-at-google/ |title=Facebook Says Click Through Rates Do Not Match Those At Google |work= TechPulse 360 |date= August 12, 2009}}</ref> |
|||
| align=left |
|||
| caption=Facebook popularity. Active users (in millions) of Facebook increased from just a million<br /> in 2004 to 2.8 billion in 2020.<ref name=wsj15 /> |
|||
| content = {{Graph:Chart |
|||
| width = 400 |
|||
| height = 220 |
|||
| type = line |
|||
| x = 2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019,2020 |
|||
| y = 1,10,20,50,100,350,500,750,950,1100,1400,1600,1800,2000,2320,2498,2797 |
|||
}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Clear}} |
|||
<gallery widths="350" heights="240"> |
|||
File:Population pyramid of Facebook users by age.png|[[Population pyramid]] of Facebook users by age {{as of|2010}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/01/04/december-data-on-facebook%E2%80%99s-us-growth-by-age-and-gender-beyond-100-million/|title=December Data on Facebook's US Growth by Age and Gender: Beyond 100 Million – Inside Facebook|work=Inside Facebook|date=January 4, 2010|access-date=October 7, 2014|archive-date=November 3, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141103003005/http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/01/04/december-data-on-facebook%e2%80%99s-us-growth-by-age-and-gender-beyond-100-million/|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
=== Demographics === |
|||
The cause of Facebook's low CTR has been attributed to younger users enabling [[ad blocking]] software and their adeptness at ignoring advertising messages, as well as the site's primary purpose being social communication rather than content viewing.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=July 18, 2010 |url=http://www.bizreport.com/2007/07/advertisers_disappointed_with_facebooks_ctr.html |title=Advertisers disappointed with Facebook's CTR |work= BizReport |date=July 16, 2007 |author=Leggatt, Helen}}</ref> According to digital consultancy iStrategy Labs in mid-January 2014, three million fewer users aged between 13 and 17 years were present on Facebook's Social Advertising platform compared to 2011.<ref>{{cite web|title=3 Million Teens Leave Facebook In 3 Years: The 2014 Facebook Demographic Report|url=http://istrategylabs.com/2014/01/3-million-teens-leave-facebook-in-3-years-the-2014-facebook-demographic-report/|work=iStategy Labs|publisher=iStategy Labs|accessdate=January 30, 2014|author=DJ Saul|date=January 15, 2014}}</ref> However, ''Time'' Writer and Reporter [[Christopher Matthews]] stated in the wake of the iStrategy Labs results: |
|||
The highest number of Facebook users as of April 2023 are from India and the United States, followed by Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico and the Philippines.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Facebook Users, Stats, Data, Trends, and More |url=https://datareportal.com/essential-facebook-stats |access-date=2024-06-14 |website=DataReportal – Global Digital Insights |language=en-GB}}</ref> Region-wise, the highest number of users in 2018 are from Asia-Pacific (947 million) followed by Europe (381 million) and US-Canada (242 million). The rest of the world has 750 million users.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://dazeinfo.com/2018/08/20/facebook-users-by-region-dgraph/|title=Number of Facebook Monthly Active Users Worldwide, By Region – DGraph|last=Khan|first=Aarzu|date=August 19, 2018|website=Dazeinfo|access-date=February 4, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
Over the 2008–2018 period, the percentage of users under 34 declined to less than half of the total.<ref name="wsj15" /> |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
A big part of Facebook's pitch is that it has so much information about its users that it can more effectively target ads to those who will be responsive to the content. If Facebook can prove that theory to be true, then it may not worry so much about losing its cool cachet.<ref>{{cite web|last=Matthews |first=Christopher |url=http://business.time.com/2014/01/15/more-than-11-million-young-people-have-fled-facebook-since-2011/#ixzz2rtiYyP1z |title=More Than 11 Million Young People Have Fled Facebook Since 2011 |publisher=Business.time.com |date=January 15, 2014 |accessdate=April 22, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Matthews |first=Christopher |url=http://business.time.com/2014/01/15/more-than-11-million-young-people-have-fled-facebook-since-2011/ |title=More Than 11 Million Young People Have Fled Facebook Since 2011 |publisher=Business.time.com |date=January 15, 2014 |accessdate=April 22, 2014}}</ref></blockquote> |
|||
=== Censorship === |
|||
In December 2014, a report from Frank N. Magid and Associates found that the percentage of teens aged 13 to 17 who used Facebook fell to 88% in 2014, down from 94% in 2013 and 95% in 2012.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2474049,00.asp |title=Survey Says: Teens Hate Facebook |publisher=PC Magazine|accessdate=December 22, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
{{Further|Censorship of Facebook|Censorship by Facebook}} |
|||
[[File:Facebook censorship.svg|thumb|Map showing the countries that are either currently blocking or have blocked Facebook in the past |
|||
{{legend|#225ea8|Currently blocked}}{{legend|#41b6c4|Formerly blocked}}]] |
|||
In many countries the social networking sites and mobile apps have been blocked temporarily, intermittently, or permanently, including: [[Brazil]],<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wirter |first1=Staff |date=August 5, 2024 |orig-date= |title=Brazil court bans global access to social media accounts |url=https://www.dw.com/en/brazil-top-court-sets-precedent-by-banning-global-access-to-social-media-accounts/a-54452807 |publisher=Deutsche Welle |publication-date=August 5, 2024 |agency= |access-date=August 5, 2024 |url-access= |quote= |trans-quote= }}</ref> [[China]],<ref>{{cite web|first=Robin|last=Wauters|title=China Blocks Access To Twitter, Facebook After Riots|url=https://techcrunch.com/2009/07/07/china-blocks-access-to-twitter-facebook-after-riots/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=July 7, 2009|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> [[Iran]],<ref>{{cite web|title=Iranian government blocks Facebook access|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/may/24/facebook-banned-iran|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=May 24, 2009|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> [[Vietnam]],<ref>{{cite news |title=MAP: Here Are the Countries That Block Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube |url=https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/03/turkey-facebook-youtube-twitter-blocked/ |work=[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]] |date=March 28, 2014}}</ref> [[Pakistan]],<ref>{{cite news |title=Pakistan lifts Facebook ban but 'blasphemous' pages stay hidden |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/31/pakistan-lifts-facebook-ban |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=May 31, 2010}}</ref> [[Syria]],<ref>{{cite news |title=Syria Restores Access to Facebook and YouTube |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/10/world/middleeast/10syria.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110210033047/http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/10/world/middleeast/10syria.html |archive-date=February 10, 2011 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=February 9, 2011}}</ref> and [[North Korea]]. In May 2018, the government of [[Papua New Guinea]] announced that it would ban Facebook for a month while it considered the impact of the website on the country, though no ban has since occurred.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook to be banned in Papua New Guinea for a month|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44290012|website=[[BBC News]]|date=May 29, 2018|access-date=May 30, 2018}}</ref> In 2019, Facebook announced it would start enforcing its ban on users, including [[Influencer|influencers]], promoting any [[Electronic cigarette|vape]], [[tobacco]] products, or [[weapon]]s on its platforms.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/18/tech/instagram-influencers-vaping-guns/index.html|title=Instagram influencers can no longer promote vaping and guns|author=Kaya Yurieff|website=[[CNN]]|date=December 18, 2019|access-date=December 19, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
== Criticisms and controversies == |
|||
Zuckerberg, alongside other Facebook executives, have questioned the data in such reports; although, a former Facebook senior employee has commented: "Mark [Zuckerberg] is very willing to recognize the strengths in other products and the flaws in Facebook."<ref name="Bloom">{{cite web|title=eatures Facebook Turns 10: The Mark Zuckerberg Interview|url=http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-30/facebook-turns-10-the-mark-zuckerberg-interview#p2|work=Bloomberg Businessweek|publisher=Bloomberg L.P|accessdate=January 30, 2014|author=Brad Stone|author2=Sarah Frier|date=January 30, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Criticism of Facebook}} |
|||
{{quote box |width=33% |author={{mdash}}[[Frances Haugen]], condemning lack of transparency around Facebook at a [[Us congress|US congressional hearing]] (2021).<ref>{{cite web |title=Facebook whistleblower hearing: Frances Haugen calls for more regulation of tech giant – live updates |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/live/2021/oct/05/facebook-hearing-whistleblower-frances-haugen-testifies-us-senate-latest-news |archive-url=https://archive.today/20211005200002/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/live/2021/oct/05/facebook-hearing-whistleblower-frances-haugen-testifies-us-senate-latest-news?page=with:block-615c55448f083d2ce2634c5a%23liveblog-navigation |archive-date=October 5, 2021 |date=October 5, 2021 |work=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=October 5, 2021 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
|quote="I'm here today because I believe Facebook's products harm children, stoke division, and weaken our democracy. The company's leadership knows how to make Facebook and Instagram safer, but won't make the necessary changes because they have put their astronomical profits before people." |
|||
}} |
|||
{{quote box |width=33% |author={{mdash}}Mark Zuckerberg, responding to [[Frances Haugen]]'s revelations (2021).<ref>{{cite web |title=Mark Zuckerberg says whistleblower's claims that Facebook places profit over people 'don't make any sense.' Read his full response to the whistleblower's testimony. |date=October 6, 2021 |url=https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-whistleblower-claims-dont-make-sense-2021-10 |via=businessinsider.com |first=Isobel Asher |last=Hamilton}}</ref> |
|||
On pages for brands and products, however, some companies have reported CTR as high as 6.49% for Wall posts.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate= July 18, 2010 |url= http://adage.com/digitalnext/post?article_id=138442 |title=Facebook's Click-Through Rates Flourish ... for Wall Posts |work=Advertising Age |location =New York |date=August 13, 2009 |author=Klaassen, Abbey}}</ref> A study found that, for video advertisements on Facebook, over 40% of users who viewed the videos viewed the entire video, while the industry average was 25% for in-banner video ads.<ref>{{cite news |accessdate=July 18, 2010 |url=http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=130217 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110916061802/http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=130217 |archivedate=January 5, 2015 |title=Study: Video Ads On Facebook More Engaging Than Outside Sites |work= MediaPost |location =New York |date=June 15, 2010 |author=Walsh |first=Mark}}</ref> |
|||
|quote="I don't believe private companies should make all of the decisions on their own. That's why we have advocated for updated internet regulations for several years now. I have testified in Congress multiple times and asked them to update these regulations. I've written op-eds outlining the areas of regulation we think are most important related to elections, harmful content, privacy, and competition."}} |
|||
Facebook's importance and scale has led to criticisms in many domains. Issues include [[Internet privacy]], excessive retention of user information,<ref>{{cite news|first=Maria|last=Aspen|title=How Sticky Is Membership on Facebook? Just Try Breaking Free|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/technology/11facebook.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080212190105/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/technology/11facebook.html |archive-date=February 12, 2008 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|website=[[The New York Times]]|date=February 11, 2008|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> its [[Facial recognition system|facial recognition]] software, [[DeepFace]]<ref>{{cite news|first=Sebastian|last=Anthony|title=Facebook's facial recognition software is now as accurate as the human brain, but what now?|url=http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/178777-facebooks-facial-recognition-software-is-now-as-accurate-as-the-human-brain-but-what-now|website=[[ExtremeTech]]|publisher=Ziff Davis|date=March 19, 2014|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Liz|last=Gannes|title=Facebook facial recognition prompts EU privacy probe|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-facial-recognition-prompts-eu-privacy-probe/|website=[[CNET]]|publisher=CBS Interactive|date=June 8, 2011|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> its addictive quality<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/billrobinson/facebook-the-worlds-bigge_b_4585457.html|title=Facebook: The World's Biggest Waste of Time?|last=Robinson|first=Bill|date=February 10, 2014|work=[[HuffPost]]|access-date=March 3, 2018}}</ref> and its role in the workplace, including employer access to employee accounts.<ref>{{cite web|first=Matt|last=Friedman|title=Bill to ban companies from asking about job candidates' Facebook accounts is headed to governor|url=http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/03/bill_to_ban_companies_from_req.html|website=[[NJ.com]]|publisher=[[Advance Digital]]|date=March 21, 2013|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
The company released its own set of revenue data at the end of January 2014 and claimed: Revenues of US$2.59 billion were generated for the three months ending December 31, 2013; earnings per share were 31 cents; revenues of US$7.87 billion were made for the entirety of 2013; and Facebook's annual profit for 2013 was US$1.5 billion. During the same time, independent market research firm [[eMarketer]] released data in which Facebook accounted for 5.7 per cent of all global digital ad revenues in 2013 (Google's share was 32.4 per cent).<ref name="Rush" /> Revenue for the June 2014 quarter rose to $2.68 billion, an increase of 67 per cent over the second quarter of 2013. Mobile advertising revenue accounted for around 62 per cent of advertising revenue, an increase of approximately 41 per cent over the comparable quarter of the previous year. |
|||
Facebook has been criticized for electricity usage,<ref>{{cite web|first=Robin|last=Wauters|title=Greenpeace Slams Zuckerberg For Making Facebook A "So Coal Network" (Video)|url=https://techcrunch.com/2010/09/16/greenpeace-slams-zuckerberg-for-making-facebook-a-so-coal-network-video/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=September 16, 2010|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> tax avoidance,<ref>{{cite web|first=Rupert|last=Neate|title=Facebook paid £2.9m tax on £840m profits made outside US, figures show|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/dec/23/facebook-tax-profits-outside-us|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=December 23, 2012|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> real-name user requirement policies,<ref>{{cite web|first=Emanuella|last=Grinberg|title=Facebook 'real name' policy stirs questions around identity|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/16/living/facebook-name-policy|website=[[CNN]]|date=September 18, 2014|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> censorship<ref>{{cite web|first=Vidhi|last=Doshi|title=Facebook under fire for 'censoring' Kashmir-related posts and accounts|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/19/facebook-under-fire-censoring-kashmir-posts-accounts|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=July 19, 2016|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Michael|last=Arrington|author-link=Michael Arrington|title=Is Facebook Really Censoring Search When It Suits Them?|url=https://techcrunch.com/2007/11/22/is-facebook-really-censoring-search-when-it-suits-them/|website=[[TechCrunch]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=November 22, 2007|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> and its involvement in the United States [[PRISM (surveillance program)|PRISM surveillance program]].<ref>{{cite web|first1=Glenn|last1=Greenwald|first2=Ewen|last2=MacAskill|title=NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=June 7, 2013|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> According to ''[[The Express Tribune]]'', Facebook "avoided billions of dollars in tax using offshore companies".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://tribune.com.pk/story/1550750/3-paradise-papers-reveal-hidden-wealth-global-elite/|title=Paradise Papers reveal hidden wealth of global elite|date=November 6, 2017|work=[[The Express Tribune]]}}</ref> |
|||
====Number of advertisers==== |
|||
In February 2015, Facebook announced that it has reached two million active advertisers with most of the gain coming from small businesses. An active advitiser is an advertiser that has advertised on the Facebook platform in the last 28 days.<ref>{{cite news |last=Meola |first=Andrew |url=http://www.thestreet.com/story/13056913/1/facebook-fb-stock-falls-today-despite-two-million-active-advertiser-announcement.html |title=Active, in this case, means the advertiser has advertised on the site in the last 28 days. |work=TheStreet |publisher=TheStreet, Inc. |date=February 24, 2015 |accessdate=February 25, 2015 }}</ref> |
|||
Facebook is alleged to have harmful psychological effects on its users, including feelings of jealousy<ref>{{cite web|title=How Facebook Breeds Jealousy|url=https://www.seeker.com/how-facebook-breeds-jealousy-1765020296.html|website=[[Seeker (media company)|Seeker]]|publisher=[[Group Nine Media]]|date=February 10, 2010|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Chris|last=Matyszczyk|title=Study: Facebook makes lovers jealous|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/study-facebook-makes-lovers-jealous/|website=[[CNET]]|publisher=CBS Interactive|date=August 11, 2009|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> and stress,<ref>{{cite web|first=Chenda|last=Ngak|title=Facebook may cause stress, study says|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-may-cause-stress-study-says/|website=[[CBS News]]|publisher=[[CBS]]|date=November 27, 2012|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Dave|last=Smith|title=Quitting Facebook will make you happier and less stressed, study says|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/quitting-facebook-will-make-you-happier-and-less-stressed-study-2015-11|website=[[Business Insider]]|publisher=Axel Springer SE|date=November 13, 2015|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> a lack of attention<ref>{{cite web|first=Michael J.|last=Bugeja|title=Facing the Facebook|url=http://chronicle.com/jobs/news/2006/01/2006012301c/careers.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080220193743/http://chronicle.com/jobs/news/2006/01/2006012301c/careers.html|website=[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]]|date=January 23, 2006|archive-date=February 20, 2008|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> and [[social media addiction]].<ref>{{cite news|first=Andrew|last=Hough|title=Student 'addiction' to technology 'similar to drug cravings', study finds|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8436831/Student-addiction-to-technology-similar-to-drug-cravings-study-finds.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8436831/Student-addiction-to-technology-similar-to-drug-cravings-study-finds.html |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|website=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]|date=April 8, 2011|access-date=June 3, 2017}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook and Twitter 'more addictive than tobacco and alcohol'|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9054243/Facebook-and-Twitter-more-addictive-than-tobacco-and-alcohol.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150216152536/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9054243/Facebook-and-Twitter-more-addictive-than-tobacco-and-alcohol.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=February 16, 2015|website=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]|date=February 1, 2012|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> According to Kaufmann et al., mothers' motivations for using social media are often related to their social and mental health.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kaufmann |first1=Renee |last2=Buckner |first2=Marjorie M. |last3=Ledbetter |first3=Andrew M. |date=August 3, 2017 |title=Having Fun on Facebook?: Mothers' Enjoyment as a Moderator of Mental Health and Facebook Use |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10410236.2016.1196513 |journal=Health Communication |language=en |volume=32 |issue=8 |pages=1014–1023 |doi=10.1080/10410236.2016.1196513 |pmid=27463860 |s2cid=25726659 |issn=1041-0236|url-access=subscription }}</ref> European antitrust regulator [[Margrethe Vestager]] stated that Facebook's terms of service relating to private data were "unbalanced".<ref>{{cite magazine|first=Evan|last=Osnos|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/09/17/can-mark-zuckerberg-fix-facebook-before-it-breaks-democracy|title=Can Mark Zuckerberg Fix Facebook Before It Breaks Democracy?|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]|date=September 17, 2018<!--Issue yes, after the actual date of access-->|access-date=September 15, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
===Stock history=== |
|||
[[File:Chart of Facebook, inc. Stock.png|thumb|right|Chart of Facebook's Stock]] |
|||
* All-time closing high: US$81.89 on December 22, 2014 |
|||
* All-time intra-day high: US$82.17 on December 23, 2014 |
|||
Facebook has been criticized for allowing users to publish illegal or offensive material. Specifics include [[copyright]] and [[intellectual property]] infringement,<ref>{{cite web|first=Ariha|last=Setalvad|title=Why Facebook's video theft problem can't last|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/8/7/9114149/facebook-freebooting-video-copyright-infringement|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=August 7, 2015|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> [[hate speech]],<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook, Twitter and Google grilled by MPs over hate speech|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-39272261|website=[[BBC News]]|date=March 14, 2017|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Amar|last=Toor|title=Facebook will work with Germany to combat anti-refugee hate speech|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/9/15/9329119/facebook-germany-hate-speech-xenophobia-migrant-refugee|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=September 15, 2015|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> incitement of rape<ref>{{cite news|first=Philip|last=Sherwell|title=Cyber anarchists blamed for unleashing a series of Facebook 'rape pages'|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8829165/Cyber-anarchists-blamed-for-unleashing-a-series-of-Facebook-rape-pages.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8829165/Cyber-anarchists-blamed-for-unleashing-a-series-of-Facebook-rape-pages.html |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|website=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]|date=October 16, 2011|access-date=June 3, 2017}}{{cbignore}}</ref> and terrorism,<ref>{{cite web|title=20,000 Israelis sue Facebook for ignoring Palestinian incitement|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/20000-israelis-sue-facebook-for-ignoring-palestinian-incitement/|website=[[The Times of Israel]]|date=October 27, 2015|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Israel: Facebook's Zuckerberg has blood of slain Israeli teen on his hands|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-facebooks-zuckerberg-has-blood-of-slain-israeli-teen-on-his-hands/|website=[[The Times of Israel]]|date=July 2, 2016|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> [[fake news]],<ref>{{cite web|first=Samuel|last=Burke|title=Zuckerberg: Facebook will develop tools to fight fake news|url=https://money.cnn.com/2016/11/19/technology/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-fake-news-election/|website=[[CNN]]|date=November 19, 2016|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Hillary Clinton says Facebook 'must prevent fake news from creating a new reality'|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/05/31/hillary-clinton-says-facebook-must-prevent-fake-news-creating/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/05/31/hillary-clinton-says-facebook-must-prevent-fake-news-creating/ |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|newspaper=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]|date=June 1, 2017|access-date=June 3, 2017|last=Staff|first=Our Foreign }}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Seth|last=Fiegerman|title=Facebook's global fight against fake news|url=https://money.cnn.com/2017/05/09/technology/facebook-fake-news/index.html|website=[[CNN]]|date=May 9, 2017|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> and crimes, murders, and livestreaming violent incidents.<ref>{{cite web|first1=Emanuella|last1=Grinberg|first2=Samira|last2=Said|title=Police: At least 40 people watched teen's sexual assault on Facebook Live|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/21/us/facebook-live-gang-rape-chicago|website=[[CNN]]|date=March 22, 2017|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Emanuella|last=Grinberg|title=Chicago torture: Facebook Live video leads to 4 arrests|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/04/us/chicago-facebook-live-beating|website=[[CNN]]|date=January 5, 2017|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Aatif|last=Sulleyman|title=Facebook Live killings: Why the criticism has been harsh|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/facebook-live-killings-ai-artificial-intelligence-not-blame-fatalities-murders-us-steve-stephens-a7706056.html|website=[[The Independent]]|date=April 27, 2017|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> Commentators have accused Facebook of willingly facilitating the spread of such content.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newsweek.com/facebook-spreads-viral-fake-news-story-about-vaccines-791331|title=Facebook Spreads Viral Fake News Story About Vaccines|first=Kastalia|last=Medrano|website=[[Newsweek]]|date=January 25, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44809815|title=Facebook will not remove fake news – but will 'demote' it|work=[[BBC News]]|date=July 13, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2019/forget-fake-news-stories-false-text-posts-are-getting-massive-engagement-on-facebook/|title=Forget fake news stories. False text posts are getting massive engagement on Facebook.|first=Daniel|last=Funke|website=[[Poynter Institute|Ponyter]]|date=March 6, 2019}}</ref> [[Sri Lanka]] blocked both Facebook and WhatsApp in May 2019 after [[2019 anti-Muslim riots in Sri Lanka|anti-Muslim riots]], the worst in the country since the [[2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings|Easter Sunday bombing]] in the same year as a temporary measure to maintain peace in Sri Lanka.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/south-asia/sri-lanka-imposes-nationwide-curfew-after-anti-muslim-riots/articleshow/69311594.cms|title=Sri Lanka Riots: Sri Lanka imposes nationwide curfew after anti-Muslim riots |newspaper=Times of India|date=May 13, 2019 |agency=[[Reuters]]|access-date=May 14, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thenational.ae/world/asia/sri-lanka-blocks-social-media-after-worst-anti-muslim-violence-since-easter-sunday-attacks-1.860859|title=Sri Lanka blocks social media after worst anti-Muslim violence since Easter Sunday attacks|website=The National|date=May 13, 2019|access-date=May 14, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
===Mergers and acquisitions=== |
|||
Facebook removed 3 billion fake accounts only during the last quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019;<ref name="Sullivan">{{cite news|url=https://www.fastcompany.com/90354777/facebooks-active-user-problem-how-many-maus-are-fake|title=Facebook catches 3 billion fake accounts, but the ones it misses are the real problem|last=Sullivan|first=Mark|website=Fast Company|date=May 23, 2019}}</ref> in comparison, the social network reports 2.39 billion monthly active users.<ref name="Sullivan" /> |
|||
{{Main|List of acquisitions by Facebook}} |
|||
On November 15, 2010, Facebook announced it had acquired the domain name fb.com from the [[American Farm Bureau Federation]] for an undisclosed amount. On January 11, 2011, the Farm Bureau disclosed $8.5 million in "domain sales income", making the acquisition of FB.com one of the ten highest domain sales in history.<ref>{{cite news |title=FB.com acquired by Facebook |url=http://namemon.com/news/1-latest-news/115-fbcom-acquired-by-facebook |date=January 11, 2011 |work=NameMon News}}</ref> |
|||
In late July 2019, the company announced it was under [[antitrust]] investigation by the [[Federal Trade Commission]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Cox|first=Kate|title=The FTC is investigating Facebook. Again|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/07/facebook-faces-new-anti-competition-investigation-as-privacy-probe-is-settled/|website=ars Technica|date=July 25, 2019|access-date=August 11, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
===Offices=== |
|||
In early 2011, Facebook announced plans to move to its new headquarters, the former Sun Microsystems campus in Menlo Park.<ref>{{cite web|author=Laird, Sam|url=http://mashable.com/2011/12/19/facebook-completes-move-into-new-menlo-park-headquarters/ |title=Facebook Completes Move Into New Menlo Park Headquarters |publisher=Mashable.com |date=December 19, 2011 |accessdate=August 4, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
The consumer advocacy group, Which?, claims that individuals are still utilizing Facebook to set up fraudulent five-star ratings for various products. The group has identified 14 communities that exchange reviews for either money or complimentary items such as watches, earbuds, and sprinklers.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-65336369 |title=Facebook still being used to arrange fake reviews – Which? |work=[[BBC News]]}}</ref> |
|||
All users outside of the US and Canada have a contract with Facebook's Irish subsidiary "Facebook Ireland Limited". This allows Facebook to avoid US taxes for all users in Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa and South America. Facebook is making use of the [[Double Irish arrangement]] which allows it to pay just about 2-3% corporation tax on all international revenue.<ref name="bloom2010">{{cite news |
|||
|url= http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-21/google-2-4-rate-shows-how-60-billion-u-s-revenue-lost-to-tax-loopholes.html/ |
|||
=== Privacy === |
|||
|title=Google 2.4% Rate Shows How $60 Billion Lost to Tax Loopholes |
|||
{{Main|Privacy concerns with Facebook}} |
|||
|work=Bloomberg |
|||
{{See also|Privacy concerns with social networking services#Facebook}} |
|||
|publisher=Bloomberg.com |
|||
Facebook has experienced a steady stream of controversies over how it handles user privacy, repeatedly adjusting its privacy settings and policies.<ref name="Ingram-2018">{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-privacy-idUSKBN1H41KV|title=Facebook cuts ties to data brokers in blow to targeted ads|last1=Ingram|first1=David|date=March 29, 2018|work=[[Reuters]]|access-date=February 5, 2019|last2=Fioretti|first2=Julia}}</ref> |
|||
|accessdate= |
|||
|first=Jesse |
|||
Since 2009, Facebook has been participating in the PRISM secret program, sharing with the US [[National Security Agency]] audio, video, photographs, e-mails, documents and connection logs from user profiles, among other social media services.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/30/us/nsa-social-networks/index.html|title=NSA mines Facebook, including Americans' profiles|last1=Simpson|first1=David|date=September 30, 2013|work=[[CNN]]|access-date=September 30, 2013|last2=Brown|first2=Pamela}}</ref><ref name="usa1">{{cite news |author1=Johnson, Kevin |author2=Martin, Scott |author3=O'Donnell, Jayne |author4=Winter, Michael |date=June 15, 2013 |title=Reports: NSA Siphons Data from 9 Major Net Firms |work=[[USA Today]] |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/06/06/nsa-surveillance-internet-companies/2398345/ |url-status=live |access-date=June 6, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130607113440/http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/06/06/nsa-surveillance-internet-companies/2398345/ |archive-date=June 7, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
|last=Drucker |
|||
|date=October 21, 2010 |
|||
On November 29, 2011, Facebook settled [[Federal Trade Commission]] charges that it deceived consumers by failing to keep privacy promises.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/11/privacysettlement.shtm|title=Facebook Settles FTC Charges That It Deceived Consumers By Failing To Keep Privacy Promises|date=November 29, 2011|work=[[Federal Trade Commission|FTC]]|access-date=November 29, 2011}}</ref> In August 2013 [[High-Tech Bridge]] published a study showing that links included in Facebook messaging service messages were being accessed by Facebook.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.htbridge.com/news/social_networks_can_robots_violate_user_privacy.html|title=Social networks: can robots violate user privacy?|date=August 27, 2013|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130903073506/https://www.htbridge.com/news/social_networks_can_robots_violate_user_privacy.html|archive-date=September 3, 2013|url-status=dead|access-date=January 5, 2014}}</ref> In January 2014 two users filed a lawsuit against Facebook alleging that their privacy had been violated by this practice.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-sued-for-allegedly-intercepting-private-messages/|title=Facebook sued for allegedly intercepting private messages|last=Van Grove|first=Jennifer|date=January 2, 2014|website=[[CNet]]|publisher=CBS Interactive|access-date=March 16, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
On June 7, 2018, Facebook announced that a bug had resulted in about 14 million Facebook users having their default sharing setting for all new posts set to "public".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://money.cnn.com/2018/06/07/technology/facebook-public-post-error/index.html|title=Facebook bug set 14 million users' sharing settings to public|date=June 7, 2018|access-date=June 7, 2018}}</ref> Its data-sharing agreement with Chinese companies such as [[Huawei]] came under the scrutiny of US lawmakers, although the information accessed was not stored on Huawei servers and remained on users' phones.<ref>{{cite news |title=Facebook confirms data-sharing agreements with Chinese firms |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-44379593 |date=6 June 2018}}</ref> |
|||
On April 4, 2019, half a billion records of Facebook users were found exposed on [[Amazon (company)|Amazon]] cloud servers, containing information about users' friends, likes, groups, and checked-in locations, as well as names, passwords and email addresses.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://hackhex.com/security/millions-of-facebook-records-found-on-amazon-servers-5173.html|title=Millions of Facebook Records Found On Amazon Servers|date=April 4, 2019|website=Hack Hex|access-date=June 4, 2019|archive-date=June 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190604144710/https://hackhex.com/security/millions-of-facebook-records-found-on-amazon-servers-5173.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
The phone numbers of at least 200 million Facebook users were found to be exposed on an open online database in September 2019. They included 133 million US users, 18 million from the UK, and 50 million from users in [[Vietnam]]. After removing duplicates, the 419 million records have been reduced to 219 million. The database went offline after TechCrunch contacted the web host. It is thought the records were amassed using a tool that Facebook disabled in April 2018 after the [[Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal|Cambridge Analytica]] controversy. A Facebook spokeswoman said in a statement: "The dataset is old and appears to have information obtained before we made changes last year...There is no evidence that Facebook accounts were compromised."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/04/facebook-users-phone-numbers-privacy-lapse|title=Facebook confirms 419 m phone numbers exposed in latest privacy lapse|date=September 5, 2019|website=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=September 7, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook's privacy problems resulted in companies like [[Viber|Viber Media]] and [[Mozilla]] discontinuing advertising on Facebook's platforms.<ref>{{cite news |
|||
| last = Reaz |
|||
| first = Shaer |
|||
| date = August 28, 2020 |
|||
| title = Cutting ties with a giant: Viber CEO on Facebook relations and #StopHateForProfit |
|||
| url = https://www.thedailystar.net/bytes/news/cutting-ties-giant-viber-ceo-facbook-relations-and-stophateforprofit-1952021 |
|||
| work = [[The Daily Star (Bangladesh)|The Daily Star]] |
|||
| access-date = September 27, 2020 |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2020/06/24/were-proud-to-join-stophateforprofit/ |
|||
|title=We're proud to join #StopHateForProfit |
|||
|date=June 24, 2020 |
|||
|website=[[Mozilla Corporation]] |
|||
|publisher=[[Mozilla Foundation]] |
|||
|access-date=September 27, 2020 |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
A January 2024 study by [[Consumer Reports]] found that among a self-selected group of volunteer participants, each user is monitored or tracked by over two thousand companies on average. [[LiveRamp]], a San Francisco-based data broker, is responsible for 96 per cent of the data. Other companies such as [[Home Depot]], [[Macy's]], and [[Walmart]] are involved as well.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Keegan |first1=Jon |title=Each Facebook User Is Monitored by Thousands of Companies |url=https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics/privacy/each-facebook-user-is-monitored-by-thousands-of-companies-a5824207467/ |website=Consumer Reports |date=January 17, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
In 2010, Facebook opened its fourth office, in [[Hyderabad, India|Hyderabad]]<ref>{{cite news|author=PTI |url=http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/internet/article804734.ece?homepage=true/ |title=Facebook opens office in India |work=The Hindu |date=September 30, 2010 |accessdate= May 5, 2012 |location=Chennai, India}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/young-business-leaders-kirthiga-reddy-facebook/1/15083.html/ |title=Kirthiga Reddy: The face behind Facebook |publisher=Businesstoday.intoday.in |date=May 15, 2011 |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Nikhil Pahwa |url=http://www.medianama.com/2010/07/223-facebook-appoints-kirthiga-reddy-as-head-of-indian-operations/ |title=Facebook Appoints Kirthiga Reddy As Head Of Indian Operations |publisher=Medianama.com |date=July 16, 2010 |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref> and the first in [[Asia]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Facebook's India face-Meet Kirthiga Reddy, Head and Director Online Operations, Facebook India. |url=http://lifestyle.in.msn.com/exclusives/it/article.aspx?cp-documentid=5592317 |date=November 14, 2011 |work=MSN India}}</ref> |
|||
In March 2024, a court in California released documents detailing Facebook's 2016 "Project Ghostbusters". The project was aimed at helping Facebook compete with [[Snapchat]] and involved Facebook trying to develop decryption tools to collect, decrypt, and analyze traffic that users generated when visiting Snapchat and, eventually, YouTube and Amazon. The company eventually used its tool [[Onavo]] to initiate man-in-the-middle attacks and read users' traffic before it was encrypted.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Franceschi-Bicchierai |first1=Lorenzo |title=Facebook snooped on users' Snapchat traffic in secret project, documents reveal |url=https://techcrunch.com/2024/03/26/facebook-secret-project-snooped-snapchat-user-traffic/ |website=TechCrunch |access-date=March 26, 2024 |date=March 26, 2024}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook, which in 2010 had more than 750 million active users globally including over 23 million in India, announced that its [[Hyderabad, India|Hyderabad]] center would house online advertising and developer support teams and provide round-the-clock, multilingual support to the social networking site's users and advertisers globally.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.watblog.com/2010/08/30/facebooks-hyderabad-office-inaugurated-google-vs-facebook-battle-india/ |title=Facebook's Hyderabad Office Inaugurated – Google vs Facebook Battle Comes To India |publisher=Watblog.com |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref> With this, Facebook joins other giants like [[Google]], [[Microsoft]], [[Oracle Corporation|Oracle]], [[Dell]], [[IBM]] and Computer Associates that have already set up shop.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-19/hyderabad/31076680_1_hyderabad-headcount-deloitte-amazon/ |title=City back as investors' top pick |publisher=Articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com |date=February 19, 2012 |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref> In Hyderabad, it is registered as 'Facebook India Online Services Pvt Ltd'.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-02-29/news/31110820_1_fatwaonline-internet-users-objectionable-content/ |title=Not responsible for user-generated content hosted on website: Facebook India |publisher=Articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com |date=February 29, 2012 |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref><ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Facebook-India-to-court-Not-responsible-for-user-generated-content/articleshow/12080208.cms?prtpage=1/ Facebook India to court: Not responsible for user-generated content]{{dead link|date=May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://m.timesofindia.com/PDATOI/articleshow/12080208.cms/ |title=Facebook India to court: Not responsible for user-generated content |publisher=M.timesofindia.com |date=February 29, 2012 |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
==== Racial bias ==== |
|||
Though Facebook did not specify its India investment or hiring figures, it said recruitment had already begun for a director of operations and other key positions at Hyderabad,<ref>[https://www.facebook.com/careers/department.php?dept=hyderabad Hyderabad, India]{{dead link|date=January 2014}}: "At the tech epicenter of India, our Hyderabad office is where we help support the region's growing users base, advertisers, and developers."</ref> which would supplement its operations in [[California]], [[Dublin]] in [[Republic of Ireland|Ireland]] as well as at [[Austin]], [[Texas]]. |
|||
Facebook was accused of committing "systemic" racial bias by EEOC based on the complaints of three rejected candidates and a current employee of the company. The three rejected employees along with the Operational Manager at Facebook as of March 2021 accused the firm of discriminating against Black people. The EEOC has initiated an investigation into the case.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/mar/05/facebook-systemic-racial-bias-hiring-eeoc-investigation|title=Facebook faces US investigation for 'systemic' racial bias in hiring|access-date=March 6, 2021|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=March 6, 2021}}</ref> |
|||
A custom-built [[data center]] with substantially reduced ("38% less") [[IT energy management#Server and data center power management|power consumption]] compared to existing Facebook data centers opened in April 2011 in [[Prineville, Oregon]].<ref>{{cite news |accessdate=April 16, 2011 |date=April 16, 2011 |title=Zuckerberg at Ore. Facebook data center |agency=Associated Press |
|||
|url=http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2011/04/16/zuckerberg_at_ore_facebook_data_center/ |newspaper=''[[The Boston Globe]]'' |deadurl=yes}} {{Dead link|date=April 2014|bot=RjwilmsiBot}}</ref> In April 2012, Facebook opened a second data center in [[Forest City, North Carolina]], US.<ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook Building $450M North Carolina Data Center|url=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2372572,00.asp|work=PC Mag|publisher=Ziff Davis|accessdate=September 8, 2013|author=Chloe Albanesius|date=November 11, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
==== Shadow profiles ==== |
|||
On October 1, 2012, CEO Zuckerberg visited Moscow to stimulate social media innovation in Russia and to boost Facebook's position in the Russian market.<ref>{{cite web |title=Zuckerberg in Moscow to boost Facebook's presence |url=http://www.france24.com/en/20121001-zuckerberg-moscow-boost-facebooks-presence-0 |publisher=France24.com | date=October 1, 2012}}{{dead link|date=January 2014}}</ref> Russia's communications minister tweeted that Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev urged the social media giant's founder to abandon plans to lure away Russian programmers and instead consider opening a research center in Moscow. Facebook has roughly 9 million users in Russia, while [[VK (social network)|domestic analogue VK]] has around 34 million.<ref>{{cite news |title=Russia pushes Facebook to open research center |url=http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2012/10/01/russia-pushes-facebook-to-open-research-center/ |publisher=FoxNews |date=October 1, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
A "[[shadow profile]]" refers to the data Facebook collects about individuals without their explicit permission. For example, the [[Facebook like button#Tracking|"like" button]] that appears on third-party websites allows the company to collect information about an individual's internet browsing habits, even if the individual is not a Facebook user.<ref name="verge shadow profiles">{{cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/11/17225482/facebook-shadow-profiles-zuckerberg-congress-data-privacy|title=Shadow profiles are the biggest flaw in Facebook's privacy defense|last=Brandom|first=Russell|date=April 11, 2018|website=[[The Verge]]|access-date=June 28, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=How Facebook can have your data even if you're not on Facebook|work=[[USA Today]]|access-date=April 13, 2018|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/baig/2018/04/13/how-facebook-can-have-your-data-even-if-youre-not-facebook/512674002/}}</ref> Data can also be collected by other users. For example, a Facebook user can link their email account to their Facebook to find friends on the site, allowing the company to collect the email addresses of users and non-users alike.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://gizmodo.com/how-facebook-figures-out-everyone-youve-ever-met-1819822691|title=How Facebook Figures Out Everyone You've Ever Met|last=Hill|first=Kashmir|date=November 7, 2017|website=[[Gizmodo]]|access-date=June 28, 2019}}</ref> Over time, countless data points about an individual are collected; any single data point perhaps cannot identify an individual, but together allows the company to form a unique "profile". |
|||
This practice has been criticized by those who believe people should be able to opt-out of involuntary data collection. Additionally, while Facebook users have the ability to download and inspect the data they provide to the site, data from the user's "shadow profile" is not included, and non-users of Facebook do not have access to this tool regardless. The company has also been unclear whether or not it is possible for a person to revoke Facebook's access to their "shadow profile".<ref name="verge shadow profiles" /> |
|||
The functioning of a woodwork facility on the Menlo Park campus was announced at the end of August 2013. The facility, opened in June 2013, provides equipment, safety courses and woodwork learning course, while employees are required to purchase materials at the in-house store. A Facebook spokesperson explained that the intention of the facility is to encourage employees to think in an innovative manner because of the different environment, and also serves as an attractive perk for prospective employees.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook tells employees, 'build something' -- with a table saw|url=http://www.techhive.com/article/2047898/facebook-tells-employees-build-something-with-a-table-saw.html#tk.nl_thbest|work=TechHive|publisher=IDG Consumer & SMB|accessdate=September 8, 2013|author=Zach Miners|date=August 30, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
==== Cambridge Analytica ==== |
|||
<gallery style="float:left; margin:0em 0.5em 0em 0em;" widths="275" heights="150"> |
|||
{{Main|Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal}} |
|||
1601californiaavelobby.jpg|Entrance to Facebook's previous headquarters in the [[Stanford Research Park]], [[Palo Alto, California|Palo Alto]], [[California]] |
|||
Facebook customer Global Science Research sold information on over 87 million Facebook users to Cambridge Analytica, a political data analysis firm led by [[Alexander Nix]].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Lewis|first1=Paul|last2=Wong|first2=Julia Carrie|title=Facebook employs psychologist whose firm sold data to Cambridge Analytica|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=March 20, 2018|date=March 18, 2018|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/18/facebook-cambridge-analytica-joseph-chancellor-gsr}}</ref> While approximately 270,000 people used the app, Facebook's [[Application programming interface|API]] permitted data collection from their friends without their knowledge.<ref>{{cite web|last=Franceschi-Bicchierai|first=Lorenzo|title=Why We're Not Calling the Cambridge Analytica Story a 'Data Breach'|work=Motherboard|access-date=March 20, 2018|date=March 19, 2018|url=https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3kjzvk/facebook-cambridge-analytica-not-a-data-breach}}</ref> At first Facebook downplayed the significance of the breach, and suggested that Cambridge Analytica no longer had access. Facebook then issued a statement expressing alarm and suspended Cambridge Analytica. Review of documents and interviews with former Facebook employees suggested that Cambridge Analytica still possessed the data.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html|title=How Trump Consultants Exploited the Facebook Data of Millions|first1=Matthew|last1=Rosenberg|first2=Nicholas|last2=Confessore|first3=Carole|last3=Cadwalladr|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=March 17, 2018}}</ref> This was a violation of Facebook's [[consent decree]] with the [[Federal Trade Commission]]. This violation potentially carried a penalty of $40,000 (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|40000|2018}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) per occurrence, totalling trillions of dollars.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/18/facebook-may-have-violated-ftc-privacy-deal-say-former-federal-officials-triggering-risk-of-massive-fines/|title=Facebook may have violated FTC privacy deal, say former federal officials, triggering risk of massive fines|last1=Timberg|first1=Craig|date=March 18, 2018|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=March 25, 2018|last2=Romm|first2=Tony|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
<gallery style="float:left; margin:0em 0.5em 0em 0em;" widths="225" heights="150"> |
|||
Facebook Headquarters 1 Hacker Way Menlo Park.jpg|Entrance to Facebook headquarters complex in [[Menlo Park, California]] |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
<gallery style="float:left; margin:0em 0.5em 0em 0em;" widths="550" heights="150"> |
|||
Inside the Facebook campus.jpg|Inside the Facebook headquarters in 2014 |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
{{-}} |
|||
According to ''The Guardian'', both Facebook and Cambridge Analytica threatened to sue the newspaper if it published the story. After publication, Facebook claimed that it had been "lied to". On March 23, 2018, The [[High Court of Justice|English High Court]] granted an application by the [[Information Commissioner's Office]] for a warrant to search Cambridge Analytica's London offices, ending a standoff between Facebook and the Information Commissioner over responsibility.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/23/uk-high-court-grants-cambridge-analytica-search-warrant-to-ico.html|title=UK High Court grants Cambridge Analytica search warrant to ICO|date=March 23, 2018|work=[[CNBC]]|access-date=March 23, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180323222219/https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/23/uk-high-court-grants-cambridge-analytica-search-warrant-to-ico.html|archive-date=March 23, 2018|url-status=dead }}</ref> |
|||
===Open source contributions=== |
|||
Facebook is both a consumer of and contributor to [[Free and open-source software|free and open source software]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.developer.com/features/article.php/3894566/Inside-Facebooks-Open-Source-Infrastructure.htm |title=Inside Facebook's Open Source Infrastructure |publisher=Developer.com |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref> Facebook's contributions include: [[HipHop for PHP]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee380/Abstracts/100505.html |title=HipHop Compiler for PHP? Transforming PHP into C++ |publisher = [[Stanford University]]}}</ref> Fair scheduler in [[Apache Hadoop]],<ref>{{cite book |last=White |first=Tom |title=Hadoop: The Definitive Guide |publisher=[[O'Reilly Media]] |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-4493-8973-4}}</ref> [[Apache Hive]], [[Apache Cassandra]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cs.cornell.edu/projects/ladis2009/papers/lakshman-ladis2009.pdf |title=Cassandra - A Decentralized Structured Storage System |format=PDF |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref> and the [[Open Compute Project]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee380/Abstracts/120215.html |title=Facebook's Open Compute Project |publisher = [[Stanford University]]}}</ref> |
|||
On March 25, Facebook published a statement by Zuckerberg in major UK and US newspapers apologizing over a "breach of trust".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43532948|title=Facebook boss apologises in newspaper ads|date=March 25, 2018|work=[[BBC News]]|access-date=March 25, 2018 }}</ref> |
|||
Facebook also contributes to other opensource projects such as [[Oracle Corporation|Oracle]]'s [[MySQL]] database engine.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/MySQLatFacebook |title=MySQL at Facebook (Maintained by software developers who work on MySQL at Facebook) |publisher=Facebook.com |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://launchpad.net/mysqlatfacebook |title=MySQL at Facebook |publisher=Launchpad.net |accessdate= May 5, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
{{blockquote|You may have heard about a quiz app built by a university researcher that leaked Facebook data of millions of people in 2014. This was a breach of trust, and I'm sorry we didn't do more at the time. We're now taking steps to make sure this doesn't happen again. |
|||
==Website== |
|||
{{Main|Facebook features|Facebook Platform}} |
|||
[[File:Original-facebook.jpg|thumb|Profile shown on Thefacebook in 2005]] |
|||
We've already stopped apps like this from getting so much information. Now we're limiting the data apps get when you sign in using Facebook. |
|||
===Technical aspects=== |
|||
The website's primary color is blue as Zuckerberg is [[Red–green color blindness|red-green colorblind]], a realization that occurred after a test undertaken around 2007; he explained in 2010: "blue is the richest color for me—I can see all of blue."<ref>{{cite web|title=Generation Why?|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/nov/25/generation-why/?pagination=false|work=The New York Review of Books|publisher=NYREV, Inc|accessdate=February 15, 2014|author=Zadie Smith|date=November 25, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=LETTER FROM PALO ALTO: THE FACE OF FACEBOOK|url=http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/09/20/100920fa_fact_vargas?currentPage=all|work=The New Yorker|publisher=Condé Nast|accessdate=February 15, 2014|author=Jose Antonio Vargas|date=September 20, 2010}}</ref> Facebook is built in [[PHP]] which is compiled with [[HipHop for PHP]], a 'source code transformer' built by Facebook engineers that turns PHP into [[C++]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Developer Blog - HipHop for PHP: Move Fast|url=https://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/2010/02/02/hiphop-for-php--move-fast/|work=Facebook Developers|publisher=Facebook|accessdate=November 11, 2013|author=Haiping Zhao|date=February 2, 2010}}</ref> The deployment of HipHop reportedly reduced average CPU consumption on Facebook servers by 50%.<ref name="arstechnica">{{cite web|last=Paul|first=Ryan|title=Exclusive: a behind-the-scenes look at Facebook release engineering|url=http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/04/exclusive-a-behind-the-scenes-look-at-facebook-release-engineering.ars/1|publisher=Ars Technica|accessdate=April 19, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
We're also investigating every single app that had access to large amounts of data before we fixed this. We expect there are others. And when we find them, we will ban them and tell everyone affected. |
|||
Facebook is developed as one monolithic application. According to an interview in 2012 with Chuck Rossi, a build engineer at Facebook, Facebook compiles into a 1.5 GB binary blob which is then distributed to the servers using a custom [[BitTorrent]]-based release system. Rossi stated that it takes approximately 15 minutes to build and 15 minutes to release to the servers. The build and release process is zero downtime and new changes to Facebook are rolled out daily.<ref name="arstechnica" /> |
|||
Finally, we'll remind you which apps you've given access to your information – so you can shut off the ones you don't want anymore. |
|||
Facebook used a combination platform based on [[HBase]] to store data across distributed machines. Using a tailing architecture, new events are stored in log files, and the logs are tailed. The system rolls these events up and writes them into storage. The User Interface then pulls the data out and displays it to users. Facebook handles requests as [[Ajax (programming)|AJAX]] behavior. These requests are written to a log file using [[Scribe (log server)|Scribe]] (developed by Facebook).<ref name="high scalability">{{cite web|url=http://highscalability.com/blog/2011/3/22/facebooks-new-realtime-analytics-system-hbase-to-process-20.html |title=Facebook's New Realtime Analytics System: HBase To Process 20 Billion Events Per Day |publisher=Highscalability.com |date=March 22, 2011 |accessdate=December 26, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
Thank you for believing in this community. I promise to do better for you.}} |
|||
