Talk:The Erotic Network: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Magioladitis (talk | contribs) m clean up using AWB (11717) |
Tag: |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old AfD multi|page=The Erotic Network|result='''keep'''}} |
|||
{{Old AfD}} |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| |
||
{{WikiProject Pornography|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Nudity|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Channels== |
==Channels== |
||
How does a list of channel names add anything to the article? How are they notable by themselves? Just seems spammy to me. [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] 00:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC) |
How does a list of channel names add anything to the article? How are they notable by themselves? Just seems spammy to me. [[User:Leuko|Leuko]] 00:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:18, 17 February 2024
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Channels
[edit]How does a list of channel names add anything to the article? How are they notable by themselves? Just seems spammy to me. Leuko 00:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- The network is a collection of PPV channels. Much like there are lists for XM channels, it's informative. It's sometimes hard to seperate spammy from informative, but having a list is hardly promotion..
Disclaimer
[edit]There should not be a disclaimer warning about adult content because every article has them at the bottom. However, I would like to ask if anyone disagrees.--Ainlina (talk) 11:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, of course there shouldn't be a specific warning. It's an encyclopedia, you have to expect such material here. It's the same case as WP:SPOILER. So#Why 11:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Suggest removing that silly warning. Fletcher (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)