Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Nanna Nalle: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 12:16, 8 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

O Nanna Nalle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article includes no references to support a notability claim. Without the addition of multiple, reliable, independent, and nontrivial sources, Wikipedia cannot retain such an article. KDS4444^Talk 15:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Indeed the article looks very bad, but it's a movie by a famous director, with a famous lead actress, and it was a hit at the box office. Biwom (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDAFD: "O Nanna Nalle"

Keep this brand new suitable stub on notable topic... a released film that has received review and commentary in multiple reliable sources. Nominator, a topic's notability is NOT determined by sources being used, but instead rather by sources BEING AVAILABLE, used or not. And just a little due diligence quickly finds Sify Rediff Sify and others. WP:NF is met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to satisfy two important criteria: (1) Film that's completed filming. (2) Has received good deal secondary source coverage. — Cirt (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''keep'''. Consensus was keep.  <small>([[Wikipedia:NACD#Non-administrators_closing_discussions|non-admin closure]])</small> [[User:onel5969|<b><span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#FFB300;">5969</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 14:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 ===[[O Nanna Nalle]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
 :{{la|O Nanna Nalle}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Nanna Nalle|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 13#{{anchorencode:O Nanna Nalle}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/O_Nanna_Nalle Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources AFD|O Nanna Nalle}})
-Article includes no references to support a notability claim.  Without the addition of multiple, reliable, independent, and nontrivial sources, Wikipedia cannot retain such an article. <font face="Verdana">[[User:KDS4444|<span style="color:midnightblue">'''KDS'''</span><span style="color:steelblue">'''4444'''</span>]][[User talk:KDS4444|<span style="color:limegreen"><sup>''Talk''</sup></span>]]</font> 15:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
+Article includes no references to support a notability claim.  Without the addition of multiple, reliable, independent, and nontrivial sources, Wikipedia cannot retain such an article. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">[[User:KDS4444|<span style="color:midnightblue">'''KDS'''</span><span style="color:steelblue">'''4444'''</span>]][[User talk:KDS4444|<span style="color:limegreen"><sup>''Talk''</sup></span>]]</span> 15:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. —&thinsp;[[User:JJMC89|JJMC89]]&thinsp;<small>([[User talk:JJMC89|T]]'''·'''[[Special:Contributions/JJMC89|C]])</small> 22:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Keep'''. Indeed the article looks very bad, but it's a movie by a famous director, with a famous lead actress, and it was a hit at the box office. [[User:Biwom|Biwom]] ([[User talk:Biwom|talk]]) 08:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
+:[[WP:INDAFD]]: [https://4d1fac7452666a9f1a1e7b6fa5af791fa725173b.googledrive.com/host/0B3ke7sJYbO1gVkRjUVh6bmtqeVU/IndianEnglishNewspaperSearch.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22O%20Nanna%20Nalle%22&gsc.sort= "O Nanna Nalle"]
+*'''Keep''' this brand new suitable stub on [[WP:NF|notable topic]]... a released film that has received review and commentary in multiple reliable sources. Nominator, a topic's notability is [[WP:NPOSSIBLE|'''NOT''' determined by sources being used, but instead rather by sources BEING AVAILABLE, used or not]]. And just a little [[WP:BEFORE|due diligence]] quickly finds [http://www.sify.com/movies/o-nanna-nalle-review-bollywood-pcltXpheecghf.html ''Sify'']  [http://www.rediff.com/movies/2000/jan/24spice.htm ''Rediff'']  [http://www.sify.com/movies/isha-kopikkar-is-back-with-looty-news-kannada-nkbjFzaeccjsi.html ''Sify'']  [https://4d1fac7452666a9f1a1e7b6fa5af791fa725173b.googledrive.com/host/0B3ke7sJYbO1gVkRjUVh6bmtqeVU/IndianEnglishNewspaperSearch.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22O%20Nanna%20Nalle%22&gsc.sort= and others]. [[WP:NF]] is met. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<span style="color:blue;">Schmidt, </span>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>Michael Q.</small></sup>]]'' 10:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
+:<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India|list of India-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 22:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Keep'''. Appears to satisfy two important criteria: (1) Film that's completed filming. (2) Has received good deal secondary source coverage. &mdash; '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 09:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>