Data is read from these log files using Ptail, an internally built tool to aggregate data from multiple Scribe stores. It tails the log files and pulls data out (thus the name). Ptail data is separated out into three streams so they can eventually be sent to their own clusters in different [[data center]]s (Plugin impression, News feed impressions, Actions (plugin + news feed)). Puma is used to manage periods of high data flow (Input/Output or IO). Data is processed in batches to lessen the number of times needed to read and write under high demand periods (A hot article will generate a lot of impressions and news feed impressions which will cause huge data skews). Batches are taken every 1.5 seconds, limited by memory used when creating a [[hash table]].<ref name="high scalability" /> |
|||
On March 26, the [[Federal Trade Commission]] opened an investigation into the matter.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ftc-facebook-investigation-confirmed-opened-facebook-stock-drops-futher-today/|title=Facebook stock rebounds after FTC investigation news|last=Ivanova|first=Irina|date=March 26, 2018|work=[[CBS News]]|access-date=March 26, 2018}}</ref> The controversy led Facebook to end its partnerships with data brokers who aid advertisers in targeting users.<ref name="Ingram-2018" /> |
|||
After this, data is output in PHP format (compiled with [[HipHop for PHP]]). The backend is written in [[Java]] and Thrift is used as the messaging format so PHP programs can query Java services. Caching solutions are used to make the web pages display more quickly. The more and longer data is cached the less realtime it is. The data is then sent to [[MapReduce]] servers so it can be queried via Hive. This also serves as a backup plan as the data can be recovered from Hive. Raw logs are removed after a period of time.<ref name="high scalability" /> |
|||
On April 24, 2019, Facebook said it could face a fine between $3 billion (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|3000000000|2019}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) to $5 billion (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|5000000000|2019}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) as the result of an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/24/facebook-estimates-up-to-5-billion-loss-in-ftc-privacy-inquiry.html|title=Facebook estimates up to $5 billion loss in FTC privacy inquiry|last=Feiner|first=Lauren|date=April 24, 2019|website=[[CNBC]]|access-date=April 25, 2019}}</ref> On July 24, 2019, the FTC fined Facebook $5 billion, the largest penalty ever imposed on a company for violating consumer privacy. Additionally, Facebook had to implement a new privacy structure, follow a 20-year settlement order, and allow the FTC to monitor Facebook.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 24, 2019 |title=FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-imposes-5-billion-penalty-sweeping-new-privacy-restrictions-facebook |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230721213553/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-imposes-5-billion-penalty-sweeping-new-privacy-restrictions-facebook |archive-date=July 21, 2023 |access-date=August 12, 2023 |website=Federal Trade Commission |language=en}}</ref> Cambridge Analytica's CEO and a developer faced restrictions on future business dealings and were ordered to destroy any personal information they collected. Cambridge Analytica filed for bankruptcy.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 23, 2019 |title=FTC Sues Cambridge Analytica, Settles with Former CEO and App Developer |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-sues-cambridge-analytica-settles-former-ceo-app-developer |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220613132946/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-sues-cambridge-analytica-settles-former-ceo-app-developer |archive-date=June 13, 2022 |access-date=August 12, 2023 |website=Federal Trade Commission |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
On March 20, 2014 Facebook announced a new open source programming language called [[Hack (programming language)|Hack]]. Prior to public release, a large portion of Facebook was already running and "battle tested" using the new language.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2014/03/facebook-hack/|title=Facebook Introduces 'Hack,' the Programming Language of the Future|date=March 20, 2014 | work=Wired|first=Cade|last=Metz}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook also implemented additional privacy controls and settings<ref name="guar1">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/11/fact-checking-mark-zuckerberg-testimony-congress|title=Fact-checking Mark Zuckerberg's testimony about Facebook privacy|last=Solon|first=Olivia|date=April 12, 2018|access-date=June 29, 2018|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref> in part to comply with the European Union's [[General Data Protection Regulation]] (GDPR), which took effect in May.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://techcrunch.com/2018/04/04/zuckerberg-gdpr/|title=Zuckerberg says Facebook will offer GDPR privacy controls everywhere|website=[[TechCrunch]]|access-date=April 4, 2018}}</ref> Facebook also ended its active opposition to the [[California Consumer Privacy Act]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/04/facebook-donated-200000-to-kill-a-privacy-law-but-now-its-backtracking/|title=Facebook exits anti-privacy alliance it formed with Comcast and Google|last=Brodkin|first=Jon|date=April 12, 2018|work=Ars Technica|access-date=April 13, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook uses the Momentum platform from [[Message Systems]] to deliver the enormous volume of emails it sends to its users every day.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://fortune.com/2014/10/06/message-systems-email-provider/|title=The biggest email provider you've never heard of|date=October 6, 2014 | work=Fortune|first=Heather|last=Clancy}}</ref> |
|||
Some, such as [[Meghan McCain]] have drawn an equivalence between the use of data by Cambridge Analytica and the [[Barack Obama 2012 presidential campaign|Barack Obama's 2012 campaign]], which, according to ''[[Investor's Business Daily]]'', "encouraged supporters to download an Obama 2012 Facebook app that, when activated, let the campaign collect Facebook data both on users and their friends."<ref>"[https://web.archive.org/web/20190220020940/https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/facebook-data-scandal-trump-election-obama-2012/ Funny, When Obama Harvested Facebook Data On Millions Of Users To Win In 2012, Everyone Cheered]". ''[[Investor's Business Daily]]''. March 19, 2018.</ref><ref name="forbes.com">"[https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2018/03/19/why-are-we-only-now-talking-about-facebook-and-elections/ Why Are We Only Now Talking About Facebook And Elections?]". ''[[Forbes]]''. March 19, 2018.</ref><ref name="news.com.au">"[http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/security/former-obama-campaign-boss-reveals-how-they-could-access-creepy-facebook-data/news-story/5a275b7c9f540fc9542f5256e644e26e Former Facebook staffer, Obama campaign boss reveal concerns about Facebook data]". [[News.com.au]]. March 21, 2018.</ref> Carol Davidsen, the Obama for America (OFA) former director of integration and media analytics, wrote that "Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn't stop us once they realised that was what we were doing".<ref name="forbes.com" /><ref name="news.com.au" /> [[PolitiFact]] has rated McCain's statements "Half-True", on the basis that "in Obama's case, direct users knew they were handing over their data to a political campaign" whereas with Cambridge Analytica, users thought they were only taking a personality quiz for academic purposes, and while the Obama campaign only used the data "to have their supporters contact their most persuadable friends", Cambridge Analytica "targeted users, friends and lookalikes directly with digital ads."<ref>{{cite web|title=Comparing Facebook data use by Obama, Cambridge Analytica|url=https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/mar/22/meghan-mccain/comparing-facebook-data-use-obama-cambridge-analyt/|publisher=[[PolitiFact]]|access-date=May 24, 2019 }}</ref> |
|||
===History=== |
|||
On July 20, 2008, Facebook introduced "Facebook Beta", a significant redesign of its user interface on selected networks. The Mini-Feed and Wall were consolidated, profiles were separated into tabbed sections, and an effort was made to create a "cleaner" look.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_852573C4006938800025748D0064C292.html?ref=technology |title= Facebook Facelift Targets Aging Users and New Competitors |work= The New York Times |author=Havenstein, Heather |date= July 21, 2008}}</ref> After initially giving users a choice to switch, Facebook began migrating all users to the new version starting in September 2008.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://blog.new.facebook.com/blog.php?post=30074837130 |title=Moving to the new Facebook |publisher=The Facebook Blog |accessdate=September 12, 2008 |author=Slee, Mark |date=September 10, 2008}}</ref> On December 11, 2008, it was announced that Facebook was testing a simpler signup process.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/11/facebook-testing-even-simpler-sign-up-closing-the-gap-with-myspace-in-the-us/ |title= Facebook Testing Even Simpler Sign Up; Closing The Gap With MySpace In The U.S |work= [[TechCrunch]] |date= December 11, 2008}}</ref> |
|||
==== DataSpii ==== |
|||
;Notes |
|||
In July 2019, cybersecurity researcher Sam Jadali exposed a catastrophic data leak known as [[DataSpii]] involving data provider DDMR and marketing intelligence company Nacho Analytics (NA).<ref name="Fowler-2019">{{Cite news |last=Fowler |first=Geoffrey A. |date=July 19, 2019 |title=Perspective {{!}} I found your data. It's for sale. |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/07/18/i-found-your-data-its-sale/ |access-date=April 3, 2024 |newspaper=Washington Post |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Goodin |first=Dan |date=July 18, 2019 |title=My browser, the spy: How extensions slurped up browsing histories from 4M users |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/07/dataspii-inside-the-debacle-that-dished-private-data-from-apple-tesla-blue-origin-and-4m-people/ |access-date=April 3, 2024 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-us}}</ref> Branding itself as the "God mode for the internet," NA through DDMR, provided its members access to private Facebook photos and Facebook Messenger attachments including tax returns.<ref name="Jadali-2019">{{Cite web |last=Jadali |first=Sam |date=July 18, 2019 |title=DataSpii – A global catastrophic data leak via browser extensions |url=https://securitywithsam.com/2019/07/dataspii-leak-via-browser-extensions/ |access-date=April 3, 2024 |website=Security with Sam |language=en-US}}</ref> DataSpii harvested data from millions of Chrome and Firefox users through compromised browser extensions.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 19, 2019 |title=Google, Firefox Browser Extensions Expose Data of 4 Million People |url=https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics-computers/privacy/google-firefox-browser-extensions-expose-personal-data-a2138132661/ |access-date=April 3, 2024 |website=Consumer Reports |language=en-US}}</ref> The NA website stated it collected data from millions of opt-in users. Jadali, along with journalists from ''Ars Technica'' and ''The Washington Post'', interviewed impacted users, including a ''Washington Post'' staff member. According to the interviews, the impacted users did not consent to such collection. |
|||
:Facebook Notes was introduced on August 22, 2006, a blogging feature that allowed tags and embeddable images. Users were later able to import blogs from [[Xanga]], [[LiveJournal]], [[Blogger (service)|Blogger]], and other blogging services.<ref name="welcome" /> |
|||
DataSpii demonstrated how a compromised user exposed the data of others, including the private photos and Messenger attachments belonging to a Facebook user's network of friends.<ref name="Jadali-2019" /> |
|||
;Chat |
|||
:Facebook Chat was added April 6, 2008. It is a [[Comet (programming)|Comet]]-based<ref>{{cite web |accessdate=June 2, 2008 |url=https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=14218138919&id=9445547199&index=0|title=Facebook Chat |publisher=Facebook|date=May 14, 2008|author=Eugene }}</ref> [[instant messaging]] application<ref>{{Cite press release | title = Announcement: Facebook Launches Facebook Chat | publisher=Facebook | date = April 6, 2008 | url = https://www.facebook.com/press/releases.php?p=27681 | accessdate =April 11, 2008 }}</ref> which allows users to communicate with other Facebook users in a way similar in functionality to [[instant messaging]] software. |
|||
DataSpii exploited Facebook's practice of making private photos and Messenger attachments publicly accessible via unique URLs. To bolster security in this regard, Facebook appends query strings in the URLs so as to limit the period of accessibility.<ref name="Jadali-2019" /> Nevertheless, NA provided real-time access to these unique URLs, which were intended to be secure. This allowed NA members to access the private content within the restricted time frame designated by Facebook. |
|||
;Gifts |
|||
[[File:Sörreklám a Facebookon.JPG|thumb|Gift for friends on Facebook]] |
|||
:Facebook launched [[Facebook features#Gifts|Gifts]] on February 8, 2007, which allows users to send virtual gifts to their friends that appear on the recipient's profile. Gifts cost $1.00 each to purchase, and a personalized message can be attached to each gift.<ref>{{cite web |accessdate=March 15, 2008|url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2234372130 |title=Give gifts on Facebook! |publisher=Facebook }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|accessdate=March 15, 2008 |url=https://www.facebook.com/help.php?page=16|title=Gifts |publisher=Facebook }}{{dead link|date=October 2011}}</ref> |
|||
''The Washington Post''{{'}}s Geoffrey Fowler, in collaboration with Jadali, opened Fowler's private Facebook photo in a browser with a compromised browser extension.<ref name="Fowler-2019" /> Within minutes, they anonymously retrieved the "private" photo. To validate this proof-of-concept, they searched for Fowler's name using NA, which yielded his photo as a search result. In addition, Jadali discovered Fowler's ''Washington Post'' colleague, Nick Mourtoupalas, was directly impacted by DataSpii. |
|||
;Marketplace |
|||
:On May 14, 2007, Facebook launched [[Facebook features#Marketplace|Marketplace]], which lets users post free classified ads.<ref>{{cite web |accessdate=March 15, 2008|url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2383962130 |title=The Marketplace Is Open. |publisher=The Facebook Blog |author=Morgenstern, Jared |date=May 14, 2007}}</ref> Marketplace has been compared to [[Craigslist]] by [[CNET]], which points out that the major difference between the two is that listings posted by a user on Marketplace are seen only by users in the same network as that user, whereas listings posted on Craigslist can be seen by anyone.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=March 15, 2008 |url= http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9718779-7.html |title=Hands-on with Facebook Marketplace |work=CNET |date=May 13, 2007 |author=McCarthy, Caroline }}</ref> |
|||
Jadali's investigation elucidated how DataSpii disseminated private data to additional third-parties, including foreign entities, within minutes of the data being acquired. In doing so, he identified the third-parties who were scraping, storing, and potentially enabling the facial-recognition of individuals in photos being furnished by DataSpii.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Goodin |first=Dan |date=July 18, 2019 |title=More on DataSpii: How extensions hide their data grabs—and how they're discovered |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/07/dataspii-technical-deep-dive/ |access-date=April 3, 2024 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-us}}</ref> |
|||
;Messaging |
|||
:A new Messaging platform, codenamed "Project Titan", was launched on November 15, 2010. Described as a "[[Gmail]] killer" by some publications, the system allows users to directly communicate with each other via Facebook using several different methods (including a special [[email address]], text messaging, or through the Facebook website or mobile app){{emdash}}no matter what method is used to deliver a message, they are contained within single [[Threaded discussion|threads]] in a unified inbox. As with other Facebook features, users can adjust from whom they can receive messages{{emdash}}including just friends, friends of friends, or from anyone.<ref>{{Cite news |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/nov/15/facebook-mail-gmail-killer-email |location= London |work=The Guardian |first1=Adam |last1=Gabbatt |first2=Charles |last2=Arthur |title=Facebook mail: it might kill Gmail, but 'it's not email' |date= November 15, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_16619072 |title=Facebook adds 'social inbox' – with E-mail |work= San Jose Mercury News |date= November 16, 2010 |accessdate=January 13, 2011}}</ref> Email service was terminated in 2014 because of low uptake.<ref name=drake2014>{{cite news | last = Drake | first=Sarah | date=February 25, 2014 | title=Facebook closes down email addresses | url=http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2014/02/25/facebook-ends-its-experiment-with-email.html | deadurl=no | archivedate=February 26, 2014 | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140226120058/http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2014/02/25/facebook-ends-its-experiment-with-email.html | work=[[Silicon Valley Business Journal]] }}</ref> Aside from the Facebook website, messages can also be accessed through the site's [[mobile app]]s, or a dedicated [[Facebook Messenger]] app.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.hindustantimes.com/technology/SocialMedia-Updates/Facebook-Messenger-for-Windows-launched/SP-Article1-821699.aspx |title=Facebook Messenger for Windows launched |newspaper= Hindustan Times |location= New Delhi |date=March 6, 2012 |accessdate=April 29, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
==== Breaches ==== |
|||
;Voice calls |
|||
On September 28, 2018, Facebook experienced a major breach in its security, exposing the data of 50 million users. The data breach started in July 2017 and was discovered on September 16.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/28/everything-you-need-to-know-about-facebooks-data-breach-affecting-50m-users/|title=Everything you need to know about Facebook's data breach affecting 50M users|work=[[TechCrunch]]|access-date=October 2, 2018}}</ref> Facebook notified users affected by the exploit and logged them out of their accounts.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/technology/facebook-hack-data-breach.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928165450/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/technology/facebook-hack-data-breach.html |archive-date=September 28, 2018 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Facebook Security Breach Exposes Accounts of 50 Million Users|last1=Isaac|first1=Mike|date=September 28, 2018|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=September 29, 2018|last2=Frenkel|first2=Sheera}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/sep/28/facebook-50-million-user-accounts-security-berach|title=Facebook says nearly 50 m users compromised in huge security breach|last=Wong|first=Julia Carrie|date=September 28, 2018|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=September 29, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
:Since April 2011, Facebook users have had the ability to make live voice calls via Facebook Chat, allowing users to chat with others from all over the world. This feature, which is provided free through T-Mobile's new Bobsled service, lets the user add voice to the current Facebook Chat as well as leave voice messages on Facebook.<ref>{{cite news |last=Swartz |first=Jon |title= Facebook hops aboard T-Mobile's Bobsled Service |url=http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2011/04/facebook-hops-aboard-t-mobiles-voip-service/1|newspaper=USA Today |location =Washington DC|date=April 19, 2011}}</ref> |
|||
In March 2019, Facebook confirmed a password compromise of millions of Facebook lite application users also affected millions of Instagram users. The reason cited was the storage of password as plain text instead of encryption which could be read by its employees.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.news18.com/news/tech/not-tens-of-thousands-but-millions-of-instagram-passwords-exposed-admits-facebook-2108667.html|title=Not Tens of Thousands, But Millions of Instagram Passwords Exposed, Admits Facebook|website=News18|date=April 19, 2019 |access-date=April 19, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
;Video calling |
|||
:On July 6, 2011, Facebook launched its video calling services using [[Skype Technologies|Skype]] as its technology partner. It allows one-to-one calling using a [[Skype]] [[Representational state transfer|Rest]] [[Application programming interface|API]].<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://blogs.skype.com/2011/07/07/under-the-hood-facebook-video/|title = Under the Hood with Facebook Video Calling, Powered by Skype|date = |accessdate = |website = |publisher = |last = |first = }}</ref> |
|||
On December 19, 2019, security researcher Bob Diachenko discovered a database containing more than 267 million Facebook user IDs, phone numbers, and names that were left exposed on the web for anyone to access without a password or any other authentication.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thenextweb.com/facebook/2019/12/20/267-million-facebook-users-data-has-reportedly-been-leaked/|title=267 million Facebook users' data has reportedly been leaked|last=Ghoshal|first=Abhimanyu|date=December 20, 2019|website=The Next Web|language=en-us|access-date=December 21, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
;Video viewing |
|||
:In September 2014, Facebook announced that it delivers 1 billion video views per day and that it would begin showing everyone view counts on publicly posted videos from users, Pages, and public figures. It also confirmed that it is recommending additional videos to users after they have watched a video. Sixty-five percent of Facebook's video views are coming from mobile where Facebook's user base is shifting, and views grew 50 percent from May to July, in part thanks to the viral ALS [[Ice Bucket Challenge]] finding a home on Facebook.<ref>{{cite news |last=Constine |first=Josh |title= Facebook hops aboard T-Mobile's Bobsled Service |url=http://techcrunch.com/2014/09/07/facebook-puts-its-video-reach-in-the-spotlight/|work=TechCrunch|date=September 7, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
In February 2020, Facebook encountered a major [[security breach]] in which its official [[Twitter]] account was hacked by a [[Saudi Arabia]]-based group called "[[OurMine]]". The group has a history of actively exposing high-profile social media profiles' vulnerabilities.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/facebook-s-twitter-account-hacked-n1132901|title=Facebook's Twitter account hacked|access-date=February 7, 2020|website=[[NBC News]]}}</ref> |
|||
;Tor hidden service |
|||
:In October 2014, Facebook announced<ref name="fb-tor-note">{{cite web|last1=Muffett|first1=Alec|title=Making Connections to Facebook more Secure|url=https://www.facebook.com/notes/protect-the-graph/making-connections-to-facebook-more-secure/1526085754298237|website=Protect the Graph|publisher=Facebook|accessdate=December 4, 2014|date=October 31, 2014}}</ref> that users could now connect to the website through a [[Tor hidden service]] using the privacy-protecting [[Tor browser]] and encrypted using [[Secure Sockets Layer|SSL]].<ref name="Rober Lemos">{{cite web|publisher=Ars Technica |url=http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/10/facebook-offers-hidden-service-to-tor-users//|title=Facebook offers hidden service to Tor users|author=Rober Lemos|date=October 31, 2014|accessdate=October 31, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|url = https://blog.torproject.org/blog/facebook-hidden-services-and-https-certs|title = Facebook, hidden services, and https certs|author = arma|date = October 31, 2014|journal = |accessdate = |doi = |pmid = |publisher = [[Tor Project]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url = http://www.zdnet.com/article/facebook-sets-up-hidden-service-for-tor-users/|title = Facebook sets up hidden service for Tor users|last = Duckett|first = Chris|date = October 31, 2014|work = |accessdate = |publisher = [[ZDNet]]}}</ref> Announcing the feature, [[Alec Muffett]] said "Facebook's onion address provides a way to access Facebook through Tor without losing the cryptographic protections provided by the Tor cloud. [...] it provides end-to-end communication, from your browser directly into a Facebook datacentre."<ref name="Rober Lemos" /> Its URL address – <code>facebookcorewwwi.onion</code> is a [[backronym]], which stands for ''Facebook's Core WWW Infrastructure''.<ref name="fb-tor-note" /> |
|||
In April 2021, ''The Guardian'' reported approximately half a billion users' data had been stolen including birthdates and phone numbers. Facebook alleged it was "old data" from a problem fixed in August 2019 despite the data's having been released a year and a half later only in 2021; it declined to speak with journalists, had apparently not notified regulators, called the problem "unfixable", and said it would not be advising users.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/apr/11/another-huge-data-breach-another-stony-silence-from-facebook|title=Another huge data breach, another stony silence from Facebook|access-date=April 21, 2021|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=April 11, 2021}}</ref> |
|||
===User profile/personal timeline=== |
|||
[[File:Facebook user page (2014).jpg|thumb|Public profile of a user on Facebook in 2014 showing various social networking features of the site, including music preferences and favorite books]] |
|||
In September 2024, Meta paid out a $101 million fine for storing up to 600 million passwords of Facebook and Instagram users in plain text. The practice was initially discovered in 2019, though reports indicate passwords were stored in plain text since 2012.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lovejoy |first1=Ben |title=Up to 600 million Facebook and Instagram passwords stored in plain text |url=https://9to5mac.com/2024/09/27/up-to-600-million-facebook-and-instagram-passwords-stored-in-plain-text/ |website=9to5Mac |access-date=29 September 2024 |date=27 September 2024}}</ref> |
|||
The format of individual user pages was revamped in late 2011 and became known as either a profile or personal timeline since that change.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook Timeline: How to Enable It With One Click [PICS]|url=http://mashable.com/2011/12/15/facebook-timeline-how-to/|work=Mashable|publisher=Mashable|accessdate=February 15, 2014|author=Charlie White|date=December 16, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Desktop > HelpPages|url=https://www.facebook.com/help/281592001947683/|work=Facebook|publisher=Facebook|accessdate=February 15, 2014|date=February 2014}}</ref> Users can create profiles with photos and images, lists of personal interests, contact information, memorable life events, and other personal information, such as employment status.<ref>{{cite web|title=Introducing Timeline|url=https://www.facebook.com/about/timeline|work=Facebook|publisher=Facebook|accessdate=February 15, 2014|date=February 2014}}</ref> Users can communicate with friends and other users through private or public messages, as well as a chat feature, and share content that includes website URLs, images, and video content.<ref>{{cite web|title=Desktop Help|url=https://www.facebook.com/help/467610326601639|work=Facebook|publisher=Facebook|accessdate=February 15, 2014|date=February 2014}}</ref> A 2012 Pew Internet and American Life study identified that between 20 and 30 percent of Facebook users are "power users" who frequently link, poke, post and tag themselves and others.<ref>{{cite web|title=Why most Facebook users get more than they give|url=http://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/media-society/facebook-engagement-patterns/|work=Journalist's Resource|publisher=Harvard Kennedy School|accessdate=February 15, 2014|author=Margaret Weigel|date=February 29, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
==== Phone data and activity ==== |
|||
In 2007, Facebook launched Facebook Pages (also called "Fan Pages" by users) to allow "users to interact and affiliate with businesses and organizations in the same way they interact with other Facebook user profiles". On November 6, 2007, more than 100,000 Facebook pages were launched.<ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook Declares New Era for Advertising|url=http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2007/11/facebook_declar.html|accessdate=February 14, 2014|newspaper=Bloomberg Businessweek|date=November 6, 2007|author=Rob Hof}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Onavo logo.png|thumb|Facebook acquired [[Onavo]]'s [[virtual private network]] to harvest usage data on its competitors.]] |
|||
After acquiring [[Onavo]] in 2013, Facebook used its Onavo Protect [[virtual private network]] (VPN) app to collect information on users' [[web traffic]] and app usage. This allowed Facebook to monitor its competitors' performance, and motivated Facebook to acquire WhatsApp in 2014.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-new-copycats-how-facebook-squashes-competition-from-startups-1502293444|title=The New Copycats: How Facebook Squashes Competition From Startups|last1=Morris|first1=Betsy|date=August 9, 2017|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|access-date=August 15, 2017|last2=Seetharaman|first2=Deepa|issn=0099-9660}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.foxbusiness.com/features/2017/08/09/new-copycats-how-facebook-squashes-2.html|title=The New Copycats: How Facebook Squashes -2-|date=August 9, 2017|work=Fox Business|access-date=August 15, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.engadget.com/2017/08/13/facebook-knew-about-snap-struggles-through-app-tracking/|title=Facebook knew about Snap's struggles months before the public|website=Engadget|date=August 13, 2017 |access-date=August 15, 2017}}</ref> Media outlets classified Onavo Protect as [[spyware]].<ref>{{cite news|access-date=September 3, 2018|title=Apple makes Facebook pull its spyware(ish) VPN from the App Store|url=https://www.fastcompany.com/90224974/apple-makes-facebook-pull-its-spywareish-vpn-from-the-app-store|website=Fast Company|date=August 23, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Tom|last=McKay|date=August 22, 2018|access-date=September 3, 2018|title=Facebook Pulls Its Data-Harvesting Onavo VPN From App Store After Apple Says It Violates Rules|url=https://gizmodo.com/facebook-pulls-its-data-harvesting-onavo-vpn-from-app-s-1828541718|website=Gizmodo}}</ref><ref name="Mashable">{{cite news|first=Jack|last=Morse|date=August 22, 2018|access-date=September 3, 2018|title=Facebook to pull its creepy VPN Onavo from App Store after Apple pushback|url=https://mashable.com/article/facebook-pulls-onavo-from-app-store/|website=Mashable}}</ref> In August 2018, Facebook removed the app in response to pressure from Apple, who asserted that it violated their guidelines.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/22/apple-facebook-onavo/|title=Apple removed Facebook's Onavo from the App Store for gathering app data|work=[[TechCrunch]]|access-date=August 23, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/22/17771298/facebook-onavo-protect-apple-app-store-pulled-privacy-concerns|title=Facebook will pull its data-collecting VPN app from the App Store over privacy concerns|work=[[The Verge]]|access-date=August 23, 2018}}</ref> The [[Australian Competition and Consumer Commission]] sued Facebook on December 16, 2020, for "false, misleading or deceptive conduct" in response to the company's use of personal data obtained from Onavo for business purposes in contrast to Onavo's privacy-oriented marketing.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Spadafora |first1=Anthony |title=Facebook sued for using VPN to spy on users |url=https://www.techradar.com/news/facebook-sued-for-using-vpn-to-spy-on-users |website=[[TechRadar]] |access-date=January 7, 2021 |language=en |date=December 16, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Duckett |first1=Chris |title=Facebook dragged to court by ACCC over deceptive VPN conduct allegations |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/facebook-dragged-to-court-by-accc-over-deceptive-vpn-conduct-allegations/ |website=ZDNet |access-date=January 7, 2021 |language=en |date=December 16, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
In 2016, Facebook Research launched Project Atlas, offering some users between the ages of 13 and 35 up to $20 per month (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|20|2016}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) in exchange for their personal data, including their app usage, [[web browsing history]], [[Web search engine|web search]] history, [[Mobile phone tracking|location history]], [[personal message]]s, photos, videos, [[email]]s and [[Amazon (company)|Amazon]] order history.<ref>{{cite web |last=Laura |first=Bremner |date=January 29, 2019 |title=Facebook pays teens to install VPN that spies on them |url=https://pcsite.co.uk/facebook-project-atlas/ |access-date=January 30, 2019 |website=PcSite}}</ref><ref name="Recode Jan 2019">{{cite web|url=https://www.recode.net/2019/1/30/18203231/apple-banning-facebook-research-app|title=Apple says it's banning Facebook's research app that collects users' personal information|last=Wagner|first=Kurt|date=January 30, 2019|website=Recode|access-date=January 30, 2019}}</ref> In January 2019, ''TechCrunch'' reported on the project. This led Apple to temporarily revoke Facebook's Enterprise Developer Program [[Public key certificate|certificates]] for one day, preventing Facebook Research from operating on iOS devices and disabling Facebook's internal iOS apps.<ref name="Recode Jan 2019" /><ref>{{cite web|first=Tom|last=Warren|access-date=January 30, 2019|title=Apple blocks Facebook from running its internal iOS apps|url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/30/18203551/apple-facebook-blocked-internal-ios-apps|date=January 30, 2019|website=[[The Verge]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Mike|last=Isaac|access-date=February 2, 2019|title=Apple Shows Facebook Who Has the Power in an App Dispute|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/technology/apple-blocks-facebook.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190201020059/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/technology/apple-blocks-facebook.html |archive-date=February 1, 2019 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=January 31, 2019|issn=0362-4331|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref> |
|||
In July 2012, Facebook added a [[same-sex marriage]] icon to its timeline feature.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/02/facebook-gay-marriage-timeline-icons-couples_n_1643183.html |title=Facebook Adds Gay Marriage Timeline Icons For Same-Sex Couples |work= Huffington Post |date= July 2, 2012 |accessdate=December 26, 2012 |first=Curtis |last=Wong}}</ref> On February 14, 2014, Facebook expanded the options for user's gender setting, adding a custom input field that allows users to choose from a wide range of gender identities. Users can also set which set of gender-specific pronouns are used in reference to them throughout the site.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook Opens Up LGBTQ-Friendly Gender Identity And Pronoun Options|url=http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/13/facebook-gender-identity/?ncid=tcdaily|work=TechCrunch|publisher=AOL Inc|accessdate=February 15, 2014|author=Jordan Crook|date=February 14, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=When you come to Facebook to connect with the people, causes, and organizations you care about, we want you to feel comfortable being your true, authentic self ...|url=https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=567587973337709&set=a.196865713743272.42938.105225179573993&type=1&stream_ref=10|work=Facebook Diversity on Facebook|publisher=Facebook|accessdate=February 15, 2014|date=February 14, 2014}}</ref> The change occurs after Nepal's first openly gay politician [[Sunil Babu Pant]] sent a letter to Zuckerberg in early 2012 to request the addition of an "Other" gender option for Facebook users; Facebook's official statement on the issue: "People can already opt out of showing their sex on their profile. We're constantly innovating on our products and features and we welcome input from everyone as we explore ways to improve the Facebook experience."<ref>{{cite web|author=Torsten Højer |url=http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/facebook-warned-over-third-gender-option300312 |title=Facebook warned over 'third gender' option |publisher=Gay Star News |date=March 30, 2012 |accessdate=December 26, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
''[[Ars Technica]]'' reported in April 2018 that the Facebook Android app had been harvesting user data, including phone calls and text messages, since 2015.<ref>{{cite web|first=Sean|last=Gallagher|access-date=January 31, 2019|title=Facebook scraped call, text message data for years from Android phones [Updated]|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/03/facebook-scraped-call-text-message-data-for-years-from-android-phones/|date=March 24, 2018|website=Ars Technica}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://mashable.com/2018/03/25/facebook-android-phone-call-data-gathering/|title=Facebook's app has been collecting Android phone data for years on some devices|last=Rosenberg|first=Adam|website=Mashable|date=March 25, 2018|access-date=February 6, 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/25/17160944/facebook-call-history-sms-data-collection-android Facebook has been collecting call history and SMS data from Android devices] ''The Verge''</ref> In May 2018, several Android users filed a [[class action lawsuit]] against Facebook for invading their privacy.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jurist.org/news/2018/05/android-users-file-lawsuit-against-facebook-for-invasion-of-privacy/|title=Android users file lawsuit against Facebook for invasion of privacy|work=jurist.org|date=May 11, 2018 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Buckner, Gabriella|url=http://www.itpro.co.uk/data-mining/31107/facebook-faces-class-action-lawsuit-for-android-call-and-message-data-scraping|title=Facebook faces class action lawsuit for Android call and message data scraping|work=itpro.co.uk|date=May 14, 2018|access-date=February 7, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
On June 13, 2009, Facebook introduced a "Usernames" feature, whereby pages can be linked with simpler [[Uniform resource locator|URLs]] such as <code>[https://www.facebook.com/facebook https://www.facebook.com/facebook]</code> instead of <code>[https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=20531316728 https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=20531316728]</code>.<ref>{{cite web |accessdate=June 13, 2009 |url= http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=90316352130 |title=Coming Soon: Facebook Usernames |author=DiPersia, Blaise |date=June 9, 2009 |publisher=The Facebook Blog}}</ref> Many new [[smartphone]]s offer access to Facebook services through either their Web browsers or applications. An official Facebook application is available for the operating systems [[Android (operating system)|Android]], [[iOS]], [[webOS]], and [[Firefox OS]]. [[Nokia]] and [[BlackBerry (company)|Research In Motion]] both provide Facebook applications for their own mobile devices. As of January 2015, 745 million active users access Facebook through mobile devices every day. {{Cite news| url=http://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-mobile-users-hit-new-highs-revenue-jumps/ | work=[[Cnet]] | title=Facebook mobile users hit new highs, revenue jumps | date=January 28, 2015 | accessdate=March 2, 2015 | author=Sherr, Ian}} |
|||
In January 2020, Facebook launched the Off-Facebook Activity page, which allows users to see information collected by Facebook about their non-Facebook activities.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/off-facebook-activity|title=Off-Facebook Activity|website=Facebook for Business}}</ref> ''The Washington Post'' columnist Geoffrey A. Fowler found that this included what other apps he used on his phone, even while the Facebook app was closed, what other web sites he visited on his phone, and what in-store purchases he made from affiliated businesses, even while his phone was completely off.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/01/28/off-facebook-activity-page/|title=Facebook will now show you exactly how it stalks you – even when you're not using Facebook|first=Geoffrey A. |last=Fowler |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> |
|||
In May 2014, Facebook introduced a feature to allow users to ask for information not disclosed by other users on their profiles. If a user does not provide key information, such as location, hometown, or relationship status, other users can use a new 'ask' button to send a message asking about that item to the user in a single click.<ref>By Harrison Weber, Venture Beat. "[http://venturebeat.com/2014/05/20/facebook-now-lets-you-ask-someone-out-in-the-most-awkward-way-possible/ Facebook now lets you ask someone out in the most awkward way possible]". May 20, 2014. Retrieved May 22, 2014.</ref> |
|||
In November 2021, a report was published by Fairplay, Global Action Plan and Reset Australia detailing accusations that Facebook was continuing to manage their ad targeting system with data collected from teen users.<ref>{{cite web |date=November 16, 2021 |title=Facebook continuing to surveil teens for ads, says report |url=https://techcrunch.com/2021/11/16/facebook-accused-of-still-targeting-teens-with-ads/ |access-date=November 16, 2021 |website=[[TechCrunch]] |language=en-US}}</ref> The accusations follow announcements by Facebook in July 2021 that they would cease ad targeting children.<ref>{{Cite news |author=Naomi Nix |date=July 27, 2021|title=Facebook Reduces Advertising Targeting for Teenagers |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-27/facebook-reduces-advertising-targeting-for-teenagers|access-date=November 16, 2021|work=[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Klar|first=Rebecca|date=July 27, 2021|title=Facebook, Instagram to limit targeted ads for teen users|url=https://thehill.com/policy/technology/564878-facebook-instagram-to-limit-targeted-ads-for-teen-users/|access-date=November 16, 2021|website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
===News Feed=== |
|||
On September 6, 2006, [[News Feed (Facebook)|News Feed]] was announced, which appears on every user's homepage and highlights information including profile changes, upcoming events, and birthdays of the user's friends.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2207967130 |title=Facebook Gets a Facelift|accessdate=February 11, 2008 |last=Sanghvi |first=Ruchi |date=September 6, 2006 |publisher=The Facebook Blog}}</ref> This enabled spammers and other users to manipulate these features by creating illegitimate events or posting fake birthdays to attract attention to their profile or cause.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.colnect.com/2010/03/facebook-celebrate-your-birthday-every.html |title=Facebook: Celebrate Your Birthday Every Day |publisher=Colnect blog |accessdate=March 9, 2010}}</ref> Initially, the News Feed caused dissatisfaction among Facebook users; some complained it was too cluttered and full of undesired information, others were concerned that it made it too easy for others to track individual activities (such as relationship status changes, events, and conversations with other users).<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=June 28, 2008 |url= http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2006/tc20060908_536553.htm?campaign_id=rss_tech |title=Facebook Learns from Its Fumble |work=BusinessWeek |location =New York |date=September 8, 2006 |author=Lacy, Sarah |authorlink= Sarah Lacy}}</ref> |
|||
==== Public apologies ==== |
|||
In response, Zuckerberg issued an apology for the site's failure to include appropriate customizable privacy features. Since then, users have been able to control what types of information are shared automatically with friends. Users are now able to prevent user-set categories of friends from seeing updates about certain types of activities, including profile changes, Wall posts, and newly added friends.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=June 28, 2008 |url=http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/ebusiness/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192700574 |title=Facebook Founder Apologizes In Privacy Flap; Users Given More Control |work=[[InformationWeek]] | location = New York |date=September 8, 2006 |author=Gonsalves, Antone }}</ref> |
|||
The company first apologized for its privacy abuses in 2009.<ref>{{Cite book|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=SzxDTGGr80EC|page=119}}|title=Business Ethics For Dummies|last1=Bowie|first1=Norman E.|last2=Schnieder|first2=Meg|date=February 9, 2011|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-118-02062-3}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook apologies have appeared in newspapers, television, blog posts and on Facebook.<ref name="Hempel-2018" /> On March 25, 2018, leading US and UK newspapers published full-page ads with a personal apology from Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg issued a verbal apology on [[CNN]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/25/17161398/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-apology-cambridge-analytica-full-page-newspapers-ads|title=Mark Zuckerberg apologizes for Facebook's data privacy scandal in full-page newspaper ads|last=Statt|first=Nick|date=March 25, 2018|website=[[The Verge]]|access-date=February 6, 2019|archive-date=December 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224105735/https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/25/17161398/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-apology-cambridge-analytica-full-page-newspapers-ads|url-status=dead}}</ref> In May 2010, he apologized for discrepancies in privacy settings.<ref name="Hempel-2018">{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-a-history-of-mark-zuckerberg-apologizing/|title=A Short History of Facebook's Privacy Gaffes|last=Hempel|first=Jessi|date=March 30, 2018|magazine=Wired|access-date=February 6, 2019|issn=1059-1028}}</ref> |
|||
On February 23, 2010, Facebook was granted a patent<ref>{{cite patent |country=US |number=7669123 |status=patent}}</ref> on certain aspects of its News Feed. The patent covers News Feeds in which links are provided so that one user can participate in the same activity of another user.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://themelis-cuiper.com/22/us-patent-no-7669123.html |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110515155132/http://themelis-cuiper.com/22/us-patent-no-7669123.html |archivedate=May 15, 2011 |title=US Patent No. 7669123 |accessdate=March 9, 2010|publisher=Social Media|date=March 1, 2010}}</ref> The patent may encourage Facebook to pursue action against websites that violate its patent, which may potentially include websites such as [[Twitter]].<ref>{{Cite news |url= http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/26/facebook.patent/index.html |title= Facebook's news-feed patent could mean lawsuits |work=CNN |date= February 26, 2010 |accessdate =July 12, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
Previously, Facebook had its privacy settings spread out over 20 pages, and has now put all of its privacy settings on one page, which makes it more difficult for third-party apps to access the user's personal information.<ref name="Ingram-2018" /> In addition to publicly apologizing, Facebook has said that it will be reviewing and auditing thousands of apps that display "suspicious activities" in an effort to ensure that this breach of privacy does not happen again.<ref>{{cite web|title=Social Media/polls Show Low Trust in Facebook|url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/social-media/polls-show-low-trust-facebook/|website=www.digitaltrends.com|date=March 26, 2018|access-date=February 6, 2019}}</ref> In a 2010 report regarding privacy, a research project stated that not a lot of information is available regarding the consequences of what people disclose online so often what is available are just reports made available through popular media.<ref name="christofides2011">{{cite web|url=https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-actions-and-decisions/research/funding-for-privacy-research-and-knowledge-translation/completed-contributions-program-projects/2009-2010/p_200910_06/|title=Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook: Youth & Adults' Information Disclosure and Perceptions of Privacy Risks – Contributions Program 2009–2010|publisher=Office of the Privacy Commissioner of|date=March 31, 2010|website=www.priv.gc.ca|access-date=February 6, 2019|last1=Christofides|first1=E.|last2=Muise|first2=A.|last3=Desmarais|first3=S.}}</ref> In 2017, a former Facebook executive went on the record to discuss how social media platforms have contributed to the unraveling of the "fabric of society".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/11/facebook-former-executive-ripping-society-apart|title=Former Facebook executive: social media is ripping society apart|last=Wong|first=Julia Carrie|date=December 12, 2017|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=February 6, 2019|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> |
|||
One of the most popular applications on Facebook is the [[Facebook features#Photo and video uploads|Photos]] application, where users can upload albums and photos.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=June 28, 2008 |url=http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/24/facebook-launches-facebook-platform-they-are-the-anti-myspace/ |title=Facebook Launches Facebook Platform; They are the Anti-MySpace |work=[[TechCrunch]] |date=May 24, 2007 |author=Arrington, Michael |authorlink=Michael Arrington}}</ref> Facebook allows users to upload an unlimited number of photos, compared with other [[image hosting service]]s such as [[Photobucket]] and [[Flickr]], which apply limits to the number of photos that a user is allowed to upload. During the first years, Facebook users were limited to 60 photos per album. As of May 2009, this limit has been increased to 200 photos per album.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=87157517130 |title=Share More Memories with Larger Photo Albums |accessdate=January 4, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=2305272732&topic=7363 |title=Upload: 60 or 200 photos in the same album? |accessdate=January 25, 2009 |publisher=Facebook}} {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=H3llBot}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=2305272732&topic=4947 |title=How can I add more than 60 photos to an album? |accessdate=January 25, 2009 |publisher=Facebook}} {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=H3llBot}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2003726&l=5f3c8&id=1352160452 |title=Example of album from a regular user with a 200-photo limit |accessdate=January 25, 2009 |publisher=Facebook}}</ref> |
|||
=== Content disputes and moderation{{anchor|Violence, conspiracy theories and fringe discourse}} === |
|||
Privacy settings can be set for individual albums, limiting the groups of users that can see an album. For example, the privacy of an album can be set so that only the user's friends can see the album, while the privacy of another album can be set so that all Facebook users can see it. Another feature of the Photos application is the ability to "[[tag (metadata)|tag]]", or label, users in a photo. For instance, if a photo contains a user's friend, then the user can tag the friend in the photo. This sends a notification to the friend that they have been tagged, and provides them a link to see the photo.<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=March 15, 2008|url=https://www.facebook.com/help.php?page=7|title=Photos |publisher=Facebook }}{{dead link|date=October 2011}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Facebook content management controversies}} |
|||
{{See also|Oversight Board (Meta)|l1=Oversight Board}} |
|||
Facebook relies on its users to generate the content that bonds its users to the service. The company has come under criticism both for allowing objectionable content, including conspiracy theories and fringe discourse,<ref>{{Cite news|last=Roose|first=Kevin|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/27/technology/alex-jones-facebook-youtube.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180727221747/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/27/technology/alex-jones-facebook-youtube.html |archive-date=July 27, 2018 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Facebook and YouTube Give Alex Jones a Wrist Slap|newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=July 27, 2018 |access-date=August 4, 2018}}</ref> and for prohibiting other content that it deems inappropriate. |
|||
On June 7, 2012, Facebook launched its App Center to its users. It will help the users in finding games and other applications with ease.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/internet/Facebook-to-launch-App-Center/articleshow/13920641.cms | title=Facebook to launch App Center| date=June 8, 2012 | work=The Times Of India}}{{dead link|date=November 2012}}</ref> Since the launch of the App Center, Facebook has seen 150M monthly users with 2.4 times the installation of apps.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/14/facebook-says-it-now-has-235m-monthly-gamers-app-center-hits-150m-monthly-users/ |title=Facebook Says It Now Has 235M Monthly Gamers, App Center Hits 150M Monthly Visitors |publisher=TechCrunch |date=August 14, 2012 |accessdate=December 26, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
==== Misinformation and fake news ==== |
|||
The sorting and display of stories in a user's News Feed is governed by the [[EdgeRank]] algorithm.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://edgerank.net/ |title=EdgeRank |publisher=EdgeRank |date=October 29, 2007 |accessdate=February 16, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook has been criticized as a vector for [[fake news]], and has been accused of bearing responsibility for the conspiracy theory that the United States created [[ISIS]],<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mackey |first=Robert |date=August 26, 2014 |title=Borne by Facebook, Conspiracy Theory That U.S. Created ISIS Spreads Across Middle East |language=en-US |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/world/middleeast/isis-conspiracy-theories-include-a-purported-american-plot.html |access-date=April 15, 2022 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> false anti-[[Rohingya people|Rohingya]] posts being used by [[Myanmar]]'s military to fuel [[genocide]] and [[Rohingya genocide|ethnic cleansing]],<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Gowen|first1=Annie|last2=Bearak|first2=Max|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/fake-news-on-facebook-fans-the-flames-of-hate-against-the-rohingya-in-burma/2017/12/07/2c1fe830-ca1f-11e7-b506-8a10ed11ecf5_story.html|title=Fake news on Facebook fans the flames of hate against the Rohingya in Burma|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=August 4, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Mozur |first=Paul |date=October 15, 2018 |title=A Genocide Incited on Facebook, With Posts From Myanmar's Military |language=en-US |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myanmar-facebook-genocide.html |access-date=April 15, 2022 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> enabling [[climate change denial]]<ref>{{cite web |last=Waldman |first=Scott |title=Climate Denial Spreads on Facebook as Scientists Face Restrictions |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-denial-spreads-on-facebook-as-scientists-face-restrictions/ |access-date=August 6, 2020 |website=[[Scientific American]] |publisher=[[Environment & Energy Publishing|E&E News]] |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Guynn |first=Jessica |title=Climate change denial on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and TikTok is 'as bad as ever' |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2022/01/21/climate-change-misinformation-facebook-youtube-twitter/6594691001/ |access-date=April 15, 2022 |website=[[USA Today]] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Waldman |first=Scott |date=February 23, 2022 |title=Climate denial still flourishes on Facebook — report |url=https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-denial-still-flourishes-on-facebook-report/ |access-date=April 15, 2022 |website=E&E News |language=en-US}}</ref> and [[Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting]] conspiracy theorists,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/25/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-sandy-hook-parents-open-letter|title=An open letter to Mark Zuckerberg from the parents of a Sandy Hook victim|last1=Pozner|first1=Leonard|last2=Rosa|first2=Veronique De La|date=July 25, 2018|website=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=August 4, 2018|last3=Pozner|first3=parents of Noah}}</ref> and anti-refugee attacks in Germany.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/world/europe/facebook-refugee-attacks-germany.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821102155/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/world/europe/facebook-refugee-attacks-germany.html |archive-date=August 21, 2018 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Facebook Fueled Anti-Refugee Attacks in Germany, New Research Suggests|newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=August 21, 2018 |access-date=August 21, 2018|last1=Taub |first1=Amanda |last2=Fisher |first2=Max }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=MMller|first1=Karsten|last2=Schwarz|first2=Carlo|date=2017|title=Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate Crime|journal=SSRN Working Paper Series|doi=10.2139/ssrn.3082972|issn=1556-5068|ssrn=3082972|s2cid=19194580}}</ref><ref name="RottingDemocracyBeauchamp">{{cite web| url=https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/22/18177076/social-media-facebook-far-right-authoritarian-populism| title=Social media is rotting democracy from within| last=Beauchamp| first=Zack| publisher=[[Vox Media]]| date=January 22, 2019| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190125171545/https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/22/18177076/social-media-facebook-far-right-authoritarian-populism|archive-date=January 25, 2019 }}</ref> The government of the [[Philippines]] has also used Facebook as a tool to attack its critics.<ref name="PhilippinesEtter">{{cite web| url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-12-07/how-rodrigo-duterte-turned-facebook-into-a-weapon-with-a-little-help-from-facebook| title=What Happens When the Government Uses Facebook as a Weapon?| last=Etter| first=Lauren| publisher=[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]]| date=December 7, 2017| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190124225207/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-12-07/how-rodrigo-duterte-turned-facebook-into-a-weapon-with-a-little-help-from-facebook|archive-date=January 24, 2019 }}</ref> |
|||
