Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexis PR: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Placing notification for listing at WP:DELSORT (delsort.js) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Sarahj2107|Sarahj2107]] ([[User talk:Sarahj2107|talk]]) 15:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Lexis PR]]=== |
===[[Lexis PR]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
:{{la|Lexis PR}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexis PR|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October |
:{{la|Lexis PR}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexis PR|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 20#{{anchorencode:Lexis PR}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lexis_PR Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Lexis PR}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Lexis PR}}) |
||
Quite questionably notable company as although I found some links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam, there's simply nothing to suggest better improvement for this speedy and PROD-worthy article that has managed to stay since October 2007. Notifying past users {{U|Vrenator}} and {{U|Fluffernutter}}. [[User:SwisterTwister|< |
Quite questionably notable company as although I found some links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam, there's simply nothing to suggest better improvement for this speedy and PROD-worthy article that has managed to stay since October 2007. Notifying past users {{U|Vrenator}} and {{U|Fluffernutter}}. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">SwisterTwister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:SwisterTwister|< |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">SwisterTwister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 06:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:SwisterTwister|< |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">SwisterTwister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 06:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Advertising|list of Advertising-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:SwisterTwister|< |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Advertising|list of Advertising-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">SwisterTwister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 06:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)</small> |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 04:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
|||
*'''Delete.''' Nothing to distinguish this pr agency. In general, � such companies work with occasional major brands-- it would be significant if it were the principal agency for several of them, but that's not stated. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 18:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- [[User:Sam Sailor|Sam Sailor]] [[User talk:Sam Sailor|<sup>''Talk!''</sup>]] 00:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
|||
*'''Delete''' as per nom and above editor. Nothing in searches to show they pass [[WP:GNG]] or [[WP:NCORP]]. [[User:onel5969|<b><span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#FFB300;">5969</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 13:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:25, 19 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Lexis PR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Quite questionably notable company as although I found some links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam, there's simply nothing to suggest better improvement for this speedy and PROD-worthy article that has managed to stay since October 2007. Notifying past users Vrenator and Fluffernutter. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing to distinguish this pr agency. In general, � such companies work with occasional major brands-- it would be significant if it were the principal agency for several of them, but that's not stated. DGG ( talk ) 18:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 00:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 00:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and above editor. Nothing in searches to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 TT me 13:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.