In 2017, Facebook partnered with fact checkers from the [[Poynter Institute]]'s international fact-checking network to identify and mark false content, though most ads from political candidates are exempt from this program.<ref>{{cite web |last=Hunt |first=Elle |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/22/facebook-fact-checking-tool-fake-news |title='Disputed by multiple fact-checkers': Facebook rolls out new alert to combat fake news |date=March 22, 2017 |work=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=November 4, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Sherman |first=Amy |url=https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/oct/15/elizabeth-warren/phony-facebook-ad-warren-said-most-tv-networks-wil/ |title=In phony Facebook ad, Warren said most TV networks will refuse ads with a 'lie' but that's wrong |work=[[PolitiFact]]|access-date=November 4, 2019}}</ref> As of 2018, Facebook had over 40 fact-checking partners across the world, including ''[[The Weekly Standard]]''.<ref name="Levin-2018">{{cite web |last=Levin |first=Sam |date=December 13, 2018 |title='They don't care': Facebook factchecking in disarray as journalists push to cut ties |url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/dec/13/they-dont-care-facebook-fact-checking-in-disarray-as-journalists-push-to-cut-ties |access-date=April 15, 2022 |website=[[The Guardian]] |location=San Francisco |language=en}}</ref> Critics of the program have accused Facebook of not doing enough to remove false information from its website.<ref name="Levin-2018" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/24/facebook-fake-pelosi-video-1472413|title=Facebook on fake Pelosi video: Being 'false' isn't enough for removal|first=Nancy|last=Scola|website=[[Politico]]|date=May 24, 2019 }}</ref> |
|||
On May 13, 2015 Facebook in association with major news portals launched a program "Instant Articles" to provide rich news experience. Instant articles provides users, access to articles on Facebook news feed without leaving the site.<ref>http://media.fb.com/2015/05/12/instantarticles/</ref><ref>http://previewtech.net/facebook-launches-instant-articles/</ref> |
|||
Facebook has repeatedly amended its content policies. In July 2018, it stated that it would "downrank" articles that its [[Fact-checking|fact-checkers]] determined to be false, and remove misinformation that incited violence.<ref>{{cite news|last=Frenkel|first=Sheera|title=Facebook to Remove Misinformation That Leads to Violence|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/technology/facebook-to-remove-misinformation-that-leads-to-violence.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180718221759/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/technology/facebook-to-remove-misinformation-that-leads-to-violence.html |archive-date=July 18, 2018 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=August 9, 2018|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=July 18, 2018 }}</ref> Facebook stated that content that receives "false" ratings from its fact-checkers can be demonetized and suffer dramatically reduced distribution. Specific posts and videos that violate community standards can be removed on Facebook.<ref name="Darcy-2018">{{Cite news|last=Darcy|first=Oliver|date=July 20, 2018|title=Facebook's rhetoric on misinformation doesn't match its actions|work=[[CNN Business]]|url=https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/20/media/facebook-infowars-false-news-misinformation/index.html|access-date=August 4, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
===Like button=== |
|||
{{main|Like button}} |
|||
The like button is a social networking feature, allowing users to express their appreciation of content such as status updates, comments, photos, and advertisements. It is also a [[Facebook Platform#Social plugins|social plug-in of the Facebook Platform]] – launched on April 21, 2010<ref name="1-billion-likes">{{cite news |
|||
|title=Facebook: We'll Serve 1 Billion Likes on the Web in Just 24 Hours |
|||
|last=Siegler |
|||
|first=MG |
|||
|work=[[TechCrunch]] |
|||
|url=http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/21/facebook-like-button/ |
|||
|date=April 21, 2010 |
|||
|accessdate=December 19, 2011 |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="time-open-graph">{{cite news |
|||
|last=Fletcher |
|||
|first=Dan |
|||
|title=Facebook Looks to Get Personal |
|||
|work=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |
|||
|url=http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1983721,00.html |
|||
|date=April 22, 2010 |
|||
|accessdate=December 19, 2011 |
|||
}}</ref> – that enables participating Internet websites to display a similar like button. |
|||
In May 2019, Facebook banned a number of "dangerous" commentators from its platform, including [[Alex Jones]], [[Louis Farrakhan]], [[Milo Yiannopoulos]], [[Paul Joseph Watson]], [[Paul Nehlen]], [[David Duke]], and [[Laura Loomer]], for allegedly engaging in "violence and hate".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/02/tech/facebook-ban-louis-farrakhan-infowars-alex-jones-milo-laura-loomer/index.html|website=CNN|title=Facebook bans Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, InfoWars and others from its platforms as 'dangerous'|first=Oliver|last=Darcy|date=May 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-bans-alex-jones-louis-farrakhan-others-facebook-instagram-n1001311|website=NBC News|title=Alex Jones, Louis Farrakhan, others banned from Facebook and Instagram|date=May 2, 2019|author=Michael Cappetta and Ben Collins}}</ref> |
|||
Following the termination by the sheriff of Hampton, Virginia, US of employees who liked the Facebook page of an adversary, a federal appeals court in Virginia handed down a decision that the US Constitution protects the rights of US citizens to like any Facebook page of their choosing. US Circuit Judge William Traxler likened the practice to displaying a "political sign in one's front yard."<ref>{{cite web|title=Rest assured, your Facebook likes are now free speech|url=http://www.techhive.com/article/2049028/rest-assured-your-facebook-likes-are-now-free-speech.html#tk.nl_thbest|work=TechHive|publisher=IDG Consumer & SMB|accessdate=September 27, 2013|author=Caitlin McGarry|date=September 19, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
In May 2020, Facebook agreed to a preliminary settlement of $52 million (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|52000000|2020}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) to compensate U.S.-based Facebook content moderators for their psychological trauma suffered on the job.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook will pay $52 million in settlement with moderators who developed PTSD on the job|url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/12/21255870/facebook-content-moderator-settlement-scola-ptsd-mental-health|last=Newton|first=Casey|date=May 12, 2020|website=[[The Verge]]|language=en|access-date=May 13, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The secret lives of Facebook moderators in America|url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/25/18229714/cognizant-facebook-content-moderator-interviews-trauma-working-conditions-arizona|last=Newton|first=Casey|date=February 25, 2019|website=[[The Verge]]|language=en|access-date=May 16, 2020}}</ref> Other legal actions around the world, including in Ireland, await settlement.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook Content Moderators Win $52m Compensation Settlement|url=https://www.moderatorrights.com/blog/facebook-content-moderators-win-52m-compensation-settlement/|date=May 13, 2020|website=ModeratorRights.com|language=en-US|access-date=May 13, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
Following a lengthy period of calls from the public to include a dislike button on the Facebook interface, Zuckerberg explained in a Q&A session on December 11, 2014, that his reticence was due to a concern about a tone of negativity on the platform—whereby users could "shame" others—and he offered the comment option for situations where people were unwilling to use the like function. However, he said, "We're [Facebook] thinking about it [dislike button] ... It's an interesting question," and said that he likes the idea of Facebook users being able to express a greater variety of emotions.<ref name="Sam" /> |
|||
In September 2020, the [[Government of Thailand]] utilized the Computer Crime Act for the first time to take action against Facebook and [[Twitter]] for ignoring requests to take down content and not complying with court orders.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-internet-idUSKCN26F0R7?taid=5f6c4b2a82069f0001b379a4|title=Thailand takes first legal action against Facebook, Twitter over content|access-date=September 24, 2020|website=Reuters|date=September 24, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
===Following=== |
|||
On September 14, 2011, Facebook added the ability for users to provide a "Subscribe" button on their page, which allows users to subscribe to public postings by the user without needing to add them as a friend.<ref>{{cite web|author=Meghan Peters|url=http://mashable.com/2011/09/15/facebook-subscribe-users/ |title=Facebook Subscribe Button: What It Means for Each Type of User |publisher=Mashable.com |date=September 15, 2011 |accessdate=April 29, 2012}}</ref> In conjunction, Facebook also introduced a system in February 2012 to verify the identity of certain accounts. Unlike a similar system used by Twitter, verified accounts do not display a special verification badge, but are given a higher priority in a user's "Subscription Suggestions".<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=March 3, 2012|url=http://techcrunch.com/2012/02/15/facebook-verified-accounts-alternate-names/|title= Facebook Launches Verified Accounts and Pseudonyms|publisher=TechCrunch}}</ref> |
|||
According to a report by [[Reuters]], beginning in 2020, the United States military ran a [[Propaganda in the United States|propaganda]] campaign to spread disinformation about the [[Sinovac Biotech|Sinovac]] Chinese [[COVID-19]] vaccine, including using fake social media accounts to spread the disinformation that the Sinovac vaccine contained pork-derived ingredients and was therefore ''[[haram]]'' under [[Sharia|Islamic law]].<ref name=":63">{{Cite news |last1=Bing |first1=Chris |last2=Schechtman |first2=Joel |date=June 14, 2024 |title=Pentagon Ran Secret Anti-Vax Campaign to Undermine China during Pandemic |url=https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-covid-propaganda/ |work=[[Reuters]]}}</ref> The campaign was described as "payback" for [[COVID-19 misinformation by China|COVID-19 disinformation by China]] directed against the U.S.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Toropin |first=Konstantin |date=2024-06-14 |title=Pentagon Stands by Secret Anti-Vaccination Disinformation Campaign in Philippines After Reuters Report |url=https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/06/14/pentagon-stands-secret-anti-vaccination-disinformation-campaign-philippines-after-reuters-report.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240614223757/https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/06/14/pentagon-stands-secret-anti-vaccination-disinformation-campaign-philippines-after-reuters-report.html |archive-date=2024-06-14 |access-date=2024-06-19 |website=[[Military.com]] |language=en}}</ref> In summer 2020, Facebook asked the military to remove the accounts, stating that they violated Facebook's policies on fake accounts and on COVID-19 information.<ref name=":63" /> The campaign continued until mid-2021.<ref name=":63" /> |
|||
In December 2012, Facebook announced that because of user confusion surrounding its function, the Subscribe button would be re-labeled as a "Follow" button{{emdash}}making it more similar to other social networks with similar functions.<ref name="verge-fbfollow">{{cite web|title=Facebook snubs 'Subscribe' button in favor of Twitter-esque 'Follow' on all profile pages|url=http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/5/3731986/facebook-like-follow|publisher=The Verge|accessdate=December 6, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
==== Threats and incitement ==== |
|||
===Comparison with Myspace=== |
|||
Professor [[Ilya Somin]] reported that he had been the subject of death threats on Facebook in April 2018 from [[Cesar Sayoc]], who threatened to kill Somin and his family and "feed the bodies to Florida alligators". Somin's Facebook friends reported the comments to Facebook, which did nothing except dispatch automated messages.<ref>{{cite web |date=October 27, 2018 |title=Mail Bomber Cesar Sayoc Threatened Me on Facebook – Volokh Conspiracy |url=http://reason.com/volokh/2018/10/27/mail-bomber-cesar-sayoc-threatened-me-on}}</ref> Sayoc was later arrested for the [[October 2018 United States mail bombing attempts]] directed at Democratic politicians. |
|||
The media often compares Facebook to [[Myspace]], but one significant difference between the two Web sites is the level of customization.<ref>{{Cite news|accessdate=March 8, 2008 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/25/technology/25social.html |title=Facebook Expands Into MySpace's Territory |work=The New York Times |author=Stone, Brad |date=May 25, 2007 }}</ref> Another difference is Facebook's requirement that users give their true identity, a demand that MySpace does not make.<ref>{{cite web |accessdate=September 10, 2010 |url=http://mobilitytoday.com/news/009500/facebook_connect_mt |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101024033731/http://mobilitytoday.com/news/009500/facebook_connect_mt |archivedate=October 24, 2010 |title=Facebook Connect fully integrated into Mobility Today |publisher=Mobility Today Fitness |date=May 7, 2009 |author=Ciccone, David }}</ref> MySpace allows users to decorate their profiles using [[HTML]] and [[Cascading Style Sheets]] (CSS), while Facebook allows only [[plain text]].<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=April 30, 2008 |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,134635-c,categories/article.html |title=Is Facebook the New MySpace? |work=[[PC World]] |location =San Francisco |date=July 24, 2007| author=Sullivan, Mark }}</ref> Facebook has a number of features with which users may interact. They include the [[Tag (Facebook)|Wall]], a space on every user's profile page that allows friends to post messages for the user to see;<ref name="off">{{cite web |last=Der |first=Kevin |url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=3532972130 |title=Facebook is off-the-wall |accessdate=July 30, 2007|publisher=The Facebook Blog}}</ref> [[Super Poke|Pokes]], which allows users to send a virtual "poke" to each other (a notification then tells a user that they have been poked);<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=March 9, 2008|url= https://www.facebook.com/help/?faq=210552142308915&ref_query=pok|title=Inbox, Messages and Pokes |publisher=Facebook }}</ref> [[Facebook features#Photo and video uploads|Photos]], where users can upload albums and photos;<ref name="gifts">{{cite web|url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2406207130|accessdate=March 5, 2008|title=The Facebook Gifts|publisher=Facebook}}</ref> and [[Facebook features#Status updates|Status]], which allows users to inform their friends of their whereabouts and actions.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.news.com.au/technology/story/0,25642,22822400-5014108,00.html |title=Facebook is ... reconsidering the word "is" |accessdate=March 8, 2008 |work=news.com.au Technology blog |first=Andrew |last=Ramadge |date=November 26, 2007 |location =Sydney}}</ref> Depending on privacy settings, anyone who can see a user's profile can also view that user's Wall. In July 2007, Facebook began allowing users to post attachments to the Wall, whereas the Wall was previously limited to textual content only.<ref name="off" /> |
|||
=== |
==== Terrorism ==== |
||
[[Force v. Facebook Inc.|Force v. Facebook, Inc'''.''']], 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019) was a case that alleged Facebook was profiting off recommendations for Hamas. In 2019, the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|US Second Circuit Appeals Court]] held that [[Section 230]] bars civil terrorism claims against [[Social media|social media companies]] and internet service providers, the first federal appellate court to do so. |
|||
Facebook enables users to choose their own privacy settings and choose who can see specific parts of their profile.<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=June 13, 2009 |url=https://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=search |title=Search Privacy |publisher=Facebook}}</ref> The website is free to its users and generates revenue from advertising, such as [[Web banner|banner ads]].<ref name="tc">{{Cite news |accessdate=March 9, 2008 |url=http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6066533.html |title=Facebook goes corporate |work=[[ZDNet]] News |date=April 28, 2006 |author=Barton, Zoe |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080526001748/http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6066533.html |archivedate = May 26, 2008 |deadurl=yes}}</ref> Facebook requires a user's name and profile picture (if applicable) to be accessible by everyone. Users can control who sees other information they have shared, as well as who can find them in searches, through their privacy settings.<ref name="Choose Your Privacy Settings">{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=privacy |title=Choose Your Privacy Settings |publisher=Facebook |accessdate=September 10, 2009}}</ref> |
|||
==== Hate speech ==== |
|||
On November 6, 2007, Facebook launched [[Facebook Beacon]], which was a part of Facebook's advertisement system until it was discontinued in 2009. Its purpose was to allow targeted advertisements and allowing users to share their activities with their friends. |
|||
In October 2020, [[Pakistani]] Prime Minister [[Imran Khan]] urged [[Mark Zuckerberg]], through a letter posted on government's [[Twitter]] account, to ban [[Islamophobic]] content on Facebook, warning that it encouraged [[extremism]] and violence.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pakistan-facebook/pakistani-pm-asks-facebook-ceo-to-ban-islamophobic-content-idUSKBN27A0UK?rpc=401&|title=Pakistani PM asks Facebook CEO to ban Islamophobic content|access-date=October 25, 2020|website=Reuters|date=October 25, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
In October 2020, the company announced that it would ban [[Holocaust denial]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Grenoble|first=Ryan|date=October 12, 2020|title=Facebook Decides Holocaust Denial Content Is Bad, Actually|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/facebook-ban-holocaust-denials_n_5f8478dec5b62f97bac625c3|access-date=October 12, 2020|website=HuffPost|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
In 2010, Facebook's security team began expanding its efforts to reduce the risks to users' [[privacy]],<ref name="revealed">{{cite web|title=Revealed: Which social networks pose the biggest risk? | url=http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2010/02/01/revealed-social-networks-pose-biggest-risk/ |publisher=[[Sophos]]|last=Cluley|first=Graham|date=February 1, 2010|accessdate=July 12, 2010}}</ref> but [[Criticism of Facebook#Privacy concerns|privacy concerns]] remain.<ref name="liebertpub1">{{cite web|url = http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cyber.2012.0323 |title = Who Commits Virtual Identity Suicide? Differences in Privacy Concerns, Internet Addiction, and Personality Between Facebook Users and Quitters |publisher = Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking }}</ref> |
|||
In October 2022, [[Media Matters for America]] published a report that Facebook and Instagram were still profiting off advertisements using the slur "[[LGBT grooming conspiracy theory|groomer]]" for [[LGBT]] people.<ref name="carter_20221013">{{Cite web |url=https://www.mediamatters.org/facebook/meta-still-profiting-ads-use-anti-lgbtq-groomer-slur-despite-platforms-ban |title=Meta is still profiting off ads that use the anti-LGBTQ 'groomer' slur, despite the platform's ban |website=Media Matters |last1=Carter |first1=Camden |date=October 13, 2022 |access-date=October 22, 2022}}</ref> The article reported that Meta had previously confirmed that the use of this word for the LGBT community violates its hate speech policies.<ref name="carter_20221013"/> The story was subsequently picked up by other news outlets such as the ''[[New York Daily News]]'', ''[[PinkNews]]'', and ''[[LGBTQ Nation]]''.<ref name="assuncao_20221014">{{Cite web |url=https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-facebook-meta-media-matters-profit-anti-lgbtq-slur-groomers-ads-despite-ban-20221014-l5gpzfozjbaq5hpbst66bzkq3e-story.html |title=Facebook parent company Meta still cashing in on ads using anti-LGBTQ slur 'groomers' despite platform's ban: report |website=New York Daily News |last1=Assunção |first1=Muri |date=October 14, 2022 |access-date=October 22, 2022}}</ref><ref name="wakefield_20221014">{{Cite web |url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/10/14/meta-facebook-advert-profit-groomer-slur-rhetoric/ |title=Facebook has made thousands from hateful 'groomer' adverts in 2022 |website=PinkNews |last1=Wakefield |first1=Lily |date=October 14, 2022 |access-date=October 22, 2022}}</ref><ref name="villarreal_20221014">{{Cite web |url=https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/10/facebook-instagram-making-money-off-ads-calling-lgbtq-people-groomers-despite-policy/ |title=Facebook & Instagram are making money off ads calling LGBTQ people 'groomers' despite policy |website=LGBTQ Nation |last1=Villarreal |first1=Daniel |date=October 14, 2022 |access-date=October 22, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
Since 2010, among other social media services, the [[National Security Agency]] has been taking publicly-posted profile information from users Facebook profiles to discover who they interact with.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/30/us/nsa-social-networks/index.html?hpt=ibu_c2 |title=NSA mines Facebook, including Americans' profiles|first1=David |last1=Simpson |first2=Pamela |last2=Brown |work=cnn.com |date=September 30, 2013 |accessdate=September 30, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
==== Violent Erotica ==== |
|||
On November 29, 2011, Facebook settled [[Federal Trade Commission]] charges that it deceived consumers by failing to keep privacy promises.<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=November 29, 2011|url=http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/11/privacysettlement.shtm|title=Facebook Settles FTC Charges That It Deceived Consumers By Failing To Keep Privacy Promises|work=[[Federal Trade Commission|FTC]]|date=November 29, 2011 }}</ref> |
|||
There are ads on Facebook and Instagram containing sexually explicit content, descriptions of graphic violence and content promoting acts of self harm. Many of the ads are for webnovel apps backed by tech giants [[ByteDance|Bytedance]] and [[Tencent]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Baker-White |first=Emily |title=Facebook And Instagram Are Full Of Violent Erotica Ads From ByteDance- And Tencent-Backed Apps |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilybaker-white/2022/09/30/bytedance-tencent-facebook-instagram-ads-violent-erotica/ |access-date=September 30, 2022 |website=Forbes |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
==== ''InfoWars'' ==== |
|||
In August 2013 [[High-Tech Bridge]] published a study showing that links included in Facebook messaging service messages were being accessed by Facebook.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.htbridge.com/news/social_networks_can_robots_violate_user_privacy.html |title=Social networks: can robots violate user privacy?|date=August 27, 2013|accessdate=January 5, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook was criticized for allowing ''[[InfoWars]]'' to publish falsehoods and conspiracy theories.<ref name="Darcy-2018" /><ref>{{Cite news|last=Kelly|first=Heather|date=July 18, 2018|title=Mark Zuckerberg clarifies his Holocaust comments|work=CNNMoney|url=https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/18/technology/zuckerberg-recode-holocaust/index.html|access-date=August 4, 2018}}</ref><ref name="Recode">{{Cite news|url=https://www.recode.net/2018/7/16/17577426/media-left-right-facebook-define-journalism|title=Media – both on the left and right – are pressing Facebook to define what journalism is|work=Recode|access-date=August 4, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/07/how-facebooks-infowars-crisis-exposes-mark-zuckerbergs-hypocrisy?mbid=social_twitter|title=Why Facebook Won't Actually Ban Fake News|last=Kosoff|first=Maya|work=The Hive|access-date=August 4, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/facebook-alex-jones-robertmueller-pedophile|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230430002647/https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/facebook-alex-jones-robertmueller-pedophile|archive-date=April 30, 2023|title=Facebook Said Alex Jones' Threatening Rant Against Robert Mueller Doesn't Violate Its Rules|work=[[BuzzFeed News]]|access-date=August 4, 2018}}</ref> Facebook defended its actions in regard to ''InfoWars'', saying "we just don't think banning Pages for sharing conspiracy theories or false news is the right way to go."<ref name="Recode" /> Facebook provided only six cases in which it fact-checked content on the ''InfoWars'' page over the period September 2017 to July 2018.<ref name="Darcy-2018" /> In 2018, ''InfoWars'' falsely claimed that the survivors of the Parkland shooting were "actors". Facebook pledged to remove ''InfoWars'' content making the claim, although ''InfoWars'' videos pushing the false claims were left up, even though Facebook had been contacted about the videos.<ref name="Darcy-2018" /> Facebook stated that the videos never explicitly called them actors.<ref name="Darcy-2018" /> Facebook also allowed ''InfoWars'' videos that shared the [[Pizzagate conspiracy theory]] to survive, despite specific assertions that it would purge Pizzagate content.<ref name="Darcy-2018" /> In late July 2018, Facebook suspended the personal profile of ''InfoWars'' head Alex Jones for 30 days.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/26/media/facebook-infowars-alex-jones/index.html|title=Facebook suspends personal profile of InfoWars founder Alex Jones|last=Darcy|first=Oliver|work=[[CNN Business]]|access-date=August 4, 2018}}</ref> In early August 2018, Facebook banned the four most active ''InfoWars''-related pages for [[hate speech]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/facebook-and-apple-itunes-ban-alex-jones-as-internet-giants-silence-infowars|title=Facebook and Apple iTunes Ban Alex Jones as Internet Giants Silence Infowars|last=Ross|first=Jamie|date=August 6, 2018|work=[[The Daily Beast]]|access-date=August 6, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
In January 2014 two users filed a lawsuit against Facebook alleging that their privacy had been violated by this practice.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Van Grove|first1=Jennifer|title=Facebook sued for allegedly intercepting private messages|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-sued-for-allegedly-intercepting-private-messages/|website=[[CNet]]|publisher=[[CBS Interactive]]|accessdate=March 16, 2015|date=January 2, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
=== Political manipulation === |
|||
===Facebook Bug Bounty Program=== |
|||
{{See also|State-sponsored Internet propaganda}} |
|||
On July 29, 2011, Facebook announced its Bug Bounty Program in which security researchers will be paid a minimum of $500 for reporting security holes on Facebook website. Facebook's [https://facebook.com/whitehat Whitehat] page for security researchers says: "If you give us a reasonable time to respond to your report before making any information public and make a good faith effort to avoid privacy violations, destruction of data, and interruption or degradation of our service during your research, we will not bring any lawsuit against you or ask law enforcement to investigate you."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://facebook.com/whitehat |title=Facebook |publisher=Facebook |date= |accessdate=August 4, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2389460,00.asp|title=Facebook Offers $500 Bounty for Reporting Bugs: Why So Cheap|publisher=PC Magazine|accessdate=January 18, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Berlin_(9163009052).jpg|thumb|right|upright=0.75|Graffiti in Berlin of Facebook founder [[Mark Zuckerberg]]. The caption is a reference to [[George Orwell]]'s novel ''[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]''.]] |
|||
<!-- This section needs a dedicated article "Political manipulations on Facebook" --> |
|||
[[File:Facebook t-shirt with whitehat debit card for Hackers.jpg|thumb|A Facebook "White Hat" debit card, given to researchers who report security bugs]] |
|||
As a dominant social-web service with massive outreach, Facebook has been used by identified or unidentified political operatives to affect public opinion. Some of these activities have been done in violation of the platform policies, creating "coordinated inauthentic behavior", support or attacks. These activities can be scripted or [[Troll farm|paid]]. Various such abusive campaign have been revealed in recent years, best known being the [[Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections]]. In 2021, former Facebook analyst within the ''Spam'' and ''Fake Engagement'' teams, [[Sophie Zhang (whistleblower)|Sophie Zhang]], reported more than 25 political subversion operations and criticized the general slow reaction time, oversightless, laissez-faire attitude by Facebook.<ref name="Ex">{{Citation|title=Ex-Facebook employee on the company's dangerous loophole: 'Autocrats don't bother to hide'| date=April 11, 2021 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYigm8R2ep8 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211219/eYigm8R2ep8 |archive-date=December 19, 2021 |url-status=live|language=en|access-date=April 15, 2021}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="Wong-2021">{{Cite news|last=Wong|first=Julia Carrie|date=April 12, 2021|title=How Facebook let fake engagement distort global politics: a whistleblower's account|language=en-GB|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/apr/12/facebook-fake-engagement-whistleblower-sophie-zhang|access-date=April 15, 2021|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref name="the Guardian-2021">{{cite web|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/apr/12/facebook-loophole-state-backed-manipulation|title=Revealed: the Facebook loophole that lets world leaders deceive and harass their citizens|date=April 12, 2021|website=the Guardian}}</ref> |
|||
==== Influence Operations and Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior ==== |
|||
Facebook started paying researchers who find and report security bugs by issuing them custom branded "White Hat" debit cards that can be reloaded with funds each time the researchers discover new flaws. "Researchers who find bugs and security improvements are rare, and we value them and have to find ways to reward them," Ryan McGeehan, former manager of Facebook's security response team, told CNET in an interview. "Having this exclusive black card is another way to recognize them. They can show up at a conference and show this card and say 'I did special work for Facebook.'"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-hands-out-white-hat-debit-cards-to-hackers/|title=Facebook hands out White Hat debit cards to hackers|publisher=[[CNET]]|accessdate=January 18, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
In 2018, Facebook stated that during 2018 they had identified "coordinated inauthentic behavior" in "many Pages, Groups and accounts created to stir up political debate, including in the US, the Middle East, Russia and the UK."<ref>{{cite web|last1=Gleicher|first1=Nathaniel|last2=Rodriguez|first2=Oscar|title=Removing Additional Inauthentic Activity from Facebook|url=https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/10/removing-inauthentic-activity/|publisher=Facebook Newsroom|access-date=May 27, 2019|date=October 11, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
Campaigns operated by the British intelligence agency unit, called [[Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group]], have broadly fallen into two categories; cyber attacks and propaganda efforts. The propaganda efforts utilize "mass messaging" and the "pushing [of] stories" via social media sites like Facebook.<ref>{{cite web|title=Snowden Docs: British Spies Used Sex and 'Dirty Tricks'|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/snowden-docs-british-spies-used-sex-dirty-tricks-n23091|work=[[NBC News]]|date=February 7, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Snowden leaks: GCHQ 'attacked Anonymous' hackers|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26049448|work=[[BBC News]]|date=February 5, 2014}}</ref> Israel's [[Jewish Internet Defense Force]], the [[Chinese Communist Party]]'s [[50 Cent Party]] and Turkey's [[AK Trolls]] also focus their attention on social media platforms like Facebook.<ref>{{cite news|title=China's 'troll factory' targeting Taiwan with disinformation prior to election|url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3568146|work=Taiwan News|date=May 11, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Trolls, bots and shutdowns: This is how Turkey manipulates public opinion|url=https://ahvalnews.com/freedoms/trolls-bots-and-shutdowns-how-turkey-manipulates-public-opinion|work=Ahval|date=November 17, 2017|access-date=May 27, 2019|archive-date=November 11, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111190541/https://ahvalnews.com/freedoms/trolls-bots-and-shutdowns-how-turkey-manipulates-public-opinion|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Jewish Internet Defense Force 'seizes control' of anti-Israel Facebook group|url=https://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/Jewish-Internet-Defense-Force-seizes-control-of-anti-Israel-Facebook-group|work=The Jerusalem Post|date=July 29, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |
|||
India, which has the second largest number of bug hunters in the world,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Researchers|first1=Indian|title=Indian Security Researchers tops Facebook Bug Bounty Program|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-dna-special-indians-are-worlds-top-bug-bounty-hunters-1884018|website=www.dnaindia.com/india/report-dna-special-indians-are-worlds-top-bug-bounty-hunters-1884018|publisher=DNA Newspaper}}</ref> tops the Facebook Bug Bounty Program with the largest number of valid bugs. "Researchers in Russia earned the highest amount per report in 2013, receiving an average of $3,961 for 38 bugs. India contributed the largest number of valid bugs at 136, with an average reward of $1,353. The U.S. reported 92 issues and averaged $2,272 in rewards. Brazil and the UK were third and fourth by volume, with 53 bugs and 40 bugs, respectively, and average rewards of $3,792 and $2,950", Facebook quoted in a post.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bug Bounty|first1=Facebook|title=Facebook Bug Bounty|url=https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-bug-bounty/bug-bounty-highlights-and-updates/818902394790655|publisher=Facebook Security|accessdate=April 3, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
|last=Morrison |
|||
|first=Sarah |
|||
|title=Jewish Activist Battles For Israel on Facebook |
|||
|newspaper=Israel National News |
|||
|date=March 4, 2008 |
|||
|url=http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/125783 |
|||
}}{{better source needed|date=July 2022}}</ref> |
|||
In July 2018, Samantha Bradshaw, co-author of the report from the [[Oxford Internet Institute]] (OII) at [[Oxford University]], said that "The number of countries where formally organised [[social media manipulation]] occurs has greatly increased, from 28 to 48 countries globally. The majority of growth comes from political parties who spread [[disinformation]] and junk news around election periods."<ref>{{cite news|title=Social media manipulation rising globally, new report warns|url=http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2018-07-20-social-media-manipulation-rising-globally-new-report-warns|publisher=University of Oxford|date=July 20, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
==Reception== |
|||
[[File:Social networks.jpg|thumb|300px|The most popular social networking sites by country]] |
|||
According to [[comScore]], Facebook is the leading social networking site based on monthly unique visitors, having overtaken main competitor [[MySpace]] in April 2008.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.techtree.com/India/News/Facebook_Largest_Fastest_Growing_Social_Network/551-92134-643.html |title=Facebook: Largest, Fastest Growing Social Network |accessdate=August 14, 2008 |date=August 13, 2008 |work=Techtree.com}}</ref> ComScore reports that Facebook attracted 130 million unique visitors in May 2010, an increase of 8.6 million people.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/07/privacy-facebook-visitors/ |title=Privacy, Schmivacy: Facebook Is Attracting Near-Record Numbers Of New Visitors |accessdate=September 8, 2010 |date=June 7, 2010 |work= TechCrunch}}</ref> According to third-party [[web analytics]] providers, [[Alexa]] and [[SimilarWeb]], Facebook is ranked second and first globally respectively, it is the highest-read social network on the Web, with over 20 billion visitors per month, as of 2015.<ref name="alexaranking">{{cite web | url=http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/www.facebook.com | title=facebook.com Site Overview | publisher=[[Alexa Internet]] | accessdate=June 29, 2015}}</ref><ref name="similarranking">{{cite web | url=http://www.similarweb.com/website/facebook.com | title=Facebook.com Analytics | publisher=[[SimilarWeb]] | accessdate=June 29, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.similarweb.com/category/internet_and_telecom/social_network | title=Top 50 sites in the world for Internet And Telecom > Social Network | publisher=[[SimilarWeb]] | accessdate=June 29, 2015}}</ref> [[SimilarWeb]], [[Quantcast]] and [[Compete.com]] all rank the website 2nd in the U.S. in traffic.<ref name="similarranking"/><ref>{{cite web |accessdate=September 9, 2010 |url=http://www.quantcast.com/facebook.com |title=Facebook.com Web Site Audience Profile |publisher=[[Quantcast]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|accessdate=September 9, 2010|url=http://blog.compete.com/2010/02/17/we%E2%80%99re-number-two-facebook-moves-up-one-big-spot-in-the-charts/|title=We're Number Two! Facebook moves up one big spot in the charts |publisher=[[Compete.com]] }}</ref> The website is the most popular for uploading photos, with 50 billion uploaded cumulatively.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=September 9, 2010 |url=http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2010-07-21-facebook-hits-500-million-users_N.htm |title=Status update: Facebook logs 500 million members |work=USA Today |location =Washington DC |date=July 22, 2010 |author= McGrath, Kristin}}</ref> In 2010, [[Sophos]]'s "Security Threat Report 2010" polled over 500 firms, 60% of which responded that they believed that Facebook was the social network that posed the biggest threat to security, well ahead of MySpace, Twitter, and [[LinkedIn]].<ref name="revealed" /> |
|||
In October 2018, ''The Daily Telegraph'' reported that Facebook "banned hundreds of pages and accounts that it says were fraudulently flooding its site with partisan political content – although they came from the United States instead of being associated with [[Russia]]."<ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook: Most political trolls are American, not Russian|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/10/11/facebook-political-trolls-american-not-russian/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/10/11/facebook-political-trolls-american-not-russian/ |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]|date=October 12, 2018}}{{cbignore}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook is the most popular social networking site in several [[List of countries where English is an official language|English-speaking countries]], including Canada,<ref name="canada">{{cite news |accessdate=April 30, 2008 |url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2007/05/18/facebook-says-thanks-canada.aspx |title=Facebook says 'Thanks, Canada' |work=National Post |location=Toronto |date=May 18, 2007 |author=Yum, Kenny}}{{dead link|date=October 2011}}</ref> the United Kingdom,<ref name="uk">{{Cite news |accessdate=April 30, 2008 |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/25/nface125.xml |title=Facebook is UK's biggest networking site |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=September 26, 2007 |author=Malkin, Bonnie |location= London}}</ref> and the United States.<ref>{{cite news |first=Doug |last=Caverly |title=comScore: Facebook Catches MySpace in U.S |url=http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/16/comscore-facebook-catches-myspace-in-us |work=WebProNews |publisher=iEntry Network |date=June 16, 2009 |accessdate=September 24, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=Facebook grows as MySpace cuts back |url=http://atlanta.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2009/06/15/daily47.html |work=Atlanta Business Chronicle |date=June 17, 2009 |quote=The Conference Board report on first quarter online users in the U.S. showed Facebook with an even larger lead, with 78 percent of social network participants, followed by MySpace (42 percent), [[LinkedIn]] (17 percent) and Twitter (10 percent). |accessdate=September 24, 2009 |first=Steven E.F. |last=Brown}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Drew |last=Hasselback |title=Comscore says Facebook has surpassed MySpace for U.S. users |url=http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpposted/archive/2009/06/17/comscore-says-facebook-has-surpassed-myspace-for-u-s-users.aspx |work=National Post |location =Toronto |date=June 17, 2009 |quote=Comscore says Facebook surpassed MySpace among U.S. users in May, while Nielsen figures that actually happened back in January. |accessdate=September 24, 2009}}{{dead link|date=October 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Cara |last=Wood |title=Keeping pace with mainstream social media |url=http://www.dmnews.com/keeping-pace-with-mainstream-social-media/article/147429/ |work=Direct Marketing News |location =New York |date=August 31, 2009 |quote=The giant in the space remains Facebook, which gets 87.7 million unique viewers per month, according to ComScore. MySpace, with nearly 70 million unique monthly visitors, has seen growth stagnate over the past year. |accessdate=September 24, 2009}}</ref> However, Facebook still receives limited adoption in countries such as Japan, where domestically created social networks are still largely preferred.<ref>{{cite news|title=Looking at 2013′s Japanese social-media scene|url=http://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2013/12/17/digital/looking-at-2013s-japanese-social-media-scene-3/|accessdate=December 27, 2013|newspaper=The Japan Times|date=December 17, 2013|author=AKKY AKIMOTO}}</ref> In regional Internet markets, Facebook penetration is highest in North America (69 percent), followed by Middle East-Africa (67 percent), Latin America (58 percent), Europe (57 percent), and Asia-Pacific (17 percent).<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=September 23, 2008 |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20011158-36.html|title=Who will be Facebook's next 500 million? |work=CNET |date=July 21, 2010 |author=McCarthy, Caroline |location=New York}}</ref> Some of the top competitors were listed in 2007 by [[Mashable]].<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| last = Ostrow |
|||
| first = Adam |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| title = Copycats: Top 10 International Facebook Clones |
|||
| publisher = [[Mashable]] |
|||
| url = http://mashable.com/2007/07/11/10-facebook-clones/ |
|||
| date = July 11, 2007 |
|||
| accessdate = November 14, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
In December 2018, ''The Washington Post'' reported that "Facebook has suspended the account of Jonathon Morgan, the chief executive of a top social media research firm" [[New Knowledge]], "after reports that he and others engaged in an operation to spread disinformation" on Facebook and Twitter during the [[2017 United States Senate special election in Alabama]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Facebook suspends five accounts, including that of a social media researcher, for misleading tactics in Alabama election |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/12/22/facebook-suspends-five-accounts-including-social-media-researcher-misleading-tactics-alabama-election/ |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=December 22, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Democratic operatives created fake Russian bots designed to link Kremlin to Roy Moore in Alabama race |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-operatives-created-fake-russian-bots-in-alabama-race-designed-to-link-kremlin-to-republican-roy-moore |work=[[Fox News]] |date=December 20, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
The website has won awards such as placement into the "Top 100 Classic Websites" by ''[[PC Magazine]]'' in 2007,<ref>{{cite news|accessdate=May 9, 2008|url=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2169354,00.asp|title= Social Networking |work=[[PC Magazine]]|date=August 13, 2007 }}</ref> and winning the "People's Voice Award" from the [[Webby Award]]s in 2008.<ref name="webby">{{cite web|accessdate=May 6, 2008|url=http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=12|title=12th Annual Webby Awards Nominees |publisher=[[International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences]] }}</ref> In a 2006 study conducted by Student Monitor, a company specializing in research concerning the college student market, Facebook was named the second most popular thing among undergraduates, tied with beer and only ranked lower than the [[iPod]].<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=March 10, 2008 |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198632,00.html |title=Survey: College Kids Like IPods Better Than Beer |work =Fox News |date=June 8, 2006}}</ref> |
|||
In January 2019, Facebook said it has removed 783 Iran-linked accounts, pages and groups for engaging in what it called "coordinated inauthentic behaviour".<ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook Says It Removed 783 Accounts Tied to an Iranian Manipulation Campaign|url=http://fortune.com/2019/01/31/facebook-manipulation-campaign-iran-fake-news/|work=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]|date=January 31, 2019}}</ref> In March 2019, Facebook sued four Chinese firms for selling "fake accounts, likes and followers" to amplify Chinese [[state media]] outlets.<ref>{{Cite news |date=April 20, 2019 |title=China is using Facebook to build a huge audience around the world |newspaper=[[The Economist]] |url=https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/04/20/china-is-using-facebook-to-build-a-huge-audience-around-the-world |url-access=subscription |access-date=August 19, 2023 |issn=0013-0613 |quote=Facebook pages usually gain followers when people share posts with their friends. Chinese outlets receive far fewer shares than Western ones do, which implies that they use some other tactic to amass fans. Facebook has already accused Chinese actors of skullduggery. In March it sued four Chinese firms, which it said had sold "fake accounts, likes and followers".}}</ref> |
|||
In 2010, Facebook won the [[Crunchie]] "Best Overall Startup Or Product" for the third year in a row<ref>{{cite news |last=Kincaid |first=Jason |url=http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/08/crunchies-winner/ |title=Facebook Takes Best Overall For The Hat Trick |work=Techcrunch |date=January 8, 2010 |accessdate=July 8, 2010}}</ref> and was recognized as one of the "Hottest [[Silicon Valley]] Companies" by Lead411.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lead411.com/silicon-valley-companies.html |title=Lead411 launches "Hottest Silicon Valley Companies" awards |publisher=Lead411.com |date=May 25, 2010 |accessdate=July 8, 2010}}</ref> However, in a July 2010 survey performed by the [[American Customer Satisfaction Index]], Facebook received a score of 64 out of 100, placing it in the bottom 5% of all private-sector companies in terms of customer satisfaction, alongside industries such as the [[IRS e-file]] system, airlines, and [[cable companies]]. The reasons why Facebook scored so poorly include privacy problems, frequent changes to the website's interface, the results returned by the News Feed, and spam.<ref>{{Cite news |accessdate=July 21, 2010 |url=http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/07/20/users-rate-facebook-slightly-above-the-tax-man/ |title=Users Rate Facebook Slightly Above the Tax Man |work=Digits (Wall Street Journal technology blog) |date=July 20, 2010 |author=Fowler, Geoffrey A. }}</ref> |
|||
In May 2019, [[Tel Aviv]]-based private intelligence agency [[Archimedes Group]] was banned from Facebook for "coordinated inauthentic behavior" after Facebook found fake users in countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-48349671|title=Is Facebook undermining democracy in Africa?|last=Madowo|first=Larry|date=May 24, 2019|access-date=June 8, 2019}}</ref> Facebook investigations revealed that Archimedes had spent some $1.1 million (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|1100000|2019}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) on fake ads, paid for in Brazilian reais, Israeli shekels and US dollars.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/middle-east/change-reality-facebook-busts-israel-based-campaign-to-disrupt-elections-20190517-p51oad.html|title='Change reality': Facebook busts Israel-based campaign to disrupt elections|last1=Debre|first1=Isabel|last2=Satter|first2=Raphael|date=May 16, 2019|website=The Sydney Morning Herald|access-date=June 8, 2019}}</ref> Facebook gave examples of Archimedes Group political interference in Nigeria, Senegal, Togo, Angola, Niger and Tunisia.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2019/05/removing-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-from-israel/|title=Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior From Israel {{!}} Facebook Newsroom|date=May 16, 2019|access-date=June 8, 2019}}</ref> The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab said in a report that "The tactics employed by Archimedes Group, a private company, closely resemble the types of information warfare tactics often used by governments, and the Kremlin in particular."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/16/tech/facebook-takedown-israeli-company/index.html|title=Facebook says Israeli company used fake accounts to target African elections|last1=O'Sullivan|first1=Donie|last2=Gold|first2=Hadas|department=CNN Business|website=CNN|date=May 16, 2019|access-date=June 8, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-bans-israeli-firm-over-fake-political-activity-11558030115|title=Facebook Bans Israeli Firm Over Fake Political Activity|last=Needleman|first=Sarah E.|date=May 16, 2019|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|access-date=June 8, 2019|issn=0099-9660}}</ref> |
|||
{{facebook growth}} |
|||
On May 23, 2019, Facebook released its Community Standards Enforcement Report highlighting that it has identified several fake accounts through artificial intelligence and human monitoring. In a period of six months, October 2018 – March 2019, the social media website removed a total of 3.39 billion fake accounts. The number of fake accounts was reported to be more than 2.4 billion real people on the platform.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.npr.org/2019/05/23/726353723/facebook-removed-nearly-3-2-billion-fake-accounts-in-last-six-months|title=Facebook Removed Nearly 3.4 Billion Fake Accounts in 6 Months|newspaper=[[NPR]]|date=May 23, 2019|access-date=May 23, 2019|publisher=[[NPR]]|last1=Romo|first1=Vanessa|last2=Held|first2=Amy}}</ref> |
|||
In December 2008, the [[Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory]] ruled that Facebook is a valid [[protocol (diplomacy)|protocol]] to serve court notices to defendants. It is believed to be the world's first legal judgement that defines a [[summons]] posted on Facebook as legally binding.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/12/16/1229189579001.html |title= Lawyers to serve notices on Facebook |work=The Age |location=Melbourne |date=December 16, 2008 |accessdate=March 23, 2010 |first=Noel |last=Towell}}</ref> In March 2009, the New Zealand High Court associate justice David Gendall allowed for the serving of legal papers on Craig Axe by the company Axe Market Garden via Facebook.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.theage.com.au/news/technology/web/kiwis-follow-australian-facebook-precedent/2009/03/16/1237054723620.html |title =Kiwi judge follows Australian Facebook precedent |work=The Age |location =Melbourne |agency =Agence France-Presse |date =March 16, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=vn20090405104820309C778226&newslett=1&em=197599a6a20090405ah |title= Facebook trap criminals in its web |author=Peters, Melanie |work=Independent Online |location= Cape Town |date=April 5, 2009}}</ref> Employers have also used Facebook as a means to keep tabs on their employees and have even been known to fire them over posts they have made.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Watch out! Bosses are saving money by firing employees over Facebook posts |author=Cochran, Jason |date=November 6, 2008 |accessdate=May 6, 2010 |url=http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2008/11/06/watch-out-bosses-are-saving-money-by-firing-employees-over-face/ |work=WalletPop.com}}{{dead link|date=January 2014}}</ref> |
|||
In July 2019, Facebook advanced its measures to counter deceptive political propaganda and other abuse of its services. The company removed more than 1,800 accounts and pages that were being operated from Russia, Thailand, Ukraine and Honduras.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-accounts/facebook-removes-fake-accounts-from-thailand-russia-ukraine-honduras-idUSKCN1UK0KE|title=Facebook removes fake accounts from Thailand, Russia, Ukraine, Honduras|access-date=July 25, 2019|work=[[Reuters]]}}</ref> After Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, it was announced that the internet regulatory committee would block access to Facebook.<ref>{{cite web |date=March 4, 2022 |title=Russia blocks access to Facebook |url=https://techcrunch.com/2022/03/04/russia-blocks-facebook/ |access-date=March 4, 2022 |website=[[TechCrunch]] |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
By 2005, the use of Facebook had already become so ubiquitous that the generic verb "facebooking" had come into use to describe the process of browsing others' profiles or updating one's own.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Facebooking, the rage on college campuses |author=McDonald, Soraya Nadia |newspaper=The Seattle Times |date=July 4, 2005 |accessdate=September 14, 2009 |url=http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20050704&slug=btfacebook04}}</ref> In 2008, [[Collins English Dictionary]] declared "Facebook" as its new Word of the Year.<ref>{{cite web |author=Nicole, Kristen |url= http://mashable.com/2007/12/21/facebook-noun-verb-collins-english-dictionary/ |title=I Can So "Facebook" You Now (and be {{sic|nolink=y|gramatically|expected=grammatically}} correct) |work= Mashable |date=December 21, 2007 |accessdate=March 23, 2010}}</ref> In December 2009, the [[New Oxford American Dictionary]] declared its word of the year to be the verb "[[unfriend]]", defined as "To remove someone as a '[[Friend (Facebook)|friend]]' on a [[social networking]] site such as Facebook.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2009/11/unfriend-is-new-oxford-dictionarys-word-of-the-year-/1 |title=Unfriend is New Oxford dictionary's Word of the Year |work=USA Today |location =Washington DC |accessdate=July 12, 2010 |date=November 17, 2009}}</ref> |
|||
On October 30, 2019, Facebook deleted several accounts of the employees working at the Israeli [[NSO Group]], stating that the accounts were "deleted for not following our terms". The deletions came after WhatsApp sued the Israeli surveillance firm for targeting 1,400 devices with [[spyware]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://qudsnen.co/facebook-deletes-accounts-of-workers-at-nso-israeli-firm/|title=Facebook deletes accounts of workers at NSO Israeli firm|access-date=November 1, 2019|website=Quds News Network|date=November 2019|archive-date=August 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200817171324/https://qudsnen.co/facebook-deletes-accounts-of-workers-at-nso-israeli-firm/|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
In early 2010, [[Openbook (website)|Openbook]] was established, an avowed [[parody]] (and privacy advocacy) website<ref>{{cite web|url=http://youropenbook.org/about.html |title=Openbook – Connect and share whether you want to or not |publisher=Youropenbook.org |date=May 12, 2010 |accessdate=June 26, 2010}}</ref> that enables text-based searches of those Wall posts that are available to "Everyone", i.e. to everyone on the Internet. |
|||
{{anchor|American Edge}} |
|||
Writers for ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' found in 2010 that Facebook apps were transmitting identifying information to "dozens of advertising and Internet tracking companies". The apps used an [[HTTP referer]] which exposed the user's identity and sometimes their friends'. Facebook said, "We have taken immediate action to disable all applications that violate our terms".<ref>{{Cite news |author=Steel, Emily; Fowler, Geoffrey A. |title=Facebook in Privacy Breach |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304772804575558484075236968.html |date=October 18, 2010 |work=The Wall Street Journal |location=New York |accessdate=October 18, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
In 2020, Facebook helped found [[American Edge]], an anti-regulation [[lobbying firm]] to fight anti-trust probes.<ref name="ae">{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/05/12/facebook-lobbying-american-edge/ |title=Facebook Helps Launch American Edge, a Dark-Money Advocacy Group for Big Tech |date=May 12, 2020 |access-date=May 12, 2020 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|language=en-US |last=Romm |first=Tony}}</ref> The group runs ads that "fail to mention what legislation concerns them, how those concerns could be fixed, or how the horrors they warn of could actually happen", and do not clearly disclose that they are funded by Facebook.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.brookings.edu/articles/history-repeats-itself-with-big-techs-misleading-advertising/ |accessdate=August 26, 2023 |title=History repeats itself with Big Tech's misleading advertising |first=Tom |last=Wheeler |date=June 15, 2022 |publisher=[[Brookings Institution]]}}</ref> |
|||
In 2020, the government of Thailand forced Facebook to take down a Facebook group called Royalist Marketplace with one million members following potentially illegal posts shared. The authorities have also threatened Facebook with legal action. In response, Facebook is planning to take legal action against the Thai government for suppression of freedom of expression and violation of human rights.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/24/tech/facebook-blocks-thailand-group/index.html|title=Facebook prepares legal action against Thai government's order to block group|access-date=August 25, 2020|website=CNN International|date=August 24, 2020 }}</ref> |
|||
In January 2013, the countries with the most Facebook users were:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-statistics/ |title=Facebook Statistics by country |date=March 3, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
* United States with 168.8 million members |
|||
* Brazil with 64.6 million members |
|||
* India with 62.6 million members |
|||
* Indonesia with 51.4 million members |
|||
* Mexico with 40.2 million members |
|||
In 2020, during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], Facebook found that troll farms from [[North Macedonia]] and the Philippines pushed coronavirus disinformation. The publisher, which used content from these farms, was banned.<ref name="facebook_ban">{{cite news|last1=Collins|first1=Ben|last2=Zadrozny|first2=Brandy|author-link2=Brandy Zadrozny|date=May 20, 2020|title=Troll farms from North Macedonia and the Philippines pushed coronavirus disinformation on Facebook|work=NBC News|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/troll-farms-macedonia-philippines-pushed-coronavirus-disinformation-facebook-n1218376}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook's popularity throughout the world (especially as a tool for political movements or procrastination) has led to some countries and employers [[Censorship of Facebook|blocking access]] to the site. |
|||
In the run-up to the [[2020 United States elections]], Eastern European troll farms operated popular Facebook pages showing content related to [[Christianity in the United States|Christians]] and [[African Americans|Blacks]] in America. They included more than 15,000 pages combined and were viewed by 140 million US users per month. This was in part due to how Facebook's algorithm and policies allow unoriginal viral content to be copied and spread in ways that still drive up user engagement. As of September 2021, some of the most popular pages were still active on Facebook despite the company's efforts to take down such content.<ref>{{cite web |title=Troll farms reached 140 million Americans a month on Facebook before 2020 election, internal report shows |url=https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/09/16/1035851/facebook-troll-farms-report-us-2020-election/ |website=MIT Technology Review |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
All of the above total 309 million members or about 38.6 percent of Facebook's 1 billion worldwide members.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://english.kompas.com/read/2012/02/02/08412923/43.1.Million.Members.of.Facebook.in.Indonesia |title=43.1 Million Members of Facebook in Indonesia |date=February 2, 2012}}</ref> As of March 2013, Facebook reported having 1.11 billion monthly active users, globally.<ref>[http://investor.fb.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=761090 Facebook Reports First Quarter 2013 Results - Facebook]. Investor.fb.com (May 1, 2013). Retrieved on July 21, 2013.</ref> |
|||
In February 2021, Facebook removed the main page of the Myanmar military, after two protesters were shot and killed during the [[2021 Myanmar protests|anti-coup protests]]. Facebook said that the page breached its guidelines that prohibit the incitement of violence.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-21/facebook-removes-main-page-of-myanmar-military/13176760|title=Facebook removes main page of Myanmar military for 'incitement of violence'|access-date=February 21, 2021|website=ABC News|date=February 21, 2021}}</ref> On February 25, Facebook announced to ban all accounts of the Myanmar military, along with the "[[Tatmadaw]]-linked commercial entities". Citing the "exceptionally severe human rights abuses and the clear risk of future military-initiated violence in Myanmar", the tech giant also implemented the move on its subsidiary, [[Instagram]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20210225-facebook-bans-myanmar-military-accounts-from-its-platforms-citing-coup|title=Facebook bans Myanmar military accounts from its platforms, citing coup|access-date=February 25, 2021|website=France 24|date=February 25, 2021}}</ref> |
|||
In regards to Facebook's mobile usage, per an analyst report in early 2013, there are 192 million Android users, 147 million iPhone users, 48 million iPad users and 56 million messenger users, and a total of 604 million mobile Facebook users.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/04/how-many-mobile-users-does-facebook-have/ |title=Facebook Mobile User Counts Revealed: 192M Android, 147M iPhone, 48M iPad, 56M Messenger, 604M total users |publisher=TechCrunch |date=January 4, 2013 |accessdate=April 20, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
In March 2021, ''The Wall Street Journal''{{'s}} editorial board criticized Facebook's decision to fact-check its op-ed titled "We'll Have Herd immunity by April" written by surgeon [[Marty Makary]], calling it "counter-opinion masquerading as [[fact-checking|fact checking]]."<ref>{{Cite news|last=|first=|date=March 5, 2021|title=Opinion: Fact-Checking Facebook's Fact Checkers |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/fact-checking-facebooks-fact-checkers-11614987375|access-date=March 7, 2021|issn=0099-9660}}</ref> |
|||
<gallery widths="350" heights="270"> |
|||
File:Facebook popularity.PNG|Facebook popularity. Active users of Facebook increased from just a million in 2004 to over 750 million in 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics |title=Facebook Statistics |publisher=Facebook.com |accessdate=December 21, 2011}}</ref> |
|||
Population pyramid of Facebook users by age.png|[[Population pyramid]] of Facebook users by age as of January 1, 2010<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/01/04/december-data-on-facebook%E2%80%99s-us-growth-by-age-and-gender-beyond-100-million/|title=December Data on Facebook's US Growth by Age and Gender: Beyond 100 Million - Inside Facebook|work=Inside Facebook|accessdate=October 7, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
Facebook guidelines allow users to call for the death of public figures, they also allow praise of mass killers and 'violent non-state actors' in some situations.<ref>{{cite web|date=March 23, 2021|title=Facebook guidelines allow for users to call for death of public figures|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/mar/23/facebook-guidelines-allow-for-users-to-call-for-death-of-public-figures|access-date=March 23, 2021|website=the Guardian|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=March 23, 2021|title=Facebook leak underscores strategy to operate in repressive regimes|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/mar/23/facebook-leak-underscore-strategy-operate-repressive-regimes|access-date=March 25, 2021|website=the Guardian|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
== Criticisms and controversies == |
|||
{{Main|Criticism of Facebook}} |
|||
In 2021, former Facebook analyst within the ''Spam'' and ''Fake Engagement'' teams, [[Sophie Zhang (whistleblower)|Sophie Zhang]], reported on more than 25 political subversion operations she uncovered while in Facebook, and the general laissez-faire by the private enterprise.<ref name="Ex" /><ref name="Wong-2021" /><ref name="the Guardian-2021" /> |
|||
=== Electricity usage === |
|||
On April 21, 2011, [[Greenpeace]] released a report showing that of the top ten big brands in cloud computing, Facebook was most reliant on coal for electricity for its data centers. At the time, data centers consumed up to 2% of all global electricity and this amount was projected to increase. [[Phil Radford]] of Greenpeace said "we are concerned that this new explosion in electricity use could lock us into old, polluting energy sources instead of the clean energy available today."<ref name="Dirty Data Report Card">{{cite web |publisher=[[Greenpeace]] |url= http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/climate/2011/Cool%20IT/dirty-data-report-greenpeace.pdf|title=Dirty Data Report Card|accessdate=August 22, 2013}}</ref> On December 15, 2011, Greenpeace and Facebook announced together that Facebook would shift to use clean and renewable energy to power its own operations. Marcy Scott Lynn, of Facebook's sustainability program, said it looked forward "to a day when our primary energy sources are clean and renewable" and that the company is "working with Greenpeace and others to help bring that day closer."<ref name="Facebook and Greenpeace Settle Clean Energy Feud">{{cite web |publisher=[[Techcrunch]] |url= http://techcrunch.com/2011/12/15/facebook-greenpeace-settle-clean-energy-feud-after-two-year-campaign/ |title= Facebook and Greenpeace settle Clean Energy Feud |accessdate=August 22, 2013}}</ref><ref name="Facebook Commits to Clean Energy Future">{{cite web |publisher=[[Greenpeace]] |url=http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/media-center/news-releases/Facebook-Commits-to-Clean-Energy-Future/ |title= Facebook Commits to Clean Energy Future |accessdate=August 22, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
In 2021, Facebook was cited as playing a role in the fomenting of the [[2021 United States Capitol attack]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Brewster |first=Thomas |date=February 7, 2021 |title=Sheryl Sandberg Downplayed Facebook's Role In The Capitol Hill Siege—Justice Department Files Tell A Very Different Story |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/02/07/sheryl-sandberg-downplayed-facebooks-role-in-the-capitol-hill-siege-justice-department-files-tell-a-very-different-story/ |access-date=March 9, 2022 |website=Forbes |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Timberg |first1=Craig |last2=Dwoskin |first2=Elizabeth |last3=Albergotti |first3=Reed |date=October 22, 2021 |title=Inside Facebook, Jan. 6 violence fueled anger, regret over missed warning signs |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/22/jan-6-capitol-riot-facebook/ |access-date=March 9, 2022 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
===Google=== |
|||
In May 2011 emails were sent to journalists and bloggers making critical allegations about [[Google's privacy policies]]; however it was later discovered that [[Public relations|PR]] giant [[Burson-Marsteller]] was paid for the emails by Facebook .<ref>{{cite news |url= http://money.cnn.com/2011/05/12/technology/facebook_google/index.htm |title= Facebook vs. Google fight turns nasty |work=CNN Money |date =May 12, 2011 |first=Julianne |last=Pepitone}}</ref> |
|||
==== Russian interference ==== |
|||
=== Users violating minimum age requirements === |
|||
{{See also|Internet Research Agency|Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections}} |
|||
A 2011 study in the online journal ''[[First Monday]]'', examines how parents consistently enable children as young as 10 years old to sign up for accounts, directly violating Facebook's policy banning young visitors. This policy is in compliance with a United States law, the 1998 [[Children's Online Privacy Protection Act]], which requires minors aged 13 or younger to gain explicit parental consent to access commercial websites. In other jurisdictions where a similar law sets a lower minimum age, Facebook enforces the lower age. Of the 1,007 households surveyed for the study, 76% of parents reported that their child joined Facebook when they were younger than 13, the minimum age in the site's terms of service. The study also reported that Facebook removes roughly 20,000 users each day for violating its minimum age policy. The study's authors also note, "Indeed, Facebook takes various measures both to restrict access to children and delete their accounts if they join." The findings of the study raise questions primarily about the shortcomings of United States federal law, but also implicitly continue to raise questions about whether or not Facebook does enough to publicize its terms of service with respect to minors. Only 53% of parents said they were aware that Facebook has a minimum signup age; 35% of these parents believe that the minimum age is merely a recommendation, or thought the signup age was 16 or 18, and not 13.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/education/parents-children-facebook-privacy-age/ |title = Why Parents Help Their Children Lie to Facebook About Age: Unintended Consequences of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act |publisher = Journalist's Resource.org }}</ref> |
|||
In 2018, Special Counsel [[Robert Mueller]] indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian organizations for "engaging in operations to interfere with U.S. political and electoral processes, including the 2016 presidential election."<ref>{{cite news|title=Internet Research Agency indicted: Who is the Russian company behind the fake Facebook ads?|url=https://www.foxnews.com/tech/internet-research-agency-indicted-who-is-the-russian-company-behind-the-fake-facebook-ads|work=[[Fox News]]|date=February 16, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=13 Russians Indicted as Mueller Reveals Effort to Aid Trump Campaign|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/16/us/politics/russians-indicted-mueller-election-interference.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180216182422/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/16/us/politics/russians-indicted-mueller-election-interference.html |archive-date=February 16, 2018 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=February 16, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Exposing Russia's Effort to Sow Discord Online: The Internet Research Agency and Advertisements|url=https://intelligence.house.gov/social-media-content/|website=intelligence.house.gov|publisher=Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence|access-date=May 27, 2019|archive-date=January 28, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210128044519/https://intelligence.house.gov/social-media-content/|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
Mueller contacted Facebook subsequently to the company's disclosure that it had sold more than $100,000 (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|100000|2016}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) worth of ads to a company ([[Internet Research Agency]], owned by Russian billionaire and businessman [[Yevgeniy Prigozhin]]) with links to the Russian intelligence community before the [[2016 United States presidential election]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-gave-special-counsel-robert-mueller-more-details-on-russian-ad-buys-than-congress-1505514552|title=Facebook Gave Special Counsel Robert Mueller More Details on Russian Ad Buys Than Congress|last1=Seetharaman|first1=Deepa|date=September 15, 2017|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|access-date=September 15, 2017|last2=Tau|first2=Byron|issn=0099-9660|last3=Harris|first3=Shane}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook sold $100,000 of political ads to fake Russian accounts during 2016 US election|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-russia-ads-us-election-political-adverts-trump-putin-fake-news-a7933461.html|access-date=May 24, 2019|work=[[The Independent]]|date=September 6, 2017 }}</ref> In September 2017, Facebook's chief security officer [[Alex Stamos]] wrote the company "found approximately $100,000 in ad spending from June 2015 to May 2017 – associated with roughly 3,000 ads – that was connected to about 470 inauthentic accounts and Pages in violation of our policies. Our analysis suggests these accounts and Pages were affiliated with one another and likely operated out of Russia."<ref>{{cite magazine|title=Facebook Says Russian Accounts Bought $100,000 in Ads During the 2016 Election|url=https://time.com/4930532/facebook-russian-accounts-2016-election/|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]|date=September 6, 2017}}</ref> Clinton and Trump campaigns spent $81 million (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|81000000|2016}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}) on Facebook ads.<ref>{{cite news|title=New Studies Show Pundits Are Wrong About Russian Social-Media Involvement in US Politics|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/russiagate-elections-interference/|work=The Nation|date=December 28, 2018|access-date=June 2, 2019|archive-date=June 3, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190603215617/https://www.thenation.com/article/russiagate-elections-interference/|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
=== Accounts hacked in Bangalore, India === |
|||
In November 2011, several Facebook users in [[Bangalore]], India reported that their accounts had been hacked and their profile pictures replaced with pornographic images. For more than a week, users' news feeds were spammed with pornographic, violent and sexual content, and it was reported that more than 200,000 accounts were affected. Facebook described the reports as inaccurate, and Bangalore police speculated that the stories may have been rumors spread by Facebook's competitors.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Bangalore/article2635228.ece?homepage=true | location=Chennai, India |work=The Hindu | first=Deepa | last=Kurup | title=Facebook feeds spammed globally | date=November 17, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Anuradha Shetty |url=http://tech2.in.com/news/all/facebook-denies-hack-in-india-assures-safety/258592 |title=Facebook denies hack in India, assures safety |publisher=Tech2.in.com |date=November 18, 2011 |accessdate=December 21, 2011}}{{dead link|date=January 2014}}</ref> |
|||
The company pledged full cooperation in [[Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections|Mueller's investigation]], and provided all information about the Russian advertisements.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/06/facebook-gave-special-counsel-robert-mueller-data-on-russian-ads-report-says.html|title=Facebook gave special counsel Robert Mueller data on Russian ads, report says|last=Castillo|first=Michelle|website=[[CNBC]]|date=September 6, 2017|access-date=September 7, 2017}}</ref> Members of the [[United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence|House]] and [[United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence|Senate Intelligence Committees]] have claimed that Facebook had withheld information that could illuminate the Russian propaganda campaign.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/facebooks-openness-on-russia-questioned-by-congressional-investigators/2017/09/18/060e1ee4-9c90-11e7-9083-fbfddf6804c2_story.html|title=Facebook's openness on Russia questioned by congressional investigators|last1=Leonnig|first1=Carol D.|date=September 18, 2017|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=September 19, 2017|last2=Dwoskin|first2=Elizabeth|issn=0190-8286|last3=Timberg|first3=Craig}}</ref> Russian operatives have used Facebook polarize the American public discourses, organizing both [[Black Lives Matter]] rallies<ref>{{cite news|title=Russians trolls organized a protest in the US|url=https://edition.cnn.com/videos/us/2018/06/25/russia-protest-philando-castile-distorting-truth-orig.cnn/video/playlists/russian-trolls-exploit-philando-castiles-death/|work=[[CNN]]|date=June 25, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Did Russian hackers organize Philando Castile protest? Activists say no|url=http://www.startribune.com/local-organizers-doubt-reports-of-russian-ties-to-castile-protest/454368633/|work=[[Star Tribune]]|date=November 1, 2017}}</ref> and anti-immigrant rallies on U.S. soil,<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/exclusive-russia-used-facebook-events-to-organize-anti-immigrant-rallies-on-us-soil|title=Exclusive: Russia Used Facebook Events to Organize Anti-Immigrant Rallies on U.S. Soil|last1=Collins|first1=Ben|last2=Poulsen|first2=Kevin|last3=Ackerman|first3=Spencer|date=September 12, 2017|work=[[The Daily Beast]]|access-date=September 12, 2017}}</ref> as well as anti-Clinton rallies<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://businessinsider.com/facebook-group-russia-texas-anti-immigrant-rallies-2017-9|title=Shuttered Facebook group that organized anti-Clinton, anti-immigrant rallies across Texas was linked to Russia|work=[[Business Insider]]|access-date=September 14, 2017|archive-date=September 13, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170913202902/https://businessinsider.com/facebook-group-russia-texas-anti-immigrant-rallies-2017-9|url-status=dead}}</ref> and rallies both for and against Donald Trump.<ref>"[http://fortune.com/2018/02/17/russian-organized-rallies-election-meddling/ Russians Staged Rallies For and Against Trump to Promote Discord, Indictment Says]". ''[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]''. February 17, 2018.</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/russians-appear-to-use-facebook-to-push-pro-trump-flash-mobs-in-florida|title=Exclusive: Russians Appear to Use Facebook to Push Trump Rallies in 17 U.S. Cities|last1=Collins|first1=Ben|last2=Resnick|first2=Gideon|last3=Poulsen|first3=Kevin|last4=Ackerman|first4=Spencer|date=September 20, 2017|work=[[The Daily Beast]]|access-date=September 20, 2017}}</ref> Facebook ads have also been used to exploit divisions over black political activism and Muslims by simultaneously sending contrary messages to different users based on their political and demographic characteristics in order to sow discord.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/russian-operatives-used-facebook-ads-to-exploit-divisions-over-black-political-activism-and-muslims/2017/09/25/4a011242-a21b-11e7-ade1-76d061d56efa_story.html|title=Russian operatives used Facebook ads to exploit divisions over black political activism and Muslims|last1=Entous|first1=Adam|last2=Timberg|first2=Craig|last3=Dwoskin|first3=Elizabeth|date=September 25, 2017|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=September 25, 2017|issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>"[https://money.cnn.com/2017/09/27/media/facebook-black-lives-matter-targeting/index.html Exclusive: Russian-bought Black Lives Matter ad on Facebook targeted Baltimore and Ferguson]". CNN. September 28, 2017.</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/exclusive-russians-impersonated-real-american-muslims-to-stir-chaos-on-facebook-and-instagram|title=Exclusive: Russians Impersonated Real American Muslims to Stir Chaos on Facebook and Instagram|last1=Collins|first1=Ben|last2=Poulsen|first2=Kevin|last3=Ackerman|first3=Spencer|date=September 27, 2017|work=[[The Daily Beast]]|access-date=September 28, 2017}}</ref> Zuckerberg has stated that he regrets having dismissed concerns over Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/27/mark-zuckerberg-says-facebook-impact-on-2016-election-went-beyond-ads.html|title=Mark Zuckerberg responds to Trump, regrets he dismissed election concerns|last=Shinal|first=John|date=September 27, 2017|work=[[CNBC]]|access-date=September 27, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
=== Unauthorized wall posting bug === |
|||
On August 19, 2013, Facebook's [[customer service|guest service]] treatment was widely decried. That day, it was reported that a Facebook user from [[Yatta, Hebron|Yatta]], [[West Bank]]<ref>{{cite news |url=http://bigstory.ap.org/article/palestinian-finds-facebook-bug-hacks-ceos-page |title=Palestinian finds Facebook bug, hacks CEO's page - Associated Press |work=Associated Press |date=August 19, 2013 |accessdate=September 22, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-08/20/researcher-denied-facebook-bounty |title=£4,700 raised for snubbed researcher who posted on Zuckerberg's wall |publisher=Wired Magazine |date=August 20, 2013 |accessdate=September 22, 2013}}</ref> Khalil Shreateh had found a [[software bug|bug]] that allowed him to post material to other users' Facebook Walls. Users are not supposed to have the ability to post material to the Facebook Walls of other users unless they are approved friends of those users that they have posted material to. To prove that he was telling the truth, Shreateh posted material to Sarah Goodin's wall, a friend of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Following this, Shreateh contacted Facebook's security team with the proof that his bug was real, explaining in detail what was going on. Facebook has a bounty program in which it compensates people a $500 USD fee for reporting bugs instead of using them to their advantage or selling them on the black market. However, it was reported that instead of fixing the bug and paying Shreateh the fee, Facebook originally told him that "this was not a bug" and dismissed him. Shreateh then tried a second time to inform Facebook, but they dismissed him yet again. On the third try, Shreateh used the bug to post a message to Mark Zuckerberg's Wall, stating "Sorry for breaking your privacy ... but a couple of days ago, I found a serious Facebook exploit" and that Facebook's security team was not taking him seriously. Within minutes, a security engineer contacted Shreateh, questioned him on how he performed the move and ultimately acknowledged that it was a bug in the system. Facebook temporarily suspended Shreateh's account and fixed the bug after several days. Facebook refused to pay out the bounty to Shreateh, stating that by posting to Zuckerberg's account, Shreateh had violated one of their [[terms of service]] policies and therefore "could not be paid." Facebook also noted that in Shreateh's initial reports, he had failed to provide technical details for Facebook to act on the bug.<ref>{{cite web|last=Bort |first=Julie |url=http://finance.yahoo.com/news/researcher-facebook-ignored-bug-found-143418388.html |title=Researcher: Facebook Ignored the Bug I Found Until I Used It to Hack Zuckerberg - Yahoo! Finance |publisher=Finance.yahoo.com |date=April 20, 2011 |accessdate=August 19, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/19/tech/social-media/zuckerberg-facebook-hack/ |title=Zuckerberg's Facebook page hacked to prove security exploit |publisher=CNN.com |date=May 14, 2013 |accessdate=August 19, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/18/4633046/facebook-security-bug-let-anyone-post-on-walls |title=Facebook ignored security bug, researcher used it to post details on Zuckerberg's wall |publisher=The Verge |date=August 1, 2013 |accessdate=August 19, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
Russian-American billionaire [[Yuri Milner]], who befriended Zuckerberg<ref>"[https://www.icij.org/investigations/paradise-papers/kremlin-owned-firms-linked-major-twitter-facebook-investments-icij/ Kremlin-owned Firms Linked to Major Investments in Twitter and Facebook]". ''International Consortium of Investigative Journalists – ICIJ''. November 5, 2017.</ref> between 2009 and 2011, had [[Kremlin]] backing for his investments in Facebook and Twitter.<ref name="Drucker-2017">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/05/world/yuri-milner-facebook-twitter-russia.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171105190211/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/05/world/yuri-milner-facebook-twitter-russia.html |archive-date=November 5, 2017 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Kremlin Cash Behind Billionaire's Twitter and Facebook Investments|last=Drucker|first=Jesse|date=November 5, 2017|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=November 6, 2017|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> |
|||
On August 22, 2013, [[Yahoo News]] reported that [[Marc Maiffret]], a chief technology officer of the [[Cyber security standards|cybersecurity]] firm [[BeyondTrust]], is prompting [[hacker (computer security)|hackers]] to support in raising a $10,000 reward for Khalil Shreateh. On August 20, Maiffret stated that he had already raised $9,000 in his efforts, including the $2,000 he himself contributed. He and other hackers alike have denounced Facebook for refusing Shreateh compensation. Stated Maiffret, "He is sitting there in Palestine doing this research on a five-year-old laptop that looks like it is half broken. It's something that might help him out in a big way." Facebook representatives have since responded, "We will not change our practice of refusing to pay rewards to researchers who have tested vulnerabilities against real users." Facebook representatives also claimed they'd paid out over $1 million to individuals who have discovered bugs in the past.<ref>{{cite web|author=Reuters – Tue, August 20, 2013 5:03 PM EDT |url=http://finance.yahoo.com/news/hacker-exposed-facebook-bug-reward-210333258.html |title=Hacker who exposed Facebook bug to get reward from unexpected source - Yahoo! Finance |publisher=Finance.yahoo.com |accessdate=August 22, 2013}}{{dead link|date=January 2014}}</ref> |
|||
In January 2019, Facebook removed 289 pages and 75 coordinated accounts linked to the Russian state-owned news agency [[Sputnik (news agency)|Sputnik]] which had misrepresented themselves as independent news or general interest pages.<ref name=DaFN>{{cite web|title=Disinformation and 'fake news': Final Report|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/179109.htm|website=publications.parliament.uk|publisher=Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – House of Commons|access-date=May 24, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Gleicher|first=Nathaniel|title=Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior from Russia|url=https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2019/01/removing-cib-from-russia/|publisher=Facebook Newsroom|access-date=May 24, 2019|date=January 17, 2019}}</ref> Facebook later identified and removed an additional 1,907 accounts linked to Russia found to be engaging in "coordinated inauthentic behaviour".<ref>{{cite news|last=Cuthbertson|first=Antony|title=Facebook removes thousands more Russian accounts|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-russia-bots-brexit-account-iran-instagram-a8840256.html|access-date=May 24, 2019|work=[[The Independent]]|date=March 26, 2019 }}</ref> In 2018, a UK [[Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport]] (DCMS) select committee report had criticised Facebook for its reluctance to investigate abuse of its platform by the Russian government, and for downplaying the extent of the problem, referring to the company as 'digital gangsters'.<ref>{{cite web|title=Disinformation and 'fake news': Interim Report|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/363/36308.htm|website=publications.parliament.uk|publisher=Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – House of Commons}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Cadwalladr|first=Carole|author-link=Carole Cadwalladr|title=A withering verdict: MPs report on Zuckerberg, Russia and Cambridge Analytica|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/28/dcms-report-fake-news-disinformation-brexit-facebook-russia|access-date=May 24, 2019|work=[[The Observer]]|date=July 28, 2018}}</ref><ref name="the Guardian-2019">{{cite web|date=February 18, 2019|title=Facebook labelled 'digital gangsters' by report on fake news|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/feb/18/facebook-fake-news-investigation-report-regulation-privacy-law-dcms|access-date=September 24, 2020|website=the Guardian|language=en}}</ref><blockquote>"Democracy is at risk from the malicious and relentless targeting of citizens with disinformation and personalised 'dark adverts' from unidentifiable sources, delivered through the major social media platforms we use every day," Damian Collins, DCMS Committee Chair<ref name="the Guardian-2019" /></blockquote>In February 2019, [[Glenn Greenwald]] wrote that a cybersecurity company New Knowledge, which is behind one of the [[United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence|Senate reports]] on Russian social media election interference, "was caught just six weeks ago engaging in a massive scam to create fictitious Russian troll accounts on Facebook and Twitter in order to claim that the Kremlin was working to defeat Democratic Senate nominee [[Doug Jones (politician)|Doug Jones]] in Alabama. ''[[The New York Times]]'', when exposing the scam, quoted a New Knowledge report that boasted of its fabrications..."<ref>{{cite news|title=NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party|url=https://theintercept.com/2019/02/03/nbc-news-to-claim-russia-supports-tulsi-gabbard-relies-on-firm-just-caught-fabricating-russia-data-for-the-democratic-party/|work=The Intercept|date=February 3, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Secret Experiment in Alabama Senate Race Imitated Russian Tactics|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181220010545/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html |archive-date=December 20, 2018 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=December 19, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
=== Users quitting === |
|||
A 2013 study examined the reasons users eventually quit the site. It found the most common reasons were privacy concerns (48%), general dissatisfaction with Facebook (14%), negative aspects regarding Facebook friends (13%) and the feeling of getting addicted to Facebook (6%). Facebook quitters were found to be more concerned about privacy, more addicted to the Internet and more conscientious.<ref name="liebertpub1" /> |
|||
=== |
==== Anti-Rohingya propaganda ==== |
||
{{See also|Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar}} |
|||
Following the release of the Facebook [[iPhone app]] "Paper" at the beginning of February 2014, developer company [[FiftyThree, Inc.|FiftyThree]] sent a correspondence to the social media company regarding its own app, also entitled Paper and trademarked in 2012, asking Facebook to cease using an app name that they consider their own. In response, Facebook stated that it will continue to use the Paper title but conceded that it should have informed FiftyThree at an earlier point in time. FiftyThree articulated its desired outcome in a blog post: "There's a simple fix here. We think Facebook can apply the same degree of thought they put into the app into building a brand name of their own. An app about stories shouldn't start with someone else's story. Facebook should stop using our brand name."<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook's New Storytelling App 'Paper' Lands In The App Store|url=http://www.cultofmac.com/264972/facebooks-new-storytelling-app-paper-lands-app-store/|work=Cult of Mac|publisher=Cul |
|||
In 2018, Facebook took down 536<!--425+46+52+13--> Facebook pages, 17 Facebook groups, 175<!--135+12+18+10--> Facebook accounts, and 16<!--15+1--> Instagram accounts linked to the [[Myanmar]] military. Collectively these were followed by over 10 million people.<ref>{{cite web|title=Removing Myanmar Military Officials From Facebook|date=August 28, 2018|url=https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/08/removing-myanmar-officials/|publisher=Facebook Newsroom|access-date=May 27, 2019 }}</ref> ''The New York Times'' reported that:<ref>{{cite news|last=Mozur|first=Paul|title=A Genocide Incited on Facebook, With Posts From Myanmar's Military|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myanmar-facebook-genocide.html|access-date=May 27, 2019|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=October 15, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
tomedia Corp|accessdate=February 4, 2014|author=Buster Heine|date=February 3, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=FiftyThree Accuses Facebook Of Stealing Their App Name|url=http://www.cultofmac.com/265024/fiftythree-accuses-facebook-stealing-app-name/|work=Cult of Mac|publisher=Cultomedia Corp|accessdate=February 4, 2014|author=John Brownlee|date=February 3, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
{{blockquote|after months of reports about anti-Rohingya propaganda on Facebook, the company acknowledged that it had been too slow to act in Myanmar. By then, more than 700,000 Rohingya had fled the country in a year, in what United Nations officials called "a textbook example of ethnic cleansing".}} |
|||
==== Anti-Muslim propaganda and Hindu nationalism in India ==== |
|||
===Lane v. Facebook, Inc.=== |
|||
A 2019 book titled ''The Real Face of Facebook in India'', co-authored by the journalists [[Paranjoy Guha Thakurta]] and Cyril Sam, alleged that Facebook helped enable and benefited from the rise of [[Narendra Modi]]'s [[Hindu nationalism|Hindu nationalist]] [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP) in [[India]].<ref>{{cite web|title=The Past and Future of Facebook and BJP's Mutually Beneficial Relationship|url=https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-facebook-india-modi|website=The Wire}}</ref> |
|||
On March 2010, Judge Richard Seeborg issued an order approving the class settlement in ''[[Lane v. Facebook, Inc.]]'',<ref>{{cite web|title=FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 03/17/2010.|url=https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/California_Northern_District_Court/5--08-cv-03845/Lane_et_al_v_Facebook_Inc_et_al/123/|publisher=Docket Alarm, Inc.|accessdate=July 19, 2013}}</ref> the class action lawsuit arising out of Facebook's Beacon program. |
|||
Ankhi Das, Facebook's policy director for India and South and Central Asia, apologized publicly in August 2020 for sharing a Facebook post that called Muslims in India a "degenerate community". She said she shared the post "to reflect my deep belief in celebrating feminism and civic participation".<ref>{{cite web|title=A Facebook Executive Who Shared An Anti-Muslim Post Has Apologized To Employees|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranavdixit/facebook-executive-apologies-anti-muslim-post|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230426173931/https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranavdixit/facebook-executive-apologies-anti-muslim-post|archive-date=April 26, 2023|access-date=September 2, 2020|website=BuzzFeed News|date=August 24, 2020 |language=en}}</ref> She is reported to have prevented action by Facebook against anti-Muslim content<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Ellis-Petersen|first1=Hannah|last2=Rahman|first2=Shaikh Azizur|date=September 1, 2020|title=Facebook faces grilling by MPs in India over anti-Muslim hate speech|language=en-GB|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/01/facebook-faces-grilling-by-mps-in-india-over-anti-muslim-hate-speech|access-date=September 2, 2020|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref name="The Wire" /> and supported the BJP in internal Facebook messages.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Horwitz|first1=Jeff|last2=Purnell|first2=Newley|date=August 30, 2020|title=Facebook Executive Supported India's Modi, Disparaged Opposition in Internal Messages|language=en-US|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-executive-supported-indias-modi-disparaged-opposition-in-internal-messages-11598809348|access-date=September 1, 2020|issn=0099-9660}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=New Report Says Facebook's Ankhi Das Supported Modi, Hoped for BJP's Victory|url=https://thewire.in/tech/facebook-ankhi-das-modi-bjp-support-wsj-new-report|access-date=September 1, 2020|website=The Wire}}</ref> |
|||
=== User influence experiments === |
|||
In 2020, Facebook executives overrode their employees' recommendations that the BJP politician [[T. Raja Singh]] should be banned from the site for [[Hate speech laws in India|hate speech]] and rhetoric that could lead to violence. Singh had said on Facebook that [[Rohingya people|Rohingya Muslim immigrants]] should be shot and had threatened to destroy [[mosque]]s. Current and former Facebook employees told ''The Wall Street Journal'' that the decision was part of a pattern of favoritism by Facebook toward the BJP as it seeks more business in India.<ref name="The Wire">{{cite web|title=Watch {{!}} Why Did Facebook Not Remove BJP-Linked Anti-Muslim Hate Posts?|url=https://thewire.in/video/watch-facebook-bjp-hate-posts-wall-street-journal-raja-singh|access-date=September 1, 2020|website=The Wire}}</ref> Facebook also took no action after BJP politicians made posts accusing Muslims of intentionally spreading [[COVID-19 pandemic in India|COVID-19]], an employee said.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Purnell|first1=Newley|last2=Horwitz|first2=Jeff|date=August 14, 2020|title=Facebook's Hate-Speech Rules Collide With Indian Politics|language=en-US|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-hate-speech-india-politics-muslim-hindu-modi-zuckerberg-11597423346|access-date=August 16, 2020|issn=0099-9660}}</ref> |
|||
Academic and Facebook researchers have collaborated to test if the messages people see on Facebook can influence their behavior. For instance, in "A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence And Political Mobilization," during the 2010 elections, Facebook users were given the opportunity to "tell your friends you voted" by clicking on an "I voted" button. Users were 2% more likely to click the button if it was associated with friends who had already voted.<ref name="bond20146mp">{{cite journal | author=Robert M. Bond, Christopher J. Fariss, Jason J. Jones, Adam D. I. Kramer, Cameron Marlow, Jaime E. Settle, James H. Fowler |title=A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization| journal=Nature| year=2012| volume=489| issue=7415| pages=295–298| url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7415/abs/nature11421.html| doi=10.1038/nature11421}}</ref> |
|||
On August 31, 2020, the [[Delhi Legislative Assembly|Delhi Assembly]] began investigating whether Facebook bore blame for the [[2020 Delhi riots|2020 religious riots]] in the city, claiming it had found Facebook "prima facie guilty of a role in the violence".<ref>{{Cite news|author=Staff Reporter|date=August 31, 2020|title=Assembly panel alleges role of Facebook in Delhi riots|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/assembly-panel-alleges-role-of-facebook-in-delhi-riots/article32488223.ece|access-date=September 2, 2020|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Deol|first=Taran|date=August 31, 2020|title=Delhi assembly panel wants Facebook named co-accused in communal riots, hints at 'conspiracy'|url=https://theprint.in/india/governance/delhi-assembly-panel-wants-facebook-named-co-accused-in-communal-riots-hints-at-conspiracy/492793/|access-date=September 2, 2020|website=ThePrint|language=en-US}}</ref> On September 12, 2020, a Delhi Assembly committee said in a statement that it had asked Facebook India head Ajit Mohan to appear before it on September 15, leading to Facebook objecting and moving the [[Supreme Court of India]] against the decision.<ref>{{Cite news|date=September 12, 2020|title=Delhi city lawmakers summon Facebook India chief over February riots|language=en|work=[[Reuters]]|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-facebook-idUSKBN2630N6|access-date=July 5, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=September 23, 2020|title=Facebook India moves supreme court against Delhi assembly panel summons|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/facebook-india-moves-supreme-court-against-delhi-assembly-panel-summons/story-exrgUJRGksKVLeDlUsoMWL.html|access-date=July 5, 2021|website=Hindustan Times|language=en}}</ref> On September 15, Facebook skipped the Delhi Assembly panel hearing.<ref>{{cite web|title=Facebook Skips Delhi Assembly Panel Hearing, "Insulting," Fume Members|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/facebook-to-be-issued-final-warning-by-delhi-assembly-panel-after-executives-skip-hearing-2295583|access-date=July 5, 2021|website=NDTV.com}}</ref> On September 20, the Delhi Assembly panel issued a new notice asking Facebook to appear before it on September 23.<ref>{{cite web|date=September 20, 2020|title=Delhi Assembly panel issues fresh notice of appearance to Facebook India VP|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/delhi-assembly-panel-issues-fresh-notice-of-appearance-to-facebook-india-vp-6603758/|access-date=July 5, 2021|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref> On September 22, Facebook India vice-president and managing director Ajit Mohan moved the Supreme Court against the summons of the Delhi Assembly Committee.<ref>{{cite web|date=September 22, 2020|title=Facebook India VP moves Supreme Court against Delhi Assembly panel summoning him|url=https://www.livemint.com/news/india/fb-india-vp-moves-supreme-court-against-delhi-assembly-panel-summoning-him-11600785870396.html|access-date=July 5, 2021|website=mint|language=en}}</ref> On September 23, the Supreme Court granted him relief and ordered a stay to the summons, with the Central government later backing the decision.<ref>{{Cite news|date=September 23, 2020|title=Delhi riots {{!}} Supreme Court grants relief to Facebook official|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/delhi-riots-no-coercive-action-against-facebook-vp-till-oct-15-over-assembly-panel-summons-says-sc/article32677366.ece|access-date=July 5, 2021|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=September 23, 2020|title=SC orders stay on summons to Facebook India V–P by Delhi Assembly panel on riots|work=ThePrint|url=https://theprint.in/judiciary/sc-orders-stay-on-summons-to-facebook-india-v-p-by-delhi-assembly-panel-on-riots/509050/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Centre backs Facebook in SC row with Delhi Assembly over summons|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/centre-backs-facebook-in-sc-row-with-delhi-assembly-over-summons/articleshow/78684769.cms|access-date=July 5, 2021}}</ref> A former Facebook employee told a Delhi Assembly panel on November 13 that the violence could have been 'easily averted' if the social media giant had acted in a 'proactive and prompt manner'.<ref>{{Cite news|date=November 13, 2020|title=Delhi riots could have been averted if firm had acted: Ex-Facebook employee|work=Business Standard|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/delhi-riots-could-have-been-averted-if-firm-had-acted-ex-facebook-employee-120111300137_1.html|access-date=July 5, 2021}}</ref> On December 3, the Delhi Assembly moved the Supreme Court for intervention in the case.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Delhi Assembly peace panel moves SC for intervention in Facebook VP Ajit Mohan's case|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/delhi-assembly-peace-panel-moves-sc-for-intervention-in-facebook-vp-ajit-mohans-case/articleshow/79550742.cms|access-date=July 9, 2021}}</ref> On February 4, 2021, the Delhi Assembly panel issued a fresh notice to Facebook India to testify on the riots, avoiding specific notice to Mohan, by asking a senior, responsible officer from the company to appear before the panel.<ref>{{cite web|date=February 5, 2021|title=Facebook gets new notice to appear before Delhi Assembly committee probing riots|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/facebook-gets-new-notice-to-appear-before-delhi-assembly-committee-probing-riots-101612468672035.html|access-date=July 9, 2021|website=Hindustan Times|language=en}}</ref> The Union government submitted in the Supreme Court that Facebook could not be made accountable before any state assembly and the committee formed was unconstitutional.<ref>{{cite web|date=February 18, 2021|title='Facebook, Twitter can't be accountable to state assemblies': Centre to SC|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/facebook-twitter-can-t-be-accountable-to-state-assemblies-government-101613610284320.html|access-date=July 9, 2021|website=Hindustan Times|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=[Delhi Riots] Committee formed by Delhi Assembly to probe social media giants' omissions unconstitutional: Centre, Facebook tell Supreme Court|url=https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/peace-harmony-committee-constituted-delhi-state-assembly-probe-delhi-riots-unconstitutional-centre-facebook-supreme-court|access-date=July 9, 2021|website=Bar and Bench – Indian Legal news|date=February 2, 2021 |language=en}}</ref> On February 24, Mohan challenged summons issued by the Delhi assembly for failing to appear before it as a witness in connection with the 2020 riots in the Supreme Court, saying that the 'right to silence' is a virtue in present 'noisy times' and the legislature had no authority to examine him in a law and order case. The Supreme Court reserved its judgment for the case.<ref>{{cite web|title="Expansion Of Power Through Backdoor": Facebook Boss On Delhi Summons|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/facebook-md-ajit-mohan-to-supreme-court-right-to-silence-is-virtue-in-noisy-times-2377893|access-date=July 9, 2021|website=NDTV.com}}</ref> On July 8, the Supreme Court refused to quash the summons and asked Facebook asked to appear before the Delhi assembly panel.<ref>{{cite web|date=July 8, 2021|title=Facebook asked to appear before Delhi assembly panel, Supreme Court refuses to quash summons|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/delhi-riots-sc-rejects-facebook-india-vp-ajit-mohan-plea-summons-assembly-committee-7395029/|access-date=July 9, 2021|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
Much more controversially, a 2014 study of "Emotional Contagion Through Social Networks" manipulated the balance of positive and negative messages seen by 689,000 Facebook users.<ref name="guardian2014">{{cite web|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/29/facebook-users-emotions-news-feeds|title=Facebook reveals news feed experiment to control emotions|accessdate=June 30, 2014|publisher=The Guardian|year=2014|author=Robert Booth}}</ref> The researchers concluded that they had found "some of the first experimental evidence to support the controversial claims that emotions can spread throughout a network, [though] the effect sizes from the manipulations are small." <ref name="pnas2014">{{cite journal | author=Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory. Jeffrey T. Hancock|title=Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks| journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America| year=2014| volume=111| issue=24| pages=8788–8790| url=http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full| doi=10.1073/pnas.1320040111| pmid=24889601}}</ref> |
|||
On September 23, 2023, it was reported that Facebook had delayed for about a year when in 2021, it removed a network of accounts ran by India's [[Chinar Corps]] which spread disinformation that would put Kashmiri journalists in danger. The delay and the previously not publicized takedown action were due a fear that its local employees would be targeted by authorities, and that it would hurt business prospects in the country.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Menn |first1=Joseph |last2=Shih |first2=Gerry |date=September 26, 2023 |title=Under India's pressure, Facebook let propaganda and hate speech thrive |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/09/26/india-facebook-propaganda-hate-speech/ |url-access=registration}}</ref> |
|||
Unlike the "I voted" study, which had presumptively beneficial ends and raised few concerns, this study was criticized for both its ethics and methods/claims. As controversy about the study grew, Adam Kramer, a lead author of both studies and member of the Facebook data team, defended the work in a [https://www.facebook.com/akramer/posts/10152987150867796 Facebook update]. A few days later, Sheryl Sandburg, Facebook's COO, made a statement while traveling abroad. While at an Indian Chambers of Commerce event in New Delhi she stated that "This was part of ongoing research companies do to test different products, and that was what it was. It was poorly communicated and for that communication we apologize. We never meant to upset you." <ref>{{cite web|url=http://money.cnn.com/2014/07/02/technology/social/facebook-apology/index.html?iid=TL_Popular|title=Facebook still won't say 'sorry' for mind games experiment |accessdate=July 3, 2014|publisher=[[CNNMoney]]|year=2014|author=David Goldman}}</ref> |
|||
=== Company governance === |
|||
Shortly thereafter, on July 3, 2014, [[USA Today]] reported that the privacy watchdog group [[Electronic Privacy Information Center]] (EPIC) had filed a formal complaint with the Federal Trade claiming that Facebook had broken the law when it conducted the study on the emotions of its users without their knowledge or consent. In its complaint the EPIC alleged that Facebook had deceived it users by secretly conducting a psychological experiment on their emotions: "At the time of the experiment, Facebook did not state in the Data Use Policy that user data would be used for research purposes. Facebook also failed to inform users that their personal information would be shared with researchers."<ref>{{cite web|last1=Guynn|first1=Jessica|title=Privacy watchdog files complaint over Facebook study|url=http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/07/03/facebook-emotion-study-complaint-epic/12157471/|website=[[USA Today]]|publisher=[[USA Today]]|accessdate=July 5, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
Early Facebook investor and former Zuckerberg mentor [[Roger McNamee]] described Facebook as having "the most centralized decision-making structure I have ever encountered in a large company."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/books/review/roger-mcnamee-zucked.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190129162648/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/books/review/roger-mcnamee-zucked.html |archive-date=January 29, 2019 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor|first=Tom|last=Bissell|newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=January 29, 2019}}</ref> [[Nathan Schneider]], a professor of media studies at the University of Colorado Boulder argued for transforming Facebook into a [[platform cooperative]] owned and governed by the users.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/qvxbgq/its-time-for-mark-zuckerberg-to-give-up-control-of-facebook|title=It's Time for Mark Zuckerberg to Give Up Control of Facebook|first1=Nathan|last1=Schneider|first2=Harry|last2=Cheadle|date=March 27, 2018 |website=Vice |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231103090705/https://www.vice.com/en/article/qvxbgq/its-time-for-mark-zuckerberg-to-give-up-control-of-facebook |archive-date= November 3, 2023 }}</ref> |
|||
Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes states that CEO Mark Zuckerberg has too much power, that the company is now a monopoly, and that, as a result, it should be split into multiple smaller companies. Hughes called for the breakup of Facebook in an [[op-ed]] on ''The New York Times''. Hughes says he is concerned that Zuckerberg has surrounded himself with a team that does not challenge him and that as a result, it is the U.S. government's job to hold him accountable and curb his "unchecked power".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-co-founder-chris-hughes-calls-for-companys-breakup-zuckerberg/|title=Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes calls for company's breakup|first=Shelby|last=Brown|website=CNET |date=May 9, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230428144947/https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/facebook-co-founder-chris-hughes-calls-for-companys-breakup-zuckerberg/ |archive-date= April 28, 2023 }}</ref> Hughes also said that "Mark's power is unprecedented and un-American."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/opinion/sunday/chris-hughes-facebook-zuckerberg.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190509103054/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/opinion/sunday/chris-hughes-facebook-zuckerberg.html |archive-date=May 9, 2019 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=It's Time to Break Up Facebook|first=Chris|last=Hughes|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=May 9, 2019}}</ref> Several U.S. politicians agree with Hughes.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/more-politicians-side-with-chris-hughes-and-are-ready-to-split-up-facebook/|title=More politicians side with Facebook co-founder on breaking up company|first=Shelby|last=Brown|website=CNET}}</ref> EU Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager has stated that splitting Facebook should only be done as "a remedy of the very last resort", and that splitting Facebook would not solve Facebook's underlying problems.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/eu-competition-commissioner-facebook-breakup-would-be-last-resort/|title=EU competition commissioner: Facebook breakup would be 'last resort'|first=Katie|last=Collins|website=CNET}}</ref> |
|||
Beyond the ethical concerns, other scholars criticized the methods and reporting of the study's findings. John Grohol, writing at PsycCentral, argued that despite its title and claims of "[[emotional contagion]]," this study did not look at emotions at all. Instead, its authors used an application (called "Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count" or LIWC 2007) that simply counted positive and negative words in order to infer users' sentiments. He wrote that a shortcoming of the LIWC tool is that it does not understand negations. Hence, the tweet "I am not happy" would be scored as positive: "Since the LIWC 2007 ignores these subtle realities of informal human communication, so do the researchers." Grohol concluded that given these subtleties, the [[effect size]] of the findings are little more than a "statistical blip." |
|||
=== Customer Support=== |
|||
<blockquote>Kramer et al. (2014) found a 0.07% — that's not 7 percent, that's 1/15th of one percent!! — decrease in negative words in people's status updates when the number of negative posts on their Facebook news feed decreased. Do you know how many words you'd have to read or write before you've written one less negative word due to this effect? Probably thousands.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Grohol|first1=John|title=Emotional Contagion on Facebook? More Like Bad Research Methods|url=http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2014/06/23/emotional-contagion-on-facebook-more-like-bad-research-methods/|website=[[PsycCentral]]|publisher=[[PsycCentral]]|accessdate=July 12, 2014}}</ref></blockquote> |
|||
Facebook has been criticized for its lack of human [[customer support]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stewart |first1=Emily |title=The death of the customer service hotline |url=https://www.vox.com/23571375/no-call-center-phone-number-frontier-facebook |access-date=23 June 2024 |work=Vox |date=26 January 2023}}</ref> When users personal and business accounts are breached, many are forced to go through [[small claims court]] to regain access and [[restitution]].<ref>{{cite news |title=How small claims court became Meta's customer service hotline |url=https://www.engadget.com/how-small-claims-court-became-metas-customer-service-hotline-160224479.html |access-date=23 June 2024 |work=Engadget |date=20 June 2024}}</ref> |
|||
=== Litigation === |
|||
The consequences of the controversy are pending (be it FTC or court proceedings) but it did prompt an "[http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/07/02/1412469111.full.pdf+html Editorial Expression of Concern]" from its publisher, the [[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences]], as well as an blog posting from [[OkCupid]] that "[http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/we-experiment-on-human-beings/ We experiment on human beings]!" In September 2014, law professor James Grimmelmann argued that the actions of both companies were "illegal, immoral, and mood-altering" and filed notices with the Maryland Attorney General and Cornell Institutional Review Board.<ref>{{cite web | first1 = James | last1 = Grimmelmann | title = Illegal, immoral, and mood-altering: How Facebook and OkCupid broke the law when they experimented on users | date = September 23, 2014 | url = https://medium.com/@JamesGrimmelmann/illegal-unethical-and-mood-altering-8b93af772688 | accessdate = September 24, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
{{Further|Lawsuits involving Meta Platforms}} |
|||
The company has been subject to repeated litigation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/01/appeals-court-upholds-deal-allowing-kids-images-in-facebook-ads/|title=Appeals court upholds deal allowing kids' images in Facebook ads|last=Farivar|first=Cyrus|date=January 7, 2016|website=Ars Technica|publisher=Condé Nast|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-yahoo-facebook-lawsuit-idUSBRE82B18M20120312|title=Yahoo sues Facebook for infringing 10 patents|last1=Levine|first1=Dan|last2=Oreskovic|first2=Alexei|date=March 12, 2012|website=[[Reuters]]|publisher=Thomson Reuters|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.recode.net/2017/2/1/14476500/facebook-oculus-zenimax-lawsuit-500-million|title=Facebook lost its Oculus lawsuit and has to pay $500 million|last=Wagner|first=Kurt|date=February 1, 2017|website=[[Recode]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2016/5/19/11712804/facebook-private-message-scanning-privacy-lawsuit|title=Lawsuit claims Facebook illegally scanned private messages|last=Brandom|first=Rusell|date=May 19, 2016|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> Its most prominent case addressed allegations that Zuckerberg broke an [[oral contract]] with [[Cameron Winklevoss]], [[Tyler Winklevoss]], and [[Divya Narendra]] to build the [[ConnectU|then-named "HarvardConnection"]] social network in 2004.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jul/25/digitalmedia.usnews|title=Facebook in court over ownership|last=Tryhorn|first=Chris|date=July 25, 2007|website=The Guardian|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=3391856|title=Facebook Founder Accused of Stealing Idea for Site|last=Michels|first=Scott|date=July 20, 2007|website=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]|publisher=[[American Broadcasting Company|ABC]]|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/how-mark-zuckerberg-hacked-connectu-2010-3|title=How Mark Zuckerberg Hacked into Rival ConnectU In 2004|last=Carlson|first=Nicholas|date=March 5, 2010|website=Business Insider|publisher=Axel Springer SE|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
On March 6, 2018, [[BlackBerry Limited|BlackBerry]] sued Facebook and its Instagram and WhatsApp subdivision for ripping off key features of its messaging app.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/tech/blackberry-to-facebook-you-stole-our-messaging-technology/|title=BlackBerry to Facebook: You stole our messaging technology|date=March 7, 2018|work=[[Fox News]]|access-date=March 8, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
In the UK, the study was also criticised by the [[British Psychological Society]] which said, in a letter to ''[[The Guardian]]'', "There has undoubtedly been some degree of harm caused, with many individuals affected by increased levels of negative emotion, with consequent potential economic costs, increase in possible mental health problems and burden on health services. The so-called 'positive' manipulation is also potentially harmful."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/01/facebook-socially-irresponsible |title=Facebook's 'experiment' was socially irresponsible | Technology |publisher=The Guardian |date=July 1, 2014 |accessdate=August 4, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
In October 2018, a Texan woman sued Facebook, claiming she had been recruited into the sex trade at the age of 15 by a man who "friended" her on the social media network. Facebook responded that it works both internally and externally to ban sex traffickers.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sex-trafficking-facebook-lawsuit/woman-sues-facebook-claims-site-enabled-sex-trafficking-idUSKCN1MD080|title=Woman sues Facebook, claims site enabled sex trafficking|last=Whitcomb|first=Dan|work=[[Reuters]]|access-date=October 4, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sex-trafficking-facebook-lawsuit/facebook-responding-to-lawsuit-says-sex-trafficking-banned-on-site-idUSKCN1ME038|title=Facebook, responding to lawsuit, says sex trafficking banned on site|last=Whitcomb|first=Dan|work=[[Reuters]]|access-date=October 4, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
=== Real-name policy controversy === |
|||
{{Main|Facebook real-name policy controversy}} |
|||
In 2019, British solicitors representing a [[Almondbury Community School bullying incident|bullied Syrian schoolboy]], sued Facebook over [[Almondbury Community School bullying incident#False claims|false claims]]. They claimed that Facebook protected prominent figures from scrutiny instead of removing content that violates its rules and that the special treatment was financially driven.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/refugee-waterboarded-bullies-sue-facebook-13885978|title=Refugee 'waterboarded' by bullies to sue Facebook over Tommy Robinson claims|last=Jolly|first=Bradley|date=January 21, 2019|work=Mirror}}</ref><ref name="facebookjamalrobinson">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jan/21/bullied-syrian-schoolboy-to-sue-facebook-over-tommy-robinson-claims|title=Bullied Syrian schoolboy to sue Facebook over Tommy Robinson claims|last=Halliday|first=Josh|date=January 21, 2019|work=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook has a [[real-name system]] policy for [[user profile]]s. The real-name policy stems from the position "that way, you always know who you're connecting with. This helps keep our community safe."<ref name="CNN">{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/16/living/facebook-name-policy/ |title=Facebook 'real name' policy stirs questions around identity |last=Grinberg |first=Emanuella |date=September 18, 2014 |publisher=[[CNN]] |accessdate=October 21, 2014}}</ref><ref name="Facebook">{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/help/112146705538576|title=What names are allowed on Facebook?|last=|first=|date=|publisher=Facebook |accessdate=October 21, 2014}}</ref> Facebook's real-name system does not allow adopted names or [[pseudonym]]s, and in its enforcement has suspended accounts of legitimate users, until the user provides identification indicating the name. Facebook representatives have described these incidents as very rare.<ref>{{cite news|agency=Associated Press| url=http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-05-25/business/20872135_1_accounts-with-fake-names-facebook-facebook-guidelines-and-features|work=The San Francisco Chronicle|first=Barbara|last=Ortutay|date=May 25, 2009|title=Real users caught in Facebook fake-name purge|accessdate=October 22, 2014}}</ref> A user claimed responsibility via the [[Anonymous social media|anonymous]] [[Android (operating system)|Android]] and [[iOS]] app [[Secret (app)|Secret]] for reporting "fake names" which caused user profiles to be suspended, specifically targeting the [[stage name]]s of [[drag queen]]s.<ref name="Business Insider">{{cite news |url=http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-apologizes-for-real-name-policy-2014-10|title=Facebook Apologizes For 'Real Name' Policy That Forced Drag Queens To Change Their Profiles|last=Levy|first=Karyne|date=October 1, 2014|work=[[Business Insider]] |accessdate=October 21, 2014}}</ref> On October 1, 2014, [[Chris Cox (Facebook)|Chris Cox]], Chief Product Officer at Facebook, offered an apology: "In the two weeks since the real-name policy issues surfaced, we've had the chance to hear from many of you in these communities and understand the policy more clearly as you experience it. We've also come to understand how painful this has been. We owe you a better service and a better experience using Facebook, and we're going to fix the way this policy gets handled so everyone affected here can go back to using Facebook as you were."<ref name="ChrisCoxRealNamePolicy">{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/chris.cox/posts/10101301777354543|title=Chris Cox - I want to apologize to the affected community of drag...|last=Cox|first=Chris|date=October 1, 2014|publisher=Facebook |accessdate=October 22, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
The Federal Trade Commission and a coalition of New York state and 47 other state and regional governments filed separate suits against Facebook on December 9, 2020, seeking antitrust action based on its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsUp among other companies, calling these practices as anticompetitive. The suits also assert that in acquiring these products, they weakened their privacy measures for their users. The suits, besides other fines, seek to unwind the acquisitions from Facebook.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/9/22158483/facebook-antitrust-lawsuit-anti-competition-behavior-attorneys-general | title = The FTC is suing Facebook to unwind its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp |first1= Nick | last1= Statt | first2= Russell |last2=Brandom | date = December 9, 2020 | access-date = December 9, 2020 | work = The Verge }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebook-hit-with-antitrust-suit-from-ftc-and-48-states-targeted-at-acquisitions-11607543049 | title = Facebook hit with antitrust suits from FTC, 48 AGs to 'unwind' Instagram, WhatsApp transactions | first = Jon | last = Swartz |date = December 9, 2020 | access-date = December 9, 2020 | work = [[Marketwatch]] }}</ref> |
|||
==Impact== |
|||
[[File:Ad-tech London 2010 (5).JPG|thumb|Facebook on the Ad-tech 2010]] |
|||
On January 6, 2022, France's data privacy regulatory body [[CNIL]] fined Facebook a 60 million euros for not allowing its internet users an easy refusal of [[HTTP cookie|cookies]] along with [[Google]].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Rosemain|first=Mathieu|date=January 6, 2022|title=Google hit with 150 mln euro French fine for cookie breaches|language=en|work=[[Reuters]]|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-imposes-fines-facebook-ireland-google-2022-01-06/|access-date=January 6, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
===Media impact=== |
|||
In April 2011, Facebook launched a new portal for marketers and creative agencies to help them develop brand promotions on Facebook.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.facebook.com/marketing |title=Facebook Marketing Solutions |publisher=Facebook |accessdate=January 30, 2011}}</ref> The company began its push by inviting a select group of British advertising leaders to meet Facebook's top executives at an "influencers' summit" in February 2010. Facebook has now been involved in campaigns for ''[[True Blood]]'', ''[[American Idol]]'', and ''[[Top Gear (2002 TV series)|Top Gear]]''.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.tvgenius.net/blog/2011/04/19/4-ways-facebook-social-tv-1-video/ |title=Move Over Twitter: Facebook Wants a Piece of Social TV, Too |work=tvgenius: TV Trends Blog |author= Wells, Emma K. |date=April 19, 2011 |accessdate=May 15, 2011}}{{dead link|date=January 2014}}</ref> News and media outlets such as the Washington Post,<ref>{{cite news |work=The Washington Post |date=January 6, 2012 |title=Facebook data reveal what GOP presidential candidates' supporters 'like' |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/facebook-data-reveals-what-gop-presidential-candidates-supporters-like/2012/01/06/gIQAOScufP_graphic.html }}</ref> Financial Times<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/e82978cc-3e19-11e1-ac9b-00144feabdc0.html |title=Romney tags Facebook to build momentum |date=January 16, 2012 |last=Dembosky |first=April }}</ref> and ABC News<ref>{{cite news |publisher=ABCNews.com |url=http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/social-media-opens-trove-of-voter-info-to-campaigns/ |title=Social Media Opens Trove of Voter Info to Campaigns |date=January 10, 2012 |last=Bingham |first=Amy }}</ref> have used aggregated Facebook fan data to create various infographics and charts to accompany their articles. In 2012, the beauty pageant [[Miss Sri Lanka Online]] was run exclusively using Facebook.<ref>{{cite web|title=Seri Miss Sri Lanka Online Unveiled|url=http://www.ft.lk/2012/09/21/seri-miss-sri-lanka-online-unveiled/|work=FT.lk|accessdate=January 9, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
On December 22, 2022, the Quebec Court of Appeal approved a class-action lawsuit on behalf of Facebook users who claim they were discriminated against because the platform allows advertisers to target both job and housing advertisements based on various factors, including age, gender, and even race.<ref name="Facebook-lawsuit">{{cite news|last =Thompson |first =Elizabeth |title =Class-action lawsuit against Facebook claiming discrimination gets the green light|newspaper =[[Canadian Broadcasting Corporation]]|location =Quebec|language =English |publisher =CBC|date =January 4, 2023|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/facebook-lawsuit-discrimination-ads-1.6702606|access-date =January 10, 2023 }}</ref> The lawsuit centres on the platform's practice of "micro targeting ads", claiming ads are ensured to appear only in the feeds of people who belong to certain targeted groups. Women, for example, would not see ads targeting men, while older generation men would not see an ad aimed at people between 18 and 45.<ref name="Facebook-lawsuit"/> |
|||
===Social impact=== |
|||
{{main|Social networking service#Social impact|Social impact of the Internet#Social networking and entertainment}} |
|||
Facebook has affected the social life and activity of people in various ways. With its availability on many mobile devices, Facebook allows users to continuously stay in touch with friends, relatives and other acquaintances wherever they are in the world, as long as there is access to the Internet. It can also unite people with common interests and/or beliefs through groups and other pages, and has been known to reunite lost family members and friends because of the widespread reach of its network.<ref>[http://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/chart/1103/top-10-social-networks-in-q1-2013/ Half of the World's Online Population Uses Facebook], GlobalWebIndex. May 2013.</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local&id=7739245 |title=Father finds daughter on Facebook after 20 years apart |work=WABC |location=New York |date=October 23, 2010 |accessdate=May 15, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.in.msn.com/international/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3570509&= |title=Facebook reunites father, daughter after 48 years |work=MSN India |location=Delhi |date=January 27, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
The class action could include thousands of Quebec residents who have been using the platform as early as April 2016, who were seeking jobs or housing during that period.<ref name="Facebook-lawsuit"/> Facebook has 60 days after the court's December 22 ruling to decide to appeal the case to the Supreme Court of Canada. If it does not appeal, the case returns to the Quebec Superior Court.<ref name="Facebook-lawsuit"/> |
|||
===Health impact=== |
|||
Recent studies have shown that Facebook causes negative effects on [[self-esteem]] by triggering feelings of envy, with vacation and holiday photos proving to be the largest resentment triggers. Other prevalent causes of envy include posts by friends about family happiness and images of physical beauty—such envious feelings leave people lonely and dissatisfied with their own lives. A joint study by two German universities discovered that one out of three people were more dissatisfied with their lives after visiting Facebook, and another study by [[Utah Valley University]] found that college students felt worse about their own lives following an increase in the amount of time spent on Facebook.<ref name="huffsachs">{{cite news |title=Facebook Envy: How Cruising Can Kill Self Esteem |first=Wendy |last=Sachs |url= http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendy-sachs/facebook_b_1262681.html |newspaper=Huffington Post |date=February 8, 2012 |accessdate=June 10, 2013}}</ref><ref name="huffgoldsmith">{{cite news |title=Facebook Study Says Envy Is Rampant On The Social Network |first=Belinda |last=Goldsmith |url= http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/22/facebook-study-envy_n_2526549.html |newspaper=Huffington Post |date=January 22, 2013 |accessdate=June 10, 2013}}</ref><ref name="healthmag">{{cite news |title= Facebook Envy When social networking only brings you down |first=Michael |last=Richardson |url= http://www.healthy-mag.com/articles/1343/Facebook-Envy |work=Healthy Magazine |date=May 25, 2013 |accessdate=June 10, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
On September 21, 2023, the [[California Courts of Appeal]] ruled that Facebook could be sued for discriminatory advertising under the [[Unruh Civil Rights Act]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Roth |first1=Emma |title=Facebook can be sued over biased ad algorithm, says court |url=https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/25/23889747/facebook-biased-ad-algorithm-aclu-court |access-date=23 June 2024 |work=The Verge |date=25 September 2023 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
According to professor of psychology Susan Krauss Whitbourne, although Facebook has an upside of friending people, there is also the downside of having someone [[unfriend]] or reject another person.<ref name="Whitbourne_6_19_2012">{{cite journal |last=Whitbourne |first=Susan Krauss |title=Unfriended? Five Ways to Manage Online Rejection |url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201206/unfriended-five-ways-manage-online-rejection |magazine=Psychology Today |date=June 19, 2012}}</ref> Whitbourne refers to unfriended persons on Facebook as victims of [[wikt:estrangement|estrangement]].<ref name="Whitbourne_6_19_2012"/> Unfriending someone is seldom a mutual decision and the person often does not know they have been unfriended.<ref name="Whitbourne_6_19_2012" /> |
|||
== |
== Impact{{anchor|Social impact}} == |
||
[[File:Ad-tech London 2010 (5).JPG|thumb|Facebook on the [[ad:tech]] 2010]] |
|||
{{further|Social media and political communication in the United States}} |
|||
[[File:2011 Egyptian protests Facebook & jan25 card.jpg|thumb|A man during the 2011 Egyptian protests carrying a card saying "Facebook,#jan25, The Egyptian Social Network".]] |
|||
<!-- Commented out because image was deleted: [[File:Lions of Rojava Facebook recruitment page.png|thumb|Recruitment page for the [[People's Protection Units|YPG]], a libertarian guerilla army in [[Rojava]] fighting against [[ISIS]].]] --> |
|||
=== Scope === |
|||
In February 2008, a Facebook group called "One Million Voices Against FARC" organized an event in which hundreds of thousands of [[Colombian people|Colombians]] marched in protest against the [[Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia]], better known as the FARC (from the group's Spanish name).<ref>{{cite news |accessdate=August 1, 2010 |url= http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2008/0204/p04s02-woam.html |title=Facebook used to target Colombia's FARC with global rally |work=The Christian Science Monitor |location= Boston |date=February 4, 2008 |author=Brodzinsky, Sibylla }}</ref> In August 2010, one of [[North Korea]]'s official government websites and the official news agency of the country, [[Uriminzokkiri]], joined Facebook.<ref>{{cite news |first= Laura |last= Roberts |title= North Korea joins Facebook |date= August 21, 2010 |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7957222/North-Korea-joins-Facebook.html |work= The Daily Telegraph |accessdate =August 22, 2010 |location=London}}</ref> |
|||
A commentator in ''The Washington Post'' noted that Facebook constitutes a "massive depository of information that documents both our reactions to events and our evolving customs with a scope and immediacy of which earlier historians could only dream".<ref name=WashPost_20190508 /> Especially for anthropologists, social researchers, and social historians—and subject to proper preservation and curation—the website "will preserve images of our lives that are vastly crisper and more nuanced than any ancestry record in existence".<ref name=WashPost_20190508>{{cite news|last=Gebelhoff|first=Robert|title=Facebook is becoming a vast digital graveyard – and a gift to the future|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/08/facebook-is-becoming-vast-digital-graveyard-gift-future/|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=May 8, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190508220055/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/08/facebook-is-becoming-vast-digital-graveyard-gift-future/|archive-date=May 8, 2019|url-status=live|access-date=July 16, 2019 }}</ref> |
|||
=== Economy === |
|||
During the [[Arab Spring]] many journalists made claims that Facebook played a major role in generating the [[2011 Egyptian revolution]].<ref>{{cite news |author= Sutter, John D. |url= http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/innovation/02/21/egypt.internet.revolution/index.html |title=The faces of Egypt's 'Revolution 2.0' |work=CNN |date= February 21, 2011 |accessdate= June 7, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Hauslohner |first=Abigail |url= http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2044142,00.html |title=Is Egypt About to Have a Facebook Revolution? |work=Time |location=New York |date=January 24, 2011 |accessdate=June 7, 2013}}</ref> On January 14, the Facebook page of "We are all khaled Said" was started by Wael Ghoniem Create Event to invite the Egyptian people to "peaceful demonstrations" on January 25. According to [[Mashable]],{{unreliable source?|date=November 2014}} in Tunisia and Egpyt, Facebook became the primary tool for connecting all protesters and led the Egyptian government of Prime Minister [[Ahmed Nazif|Nazif]] to ban Facebook, Twitter and another websites on January 26<ref>{{cite news |author= Kessler, Sarah |url= http://mashable.com/2011/01/26/facebook-blocked-in-egypt/ |title=Facebook & Twitter Both Blocked in Egypt |work=Mashable |date=January 26, 2011 |accessdate=June 7, 2013}}</ref> then ban all mobile and Internet connections for all of Egypt at midnight January 28. After 18 days, the uprising forced President [[Mubarak]] to resign. |
|||
Economists have noted that Facebook offers many non-rivalrous services that benefit as many users as are interested without forcing users to compete with each other. By contrast, most goods are available to a limited number of users. E.g., if one user buys a phone, no other user can buy that phone. Three areas add the most economic impact: platform competition, the market place and user behavior data.<ref>{{cite book|doi=10.1017/CBO9781139060011.003|chapter=The Economics of Internet Markets|title=Advances in Economics and Econometrics|pages=48–75|year=2013|last=Levin|first=Jonathan|s2cid=37187854|isbn=978-1-139-06001-1|url=http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/repec/sip/10-018.pdf|editor1-last=Acemoglu|editor1-first=Daron|editor2-last=Arellano|editor2-first=Manuel|editor3-last=Dekel|editor3-first=Eddie|access-date=September 2, 2020|archive-date=August 8, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808002527/http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/repec/sip/10-018.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook began to reduce its carbon impact after Greenpeace attacked it for its long-term reliance on coal and resulting carbon footprint.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.com/2011/12/greenpeace-declares-victory-over-facebook-data-centers/|title=Greenpeace Declares Victory Over Facebook Data Centers|magazine=Wired|date= December 15, 2011|access-date=August 14, 2018}}</ref> In 2021 Facebook announced that their global operations are supported by 100 percent renewable energy and they have reached net zero emissions, a goal set in 2018.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://tech.fb.com/renewable-energy/|title=Achieving our goal: 100% renewable energy for our global operations|date=April 15, 2021|newspaper=Tech at Meta}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.engadget.com/facebook-reaches-renewable-energy-target-094057219.html|title=Facebook reaches its target of using 100 percent renewable energy|website=Engadget|date=April 15, 2021 }}</ref> |
|||
In 2011, Facebook filed paperwork with the [[Federal Election Commission]] to form a [[political action committee]] under the name ''FB PAC''.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/26/facebook-forms-its-own-pac_n_982053.html |title= Facebook forms its own Political Action Committee |date=September 26, 2011 |work=Huffington Post |accessdate=September 27, 2011 |first=Luke |last=Johnson}}</ref> In an email to ''[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]'', a spokesman for Facebook said "Facebook [[Political Action Committee]] will give our employees a way to make their voice heard in the political process by supporting candidates who share our goals of promoting the value of innovation to our economy while giving people the power to share and make the world more open and connected."<ref>{{cite news |url= http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/183951-facebook-forming-own-pac-to-back-candidates |title=Facebook to form its own PAC to back political candidates |first=Gautham |last=Nagesh |date=September 26, 2011 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |accessdate= September 27, 2011 |location=Washington DC}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook provides a development platform for many [[social-network game|social gaming]], communication, feedback, review, and other applications related to online activities. This platform spawned many businesses and added thousands of jobs to the global economy. [[Zynga Inc.]], a leader in social gaming, is an example of such a business. An [[Econometrics|econometric]] analysis found that Facebook's app development platform added more than 182,000 jobs in the U.S. economy in 2011. The total economic value of the added employment was about $12 billion (${{formatprice|{{Inflation|US|12000000000|2011}}}} in {{Inflation-year|US}} dollars{{inflation-fn|US}}).<ref>{{cite web|title=The Facebook App Economy|date=September 19, 2011|publisher=University of Maryland|url=https://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/files/Documents/Centers/DIGITS/AppEconomyImpact091911.pdf|access-date=June 25, 2017|archive-date=March 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200301183356/https://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/files/Documents/Centers/DIGITS/AppEconomyImpact091911.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
During the Syrian civil war, the [[People's Protection Units|YPG]], a libertarian army for [[Rojava]] has recruited westerners through Facebook in its fight against [[ISIL]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rW7-kqiAGA|title=Former Israeli Female Soldier Joins Kurds to Fight ISIS|work=YouTube}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Lions-Of-Rojava/290140627860127|title=The Lions Of Rojava|work=Facebook}}</ref> Dozens have joined its ranks for various reasons from religious to ideological. The Facebook page's name "The Lions of Rojava" comes from a Kurdish saying which translates as "A lion is a lion, whether it's a female or a male", reflecting the organisation's feminist ideology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/frontline-isis-real-story-narin-afrini-kurdish-female-lions-terrorising-islamic-front-1470119|title=Frontline Isis: The Real Story of Narin Afrini and the Kurdish Female 'Lions' Terrorising Islamic State|work=International Business Times UK}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
=== Society === |
||
{{See also|Social networking service#Social impact|Sociology of the Internet#Social networking and entertainment|Social capital}} |
|||
Facebook's role in the American political process was demonstrated in January 2008, shortly before the [[New Hampshire primary]], when Facebook teamed up with [[American Broadcasting Company|ABC]] and [[Saint Anselm College]] to allow users to give live feedback about the "back to back" January 5 Republican and Democratic debates.<ref>{{Cite news |url= http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Politics/story?id=3899006&page=1 |title=ABC News Joins Forces With Facebook |work=ABC News |date=December 18, 2007 |accessdate=March 23, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first =Doug |last= Minor |url= http://blogs.saintanselmcollege.net/2007/11/29/abcdebates/ |title=Saint Anselm to Host ABC Debates Jan. 5 |publisher= Saint Anselm College blog |date=November 29, 2007 |accessdate=July 18, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |first =Tahman |last= Bradley |url= http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/abc_wmur_and_facebook_debates/index.html |title= Republicans Lead off ABC News, WMUR-TV and Facebook Back-To-Back Debates in New Hampshire |publisher=ABC News |work= Political Radar blog |date=December 12, 2007 |accessdate=March 23, 2010}}</ref> Facebook users took part in debate groups organized around specific topics, register to vote, and message questions.<ref>{{cite web |first =Ezra |last= Callahan |url= http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=8183627130 |title=Tune in to the ABC News/Facebook Debates, Tonight 7 pm/6c on ABC |publisher= Facebook Blog |date=January 5, 2008 |accessdate=March 23, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook was one of the first large-scale [[social network]]s. In ''The Facebook Effect'', David Kirkpatrick stated that Facebook's structure makes it difficult to replace, because of its "[[network effect]]s".{{cn|date=December 2024}} {{As of|2016}}, it was estimated 44% of Americans get news through Facebook.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/facebook-extends-lead-as-news-gateway-study/articleshow/52456528.cms|title=Facebook extends lead as news gateway: Study – The Economic Times|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=May 27, 2016|date=May 26, 2016 }}</ref> A study published at [[Frontiers Media]] in 2023 found that there was more polarization of the user-base on Facebook than even far-right social networks like Gab.<ref>{{cite journal | pmc=10390321 | date=2023 | last1=Acampa | first1=S. | last2=Crescentini | first2=N. | last3=Padricelli | first3=G. M. | title=Between alternative and traditional social platforms: The case of gab in exploring the narratives on the pandemic and vaccines | journal=Frontiers in Sociology | volume=8 | doi=10.3389/fsoc.2023.1143263 | pmid=37534329 | doi-access=free }}</ref> |
|||
=== Mental and emotional health === |
|||
Over a million people installed the Facebook application "US Politics on Facebook" in order to take part, and the application measured users' responses to specific comments made by the debating candidates.<ref>{{cite news |first =Russell | last = Goldman |url=http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=4091460&page=1 |title=Facebook Gives Snapshot of Voter Sentiment |work = ABC News |date=January 5, 2007 |accessdate=March 23, 2010}}</ref> This debate showed the broader community what many young students had already experienced: Facebook as a popular and powerful new way to interact and voice opinions. A poll by [[CBS News]], [[UWIRE]] and ''[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]]'' claimed to illustrate how the "Facebook effect" has affected youth voting rates, support by youth of political candidates, and general involvement by the youth population in the 2008 election.<ref>{{cite news |first =Michelle | last = Sullivan |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/11/04/politics/uwire/main4568563.shtml |title=Facebook Effect Mobilizes Youth Vote |work = CBS News |date=November 3, 2008 |accessdate=March 23, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
{{See also|Social media and suicide}} |
|||
Studies have associated social networks with positive<ref>{{Cite journal| doi=10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x|title = The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites| journal=Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication| volume=12| issue=4| pages=1143–1168|year = 2007|last1 = Ellison|first1 = Nicole B.| last2=Steinfield| first2=Charles| last3=Lampe| first3=Cliff| doi-access=free}}</ref> and negative impacts<ref>{{cite web|last=Marche|first=Stephen|title=Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?|url=http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/05/is-facebook-making-us-lonely/8930/|work=[[The Atlantic]]|date=May 2012 |accessdate=December 3, 2022|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120531223919/http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/05/is-facebook-making-us-lonely/8930/|archivedate= May 31, 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|first=Maria|last=Konnikova|title=How Facebook Makes Us Unhappy|url=https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/how-facebook-makes-us-unhappy|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]|publisher=Condé Nast|date=September 10, 2013|access-date=December 15, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Grace|last=Dent|title=Social media is full of sad, lonely people pretending they're OK and perfectly fine attention-seekers pretending to be sad|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/facebook-instagram-twitter-social-media-makes-sad-lonely-attention-seekers-a7614396.html|website=The Independent|date=March 6, 2017|access-date=December 15, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|first=Alexandra|last=Sifferlin|title=Why Facebook Makes You Feel Bad About Yourself|url=https://healthland.time.com/2013/01/24/why-facebook-makes-you-feel-bad-about-yourself/|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]|date=January 24, 2013|access-date=December 15, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Katherine|last=Hobson|title=Feeling Lonely? Too Much Time On Social Media May Be Why|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/03/06/518362255/feeling-lonely-too-much-time-on-social-media-may-be-why|website=[[NPR]]|date=March 6, 2017|access-date=December 15, 2017}}</ref> on emotional health. |
|||
Studies have associated Facebook with feelings of [[envy]], often triggered by vacation and holiday photos. Other triggers include posts by friends about family happiness and images of physical beauty—such feelings leave people dissatisfied with their own lives. A joint study by two German universities discovered that one out of three people were more dissatisfied with their lives after visiting Facebook,<ref>{{cite web|first=Belinda|last=Goldsmith|title=RPT-Is Facebook envy making you miserable?|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/facebook-envy-idUSL6N0AR8D820130122|website=[[Reuters]]|publisher=Thomson Reuters|date=January 22, 2013|access-date=July 13, 2017}}</ref><ref name="CNN studies" /> and another study by [[Utah Valley University]] found that college students felt worse about themselves following an increase in time on Facebook.<ref name="CNN studies">{{cite web|first=Heather|last=Kelly|title=Study: Using Facebook can make you sad|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2013/08/15/tech/social-media/study-facebook-blues/index.html|website=CNN|date=August 15, 2013|access-date=July 13, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Mike|last=Flacy|title=Study: Why Facebook is making people sad|url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/social-media/study-why-facebook-is-making-people-sad/|website=[[Digital Trends]]|date=January 22, 2012|access-date=July 13, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Wendy|last=Sachs|title=Facebook Envy: How Cruising Can Kill Self Esteem|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendy-sachs/facebook_b_1262681.html|website=[[HuffPost]]|publisher=[[AOL]]|date=February 8, 2012|access-date=July 13, 2017}}</ref> Professor Larry D. Rosen stated that teenagers on Facebook exhibit more narcissistic tendencies, while young adults show signs of antisocial behavior, [[mania]] and aggressiveness. |
|||
The new social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, made use first of the personal computer and the Internet, and after 2010 of the smart phones to connect hundreds of millions of people, especially those under age 35. By 2008, politicians and interest groups were experimenting with systematic use of social media to spread their message among much larger audiences than they had previously reached.<ref>Juliet E. Carlisle, and Robert C. Patton, "Is Social Media Changing How We Understand Political Engagement? An Analysis of Facebook and the 2008 Presidential Election," ''Political Research Quarterly'' (2013) 66#4 pp 883-895. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/23612065 in JSTOR]</ref><ref>Eli Skogerbø & Arne H. Krumsvik, "Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter: Intermedial agenda setting in local election campaigns," ''Journalism Practice'' (2015) 9#3 DOI:10.1080/17512786.2014.950471</ref> |
|||
Positive effects include signs of "virtual empathy" with online friends and helping introverted persons learn social skills.<ref>{{cite web|first=Ysolt|last=Usigan|title=Facebook makes teens narcissistic, anxious and depressed – but also nice, social and engaged|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-makes-teens-narcissistic-anxious-and-depressed-but-also-nice-social-and-engaged/|website=CBS News|publisher=[[CBS]]|date=August 29, 2011|access-date=December 15, 2017}}</ref> A 2020 experimental study in the ''American Economic Review'' found that deactivating Facebook led to increased subjective well-being.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Allcott|first1=Hunt|last2=Braghieri|first2=Luca|last3=Eichmeyer|first3=Sarah|last4=Gentzkow|first4=Matthew|date=2020|title=The Welfare Effects of Social Media|journal=American Economic Review|language=en|volume=110|issue=3|pages=629–676|doi=10.1257/aer.20190658|issn=0002-8282|doi-access=free|url=http://www.nber.org/papers/w25514.pdf}}</ref> In a blog post in December 2017, the company highlighted research that has shown "passively consuming" the [[News Feed]], as in reading but not interacting, left users with negative feelings, whereas interacting with messages pointed to improvements in well-being.<ref>{{cite web|first=Casey|last=Newton|title=Facebook says 'passively consuming' the News Feed will make you feel worse about yourself|url=https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/15/16781448/facebook-makes-you-feel-bad-study-research|website=[[The Verge]]|publisher=[[Vox Media]]|date=December 15, 2017|access-date=December 15, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook is having an impact on local government as well. [[Justin Smith (Colorado sheriff)|Justin Smith]], a Colorado sheriff uses Facebook to disseminate his ideas on matters relating to local, state, and national concerns. He also publicizes crimes, particularly those that his department solves. He has seven thousand followers on the social medium, considered a large number. Smith said that he rarely goes out in public "when I don't get feedback from folks. ... Facebook is an interesting tool because I think it holds candidates and elected officials more accountable. Voters know where someone stands."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/local/2014/07/06/justin-smith-colorados-social-sheriff/12263531/|title=Is Justin Smith Colorado's most social sheriff?|publisher=''[[Fort Collins Coloradoan]]''|date=July 6, 2014|author=Jason Pohl|accessdate=February 7, 2015}}</ref> |
|||
=== Politics{{anchor|Political_impact}} === |
|||
As American political strategists turn their attention to the 2016 presidential contest, they identify Facebook as an increasingly important advertising tool. Recent technical innovations have made possible more advanced divisions and subdivisions of the electorate. Most important, Facebook can now deliver video ads to small, highly targeted subsets. Television, by contrast, shows the same commercials to all viewers, and so cannot be precisely tailored.<ref>Shane Goldmacher, "Facebook the Vote: The social network at the center of American digital life could become the epicenter of the presidential race," [http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/facebook-the-vote-20150612 ''National Journal Magazine'' June 13, 2015]</ref> |
|||
{{broader|Social media in politics}} |
|||
{{further|Social media and political communication in the United States|Social media in the 2016 U.S. Presidential campaign|WhatsApp#Hoaxes and fake news}} |
|||
In February 2008, a Facebook group called "One Million Voices Against FARC" organized an event in which hundreds of thousands of [[Colombians]] marched in protest against the [[Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia]] (FARC).<ref>{{cite news|access-date=August 1, 2010|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2008/0204/p04s02-woam.html|title=Facebook used to target Colombia's FARC with global rally|work=The Christian Science Monitor|location=Boston|date=February 4, 2008|author=Brodzinsky, Sibylla}}</ref> In August 2010, one of [[North Korea]]'s official government websites and the country's official news agency, [[Uriminzokkiri]], joined Facebook.<ref>{{cite news|first=Laura|last=Roberts|title=North Korea joins Facebook|date=August 21, 2010|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7957222/North-Korea-joins-Facebook.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7957222/North-Korea-joins-Facebook.html |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=[[The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph]]|access-date=August 22, 2010|location=London}}{{cbignore}}</ref> |
|||
== In popular culture == |
|||
[[File:SF Pride 2014 - Stierch 7.jpg|thumbnail|Facebook [[parade float]] in [[San Francisco Pride]] 2014]] |
|||
[[File:2011 Egyptian protests Facebook & jan25 card.jpg|thumb|A man during the 2011 Egyptian protests carrying a card saying "Facebook,#jan25, The Egyptian Social Network"]] |
|||
* American author [[Ben Mezrich]] published a book in July 2009 about Zuckerberg and the founding of Facebook, titled ''[[The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook, A Tale of Sex, Money, Genius, and Betrayal]]''.<ref>{{cite news |last=Hempel |first=Jessi |title=The book that Facebook doesn't want you to read |url=http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/25/technology/founding_of_facebook.fortune/|work =CNN |accessdate=July 3, 2010 | date=June 25, 2009}}</ref> |
|||
During the [[Arab Spring]] many journalists claimed Facebook played a major role in the [[2011 Egyptian revolution]].<ref>{{cite news|author=Sutter, John D.|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/innovation/02/21/egypt.internet.revolution/index.html|title=The faces of Egypt's 'Revolution 2.0'|work=[[CNN]]|date=February 21, 2011|access-date=June 7, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|last=Hauslohner|first=Abigail|url=http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2044142,00.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110125022244/http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2044142,00.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 25, 2011|title=Is Egypt About to Have a Facebook Revolution?|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]|location=New York|date=January 24, 2011|access-date=June 7, 2013}}</ref> On January 14, the Facebook page of "We are all Khaled Said" was started by Wael Ghoniem to invite the Egyptian people to "peaceful demonstrations" on January 25. In Tunisia and Egypt, Facebook became the primary tool for connecting protesters and led the Egyptian government to ban it, Twitter and other sites.<ref>{{cite news|author=Kessler, Sarah|url=http://mashable.com/2011/01/26/facebook-blocked-in-egypt/|title=Facebook & Twitter Both Blocked in Egypt|work=Mashable|date=January 26, 2011|access-date=June 7, 2013}}</ref> After 18 days, the uprising forced President [[Hosni Mubarak]] to resign. |
|||
* ''[[The Social Network]]'', a drama film directed by [[David Fincher]] and adapted from Mezrich's book, was released October 1, 2010.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Social Network (2010) |url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1285016/ |publisher = Internet Movie DataBase |accessdate=July 3, 2010}}</ref> People portrayed in the movie, including Zuckerberg, have criticized its accuracy.<ref>{{cite news |title=Mark Zuckerberg Calls The Social Network Inaccurate |url=http://www.limelife.com/blog-entry/Mark-Zuckerberg-Calls-The-Social-Network-Inaccurate-VIDEO/77351.html |date=October 20, 2010 | first = Jeffery | last = Racheff |work = Limelife}}</ref> |
|||
* In response to the [[Everybody Draw Mohammed Day]] controversy and the banning of the website in Pakistan, an Islamic version of the website was created, called [[MillatFacebook]].<ref name="afp">{{cite news |last=Hussain |first=Waqar |url=http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iOAHXhFHXrWMDdtAajYAxmypKT2w |title= Pakistanis create rival Muslim Facebook |agency =Agence France-Presse |date=May 27, 2010 |accessdate=June 9, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
In [[Bahraini uprising of 2011|a Bahraini uprising]] that started on February 14, 2011, Facebook was utilized by the Bahraini regime and regime loyalists to identify, capture and prosecute citizens involved in the protests. A 20-year-old woman named [[Ayat Al-Qurmezi|Ayat Al Qurmezi]] was identified as a protester using Facebook and imprisoned.<ref>{{cite news|title=Facebook 'used to hunt down Bahrain dissidents'|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatnews/8681230/Facebook-used-to-hunt-down-Bahrain-dissidents.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220110/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatnews/8681230/Facebook-used-to-hunt-down-Bahrain-dissidents.html |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=September 24, 2015|date=August 4, 2011|last=Agencies|first=Suzi Dixon and }}{{cbignore}}</ref> |
|||
* "[[You Have 0 Friends]]", an April 2010 episode of the American animated comedy series, ''[[South Park]]'', explicitly parodied Facebook.<ref name="GuardianMediaMonkey8April2010">{{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/mediamonkeyblog/2010/apr/08/south-park-season-4-episode-14-facebook |title=South Park parodies Facebook |work=Guardian media blog |date=April 8, 2010 |accessdate=June 7, 2010 | location=London}}</ref> |
|||
* At age 102, [[Ivy Bean]] of [[Bradford]], England joined Facebook in 2008, making her one of the oldest people ever on Facebook.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/5327822/Oldest-Tweeter-talks-cuppas-and-casserole-on-Twitter-at-104.html | title = Oldest Tweeter talks cuppas and casserole on Twitter at 104 | newspaper = The Daily Telegraph | date = May 15, 2009 | location = London }}</ref> At the time of her death in July 2010, she had 4,962 friends on Facebook and more than 56,000 followers on Twitter.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/social.media/07/28/obit.ivy.bean/index.html?hpt=T2#fbid=txV8eA_Nah8 |title=Ivy Bean, 'world's oldest Twitter user,' dead at 104 |last=Gray |first=Melissa |date=July 28, 2010 |work =CNN |accessdate=July 31, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
In 2011, Facebook filed paperwork with the [[Federal Election Commission]] to form a [[political action committee]] under the name ''FB PAC''.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/26/facebook-forms-its-own-pac_n_982053.html|title=Facebook forms its own Political Action Committee|date=September 26, 2011|work=[[HuffPost]]|access-date=September 27, 2011|first=Luke|last=Johnson}}</ref> In an email to ''[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]'', a spokesman for Facebook said "Facebook [[Political Action Committee]] will give our employees a way to make their voice heard in the political process by supporting candidates who share our goals of promoting the value of innovation to our economy while giving people the power to share and make the world more open and connected."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://thehill.com/policy/technology/173847-facebook-to-form-its-own-pac-to-back-political-candidates/|title=Facebook to form its own PAC to back political candidates|first=Gautham|last=Nagesh|date=September 26, 2011|work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|access-date=September 27, 2011|location=Washington DC}}</ref> |
|||
* On May 16, 2011, an Israeli couple named their daughter after the Facebook "like" feature.<ref>{{cite news |title=Parents name child after Facebook 'Like' button|url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/social.media/05/16/baby.like.name.mashable/index.html |date=May 17, 2011 | work = CNN |first = Brenna | last = Ehrlich}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Israeli newborn named 'Like' in tribute to Facebook| url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011/05/israeli-couple-names-daughter-like-in-tribute-to-facebook.html |date=May 16, 2011 | work = Los Angeles Times | first = Nathan |last = Olivarez-Giles}}</ref> |
|||
* In July 2014, [[Shakira]] became the first celebrity to cross over 100 million likes, [[Cristiano Ronaldo]] is the second to reach 100 million likes, ahead of [[Rihanna]] and [[Eminem]], who had 98 million and 89 million likes respectively.<ref>{{cite web|title=Shakira reaches 100 million 'likes': Do Facebook fans and Twitter followers matter?|url=http://metro.co.uk/2014/07/25/shakira-reaches-100-million-likes-do-facebook-fans-and-twitter-followers-matter-4806640/|work=correspondent|publisher=[[Metro (British newspaper)|Metro UK]]|date=July 25, 2014|accessdate=August 13, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Shakira is Facebook's most popular celebrity with 100million likes – enough to fill 1,359 Maracana stadiums|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/shakira-is-facebooks-most-popular-celebrity-with-100million-likes--enough-to-fill-1359-maracana-stadiums-9618568.html|work=Ella Alexander|publisher=[[Independent (newspaper)|Independent UK]]|date=July 21, 2014|accessdate=August 13, 2014}}</ref> Mark Zuckerberg posted a congratulatory message on the artist's wall.<ref>{{cite web|title=Mark Zuckerberg Congratulates Shakira, Singer Attains "Most Liked Page on Facebook"|url=http://onobello.com/mark-zuckerberg-founder-facebook-congratulates-shakira-singer-attains-liked-page-facebook/#sthash.IIXwUXkU.dpbs|work=Correspondent|publisher=OnoBello.com|date=July 22, 2014|accessdate=August 13, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
During the Syrian civil war, the [[People's Protection Units|YPG]], a libertarian army for [[Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria|Rojava]] recruited westerners through Facebook in its fight against [[ISIL]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Kobani Kurds Use Facebook To Recruit Foreign Fighters in Struggle Against IS |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/islamic-state-ypg-foreign-fighters/26690432.html |work=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty |date=November 13, 2014}}</ref> Dozens joined its ranks. The Facebook page's name "The Lions of Rojava" comes from a Kurdish saying which translates as "A lion is a lion, whether it's a female or a male", reflecting the organization's feminist ideology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/frontline-isis-real-story-narin-afrini-kurdish-female-lions-terrorising-islamic-front-1470119|title=Frontline Isis: The Real Story of Narin Afrini and the Kurdish Female 'Lions' Terrorising Islamic State|work=International Business Times UK|date=October 15, 2014 }}</ref> |
|||
In recent years, Facebook's [[News Feed]] algorithms have been identified as a cause of political polarization, for which it has been criticized.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Quattrociocchi|first1=Walter|last2=Uzzi|first2=Brian|last3=Caldarelli|first3=Guido|last4=Scala|first4=Antonio|last5=Puliga|first5=Michelangelo|last6=Vicario|first6=Michela Del|last7=Zollo|first7=Fabiana|last8=Bessi|first8=Alessandro|title=Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube|journal=PLOS ONE|date=August 23, 2016|volume=11|issue=8|pages=e0159641|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0159641|pmid=27551783|pmc=4994967|issn=1932-6203|arxiv=1604.02705|bibcode=2016PLoSO..1159641B |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Solon|first=Olivia|title=Facebook's failure: did fake news and polarized politics get Trump elected?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/10/facebook-fake-news-election-conspiracy-theories|access-date=May 24, 2019|work=[[The Guardian]]|date=November 10, 2016}}</ref> It has likewise been accused of amplifying the reach of '[[fake news]]' and extreme viewpoints, as when it may have enabled conditions which led to the [[2015 Rohingya refugee crisis]].<ref>{{cite news|title=The country where Facebook posts whipped up hate|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-45449938|work=[[BBC News]]|access-date=May 24, 2019|date=September 12, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Mozur|first=Paul|title=A Genocide Incited on Facebook, With Posts From Myanmar's Military|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myanmar-facebook-genocide.html|access-date=May 24, 2019|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=October 15, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook first played a role in the American political process in January 2008, shortly before the [[New Hampshire primary]]. Facebook teamed up with [[American Broadcasting Company|ABC]] and [[Saint Anselm College]] to allow users to give live feedback about the "back to back" January 5 Republican and Democratic debates.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Politics/story?id=3899006&page=1|title=ABC News Joins Forces With Facebook|work=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]|date=December 18, 2007|access-date=March 23, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Doug|last=Minor|url=http://blogs.anselm.edu/blog/2007/11/29/abcdebates/|title=Saint Anselm to Host ABC Debates Jan. 5|publisher=Saint Anselm College blog|date=November 29, 2007|access-date=July 18, 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171009210810/http://blogs.anselm.edu/blog/2007/11/29/abcdebates/|archive-date=October 9, 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Tahman|last=Bradley|url=http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/abc_wmur_and_facebook_debates/index.html|title=Republicans Lead off ABC News, WMUR-TV and Facebook Back-To-Back Debates in New Hampshire|publisher=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]|work=Political Radar blog|date=December 12, 2007|access-date=March 23, 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511122929/http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/abc_wmur_and_facebook_debates/index.html|archive-date=May 11, 2011}}</ref> Facebook users took part in debate groups on specific topics, voter registration and message questions.<ref>{{cite web|first=Ezra|last=Callahan|url=http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=8183627130|title=Tune in to the ABC News/Facebook Debates, Tonight 7 pm/6c on ABC|publisher=Facebook Blog|date=January 5, 2008|access-date=March 23, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
Over a million people installed the Facebook application "US Politics on Facebook" in order to take part which measured responses to specific comments made by the debating candidates.<ref>{{cite news|first=Russell|last=Goldman|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=4091460&page=1|title=Facebook Gives Snapshot of Voter Sentiment|work=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]|date=January 5, 2007|access-date=March 23, 2010}}</ref> A poll by [[CBS News]], [[UWIRE]] and ''[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]]'' claimed to illustrate how the "Facebook effect" had affected youthful voters, increasing voting rates, support of political candidates, and general involvement.<ref>{{cite news|first=Michelle|last=Sullivan|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-effect-mobilizes-youth-vote/|title=Facebook Effect Mobilizes Youth Vote|work=[[CBS News]]|date=November 3, 2008|access-date=March 23, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
The new social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, connected hundreds of millions of people. By 2008, politicians and interest groups were experimenting with systematic use of social media to spread their message.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Carlisle|first1=Juliet E.|last2=Patton|first2=Robert C.|s2cid=154739808|date=January 1, 2013|title=Is Social Media Changing How We Understand Political Engagement? An Analysis of Facebook and the 2008 Presidential Election|jstor=23612065|journal=Political Research Quarterly|volume=66|issue=4|pages=883–895|doi=10.1177/1065912913482758}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Skogerbø|first1=Eli|last2=Krumsvik|first2=Arne H.|s2cid=145344499|date=May 4, 2015|title=Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter|journal=Journalism Practice|volume=9|issue=3|pages=350–366|doi=10.1080/17512786.2014.950471|hdl=10852/41249 |url=https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/10852/41249/3/SkogerboKrumsvik_JP_final.pdf|hdl-access=free}}</ref> By the 2016 election, political advertising to specific groups had become normalized. Facebook offered the most sophisticated targeting and analytics platform.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bossetta|first=Michael|date=March 2018|title=The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election|journal=Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly|volume=95|issue=2|pages=471–496|doi=10.1177/1077699018763307|arxiv=1904.07333|url=https://curis.ku.dk/portal/da/publications/the-digital-architectures-of-social-media-comparing-political-campaigning-on-facebook-twitter-instagram-and-snapchat-in-the-2016-us-election(38ec7c51-c55d-4902-8066-5b3149619644).html|doi-access=free}}</ref> [[ProPublica]] noted that their system enabled advertisers to direct their pitches to almost 2,300 people who expressed interest in the topics of "Jew hater", "How to burn Jews", or, "History of 'why Jews ruin the world".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-enabled-advertisers-to-reach-jew-haters|title=Facebook Enabled Advertisers to Reach 'Jew Haters' – ProPublica|date=September 14, 2017|website=ProPublica|first1=Julia|last1=Angwin|first2=Madeleine|last2=Varner|first3=Ariana|last3=Tobin|access-date=September 14, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook has used several initiatives to encourage its users to register to vote and vote. An experiment in 2012 involved showing Facebook users pictures of their friends who reported that they had voted; users who were shown the pictures were about 2% more likely to report that they had also voted compared to the [[control group]], which was not encouraged to vote.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Brady|first=Henry E.|date=May 11, 2019|title=The Challenge of Big Data and Data Science|journal=Annual Review of Political Science|language=en|volume=22|issue=1|pages=297–323|doi=10.1146/annurev-polisci-090216-023229| doi-access=free|issn=1094-2939}}</ref> In 2020, Facebook announced the goal of helping four million voters register in the US, saying that it had registered 2.5 million by September.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://about.fb.com/news/2020/09/national-voter-registration-day/| title=Celebrating National Voter Registration Day With a Week of Action| website=Facebook| date=September 21, 2020| access-date=September 24, 2020| first=Naomi| last=Gleit | author-link=Naomi Gleit }}</ref> |
|||
The [[Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal|Cambridge Analytica data scandal]] offered another example of the perceived attempt to influence elections.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html|title=How Trump Consultants Exploited the Facebook Data of Millions|last1=Rosenberg|first1=Matthew|date=March 17, 2018|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=March 17, 2018|last2=Confessore|first2=Nicholas|issn=0362-4331|last3=Cadwalladr|first3=Carole}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article205653624.html|title=Facebook bans Trump-affiliated data firm Cambridge Analytica|work=newsobserver|access-date=March 17, 2018|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180317234505/https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article205653624.html|archive-date=March 17, 2018 }}</ref> ''The Guardian'' claimed that Facebook knew about the security breach for two years, but did nothing to stop it until it became public.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/data-war-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-faceook-nix-bannon-trump|title='I made Steve Bannon's psychological warfare tool': meet the data war whistleblower|last=Cadwalladr|first=Carole|date=March 18, 2018|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=March 18, 2018|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> |
|||
Facebook banned political ads to prevent the manipulation of voters in the US's November's election. Industry experts suggested{{clarify|date=April 2022}} that there are several other ways for misinformation to reach voters on social media platforms and blocking political ads will not serve as a proven solution to the problem.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/09/06/1008192/why-facebooks-political-ad-ban-is-taking-on-the-wrong-problem/|title=Why Facebook's political-ad ban is taking on the wrong problem|access-date=September 6, 2020|website=Technology Review}}</ref> |
|||
In March 2024, former US President [[Donald Trump]] said that getting rid of TikTok would allow Facebook, which he called the "enemy of the people", to double its business. He spoke after [[Joe Biden|President Biden]] said he was ready to sign legislation that would require [[TikTok]] owner [[ByteDance]] to sell the video platform or face a ban in the US.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Swint |first=Brian |date=March 11, 2024 |title=Trump Complicates the Story on TikTok. Meta Platforms Stock Is Falling. |url=https://www.barrons.com/articles/kotich-tiktok-trump-congress-c4a48236?mod |access-date=March 12, 2024 |website=Barron's}}</ref> |
|||
==== India ==== |
|||
Ahead of the 2019 general elections in India, Facebook has removed 103 pages, groups and accounts on Facebook and Instagram platforms originating from Pakistan. Facebook said its investigation found a Pakistani military link, along with a mix of real accounts of ISPR employees, and a network of fake accounts created by them that have been operating military fan pages, general interest pages but were posting content about Indian politics while trying to conceal their identity.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/facebook-takes-down-pakistan-military-backed-pages-targeting-india-ahead-of-ls-polls/articleshow/68668722.cms|title=Facebook takes down Pakistan military backed pages targeting India ahead of LS polls|last=Ananth|first=Venkat|date=April 1, 2019|work=The Economic Times|access-date=April 1, 2019}}</ref> Owing to the same reasons, Facebook also removed 687 pages and accounts of Congress because of coordinated inauthentic behavior on the platform.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/facebook-removes-nearly-700-pages-linked-to-congress-ahead-of-polls-2084823.html|title=Facebook Removes Nearly 700 Pages Linked to Congress Ahead of Polls|website=News18|date=April 2019|access-date=April 1, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
=== Culture === |
|||
[[File:SF Pride 2014 - Stierch 7.jpg|thumb|Facebook [[parade float]] in [[San Francisco Pride]] 2014]] |
|||
Facebook and Zuckerberg have been the subject of music, books, film and television. The 2010 film ''[[The Social Network]]'', directed by [[David Fincher]] and written by [[Aaron Sorkin]], stars [[Jesse Eisenberg]] as Zuckerberg and went on to win three [[Academy Awards]] and four [[Golden Globes]]. |
|||
In 2008, [[Collins English Dictionary]] declared "Facebook" as its new Word of the Year.<ref>{{cite web|author=Nicole, Kristen|url=http://mashable.com/2007/12/21/facebook-noun-verb-collins-english-dictionary/|title=I Can So "Facebook" You Now (and be {{sic|nolink=y|gramatically|expected=grammatically}} correct)|work= Mashable|date=December 21, 2007|access-date=March 23, 2010}}</ref> In December 2009, the [[New Oxford American Dictionary]] declared its word of the year to be the verb "[[Friending and following|unfriend]]", defined as "To remove someone as a '[[List of Facebook features|friend]]' on a [[social networking]] site such as Facebook".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2009/11/unfriend-is-new-oxford-dictionarys-word-of-the-year-/1|title=Unfriend is New Oxford dictionary's Word of the Year|work=[[USA Today]]|location=Washington DC|access-date=July 12, 2010|date=November 17, 2009}}</ref> |
|||
=== Internet.org === |
|||
{{Main|Internet.org}} |
|||
In August 2013, Facebook founded [[Internet.org]] in collaboration with six other technology companies to plan and help build affordable Internet access for underdeveloped and developing countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://info.internet.org/en/mission/|title=Internet.org|date=August 25, 2015|website=English|access-date=February 14, 2019}}</ref> The service, called Free Basics, includes various low-bandwidth applications such as [[AccuWeather]], [[BabyCenter]], [[BBC News]], [[ESPN]], and [[Bing (search engine)|Bing]].<ref name="TechCrunch">{{cite web |title=Facebook's Internet.org has connected almost 100M to the 'internet' |url=http://techcrunch.com/2018/04/25/internet-org-100-million/ |access-date=May 13, 2019 |website=[[TechCrunch]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/27/facebook-free-basics-developing-markets|title='It's digital colonialism': how Facebook's free internet service has failed its users|last=Solon|first=Olivia|date=July 27, 2017|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=May 13, 2019|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> There was severe opposition to Internet.org in India, where the service started in partnership with [[Reliance Communications]] in 2015 was banned a year later by the [[Telecom Regulatory Authority of India]] (TRAI). In 2018, Zuckerberg claimed that "Internet.org efforts have helped almost 100 million people get access to the internet who may not have had it otherwise."<ref name="TechCrunch" /> |
|||
=== Environment === |
|||
Facebook announced in 2021 that it will make an effort to stop disinformation about climate change. The company will use [[George Mason University]], [[Yale Program on Climate Change Communication]] and [[the University of Cambridge]] as sources of information. The company will expand its information hub on climate to 16 countries. Users in other countries will be directed to the site of the [[United Nations Environment Programme]] for information.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Rodriguez |first1=Salvador |title=Facebook will debunk myths about climate change, stepping further into 'arbiter of truth' role |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/18/facebook-will-debunk-myths-about-climate-change.html |access-date=February 19, 2021 |agency=[[CNBC]]|date=February 18, 2021}}</ref> |
|||
{{Clear}} |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
<!-- Please keep entries in alphabetical order & add a short description [[WP:SEEALSO]] --> |
|||
{{Portal|Companies|Internet}} |
|||
{{div col|colwidth= |
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} |
||
* [[Ambient awareness]] |
* [[Ambient awareness]] |
||
* [[Corporation tax in the Republic of Ireland]] |
|||
* [[Criticism of Facebook]] |
|||
* [[Cyberstalking]] |
* [[Cyberstalking]] |
||
* [[DARPA LifeLog]] |
|||
* [[List of social networking websites]] |
|||
* [[Double Irish]] tax scheme |
|||
* [[List of virtual communities with more than 100 million active users]] |
|||
* [[Facebook malware]] |
|||
* [[Six degrees of separation]] |
* [[Six degrees of separation]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Social graph]] |
||
* [[Timeline of social media]] |
|||
* [[Surveillance Capitalism]] |
|||
{{div col end}} |
{{div col end}} |
||
<!-- please keep entries in alphabetical order --> |
|||
== Notes == |
|||
{{reflist|group=N}} |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{reflist|30em}} |
{{reflist|30em}} |
||
== Further reading == |
|||
{{Spoken Wikipedia|Facebook.ogg|August 15, 2009}} |
|||
* {{cite web |url=http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/25/the-age-of-facebook/ |title=The Age Of Facebook |last=Arrington |first=Michael |publisher=TechCrunch |date=April 25, 2012}} |
|||
* Kirkpatrick, David, [http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/06/magazines/fortune/fastforward_facebook.fortune/index.htm "Why Facebook matters: It's not just for arranging dates. And it's not just another social network. Facebook offers sophisticated tools for maintaining social relationships"], ''[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]'', October 6, 2006 |
|||
* {{cite book|first=Newton|last=Lee|title=Facebook Nation: Total Information Awareness (2nd Edition)|url=http://www.amazon.com/Facebook-Nation-Total-Information-Awareness/dp/1493917390/|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media|date=2014}} ISBN 978-1-4939-1739-6. |
|||
* [[Daniel Miller (anthropologist)|Miller, Daniel]], ''Tales from Facebook'', [[Polity (publisher)|Polity]] 2011, ISBN 978-0-7456-5209-2 |
|||
* {{cite web |url=http://mashable.com/2011/02/07/facebook-privacy-guide/ |title=Facebook Privacy: 10 Settings Every User Needs to Know |last=Schroeder |first=Stan |publisher=[[Mashable]] |date=February 7, 2011 |accessdate=February 1, 2015 }} |
|||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
{{Sister project links |
{{Sister project links|c=Category:Facebook|n=Category:Facebook|q=Facebook|wikt=Facebook|s=no|b=no|v=no}} |
||
{{Scholia|topic}} |
|||
* {{Official website|https://www.facebook.com|mobile=https://m.facebook.com}} |
|||
<!-- {{No more links}} |
|||
* <nowiki>https://facebookcorewwwi.onion</nowiki>,<ref>{{cite news|last1=Muffett|first1=Alec|title=Making Connections to Facebook more Secure|url=https://www.facebook.com/notes/protect-the-graph/making-connections-to-facebook-more-secure/1526085754298237|accessdate=June 7, 2015|date=October 31, 2014}}</ref> [[Tor hidden service]] |
|||
* {{OpenCorp|Facebook}} |
|||
* [http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/facebook_inc/index.html Facebook] collected news and commentary at ''[[The New York Times]]'' <!-- NYTtopic is broken --> |
|||
* {{Guardiantopic|technology/facebook}} |
|||
Please be cautious adding more external links. |
|||
{{Facebook navbox|state=uncollapsed}} |
|||
{{NASDAQ-100}} |
|||
Wikipedia is not a collection of links and should not be used for advertising. |
|||
Excessive or inappropriate links will be removed. |
|||
See [[Wikipedia:External links]] and [[Wikipedia:Spam]] for details. |
|||
If there are already suitable links, propose additions or replacements on |
|||
the article's talk page, or submit your link to the relevant category at |
|||
the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) and link there using {{Dmoz}}. |
|||
--> |
|||
* {{Official website|https://www.facebook.com/}} |
|||
{{Meta Platforms}} |
|||
{{Navboxes|list1= |
{{Navboxes|list1= |
||
{{Microblogging}} |
|||
{{Social network}} |
{{Social network}} |
||
{{Microblogging}} |
|||
{{Major information technology companies}} |
|||
{{Social networking}} |
|||
{{Tor hidden services}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Portal bar|Companies|Internet}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
||
[[Category:Facebook]] |
[[Category:Facebook| ]] |
||
[[Category:2004 establishments in Massachusetts]] |
|||
[[Category:American social networking websites]] |
|||
[[Category:American websites]] |
[[Category:American websites]] |
||
[[Category:Android (operating system) software]] |
[[Category:Android (operating system) software]] |
||
[[Category:Bada software]] |
|||
[[Category:BlackBerry software]] |
[[Category:BlackBerry software]] |
||
[[Category:Blog hosting services]] |
[[Category:Blog hosting services]] |
||
[[Category:Companies' terms of service]] |
|||
[[Category:Companies based in Menlo Park, California]] |
[[Category:Companies based in Menlo Park, California]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:English-language websites]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Image-sharing websites]] |
||
[[Category:Firefox OS software]] |
|||
[[Category:Human–computer interaction]] |
|||
[[Category:Internet companies of the United States]] |
|||
[[Category:Internet properties established in 2004]] |
[[Category:Internet properties established in 2004]] |
||
[[Category:IOS software]] |
[[Category:IOS software]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Meta Platforms applications]] |
||
[[Category:Multilingual websites]] |
[[Category:Multilingual websites]] |
||
[[Category:Online |
[[Category:Online video game services]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Products introduced in 2004]] |
||
[[Category:Proprietary cross-platform software]] |
|||
[[Category:Social information processing]] |
[[Category:Social information processing]] |
||
[[Category:Social |
[[Category:Social media]] |
||
[[Category:Social |
[[Category:Social planning websites]] |
||
[[Category:Student culture]] |
[[Category:Student culture]] |
||
[[Category:Symbian software]] |
[[Category:Symbian software]] |
||
[[Category:Universal Windows Platform apps]] |
|||
[[Category:Video game streaming services]] |
|||
[[Category:Websites which mirror Wikipedia]] |
[[Category:Websites which mirror Wikipedia]] |
||
[[Category:Windows Phone software]] |
|||
[[Category:2004 establishments in Massachusetts]] |
|||
[[Category:2004 introductions]] |
|||
[[Category:Tor hidden services]] |
Latest revision as of 11:04, 18 December 2024
Type of site | Social networking service |
---|---|
Available in | 112 languages[1] |
List of languages Multilingual Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Assamese, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Breton, Bulgarian, Burmese, Catalan, Cebuano, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Dutch (België), English (UK), English (US), English (upside down), Esperanto, Estonian, Faroese, Filipino, Finnish, French (Canada), French (France), Frisian, Fula, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Guarani, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Icelandic, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Japanese (Kansai), Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latvian, Lithuanian, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Marathi, Mongolian, Nepali, Norwegian (bokmal), Norwegian (nynorsk), Odia, Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazil), Portuguese (Portugal), Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Sardinian, Serbian, Shona, Silesian, Simplified Chinese (China), Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Sorani Kurdish, Spanish, Spanish (Spain), Swahili, Swedish, Syriac, Tajik, Tamazight, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Tetun, Thai, Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong), Traditional Chinese (Taiwan), Turkish, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh and Zaza | |
Founded | February 4, 2004Cambridge, Massachusetts, US | in
Area served | Worldwide, except blocking countries |
Owner | Meta Platforms |
Founder(s) | |
CEO | Mark Zuckerberg |
URL | facebook |
Registration | Required (to do any activity) |
Users | 2.94 billion monthly active users (as of 31 March 2022[update])[2] |
Launched | February 4, 2004 |
Current status | Active |
Written in | C++, Hack (as HHVM) and PHP |
[3][4][5] |
This article is part of a series about |
Meta Platforms |
---|
Products and services |
People |
Business |
Facebook is a social media and social networking service owned by American technology conglomerate Meta. Created in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with four other Harvard College students and roommates Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, and Chris Hughes, its name derives from the face book directories often given to American university students. Membership was initially limited to Harvard students, gradually expanding to other North American universities. Since 2006, Facebook allows everyone to register from 13 years old, except in the case of a handful of nations, where the age limit is 14 years.[6] As of December 2022[update], Facebook claimed almost 3 billion monthly active users.[7] As of November 2024[update], Facebook ranked as the third-most-visited website in the world, with 23% of its traffic coming from the United States.[8] It was the most downloaded mobile app of the 2010s.[9]
Facebook can be accessed from devices with Internet connectivity, such as personal computers, tablets and smartphones. After registering, users can create a profile revealing personal information about themselves. They can post text, photos and multimedia which are shared with any other users who have agreed to be their friend or, with different privacy settings, publicly. Users can also communicate directly with each other with Messenger, join common-interest groups, and receive notifications on the activities of their Facebook friends and the pages they follow.
The subject of numerous controversies, Facebook has often been criticized over issues such as user privacy (as with the Cambridge Analytica data scandal), political manipulation (as with the 2016 U.S. elections) and mass surveillance.[10] Facebook has also been subject to criticism over psychological effects such as addiction and low self-esteem, and various controversies over content such as fake news, conspiracy theories, copyright infringement, and hate speech.[11] Commentators have accused Facebook of willingly facilitating the spread of such content, as well as exaggerating its number of users to appeal to advertisers.[12]
History
The history of Facebook traces its growth from a college networking site to a global social networking service.[13]
Zuckerberg built a website called "Facemash" in 2003 while attending Harvard University. The site was comparable to Hot or Not and used photos from online face books, asking users to choose the 'hotter' person".[14] Zuckerberg was reported and faced expulsion, but the charges were dropped.[14]
A "face book" is a student directory featuring photos and personal information. In January 2004, Zuckerberg coded a new site known as "TheFacebook", stating, "It is clear that the technology needed to create a centralized Website is readily available ... the benefits are many." Zuckerberg met with Harvard student Eduardo Saverin, and each agreed to invest $1,000.[15] On February 4, 2004, Zuckerberg launched "TheFacebook".[16]
Membership was initially restricted to students of Harvard College. Dustin Moskovitz, Andrew McCollum, and Chris Hughes joined Zuckerberg to help manage the growth of the site.[17] It became available successively to most universities in the US and Canada.[18][19] In mid-2004, Napster co-founder Sean Parker became company president[20] and the company moved to Palo Alto, California.[21] PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, gave Facebook its first investment.[22][23] In 2005, the company dropped "the" from its name after purchasing the domain name Facebook.com.[24]
In 2006, Facebook opened to everyone at least 13 years old with a valid email address.[25][26][27] Facebook introduced key features like the News Feed, which became central to user engagement. By late 2007, Facebook had 100,000 pages on which companies promoted themselves.[28] Facebook had surpassed MySpace in global traffic and became the world’s most popular social media platform. Microsoft announced that it had purchased a 1.6% share of Facebook for $240 million ($353 million in 2023 dollars[29]), giving Facebook an implied value of around $15 billion ($22 billion in 2023 dollars[29]). Facebook focused on generating revenue through targeted advertising based on user data, a model that drove its rapid financial growth. In 2012, Facebook went public with one of the largest IPOs in tech history. Acquisitions played a significant role in Facebook's dominance. In 2012, it purchased Instagram, followed by WhatsApp and Oculus VR in 2014, extending its influence beyond social networking into messaging and virtual reality.
The Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal in 2018 revealed misuse of user data to influence elections, sparking global outcry and leading to regulatory fines and hearings. Facebook’s role in global events, including its use in organizing movements like the Arab Spring and its impact on events like the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar, highlighted its dual nature as a tool for empowerment and harm. In 2021, Facebook rebranded as Meta, reflecting its shift toward building the "metaverse" and focusing on virtual reality and augmented reality technologies.
Features
Facebook posts can have an unlimited number of characters, with images and videos.
Users can "friend" users, both sides must agree to being friends. Posts can be changed to be seen by everyone (public), friends, people in a certain group (group) or by selected friends (private).
Users can join groups. Groups are composed of persons with shared interests. For example, they might go to the same sporting club, live in the same suburb, have the same breed of pet or share a hobby. Posts posted in a group can be seen only by those in a group, unless set to public.
Users can buy, sell or swap things on Facebook Marketplace or in a Buy, Swap and Sell group. Facebook users can advertise events, which can be offline, on a website other than Facebook, or on Facebook.
Website
Technical aspects
The site's primary color is blue as Zuckerberg is red–green colorblind, a realization that occurred after a test taken around 2007.[30][31] Facebook was initially built using PHP, a popular scripting language designed for web development.[32] PHP was used to create dynamic content and manage data on the server side of the Facebook application. Zuckerberg and co-founders chose PHP for its simplicity and ease of use, which allowed them to quickly develop and deploy the initial version of Facebook. As Facebook grew in user base and functionality, the company encountered scalability and performance challenges with PHP. In response, Facebook engineers developed tools and technologies to optimize PHP performance. One of the most significant was the creation of the HipHop Virtual Machine (HHVM). This significantly improved the performance and efficiency of PHP code execution on Facebook's servers.
The site started switching from HTTP to HTTPS in January 2011.[33]
2012 architecture
Facebook is developed as one monolithic application. According to an interview in 2012 with Facebook build engineer Chuck Rossi, Facebook compiles into a 1.5 GB binary blob which is then distributed to the servers using a custom BitTorrent-based release system. Rossi stated that it takes about 15 minutes to build and 15 minutes to release to the servers. The build and release process has zero downtime. Changes to Facebook are rolled out daily.[34]
Facebook used a combination platform based on HBase to store data across distributed machines. Using a tailing architecture, events are stored in log files, and the logs are tailed. The system rolls these events up and writes them to storage. The user interface then pulls the data out and displays it to users. Facebook handles requests as AJAX behavior. These requests are written to a log file using Scribe (developed by Facebook).[35]
Data is read from these log files using Ptail, an internally built tool to aggregate data from multiple Scribe stores. It tails the log files and pulls data out. Ptail data are separated into three streams and sent to clusters in different data centers (Plugin impression, News feed impressions, Actions (plugin + news feed)). Puma is used to manage periods of high data flow (Input/Output or IO). Data is processed in batches to lessen the number of times needed to read and write under high demand periods. (A hot article generates many impressions and news feed impressions that cause huge data skews.) Batches are taken every 1.5 seconds, limited by memory used when creating a hash table.[35]
Data is then output in PHP format. The backend is written in Java. Thrift is used as the messaging format so PHP programs can query Java services. Caching solutions display pages more quickly. The data is then sent to MapReduce servers where it is queried via Hive. This serves as a backup as the data can be recovered from Hive.[35]
Content delivery network (CDN)
Facebook uses its own content delivery network or "edge network" under the domain fbcdn.net for serving static data.[36][37] Until the mid-2010s, Facebook also relied on Akamai for CDN services.[38][39][40]
Hack programming language
On March 20, 2014, Facebook announced a new open-source programming language called Hack. Before public release, a large portion of Facebook was already running and "battle tested" using the new language.[41]
User profile/personal timeline
Each registered user on Facebook has a personal profile that shows their posts and content.[42] The format of individual user pages was revamped in September 2011 and became known as "Timeline", a chronological feed of a user's stories,[43][44] including status updates, photos, interactions with apps and events.[45] The layout let users add a "cover photo".[45] Users were given more privacy settings.[45] In 2007, Facebook launched Facebook Pages for brands and celebrities to interact with their fanbases.[46][47] 100,000 Pages[further explanation needed] launched in November.[48] In June 2009, Facebook introduced a "Usernames" feature, allowing users to choose a unique nickname used in the URL for their personal profile, for easier sharing.[49][50]
In February 2014, Facebook expanded the gender setting, adding a custom input field that allows users to choose from a wide range of gender identities. Users can also set which set of gender-specific pronoun should be used in reference to them throughout the site.[51][52][53] In May 2014, Facebook introduced a feature to allow users to ask for information not disclosed by other users on their profiles. If a user does not provide key information, such as location, hometown, or relationship status, other users can use a new "ask" button to send a message asking about that item to the user in a single click.[54][55]
News Feed
News Feed appears on every user's homepage and highlights information including profile changes, upcoming events and friends' birthdays.[56] This enabled spammers and other users to manipulate these features by creating illegitimate events or posting fake birthdays to attract attention to their profile or cause.[57] Initially, the News Feed caused dissatisfaction among Facebook users; some complained it was too cluttered and full of undesired information, others were concerned that it made it too easy for others to track individual activities (such as relationship status changes, events, and conversations with other users).[58] Zuckerberg apologized for the site's failure to include appropriate privacy features. Users then gained control over what types of information are shared automatically with friends. Users are now able to prevent user-set categories of friends from seeing updates about certain types of activities, including profile changes, Wall posts and newly added friends.[59]
On February 23, 2010, Facebook was granted a patent[60] on certain aspects of its News Feed. The patent covers News Feeds in which links are provided so that one user can participate in the activity of another user.[61] The sorting and display of stories in a user's News Feed is governed by the EdgeRank algorithm.[62]
The Photos application allows users to upload albums and photos.[63] Each album can contain 200 photos.[64] Privacy settings apply to individual albums. Users can "tag", or label, friends in a photo. The friend receives a notification about the tag with a link to the photo.[65] This photo tagging feature was developed by Aaron Sittig, now a Design Strategy Lead at Facebook, and former Facebook engineer Scott Marlette back in 2006 and was only granted a patent in 2011.[66][67]
On June 7, 2012, Facebook launched its App Center to help users find games and other applications.[68]
On May 13, 2015, Facebook in association with major news portals launched "Instant Articles" to provide news on the Facebook news feed without leaving the site.[69][70]
In January 2017, Facebook launched Facebook Stories for iOS and Android in Ireland. The feature, following the format of Snapchat and Instagram stories, allows users to upload photos and videos that appear above friends' and followers' News Feeds and disappear after 24 hours.[71]
On October 11, 2017, Facebook introduced the 3D Posts feature to allow for uploading interactive 3D assets.[72] On January 11, 2018, Facebook announced that it would change News Feed to prioritize friends/family content and de-emphasize content from media companies.[73]
In February 2020, Facebook announced it would spend $1 billion ($1.18 billion in 2023 dollars[29]) to license news material from publishers for the next three years; a pledge coming as the company falls under scrutiny from governments across the globe over not paying for news content appearing on the platform. The pledge would be in addition to the $600 million ($706 million in 2023 dollars[29]) paid since 2018 through deals with news companies such as The Guardian and Financial Times.[74][75][76]
In March and April 2021, in response to Apple announcing changes to its iOS device's Identifier for Advertisers policy, which included requiring app developers to directly request to users the ability to track on an opt-in basis, Facebook purchased full-page newspaper advertisements attempting to convince users to allow tracking, highlighting the effects targeted ads have on small businesses.[77] Facebook's efforts were ultimately unsuccessful, as Apple released iOS 14.5 in late April 2021, containing the feature for users in what has been deemed "App Tracking Transparency". Moreover, statistics from Verizon Communications subsidiary Flurry Analytics show 96% of all iOS users in the United States are not permitting tracking at all, and only 12% of worldwide iOS users are allowing tracking, which some news outlets deem "Facebook's nightmare", among similar terms.[78][79][80][81] Despite the news, Facebook has stated that the new policy and software update would be "manageable".[82]
Like button
The "like" button, stylized as a "thumbs up" icon, was first enabled on February 9, 2009,[83] and enables users to easily interact with status updates, comments, photos and videos, links shared by friends, and advertisements. Once clicked by a user, the designated content is more likely to appear in friends' News Feeds.[84][85] The button displays the number of other users who have liked the content.[86] The like button was extended to comments in June 2010.[87] In February 2016, Facebook expanded Like into "Reactions", choosing among five pre-defined emotions, including "Love", "Haha", "Wow", "Sad", or "Angry".[88][89][90][91] In late April 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a new "Care" reaction was added.[92]
Instant messaging
Facebook Messenger is an instant messaging service and software application. It began as Facebook Chat in 2008,[93] was revamped in 2010[94] and eventually became a standalone mobile app in August 2011, while remaining part of the user page on browsers.[95]
Complementing regular conversations, Messenger lets users make one-to-one[96] and group[97] voice[98] and video calls.[99] Its Android app has integrated support for SMS[100] and "Chat Heads", which are round profile photo icons appearing on-screen regardless of what app is open,[101] while both apps support multiple accounts,[102] conversations with optional end-to-end encryption[103] and "Instant Games".[104] Some features, including sending money[105] and requesting transportation,[106] are limited to the United States.[105] In 2017, Facebook added "Messenger Day", a feature that lets users share photos and videos in a story-format with all their friends with the content disappearing after 24 hours;[107] Reactions, which lets users tap and hold a message to add a reaction through an emoji;[108] and Mentions, which lets users in group conversations type @ to give a particular user a notification.[108]
In April 2020, Facebook began rolling out a new feature called Messenger Rooms, a video chat feature that allows users to chat with up to 50 people at a time.[109] In July 2020, Facebook added a new feature in Messenger that lets iOS users to use Face ID or Touch ID to lock their chats. The feature is called App Lock and is a part of several changes in Messenger regarding privacy and security.[110][111] On October 13, 2020, the Messenger application introduced cross-app messaging with Instagram, which was launched in September 2021.[112] In addition to the integrated messaging, the application announced the introduction of a new logo, which will be an amalgamation of the Messenger and Instagram logo.[113]
Businesses and users can interact through Messenger with features such as tracking purchases and receiving notifications, and interacting with customer service representatives. Third-party developers can integrate apps into Messenger, letting users enter an app while inside Messenger and optionally share details from the app into a chat.[114] Developers can build chatbots into Messenger, for uses such as news publishers building bots to distribute news.[115] The M virtual assistant (U.S.) scans chats for keywords and suggests relevant actions, such as its payments system for users mentioning money.[116][117] Group chatbots appear in Messenger as "Chat Extensions". A "Discovery" tab allows finding bots, and enabling special, branded QR codes that, when scanned, take the user to a specific bot.[118]
Privacy policy
Facebook's data policy outlines its policies for collecting, storing, and sharing user's data.[119] Facebook enables users to control access to individual posts and their profile[120] through privacy settings.[121] The user's name and profile picture (if applicable) are public.
Facebook's revenue depends on targeted advertising, which involves analyzing user data to decide which ads to show each user. Facebook buys data from third parties, gathered from both online and offline sources, to supplement its own data on users. Facebook maintains that it does not share data used for targeted advertising with the advertisers themselves.[122] The company states:
"We provide advertisers with reports about the kinds of people seeing their ads and how their ads are performing, but we don't share information that personally identifies you (information such as your name or email address that by itself can be used to contact you or identifies who you are) unless you give us permission. For example, we provide general demographic and interest information to advertisers (for example, that an ad was seen by a woman between the ages of 25 and 34 who lives in Madrid and likes software engineering) to help them better understand their audience. We also confirm which Facebook ads led you to make a purchase or take an action with an advertiser."[119]
As of October 2021[update], Facebook claims it uses the following policy for sharing user data with third parties:
Apps, websites, and third-party integrations on or using our Products.
When you choose to use third-party apps, websites, or other services that use, or are integrated with, our Products, they can receive information about what you post or share. For example, when you play a game with your Facebook friends or use a Facebook Comment or Share button on a website, the game developer or website can receive information about your activities in the game or receive a comment or link that you share from the website on Facebook. Also, when you download or use such third-party services, they can access your public profile on Facebook, and any information that you share with them. Apps and websites you use may receive your list of Facebook friends if you choose to share it with them. But apps and websites you use will not be able to receive any other information about your Facebook friends from you, or information about any of your Instagram followers (although your friends and followers may, of course, choose to share this information themselves). Information collected by these third-party services is subject to their own terms and policies, not this one.
Devices and operating systems providing native versions of Facebook and Instagram (i.e. where we have not developed our own first-party apps) will have access to all information you choose to share with them, including information your friends share with you, so they can provide our core functionality to you.
Note: We are in the process of restricting developers' data access even further to help prevent abuse. For example, we will remove developers' access to your Facebook and Instagram data if you haven't used their app in 3 months, and we are changing Login, so that in the next version, we will reduce the data that an app can request without app review to include only name, Instagram username and bio, profile photo and email address. Requesting any other data will require our approval.[119]
Facebook will also share data with law enforcement if needed to.[119]
Facebook's policies have changed repeatedly since the service's debut, amid a series of controversies covering everything from how well it secures user data, to what extent it allows users to control access, to the kinds of access given to third parties, including businesses, political campaigns and governments. These facilities vary according to country, as some nations require the company to make data available (and limit access to services), while the European Union's GDPR regulation mandates additional privacy protections.[123]
Bug Bounty Program
On July 29, 2011, Facebook announced its Bug Bounty Program that paid security researchers a minimum of $500 ($677.00 in 2023 dollars[29]) for reporting security holes. The company promised not to pursue "white hat" hackers who identified such problems.[124][125] This led researchers in many countries to participate, particularly in India and Russia.[126]
Reception
Userbase
Facebook's rapid growth began as soon as it became available and continued through 2018, before beginning to decline.
Facebook passed 100 million registered users in 2008,[127] and 500 million in July 2010.[128] According to the company's data at the July 2010 announcement, half of the site's membership used Facebook daily, for an average of 34 minutes, while 150 million users accessed the site by mobile.[129]
In October 2012, Facebook's monthly active users passed one billion,[130][131] with 600 million mobile users, 219 billion photo uploads, and 140 billion friend connections.[132] The 2 billion user mark was crossed in June 2017.[133][134]
In November 2015, after skepticism about the accuracy of its "monthly active users" measurement, Facebook changed its definition to a logged-in member who visits the Facebook site through the web browser or mobile app, or uses the Facebook Messenger app, in the 30-day period prior to the measurement. This excluded the use of third-party services with Facebook integration, which was previously counted.[135]
From 2017 to 2019, the percentage of the U.S. population over the age of 12 who use Facebook has declined, from 67% to 61% (a decline of some 15 million U.S. users), with a higher drop-off among younger Americans (a decrease in the percentage of U.S. 12- to 34-year-olds who are users from 58% in 2015 to 29% in 2019).[136][137] The decline coincided with an increase in the popularity of Instagram, which is also owned by Meta.[136][137]
The number of daily active users experienced a quarterly decline for the first time in the last quarter of 2021, down to 1.929 billion from 1.930 billion,[138] but increased again the next quarter despite being banned in Russia.[139]
Historically, commentators have offered predictions of Facebook's decline or end, based on causes such as a declining user base;[140] the legal difficulties of being a closed platform, inability to generate revenue, inability to offer user privacy, inability to adapt to mobile platforms, or Facebook ending itself to present a next generation replacement;[141] or Facebook's role in Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.[142]
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Demographics
The highest number of Facebook users as of April 2023 are from India and the United States, followed by Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico and the Philippines.[144] Region-wise, the highest number of users in 2018 are from Asia-Pacific (947 million) followed by Europe (381 million) and US-Canada (242 million). The rest of the world has 750 million users.[145]
Over the 2008–2018 period, the percentage of users under 34 declined to less than half of the total.[123]
Censorship
In many countries the social networking sites and mobile apps have been blocked temporarily, intermittently, or permanently, including: Brazil,[146] China,[147] Iran,[148] Vietnam,[149] Pakistan,[150] Syria,[151] and North Korea. In May 2018, the government of Papua New Guinea announced that it would ban Facebook for a month while it considered the impact of the website on the country, though no ban has since occurred.[152] In 2019, Facebook announced it would start enforcing its ban on users, including influencers, promoting any vape, tobacco products, or weapons on its platforms.[153]
Criticisms and controversies
"I'm here today because I believe Facebook's products harm children, stoke division, and weaken our democracy. The company's leadership knows how to make Facebook and Instagram safer, but won't make the necessary changes because they have put their astronomical profits before people."
"I don't believe private companies should make all of the decisions on their own. That's why we have advocated for updated internet regulations for several years now. I have testified in Congress multiple times and asked them to update these regulations. I've written op-eds outlining the areas of regulation we think are most important related to elections, harmful content, privacy, and competition."
Facebook's importance and scale has led to criticisms in many domains. Issues include Internet privacy, excessive retention of user information,[156] its facial recognition software, DeepFace[157][158] its addictive quality[159] and its role in the workplace, including employer access to employee accounts.[160]
Facebook has been criticized for electricity usage,[161] tax avoidance,[162] real-name user requirement policies,[163] censorship[164][165] and its involvement in the United States PRISM surveillance program.[166] According to The Express Tribune, Facebook "avoided billions of dollars in tax using offshore companies".[167]
Facebook is alleged to have harmful psychological effects on its users, including feelings of jealousy[168][169] and stress,[170][171] a lack of attention[172] and social media addiction.[173][174] According to Kaufmann et al., mothers' motivations for using social media are often related to their social and mental health.[175] European antitrust regulator Margrethe Vestager stated that Facebook's terms of service relating to private data were "unbalanced".[176]
Facebook has been criticized for allowing users to publish illegal or offensive material. Specifics include copyright and intellectual property infringement,[177] hate speech,[178][179] incitement of rape[180] and terrorism,[181][182] fake news,[183][184][185] and crimes, murders, and livestreaming violent incidents.[186][187][188] Commentators have accused Facebook of willingly facilitating the spread of such content.[189][190][191] Sri Lanka blocked both Facebook and WhatsApp in May 2019 after anti-Muslim riots, the worst in the country since the Easter Sunday bombing in the same year as a temporary measure to maintain peace in Sri Lanka.[192][193] Facebook removed 3 billion fake accounts only during the last quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019;[194] in comparison, the social network reports 2.39 billion monthly active users.[194]
In late July 2019, the company announced it was under antitrust investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.[195]
The consumer advocacy group, Which?, claims that individuals are still utilizing Facebook to set up fraudulent five-star ratings for various products. The group has identified 14 communities that exchange reviews for either money or complimentary items such as watches, earbuds, and sprinklers.[196]
Privacy
Facebook has experienced a steady stream of controversies over how it handles user privacy, repeatedly adjusting its privacy settings and policies.[197]
Since 2009, Facebook has been participating in the PRISM secret program, sharing with the US National Security Agency audio, video, photographs, e-mails, documents and connection logs from user profiles, among other social media services.[198][199]
On November 29, 2011, Facebook settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived consumers by failing to keep privacy promises.[200] In August 2013 High-Tech Bridge published a study showing that links included in Facebook messaging service messages were being accessed by Facebook.[201] In January 2014 two users filed a lawsuit against Facebook alleging that their privacy had been violated by this practice.[202]
On June 7, 2018, Facebook announced that a bug had resulted in about 14 million Facebook users having their default sharing setting for all new posts set to "public".[203] Its data-sharing agreement with Chinese companies such as Huawei came under the scrutiny of US lawmakers, although the information accessed was not stored on Huawei servers and remained on users' phones.[204]
On April 4, 2019, half a billion records of Facebook users were found exposed on Amazon cloud servers, containing information about users' friends, likes, groups, and checked-in locations, as well as names, passwords and email addresses.[205]
The phone numbers of at least 200 million Facebook users were found to be exposed on an open online database in September 2019. They included 133 million US users, 18 million from the UK, and 50 million from users in Vietnam. After removing duplicates, the 419 million records have been reduced to 219 million. The database went offline after TechCrunch contacted the web host. It is thought the records were amassed using a tool that Facebook disabled in April 2018 after the Cambridge Analytica controversy. A Facebook spokeswoman said in a statement: "The dataset is old and appears to have information obtained before we made changes last year...There is no evidence that Facebook accounts were compromised."[206]
Facebook's privacy problems resulted in companies like Viber Media and Mozilla discontinuing advertising on Facebook's platforms.[207][208]
A January 2024 study by Consumer Reports found that among a self-selected group of volunteer participants, each user is monitored or tracked by over two thousand companies on average. LiveRamp, a San Francisco-based data broker, is responsible for 96 per cent of the data. Other companies such as Home Depot, Macy's, and Walmart are involved as well.[209]
In March 2024, a court in California released documents detailing Facebook's 2016 "Project Ghostbusters". The project was aimed at helping Facebook compete with Snapchat and involved Facebook trying to develop decryption tools to collect, decrypt, and analyze traffic that users generated when visiting Snapchat and, eventually, YouTube and Amazon. The company eventually used its tool Onavo to initiate man-in-the-middle attacks and read users' traffic before it was encrypted.[210]
Racial bias
Facebook was accused of committing "systemic" racial bias by EEOC based on the complaints of three rejected candidates and a current employee of the company. The three rejected employees along with the Operational Manager at Facebook as of March 2021 accused the firm of discriminating against Black people. The EEOC has initiated an investigation into the case.[211]
Shadow profiles
A "shadow profile" refers to the data Facebook collects about individuals without their explicit permission. For example, the "like" button that appears on third-party websites allows the company to collect information about an individual's internet browsing habits, even if the individual is not a Facebook user.[212][213] Data can also be collected by other users. For example, a Facebook user can link their email account to their Facebook to find friends on the site, allowing the company to collect the email addresses of users and non-users alike.[214] Over time, countless data points about an individual are collected; any single data point perhaps cannot identify an individual, but together allows the company to form a unique "profile".
This practice has been criticized by those who believe people should be able to opt-out of involuntary data collection. Additionally, while Facebook users have the ability to download and inspect the data they provide to the site, data from the user's "shadow profile" is not included, and non-users of Facebook do not have access to this tool regardless. The company has also been unclear whether or not it is possible for a person to revoke Facebook's access to their "shadow profile".[212]
Cambridge Analytica
Facebook customer Global Science Research sold information on over 87 million Facebook users to Cambridge Analytica, a political data analysis firm led by Alexander Nix.[215] While approximately 270,000 people used the app, Facebook's API permitted data collection from their friends without their knowledge.[216] At first Facebook downplayed the significance of the breach, and suggested that Cambridge Analytica no longer had access. Facebook then issued a statement expressing alarm and suspended Cambridge Analytica. Review of documents and interviews with former Facebook employees suggested that Cambridge Analytica still possessed the data.[217] This was a violation of Facebook's consent decree with the Federal Trade Commission. This violation potentially carried a penalty of $40,000 ($48,534 in 2023 dollars[29]) per occurrence, totalling trillions of dollars.[218]
According to The Guardian, both Facebook and Cambridge Analytica threatened to sue the newspaper if it published the story. After publication, Facebook claimed that it had been "lied to". On March 23, 2018, The English High Court granted an application by the Information Commissioner's Office for a warrant to search Cambridge Analytica's London offices, ending a standoff between Facebook and the Information Commissioner over responsibility.[219]
On March 25, Facebook published a statement by Zuckerberg in major UK and US newspapers apologizing over a "breach of trust".[220]
You may have heard about a quiz app built by a university researcher that leaked Facebook data of millions of people in 2014. This was a breach of trust, and I'm sorry we didn't do more at the time. We're now taking steps to make sure this doesn't happen again.
We've already stopped apps like this from getting so much information. Now we're limiting the data apps get when you sign in using Facebook.
We're also investigating every single app that had access to large amounts of data before we fixed this. We expect there are others. And when we find them, we will ban them and tell everyone affected.
Finally, we'll remind you which apps you've given access to your information – so you can shut off the ones you don't want anymore.
Thank you for believing in this community. I promise to do better for you.
On March 26, the Federal Trade Commission opened an investigation into the matter.[221] The controversy led Facebook to end its partnerships with data brokers who aid advertisers in targeting users.[197]
On April 24, 2019, Facebook said it could face a fine between $3 billion ($3.58 billion in 2023 dollars[29]) to $5 billion ($5.96 billion in 2023 dollars[29]) as the result of an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.[222] On July 24, 2019, the FTC fined Facebook $5 billion, the largest penalty ever imposed on a company for violating consumer privacy. Additionally, Facebook had to implement a new privacy structure, follow a 20-year settlement order, and allow the FTC to monitor Facebook.[223] Cambridge Analytica's CEO and a developer faced restrictions on future business dealings and were ordered to destroy any personal information they collected. Cambridge Analytica filed for bankruptcy.[224]
Facebook also implemented additional privacy controls and settings[225] in part to comply with the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which took effect in May.[226] Facebook also ended its active opposition to the California Consumer Privacy Act.[227]
Some, such as Meghan McCain have drawn an equivalence between the use of data by Cambridge Analytica and the Barack Obama's 2012 campaign, which, according to Investor's Business Daily, "encouraged supporters to download an Obama 2012 Facebook app that, when activated, let the campaign collect Facebook data both on users and their friends."[228][229][230] Carol Davidsen, the Obama for America (OFA) former director of integration and media analytics, wrote that "Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn't stop us once they realised that was what we were doing".[229][230] PolitiFact has rated McCain's statements "Half-True", on the basis that "in Obama's case, direct users knew they were handing over their data to a political campaign" whereas with Cambridge Analytica, users thought they were only taking a personality quiz for academic purposes, and while the Obama campaign only used the data "to have their supporters contact their most persuadable friends", Cambridge Analytica "targeted users, friends and lookalikes directly with digital ads."[231]
DataSpii
In July 2019, cybersecurity researcher Sam Jadali exposed a catastrophic data leak known as DataSpii involving data provider DDMR and marketing intelligence company Nacho Analytics (NA).[232][233] Branding itself as the "God mode for the internet," NA through DDMR, provided its members access to private Facebook photos and Facebook Messenger attachments including tax returns.[234] DataSpii harvested data from millions of Chrome and Firefox users through compromised browser extensions.[235] The NA website stated it collected data from millions of opt-in users. Jadali, along with journalists from Ars Technica and The Washington Post, interviewed impacted users, including a Washington Post staff member. According to the interviews, the impacted users did not consent to such collection.
DataSpii demonstrated how a compromised user exposed the data of others, including the private photos and Messenger attachments belonging to a Facebook user's network of friends.[234]
DataSpii exploited Facebook's practice of making private photos and Messenger attachments publicly accessible via unique URLs. To bolster security in this regard, Facebook appends query strings in the URLs so as to limit the period of accessibility.[234] Nevertheless, NA provided real-time access to these unique URLs, which were intended to be secure. This allowed NA members to access the private content within the restricted time frame designated by Facebook.
The Washington Post's Geoffrey Fowler, in collaboration with Jadali, opened Fowler's private Facebook photo in a browser with a compromised browser extension.[232] Within minutes, they anonymously retrieved the "private" photo. To validate this proof-of-concept, they searched for Fowler's name using NA, which yielded his photo as a search result. In addition, Jadali discovered Fowler's Washington Post colleague, Nick Mourtoupalas, was directly impacted by DataSpii.
Jadali's investigation elucidated how DataSpii disseminated private data to additional third-parties, including foreign entities, within minutes of the data being acquired. In doing so, he identified the third-parties who were scraping, storing, and potentially enabling the facial-recognition of individuals in photos being furnished by DataSpii.[236]
Breaches
On September 28, 2018, Facebook experienced a major breach in its security, exposing the data of 50 million users. The data breach started in July 2017 and was discovered on September 16.[237] Facebook notified users affected by the exploit and logged them out of their accounts.[238][239]
In March 2019, Facebook confirmed a password compromise of millions of Facebook lite application users also affected millions of Instagram users. The reason cited was the storage of password as plain text instead of encryption which could be read by its employees.[240]
On December 19, 2019, security researcher Bob Diachenko discovered a database containing more than 267 million Facebook user IDs, phone numbers, and names that were left exposed on the web for anyone to access without a password or any other authentication.[241]
In February 2020, Facebook encountered a major security breach in which its official Twitter account was hacked by a Saudi Arabia-based group called "OurMine". The group has a history of actively exposing high-profile social media profiles' vulnerabilities.[242]
In April 2021, The Guardian reported approximately half a billion users' data had been stolen including birthdates and phone numbers. Facebook alleged it was "old data" from a problem fixed in August 2019 despite the data's having been released a year and a half later only in 2021; it declined to speak with journalists, had apparently not notified regulators, called the problem "unfixable", and said it would not be advising users.[243]
In September 2024, Meta paid out a $101 million fine for storing up to 600 million passwords of Facebook and Instagram users in plain text. The practice was initially discovered in 2019, though reports indicate passwords were stored in plain text since 2012.[244]
Phone data and activity
After acquiring Onavo in 2013, Facebook used its Onavo Protect virtual private network (VPN) app to collect information on users' web traffic and app usage. This allowed Facebook to monitor its competitors' performance, and motivated Facebook to acquire WhatsApp in 2014.[245][246][247] Media outlets classified Onavo Protect as spyware.[248][249][250] In August 2018, Facebook removed the app in response to pressure from Apple, who asserted that it violated their guidelines.[251][252] The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission sued Facebook on December 16, 2020, for "false, misleading or deceptive conduct" in response to the company's use of personal data obtained from Onavo for business purposes in contrast to Onavo's privacy-oriented marketing.[253][254]
In 2016, Facebook Research launched Project Atlas, offering some users between the ages of 13 and 35 up to $20 per month ($25.00 in 2023 dollars[29]) in exchange for their personal data, including their app usage, web browsing history, web search history, location history, personal messages, photos, videos, emails and Amazon order history.[255][256] In January 2019, TechCrunch reported on the project. This led Apple to temporarily revoke Facebook's Enterprise Developer Program certificates for one day, preventing Facebook Research from operating on iOS devices and disabling Facebook's internal iOS apps.[256][257][258]
Ars Technica reported in April 2018 that the Facebook Android app had been harvesting user data, including phone calls and text messages, since 2015.[259][260][261] In May 2018, several Android users filed a class action lawsuit against Facebook for invading their privacy.[262][263]
In January 2020, Facebook launched the Off-Facebook Activity page, which allows users to see information collected by Facebook about their non-Facebook activities.[264] The Washington Post columnist Geoffrey A. Fowler found that this included what other apps he used on his phone, even while the Facebook app was closed, what other web sites he visited on his phone, and what in-store purchases he made from affiliated businesses, even while his phone was completely off.[265]
In November 2021, a report was published by Fairplay, Global Action Plan and Reset Australia detailing accusations that Facebook was continuing to manage their ad targeting system with data collected from teen users.[266] The accusations follow announcements by Facebook in July 2021 that they would cease ad targeting children.[267][268]
Public apologies
The company first apologized for its privacy abuses in 2009.[269]
Facebook apologies have appeared in newspapers, television, blog posts and on Facebook.[270] On March 25, 2018, leading US and UK newspapers published full-page ads with a personal apology from Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg issued a verbal apology on CNN.[271] In May 2010, he apologized for discrepancies in privacy settings.[270]
Previously, Facebook had its privacy settings spread out over 20 pages, and has now put all of its privacy settings on one page, which makes it more difficult for third-party apps to access the user's personal information.[197] In addition to publicly apologizing, Facebook has said that it will be reviewing and auditing thousands of apps that display "suspicious activities" in an effort to ensure that this breach of privacy does not happen again.[272] In a 2010 report regarding privacy, a research project stated that not a lot of information is available regarding the consequences of what people disclose online so often what is available are just reports made available through popular media.[273] In 2017, a former Facebook executive went on the record to discuss how social media platforms have contributed to the unraveling of the "fabric of society".[274]
Content disputes and moderation
Facebook relies on its users to generate the content that bonds its users to the service. The company has come under criticism both for allowing objectionable content, including conspiracy theories and fringe discourse,[275] and for prohibiting other content that it deems inappropriate.
Misinformation and fake news
Facebook has been criticized as a vector for fake news, and has been accused of bearing responsibility for the conspiracy theory that the United States created ISIS,[276] false anti-Rohingya posts being used by Myanmar's military to fuel genocide and ethnic cleansing,[277][278] enabling climate change denial[279][280][281] and Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theorists,[282] and anti-refugee attacks in Germany.[283][284][285] The government of the Philippines has also used Facebook as a tool to attack its critics.[286]
In 2017, Facebook partnered with fact checkers from the Poynter Institute's international fact-checking network to identify and mark false content, though most ads from political candidates are exempt from this program.[287][288] As of 2018, Facebook had over 40 fact-checking partners across the world, including The Weekly Standard.[289] Critics of the program have accused Facebook of not doing enough to remove false information from its website.[289][290]
Facebook has repeatedly amended its content policies. In July 2018, it stated that it would "downrank" articles that its fact-checkers determined to be false, and remove misinformation that incited violence.[291] Facebook stated that content that receives "false" ratings from its fact-checkers can be demonetized and suffer dramatically reduced distribution. Specific posts and videos that violate community standards can be removed on Facebook.[292]
In May 2019, Facebook banned a number of "dangerous" commentators from its platform, including Alex Jones, Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, Paul Joseph Watson, Paul Nehlen, David Duke, and Laura Loomer, for allegedly engaging in "violence and hate".[293][294]
In May 2020, Facebook agreed to a preliminary settlement of $52 million ($61.2 million in 2023 dollars[29]) to compensate U.S.-based Facebook content moderators for their psychological trauma suffered on the job.[295][296] Other legal actions around the world, including in Ireland, await settlement.[297]
In September 2020, the Government of Thailand utilized the Computer Crime Act for the first time to take action against Facebook and Twitter for ignoring requests to take down content and not complying with court orders.[298]
According to a report by Reuters, beginning in 2020, the United States military ran a propaganda campaign to spread disinformation about the Sinovac Chinese COVID-19 vaccine, including using fake social media accounts to spread the disinformation that the Sinovac vaccine contained pork-derived ingredients and was therefore haram under Islamic law.[299] The campaign was described as "payback" for COVID-19 disinformation by China directed against the U.S.[300] In summer 2020, Facebook asked the military to remove the accounts, stating that they violated Facebook's policies on fake accounts and on COVID-19 information.[299] The campaign continued until mid-2021.[299]
Threats and incitement
Professor Ilya Somin reported that he had been the subject of death threats on Facebook in April 2018 from Cesar Sayoc, who threatened to kill Somin and his family and "feed the bodies to Florida alligators". Somin's Facebook friends reported the comments to Facebook, which did nothing except dispatch automated messages.[301] Sayoc was later arrested for the October 2018 United States mail bombing attempts directed at Democratic politicians.
Terrorism
Force v. Facebook, Inc., 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019) was a case that alleged Facebook was profiting off recommendations for Hamas. In 2019, the US Second Circuit Appeals Court held that Section 230 bars civil terrorism claims against social media companies and internet service providers, the first federal appellate court to do so.
Hate speech
In October 2020, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan urged Mark Zuckerberg, through a letter posted on government's Twitter account, to ban Islamophobic content on Facebook, warning that it encouraged extremism and violence.[302]
In October 2020, the company announced that it would ban Holocaust denial.[303]
In October 2022, Media Matters for America published a report that Facebook and Instagram were still profiting off advertisements using the slur "groomer" for LGBT people.[304] The article reported that Meta had previously confirmed that the use of this word for the LGBT community violates its hate speech policies.[304] The story was subsequently picked up by other news outlets such as the New York Daily News, PinkNews, and LGBTQ Nation.[305][306][307]
Violent Erotica
There are ads on Facebook and Instagram containing sexually explicit content, descriptions of graphic violence and content promoting acts of self harm. Many of the ads are for webnovel apps backed by tech giants Bytedance and Tencent.[308]
InfoWars
Facebook was criticized for allowing InfoWars to publish falsehoods and conspiracy theories.[292][309][310][311][312] Facebook defended its actions in regard to InfoWars, saying "we just don't think banning Pages for sharing conspiracy theories or false news is the right way to go."[310] Facebook provided only six cases in which it fact-checked content on the InfoWars page over the period September 2017 to July 2018.[292] In 2018, InfoWars falsely claimed that the survivors of the Parkland shooting were "actors". Facebook pledged to remove InfoWars content making the claim, although InfoWars videos pushing the false claims were left up, even though Facebook had been contacted about the videos.[292] Facebook stated that the videos never explicitly called them actors.[292] Facebook also allowed InfoWars videos that shared the Pizzagate conspiracy theory to survive, despite specific assertions that it would purge Pizzagate content.[292] In late July 2018, Facebook suspended the personal profile of InfoWars head Alex Jones for 30 days.[313] In early August 2018, Facebook banned the four most active InfoWars-related pages for hate speech.[314]
Political manipulation
As a dominant social-web service with massive outreach, Facebook has been used by identified or unidentified political operatives to affect public opinion. Some of these activities have been done in violation of the platform policies, creating "coordinated inauthentic behavior", support or attacks. These activities can be scripted or paid. Various such abusive campaign have been revealed in recent years, best known being the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. In 2021, former Facebook analyst within the Spam and Fake Engagement teams, Sophie Zhang, reported more than 25 political subversion operations and criticized the general slow reaction time, oversightless, laissez-faire attitude by Facebook.[315][316][317]
Influence Operations and Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior
In 2018, Facebook stated that during 2018 they had identified "coordinated inauthentic behavior" in "many Pages, Groups and accounts created to stir up political debate, including in the US, the Middle East, Russia and the UK."[318]
Campaigns operated by the British intelligence agency unit, called Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group, have broadly fallen into two categories; cyber attacks and propaganda efforts. The propaganda efforts utilize "mass messaging" and the "pushing [of] stories" via social media sites like Facebook.[319][320] Israel's Jewish Internet Defense Force, the Chinese Communist Party's 50 Cent Party and Turkey's AK Trolls also focus their attention on social media platforms like Facebook.[321][322][323][324]
In July 2018, Samantha Bradshaw, co-author of the report from the Oxford Internet Institute (OII) at Oxford University, said that "The number of countries where formally organised social media manipulation occurs has greatly increased, from 28 to 48 countries globally. The majority of growth comes from political parties who spread disinformation and junk news around election periods."[325]
In October 2018, The Daily Telegraph reported that Facebook "banned hundreds of pages and accounts that it says were fraudulently flooding its site with partisan political content – although they came from the United States instead of being associated with Russia."[326]
In December 2018, The Washington Post reported that "Facebook has suspended the account of Jonathon Morgan, the chief executive of a top social media research firm" New Knowledge, "after reports that he and others engaged in an operation to spread disinformation" on Facebook and Twitter during the 2017 United States Senate special election in Alabama.[327][328]
In January 2019, Facebook said it has removed 783 Iran-linked accounts, pages and groups for engaging in what it called "coordinated inauthentic behaviour".[329] In March 2019, Facebook sued four Chinese firms for selling "fake accounts, likes and followers" to amplify Chinese state media outlets.[330]
In May 2019, Tel Aviv-based private intelligence agency Archimedes Group was banned from Facebook for "coordinated inauthentic behavior" after Facebook found fake users in countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia.[331] Facebook investigations revealed that Archimedes had spent some $1.1 million ($1.31 million in 2023 dollars[29]) on fake ads, paid for in Brazilian reais, Israeli shekels and US dollars.[332] Facebook gave examples of Archimedes Group political interference in Nigeria, Senegal, Togo, Angola, Niger and Tunisia.[333] The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab said in a report that "The tactics employed by Archimedes Group, a private company, closely resemble the types of information warfare tactics often used by governments, and the Kremlin in particular."[334][335]
On May 23, 2019, Facebook released its Community Standards Enforcement Report highlighting that it has identified several fake accounts through artificial intelligence and human monitoring. In a period of six months, October 2018 – March 2019, the social media website removed a total of 3.39 billion fake accounts. The number of fake accounts was reported to be more than 2.4 billion real people on the platform.[336]
In July 2019, Facebook advanced its measures to counter deceptive political propaganda and other abuse of its services. The company removed more than 1,800 accounts and pages that were being operated from Russia, Thailand, Ukraine and Honduras.[337] After Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, it was announced that the internet regulatory committee would block access to Facebook.[338]
On October 30, 2019, Facebook deleted several accounts of the employees working at the Israeli NSO Group, stating that the accounts were "deleted for not following our terms". The deletions came after WhatsApp sued the Israeli surveillance firm for targeting 1,400 devices with spyware.[339]
In 2020, Facebook helped found American Edge, an anti-regulation lobbying firm to fight anti-trust probes.[340] The group runs ads that "fail to mention what legislation concerns them, how those concerns could be fixed, or how the horrors they warn of could actually happen", and do not clearly disclose that they are funded by Facebook.[341]
In 2020, the government of Thailand forced Facebook to take down a Facebook group called Royalist Marketplace with one million members following potentially illegal posts shared. The authorities have also threatened Facebook with legal action. In response, Facebook is planning to take legal action against the Thai government for suppression of freedom of expression and violation of human rights.[342]
In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Facebook found that troll farms from North Macedonia and the Philippines pushed coronavirus disinformation. The publisher, which used content from these farms, was banned.[343]
In the run-up to the 2020 United States elections, Eastern European troll farms operated popular Facebook pages showing content related to Christians and Blacks in America. They included more than 15,000 pages combined and were viewed by 140 million US users per month. This was in part due to how Facebook's algorithm and policies allow unoriginal viral content to be copied and spread in ways that still drive up user engagement. As of September 2021, some of the most popular pages were still active on Facebook despite the company's efforts to take down such content.[344]
In February 2021, Facebook removed the main page of the Myanmar military, after two protesters were shot and killed during the anti-coup protests. Facebook said that the page breached its guidelines that prohibit the incitement of violence.[345] On February 25, Facebook announced to ban all accounts of the Myanmar military, along with the "Tatmadaw-linked commercial entities". Citing the "exceptionally severe human rights abuses and the clear risk of future military-initiated violence in Myanmar", the tech giant also implemented the move on its subsidiary, Instagram.[346]
In March 2021, The Wall Street Journal's editorial board criticized Facebook's decision to fact-check its op-ed titled "We'll Have Herd immunity by April" written by surgeon Marty Makary, calling it "counter-opinion masquerading as fact checking."[347]
Facebook guidelines allow users to call for the death of public figures, they also allow praise of mass killers and 'violent non-state actors' in some situations.[348][349]
In 2021, former Facebook analyst within the Spam and Fake Engagement teams, Sophie Zhang, reported on more than 25 political subversion operations she uncovered while in Facebook, and the general laissez-faire by the private enterprise.[315][316][317]
In 2021, Facebook was cited as playing a role in the fomenting of the 2021 United States Capitol attack.[350][351]
Russian interference
In 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian organizations for "engaging in operations to interfere with U.S. political and electoral processes, including the 2016 presidential election."[352][353][354]
Mueller contacted Facebook subsequently to the company's disclosure that it had sold more than $100,000 ($126,955 in 2023 dollars[29]) worth of ads to a company (Internet Research Agency, owned by Russian billionaire and businessman Yevgeniy Prigozhin) with links to the Russian intelligence community before the 2016 United States presidential election.[355][356] In September 2017, Facebook's chief security officer Alex Stamos wrote the company "found approximately $100,000 in ad spending from June 2015 to May 2017 – associated with roughly 3,000 ads – that was connected to about 470 inauthentic accounts and Pages in violation of our policies. Our analysis suggests these accounts and Pages were affiliated with one another and likely operated out of Russia."[357] Clinton and Trump campaigns spent $81 million ($103 million in 2023 dollars[29]) on Facebook ads.[358]
The company pledged full cooperation in Mueller's investigation, and provided all information about the Russian advertisements.[359] Members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees have claimed that Facebook had withheld information that could illuminate the Russian propaganda campaign.[360] Russian operatives have used Facebook polarize the American public discourses, organizing both Black Lives Matter rallies[361][362] and anti-immigrant rallies on U.S. soil,[363] as well as anti-Clinton rallies[364] and rallies both for and against Donald Trump.[365][366] Facebook ads have also been used to exploit divisions over black political activism and Muslims by simultaneously sending contrary messages to different users based on their political and demographic characteristics in order to sow discord.[367][368][369] Zuckerberg has stated that he regrets having dismissed concerns over Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[370]
Russian-American billionaire Yuri Milner, who befriended Zuckerberg[371] between 2009 and 2011, had Kremlin backing for his investments in Facebook and Twitter.[372]
In January 2019, Facebook removed 289 pages and 75 coordinated accounts linked to the Russian state-owned news agency Sputnik which had misrepresented themselves as independent news or general interest pages.[373][374] Facebook later identified and removed an additional 1,907 accounts linked to Russia found to be engaging in "coordinated inauthentic behaviour".[375] In 2018, a UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) select committee report had criticised Facebook for its reluctance to investigate abuse of its platform by the Russian government, and for downplaying the extent of the problem, referring to the company as 'digital gangsters'.[376][377][378]
"Democracy is at risk from the malicious and relentless targeting of citizens with disinformation and personalised 'dark adverts' from unidentifiable sources, delivered through the major social media platforms we use every day," Damian Collins, DCMS Committee Chair[378]
In February 2019, Glenn Greenwald wrote that a cybersecurity company New Knowledge, which is behind one of the Senate reports on Russian social media election interference, "was caught just six weeks ago engaging in a massive scam to create fictitious Russian troll accounts on Facebook and Twitter in order to claim that the Kremlin was working to defeat Democratic Senate nominee Doug Jones in Alabama. The New York Times, when exposing the scam, quoted a New Knowledge report that boasted of its fabrications..."[379][380]
Anti-Rohingya propaganda
In 2018, Facebook took down 536 Facebook pages, 17 Facebook groups, 175 Facebook accounts, and 16 Instagram accounts linked to the Myanmar military. Collectively these were followed by over 10 million people.[381] The New York Times reported that:[382]
after months of reports about anti-Rohingya propaganda on Facebook, the company acknowledged that it had been too slow to act in Myanmar. By then, more than 700,000 Rohingya had fled the country in a year, in what United Nations officials called "a textbook example of ethnic cleansing".
Anti-Muslim propaganda and Hindu nationalism in India
A 2019 book titled The Real Face of Facebook in India, co-authored by the journalists Paranjoy Guha Thakurta and Cyril Sam, alleged that Facebook helped enable and benefited from the rise of Narendra Modi's Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in India.[383]
Ankhi Das, Facebook's policy director for India and South and Central Asia, apologized publicly in August 2020 for sharing a Facebook post that called Muslims in India a "degenerate community". She said she shared the post "to reflect my deep belief in celebrating feminism and civic participation".[384] She is reported to have prevented action by Facebook against anti-Muslim content[385][386] and supported the BJP in internal Facebook messages.[387][388]
In 2020, Facebook executives overrode their employees' recommendations that the BJP politician T. Raja Singh should be banned from the site for hate speech and rhetoric that could lead to violence. Singh had said on Facebook that Rohingya Muslim immigrants should be shot and had threatened to destroy mosques. Current and former Facebook employees told The Wall Street Journal that the decision was part of a pattern of favoritism by Facebook toward the BJP as it seeks more business in India.[386] Facebook also took no action after BJP politicians made posts accusing Muslims of intentionally spreading COVID-19, an employee said.[389]
On August 31, 2020, the Delhi Assembly began investigating whether Facebook bore blame for the 2020 religious riots in the city, claiming it had found Facebook "prima facie guilty of a role in the violence".[390][391] On September 12, 2020, a Delhi Assembly committee said in a statement that it had asked Facebook India head Ajit Mohan to appear before it on September 15, leading to Facebook objecting and moving the Supreme Court of India against the decision.[392][393] On September 15, Facebook skipped the Delhi Assembly panel hearing.[394] On September 20, the Delhi Assembly panel issued a new notice asking Facebook to appear before it on September 23.[395] On September 22, Facebook India vice-president and managing director Ajit Mohan moved the Supreme Court against the summons of the Delhi Assembly Committee.[396] On September 23, the Supreme Court granted him relief and ordered a stay to the summons, with the Central government later backing the decision.[397][398][399] A former Facebook employee told a Delhi Assembly panel on November 13 that the violence could have been 'easily averted' if the social media giant had acted in a 'proactive and prompt manner'.[400] On December 3, the Delhi Assembly moved the Supreme Court for intervention in the case.[401] On February 4, 2021, the Delhi Assembly panel issued a fresh notice to Facebook India to testify on the riots, avoiding specific notice to Mohan, by asking a senior, responsible officer from the company to appear before the panel.[402] The Union government submitted in the Supreme Court that Facebook could not be made accountable before any state assembly and the committee formed was unconstitutional.[403][404] On February 24, Mohan challenged summons issued by the Delhi assembly for failing to appear before it as a witness in connection with the 2020 riots in the Supreme Court, saying that the 'right to silence' is a virtue in present 'noisy times' and the legislature had no authority to examine him in a law and order case. The Supreme Court reserved its judgment for the case.[405] On July 8, the Supreme Court refused to quash the summons and asked Facebook asked to appear before the Delhi assembly panel.[406]
On September 23, 2023, it was reported that Facebook had delayed for about a year when in 2021, it removed a network of accounts ran by India's Chinar Corps which spread disinformation that would put Kashmiri journalists in danger. The delay and the previously not publicized takedown action were due a fear that its local employees would be targeted by authorities, and that it would hurt business prospects in the country.[407]
Company governance
Early Facebook investor and former Zuckerberg mentor Roger McNamee described Facebook as having "the most centralized decision-making structure I have ever encountered in a large company."[408] Nathan Schneider, a professor of media studies at the University of Colorado Boulder argued for transforming Facebook into a platform cooperative owned and governed by the users.[409]
Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes states that CEO Mark Zuckerberg has too much power, that the company is now a monopoly, and that, as a result, it should be split into multiple smaller companies. Hughes called for the breakup of Facebook in an op-ed on The New York Times. Hughes says he is concerned that Zuckerberg has surrounded himself with a team that does not challenge him and that as a result, it is the U.S. government's job to hold him accountable and curb his "unchecked power".[410] Hughes also said that "Mark's power is unprecedented and un-American."[411] Several U.S. politicians agree with Hughes.[412] EU Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager has stated that splitting Facebook should only be done as "a remedy of the very last resort", and that splitting Facebook would not solve Facebook's underlying problems.[413]
Customer Support
Facebook has been criticized for its lack of human customer support.[414] When users personal and business accounts are breached, many are forced to go through small claims court to regain access and restitution.[415]
Litigation
The company has been subject to repeated litigation.[416][417][418][419] Its most prominent case addressed allegations that Zuckerberg broke an oral contract with Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss, and Divya Narendra to build the then-named "HarvardConnection" social network in 2004.[420][421][422]
On March 6, 2018, BlackBerry sued Facebook and its Instagram and WhatsApp subdivision for ripping off key features of its messaging app.[423]
In October 2018, a Texan woman sued Facebook, claiming she had been recruited into the sex trade at the age of 15 by a man who "friended" her on the social media network. Facebook responded that it works both internally and externally to ban sex traffickers.[424][425]
In 2019, British solicitors representing a bullied Syrian schoolboy, sued Facebook over false claims. They claimed that Facebook protected prominent figures from scrutiny instead of removing content that violates its rules and that the special treatment was financially driven.[426][427]
The Federal Trade Commission and a coalition of New York state and 47 other state and regional governments filed separate suits against Facebook on December 9, 2020, seeking antitrust action based on its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsUp among other companies, calling these practices as anticompetitive. The suits also assert that in acquiring these products, they weakened their privacy measures for their users. The suits, besides other fines, seek to unwind the acquisitions from Facebook.[428][429]
On January 6, 2022, France's data privacy regulatory body CNIL fined Facebook a 60 million euros for not allowing its internet users an easy refusal of cookies along with Google.[430]
On December 22, 2022, the Quebec Court of Appeal approved a class-action lawsuit on behalf of Facebook users who claim they were discriminated against because the platform allows advertisers to target both job and housing advertisements based on various factors, including age, gender, and even race.[431] The lawsuit centres on the platform's practice of "micro targeting ads", claiming ads are ensured to appear only in the feeds of people who belong to certain targeted groups. Women, for example, would not see ads targeting men, while older generation men would not see an ad aimed at people between 18 and 45.[431]
The class action could include thousands of Quebec residents who have been using the platform as early as April 2016, who were seeking jobs or housing during that period.[431] Facebook has 60 days after the court's December 22 ruling to decide to appeal the case to the Supreme Court of Canada. If it does not appeal, the case returns to the Quebec Superior Court.[431]
On September 21, 2023, the California Courts of Appeal ruled that Facebook could be sued for discriminatory advertising under the Unruh Civil Rights Act.[432]
Impact
Scope
A commentator in The Washington Post noted that Facebook constitutes a "massive depository of information that documents both our reactions to events and our evolving customs with a scope and immediacy of which earlier historians could only dream".[433] Especially for anthropologists, social researchers, and social historians—and subject to proper preservation and curation—the website "will preserve images of our lives that are vastly crisper and more nuanced than any ancestry record in existence".[433]
Economy
Economists have noted that Facebook offers many non-rivalrous services that benefit as many users as are interested without forcing users to compete with each other. By contrast, most goods are available to a limited number of users. E.g., if one user buys a phone, no other user can buy that phone. Three areas add the most economic impact: platform competition, the market place and user behavior data.[434]
Facebook began to reduce its carbon impact after Greenpeace attacked it for its long-term reliance on coal and resulting carbon footprint.[435] In 2021 Facebook announced that their global operations are supported by 100 percent renewable energy and they have reached net zero emissions, a goal set in 2018.[436][437]
Facebook provides a development platform for many social gaming, communication, feedback, review, and other applications related to online activities. This platform spawned many businesses and added thousands of jobs to the global economy. Zynga Inc., a leader in social gaming, is an example of such a business. An econometric analysis found that Facebook's app development platform added more than 182,000 jobs in the U.S. economy in 2011. The total economic value of the added employment was about $12 billion ($16.3 billion in 2023 dollars[29]).[438]
Society
Facebook was one of the first large-scale social networks. In The Facebook Effect, David Kirkpatrick stated that Facebook's structure makes it difficult to replace, because of its "network effects".[citation needed] As of 2016[update], it was estimated 44% of Americans get news through Facebook.[439] A study published at Frontiers Media in 2023 found that there was more polarization of the user-base on Facebook than even far-right social networks like Gab.[440]
Mental and emotional health
Studies have associated social networks with positive[441] and negative impacts[442][443][444][445][446] on emotional health.
Studies have associated Facebook with feelings of envy, often triggered by vacation and holiday photos. Other triggers include posts by friends about family happiness and images of physical beauty—such feelings leave people dissatisfied with their own lives. A joint study by two German universities discovered that one out of three people were more dissatisfied with their lives after visiting Facebook,[447][448] and another study by Utah Valley University found that college students felt worse about themselves following an increase in time on Facebook.[448][449][450] Professor Larry D. Rosen stated that teenagers on Facebook exhibit more narcissistic tendencies, while young adults show signs of antisocial behavior, mania and aggressiveness.
Positive effects include signs of "virtual empathy" with online friends and helping introverted persons learn social skills.[451] A 2020 experimental study in the American Economic Review found that deactivating Facebook led to increased subjective well-being.[452] In a blog post in December 2017, the company highlighted research that has shown "passively consuming" the News Feed, as in reading but not interacting, left users with negative feelings, whereas interacting with messages pointed to improvements in well-being.[453]
Politics
In February 2008, a Facebook group called "One Million Voices Against FARC" organized an event in which hundreds of thousands of Colombians marched in protest against the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).[454] In August 2010, one of North Korea's official government websites and the country's official news agency, Uriminzokkiri, joined Facebook.[455]
During the Arab Spring many journalists claimed Facebook played a major role in the 2011 Egyptian revolution.[456][457] On January 14, the Facebook page of "We are all Khaled Said" was started by Wael Ghoniem to invite the Egyptian people to "peaceful demonstrations" on January 25. In Tunisia and Egypt, Facebook became the primary tool for connecting protesters and led the Egyptian government to ban it, Twitter and other sites.[458] After 18 days, the uprising forced President Hosni Mubarak to resign.
In a Bahraini uprising that started on February 14, 2011, Facebook was utilized by the Bahraini regime and regime loyalists to identify, capture and prosecute citizens involved in the protests. A 20-year-old woman named Ayat Al Qurmezi was identified as a protester using Facebook and imprisoned.[459]
In 2011, Facebook filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission to form a political action committee under the name FB PAC.[460] In an email to The Hill, a spokesman for Facebook said "Facebook Political Action Committee will give our employees a way to make their voice heard in the political process by supporting candidates who share our goals of promoting the value of innovation to our economy while giving people the power to share and make the world more open and connected."[461]
During the Syrian civil war, the YPG, a libertarian army for Rojava recruited westerners through Facebook in its fight against ISIL.[462] Dozens joined its ranks. The Facebook page's name "The Lions of Rojava" comes from a Kurdish saying which translates as "A lion is a lion, whether it's a female or a male", reflecting the organization's feminist ideology.[463]
In recent years, Facebook's News Feed algorithms have been identified as a cause of political polarization, for which it has been criticized.[464][465] It has likewise been accused of amplifying the reach of 'fake news' and extreme viewpoints, as when it may have enabled conditions which led to the 2015 Rohingya refugee crisis.[466][467]
Facebook first played a role in the American political process in January 2008, shortly before the New Hampshire primary. Facebook teamed up with ABC and Saint Anselm College to allow users to give live feedback about the "back to back" January 5 Republican and Democratic debates.[468][469][470] Facebook users took part in debate groups on specific topics, voter registration and message questions.[471]
Over a million people installed the Facebook application "US Politics on Facebook" in order to take part which measured responses to specific comments made by the debating candidates.[472] A poll by CBS News, UWIRE and The Chronicle of Higher Education claimed to illustrate how the "Facebook effect" had affected youthful voters, increasing voting rates, support of political candidates, and general involvement.[473]
The new social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, connected hundreds of millions of people. By 2008, politicians and interest groups were experimenting with systematic use of social media to spread their message.[474][475] By the 2016 election, political advertising to specific groups had become normalized. Facebook offered the most sophisticated targeting and analytics platform.[476] ProPublica noted that their system enabled advertisers to direct their pitches to almost 2,300 people who expressed interest in the topics of "Jew hater", "How to burn Jews", or, "History of 'why Jews ruin the world".[477]
Facebook has used several initiatives to encourage its users to register to vote and vote. An experiment in 2012 involved showing Facebook users pictures of their friends who reported that they had voted; users who were shown the pictures were about 2% more likely to report that they had also voted compared to the control group, which was not encouraged to vote.[478] In 2020, Facebook announced the goal of helping four million voters register in the US, saying that it had registered 2.5 million by September.[479]
The Cambridge Analytica data scandal offered another example of the perceived attempt to influence elections.[480][481] The Guardian claimed that Facebook knew about the security breach for two years, but did nothing to stop it until it became public.[482]
Facebook banned political ads to prevent the manipulation of voters in the US's November's election. Industry experts suggested[clarification needed] that there are several other ways for misinformation to reach voters on social media platforms and blocking political ads will not serve as a proven solution to the problem.[483]
In March 2024, former US President Donald Trump said that getting rid of TikTok would allow Facebook, which he called the "enemy of the people", to double its business. He spoke after President Biden said he was ready to sign legislation that would require TikTok owner ByteDance to sell the video platform or face a ban in the US.[484]
India
Ahead of the 2019 general elections in India, Facebook has removed 103 pages, groups and accounts on Facebook and Instagram platforms originating from Pakistan. Facebook said its investigation found a Pakistani military link, along with a mix of real accounts of ISPR employees, and a network of fake accounts created by them that have been operating military fan pages, general interest pages but were posting content about Indian politics while trying to conceal their identity.[485] Owing to the same reasons, Facebook also removed 687 pages and accounts of Congress because of coordinated inauthentic behavior on the platform.[486]
Culture
Facebook and Zuckerberg have been the subject of music, books, film and television. The 2010 film The Social Network, directed by David Fincher and written by Aaron Sorkin, stars Jesse Eisenberg as Zuckerberg and went on to win three Academy Awards and four Golden Globes.
In 2008, Collins English Dictionary declared "Facebook" as its new Word of the Year.[487] In December 2009, the New Oxford American Dictionary declared its word of the year to be the verb "unfriend", defined as "To remove someone as a 'friend' on a social networking site such as Facebook".[488]
Internet.org
In August 2013, Facebook founded Internet.org in collaboration with six other technology companies to plan and help build affordable Internet access for underdeveloped and developing countries.[489] The service, called Free Basics, includes various low-bandwidth applications such as AccuWeather, BabyCenter, BBC News, ESPN, and Bing.[490][491] There was severe opposition to Internet.org in India, where the service started in partnership with Reliance Communications in 2015 was banned a year later by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). In 2018, Zuckerberg claimed that "Internet.org efforts have helped almost 100 million people get access to the internet who may not have had it otherwise."[490]
Environment
Facebook announced in 2021 that it will make an effort to stop disinformation about climate change. The company will use George Mason University, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the University of Cambridge as sources of information. The company will expand its information hub on climate to 16 countries. Users in other countries will be directed to the site of the United Nations Environment Programme for information.[492]
See also
References
- ^ "Facebook Interface Languages". Facebook (Select your language). Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
- ^ "Facebook Reports First Quarter 2022 Results". Facebook Investor Relations. March 31, 2022. Archived from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved April 27, 2022.
- ^ "Our History". Facebook. Archived from the original on November 15, 2015. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
- ^ Clarke, Gavin (February 2, 2010). "Facebook re-write takes PHP to an enterprise past". The Register. Situation Publishing. Archived from the original on May 28, 2020. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
- ^ Levin, Sam (July 3, 2018). "Is Facebook a publisher? In public it says no, but in court it says yes". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 21, 2021. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
- ^ "How do I report a child under the age of 14 on Facebook in South Korea, Spain or Quebec, Canada?". Facebook. Archived from the original on October 13, 2023. Retrieved October 9, 2023.
- ^ "Meta Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 Results". Meta Investor Relations – Facebook. February 1, 2023. Archived from the original on October 31, 2023. Retrieved March 26, 2023.
- ^ "facebook.com". similarweb.com. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
- ^ Miller, Chance (December 17, 2019). "These were the most-downloaded apps and games of the decade". 9to5Mac. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
- ^ Cadwalladr, Carole; Graham-Harrison, v (May 24, 2018). "Facebook accused of conducting mass surveillance through its apps". The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2020.
- ^ Mahdawi, Arwa (December 21, 2018). "Is 2019 the year you should finally quit Facebook?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on May 28, 2023. Retrieved January 24, 2019.
- ^ Claburn, Thomas (August 17, 2018). "Facebook flat-out 'lies' about how many people can see its ads – lawsuit". The Register. Archived from the original on September 7, 2023. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
- ^ Phillips, Sarah (July 25, 2007). "A brief history of Facebook". The Guardian – via www.theguardian.com.
- ^ a b Kaplan, Katharine A. (November 19, 2003). "Facemash Creator Survives Ad Board". The Harvard Crimson. Archived from the original on May 4, 2019. Retrieved June 24, 2017.
- ^ Hoffman, Claire (September 15, 2010). "The Battle For Facebook". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved July 4, 2017.
- ^ Rothman, Lily (February 4, 2015). "Happy Birthday, Facebook". Time. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved July 4, 2017.
- ^ Weinberger, Matt (September 7, 2017). "33 photos of Facebook's rise from a Harvard dorm room to world domination". Business Insider. Axel Springer SE. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
- ^ Rosmarin, Rachel (September 11, 2006). "Open Facebook". Forbes. New York. Archived from the original on March 23, 2019. Retrieved June 13, 2008.
- ^ Nguyen, Lananh (April 12, 2004). "Online network created by Harvard students flourishes". The Tufts Daily. Medford, MA. Archived from the original on February 14, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ Rosen, Ellen (May 26, 2005). "Student's Start-Up Draws Attention and $13 Million". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 29, 2005. Retrieved May 18, 2009.
- ^ "Company Timeline" (Press release). Facebook. January 1, 2007. Archived from the original on January 6, 2019. Retrieved March 5, 2008.
- ^ "Why you should beware of Facebook". The Age. Melbourne. January 20, 2008. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved April 30, 2008.
- ^ Parker, Sean (April 16, 2015). "Reid Hoffman: The World's 100 Most Influential People". Time. Archived from the original on October 30, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
- ^ Williams, Christopher (October 1, 2007). "Facebook wins Manx battle for face-book.com". The Register. Situation Publishing. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
- ^ Abram, Carolyn (September 26, 2006). "Welcome to Facebook, everyone". The Facebook Blog. Archived from the original on January 11, 2019. Retrieved March 8, 2008.
- ^ "Terms of Use". Facebook. November 15, 2007. Archived from the original on March 5, 2008. Retrieved March 5, 2008.
- ^ "Facebook Expansion Enables More People to Connect with Friends in a Trusted Environment". Facebook Newsroom. September 26, 2006. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved February 4, 2016.
- ^ Richmond, Riva (November 27, 2007). "Enterprise: Facebook, a Marketer's Friend; Site Offers Platform To Tout Products, Interact With Users". The Wall Street Journal. New York. p. B4.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n 1634–1699: McCusker, J. J. (1997). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States: Addenda et Corrigenda (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1700–1799: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". Retrieved February 29, 2024.
- ^ Smith, Zadie (November 25, 2010). "Generation Why?". The New York Review of Books. 57 (18). Archived from the original on October 23, 2015. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- ^ Jose Antonio Vargas (September 20, 2010). "LETTER FROM PALO ALTO: THE FACE OF FACEBOOK". The New Yorker. Condé Nast. Archived from the original on June 26, 2014. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
- ^ Atkins, Ashley; Hagigi, Royi (May 8, 2020). "Rebuilding our tech stack for the new Facebook.com". Archived from the original on March 21, 2024. Retrieved March 21, 2024.
- ^ Constine, Josh (November 18, 2012). "Facebook Could Slow Down A Tiny Bit As It Starts Switching All Users To Secure HTTPS Connections". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on June 24, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
- ^ Paul, Ryan (April 5, 2012). "Exclusive: a behind-the-scenes look at Facebook release engineering". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Archived from the original on July 4, 2017. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ a b c "Facebook's New Real-time Analytics System: HBase To Process 20 Billion Events Per Day". Highscalability.com. March 22, 2011. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved December 26, 2012.
- ^ "The Evolution of Advanced Caching in the Facebook CDN". April 7, 2016. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved May 20, 2020.
- ^ Dwarakanath, Navya (August 12, 2019), What I Learned About How Facebook Infrastructure Serves Our Photos
- ^ "An Analysis of Facebook Photo Caching – Meta Research". Meta Research. Archived from the original on December 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2021.
- ^ "Does Facebook use any other CDN apart from Akamai? Encountered fbcdn.net subdomain that does not belong to Akamai". Web Applications Stack Exchange. Archived from the original on August 11, 2020. Retrieved May 20, 2020.
- ^ Farahbakhsh, Reza; Cuevas, Angel; Ortiz, Antonio M.; Han, Xiao; Crespi, Noel (2015). "How far is Facebook from me? Facebook network infrastructure analysis". IEEE Communications Magazine. 53 (9). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): 134–142. arXiv:1705.00717. doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7263357. ISSN 0163-6804. S2CID 7987529.
- ^ Metz, Cade (March 20, 2014). "Facebook Introduces 'Hack', the Programming Language of the Future". Wired. Archived from the original on March 28, 2014. Retrieved March 7, 2017.
- ^ Knibbs, Kate (December 11, 2015). "How Facebook's design has changed over the last 10 years". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Schulman, Jacob (September 22, 2011). "Facebook introduces Timeline: 'a new way to express who you are'". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2018. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Gayomali, Chris (September 22, 2011). "Facebook Introduces 'Timeline': The 'Story' of Your Life". Time. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ a b c Panzarino, Matthew (September 22, 2011). "Facebook introduces radical new profile design called Timeline: The story of your life [Video]". The Next Web. Archived from the original on November 27, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Weaver, Jason (March 30, 2012). "The Evolution of Facebook for Brands". Mashable. Archived from the original on October 25, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ "Before Graph Search: Facebook's Biggest Changes". PC Magazine. Ziff Davis. January 15, 2013. Archived from the original on July 1, 2018. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Hof, Rob (November 6, 2007). "Facebook Declares New Era for Advertising". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on August 7, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Parr, Ben (June 9, 2009). "Facebook to Launch Vanity URLs for All". Mashable. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ O'Neill, Nick (June 9, 2009). "Facebook Begins Rolling Out Free Profile Usernames For Vanity URLs". Adweek. Beringer Capital. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Crook, Jordan; Constine, Josh (February 13, 2014). "Facebook Opens Up LGBTQ-Friendly Gender Identity And Pronoun Options". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on November 29, 2020. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
- ^ "Facebook expands gender options: transgender activists hail 'big advance'". The Guardian. February 14, 2014. Archived from the original on February 13, 2021. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Oreskovic, Alexei (February 13, 2014). "In new profile feature, Facebook offers choices for gender identity". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Archived from the original on November 24, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Machkovech, Sam (May 16, 2014). "Facebook adds naggy "ask" button to profile pages". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Archived from the original on February 24, 2017. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Stampler, Laura (May 19, 2014). "Facebook's New 'Ask' Button Gives You a Whole New Way to Badger Friends About Their Relationship Status". Time. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
- ^ Sanghvi, Ruchi (September 6, 2006). "Facebook Gets a Facelift". The Facebook Blog. Archived from the original on June 10, 2011. Retrieved February 11, 2008.
- ^ "Facebook: Celebrate Your Birthday Every Day". Colnect blog. Archived from the original on July 7, 2012. Retrieved March 9, 2010.
- ^ Lacy, Sarah (September 8, 2006). "Facebook Learns from Its Fumble". BusinessWeek. New York. Archived from the original on November 6, 2006. Retrieved June 28, 2008.
- ^ Gonsalves, Antone (September 8, 2006). "Facebook Founder Apologizes in Privacy Flap; Users Given More Control". InformationWeek. New York. Archived from the original on March 2, 2010. Retrieved June 28, 2008.
- ^ US patent 7669123
- ^ "US Patent No. 7669123". Social Media. March 1, 2010. Archived from the original on May 15, 2011. Retrieved March 9, 2010.
- ^ "EdgeRank". EdgeRank. October 29, 2007. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved February 16, 2013.
- ^ Arrington, Michael (May 24, 2007). "Facebook Launches Facebook Platform; They are the Anti-MySpace". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on May 30, 2019. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
- ^ "Share More Memories with Larger Photo Albums". Archived from the original on May 10, 2011. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
- ^ "Photos". Facebook. Archived from the original on July 31, 2008. Retrieved March 15, 2008.
- ^ Shontell, Alyson (May 13, 2011). "The First 20 Facebook Employees: Where Are They Now?". Business Insider. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
- ^ Cutler, Kim-Mai (May 17, 2011). "Facebook Wins Patents For Tagging in Photos, Other Digital Media". Adweek. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook to launch App Center". The Times Of India. June 8, 2012. Archived from the original on June 8, 2012.
- ^ "Introducing Instant Articles – Facebook Media". fb.com. Archived from the original on May 14, 2015. Retrieved May 15, 2015.
- ^ "Facebook launches "Instant Articles"". Preview Tech. May 14, 2015. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved May 15, 2015.
- ^ Constine, Josh (January 25, 2017). "Facebook Stories puts a Snapchat clone above the News Feed". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on February 21, 2021. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
- ^ Franklin, Rachel (October 11, 2017). "Building Connections Through Creativity and Opening VR to Everyone". Oculus. Archived from the original on October 24, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
- ^ Isaac, Mike (2018). "Facebook Overhauls News Feed to Focus on What Friends and Family Share". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 17, 2018.
- ^ Ziobro, Paul (February 24, 2021). "Facebook to Spend $1 Billion on News Content Over Three Years". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on February 25, 2021. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
- ^ "UPDATE 1-Facebook says it inadvertently blocked content during Australia news ban". finance.yahoo.com. February 24, 2021. Archived from the original on February 24, 2021. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
- ^ Barker, Alex. "Facebook pledges to pay $1bn for news". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on February 24, 2021. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook Takes Out Full-Page Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's iOS Privacy Changes". MacRumors. December 16, 2020. Archived from the original on May 12, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
- ^ Datti, Sharmishte (May 12, 2021). "Apple's App Tracking Transparency Becomes Facebook's Nightmare: Only 4% Allow Tracking". gizbot.com. Archived from the original on June 4, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
- ^ "Apple Might Have Just Put and End to Facebook". www.msn.com. Archived from the original on May 12, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
- ^ "Apple vs Facebook: 96 Percent Users Disabling App Tracking So Far, Claims Report". www.news18.com. May 9, 2021. Archived from the original on May 12, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
- ^ Heisler, Yoni (May 11, 2021). "New data shows how devastating Apple's new anti-tracking feature is for Facebook". BGR. Archived from the original on May 11, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook Says Impact of iOS 14.5's App Tracking Transparency Will Be 'Manageable'". MacRumors. April 28, 2021. Archived from the original on May 12, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
- ^ Kincaid, Jason (February 9, 2009). "Facebook Activates "Like" Button; FriendFeed Tires Of Sincere Flattery". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on July 1, 2018. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ Mangalindan, JP (April 21, 2015). "Facebook Likes don't go as far as they used to in News Feed update". Mashable. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ Constine, Josh (September 6, 2016). "How Facebook News Feed Works". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on January 29, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ "Like and React to Posts". Facebook Help Center. Facebook. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ Albanesius, Chloe (June 17, 2010). "Facebook Adds Ability to 'Like' Comments". PC Magazine. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 26, 2019. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ Newton, Casey (February 24, 2016). "Facebook rolls out expanded Like button reactions around the world". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on February 14, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ Stinson, Liz (February 24, 2016). "Facebook Reactions, the Totally Redesigned Like Button, Is Here". Wired. Archived from the original on December 3, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ Garun, Natt (May 3, 2017). "Facebook reactions have now infiltrated comments". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on June 20, 2018. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ Cohen, David (May 3, 2017). "Facebook Just Extended Reactions to Comments". Adweek. Beringer Capital. Archived from the original on February 21, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- ^ Hendrickson, Mark (April 6, 2008). "Facebook Chat Launches, For Some". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Siegler, MG (November 15, 2010). "Facebook's Modern Messaging System: Seamless, History, And A Social Inbox". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Kincaid, Jason (August 9, 2011). "Facebook Launches Standalone iPhone/Android Messenger App (And It's Beluga)". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on October 5, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ King, Hope (April 27, 2015). "Facebook Messenger now lets you make video calls". CNN. Archived from the original on June 11, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Statt, Nick (December 19, 2016). "Facebook Messenger now lets you video chat with up to 50 people". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Hamburger, Ellis (January 16, 2013). "Facebook launches free calling for all iPhone users in the US". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Constine, Josh (April 27, 2015). "Facebook Messenger Launches Free VOIP Video Calls Over Cellular And Wi-Fi". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Arthur, Charles (December 4, 2012). "Facebook turns Messenger into a text message killer". The Guardian. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ "Chat Heads come to Facebook Messenger for Android". The Verge. Vox Media. April 12, 2013. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Perez, Sarah (February 11, 2016). "Facebook Tests SMS Integration in Messenger, Launches Support For Multiple Accounts". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Greenberg, Andy (October 4, 2016). "You Can All Finally Encrypt Facebook Messenger, So Do It". Wired. Archived from the original on November 22, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Constine, Josh (November 29, 2016). "Facebook Messenger launches Instant Games". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ a b Constine, Josh (March 17, 2015). "Facebook Introduces Free Friend-To-Friend Payments Through Messages". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on August 15, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Hawkins, Andrew J. (December 16, 2015). "Facebook Messenger now lets you hail an Uber car". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Vincent, James (March 9, 2017). "Facebook's Snapchat stories clone, Messenger Day, is now rolling out globally". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ a b Vincent, James (March 23, 2017). "Facebook Messenger gets reactions for individual messages and @ notifications". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ O'Flaherty, Kate. "Facebook Users Beware: Here's Why Messenger Rooms Is Not Actually That Private". Forbes. Retrieved May 14, 2020.
- ^ Kastrenakes, Jacob (July 22, 2020). "Facebook Messenger can now lock your chats behind Face ID". The Verge. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
- ^ Mendiratta, Hemant (August 7, 2020). "How To View Only Unread Messages On Facebook Messenger". TechUntold. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook Messenger releases cross-app group chats, further integrating with Instagram". TechCrunch. September 30, 2021. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
- ^ "The Future of Messaging is Now". Messenger News. October 13, 2020. Retrieved October 13, 2020.
- ^ King, Hope (March 25, 2015). "7 big changes coming to Facebook". CNN. Archived from the original on March 1, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Newton, Casey (April 12, 2016). "Facebook launches a bot platform for Messenger". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Statt, Nick (April 6, 2017). "Facebook's AI assistant will now offer suggestions inside Messenger". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Constine, Josh (April 6, 2017). "Facebook Messenger's AI 'M' suggests features to use based on your convos". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on October 26, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ Constine, Josh (April 18, 2017). "Facebook Messenger launches group bots and bot discovery tab". TechCrunch. AOL. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
- ^ a b c d ""Data Policy"". Facebook.com. Archived from the original on October 21, 2021. Retrieved October 20, 2021.
- ^ "Search Privacy". Facebook. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved June 13, 2009.
- ^ "Choose Your Privacy Settings". Facebook. Retrieved September 10, 2009.
- ^ Ortutay, Barbare (March 25, 2018). ""What Facebook's privacy policy allows may surprise you"".
- ^ a b c Wilberding, Kurt; Wells, Georgia (February 4, 2019). "Facebook's Timeline: 15 Years In". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook". Facebook. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
- ^ "Facebook Offers $500 Bounty for Reporting Bugs: Why So Cheap". PC Magazine. Retrieved January 18, 2015.
- ^ Bug Bounty, Facebook. "Facebook Bug Bounty". Facebook Security. Retrieved April 3, 2014.
- ^ Schroeder, Stan (August 26, 2008). "Facebook's 100 Million Users: How Much are They Worth?". Mashable. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
- ^ Wauters, Robin (July 21, 2010). "Zuckerberg Makes It Official: Facebook Hits 500 Million Members". TechCrunch. AOL. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
- ^ Arthur, Charles; Kiss, Jemima (July 21, 2010). "Facebook reaches 500 million users". The Guardian. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
- ^ Smith, Aaron; Segal, Laurie; Cowley, Stacy (October 4, 2012). "Facebook reaches one billion users". CNN. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
- ^ Kiss, Jemima (October 4, 2012). "Facebook hits 1 billion users a month". The Guardian. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
- ^ Ionescu, Daniel (October 4, 2012). "Facebook rules the social networking world with 1 billion users". PC World. International Data Group. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
- ^ Welch, Chris (June 27, 2017). "Facebook crosses 2 billion monthly users". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved June 27, 2017.
- ^ Constine, Josh (June 27, 2017). "Facebook now has 2 billion monthly users ... and responsibility". TechCrunch. AOL. Retrieved July 1, 2017.
- ^ Cohen, David (November 6, 2015). "Facebook Changes Definition of Monthly Active Users". Adweek. Beringer Capital. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
- ^ a b Abrar Al-Heeti, Facebook lost 15 million US users in the past two years, report says, CNET (March 6, 2019).
- ^ a b Nick Statt, Facebook's US user base declined by 15 million since 2017, according to survey, The Verge (March 6, 2019).
- ^ "Facebook: Daily active users fall for first time in 18-year history". BBC News. February 3, 2022.
- ^ "Daily Facebook users up again after first-ever decline". BBC News. April 27, 2022.
- ^ Heaven, Will (June 14, 2011). "Is this the beginning of the end for Facebook?". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on March 14, 2012.
- ^ Silverman, Matt (June 13, 2012). "The End of Facebook: What Will It Take to Kill the King of Social?". Mashable.
- ^ Bilton, Nick (October 27, 2017). "This Could Be the End of Facebook". Vanity Fair.
- ^ "December Data on Facebook's US Growth by Age and Gender: Beyond 100 Million – Inside Facebook". Inside Facebook. January 4, 2010. Archived from the original on November 3, 2014. Retrieved October 7, 2014.
- ^ "Facebook Users, Stats, Data, Trends, and More". DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
- ^ Khan, Aarzu (August 19, 2018). "Number of Facebook Monthly Active Users Worldwide, By Region – DGraph". Dazeinfo. Retrieved February 4, 2019.
- ^ Wirter, Staff (August 5, 2024). "Brazil court bans global access to social media accounts". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ Wauters, Robin (July 7, 2009). "China Blocks Access To Twitter, Facebook After Riots". TechCrunch. AOL. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ "Iranian government blocks Facebook access". The Guardian. May 24, 2009. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ "MAP: Here Are the Countries That Block Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube". Mother Jones. March 28, 2014.
- ^ "Pakistan lifts Facebook ban but 'blasphemous' pages stay hidden". The Guardian. May 31, 2010.
- ^ "Syria Restores Access to Facebook and YouTube". The New York Times. February 9, 2011. Archived from the original on February 10, 2011.
- ^ "Facebook to be banned in Papua New Guinea for a month". BBC News. May 29, 2018. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
- ^ Kaya Yurieff (December 18, 2019). "Instagram influencers can no longer promote vaping and guns". CNN. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook whistleblower hearing: Frances Haugen calls for more regulation of tech giant – live updates". The Guardian. October 5, 2021. Archived from the original on October 5, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
- ^ Hamilton, Isobel Asher (October 6, 2021). "Mark Zuckerberg says whistleblower's claims that Facebook places profit over people 'don't make any sense.' Read his full response to the whistleblower's testimony" – via businessinsider.com.
- ^ Aspen, Maria (February 11, 2008). "How Sticky Is Membership on Facebook? Just Try Breaking Free". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 12, 2008. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Anthony, Sebastian (March 19, 2014). "Facebook's facial recognition software is now as accurate as the human brain, but what now?". ExtremeTech. Ziff Davis. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Gannes, Liz (June 8, 2011). "Facebook facial recognition prompts EU privacy probe". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Robinson, Bill (February 10, 2014). "Facebook: The World's Biggest Waste of Time?". HuffPost. Retrieved March 3, 2018.
- ^ Friedman, Matt (March 21, 2013). "Bill to ban companies from asking about job candidates' Facebook accounts is headed to governor". NJ.com. Advance Digital. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Wauters, Robin (September 16, 2010). "Greenpeace Slams Zuckerberg For Making Facebook A "So Coal Network" (Video)". TechCrunch. AOL. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Neate, Rupert (December 23, 2012). "Facebook paid £2.9m tax on £840m profits made outside US, figures show". The Guardian. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Grinberg, Emanuella (September 18, 2014). "Facebook 'real name' policy stirs questions around identity". CNN. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Doshi, Vidhi (July 19, 2016). "Facebook under fire for 'censoring' Kashmir-related posts and accounts". The Guardian. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Arrington, Michael (November 22, 2007). "Is Facebook Really Censoring Search When It Suits Them?". TechCrunch. AOL. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Greenwald, Glenn; MacAskill, Ewen (June 7, 2013). "NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others". The Guardian. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ "Paradise Papers reveal hidden wealth of global elite". The Express Tribune. November 6, 2017.
- ^ "How Facebook Breeds Jealousy". Seeker. Group Nine Media. February 10, 2010. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Matyszczyk, Chris (August 11, 2009). "Study: Facebook makes lovers jealous". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Ngak, Chenda (November 27, 2012). "Facebook may cause stress, study says". CBS News. CBS. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Smith, Dave (November 13, 2015). "Quitting Facebook will make you happier and less stressed, study says". Business Insider. Axel Springer SE. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Bugeja, Michael J. (January 23, 2006). "Facing the Facebook". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on February 20, 2008. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Hough, Andrew (April 8, 2011). "Student 'addiction' to technology 'similar to drug cravings', study finds". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ "Facebook and Twitter 'more addictive than tobacco and alcohol'". The Telegraph. February 1, 2012. Archived from the original on February 16, 2015. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Kaufmann, Renee; Buckner, Marjorie M.; Ledbetter, Andrew M. (August 3, 2017). "Having Fun on Facebook?: Mothers' Enjoyment as a Moderator of Mental Health and Facebook Use". Health Communication. 32 (8): 1014–1023. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1196513. ISSN 1041-0236. PMID 27463860. S2CID 25726659.
- ^ Osnos, Evan (September 17, 2018). "Can Mark Zuckerberg Fix Facebook Before It Breaks Democracy?". The New Yorker. Retrieved September 15, 2018.
- ^ Setalvad, Ariha (August 7, 2015). "Why Facebook's video theft problem can't last". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ "Facebook, Twitter and Google grilled by MPs over hate speech". BBC News. March 14, 2017. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Toor, Amar (September 15, 2015). "Facebook will work with Germany to combat anti-refugee hate speech". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Sherwell, Philip (October 16, 2011). "Cyber anarchists blamed for unleashing a series of Facebook 'rape pages'". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ "20,000 Israelis sue Facebook for ignoring Palestinian incitement". The Times of Israel. October 27, 2015. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ "Israel: Facebook's Zuckerberg has blood of slain Israeli teen on his hands". The Times of Israel. July 2, 2016. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Burke, Samuel (November 19, 2016). "Zuckerberg: Facebook will develop tools to fight fake news". CNN. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Staff, Our Foreign (June 1, 2017). "Hillary Clinton says Facebook 'must prevent fake news from creating a new reality'". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Fiegerman, Seth (May 9, 2017). "Facebook's global fight against fake news". CNN. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Grinberg, Emanuella; Said, Samira (March 22, 2017). "Police: At least 40 people watched teen's sexual assault on Facebook Live". CNN. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Grinberg, Emanuella (January 5, 2017). "Chicago torture: Facebook Live video leads to 4 arrests". CNN. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Sulleyman, Aatif (April 27, 2017). "Facebook Live killings: Why the criticism has been harsh". The Independent. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Medrano, Kastalia (January 25, 2018). "Facebook Spreads Viral Fake News Story About Vaccines". Newsweek.
- ^ "Facebook will not remove fake news – but will 'demote' it". BBC News. July 13, 2018.
- ^ Funke, Daniel (March 6, 2019). "Forget fake news stories. False text posts are getting massive engagement on Facebook". Ponyter.
- ^ "Sri Lanka Riots: Sri Lanka imposes nationwide curfew after anti-Muslim riots". Times of India. Reuters. May 13, 2019. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
- ^ "Sri Lanka blocks social media after worst anti-Muslim violence since Easter Sunday attacks". The National. May 13, 2019. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
- ^ a b Sullivan, Mark (May 23, 2019). "Facebook catches 3 billion fake accounts, but the ones it misses are the real problem". Fast Company.
- ^ Cox, Kate (July 25, 2019). "The FTC is investigating Facebook. Again". ars Technica. Retrieved August 11, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook still being used to arrange fake reviews – Which?". BBC News.
- ^ a b c Ingram, David; Fioretti, Julia (March 29, 2018). "Facebook cuts ties to data brokers in blow to targeted ads". Reuters. Retrieved February 5, 2019.
- ^ Simpson, David; Brown, Pamela (September 30, 2013). "NSA mines Facebook, including Americans' profiles". CNN. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ Johnson, Kevin; Martin, Scott; O'Donnell, Jayne; Winter, Michael (June 15, 2013). "Reports: NSA Siphons Data from 9 Major Net Firms". USA Today. Archived from the original on June 7, 2013. Retrieved June 6, 2013.
- ^ "Facebook Settles FTC Charges That It Deceived Consumers By Failing To Keep Privacy Promises". FTC. November 29, 2011. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
- ^ "Social networks: can robots violate user privacy?". August 27, 2013. Archived from the original on September 3, 2013. Retrieved January 5, 2014.
- ^ Van Grove, Jennifer (January 2, 2014). "Facebook sued for allegedly intercepting private messages". CNet. CBS Interactive. Retrieved March 16, 2015.
- ^ "Facebook bug set 14 million users' sharing settings to public". June 7, 2018. Retrieved June 7, 2018.
- ^ "Facebook confirms data-sharing agreements with Chinese firms". June 6, 2018.
- ^ "Millions of Facebook Records Found On Amazon Servers". Hack Hex. April 4, 2019. Archived from the original on June 4, 2019. Retrieved June 4, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook confirms 419 m phone numbers exposed in latest privacy lapse". The Guardian. September 5, 2019. Retrieved September 7, 2019.
- ^ Reaz, Shaer (August 28, 2020). "Cutting ties with a giant: Viber CEO on Facebook relations and #StopHateForProfit". The Daily Star. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
- ^ "We're proud to join #StopHateForProfit". Mozilla Corporation. Mozilla Foundation. June 24, 2020. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
- ^ Keegan, Jon (January 17, 2024). "Each Facebook User Is Monitored by Thousands of Companies". Consumer Reports.
- ^ Franceschi-Bicchierai, Lorenzo (March 26, 2024). "Facebook snooped on users' Snapchat traffic in secret project, documents reveal". TechCrunch. Retrieved March 26, 2024.
- ^ "Facebook faces US investigation for 'systemic' racial bias in hiring". The Guardian. March 6, 2021. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
- ^ a b Brandom, Russell (April 11, 2018). "Shadow profiles are the biggest flaw in Facebook's privacy defense". The Verge. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
- ^ "How Facebook can have your data even if you're not on Facebook". USA Today. Retrieved April 13, 2018.
- ^ Hill, Kashmir (November 7, 2017). "How Facebook Figures Out Everyone You've Ever Met". Gizmodo. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
- ^ Lewis, Paul; Wong, Julia Carrie (March 18, 2018). "Facebook employs psychologist whose firm sold data to Cambridge Analytica". The Guardian. Retrieved March 20, 2018.
- ^ Franceschi-Bicchierai, Lorenzo (March 19, 2018). "Why We're Not Calling the Cambridge Analytica Story a 'Data Breach'". Motherboard. Retrieved March 20, 2018.
- ^ Rosenberg, Matthew; Confessore, Nicholas; Cadwalladr, Carole (March 17, 2018). "How Trump Consultants Exploited the Facebook Data of Millions". The New York Times.
- ^ Timberg, Craig; Romm, Tony (March 18, 2018). "Facebook may have violated FTC privacy deal, say former federal officials, triggering risk of massive fines". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 25, 2018.
- ^ "UK High Court grants Cambridge Analytica search warrant to ICO". CNBC. March 23, 2018. Archived from the original on March 23, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2018.
- ^ "Facebook boss apologises in newspaper ads". BBC News. March 25, 2018. Retrieved March 25, 2018.
- ^ Ivanova, Irina (March 26, 2018). "Facebook stock rebounds after FTC investigation news". CBS News. Retrieved March 26, 2018.
- ^ Feiner, Lauren (April 24, 2019). "Facebook estimates up to $5 billion loss in FTC privacy inquiry". CNBC. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
- ^ "FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook". Federal Trade Commission. July 24, 2019. Archived from the original on July 21, 2023. Retrieved August 12, 2023.
- ^ "FTC Sues Cambridge Analytica, Settles with Former CEO and App Developer". Federal Trade Commission. July 23, 2019. Archived from the original on June 13, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2023.
- ^ Solon, Olivia (April 12, 2018). "Fact-checking Mark Zuckerberg's testimony about Facebook privacy". The Guardian. Retrieved June 29, 2018.
- ^ "Zuckerberg says Facebook will offer GDPR privacy controls everywhere". TechCrunch. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
- ^ Brodkin, Jon (April 12, 2018). "Facebook exits anti-privacy alliance it formed with Comcast and Google". Ars Technica. Retrieved April 13, 2018.
- ^ "Funny, When Obama Harvested Facebook Data On Millions Of Users To Win In 2012, Everyone Cheered". Investor's Business Daily. March 19, 2018.
- ^ a b "Why Are We Only Now Talking About Facebook And Elections?". Forbes. March 19, 2018.
- ^ a b "Former Facebook staffer, Obama campaign boss reveal concerns about Facebook data". News.com.au. March 21, 2018.
- ^ "Comparing Facebook data use by Obama, Cambridge Analytica". PolitiFact. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ a b Fowler, Geoffrey A. (July 19, 2019). "Perspective | I found your data. It's for sale". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
- ^ Goodin, Dan (July 18, 2019). "My browser, the spy: How extensions slurped up browsing histories from 4M users". Ars Technica. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
- ^ a b c Jadali, Sam (July 18, 2019). "DataSpii – A global catastrophic data leak via browser extensions". Security with Sam. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
- ^ "Google, Firefox Browser Extensions Expose Data of 4 Million People". Consumer Reports. July 19, 2019. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
- ^ Goodin, Dan (July 18, 2019). "More on DataSpii: How extensions hide their data grabs—and how they're discovered". Ars Technica. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
- ^ "Everything you need to know about Facebook's data breach affecting 50M users". TechCrunch. Retrieved October 2, 2018.
- ^ Isaac, Mike; Frenkel, Sheera (September 28, 2018). "Facebook Security Breach Exposes Accounts of 50 Million Users". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 28, 2018. Retrieved September 29, 2018.
- ^ Wong, Julia Carrie (September 28, 2018). "Facebook says nearly 50 m users compromised in huge security breach". The Guardian. Retrieved September 29, 2018.
- ^ "Not Tens of Thousands, But Millions of Instagram Passwords Exposed, Admits Facebook". News18. April 19, 2019. Retrieved April 19, 2019.
- ^ Ghoshal, Abhimanyu (December 20, 2019). "267 million Facebook users' data has reportedly been leaked". The Next Web. Retrieved December 21, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook's Twitter account hacked". NBC News. Retrieved February 7, 2020.
- ^ "Another huge data breach, another stony silence from Facebook". The Guardian. April 11, 2021. Retrieved April 21, 2021.
- ^ Lovejoy, Ben (September 27, 2024). "Up to 600 million Facebook and Instagram passwords stored in plain text". 9to5Mac. Retrieved September 29, 2024.
- ^ Morris, Betsy; Seetharaman, Deepa (August 9, 2017). "The New Copycats: How Facebook Squashes Competition From Startups". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved August 15, 2017.
- ^ "The New Copycats: How Facebook Squashes -2-". Fox Business. August 9, 2017. Retrieved August 15, 2017.
- ^ "Facebook knew about Snap's struggles months before the public". Engadget. August 13, 2017. Retrieved August 15, 2017.
- ^ "Apple makes Facebook pull its spyware(ish) VPN from the App Store". Fast Company. August 23, 2018. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
- ^ McKay, Tom (August 22, 2018). "Facebook Pulls Its Data-Harvesting Onavo VPN From App Store After Apple Says It Violates Rules". Gizmodo. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
- ^ Morse, Jack (August 22, 2018). "Facebook to pull its creepy VPN Onavo from App Store after Apple pushback". Mashable. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
- ^ "Apple removed Facebook's Onavo from the App Store for gathering app data". TechCrunch. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
- ^ "Facebook will pull its data-collecting VPN app from the App Store over privacy concerns". The Verge. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
- ^ Spadafora, Anthony (December 16, 2020). "Facebook sued for using VPN to spy on users". TechRadar. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
- ^ Duckett, Chris (December 16, 2020). "Facebook dragged to court by ACCC over deceptive VPN conduct allegations". ZDNet. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
- ^ Laura, Bremner (January 29, 2019). "Facebook pays teens to install VPN that spies on them". PcSite. Retrieved January 30, 2019.
- ^ a b Wagner, Kurt (January 30, 2019). "Apple says it's banning Facebook's research app that collects users' personal information". Recode. Retrieved January 30, 2019.
- ^ Warren, Tom (January 30, 2019). "Apple blocks Facebook from running its internal iOS apps". The Verge. Retrieved January 30, 2019.
- ^ Isaac, Mike (January 31, 2019). "Apple Shows Facebook Who Has the Power in an App Dispute". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 1, 2019. Retrieved February 2, 2019 – via NYTimes.com.
- ^ Gallagher, Sean (March 24, 2018). "Facebook scraped call, text message data for years from Android phones [Updated]". Ars Technica. Retrieved January 31, 2019.
- ^ Rosenberg, Adam (March 25, 2018). "Facebook's app has been collecting Android phone data for years on some devices". Mashable. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
- ^ Facebook has been collecting call history and SMS data from Android devices The Verge
- ^ "Android users file lawsuit against Facebook for invasion of privacy". jurist.org. May 11, 2018.
- ^ Buckner, Gabriella (May 14, 2018). "Facebook faces class action lawsuit for Android call and message data scraping". itpro.co.uk. Retrieved February 7, 2019.
- ^ "Off-Facebook Activity". Facebook for Business.
- ^ Fowler, Geoffrey A. "Facebook will now show you exactly how it stalks you – even when you're not using Facebook". The Washington Post.
- ^ "Facebook continuing to surveil teens for ads, says report". TechCrunch. November 16, 2021. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
- ^ Naomi Nix (July 27, 2021). "Facebook Reduces Advertising Targeting for Teenagers". Bloomberg. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
- ^ Klar, Rebecca (July 27, 2021). "Facebook, Instagram to limit targeted ads for teen users". The Hill. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
- ^ Bowie, Norman E.; Schnieder, Meg (February 9, 2011). Business Ethics For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-02062-3.
- ^ a b Hempel, Jessi (March 30, 2018). "A Short History of Facebook's Privacy Gaffes". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
- ^ Statt, Nick (March 25, 2018). "Mark Zuckerberg apologizes for Facebook's data privacy scandal in full-page newspaper ads". The Verge. Archived from the original on December 24, 2020. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
- ^ "Social Media/polls Show Low Trust in Facebook". www.digitaltrends.com. March 26, 2018. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
- ^ Christofides, E.; Muise, A.; Desmarais, S. (March 31, 2010). "Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook: Youth & Adults' Information Disclosure and Perceptions of Privacy Risks – Contributions Program 2009–2010". www.priv.gc.ca. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
- ^ Wong, Julia Carrie (December 12, 2017). "Former Facebook executive: social media is ripping society apart". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
- ^ Roose, Kevin (July 27, 2018). "Facebook and YouTube Give Alex Jones a Wrist Slap". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 27, 2018. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ Mackey, Robert (August 26, 2014). "Borne by Facebook, Conspiracy Theory That U.S. Created ISIS Spreads Across Middle East". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 15, 2022.
- ^ Gowen, Annie; Bearak, Max. "Fake news on Facebook fans the flames of hate against the Rohingya in Burma". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ Mozur, Paul (October 15, 2018). "A Genocide Incited on Facebook, With Posts From Myanmar's Military". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 15, 2022.
- ^ Waldman, Scott. "Climate Denial Spreads on Facebook as Scientists Face Restrictions". Scientific American. E&E News. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
- ^ Guynn, Jessica. "Climate change denial on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and TikTok is 'as bad as ever'". USA Today. Retrieved April 15, 2022.
- ^ Waldman, Scott (February 23, 2022). "Climate denial still flourishes on Facebook — report". E&E News. Retrieved April 15, 2022.
- ^ Pozner, Leonard; Rosa, Veronique De La; Pozner, parents of Noah (July 25, 2018). "An open letter to Mark Zuckerberg from the parents of a Sandy Hook victim". The Guardian. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ Taub, Amanda; Fisher, Max (August 21, 2018). "Facebook Fueled Anti-Refugee Attacks in Germany, New Research Suggests". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 21, 2018. Retrieved August 21, 2018.
- ^ MMller, Karsten; Schwarz, Carlo (2017). "Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate Crime". SSRN Working Paper Series. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3082972. ISSN 1556-5068. S2CID 19194580. SSRN 3082972.
- ^ Beauchamp, Zack (January 22, 2019). "Social media is rotting democracy from within". Vox Media. Archived from the original on January 25, 2019.
- ^ Etter, Lauren (December 7, 2017). "What Happens When the Government Uses Facebook as a Weapon?". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on January 24, 2019.
- ^ Hunt, Elle (March 22, 2017). "'Disputed by multiple fact-checkers': Facebook rolls out new alert to combat fake news". The Guardian. Retrieved November 4, 2019.
- ^ Sherman, Amy. "In phony Facebook ad, Warren said most TV networks will refuse ads with a 'lie' but that's wrong". PolitiFact. Retrieved November 4, 2019.
- ^ a b Levin, Sam (December 13, 2018). "'They don't care': Facebook factchecking in disarray as journalists push to cut ties". The Guardian. San Francisco. Retrieved April 15, 2022.
- ^ Scola, Nancy (May 24, 2019). "Facebook on fake Pelosi video: Being 'false' isn't enough for removal". Politico.
- ^ Frenkel, Sheera (July 18, 2018). "Facebook to Remove Misinformation That Leads to Violence". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 18, 2018. Retrieved August 9, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f Darcy, Oliver (July 20, 2018). "Facebook's rhetoric on misinformation doesn't match its actions". CNN Business. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ Darcy, Oliver (May 2, 2019). "Facebook bans Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos, InfoWars and others from its platforms as 'dangerous'". CNN.
- ^ Michael Cappetta and Ben Collins (May 2, 2019). "Alex Jones, Louis Farrakhan, others banned from Facebook and Instagram". NBC News.
- ^ Newton, Casey (May 12, 2020). "Facebook will pay $52 million in settlement with moderators who developed PTSD on the job". The Verge. Retrieved May 13, 2020.
- ^ Newton, Casey (February 25, 2019). "The secret lives of Facebook moderators in America". The Verge. Retrieved May 16, 2020.
- ^ "Facebook Content Moderators Win $52m Compensation Settlement". ModeratorRights.com. May 13, 2020. Retrieved May 13, 2020.
- ^ "Thailand takes first legal action against Facebook, Twitter over content". Reuters. September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
- ^ a b c Bing, Chris; Schechtman, Joel (June 14, 2024). "Pentagon Ran Secret Anti-Vax Campaign to Undermine China during Pandemic". Reuters.
- ^ Toropin, Konstantin (June 14, 2024). "Pentagon Stands by Secret Anti-Vaccination Disinformation Campaign in Philippines After Reuters Report". Military.com. Archived from the original on June 14, 2024. Retrieved June 19, 2024.
- ^ "Mail Bomber Cesar Sayoc Threatened Me on Facebook – Volokh Conspiracy". October 27, 2018.
- ^ "Pakistani PM asks Facebook CEO to ban Islamophobic content". Reuters. October 25, 2020. Retrieved October 25, 2020.
- ^ Grenoble, Ryan (October 12, 2020). "Facebook Decides Holocaust Denial Content Is Bad, Actually". HuffPost. Retrieved October 12, 2020.
- ^ a b Carter, Camden (October 13, 2022). "Meta is still profiting off ads that use the anti-LGBTQ 'groomer' slur, despite the platform's ban". Media Matters. Retrieved October 22, 2022.
- ^ Assunção, Muri (October 14, 2022). "Facebook parent company Meta still cashing in on ads using anti-LGBTQ slur 'groomers' despite platform's ban: report". New York Daily News. Retrieved October 22, 2022.
- ^ Wakefield, Lily (October 14, 2022). "Facebook has made thousands from hateful 'groomer' adverts in 2022". PinkNews. Retrieved October 22, 2022.
- ^ Villarreal, Daniel (October 14, 2022). "Facebook & Instagram are making money off ads calling LGBTQ people 'groomers' despite policy". LGBTQ Nation. Retrieved October 22, 2022.
- ^ Baker-White, Emily. "Facebook And Instagram Are Full Of Violent Erotica Ads From ByteDance- And Tencent-Backed Apps". Forbes. Retrieved September 30, 2022.
- ^ Kelly, Heather (July 18, 2018). "Mark Zuckerberg clarifies his Holocaust comments". CNNMoney. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ a b "Media – both on the left and right – are pressing Facebook to define what journalism is". Recode. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ Kosoff, Maya. "Why Facebook Won't Actually Ban Fake News". The Hive. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ "Facebook Said Alex Jones' Threatening Rant Against Robert Mueller Doesn't Violate Its Rules". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on April 30, 2023. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ Darcy, Oliver. "Facebook suspends personal profile of InfoWars founder Alex Jones". CNN Business. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
- ^ Ross, Jamie (August 6, 2018). "Facebook and Apple iTunes Ban Alex Jones as Internet Giants Silence Infowars". The Daily Beast. Retrieved August 6, 2018.
- ^ a b Ex-Facebook employee on the company's dangerous loophole: 'Autocrats don't bother to hide', April 11, 2021, archived from the original on December 19, 2021, retrieved April 15, 2021
- ^ a b Wong, Julia Carrie (April 12, 2021). "How Facebook let fake engagement distort global politics: a whistleblower's account". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved April 15, 2021.
- ^ a b "Revealed: the Facebook loophole that lets world leaders deceive and harass their citizens". the Guardian. April 12, 2021.
- ^ Gleicher, Nathaniel; Rodriguez, Oscar (October 11, 2018). "Removing Additional Inauthentic Activity from Facebook". Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
- ^ "Snowden Docs: British Spies Used Sex and 'Dirty Tricks'". NBC News. February 7, 2014.
- ^ "Snowden leaks: GCHQ 'attacked Anonymous' hackers". BBC News. February 5, 2014.
- ^ "China's 'troll factory' targeting Taiwan with disinformation prior to election". Taiwan News. May 11, 2018.
- ^ "Trolls, bots and shutdowns: This is how Turkey manipulates public opinion". Ahval. November 17, 2017. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
- ^ "Jewish Internet Defense Force 'seizes control' of anti-Israel Facebook group". The Jerusalem Post. July 29, 2008.
- ^ Morrison, Sarah (March 4, 2008). "Jewish Activist Battles For Israel on Facebook". Israel National News.[better source needed]
- ^ "Social media manipulation rising globally, new report warns". University of Oxford. July 20, 2018.
- ^ "Facebook: Most political trolls are American, not Russian". The Telegraph. October 12, 2018. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022.
- ^ "Facebook suspends five accounts, including that of a social media researcher, for misleading tactics in Alabama election". The Washington Post. December 22, 2018.
- ^ "Democratic operatives created fake Russian bots designed to link Kremlin to Roy Moore in Alabama race". Fox News. December 20, 2018.
- ^ "Facebook Says It Removed 783 Accounts Tied to an Iranian Manipulation Campaign". Fortune. January 31, 2019.
- ^ "China is using Facebook to build a huge audience around the world". The Economist. April 20, 2019. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved August 19, 2023.
Facebook pages usually gain followers when people share posts with their friends. Chinese outlets receive far fewer shares than Western ones do, which implies that they use some other tactic to amass fans. Facebook has already accused Chinese actors of skullduggery. In March it sued four Chinese firms, which it said had sold "fake accounts, likes and followers".
- ^ Madowo, Larry (May 24, 2019). "Is Facebook undermining democracy in Africa?". Retrieved June 8, 2019.
- ^ Debre, Isabel; Satter, Raphael (May 16, 2019). "'Change reality': Facebook busts Israel-based campaign to disrupt elections". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved June 8, 2019.
- ^ "Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior From Israel | Facebook Newsroom". May 16, 2019. Retrieved June 8, 2019.
- ^ O'Sullivan, Donie; Gold, Hadas (May 16, 2019). "Facebook says Israeli company used fake accounts to target African elections". CNN Business. CNN. Retrieved June 8, 2019.
- ^ Needleman, Sarah E. (May 16, 2019). "Facebook Bans Israeli Firm Over Fake Political Activity". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved June 8, 2019.
- ^ Romo, Vanessa; Held, Amy (May 23, 2019). "Facebook Removed Nearly 3.4 Billion Fake Accounts in 6 Months". NPR. NPR. Retrieved May 23, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook removes fake accounts from Thailand, Russia, Ukraine, Honduras". Reuters. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
- ^ "Russia blocks access to Facebook". TechCrunch. March 4, 2022. Retrieved March 4, 2022.
- ^ "Facebook deletes accounts of workers at NSO Israeli firm". Quds News Network. November 2019. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2019.
- ^ Romm, Tony (May 12, 2020). "Facebook Helps Launch American Edge, a Dark-Money Advocacy Group for Big Tech". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
- ^ Wheeler, Tom (June 15, 2022). "History repeats itself with Big Tech's misleading advertising". Brookings Institution. Retrieved August 26, 2023.
- ^ "Facebook prepares legal action against Thai government's order to block group". CNN International. August 24, 2020. Retrieved August 25, 2020.
- ^ Collins, Ben; Zadrozny, Brandy (May 20, 2020). "Troll farms from North Macedonia and the Philippines pushed coronavirus disinformation on Facebook". NBC News.
- ^ "Troll farms reached 140 million Americans a month on Facebook before 2020 election, internal report shows". MIT Technology Review.
- ^ "Facebook removes main page of Myanmar military for 'incitement of violence'". ABC News. February 21, 2021. Retrieved February 21, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook bans Myanmar military accounts from its platforms, citing coup". France 24. February 25, 2021. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
- ^ "Opinion: Fact-Checking Facebook's Fact Checkers". The Wall Street Journal. March 5, 2021. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved March 7, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook guidelines allow for users to call for death of public figures". the Guardian. March 23, 2021. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook leak underscores strategy to operate in repressive regimes". the Guardian. March 23, 2021. Retrieved March 25, 2021.
- ^ Brewster, Thomas (February 7, 2021). "Sheryl Sandberg Downplayed Facebook's Role In The Capitol Hill Siege—Justice Department Files Tell A Very Different Story". Forbes. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
- ^ Timberg, Craig; Dwoskin, Elizabeth; Albergotti, Reed (October 22, 2021). "Inside Facebook, Jan. 6 violence fueled anger, regret over missed warning signs". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
- ^ "Internet Research Agency indicted: Who is the Russian company behind the fake Facebook ads?". Fox News. February 16, 2018.
- ^ "13 Russians Indicted as Mueller Reveals Effort to Aid Trump Campaign". The New York Times. February 16, 2018. Archived from the original on February 16, 2018.
- ^ "Exposing Russia's Effort to Sow Discord Online: The Internet Research Agency and Advertisements". intelligence.house.gov. Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Archived from the original on January 28, 2021. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
- ^ Seetharaman, Deepa; Tau, Byron; Harris, Shane (September 15, 2017). "Facebook Gave Special Counsel Robert Mueller More Details on Russian Ad Buys Than Congress". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved September 15, 2017.
- ^ "Facebook sold $100,000 of political ads to fake Russian accounts during 2016 US election". The Independent. September 6, 2017. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook Says Russian Accounts Bought $100,000 in Ads During the 2016 Election". Time. September 6, 2017.
- ^ "New Studies Show Pundits Are Wrong About Russian Social-Media Involvement in US Politics". The Nation. December 28, 2018. Archived from the original on June 3, 2019. Retrieved June 2, 2019.
- ^ Castillo, Michelle (September 6, 2017). "Facebook gave special counsel Robert Mueller data on Russian ads, report says". CNBC. Retrieved September 7, 2017.
- ^ Leonnig, Carol D.; Dwoskin, Elizabeth; Timberg, Craig (September 18, 2017). "Facebook's openness on Russia questioned by congressional investigators". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved September 19, 2017.
- ^ "Russians trolls organized a protest in the US". CNN. June 25, 2018.
- ^ "Did Russian hackers organize Philando Castile protest? Activists say no". Star Tribune. November 1, 2017.
- ^ Collins, Ben; Poulsen, Kevin; Ackerman, Spencer (September 12, 2017). "Exclusive: Russia Used Facebook Events to Organize Anti-Immigrant Rallies on U.S. Soil". The Daily Beast. Retrieved September 12, 2017.
- ^ "Shuttered Facebook group that organized anti-Clinton, anti-immigrant rallies across Texas was linked to Russia". Business Insider. Archived from the original on September 13, 2017. Retrieved September 14, 2017.
- ^ "Russians Staged Rallies For and Against Trump to Promote Discord, Indictment Says". Fortune. February 17, 2018.
- ^ Collins, Ben; Resnick, Gideon; Poulsen, Kevin; Ackerman, Spencer (September 20, 2017). "Exclusive: Russians Appear to Use Facebook to Push Trump Rallies in 17 U.S. Cities". The Daily Beast. Retrieved September 20, 2017.
- ^ Entous, Adam; Timberg, Craig; Dwoskin, Elizabeth (September 25, 2017). "Russian operatives used Facebook ads to exploit divisions over black political activism and Muslims". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved September 25, 2017.
- ^ "Exclusive: Russian-bought Black Lives Matter ad on Facebook targeted Baltimore and Ferguson". CNN. September 28, 2017.
- ^ Collins, Ben; Poulsen, Kevin; Ackerman, Spencer (September 27, 2017). "Exclusive: Russians Impersonated Real American Muslims to Stir Chaos on Facebook and Instagram". The Daily Beast. Retrieved September 28, 2017.
- ^ Shinal, John (September 27, 2017). "Mark Zuckerberg responds to Trump, regrets he dismissed election concerns". CNBC. Retrieved September 27, 2017.
- ^ "Kremlin-owned Firms Linked to Major Investments in Twitter and Facebook". International Consortium of Investigative Journalists – ICIJ. November 5, 2017.
- ^ Drucker, Jesse (November 5, 2017). "Kremlin Cash Behind Billionaire's Twitter and Facebook Investments". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 5, 2017. Retrieved November 6, 2017.
- ^ "Disinformation and 'fake news': Final Report". publications.parliament.uk. Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – House of Commons. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ Gleicher, Nathaniel (January 17, 2019). "Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior from Russia". Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ Cuthbertson, Antony (March 26, 2019). "Facebook removes thousands more Russian accounts". The Independent. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ "Disinformation and 'fake news': Interim Report". publications.parliament.uk. Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – House of Commons.
- ^ Cadwalladr, Carole (July 28, 2018). "A withering verdict: MPs report on Zuckerberg, Russia and Cambridge Analytica". The Observer. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ a b "Facebook labelled 'digital gangsters' by report on fake news". the Guardian. February 18, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
- ^ "NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party". The Intercept. February 3, 2019.
- ^ "Secret Experiment in Alabama Senate Race Imitated Russian Tactics". The New York Times. December 19, 2018. Archived from the original on December 20, 2018.
- ^ "Removing Myanmar Military Officials From Facebook". Facebook Newsroom. August 28, 2018. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
- ^ Mozur, Paul (October 15, 2018). "A Genocide Incited on Facebook, With Posts From Myanmar's Military". The New York Times. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
- ^ "The Past and Future of Facebook and BJP's Mutually Beneficial Relationship". The Wire.
- ^ "A Facebook Executive Who Shared An Anti-Muslim Post Has Apologized To Employees". BuzzFeed News. August 24, 2020. Archived from the original on April 26, 2023. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ Ellis-Petersen, Hannah; Rahman, Shaikh Azizur (September 1, 2020). "Facebook faces grilling by MPs in India over anti-Muslim hate speech". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ a b "Watch | Why Did Facebook Not Remove BJP-Linked Anti-Muslim Hate Posts?". The Wire. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ Horwitz, Jeff; Purnell, Newley (August 30, 2020). "Facebook Executive Supported India's Modi, Disparaged Opposition in Internal Messages". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ "New Report Says Facebook's Ankhi Das Supported Modi, Hoped for BJP's Victory". The Wire. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ Purnell, Newley; Horwitz, Jeff (August 14, 2020). "Facebook's Hate-Speech Rules Collide With Indian Politics". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- ^ Staff Reporter (August 31, 2020). "Assembly panel alleges role of Facebook in Delhi riots". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ Deol, Taran (August 31, 2020). "Delhi assembly panel wants Facebook named co-accused in communal riots, hints at 'conspiracy'". ThePrint. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ "Delhi city lawmakers summon Facebook India chief over February riots". Reuters. September 12, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook India moves supreme court against Delhi assembly panel summons". Hindustan Times. September 23, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook Skips Delhi Assembly Panel Hearing, "Insulting," Fume Members". NDTV.com. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
- ^ "Delhi Assembly panel issues fresh notice of appearance to Facebook India VP". The Indian Express. September 20, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook India VP moves Supreme Court against Delhi Assembly panel summoning him". mint. September 22, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
- ^ "Delhi riots | Supreme Court grants relief to Facebook official". The Hindu. September 23, 2020. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
- ^ "SC orders stay on summons to Facebook India V–P by Delhi Assembly panel on riots". ThePrint. September 23, 2020.
- ^ "Centre backs Facebook in SC row with Delhi Assembly over summons". The Economic Times. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
- ^ "Delhi riots could have been averted if firm had acted: Ex-Facebook employee". Business Standard. November 13, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
- ^ "Delhi Assembly peace panel moves SC for intervention in Facebook VP Ajit Mohan's case". The Economic Times. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook gets new notice to appear before Delhi Assembly committee probing riots". Hindustan Times. February 5, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
- ^ "'Facebook, Twitter can't be accountable to state assemblies': Centre to SC". Hindustan Times. February 18, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
- ^ "[Delhi Riots] Committee formed by Delhi Assembly to probe social media giants' omissions unconstitutional: Centre, Facebook tell Supreme Court". Bar and Bench – Indian Legal news. February 2, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
- ^ ""Expansion Of Power Through Backdoor": Facebook Boss On Delhi Summons". NDTV.com. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook asked to appear before Delhi assembly panel, Supreme Court refuses to quash summons". The Indian Express. July 8, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
- ^ Menn, Joseph; Shih, Gerry (September 26, 2023). "Under India's pressure, Facebook let propaganda and hate speech thrive". The Washington Post.
- ^ Bissell, Tom (January 29, 2019). "An Anti-Facebook Manifesto, by an Early Facebook Investor". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 29, 2019.
- ^ Schneider, Nathan; Cheadle, Harry (March 27, 2018). "It's Time for Mark Zuckerberg to Give Up Control of Facebook". Vice. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023.
- ^ Brown, Shelby (May 9, 2019). "Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes calls for company's breakup". CNET. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023.
- ^ Hughes, Chris (May 9, 2019). "It's Time to Break Up Facebook". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019.
- ^ Brown, Shelby. "More politicians side with Facebook co-founder on breaking up company". CNET.
- ^ Collins, Katie. "EU competition commissioner: Facebook breakup would be 'last resort'". CNET.
- ^ Stewart, Emily (January 26, 2023). "The death of the customer service hotline". Vox. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
- ^ "How small claims court became Meta's customer service hotline". Engadget. June 20, 2024. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
- ^ Farivar, Cyrus (January 7, 2016). "Appeals court upholds deal allowing kids' images in Facebook ads". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Levine, Dan; Oreskovic, Alexei (March 12, 2012). "Yahoo sues Facebook for infringing 10 patents". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Wagner, Kurt (February 1, 2017). "Facebook lost its Oculus lawsuit and has to pay $500 million". Recode. Vox Media. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Brandom, Rusell (May 19, 2016). "Lawsuit claims Facebook illegally scanned private messages". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Tryhorn, Chris (July 25, 2007). "Facebook in court over ownership". The Guardian. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Michels, Scott (July 20, 2007). "Facebook Founder Accused of Stealing Idea for Site". ABC News. ABC. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ Carlson, Nicholas (March 5, 2010). "How Mark Zuckerberg Hacked into Rival ConnectU In 2004". Business Insider. Axel Springer SE. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- ^ "BlackBerry to Facebook: You stole our messaging technology". Fox News. March 7, 2018. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
- ^ Whitcomb, Dan. "Woman sues Facebook, claims site enabled sex trafficking". Reuters. Retrieved October 4, 2018.
- ^ Whitcomb, Dan. "Facebook, responding to lawsuit, says sex trafficking banned on site". Reuters. Retrieved October 4, 2018.
- ^ Jolly, Bradley (January 21, 2019). "Refugee 'waterboarded' by bullies to sue Facebook over Tommy Robinson claims". Mirror.
- ^ Halliday, Josh (January 21, 2019). "Bullied Syrian schoolboy to sue Facebook over Tommy Robinson claims". The Guardian.
- ^ Statt, Nick; Brandom, Russell (December 9, 2020). "The FTC is suing Facebook to unwind its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp". The Verge. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
- ^ Swartz, Jon (December 9, 2020). "Facebook hit with antitrust suits from FTC, 48 AGs to 'unwind' Instagram, WhatsApp transactions". Marketwatch. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
- ^ Rosemain, Mathieu (January 6, 2022). "Google hit with 150 mln euro French fine for cookie breaches". Reuters. Retrieved January 6, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Thompson, Elizabeth (January 4, 2023). "Class-action lawsuit against Facebook claiming discrimination gets the green light". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Quebec: CBC. Retrieved January 10, 2023.
- ^ Roth, Emma (September 25, 2023). "Facebook can be sued over biased ad algorithm, says court". The Verge. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
- ^ a b Gebelhoff, Robert (May 8, 2019). "Facebook is becoming a vast digital graveyard – and a gift to the future". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved July 16, 2019.
- ^ Levin, Jonathan (2013). "The Economics of Internet Markets". In Acemoglu, Daron; Arellano, Manuel; Dekel, Eddie (eds.). Advances in Economics and Econometrics (PDF). pp. 48–75. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139060011.003. ISBN 978-1-139-06001-1. S2CID 37187854. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 8, 2017. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ "Greenpeace Declares Victory Over Facebook Data Centers". Wired. December 15, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2018.
- ^ "Achieving our goal: 100% renewable energy for our global operations". Tech at Meta. April 15, 2021.
- ^ "Facebook reaches its target of using 100 percent renewable energy". Engadget. April 15, 2021.
- ^ "The Facebook App Economy" (PDF). University of Maryland. September 19, 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 1, 2020. Retrieved June 25, 2017.
- ^ "Facebook extends lead as news gateway: Study – The Economic Times". The Economic Times. May 26, 2016. Retrieved May 27, 2016.
- ^ Acampa, S.; Crescentini, N.; Padricelli, G. M. (2023). "Between alternative and traditional social platforms: The case of gab in exploring the narratives on the pandemic and vaccines". Frontiers in Sociology. 8. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1143263. PMC 10390321. PMID 37534329.
- ^ Ellison, Nicole B.; Steinfield, Charles; Lampe, Cliff (2007). "The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12 (4): 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
- ^ Marche, Stephen (May 2012). "Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on May 31, 2012. Retrieved December 3, 2022.
- ^ Konnikova, Maria (September 10, 2013). "How Facebook Makes Us Unhappy". The New Yorker. Condé Nast. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
- ^ Dent, Grace (March 6, 2017). "Social media is full of sad, lonely people pretending they're OK and perfectly fine attention-seekers pretending to be sad". The Independent. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
- ^ Sifferlin, Alexandra (January 24, 2013). "Why Facebook Makes You Feel Bad About Yourself". Time. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
- ^ Hobson, Katherine (March 6, 2017). "Feeling Lonely? Too Much Time On Social Media May Be Why". NPR. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
- ^ Goldsmith, Belinda (January 22, 2013). "RPT-Is Facebook envy making you miserable?". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
- ^ a b Kelly, Heather (August 15, 2013). "Study: Using Facebook can make you sad". CNN. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
- ^ Flacy, Mike (January 22, 2012). "Study: Why Facebook is making people sad". Digital Trends. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
- ^ Sachs, Wendy (February 8, 2012). "Facebook Envy: How Cruising Can Kill Self Esteem". HuffPost. AOL. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
- ^ Usigan, Ysolt (August 29, 2011). "Facebook makes teens narcissistic, anxious and depressed – but also nice, social and engaged". CBS News. CBS. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
- ^ Allcott, Hunt; Braghieri, Luca; Eichmeyer, Sarah; Gentzkow, Matthew (2020). "The Welfare Effects of Social Media" (PDF). American Economic Review. 110 (3): 629–676. doi:10.1257/aer.20190658. ISSN 0002-8282.
- ^ Newton, Casey (December 15, 2017). "Facebook says 'passively consuming' the News Feed will make you feel worse about yourself". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
- ^ Brodzinsky, Sibylla (February 4, 2008). "Facebook used to target Colombia's FARC with global rally". The Christian Science Monitor. Boston. Retrieved August 1, 2010.
- ^ Roberts, Laura (August 21, 2010). "North Korea joins Facebook". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved August 22, 2010.
- ^ Sutter, John D. (February 21, 2011). "The faces of Egypt's 'Revolution 2.0'". CNN. Retrieved June 7, 2013.
- ^ Hauslohner, Abigail (January 24, 2011). "Is Egypt About to Have a Facebook Revolution?". Time. New York. Archived from the original on January 25, 2011. Retrieved June 7, 2013.
- ^ Kessler, Sarah (January 26, 2011). "Facebook & Twitter Both Blocked in Egypt". Mashable. Retrieved June 7, 2013.
- ^ Agencies, Suzi Dixon and (August 4, 2011). "Facebook 'used to hunt down Bahrain dissidents'". Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
- ^ Johnson, Luke (September 26, 2011). "Facebook forms its own Political Action Committee". HuffPost. Retrieved September 27, 2011.
- ^ Nagesh, Gautham (September 26, 2011). "Facebook to form its own PAC to back political candidates". The Hill. Washington DC. Retrieved September 27, 2011.
- ^ "Kobani Kurds Use Facebook To Recruit Foreign Fighters in Struggle Against IS". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. November 13, 2014.
- ^ "Frontline Isis: The Real Story of Narin Afrini and the Kurdish Female 'Lions' Terrorising Islamic State". International Business Times UK. October 15, 2014.
- ^ Quattrociocchi, Walter; Uzzi, Brian; Caldarelli, Guido; Scala, Antonio; Puliga, Michelangelo; Vicario, Michela Del; Zollo, Fabiana; Bessi, Alessandro (August 23, 2016). "Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube". PLOS ONE. 11 (8): e0159641. arXiv:1604.02705. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1159641B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159641. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4994967. PMID 27551783.
- ^ Solon, Olivia (November 10, 2016). "Facebook's failure: did fake news and polarized politics get Trump elected?". The Guardian. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ "The country where Facebook posts whipped up hate". BBC News. September 12, 2018. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ Mozur, Paul (October 15, 2018). "A Genocide Incited on Facebook, With Posts From Myanmar's Military". The New York Times. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- ^ "ABC News Joins Forces With Facebook". ABC News. December 18, 2007. Retrieved March 23, 2010.
- ^ Minor, Doug (November 29, 2007). "Saint Anselm to Host ABC Debates Jan. 5". Saint Anselm College blog. Archived from the original on October 9, 2017. Retrieved July 18, 2010.
- ^ Bradley, Tahman (December 12, 2007). "Republicans Lead off ABC News, WMUR-TV and Facebook Back-To-Back Debates in New Hampshire". Political Radar blog. ABC News. Archived from the original on May 11, 2011. Retrieved March 23, 2010.
- ^ Callahan, Ezra (January 5, 2008). "Tune in to the ABC News/Facebook Debates, Tonight 7 pm/6c on ABC". Facebook Blog. Retrieved March 23, 2010.
- ^ Goldman, Russell (January 5, 2007). "Facebook Gives Snapshot of Voter Sentiment". ABC News. Retrieved March 23, 2010.
- ^ Sullivan, Michelle (November 3, 2008). "Facebook Effect Mobilizes Youth Vote". CBS News. Retrieved March 23, 2010.
- ^ Carlisle, Juliet E.; Patton, Robert C. (January 1, 2013). "Is Social Media Changing How We Understand Political Engagement? An Analysis of Facebook and the 2008 Presidential Election". Political Research Quarterly. 66 (4): 883–895. doi:10.1177/1065912913482758. JSTOR 23612065. S2CID 154739808.
- ^ Skogerbø, Eli; Krumsvik, Arne H. (May 4, 2015). "Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter" (PDF). Journalism Practice. 9 (3): 350–366. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.950471. hdl:10852/41249. S2CID 145344499.
- ^ Bossetta, Michael (March 2018). "The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election". Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 95 (2): 471–496. arXiv:1904.07333. doi:10.1177/1077699018763307.
- ^ Angwin, Julia; Varner, Madeleine; Tobin, Ariana (September 14, 2017). "Facebook Enabled Advertisers to Reach 'Jew Haters' – ProPublica". ProPublica. Retrieved September 14, 2017.
- ^ Brady, Henry E. (May 11, 2019). "The Challenge of Big Data and Data Science". Annual Review of Political Science. 22 (1): 297–323. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-090216-023229. ISSN 1094-2939.
- ^ Gleit, Naomi (September 21, 2020). "Celebrating National Voter Registration Day With a Week of Action". Facebook. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
- ^ Rosenberg, Matthew; Confessore, Nicholas; Cadwalladr, Carole (March 17, 2018). "How Trump Consultants Exploited the Facebook Data of Millions". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
- ^ "Facebook bans Trump-affiliated data firm Cambridge Analytica". newsobserver. Archived from the original on March 17, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
- ^ Cadwalladr, Carole (March 18, 2018). "'I made Steve Bannon's psychological warfare tool': meet the data war whistleblower". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved March 18, 2018.
- ^ "Why Facebook's political-ad ban is taking on the wrong problem". Technology Review. Retrieved September 6, 2020.
- ^ Swint, Brian (March 11, 2024). "Trump Complicates the Story on TikTok. Meta Platforms Stock Is Falling". Barron's. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
- ^ Ananth, Venkat (April 1, 2019). "Facebook takes down Pakistan military backed pages targeting India ahead of LS polls". The Economic Times. Retrieved April 1, 2019.
- ^ "Facebook Removes Nearly 700 Pages Linked to Congress Ahead of Polls". News18. April 2019. Retrieved April 1, 2019.
- ^ Nicole, Kristen (December 21, 2007). "I Can So "Facebook" You Now (and be gramatically [sic] correct)". Mashable. Retrieved March 23, 2010.
- ^ "Unfriend is New Oxford dictionary's Word of the Year". USA Today. Washington DC. November 17, 2009. Retrieved July 12, 2010.
- ^ "Internet.org". English. August 25, 2015. Retrieved February 14, 2019.
- ^ a b "Facebook's Internet.org has connected almost 100M to the 'internet'". TechCrunch. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
- ^ Solon, Olivia (July 27, 2017). "'It's digital colonialism': how Facebook's free internet service has failed its users". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved May 13, 2019.
- ^ Rodriguez, Salvador (February 18, 2021). "Facebook will debunk myths about climate change, stepping further into 'arbiter of truth' role". CNBC. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
External links
- 2004 establishments in Massachusetts
- American social networking websites
- American websites
- Android (operating system) software
- BlackBerry software
- Blog hosting services
- Companies' terms of service
- Companies based in Menlo Park, California
- English-language websites
- Image-sharing websites
- Internet properties established in 2004
- IOS software
- Meta Platforms applications
- Multilingual websites
- Online video game services
- Products introduced in 2004
- Proprietary cross-platform software
- Social information processing
- Social media
- Social planning websites
- Student culture
- Symbian software
- Universal Windows Platform apps
- Video game streaming services
- Websites which mirror Wikipedia